default when as otherwyse the prouidence of God vsed theyr wickednes to hys glorye and to set forth hys iustice God vsed theyr wickednes to hys glory We must not desist frō teching though men seeme not to profyte therby The true doctrine is herein profytable in the vngodly namely they should be condemned themselues Thus much they profited through their sinnes that the doctrine and knowledge which they obtayned furthered them to iudgement and condemnation Wherfore we ought not to be feared away from teaching though we sée that men become nothing the better forasmuch as the selfe same thyng happeneth vnto that doctrine which God hym selfe ministreth vnto vs. At the least way thys commoditie shall therby aryse if men bee not of God conuerted yet shall they by theyr owne iudgement and testimonie be condemned And thys thyng chieflye séemeth God to will namely then to appeare righteous when he punisheth or condemneth The profite that Iudas the betrayer receaued by the doctrine of Christ was at the length to condemne hym selfe saying I haue sinned in deliuering the iuste bloude For to that poynt are the vngodly driuen at the length by their own iudgement to be condemned And such which ought to haue taken profite by the doctrine are by the same greuously hurt which thyng we read in Esaie the Prophet when it is sayd Make blinde the harte of thys people Stoppe their eares and shutte their eyes Least peraduenture they shoulde see heare and vnderstand and bee conuerted and I shoulde heale them So also by the wordes of Moyses was the hart of Pharao alwayes more and more hardened Because when they knew God they glorisied him not as God neither were they thankefull Here is added a reason why they were without excuse And The Methode of Paule not to go confusedly to worke this is the methode which Paule vseth He made mencion of the naturall knowledge which ought to haue bene to the Ethnikes a most profitable lawe how to leade their life namely to expresse in maners that which by knowledge they vnderstoode Now he accuseth thē of the transgression of this lawe And his accusation contayneth two principall poyntes First he layeth to their charge the contempt of the worshipping of God and The principall poynts of the accusation ingratitude towardes hym which thynges pertayne vnto the mynde then he accuseth them for that they attributed vnto Images which they themselues had made and vnto creatures that honour whiche was due vnto God only And to the ende he would exaggerate or amplyfye these sinnes he sheweth how Sinnes are aggrauated by the greuousnes of punishments they escaped not vnreuenged For fyrst God tooke vengeance vpon their wickednes with thys punishment that he blynded theyr hart and theyr mynde waxed foolishe so that they which aboue other professed learning and wisdom appeared most fooles of all and theyr reasones whiche they counted wittye were made frustrate and became vtterly vayne The punishement of the other sinne namely of the inuention of Idoles was that they should contaminate themselues with most fylthy vices By this order of accusation is gathered Idolatry springeth not but frō a corrupted minde A place of Ieremy that idolatry taketh not place vnles error or to speake more playnly sinne first haue place in the mind And those things which are here spokē of these two principall vices are bewayled of Ieremy in the 2. chap. when he sayth Be astonished O ye heauens be afrayde and excedingly abashed For my people hath committed two greuous thinges They haue forsaken me the fountayne of the water of life and haue digged for themselues cesternes which are not able to hold water To forsake God is to take away the worshipping due vnto him and true geuing of thankes And to make and worship Images is to make cesternes out of whiche can not be The Methode of the two fyrst commaundements drawen the waters of helpe and grace The selfe same order we fynde in the first table of the tenne commaundementes For God first commaundeth that he be worshipped alone then in the second precept he commaundeth that we take not vnto our selues any other Gods And vndoubtedly if we depart from the true God it is not possible but that straight waye shoulde spring forth idolatrye Because will we or nyll we we can not be without a God Wherefore take away him which is the true God out of our hartes and of necessitye We cannot be without some God an other fayned God must be substituted in his place And Chrisostome hath profitably noted that euen as they which walke or sayle by night without light do oftentymes hit agaynst some rocke or stumblyng blocke and miserablye perishe fo farre is it of that that they come to the place they determined to come vnto so they which depart from the light of the doctrine set forth vnto vs by The naturall knowlege whych we haue of God is weake God must needes of necessitie fall into most greuous euils By these thinges which the Apostle now speaketh is easely perceaued that this was a weake knowledge which the Ethnikes had naturally touching God for asmuch as it altered thē not but rather was ouercome with lustes which darkened that minde They glorified him not as God neyther vvere they thankfull By these wordes he describeth the worshipping which they ought to haue performed in Foure principal points of the true worshipping of God mynde and in spirite whereof we haue before written at large and haue reduced the whole matter vnto fower principall poyntes namely vnto prayers hope thankes geuing and the feare or obeysance which good children haue towardes their parentes For then we worshippe God truly when we wholy submitte our selues vnto him so that we embrace him aboue all thinges and aboue our selues also And all this is expressed in that commaundement Thou shalte loue thy Lorde thy God wythall thy harte wyth all thy soule and wyth all What is to glorify God thy strengthes And this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Paule here vseth which is translated to gloryfye signifyeth chiefely to iudge very well and honorably of a man But how sclenderly the Philosophers iudged of the prouidence of god of hys iudgements of his rewards I say punishements their opinions which are euery where abroade do sufficiently declare If a man should demaunde what it is that doth chiefely gloryfye god I would answere that it is fayth Which Fayth doth most of all glorify god thyng I affirme not of my selfe but the scripture teacheth it for afterward it is sayd of Abraham that when god had promised vnto him an heyre by Sara his wife he considered not hys body being in a maner dead nor the wombe of Sara now past childe bearing but gaue glory vnto God For he iudged so honorably of hym that although he saw that by mans power that could not be performed Who they be that do truly geue thankes
lawe increaseth sinne because he which sinneth knowing and wittingly is more greuously to be accused then he which sinneth He that sinneth knowing and wittingly is more greuously to be accused vnawares The lawe of nature was nowe so decaied that it wincked at many thinges For many counted lust for no sinne yea rather they semed happy which could obtaine that which they lusted for But when this voyce sounded from heauen thou shalt not lust man began to consider that lust was vnhonest and filthy Wherefore when he endeuoured to striue against it being destitute of strength as Agustine saith he found not a victory but captiuitye For he saw now that he was a bondsclaue vnto it Farther sinne is therefore increased by the lawe because in it we see paynes and punishementes set forth In the lawe we see the paines and punishmeÌ„ts of sinners vnto sinners Whereby it commeth to passe that men hauing their conscience accusing them leape backe from God as froÌ„ a seuere iudge and cruell reuenger And when they haue begon once to hate him they rather throwe theÌ„selues hedlong into any euil then that they will light vpon him Fourthly Chrisostome saith that the lawe of nature containeth a few and certayne briefe preceptes By the law of Moses the law of nature is deuided and distinct into many parts Before the law sinne was on slepe and halfe deade That grace should abound sins being incresed is not true in all men The law and aboundaunce of sinne are not the perfect causes of saluatioÌ„ which are amplified by the lawe of God For that it hath deuided those fewe into many partes whereby is augmented a heape of preceptes And because vnto euery commaundement his proper transgression is repugnant therefore sinnes may seeme also to be increased Neither doth the lawe by these meanes which we haue alledged onely increase sinne but also accuse and condemne it Wherefore in the first to the Corrinthians he saith that the lawe is the power of sin because they which sinne are by it proued guilty But these thinges are not so to be vnderstand as though there had bene no sinne before the lawe For there was sinne in dede but it was on sleepe and halfe deade Wherefore Paul in the 7. chapter of this epistle saith when the commaundement came sinne reuiued Which words declare that sinne was also before although it were not felt Farther we must note that the connexion betwene the law and the increase of sinne is vniuersall and pertaineth vnto all men but the connexioÌ„ which is betweene sinne increased grace abounding hath not place but only in the elect and predestinate For in the reprobate after sinne was by the law increased sorrow and griefe which come thereby engendreth desperation For these are not the full causes of saluation but instruments by which God vseth to deliuer his And the nature of instrumentes is that if a man remoue from them the power of the principal agent of themselues they bring to passe nothing God doth in dede What is the nature oâ— instruments God by certain meanes prepareth or bringeth vs to regeneration An â—â—ror of the Sophisters God vseth euell things to our saluation vse the law the feeling of sinne and terrors of paynes wherby to prepare away to iustification And although before our conuersion the same be sinnes yet by them he prepareth our minds but yet not with that kinde of preparatioÌ„ which the Sophisters haue fayned For they affirme that a man by these meanes deserueth grace as they are accustomed to say of congruency which thinge we haue in an other place declared to be repugnant vnto the holy scriptures But we graunt that as touchinge Gods behalfe there is a preparation for he vseth these meanes whereof some are of theyr owne nature euill and directeth them to a good end which ought to be ascribed only to his most wise prouidence But that grace hath abounded euen this thing may teache vs for that the Elect doo not only obteyne remission of sinnes by Christe but also are adopted to be the How grace is sayd to abound children of God made brethren of Christ heyres of God and fellow heires of Christ and they reioyce also in tribulations and in the hope of the glory of God God dealeth as good phisitions vse to doo which doo not only heale the disease but also doo adde strength and forme which the sicke man had not before But it semeth more agreable that Paul should haue sayd that sinne beinge augmented paynes and punishementes should haue more abounded for that doo sins deserue But he inuerteth his oration and in stede of paynes and punishements Paule inuerteth hys oration sayth that grace abounded Which thing we first fele by our owne experience to be true For we which were before oppressed with griefe and in a maner consumed with sinnes when we se our selues to be reconciled vnto God can not but count it for a most singular benefite For he which hath the more forgeuen him forasmuch as he feleth the greater gift loueth the more Farther the common people commonly weigh and esteme giftes by the consideration of the necessity that went before Wherfore forasmuch as sin being increased was after a sort vnmeasurable the grace also which should blot out the same ought likewise to What it is to haue the gospell preached vnto them that are in misery Of the nature of the law The Manichies and Pelagians vnderstood it nor be in amaner vnmeasurable By this place we may vnderstand what it is to haue the Gosple preached to meÌ„ broken in misery as it is written in Esay and what that is that Christ called vnto him those which were in trauaile and were laden For they which fele not themselues to be such come not vnto him when he calleth them Here I thinke it good somewhat briefly to speake of the nature of the Law and therewithall to declare how the Maneches and Pelagians vnderstood it not and what it worketh in vs ether before regeneration or after we be iustified First as touching the forme therof we may affirme the self same thing that Paul sayth in this epistle when he writeth that it is spirituall But the vniuersall end therof which pertayneth vnto all men is to bring men to the knowledge of sinne Which thing Paul hath both here signified and also before manifestly tought saying that by the law is the knowledge of sinne Here if a man aske why the Apostle sayd not rather by the law is the knowledg of righteousnes I answere bycause a man that is not yet regenerate so long as he is without Christ can not haue within himselfe the fealing of good workes or of true righteousnes which satisfieth the law of God Wherefore when he compareth his doings with the law he findeth them to be nothing but onely falles and transgressions But if we speake of the end of the law as touching the elect the same is
incline our hartes that we may walke in hys wayes and wyth Paul to the Thessalonians The Lord direct your hartes in patience and in the wayting for of Christ. And Solomon in his prouerbes sayth The hart of the kinge is in the hand of God and to what end he wyll he enclineth it These testemonyes sufficiently declare that it is the worke of God and not our worke to be conuerted vnto hym and to liue vprightly Here some obiect vnto vs the commaundementes which are set forth vnto vs in the holy scriptures for they séeme to signifie that it lieth in our selues to performe the thinges which are commaunded For Esay sayth If ye will and wyll harken vnto me ye shall eate the good thynges of the earth And the Lord oftentimes commaundeth vs to conuert our selues vnto him Be ye conuerted sayth he vnto me I wyll not the death of a sinner I had rather he should be conuerted and lyue And when he had published abroade the lawe he sayd that the had set before them life and death blessing and cursing And infinite such other like testemonies mought be brought But here we ought to consider that these thinges in Commaundements in deede are geuen but we are not taught that is lieth in humane strengthes to performe them By the law of God we must measure our infirmity and not our strengthes dede are commaunded vnto men but we are no where tought that a man is able to performe them by his owne proper strengthes Neither is it mete that by the preceptes of the lawe of God we should gather the power of our strengthes as though we of our owne accord are able to performe so much as the lawe of God commaundeth Yea rather hereby is to be measured our infirmity that when we sée that the excellency and dignity of the commaundementes of God infinitly passeth our strenthes we should remember that the law hath a certayne other end then to be performed of vs. That ende Paul declareth to be sondry and diuers By the lawe sayth he commeth the knowledge of sinne which lawe he sayth was therfore geuen that the number of transgressions mought be increased For by this meanes the lawe is made a scholemaster to leade men vnto Christ that when they sée themselues oppressed with the waight of the commaundementes and with the greatnes of sinnes they should vnderstand that their saluation lieth only in the mercy of God in the redemption of Christ For when we perceaue our owne imbecillity and vnworthynes straight way we beginne to pray vnto God that he would both forgeue our sinnes through Christ and also minister vnto vs the helpe of his spirite that we may endeuor our selues vnto his will Geue what thou commaundest sayth Augustine and commaund what thou wylt Farther an other end of the law is that we should sée whereunto we must apply our selues It is possible also that if by the grace of God there be geuen an obedience begon men may frame thēselues vnto y◠law Lastly though in this life be not geuen vnto vs to be able exactly to satisfye the lawe yet in an other life when we haue caste of all this corruption we shall fully obtayne it And yet ought not God therefore to be accused of iniustice for it commeth not throughe his fault that his commaundements can not be obserued Neither can any of vs be excused for y◠we willingly Why God is not to be accused of iniustice desirously violate y◠law geuē vnto vs. The law was geuē as a thing most agréeable vnto our nature as it was first instituted For y◠image of God could not otherwise more liuely plainly be expressed And although by reason of sin we are not able to accōplish the law yet this at y◠least way we sée what maner ones we ought to be And that sentence which is commonly obiected that nothing is to be counted for sinne which dependeth not of election ought to be vnderstand as Augustine interpreteth it of that kind of sinne which is not a punishement of sinne For otherwise originall sinne is neither voluntary nor receaued by election But thou wilt say Seing the matter goeth so we shall séeme of necessity to sticke fast in sinne Which thing doubles I will not deny Although such is this necessity that it hath not compulsion ioyned with it God is of necessity good neither can he by any meanes sinne and yet is he not violently compelled to be good which thyng The necessity of sinning is without compulsion Augustine in his 22. booke De ciuitate dei and 30. chapter excellently well declareth Shall we sayth he for that God hymselfe can not sinne therefore deny that he hath free will Ambrose in his 2. booke and third chapiter de Fide to Gratian the emperor testefieth that God is free when as sayth he one and the selfe same spirite worketh all thinges diuiding vnto all as pleaseth him according to the choyse of hys free will and not for the dewty of necessity In these sentences of these fathers free wil is so taken that it is contrary vnto violence and compulsion not that it is equally prone to ether part Wherefore Ierome in his homely of the prodigall sonne which he wrote vnto damasus for that he tooke free will in an other sence therefore wrote otherwise For it is God only sayth he on whome sinne falleth not nether can fall But others forasmuch as they haue free will may be bowed to ether part Vnto blessed spirites also and angells forasmuch as theyr felicity is nowe confirmed this belongeth that they can not sinne Wherefore Augustine in his 22. booke de Ciuitate Dei the. 30. chapiter Euen as sayth he the first immortalitye whiche Adam thorough sin lost was that he mought not die so the first free wil was that he mought not sin but the last free wil shall be that he can not sin And yet notwithstanding there is graunted a certayne kinde of libertye not whereby they can be bowed to ether part but whereby although that which they do is of necessity yet are they not compelled or violentlye driuen For euen as there are certayne true thinges so manifest that the minde can not but assent vnto them so the presence of God A similitude Why the blessed can not sinne now reuealed and made manifest is so greate a good thing that the saintes can not fall away from it So also although we of necessity sinne before we be regenerate in Christe yet are not therefore the powers of the will violated for whatsoeuer we do we do it both willingly and also being induced by some certayne hope And yet are we not therefore to be counted nothinge to differ from brute beastes For they although they be moued by some certayne iudgmēt yet They that are not regenerate differ from brute beastes is it not by a free iudgement But in men although not yet regenerate there is still as we
when we are demaunded whether the workes of the law iustify we aunswere if a man vnderstand thē as they are vnperfect and mayned they haue no strength to iustify But if a Workes iustify not because they procede of iustification man vnderstand the workes of the law as they are whole and perfect so are they not strange from iustification because they haue faith ioyned with them whereunto they cleaue as vnto the roote Yet will we not graunt that good workes being taken euen after this maner do iustify for that they proceede of iustification do of necessity require iustification to go before them and therefore Why Paule calleth those workes the workes of the lawe which are mained and vnperfect are they not strange from it because they depend of it Thou wilt say peraduenture why doth Paule by the workes of the law vnderstand those mayned and vnperfecte workes Because he taketh them as the aduersaries did which had a respect only vnto them and were strangers both from Christ and also from fayth in him And that Paule did not thinke those to be in very deede the workes of the lawe it manifestly appeareth by that which is before written He is not a Iew which is only a Iew outward neyther is that circumcision which is in the flesh only Where a man may manifestly see that he taketh away the nature of the Iewish religion and of circumcision from the obseruation which is only outward And vndoubtedly the Images of good thinges if they haue only a shewe be in themselues vayne and ought to be counted among thinges A similitude worthy of disprayse As the art of Sophistry forasmuch as it hath a shewe of knowledge and wanteth it in very deede is condemned Hipocrisy also is to be detested which although it set forth a shew of holynes yet is it most farre of from it Wherefore if a man should agaynst the proper and true workes of the lawe vse those testimonies which Paule now alleageth and which to the like purpose he writeth in an other place vndoubtedly he should abuse them As if Another similitude a man should impute vnto true nobility those reproches which are iustly imputed vnto them which hauing had excellent noble pregenitors haue degenerated from them into most filthy vices Or if a man shoulde reproue eloquence after the selfe same maner that we are wont iustly to reproue those which only with fine and eloquent wordes do poynt out foolishe matter when as they are vtterly ignorant of the sound truth But as touching this matter let thys suffice at this present Now is this to be expounded why he addeth this particle Before God Vndoubtedly therefore that by the contrary we myght know that certayne may sometymes be iustified before men by the workes of the law Because forasmuch as the sight of man can not perce into the inward partes of the hart men do geue sentence by the workes But God as Augustine Before men we may be iustified by workes of the law writeth in his booke De spiritu litera beholdeth the hart and sometymes beholdeth them which outwardly kepe the lawe and inwardly desire rather to do otherwise were not eyther that punishementes hang ouer theyr heds or that they thinke that they should thereby lose their estimation when as in very dede they want both fayth and charity Neyther is this to be passed ouer that by the What is to be vnderstand by the name of flesh name of fleshe is vnderstand the whole man Which phrase of speach is much vsed in the scriptures The word was made fleshe All fleshe had corrupted his way All fleshe shall see the saluation of God And a greate many other such lyke And therefore is man so called that he might be continually admonished of his miserable and weake estate and that he should vnderstand that vnles the spirite of God should resist it he should vtterly be caried away with the appetite of the fleshe To iustify as we haue before said is taken three maner of wayes Sometymes To iustify taken three maner of wayes it is to obtayne a righteousnes which sticketh and abideth in our minds But such righteousnes Paule meaneth not in this place Otherwise we deny not but that of true workes of the law by continuall exercise of them are ingenerated good and holy habites or qualities To be iustified also is to be pronounced or to be counted iust Which thinges also may be gotten by workes For so one is sayd to iustifye an other when he beholdeth his good dedes God also in the last iudgement shall geue sentence according to workes and shall pronounce good men iust by those thinges which they vprightly haue done Thirdly to iustifye is as much to say as to forgeue sinnes to absolue a man and to impute vnto him the righteousnes of Christ which thing works by their deserte can not obtayne And in this sense are those thinges to be taken which the Apostle here writeth It followeth For by the lawe is the knowledge of sinne This is the reason why we are not iustified by the workes of the lawe Because the office of the lawe is farre other then to iustifie There are some which thinke that these wordes are spoken by preuention as though the Iewes should obiect and say If the law iustifye not why then was it geuen Haue we in vayne receaued it We haue not Although the lawe iustifie not yet was it not geuen in vayne The propriety to declar sinnes is cōmon to all lawes in vayne receaued it sayth Paule the office thereof is to shew sinnes If a man demaund of what lawe these thinges are spoken we aunswere that Paule doth priuately entreate of the law of Moses but the propriety which he bringeth is common to all lawes to the law of nature the lawe of Moses to ciuill lawes which we vse in our publike wealthes As touching the law of Moses and ours there is no doubt to be put As concerning the lawe of nature the booke of Genesis doth most manifestly teach that by it was sinne knowen Which thing Ambrose vpon this place alleadgeth out of the history of Ioseph And Paule also wyll afterward declare the same when he sayth For euen vnto the law sinne was in the world but it was not so counted namely because the law of nature was dayly more and more obfuscated Wherefore it was necessary that by the law of Moses and other lawes it should be agayne illustrated And that syn was before Moses time he thereby declareth because death raigned all that time ouer all mankind And in this place in the Greke is red 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in latine a man may call Agnitio that is an acknowledging which is when a thinge being alreadye knowne is againe called to knowledge But after what sorte the lawe is sayd to woorke the acknowledginge of sinnes he hath before taughte whē as by many testemonies of the
scriptures he accused all mankind Wherefore seinge by those woordes and such like we are accused of the law the knowledge of sinne must needes follow Whiche thing also happeneth an other waye namely when we beholde the law of God For sythen it commaundeth thinges vpright and prohibiteth thinges vnhonest it sufficiently declareth vnto vs how and when we sinne in our doinges The scripturs also conteineth the threateninges forespoken by the Prophetes and the punishmentes whiche God hath euer more inflicted vpon transgressors All whiche thinges not a little conduce to the acknowledging of sinne But this is to be meruailed at that seing the lawe Why the law is not said to shew honeste and good thinges doth set before our eyes not onely our sinnes but also thinges honeste and iuste For those thinges also doth it commaunde and therefore they pertayne to one and the selfe same knowledge euen as it belongeth to one artificer as to a Geometrician to declare what is a right line and what is a crooked line it is to be meruailed at I say what moued the Apostle to make mencion onely of sinne Whereunto may be aunswered that Paule so wrote partly because the Iewes whiche had refused Christ and his fayth had no more any parte with the righteousnes and vprightnes of the law partly also which is most likely because that other parte pertayned not vnto the purpose of Paule For hys purpose was to proue that the woorkes of the law iustify not Because forasmuch as it both accuseth and condemneth it is not to be looked for that it should iustefy when as these thinges are both contrary and also muche repugnaunte one to the other Neither commeth it to the law by chaunce to declare sinne but it is such a propriety so annexed vnto it which cannot be plucked away frō it But here ariseth What law geuers haue a regard vnto in geuing of lawes a doubt for lawgeuers seme not when they geue lawes to haue a regard to thys thing onely to make vs to vnderstand offences or things well done but this rather entend they by theyr lawes to make theyr citezens good Which thing if it be ascribed vnto men much more oughte it to be attributed vnto God But we A difference betwene the lawes of mā and the lawes of God aunswere that there is a difference betwene the lawes of God and the lawes of man because mans lawes require nothinge of vs but that whiche lieth in our power to do For as touching the affections of the minde they are not carefull they correct onely outward thinges But the lawes of God do cōmaunde those thinges also which we being as we are weake are not able to performe Wherfore the similitude which they bring concludeth nothinge Farther this is to be considered that humane lawes also by declaring what thinges are to be done by promising and by threatninge may inuite and stirre vp men vnto righteousnes But to change the mind they cannot Wherfore we ought not to attribut◠more vnto them then vnto the lawes of God And that whiche is sayde of the entent and purpose of the humane lawgeuer we graunte of God also that his entente also in geuinge his law was to saue men by it namely as wherein he did not onely shew sinnes but also Christe whiche is the ende thereof And therefore The law is profitable vnto saluation we deny not but that the lawe is profitable to men vnto saluatiō And yet can it not iustefy because the office thereof is not to poure into our harts either faith or charitye Wherefore the wonderfull wilines of Sathan is to be taken heede oft whereby he goeth about to plucke away from men the fruites of the lawe And vndoubtedly besides the knowledge of sinne it brought two other excellent good Besides the knowledge of sinne two commodities of the lawe The deuill hath bene an enemy vnto the law of God The law aggrauateth sinne thinges First it shewed vnto vs our sauiour farther it prescribed vnto vs what was best to be done As touching the first the deuell hath obscured the hartes of men that they should not behold Christ whiche is the ende of the law puttinge a vayle before theyr hartes And as touchinge the execution of good woorkes he hath hindred them by trieflinge questions genealogies and vayne bablinges so that they beinge bent vnto them onely and vnto outwarde ceremonies had no farther regard In wordes forsooth they confessed that they knew God but in deedes they denied him Farther forasmuch as by the law sinne is known it followeth that by it sinnes are after a sorte aggrauated Whiche thing the Apostle declared when he wrote that the law is the power of synne And in this Epistle the vii chapter it is written That synne mighte be out of measure synfull throughe the commaundemente By the law sayth he is the knowledge of sinne This is to certaine that The groūd o◠all lawes is a deuine minde Vniust lawes are not lawes the deuine minde is the beginning and ground of all lawes For in any decree◠whatsoeuer is found either iust or honest that altogether there hence proceedeth So that we may rightly say that all lawes are nothing els but the ordinances of the deuine minde Whereby is concluded that such lawes which are not iust ought not to be counted for lawes The knowledge of sinne which is had by the law is of two sortes one whiche is vtterly of no efficacy and weake whereby The knowledge of sin two sortes mens mindes are not made afrayd nor the consciences deiected as sometimes we se dronkardes which euen in the middest of theyr cuppes condemne the vice of dronkennes The Poets also in theyr verses and meeters most openly reproued sinnes but yet they themselues refrayned not from them any more then others But that knowledge of sin which terrefieth doth not alwayes bringe saluation Because if it be frustrated of hope of remedye it is hurtefull as it happened in Iudas Esau and Caine who when they knewe theyr wickendes fell into dispayre But as touchinge the electe vnto the knowledge of sinnes is alwayes ioyned as a companion hope of obteyning saluation by Christ The sins whiche How manifold sinne is whiche is knowne by the law are knowne by the lawe if we rehearse them by theyr partes are these firste the sinne which from our birth cleaueth vnto vs which is called originall sinne and it is the vice and corruption of our whole nature of whiche we are toughte in the psalme In iniquity was I conceaued and in sinnes hath my mother conceaued me secondly the motions and vehement impulsions which the Grecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 do continuallye flowe out of that corruption and resiste the lawe of God Of which Paule writeth that he felt an other law in his members repugnaunte vnto the law of his minde and leading hym a way captyue into the law of sinne Then thirdelye commeth the consent of the
And before in this epistle by the law is said to come the knowledge of sinne Wherfore a man may not without iust cause meruaile what moued Paul to write so like things so oftentymes of the lawe But we oughte to consider that it is moste What was Paules entente when he wrote of the law lykely that in the primitiue church when Christ beganne euery where to be receued the deuill craftely inuented an other new deuise to extol the law by all manner of meanes that it mought be had in estimation not onely of the Iewes but also of the Gentles that in the mean time Christian religion mought be weakened and cleane taken away And he blinded the eyes of men that none should haue an eye vpon Christ which was the end of the law And lest any man should by often reading of the law attaine to any commoditie he found the meanes that mē gaue themselues to brawling about wordes and old wiues questions Wherefore Paul was brought to this point that either he must reiect the lawe of God or els haue wincked at the lettes of the Gospell Wherfore by great aduise he teacheth thrée thinges For first considering the law of God by it self and in his owns nature he with worthy praises extolleth it and therewithall sheweth what euils by it come vnto vs thorough our owne default Secondly he teacheth that Christ is the ende of the law last of al he cutteth of brawlings contencions disputations and vnprofitable questions and which make nothyng to the purpose These self same things in a maner happen also in our tymes Our aduersaries cry out Good workes good workes as though we were agaynst them Farther they wyll not that the people As the false Apostles pretended the defence of the law so do our aduersaries now pretend the defence of good works What we must teache concerning good woorkes What they are that are the instrumentes of the deuell should vnderstād the mercy grace of God benefite of Christ Lastly they continually braule contend to hinder the iust reformation of the church so continually prolong the tyme to the ende nothyng shoulde be put in execution But let vs learne of Paul how we may warely and wisely resist them Let vs leaue vnto good workes their dignitie but yet not in such sorte to attribute more vnto them then either the truth and holy scriptures will suffer or els is agreable with our weake nature Farther let vs as plainly as we can out of the holy scriptures declare the grace of God and benefite of Christ Lastly let vs abstayne from superfluous and contentious questions By these wayes and meanes may we well withstand the deuill Neither doth the diuell these things by himselfe but alwayes findeth instrumentes apte for his wicked purpose whome Paule calleth deceitfull workers which transforme themselues into aungels of light and euery where sowe discordes and offences bewitching mē that are in the ryght course and leadyng men from Christ to estimation of themselues He calleth them moreouer thynges cut of dogges enemies of the crosse of Christ whose God is the belly and end destruction which wyll be teachers of the law and yet in the meane tyme know not what they affirme and speake whiche by a fayned modesty and affliction of the flesh and worshippyng of angels and religion of themselues deuised take away from men the reward of saluation which after they haue fallen away from the loue which procedeth from a pure hart a good conscience and an vnfeined faith turne themselues to vayne speaches and range and creepe abrode like a canker which although in wordes they say they know God yet in dedes they deny hym With these coulours doth the Apostle paint forth false ministers against whome he had muche to do Vnto whome they are not vnlike which in our dayes withstand the restoryng of religion Hitherto he hath vsed reasons ab absurdo that is driuing to an absurditie If the inheritaunce should consist of the law then should faith be vayne and the promise of none effect and to affirme either of them were very absurd His argument he hereby proued for that the law worketh anger and is alwayes ioyned with some transgression Now he proueth by a direct reason that the inheritaunce consisteth of faith namely that it might be of grace to the ende the promise should be firme As if he should haue sayd it behoueth that the nature of Gods promises be kept For such is the nature thereof that it be certayne and come fréely But it can not be certayne and come fréely vnlesse we be made heyres by fayth and not by the lawe Therfore is the inheritaunce geuen by fayth that it might come by grace and that the promise might be firme to all the sede not to that onely which is of the law but also to that which is of the fayth of Abraham who is the father of vs all as it is written I haue made thee a father of many nations accordyng to the example of God whome he beleued who restoreth to lyfe the dead and calleth those thinges which are not as though they were Whiche aboue hope beleued vnder hope that he should be the father of many nations accordyng to that which was spoken vnto hym So shall thy seede be And he not weake in fayth considered not his owne body which was now dead beyng almost an hundreth yeare olde neyther the deadnes of Saraes wombe Neither did he doubt of the promise of God through vnbeliefe but was strengthned in faythe gaue glory to God beyng full assured that he which had promised was also able to do it And therefore it was imputed vnto hym for righteousnes Therfore is the inheritaunce geuen by faith By this place we sée that to To haue a thing by fayth is to haue it freely attaine to any thing by faith is with Paul nothing els but to haue it fréely Wherfore it ought not to seme meruailous that we haue oftētimes inculcated that to be iustified by fayth is to be vnderstande of the obiect of fayth that is of the mercy and promise that we may be iustified fréely Chrisostome sayth if the promise should come of the law we should not nede that saluation which we obteyne by fayth and grace But In Abrahā a double posterity now where as the Apostle saith that the promise oughte to be firme vnto all the sede of Abraham that ought to be vnderstanded both of the Iewes and also of the Gentles as though in Abraham were a double posteritie And this is chiefly to be noted which here is alleaged of the certaintie of the promise For that may not either be wauerynge or doubtfull For that whyche we apprehende by fayth Besides the holy scriptures there is nothing that can wyth a true fayth be beleued He declareth that whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne oughte to be certayne Whiche is onely the worde of GOD whereunto onelye faith ought to leane
And he thinketh A similitude that Paul as a wise Phisition hauing the disease set before him abideth not in those thinges which be circumstances about it or do follow it but cunneth to the principall ground and first cause therof Therefore do all men die bicause all men haue sinned Neither ought we to thinke that here is ment that all men do sinne by some certaine action for that can haue no place in children But it is all one as if he had said Now they are bondslaues vnto sinne and are counted guilty therof And when we read these thinges we ought alwayes with the eye of our minde to consider wherunto they tend namely that we should receiue consolation and be made assured of our saluation knowing that the death of Christ hath preuayled against all these thinges By those things also which are written vnto the Hebrues may be declared how we haue sinned in the fall of Adam For there we read that Leui paid tenthes in the loynes of Abraham After the selfe same maner also may here be vnderstand that we were polluted in the loynes and in the masse of Adā The Scholies which are ascribed vnto Ierome interpretate that sinne is committed by the imitation of Adam which is commonly called actuall sinne And they say moreouer that this sinne of Adam went not ouer Abraham Isaac and Jacob which liued a holy life But bicause they sée that this is against them y◠Paul saith That all haue sinned this vniuersalitie say they is to be vnderstand with an exception Which thing they also affirme of other such kinde of sentences as Euery man is a lier Also There is none which doth good no not one when as yet there were in the world many true and holy men when those thinges were written But whosoeuer was the writer of that boke his authority ought not to cause vs to departe frō y◠truth For that which Paul spake vniuersally that all haue sinned hereby is proued Paul with our exception affirmeth that all haue sinned Here is not spoken of sinne spred abrode by imitation for that all men without exception dye For experience teacheth that to be vniuersally most true Wherfore here is to be set no exceptiō Neither ought those such like kinde of speaches which they bring to moue vs for that those sentences also are true if we speake of men not regenerate they are true also euen in the regenerate if we will speake according to their corrupt and vitiate nature Farther that here is not ment only imitation it is manifest by the Antithesis for Christe hath not only set forth vnto vs his righteousnes to imitate but also by the power of the holy ghost spredeth it abrode poureth it into the hartes of the beleuers Origene semeth to expound this place very warely For he at y◠beginning setteth forth certain things which euen Erasmus confesseth to signifie Originall sinne For he affirmeth that in Adam we were all corrupted as it were in a common ground and that we were all in his loynes as in the Epistle vnto the Hebrues Leui is sayd to haue bene in the loynes of Abraham Then addeth he certayne thinges which pertayne vnto the sinnes of perticular men which are called personall and exhorteth vs to cary about with vs the image of the celestiall man These thinges are so taken of Erasmus as though they were an interpretacion of that which went before when as in very deede they wholy confirme our sentence wherein we say Paul here taketh the name of sin in most ample sort Difinition of actuall sinne An vniuersall difinition of sinne that Paule in this place taketh sinne most amply so that it comprehendeth both the roote and all the fruites thereof But I meruayle how these men go aboute to plucke away originall vice from the nature of sinne For sinne according to the common definition they say is whatsoeuer is spoken done or thought agaynst the lawe of God and this can haue no place in children But they consider not that in this definition is not all sinne vniuersally contayned And therfore we before signified that sinne is otherwise to be defined so that that is sayd to be sinne which any maner of way is agaynst the law and will of God These men go farther and say if this were the definition of originall sinne namely the withdrawing of grace or pronesse to sinne these thinges ought rather to be counted paynes of sinnes then simles But they should haue remembred that God doth not alwayes punishe sinnes by outward scourges and aduersities God sometimes punisheth sins by sinnes but sometymes also by other sinnes Wherefore although the corruption of nature and that lust and pronesse to sinne grafted in vs all may after a sort be called paynes of sinnes yet do we affirme that they are also in very dede sinnes But they say that these thinges remayne in vs after baptisme and therefore can not be sinnes vnles we will say that sinnes are not remitted through baptisme and fayth in Christ But to this we answered before that the guiltynes The guiltines is forgeuen through fayth but the corrupt substance abideth Agaynst Erasmus indede is forgeuen vnto the beleuers howbeit the corrupt substance remaineth which if Christ were not a helper vnto vs should of his owne nature condemne vs. For seing it turneth vs away from the rule of the law of God it ought to be taken to be in very dede sinne Nether is it true which Erasmus sayth that the discourse of Paul will not suffer these thinges to be expounded of originall sinne for the thing it selfe teacheth otherwise For the entent of the Apostle is to shew from what euils the death of Christ hath deliuered vs. But that can he not do vnles he take sinne so largely that it also comprehend originall sinne But whereas Paul addeth that euen vnto the law sinne was in the world it maketh nothing agaynst this sentence For we say with Erasmus that sinne is in this place taken in the selfe same sense that it was in the sentences going before by reason of this coniunction causall For. Howbeit it is playne that those thinges which are spoken pertayne as well to originall sinne as to actuall sinnes For Nothing is counted to be sinne but in consideration of the lawe nether of both these kindes if the law were away is ether imputed or acknowledged although otherwise they both are sinnes in very dede and also wrappe vs in death wherfore let vs not suffer this place to be wrested out of our hands as well for that it is a good sure defence for vs as also for that it very well agréeth with Pauls purpose and notably setteth forth the benefite of Christ For euen vnto the law was sinne in the world But sinne is not imputed when there is no lawe Now declareth he that which was set forth in the third place Wherdof commeth knowledge of sinne namely wherehence commeth
lyeth a sléepe in them as Augustine sayth in his 2. booke of the merites and remission of sinnes following yâ— which is spoken of Paul sayth I liued sometimes without a law not yâ— there was at any time no law prescribed vnto Paul but bycause in his childhode by reasoÌ„ of age he felt it not Wherefore sinne sayth Paul was dead which Augustine interpreteth was on slepe But when the commaundement came yâ— is when I began to know yâ— law sinne reuiued He had sin in him before but forasmuch as it was not felt it semed dead Now appeareth how those thinges which we haue spoken agree with the holye scriptures Yet still Pigghius vrgeth that these thinges nothing An obiection of Pigghius pertaine vnto infantes for they oughte not to haue a law prescribed vnto them which can not be auoyded But in so saying he vnderstandeth not the meaning of the holy scriptures for they sufficiently declare that those things which A law may be geuen eueÌ„â—or those thinges which can not be performed are commaunded in the law can not perfectly be performed of vs when as yet they are most seuerely commauÌ„ded Paul saith in this epistle That which was imposible vnto the law forasmuch as it was weakened through the flesh God sending his sonne c. By these words it most manifestly appeareth that we caÌ„not performe the law â—s it is commaunded For if we could we should be iustified by works nether had Christ neded to haue suffred death for vs. There ar also other offices Vtilities of the law of the Law for which it is written For it is profitable to direct the actions of the godly but it is most profitable to declare sin For by the law sayth Paul coÌ„eth the knowledg of sin Again I was ignoraÌ„t of lust vnles the law had sayd Thou shalt not lust Farther by the law sinne is also increased doth more lead vs greuouslier oppresse vs. For the law 〈…〉 ed in that sin should abound to the Corrint The power of sin is the law And al these things teÌ„d to this end yâ— maÌ„ should as it were by a Scholmaster be brought vnto Christ and implore his ayd and desire to haue streÌ„gth geuen him whereby at the least in some part and with an obedience now begon to performe those thinges which are commaunded and that those things wherin he fayleth might not be imputed vnto him but might be made whole by the righteousnes of Christ Augustine in his first boke against Iulianus reproueth the The pelagians boasted that God commaundeth not those things which can not be done Augustine reherseth the sinnes of infantes Pelagians for that they thoughte that they had taught some great point of doctrine when they taughte that God commaundeth not those thinges whiche can not be doone and he declareth those to be the endes of the lawe whiche we haue now expressed Yea and Augustine also in his bookes of confessions maketh mencion of those sinnes which euen suckinge infantes doo committe Agaynst which no maÌ„ caÌ„ say they could resist And they should not be sins vnles they wer referred to some law which is by them violated Nether doth yâ— any thing helpe Pigghius or put away their sinnes for that they vnderstand them not For that which is filthy although it seme not so to vs yet of his owne nature is it filthy Thinges filthy although they seme not filthy yet ar they neuerthelesse of their owne nature fylthy The opinioÌ„ of Augustine and Anselmus differ not in very deede The definition of Original sinne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is That which is filthy is filthy whither it seme so or no. This opinion of Anselmus concerning the lacke and want of originall iustice doth in very dede nothing differre from the sentence of Augustine wherein he calleth originall sinne luste but that whiche in Anselmus is spoken somewhat more expressedlye is more obscurely wrapped in the word concupiscence But bycause this want of originall iustice may so be taken as though we vnderstoode onely the priuation of the giftes of God with out any vice of nature therefore it shall be good to set forth a more full definition of originall sinne Originall sinne therefore is the corruption of the whole nature of man traduced by generation from the fall of our first parent into his posterity which corruption were it not for the benefite of Christ adiudgeth al men borne therin in a maner to infinite euills and to eternall damnation In this definition are contained al kinds of causes We haue for the matter or subiect all the partes strengthes of man The forme is the deprauation of them al The efficieÌ„t cause is the will of Adam which sinned The instrument is the propagation of traduction which is done thorough the flesh The end and effect is eternall damnation together with all the discomoditis of thys life And hereof sprange sondrye Sondry names of this sinne names of this sinne so that sometimes it is called a defect or want sometimes peruersenes sometimes vice sometymes a disease sometymes contagiousnes sometymes malice and Augustine calleth it an affected quality and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a disorder And that the whole maÌ„ is corrupt hereby appeareth because he was to this ende created to cleaue vnto God as to the chiefe good But now he vnderstandeth The corruption of the partes of man is declared not things pertayning vnto God nor with patience waiteth for the promises which are set forth in yâ— sciptures but with grief he harkeneth vnto yâ— preceptes of God and the paynes rewardes he vtterly coÌ„temneth The affections rebelling agaynst sound reason do wantonly deride the word of God The body neglecteth to obey the soule All these thinges although they be experimeÌ„ts of naturall corruption yet are they also confirmed by testimonies of the holy scriptures Of the corruption of vnderstanding Paul sayth The carnall man vnderstandeth not those thinges which are of the spirite of God yea he can not because they are foolishenes vnto him In which wordes let vs marke by the way agaynst A proofe of the impossibility of the law Pigghius that the lawe was geuen of such thinges which of vs can not be performed For the lawe doth chiefely commaund vs to haue knowledge in things pertayning to God which thinges yet Paul apertly affirmeth that the carnall man can not vnderstand And to our purpose we sée that Paul affirmeth that this blindnes or ignorance is grafted in man and that of nature for we can not imagine that it commeth by reason of tyme or age For the elder in yeares a man is so much the more and more is he instructed concerning God Wherefore in that he is carnall and vnapt to vnderstand thinges pertayning to God it commeth of his corrupt nature And this corruption is of so great waight that Augustine in his 3. booke agaynst Iulianus the 12.
I knew not sinne but by the law for I had not knowen lust except the law had saide Thou shalt not lust But sin toke an occasion by the commaundement and wrought in me all manner of lust For without the law sinne was dead For I once was aliue wythout the law but when the commaundement came sinne reuiued but I was dead and the same commaundement which was ordeyned vnto lyfe was found to be vnto me vnto death For sinne tooke an occasion by the commaundement and deceaued me and thereby slew me Wherefore the lawe is holy and the commaundement is holy and iust and good What shall we then say Is the law sinne God forbid Here Paul beginneth after a sort to defend the law For before he sayd that we are deliuered from it And he mought haue semed not very godly to haue estemed of the law especially when he sayd That the affectes of sinnes which are by the law were of efficacy in our members that we should bryng forth fruite vnto death For these and such other lyke things which semed to be contumeliously spoken agaynst the law he was cōmonly ill thought of of the apostles Wherfore by preuention he obiecteth vnto himself that which he knew was by them layd to his charge Is the law sayth he sinne By the figure Metonymia he putteth sinne for the cause of sinne or for that doctrine whiche persuadeth to sinne He speaketh it by way of interrogation as though he would put forth a question to be debated And to cleare himselfe of all manner of suspicion and to declare how farre he was from this impietie straight way without The law is not properly the efficient cause of sinne In our selues is the true cause of sinne any taryeng he aunswereth God forbid But to make that which followeth y◠eastlier and plainlier to be vnderstand this is to be noted that Paul attributeth not vnto the law the workyng of sinne For sinne commeth of it only per accidēs that is by chaunce For the true and proper cause of sinne is in our selues For y◠lust which is grafted infixed in vs when the law of God setteth it self against it waxeth more 〈…〉 ce and is more vehemently kindled not that the law bringeth occasions to this infection For it only sheweth things which are euill setting forth what things are to be done what to be eschued But when the corruption of nature perceyueth that those thyngs which are set forth of the law are agaynst it it gathereth together his strengths and strengthneth it selfe to resist as much as lyeth in it and therfore it poureth out greater forces As we sée in the sommer whē A similitude cold cloudes hange ouer vs then in these lower regions are much greater heates And when as of the sonne al things are inflamed and made whote yet by Antiperistasin welles and places vnder the earth are more cold For such is the nature of The nature of thinges contrary things contrary that to repell the presence of their contrary they more vehemētly bend themselues and gather greater strengthes But I knevv not sinne but by the Lavv For I had not knovven lust except the Lavv had sayd Thou shalt not lust By these wordes the Apostle teacheth that How the law encreaseth sinne the Law encreaseth not sinne but so farre forth as it setteth before our eyes the knowledge thereof And he speaketh of himselfe to geue vs to vnderstand that he speaketh or declareth nothing but that which he had learned by feling and experience And by y◠same example he secretly exhorteth vs wholy to discēd down into our selues if we will together with him know the groūde of our saluation If thou demaund it what time Paul sayth that he knew not sinne and was ignorant At what time Paul◠knew not sinne of lust many thinke y◠he meaneth this of his childhode in which time by reason of age he could not vnderstand the commaundementes of the law This answere although I meane not to disproue yet do I not thinke it to be sufficiēt For after that we are come to discretion nether age nor naturall knowledge can of themselues shew sinne vnles we most attentiuely consider the Law of God For if it be but lightly and sclonderly looked vpon it engēdreth not a true knowledge of sinnes Wherefore we may say that sinne is not knowen of men both when they are letted by age and when being come to age they neglect the Law of God and also when they doo not attētiuely enough ether heare or rede it This place manifestly teacheth that Paul entreateth not only of ceremonies Both age and sinne let vs from the knowledge of the law Here is proued that Paul entreateth also of morall preceptes The law of nature also shewed sin The law of nature was in a manner cleane blotted out The presumption of hipocrites went about to depraue many thinges in the law of God An euident difference betwene the letter the spirite but also comprehendeth the ten commaundementes For out of thē he bringeth a confirmatiō of his sentence when he citeth this precept Thou shalt not lust And euen this Law whereof he speaketh is it from which he pronounceth that we are deliuered Which thing were not possible if as our aduersaries affirm we should be iustified by the workes thereof But thou wilt say did not the Law of nature shew sinne why then doth Paul say that he knew not sinne but by the law geuen of God by Moses Indede the law of nature shewed sinne but yet so long as it was soūd and whole But it being in a maner clene blotted out partly by the fall of the first parentes and partly by many other corruptions which it had now by long vse and continuance contracted could not performe his office so much as should be sufficient vnto the saluation of men Wherfore God gaue a law which should restore all thinges which our prauity had corrupted in the Law of nature And yet could not the presumption of men be so repressed but it went aboute in the Law also geuen of God to depraue many things For the Scribes and Pharisies with theyr interpretaciōs had corrupted the natiue and proper sence of the Law Wherefore Christ was compelled to bring it to perfection from theyr deprauation and to shew that it is farre otherwise to be vnderstand then they in the olde time had interpretated it And hereby we vnderstand that there is no small difference betwene the Law and the Spirite The Law may be blotted and corrupted by euill interpretations Farther also although it be perfect yet hath it not suche strengths that it can ether extinguishe sinne or alienate the minde from sinne But the spirite can not be vitiated nor corrupted and it breaketh sinne and chāgeth the minde But we ought to know that the Law geuen by Moses could not so much be corrupted as the Law of nature For although it were by interpretations
not distinguished from the Gospell by bookes The knowledge of sin two fold Paul now declareth namely to shewe sinne And that alwayes it doth wheresoeuer any commaundement of the lawe is whether it be in the fiue bookes of Moses or in the prophetes or in the bookes of the new testament For the lawe is not distinguished from the Gospell by bookes but in forme and maner of teaching But this property of the law when it is lightly weighed appeareth not For the knowledge of sinne is two maner of wayes the one is whereby we only beholde the nature thereof the other is whereby by experience or some certayne byting we haue a féeling thereof in our selues And this latter way is the fruite that commeth of the reading of the lawe namely not only to know sinne but also to be daunted at the féeling thereof when we vnderstand that we are in a maner consumed of the wrath of God The Apostle warely sayth that he knew not sinne and was ignorant of lust vnles the lawe had sayd thou shalt not lust But he sayth not that he had not sinne before the lawe For there was euen then also sin in him but it was not acknowledged And a litle afterward how sinne was in him then he declareth saying Sinne before the lawe was dead but so soone as it came it reuiued agayne Sinne in dede was before but yet not so vehement wherefore also it semed the les to be accused And for that cause Christ said If I had not come and spoken vnto them they should haue had no sinne By which wordes he signifieth not that they should vtterly haue bene without all sinne if he had not come but that they should not haue sinned so greuously But thou wilt say seing the lawe Why the law is sayd to shew sins and not vertues sheweth not only sinnes but also good déedes why doth the Apostle only say that it sheweth sinne I answere as before I answered For that the lawe was not able to shew vertues which are known by experience and féeling neither in men strange from Christ nor in the regenerate For in men strange from Christ the lawe found nothing but sinne And in the regenerate it found rather certayne inchoations or beginnings then perfect vertues Farther by this place we vnderstand The law is diligently to be learned that the lawe is with great diligence to be learned and to be peysed in the minde as without which both the force of sinne is not knowen and the grace and mercy of him that forgeueth is contemned And because this is very hurtful therfore the holy scriptures alwayes inculcate into vs the knowledge of the lawe and pronounce them blessed which are occupied in it day and night Which is true if therewith all be ioyned Christ the only ende of the lawe And that the law might the easelyer be vnderstand God alwayes raysed vp and inspired holy prophetes to expound it vnto the people when they sharpely cried out agaynst the sinnes of their times Christ also our Sauiour hath deliuered vnto vs a most exquisite interpretacion of the lawe Now they at the last are to be counted to rede the lawe of Who are with fruite occupied in the contemplacion of the law the Lord with fruite which so often as they lay away the booke acknowledge in themselues somewhat which must be by the mercy of God forgeuen and by his grace be amended Agayne by these wordes of the Apostle is the law◠defended from their sclander which crye out that it is euill and proceded from an euill God For they say that the lawe is euill and sinne which thing Paul expressedly denieth For he answereth God forbid Farther how can it be ill which condemneth and forbiddeth lust which they are compelled to confesse to be ill But wheras he saith by the law sin entred in that is spokē by a metaphore For that blame which thesemē ascribe vnto y◠law ought to be trāsferred vnto corruptiō y◠naturally grafted in vs. And although the lawe in many seme to worke nothing els but more and more to heape vp sinnes yet that commeth not therefore for that it selfe is euill but for that it can of a corrupte nature bring foorth no other thing But why the lawe is vnpleasant and hatefull vnto vs that hereof commeth saith Why the law is odious vnto vs. Ambrose for that it alwayes sheweth thinges euill namely sinnes and condemnation But there is none which will gladly heare of those thinges Yet they that be godly indede although they are by it bitten for it doo geue thankes vnto God For they féele that by the preaching thereof they get incredible fruites But before we passe ouer this place there are a fewe thinges to be spoken of whiche in my iudgement seme very necessary to the full vnderstanding thereof There What is prohibited in this commaundemēt Thou shalt not luste are some which thinke that this commaundement Thou shalt not lust forbiddeth not the prauity and corruption of nature or the first motions whereby we are affcted towardes those things which God hath forbidden But by that commaundement say they is only prohibited the consent of the will and of the minde And then at the length they confesse that we sinne whē we geue place vnto those first motions and suffer sinne to raigne in vs. But those thinges whiche followe in this selfe same chapiter do most manifestly reproue them For Paul sheweth that he entreateth of that lust which is irkesome vnto a minde that serueth the lawe of God And he addeth that by it he doth that euill which he hateth But these thinges haue no place where the consent of the minde is ioyned with all And of this kinde of lust he cryeth out Vnhappy man that I am who shall deliuer me frō the body of this death And he addeth that he is of it drawen captiue agaynst his will and resisting it Wherefore seing this lust is of this nature there is no cause why it should be wrested vnto the consent of the minde But herein our aduersaries That commaundemēt which can not be fulfilled is not in vaine geuen are excedingly deceaued for that they thinke that this precept is in vayne geuen if it prohibite that which can not be auoyded in this life And it is a thing ridiculous say they to commaunde any thing vnto the brute and foolishe fleshe and to the irrationall partes of the minde whiche vnderstand no such thing and are of necessity moued to do that whereunto they were instituted But these men ought to haue remembred that this precept was geuen vnto man endued with reason and that not in vayne nor without purpose For God had created man to hys owne image and likenes Wherefore it was requisite that he should haue nothing in him which should not agrée with the will of God Neither are the commaundementes which can not be performed in this life geuen in vayne to men as these men
ought to be vnderstand both of Paul and of all the godly And yet followeth it not of necessity that we should say yâ— Paul by reason of natural lust fell into al kindes of sins For here is not entreated of the outward actions but of the affectes of the mind and the first motions Nether is here coÌ„sidered what is done but what may be done by our naturall prones vnto euill For vvithout the lavv sinne vvas dead Then men are sayd to be without the Law when ether by reasoÌ„ of age they can not attayne to the vnderstanding therof or ells wheÌ„ now being come to full age they ether nothing at al peise it or very sclenderly He sayth that sinne was dead bycause as it is written to the How sinne was deade CorrinthiaÌ„s The force of sinne is the Law And eueÌ„ as that body is said to be dead which vtterly wanteth all maner of strengths so sinne also was said to be dead for that wheÌ„ the Law was not it was not of efficacy waÌ„ted his power That which is dead moueth not it selfe So sin wheÌ„ it was not impelled by any law nothing at all moued vs but was sluggish after a sort dead so yâ— it was ether litle or in a maner nothing at al felt But as sone as yâ— Lawe came it receaued strengths Chrisostome interpretateth That sinne was dead for that it was not knowen Vnto which opinion Augustine leneth when he fayth that it was hidden But al these things tend to one end For the Law stirreth not vp sin but by knowledge Ambrose sayth that sinne was dead bycause men before the Law thought they mought sinne freely without punishment But this sentence we haue before confuted For we haue shewed that men also by the Law of nature felt that God was angry against sinne and greuously punished it Vnles paradueneure Ambrose ment this yâ— that thing was theÌ„ more obscurely knowne then it was afterward when the Law was geuen But he sayth moreouer that by sinne may be vnderstand the deuill For he toke an occasion by the Law to worke in vs all maner of lust The law sheweth sin and sheweth not the deuill and he is sayd of Paul to haue bene dead before the Law for that he not so carefully tempted men as being sure of them as of his owne possession But as sone as the Law was geueÌ„ he ceassed of from that quietnes But this interpretation is farre from the skope of the Apostle For he entreateth of sinne which is shewed by the Lawe And the Law sheweth vices and wicked actes and not the deuill Which thing is proued by that which streight way followeth For I knew not lust except the Lavv had sayd Thou shalt not lust But it is wonderfull how Ambrose entreating of this argument should say that the deuill when the Law was geuen lost his dominion ouer men For by the Law and sinne meÌ„ were made more obnoxions vnto the deuill This benefite we owâ— vnto Christ and not vnto the Law Howbeit the Greke Scholies I knowe not by what meanes bend vnto this sentence touchyng the Deuill For they say that it is possible that as our sauiour is sayd to be the way the truth and righteousnes So the deuill may be called sinne a lye and death The commentaries which are ascribed vnto Ierome fauouring this senteÌ„ce bring a similitude of an enuious maÌ„ which is commonly so much the more moued against him whom he enuieth how much the greatrâ— the benefite is which he séeth is bestowed vpoÌ„ him So the deuil when he saw the singuler gift of the law of God geuen by God vnto man began so much the more to rage against him and by the commaundement of God tooke an occasion of raging But whatsoeuer these fathers say it is very plaine by the wordes of Paul that he in this place speaketh of that sinne which is by the lawe brought to light such as is lust But they when they heard that sinne tooke an occasion by the law and seduced and killed thought that these things ought to be referred vnto some certaine person which might be distinct from vs which are seduced and killed But they saw not yâ— Paul by the figure Profopopoeia speaketh eueÌ„ Paul vseth the figure Prosopopeâ—â— The commentaries ascribed vn to Ierome make wyth the Pelagians of our sinne and lust And they followed Origene as their author But most of all do those commentaries erre which beare the name of Ierome For they in thys place vtterly make with the Pelagians touching originall sinne For thus in theÌ„ is it written If when the law was not sinne was dead they are out of their wits whiche auouch that sinne by traduction commeth from Adam vnto vs. Therfore here he sayth sinne was dead for that it liueth not in infantes which are without the law that is it is in them committed without punishment For when the infante speaketh ill vnto the parentes it semeth to be sinne but yet sinne not liuing but dead Although the child sinne yet sinne is dead in hym for he is not subiect vnto the law Thus much in that place But touching the sinnes of infantes and especially of them that are not regenerate Augustine was of a farre other opinion and especially in his bookes of confessions Neither do the Catholikes doubt but yâ— Original sinne is traduced from Adam into his posteritie and that by it are condemned those infantes which are How sinne in infantes is sayd to â—e dead straungers from Christ Howbeit sinne may be said to be dead in them for that it is not knowen of them and for that they féele not themselues moued therwith But when the commaundement came sinne reuiued but I was dead and the commaundement which was ordeyned vnto lyfe was found to be vnto me vnto death When sinne was dead he saith that he liued for yâ— he was not troubled neither was his conscience made afeard Yet did he not liue in dede but as Augustine saith he semed vnto himselfe to liue As when a man thinketh that A similitude his enemy now ceaseth and is quiet he beginneth to be secure So Paul saith that when he was without the law he semed vnto himselfe to liue but when the commaundement came things began a new course Sinne saith he reuiued and I was dead So vndoubtedly scandeth the case When sinne is dead then do we seme vnto our selues to liue But wheÌ„ it once reuiueth we straight way are dead For we féele in our selues the wrath of God and condemnation And when the elect are so dead Christ rayseth them vp agayne and killeth sinne in them For he pardoneth whatsoeuer is done amisse and breaketh and diminisheth whatsoeuer of the corrupt lust is remayning Wherfore the death of sinne is two maner of wayes the one is not a very death but a counterfait death for that yâ— law is absent For sinne The death of sinne two maner of wayes All are not
of death For forasmuch as death and sinne are so ioyned together that the one is alwayes engendred of the other therefore Paul when he had confuted the first obiection touching sin goeth to the other obiection concerning death For before he denied that the law was of it selfe the cause of sinne now he also denieth it to be the cause of death And euen as before he defended the Law by translation when as he sayd that As the law by it selfe is not the the cause of sinne so also is it not the cause of death the lust naturally grafted in vs is the true and proper cause of sinne So now also he vseth the selfe same translation and ascribeth death not vnto the Law but vnto the vice grafted into vs by nature If a man demaund what commodity hereof followeth that our lust beinge irritated by the Lawe committeth more haynouser wicked facts and bringeth death he answereth that we are thereby brought opēly to the knowledge of the malice of our naturall prauitye which prauity herein chiefely consisteth that it perniciously abuseth the most excellent Law of God so that y◠which was ordeyned to good doth now bring vnto vs destructiō And yet must we not sticke stay in this knowledge of our misery For the more we know that we are in perdition with so muche the greater endeuor We must not stay in the knowledge of our misery The scope of the whole scripture Why the law is not the cause of death ought we to flye vnto Christ at whose hands alone we must looke for saluation and who is the only remedy of our so greate misery And this is the skope of the whole scripture For euery where in it is ether declared our prauity or ells set forth the mercy of God thorough Christ The reason whereby Paul proueth that the Lawe is not the cause of death is this That whiche is spirituall and ordeyned vnto life can not bring death But the Law of God is spirituall and or deyned to life wherefore it can not properlye be the cause of death The Maior or first propositiō hath two parts the first is that the Law can not bring death for that it was ordeined vnto life This sentēce is proued by the nature of things contrarye For death and life forasmuche as they are thinges contrarye can not at one time be found in one and the selfe same subiect For it is not possible that of one and the same Law should in the selfe same men together at one and the same time be engendred both life and death The second part is that the law is spirituall and therefore can not bring death And that is hereby proued for that the nature of the spirite is to quicken and not to destroy VVas that then which vvas good made death vnto me Thys he therefore What is the nature of the spirite obiecteth vnto himself for y◠before he semed to speak things repugnant namely y◠the commaundemente was ordeyned vnto life but yet turned to him to death These thinges seme at the first sight not well to agree It semeth that he should rather thus haue sayd What then Is the Law which bringeth life made vnto me death But Paul to set forth the obiection more vehemently comprehendeth the Law vnder this word Good or this pronowne which is referred to y◠which was before spoken namely ordeyned to life For before he had affirmed both namely that the Law is both good and also ordeyned to life Wherefore he now not without cause obiecteth vnto himselfe Was that then which was good made vn to me death God forbid But Sinne here vnderstād vvas made vnto me death For so is the sentence to be made perfect Now he declareth what vtility the Lawe which was geuen broughte For he sayth that sinne abused it and by it slewe vs that sayth he it mought be knowen and appeare that sinne by that which was good wrought vnto me death God would haue vs to vnderstand that our corruption is greate that by the Law that is by a thing most good it bringeth death Paul speaketh not here chiefely of the death of the body althoughe it also What death Paul here meaneth doo follow but rather of that death whereinto we incurre when we ernestlye fele our sinne by the knowledge of the Law For hereby we see that we are obnoxious vnto the wrath of God adiudged to hell fire Which thinge when we A taste of ēternall condemnation A similitude with efficacy seriously consider we fele in our selues some tast of eternall condēnation By which meanes it commeth to passe that although in body we liue yer we are sayde to be slaine of sinne by the Lawe And as they which are kept in prison after that they know that sentence of death is geuē vpon thē although they are permitted to liue two or three dayes to take their leue of theyr frends yet are they filled with incredible heauines and horror and euery houre haue a tast of theyr death so that al that time they may seme rather to dye then to liue An other similitude And euē as they which are sure to be very shortly rewarded with a greate and looked for reward although in the meane time they take greate paynes yet do they nothing weighe that trouble for that euen in theyr labors they seme to thē selues to haue after a sort the fruition of theyr hoped for reward and to haue it in a maner in theyr hands So they which by the Lawe see fele that they are now condemned to eternall death take no pleasure at all in the delights of thys life For euen now they fele in themselues that those paynes are begon But many maruell that Paul should say that this came to passe in himselfe and especially when as he writeth vnto the Galathians that he had profited in the religion of the Iewes aboue all the men in his time And vnto the Phillippians That he had How Paul was decraned and slaine of sin bene conuersant in the righteousnes of the Law without blame And vnto Timothe That he had from his elders serued God with a pure conscience But Augustine in hys first booke agaynst the two epistles of the Pelagians in the 8. and 9. chapiters diligently dissolueth this doubt He mought sayth he be honestly conuersant in outward workes so that before men he mought without blame performe the righteousnes of the Lawe But before God and as touchinge the affectes of the minde he wa◠not free frō sinne For it mought be that he thorough feare of men or through feare of punishmentes which God threatneth vnto transgressors was moued to liue vprightly but as touching Paul acknowledged himself◠obnoxious vnto the lust grafted into him by nature lustes and inward motions agaynst which men would not that God had made any Law he also was obnoxious vnto vice sinne Nether was h◠by faith and charity as he
ought to haue bene stirred vp to the workes whiche he did And that he erred he hymselfe testifieth of himself in many places Vnto the Eph. the. 2. cha he sayth And you that wer dead in sins wherin in times past the walked according to the course of this world after the prince that ruleth in the ayre euen the spirite that now worketh in the children of distrust Among whome we also had our conuersation in times past in the lusts of our fleshe in fulfilling the will of the flesh and of affections and we were by nature the children of wrath as well as others But GOD which is rich in mercye thorough hys greate loue wherewith he loued vs euen when we were dead by sinnes hath quickened vs together with Christ And vnto Titus For we also were once fooles disobedient straying out of the way seruing the desires and pleasures in maliciousnes and enuy one of vs hating an other Such a one was Paul before he was conuerted vnto Christ although he mought not vnworthely make great boast of his outward righteousnes And that thou shouldest not say that he was changed and deliuered frō these sinnes when he began earnestly to apply himselfe vnto the doctrine of the lawe wherein he so much profited that he coulde now be neither accused nor slayne of it he hymselfe in the selfe same epistle to Titus auoutcheth that he was Paul affirmeth that he was iustified by Christ only by Christ only iustified and by the benefite of the holy ghost acquited Wherefore before he was come to Christe the knowledge of the lawe coulde do nothing but kill him For thus he sayth but when the bountifulnes and loue of God our Sauiour towardes man appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which we haue done but according to his mercy he saued vs by the washing of regeneration and of the renuing of the holy ghost which he shed on vs most aboundantly through Iesus Christ our Sauiour that being iustified by his grace we might be made heyres according to the hope of eternall life But vnto that which he writeth vnto Timothe that he had from his elders serued God with a pure conscience answere may thus be made That although he had not in him his conscience accusing him yet this acquited him not from sinne For there are many and haue bene many Scribes and Pharises which being instructed with an ill conscience had an ill iudgement of the law of God They which are not well instructed in the lawe ar not sometimes reproued of their conscience whome yet Christ manifestly reproueth Wherefore when as afterward came a more sounder knowledge of the lawe by it by reason of sinne now known were they slayne Farther we must see what it is that Paul goeth about in that place to perswade vnto Timothe he sayth that he geueth thankes vnto God that without ceassing he maketh mencion of him in his prayers and desireth to see him And that he should not think that he spake this after any common maner as though he did it only to flatter him but spake not from the hart he sayth that he had neuer bene accustomed to lye And although his conscience could not reproue hym of lying yet were there a greater many other thinges which the lawe being truely knowen mought reproue in him And that he had not the perfect knowledge of the lawe hereby it is manifest for that he persecuted Christ in hys Paul before his cōuersion knew not the law perfectly church who is the ende of the lawe In which thing he did nothing agaynst his conscience for it was then in no other sort enstructed And therfore he sayth be did it through ignorance and infidelity Neither hath the law of God that power to kill through sinne but when it is perfectly known And these thinges are spoken of Paul when he was yet of the Iewishe religion And how these thinges pertayned vnto him after he knew Christ and how they pertayne to vs shall afterward be declared Howbeit in the meane time these things ought to moue vs to detest the naturall sinne grafted in vs. That sinne might be out of measure sinfull by the commaundement Here the Apostle declareth that he entreateth not only of the knowledge of sinne which is perceaued by the lawe but also of the comming of that wickednes which is wrought by taking an occasion of the law For by y◠figure Hyperbole Why the Apostle vseth the figure Prosopopeia he saith that sinne is made sinfull aboue measure And vnto sinne by a figure he fayneth a person which sinneth deceaueth and slayeth Which he therefore did for that he considered that we are slow and blockishe and vnderstand not the pernicious blot of our originall sinne But because the lattin translatiō hath aboue measure sinfull Ambrose demaundeth whether paraduenture there be any measure of sinne granted by the lawe And he answereth that there is none for the lawe condemneth all sinnes vniuersally although he confesse that there is The law cōdemneth all sinnes a certayne measure as touching the seuerity of God aboue which measure God differreth not his punishements and vengeance As it may be sayd of the Chananites There is with God a certaine measure of sinnes aboue which they are not suffered to escape vnpunished Sodoma Gomorrha and other nations whome God suffered a longe while to escape vnpunished But afterward when they exceded that measure whiche God coulde no longer suffer to excede he vtterly ertinguished and destroyed them Although some say that sinne aboue measure encreased after the law was geuen if it be compared with that tyme wherein the lawe was not For then mought haue bene pretended some ignorance but that ignorance so soone as the lawe was geuen and published was taken away But I would rather expound this by the figure Hyperbole that is vnmeasurably For when lust waxeth of force we fall into all kindes of sinnes But the kindes of sinnes can not be expressed For euen as archers but one only way hit the marke but yet infinite wayes mysse it A similitude so vertue consisting in the middest as a marke we may infinite wayes erre from it but there is but one only way to attaine vnto it That which is in the Greke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may thus be turned in Lattin Peccatum peccator that is sinne a sinner But because that soundeth not so well it may be turned sinne out of measure vicious Aristotle in his 3. of Ethikes sayth that of extreames the one is more vitious and the other lesse The lawe is spirituall but I am carnall being sold vnder sinne Here is rendred a reason why it is not to be imputed vnto the lawe that of the knowledge thereof followeth death For saith he the lawe is spirituall but the propriety of the spirite is to geue life And this thing experience well teacheth vs. For we sée that bodyes do so long liue how long there is in
that it is good nowe he after a sort goeth vp one steppe higher which pertayneth only vnto the Godly For theyr will towardes the lawe is not a colde will but pleasant feruent and The will of the godly towardes the law is not cold The vngodly are not kindled with a true loue to that whiche to good The saints tooke great pleasure of the law of God vehement With great endeuor they contende that they may indéede performe that which in minde they desire But the vngodly although by a naturall light which is not vtterly extinguished in them they haue some knowledge of iustice and vertue yet are they not kindled with a true loue of things good Wherefore yâ— Apostle writeth not these things vnto theÌ„ but vnto the godly which euery moment striue against yâ— lust which is grafted in theÌ„ by nature But how great a plesure yâ— good meÌ„ take of yâ— law of God many places of yâ— scripture testefie Dauid in his 1â—9 psalme sayth Blessed are they which walk in the Law of the Lord and which seke the testemonies thereof And in his 1. psalme Blessed are they which meditate in his Law day and night And in an other place The Law of God sayth he is more precious then gold and precious stones and more swete then hony and the hony combe And other infinite such like testemonies But there is very much difference betwene the godlâ— and men straungers from Christ For the wise men amongst the Ethnikes did Difference betwene the Ethnikes and godly men put the greatest part of theyr felicity herein that they might alwayes remember the notable actes by them done But they greatly reioysed not of the knowledge of the true and perfect righteousnes bycause they perfectlye knew it not But the sayntes contrarywise alwayes cast theyr eyes vpon the Law of God and when in it they se before theyr eies drawen out the portrature of a iust man and the perfect image of God whereunto we are created they can not but wonderfully reioyce But afterward wheÌ„ they turne aside theyr eyes to their works they are excedingly sory for that they se them so much to fayle of the example set before them So paynters when they se an image excellently set forth they A similitude take therein great pleasure But when as hauing enterprised to make such an other they se that they can not attayne to that liuelines and excellency they begin to be sory and to be angry There is noted also in Pecockes the selfe same An other similitude kinde of affection for when they haue erected vp theyr fethers they delighting in the pleasant variety of the colours seme much to reioyce But agayne when they behold theyr deformed and blacke fete streight way theyr courage is deiected and they let downe theyr fethers So the godly delight in the Lawe of God and are inflamed with great loue to his commaundementes but contrariwise they lament and are sory for the filthines which they find to be in al their works Concerning the inward man Sithen Paul calleth the regenerate part of man by this name it can not be doubted but that he speaketh of the whole man For man consisteth not only of the body and of flesh but also of the soule and of that part whiche they commonlye call rationall And this whole man is called both inward outward He is called the Inward man in that he is moued by The whole man is called both inward and outward in diuerse respectes the spirite which worketh in our inwarde partes and of stony hartes maketh fleshy hartes But he is called outward in that he is taken with the delights of this world with riches honors goodly shewes and such like thinges For all these are outward thinges So the Apostle hath now proued the first part which he put forth namely That he would doo good and that he delighted in the law of God concerning the inward man Now he goeth to the other part to declare that he is agaynst his will drawen to other thinges I fele an other Lavv in my members resisting the Lavv of my mind and leding me captiue into the Lavv of sinne vvhtch is in my members This Law which he describeth is the force of sinne and of our naturall corruption He calleth it the Law of members for that before he called this whole euil the body of sinne but a body hath members Farther members in this place signifieth as I haue before admonished all the powers of the minde and all the partes of the body now contaminate with sinne The Apostles minde was to declare that this disease drawen from our birth stayeth not only in some one part of vs but persâ—th thorough out the whole man and thoroughout-all his partes Here we haue sondry Sondrye names of lawes What the law being aâ— large taken signifieth names of Lawes for hece is mencioned The Lawe of God The Lawe of the minde The Law of sinne The Law of the members And this hereof commeth for that the Law is largely taken for all that whiche gouerneth moderateth our actions And bycause our actions procede not all from one greuÌ„d thereof it commeth that there are diuers names of Lawes Although the Law of the mind and the Law of God is one and the same It is called the Law of God bicause by it is expressed the will of God And it is called the Law of the mind for that it raigneth chiefely inwardly and is most knowen in the minde The Law of sinne also and the Law of the members is one and the same It is called the Law of sinne bycause such lust is of it selfe sinne and of it selfe bringeth forth other sinnes and it is called the Lawe of the members for that it vseth all our Why sinne to adorned with the name of law partes strenths and faculties for instrumeÌ„ts Chrisostome warely admonisheth that sinne is not for any his owne dignity adorned with the name of Lawe for that commeth thorough our default for that we obey sinne as a Lawe For so Christ called Mammon Lord and Paul called the bely God Rebeâ—ling 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is a greate conflict betwene these two Lawes for the Law which is in my members laboureth to lede me away captiue and to make me a bondsclaue vnto the Law of sinne But if the Law of sin and the Law of the memvers be one and the same how is the one sayd to lede away a man captiue vnto the other This is not without greate consideration Lust grafted in vs impelleth vs to actual sinnes sayd For so long as lust grafted in vs which is sinne resisteth the Law of God by which Law the knowledge of the minde is enstructed it impelleth vs to many kindes of sinnes Those are commonly called actuall sinnes whereunto our lust and corrupt oâ—sposition incline vs. But this maketh vs subiect vnto the law of sinne that is vnto death for death as
mercy for that they haue purged themselues from filthines But what the verye meaning of that place is we haue before declared And that the Gentiles performed by nature those thinges which are of the law we thus expounded that they did many things in outward discipline which were coÌ„maunded in the law of Moses as in yâ— they eschued thefts whordomes adulteries other such like sins Wherfore Paul coÌ„cluded yâ— they waÌ„ted not the knowledge of vice vertue of right and wrong so yâ— when in many things they fell sinned they could not be excused by reason of ignoraunce There are others which vnderstand those wordes of the Gentiles now conuerted vnto Christ which being endewed with the holy ghost executed the commaundementes of God and declared both in life and in maners yâ— righteousnes consisteth not of the law of Moses of which thing yâ— Iewes continually boasted of But the first interpretacioÌ„ more agreeth with the words of the Apostle But whether soeuer interpretacion be admitted Origen hath therby no defence to proue that men attayne vnto righteousnes by the worthines True righteousnes dependeth not of the endeuor of men but of the goodnes of God The Iews did not rightly follow righteousnes of workes Yea rather the very wordes of the Apostle most plainly declare that true righteousnes dependeth not of the endeuor or worthines of men but of the goodnes and mercy of God For he sayth that the Israelites following the law of righteousnes attained not vnto righteousnes But this semeth vnto humane reason very absurd namely that those which followed not should obteyne and those which followed should be frustrated Howbeit this we ought to consider that the Israelites did not vprightly and lawfully seke it For if they had sought it according to the meaning of the law for as much as Christ is the end of the law they had doubtles beleued in him and so should haue bene iustified But by cause Paul in this place twise repeteth the righteousnes of the law some thinke yâ— those wordes are not in either place to be a like vnderstanded For in the first place by the law of rightousnes they thinke is to be vnderstanded the outward law and in the second place the true righteousnes as though Paul should saye that the Iewes applied themselues vnto the outward obseruation of the law but could not attayne vnto the true righteousnes in Christ Which interpretation I indede dislike not howebeit I thinke that these wordes may in eyther place be taken in one and the same sence so that the meaning is although that Wherfore the law of God is called the law of righteousnes the Iewes had purposed in theyr minde to kepe the law geuen them of God which law is called the law of righteousnes for that in it is contayned moste perfect righteousnes yet being voyde of fayth and of the spirite of Christ they could not kepe the law and therfore they were frustrated of theyr purpose and of that which they had determined in theyr minde so that they neyther had the true righteousnes which the Gentiles had obteyned and also were frustrated of that righteousnes which they sought for And the ground of that error was The grouÌ„d of the error of the Iewes in folowing of righteousnes Faith the soule of the commaundementes of God for that they being destitute of fayth and in the meane time supposing that they mought be iustified by workes applied themselues vnto workes only But without fayth these thinges are in vayne enterprised For fayth is the soule and life of all those thinges which are commaunded in the law Seing therfore that they fayled of the prescript of the law they had not Christ by whome their transgression of the law mought be forgeuen and by whome that which wanted mought be supplied And these workes whereof Paul speaketh the Fathers referre vnto the rites and ceremonies of the law of Moses but that as we haue declared is straÌ„ge from the very methode and doctrine which Paul vseth in thys epistle The contencion indede at the first beganne as we haue oftentimes said aboute ceremonies But Paul to proue that they can not iustify added a generall What Paul in this place vnderstandeth by workes In the obteinyng of rightousnes workes are as contrary opposed vnto fayth They which ascribe righteousnes vnto workes are not iustified proposition namely that no workes of what kinde soeuer they be in as much as they are workes haue power to iustify wherefore Paul in this place by workes vnderstandeth not only ceremonies but also all dewties of life This moreouer is worthy to be noted that Paul in this place in such sort affirmeth that righteousnes is taken hold of by fayth that vnto it he opposeth workes as contrary For when he had said that the Gentiles attayned vnto righteousnes by fayth streight way he addeth that the Iewes fell away from the law of righteousnes although they endeuored themselues thereunto namely for that they sought it not by fayth But why they sought it not by fayth he geueth a reason for that they sought it by workes Whereof it followeth that they are not iustified which abscribe righteousnes vnto workes For to put conâ—idence in them and to attribute righteousnes vnto them is an assured and euident let that thou canst not attayne vnto the true righteousnes Chrisostome noteth that these wordes of Paul which eyther pertayne vnto the Gentiles or which pertayne vnto the Iewes may be reduced to thrée wonderful principal poynts For first of the Gentiles he sayth that they attayned vnto righteousnes which Three things here out gathered against the meaning of the Iewes How the righteousnes of faith is greater then the righteousnes of workes thing the Iewes could in no case abide to heare for they would haue had none but themselues counted to pertayne to the kingdome of Christ SecoÌ„dly which is also more wonderfull he sayth that they attayned vnto righteousnes when as they gaue not themselues vnto righteousnes And which is most wonderfull of all he sayth that the righteousnes of fayth which the Gentiles tooke hold of is farre greater then the righteousnes of workes And therefore Paul before in this selfe same epistle thus wrote If Abraham were iustified by workes he hath glory but he hath not whereof to glory before God But how the righteousnes of fayth is greater and ercellenter then the righteousnes of workes is thus to be vnderstanded that although the workes of men not regenerate seme to be honest and notable and bring with them a certayne ciuill righteousnes yet notwithstanding is that righteousnes of so small valew that before God it is none at all yea rather it is counted for sinne Farther the holines and vprightnes of works which are done of men regenerate although it please God yet can it not abide to be examined tried by his exacte iudgmeÌ„t For our righteousnesses are like a cloth stayned with the naturall course of
of his owne nature for if the sicke person being so cut had ben left of the phisition without doubt he had perished For he that was so payned had neuer ben able by his owne wit or by his owne strengthes to come to health yea rather for very payne and anguish he should haue dyed Wherfore in that the cutting of was a preparation vnto health the same is to be ascribed vnto the phisition and vnto his art So if God should leaue a man in those wayes and degrées by which some are brought Meanes preparatioÌ„s of their own nature nothing helpe vnles the grace of God be annexed vnto them The difference betwene God phisitioÌ„s vnto saluation he should miserably perishe in them But forasmuch as God by his most healthfull art and wisedome vseth them they are made preparations vnto iustification although of their owne nature they nothing helpe vs but through our default corrupt nature do excedingly hurt vs vnles the grace of God be ioyned vnto them But this similitude in this part fayleth for that the phisition can not paraduenture heale the sicke person without that cutting of but God can by infinite other wayes and meanes bring vs to saluation The selfe thing I will nowe declare by examples Iudas when he had betrayed Christ acknowledged his sinne and confessed it plainely For he sayde openly that he had sinned and betrayed the iust bloud This acknowledging and confession of his sinne should haue ben vndoubtedly preparations vnto iustification if God woulde haue vsed them But forasmuch as God vsed them not what other thing shal we thinke that Iudas therein deserued but only damnation For certaine it is that afterward he An example of Iudas honge himselfe and perished for euer This selfe thing we sée happened in Cayn for he also confessed his sinne and yet was he swallowed vp with desperation This is the strength and nature of these thinges if they be not gouerned and ordred by God Farther our aduersaries accuse vs that we haynously sclander the lawe of God and make it vnprofitable when we affirme that it can not be obserued of men by naturall strengthes But these men do right well declare that they neuer throughly considered in the scriptures what are the offices of the law The law is not vnprofitable although it cannot be fulfilled For if they had peysed them they would neuer iudge it vnprofitable although it can not fully be obserued of vs. The first office thereof as Paul teacheth is to shew sinne For by the lawe is the knowledge of sinne Againe it prouoketh yâ— wrath of God For the lawe worketh anger Moreouer it augmenteth the haynousnes of sinne For the lawe entred in that sinne should abound It bringeth also a curse For as many as are vnder the lawe are vnder the curse But to what end are these thinges That it might be as it were our schoolemaster vnto Christ For they which acknowledge their sinnes do sée that the wrath of God hangeth ouer them and fele that theyr sinnes do dayly encrease and that they are continually more and more vnder the curse at the length when the spirite of God shall breath vpon them they beginne to longe for Christ that they might by him be deliuered from so great euils And this is the schooling of the lawe vnto Christ And seing it is so how can the lawe An example of Aristotle séeme vnto any man vnprofitable Farther who will say that Aristotle labored vnprofitably when with so great conning he did set forth in his bookes called Aualytica posteriora the nature of a â—yllogismus demonstratiue When as yet notwythstandyng there are scantly founde any reasons framed wyth so great conning in any faculties or sciences of wyse men For seinge we are ignoraunt of the last differences of thinges we can not either perfectly define or make a perfect demonstration But yet notwithstanding Aristotle bestowed good and diligent labour for by those his most excellent rules he sheweth whereunto at the lest we should leuell if a man will surely and firmely proue any thing Cicero also when he describeth vnto vs such an Orator as there neuer hath bene or shal be yet loseth he not his labor For this at yâ— least way he sheweth what paterne he ought to set before him which desireth to excell in that arte So God hath set forth hys lawes that men should alwayes haue an example before theyr eyes whereunto they should frame theyr life Besides this vnto men that are regenerate in Christ The law of God is after a sort obserued of the godly the lawes of God are not vtterly impossible to be obserued For forasmuch as they by the spirite of God haue theyr strength after a sort renewed and the violence of the flesh somewhat repressed they may accomplish many thinges which are greateful and acceptable vnto God Farther also men not yet regenerate may notwithstanding as touching outward discipline after a sorte apply themselues vnto the lawes of God Which thing where it is practised there pub welths florish and the wrath of God is not so much kindled agaynst men and the punishmentes which By ciuile discipline the scourges of the wrath of God are auoyded It lieth in no man to adde an equity vnto the law of God God vseth sometimes to poure vpon open sinners are for a time auoyded And these are no smal or vulgare vtilities of the law which they seme to be ignoraunt of which make those obiections vnto vs. But they not being content with this say farther yâ— the law may be kept eueÌ„ of men not yet regenerate And if a man obiect the excellency and difficulty thereof they answere that our righteousnes if it be compared with the righteousnes of God whiche is on euery side absolute and perfect or be applied vnto the law being takeÌ„ by it selfe is no righteousnes But if our righteousnes be so compared with the law as God of his goodnes condescendeth vnto our infirmity after that maner we may obserue it and be iustified by good workes But to the end thou shouldest not be ignorant know yâ— this is a Sophisticall distinction of Pigghius whereby he tooke vpon him authority to moderate the law of GOD whiche authority vndoubtedly can pertayne vnto no mortall man and this may we proue both by the law of man and also by the law of God For it is written in the digestes de Legibus Senatusconsultis As touching those thinges which are first ordeyned in a common wealth decrees ought to be made certayne either by the interpretacion or constitution of a good prince namely that it be not in the hand of any man or iudge to mitigate the lawes at his pleasure or to transgresse them vnder the name of any equity For so lawes should be made Lesbia regula that is a rule of lead and all thinges should be confounded at euery mans pleasure Yea rather this rule is therefore geuen that if
made his oration to Agrippa the king when he sayd that the lord had said vnto him For to this end haue I appeared to thee to appoint thee a minister What was the ministery of Paul and a witnes both of those things which thou hast sene and of those thinges in which I will appeare vnto thee deliuering thee from the people and nations to whome I now send thee that thou mayst open theyr eyes that they may be conuerted from darkenes to light and frō the power of Sathan to God that they may receaue forgeuenes of sinnes and inheritance amongest them which are sanctified by fayth in me And with how great diligence Paul executed this office it is manifest when as towards the end of this epistle he writeth that from Ierusalem to Illiricum he had filled all the places rounde about with the Gospell which thing he with so feruent a minde performed that in the 20. chapiter of the Actes he in effect spake these wordes to the Ephesians I haue by the space of three yeares preached the Lord and that night and day How Paul behoued himselfe in the ministery with many teares and haue opened vnto you all the counsel of God I haue not coueted any mans gold or siluer amongst you these handes haue ministred to my necessities and to thē that were with me These wordes haue a wonderful emphasis He sayth that he had preached vnto them not one day or twayn but whole 3. yeres not by turnes times but night day not with a cold affection but with many teares not guile fully or disceitfully for he opened vnto thē all the coūsel of God not in a quiet peace able state when as the Hebrues sought sundry and manifold ways to destroy him neither had he a regard to his owne thinges when as he desired nothing that pertayned to any man neyther finally tooke he small paynes in this office when as In what sort all men ought to imitate Paul with his owne handes he gott thinges necessary both for himselfe and his These thinges can not we without shame heare which so leue destitute our wiues children famely frendes kinsfolkes and cosins and finally all those with whome we are conuersant that we neuer at any time preach either Christ or his doctrine vnto thē vnto whō yet we ought most feruently to preach For we are no lesse Apostles to these then Paul was appointed for that Gentiles And whē as he sayth that he had opened vnto thē all the counsels of God it is to be wondred at how that many will so with tooth and nayle hold fast things as necessary to saluation which we know of what Bishoppes of Rome and of what counsels of what decrees of men they were brought in and are not prescribed vnto vs of Paul nor of any part of the holy scripture Paul for the better executing of his office contēned wonderful great dangers and where he saw the gate open thither he slacked not to go although he had many aduersaries which sought to withstand him He was made all thinges to all men to the Iewes a Iew and to those that were without the law as one that wanted the law Yea and to the Ethnikes whē as they had no skill in the prophets Why Paul some times in his sermōs vsed verses of Poets Paul came to Ierusalem to conferre hys gospel with the apostles What fruit is to be loked for of counsels That Paule at the beginning persecuted the church wāted not fruite Paul was not of the meane sort Paul was most studious in the law Of those thinges which are sayd to be done of a good entēt From whence the epistle to the Galathians was written Why Paul spake more gently touching the obseruyng of the law to the Romanes thē to the Galathians Pauls secretary was named Tertius From whence these letters were geuen Argumēts whereby the Iewes thought that the Gentles were to be excluded from the Gospell neither had any knowledge in the scriptures he cited verses out of theyr Poets as out of Aratus Menander and Epinemides And the same Paul was not aferd to go vnto Ierusalem to conferre the Gospell with the chiefe Apostles not as though he had small confidence in his doctrine which he had receaued from the Lord out of heauen for he had an assured persuasion and as the Greaciās say such a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he pronounced him to be Anathema or accursed which preached any other Gospel neither as touching this thing spared he the angels Neither is it any meruail for such a certaintie fayth requireth Wherefore we learne that Counsells are not to this end to be called as though our fayth ought to depend of theyr determinations but that there we should make manifest that those thinges which we beleue exactly agree with the holy scriptures and playnly to proue the same to our aduersaries Neither is there any more fruite or commodity therehence to be looked for The louing mercy also of God prouided that that also turned to good to the Church that Paul had at the beginning so vebemently persecuted it For they which afterward saw him sodenly cōuerted vnto Christ could not beleue that this could haue happened with out the mighty power of God For as a man doth not vpon the sodayn◠become most vile so also is not a man of a wicked man straight way made most holy vnles the Spirite of God worke the same Paul was none of the commō and meane sort he was not an obstinate Iewe which wanted learning and knowledge but he was most studious in the law neither had he bent his study to it only but also applied himselfe to the traditions of the fathers And thereof it came that he persecuted the Church of Christ For if he had geuen himselfe to the law of God only without adding vnto it the leuen of humane traditions he should the easelier haue acknowledged Christ But whosoeuer haue addicted themselues to humane traditions they must nedes be persecuters of the Church of Christ They say that Paul did these thinges of a good pretence and not of an euill purpose but of an holy entent as they vse to speake For my part as I confesse that this somewhat diminisheth the greauousnes of the sinne both before God and before man for I do not make all sinnes a like so also affirme I that the case is thereby the more dangerous For they which sinne vnder the shew of holines and vnder a godly pretence and not of an euill purpose do with the more difficulty returne agayne into the right way for that they are farre of to vnderstand that they sinne Wherfore in that case there nedeth the wonderfull great mercy and helpe of God But this is all that I mind at this time to write touching Paul Now in what order his epistles were written Chrysostome as I thinke hath sufficiently shewed From whome herein only I dissagree that I thinke
controuersye touching the ceremonies of the law Some haue by reason of these thinges takē occasion to withdraw men from studieng of this epistle and haue said that from the .xii. chapiter to the end it is worthy to be red for that there is set forth an excellent institucion touching maners But vnto that chapiter forasmuche as say they there is nothing entreted of but only striues and contencions concerning the ceremonies of the law it serueth litle to our vse to know them for that they of conduce not to our times wherein are vtterly remoued away the ceremonies of the Iewes But these men are farre deceaned themselues and seke also to deceaue others For the whole epistle doubtles is a golden epistle and most worthy to be red It contayneth places touching naturall knowledge and ciuill offices touching the law of Moses and touching the Gospell it expliraceth iustification and original sinne it setteth forth grace it entreateth of election predestination the execution of the Iewes and of the restoring of them agayne From the twelfth chapites it contayneth what kind of sacrifice we ought to offer and entreateth touching the magestrate and touching bearing with the weake and remouing away offence And who seeth not that these are great matters and most The question being moued touching ceremonies is reduced to the generalitie profitable to be knowen But whereas they obiect vnto vs that as touching the first part is entreated of ceremonies I graunt indede that by the meanes of them the question began first which Paul seking to dissolue reduced it to the genus or generall word And to declare that we can not be iustified by the ceremonies of the law he proueth generally that iustification can not come of any our workes And so when he had taken away the genus the species or parts could by no meanes consist For it followeth We are iustified by no workes therefore neyther by ceremoniall workes nor by morall workes nor by iudiciall workes And that the reasons of Paul extend so farre I will proue by these arguments Argumēts to proue that here are entreated of works generally and not of ceremonyall workes only following First he teacheth that we are iustified by sayth and by the mercy of God that the promise might be firme But that promise is not firme if it depend eyther of the execution of ceremonies or of the obseruation of the ten commaundements for that we are as touching ech part a like weake Moreouer he sayth that we are iustified freely which word Freely is of no effect vnles we exclude morall workes For he which worketh vnto him reward is rendred according to debt and not according to grace Afterward he entreateth of the obseruation of that law by which we haue the knowledge of sinne which thing belongeth rather to morall precepts then to ceremonies This is the law whirh worketh anger neyther doubt we but that God is more prouoked to anger if we transgresse the ten commaundements then if we offend in certayne rites and ceremonies And more ouer Paul putteth our iustification to consist of the grace and mercy of God to the end our boasting should be excluded But if thou remoue away ceremonies only and say that we are iustified by morall works boasting is not taken away for we may at the least boast of them Farther it is certayne that the ceremonies of Moses pertayned to the first table where the worshipping of God is commaunded Neyther were the elders any lesse bound to these ceremonies then we are at this daye bounde to receaue baptisme and the Eucharist And if Paul proue that we are not iustified by those thinges which pertayn to that first cable much more then is it proued that we can not attayne vnto righteousnes by the workes of the latter table Paul when he had declared that we are now by the benefit of Christ free from the law obiecteth vnto himselfe Let vs sinne more freely and abide in sinne that grace may the more abound If the question had bene moued touching ceremonies only he mought haue answered ye are not deliuered but only from ceremonies ye are still bound to the morall law But he maketh no such answere but sayth that we ought to sinne no more for that we are now dead vnto sin and grafted into Christ and buried together with him And the same Paul when he wrote that by the fauor of Christ we are deliuered and absolued from those thinges which in our flesh resist the law of God expressedly declared of what law he entreated For he made mencion of that commaundement Thou shalt not lust Lastly in the epistle to the Galathians where he entreateth of the selfe same matter be pronounceth him accursed which abideth not in all the thinges which are written in the booke of the law When he saith all doubtles he excludeth not morall workes Wherefore this disputacion of the Apostle is not superfluous Yea rather vnles he had taken it in hand the liberty of the Church had bene put in great danger which the deuill sought to bring vnder the law as though Christ of himselfe were not sufficient to iustifye men And the reasons which are perticularly brought in touching ceremonies are A sure reason wherby is proued y◠no man is iustified by the ceremonies of mē not superfluous For by the selfe same reasons we may proue that mens tradicions and the rites which men haue appoynted vnto vs are not such worshippinges of God as can not be changed nor omitted if they shall seme not to conduce to saluation For these thinges much les pertayne to the obteyning of righteousnes then do the ceremonies instituted by God himselfe Wherefore if these auayle not to righteousnes then can not those of necessity be required vnto it Thou wilt demaund paraduenture whether bicause of these reasons of the Apostle we ought to thinke our selues losed from all maner of law Not so vndoubtedly Whether we be free from the law neyther doth this follow of his sayinges vnles thou vnderstand that we are free and loosed from the law in respect that we can not be iustified by it Otherwise we ought to obey it and to the vttermost of our power to labour to execute it but yet not with this purpose to seke thereby to be iustifyed And as touching the ceremonies of the old law two extreme errors are to be takē hede of the one is of the Ebionites and others which Iewishly sought to ioyne of necessity Two errors to be taken hed ▪ of ▪ as touching the olde law the ceremonies of Moses to Christ Contrariwise the other extreme error is of the Marcionites which affirmed that the old law was not geuen of a good God but of an euil gouerner the maker of this world We saile in that middest betwene these extremities and affirme that now after Christ the ceremonies of the law are not still to be kept when as theyr time is now expired Howbeit we commend them as
thinges which in the time of the fathers before Christ came were good and we beleue that they were instituted by the selfe same God which is the father of our lord Iesus Christ But to make the discourse of the first part more Abrief content of the whole Epistle playne and vniuersally the vtility of the whole epistle we will briefely touch the summe thereof that it being in that maner layd before our eyes the whole epistle may haue the more light In the first chapiter is set forth vnto vs how that neyther naturall knowledge The first chapiter nor ciuill offices could by any meanes iustifie men for that it is euidently shewed that men endewed with them liued drowned in most horrible sinnes whiche thing shoulde not haue happened if by these thinges they had bene iustyfied In the second chapiter the Iewes are made equall with the Gentiles whose The second chapiter life accused as most corrupt for that they preached that a man should not steale and yet stole that a man should not commit adultery and yet committed adultery that a man should not committe sacriledge and yet committed it thēselues By which it is manifest that the law which they had receaued brought them not to iustification In the third chapiter lest he might seme to deface the law he confesseth that that The third chapiter it was an excellent gift of God but yet not of that kind that it could iustifye He attributeth vnto it other offices namely to bring forth the knowledge of sinne And so he reduceth both the Iewes and the Gentiles to one Christ as to the fountayne and author of all righteousnes And yet notwithstanding he doth not by thys meanes he sayth violate or ouerthrowe the law but most of all establishe it In the fourth chapiter he proueth the selfe same thing which he had before The fourth chapiter put forth by the example of Abraham who before workes and before he had receaued circumcision was for this cause pronounced iust for that he beleued the promise of God This doubtles was imputed to him to righteousnes And to confirm that same he bringeth a testimony of Dauid who saith Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgeuen and whose sinnes are couered Blessed is the man to whome the Lord hath not imputed sinne Which chapiter if be diligently peysed we shall find that in it the Apostle in a maner tē times vseth this word of Imputacion Wherfore it ought not to seme so strange if we also vse it when we affirme that concupiscence lest in vs after baptisme is sinne although it be not imputed vnto sinne and although we are not able to get vnto our selues that righteousnes which is the true righteousnes before God yet if we beleue in him the righteousnes of Christ is imputed vnto vs. In the fift chapiter after that this righteousnes of Christ is apprehended by The fifth chapiter fayth many thinges are declared touching it that is that it is firme and embraseth Christ who died for the weake for enemies wicked men and sinners And in it is set forth a comparison of Christ with Adam For euen as by him all our kind was vitiated and corrupted so by Christ are all the elect renewed yea rather Christ is sayd to ouer passe Adam For he by one sinne infected al men but infinite sins were not able to resist Christ but that he performed that redemption which his will was to performe Yea he so vsed this euill that he gaue the plentifuller grace where the greater plenty of sinnes raigned In the sixt chapiter he ouerthroweth the importunate obiection of diuers The sixth chapiter which hereof inferred that we should sinne freely and liue loosely if as the Apostle had sayd greater grace should there be rendred where were found more sinnes The Apostle answereth that theyr collection was not good forasmuche as we are dead vnto sinne and grafted into Christ we ought vndoubtedly to liue vnto him and not to iniquity In the seuenth chapiter he declareth the maner how we are exempted from The seuēth chapiter the law And that is that forasmuch as in vs whilest we liue here is not a full perfect regeneration and corrupt affections do continually resist the lawes of God by the grace of Christ is brought to passe that we are deliuered from sin although it perpetually inhabite in our members and in our flesh Whereof he concludeth in the eight chapiter that there is no condemnation The eight chapiter to those whih are in Christ Iesus neyther walke they according to the flesh For they haue the spirite of Christ whereby they both liue and also are made pertakers of the resurrection to come they mortifye the deedes of the flesh and in themselues they haue witnes of the selfe same spirite that they are the children of God and by the selfe same spirite they are confirmed in aduersities to suffer them with a constāt and valiant mind and they haue this spirite making intercession for them which draweth them to expresse the similitude of the image of the sonne of God and at the last bringeth to passe that they can neyther be accused nor condemned before God In the ninth chapiter he answereth vnto the Iewes which contēded that these The ninth chapiter promises were bestowed vpon theyr nation only and were not powred vpon the Gentiles Vnto whome he sayth that touching this matter all thinges are done by the election of God whereby he hath mercy on whome he will and whome he will he hardneth And he compareth God to a potter who of one and the selfe same clay maketh some vessells to honour and some to contumely In the tenth chapiter he entreateth of the effectes of thys election namely that The tenth chapiter some embrace fayth and other some reiect it And he also declareth that Christ is the end of the law and that the law requireth this that we should beleue in Christ And hereby he proueth that the Iewes attayned not to righteousnes for that they went about to obtayne it by their owne merites and by their owne workes but the Gentles attayned vnto it for that they claue vnto fayth And all those thinges he confirmeth by the oracles of God that the Iewes I say were made blynde and that the Gentiles were receaued In the eleuēth chapiter he mitigateth that hard reprobation of the Iewes which The eleuenth chapiter he had set forth and declareth that not all vtterly were reiected but putteth them in good hope that for asmuch as their roote is holy many also of that nation shal be holy howbeit they are in the meane tyme excluded as touching vs which were wilde Oliue trees that we might be grafted into the good Oliue tree And after that this is accomplished they shall agayne be receaued And so he knitteth vp this discourse that God hath shut vp all vnder sinne and he is compelled at the lengh to cry out O the
no reputacion yet was it taken to be geuen for Christes sake And therefore in all the promises of the olde Testament the myndes of the godly ranne vnto this foundation and ground Then let vs consider the finall cause Wherefore would God haue the publike wealth of the Iewes preserued to the ende but only that Christ should be born therehence Why prouided he that the stock of Dauid should contynue safe euen to the ende but onely that the sonne of God should of it take humane fleshe Why brought he agayne hys people from captiuity but only that the Messias should at length be borne at the tyme promised in the place appointed and of a stocke assigned This vndoubtedly was the cause of all those promises vpon this cause did all the fathers bend their minds as many as vnderstood a right Wherfore Paule wresteth not the testemonyes of the prophetes neyther doth he rashely abuse them And let this be vnto vs a sure and faythfull rule for the perfect vnderstanding of the promises of the olde What it is to lyue by fayth testament whereas he sayth that the iust man shall lyue by fayth he meaneth that he shal be able to moue hymselfe to all good thynges as to beleue to hope to contynue in hope and to loue of charity vnto which thynges by the power and strength of our owne nature we canne by no meanes attayne And that by faith we obtaine eternall life it very well agreeth with those thinges which The knowledge whiche commeth by fayth and the eternall lyfe which shal be in heauen are one and the selfe same thyng as touching the matter Wherein the righteousnes which is receaued by fayth consisteth We are not firste iuste and then afterward lyue by fayth Differences betwen the righteousnes of the Gospel and of the lawe Christ spake This is the life eternall that they should acknowledge thee to be the only true God and him whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ These thinges shall we playnly and openly knowe in heauen our countrey and that with a cleare and manifest sight But now haue we these selfe same thinges with a very obscure knowledge that is through fayth This is not an other lyfe from that But then shall that be made perfecte which we haue now but only begon And the righteousnes which by this fayth maketh it selfe open consisteth herein especially that from the tyme we are reconciled vnto God we leade our life in such sorte that both we render vnto hym his due worshipe and also vnto our neighbour our bounden due offices or dueties And whereas the Prophete writeth that the iust man lyueth by fayth his wordes must not so be taken as though he should affirme that we are fyrst iust and that then afterward we liue by fayth But this thyng he teacheth that by fayth do come vnto vs two commodityes both that we should be iust and also that we should obtayne life we see here also set forth vnto vs the difference betweene the righteousnes of the law and of the Gospell The righteousnes of the law is a perfecte obedience of the commaundementes of God But the righteousnes of the Gospell is an imputacion thereof The righteousnes of gospell God geueth vnto vs but the righteousnes of the law we geue vnto God The righteousnes of the law leaneth vnto workes For it is written The man which doth these thinges shall liue in them and cursed be he whiche abideth not in all the thinges whiche are written in the booke of the lawe also If thou wilte enter into lyfe keepe the Commaundementes Also doo thys and thou shalte lyue But here it is sayd The iuste manne shall lyue by fayth Wherfore looke what difference there is betwene to do and to beleue so much seeme these places to be repugnaunt one to the other But these thinges A conciliation of places repugnant shall easely be made to agree by making a distinction of righteousnes For forasmuch as the righteousnes of the Gospell is one and the righteousnes of the lawe is an other some testimonyes speake of the one righteousnes and some teach of the other Now by that which hath bene spoken the Apostle setteth forth three good By fayth we obtayne saluation righteousnes and life thinges and those most principall which by fayth we obtayne namely saluation righteousnes and life For thē Gospell is the power of God to saluation to euery one that beleueth agayne the righteousnes of God is reuealed by it from fayth also the iust man shall liue by fayth If there be anye that requyre more then these good thinges then is he ouer curious Further euen in the very first entrance into the cause we see how strongly he affirmeth by these three sentences now rehersed that by fayth these good thinges happen vnto vs. Here also maye be noted in what estimation Paul hath the holy scripture for vnto it he ascribeth the chiefest authority to proue the question takē in hand namely that the righteousnes of god is reuealed by fayth And if both the Apostle and also the Prophet do so manifestlye pronounce that we are iustified by fayth then is it not meete that our aduersaryes should so crye out agaynst vs for that we affirme the very selfe same Wherefore if they be herewith offended then let them grudge agaynst the scriptures agaynst Paule and agaynst What remedy we must vse when it is sayd that we reiect good woorkes the Prophet and not agaynste vs. And agaynst them which crye out that we spoyle good workes of theyr dignity and honour there is no presenter remedy then to lyue vprightly and holyly that thereby we may aboundantly haue testemonyes of good workes and say to our aduersaries if any confydence were to be put in good workes then should we in no case geue place vnto you forasmuch as in them we farre excell you And all that whiche we say and teach of iustification which commeth through fayth tendeth only to this that the truth should by the word of God be defended This was Paules meaning when he sayde vnto the Phillippians If any man may put confidence in the fleshe I also may much more and by many thinges he declareth how much in this kinde of glory he excelled others But he afterward addeth that all these things he counted as dongue and losse that he might wyn Christ and that he mought be found in him not hauing his own righteousnes namely which is of works but that which is by the fayth of Iesus Christ This excellent example of the Apostle ought we to imitate that although we attribute not iustification vnto workes yet ought we plentifully to abound in them aboue other men For if we leade an vnpure lyfe and on the other syde boaste of iustification through fayth then shall we be laughed to scorne of our aduersaryes as though we for that cause professed this doctrine to lyue without punishement 〈…〉 ly and without all order For
sort of offences And yet was it not therefore to be suffred that lighter offences which deserued death should not be punished with it To consent vnto them that do euill is to fauor and embrace thē not to reproue thē yea rather to prayse thē And whē a mā hath cōmitted vnto him y◠office either of teaching or of preaching or els of admonishing to winke at these things or as the maner is in the court of Rome to dispēce with thē to take money to bargayne and as they terme it to cōpoūd for those things which they count for manifest hainous crimes The Apostle as Chrisostome noteth endeuoureth himself vtterly to stop the mouth of this kind of men For if they had layd ignoraunce for an excuse therto he answereth when they knew the righteousnes of God but if they had excused thēselues by weakenes yet neuertheles were they gilty because they cōsented and reioyced at others which committed the selfe same thinges But for Whether al the Ethenikes were guilty of so many and so great crimes as much as Paule inueigheth here against them which when they knew God glorified him not as God neither were thankeful but addicted themselues vnto idolatry whether shall we condemne all these Ethnikes as guilty of so many and so great crymes as we haue now heard recited or no Vndoubtedly there were in the publike wealth of Rome many excellent and good men as the Valerians the Catos and the Scipios and also there were suche among the Grecians as Aristides Phocio and Socrates whome we reade not to haue bene defiled wyth so many shamefull and filthy lustes There are some whiche to this question thus aunswer that although these men were not polluted with all these sinnes yet there was not one of them but that at the lest he was spotted with a great many of them Vndoubtedly they were proude and ouermuch desirous of glory fame Farther without all doubt their iudgement was very ill touchyng God But this it should seme is an easier exposition to say that these excellent men as touching the hart and mynde were vnpure and contaminated as such which had not Christ both for a mediator and for a propitiator through whome theyr natural lustes mought not haue bene imputed vnto them for sinne Nether had they the holy ghost or grace of Christ whereby they should haue bene restrayned from committyng of sinne and also haue wrought suche workes whiche mought haue aduaunced the glory of God Wherfore this their vncleannes of hart and naturall enmitie agaynst God as touching it selfe coulde haue burst forthe into all these wycked actes if God had not prouided lest publike wealths should haue bene turned vpside downe and least all politicall discipline shoulde haue perished that euermore some excellent men should florish by whose lawes and pure lyfe after a sort other men should be conteyned in doyng of ciuile dueties And although the actions and doynges euen of these men were sinnes as touchyng God yet in outwarde appearance they were not so polluted but that they might be vnto others an example and also a certain rule of ciuile honesty But there were so few of these men that amongst a great number of Philosophers a man could scarsely fynde one or two of them and in an infinite multitude of ciuile men a man could as we see scantly be able to finde a few examples of morall vertues And Paule speaketh of men as they are for the most part Wherfore that which he here sayth abideth firme neither doth thys obiection any thyng weaken it The second Chapter WHerfore O man thou art inexcusable whosoeuer thou arte that iudgest for in that that thou iudgest an other thou condemnest thy selfe for thou that iudgest doost euen the selfe same thyng But we knowe that the iudgement of God is accordyng to truth agaynst them which commit such thinges And thinkest thou O man that iudgest them which do such thynges and doest the same that thou shalt escape the iudgement of God Knowledge generally is deuided into two partes wherof the one pertayneth Two kindes of knowledge onely vnto contemplation of whiche he hathe hetherto from the begynnyng at large written when he declared that these men by the obseruation of thinges created mought haue come to the knowledge of the most high God the authour of the world from whome when they had thorough idolatry filthilye fallen they were deliuered vp to be punished with most shamefull lust There is on other knowledge which is called practike for that it is occupied aboute the doyng of things Now in this place doth Paule teach the they abused thys knowledge also for that when as they knewe what was equitie and right as touchyng the doyng of thyngs yet notwithstandyng partly they maintained and supported others when they transgressed these bondes and partlye if they dyd punishe sinnes in other men yet wincked they at the selfe same sinnes in themselues And he in such sort reproueth them that he declareth vnto them that they shall not escape the iudgement of God although in the meane tyme they auoid the iudgement of men So that his entent is to take away from thē al manner of excuse Such great loue and affection beare we vnto our selues that oftentymes we can geue vpright iudgement vppon other men but can easely ouerskip our selues offending in the like or rather in things more haynous Wherefore he sayth Thou art inexcusable This sentence he inferreth of those thinges which he had before spokē because that as touchinge eyther of these two knowledges they are conuinced both wittingly willingly to haue sinned Origen supposeth that this is not a verye apte distinction of the chapiter when as those thinges which are here spoken do so plainely depend of the things going before Ambrose also supposeth that in this place is a preuention against them whych peraduenture would excuse themselues for that although they fal themselues yet consent they not vnto such as worke wickedly which men he willeth to call to minde that forasmuche as they are seuere in punishinge of others the selfe same iudgement shall at the length lighte vpon themselues But why the Apostle seemeth to cut of onely the excuse of ignorance we haue alredy before declared the cause namely for that the Ethnikes whiche attributed all thinges vnto free will neuer pretended the other excuse of infirmitie Therfore was it nedefull to vrge them on this behalfe that they should vnderstand that theyr knowledge was not sufficient for them Moreouer the entent of the Apostle is to call them backe from the lawe and from Philosophye of whiche two thinges the principallest office is to teach Wherefore when he had declared that knowlege by it selfe was not sufficient to iustefy them he moste manifestly inferreth that iustification cannot be obtayned neyther by Philosophy nor by the lawe And that these men by the lighte of nature knew what thinges were to be doone he proueth manifestlye by this token namely for
forasmuch as by reason of age they are as yet not able to do any thing are to be exempted out of the number of them vnto whome shal be rendred according to their workes For Paule speaketh of them whiche be of full age who mought haue brought forth good workes And that which Chrisostome writeth that this place teacheth vs not in any wise to put our trust in fayth only forasmuch as before the iudgement seate of God workes also shal be examined this his saying I say must be warely taken For true fayth neuer wanteth iust workes But Chrisostome in that place taketh fayth for that credulity whiche wicked men oftentymes boast of which is rather an opinion and vayne perswasion then that it can be called fayth which selfe same Iames calleth a dead fayth And forasmuch as it A deade sayth is no fayth is sayd to be deade it can in no case be true fayth As that man which certaynly is dead is no more sayd to be a man Wherefore Ambrose vpon thys place hath made the thing playne saying That we haue neede not only of profession but also of good life Wherefore where men do worke wickedly and yet in the meane tyme boast of fayth it is rather a vayne profession then a Christian fayth But vnto those that are contentious and which obey not the truth but obey vnrighteousnes Here is expressed the other part of iustice namely that whereby sinners are most worthely punished And by two signes he expresseth Two notes whereby the vngodly are expressed A wicked kinde of contēcion such as are wicked in that as touching rules of doctrine they are contentious and as touching maners they obey not the truth but vnrighteousnes Contention which is here ment is when a thing without iust cause and with a more vehement strife then is nedefull is taken in hand to be defended And oftentymes it happeneth that contentions men labour to defend that which in their mynde and conscience they beleue not to be true but only study to get the victory Wherefore they do nothing with any mediocritye but altogether with most vehemency and they are so tossed with the perturbation of the mynde that they alwayes farther and farther depart frō the truth Howbeit there is some A certayne contention laudable kynde of contention which is pardonable namely that which is taken in hād for the defence of the truth And such contention is without obstinacy whiche thing we may behold in Paule For he as soone as he knew himselfe to be deceaued abode not still stubburnely in hys purpose but strayght waye sayde Lord what wilt thou that I shall do But these men whom God will thus punishe are in prosecuting their matters not a whit better then they were in rules of doctrine because they obey not the truth which they know yea rather they hold it captiue with themselues as we haue before hard and are obedient vnto vnrighteousnes For truth and lust are euer present with men to geue counsell and Two perpetuall counsellers of men perswade them in intreating of matters In the wicked the worser counseller namely lust prenayleth and so they are miserably deceaued Which thing the Apostle expresseth in hys latter Epistle to the Thessalonians the second chapiter where he writeth that Antichrist shall come with power with signes and lying waytes and with all maner of deceite of vnrighteousnes in those which perishe because that they receaued not the loue of the truth to the ende they mought haue bene saued Therefore shall God send vpon them the efficacy of illusion to beleue lyes But this vnrighteousnes which they obey is afterward in the 7. chapiter called The law of the members namely because wicked luste is from the fall of the first parentes ingenerate in men and is obiected to our mynd by the ministery of Sathan who vseth it as a most apte instrument for his purpose Vnto these mē I say shal be indignatiō anger afflictiō anguish against euery soule of man that committeth euill of the Iew first and also of the Grecian Betwene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is indignation and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is anger semeth to be a difference for that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is a more vehementer impulsion or motion and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a more easier which differences yet haue no place in the high iudge For God is not troubled with these affections But the scripture vseth thys trope or fygure to set forth the vengeance whiche followeth these thinges whiche afterward is expressed in that he addeth Affliction and anguishe And as touching anguishe which in Greke is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we must vnderstand that the minde of man delighteth in liberty Wherefore whē we are brought to such a straight that we can not by any meanes eyther moue our selues or els fynde a way out thinke we to be most greuous vnto vs. And by these wordes is described the great punishement and a desperation of the felicity to come The soule signifieth man Agaynst euery soule There are some which by this place argue that therfore is mencion made of the soule because the affliction thereof shal be a greate deale more greuous then the affliction of the body But me thinketh it is more playne to say that after the Hebrewe maner by the soule is signified the whole man or to speake more vprightly all the powers and partes of man Neyther doth this any thing let that here in the texte man is put in the genetiue case and because the Iew and the Grecian is here expressed For that tendeth to thys ende to comprehend all mankinde whiche Paule deuideth into two partes so that some he calleth Iewes and other some Grecians namely the Gentiles as many He beginneth to reprehend the Iewes as were not subiect vnto the law of Moses And here the Apostle beginneth to ioyne the Iewes to the selfe same reprehension which he vsed agaynst the Gentiles because he entendeth to reproue them also And easely by litle and litle he turneth his speach vnto thē vnto whom hereafter by name he speaketh whē not much afterwarde he saith Behold thou art called a Iew and restest in the law c. He Why the first place is assigned vnto the Iewes therefore geueth the fyrst place vnto the Iewes because in the knowledge and vnderstanding of God and of righteousnes they had the principalitye if they be compared with other nations Further forasmuch as Paule came of their kinred here hearseth them in the first place least he should seeme to spare his owne when as he had sharpely reproued the Ethnikes It was meete also that they shoulde be named before Gentiles to the ende they mought the more greeuously be accused and more sharpely punished for that they were not ignorant both of the true God and of the religion due vnto hym But glory honour and peace to euery one that worketh good to the
haue good woorkes What Moses and the Prophets had a regarde vnto when in theyr prayers they made mencion of the names of certain of the electe thinges nothing let this sentence which was alleaged namely that before God there is no acception of persons And as often as we read in the prayers of Moses or of the Prophets that mention is made of the Patriarkes whereby they endeuoured themselues to prouoke God vnto mercy we muste thinke that they had a regarde to two thinges First forasmuch as in that nation God had some appointed vnto himselfe they desired that for theyr sakes he woulde spare the whole multitude Secondlye they attributed not these thinges vnto the merites of the saintes which as we haue sayd are none but they made mencion of the promises made vnto those Fathers Hereby therefore it is manifeste by what meanes those thinges which were obiected may be aunswered But nowe let vs retourne to the exposition of the woordes of Paule For as many as haue sinned without the law shall perishe also without the law and as many as haue sinned in the law shal be iudged by the law For the hearers of the law are not righteous before God but the doers of the law shal be iustified For as many as haue sinned c. Paule here teacheth that God in very dede hath no respect of persons neyther in iudgement doth iniury vnto any man He maketh the Iewes equall with the Gentles forasmuch as of ech nation they which haue liued wickedly shall perishe And as touching the maner of iudgement the Iewes which shal be condemned shal be iudged by the law of Moses because they shall haue it both to accuse them and to condemne them But the Gentiles being wicked shall neither be accused nor condemned by that law but by the light of nature and euen by their own cogitations By the law in thys place we must vnderstand the law of Moses For it only is perfect and for it began all the contencion otherwise there were none or very fewe nations which were not gouerned by some institutions or lawes Here are added two preuentions The first is that it mought haue semed wonderfull vnto the Iewes that theyr cause should not be a whit better forasmuch as they were adorned by God with the benefite of the law Vnto whome Paule answereth that therby they were rather the more greuously to be accused because before God not they which heare the law shal be iustefied but they which do it The other preuention is for that it semed a hard thing vnto the Ethnikes that they should perishe when as they wanted the law of God Vnto whome he sayth ye were not vtterly without a law And two maner of wayes he proueth that they had a law fyrst in that by nature they did those thinges which are prescribed by the law secondly because they had within themselues their owne cogitations mutually accusing them or excusing them As touching the Iewes he sharpely reproueth them as which were of so small sound iudgement that they iudged themselues to be therefore iustefyed because they had receaued the lawe And now he beginneth by litle and litle to come vnto them which a litle afterward he doth more openly For saith he the hearers of the law shall not be iustified before God but the doers He therefore saith before God because they before mē wōderfully much boasted of the law which they had receaued God sayth he nothing regardeth this For there shall not be required of you that ye receaue the law but that ye execute the law The discourse which now is in hād is touching the righteousnes The righteousnes of the law requireth deedes and workes of the law which alone they allowed For touching the righteousnes of fayth he will afterward plainly entreate Now he cutteth their throtes with theyr owne sword in defining the righteousnes of the law namely that it vrgeth dedes and requireth works to the fulfilling thereof Whereby he calleth thē backe to consider their owne life Neither saith he in the meane time that mē cā not be otherwise iustified but only sheweth vnto thē that they haue fallē away frō the righteousnes of the law wherof they so much boasted That therfore which he now saith hath this sence If any man should by the righteousnes of the law be iustified before God it behoueth that the same should fulfil the law according to that saying Cursed be he which abideth not in all the things which are writē in the booke of the lawe This is an easy plaine expositiō But Augustine in his booke de Spiritu litera ad Marcellinum is of this minde that the doers of the law are iustified but yet in such sort that righteousnes goeth before the good works which the saintes do For they are fyrst iust before they do iust workes But because he seeth that this word of iustifying is in the future tence and by that meanes is signifyed that men shall not be iustefyed vnles they fyrst haue good workes therefore he addeth that to be iustefied in this place is not first to receaue righteousnes but to be counted righteous so that the sense is they shal be counted for righteous which shal be doers of the law but they ought first by fayth to haue receaued righteousnes whereby they were made iust but afterward they shal be made knowen by the effectes as they were before iust so now shal they be counted for iust And the like kinde of speach sayth he is in this sentence when Halowed be thy name how it is to be expounded we pray Thy name be sanctified Where we desire not that the name of God should be made holy as though before it were not holy but we desire that it may be of men counted holy This is Augustines exposition For when the Gentiles which haue not the law do by nature the thinges contayned in the law they hauing not the lawe are a lawe vnto themselues whiche shewe the effect of the law in theyr hartes their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughtes accusing one an other or excusing at the day when God shall iudge the secretes of men by Iesus Christ according to my Gospell For when the Gentles c. Now commeth he vnto the Gentles whiche ought not to complayne thoughe they perished seing they had not the lawe of Moses For hee declareth that they were not vtterly without a lawe because they did by nature those thinges whiche were contayned in the law And when hee sayth by Nature he doth not vtterly exclude the helpe of God For all truth that men knowe is of God and of the holy ghost And nature here signifieth that knowledge whiche is grafted in the myndes of men Euen as in the eyes of the body God hath plāted the power of seinge Neither doth Paul in this place entreate of the strēgthes by which the Gētiles being holpē performed these things For that shall afterward bée
declared how by the spirite and grace of Christ the power to lyue vprightly is ministred vnto the regenerate But now he speaketh onely of certayne outwarde honest and vpright actions whiche as touchyng ciuill righteousnes might by nature be performed of me Neither sayth hee that the Ethnikes fully performed the lawe so that they kept it all whole or that bycause of it they were iustified but onely hee vnderstandeth that they performed some certaine pointes thereof Whereof hee inferreth that they by the light of nature could discerne betwene honesty and dishonesty betwene right and Some Ethenikes in ciuil righteousnes far excell very many Christians wrong Yea if we looke vpon the lyfe and maners of Cato Atticus Socrates and Aristides we shall sée that in iustice ciuill comelynes they farre excelled a great many Christians yea and also Iewes Therfore they can not excuse them selues that they had not a law Ambrose vpon this place for asmuch as by this sentence to do those thinges whiche are of the law he vnderstandeth the full and absolute accomplishement of the law and séeth not how it is possible that any man should performe it whiche beleueth not in Christe for asmuch as Christe is the ende of the lawe affirmeth that Paul here speaketh of such Gentiles as were now conuerted vnto the Gospell and beleued in Christ This kynd of men without the helpe of the law of Moses did those thynges which are contayned in the law Augustine in this booke De Spiritu litera ad Marcellinum is of the same opinioÌ„ that by the Gentiles are vnderstaÌ„ded the ChristiaÌ„s whiche were conuerted froÌ„ yâ— The difference betwene the olde Testament and the new Ethnikes for yâ— he herein putteth the difference betwene the old Testament and the new namely that in the old Testament the law was described in outwarde tables but in the new Testament it should be written in the hartes and bowels of men accordyng to the Prophesie of Ieremy in hys 31. chap. Wherfore seyng Paul here sayth that the Gentles whiche by nature fulfilled the law shewed the worke of the law writen in their hartes it could not sayth he but pertayne vnto the new Testament And bycause he saw that this was agaynst hym where it is sayd by nature he sayth that by that worde is excluded the law of Moses but not the grace and spirite of Christ by which nature is not ouerthrowen but restored to hys old estate wherfore hys mynde is that the Gentles fulfill the lawe by nature beyng reformed by the spirite and grace But nowe let vs sée how those thinges which Augustine Ambrose alleage agrée with the senteÌ„ce of the Apostle Vndoubtedly that whiche moued Ambrose to this exposition is very weake for Many Ethenikes before the comming of Christ obteyned saluation by faith in him asmuch as there mought haue bene many before the commyng of Christ whiche beleued in hym and were iustified and obserued the thynges contayned in the law so much as the infirmitie of man will suffer Iob was an Ethnike who yet was not ignoraunt of Christ and also at the preachyng of Daniell the kyng of Babilon and as it is easie to bée beleued together with hym many of the Chaldeans were conuerted vnto God as it is written in Ionas the Niniuites returned into the right way And seyng all these attayned vnto saluation vndoubtedly they looked for the Mediator to come and by that meanes endeuored to performe those thynges whiche pertayned vnto the law Neither hath the reason of Augustine The holy patriarkes prophets had the law written in their â—arts because they pertained vnto the gospell much force For although it be a promise of the new Testament that by the benefite of the holy Ghost the lawes of God should bee written in the hartes of men yet is not that so to be vnderstand as though before the comming of Christ the same happened vnto none For the good fathers and holy Prophetes whiche were both endued with the fayth of Christ and had also geuen vnto them the holy Ghost had the law grauen not onely in stones but also in theyr bowels And although they liued before the sonne of God tooke fleshe vpoÌ„ him yet for asmuch as they beleued in him they pertayned vnto the Gospell Whiche is not therfore called a new Testament bycause the thyng is new but onely bycause it was published The Gospell is not called the new TestameÌ„t because the thing is new abroad in the latter tymes and was then publickely receaued Wherfore although before the preachyng of the Apostles it was not publikely professed among the Gentles yet florished it among many of the Ethnikes in whose harts the law of God was sealed so that although they wanted the doctrine of Moses yet were they so much rightly instructed that they could frame theyr actions vnto the preceptes of God And yet the same Augustine in the booke before cited the 7. chap. bryngeth the selfe same exposition whiche we before brought namely yâ— these thinges may be vnderstanded of certeine excellent actions of the Ethnikes whiche were notwithstandyng vngodly Their excelleÌ„t workes although as touchinge them they were sinnes yet of their owne nature or kynde for asmuch as they agréed with those thynges whiche God commaunded in the law could not The workes of the Ethnikes although theiwere goodly to the outward shew yet were they sinnes be condemned by the iudgement of maÌ„ But that they were wicked before God therfore it is not to be doubted bycause they were not referred to the right end Augustine noteth the same and addeth that therfore the worke of the law is sayd to be written in the hartes of the infidels bycause the lineamentes of the first estate still abode Hereof we gather that the writing of the lawe of God in the hartes of men is after two sortes one is which serueth only to knowledge and iudgement the other is which besides that addeth both a readines and also strength to doe that which is iudged to bée iuste and honest And the Image of The law may be writea in the hartes of men not vp the holy gost geuen vnto the faithful but by the naturall knowledge grafted into meÌ„ God vnto which man is created is not as touching this by hys fall vtterly blotted out but obfuscated and for that cause hath néede to be renued by hym So naturall knowledges are not fully quenched in our mindes but much of them do still remaine which thyng Paule now toucheth Wherefore the difference betwene the olde Testament and the newe abydeth whole although Paule so speaketh of the vngodly Ethnickes that they had the worke of the lawe written in their hartes Neither is it sayd that because of these thinges which they did or knewe they attayned vnto the true righteousnes Yea rather when Paule had shewed that they wanted it he styreth them vp vnto Christ Chrysostome in déede vppon thys place writeth that
God made man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is sufficient of himselfe to eschewe vices and to embrace vertue Whiche if he vnderstande of man as he was first created is true But after hys fall it is not to be graunted forasmuch as without Christ we can doe nothyng of our selues yea by our owne strengthes we can not so much as thinke any good thyng much lesse to doe any thyng Vnlesse peraduenture he vnderstand this as touchyng the knowledge of iustice and vprightnes in generall wherof we doe now speake For the self same father in an other place more then once auoucheth that we haue altogether néede of the grace of Christ That which the Apostle now maketh mencion of touching the knowledge of the Gentiles is very apte to repell the sclaunderous Against the complaint of the late comming of Christ talke of the vngodly which vse to say Why came not Christ before How was mankinde prouided for before hys comming What wrought hys prouidence then By these thinges which are now spoken thou now perceauest that mankinde was then also prouided for For as touching knowledge they had inough whether we vnderstand that which pertayneth vnto contemplation or that which is directed to workyng and doing Wherfore before the coÌ„ming of Christ they dyd vniustly complaine that they were forsaken when as they had knowledge and thought not them selues to want sufficient strengthes Theyr thoughtes accusing one an other or excusing Now bryngeth he an other reason wherby he proueth that the Ethnickes had a law because they were not without accusations excusations of the conscience which were most manifest testimonies of the knowledge grafted in vs by nature And by this self A manifest profe of the iudgement to come same argument may probablie be inferred that the iudgement of God shall at yâ— length come For if our minde do iudge with it self touching those thyngs which we doe what will God at the length doe which hath ingrafted these iudgemeÌ„tes in the mindes of men Accordyng to my Gospell He calleth it hys Gospell partly because hée tooke much labour in preachyng of it and partly for the excéeding great affection that he had towardes it for that he was appointed to the publishing of it abroad In the daye of the Lorde Then shall our cogitations be both accusers and also witnesses of all our doinges and by them shall the Ethnickes be iudged Now for that we are drawen away by the entisementes and lustes of thys lyfe we doe consider them not but then shall the Lorde bryng them forth to light Who as it is written in the first Epistle to the Corinthians shall illuminate the hidden workes of darkenes By thys place we sée that the iudgement of God is a part of the Gospell forasmuch as it is profitable to styrre vp to repentaunce Moreouer The iudgemeÌ„t of God is a part of the gospell â–ª as touchyng the godly it is a glad tidinges For Christ sayd When these thynges shall beginne to come to passe then lift vp your heades for your redemptioÌ„ draweth nye And although God will render vnto euery man according to his workes In iudgement God rendereth not lyke to our works yet will he not render like for lyke For we shall receaue farre much more then our workes haue deserued And they which shall be condemned shall be lesse punished then the greatnes of their sinnes requireth And as touchyng these excusing cogitations Augustine in hys booke which we haue now cited writeth that they shall not obteine forgeuenes Howbeit they may obtaine a more easter punishment The paines of the damned shall not be a like For the paynes of the damned shall not be a like And he vseth thys similitude that euen as there are certaine veniall sinnes which can not let but that the godly may obtaine felicitie so are there certaine excellent workes being of their own kind good which yet shall not deliuer the damned And as the lyfe of euery one be he neuer so holy can not wante small sinnes so the life of no maÌ„ though he be most wicked can be so filthye but that it may in yâ— meane time haue some excellent worke annexed vnto it And after thys maner doth the Apostle close vp the accusation of the Gentiles making mencion againe of the last iudgement And when he sayth Beholde thou arte called a Iewe he beginneth his The accusaâ—ioÌ„ of the Iewes accusation agaynst the Iewes which consisteth of these principall pointes Fyrst he setteth forth the excellent giftes wherwith God had adorned them afterward he addeth how they had abused them thirdly he expouÌ„deth what it is to be truely The principall pointes of the accusation of the Iewes a Iewe what true Circumcision is Afterward he declareth that those giftes of God bestowed vpon the Iewes could not by theÌ„ be so contaminated that they should not be estéemed and praysed But yet by them the Iewes had no matter wherby to preferre them selues before the Gentiles when as they liued wickedly For theyr filthye life made them equall to the Gentiles which thing in Why he fyrst reproued the Gentiles the laste place he maketh playne by testimonie of the Scriptures He reproued the Gentiles before the Iewes that by the former reprehension hée myght prepare hys waye to the latter For the Iewes were hautye neyther coulde they easilie abide one to reproue them Farther if the Apostle hadde fyrste accused them he might haue semed more extreme against his owne nation then was mete especially forasmuch as he was accused of the false Apostles that he was an Apostata from the law and that he had filthily fallen from the Iewish The sum of the reprehension of the Iewes religion The summe of the reprehension of the Iewes is that they by professioÌ„ and not by life measured their righteousnes First of all he maketh mention of the giftes which were geuen vnto the Iewes and reduceth them in a maner to The giftes bestowed vpon the Iewes are reduced to three principal pointes three principall poyntes The first is the dignity of the name which came vnto them by the kinrede and holy sede of the fathers The second is that they knews the will of God by the law geuen vnto their elders The third that they were apointed to teach other nations These were in dede excellent things but yet they nothing helped them because they both degenerated from their fathers as touching honesty and iustice and also by their sinnes they repugned the law which they had receaued and moreouer because they neglected themselues and much lesse did they teach other people But herein the Apostle chiefly maketh mention of those thinges which they had frely receiued For they were not bestowed vpon them for any merite of theirs Beholde thou art called a Iew and restest in the law and gloriest in God and knowest hys wyll and allowest the thynges that are excellent in that thou art instructed by the lawe
and perswadest thy selfe that thou art a guide of the blynde a lyghte of them which are in darkenes An instructer of them whiche lacke discretion a teacher of the vnlerned which hast the forme of knowledge and of the truth in the law Behold thou art called a Iew. In this place there is two maner of readyngs The Latines seme to haue read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is and if But in the Greke copies it is written by Iota simple 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Behold or see But whether of them thou readest it skilleth not much saue onely that to the purpose of the Apostle connexion together of his speaches that which is in the Greke semeth to be more apte The name of a Iew was no lesse set by at that tyme then the name of a Christian is at this time Vndoubtedly it was an honourable stocke But Paule saith wisely cognominaris which signified thou art so called for he wil not graūt vnto them that they were in dede Iewes Neither could he when as afterward he sayth That he is truely a Iew whiche is a Iew in secret and that that is the true Circumcision which is marked not in the flesh but in the hart And restest in the lavv This is nothing els but with a certayne vayne bostyng to delight himselfe by reasō of the law wherunto perauenture they wer moued by reason of those things which are written in Deut. the 4. chapter Namely That other nations should wonder at the publike wealth of the Israelites which◠had so noble and excellent lawes Dauid also sayd That it was not so done vnto other nations And boastest in God Because as it is written in the 17. chap. of the boke of Genesis God had made a league with Abraham and with all his posterity These thinges vndoubtedly had bene vnto them great honour and estimation if they had broght forth fruit accordingly For to come of godly elders is a gift of God not to be despised Moreouer to rest in the law so that thou wholy quietest thy selfe in it and art so content with the commaundementes of God that thou fainest not vnto thy selfe any other is a thyng worthy of prayse And lykewyse to count the true God for God may be ascribed vnto glory and that to sound glorye But they onely boasted in these thinges glorying in themselues of these vayne titles And knowest his will and allovvest the things that are excellent beyng instructed by the law To know the will of God is a great benefite of his But that commeth by the instruction of the scripture For no where els is the knowledge of the wil of God to be sought for Out of it we learn to alow most best things so the therby we are able to discerne them from things filthy vile In Greeke is red 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is turned things excellent Augustine in his boke de spiritu Litera readeth Distantia that is thinges different because those things which are excellent are different from meane thynges The Latin interpreter turneth it Vtilia that is thinges profitable because peraduenture as Erasmus admonisheth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greke is to profite Farther this verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is to allow is here taken otherwise then it was in the first chapiter Forasmuch as here it is referred onely vnto iudgement but there it is referred to that allowyng whereby we do in very deede and actes declare that which we iudge And persuadest thy selfe that thou art a guide of the blynde a lyghte of them whiche are in darkenesse An instructer of them whiche lacke discretion a teacher of the vnlearned He saythe not that these men performed those thynges but that they went about arrogantly to clayme them vnto themselues For they both iudged and also spake most contemptuously of other nations whome in comparison of themselues they counted to bee blynde and lyuers in darkenes vndiscrete and vnlearned And also they so vsurped vnto themselues the office of teaching others that Christ saide they went about sea and land to adioyne vnto themselues proselites whome they made not the children of God but the children of hell fyre And whiche was worst of all as Christ vpbraydeth thē they had takē away the kay of knowledge by clayming it vnto themselues when as neyther they thēselues would enter into the kingdome of heauen nor yet would they suffer others to enter therein They shewed themselues to be masters when as yet they were blynde Vnto whom the Lord sayd If the blynde leade the blynde they shall both fall into the ditch And in Esay the 42. chapter we reade who is blynde but my seruaunt Also in the 9. of Iohn If ye were blynde ye should haue no sinne But now because ye saye we see your sinne abideth Hauing the forme of knowldege Chrisostome thinketh that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a forme signifieth not here the true maner of knowing whiche hath in it nothing that is filthy but only a shew thereof Hauing the forme of knowledge and of the truth in the lawe We should vndoubtedly haue the forme of our doctrine in our selues and not in the law or in Where the forme of doctrine should be had bookes as Chrisostome here noteth For as they are not very well learned which are wise only by reading commentaries so they are not to be counted iust which put theyr righteousnes in lawes or in decrees For Iohn sayth Hereby we know that we loue God if we obserue his commaundementes Thou therefore which teachest an other teachest thou not thy selfe thou that preachest a man should not steale doost thou steale Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery doost thou commit adultery thou that abhorrest Idols committest thou sacriledge Thou that gloriest in the law through breaking the law dishonorest thou God For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you as it is written Thou therefore vvhich teachest an other teachest thou not thy selfe This The figure of interrogation How Paule here speaketh of the Iewes figure of interrogation is of great efficacy in reprouing But were all the Hebrewes such No vndoubtedly but Paule here speaketh of them Christ being excluded as the Gospel is set agaynst the lawe There were some of the fathers very holy which so liued in the Iewishe religion that yet neuertheles they most perfectly beleued in Christ But they were not such as Paule here describeth They were blessed vndoubtedly not because they had receaued the law but because they were occupied in it both day night But these mē of whom is now intreated knew the law in deede but they knew it not as they ought to haue done The summe of Paules reason is this that to receaue the law iustifyeth An explication of Paules reason agaynst the Iewes not For if it should iustefye then vndoubtedly all the Iewes should be both iust and holy when as they all had receaued the
he wil geue any plasters to heale it withall And so commeth it to passe that the law openeth the way vnto the Gospel Neither is this to What is the property of the law be maruelled at that in this place by the law are vnderstanded the Prophets and Psalmes For what soeuer is found in the whole scrpture serueth to the institution of lyfe which is peculiar and proper vnto the law Because by the workes of the law shall no flesh be iustefied in his sight For by the law coÌ„meth the knowledge of sinne But now is that righteousnes of God made manifest wtout the law hauing witnes of the law of the Prophets Namely the righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vppon all that beleue For there is no difference for all haue sinned are depriued of the glory of God And are iustefied frely by his grace thorough the redemption that is in Christ Iesu whome God hath set forth to be a reconciliation thorough fayth in his bloud to declare his righteousnesse by the remission of the sinnes that are passed thorough the patience of God to shew at this present tyme his righteousnes that he mighte be iust and a iustefier of hym which is of the fayth of Iesus Christ Because by the vvorkes of the lavv sâ—all no flesh be iustefied in his sight Hitherto Paule hath by good argumentes proued that iustification is not to belooked for by those thinges which wheÌ„ we haue obtayned yet notwithstanding we lyue wickedly That philosophy and the law were such he hath manifestly declared forasmuch as by them were accused both the Gentles and the Iewes that they were excedingly contaminated with wicked actes Wherby is concluded that the mouthe as well of the Iewes as of the Gentiles is stopped so that the whole world is made culpable before God And in that he lastly chiefly inueighed by sundry testimonies of the holy Scripture it was because he should haue a sharpe conflict agaynst the A sharpet conflict against the Iewes theÌ„ against the Ethnikes Hebrues For the Ethnikes were easely ouercome For they openly liued filthily neither could they out of philosophy bring any thing but the inuentions and opinions of men But the Hebrewes pretended the law and the ceremonies which they had receiued at the handes of God and therfore it semed that they might lawfully put confidence in them And peraduenture they mought haue sayd yâ— those thinges which were brought against them out of the holy scriptures pertayned vnto theyr elders and vnto them which filthily liued in the tyme of the Prophetes and not to theyr whole kinred Therfore the Apostle bringeth in a generall sentence wherby vtterly to represse them and affirmeth that no man can be iustified before God by the workes of the law Where he taketh away the power of iustifieng not onely An vniuersall proposition that by the workes of the law no man can be iustified from men or persons but also from the workes of the law so that it followeth of necessity that we must not put any confidence in them For as they were coÌ„maunded by the law no man was able to performe them For forasmuch as two things were required by the law First that workes should procede from fayth grace and charity Secondly that throughout and exactly they should agrée with the law and sithen the law ministred not strengthes to do these thinges there remained onely outward obseruations and ceremonies of which the Apostle sayth that they had not the power to iustifie Afterward by a firme reason he concludeth that we must not thinke that iustification is receiued by the law bicause by it commeth the knowledge Forasmuch as the law coÌ„demneth accuseth it absolueth not Righteousnes happeneth without the law of sinne Seyng therfore the law condemneth accuseth it absolueth not nor iustifieth For these two offices are contrary and repugnaunt the one to the other And these thyngs beyng thus ordered he gathereth his chiefe proposition of which he will in this epistle dispute namely that righteousnes commeth wythout the law Wherby commeth to passe that it depeÌ„deth not of it Afterward he affirmeth that the righteousnes of God which hath his testimony out of the law and the prophetes commeth by the fayth of Iesus Christ And this is all one wyth that which he proposed at the beginnyng that the Gospell is the power of God to saluation to Righteousnes by the faith of Iesus Christ euery one that beleueth and that in it is reueled the righteousnes of God froÌ„ faith to faith and that the iust man as Abacuck saith liueth by faith Thus much as touching the disposition now let vs diligently examine euery thing by it selfe In that he saith That by the workes of the law no flesh shal be iustified in the fight of God It is necessary that we know of what workes of the lawe the Apostle here intreateth And here we affirme that he speaketh vniuersally of all workes so the those thinges which are here spoken ought not perticularly to be drawen vnto ceremonies wheÌ„ as they include the whole law We grauÌ„t in dede yâ— the controuersy sproÌ„g by reasoÌ„ of ceremonies For the false Apostles went about to obtrude theÌ„ as necessary vnto theÌ„ They which say that ceremonies are nedelul affirm Christ not to be Christ which beleued in Christ As though Christ could not wtout theÌ„ bring saluation to yâ— beleuers Which was blasphemous neither was it any lesse irreligious then to deny Christ to be Christ which thing they must néedes graunt that affirme that he cannot saue men without the workes of the law But as touching morall commaundementes they contended not For as well the Apostles as the deceiuers vrged them Neither was there any controuersie about ciuill or as they call them iudiciall lawes for they pertayned vnto the publike wealth Which forasmuch as it had maiestrates the church and the Apostles tooke no care of those thinges But although the contention sprong by reason of ceremonies yet by the benefite of the Workes ar to be taken vniuersally when they are affirmed not to iustify The question was moued because of ceremonies holy ghost it came to passe that Paule reuoked the question from the species or partes vnto the vniuersall genus or generall worde For if the generall worde be by negation ouerthrowen it followeth that the species also euery parte be clene destroyed For if generally the law iustify not neither vndoubtedly shall ceremonies iustify forasmuch as they are a certaine species and a part of the lawe And that the discention began by reason of ceremonies the Actes of the Apostles do testiffe in the xv chapter And not much afterwarde in this selfe same epistle the Apostle when he would proue that Abraham was not iustified by the lawe bryngeth a reason taken from Circumcision And also to the Galathians where he rehearseth hearseth this selfe same sentence and in a maner with
the selfe same wordes that they are here when he saith We are by nature Iewes and not sinners of the Gentiles Because we know that man is not iustified by the workes of the lawe but by the fayth of Iesus Christ. Also we haue beleued in Christ Iesus that we mighte be iustified by the fayth of Christ and not by the workes of the lawe For no fleshe shall be iustified by the workes of the lawe And vndoubtedly Paule reproued not Peter but onely touchyng ceremonies And in the same place in yâ— third chapiter he writeth Haue ye receiued the spirite by the workes of the law or by preaching of fayth Are ye so foolish that hauing begonne in the spirite ye should now make an ende in the fleshe where by the workes of the law seing he expoundeth them by the flesh he manifestly vnderstandeth the ceremonies of Moses But although therehence sprang the controuersie yet was it most commodiously done for Paule to reuoke it to the genus or generall worde of workes of the law Forasmuch as the tyme should come that ceremonies being banished many would in successe of tyme attribute iustificatioÌ„ to moral workes which is most manifestly confuted by this so pithy a reason of Paule And this is to be noted that this is an argument that may be turned For euen as we may inferre that no workes of the law do iustifie therfore neither do ceremonies iustifie so contrariwise may we conclude if ceremonies iustifie not therfore neither any other part of the law forasmuch as they were the principall part of the lawe If ceremonies iustefy not neither doth the morall part instefy For they are the offices of the first and greatest commaundement I am sayth the Lord thy God Wherfore it is mete that I be worshipped of thée bothe in spirite and in outward confession not only by voyce but also by rites apointed by me Neither did those ceremonies any lesse bynde the olde fathers then do Baptisme and the Eucharist in these dayes binde vs. Wherfore euen as they most greuously sinned when they were not content with the worshipping prescribed them by God but sought new ceremonies and rites inuented by men for that was to go aboute to adde vnto the wisedome of God and that the worshippyng instituted by God was the chiefe wisdome we rede in Deut. the iiij chapter so our men do most greuously sinne when besides Baptisme and the Eucharist and those thinges which we haue deliuered vs by Christ they appoint other thyngs which meÌ„ haue inuented as worshippings of God and as necessary vnto saluation As are the masse the inuocation of saintes and such other like And that by the workes of the lawe are vnderstanded also morall workes Paule teacheth by that which followeth For by the law is the knowledge of sinne For although other partes also of the law do after a sort declare sinne yet is that chiefly the office of the morall part What groundes or principles the proper workes of the law haue A distinctioÌ„ of the workes of the law A conciliation of places repugnant Which thing is expressedly declared in the vij chap. where he writeth For I should not haue knowen what lust had bene if the law had not sayd Thou shalte not lust And this is furthermore to be noted that the workes of the law as I before said when they are taken properly haue ioyned with them fayth and charity and therfore are they not without iustification For wheresoeuer is true faith there iustificatioÌ„ followeth But the Apostle by workes of the law vnderstandeth as they were done of them beyng vnprofitable and proceding also of hipocrisie Otherwise the law in dede is spirituall wherfore the workes therof must nedes be good if they be considered as they are whole and perfect And by this meanes may we conciliate those places which as touching this thing seme in the holy scriptures to be repugnant Moses said that he did set before the Iewes life when he spake of the lawe And in the 119. psalme Dauid prayeth oftentimes that God would quicken him with If the fathers at any tyme attribute righteousnes vnto good works that is to be vnderstand by reason of faith which they haue as a roote his commaundements and with his law And in this selfe same epistle the law is called both good and spirituall and the commaundement holy and good But on the contrary side Paule calleth it the ministery of death in the next chapter he saith that it worketh anger and againe that it sheweth sinne and therfore condemneth and accuseth So must we vnderstand the fathers also when they ascribe so excellent thinges vnto workes For they take them ioyned with faith grace and the holy ghost And so they ascribe vnto them eternall life and other suche like things which are vnderstanded to be geuen vnto them by reason of faith and the spirite And to declare the same this is a very apt similitude We say that man is reasonable vnto whome yet we ascribe reason not because of the body but because of the soule which is included in the body So when iustification semeth to be ascribed vnto workes we must vnderstaÌ„d yâ— that is done by reason of faith wherunto workes By faith alone we are iustefied which yet is neuer alone which are in very dede good do chiefly lene But we when we wil speake of iustification ought to bring forth our sentence prospicuously expressedly Wherefore we say yâ— iustification coÌ„meth by faith only which faith yet we confesse is neuer alone For if it be a true faith it ought alwais to haue good workes ioyned with it But the holy fathers spake hyperbollically of workes to the ende to stirre vp The fathers spake hyperboilically of workes Fayth as it is a worke iustifieth not men more and more to vse them But they are so to be vnderstanded as I haue sayd vnles we will leaue them without Christ But some obiect that fayth also it selfe is a worke of the lawe Therefore we answere that as it is our worke comming out of our will and vnderstanding it iustifieth not Because it is feble and weake For none beleueth so much as he ought neyther so strongly cleaueth vnto God as he should do But when fayth is sayd to iustifye it is taken for his obiect namely Christ and the promises of God Neyther is fayth that The power of iustifâ—ing is to be r 〈…〉 erred to his obiect A similitude thing which iustifyeth but the instrument whereby iustification is receaued Neyther must we thinke that by the worthynes thereof it is of it selfe sufficient to iustifie a man A most euident similitude may be brought as touching a begger which with his weake hand or peraduenture with his hand enfected with leprosy receaueth almes And that benefite is not weighed according to the weakenes or disease of the hand which receaueth it but according to the quantity of the monye which is geuen Wherefore
An error of the Anabaptistes the chief and principall benefite of Christ neyther make they any difference betwene the law and the Gospell The law in deede commaundeth but the Gospell ministreth strengths to accomplishe those thinges whiche are commaunded The law accused the The Gospel absolueth The law maketh a sound outwardly The DiffereÌ„ces betwene the Law and the Gospel Gospell is grauen in the bowells The law worketh anger The Gospell maketh God pacifyed and reconciled vnto vs The lawe by making afeard deiecteth the mind The Gospell by comforting erecteth it The law is the ministery of death The gospel of life The law is a schoolemaster The gospel is a perfect instruction The whole lawe consisteth in this that we should woork The Gospel herein chiefly consisteth that we should beleue The law bringeth a curse vnto theÌ„ whichlyue vnder it The Gospel bringeth blessing The law bringeth bondage The Gospell spirituall liberty The lawe is the letter The Gospell is the spirite The lawe hath promises but with this condition if ye shall doo all those thinges The promises of the Gospell are free and therefore firme There mought be rehersed also other differences whereby these two differ very much a sunder But at thys tyme we thinke these to be sufficient Whiche thinges yet are not iudged true by humaine reason Neither is it any maruayle for as Plato sayd in his second booke De legibus What soeuer we behold a farre of we know it not thoroughly For there cometh betwene our sight and it a dissines and by farre distaÌ„ce of place darknes shadoweth The cause why many iudge so ill of the Law and of the Gospell our sights But when we come and behold them more nighly theÌ„ we iudge of euery thing a right These things spake he bycause voluptuous and corrupt men could not be perswaded that a good and innocent life is pleasauntest For they iudge of it farre otherwise for that they are very much distant from it But if they would drawe nere vnto it and make a triall therof they should then iudge vprightly So do we at this present pronounce of these men For asmuch as they a far of looke vpon the holy scriptures neither do with any diligent heade taking consider the Gospel and the lawe thereof it commeth to passe that they iudge so ill of them The Apostle addeth of this righteousnes which he speaketh of that it hath the testimony of the law and of the Prophets Which he therfore addeth because that doctrine whiche he set forth mought haue semed new and strange But in the Gospell newnes is Newnes must be remoued away from the Gospel in any wise to be auoyded Therfore he euery where testifieth of the Gospell that it is of antiquity and instituted by God before all worlds And in the beginnyng of this Epistle he wrote that God promised it by hys Prophets in the holy Scriptures At this day also there is a strife betwene vs and the aduersaryes about doctrine whilest they contend that we bring in new things but they abyde stil by the old doctrine But now by the Apostle we learne how this controuersy may be ended What doctrine is called new what olde The doctrine of the Papistes is new forasmuche as it hath no testemonye out of the holy scriptures That doctrine vndoubtedly is old and auncient which hath hys testimony by the lawe and the prophets that is by the holy scriptures And that is to be iudged new wherof there is no mention made in them They haue set vp the Masse wherin one alone doth communicate for others whiche are standers by This hath no testimony thoroughe al the scriptures We affirme that the supper of the Lord ought to be common vnto all the faythfull which thing is most playnely declared by the institution therof as it is set forth in the Gospels and in Paul They geue vnto the lay men the sacrament of the Eucharist mayned which is not only not in the scriptures but also is playnly agaynst the scriptures They defend the inuocations of the dead for the confirmacion wherof they haue nothing out of the holy scriptures They compel the Clergie froÌ„ matrimony they defend purgatory they maintayne Images they vse a strange tongue in their holy seruices they obtrude the choyse of meats garments shauings vnctions and a thousand such like trumperyes as things necessary vnto the worshippinge of God and that vtterly without any testimony of the scriptures Let them learne of Paul who endeuouring to teache righteousnes to come by Christ sayeth that it hath testimony of the law and of the prophets and not that he made it of his owne head But the doctrines of these men do aduaunce impietye For they obtrude the fayned inueÌ„tions of men as necessary worshippinges of God And forasmuch as they haue no testimony out of the scriptures it must follow of necessity that they are new But the reason Why newnes is to be taken hede of in religion why newnes ought to be auoyded in religion is because the Lord commaunded in Deutronomy that from his commaundements and rytes they should nether take away any thing nor adde therunto Euen Plato also in his lawes and Pub. welth forbiddeth that there should be any innouation in thinges pertayning vnto religion In deed mens laws may sometymes be changed for that the form of the Pub. Humane lawes may be chaunged welth is sometymes altered Neyther do those lawes which serue for a kingdome serue for that gouernemente which is executed by the noble men or a Pub. welth that is ruled by the people Farther the lawgeuers forasmuch as they are men can not se all things And there happen daily many cases for which they are fayne both to correct and to change laws And eueÌ„ as in artes throughe continuance of tyme somewhat is found wherby they are made more perfect so lawes also in successe of tyme are oftentymes amended and brought into a better forme But none of al these rases taketh place in the lawes of God For as touching the Church it chaungeth The politicall gouernment of the church chaungeth not his forme not his forme it is alwaies one and the self same Pub. welth and there is nothing hidden from the vnderstanding of God which is the author of those lawes He forsâ—â—th all thinges neyther is his knowledg increased by successe of tyme. Wherfore it is not mete that men should attempt to alter any thing in his lawes But now let vs se what testimonyes there are of this righteousnes in the lawe and the Prophets which Paul asserteth And although Christ sayd generally that Moses wrote of him and Luke declareth that Christ beyng apparelled like a stranger and talking by the way with the twoo Disciples began at Moses and then tought them by the prophets and psalmes yet is there no certayne place brought forth wherin is expressedly made mention of the Messias And yet neuertheles if we will
one of vs perticularly For he wayteth long that we should repent vs. Which thing if we do not we heape vnto our selues wrath in the day of wrath of the reuelation of the iust iudgement of God And by this pacience of God we knowe that that is true whiche Ezechiel sayth that God will not the death of a sinner but rather that he should be coÌ„uerted and liue Neither here ought We must iudge by the will of God reueled and not by hys secret will we to haue a respect vnto the secret will of God whiche vnto vs is vnknowne obscure For we oughte to iudge of it as by the holye scriptures and by daylye experieÌ„ce it is setforth vnto vs and may be known For he suffreth long and by scriptures sermons scourges and finally by all manner of meanes and wayes calleth backe sinners vnto him At this present time Chrisostome interpreteth this of the coÌ„ming of Christ in the flesh For that then was he most chiefly geuen the pacience of God was declared to be so muche the greater for that then all manner of vices were rife and when men séemed to haue deserued to be moste gréeuouslye punished euen then did the mercye of God most chieflye shine vpon them And it seemeth that When sins semed most worthy to be punished then most of all shined forth the mercy of God The fâ—lnes of time Paule euery where wonderfully extolleth this time wherein God so singularly declared his beneuolence toward men that he gaue his onely begotten sonne for our saluation And that time wherein God came vnto vs he calleth the fulnes of times That he might be iuste and a iustifier of him vvhiche is of the fayth of Iesus Christ Here is touched the reason why God appoynted after thys manner to forgeue sinnes namelye that his righteousnes moughte the more appeare we vse to say that in a manne there is a notable qualitye when as out of the same fountayne others are pertakers thereof But there is an Emphasis or strength in this forme of speaking That he might be iust Wherby we vnderstaÌ„d that he is of himselfe iust neither ought we to presume to chalenge the same to our selues And he addeth Of the fayth of Iesus Christ because by that meanes the righteousnes of God doth better appeare then if we shoulde clayme it vnto our selues by workes Where is then thy glorying It is excluded By what law By the lawe of workes No but by the lawe of fayth Therefore we conclude that a man is iustified by fayth without the workes of the law God is he the God of the Iewes only and not of the GeÌ„tiles also Yes euen of the Gentiles also For it is one God who shall iustifie circumcision by faith vncircumcision through fayth Do we then make the lawof none effect God forbid yea rather we establishe the law VVherefore thy glorying is excluded By what lawe By the lawe of workes No but by the lawe of fayth After that he had declared his proposition now Epiphonema as it were by a conclusion he geueth a definitiue sentence of that which he put forth at the beginning of the chapiter when he sayd what is then the preferment of the Iewe or what is the profite of circumcision In this place he maketh answere that as touching iustification the Iewes had nothing aboue others whereof they might glory for that by those thinges which haue bene now spoken their glorying is excluded In the Greke booke is not reade this woord thy And Ambrose thinketh that these thinges are spoken against the Iewes For against theÌ„ peculiarly conteÌ„ded he now So farre is it of that the law of works excludeth glorying that rather it ministreth matter to glory of And by this woorde lawe the Apostle vnderstandeth doctrine for it hath the power to moderate and The Law of woorkes ministreth matter of boasting What this woord law signifieth gouerne our strengthes and willes to the executing of any thing as touching knowledge doctrine or instruction And in other places he applieth this worde lawe to diuers thinges as The lawe of the spirite The law of the fleshe the lawe of the members the lawe of the minde and such other like The lawe of workes is that which decreeth that righteousnes oughte to be gotten by workes But the lawe of fayth teacheth that it is to be hoped for of the mercy of God And Chrisostome sayth that the lawe of fayth is that by grace we are saued and he thinketh that the Apostle vseth the name of the lawe to the ende he would the lesse offend the Iewes which much delighted in that worde For by that meanes he semed to attribute some honour vnto the lawe which had not ill deserued of What glorieng is The contrariety betwene the law of faith and the law of workes Where merites are there is glorieng men Glorying according to the definition thereof is a boasting of some good thing And how repugnaÌ„t these two lawes are one to the other we ar manifestly tought in the Gospel where the Pharisey speaketh thus to God I geue thankes vnto thee that I am not as other men I fast twise in the weake c. Here he maketh mencion of workes only ouerhipping the grace of God as much as lay in him But the other namely the Publicane prayd with fayth God be mercifull vnto me a sinner In which words he maketh no mencion at all of works And seeing that God will haue all glorying excluded it is manifest how they erre which defend merites For where they haue place there wanteth not glorying They which glory thinke that both saluation and righteousnes and eternall life are dew vnto them But he which leneth vnto the lawe of fayth ought not in any Debte may be taken two maner of wayes wyse to perswade himselfe of any such thing Although we mought make such a distinction that debt may sometymes be taken as it is referred vnto our labours and so it hath a respect vnto reward as the Apostle will playnly afterward declare when he sayth that vnto hym which worketh are ward is imputed not according to grace but according to debt and debt may be taken an other way as it hath a respect vnto a promise when a thing is dew vnto a man not that he hath deserued it but because by our promise we haue bound our selues to geue it vnto hym Of which thing we haue an example in those giftes which are confirmed by contractes and hand writinges And agaynst this kinde of debt the lawe of fayth is not But of it springeth no glorying but our aduersaryes doo not vndoubtedly exclude glorying when they say that vnto the repentaunte is graunted remission of sinnes so that she repentaunce be mete and as they call it sufficient In this their saying they of purpose resiste the will of God which vtterly tendeth to this that all glorying should be excluded from vs. Yea Chrisostome affirmeth that
moughte haue proued his argument by that which we haue a litle before made mencion of that none of vs is able to kepe the law But he omitteth that at this present And to conclude the more euidently he addeth that the lawe worketh anger As if he shoulde haue sayde So farre is it of that the lawe bringeth the inheritance that it rather maketh vs guilty and subiect vnto the wrath of God And if thou demaund why the law doth in such sort bring vnto vs anger we may answere because we are not able to kepe it For by anger Paule vnderstandeth nothing els but the vengeance of God and that by the figure Metonymia For men when they are angry are accustomed to auenge whiche thinge God also doth although he be not moued with humane affections This selfe same thinge hath Paule to the Galathyans in other words expressed saying Cursed be he that abideth not in all the thinges that are written in the boke of the law And a curse in the holy scriptures signifieth nothing els but calamity affliction and misery I meruayle that Origen vnderstandeth this saying of Paule of the lawe of the members for that vndoubtedly is to farre wide from the purpose For the Iewes gloried not of the concupiscence which was in them by nature which is called of Paul the lawe of the members but they boasted of the lawe of God which was geuen them of God by Moses Wherefore that the Apostle mought with some fruite deale agaynst them it behoued him to write of that lawe whereof they boasted Howbeit by Origenes wordes our aduersaryes may see what he thought of naturall concupisence Vndoubtedly seing he sayth it worketh anger it followeth that he iudged that the first motions which are deriued out of it are of necessity sinnes and transgressions I know there haue bene some which haue taken anger in this place not for the anger of God but for our owne anger For forasmuch as we are by nature prone vnto vices and the lawe when it commeth forbiddeth them we beginne to hate God the author of the lawe and so it worketh in vs anger But the first exposition is bothe plainer and also better agréeth with the sentence followyng For where no law is there is no transgression By these wordes it is manifest that the Apostlement to signifis this that the wrath of GOD is kindled against transgressions But how transgression is brought in by the law the nature How the law and transgression follow one the other of relatiues teacheth which is such that the one of them beyng taken away the other also is taken away On the one side is put the law on the other side is set eyther the obseruation or transgression therof And forasmuch as the obseruation of the law can not be perfect there remayneth onely transgressiō which Paul in this place inferreth But those thinges which are here spoken are to be vnderstande of the law written and whiche was geuen by Moses For otherwise there is none which wanteth a law at the least vndoubtedly the law of nature Wherfore there can none be found without sinne no not an infant of a day olde when as vnto him the image of God is in stede of a law vnto which image for that he answereth not The law of children is the image of God as Augustine declareth in his booke of confessions vndoubtedly he can not be with out sinne As touching the letter the Greke worde worde is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with aspiration so it is turned in Latine cuius that is of whome But the vulger interpreter séemeth to haue red 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and therfore turned it vbi that is where But as touching the sence there is no difference whether it be this or that Howbeit let vs not thinke that these thinges are to be ascribed vnto the lawe as it is taken by it selfe alone The law of his owne nature worketh not these things A similitude but as it lighteth vppon our mynde being corrupt and vitiate We haue of thys thing an example although grosse in gonne pouder wherwith is mingled either salt nitre or salt peter which is by nature very cold And thereof it commeth that when the fire is receiued in the brimstone against which striueth the coldnes of the salt nitre or of the salt peter it conceiueth so great a violence that the pellet beyng driuen out with an incredible force shaketh and ouerthroweth whatsoeuer is in the way So the heate of our lust when it findeth the law repugnaunt agaynst it is with a greater violēce strēgthned so that it enforceth men to most haynous wycked actes For as the common saying is We endeuour our selues to that whiche is forbidden vs and we haue alwayes a desire to thinges denied vs. Howbeit to the godly and to the elect this force of the law is not vnprofitable For it leadeth them euen as a scholemaister vnto Christ And for that cause Christ is iustly and worthely called the ende of the law not for that the law is by him abrogated but bicause it directeth men vnto him Finally Christ hath performed and accomplished y◠law Christ the end of the law not onely in himselfe but also in them that beleue in hym for he hath geuen them strengthes to obey it Neyther is it any maruell that the law bryngeth men vnto Christ especially seyng he himself was the author therof For by the Sonne it was Christ the author of the law reuealed vnto Moses And for this ende he gaue it by it to drawe men vnto hym Here are we admonished of the peruersenes of our nature whiche is so greate that although we be taughte the wyll of GOD by the lawe yet we neuer cease to striue agaynste it Some goe aboute by this place to inferre that they do ill whiche set for the lawes especiallye seyng they serue verye muche to increase Whether it be lawfull to make lawes transgressions But if their argument were of any strengthe then shoulde they inferre that GOD also oughte not to haue made any lawe Wherefore we say that those lawes whiche are made are either iust or vniust If they be vniust then are they not to be counted for lawes For who will call the violent affectes of tyrantes lawes But if they be iust then are they interpretations of the lawes of God And by them we vnderstande the will of God that by that meanes we Good lawes are interpretacions of the lawes of God Names attributed vnto the law may be broughte to Christe that by him we may obteine strengthes to do them This selfe same sentence also is had in the epistle to the Galathians That the lawe was put because of transgressions namely to shew forth thē to accuse them to condemne them So in the latter epistle to the Corinthians the law is called the ministery of deathe and in the first to the Cor. it is called the power efficacy of sinne
Christ which thing Paul also teacheth saying The end of the law is Christ to saluation The law doth not by it selfe bring men to Christe and to saluatiō The Ethnikes opinion concerning the end of the law What is the law which yet he speaketh not vniuersally But to euery one that beleueth For the law doth not of it selfe bring a man to thys end The Ethnikes sayd that the end of the law is knowledge which it engēdreth of thinges that are to be done Wherfore Christippus as he is cyted in the digestes fayth that the law is the knowledg of thinges diuine and humane But thys end and thys definition extend to largelye For all wisdome and all good artes doo geue some knowledg of diuine and humane thinges Now resteth diligently to se what is the matter and efficient cause of the law And briefely to speake of these thinges I say that the Law is a commaundement of God wherein both hys will and also disposition or nature is expressed When I say a commaundement I note the generall woorde For there are commaūdemēts of people Senators kings of Emperors But whē I say of God I adde the difference which noteth the efficient cause But in that I The law expresseth vnto vs the disposition nature of God say that in the law is expressed the will of God that is so manifest that it nedeth not to be expounded But this may peraduēture seme more obscure in that I said that in the law the disposition of God is taught vs and we are stirred vp to the knowledge of his nature we wil therfore by examples make it more playn Whē God commaundeth vs to loue him he therebye teacheth that he is of nature amiable For those things cannot iustly be beloued which are not worthy to be beloued And vnles he bare great good will toward vs he would not set forth vnto vs the chiefe good which we should loue Wherfore he for this cause exhorteth vs therunto bicause he desireth to haue vs pertakers of himselfe We sée therfore that he is such towardes vs as he desireth vs to be also And when he prohibiteth vs to kill First therin he declareth his will farther he sheweth himselfe to be such a God which abhorreth from violence and from iniuries had rather do good vnto men then hurt them After the same maner these two thinges may also be declared in the other preceptes and out of this definition may those thinges also be gathered which we haue before spoken concerning the forme and ende of the law bicause of necessity such doctrine ought to be both spirituall and also to engender a wonderfull excellent knowledge and we are taught that God by it hath geuen no small Benefites of the lawe benefite vnto men for it causeth vs both to know our selues and also to vnderstand the proprieties of God Plato in his bookes of lawes of a publike wealth and Platoes definition in Minoe seemeth thus to define the lawe namely that it is an vprighte manner of gouerning which by conuenient meanes directeth vnto the best ende in setting forth paynes vnto the transgressors and rewardes vnto the obedient This definition may be most aptly applied vnto the law of God yea there can be no such law Lawgeuers made God the author of theyr lawes vnles it be of God It is no meruaile therefore if the olde lawgeuers when they would haue their lawes commended fayned some God to be the author of them For Minos ascribed his lawes to Iupiter Licurgus his to Apollo Solon and Draco theirs to Minerua and Numa Pompilius referred his vnto Aegiria But we are assured and that by the holy scriptures that our law was geuen of God by Moses The Manichies do wickedly condemne the law There is no good or euill whych is not by the law of God either commaunded or forbiddē The law requireth not onely deades but also the wil The law bringeth vs to the knowledge of God and of our selues in mount Syna And these thinges beyng thus sene concerning the nature and definition of y◠law we mayeasly vnderstand how fowly the Manichies erred which blasphemed it and cursed it as euil For seyng that the law commaundeth nothing but things worthy to be commaunded and prohibiteth nothing but thinges mete to be prohibited how can it iustly be accused For there can be no iust or honest duety found which is not commended in the law of God nor nothyng filthy or vnhonest which in it is not forbidden neither are wicked actes onely prohibited in y◠law but also wicked lustes are there condemned Wherfore it sheweth that not onely outward workes are to be corrected but also the mynd and will And forasmuch as a great part of felicitie consisteth in the knowledge of God and Philosophers do so much extoll the knowledge of our selues and the law of GOD as we haue taught performeth either it can not but with great wickednes be reproued as euill and hurtful Howbeit this place wherein it is sayd That the law entred in that sinne should abound may seme to make somwhat with the Manichies as doth that also vnto the Galathians That the law was put for transgressions and that also in the 7. chap. of this epistle That sinne through the commaundement killeth and that likewise which is sayd in the second epist ▪ to the Corint That the law is the ministery of death All these thinges may seme to confirme the error of the Manichies But The things which are ioyned vnto the law of themselues and the thinges that come by chaunce must be seperated A similitude we must diligently put a differēce betwene those things which of themselues pertaine vnto the law and those things which follow it by reason of an other thing per accidens that is by chaunce For as we haue before taught sinne death damnation and other such like do spring of the law by reason of the corruption of our nature But if a man compare not the law with our nature but consider it by it selfe or if he referre it to a sound vncorrupt nature then can he affirme nothing els of it then that which Paul sayth Namelye that it is spirituall holye good and instituted vnto lyfe and it is said rather to shewe synne then to worke synne Wherefore if men deformed lying hidde in the darke shoulde saye vnto a man whiche by chaunce bryngeth a lyghte vnto them gette the hence least by this thy light thou make vs deformed vndoubtedly we could not gather by their wordes that the power and nature of light is such that it doth make men deformed but this we might rather gather that those things which of themselues are deformed are by the light vttered and shewed what they be And so is it of the lawe for it after a maner bringeth light and openeth to our knowledge the sinnes which before lay hidden But a man will say if the law be good and holy why
is it so displeasant and had in hatred Because it calleth Why the law is had in hatred men backe from those thinges which of their owne nature they are prone vnto for it gréeueth them to haue those thinges forbidden them And when we looke vpon the lawe we sée those thinges which we ought to do and by reason of the pride which is naturally plāted and grafted in vs we will not be restrained by any rules Farther thereby we sée how our actiōs are writhed from that vprightnes which is set forth in the lawe and whiche is more grieous we feele our selues to be so weake that we can not correct them and call thē backe to the prescribed rule howbeit in the meane while we behold the paines and anger of God whereinto by reason of sinnes we incurre All these thinges do so We are not angry with our selues as it is meete but wyth the law and wyth God How the law of God may please vs. Christ being ioyned with the law maketh it swete offend our minde that we are angry not indeede with our selues and with our sinnes as it were mete we shoulde but with the lawe geuen of God when as otherwise it is most perfect and most holy Howbeit this discommodity may be remedied and we may bring to passe that those thinges which before were displeasant vnto vs may afterward be pleasant vnto vs. And that shall we do if we ioyne the lawe together with Christ For euen as the waters of Marath were most bitter vnto the people of Israell in the desert and yet the selfe same by casting in the wood which God had commaunded were made swete So although the law by it selfe be bitter yet if Christ be ioyned with it whom God hath set forth vnto vs as an only sauior and also as the iust and due ende thereof we shall then feele it to be sweete Which thing to haue happened vnto Dauid the 119 Psalme manifestly declareth wherein are wonderfully set forth the prayses of the lawe of God For there it is called pleasaunt delectable sweete Prayses of the law in the Psalmes How the law of God is written in our hartes aboue hony and the hony combe And this is it which is promised vs in the prophete that God would write the lawe in our hartes which is nothing els but that he will geue vnto vs the spirite of Christ whereby we may be inclyned to those thinges which the lawe hath commaunded to be done that at the least way the commaundementes of God should be pleasant to our minde Which thing also the Apostle teacheth when he saith In minde I serue the lawe of God This they that are regenerate do fele who although they can not performe a perfect obedience vnto the commaundementes of God yet they loue them and excedingly desire them and embrace them as the chiefe good and do dilligently desire of God to come to the perfection of them as nigh as is possible By these thinges it plainly appeareth how the vtility and righteousnes of the lawe is to be defended against the Manechies But on the other side the Pelagians are no les to be auoyded which ascribe vnto the lawe more then is mete for they affirme it to The Pelagians attribute vnto the law more then is which they thinke to be sufficient vnto saluation Pelagius sometymes confessed the grace of God in woorde and not in dede By grace Pelagius vnderstoods nature and the law The schole men come very nye vnto the error of the Pelagians be sufficient vnto saluation For they say that if men once vnderstand what is to be done they may easely by the power of nature performe the same Wherfore Pelagius for feare least he should haue bene condemned of the Bishoppes of Palestine as one which vtterly denied the grace of God cōfessed the same grace in word for he affirmed that to our saluation the grace of God is necessary But by grace he vnderstoode nothing els but nature it selfe geuen vs freely of God because God hath made vs reasonable and endued vs with free will Farther he saide that the lawe or doctrine of the lawe was grace because of our selues we are ignorant what thinges are to be done or to be beleued vnles God reuele them vnto vs. Wherefore Augustine writeth in his books of the grace of Christ against Celestius that they with mouth affirme that the possibility of nature it holpen by grace But he addeth that if their meaninges were examined and narrowly waighed then shall we see that by grace doctrine and the lawe they vnderstand nothing els but that a man hauing receaued only the knowledge of the lawe hath of himselfe strength inough to do the thinges that are commaunded Vnto which error the schoole deuines approch very nye when they teach that a man euen by the power of nature can obserue the preceptes of God as touching the substance of the worke although not according to y◠intēt of the cōmaunder By which words this they signifie that we can perform the very works although not in such sort as God hath commaunded they should be done namely of charity the spirite Which latter part I thinke they added that they might seme in some point to disagree from the Palagians But Augustine so abhorred from such sentences that not euen vnto the regenerate so long as they liue in this flesh he graunteth a perfect Euen the regenerate are not able perfectly to obserue the law The Pelagians make the death of Christe vaine obseruation of the commaundementes of God whiche thing manifestly appeareth by his Retractations And that his iudgement therein is most true Paule declareth in the 7. chap. of this epistle Vndoubtedly if the thing were so as Pelagius hath taughte the comming of Christ and sacrifice of the crosse had bene nothing nedefull For these thinges were therefore geuen bycause by our owne strengths we could not attayne vnto the righteousnes of workes That thing Paul most manifestly testefieth saying That which was impossible vnto the law for asmuch as it was weakened by the flesh c These wordes apertly declare that mā by reason of the infirmity of the flesh could not fullfil the law Farther he saith The wisdome of the flesh is enmity towards God for it is not subiect vnto the law of God nether certainely can it be For although the law hath power to teach and to illustrate the minde yet it doth not therefore minister strength or change the will Wherefore Ambrose in his booke de fuga seculi The law sayth he cā stop the mouth of all men but yet it can not conuert the minde And afterward The law indede sheweth the fault but it taketh not a way the malice Wherefore vnto it must be adioyned grace which forasmuch as the Pelagians contemned they wandred from saluation were iustly condemned of the Church But as touching the office of y◠law these few thinges are to be obserued
vnto an other namely to him which rose agayne from the dead that we should bryng forthe fruite vnto God For when we were in the fleshe the affectes of sinnes which were by the law had force in our members to bryng forth fruite vnto death But now ye are deliuered from the law beyng dead vnto it where in ye were holden that we should serue in newnes of spirite and not in the oldnes of the letter In this chapter the Apostle answereth vnto the other obiection of the aduersaries Methode of this chapter namely that he semed to deiect the lawe more then was mete And he declareth that he for this purpose did it that they which had once taken vpon them the name of Christ should no more séeke to be vnder the lawe when as by the benefit of Christ they are deliuered from it And here he at large prosecuteth that which in the chapter before he had but briefely touched when he sayd Ye are not vnder the law but vnder grace Wherfore first he setteth forth our liberty wherby we are deliuered from the seruitude of the law Secondly that he should not seme to haue abrogated it for that it commaundeth things vile or vniust he declareth that it is not sinne but only sheweth and vttereth sinne Thirdly after he had declared that by the prohibitions of the law sinne is both encreased and more vehemently killeth he defendeth the law it self not to be that cause of our death and that it cannot by any meanes be counted guilty therof And after that he had taught that all destruction and the whole cause of euils is deriued of the corruption prauity which is by nature in vs at the last he addeth that it exerciseth a very sore and violent tiranny in men euen being regenerate and wyth great affect crieth out wysheth that he might be out of hand deliuered from that violence Now at the beginnyng he doth not absolutely write that we are deliuered from the seruitude of the law but he addeth that as a reason to open vnto vs the way meane wherby we come vnto such a liberty namely the death of Christ After that he declareth the ende wherfore we are brought from the law vnto Christ which is that euen as before we brought forth fruit vnto death so now we should bring forth fruit vnto God And bicause the Iewes which were now come vnto Christ mought heue bane offended wyth thys sentence of the deliuery from the law therfore by a louyng and gentle name he calleth them brethern and attributeth vnto them the knowledge Why he calleth the brethern of the law lest he should seme to be moued either of hatreâ— or of contempt toward them to abrogate the law wherin they so much gloried Know ye not brethren for I speake to them that know the lawe that the law hath dominion ouer a man so long as he liueth The proofe of that that he said that we are deliuered from the law is taken of no other thing but for that we are dead For they which are dead are not bound vnto the law And yâ— we are dead We are sayd to be deliuered from the law for that we ar dead It seemed filthy to the Iewes a thing vile to fall away from the law of God We depart â—ot from the law against the will therof he declareth by the body of Christ in which he saith we are mortefied vnto the law And this argument the Apostle therfore so diligently handleth for that vnto the Iewes of whom in those first tymes the greatest part of the church consisted it sented a thing vile and filthy sodenly to fall away from the law which they had receiued both of their elders and also at the handes of God Wherfore the Apostle now sayth that that ought not to be layd vnto vs for a fault seing that we are exempted from the law neither depart we from it against the will therof For it also sendeth vs away from it self vnto Christ But of what law Paul here speketh all men are not of one minde Ambrose thinketh that those things which are here spoken pertaine to the commaundement of the Gospell and not vnto the law of Moses For in it is permitted diuorcement neither is separation alwayes waited for till the death of the husband or wife But sauing the authoritie of Ambrose a man shall not easely finde in the scriptures that the Gospel is plainly called a law Farther it is very plaine that Paul reasoneth these thinges against yâ— Iewes who thought the obseruation of the law necessary also in the Gospell Wherfore it was nedefull to confute them not only by the Gospell but also by the authoritie of the law In which law although diuorcement were permitted yet the Apostle now speaketh not therof For he followeth the ordinary way vsed in matrimony rightly instituted wherin separation happeneth not but only by death But that matrimony should thorough diuorcement be losed happeneth not as Chrisostome vpon this place noteth but thorough some default For therfore oftentimes in the olde In the matrimony of vertuous and honeste yoke fellowes diuorcemente had not place law were wiues put away of their husbandes for that they were infected wyth some great haynous sinne or if they were vertuous and honest for that their husbandes were to much froward and malicious towardes them But Paul would not ascribe any such things vnto the law And forasmuch as he had a certayne and necessary cause of separation as which came by the meanes of death therfore he thought it not good to make mentioÌ„ of yâ— other cause which neither hapned alwais nor was at any tyme vsed of the vertuous and honest Wherfore by this place we cannot define what and how much Paul permitteth as lawfull vnto Christians in the case of diuorcement For here he bringeth only a similitude taken of matrimony By this place can not be gathered whether diuorsement be lawfull for Christians or no. Matrimony is two wayes loosed We in thys comparison occupie the rome of the wife Wiues in the old law repudiated not their husbandes But it is not of necessitie that similitudes should vniuersally in al points be correspondent which thing Erasmus also in this place noteth And Paul therefore made no mention of that separatioÌ„ which happeneth by repudiation for that we depart not from the law by repudiation but by mortification Wherfore he thought it good to set forth that cause of separatioÌ„ which made best to his purpose For forasmuch as there are two causes of separation namely death and diuorcement Paul toucheth that only wherby we are deliuered from the law And that is death Farther forasmuch as in this similitude we occupie the roome of the wyfe and the wife in the olde law although she mought be put away by diuorcement yet could not she repudiate her husband only it was lawful for her being put away to depart from her husband vnles her husband
corruâ—ted yet the Law written The law geuen by Moses could not be so corrupted as the lawe of nature was remayned alwayes one which being righly examined was able alwayes to reproue the corrupters thereof But the Law of nature fora 〈…〉 â—s it is siâ—uate in the mindes of men if it be there once corrupted can neuer be made sound agayne But there are many which say that Paul vnderstode these â—inges of the Law of nature of which opinion Origen semeth to be But Paul himselfe confuteth them when he bringeth a testemony out of the Law of Moses Others thinke that the Law of nature did indede shew sinne but taughte not the offeÌ„ce of God and as they say the guiltines whereby we are by reason of the sinnes committed condemned to punishmentes But the Law geueÌ„ of God performed The law of nature did not only shew sinne but also the offence of God and guiltines both And forasmuch as this guiltines and the offence of God are the principall thinges which are considered in the Law therefore the Law geuen of God is sayd to shew sin But this can not be attributed vnto yâ— Law of nature bicause it shewed not that thing which in sinne is the chiefest But nether is this senteÌ„ce sufficient as I thinke For vnles men had by the Lawe of nature vnderstode that God had bene offended they woulde neuer haue endeuored themselues by sacrifices and oblations to satisfie his wrath or by vowes and purifications to redeme theyr murthers Farther those thinges whiche happened in the floude and in Sodome and in many other places may be a sufficient argument that God punisheth sinnes This thing also the historiagraphers poets orators and philosophers haue euery where in theyr writinges taught and in the holy scriptures bothe Pharao and Abimelech testefied the same as we haue before sayd Wherefore omitting all these opinions we say that Paul speaketh these things of the Law geuen by Moses For of it arose the controuersie And although it be longe to all good lawes to vtter and to shew sinne yet is there no law which so fully doth it as doth the Law geuen of God so that it be rightly vnderstand that euen for this cause chiefely for that it is geuen of God For other Lawes The lawes of men not such efficacy as the law of Moles althoughe sometimes they commaund thinges vpright yet bycause they are thoughte to be onelye inuencions of wise men doo not much mone the minde Iudede the excellent sentences of philosophers and poetes delight the mind but they doo not so vehemently reproue a minde hardened as doth that Law which we are fully perswaded to haue ben geueÌ„ of God For in it we seme to hear God him selfe speaking vnto vs. Farther it may at the firste bront seme wonderfull why the Apostle amongest all other preceptes brought this only precept Thou Why the precept of not lustinge is aboue other here brought Lust is here touched because it is the heade of all euils shalt not lust But the Apostle did this as he did also all other thinges mostâ— warely For he thought chiefely to take that kynde of prauity which is most hidden from the iudgement of men and is not set forth in other lawes For the naturall lust and corruption which impelleth vs to all euils is in this place touched and layd abrode as the fountayne and hed of al euilles Wherfore this is an excellent sayinge of Augustine that no sinne is committed without luste Wherefore Paul woulde not speake of the grosser outward sinnes for that he saw that they pertained vnto discipline and are not onlye set forth by the ciuill Lawes but also punished Nether would he speak of wicked affections and perturbations for that he saw them condemned of the philosophers in theyr Moral The preceptes of God are distinguished into precepts commaunding and prohibiting The thinges that are commaunded ought to be done with al our strength The things that are forbiddeÌ„ ought to be eschewed without all maner of prones vnto them Two principall commaundementes of the law discipline and rules geueÌ„ by them to bring them to a mediocrity he weÌ„t rather to the very roote of all sinnes and sheweth that it being vnknowen and hidden is manifested and brought to light by the law of God And to expresse this thing more playnly this is to be obserued that all the commauÌ„demeÌ„tes of God ether commaund something or forbid something And they commaund not only that a thing should be sclenderly done but also that it be done withall the soule with all the hart and with all strengths and most exactly so that there be vtterly nothing in vs which is not obedient vnto the will of God And that which they forbid they doo not only so forbid it that it it self be not in vs but also that there be not leaft in vs any affect or prones thereunto And therefore God gaue this coÌ„maundement Thou shalt not lust that we should both in minde will and wholy in al the partes both of the soule and of the body abhore froÌ„ those things which God hath prohibited And in this maner answere together these two coÌ„maundmentes Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with all thy soule and with all thy hart c Whiche is to be repeted in all the preceptes that commaund any thinge to be done and the laste precept Thou shalt not lust which agayne is to be vnderstand in all thinges that are forbidden Wherefore in these two commaundementes is the pith and if I may so speake the soule of the lawe as without whiche the other commaundementes of GOD can not be full and perfect And all men althoughe they be neuer so holye yet are they accused ouercome and condemned of ether of these preceptes For vnlesse the grace of God throughe Christe shoulde These two precepts accuse men though they be neuer so holy succour vs we haue nothing before our eyes but certayne destruction For so long as we here liue how frée we are from lust Augustine most plainely declareth in many places and especially in his 200. epistle to Asellicus the bishop For thus he sayth That in mynde he may do that which he loueth and not consent vnto the flesh which doth that which he hateth that is not that he should not lust at all but that he should not follow after his lustes And straight way We shall one daye come to the ende thereof when the lust of sinne shall not be restrayned or bridled but shall not be at all For this thyng hath the lawe set forth saying thou shalt not lust not that we are here able to performe this but as whereunto by going forward we bend our selues And against Iulianus in his 6. booke and 5. chapter but who doubteth but that lust may in thys lyfe be diminished but yet not consumed What is the property of the lawe Where the law shewerh sinne In the scriptures the lawe is
touching Ismaell and Esau whether they be faued or whether they be condemned And the like some do touching Salomon Origen and others such like But I omitte these thinges and thinke of Esau and Ismaell so much onely as the holy scripture hath set forth vnto vs. And I think that there are What is to be thought of Esau no places extant by which we may define any thing touching their saluation The scripture thus speaketh of Esau that he so vehemently hated his brother that he sought to kill him that he sold his birth right that he prouoked h 〈…〉 â—arentes to anger when he had take strange women for wiues that he was a violent man and despised the land of Chanaan promised vnto the fathers and in the epistle to the Hebrues it is written that he although he poured out many teares yet found he no place of repentance Of Ismaell also we reade that he was reiected not only What is to be thought of their stocke by the will of Sara but also by the will of God But touching both their posterities I deny not but that some of them mought be saued no les then some of the stocke of Iacob might become runnagates and obstinate For it is sufficient to the election and reiection of God that some part of ech stocke be either elected or reiected And touching this sentence I haue Ambrose on my side who affirmeth that the most holy man Iob was of the famely of Esau Which saying yet how much it is to be regarded I know not This thing only I dare affirme yâ— as many as were saued that came of Israell those were saued by the grace of God and had a promise of their saluation and on the other side as many as were saued of the stocke of Esau those also were saued by the mere grace of God but there was no peculiar promise touching their saluation But as many as were of that stocke condemed Indefinite promises at not to be vnderstanded of euery one perticulerly they were condemned for their sinnes And the sentence of the reiection of the posterity of Esau is indefinite neither is to be vnderstanded of euery one perticularly But it may séeme more then wonderfull that God in his election worketh not only contrary to our iudgement but also contrary to his own lawes For not only after the mauer of men the first borne are preferred before the rest of the brethern but also by the prescript of the lawe of God they were holy and obtayned a dooble portion of the inheritance But God therefore so doth that we should God doth thinges contrary to his lawes vnderstand that we are saued only by grace and not through any priuiledges or conditions of this life and moreouer to geue vs to vnderstand that he is vtterly free from all lawes For his will is euen iustice it selfe and the rule of all thinges that are vpright and iust But because men can not attayne to the knowledge of of this hidden election therefore we ought to frame our selues to the lawes of of God which are published abroade and set forth to all men For Isaack circumcised his sonne Esau as God had commaunded him neither was he greatly carefull whether he were elected of God or reiected for he was then vtterly ignorant of the counsaile of God But the mother for that she had hard the oracle gaue faith vnto it as it became her and had a care that the blessing mought be distributed according to the will of God And so by her industry it came to passe that Iacob preuented his brother of the blessing Touching which will when the father also was by the spirite of God made more certayne he would by no meanes make voide that which had now passed betwene him and Iacob Paul mought now seme to haue thoroughly defended the truth of the promises of God when as after the example of Ismaell and Isaack which were borne of diuers parentes and at diuers tymes he with so great diligence bringeth in also an other coople of bretheren Iacob and Esau in whome all thinges in a maner were equall For they were borne both of one and the selfe same parentes and in one and the selfe same day and as Augustine saith in his epistle to Sixtus both conceaued at one and the selfe same time least any man mought cauell that the father was better when he begat the one then he was when he begat the other And the mother which bare them both was one and the selfe same woman And although she myght in that space of time whilest she was with child alter her maners and disposition yet that could not in such sort profit the one to be a let vnto the other Although by the Greke it appeareth not that they were both conceaued at one and the selfe same tyme. Howbeit this is red That Rebecka had fellowship by one euen by our father Isaack But Augustine followed the latine translation Farther it is not vnlikely to be true yâ— they which were borne in one and the selfe same tyme were also begotten atone the selfe same tyme especially seing that the Apostle in this place endeuoreth The industry of yâ— holye ghost in Paul in this coople of twynes vtterly to take away all maner of differences In Paul also is to be considered the industry of the holy ghost who when he had affirmed out of the holy scriptures that of these two brethern the one was elected the other reiected bringeth no other reason or cause of the counsell of God but that election should abide according to purpose But because he saw that this would in no case satisfy humane reason therefore he confirmed his sentence by an oracle of Malach. who straight way at the the beginning of his first chapiter thus writeth The Lord hath loued you And ye haue sayd wherein hath the Lord loued vs And the Prophet maketh answere Iacob and Esau were they not brethern But I haue loued Iacob and haue hated Esau Wherefore with Malachy to loue is all one wyth that which Paul hath That the Election of God shoulde abide according to purpose Neither is this to be passed ouer that the Apostle in thus ioyning together these Paul most diligently red the scriptures two testimonies declareth that he had not negligently red the scriptures Wherfore we also must endeuor our selues to do the like when as we shall see places of the scriptures alleadged either of the Apostles or of other writers Paul when he red the Prophet Malachy and saw that God proueth his loue towardes the Iewes by that that he had loued Iacob and hated Esau when yet notwithstanding they were brethern and twines straight way turned himselfe to the history of Genesis and there considered many thinges which mought conduce to adorne and amplifye this matter namelye that they were borne bothe at one and the same time and of one and the selfe same parentes and that the
men after the fall if grace and the spirite be away For of themselues they cannot do otherwise although it be not againste their nature but that they may By what necessitie we are vrged to sinne be holpen and chaunged of God The third necessitie is that which they call of infalliblenes or of consequence or as the Logicians speake of a composed sense Which is when our actions are not considered as they come from our owne nature reason or will but are considered together with the predestination and foreknowledge of God And although the disquieting of humane reason as touching this necessitie is by those distinctions after a sorte asswaged yet is there an other maze wherein it excéedingly wandreth For it séeth that God coÌ„maunded Pharao to let the people go and therby it gathereth that he willed that thing On the other Whether God at one the selfe same tyme both willeth and â—illeth one and the selfe same thing A place of Esay side it heareth that God saith I will harden the hart of Pharao by which wordes it gathereth that he would not haue the people let goe â–ª Wherefore humane sence iudgeth it a thing very absurde that God should at one and the same time both will and not will one and the same thing But a godly minde to vnfold it selfe out of this perplexity will call to memory the sentence of Esay spoken vnder the persoÌ„ of God which sentence our sauiour Christe also vsed in the Gospell and likewise Paul in the actes of the Apostles when he had preached at Rome to the vnbeleuing Iewes Heare saith he the word and vnderstande it not see a sight and discerne it not Make grosse the hart of the people that they vnderstande not stoppe theyr eares that they heare not blind theyr eyes that they see not lest peraduenture they be conuerted I heale them And Christ in the Gospell saith that he came to iudgemente that they God wil haue some to be made blinde â–ª vnto whome yet he wil ha them his word bâ— seâ— for which see should not see These sayings declare that God wil haue some to be made blinde and yet in the meane time he will haue his word to be set forth vnto them For Christ sent his Apostles to preache throughout the whole world And although he excepted none vnto whome he would not haue his Gospel preached yet opened he not the haâ—ts of all men to assent vnto the truth when they heard it Wherfore it followeth that the elect onely do beleue but the wicked are hardened and their sinne is made more greuous when as now is taken away the excuse of ignorance For Paul saith in the first chapter of this Epistle that the inuisible thinges of God â—â— seene by the creation of this world being vnderstanded by those things which are made his eternall power also and diuinitie so that they are without excuse Christ also sayth If I had not come and spoken vnto theÌ„ they had had no sin not yâ— otherwise they should haue bene without sinne but for that they shoulde not haue had so gréeuous sinne For after that they had heard Christ al excuse of ignorance was now taken away from them Wherefore when humane reason beareth vs in hand that to call a maÌ„ and yet in the meane time will not haue him to come is nothing els but to séeke to mocke and to deceaue let vs put it to silence and say with the Apostle O man what art thou that contendest with God And let vs declare that it is méere madnes A remedy against humaine reason to séeke by Dilemmas and Silogismes to carpe God and to obiecte vnto him that he dealeth no les absurdlie then if a man should call his frende to a banquet should sée many things to be therunto a let which lets although he when he may remoueth not yet is he angry vnles he come or if a man should sende his seruaunte any whether whome he knoweth shal be letted in his iorney and although he take not away those hindrances when as he may yet wil he punish his seruant for tarieng or if a magistrate should coÌ„maund a man fast bound in prison to come foorth wheÌ„ yet notwithstanding he looseth not his bondes These thinges séeme vnto them absurde for two causes First for that they vnderstand not to what ende the law and Vocation the law haue moe endes then one vocation and the commaundements were geuen For they thinke that they were geuen to no other vse but to be performed But Paul saith that by the law is the knowledge of sinne Men are so proude and so blockishe that they thinke they can straight way perform al things so yâ— it be onely declared vnto theÌ„ what they should do Wherfore yâ— they mought vnderstaÌ„d their impoteÌ„cie imbecilitie it was necessary yâ— they should receue yâ— law should be called being not yet deliuered for by yâ— meanes they must nedes fele perceiue yâ— knowledge alone of it self is not sufficient An other cause why these men are troubled is for yâ— they see not the other commoditye which the elect gee hereby For when they fele in theÌ„selues how weake they are they are stirred vp to thinke lowly of theÌ„selues and to implore yâ— By the vocatâ—on of the reprobate although without efficacy the elect are holpen ayde of God and more and more in the reprobate which are forsakeÌ„ to acknowledge theyr owne naturall imbecility and to confesse that they shoulde haue bene in the same estate vnles besides the knowledge of the truth they had bene holpen by the spirite and grace of God Wherefore hereby it is manifest how profitably and wisely those thinges were instituted which semed absurd And forasmuch as not al which heare the Gospel are inwardly with efficacy moued of God thereof it commeth that Paul sayth to the Corrinthians that it is to some the sauor of life to life aâ—â— to other some the sauor of death to death This is a playne There is no contrariety in the will of God simple conciliation of that contrariety which appeareth to be in the wil of God And bycause that in these vocations and promises semeth to be expressed some will of God which yet taketh not effect certayne diuines haue not vnskilfully sayd that there is one will of the signe or of the antecedent an other will of efficacy The will of the antecedent and of the consequent God when he pronounceth things which succede not doth not therfore lie Examples or of the consequent For it oftentimes happeneth yâ— God ether threatneth or promiseth a thing which yet shall not come to passe And yet doth not God therefore lye or deceaue For he pronounceth those thinges eyther as nature was then ordered or as thorough ill desertes it mought come to passe vnlesse some change were had in the meane time So was Ezechias told that he should dye bycause that
oliue tree against nature neither in this respect are miracles done eyther besides nature or agaynst nature But if we looke vpon the proprieties and qualities of things both miracles are not according to nature yea rather they are repugnant vnto it and men are contrary to nature called backe to true piety and grafted into a good tree Wherefore Augustine aptly said that to haue possibility to beleue is of nature but to beleue is of grace I knowe that there are some which in this place referre contrary to nature this way that the spirituall grafting in is contrary to the naturall grafting in which men according to yâ— rules of husbandry vse wheÌ„ as in naturall grafting the grafte which is grafted in bringeth forth fruite agreable to his owne sappe not to the sappe of the stock wherinto it is grafted But here the braunches of the wild oliue tree grafted into the fatte oliue tree draw their sappe whereout they bring forth good fruites not of their owne naturall plant but of that whereinto they are grafted These thinges without Braunches proper haue greater conformity to theyr owne plante then straunge plantes doubt as I haue before mencioned are true but they seme not to serue to the purpose of Paul The summe is that there is a greater conformity agreeablenes and proportion betwene braunches broken of to their owne plant then betwene straunge braunches to the selfe same plaÌ„t But because this conformity though it be neuer so nigh is not of it selfe sufficient therefore the power of of God is necessarily to be had Whiche power is sufficient to grafte in any whether they be nigh or farre of or howsoeuer they be God is able saith Iohn of these stones to rayse vp children vnto Abraham And the Lord sayth Thinges which are impossible with men are possible with God The Prophets and all yâ— scriptures in a manner when any great thinges or after a sort incredible are to be looked for at Gods hands commaunde vs to consider the power of God And thereof commeth vnto the godly most swete consolation if at any time any great aduersityes hange ouer their heddes for they doo not easely feare the power of their aduersaries which set before their eyes the power of their heauenly father And hereof it commeth that the Church when it prayeth for helpe at Gods In the beginnyng of prayers are well put these words almighty God The power of God extendeth farther theÌ„ his will How an argument a posse ad esse is in this place of force hands alwayes in a manner in the beginning of their prayers hath these two wordes Almighty God Neither is this to be passed ouer that it commeth to passe farre otherwise in vs then in God both in all other thinges in a maner and also in this thing chiefly For in vs the will extendeth a great deale farther then the power when as oftentimes we will very many thinges which yet we are not able to performe But it is cleane contrary with God for he is able to do many more thinges then he will For the Father coulde haue geuen vnto his sonne which was euen at the point to be crucified eleuen legions of Angels which should straight way haue deliuered him but he would not But if a maÌ„ say that it is not a strong argument a posse ad â—sse as the Logicians vse to speake that is from possibility to being and therefore Paul ought not to conclude that the Iewes shal be grafted in againe for that God is able to performe that thing for besides power is also required will We answere that here can no controuersy be made touching his will for that he is redy to do them good the promises the couenant which he made and the benefits which he bestowed vpon their elders playnly declare Further if he would graft in the Gentles being straungers why should we doubt but that he will one day bestow the A similitude like benefit vpon the Iewes Wherefore this we may affirme that the nation of the Iewes is at this tyme like vnto the roote of some good tree in the tyme of winter which roote if one that hath no skill looke vpon he will soone contemne plucke vp and burne it if it lye in him But a skilfull husbandman will say that it ought to be spared and will be more carefull to cherishe it for he knoweth that when the time commeth he shall haue thereof leaues flowers God hath not extinguished the Iewes but daily calleth some of theÌ„ fruites So vndoubtedly doth God deale with the Iewes he extinguisheth not that stocke but oftentimes out of it calleth some vnto him and towardes the end of the world looketh for great plenty of his elect to come thereout Not that any holynes is to be attributed vnto that stocke or generation if it be considered by it selfe for as we haue already twise admonished as touching it selfe it is condemned and obnoxious vnto the curse Which thing Paul acknowledged when he sayd We are by nature the children of wrath as others are But when these excellent things are spoken in the commendation of the nation of the Iewes vnto it is adioyned the fauor of God and his promise and couenant which yet burst not forth into acte but only as touching the elect Of which things yet there appeare Certain tokens of the nobilitie of the natioÌ„ of the Iewes some markes in others for they are studious of the law and of the word of God although they vnderstand it not rightly and as Paul sayd They haue the zeale of God but not according to knowledge which things although vnto them they are sinnes yet is it a certaine light and shew of that nobility wherof we speake For I would not brethern that ye should be ignoraunt of this mistery least ye should be high mynded that partly blindnes is come vnto Israell vntil the fulnes of the Gentiles be come in And so all Israell shal be saued as it is written Out of Sion shall the deliuerer come shal burne away the vngodlines from Iacob And this is my testament with them wheÌ„ I shall take away their sins For I would not brethern that ye should be ignoraunt of this mistery The entent of the Apostle now is to proue that in the nation of the Iewes still remayneth séede of election which thing he doth many wayes First he setteth forth his prophesy which he calleth a mistery after that he bringeth testimonies of the Prophets then he declareth the nature of the vocation and giftes of God namely that they are without repentance last of all he teacheth that the order of thinges so requireth and he abideth long in this matter for that of the full knowledge thereof much depended the peace and quietnes of the Church at that tyme. And how much the peace and tranquillity of Churches is to be desired we may How much the tranquilitie of churches is to be be
speaketh he any thing of the ceremonies of Moses Wherefore forasmuch as those thinges which he there rehearseth are repugnaunt vnto the ten commaundementes and to the morall lawe we can not but thinke that of it also he vnderstandeth those thinges which he writeth And in the second chapiter he reproueth the Iewes for the like kinde of sinnes For he saith Thou which teachest an other dost thou not teach thy self Thou whiche teachest that a man shoulde not steale dost thou steale that a man shoulde not commit adultery doost thou commit adultery and thou which detestest idols dost thou robbe God of his honour Who séeth not that these thinges are contayned in the lawe of the ten commaundementes And in the third chapiter he yet more manifestly entreateth of the same when he writeth There is none iust there is none that vnderstandeth or requireth after God all haue declined and are together made vnprofitable there is none that doth good no not one These thinges we sée are of the same kinde pertayne vnto maners If the apostle would haue spoken only of ceremoniall lawes he woulde neuer haue made mencion of these thinges And this is also more euidently gathered that when he had sayd no fleshe is iustified by the works of the lawe he addeth For by the lawe commeth the knowledge of sinne Wherefore that lawe iustifieth not by which we know sinne According to which meaning he said also in the 4. chapiter The lawe worketh anger so farre is it of that it should iustify but it is very manifest vnto al men that sinnes are knowen and the wrath of God prouoked against transgressors more by the ten commaundementes then by the precepts of ceremonies I will not speake also of that generall sentence wherein it is sayd in the 4. chapiter That vnto him which worketh a reward is not imputed according vnto grace but according to debt◠And also that God would haue the inheritaunce to consist of grace that the promise should abide firme and not be changed that our gloriyng might be excluded which glorying commeth no les of good workes morall then of ceremonies It is written also in the 5. chapiter that the lawe entred in that sinne should abound and where sinne hath abounded there also hath grace more abounded These thinges also can not be drawen vnto ceremonies only Moreouer in the 6. chapiter when it was obiected vnto him that by so depressing workes and the lawe he did séeme to open a gate vnto loose life and vnto slouthfulnes and vnto sinnes as now dayly they obiect vnto vs he aunswered That we ought not to abide in sinne forasmuch as we are now dead vnto it By baptisme saith he we are buried with Christ that euen as he dyed and rose agayne so also should we walke in newnes of life And he admonisheth vs that euen as Christ dyed once and dyeth no more so also should we thinke our selues dead vnto sinne but liuing vnto God And he addeth that we must haue a diligent care that sinne raigne not in our mortall body and that we geue not our members the weapon◠of iniquity vnto sinne but geue ouer our selues vnto God as men of dead folke◠now lyuing and our members the weapons of righteousnes to sanctification These thinges which we haue rehearsed and the rest whiche followe euen in a manner to the ende of the chapiter séeme they to pertayne vnto the ceremonies of Moses or rather vnto a iust sincere and morall life The thing is so playne that there nedeth no question therein yet those thinges which are written in the 7. chapiter are yet much more manifest The affection saith he which are in the members were by the lawe made stronge and of efficacy to bring forth fruit vnto death But what other thing are these affections then 〈…〉 es filthy desires anger hatred and enuy which affections are rehearsed to◠the Galathians in that Cataloge where the workes of the fleshe are seperated from the workes of the spirite And there is no doubt but that all these thinges pertayne vnto the ten commaundementes Which thing the better to vnderstand Paul addeth What shall we say then Is the lawe sinne God forbid but I had not knowen sinne but by the law For I knew not what lust ment vnles the law had said thou shalt not lust Also the lawe in deede is holy the commaundemente is holy and iust and good Agayne The lawe in deede is spirituall but I am carnall sold vnder sinne For that which I do I allow not For the good which I would I do not but the euill which I would not that I do◠wherefore it is not I now which worketh it but sinne which dwelleth in me For there dwelleth no good in me that is in my flesh I haue a delight in the lawe of God as touching the inwarde man but I feele an other lawe in my member resisting the lawe of the mynde Oh vnhappy man that I am who shall deliuer me from the law of sinne and of death Wherefore in mynde I serue the lawe of God but in fleshe the lawe of sinne Whosoeuer shall diligently weigh all these testimonies shall easely sée that the Apostle wholy speaketh of the ten commaundementes whereof also he plainly maketh mencion in those foresayd words But these words which afterward follow in the 8. chapiter That which was impossible vnto the lawe in as much as it was weake by meanes of the fleshe God sending his owne sonne in the similitude of the fleshe of sinne by sinne condemned sinne in the fleshe these wordes I say can not be expounded of the lawe of ceremonies and much les that which followeth in the same chapter We are debt ours not vnto the fleshe that we shoulde liue according vnto the fleshe for if ye liue according to the fleshe ye shall dye But if by the spirite ye shall mortifye the deedes of the fleshe ye shall liue Neither can this be referred vnto ceremonies euē as neither can that also which is written vnto the Galathithians The lawe was put because of transgressions for where there is no lawe there is also no transgression And it is certayne that neither boasting can be excluded neither can the promise be firme if our iustification should depend of the obseruation of the ten commaundementes and of the morall preceptes howsoeuer thou take away the rites and ceremonies of Moses But much more firme is this place out of the 11. chapiter of this epistle vnto the Romanes And if it be of workes then is it not of grace if of grace then not of workes This Antithesis is vniuersall neither can it by any meanes be contracted vnto ceremonies I will not speake of that also which Paul writeth vnto the Phillippians how that he besides those precepts of Moses was conuersant without blame also as touching the righteousnes which is of the law For y◠which he writeth vnto the Ephe. the second chapter Not of workes least any man should boast
to be harkened vnto We ought to receaue and reuerence those Counsels only which haue framed theyr doctrine to the rule of the holy scriptures Demosthenes in an oration against Androtion sayth that decrees of the senate ought not to be made but according to the prescript of those thinges which are alredy determined in the lawes So in ecclesiastical counsells ought not new decrées to be made as touching doctrine but of those things only which are either had expressedly in yâ— word of God or ells may assuredly and euidently be gathered out of it First we will begin with the Counsell of Aphricke in which in the 80. chapiter a curse is pronounced Concilium AphricanuÌ„ agaynst the Pelagians who sayd that the grace of iustification is therfore geuen that by grace we may the easelyer fullfill that which we are commaunded to doo as though also with out grace although with more difficulty we might by our frée will fullfill the commaundementes of God when as yet the Lord speaking of the fruites of the commaundementes sayde not Without me ye can hardlye doo anye thing but with out me ye can vtterly doo nothing By these wordes are reproued the Papistes of our time which are not ashamed to say that a man before iustification can do yâ— workes which are commauÌ„ded in the law and which do please God and prepare a man to regeneration For what thing ells is this then with the Pelagians to say that a man may indede also before iustification performe the law although not so fully and easely as after he is iustified And that is nothing which they say namely that they put a certayne grace preuenting whereby men not yet regenerate may doo those workes which they call preparatory For in thus saying they differ in name only from the Pelagians For they also taught no les then these men doo that there goeth before a certayne grace of the law and of the knowledge of the will of God and of illumination wherby a man vnderstandeth what he ought to doo But as for the rest they attributed it vnto frée will which thing these men also do And that the Pelagians were of that opinion the counsel Mileuitanum declareth wherin it is thus written in the 4. chap. We curse all them which say that the grace of God through Iesus Christ our Lord helpeth vs onely for that Concilium Mileuitanum by it is reueled and opened vnto vs the vnderstanding of the commaundements of God that we may know what we ought to desire what to auoyd and that by it is not geuen vs also to loue to be able to do that which we know ought to be done For forasmuch as the Apostle sayth knowledge puffeth vp but loue edifieth it is very wicked to beleue that we should haue that grace of Christ which puffeth vp and not that grace which edifieth especially seyng it is written in the 4. chapter of the 1. epistle of Iohn Loue is of God In the second counsel also of Arausicanum the 4 chap. it is thus writen That Concilium Arausicanum they resist the holy ghost which say that the Lord wayteth for our will when as SalomoÌ„ sayth The will is prepared of the Lord and also when as Paul saith vnto the Philippians It is God that worketh in vs both to will and to performe according to his good will And in the 5. chapter are reproued those which affirmed that of the grace of Christ is geuen an increase of faith not the beginning For the beginning also of faith commeth of the inspiration of the holy gost which correcteth our infidelitie bringing it from infidelitie to faith and from vngodlines to godlines And the proofe hereof is brought out of sundry places of the scriptures For Paul sayth vnto the Philippians I trust that he which hath begonne the good worke in you shall accomplish it euen to the day of the Lord. And againe in the same epistle Vnto you it is geueÌ„ not onely to beleue in hym but also to suffer for him And vnto the Ephes By grace ye are made safe through fayth and that not of your selues For it is the gift of God Moreouer they are there subiect vnto the curse which would say That the mercy and grace of God is geuen vnto the willing vnto the beleuers vnto them that are desirous vnto them that go about it vnto them that labour vnto them that watche vnto them that study vnto them that aske vnto them that séeke vnto them yâ— knocke but confessed not that by the infusion and inspiration of the holy ghost and by the gift of God is geuen vnto vs to haue a will to beleue to endeuour our selues and to labour They cite these testimonies out of the scriptures What hast thou â—that thou hast not receaued And if thou hast receiued why boastest thou as though thou hast not receaued And the Apostle writeth of himselfe By the grace of God I am that I am In the 7. chap. are condemned those which thinke that by the strengths we can thinke or attaine vnto any thinge that serueth to saluation or that we can without the illumination of the spirite geue credite vnto the worde of GOD preached This may be confirmed by the scriptures For Paul saith that we cannot thinke any thing of our selues as of our selues but our sufficiency is of God Christ also saith Without me ye can do nothing Also blessed art thou Simon Bariona for flesh and bloud hath not reueled this vnto thee They also are cursed which graunt that frée will is in dede in some maner weakened and hurt but yet not so but that men by it may be conuerted vnto saluation The scriptures are apertly repugnant vnto that sentence For the Lord saith No man commeth vnto me vnles my father shall draw hym Paul also vnto the Corinthians No man can say the Lord Iesus but in the spirite of God This is an excellent sentence God loueth vs beyng such as we shall be by his gift and not such as we are by our owne merite And in the 13. chapter it is thus written Free will beyng lost in the first man cannot be repayred and because it is lost it cannot be restored but by him by whome it was geuen at the beginning Wherfore the truth it selfe sayth If the sonne shall make you fre then are ye truly free Farther in the 17. chapter is decréed that the strength of the Ethnikes commeth of worldly lust which wordes declare that their vertues as we haue before shewed out of Augustine and other Fathers were not true vertues chiefly forasmuch as they sprang out of an euill ground But humane lust comprehendeth whatsoeuer is possible to be found in men not regenerate It followeth in the selfe same chap. that the loue of God maketh the force and strength of Christians which loue is poured into our hartes not by frée wil but by the holy gost which is geuen vs wheras no merites go
place and as here the gift of healinges and of miracles followeth fayth so doth there the remouing of mountaines wherfore those thinges which Paul hath spoken of a perticular fayth ought not to be wrested to the vniuersal and iustifieng fayth For that is to make a false argument A secunduÌ„ quid ad simpliciter As if a man should say this fayth may be seperated from iustification which is called fayth secundum quid ergo the true fayth and the iustifieng faith which is called fayth simpliciter that is to say absolutely may be seperated from iustification If a man should so compare two seuerall kindes that he will ascribe one and the selfe same propriety vnto either of them he shall soone be deceaued But Pigghius saw that by this easy and playne exposition all his reasoning may be ouerthrowen and therfore went he about by violence to take it from vs forgetting in the meane time that the author and patrone therof is Chrisostome And to infring it he vseth this argument Vniuersall propositioÌ„s are to be drawen vnto thâ— matter wherof is at that tyme entrâ—ated Paul manifestly sayth All fayth Wherfore we may not vnderstand it of any singular faith For the Apostle maketh an vniuersall propositioÌ„ But this man ought to remember that vniuersall propositions are to be contracted or draweÌ„ vnto that matter wherof is at that time entreated And although this might be declared by many examples yet at this present only one shall suffice vs. Paul in that selfe same epistle vnto the Corrinthians the first chapiter sayth that he geueth thankes vnto God for them for that they were enriched in all kind of speach and in all knowledge And yet it is not very likely that they were by the spirite of Christ endewed with naturall philosophy with Metaphisicall and Mathemathematicall knowledge with knowledge of the law and with other liberall sciences but only with all knowledge which perttayned vnto piety and vnto the Gospell Neyther is it likely that they by the power of the holy ghost were adorned with all kind of Rhetorical Logicall Poeticall and historicall speaches but onely with those which pertayned vnto the edification of the church with sounde doctrine and godly admonitions Wherfore propositions although they be vniuersall yet are not alwayes to be vnderstanded simply but ought sometimes to be drawen vnto the matter wherof is at that time entreated Wherfore that which Paul sayth If I haue all faith we vnderstand of all that faith which serueth vnto the working of miracles And that this contraction is of necessitie the wordes which followe do declare For Paul straight way addeth So that I can remoue mountaynes Chrisostome also saith that he in that vniuersalitie saw that this perticuler sentence is of necessity to be vnderstand For he saith that it may be doubted how Christ saith that to remoue mouÌ„taines a little faith is sufficient which in his smalnes of quantitie resembleth a grain of mustard sede wheÌ„ as Paul saith If I haue all faith so that I caÌ„ remoue mountains as though to bring that to passe is required a woÌ„derful great faith He thus dissolueth the question and saith that Christ spake of the truth nature of the thing for the gift of faith though it be neuer so small is sufficient to worke miracles be they neuer so great but Paul had a respect vnto the common opinion and iudgement of men for they when they looke vpon the greatnes and hugenes of a mountaine thinke that it cannot be remoued without a certaine incredible efficacy and greatnes of faith Neither helpeth it much Pighius cause that Erasmus makyng Erasmus opinion aunswer vnto the Sorbonicall doctors reiecteth this our interpretation For first his reason is very weake and secondly false for he saith that the purpose of the Apostle was to prayse charity by comparison But what prayse should that be saith he if it should be compared with faith which is one of the frée giftes of the holy ghost and may light as wel vpon the wicked as vpon the godly For he should but coldly prayse a man which should say that he is better theÌ„ a dogge or a beare First this is false that Paul compareth not charity with frée gifts of God For he maketh mencion of prophesâ—eng of knowledge and of the gifte of tounges and preferreth Charity before them Secondly it is weake that he sayth that if our interpretation be receaued the Apostle shoulde compare Charity onely with frée gifts For we confesse that toward the end he coÌ„pareth it with the true fayth For Paule saith there are thre things faith hope and charitie but the chiefest is charitie And he bringeth a reason why for it abideth and the other shall cease Farther it is a full comparison if as we haue sayd we begin at the frée gifts and so afterwarde come in order to the vertues Theological yea rather by that that Paule towarde the ende of the chapiter compareth charitie with true faith it is most likely that he did not so before But if we should fully graunt this vnto Pighius that that faith wherof Paul speaketh is yâ— vniuersal faith wherby men are iustified yet neither so vndoubtedly should he obtain his purpose For yâ— Apostle going about by al maner Figurâ— fictionis â–ª of meanes to set forthe charitie thought to amplifie yâ— same by a fiction or faining which is a figure of Rhetorike knowen euen vnto children And yet doth not Paul therfore bring a false proposition for he vseth a conditional proposition which we may not resolue into a categoricall proposition yet notwithstanding is the truth in the meane time kept As if I should say vnto a man if thou haddest the life or vse of the reasonable soule without the life or vse of the sensible soule thou shouldest not be affected with pertâ—rbations of minde no man coulde reproue this kinde of speache to be false And yet it is not possible that in a man the reasonable life should be seperated from the animall life Such kinde of speaches also are fouÌ„d in the holy scriptures As for example If I shall ascend vp into heauen thou art there if I shall desceÌ„d down into hell thou art present And if I take the fethers of the morning and dwell in the vttermost endes of the sea thither shall thy right hand leade me These sentences are true and yet is it not possible that a man should take vnto him the fethers of the morning After the same manner we say if a man should seperate faith from charitie he should make it vnprofitable although in very déede it can not be seperated from charitie And that Paule in that place vsed suche an Hyperbole or fiction that manifestly declareth which he a little before spake Though I should speake with the tongues of men and of Angels and haue not charitie I am made as a sounding brasse or a tingling cimball But we knowe that Angels haue neyther bodyes nor