he lost his Common the Jury found that the Defendant did not put in the Beasts but they of themselves depastured there 1. The Jury have found the substance of the issue for the Plaintiffe the depasturing there and it is not materiall if he put them not there 2. This Action lyeth for the Commoner for he may distreine damage feasant and it may be that with strong hand he is hindered to distreine and so if he shall not have this Action he is remedilesse 2. A Commoner who had freehold in the common shall have an Assize Ergo a Copy-holder shall have this Action 3. The wrong ought to be so great that the Commoner loose his Common as a Master shall not have an Action for beating his Servant without losse of his Service and it appeareth not to the Court that there are more Commoners then he and if there be yet an Action lyeth because each had private damage and it is not like to a common Nusans which shall be punished onely in a Leete if there be not speciall damage but be the Trespasse never so little the Lord may have an Action of Trespasse The Lord Sanchars Case 10. Jacobi fol. 117. For procuring the Murther of John Turnor Mr. of Defence 1. REsolv That a Baron of Scotland shall be tried by Commons of England 2. The Indictment of the accessory in one County to a Fellony in another County by the Statute of 2. E. 6. c. 24. shall recite that the fellony was done in the other County for an Indictment is no direct affirmation of the fact 3. The Justices of the Kings Bench are within these words of the Statute Justices of Gaole-delivery or Oyer and Terminer for they are the supreame Judges of Gaole-delivery 4. The Lord Sanchar cannot be in the Terme-time Arraigned in Midd. before Justices of Oyer and Terminer because Justices of Oyer and Terminer shall not sit in the same County where the Kings Bench is but the principalls were Arraigned in L. in the Terme-time because this is another County 5. There needs not be 15. dayes for the returne of the Venire facias upon an Indictment in the same County where the Kings Bench is otherwise in another County 6. Because there is no direct proofe that the Lord S. commanded one of the principalls but that he associated himselfe to one who was commanded the best way is to arraigne him as accessory to him whom he commanded but if he be Indicted as accessory to two and found accessory to one of them this is good The word Appeale in the Statute of W. 1. c. 14. is to be intended generally Viz. By Indictment by Writ or Bill c. and attainders is to be intended upon any such accusation Ergo if upon any such accusation the principall be attainted erroneously the accessory may be arraigned because the attainder is good untill it be reversed but if the Accessory be Hanged and after the Attainder against the principall is reversed the Heire of the Accessory shall be restored to all which his Father lost either by entry or Action By 5. H. 4. cap. 10. none shall be imprisoned by Justices of Peace but in the Common Gaole whereby it appeares that Justices of Peace offend who commit Fellons to the Counters in L. and other Prisons which are not Common Gaoles Cases in the Court of Wards Anthony Lowes Case 7. Jacobi fol. 122. A. L. Tenant of 59. Acres parcell of the Mannor of A. by chivalry and Suite of Court to B. whereof A. was parcell and both A. and B. were parcell of the Duchie of L. out of the County Palatine holden formerly of the King in Chivalry in Capite and of another House there holden of A. by fealty and rent H. 8. grants the rent by release to him and confirmeth his estate in the said Lands by fealty onely and grants to him the Mannor of A. Tenendum by fealty and rent It was Objected that when the King grants the Seigniory to his Tenant the ancient Seigniory is extinct and a new one that is best for the King created Viz. Chivalry 2. When he extinguisheth services parcell of the Mannor of A. this shall be holden as the Mannor of A. is that is by Chivalry But resolved that the 59. acres and house shall be holden by fealty onely and as to the said Objection the release of the King doth not extinguish service which is inseparable to a Tenure that is fealty but all others are gone and true it is when the K. grants and expresseth no tenure it shall be by Chivalry but when the Land moveth from a Subject and the Tenure is changed the new Tenure shall be as neere the ancient as may be as Feoffee of Tenant in Frankalmoigne shall hold by fealty onely and here although they grant the services yet he limits the grantee to doe fealty A Knights fee is not to be taken according to the quantity but the value of the Land as 20. l. per annum and a Hide of Land is as much as a Plough can Plough in a yeare Reliefe is the fourth part of the annuall value that is of a Knight five pound of a Baron a 100. Markes of an Earle 100. l. of a Marques 200. Markes of a Duke 200. l. The Eldest Sonne of E. 3. called the black Prince was the first Duke in England and Robert Earle of Oxford in the Raigne of R. 2. was the first Marques and the Lord Beaumont was the first Viscount created by K. H. 6. Floyers Case 8. Jacobi fol. 125. BAron and Feme seized of Lands holden in Chivalry in right of the Feme in Fee levy a Fine to one who grants and renders to them and the heires of the Baron and levy another Fine to their use for life the remainder to their three Sons in taile one after another the remainder in fee to the heires of the Baron the K. shall have neither wardship of body nor Land 1. Resol That is out of the Statute of 32. H. 8. cap. 2. if he who had the fee dye c. in respect the estate by the first Fine did not continue and this although both the Conveyances are voluntary 2. The King shall not have wardship of the third part because it is not for advancement of the Wife for in the first Fine the Land moved from her and shee had no more by the second Fine then by the first 3. In regard the particuler estate is out of the Statute no wardship accrueth to the King by advancement of him in the remainder but if a revertioner upon an estate for life convey it to the use of his Wife this will give wardship of the body of the heire for he in revertion is tenant if a Lease for life be the remainder to two and to the heires of one he who hath the fee dyeth his heire shall not be in ward if the heire of one joyntenant who had the fee dye of full age living the tenant for
House and Tenant at will of Land and Tenant by coppy of other Land within the Mannor of S. to Fermor leased all for life to I. S. and also seised of other Land there in Fee levyed a fine with Proclamations of all Messuages and Lands which comprehends all those leases and also his inheritance by covin to dissinherit his lessor and after the fine alwayes continues in possession and payes the severall rents to F. The lessee for life dyes the yeares expire S. claimes the inheritance Resolved that the Lord of the Mannor was not barred by the said fine 1. The makers of the Statute of 4. H. 7. never intended that a fine levyed by Tenant at will yeares or Coppy which pretend no Inheritance nor title to it but intend the disherison of the Lord c. should barre them of their inheritance and where the Statute sayth That Fines ought to be of greatest strength to avoyd strife and debate This Feoffement and fine by the Lessee shall be the cause of strife where none was before 2. The Statute doth not intend that those who of themselves without such fraud could not levy a fine to barre those which had the freehold and inheritance should be inabled to levy a fine by making of an estate to another by practise and fraud 3. If doubt be conceived upon an act of Parliament 't is to be construed by the reason of the common Law and that so abhorres fraud and covin that all acts as well judiciall as others and which of themselves are lawfull and just yet being mixt with fraud and deceit are tortious and illegall If a Woman intituled to have Dower which is favoured in Law by covin causes a stranger to disseise the terretenant to the intent to bring Dower against him and recovers accordingly 't is all voyd So if a Feme covert or Infant much favoured in Law of covin causes another to disseise the discontinuee and infeoffe them they are not remitted Sale in Market overt shall not binde if the Vendee had notice that the property was to another or if the Sale be by covin the Law hath ordained the common Bench as a Market overt for assurance of Land by fine for it sayth Finis finem litibus imponit yet covin shall avoyd them A Vacat was made in Banco of a recovery had by covin 33 34. of the Queene adjudged where Tenant for life levyed a fine with Proclamations and five yeares passed and he dyed that the Lessor shall have five yeares after his death for though the Statute saves the right which First shall grow and the right first accrued to the Lessor by the forfeiture yet because the Lessor by covin of the Lessee might be barred for he expected not to enter till after the death of the Lessee 't is no barre and namely when the Lessee hath Land of Inheritance in the same Towne as in this case so 't was agreed in the same case if the Feoffee of the Lessee for life hath Lands in the same Towne and levys a fine c. the Lessor shall have five yeares after the death of the Lessee for he knew not of what land the fine was levyed not being party to the Indenture or agreement c. So the Judges have construed the act against the Letter for Salvation of the Inheritance of him in reversion And 't was said if the Feoffee of a Lessee for yeares who made a feoffement by practise hath Land in the same Ville and levy a fine and the Lessee payes the rent to the Lessor it shall not binde and in the principall case the payment of the rent after the fine makes the fraud apparant for by this the Lessor was secure and not cause of any doubt of fraud But 't was resolved if the Bargainee or Feoffee of A. perceiving that C. hath right levies a fine or takes a fine of a Stranger to the intent to barre C. this fine levyed by consent shall binde for nothing was done in this that was not lawfull and the intent of the act was to avoyd strife So if A. pretending title disseise B. and to the intent to barre the disseissee levies a fine for the desseisor Venit tanquam in arena and 't is not possible but the disseisee had knowledge of it and if he doth not enter 't is his folly But in the case at barre every one will presume that the fine is levyed of his owne Land because that he might lawfully doe and though this conteines more acres then his owne Land this is usuall almost in all fines and the covin of the Lessee is the cause of non-claime of the Lessor and a man shall not take advantage of his owne covin and here the fraud is the more odious because of the great trust viz. Fealty To the objection that it should be mischievous to avoyd fines upon such nude averments 't was answered that it should be a greater mischiefe principally if fines levyed by such covin should binde And an averrment of fraud may be taken by the Statute of 27. of the Queene against a fine leavyed to secret uses by fraud for to deceive Purchasors So by the Statute of 13. of the Queene an averrment may be taken against a fine levyed upon an usurious contract Twynes Case 44. Eliz in Cam. Stel. fo 80. IN an Information per Cooke Atturney Generall against Twyne of Hampshire for contriving and publishing of a fraudulent Deed made of goods The case upon the Statute 13. Eliz. ca. 5. was thus Pierce was indebted unto Twyne in 400. l. and to one C. in 200. l. C. brought an action of Debt against Pierce and hanging the Writ Pierce being possessed of goods and Chattells to the value of 300. l. in secret made a deed of all his goods and Chattells to Twyne in satisfaction of his Debt yet Pierce continued in possession of the same some of them he sold and his Sheepe he marked with his owne marke after C. had judgement a Fier fac to the Sheriff by vertue thereof Bayliffs came to make execution of the goods and divers persons by the commandement of Twyne with force resisted them claiming them to be the goods of Twyne by vertue of the same deed and whether this deed was fraudulent or no was the Question and 't was resolved by Sir Thomas Egerton Keeper of the Great Seale of England and by the chiefe Justices Popham and Anderson and all the Court of Star-chamber that this deed was fraudulent and within the Statute of 13. El. And in this Case divers things were resolved First That this Deed had the markes of fraud it was generall and without exception of his apparell or any thing of necessitie for dolosus versatur in generalibus Secondly The Donor continueth in the possession Thirdly It was made in secret Et dona clandestina semper sunt suspiciosa Fourthly it was made hanging the Writ Fifthly there was trust betweene the parties for
them and after Judgement was given for the Plaintiffs Whistlers Case 10. Jacobi fol. 62. Vpon a speciall Verdict BEfore the Statute of Praerogativa Regis cap. 15. by the grant of the King of a Mannor all appendants without naming them passe and the Statute excepteth Knights Fees Advowsons and Indowments but all other appendants now passe without naming them and so doe Advowsons passe in case of restitution for the Statute speaketh of Grants and in Grants also without expresse mention by the words Adeo plené integré c. See other good matter there touching this Subject The Church Wardens Case of Saint Saviours in Southwark fol. 66. QUeene Elizabeth leased the rectory to the Church-Wardens of St S. for 21. yeares and after leased to them for 50. yeares in consideration of the payment of 20. l. and surrender of the Letters Patents by the Church-Wardens Modo habentes ad presens possidentes and the speciall Verdict found that they paid the 20. l. and that they delivered the Charter in Court to be cancell'd and that they paid the Fees but that no Vacat was made yet the grant is good for it appeares that the intent was not to make a surrender in deed because he saith Modo possidentes but a surrender in Law by acceptance of the second Letters Patents and although a Corporation cannot make a surrender in deed yet they may make a surrender in Law 2. Although an actuall surrender is requisit they have done all which belongs to them by delivery of the Chartar and payment of the fees and the Cancelling belongs to the Court. 3. Although it was recited that 20. l. was paid yet it needs not to be found for it is but in the personalty and is affirmed by the King to be paid and is also executed See Barwicks Case 5. Report 93. The Case of the Marshalsea 10. Jacobi fol. 68. In false Imprisonment AN Action upon the Case upon an assumpsit is brought in the Marshalsea whereas no party was of the Kings House the Plaintiffe recovered the Defendants arrested the Plaintiffe by a precept in the nature of a Capias ad satisfaciendum and he brings false Imprisonment and judgement given against the Defendants 1. Resolved the Steward and Marshall at the Common Law hath two Authorities One generall as Vicegerents of the Chiefe Justice in his absence within the Verge Another as Judges of the Marshalsea This last was limitted to Debt and Covenant where both are of the House and to trespasse Vi armis where one is but not if it concerne Land and because they have the generall authority at will and the other for life they draw many cases to the Marshalsea which ought to be in other Courts Their Jurisdiction by Fleta Lib. 2. cap. 2. Infra metas hospitij continentes 12. Leucas in circuitu And the Statute of 13. R. 2. c. 3. limits the 12. miles to be accounted about the Kings Tonnell 2. The reasons wherefore this speciall authority was given them were 1. Because the Suite there is by Bill by reason of their Priviledge which cannot be elsewhere 2. In respect of the necessity of attendance of the Kings Servants 3. If Strangers shall be suffered to sue there one Carman would sue another Carman there In aula Regis which were undecent but the generall authority vanished by the Act of 28. E. 1. c. 5. which Ordained that the Chancellour and Justices of the King should follow him therefore in Praesentia Majoris cessat c. and about 4. E. 3. the Court of K. Bench became Resident 3. The Statute of Articuli super Chartas is as much as an explanation of the great Charter and the Charter of the Forrest and not introductory of a new Law and the third Chapter of that act explaines the Jurisdiction of the Marshalsea as before and if he hold plea otherwise a prohibition lyeth and the party shall have an Action upon the Case as a consequent upon the Statute 4. That part of the Statute which giveth them Jurisdiction in trespasse shall be intended trespasse Vi armis 5. This action lyeth against the Defendants because the Court had not Jurisdiction and so have not done it by command of the Judge otherwise if the Court had Jurisdiction but proceedeth Inverso ordine or erroneously as if a Capias be awarded against an Earle c. one who is Indicted before Justices of the Peace cannot approve 1. Because he cannot assigne a Coroner 2. Because it is out of their Commission if a Court Leete be holden at another day then it ought to be the proceeding is Coram non judice otherwise it is of a Court Baron 6. R. 2. Action upon the Statute Plac. ultimo in the point that judgement in the Marshalsea when none of the parties is of the K. house may be avoided by plea without any Writ of Error which proveth that it is void Leonard Loveis Case 11. Jacobi fol. 78. In ejectione firmae for 8. acres c. L. L. seised of diverse Mannors in socage and in chivalry In Capite maketh a feoffement to diverse uses in an Indenture precedent whereby he limits to himselfe for life without impeachment of wast and to the use of his Lessees and devisees the remainder to his second Sonne in taile c. the reversion to himselfe with power of revocation after he purchaseth 8. acres in socage and revoketh as to certaine Mannors holden in socage and deviseth them and the 8. acres to his Eldest Sonne and the heires Males of his body for 500. yeares provided that if he alien otherwise then for yeares determinable upon the deaths of three persons or lesse number rendring the old rent or die without issue Male then to his second Sonne in taile with proviso to make Leases according to 32. H. 8. onely L.L. dyeth the Eldest Sonne enters into the 8. acres and dyeth leaving one Daughter who Marrieth R.D. who enters into the 8. acres c. second Sonne dyeth having L. L. who enters upon R. D. and leaseth to the Plaintiffe who enters upon whom the Defendant enters and ejecteth c. and if the entry of L L. the Lessor was congeable or not was the Question and it was adjudged that his entry was not lawfull and judgement was given against the Plaintiffe in this Case diverse points resolved some at the common Law and some upon 32 and 34. H. 8. of Wills 1. Resolv if a man seised of three acres of equall value one holden in Capite and giveth that and one of the other to his younger Sonne in taile he cannot devise any part of the third Acre because he had executed his power and if he purchase other Land in socage he can devise but two parts of that by reason of his reversion in Capite expectant upon the estate taile Object that the K. was once satisfied of the wardship by the Statute in respect of the Acre holden and the reversion thereupon shall not hinder the devise of Land purchased after 2. The statute doth not regard this seck reversion but inheritances of annuall value Resp To the first that this reversion shall hinder the devise by the words of the Statute for he had a reversion of Lands holden but
a Stranger be not in another part of the House but this was before 39. Eliz. cap. 15. whereby clergy is taken away without putting any feare if he rob any man of above the value of five shillings Accessory before in robbing a House in the day is ousted of Clergy by 4. 5. Phiâ— Mary Accessory in robbing a Booth in the night or day or out House upon 39. Eliz. shall have his Clergy Nota Although a Statute takes away Clergy from the principall yet the accessory before or after shall have it and where by statute for any offence a man is ousted of his Clergy the indictment must containe the offence with the circumstances in the Statute Dyer 99. and 183. And A. P. was ordered to be hanged in Chaines c. Metcalfs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 38. In Accompt IUdgement is given against M. Quod computet ideo in misericordia quia prius non computavit and before finall Judgement Error is brought 1. Resol It lyeth not 1. Because the Writ of Error saith Si juditium inde redditum sit which shall be intended of the principall Judgement as the Feast of St. M. shall be intended the principall Feast and the Feme shall be received upon default of her Baron after judgement of admeasurement before the principall judgement 2. It shall be intended an intire judgement therfore in an action against two if one plead to the issue and the other confesseth and judgement given against him he shall not have error before the Plea determined against the other for otherwise there would be a failer of right for the Kings Bench cannot proceed upon the Record nor the Common place because it is removed 3. The first judgement is not ad grave damnum for by that he looseth nothing but judgement of the arrearages and damages is the end of the originall 4. This is not properly a Judgement but an Award of the Court as ouster of ayde in partitione facienda an awarde quod partitio fiat c. which are but interlocutory and not definitive 5. They have day by the Roll untill the last judgment but if a Felon dye after the exigent awarded and before attainder a Writ of Error lyeth for necessity for otherwise his goods are forfeited by awarding of the exigent without remedy if diverse are sued by severall Praecipes and Judgement given against one he shall have error before judgement given against the other and if error be in the originall the tenor onely shall be certified for otherwise the Court cannot proceede against the others 2. It was Resolved That the Record is not removed because untill finall Judgement be given the Chiefe Justice of the Common place hath no authority to send it and they may proceed notwithstanding the Roll be marked Mittitur Richard Godfreys Case 12. Jacobi fol. 42. TWelve chiefe pledges according to the custome of the Mannor to present at the Leet that every one of themselves ought to pay for themselves 10 s. pro certo letae the Stewart imposeth a Fine of 6 l. upon them the Lord distreineth for the Fine and certainty of Leet one of the pledges brings Replevin and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol The Fine is not well assessed for it ought to be severall and not joynt as it is because the offence is severall and although that the offence be joynt yet the Fine shall be severall as in disseisin and trespasse But for the incertainty of the persons and infinitenesse of the number many may be fined together as a Towne for the escape of a Felon and the reasonablenesse and excessivenesse of the Fine shall be determined by the Judges Excessus in re qualibet jure reprobatur communi as excessive distresse excessive ayde and excessive amerciament are against the Common Law 2. If the Fine be imposed erroneously it may be avoyded by Plea for he had no other remedy 3. The Lord cannot distraine pro certo Letae without prescription because it is against common right but he may for a Fine or amercement but for an amercement in a Court Baron the Lord must prescribe a Fine because it is assessed by the Court needs not to be affered but an amercement must be affered by the Countrey 4 Admitting that he may distraine pro certo Letae he shall have a returne although hee had not cause to distraine for the Fine for where one brings an Action for two things and it will not lie for one of them it shall abate onely for that if he cannot have a better action for it but if he may it shall abate for the whole as in a Formedon of Land and of an advowson the Writ shall stand for the Land so if a man avow for diverse Rents arreare and it appeareth that parcell is not yet due yet the avowry is good for the residue but if a man bring a Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize of two Acres where it appeareth that for one Acre he ought to have a Writ of Entry in the per there all shall abate for this extends not to the action but to the Writ onely Richard Lifords Case 12. Jacobi fol 46. IN trespasse the Defendant pleads that J. L. was seized in fee and demised to T. S. and M. P. excepting Trees above twenty one yeares growth if not decayed for their lives and covenanted to stand seized de tenementis predictis cum pertinentijs superius dimissis to the use of R. L. in taile c. and the Defendant as Servant to the sayd R. L. entered and sold Trees and Judgement was given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resol That the Trees notwithstanding the exception remaine parcell of the inheritance and are not Chattels but shall descend to the Heire for the Law doth not favour severance of the Trees from the Land therefore if one bargaine and sell Land upon which there are Trees they shall not passe without inrolement 2. If there had not been such an exception the generall interest of them is in the Lessor and the Lessee had but a particular interest in them and the Lessor may sell them without license of the Lessee to take effect after the Lease determined and tithes shall not be payd for them because they are parcell of the inheritance 2. By the exception of them the soile is not excepted but onely so much as sustaineth the Tree and if he by licence of the lessee root them up the lessee shall have the soile but by exception of Wood the Land it selfe is excepted if an Acre or an advowson be severed from the Mannor by exception upon a Lease for life it shall not be parcell of the Mannor againe otherwise of trees for they were not severed in facto because they grow out of the Land 3. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life but Trees which grow out of the Land and Fish or Deer in the Land may and shall passe with it
the estate of the land which all the Court agreed 5. If the Fine had not been the auncient uses were determined without entry or claime because he himselfe was tenant for life of the land and the act of revocation is as strong as claime and this point was agreed in the Earle of Salops case 6. By the same conveyance that the auncient uses are revoked others may be raised without claime or other act and the Law adjudges a priority of operation Whites case adjudged according Maildmayes Case 24. Eliz. fo 175. A Use cannot be raised by any covenant proviso or bargaine c. upon a generall consideration and therefore if a man by Deed indented and inrolled c. for divers good causes considerations bargaine and sell his Land to another and his heires nihil operatur inde for no use shall be raised upon such generall considerations for it doth not appeare to the Court that the bargain or had quid pro quo But the bargainee may averre that money or other valuable consideration was paid or given if in truth it was so and the bargaine and sale is good It was resolved that when uses are raised by covenant in the consideration of advancement of any of his bloud and after in the same Indenture a Proviso that the Covenantor may make Leases for yeares c. that the Covenantor in this case may not make Leases for yeares to his sonne daughter or any of his bloud much lesse to any other person because that the power to make Leases for yeares was voyd when the Indenture was sealed and delivered For the covenant upon this generall consideration will not raise any use and no particular averment in this case may be taken but if the uses be limitted upon a recoverie fine or feoffment there needeth not any consideration to raise any of the uses Resolved that the words other consideration cannot comprise any consideration expressed in the Indenture before the proviso for other ought to be in quality nature and person different and advancement of his daughter is a consideration mentioned before Anthonie Mildmay brought an action of the case against Roger Standish for saying that Lands were lawfully assured to John Talbott for 1600. yeares and that he was lawfully possessed of the same tearme whereas in truth the said Lands were not lawfully assured for the said tearme nor the said John Talbott was lawfully possessed of the interest thereof And so for slaundering of the title by speaking of the words Mildmay brought an action Standish justified the words and shewed the title of Talbott and it was adjudged that the action was maintaineable and good although that Talbott had a limitation of the Land by will which was the reason that Standish being a man not learned in the Lawes affirmed the words yet because he tooke upon him the notice of the Law and medled in a matter that did not concerne him Judgement was given for Mildmay Et ignorantia juris non excusat THE SECOND BOOK Of Sir Edward Cooke Lord c. Mansers Case 26. Eliz. fo 3. IF a man be unlearned and cannot read and be bound to doe an act of sealing assurances writings c. upon tender c. he is not bound to seale and deliver any such writing if there be not some ready which may read the Deed if the party so require it and in the same language and tongue that he understandeth Ignorantia duplex est facti juris and ignorance in reading or of the language Quae sunt ignorantia facti may excuse but ignorantia juris non excusat and if it be read unto him he may not have a reasonable time to shew it to his Councell learned to see whether it agree with his bond or covenant for he must seale it at his perill or if the same be truly expounded to him it is good enough But if it be read amisse or declared contrary to what it is and thereby the illiterated man is deceived he may very well plead non est factum For the Law saith it is not his Deed and so it was adjudged in Throughgoods case being the third case in this second Booke Resolved that if a man be bound that a stranger shall doe an act in such case he takes upon him that he shall doe it at his perill for he which is bound takes more upon him for a stranger then for himselfe in many cases If a man plead that he hath kept a man indemnified c. he ought to shew how otherwise where he pleads in the negative Non fuit damnificatus Goddards Case 26. El. fo 4. AN obligation dated the fourth of Aprill Anno 24. El. and delivered as the Deed of the partie 30. July An. 23. El. adjudged the Deed of the partie for though the plaintiffe in pleading cannot alledge the delivery before the Date because he is estopped yet a Jury which are sworne to speake the truth shall not be estopped The Date of a Deed is not the substance of the Deed. For if it want date or have an impossible Date as the 30. February the Deed is good For there are three things of the essence or substance of a Deed viz. writing in paper or parchment sealing and delivery And if it have these three although it want In Cujus rei testimonium Sigillum suum apposuit c. yet the Deed is good and when a Deed is delivered it takes effect by the delivery not by the date Throughgoods Case 26. Eliz. fo 9. REsolved that 't is not materiall whether the party to whom the Deed is made or another by his procurement or a Stranger of his owne head reades the writing in other words then the writing is so that he that seales it be a lay man and without covin in him deceived and the pleading of it is alwayes generall without shewing by whom 't was read and A. shall voyde an obligation to B. by pleading that he did it â—y menace of C. Resolved that such a lay-man is not bound to deliver a Deed if no body be present that can reade it in such language as he can understand and if it be read in other words it shall not binde him and 't is at the perill of him to whom 't is made that the very effect and purport of it be declared if it be required but if he doe not request it he shall be bound by it though it be made contrary to his meaning Resolved that it shall not binde if the effect be declared in other words then it is as if the Deed had been read in other words Two Justices a Feoffement of two acres is read as of one it shall not binde see Mansers case before Wisemans Case 27. Eliz. fo 15. TEnant in tayle of certaine Lands the remainder to another in Fee he in remainder by Deed indented and inrolled in consideration of bloud c. as for other good considerations doth covenant to stand seized of the said
prescribe In modo decimandi but not In non decimando And the reason is because he is not except in speciall Cases capable of Tythes at the common Law before the Statute of 32. H. 8. Cap. 7. And therefore without speciall matter shewing it shall not be intended that he hath any Lawfull discharge and in favour of the Holy Church although it may have a lawfull comencement the Law will not suffer this prescription In non decimando to put it to the Tryall of lay men which sooner will straine their conscience for their private benefit then render to the Church the duty which belongeth to it A spirituall person that was capable of Tythes at the common Law in pernancy may prescribe to be discharged of Tythes generally or to have a portion of Tythes in the Land of another Before the Counsell of Lateran every man might give his tythes to any spirituall person that he would and if the Lands of the Bishop were discharged in his hands absolutely by prescription the demising it to a lay man cannot make it chargeable and the Bishop might reserve the greater Rent And in discharge of Tythes the Judges of our Law doe know that the Ecclesiasticall Judges will not allow any such allegation and therefore a Traverse Absque hoc quod judices placitum c. recusarunt is insufficient for the refusall is not materiall for the party might have a prohibition before any plea pleaded by him but in some Cases the refusall is traversable as t was adjudgd in Morris and Eatons Case where t was pleaded that the plaintiffe did not read the Articles c. and that the Ecclesiasticall Judge refused this Plea But the truth is a man may prescribe that hee and all others whose estate he hath in the mannor of D. time out of remembrance have paid to the parson of C. for the time being one certaine pension yearly for the maintenance of Divine service there in contentation of all Tythes renewing or happening within the same Mannor and prescribe in respect of the pension payd c. to have all the Tythes within c. and this was adjudgd good in Banco Regis Mich. 39. Et. 40. El. Rotulo 199. And that a lay-person may sue for the Tythes c. For at the beginning it shall be intended that the Lord was seised of the whole Mannor before any tenancy was derived out of the same and then by composition or other lawfull meanes the Lord had all the Tythes within the Mannor for the said Pension paying to the parson and the Law intends it was for Divine service Et pro bono Ecclesiae the reason of whch intendment is the continuall usage time out of remembrance And upon such speciall matter a man might have Tythes as appurtenant to a Mannor for he prescribes in a Que estate in the Mannor and therefore cannot have them in grosse but t was adjudged Winscombs Case in a prohibition that a man cannot prescribe generally in him and all those c. to have Tythes appurtenant to a Mannor without speciall matter shewne because Tythes are due Jure divino The Arch-Bishop of Canterburies Case 38. Of the Queene fo 46. A Religious house in M. was given to E. 6. by the Statute of 1. E. 6. a Rectory which was impropriated to it was granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canturbury who leased to the Defendant and Land within M. parcell of the said Colledge came to the Lord Cobham and from him to the Plaintiffe who shewes that the Master of the Colledge was seised of the said Land and Rectorie Simul semel as well at the making of 31. H 8. as of 1. E. 6. Resolved that this Colledge came to the King by 1. E. 6. onely for when 31. H. 8. speakes of dissolution renouncing relinquishing forfeiture giving up which are inferior meanes by which c. or by any other meanes cannot be intended of an act of Parliament which is the highest manner of conveyance that can be and the makers would have placed this in the beginning if they had intended it Bishops are not included within 13 of the Queene which begins with Colledges Deanes and Chapters c. Also 1. E. 6. Enacts that all Colledges by this Parliament shall be in actuall possession of the King which last act being of as high nature as the first it cannot come to the King by 31. H. 8. and it was never pleaded that of Colledges which came by 1. E. 6. the King was seised Vigore of the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that neither the Act nor the meaning of 31. H. 8. extends to other Colledges then to those which came to the King by 31. H. 8. for it should be absurd that a Branch of the act of 31. H. 8. should extend to a future Act of which the makers of 31. without a spirit of prophecy could not have foreknowledge and the Act of 31. concludes in as large manner as the late Abbots c. which late as it hath been agreed extends onely to those to be dissolved by 31. Resolved admitting that the Colledge had come to the King by 31. H. 8. that such a generall allegation of unity of possession of the Rectory and the Land with it was not sufficient for no unity shall be sufficient but lawfull and perpetuall unity of possession time out of minde as 't was adjudged in Knightly and Spencers case and that the generall allegation of the plaintiffe that the Master of the Colledge at the making of 1. E. 6. held the Land discharged is not good without shewing how either by prescription composition or other lawfull meanes as 't is adjudged in the Bishop of Winchesters case otherwise if the Land had come by 31. then by force of the said branch of discharge such generall allegation had been good Resolved that no Ecclesiasticall house except religious was within the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that though 1. E. 6. saith that the King shall have the lands of Colledges in as ample and large manner as the said Priests c. enjoyed the same yet these generall words doe not discharge the land of any tythes for they doe not issue out of the land for a Prior had tythes against his own Feoffment of the Mannor and 't is no good cause of prohibition to alledge unity of possession in a Colledge which came to the King by 1. E. 6. as 't is upon 31. H. 8. in Abbyes c. For the Statute of 1. E. 6. hath no such clause of discharge of payment of tythes as 31. hath and therefore such perpetuall unity will not serve upon 1. E. 6. So 't was likewise resolved betwixt Greene and Buffkin Sir Hugh Cholmleys case 39. of the Queene fo 50. TEnant in Taile the remainder in taile the remainder bargaines and sells the Land and all his estate to J. S. to have for the life of Tenant in taile the remainder to the Queene c. upon condition that the
had and after B. and A. levie a Fine to Perkins and he renders a rent of 42. pounds to B. and the Mannor with the Advowson to A. A. dyes without granting the Advowson and B. did not request it B. enters for condition broken and by Indenture inrolled bargained c. to the Lord Cromwell by which he entered and upon the reentry of the Sonne and heire of A. brought an Assise In this Case is shewed when this word proviso or provided maketh a condition and when not which upon long debate was judged by all the Justices of England It was adjudged that the Law hath not appointed any place in a deed or instrument proper or particular to a condition but in what place it pleaseth the parties and this word proviso or provided is as apt a word to make an estate conditionall as Sub conditione or any other word of condition but notwithstanding when this word proviso maketh an Estate or interest conditionall three things are to be observed First that the proviso doe not depend upon another sentence nor participate thereof but stand originally of it selfe Secondly that the proviso be the word of the bargainor Feoffor Donor Lessor c. Thirdly that it be compulsory to enforce the barganee Feoffee Donee Lessee c. to doe an act and where these concurre it was resolved that it was a condition in what place soever it be placed for Cujus est dare ejus est disponere And although words of Covenant be contained in the same clause of the proviso it selfe yet the proviso being in judgement of Law a word of condition it shall not loose his force and so it hath beene judged In Symson et Titterell 26. El. Serjeant Bendlowes demysed to Titterell certaine Lands in Essex for forty yeares provided alwayes and it is Covenanted and agreed betweene the said Parties That the Lessee c. should not alien and this was adjudged a condition by force of the proviso and a Covenant also by force of th' other words Also it was adjudged in Banco Regis 36. El. betweene the Earle of Pembrooke Plaintiffe and Sir Henry Barkely Defendant The Earle granted the Office of the Lievtenant-ship of the West part of the Forrest of Fronslewood in Com. Somerset to Sir Mawrice Barkely Father of the said Sir Henry in Taile provided alwayes and the said Sir Mawrice Barkeley for him c. doth Covenant to and with the said Earle that neyther he the said Earle nor any of his Heires Males c. shall cut downe any Wood growing upon any part of the premises And it was resolved by all the Justices of England upon argument before them at Serjants Inne that although the proviso was coupled with the expresse Covenant of the Grantee and every condition ought to be created by the words of the Grantor Donor Feoffor c. yet in judgement of Law this word provided was a condition created by the Grantor although all the residue of the sentence be the words of the Grantee for proviso being an apt word of a condition the same sentence containeth the words of the Grantor purporting a condition and the words of the Grantee comprehending a Covenant This word proviso when it dependeth upon another sentence or hath reference to another part of the deed doth not make a condition but a qualification or limitation of the sentence or part of the deed to which it is referred As in a Lease without impeachment of wast provided that he shall not doe voluntary wast grant of a Rent charge provided that the Grantee shall not charge the Grantor c. Resolved that B. shall have the Rent notwithstanding that before the Reddendum the use in Fee was vested by the recovery in A. and notwithstanding 't was objected that the Rent ought to be limitted out of the Estate of the Recoverors for 27 H. 8. hath an expresse clause Where diverse be seised to the intent that one shall have an annuall Rent the same person be adjudged in possession and seisin of the same rent as if a sufficient grant had beene made and so here the intent being that B. should have the Rent construction shall be made Vt res magis valeat quam pereat Resolved that the fine leavyed by B. and A. to P. hath not extinct the condition and this was the great doubt of the Case 1. Because by the generall Covenant 't is declared that all assurances afterwards to be made should be to the uses and intents in the same Indenture and to no other and the Indenture intends that the condition should be saved as the Lord releases all his right in the Land saving his Rent Putnams Case 4. 5. P. and M. Dyer Feoffement of a Mannor rendring Rent and a reentry and a Covenant by any Indenture to Leavy a fine which should be to the uses and intents of the first Indenture and to no other use which was leavyed according with the usuall words of release of all his right yet resolved that neither the Rent nor the condition was destroyed and 23. of the Queene Tussers Case a rent reserved by a fine before was not destroyed by a common recovery and generall entry into warranty and 34. of the Queene in Clever and Childs Case adjudged according to Putnams Case for the same reason t was adjudged in this Case 14. of the Queene for the Advouson of Alexton for Modus et conventio vincunt legem and Covenant and agreement of the parties hath power First to raise a use Secondly to declare uses upon fines recoveries c. Thirdly for to preserve Rents and conditions and for to direct recoveries fines c. and the saving may be contained in another deed delivered at the same time And these common assurances as fines and recoveries are to be construed according to the intent and common usage without prying into them with Eagles eyes Also here the Bargaine c. recovery c fine c. though made at severall times yet all by mutuall agreement are but one assurance and tend for to perfect a bargaine c. and therefore the one shall not destroy the other resolved that except in speciall cases a fine Sur grant render cannot be averred by word to another use then is in the fine feoffement c. yet in some cases it may be ruled in part by averrement by word when the originall contract is by deed but a man may by word averre another consideration which stands with the consideration expressed but not against it Reade the Booke at large for this purpose Resolved that by the death of A. the condition was broken for when the Feoffee or Grantee is to doe an act to the Feoffor c. upon condition and no time is limitted regularly the Feoffee may doe it at any time during his life If the Feoffor or Grantor doe not hasten the same by request and upon request and day or time limitted the Feoffee or Grantee ought to doe it
and accepted the Rent by the hands of the assignee due after the assignement and before that this rent now demanded was due the Plaintiffe demurred and adjudged against him because the privity of the contract was determined by the death of the Lessee and therefore after the assignement made by the administrator Debt doth not lye for rent due after the assignement Also it was said that if a Lessee assigne over his terme the Lessor may charge the Lessee or his Assignee at his Election And if the Lessor accept the rent of the assignee he hath determined his Election and shall not have an action after against the Lessee for rent due after the assignement no more then a Lord having received the Rent of the Feoffee shall avow upon the Feoffor afterwards Butler and Bakers Case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 25. W. B. and his Wife seised of the mannor of H. by an Estate made to them during coverture for the joynture of the Wife in taile holden In Capite and W. seised of Land in F. both which amount to a third part of all his Lands and also of the Mannor of T. In capite which amounts to two parts W. devises T. to his Wife upon condition that shee should take no former joynture and dyed the Wife in pays refused H. the question was whither the Will were good for the intire Mannor of T. or but for part by the Statutes of 32. and 34. H 8. Resolved that at common Law if a gift be to a Husband and Wife in taile c. the Husband dyes the Wife cannot devest the free hold by any verball Waiver or disagreement in pays as if she say before entry that shee will never agree to it shee may enter when shee pleases so if shee saith reciting her estate that shee assents c. to the said estate yet afterwards shee may waive it in a Court of record but if shee enters into the Land and takes the profits though shee saith nothing t is a good agreement in Law for the Law more respects acts without words then words without acts and a freehold shall not be so easily devested to the intent that the Tenant to the Praecipe should be the better knowne But as an act in Pays may amount to an agreement so it may amount to a disagreement but this is alwayes of one and the same thing if the Tenant by deed infeoffe the Lord and a stranger and maketh livery to the Lord if the Lord dissagree ' by word t is worth nothing and if he enters generally and takes the profits t is an agreement but if he distraines for his Seigniory t is a dissagreement yet in some cases a claime by words shall direct the entry to be an agreement to one Estate and a disagreement to another c. See the Booke at large but a man may devest the property of goods and Chattells or an obligation sealed to him by disagreement In pays Resolved that though the estate was created by way of use which use before the Statute might have beene waived in Pays yet now the Statute hath so incorporated the use and possession of the Land that it cannot be waived In pays more then an Estate created by feoffment c. yet t was here resolved That the refusall In pays to have H. and the entry and agreement to T. was a good agreement to the one and disagreement to the other And this by 27. H. 8. ca ' 10. If any Woman hath Lands c. assured after Marriage c. after the death of the Husband She may refuse her joynture and take her Dower c. And upon these words the Court agreed That a Woman might refuse her Joynture In pays and be indowed by consent or Writ The great doubt was if by this refusall of H. by operation of Law it doth discend immediatly to the Heire after the death of the Devisor for to satisfie the Statute which saith The King shall take for his third part such Mannors c. as shall discend c. immediatly after the death of the devisor Resolved First Upon the reason of the common Law the refusall shall not have such relation that the devise shall be good for the intire Mannor of T. for a relation is a fiction of Law to make a nullity of a thing Ab initio to one certaine intent which in truth had being and that Propter necessitatem ut res magis valeat quam pereat 11. E. 3. The Law will make a nullity Ab initio that the Wife shall have dower but not as to a collaterall intent as if the reversion were granted of the Lands which the Husband and Wife held in taile and the Wife for to have Dower dissagrees yet the grant is good for shee may be endowed though the grant stand and Relatio est fictio juris et intenta ad unum And though relations aide acts in Law as Dower yet t will never aide the acts of the party to avoyd them by relation as a man infeoffes an Infant or Feme covert and after gives c. or devises the Land or any thing out of it the Infant or Husband disagrees this shall have relation betwixt the parties that the Infant or Husband shall not be charged in damages but shall not make the voyd devise c. good A Lease for life the remainder to the King the King grants his remainder the deed is in-rolled it shall have relation to make this passe Ab initio to the King not to make the voyd pattent good And as relations extend onely to the same thing and the same intent so also to the same parties not for to prejudice a Stranger feoffement of a Mannor and a long time after livery the Tenants attourne this shall have relation to make the services passe Ab initio or otherwise they could never passe nor be parcell of the Mannor but not for to charge the Tenants for the arrerages in the meane time So here the refusall shall relate as to the mannor of H. onely not to T. and to the wife onely but not to prejudice the Heire upon whom part of the Mannor of T. discended to make the devise good for the third part which was voide at the time of the death For Omne testamentum morte consummatum est and as it was at the death so it shall remaine Resolved that after the Statute of 27. H. 8. and before the Statute of 32 H. 8. the Mannor of T. was not devisable and therefore when the devisor hath not pursued the Authority which the Acts of 32. 34. H. 8. gives t was voide for part The first branch he hath not pursued which saith That all c. having a sole estate in fee simple in any Mannors c. shall have full and free liberty c. to dispose by his last will in writing as much of c. as shall amount to the cleere yearely value of two parts in three to
binde the lessor otherwise of admittances upon surrenders or descents for he was tenant at sufferance who hath no lawfull interest and a Writ of entry ad terminum qui praeteriit lyes against him and so he is a deforceor Murrell and Smiths case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 24. THe Queene grants a Copyhold in fee and after grants the inheritance of the Copyhold to a stranger the Copyholder devises to M. and after surrenders to the use of his will Resolved that custome hath so established the estate of a Copyholder that by severance of the inheritance of the Copyhold from the Mannor the Copyhold is not destroyed for being the Lord himselfe could not ouste the Copiholder no more can another claiming in by him Objected that every Copyhold ought to be parcell of the Mannor and to be demised or demisable time out of memory Resolved that because once this had both the incidents aforesaid and its perfection the severance made by the Lord shall not destroy it Resolved that notwithstanding the surrender and devise the Copyhold descended to the heire for after the severance of the inheritance from the Mannor the surrender was utterly voyd for the land was not parcell of the Mannor at the time and the devise onely cannot transferre such a customary estate but it ought to be by surrender into the hands of the Lord c. Resolved that after severance the Copyholder shall pay his rent to the Feoffee and shall pay and do other services which are due without admittance or holding of a Court as to plough the demeanes of the Lord Heriot c. but suite of Court and Fine upon alienation or admittance are gone for now the land cannot be aliened for though the Copyholder hath some benefit by the severance as appeares before so he hath great prejudice for now he cannot surrender or alien his estate nor the Feoffee cannot make an admittance for he is not dominus pro tempore Resolved that such forfeitures remaine as were before the severance as Feoffement lease wast denier of rent So if the land were of the nature of Borough English or Gavelkind and other customes which run with the land remaine And 't was said that such Copyholder hath no other meanes to alien but by Decree in Chancery against him and his heires but by this the interest of the land is not bound but the person onely Kite and Queintons case 31. of the Queene fo 25. COpyholder in fee surrenders out of Court by the custome to the hands of certaine Copyhold tenants to the use of another and his heires upon certaine condition at the next Court the surrender was presented but the condition omitted he to whose use c. dyes the Lord admits his heire he that made the surrender releases to the heire being in possession and after enters Resolved that the presentment of the surrender was voyde for that the condition was omitted for the surrender that the Copiholder made was not presented but if the surrender the condition had been presented and the Steward in entring of it omits the condition upon sufficient proofe of it the surrender shall not be avoyded but the roll amended for the roll doth not conclude the party for to plead or give in evidence the truth of the matter Resolved if a Copyholder be ousted by wrong a release by him to the disseisor doth not transferre his right because he hath not any customary estate upon which the release of the customary right may inure and this should be prejudiciall to the Lord for by this he shall lose his Fine and services but a release made to him which is admitted by the Lord and in possession is good and a release of a customary right may inure to him and the Lord not prejudiced and the release shall inure by way of extinguishment And Littleton speaks of an alienation by surrender onely which ought to be into the hands of the Lord but a release cannot be done to the Lord and Littleton says He which claimes a Copihold by surrender hath no other evidence but he which claimes an extinguishment of a right may have it by release by Deed and 't is no perill to purchasors for if the Copiholder in possession sels it he will shew the release and he which is out of possession cannot sell till he hath regained the possession caveat emptor By Wray if he which hath a pretensed title c. to a Copihold bargaines c. this is within 32. H. 8. for the Statute says any right or title and great part of the land within the Realme is in Copy and therefore the intention was to include them to avoyde maintenance and champerty Melwich and Luters case 30. of the Queene fo 26. REsolved that the lessee of a copiholder for a yeare shall maintaine an Ej ' Firmae for his terme being warranted by Law by force of the generall custome of the Realme 't is reason that he should have remedy by Ej ' Firmae And this is a speedy course against a Stranger Resolved that the Copiholds are not destroyed by severance of the inheritance of them from the Mannor but remaine in force So Murrels case before adjudged Resolved that when the Lord of a Mannor having many ancient Copiholds in a Towne grants the inheritance of all the Copiholds the grantee may hold a Court for the customary tenants and accept surrenders and make admittances and grants for every Mannor which consists of Freeholders and Copiholders comprehends in effect two severall Courts the one the Court Baron for Freeholders and in this the Suitors viz. the Freeholders are Judges and the other Court for the Copiholders and in this the Steward or the Lord himselfe is Judge and though this is not a Mannor in Law because it wants Freeholders yet the grantee may hold such Court as aforesaid for Copiholders onely as the grantor himselfe might So if all the Freeholds escheate or the Lord releases the tenure and services yet he may hold a customary Court for the Copiholds Note Reader though the Lord by his own act cannot make of one and the same Mannor at common Law divers severall Mannors consisting of Demeanes and Freeholders yet he may make a customary Mannor of Copiholders Resolved that the Lord himselfe may make a grant or admittance of a Copiholder out of the Mannor at what place he pleases but if the Steward at any Court holden out of the Mannor shall make grants or admittances they are voyd Neales case 37. of the Queene fo 26. ADjudged that where the Lord of a Mannor demises all his lands granted by Copy for two thousand yeares that the lessee may hold Courts for Copiholders as Melwiches case is before and 't was said so to be resolved in C. Hattons case Note Reader a good diversity where the number of the Copiholders may support the custome and a singular case of a Copiholder as in Murrels case before in which case the
limitation of any estate Resolved that when the Lord admits Cestuy que use for life the reversion is in him that surrendered not in the Lord for he is but an instrument Resolved that a man may surrender to the use of his Wife though that Cestuy que use is in by him that surrendered because the Husband did not doe this immediatly to the Wife but by a second meanes Viz. By surrender to the Lord and by admittance of the Lord. Resolved that when B. surrendered out of Court and before that 't was presented in Court he dyes yet after being presented according to the custome 't is good otherwise if it had not beene presented according to custome so if the Tenants in whose hands c. dyes yet if it be proved 't is good enough so Queintons Case before if Cestuy que use c. dyes before admittance his Heires shall be admitted Downe and Hopkins Case 36. of the Queene fo 29. REsolved that where the custome of a Mannor was to grant Coppies for one two or three lives that a grant to a Woman during her viduity is within the custome for 't is an estate for life but every grant for life is not Durante viduitate issue was whether the custome was that the Wife of a Copy-holder after the death of the Husband should have for life and 't was given in evidence that she should have during her viduity and adjudged that the evidence did not maintaine such custome for 't is a lesse estate then for life But in the principall Case 't is a greater estate which is warranted by the custome and therefore a lesse is within it according to Graveners Case before 'T was said that a Lord may retaine a Steward by word to hold Courts c. as a Bayliffe and this retainer shall serve till he be discharged Harris and Jayes Case 41. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that a Lord may retaine one to be Steward of his Mannor and to hold Courts by word as in the Case before Resolved that where a Copy-hold escheates by attainder of felony of a Copy-holder of the Queene that the Steward may grant it over Ex officio without speciall warrant for the custome warrants the Steward to grant it and this shall binde the Queene and her Heires c. But yet his duty is before to informe the Lord Treasurer Chancellor or Barons of the Exchequer or any of them for his better direction Resolved that the Auditor or Receiver of the Queene hath no power to retaine a Steward to hold courts c. But it behooves that the Steward who makes such voluntary grants upon escheats or forfeitures to be good to have Letters Pattents of the Stewardship of the same Mannor And 't was said that 't was adjudged in the Lady Holcrofts Case that where one was retained generally by word to be Steward of a Mannor and to hold Courts that he may take surrenders of customary tenants out of Court Shaw and Thompsons Case 33. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that a Woman shall not be indowed of Copy-hold without speciall custome and that when a Woman is to be indowed by custome she shall have all incidents to Dower and shall recover damages by the Statute of Merton because her Husband dyed seised and therefore the recovery of damage of 50. l. in the Court of the Mannor was allowed though this exceeded 40 s Resolved that no Action of Debt lyes for these damages at common Law for upon such judgement no error or false judgement lyes but the remedy is in the Court of the Mannor or Chancery Fenner Justice said That he had seene a Record 36. H. 8. where the Lord by Petition to him had for certaine errors in the proceeding reversed such a judgement and upon this the Defendant maintained an Audita quaerela to be restored to the damages recovered against him See 14. H. 4. cited before in Brownes Case And 7. E 4. 29. Hoe and Taylors Case 37. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that Underwood growing upon parcell of the Mannor may by custome be granted by Copy of Court roll and 't is a thing of perpetuity to which a custome may extend for after every cutting the underwood growes Ex stipitibus So 't was resolved that Herbage or any profit of any parcell of the Mannor may by custome be granted by Copy and 't was said that a faire appendant to the Mannor of C. in S. is granted by Copy and this explaines the reason of the first pillar in Murrels Case Frenches Case 18. 19. of the Queene fo 31. REsolved if the Lord Lease for yeares life or make any other estate by deed or without deed of Copy-hold Land forfeited escheated c. to him that this Land can never be granted againe by Copy for the custome is destroyed for during these estates the Land was not demised nor demisable by Coppy So if the Lord make a feoffement and enter for condition broken but if the Lord keepe it in his hands a long time or leases it at will he his heires or assignes may regrant it So if the interruption be tortious as by disseisin and discent false verdict or erroneous judgement for Non valet impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum quod contra legem fit pro infecto habetur But if it be extended upon a Statute or recognizance acknowledged by the Lord or if the Wife of the Lord hath this Land assigned to her in Dower though these impediments are by act in Law yet for that the interruptions are lawfull the Land cannot be after granted by Copy If a Copy-holder accept a Lease for yeares of the Lord of his Copy-hold 't is destroyed for ever If a Copy-holder take a Lease for yeares of the Mannor his Copy-hold hath not continuance Hides Case adjudged 17. of the Queene But there 't was resolved that such Lessee might regrant the Copy to whom he would for the Land was alwayes demised or demisable If a Coppy-hold be surrendered to the Lessee his Executors or assignes may regrant it If a Copy-hold escheate to the Lord his alienee by fine feoffement c. may regrant it Foiston and Crachroodes Case 29. and 30 of the Queene fo 31. ADjudged that where a Copy-holder in pleading alledges Quod infra Man praed talis habetur nec non a toto tempore cujus c. habebatur consuetudo Viz. quod quilibet tenentes praedictorum tenement vocat C. have used to have common in such a place parcell of the Mannor and that he is a Copy-holder of the said Tenement that this custome as well for the matter as the forme was good for the Copy-holder cannot prescribe in his owne name for the exility and basenes of his estate and if he had claimed common in the soile of another he ought to prescribe in the name of the Lord Viz. That the Lord and all his ancestors and all those whose estate c. have
had common in such a place for him and his Tenants at will but when he claimes this in the soile of the Lord he cannot prescribe in the name of the Lord for the Lord cannot prescribe to have common c. in his owne soile and therefore he ought to alledge that within the Mannor there is such a custome Note a good diversity betweene a prescription which is personall and alwayes made in the name of a certaine person or his auncestors or those whose estate c. and a custome which is locall and alleadged in no person but that within the Mannor there is such a custome this shall serve for those who cannot prescribe in their owne name nor in the name of any person certaine as the Inhabitants of a Towne Also the allegation of a custome shall serve when 't is referred to a thing insensible Viz. that all such Lands are devisable And for that in the principall case the custome may have a lawfull commencement that one copy-holder onely shall have common estovers or other profit in the land of the Lord and that in many Mannors some Copiholders have common in one wast of the Mannor and others in another severally so that the custome cannot be applied to all and because that all the other Copiholds may be determined and extinct 't was adjudged the custome was well alledged So to have common of estovers in the wood of his Lord parcell of the Mannor c. was adjudged good 10. of the Queene as 't was said Myttons case 26. Eliz. QUeene Elizabeth by Letters Patents did grant the office of the Clerkship of the County Court of Somerset to Mytton with all fees c. for life Arthur Hopton Esquire Sheriffe of the same Shire interrupted him because it was incident to his office Mytton complained to the Lords of the Councell and it was referred to the two chiefe Justices Wray and Anderson And after many arguments concerning the validity of the grant and conference had with all the other Justices It was resolved by all the Justices Nullo contradicente aut reluctante that the said Letters Patents were voyd And their reasons were that the office of the Sheriffe was an ancient office before the Conquest and of great trust and authoritie for the King committeth unto him Custodiam Comitatus And though the King may determine the office ad beneplacitum yet he cannot determine this in part as for one Towne or Hundred nor abridge him of any incident to his office for the office is entire and ought to continue so without any fraction or diminution without by Parliament and the County Court and the entring of all proceedings therein are incident to the Sheriffes office c. And though 't was granted when the office of the Sheriffe was voyd yet the new Sheriffe shall avoyde it as Scroges case in the time of vacation of the office of the Chiefe Justice of the Common Bench Queene Mary granted the office of the Exigenter of London resolved that the next Chiefe Justice shall avoyd it for 't was incident to his office Also in all Writs directed to the Sheriffe concerning the County Court the King says in comitatu tuo and in retourne of exigents made by him he says ad comitatum meum tent c. and the style of the Court proves it and by the Statute of 33. H. 8. the Sheriffe of Denbigh shall keepe his Shire Court at c. In a false judgement 't is said in pleno com' tuo recordari facias c. and in a precept of Tolt 't is said summoneas c. quod sit ad comitatum meum And it should be very inconvenient that another should have the custody of the entries and Rolls of Court which may be imbesilled and the Sheriffe responsable for them And it was resolved that the custody of all the Gaoles within every County belongs to the Sheriffe by right and are annexed and incident by the Law to the Sheriffes office vid. stat An. 14o. E. 3. ca. 10. Bozouns case 26. 27. of the Queene fo 34. A. Portion of tythes in L. appertained to the Rectory of G. which was presentable and the Queene was seised of the Rectory of L. jure coronae which was appropriated to the Monastery of W. and grants to B. ex gratia speciali c. totam illam portionem decimarum c. in L. c. Cum omnibus alijs decimis suis quibuscunque in L. tunc vel nuper in occupatione J. C. and that the pattents shall be of force non obstante aliquibus defectibus in non nominando male recitando c. alicujus occupatoris And J. C. never had any tythes in L. Resolved that in the occupation of J. C referres to all the sentence and not onely to cum omnibus alijs decimis c. 1 Because illam demonstrates fully that there ought to be words subsequent to explaine and reduce in certainty what portion by the intention of the Queene should passe viz. that which was in the occupation of J. C. and 't is not satisfied till it be come to the full end of the sentence 2. This conjunction cum omnibus alijs c. couples the last words to the former and makes the words subsequent to referre to all the sentence 3. If all the tythes in L. of the said Rectory should passe the addition of the occupation of J. C. should be vaine maledicta expositio c. Resolved that by grant of portionem decimarum c. the tythes parcell of the Rectory of L. doe not passe for portion properly signifies a part or portion in grosse divided and not parcell of the Rectory and the Queene had not any portion in grosse but all were parcell of the Rectory And ex gratia speciala c. shall not extend by any strained constructiō to make a thing passe against the intention of the Queene expressed in her grant and against the apt proper and usuall signification of the words of his grant Resolved that because J. C. had not any tythes there nothing passes for admit that a portion should be taken for a part then the effect of the grant is totam illam portionem decimarum in occupatione J. C. and in truth he never had any part nothing without question passes in case of a common person a fortiori not in the case of the Queene As to the point when a clause of Non obstante shall make the grant of the Queene good when not Resolved when the King by the common Law cannot in any manner make a grant there a Non obstante of the common Law will not make the grant good against the reason of the common Law as the King grants a protection in an Assise or Quare Impedit notwithstanding any Law to the contrary 't is voyd for protection lyes not in these cases for the losse which may come to the parties by such great delay But when the King may lawfully make
a grant but the common Law requires that he be so instructed that he be not deceived there a Non obstante supplies it and makes the grant good As the King having made a lease for life or yeares grants the land Non obstante that it be in lease for life yeares c. or if he grants the land and further grants the reversion of it depending upon an estate for life yeares c. 't is good See the booke at large Resolved when the words are not sufficient ex vi termini to passe the thing granted but the grant is voyd there a Non obstante will not serve as in the principall case and the Pattents were not holpen by 18. of the Queene ca ' 2. for Pattents of concealement are expressely excepted out of the Act. Terringhams case 27. El. in banco regis fo 36. REsolved that prescription doth not make a thing appendant except the thing which is appendant agree in quality and nature to the thing unto which it should be appendant as a thing incorporate as an advowson to a thing corporate as a Mannor or as a thing corporate as Lands to a thing incorporate as an office these may be appendant but every thing incorporate may not be appendant to a thing corporate as common of turbary may not be appendant to Land but to a Messuage or house as it is holden 5. ass 9. for the thing which is appendant ought to accord with the nature and quality of the thing to which it is appendant and turves ought to be expended in a Messuage The commencement of common appendant by the ancient Law was in this manner viz. When a Lord of a Mannor infeoffed another of arrable Lands to hould of him in Soccage id est per servicium socae the Feoffee ad maintenand ' servicium socae had common in the wasts of the Lord for his necessary beasts that did plowe and ayre his Lands and this common is of common right and commenceth by operation of the Law and in favour of tillage and therefore it needeth not to prescribe in that for so it is houlden 4. H. 6. 22. H. 6. as one ought if it were against common right But it is onely appendant to the ancient arrable Lands and onely for oxen horses kyne and sheepe c. And because it is against the nature of common appendant to be appendant to meadowe or pasture and because that here the prescription was to have common time out of minde to a house meadow and pasture as well as to arrable by which it appeares to the Court that there hath been a house meadow and pasture time out of minde 't was resolved that this common was appurtenant not appendant But if of latter times men have builded upon some part of such arrable Lands and some part thereof is imployed to meadow and pasture and this for maintenance of tillage the originall cause of common the common remaines appendant and it shall be intended in respect of the continuall usage of the common for beasts leavant and couchant upon such lands that at the beginning all was arrable But in pleading he ought to prescribe that the same is appendant to Land for though terra dicitur a terrendo quia vomere territur yet terra includes all and is arrable though converted to meadow c. For it may be plowed A man may prescribe to have common appendant to his Mannor for all the demeanes shall be intended arrable at least in construction of Law redd ' singula singulis it shall be appendant to such demeanes which are ancient arrable c. And when a man claimes common appendant to his Mannor no incongruity appeares of his own shewing as here So common may be appendant to a Carve of land which may containe pasture meadow and wood but it shall be applyed to that which agrees with the nature of the common Resolved that common appendant may be apportioned because 't is of common right for if a commoner purchase part of the Lands in which he hath common yet the common shall be apportioned as well as if the Lord purchase parcell of the tenancy the rent shall be apportioned And if A. a commoner enfeoffe B. of parcell of his ancient Lands the common shall be apportioned and B. shall have common pro rata And 't was agreed that such common which is admeasurable remaines after severance of part of the land to which c. But here for that the common was appurtenant 't was adjudged that by the purchase all was extinct for 't was against common right for by the act of the parties it cannot be in esse for part and extinct for part 'T was said that pertinens is the Latine word as well for appurtenant as appendant and therefore subjecta materia and the circumstances ought to direct the Court to adjudge the common appurtenant or appendant Resolved that unity of possession of the intire land to which c and of the intire land in which c. extinguishes the common appendant By Wray chiefe Justice common for vicinage is not appendant but for that it ought to be by prescription 't is resembled to common appendant but common appurtenant or in grosse may commence at this day by grant or prescription and by him the one may inclose common for vicinage against the other as hath been adjudged in Smith and Redmans case Resolved that a man may chase out beasts that doe him trespasse with a small dog and shall not be compelled to distraine them damage feasant Cases of Appeales and Indictments Brookes case 28. of the Queene fo 39. REsolved that in an appeale of Burglary 't was an insufficient count that the defendant domum c. felâ—… burgaliter fregit for it ought to be burglaâ—… or burgulariter which is vox artis as murdravit â—…it which cannot be otherwise expressed Resolved if the count had been sufficient he being â—…icted once should not be againe impeached but here he was discharged upon the insufficient count By Wray Chiefe Justice if upon accident a man and all his family are out of the house and one in the interim breakes the house and commits felony 't is burglary for the indictment is domum mansionalem fregit and so 't was resolved 38. of the Queene where a man hath two mansion houses servants in both and in the night when the servants are out c. the house is broken 't is burglary Wetherell and Darlys case 35. of the Queene fo 40. IN an appeale of murder the Defendant was found guilty of homicide and had his Clergy after indicted and arraigned for murther pleaded this conviction Resolved that 't is a good barre at common Law and restrained by no Statute the reason is because the life of a man shall not be brought twice in question for the same offence Youngs case 38. of the Queene fo 40. AN Indictment that dedit unam plagam mortalem circiter pectus
construed shall or might be leavyed and so 't was holden of a Lease or limittation of a use otherwise he which is to leavy the Summe by deferring to doe it may exclude the reversioner for ever see the Booke at large Resolved when the heire or reversioner c. enters and expulses him to whom the Land is limitted he hath election to recover the Mesne profits in an action or reentry and retainer till he leavyes the inteir Summe and the other shall not have advantage of his owne wrong and if a stranger had entered and occupied the Devisee ought to have taken notice at his perill for Vigilantibus non c. and none is bound to give notice but here the Heire himselfe concealed the will and the Devisee had no remedy for the Mesne profits after the death of the heire Resolved that a Gardian shall not ouste Tenant for life nor yeares of the Tenement Resolved that admitting the Gardian shall ouste Tenant for yeares yet he shall not hold over because his terme is certaine in the commencement continuance and end otherwise of Tenant by Elegit Statute c. they shall hold over because the terme is uncertaine Southcots Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 83. IF A. doe deliver goods to B. for to keepe the goods be purloyned away yet B. shall be charged in a Writ of detinue For to keepe and to keepe safely is all one but if B. doe take them to keepe as his owne goods he shall not be charged with them And if A. doe pledge or Guage goods unto B. in this Case B. shall not answer for them if they be purloyned for he had some property in them and not a custody onely but a ferryman a common Inkeeper or a Carrier which taketh hyre they ought to keepe the goods safely and they shall not be discharged if they be stollen or purloyned But a Factor or a Servant although he have wages doing his indeavour shall not be charged Luttreles Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 86. IF a man have estovers eyther by grant or prescription to his house although he alter the Rooms and Chambers in his House it seemeth that the alteration of the qualities so as it be not of the house it selfe and without making new Chimnyes by which no prejudice accrewes to the owners of the Wood is not any destruction of the prescription and though he make new Chimnyes or make a new addition to his old house he shall not loose his prescription thereby but he may imploy or spend any of his new estovers in the Chimnyes or in that part newly added It was also resolved that if a House or Milne doe fal or be taken downe by the act of the owner or by wrong of another yet for that the perdurable part which includes all doth remaine which is the Land whereupon the Fabrick is built he may reedifie the same againe without any Losse of his apendant or apurtenant but it ought to be upon the same place which was the Foundation of the old House for as it did support and in judgement of Law included the ancient house when it was standing so it supports and includes the new house so as it is in a manner a continuance of the ancient house Diverse Tenants doe hold of another as of his Mannor by fealty and suite to the Lords Milne the Lord doth alien his Milne with the suite of his Tenants and after the vendor dyeth and his Sonne entereth and buildeth a new Milne upon the other part of his demeane he shall have the suite to his owne Milne which the Vendee had before for the suite belongeth to him that hath the Mannor for no man may have suite to his milne by reason of a Tenure If it be not of Corne growing upon the Lands within the Seigniory or Mannor and the Lord may erect a new Milne within any part of the Mannor and the Tenure is due to the same and not to any particular Milne Druries Case 43. Eliz. Error in Banco Regis fo 84. A Countesse being a Widdow retaineth three Chaplaines he who is last reteined is not capable of a dispensation for the Statue of 21. H. 8. c. 13. is executed by reteining of two and the reteining of the third shall not devest the capacity which was in the first two but if the reteiner had beene at one time he who is first promoted shall be first preferred because in Aequali jure c. 2. Resolved if the two first die the third is not capable of dispensation without a new reteiner because he was reteined at the common Law and not according to the Statute Quod ab initio non valet c. As if the Sonne and Heire of a Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and giveth him Letters under his Seale and after the Father dyeth And it was said that the said Act shall be taken strictly as if a Baron be made Gardian of the 5. parts he shall reteine no more Chaplains then before and if a Baron retaine two Chaplaines who are promoted he cannot discharge them and reteine others during their lives Slades Case 44. Eliz. fo 92. IT was resolved that every contract executory imports in it selfe an assumpsit For when one doth agree to pay money or to deliver any thing by that he doth assume and promise to pay or to deliver the things and therefore when he selleth any goods to another and agreeth to deliver them at a day to come and the other in consideration thereof agreeth to pay so much money at such a day in this case both parties may have an Action of Debt or Action upon the case upon the assumpsit for the mutuall executory agreement of both parties import in themselves as well a reciprocall Action upon the Case as an action of debt and a recovery or barr in an action of debt is a good Barre in an action upon the Case brought upon the same contract and so likewise in an Action upon the Case a recovery or Barre in the same is a good plea in an Action of Debt upon the same contract The Defendant in an Action of the Case upon the assumpsit may not wage his Law as he may doe in an action of Debt If a Summe of money be promised in Marriage to be paid at severall dayes an Action upon the assumpsit lyeth for non payment of the first although no Action of Debt lyeth untill all the dayes be past Multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium and if the Debtor of the King sueth by Quo minus in the Exchequor the defendant shall not have his Law for the benefit of the King Adams and Lamberts Case 44. and 45. Eliz. in banco Regis in Ejectione firmae fo 104. UPon consideration of the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 14. it was resolved 1. That if one demise to any of his Kindred to superstitious uses although he limit them to pay certaine Summes of
his consent and after the other two did alien without license and it was adjudged 28. Eliz. that in this case the condition being determined as to one person by the license of the Lessor it was determined in all for when the Lessee alieneth any part of the residue the Lessor may not enter into any part aliened with license and therefore the condition being determined in part is determined in all for the condition being entire may not be apportioned and 16. Eliz. Dyer 334. fuit deny per Popham Chiefe Justice Vide lit 80. b. 4. and 5. Ph. and M. Dyer 152. Bustards Case 1. Jac. fo 121. IN every lawfull exchange of Land this word Excambium imports in it selfe Tacite a condition and a warranty and the other a Voucher and recompence and all in respect of reciprocall consideration the one land being given in exchange for the other but that is a speciall warranty for upon the voucher he shall not recover other Lands in value but those onely which were given in Exchange and this warranty followes onely in privity for none may vouch by force thereof but the parties to the Exchange and their heires and no assignes If A give in Exchange three acres of Land to B. for other three acres and after one Acre is evicted from B. in this Case all the exchange is defeated and B. may enter into all his Lands Beverleys Case de non compos mentis in banco regis 1. Jac. fo 123. EVery act that a man De non compos mentis doth eyther concerning his Lands life or goods eyther done in Court of record or out of Court of record all acts that he doth in any Court of record eyther concerning his Lands or goods shall bind himselfe and all others for ever and those acts which he doth out of Court of record shall binde himselfe during life and in some Cases shall binde all others for ever so as the party himselfe shall not be admitted to stultifie himself or disable himself but an ideot a nativitate may not make Feoffment Gift Lease or Release but it may be avoyded during his Life by office at the Kings suite which shall have relation a tempore Nativitatis to avoyd all acts done by him and after his death the King shall deliver his Lands Rectis Haeredibus foure manner of men de non compos mentis 1. An ideot or foole naturally 2. One which was of good and perfect memory and by the visitation of God hath lost the same 3. Lunaticus qui gaudet lucidis intervallis who somtimes is of good and perfect memory and some other times Non compos mentis 4. He that is so by his owne act as a Drunkard All acts which a Lunatick during the time of his Lunacy doth and all acts which a mad man doth who once was of perfect memory and by the act of God hath lost his understanding are equivalent to the act done by an Ideot but the act which a man doth Qui Gaudet lucidis intervallis at such time as he is of good and perfect memory shall binde him and are good And a Drunkard who for the time of his Drunkenesse is Non compos mentis yet his drunkennesse shall not extenuate his act or offence but doth aggravate his offence and doth not derogate from the act which he doth during the time of his drunkennesse and that as well touching his Life Lands and goods as any other thing that concernes him The King shall have the custody of the Land goods Chattells c. of one non compos mentis to the use of him his Wife Children and Family a man non compos mentis shall not loose his life for felony or murder for no felony or murder can be committed without a felonious intent and purpose and he is deprived of reason understanding and intentions Dicta est fellonia quia fieri debet felleo animo furiosus non intelligit quid agit animo ratione caret non mulum distat a brutis as Bracton saith and stultus dicitur a stupore The End of the Fourth Booke THE FIFTH BOOK Claytons Case 37. Eliz. in Com. Banco fo 1. AN Indenture of demise dated 26. May 25. Eliz. to hold for three yeares from henceforth it was delivered at foure a clock in the afternoone of the twentieth of June after The Question was when the Lease should begin from henceforth shall be taken the day of the delivery inclusive idefi from the making or delivery Traditio loqui facit cartam this Lease must end the nineteenth of June in the third yeare after The day of the delivery is parcell of the tearme but a Die confeccionis or a Die datus the terme beginneth the day after the date from the date and from the day of the date is all one because that in judgement of Law the date includes all the day of the date c. Elmers Case 30. Eliz. Banco Regis fo 2. 1. REsolved that the Statute of 1. El. is a private act whereof the Court shall not take notice without pleading of it 2. Whereas the Bishop ousted his Lessee for yeares and made a Lease for three lives this is voidable by the successor for first the Statute giveth him power to make a Lease for twenty one yeares or three lives and therefore cannot make both 2. Lessee for lives shall have the rent reserved upon the Lease for yeares and shall not pay rent to the Bishop untill the terme determined and so hospitality will decay in the meane time and where 32. H. 8. ca ' 8. provided that the old Lease be surrendered before the making of a new illusory surrender upon condition is not within the act but judgement given against the Plaintiffe for not pleading of the said act of 1. Eliz. Jewells Case 30. Eliz. banco regis fo 3. LEase of a faire reservaing rent is not within the Statute of 1. Eliz. for although the rent be due by reason of the contract yet it is not incident to the reversion and 't is also without remedy by assise or distresse Lord Mountjoyes Case 31. 32. El. banco regis fol. 3. TEnant in tayle according to the Statute with power to make Leases c. reserving the ancient rent maketh a Lease of two distinct farmes reâ—erving the ancient rents in one summe out of both sthe farmes this is a new rent and not the accustomed rent and if he reserve a lesser rent during his life and after his death then the ancient rent the Lease is not good If Tenant in tayle be seised of three acres of Land every one of them of equall annuall value and all have beene demised for 3. shil per annum in this case he may not demise one of them for 12. d. per annum or two of them for 2. shil per annum and so Pro rata Justice Windams Case fo 31. 32. Eliza. Banco Regis in a Writ of Error fo 7
such a Feast if you make a Feoffement to another of this Mannor before the same Feast you have forfeited the obligation although that you purchase the Land againe before the said Feast because that you were once disabled to make the feoffement If a man Lease a Mannor for yeares and the Lessee covenanteth to uphold the Houses and to leave the same Mannor in as good an estate as he found it and during the terme the Lessee maketh wast in Houses and cutting of Tymber c. the Lessor may have a Writ of Covenant before the end of the Tearme for cutting the Timber for it was impossible that the Covenant should be performed after for the Timber but otherwise of the Houses Fitz Na. br fo 145 K. It was also resolved that if a man seised of Lands in Fee covenant to infeoffee I. S. upon request and after he maketh a feoffement of the same to a Stranger in this Case I. S. may have an Action of Covenant without request Laughters Case 37. Eliz. fo 21. Banco regis WHere a condition of an obligation consisteth upon two parts in the disjunctive and both possible at the time of the obligation made and after one of them becomes impossible by the Act of God the obligor is not bound to performe the other part for the condition is made for the benefite of the obligor and shall be taken most beneficiall for him and he had an Election eyther to performe the one or the other for the saving of his Obligation but now Impotentia excusat legem Hallings Case 38. Eliz. Com. banco fo 22. ONe Covenanteth to make an estate in Fee at the costs of the Covenantee the Covenantor is to doe the first Act Idest to Notifie what assurance he will make that the Covenantee may know what summe to tender Mathewsons Case 39 Eliz. fo 23. Com. banco SEverall persons make severall Covenants in one Indenture or Writing the Seale of one of them is broken away that shall not avoyd the Covenant of the rest but onely the Covenant of him whose Seale is so debrused or defaced Vide Piggots Case in the 11th Report because severall Covenants otherwise if joynt Lambes case 41. Eliz. fo 23. com banco A. Is bound unto B. to give unto B. such a release c. before the 22. day of October next as by the Judge of the Prerogative Court is thought fit In this Case A. must procure the Judge to doe it or devise it for the Judge is a stranger to the condition and the condition is for the benefite of the Obligor and he hath taken upon him to performe the same at his perill but it is otherwise if the Obligee or his Councell should devise it Broughtons case 43. Eliz. fo 24. Banco regis IN an Action of Debt by Broughton Plaintiffe against Pretty upon an Obligation with condition where the Plaintiffe was bound in an obligation of 200. l. for the Defendant for the payment of 100. l. to C. if therefore the Defendant should save and keepe harmlesse the said Broughton from all Suites quarrells and Demands touching the said Obligation c. that then the Obligation to be void c. at the day of payment of the 100. l. the Plaintiffe commeth to the place where the 100 l. ought to be paid and perceiving there not any person present to pay the 100. l. for the Defendant Broughton to save the penalty of the Obligation paid the money to C. and brought his Action upon the Counter-bond and it was adjudged that the Plaintiffe should recover for the payment of the 100. l. is damage and harme And it is not necessary whither the Plaintiff was arrested or sued c. Terror of suite so as he dare not goe about his businesse is Damnification although he be not arrested Deane Chapter de Winsors Case 44. Eliz. fo 24. Banco regis A Man Leased a House by Indenture for yeares the Lessee Covenants and grants for him and his Executors with the Lessor to repaire the house at all times necessary the Lessee Assignes over and the Assignee suffereth the house to decay the Lessor brought an Action of Covenant against the Assignee and it was adjudged per Popham and all the Court that the Action lyeth although the Lessee had not Covenanted for his Assignes because in respect thereof the rent is the lesse which is for the benefite of the Assignee Qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus If a man grant one Estovers to repaire his house this is appurtenant to the house Fitz H. nat br 181.28 H. 8.28 Sir Thomas Palmers Case 43. El. fo 24. banco regis SIr Thomas Palmer seised in Fee of a great Wood. Did bargaine and sell to one Cornford and his Assignes 600. cords of Wood to be taken by Assignement of Sir Thomas Cornford assignes his interest to one Basset and afterward Sir Thomas sells to one Maynard such quantity of Wood as will make 4000. cords at Election of the Vendee and afterwards Sir Thomas assignes to Basset 600. cords of Wood to be taken by him who doth fall the same and Maynard did take them away and converted them c. an Action upon the case was brought by Basset and iudgement was given for him for Corneford had an interest which he might assigne over and not a thing in action or a possibility for it was resolved if Sir Thomas did not assigne them to Cornford upon request Cornford might take them without assignment for the Grantor cannot by his owne act or default eyther subvert or derogate from his owne grant Therefore it ensueth that Cornford had an interest that he might assigne over If A. have a house and Land and reasonable estovers in the Woods of another by view and livery of the Bayliffe c. if A. take estovers without view or livery c. he is a trespassor although he take lesse then he ought to have by livery But if A. demand his estovers and the Owner or his Bayliffe will not deliver to him he may have an Assize 2. If the Assignement were voyd yet the Defendant cannot take Trees cut by another but out of the residue of the Wood. The Earle of Rutlands case 2. Ja. fo 25. banco regis EDward Earle of Rutland seised of the Mannor of Eykering by Indenure dated 10. March Anno. 21. El. for augmentation of the joynture of Issabell his Countesse did Covenant with Sir Gilb. Gerrard and Thomas Houlcroft his Brother that before the end of Trinity terme then next following he would assure by fine or other conveyance the said Mannor to the said Sir Gilb. Gerrard and Thomas in Fee which syne or other conveyance should be to the use of the said Earle and Issabell his Wife and the Heires of the said Earle which Indenture was acknowledged and inrolled in the Chancery the 28. of the same Moneth of March by another Indenture betweene the said Earle on the one part and the Lord Burleigh on the other
fine after delivery of the Indentures of the fine the fine is said to be ingrossed 3. The Conusor shall not assigne error in the render because it is to his advantage and none shall assigne Error except it be to his disadvantage Dormers Case 35. Eliz. Banco regis fo 40. A Common recovery is had in a Writ of Entry in the Post de uno annuali redditu sive pensione quatuor marcarum and of an advowson whereupon a Writ of Error is brought 1. Because every Praecipe ought to be certaine but here it is in the Disjunctive 2. A Writ of entry in the Post lyeth not of an advowson But judgement was affirmed and thereby 't was resolved 1. That a common recovery is not like to other recoveries for it may be averred to an use 2. It is by mutuall consent consensus tollit errorem 3. A Writ of entry in the Post lyeth of an advowson common c. to suffer a common recovery and not otherwise for no other assurance can be had to barre the remainders 2. The demand of the rent is good for one of two things is not demanded but one thing by two names for rent and pension are Synonima and the rather here because it is said to issue out of Land which a Pension properly cannot 3. Common recoveries are so usuall that the Court shall take notice that they are common recoveries Rowlands Case 35. Eliz. Banco regis fo 41. A Pannell of a Jury is annexed to the Venire facias without returne this is vicious and not remedied by 18. Eliz. cap. 14. for that remedieth insufficient returnes but not where no returne The Countesse of Rutlands Case 36. Eliz. fo 42. RObert Moore is returned upon the Venire facias but in the panell before the Justices of Nisi prius and in the Postea he was named Robert Mawre if it appeare that Moore is his right name and that it is he who was sworne it is good for by the common Law this was a discontinuance against all the Jurors and discontinuances are ayded by the Statute otherwise if he were misnamed in the Venire facias and had his right name in the Panell and Postea Codwells Case 36. Eliz. Banco regis fo 42. A Juror who gave verdict was misnam'd in the Venire facias and had his right name in the Distringas and Postea and for that the judgement was arrested Nicholls Case 38. Eliz. Banco regis fo 43. C. Brings Debt upon a single Bill against N. who pleaded Payment without Acquittance which was found for the Plaintiffe although issue was joyned upon a point not materiall yet after Verdict this is aided by 32. H. 8. and 18. Eliz. Bohuns Case 39. Eliz. fo 43. A Fine was levyed of a Mannor and other Lands to the value of twenty Marks per annum so that the Kings silver is 40 s which was paid but in entering of it upon the Writ of Covenant the Mannor was omitted and thereupon error was brought but after that the transcript of the fine was remov'd into the Kings Bench the Judges of the common place amended the Record because it appeares to them that the Kings silver was payd for the Mannor and where the Writ of Covenant was Dede meipso for Teste meipso they amended that also and certified it into the Kings Bench upon dimunution and allowed Freemans Case fo 45. 41. Eliz. Banco regis IN an original Writ c. Quod nullus faciat vastum venditionem et destrictionem where it should be destructionem the fault was onely in one Letter the Court resolved upon good Consideration that it was matter of substance for Destrictio is a Latine word and altereth the sence of the Statute and matter of Substance in an Originall Writ is not remedied but matter of forme onely Vide Statute 32. H. 8. ca. 30. 18. Eliz. ca. 14. If an Originall at this day want forme or containe false Latine or vary from the Register in matter of forme after Verdict no judgement shall be stayed or reversed But if it want substance although it be the misprision of the Clerke this is not remedied by any Statute Gages Case 41. Eliz. Banco regis fo 45. A Writ of Covenant to levy a fine boare Date after the returne this is amendable because a common assurance but in other actions no amendment c. Cookes Case 41. Eliz. com banco fo 46. A Common recovery of the Mannor of Isfeild by the name of Iffeld is amendable because it appeared to the Court by collaterall things shewed unto them that Isfield was intended to passe Cases of Pardons Francklyns Case 36. Eliz. fo 46. In the Starr-Chamber A Bill was exhibited for a Ryot in the Starre-Chamber five yeares before the generall Pardon 35. Eliz. and it was resolved that the Kings fine was excepted but not the corporall Punishment but if it were exhibited within foure yeares all shall be accepted In this Case the Kings attourney may proceede for the fine Guilbert Littletons Case 39. Eliz. fo 47. Starre-Chamber A Bill exhibited in the Starre-Chamber before the Parliament 35. Eliz. and returned after this is excepted out of the generall pardon for it was depending before the returne but if an Originall Writ issueth out of the Chancery returnable in the common place this is not depending before the returne because out of another Court but after the returne it shall be said depending by relation from the day of the Teste and if the Tenant alien before the returne and after the Teste this shall be said an alienation pending the Writ Drywoods Case 42. Eliz. Starre Chamber fo 48. A Bill in the Starre-Chamber more then foure yeares and within 8. yeares before the Parliament in 39. Eliz. the Plaintiffe dyeth before the generall pardon this is pardoned for this doth not depend now and the words remaining to be prosecuted shall be intended for the party and not for the Kings Atturney Vaughans Case 40. Eliz. Banco regis fo 49. A Writ of entry in the Quibus depends in Wales before the generall Pardon and after the Demandant had judgement but the Tenant was not amerced 1. Resolved the Amercement is pardoned because the Torte was pardoned which together with the delay was the ground thereof 2. The Statutes of Jeofailes extend to Wales because it is made parcell of England by the Act of 27. H. 8. Wyrrells Case 41. Eliz. In the Exchequer fo 49. THe Queene brings debt upon an Obligation made by the Defendant to one who was Outlawed the Defendant pleads the generall Pardon and although that Debts due to the Queene are excepted yet Debts Originally due to the Subject and after came to the Queene are not excepted also the genetall pardon is to be taken beneficially for the subject and most strong against the King Biggens case 41. Eliz. Banco regis fo 50. THe King may pardon burning in the hand where the Defendant is found guilty of Man-slaughter and hath his
Deed to the Court the plaintiffe may pray it to be entred in haec verba the same Terme but not after Pagetts case 35. El. in communi banco fol. 76. IT was resolved that if tenant for life the remainder for life the remainder in fee if tenant for life maketh wast in trees and after he in remainder for life dye an action of wast is maintainable for the wast done in the life of him in remainder for life because it was to the disinheritance of him in remainder in fee. And now the impediment which was the meane estate for life is taken away Et remoto impedimento emergit actio It was resolved that when the trees are cut downe the property thereof belongeth to him in remainder in fee. And where it is said in some Bookes That he in remainder or reversion in fee shall not have an action of wast it is to be intended during the continuance of the meane remainder And in other Bookes is said in this case that an action of wast doth lie it is intended after the death of him in remainder for life Boothes case 36. Eliz. in communi Banco fol. 77. GEeorge Booth brought an action of wast against Skevington and declared that Sir William Booth demised for yeares to Ensor who assigned to Skevington The defendant pleaded an assignement to Elizabeth Cave before which assignement no wast was made the plaintiffe replyed and shewed the Statute 11. H. 6. ca. 5. and that the grant to Elizabeth Cave was made to the intent he should not know against whom to bring his action and averred that Skevington did take the profits the defendant rejoyned that Elizabeth Cave granted her estate to A. who demised to the defendant at will and traversed the fraud c. the plaintiffe demurred it was resolved that every assignee of every Lessee mediatly or immediatly is within the said act for the Statute was made to suppresse fraud and deceipt and therefore it should be taken most beneficially Secondly that he in remainder is within the said act as well as he in reversion Thirdly the intent of fraud aforesaid is not traversable but the taking of the profits which is a thing notorious whereof the Country may have knowledge In a formedon the tenant pleaded Non tenure the demandant said that he made a Feoffment to persons unknowne to defraud him of his tenancy and to keepe the profits the pernancy of the profits and not the Feoffment is traversable Samons case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 77. THe plaintiffe and defendant referred all controversies to the Arbitrement of J. S. who did arbitrate that the defendant shall enter into an obligation to the plaintiffe that the plaintiffe and his wife shall injoy certeine lands which he had not done this is voyde for the incerteinty of what summe the obligation shall be for the award ought to be certeine like a Judgement Also the award was voyde as to the feme for she was a stranger to the submission Grayes case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 78. Replevin THe plaintiffe intitles himselfe in barre to the avowry to Common c. which was traversed the Jury found that every c. time of minde have used to pay for the Common a henne and five egges the plaintiffe had Judgement for he needs not shew more then makes for him for this is not Modus Communiae paying so much nor parcell of the issue but a collaterall recompence to be paid for the Common for which the Terretenant had remedy but if the Terretenant had no remedy then the Commoner shall have the Common sub modo and may be disturbed by the Terretenant Fitz-Herberts case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 79. THe father tenant for life the remainder to the sonne in taile leaseth for yeares to A. to the intent to barre the sonne A. infeoffeth J. S. to whom the father releaseth with warranty and dyeth this doth not barre the sonne for although that the disseisin which is made by the feoffment precedes the warranty yet because it was to that intent the Law will adjudge upon the intire act and so a warranty by disseisin 2. Although the disseisin was made to the father yet because he consented unto it the warranty commenceth by disseisin but if the father had made a feoffment in fee and dyed this shall binde the sonne if it be with warranty Foordes case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 81. A Prebend leaseth for 70. an Patron Deane and Chapter confirme dimissionem praedictam in forma praedicta fact ' for 51. yeares non ultra this is a confirmation for all the Terme for when they confirme dimissionem c. for 51. yeares it is repugnant but if they had recited the Lease and confirmed the land for 51. yeares this had been good for they have an authority coupled with an interest otherwise if onely a bare authority but by what words soever they confirme a lease for life or a gift in taile for part this is a confirmation of all because they are intire so if the estate of the disseisor or his lessee for life be confirmed for an houre yet all is confirmed Cases of Customes Snellings case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 82. S. Brings Debt upon an Obligation against an Administrator who pleads there is a custome in L. that an Administrator shall pay debts upon contract to a Citizen as well as upon Obligation and that J. S. upon a Contract had recovered and good 1. Resol Although that debt is given against an Administrator by the Statute of 31. E. 3. yet because they were charged as Executors before so that onely the name is changed the custome generally alledged is good 2. The ordinary by taking the goods was chargeable at the Common Law 3. This custome bindeth strangers The case of Markett overt 38. Eliz. fo 83. SHopps in L. are Marketts overt for things to be sold there by the trade of the owner therefore if plate be sold there in a Scriveners shop the property is not altered otherwise if in a Goldsmiths shop if he who passeth in the street may see it Nota the reason of this case extends to all Marketts overt in England Perimans case 41. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 84. IT is a good Custome of a mannor that all sales of lands within that mannor be presented at the Court of the Mannor Obj. What remedy if the Steward will not accept the presentment Resp What remedy if the Clerke will not Inrolle a deede of bargaine and sale and therefore Caveat Emptor 2. Obj. That Interest is by the feoffment vested in the feoffee which shall not be devested by the Custome Resp That livery was ordained to give notice and a Custome which addeth more solemnity and notice is good Sir Henry Knivets case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 85. TEnant for life the remainder in fee leaseth for yeares the Termor is ousted the disseisor leaseth for yeares his lessee sowes the land tenant for life dyes he
The question was whether they have an estate for life or an inheritance in taile And it was resolved that if they had children at the time of the Demise made then they had but an estate for life But if they had no children then they had an estate of inheritance in taile Sir Edward Cleeres case 42. Eliz. fol. 17. A Man is seized of three acres of Land houlden in Capite and maketh a Feoffment in Fee of two of them to the use of his wife for her life and after maketh a feoffment by Deed of the third acre to the use of such persons and of such estate and estates as he should limitt and appoint by his last Will in writing And afterwards by his last Will in writing hee Devised the said third acre to one in fee and if this Devise was good for all the third acre or not or for two parts thereof or voyd for all was the question And it was adjudged that the Devise was good For the Feoffor by his last Will limitted the estates according to his power reserved to him upon the Feoffment the estates should take effect by force of the Feoffment and the use is directed by the Will So as in this case the Will is onely directory But if he declared his Will by writing without any reference to his authoritie or power as owner of the Land and to limitt no use according to his power In this case the Land being houlden in capite the Devise is good for two parts and voyd for the third part If a man make a Feoffment in Fee of Lands in capite to the use of his last Will although he Devise the Land with reference to the Feoffment yet the Will is voyd for a third part for a Feoffment to the use of his last Will and to the use of him and his heires is all one In this case when the partie had conveyed two parts to the use of his wife by his act executed hee cannot as owner of the Land Devise any part of the residue by his Will and therefore because he hath not an election as in the case put before whether to limit according to his power or Devise the same as owner of the Land for in the case at Barre as owner of the Land having conveyed two parts to the use of his wife he cannot make any Devise The Devise of necessitie must inure to a limitation of the use otherwise the Devise should be altogether voyd Packmans case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 18. WIlson brought an action upon the case upon a trover against Packman The case was thus A man dyed intestate and the Ordinary committed the administration to a stranger and after the next of kindred of the Decedent sued out a Citatiō in the Court Christian to have it repealed and pendente lite the administrator to defeate the plaintiffe selleth the goods of the decedent to the defendant and after the Letters of administration were revoked by sentence and the first sentence anulled and made voyd and the administration granted to the plaintiffe And it was resolved that the action did not lie and in this case the diversitie was houlden betweene a suite by Citation for to countermand or revoke the former administration and an appeale which is alwayes a reversing of a former sentence for an appeale doth suspend the former sentence otherwise of a Citation And in this case because the first administrator had the absolute propertie of the goods in him without question he may sell them to whom he will and although the administration be revoked afterwards yet that cannot defeat the Sale But if the sale or gift be by covine it is voyd against Creditors by the Statute of 13. El. but it is good against a second administrator And if an administrator wast the goods and afterwards the administration is granted to another yet every debtor shall charge him in debt An administration may be granted upon condition and whatsoever the administrator doth before the condition broken is good Gregories case 38. El. Banco Regis fol. 20. VErba aequivoca in dubio posita intelliguntur in digniori potentiori sensu secundum excellentiam as if the speech be or writing of J. S. generally it shall be intended of the father where the father and sonne are both of a name and if it be of two Brothers both of a name it shall be intended of the eldest for these are more worthy so where the Statute of 4. 5. Phil. Ma. speaketh in any Court of Record it shall be intended of the foure Courts at Westminster because the Kings Attorney is attendant there Michelbornes case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 21. THe Court of Marshalsea doth onely hould plea of actions of trespasse within the verge if the one of the parties be of the Kings houshold and in contracts and Covenants where both parties are of the Kings houshold and of none other actions nor persons by the Act of Articuli super Chartas 28. E. 1. Butler Goodalls case 40. El. Banco Regis fol. 21 IT was resolved upon the Statute of 21. H. 8. that a Parson of a Church ought to stay and be Commorant upon his Rectorie viz. upon the Parsonage-house and not in any other house although it be within the Parish but lawfull imprisonment without covine is a good excuse of non-residence also if there be no Parsonage-house for impotentia excusat Legem also sicknesse without fraud if the patient remove by advice of his Councell in Physicke bona fide for better aire and recovery of his health Ambrosia Gorges case 40. El. fol. 22. in Cur. Wardorum IT was resolved that the Father shall have the Wardship of his Daughter and heire apparent so long as shee continueth his heire apparent But when the Father hath issue a sonne then shee shall be in ward to the Queene for then he is heire apparant and not the Daughter Ambrosia was daughter of Sir Arthur Gorge by Douglas Daughter and heire of Vicount Bindon and was married to Francis Gorge which Francis dyed when Ambrosia was of ten yeares of age It was resolved also that the Queene notwithstanding the said marriage should have the Wardship of the said Ambrosia for it was not a compleat marriage because to every marriage there ought to be a consent For consensus non concubitus facis matrimonium consentire non possunt ante annos nubiles And upon conference had with the Civilians it was agreed after such a marriage if the husband and the wife marry again it shall not be counted Bigamie And 30. E. 1. tit Gard. 156. if the ancestor marry his heire infra annos nubiles and dye the Lord shall recover the body of the Infant because the heire may disagree It was agreed that the grandfather shall not have the wardship of the sonne within age the father being dead in his life time Marquesse of Winchester his case 41. Eliz. fol. 23.
but a labour to the Obligor or a stranger there he had time during his Life Fitz-Williams Case 2. Jacobi banco regis fol. 32. BAron and Feme Tenants for life and to the heires of the body of the Baron the Baron sole is vouched in a common recovery the taile is barred Copledicks Case 3. Report 2. Resol If Tenant in taile suffer a recovery to his owne use the remainder to his wife with diverse remainders over with power of revocation and limittation of new uses by any such writing he revoketh all the remainders except that to his Wife and by the same deede limits new uses this is good for by any such writing shal be intended the same or any such and it may be by the same deede for first it takes effect as a revocation 2. By limittation of new uses and there are not more instances then one in it See there Leaper Wroths Case cited 30. El. to prove that powers whereby the interest of Strangers shall be changed shall be taken strictly as a power to make leases for twenty one yeares he cannot make a Lease for 21. yeares to commence in Futuro The Bishop of Bathes Case 3. Jacobi com banco fo 34. THe B. 18. H. 8. Leaseth to E. and R. for sixty yeares proviso if they dye within the terme that the B. and his Successors shall reenter E. dyes the B. dyes the Successor Leases to C. Cum post sive per mortem c. praedict R. acciderit vacare for sixty yeares with confirmation R. dyeth Resolv every Lease ought to have a certaine beginning and the continuance ought also to be certaine eyther by expresse number of yeares or by reference to an expresse certeinty or where a Lease may be reduced to a certeinty by matter Ex post facto Agreed the second Lease vests presently in poynt of interest to take effect in possession at the end of the first Terme if by none of the accidents the first Lease become voyd in the meane time and then the Lease shall commence at the first accident which doth happen and the Lessee hath no Election The Deane and Chapter of Worcesters Case 3. Jacobi fo 37. THe D. and Ch. seised of a Mannor in Fee in which were Copy-holds grantable for three lives for 8. s. 8. d payable quarterly and herriotable grant a copy-hold for the Life of three reserving the old rent halfe yearely this is not voyd by 13. Eliz. cap. 1. Resolved the grant of a copy-hold for the life of 3. is good for although there may be an occupancy yet it is not inconvenient for an occupant shall be punished in wast 2. Grant of a Copy-hold is a demise by the intent of the Statute for in Law it is a Lease at will 3. The omission of Herriot doth not make it voyd because the annuall rent is reserved 4. It is sufficient that the yearely rent be reserved twice in the yeare for the Statute saith yearly which maketh a difference betweene this Case and the Lord Mountjoyes Case in the fifth Report Bellamyes case 3. Jacobi com banco fol. 38. A Lease upon condition that the Lessee shall not alien without License Assignee of the Lessee pleads that the Assignement was with License and shewed not forth the Deede of License 1. Because he did not claime by it 2. Because the License was Ex provisione hominis and not Ex institutione legis 3. Because it was executed and good Henry Finches Case 3. Jacobi banco regis fol. 39. A Grant of a rent charge out of diverse Mannors c. in the Parishes of E. and W. Aut alibi dictis marerijs spectantur and out of Lands which is not parcell of any of the Mannors these are not charged with the distresse for Alibi doth not charge more Land then is parcell of those Mannors but all parcells of the said Mannors out of the said Parishes Sir Anthony Mildmayes Case 3. Jacob. banco regis fol. 40. 1. REsolved a perpetuity is against the rules and pollicy of the common Law 2. It is impossible that an estate tayle shall cease before that Tenant in taile dyes without issue and an estate cannot be made to continue as to one and determine as to another except by Statute 3. A gift in taile upon condition that he shall not suffer a common recovery is voyd because he had power by the Law 4. It is a voyd saying that his estate shall cease if he goe about c. for Non officit conatus nisi sequatur effectus Also many ambiguities will arise thereupon because the Law doth not define it and it is so uncertaine that is not traversable Blakes Case 3. Jacobi com banco fo 43. AN accord with satisfaction is a good barre in a Writ of Covenant because the duty accrueth not meerly by the deede but by a torte subsequent together with the deed and it is a good barre in an attaint because this is not founded upon the record onely but upon the false Oath also In all cases where an arbitrament is a good Plea an accord with satisfaction is also and so generally in all Actions where damages onely are to be recovered Higgins Case 3. Jacob. com banco fo 44. IF a man have judgement upon an Obligation so long as this judgement is in force he may not have a new action upon the same Obligation For Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium infinitum in jure reprobatur A Statute Staple is but an Obligation recorded and one Obligation cannot drowne another although they be both for one Debt and the Obligee may choose upon whither he will bring his Action 11. H. 4. and 2. Jac. Sir William Cornewalles Case and Branthwaytes Case and in every judgement the Defendant is amerced and so he shall be amerced in Infinitum Dowdales Case 3. Jac. com banco fol. 46. IN Debt against an Executor the Defendant pleads fully administred the Plaintiffe saith that he hath assets at E. the Jury found assets in Ireland 1. Resol when the place is materiall the poynt in issue cannot be found in another place 2. Where the place is named but for conformity assets may be found in another County 3. In a generall issue the Jury shall finde all materiall locall things in another County 4. The Jury by a meane shall trie locall things in another County as a release in a forreigne County the Jurors shall assesse damages for the profits of the Land in the other County Multa conceduntur per obliquum quae non c. but in case of felony the Tryall shall be where the offence was done 5. The finding of assets is the substance and that it is in Ireland is surplusage A thing done beyond the Sea shall be tryed here if the foundation of the Action be here Boswells Case 3. Jac. banco regis fol. 48. IN a Quare impedit judgement was given to remove the incumbent of the Queene not party to the Writ who was presented
pending the Writ Resolv That by the common Law by admission and institution the Usurpor gaines the inheritance of the advowson without regard of the nonage of the Patron because he is in by judiciall act and the Bishop shall be supposed not to doe wrong to the Patron and the incumbent shall not be disturbed to excercise his function but the King shall have a Quare impedit at the common Law Collation doth not put him who hath right to present out of possession but if one have right to Collate it doth an infant by the Act of W. 2. c. 5. shall have a Quare impedit if a man usurp upon an infant who had a Mannor to which c. by discent who at full age infeoffeth B. the Church voideth c. by the usurpation the infant was out of possession and his right passed not and seems the Infant is without remedy If a Clerke commeth in by course of Law this gaineth not the inheritance against the right Patron who was not party to the writ The King shall not recover damages by this Statute for he is not within the first branch Si tempus semestre transierit nor within the second Branch for that depends upon the first yet he shall count to damages An incumbent shall not be moved if he be not named in the writ and if he be not admitted c. pending the writ and lapse shall not incurre if the Bishop be named in the Writ otherwise if he be not If he who is presented pending the Writ be in by rightfull Patron or not yet he who recovereth in a Quare impedit shall have a generall Writ to the Bishop which he must execute of necessity and after that the parties may try their titles as the Law shall determine Countesse of Rutlands Case in the Starre-Chamber 3. Jacobi fo 52. THat the person of a Countesse or a Baronesse may not be arrested for Debt or trespasse for although in respect of their Sex they may not sit in the Parliament yet they are Peers of the Realme and shall be tryed by their Peers Stat. 20. H. 6. Peers of the Realme may not be sworne in any inquest a Countesse in Marrying with a Husband doth loose her Name of a Countesse If a Baronesse c. by Marriage marry againe under the Nobility shee looseth her dignity but if she be Noble by Birth or descent yet whomsoever she Marryeth she remaineth Noble for Birth-right is Character intelebilis and that which is gained by Marriage may also be lost by Marriage A Sheriffe ought not to dispute the Authority of Courts but he ought to Execute the Writs to him directed for thereunto be they Sworne Serjeant at Mace upon a cap. ad satisfaciendum came to the the said Countesse in Cheapside being in her Coach and touched her body with the Mace and said I arrest you Madame at the Suite of S. and those were all the words that were us'd therupon compell'd the Coach man to carry her unto the Counter-gate in Woodstreete and the Sheriffe tooke her into his house In this Case it was resolved that the Sheriffe Bayliffe c. upon the Arrest ought to shew at whose suite out of what Court for what cause it is and when the processe is returnable and that this generall Arrest of the Countesse cannot be said that it was by force of the said Writ of Execution and that this Arrest was of the Serjeants owne head without warrant and against Law and that the said Countesse was falsly imprisoned but she remained in the Sheriffes custody 7. or 8. dayes untill shee paid the Debt but because the Arrest was by a fained Action entered in the Counter the Serjeants were sentenced The Lord Chandos case 4. Jacobi fol. 55. THe King grants to B. in taile and in consideration of the surrender of the Letters Patents by force whereof the King is seised in fee granteth to him and his wife and to the heires of B. the reversion passeth for the recitall that the King was seised in fee was but the Collection of the King and no part of the consideration or suggestion of the party And when the King grants land in posseâ—… if he had but a reversion this shall passe for he is not deceived because lesse passes then he intended Bredimans case 4. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 56. A Man deviseth a rent for life out of a Mannor and he deviseth the Mannor for yeares the termor enters and pays the rent after the Terme the devisee brings an assize against the Terretenant Resol Payment by lessee for yeares of the rent giveth no seisin to have an assize 1. In respect of the imbecillity of his estate 2. He cannot give seisin because he had not seisin and therefore a Pracipe lyeth not against him because he cannot render seisin but he may take seisin to the use of him in the freehold A disseisor may give seisin of a rent secke because he hath a freehold and it is lawfull 3. A rent secke is caecus siccus therefore it behoveth the first payment which giveth life unto it shall be made by a Tenant of the freehold and in this case being created by devise an Annuity lyeth not thereupon otherwise if it be by grant and Tenant of the freehold ought to attorne to a grant of such a rent over therefore he shall give seisin But seisin by a Bailiffe is good if seisin were had before within sixty yeares and seisin given by Tenant at will is good but it ought to be pleaded as payment by the lessor himselfe If the King hath rent out of a ville to be paid by all the Inhabitants seisin alledged in generall without naming any is good Gatewards case 4. Jac. in Com. Banco fol. 59. TO claime common ratione Commorantiae residen in villa de B. is not good for no man may have interest â—…ommon in respect of a Messuage wherein he hath no interest For custome should alwayes extend to that which hath certenty and continuance and without question tenant in fee simple ought to prescribe in his owne name and tenant for life or yeares by elegit at will c. in the name of him that hath the Fee and he that hath no interest cannot have any common and none that hath any interest although it be but at will and ought to have common but by good pleading he may enjoy the same No improvement might be made in any wasts if this custome viz. in respect of habitation and Comorance should be allowed for tenants for life or yeares at will by elegit by Statute c. of the houses of the Lord should have common in the wasts of the Lord if this prescription were allowed which were inconvenient A Custome that every Inhabitant in B. shall have a way over such grounds either to the Church or Markett c. is a good custome for that is onely easement and no profit and a way or passage may well sequi
personam The Lord cannot claime common in his owne soyle A diversitie was taken and agreed upon between a prescription and a custome a prescription is alwayes alledged in the person and a custome ought alwayes to be alledged in the Land for every prescription ought to have by common intendment a lawful commencement but otherwise of a custome for that ought to be reasonable and ex certa causa rationabili usitata as Littleton saith But it needeth not to have intendment of a lawfull commencement as custome to have Land Devisable or of the nature of Gavelkinde or Borough English These and such like customes are reasonable but by common intendment these cannot have lawfull commencement by grant or act or agreement but onely by Parliament and the custome in the case at barre was repugnant for it was alledged that the Custome of the Towne was that every Inhabitant had used to have common within a place in the Towne of H. which was another Towne Catesbyes Case 4o. Jac. fol. 61. SIx moneths being halfe a yeare semestre is given to the Patron of an advowson to present and according to the Kalander and not after 28. dayes to a Moneth and the Statute saith Si tempus semestre non transierit adjudicentur damna ad valorem c. per dimidium anni and being ambiguous it shall be construed for the benefit of the Patron Sir Moyle Finches case 4. Jac. Com. Banco fol. 63. THe Lady M. tenant for life of the Mannor of B. the remainder in fee to the Lady Finch shee and S. her husband and D. levyed a fine to one of the demesnes who grants and renders to D. for 50. yeares the reversion to S. and his wife and her heires with proviso in the Deedes which directed the fine that the reversioner shall enter and hould Courts And it was averred that this was knowne by the name of the Mannor of B. D. maketh his sonne of three yeares of age executor and administration was committed to R. T. S. and his wife levy a fine of all the lands of the wife in K. except the Mannor of B. to the use of the feme for life the remainder to Sir M. F. R. T. demiseth to P. L. for ten yeares Dame M. dyeth P. L. entreth by vertue of a power of revocation and limitation of new uses S. with the assent of the Lady F. his wife limitteth the uses to one who ousteth P. L. and maketh a feoffment to the use of the La F. for life the remainder to H. F. in taile P. L. reenters Dame F. dyeth H. F. for rent arreare distraineth 1. Resol By the grant and render of the demesnes the Mannor is destroyed because in an instant the services and demesnes are severed by act of the party but otherwise it is if by act in Law as upon partition so it is of an advowson appendant c. and upon partition many Mannors may be made of one but not by the act of the party 2. B. is excepted by the name of a Mannor 1. Because the intent of the parties is so 2. Exception of misnosmer shall not be favoured in Law 3. It is sufficient in Law in many cases that a thing be reputed as it is named as if a remainder be limitted to a Bastard by the name of sonne of J. S. and as to that was objected that this reputation is not time out of minde this needs not if it be of convenient time as this was for it was a Mannor revera before to levy a fine and continue the name after so that this reputation is stronger having such a ground and reputation serveth in Writts amicable although not in adversarie 3. The lease made by the administrator durante minori aetate is good because the administration is generall and not speciall to the benefit of the Infant but howsoever this is good during the administration 4. P L. in the life of the Lady M. had but interesse Termini so that attornement cannot be in his life but after the death of the La. Mo. by entry of the lessee the reversion is in S. and his wife without attornement because attornement needs not because the reversion is setled and he hath no meanes to compell c. otherwise it is where an attornement may be had and although that P.L. lessee of a lessee of part cannot make an expresse attornement yet his reentry shall be an attornement in Law so he who hath interesse termini may make a surrender in Law but no expresse surrender and a man of non-sane memory may make an attornement in Law but not an expresse attornement The Lord Darcies Case 4. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 70. TEnder is not necessary to have the single value of the heire male or female but the heire female shall not forfeit the double value because the Statute of Merton is si se mavitaverit at the age of 14. yeares c. at which time the heire female is out of Ward and where by the Statute of Westm 1. cap. 22. it is provided that the Lord shal have two yeares to make a Tender it giveth not the double value but if he waive the two yeares he shall have the value without Tender quia de mero Jure c. Burrells case 5. Jac. Com. Banco fol. 72. IF the father make a lease by fraud and dyes the sonne sells the land knowing or not knowing of it the vendee shall avoyd it 2. If the father makes a lease to the sonne who assigneth it over by fraud the father dyes the sonne sells the land the vendee shall avoyd it Sir Drue Druries case 5. Jac. Cur. Wardor fol. 73. E. 1. granted to the Towne of Y. Quod omnes de villa oriundi licet terras c. extra libertatem villae c. te nuerint in Capite se maritare possint juxta libertates villae praedictae R. D. dyed seised of a house parcell of a Monasterie dissolved in the time of H. 8. houlden in Capite the King grants the wardship of his sonne to the plaintiffe and makes the Ward Knight the plaintiffe brings a valore Maritagij The Charter doth not discharge the defendant 1. Because it is juxta libertates villae praedict ' and the liberties are not shewed 2. This Charter cannot extend to a Tenure created in the time of H. 8. 3. It is not shewed that the defendant was borne within the Towne 1. Resol If the heire in Ward be made a Knight he is out of Ward for his body because by intendment he is able to doe Knights service otherwise if made a Nobleman 2. By the death of the tenant the value of the marriage is vested in the Lord and cannot be devested by Knighthood c. 3. If he be Knighted in the life of his auncestor he shall not be in Ward at all 4. If making of the heire in ward Knight shall devest the value it will be prejudiciall to the Subject and to the King for
make a Lease for yeares and after enter into the Land and make wast and the Lessor recover in an Action of wast against the Lessee for life he shall avoid the Lease for yeares made before the wast committed But if a Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares and after enter and make a feoffement in fee the Lessor shall not avoid the Lease for yeares and so if a Tenant make a Lease for yeares and after is attainted of felony or dyeth without heire the Lord by escheate shall not avoide the tearme But because the feoffement in the case at barre was executed by Letter of Attourney it was resolved to be void and the Land escheated to the Queene Jehu Webbes Case 6. Jacobi com banco fo 45. THe King grants the office of the Kings Tennis plaies at W. to one who being disseised brings an assize The Patent shall have a reasonable construction not onely when the King himselfe playes but when any of his Houshould As if a Commission be made to take Singing-Boys in a Cathedrall-Church for the Kings Chappell those that Sing there for their pleasure cannot be taken but such as get their living by it There were but two manner of assizes at the common Law assizes De libero tenemento and De communia pasturae but for no other common but for this onely there is a Writ in the Register But the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. giveth it De proficuo in certo loco capiendo in lieu of a Quod permittat and although that there offices amongst other things are named yet an assize lay of an office at the common Law and although that no Tenant for life may have a Quod permittat yet an assize did lye for him but that is to be understood of an office of profit for it lyeth not of an office of charge Originall Writs made by Statute cannot be altered without Statute In an assize of a new office it ought to be shewed what profit belongs to it but not for an ancient office because that is sufficiently knowne Syms Case 6. Jacobi fo 51. TEnant in taile levyeth a fine with warranty and dyeth the warranty discends upon the issue of him in the remainder inheritable to the taile and another the issue in taile brings a formedon and is barred for all for the warranty is intire and barreth every one upon whom it discends of all his right as if one seised of three acres maketh a feoffement of one with warranty and dyes having issue two Daughters who make partition the Mother purchaseth the part of one brings dower against the feoffee who Vouches the Daughters shee shall recover all the other acre of the other Daughter if Tenant by the curtesie make a feoffement with warranty and dyes and his Sonne heire of the Feme recovers and assets discends after the feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the Land first recovered by the Statute of Glouc. c. 3. but if assets descend to the Heire in taile bound with a lyneall warranty after recovery in formedon the Feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the assets for otherwise if the recoverer alien the assets the issue of him will recover the Land in taile againe but in these cases the discontinuee ought to confesse the title of the Demandant and pray that if assets descend after they may discend unto him for if he plead a warranty and assets this is peremptory unto him if it be found that assets did not discend for the Statute is that a Scire facias shall issue out of the rolls of the Justices and in this case there is no ground for the Scire facias in the Record but in this case if the issue in taile pleads no assets and assets are found but not to the value the tenant shall have a Scire facias to recover the assets discended after for that false plea of the Vouchee Warranty and estoppell discend upon the heire generall and warranty barreth although that he upon whom it discends claimeth not by him that made it but so doth not an estoppell but estoppells with recompence binde the right of one who claimeth not by him that made it Roger Earle of Rutlands Case 6. Jacobi fo 55. THe King grants the pannage and herbage of a Park to M. for life and reciting this grants it to the Earle of Rutland for his life 1. Resolved the King hath three manner of inheritances 1. Some which he cannot excercise himselfe and cannot grant them in reversion or remainder as Corodies and Churches of which he is Patron 2. Others which he cannot excercise himselfe but may grant them in reversion or remainder as offices 3. Others which he may excercise himselfe and may grant as Lands Houses c. 2. The King here is not deceived for when he reciteth here that M. had for life and grants for life this inureth as by Law it may that is as a grant in reversion 3. In this case the grant to the Earle shall commence after the determination of the estate of M. and if the King grants Land to one and his Heires Habendum to him and his Assignes it is good and the Habendum shall be rejected for the honour of the King See the Lord Chandos case in the sixth Booke and when a Charter of the King may be taken to two intents good in many cases it shall be taken to such intent as is most beneficiall for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another void then for the honour of the King and benefit of the Subject then it shall be taken so that it may take effect Beechers Case 6. Jacobi fo 58. B. Plaintiffe in Debt Se retraxit by attourney and by the judgement is not amerced he brings eror 1. Resolved a Retraxit ought to be in proper person for at the common Law every one who appeared ought to come in proper person and make his attorney after by license of the Court but if it be without writ he cannot without a writ of Attornato faciendo In cases where one may make an attourney but for contempt is bound to appeare in person if he appeare by attourney this is not error because the court may dispens with the contempt otherwise where he cannot appeare by Law by attorney as here for if he appeare by attourny this is error 2. B. ought to be amerced if upon a Nonsuite a Fortiori upon a Retraxit and although it is for his advantage yet he may assigne it for error because the judgement is not perfect and because it is for the advantage of the King and it shall not be amended because the act of the Court. 3. Where one disclaimes he shall not have a Writ of error because he hath confessed that he had no right otherwise it is upon a Retraxit for this is but a barre of the action à fortiori here where it wat void done by an attourney
disseissed at the common ley and dyed and the Feme before entry dyed this is a discontinuance to the Sonne because he cannot enter as Heire to both but if the Feme enter the discontinuance is purged 2. The estate which the Feme had jointly with her Baron is within the purviewe of the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 28. That no fine levyed by the Baron sole of Lands of the Feme shall hurt her and within the Statute of West 2. c. 3. 3. The entry of the Sonne is lawfull although he claimes not as heire to the Feme as the Statute speakes but as heire to both because he is within these words or to such as have right by the death of such Wife and this is to be intended of discontinuances made by the Baron and not of a rightfull barre of the issue for they cannot avoide it and the Statute is that they may enter which they cannot doe where they are barred and if the Feme enter within 5. yeares as shee may after a Fine levyed by the Baron this doth not take away the future barre of the issue and if shee enter not within 5. yeares shee also is barred Baron tenant in taile the remainder to the Feme in taile makes a feoffement the Feme may enter after his death by this Statute but if the Baron suffer a recovery she shall not enter in the Case at barre the son may have a Formedon at the common Law and where before this Statute a Cuj in vita or Sur cuj in vita did lye entry is given by this Statute and not otherwise The Lord Staffords Case 7. Jacobi fo 73. THe Queene revertioner upon an estate taile grants the revertion to T. T. in taile upon condition is to have Praedictam reversionem in fee the condition is performed the Lord Stafford Tenant in taile levyeth a fine his issue is barred 1. Resolved that a condition of accruer may be annexed to a thing which lyeth in grant and to an estate taile as if Lessee for life be the remainder for life with condition of accruer to the first this is good and yet no Merger of estate 4. things are requisit to an accruer 1. A particular estate as the Foundation Ergo a Lease at will shall not be 2. The estate ought to continue in the Grantee untill accruer therefore if the Grantee alien and repurchase the condition is Tolled but Quaere if the Tenant alien upon condition which is broken if the fee shall accrew but grantee may grant part of his estate as if Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares he may performe the condition after so may Tenant in speciall taile after he is become tenant in taile after possibility c. so may the surviving jointenant and the heire of Tenant in taile An instant is sufficient to support an accruer as if the condition be if the Lessee be ousted Eo instante that the ouster is the fee accrueth but if Lessee for yeares accept a confirmation for life the condition is gone but it is not necessary that the estate of the grantor or Lessor continue because by his owne act he shall not defeate his grant 3. It ought to vest at the time of the condition performed or never and for that rather that it shall not vest at this time by performance of the condition the fee without office or other ceremony shall be devested out of the King 4. It is necessary that the particular estate and the condition be in one deede or two deeds delivered at the same time for in Law they are but one grant and by the condition performed he had fee from the delivery Resolved Praedict reversionem signifies the reversion which the Queene had Viz. That which depends upon both the estates taile and so was the intent also shee granted Omnia praemissa which maketh it cleere Resolved also that these words Will and Declare doe amount to a grant and are so used in Patents of Liberties and things to take effect in Futuro Tenant in taile the remainder in taile the remainder to the King Tenant in taile suffers a recovery this doth not barre the remainder in taile because the issue in raile is not barred and therefore the revertions and remainders in taile are preserved by the Statute of 34. H. 8. c. 20. Lastly Resolved if the reversion in fee had remained in the Crowne that the fine levyed by Ed Lord Stafford the Father had not barred the Lord that now is Notlyes Case 31. Eliz. com banco Wiat Wields Case 7. Jacobi 78. W. W. seised of Land to which he had common appurtenant aliens 5. acres to one who in replevin counts that he and those whose estate he had in the said 5. acres have had common there c. and good 1. Resolved although by purchase of part of the Land in which c. the common appurtenant is destroyed in all yet it is not so by alienation of part of the Land to which but all remaines without damage to the Tenant of the Land 2. That the pleading of it was sufficient Vinyors Case 7. Jacobi fo 80. ONe was bound to stand to the award of W. R. and revokes the submission the Obligee brings Debt 1. Resolved the Countermand is good for an authority Countermandable by the Law cannot by any way be made irrevocable 2. Although that the Plaintiffe doth not show that the Defendant had given notice to the arbitrator yet it is good because this is implied for without notice the revocation is void 3. The Obligation by the Countermand is forfeited because he doth not stand to c. when he Countermands it 2. By his owne act he had made the condition impossible Ergo the Obligation is single if one bindes himselfe to give License to carry Wood c. for a certaine time if he give it and disturbe him the Obligation is forfeited Sir Richard Pexhalls Case 7. Jacobi fo 83. SIr R. P. seised of Lands part whereof is houlden in Capite deviseth 100. Sheepe 10. Bullocks and 10. l. quarterly to one with clause of distresse and that the Grantee shall hold his Courts for his life for rent arreare for 2. yeares the grantee avoweth 1. Resolved a devise of rent out of all is good and taketh effect out of two parts and as to the third is void 2 The grantee shall have an estate for life in rent and so he shall if it be granted by Deede also by the Intent of the Devisor it appeares that the Grantee shall hold Courts and have 10. l. per annum for his wages and quarterly here had relation to rent onely because the word Et disjoyneth it from Sheep and Bullocks and judgement given for the Avowant Buckmers Case 7. Jac. fo 86. T. B. gave a House in Gavellkinde to M. his Eldest Daughter in taile the remainder of one Moity to J. a second Daughter in taile the remainder of the other Moity to K. a third Daughter in
give to them any interest or Title eyther to the things in action or possession for they have all their title and interest by the Testament and not by the Probate Power to grant administrations was granted to the Ordinary by the act of 31. Ed. 3. ca. 11. for before that time when a man died intestate the King who is Parens patriae was accustomed by his Ministers to seize his goods to the intent they might be preserved and bestowed for the Buriall of the dead for payment of his debts for advancement of his Wife and Children if he had any otherwise to his Kindred as appeareth in Rot. Claus de 7. H. 3. in ib. bona intestatorum capi solebant in manus regis c. And after this care and trust was committed to the Ordinaries and it was resolved Per totam Cur. M. 8. and 9. Eliz. Dyer that the Ordinary himselfe hath not any authority to sell any goods of the intestate although they be in danger of perishing neither can he release any debt due unto the intestate by a statute in Ao 31. Ed. 3. ca. 11. the Ordinary shall depute the next and most lawfull friends of the dead person intestate to administer his goods And the Statute in Ao 21. H. 8. ca. 5. is that the Ordinary shall grant the administration to the widdow of the same person so deceast or to the next of his Kin or to both as by the discretion of the Ordinary shall be thought good c. Reade this latter Statute to whom administrations shall be granted The Earle of Shrewsburies Case 8. Jacobi fol. 46. 1. REsolved that the grant of the Stewardship of the Mannors of M. and B. without naming the County in which c. is good as if the K. grants all the Lands of priors aliens without naming the County but the party in pleading must name the County and upon Non concessit pleaded it will appeare by the evidence and by circumstances what Mannor was granted but if he had demanded oyer and demurred it will be adjudged against him for it is matter in fact and the acts of confirmations extend not where the County is omitted but where the County is misnamed 2. The grant from a day past is good and the intent was that the Earle shall have the fees from that day but if that cannot be it shall be good for the time to come 3. The Earle had no power to make Deputies for three offices passe by these Letters Patents severally whereof this is the middle and to the first power is annexed to make Deputies but not to the second the words are Habendum offic praed with such a contraction To that the Court answered that this Habendum shall have relation to this office for it is intended that the Earle shall excercise this base office by Deputy for if a Sheriffe shall doe it a Fortiori an Earle 2. Admitting that he cannot make a Deputy this Non user is no cause of forfeiture for true it is when an office toucheth administration of Justice Non user without request is cause of forfeiture but if he be not bound to exercise it without request otherwise it is as here he is not bound by the Letters Patents to hold Courts untill he be required if an office be private and not for administration of Justice Non user without damage or request is no forfeiture 4. Resolved that the Writ and count were good although they were Vi armis and the difference is betweene Non feasans or negligence and mis-feasance that may be Vi armis therefore if one bring an Action upon the Case Quare vi armis he hindered men from comming to his Fayre which is Causa causans whereby he lost his toll which is Causa causata and the point of the Action this is good 5. The office not being meinorable it is in his election to have an Action of the Case or an assize otherwise it is of Land See five Exceptions taken to the Verdict Falsa Orthographia Non vitiat concessionem and the difference is betweene Writs and Grants Ille numerus sensus abbreviationum accipiendus est ut concessio non sit in anis and judgement was given for the Earle of R. Hickmots Case 8 Jacobi Com. banco fol. 52. IN Debt upon an Obligation the Defendant pleads a release which is in these words The Obligee confesseth himselfe to be discharged of all bonds c. and that he will deliver all but one bond whereupon the action is brought which was made by the Plaintiffe and another 1. Resol These words that the Obligee confesseth himselfe to be discharged of all bonds is a release and amounteth to that that the bonds are discharged 2. The exception extends to all the premises and not onely to the delivery 3. The Plaintiffe by confessing that the Obligation was made by another and the Defendant against whom onely he brought the Action had abated his owne Writ and after the Plaintiffe was Non-suited Batens Case 8. Jacobi fol. 53. A Quod permittat to abate a House levyed Ad nocumentum liberi tenementi I. P. and now of the Plaintiffe and Counts that the House of the Defendant doth juttie over the House of the Plaintiffe and judgement given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolved the Plaintiffe needs not shew how he had the estate of I. P. 2. The Writ is Ad nocumentum liberi tenementi I.P. and now of the Plaintiffe and counts to the Nusans of the Plaintiffe onely it is good for the levying in the time of I. P. imployeth a Nusans to him and he must shew a Nusans to himselfe to maintaine the action 3. If it appeare to the Court that the Nusans is to the damage of the Plaintiffe he needs not shew it specially as if the House of the Defendant hangeth over the House of the Plaintiffe as here for it appeareth that the light was stopped and that the raine discended Quod constat clare non debes Verificare and the Plaintiffe may abate the Nusans if he will the Statute of Westm 2. c. 24. which giveth the Quod permittat against the alienee of him who levyed the Nusans extends not to the alienee of the alienee The Poulters Case fol. 55. IF one were taken for the death of a man he was not bailable at the Common Law without a Writ De Odio acia which serveth not if he be appealed or indicted 2. If he be found not guilty upon the said Writ he was not bailable without a Writ De ponendo in ballivum 3. A Writ of conspiracy lyeth not before acquittall but the conspirators may be indicted or censured in the Starre-Chamber Confedracies punishable by Law before Execution ought to have 4. incidents 1. They must be declared by some manner of prosecution as was in this Case 2. They ought to be malicious and for revenge 3. They ought to be false against an innocent 4. They ought to be out of
the Lord Dyer made a Quaere of that if one of the Jurors die before Verdict be given a Tales shall be granted he who is meerly a Defendant cannot pray a Tales untill default be made by the Plaintiffe the number ought to be under the number in the principall pannell except in an appeale because there the Defendant may challenge peremptorily the number shall be diminished in every new Tales and they ought to be of the same quality with the former as if the principall pannell were Per medietatem linguae so shall the Tales be Justices of Assize shall not award a Tales de circumstantibus in an Assize for the Statute of 35. H. 8. c. 6. speaketh where the Triall is Habeas corpora distringas or Nisi prius for an Assize cannot be taken by Nisi prius but must be taken in the proper County and after by advice of all the Justices of the common place and Barons of the Exchequer the judgement was affirmed Humphrey Lofields Case 10. Jacobi fol. 106. In debt upon Bond. D. Leased for a yeare to H. L. and if the parties shall please to renue the terme at the end of that yeare that he shall have for three yeares rendring 40 l. per annum H. L. bindeth himselfe to performe Covenants and faileth of payment of 20 l. at Christmas Quarter D. bringeth debt It was resolved for the Plaintiffe It was objected against the action 1. That the reservation was upon a contingency if the terme shall revive 2. Because the reservation is durante termino praedicto Viz. the last terme 3. The reservation shall be taken strictly because the words of the Lessor But it was resolved that the reservation extendeth to the first yeare for the proper place of a reservation is after the limitation of the estate as if a Lease be made with diverse remainders over reserving Rent this goeth to all and although the second terme be in contingency yet the first is certaine and Termino praedicto signifieth both the termes for it is Nomen collectivum and the reservation shall be taken reasonably according to the intent of the parties Tenant in taile of an Acre in borough English and of another by the Common Law by an Oxe dyeth having issue two Sons the service shall not be increased And Increase is onely betweene very Lord and very Tenant for there may be an increaser but not where there is a reservation or if the Seigniory be by Deed and services are reserved within time of memory for he shall have no more then he himselfe reserved In the Case at Barre in respect the obligation was forfeited the Court moved the Plaintiffe to take his arrerages costs and damages with which he was contented and so no judgement was given Arthur Legats Case in subversion of pestilent Patents of theevish Concealors 10. Jacobi fol. 109. in Communi Banco THe King ex certa scientia c. grants fifteene Acres as concealed which were parcell of a Mannor of the profits whereof the King was answered Nothing passeth 1. Resol If the King were answered of the old Rent of the Mannor and the Fermors c. suffer one to intrude in part this is not concealed 2. The grant is voyd for quae quidem c. is the suggestion of the party 2. This is a clause of restraint and nothing passeth which is not concealed 3. The King did not intend to diminish his Revenue which will be if the grant be good 4. The clause quae quidem hath a double conjunctive concelata detenta and Land cannot be detained from the King 3. Ex mero motu c. aydeth it not 4. If the Officers of the King may by matter of Record have notice of putting the Land in charge in Court of Record and doe it not yet this is not concealed and if the clause quae quidem be added for more certainty the grant shall not be vicious by it if it be false as if a Mannor be granted quod quidem was in the tenure of I. S. where it was not this is good If one substract or take the Kings Rents this is not concealed for the King may charge him as Baily and the Law will make a privity See the Statute of 4. H. 4 cap. 4. called in the Rolle Brangwyn in English White Crow And it was sayd that Perpetuities Monopolies and Patents of concealement were borne under one unfortunate constellation for as soone as they came in question judgement was ever given against them and none ever for them and they have all two inseperable qualities Viz. to be troublesome and fruitlesse Robert Pilfolds Case 10. Jacobi fol. 115. THe Plaintiffe in trespasse counts to damages of 40 l. and at the Nisi prius the Jury assessed for damages 49 l. and 20 s. costs at the day in banke hee released 9 l. parcell of the damages and had judgement of 40 l. and 10 l. for costs de incremento the defendant brings error because the damages and costs surmount the summ in the Count but judgement was affirmed for in reall actions before the Statute of Glocester 6. E. 1. cap. 1. no damages were recoverable but in personall actions and mixt they were and by that Statute a man shall have costs in all cases where he recovers damages Viz. before or by the same Statute therefore if after this damages are given where they were not at the Common Law costs shall not be recovered as in a Quare impedit but if a Statute after this give double or treble damages where damages and costs were by the common Law there the Plaintiffe shall recover the damages increased and costs also but in waste against tenant for life costs shall not be recovered for although that this Statute was at the same Parliament yet it was an act of Creation and therefore no costs And true it is that damages include costs in a generall sense but in the count it is taken for damages before the action brought in a relative signification therefore expensae litis may be added to it although he count not of them as a man shall doe in reall actions without counting of them because he shall recover them pending the Writ In entrie sur disseisin the Plaintiffe shall recover damages from the disseisin to the Writ of Inquiry c. and if the issue be tryable by verdict c. to the verdict but in a Praecipe of Rent of his owne possession hee shall recover all arreares to the judgement Judgement affirmed by all Cheyneyes Case 10. Jacobi fol. 118. IN a Valore maritagij issue is joyned upon the tenure and found for the Plaintiffe but the Jury did not inquire of the value Adjudged the verdict is insufficient and shall not be supplyed by a Writ of Inquiry 1. In this Writ three things are to be recovered the value damages and costs and although the issue be joyned upon the tenure yet as a consequent upon the issue and their charge they ought to
but of payment of them notwithstanding the mistaking of the conclusion doth not vitiate the Count when the cause to have a prohibition is good 2. The plea of the Defendant to have a prohibition is not good because he traverseth the conclusion Viz. The prescription of discharge where he ought to traverse the prescription of unity for the conclusion is not traversable and because it is matter in Law 3. The issue is not well joyned 1. The matter of discharge is by reason of discharge by the Statute and the issue is by discharge at the common Law 2. In every issue there must be an affirmative and a negative but here is no affirmative for the conclusion is no affirmative but an inference 4. The impropriation is sufficient although the License were generall and the incumbent living for it shall be construed in such a speciall sence that it may take effect and the License is alwayes generall for the incumbent may dye or resigne before the impropriation 5. Admitting the impropriation void it had not beene made good by 35. Eliz. c. 3. for this settles in the K. all possessions of Abbeys with qualification notwithstanding any defect in any surrender c. which intitleth the K. and this defect is not within this qualification but if the impropriation had been good by reputation and so used this had beene given by the Statutes of 27. 31. H. 8. 6. If the Jury found matter to barre the Plaintiffe this is not to be regarded because an attaint lyeth not nor the Witnesses punished for perjury that matter not being materiall to the issue 7. Resolved that perpetuall unity untill the dissolution is by the Statute Prima facie a discharge of payment of Tithes except that the Fermors have paid Tithes and such an unity ought to be Justa aequalis that is fee in one and other Perpetua libera but if the Abbey were founded within time of memory he cannot at all and here it appeareth that the impropriation was made in 20. H. 8. so that it appeareth to the Court that before that the 20. acres were charged with Tythes for of common right all Lands ought to pay Tithes therefore the Chiefe Justice concluded that the said 20. acres as this Case is were chargeable with Tythes but in regard the information is good and the plea Pro consultatione habenda altogether insufficient and the Verdict impertinent to the issue they would not grant a consultation Doctor Grants Case 11. Jacobi Communi Banco fol. 15. In a prohibition 1. REsolved it is a good prescription that every Inhabitant in a Parish have paid 2. s. in the pound of the value of their houses per annum in Lieu of Tithes because it may have a lawfull comencement for it may be that this was so time out of mind for the Lands whereupon the Houses were built as a Modus decimandi 2. That the Parson may sue for it in the Court Christian for that it is in the nature of Tithes and every ancient City and Borough had for the most part such a custome for their Houses for the maintainance of their Parson and obvensions include oblations rents or other revennues and after a consultation was granted Sir Henry Nevills Case 11. Jacobi fol. 17. IT was resolved that a customary Mannor may be holden of another Mannor and there may be Lord Mesne and Tenant of it and such a customary Lord may hold Courts and grant Coppies and such a Mannor shall passe by surrender and admittance and fines shall be paid upon alienation or discent and if it be forfeited the Lord shall have the services as anexed to the Mannor so if Tenant at will c. admit Copy-holders reserving rent this shall goe with the Mannor after the will determined and so note a difference betweene reservations at the common Law and by the custome of the Mannor And it was said that the Mannor of Aylesham in Norfolke is holden by Copy and others in diverse other places And judgement was affirmed in Error Doctor Ayrayes Case 11. Jacobi fol. 18. 14. E 3. the K. Lycensed R. de E. to Found in Oxford a Hall sub nomine aulae Scholarium Reginae de Oxonio in the exemplification 8. Jac. it was Sub nomine aulae Reginae de Oxonio they present to the Church by the name of praeposit Coll. Reginae in Vniversitat Oxonio sociâ—r Schollar ejusdem the incumbent deviseth the Rectory and they by the name of praeposit Socior Scholar Aulae vel Collegij reginae in Vniversitate Oxonii confirme the demise and notwithstanding these variances it was adjudged that as well the confirmation as the presentation was good and the sole doubtfull variance is that it was Aulae Reginae where it ought to be Aulae Scholarium Reginae but good for the true name of the Colledge is so for the word Scholarium is not necessary but once and if it be taken in construction to come after Aulae the provost will be the sole Corporation by the name of praeposit Aulae Scholar reginae Ergo it doth precede in good construction Also the Founder named it so and so it hath beene alwayes taken and if there be a small variance this is not to the purpose if it be so described that another cannot be meant as a gift Omnibusfilijs I.S. or filiae I.S. when there is but one or if Richerus Abbot of W. grant by the name of Richardus Nil facit error nominis cum de corpore constat and this was the ancient and constant Opinion in Case of Corporations See the Case of the Major and Burgesses of Lin in the tenth Booke Henry Harpurs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 23. IN ejectione firme upon a Lease to J. W. in unam capellam and Land in W. in the Parish of B. and Tithes without shewing the certainty of them the Visne was from B. the Case was Sir H. B. seized of G. of the value of 30 l. per annum and of N. of the annuall value of 18 l. in capite covenanted to stand seized to the use of him and his Wife in taile with remainders in taile the reversion to himselfe and after purchaseth Lands in Socage and deviseth them to be sould by his Executors the matter in Law resolved but no judgement given because diverse exceptions taken c. 1. Resol That if tenant of the King in capite conveyes his Land to one of the uses c. and after purchase Socage he may devise all the Socage 2. A seck revertion upon an estate taile shall hinder the devise of Socage Land for a third part 3. Although the reversion in fee continue in him yet he may devise two parts of the Socage and all if he had granted the reversion over 4. Although he had exercised his power in making a Joynture of more then two parts yet if the reversion in fee had not hindred he might have devised all the Socage purchased after howsoever the
4. In this Case by grant of the reversion generally or of the Tenements the Trees passe for the inheritance of all the Land passeth and thereby the Trees annexed to it the disseisee by his entry shall have the Corne upon the ground as well as the Grasse by relation of continuance of possession but this relation is not of effect to have a trespasse against any but the first disseisor for in fictione juris semper aequitas existit and the emblements shall be recovered in damages 5. In the Case at Barr by exception of the Trees power is reserved to the lessor or his servants to enter and show the Trees to the Vendee Cuicunque aliquis quid concedit concedere videtur id c. 6. The plea in Barr is insufficient for he showeth that there was another joyntenant for life not named in the Writ and demands Judgement if action which is an unapt conclusion 2. The Plea is double one to the Writ another to the Action 3. He pleads the entry of the lessees for life which is surplusage 4. Hee averreth not that the Trees which were sold were nor Dotards which are excluded out of the exception but that they de jure pertinebant to R. L. which is not formall but upon all the matter there appeared sufficient cause to give Judgement against the Plaintiffe and therefore by the rule of the Court Quaerens nil capiat per billam The Case of the Taylors of Cloaths c. of Ipswich 12. Jacobi fol. 53. THe Taylors of I. make an Ordinance that none shall exercise the Trade in I. if he have not been an Apprentice for seven yeares and if hee doe not appeare before them to be approved upon forfeiture of five Marks and for breach of it bring debt the Defendant pleads that he was reteined by A. P. to be a domestick Servant and that he made Garments by his command 1. Resol At the Common Law none may be prohibited to exercise any Trade although he hath never been an Apprentice and be ignorant but if he misdoe any thing an action of the Case lyeth 2. This Ordinance for so much as is not prohibited by the Statute of 5. Eliz. is against Law for after seven yeares Apprentiship he may exercise his Trade without allowance of any 3. The Statute of 5. Eliz. doth not prohibite the private exercise of any Trade in a Family therefore this is out of the said Ordinance 4. The Statute of 19. H. 7. cap. 7. doth not corroborate any Ordinance against Law if it be allowed but the allowance dischargeth the penalty of 40 l. for putting in use any ordinances which are against the Prerogative of the King or the common profit of the people and Judgement was given Quod querentes nil caperent per billam Edward Savells Case 12. Jacobi fol. 55. AN Ejectione firmae lyeth not of a Close but it must be of a certaine number of Acres and the nature of them must be shewed A Writ shall not abate for want of order Viz. Of a House before Land c. and judgement was stayed Benthams Case 12. Jacobi fol. 56. IF damages or costs are omitted or not well assessed by the Jury if the Plaintiffe release them he may have his judgement and it shall not for that be reversed Insufficient assessement of damages and no assessing is all one Doctor Fosters Case concerning Recusants 12. Jacobi fol. 56. AN Information was preferred against a Recusant by an Informer Tam pro domino rege quam pro seipso before the recusant was convicted for 220. l. that is 20. l. a Moneth for a 11. Moneths absence from the Church c. And judgement given against the Defendant 1. Resolved that he may be convicted to satisfie the Statute of 23. Eliz. in this same Suite and convicted shall be taken for attainted for he shall forfeit nothing before judgement 2. The Branch of distribution in the Act of 23. Eliz. extendeth as well to the clause of penalty for recusancy as to that of hearing or saying Masses for it is all one to say shall forfeite and shall forfeite to the King 2. Diverse acts of Parliament give the penalty to the King and yet after make a distribution thereof to another who will sue as 3. H. 6. cap. 3. 3. H. 7.3 3. He against whom judgement is given upon demurrer or default or otherwise is convicted within the Statute for he is attainted which implieth it for it is so found by the Judges so by the Statute of 8. H. 6. treble damages are given where a disseisin is found to be with force this extends to a judgement by Nihil dicit or default 4. The Statute of 28. Eliz. doth not take away the Statute of 23. which giveth liberty to the informer c. for 1. It is made for more speedy execution of it 2. It doth not alter the suite of the party but of the King and leaveth the Informer as he was before 3. The Act of 28. giveth not the penalty to any new person for it was given to the K. by 23. Eliz. 4. The Statute of 28. extends onely to Indictments and toucheth not informations 5. The Defendant is not within 28. Eliz. if he be not convicted at the suite of the K. Ergo this is left as before 6. Because the Statute is in the affirmative and they may stand together but the Statute of 28. alters the Statute of 23 in this that it confineth Suites against Recusants in the K. Bench or Assizes c. which clause extends as well to the suite of the informer as of the Queene and the Statute of 35. Eliz. and 3. Jacobi inlarge the Jurisdiction as to Suites of the K. and touch not the suite of the party 5. The Statute of 35. taketh not away the Action popular given by 23. for it was made to give more speedy remedy and not to take it away a feme Covert is within the Statute of 23. and 1. Eliz. but before the Statute 35. Eliz. if a Feme Covert had been indicted of recusancy the forfeiture should not have been levyed of the goods of the Husband because he was not party thereunto otherwise in an Information or Debt brought by the informer and in that that the Statute of 35. is that the K. shall recover all the paines c. in such sort c. this alters the remedy onely as to the Queene for now shee may proceede by action as for recovery of any other Debt by the Common Law in such manner as 1. H. 7. c. 1. giveth a Formedon against Parnor of the profits c. also 35. Eliz. is in the affirmative and although it giveth the penalty of 20. l. by the Moneth yet it taketh not away 1. Eliz. which giveth 12. d. for every Sonday and Holy day and where this Statute saith that the conviction shall be in the K. B. or at the Assizes yet the Justices of Peace and others authorized by 23. may take