malediction or curse Rom. 8.1 Thirdly in respect of rigour for in them which are in Christ God accepts the endeuour to obey for obedience it selfe Neuerthelesse the Law as it is the rule of good life is vnchangeable and admits no abrogation and Christ by his death did in this regard establish it Rom. 3.31 What say you now to these words of Mr. Perkins Doth he determine the question with you and for you that the Morall Law is wholly abolished or doth he not plainly resolue to the contrary that as it is the rule of good life it is vnchangeable and for euer by the death of Christ established Antinomus Your next Testimony is out of Paraeus in Argumentum Epist ad Galatas and in other places vpon that Epistle Answer I haue not that Booke by me but vnlesse Paraeus be much contrary to himselfe which I cannot so easily conceiue of so judicious a Diuine you shall see I haue reason to thinke that vpon the Galatians he speaketh nothing for your opinion seeing vpon the Hebrewes Cap. 8. pag. 400. 401. g Paraeus in Heb. 8. p. 400. 401. he purposely and aduisedly writeth so much against it Lex Moralis saith he est aeterna justiciae norma and then he sheweth how farre the Old Testament is abrogated 1. Quantum ad doctrinae spiritualis gratiae circumstantiam de futuro 2. Deinde quantum ad conditionem impossibilem perfectae obedientiae 3. Quantum ad onus legalium rituum sacerdotij Levitici Denique quantum ad jugum politie Mosaicae populi Iudaici cervicibus impositum Whereupon he inferreth thus Vnde Manichaeonum fanaticorum refutatur error qui abrogationem veteris Testamenti non folum ad tria illa sed ad legem etiam moralem malè trahebant and a little after he addeth De Lege Morali de Mosis atque Prophetarum libris doctrina aeternitatem agnoscimus de ritibus politia minimè By this you may euidently perceiue that Paraeus is of opinion that howsoeuer the Ceremoniall and Iudiciall Lawes of Moses be abrogated yet the Morall Law is perpetuall and eternall and that they are men tainted with heresie or frensie that would draw the Morall Law into the same estate of abrogation with them And if you will looke backe a little to the seuenth Chapter and sixteenth verse of the same Epistle you may see as much as this and somewhat more h Paraeus in Heb. cap. 7. ver 16.18 Obiter hic annotemus discrimen legis Moralis Ceremonialis Illa perpetua spiritualis est ista caeduca carnalis fuit And againe vpon verse 18. Probat nunc legis abrogationem inde pendentem Et est taecita occupatio Quicquid sacerdotio fiat lex Dei est immutabilis Id inquit non nego de lege Morali nunc verò loquor de praecepto carnali lege Ceremoniali See more in Paraeus in Ep. Rom. cap. 3.8.31 cap. 7.7 Nam Valentiâ—…ani c. And this may sustice to cleare Paraeus that what you haue taken you haue mistaken from him as approuing your opinion vpon the Galatians which you see he disproueth on the Epistle to the Hebrewes Let vs now proceed to that which followeth There is a word * Antinomus you say Galat. 3 19. mistranslated in most vulgar translations which drawes many men away Serueth Wherefore then Serueth the Law Neither the Greeke you say nor any Latine translation hath it If neither the Greeke nor any Latine translation haue it Answer then it may peraduenture be added amisse but mistranslated as you say it cannot be And why doth not this word Serueth serue your turne Because forsooth it is in the Present Tense Serueth and not in the Preterimperfect Tense Serued Wherefore then serued the Law And why would you haue it serued and not serueth Because I guesse you would haue all men to know that the Law was of some force and vse in times past but now is of neither for the time present and so serued in the time past serueth your purpose very well for the present businesse But be it as you would haue it serued is serued either in the Greeke or any Latine translation or doth not the Law now in the daies of the Gospell serue to the reuealing conuincing and condemning of transgressions as before it serued to the same end and vse in the daies of the Law or suppose it serued more then to that end than now it serueth serueth it now therefore to no other vse at all But you say Many haue beene drawen awry by this word serueth Surely you are the first that euer I heard either make any exception against it or stand in any danger or feare of it And k Beza in Gal. 3.19 Beza whom you alledge may be vnderstood to take it rather in the Present than in the Preterim-perfect Tense Quorsum igitur lata lex est and Quum lex posita sit hominibus redarguendis Implying thereby not only whereunto the Law serued when it was first ordained but that it l Vide Beza in 1. Ep. Tim. cap. 1. v. 9. Finis legis est charitas 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. Tim. cap. 1. v. 9. serueth yet to the same vse in some respect though in diuers things the vse be changed Not vnlike vnto this you say is in Rom. 3.20 Commeth or is By the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne which being read came or was of the time past maketh you say the sense good Not vnlike vnto that is this indeed i. of as little either weight or worth And why may not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be thus translated For by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne but must needs be rendred thus For by the Law came or was the knowledge of sinne You haue your reason I hope in readinesse for if the former stand in the present time then your opinion must needs fall presently for then there is a present vse of the Law to discouer sinne But if that fall and the latter come in his stead then you conceiue hope that your opinion for the abolishing of the Law being now in danger of falling shall hence haue a prop to stay it vp withall and what a one I pray you why surely a sorry one either this or none By the Law came or was the knowledge of sinne Ergo the Law is now abolished and by the Law commeth not now any knowledge of sinne This is indeed as you said truly not vnlike the other the Law serued for restraining or condemning transgressions ergo now it serueth neither for these nor for any other vse at all But doth not the Apostle proue by the Law whether written in Tables of stone or in m Rom. 2.15 Tables of the heart that both Iewes and Gentiles are n Rom. 3.19 20. all vnder sin not only that they had beene but that euen then at that present they were And was not this in the time of the
and obey the Gospell bestowed vpon them yet neuerthelesse this maketh nothing against the speciall offices and vses of the Morall Law either for the e Act. 2.37 conuiction of sinners or direction of Saints to prepare them for repentance by e Act. 2.37 pricking of their f Psal 19.7 8 9 10. 2 King 22.19 hearts or to bring forth fruits worthy of g Mat. 3.2 8 10 12. repentance for the well ordering of their liues The Law hath his vse to worke h Mat. 27.3 Vide Bez. in Mat. 3.2 in Act. 5.31 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 poenitentiam The Gospell his force to worke i 2 Tim. 2.25 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 resipiscentiam and both are needfull for Christians euen at this present as formerly they haue euer beene k Calu. in Act. 2.36 Caluine speaking of the last clause of Peters Sermon wherein he chargeth the Iewes that they had crucified Christ Iesus saith he did this Vt majori conscientiae dolore tacti ad remedium aspirarent and so layeth open the hainousnesse of that sinne in these words Cujus caedes non crudelitatis modo sceleris plena erat sed etiam immanis adversus Deum perfidiae sacrilegij îngratitudinis denique apostasiae testimonium and then he giues in the next words this reason of this course Verum ita vulnerari oportuit ne ad quaerendam medicinam tardi essent Here I doe demand whence had the Iewes this sight and sense of so many sinnes in that one of crucifying the Lord Iesus as of cruelty wickednesse perfidiousnesse sacrilege ingratitude against God and apostasie from God Whence had they that l Act. 2.37 pricke in their hearts and wound in their conscience for these sinnes Had they no light by the Law to conuince them no stroke by the Law to wound them If sinne be a m 1 Ioh. 3.4 transgression of the Law and by the Law comes the n Rom. 3.20 knowledge of sinne and if sinne be not o 5.13 7.7 imputed nor pressed but by the Law how can it be but the Law had some hand in wounding and afflicting their hearts for these sinnes and in opening their eies to see and discerne the same I deny not for I doubt not but the p Ioh. 16.8 Spirit as the finger of God had his especiall and principall worke in their humiliation and conuersion that is not the question The Spirit may worke by the q 2 King 12.19 Law to make vs sensible of sinne and to cast vs downe vnder the weight of Gods wrath for it as well as it may worke by the r Isai 61.1 Act. 10.43 44. Gospell to make vs looke vp vnto Christ and to raise vs vp to some hope and assurance of the mercy of God for pardon and forgiuenesse of the same It is sufficient for me both against your position and allegation if in the worke of their repentance containing both their Å¿ Act. 26.18 Act. 3.19 1 Thess 1.9 Auersion from sinne and their Conuersion vnto God the Morall Law had any either u Lex facit ut non modò intelligam sed cum morsu conscientia sentiam experiar in me esse peccatum Muscul loc com de legib p. 135. force or vse which I am well assured any judicious and indifferent Reader by this which hath beene said will judge that it had When Dionysius as x Apollod de Orig. deorum lib. 3. p. 57. Apollodorus reporteth had cast Lycurgus into a fury or frensie he in that distemper taking a hatchet in his hand whiles he thought he had smitten downe the branch of a Vine with the same hand and hatchet slew his owne sonne What Dionysius he was that cast you first into this fit or frensie error or heresie I know not but it seemes whiles you haue lift vp your hand and your hatchet your skill and pen to cut downe the Morall Law a branch of Gods Vine the dint and danger of the stroke hath light vnawares vpon your owne soule as his did vpon his owne sonne though not absolutely to kill it yet to wound it vnto death vnlesse the Lord recouer it by giuing you repentance and effectually cure it by powring in the balme of his mercy and truth which I pray he may doe in the offerings and sufferings of Christ Iesus y 2 Tim. 2.24 25 26. Antinomus Answer Your many other Arguments which for breuity sake as you say or rather for leuity sake as I conceiue you omit for vanity sake I see you must needs call vpon and that by name as if you had in readinesse a fresh supply of armed men in case of danger to renew the fight and win the field Terent. Eun. Act. 4. Scen. 16. Simalio Dorax Syrisce sequimini Câ—…do alios ubi centurio est Sanga manipulus furum Eccum adest Vbi alij Thus doe you well resemble bragging Thraso behauing himselfe proudly and brauing his aduersary vainly both with that he hath and also with that he hath not For hauing brought out your best appointed forces into the field you call on still Vbi alij as though there were yet so many and so many and many more behinde whereas poore man you haue not a man more neither tag nor rag to follow you seeing solus Sanio seruat domum Take so much of this to your selfe and your former Arguments as may best fit you and reserue the rest for the other which yet sit at home with Sanio to keepe the house Your reference to Musculus Common-places giues no better satisfaction now we haue taken the paines to view all the quarters and corners of those speciall places which you haue beene pleased to send vs vnto for that purpose For if either you will stand vnto Musculus or Musculus will not stand against himselfe you may and shall euen there and thence receiue resolution to satisfie you that there we finde no such satisfaction as you haue dreamed may be found in those places He that seriously readeth and aduisedly considereth what Musculus hath written in the place De abrogatione Legis Mosaicae may easily perceiue both by the title and the text that he principally aimeth at the abrogation of the Ceremoniall and Iudiciall and the Morall Law only so farre as it was Lex litera Muscul loc com de abrogatione Legis Magisterium Mosis Ministerium Mosis virtus peccati litera occîdens iram maledictionem mortem operans And all this neither hurteth vs nor helpeth you for the vtter abrogating of the whole Morall Law For albeit for these offices it may be said to be abolished to them that are true beleeuers in Christ Iesus in which respect they are said not to be vnder the Law but vnder grace yet for other vses and offices the Morall Law is in force still as to be a rule of obedience to discouer corruptions and transgressions to be a bridle
THE OFFICE AND VSE OF the Morall Law of God in the dayes of the GOSPELL Iustified and explained at large by Scriptures Fathers and other Orthodoxe Diuines SO FARRE AS OCCASION was giuen by a scandalous Pamphlet sent abroad of late into the hands of diuers good Christians pretending great reason and reading for the vtter abrogating and abolishing of the whole Law of MOSES since the death of CHRIST By WILLIAM HINDE sometimes Fellow of Queenes Colledge in Oxford and now Preacher of Gods Word at BVNBVRY in CHESHIRE HOS 8.12 I haue written vnto him the great things of my Law but they were counted as a strange thing MATTH 5.19 Whosoeuer shall breake one of these least Commandements and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen LONDON Printed by Iohn Haviland for Thomas Pavier and are to be sold at his shop in Ivy Lane 1622. Antinomus Anonymus OR A SCANDALOVS Pamphlet of a namelesse Aduersary of the Morall Law of God intending thereby to proue if he could that In the Church of Christ since his death the whole Law of Moses is wholly abolished SIR This pamphlet was directed and sent unto a religious and gracious Gentleman Mr. Iohn Foxe late Steward to the right Honorable the Earle of Darby of his L. of Berry and Pilkinton in Lancashire you may well thinke mee slacke in performance of my promise and not vnlike but you in respect thereof thinke that I faint in the cause but it is farre otherwise with me for the more that I consider of it the more I am confirmed in the truth of it and the more I discerne the many errors that rise out of the ignorance of the true difference betweene the Law and the Gospell Luther on Gal. 3.21 saith The knowledge of this difference keepeth all Christian doctrine in its true and proper vse Also it maketh a faithfull man iudge ouer all kinde of life ouer the Lawes and decrees of all men and ouer all doctrine whatsoeuer and it giueth them power to trie all manner of Spirits And on Gal. 4.27 he also saith As it is the most principall and speciall article of Christian doctrine To know that we are iustified and saued by Christ so is it also very necessary to know and vnderstand well the doctrine concerning the abolishment of the Law for it helpeth very much to confirme our doctrine as touching faith and to attaine to sound and certaine consolation of conscience when we are assured that the Law is abolished and especially in great terrors and serious conflicts Thus far Luther who as you see agreeth with mee that the point is of great consequence and very necessary to be knowne of all that truly seeke Christ Iesus I will set you downe as briefly as I can what I conceiue and some testimonies for the same that are briefe and point you to some others that are more large The point is this In the Church of Christ since his death the whole Law of Moses is wholly abolished or abrogated For as saith Tossanus in 2 Cor. 3. Licet unus sit Deus una semper fuerit Ecclesia idemque substantia foedus varia tamen hujus dispensatio fuit ut aliter agitur cum homine in infantia aliter in adolescentia aliter maturajam aetate Quo nomine Paulus ad Galatas 4o. Iudaeorum populum puero inter tutores educato comparat Lex fuit quidem à Deo data per virum Dei Mosen promulgata nec sine peculiari gloria sed Euangelium suam habet propriam gloriam quod non est literale solum ministerium aliquod jubens sed habet conjunctam efficaciam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Spiritus sancti 1 Cor. 2. Gal. 3. And Gualther on Gal. 3.19 20. Quia homines non semper stant conditionibus quas Deus ipsis praescribit aliter atque aliter cum ipsis agendum est Ideo tunc queque propter causas legem addi oportuit quae ad tempus duravit quam diu ejus usus fuit At nunc novi Testamenti tempus est quando lex Prophetae Euangelio cedunt ut tam Gentibus quà m Iudaeorum reliquijs in Regnum Dei vim facientibus locum dent 1. The whole Epistle to the Galatians importeth so much for it is the generall argument of that Epistle And that there is meant the Morall law as well as any other in Gal. 3.19.23 See also Calu. Iust 3.19.4 Beza in Gal 3.22 Perkins on Gal. 3.11.23 Pareus in argumento in Gal. 3. and in Columna 153. D. 229. A. 232. C. 246. C.D. 274. D. who though they speake but only vpon one or two places yet it will appeare that the like must be vnderstood in the whole Epistle One word in chap. 3.19 mis-translated in most vulgar translations drawes many men awry Serueth Neither the Greeke nor any Latine translation hath it But grant the word must needs come in to make vp the sense I cannot see how it can be sensibly in the present tense but rather in the preterimperfect tense seeing it is a question and the answer to it is in the preterimperfect tense plainly as both Bezaes note and others expound it Not vnlike to this is in Rom. 3.20 commeth or is which being read came or was of the time past maketh the sense good otherwise I cannot vnderstand the words for the time it is aduerse to Now that followeth immediatly after and therefore cannot be the same Another thing in this Epistle is worth noting that the Apostle cap. 4.1 by the Heire in minoritie meaneth the Synagogue or Church of the Iewes afore Christ or the Iewes themselues and by full age he meaneth the Church of Christ since his death or Christians themselues See Socrates lib. 5. ca 21. Tho. Aquin. 1. 2. q. 91. a. 5. 2. 2. q. 1. 7. 2. Calv. in Gal. 3.24 4.1 Gualther in eundem Beza in eundem Piscator in eundem Pareus in Gal. 4.3 col 265. B. 274. A. 276. A. 290. D. Perkins in Gal. 4.3 setteth it out very fully and withall sheweth most plainly that the words We or Vs are to be vnderstood of Paul himselfe and others that were Iewes And so doth Pareus expound them on Gal. 3.24 Luther not well vnderstanding this exposition but generally taking the nonage of the heire to be the state of the vnregenerate and the full age to be the comming of Christ in spirit to any man concludes the end of the Law to be at the comming of Christ into any mans heart though on the same Gal. 4.1 he acknowledgeth an end of the Law at the comming of Christ but doth not fully handle it so Whereas it is plaine that the Apostles meaning was so For he writ to the Churches of Galatia which were in a sort fallen from Christ Calv. in Gal. 1.2 and not particularly to them alone that were true beleeuers as he did to the Romans Ephesians Philippians and Colossians
you seeke to destroy the whole Morall Law of God also If 3 Ierem. 11.19 Ieremie held them to bee of a cruell disposition that deuised deuices against him saying Let vs destroy the tree with the fruit thereof and let vs cut him off from the land of the liuing that his name be no more remembred of what disposition then shall wee take you to be that would cut downe this tree of Gods Law together with the fruit thereof first f Manu formatoris nostri in ipsis cordibus nostris veritas scripsit Quod tibi non vis fieri ne feceris alteri Vide August in Psal 57. vers 1. planted in Paradise in the heart of Adam some roots whereof doe yet remaine in the naturall man which being g Lex Dei in cordibus scribitur non quia per naturam praeventa sit gratia sed quia per gratiam reparata est natura Vide August de vera Innocent cap. 258. transplanted by grace into the heart of the regenerate and spirituall and there rooted by faith watered by the word and warmed by the spirit doe yeeld sweet fruits of righteousnesse and holinesse to the praise and glory of God by Christ Iesus But seeing we cannot stay your hand let vs see if we can take away the dint of your stroake and abate the edge of your axe wherewith you strike to destroy the whole Morall Law Wherein howsoeuer we may faile yet are we well assured that rather shall the head fly from the helue and both fall into the bottomlesse pit and you cry out and confesse as once one of the sonnes of the 4 2 Kings 6.5 Prophets did in such a case Alas master it was but borrowed than euer this tree of the Morall law of God shall be hewen downe by your hands And first I cannot but admire againe your high conceit of your selfe great confidence in your cause and setled resolution to h Elati sibi placentes Hypocritae quaestus gratiâ inanis gloriae operantes Omnes hi decidunt à veritate alienum ignem afferentes ad altare Dei i. alienas doctrinas Vide Iren. aduersus Haeres lib. 4. cap. 43. stand stoutly to the defence of it for whereas your friend to whom you write might thinke that by reason of your slacknesse you did faint in the cause as you obiect for him you answer for your selfe in these words But it is farre otherwise with me for the more that I consider of it the more I am confirmed in the truth of it and the more I discerne of the many errors that arise out of the ignorance of the true difference betweene the Law and the Gospell Bigge words messengers of a braue heart Your cause concerning the whole abolishing of the whole Morall Law is now no longer a bare assertion but a setled perswasion for you are confirmed in the truth of it neither came you vnto this by any light opinion but by mature deliberation for you haue more and more considered of it and this consideration hath brought you with it a greater measure of illumination for by the light of this truth you are able to discerne many errors which by reason of their blinde ignorance none else can see but such as you thinke good to lend your spectacles vnto to discouer them And from all these ariseth your courage and resolution that it is so farre from you to faint in the cause that being more and more confirmed in the truth of it you are now fully resolued to set your best wits and your friends aworke stoutly to maintaine and defend it But what said the 5 1 King 20.11 King of Israel to the King of Syria Let not him that girdeth on his harnesse boast himselfe as he that putteth it off Be not so confident that your building will stand vnlesse the foundation be sure and the frame sound and good If the 6 Luc. 6.48 49. foundation be â—and and the frame 7 1 Cor. 3.11 12 13 14 15. hay and stubble it will neuer abide the touch much lesse the force either of water or of fire Many there are that build Castles in the aire and thinke them to be turrets of truth and forts of defence But when the Lord shall awaken them out of their dreame and anoint their eies with the 8 Reu. 3.18 eie-salues of grace and 9 1 Ioh. 2.27 truth they shall then see that what they built was but vpon the sand of fancie not vpon the rocke of Faith and their whole frame more like the 10 Gen. 11.4 9. Tower of Babel then the fort of 11 Cant. 4.4 Sion For as 12 Prou. 18.11 the Rich mans riches are his strong tower but only in his owne imagination so are the poore mans fancies his fortresses of faith and truth but alas only in his owne 13 Rom. 1.21 2 Cor. 10.5 vaine conceit and opinion But to make way vnto your matter you seeme to giue some reason of this your great confidence and resolution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because say you the ignorance of the true difference betweene the Law and the Gospell doth breed many errors which you haue discerned and the true knowledge of this difference keepeth all Christian doctrine in its proper vse And for this you cite Luther on Galat. 3 21. Answer Your ignorance of this difference hath bred this your error touching the vtter abolishing of the Morall Law as i Irena advers Haeres lib. 3. cap. 12. Et ea quae est sec Mosen Lex Gratia Noui Test utraque apta temporibus ad utilitatem humani generis ab uno eodem praestita Deo Irenaeus advers Here 's lib. 3. cap. 12. Ierenaeus obserued of the Marcionists Omnes qui sunt malae sententiae Mosis legem diffimilem contrariam Euangelij doctrina arbitrantes jam non sunt conversi ut differentiae utrinsque Testamenti inquirerent causas You shall anon haue a particular answer to your owne reason But first of all seeing you haue appealed vnto Luther vnto Luther shall you goe That which you alledge out of him on Gal. 3.21 we doe willingly acknowledge as good and wholsome doctrine which how little it will stand you in stead nay how much rather it stands against your opinion you shall heare by and by if first wee may heare Luther plainly deliuer his iudgement touching the abolishing or continuing of the morall Law Writing vpon the same Epistle and chapter which you cite and vers 24. he hath as you may reade these words The k Luth. in Gal. 3. vers 24. true vse of the Law is to teach me that I am brought to the knowledge of my sinne and humbled that so I may come vnto Christ and be iustified by faith But faith is neither Law nor worke but an assured confidence which apprehendeth Christ who is the end of the Law Rom. 10. And how not that he hath abolished
the old Law and giuen a New or that he is a Iudge that must be pacified by workes as the Papists haue taught but he is the end of the Law to all those that beleeue that is to say euery one that beleeueth in him is righteous and the Law shall neuer accuse him The Law then is good holy and iust so that a man vse it as he should doe By which euidence we may iustly giue sentence both against your opinion for the whole abolishing of the whole Morall Law and against your allegation also out of Luther vpon whom you would father the base and bastard fruit of your owne braine to make it either more plausible or more probable by this meanes Seuen Obseruations out of Luthers allegation for may we not hence most euidently conclude that Luthers iudgement concerning the Morall Law is this first that it is not abolished secondly that it is of good vse thirdly that it serueth to bring vs to the knowledge and sense of sinne fourthly that it driueth vs out of our selues and our owne righteousnesse which is of the Law to seeke for righteousnesse by faith in Christ only fiftly Jrenaeus is of the same iudgement for establishing the Morall Law In lege in Euangelio primum maximum praeceptum est Diligere Dominum Deum ex toto corde Irenaeus advers Hares lib. 3. cap. 25 26 that Christ hath not abolished the old Law sixtly that the Law may be said to be at an end in Christ because as it cannot iustifie so can it not iustly accuse or terrifie any that are righteous by faith in him lastly that the Gospell doth not abolish the nature and right vse of the Law for according to the Apostle the Law is holy iust and good but only taketh out of the hearts of true beleeuers the accusing and accursing power of it Which points being so apparantly contrarie to your position I haue the more fully and distinctly set downe for your better satisfaction that you may either let fall your opinion seeing you haue Luthers both heart and hand against it or else neuer run againe vnder his wing to seeke for any succour or shelter for the same I now come vnto your reason which you seeme to alledge for your so great confidence in this cause 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 namely Because the ignorance of the true difference betweene the Law and the Gospell doth breed many errors which you say you haue already discerned and the true knowledge of this difference keepeth all Christian doctrine in its proper vse Answer In which words what doe you else but establish that which you goe about to abolish For whiles you say you discerne many errors to arise out of the ignorance and much good to come in by the knowledge of the difference betweene the Law and the Gospell doe you not see your owne error and ignorance herein also that laying it downe in your position for sound and true doctrine that the whole law of Moses is wholly abolished you notwithstanding doe acknowledge not only that the m Ergo Lex Creatoris etiam ab Adversario probata est nec dispeadium sed compendium ab eo consecuta est Tertul. advers Marcion lib. 5. cap. 4. Law is but also that it is of good and great vse pulling downe with the one hand that which you haue built or would build with the other for if the whole Law of Moses be abolished then the ignorance of it will breed no error nor the knowledge of it can build no truth for young Logicians can tell vs that Non entis non est actio nee scientia Againe if the whole Law be wholly abolished it is not possible it should be distinguished by any difference from the Gospell for as Non entis non est scientia so Non entis non est differentia What difference can be designed betwixt that which is not and that which is that which is wholly abolished and that which is established If you say as before that the difference of the Law from the Gospell may be knowne and acknowledged and be of good and great vse then I say you are too bold in your assertion to maintaine that the whole Law is wholly abolished for if this were true you leaue the Law neither breath nor being neither nature nor vse neither substance nor circumstance neither difference nor n 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Diog. Laert. lib. 9. p. 694. Accidence neither place in the booke of God nor so much as a nights lodging vnder the roofe of the Church of God Which to affirme because it were both absurd and impious I hope vpon better aduice you will see and acknowledge that your point was cut out too long and too large when you thus set it downe The point is this That the whole Law of Moses is wholly abolished the rather because you haue now cut it shorter narrower with your owne hands telling vs that it is not abolished for it is nor wholly abolished for it is of good vse it hath essence and difference and may be knowne and not onely knowne in it selfe but distinguished from the Gospell and the distinct knowledge hereof so profitable and needfull that the ignorance hereof is a mother of many errors dangerous and hurtful If I acknowledge this with you for a truth then must you acknowledge with me your position for an error and if you will haue your position That the whole Law is wholly abolished to be true then is all this that you haue spoken of the profitable and necessary knowledge of the difference of the Law and the Gospell false You seeme to boast that you faint not in the cause and that you are confirmed in the truth of it but consider I pray you whether you faile not in your o Hieron adversus Ruffin p. 218. course seeing you doe not onely trip and interfere but stumble and fall at your first setting forth * Statim de portu egrediens navem impegit So said Ierome to Ruffin I vnto you Cic. Tuscul lib. 1. Is the truth diuided or doth the truth differ from it selfe * Statim de portu egrediens navem impegit So said Ierome to Ruffin I vnto you Cic. Tuscul lib. 1. I see a man may take a fall though he doe not faint and thinke himselfe confirmed in the truth when he is vnsetled in vncertainties and diuided from it Pugnantia te loqui non vides ubi est acumen tuum But to recouer your selfe againe you say Luther agreeth with you in this point How should Luther agree with him that cannot agree with himselfe But how or wherein doth he agree with you Antinom That the point is of great consequence and very necessary to be knowne of all that truly seeke Christ Iesus Answer What point his or yours His point is That the knowledge of the difference of the offices of the Law and Gospell
Gospell and doth he not conuince them all of sinne by the present vse of the Law Obserue what he saith verse 19. Now we know that whatsoeuer the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it speaketh to them that are vnder the Law Doth he not vse the present time for the manifesting of the present vse of the Law three times together in this verse and concludeth in the next That therefore by the deeds of the Law no flesh shall be justified in his sight because by the Law commeth or is the knowledge of sinne So o Beza in Rom. 3.19 20. Beza on this place doth expound it and p Paraeus in Rom. 3. v. 20. Paraeus rendreth the words thus Per legem habetur agnitiâ— peccati whence he concludeth ergo non justitia and q Caluin in Rom. 3.20 alibi Quid enim quaeso ist sibi volunt tegem propter transgressiones positam esse Gal. 3.19 per legem esse cognitionem peccati Rom. 3.20 legem peccatum efficere See Caluin Instit lib. 2. cap. 5. sect 6. See Aug. lib. de Spiritu litera cap. 13. Caluin giues the sense of these words Per legem agnitio peccati to be this Lex convincit nos peccati damnationis You see then these learned men take these words otherwise than you doe That by the Law commeth not came or is not was the acknowledgement of sinne As for that which you alledge out of Galath 4.1 I must confesse I neither know how it maketh any thing at all for your point or purpose nor can I conceiue what you meane to goe about to make so large proofe of that which no man doth deny What here you write hath neither dependance nor consequence neither ioints nor sinewes much like vnto a shadow which hauing some proportion of a mans body hath yet neither life nor substance in it For what if we yeeld you all this that the Apostle by the Heire in his minority meaneth the Church of the Iewes before Christ and by the same in his riper age the Church of Christ since his death What is there here I say not of any power but of any colour to proue the abolishing of the Morall Law Is the Morall Law therefore wholly abolished because the Mosaicall regiment in Rites and Ceremonies in Types and Figures in Legall burdens and Leuiticall seruices together with the rigour and terror of the Law is now ceased and abrogated You might as well say the Heire when he was a childe was kept in vnder sharpe and seuere Tutors and Gouernors but being now come to age he may now liue as he list Or the Church in her infancie was in bondage to the Ceremoniall Law therefore in her riper age she is not bound to obey either God or man by the duties of the Morall Law I could wish you would aduisedly consider what our SAVIOVR CHRIST himselfe saith I came not to r Est igitur damnanda Antinomorum libertinorum detestanda haeresis saith Bez. in 1 Tim. 1.9 and so say I. destroy the Law but to Å¿ Mat. 5.17 18 19. fulfill it and whosoeuer he be that shall breake one of the least of these Commandements and shall teach others so to doe he shall be called the least in the kingdome of heauen but whosoeuer shall doe and teach them he shall be called great in the kingdome of heauen And remember againe what S. Paul hath once told you already t Rom. 3.31 Doe we make void the Law by faith God forbid nay rather we establish the Law Christians indeed are freed from the bondage and burdens of the Law of Moses but yet must they take vpon them u Mat. 11.23 29 30. Christ his yoke and burden for his yoke is easie and his burden light Yea they are charged to beare one anothers burdens and so to fulfill the x Gal. 6.2 Law of Christ that their faith may y Gal. 5.6.13 worke by loue and they by loue serue one another and so shew that they delight in the z Rom. 7.22 Law of God concerning the inner man a Luc. 1.74 75. seruing the Lord in righteousnesse and holinesse all the daies of their liues that is according to both the Tables of the Morall Law Touching your quotation out of Socrat. Eccl. Hist lib. 5. cap. 21. I haue seene what he saith but can see nothing for the abolishing of the Morall Law He blameth them that contend so much for Iewish Ceremonies keeping of Easter obseruing Daies and Moneths as neuer hauing well considered that Quando religio Iudaica erat in Christianam commutata accurat is illas Mosaicae legis observationes rerum futurarum figuras penitus evannisse and so vrgeth that out of Galath 4.21 against them But what will you say if out of the same Chapter I bring you some euidence that Socrates doth not abolish but establish the Morall Law b Socrates Eccles Hist lib. 5. c. p. 21. Apostolis propositum fuit non ut leges de festis diebus celebrandis sancirent sed ut rectè vivendi rationis pietatis nobis authores essent The Apostles saith Socrates neuer purposed to make lawes for holydaies but to teach vs both by words and writing the way of godlinesse and good liuing And did not the Apostles this especially by vrging and applying the duties of the Morall Law in both Tables vnto Christians both for their persons and callings Reade and consider Rom. 1.2.6.7 12.13 Cap. 1 Tim. 1. 2 Tim. 3. Ephes 5.6 Chapters Moreouer Socrates in the same Chapter complaineth of the Churches of the Gentiles for the breaking of the Morall Law and violating the c Acts 15.20 Apostles Commandement Acts 15. Caeterum nonnulli his neglectis omnem scortationem rem quidem indifferentem arbitrantur sed tamen de diâ—bus sestis tanquam de vita decertant Dei d Vide Iunium de polit Mosis cap. 8. col 1552. praecepta evertunt ipsis sibi leges sanciunt In which words doth he not blame such as professing themselues to be Christians did yet account fornication which is a breach of the seuenth Commandement in the Morall Law to be a thing indifferent and so following their owne lust did ouerthrow Gods Law You haue gained nothing then by your allegation out of Socrates but lost more than you lookt for at his hands And as little haue you got by that which you take from Mr. Perkins againe out of Galat. 4.3 Antinomus who as you say setteth it out very fully What is that which he setteth out so fully The abrogation of the Morall Law If you meane that Answer as that you must meane if you meane to speake to the purpose then you offer him too too hard measure againe to charge him with that he neuer spake and to gather that he neuer scattered Or is it that the Church vnder the Law was but as the Heire in his minority but the Church vnder the
b Rom. 3.20 By the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne Rom. 3. c Rom. 4.31 Doe we then abrogate the Law by faith God forbid nay rather we establish the Law Rom. 4.31 d Rom. 7.7 12 22 23. See Tertull. vpon these and other places of the Epistle to the Rom. 7. Quia lex peccatum Absit Erubesce Marcion Absit Abhominatur Apostolus criminationem legis ô summum praeconium legis Tertull. aduers Marcion lib. 5. cap. 13. I had not knowne sinne but by the Law for I had not knowne lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not couet wherefore the Law is holy and the Commandement i. the tenth Commandement is holy just and good I delight in the Law of God after the inner man So then in my minde I serue the Law of God but with the flesh the law of sinne Rom. 7.7 12 22 25. Are not these plaine allegations of the Law more than bare allusions And doe not these pregnant Testimonies graciously establish the nature and vse of the Morall Law which you most wickedly goe about to abolish Will you yet see more euident for better satisfaction and assurance Owe nothing to any man saith the Apostle but to loue one another Loue is a Christian duty you will not deny 1 Cor. 13. By what argument or reason doth he presse them hereunto Euen by a sound Argument drawen from Gods Law For he that loueth another hath fulfilled the Law he meaneth partibus non gradibus and what Law he sheweth by reckning vp the seuerall Commandements of the second Table For this saith e Rom. 13.8 9. See Paraeus in Rom. 13.8 9. Aug. de spirit lit cap. 14.21 he Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not commit adultery Thou shalt not steale Thou shalt not beare false witnesse Thou shalt not couet and if there be any other Commandement it is brieflie comprehended in this saying namely Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe Loue worketh no ill to his neighbour therefore loue is the fulfilling of the Law May you not now f Erubesce Marc. Abhominatur Apostolus criminationem legis blush at your bold ignorance to say and that with such confidence That in all the Epistles there is not so much as any allusion to the Morall Law or Ten Commandements seeing there is here so expresse mention of the same And what will you say to that exhortation of the Apostle to the Ephesians Children g Ephes 6.1 2. obey your Parents in the Lord for this is right And how doth he enforce this duty and proue the equity of the same Doth he not plainly alledge the first Commandement of the second Table and the promise annexed thereto for this end and purpose saying Honor thy father and mother which is the first Commandement with promise that it may be well with thee and thou maist liue long on the earth The euidence of this one place is such and so sufficient to conuince you of grosse blindnesse in this particular that I will not seeke any further for more lights but only leaue this in your hand and pray that the scales may fall from your eies that you may see the truth by it I come now to the reason which you render of all this Antinomus For it is the goodnesse of God say you that leadeth to repentance Rom. 2.4 c. 2 Pet. 3.9 and not the thundering of the Law To this I answer Answer That the goodnesse of God indeed doth lead vs to repentance according to that which you alledge out of Rom. 2.4 But where you absolutely exclude the thundering of the Law as of no vse nor force in this businesse tell me I pray you what you thinke of the very next verse h Rom. 2.4 5. But thou after thy hardnesse and impenitent heart treasurest vp vnto thy selfe wrath against the day of wrath and reuelation of the righteous judgement of God who will render to euery man according to his deeds Whether are these any thunderings of the Law or no Euery word hath his weight Wrath of God day of wrath righteous judgement of God just recompence according to the worke so shall the wages be If the goodnesse of God leade vnto repentance doe not these threatnings driue vnto it If the mercies of God moue vs to obedience doe not the terrors of God remoue vs and withdraw vs from impenitency and profanenesse Nay doth not the Apostle in the same place for this very end ioine them both together i Rom. 2.7 8 9 10. Indignation and wrath tribulation and anguish vpon euery soule of man that doth euill of the Iew first and also of the Gentile but glory honour and peace to euery man that worketh good to the Iew first and also to the Gentile As for that which * Antinomus you alledge also out of 2 Pet. 3.9 The long suffering of the Lord to vs ward 2 Pet. 3.9 not willing that any should perish but that all shall come to repentance I acknowledge it as a point of the mercy and truth of God Answer But whereas you would haue this long suffering to be the only meanes without all threatnings or terrors to bring vs to this repentance looke backe I pray you to the k 2 Pet. 3.5 6 7. 5 6 7. verses of the same Chapter and be not willingly ignorant of the judgements of God there mentioned by the ouerflowing of waters whereby the Old world perished and by the burning and flaming fire whereunto this world is reserued against the day of judgement and perdition of vngodly men And looke forwards also to the very next words following viz. l 2 Pet. 3.10 But the day of the Lord will come as a theefe in the night in which the heauens shall passe away with a great noise and the elements shall melt with feruent heat the earth also and the workes that are therein shall be burnt vp And tell me whether these threatnings of the Day of the Lord be not as terrible as the lightnings and thunderings at the giuing of the Law the seeing and hearing whereof made m Exod. 19. Heb. 12.18 19 21. Moses to say I exceedingly feare and tremble And if you thinke these be not vrged to leade vs or draw vs to repentance then consider I beseech you what vse and application the Apostle makes hereof euen vnto all the faithfull in the words following n 2 Pet. 3.11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolued what manner of persons ought we to be in all holy conuersation and godlinesse Now for conclusion of this point Let vs heare how the Author to the Hebrewes doth vrge vs To prouoke one another to loue and to good workes This he doth not only by the boldnesse or liberty which we haue to enter into the Holiest by the o Heb. 10.19 bloud of Iesus but also by the p Heb. 10.27 looking for of judgement and fiery indignation
Act. 2.17 18. of knowledge in their mindes and much greater power of grace in their hearts h Heb. 8.10 11. and liues than euer the Iewes that first had it written in Tables of stone had For proofe whereof if other Scriptures were silent yet those which you produce for your selfe will speake enough to serue my turne Rom. 7.14 and 3.19 and 9.4 5 6 7 8. Hebr. 1.2 2. For if the Morall Law be i Rom. 7.14 spirituall if it k Rom. 3.19 conuince the whole world as guilty before God if it belong vnto the true l Rom. 9.4 5 6 7 8. Israel the children of Abraham Rom. 9.6 7. compared with Hebr. 8.10 and if God hath in these last daies spoken m Heb. 1.1 2. more plainly and opened his will more effectually by his Sonne as the Scriptures you alledge beare witnesse with me then haue we that are beleeuers of the Gentiles the Morall Law of God both in a clearer light of n 1 Ioh. 2.27 knowledge in our mindes and in a greater o Phil. 1.9 10 11. power of grace in our hearts and liues than euer the body of the people of the p See Muscul loc com de leg cap. de lege spiritus Vrsin de lege diuina p. 278 279. Iewes had which if it be true then haue you spunne a faire threed who drawing out a line and twisting a cord to binde the Morall Law vpon the Iewes only haue before you were aware made them both of that length and strength that they reach vnto and binde it vpon the Gentiles also I come now vnto the Testimonies of learned men whose names and writings you pretend for your cause and peruert to your owne purpose as being of the same minde and wrapt in the same error with you That the Morall Law was giuen to the Iewes only But take heed whilst you beare men in hand that you haue witnesse from them lest vpon due search you your selfe be found to beare false witnesse against them Let vs make triall of your dealing with some of the most judicious and religious of them And first for Caluine I haue read the Epistle q Calu. Epist 58. That Christ is the end of the Law but as you cite no sentence so can I finde no syllable to proue that the Morall Law was giuen to the Iewes only he that must finde out what you set him to seeke especially in so large a field had need to plow with your heifer and to haue some more particular markes of your meaning to lead him thereunto But although I found not what I sought yet in seeking I found what I there sought not viz. That Caluine speaking of the Ceremonies and Sacrifices of the Law hath these words Lex nihil adduxit ad pèrfectionem tantum instar r Gal. 3.24 paedagogi dirigebat deducebat ad Christum qui legis ipsius finis Å¿ Rom. 10.4 est complementum vt tradit Apostolus Now it may be that you finding these words in Caluine that Christ is the end of the Law did imagine that Christ had made an vtter end of the Morall as well as of the Ceremoniall Law either not knowing or not obseruing that there is an * Christus finis perficiens non interficiens Aug. in Ioh. Tract 55. end of accomplishment as well as an end of abolishment Christ hath both accomplished and abolished the Ceremoniall Law the Morall Law he hath accomplished but not abolished That which t See Calu. Ep. 58. was imperfect in both touching the Legall Couenant for righteousnesse by the workes of both is abolished in both and only perfected in him who for righteousnesse is the end of both CHRIST IESVS to all that beleeue in his name Rom. 10.4 Vpon which place u Paraeus in Rom. 10.14 Paraeus hath these words Consensâ—… legis Christi hinc apparet errant qui putant legem repugnare Christo Christum abolâ—… legem Hence appeareth saith he the consent of the Law and Christ and they are deceiued that thinke the Law is contrary vnto Christ or that Christ doth abolish the Law Antinomus Your next quotation of Caluine Rom. 3.19 telleth vs That whereas the Iewes would needs put off all those rebukes and threats of the Law from themselues vnto the Gentiles the Apostle doth there apply the Law to them particularly x Calu. in Rom. 3.19 Ne ad solas Gentes restringant quae in ipsos promiscuè competunt Lest they should restraine vnto the Gentiles only those things which did belong vnto them both together Answer Now as there the Iewes were blamed for restraining the Law vnto the Gentiles so are you here to be rebuked for restraining the Law vnto the Iewes only especially out of this place where the Law is said to y Rom. 3.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 stop euery mouth i. to conuince both Iewes and Gentiles of sinne in such a manner as that they can haue nothing to plead for their clearing or just defence and not only so but to hold fast the whole world as liable to Gods curse for the breach of it If you haue aduisedly read the other z Calu. Instit lib. 2. cap. 1. sect 1. li. 2. cap. 11. sect 11. places and Chapters of Caluine Instit lib. 2. cap. 1. lib. 2. nay if you haue but read the very contents of the Chapters and 13.14.16 and 17. sections you cannot but sinne against knowledge and conscience too in citing these places as making for you which stand in open force and fight against you For albeit Caluine doth acknowledge that both the Morall and Ceremoniall Law were giuen vnto the Iewes which no man doth deny yet doth he not say that the Morall Law was giuen vnto the Iewes only which is that which you affirme And although he grant as we doe that the Ceremoniall Law is now by Christ abolished yet doth he manifestly proue that the Morall Law doth yet continue and retaine some speciall force a See Bez. Theol. Ep. Ep. 20. p. 103.104 and vse still which is that which you deny I referre you to the same Booke of his b Calu. Instit lib. 2. cap. 7. sect 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. Institutions which you alledge and section 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. of the seuenth Chapter c Ad Sacramenta pertinent Circumcisio carnis Sabbatum temporale neomenia Ad mores autem non occides non machaberis Augustine in Galat. 3. hath nothing that I can finde to proue that the Morall Law was giuen to the Iewes only something he hath to the cleane contrary For distinguishing the workes of the Law into Ceremoniall and Morall d Nunquid ergo potest Apostolus non curare c. Aug. in Gal. 3. he demandeth whether the Apostle could as little care whether a Christian were a murtherer an adulterer whether he were chaste and innocent as he careth
vtterly abolished Is there any sinewes or joints nay is there any life or soule in this Argument What if the Law were giuen as a b Gal. 3.24 Schoolemaster to the Iewes is therefore the Morall Law of no force nor vse to vs Christians of the Gentiles But I demand what Law is it which you say was instituted as a Schoolemaster vnto the Iewes If you say the Ceremoniall we grant that it was a Schoolemaster not only teaching obscurely by signes and sacrifices types and figures that c Tota Legis Occonomia rudis quaedam erat disciplina rudibus conaeniens Beza in rude people of the Iewes in their non-age to looke vnto Christ to come but also conuincing and condemning them seuerely of all manner of sinne and keeping them continually vnder the rod and whip in d Gal. 4.3 the bondage of seruants as an heire in his minority is vnder sharpe e Gal. 4.1 Caluin Jnstit li. 2. ca. 11. sect 2.5 tutors and gouernors though he be lord of all that so they might be driuen to looke and long for the time of release and liberty in Christ appointed by the Father If you meane the Morall Law we doe not deny but for the manner of deliuery measure of obedience forme of Legall Couenant rigour in exacting terror in threatning and seuerity in accusing and condemning as it was in Moses hand the f 2 Cor. 3.7 9. ministery of condemnation and a killing letter it was then to the Iewes a sharpe and seuere g Gal. 3.24 Schoolemaster to driue them vnto Christ Iesus not directly as teaching pointing out or promising Christ vnto them but indirectly and as it were occasionally forcing them by h Ioh. 3.14 sorrow and feare and despaire of their owne righteousnesse for obtaining life by the Law to cast about and seeke for some remedy and releefe elsewhere as sicke men enquire for a i Matt. 9.12 Physitian and such as are wounded seeke for a Chirurgion which because it could no where be found vnder heauen but k Act. 4.10 11 12. See Calu. de usu Legis in Harmo in 4. lib. Mos p. 442.443 only in Christ Iesus they were occasioned by the Law to flie vnto the Gospell and enforced as it were to appeale from Moses vnto CHRIST resting and relying vpon him alone who hath l Mal. 4.3 healing vnder his wings for m Luk. 4.18 binding vp all their n Ad justitiam Christi lex moralis homines revocabat ut ad medicum Bez. in Rom. 3.21 wounds and curing all spirituall maladies and miseries whatsoeuer And thus also for the substance though not for euery circumstance according to the Iewish Paedagogie the Morall Law as we haue often said before hath yet in the Church of Christ some speciall vse and office still and that not only for the wicked to humble them but euen for the godly to conuince them to rebuke them to stirre them and spurre them vp to all holy duties and to teach and instruct them what to doe and what to leaue vndone euen after they are called to beleeue and liue in Christ Iesus To this purpose o Luth. on Gal. 3.24 See Calu. summa legis in Harmo in 4. lib. Mos p. 440.441 Luther speaketh most excellently vpon Gal. 3.24 The Law was our Schoolemaster vnto Christ The Law doth not only terrifie and torment as the foolish Schoolemaster beateth his schollers and teacheth them nothing but with his rods he driueth vs vnto Christ like as a good Schoolemaster instructeth and exerciseth his schollers in reading and writing to the end they may come to the knowledge of good letters and other profitable things that afterwards they may haue delight in doing of that which before being constrained vnto they did against their wils and a little after he addeth The true vse of the Law is to teach me that I aâ—…â—…rought to the knowledge of my sinne and humbled that so I may come vnto Christ and be justified by faith c. That which you alledge out of p August de Doctr. Christi cap. 6. August de Doct. Christ cap. 6. helpeth you nothing in this businesse for he speaketh only of the Iewish Paedagogie in their Sacrifices and Ceremonies which their estate he calleth servitutem custodiam tanquam sub paedagogo puerorum and tearmeth their Ceremonies signa saying they were signa quae temporaliter erant imposita servientibus And what is this to the abrogation of the Morall Law q Beza in Gal. 3.23 4.1 3. againe abused Puerilis est jactantiae accusando illustres homines nomini suo famam quarere Hieron Ep. 13. Beza you doe abuse againe he mentioneth the Ceremoniall Law only in both places Gal. 3.23 and Gal. 4.1.3 Nunc eandem Ceremonialem Legem confiderans ut Euangelicarum promissionum umbram figuram docet illam quoque hoc respectu cessasse quam comparat cum paedagogo postea cum tutore Gal. 4.1 And will you inferre vpon this Beza saith The Ceremeniall Law which to the Iewes was a Schoolemaster and Tutor vnto Christ is now ceased Ergo The Morall Law is vtterly abolished since the death of Christ The place of Mr. Perkins Galath 3.23 hath beene cleared before let me now stop your mouth once for all for euer mentioning Mr. Perkins name as being of your opinion for the vtter abolishing of the Morall Law and I will not goe far to fetch a stoppell but euen to the other side of the leafe which you haue quoted r Perk. on Gal. 3.23 Seeing faith is now come saith he it may be demanded what is the guard whereby we are kept now Answ The precepts of the Morall Law The sayings of the wise are as nailes and stakes fastened to range men in the compasse of their duties Eccles 12.11 If this stoppell will not serue your mouth is huge wide till you send me the measure of it I shall not fit it right to serue your turne Antinomus Vnto your eighth ninth and tenth short Arguments I will make no long answer Argument 8 9 10. they being all of one nature may receiue one manner of satisfaction and resolution The * Aug. ad Bonif. cont duas Epist Pelag. lib. 3. cap. 4. Law of Moses as it was giuen vnto the Iewes in the letter for the outward forme of Legall Couenant in Mount Sinai Answer is resembled to Hagar that bringeth forth children vnto bondage as she did Ismael and being giuen in such horror and terror bestoweth nothing but the spirit of feare vpon her children And in this regard we say It is the old and no part of the new Couenant See Muscul loc Com. de Discrim Veteris Nov. Iestam that is of the Gospell which on the contrary bringeth forth children vnto spirituall liberty as Sarah did Izaacke and bestoweth vpon them the spirit of Adoption making them heires of promise and fellow-heires annexed with Christ Iesus But what is
and serue your humour for the vtter abrogation of the whole Morall Law but to confirme the contrary truth for ratifying and establishing thereof amongst Christians in the daies of the Gospell Shall I trouble you yet with one other conclusion out of Musculus for your further satisfaction that he is not for certaine of your minde for the vtter abrogation of the Morall Law Muscul loc com de abrogatione Legis Quare tam abest saith he ut damnemus usum Decalogi ut admodum etiam laudemus eorum studium diligentiam qui primi illum ad catechizandum neophytos vsurpandum esse judicarunt We are so farre from condemning the vse of the Decalogue or Morall Law that we doe much commend their care and diligence which first did judge it fit to be vsed for catechizing nouices or the ruder sort in religion By this you may see how farre Musculus is gone from you though you labour neuer so much to draw him to stand by your side and to speake in your behalfe He is farre from condemning the vse of the Morall Law you are eager and hot in pursuing of it euen vnto death and vtter destruction He will allow and commend the vse of it and them that vse it too for catechizing children or nouices in religion there is neither man woman nor childe younger nor elder that can intreat you to giue them leaue or liberty to haue any thing at all to doe with it And here by the way I pray you be aduertised that howsoeuer this allegation be sufficient to confute your opinion yet doe not I so alledge it as altogether to approue it nor can I so either thinke or speake of the Decalogue or Morall Law as here your Musculus doth write of it for whereas he will not allow it any other place in the Church but in the Catechisme nor the explication thereof to be needfull for any but for nouices and children I am of opinion that the ministry and industry of the most judicious religious and best experienced Diuines may well and worthily profitably and comfortably be employed in seeking and searching out the infinite and admirable wisdome together with other the deepe things of God which are hid in the Morall Law and that not only for their owne priuate instruction but for the edification of the ripest and chiefest of Gods children And whosoeuer he be that thinks so little and so light knowledge of the Morall Law will serue the turne that it is to be held only as milke for babes and not as strong meat for men of riper age I am afraid that as he doth depresse and abase the Law of God more than is meet so doth he aduance himselfe too high aboue his pitch being rashly puft vp in his fleshly minde and knowing little or nothing in this particular as he ought to know For howsoeuer it be true that in the Morall Law there be some generall things so easie and shallow that euen a little lambe may wade in them Psal 19.7 Psal 119.18 yet considering the infinite variety of matter contained in the specials and particulars of the same there are many things to be found of greater depth and difficulty wherein a huge Elephant may swimme also Otherwise I can hardly thinke that euer the holy Prophets being all interpreters of the Morall Law and Christ himselfe the Lawgiuer Matt. 5. Iam. 4.12 best worthy and best able to expound and explaine the true meaning of it and Christs Apostles who were taught by his spirit the true sense thereof would euer either all or any of them haue taken all or halfe that paines in opening and applying extending and enlarging Execrandi igitur sâ—…t Libertini Antinoâ—…i cateri Legem Moralem repudiantes Thes Geneu thes 28. clearing and explaining vrging and enforcing of the Morall Law and that both by word and writing preaching and exhorting as we know by their publike records they haue all done and that amongst the Priests and Prophets Doctors and Expounders of the Law Scribes and Pharisies and Rabbines such as professed the greatest skill and vnderstanding of the Law if either all or any of them had beene of his minde That it is sufficient for such as are more ripe in faith to know this summe of the Law Loue the Lord thy God with all thy heart and thy neighbour as thy selfe but for the ruder sort and nouices it is meet that they be instructed in the Decalogue being a more plaine forme of liuing and fit for such persons only Antinomus The other places of Musculus which you point your finger at Answer namely of the Couenant of the difference of the Old and New Testament of the abrogation of the Legall Sabbath I haue read and perused and finde nothing in all or any of them being rightly vnderstood which I doe not willingly assent vnto If you vpon a more setled and serious reuiew of those places shall yet imagine there is any thing in them which may seeme to sauour of your opinion and beare any either colour or countenance for the vtter abolishing of the whole Morall Law when you shall be pleased to note out and send vnto me the expresse words which you conceiue doe make for your purpose you shall God willing haue a returne of a more particular and expresse answer vnto the same Meane-while I pray you now for your further satisfaction to admit of this my reference also to Musculus his Common-places for establishing of the Morall Law and the right vse thereof seeing your reference for the vtter abolishing thereof doth neither serue your turne nor satisfie me at all In that place de Legibus Muscul loc com de Legib. and those sections de usu Legis Mosaicae de vi efficacia Legis he hath sufficiently expressed himselfe that howsoeuer his writing in other places might be taken or mistaken by others yet he is of opinion Muscul de usu effica Legis That the Morall Law is now in the daies of the Gospell of speciall vse and efficacy euen for himselfe and others for the godly and for the wicked as men stand in the estate of nature or in the state of grace Now if it so fall out Muscul loc com in divisione Decalogi that Musculus may seeme vnto you in those places which you haue mentioned and the like to crosse himselfe and to be of another minde concerning the continuance office and vse of the Morall Law amongst Christians in the daies of the Gospell what answer can be fitter both for him and you in this case than the very same which he himselfe giues vnto Augustine when he found him inconstant and differing from himselfe in the diuision of the Decalogue Quaso quomodo aequum esse poterit ut unius idque sibi ipsi non constantis authoritas omnibus alijs praeferetur Deinde si placuit authoritas Augustini quare non placuit in
the written Word or reuealed will of God without any ordinary meanes of illumination or instruction and so beholding the matter of the Morall Law but very darkly and confusedly and feeling the worke in their hearts by their conscience witnessing and their thoughts accusing or excusing one another and their wils grudging and rebelling against the tenor of it So doe they vnderstand the Morall Law Theologically which besides the naturall light and sight of the Law written by nature in their hearts doe consider it and receiue it as the written Word of God as an expresse forme of a principall part of the reuealed will of God a right rule of direction for religion and religious conuersation a portion of the Couenant of Grace as it is written in our hearts by the finger of Gods Spirit a part of Gods image which in the new man is created after God in righteousnesse and true holinesse the knowledge whereof they attaine vnto by the word of Grace and the sense and feeling of the worke thereof by the spirit of Grace so beholding the beauty thereof more cleerely and distinctly and feeling the power thereof more effectually and obeying the precepts thereof more willingly and looking for the acceptance of their imperfect obedience in and by the only perfect and absolute obedience of Christ Iesus only They that thus I say doe vnderstand the Morall Law to be in force in the daies of the Gospell as for ought I know the best Diuines and best Christians doe doe vnderstand it Theologically which as yet you say you cannot see that you can doe Iunius de Theolog. vera cap. 2. thes 5. cap. 3.6 ca. 4. thes 7. cap. 7. cap. 8. Iunius that great Scholler and worthy Diuine in his Booke de Theologia will helpe you to light your candle if that will doe you any good in this your darknesse He giues this definition of Theology Theologia est rerum divinarum sapientia and this diuision Theologia est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nimirum Dei ipsius sapientia aut est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 à Deo informata And leauing the former rather to be adored than curiously inquired into he afterwards subdiuides the latter to be Theologia visionis or Revelationis and then he tels vs that this Theologia revelationis is either naturalis or supernaturalis and in handling these two he worthily setteth forth the weake sight and light of humane vnderstanding and reason according to the principles and conclusions of the Law of Nature and noteth the error obscurity and insufficiency of this naturall wisdome therewithall And then a little after he defines the absolute supernaturall Theology which doth especially concerne the present businesse after this manner Iunius de Theolog. vera ca. 12. thes 23. Theologia absolutè dicta est sapientia rerum divinarum secundum veritatem divinam à Deo inspirata per enuntiativum sermonem in Christo commissa servis ejus atque in Testamento Vetere Novo per Prophetas Apostolos Euangelistas consignata quantum ejus hic nobis expedit revelari ad gloriam ipsius Electorum bonum According to the tenor of this definition of Theology I will now proue vnto you if I can that the Morall Law of God is now in force being vnderstood Theologically Whatsoeuer in it selfe is now diuine the knowledge whereof is diuine wisdome inspired of God according to diuine truth and by word in Christ committed to his seruants and in the Old and New Testament ratified by the Prophets Apostles and Euangelists as much of it as here is meet to be reuealed vnto vs to Gods glory and our good That same is and may be according to the definition of Theology Theologically vnderstood and is now in force so vnderstood But the Morall Law of God is diuine and the knowledge thereof is diuine wisdome inspired of God according to diuine truth and by the Enunciatiue word in Christ committed to his seruants and in the Old and New Testament ratified by the Prophets Apostles and Euangelists as much of it as here is meet to be reuealed vnto vs to Gods glory and our good Ergo The Morall Law is and may be according to the definition of Theology Theologically vnderstood and is now in force so vnderstood The Major of this Syllogisme is euident by the definition of Theology The Minor is made good by the Scriptures and by the practise of Christ and his Apostles and the judgement of the most judicious and Orthodox Diuines as in euery branch thereof may be proued by the Scriptures alledged and by the testimonies before and after mentioned and produced The Morall Law is diuine because it is holy Rom. 7.22 24. spirituall just and good Rom. 7.22 24. The knowledge thereof is diuine wisdome because it maketh the simple wise Psal 19. illighteneth the eies Psal 119. and maketh Dauid wiser than his teachers because it teaches the feare of God which is the beginning of wisdome yea the end of all and whole man feare God and keepe his Commandements Psalm 111.10 Psal 112.1 Eccles 12.13 It is inspired of God according to diuine truth because God hath put it in our mindes and written it in our hearts by the finger of his spirit Heb. 8.10 2 Cor. 3.3 17 18. Nehe. 9.13 14. And the things of God knoweth no man but the spirit of God which searcheth and reuealeth the deepe things of God 1 Cor. 2.10 11. And by the Enunciatiue word in Christ committed to his seruants because it was giuen by audible voice by word and writing vnto Moses and by him to the Israelites and so by and in Christ a Prophet like vnto him giuen also by word and writing vnto vs Act. 7.38 Hebr. 11. Matth. 5.17 18 c. And in the Old and New Testament ratified by the Prophets Apostles and Euangelists by Dauid Psalm 19.7 8 9. Psalm 119. throughout by Esay Isa 8.16.20 Seale vp the Law among my disciples to the Law and to the Testimonie by Matthew Marke Luke Paul Peter Iames and Iohn Matt. 22.37 38 39 40. Mark 12.29 30 31. Luk. 10.26 27. Act. 28.23 Rom. Chapters 2.3.4.7.13 2 Pet. 2.15.21 Iam. 2.10 11. 1 Ioh. 2.7 8. 3.23 and infinite other texts of Scripture which might be heaped vp to this purpose And is not the end of the Law for Gods glory and our good justified out of the Scripture also seeing by the light of the Law shining in the works of the Law God is glorified here Matth. 5. Phil. 1.11 Luk. 1.75 and we when our faith worketh by loue gather and get assurance that we shall be glorified hereafter Gal. 5.6 2 Pet. 1 10 11. Psal 119.1 Iam. 1.25 And thus may you see if you can see any thing at all that the Major of this Syllogisme being granted and euery branch of the Minor now proued the conclusion against you must needs follow as necessarily inferred That the Morall Law according to the definition of Theology is
words as seuerely and seriously charge Timothy to keepe the Commandement which he had giuen him for the duties of his person and calling as euer did Moses the people of Israel for obseruing of the Commandement of the Law when d Deut. 30.11 15 18 19. he said This Commandement which I command thee this day is not hidden from thee c. Behold I call heauen and earth to record this day against you that I haue set before you life and death blessing and cursing For whereas Moses calleth heauen and earth only to record against Israel Paul conuents Timothy as it were before the Lord of heauen and earth and doth not only command him with all authority but charge him with all seuerity That as euer he would haue any benefit by Christ as his e 1 Tim. 6.13 14. Redeemer witnessing a good confession before Pontius Pilate or would euer render vp his account vnto him as a f 2 Tim. 4.1 2. Iudge with joy at his appearing he should be carefull and faithfull in keeping his Commandements Looke also vpon 1 Cor. 7.10 g 1 Cor. 7.10 And vnto the maried I command yet not I but the Lord Let not the wife depart from her husband And vpon Ephes 4.17 This I say therefore and testifie in the Lord that yee henceforth walke not as other Gentiles walke in the vanity of their minde And 2 Thessalon 3.6.10.12 h 2 Thess 3.6 10 12. Now we command you brethren in the name of our Lord Iesus Christ that you withdraw your selues from euery Brother that walketh disorderly And that also 1 Tim. 6. i 1 Tim. 6.25 I charge thee before God and before the Lord Iesus Christ and before the elect Angels that thou obserue these things Consider I pray you these places aduisedly and tell me whether you haue not erred too too grossely in saying so confidently That although in the Epistles of the Apostles there were some words of commanding yet was there not so much as a forme of Commandement in them seeing you haue here many and worthy Commandements both for matter and forme in full measure But you say Antinomus They are without penalty Answer For answer vnto that Tell me I beseech you whether you doe not reckon the threatnings of k Rom. 6.21 23. Death l Rom. 14.23 Damnation the m Ephes 5.6 Wrath of God the n 2 Thess 1.8 Vengeance of God o 1 Cor. 3.17 Destruction p 1 Cor. 11.32 34. Condemnation q 1 Tim. 6.9 Perdition flaming fire r Iud. v. 7 8. Eternall fire and such like against ignorant disobedient vngodly and vnbeleeuing persons such as know not God and obey not the Gospell of our Lord Iesus Christ to be penalties and not only penalties but dreadfull judgements yea the very terrors of God that fight against such sinnes and sinners If you say they be as you must needs if you will say the truth then were you deluded with a lying vanity and which is worse would delude others also therewithall when you said and set it downe That the Commandements of the Apostles in their Epistles were without penalty Å¿ Aug. contra Adamant Manich. ca. 3. Sacrae Scripturae non temerarios superbos accusatores sed pios diligentes lectores desiderant August I maruell whether euer you read that terrible sentence 1 Cor. 16. If any man t 1 Cor. 16.22 loue not the Lord Iesus Christ let him be Anathema maranatha If you did doe but tell me by what Argument the Apostle doth here vrge and enforce the loue of Christ Iesus whether by promise of mercy or threatning of penalty Or whether here be not as dreadfull a curse threatned against those that doe not loue the Lord Iesus Christ as there is Ephes 6.24 a gratious promise made to all that doe viz. u Ephes 6.24 Grace be with all them that loue the Lord Iesus Christ in sincerity It were absurd and impious to deny that here is a promise of a blessing to them that loue him and as impious and absurd it is to say that the other denounceth no terrible penalty to them that loue him not For the very words themselues Anathema maranatha doe import an execrable curse such as the Lord when he commeth in x Ecce autem quòd in clausula tribunal Christi comminatur utique Iudicis vltoris in Rom. 14.10 Tertull. advers Maâ—…i lib. 5. ca. 14. judgement shall inflict vpon all wicked reprobates being separated from Christs presence and cast into vtter darknesse So Paul vseth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 9.3 Gal. 1.8 as Accursed and 1 Cor. 12.3 for Execrable And the other y Cornel. Pertram praefat in Gram. Heb. Syriac Maranatha consists of two Syriack words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which properly signifieth Dominus noster and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 venit The Lord commeth Which words being the beginning of Enochs Prophecy cited by Iude as containing the dreadfull judgement of God at the last day against all the wicked and vngodly were vsually taken vp by the Iewes as they are here by Paul to expresse the z Bez. in 1 Cor. 16.22 Aug. Ep. 78. great Curse which is hopelesse helplesse and endlesse as their portion and just recompence which doe not loue the Lord Iesus In the next place you proceed from euill to worse when you say There is not so much as any allusion vnto Moses Law or the Ten Commandements in all the Epistles When Peter liking well of the ease and peace beauty and glory of Mount Tabor made a a Luc. 9.31 32 33. motion for building of Tabernacles that they that were there might dwell there saying Master it is good for vs to be here The Holy Ghost hath obserued That he was heauy with sleepe and wist not what he said Surely me thinkes in such a like minde and mood were you when falling into a dreame of Mount Sion and liking well of the fancies that ranne in your head of grace and peace mercy and mildnesse promises and gentle exhortations all tending to life and glory you haue laboured to build this your Tabernacle for a place of rest and said in your heart It is good to be here vnwilling altogether to heare any mention of Mount Sinai or of any allusion to the Morall Law But we will beare with your weaknesse and plead your excuse The spirit of sleepe or slumber was vpon you and you wist not what you either did or said For had you beene well awakened and your eies well opened you might haue seene in the most if not in all the Epistles not only some allusions but many allegations out of the Ten * See Iam. 2.8 9 10 11 12. 4.10 11. Commandements or * See Iam. 2.8 9 10 11 12. 4.10 11. Morall Law Doth not the Apostle in the Epistle to the Romans make often mention of the Morall Law
hath appeared and teacheth vs that denying vngodlinesse and worldly lusts we should liue soberly and righteously and godly in this present world which is the summe * Armin. disput de peccato actua thes 8. sect 4. and substance of the whole Morall Law As for that promise of long life and prosperity Exod. 20.12 annexed to the fifth Commandement Exod. 20.12 which * Antinomus you vrge as if it were appropriated only to the Land of Canaan that you might binde fast the Morall Law vnto the Iewes onely The Apostle Paul Answer Ephes 6.2 shall giue you vpon the same ground of generall equity an effectuall and full answer thereunto For pressing and perswading there diuers duties of the Morall Law he requireth and allureth children to honour and obey their Parents both by precept and by promise of the first Commandement of the second Table Children saith he Ephes 6.1 2. obey your Parents in the Lord for this is right Honor thy father and mother which is the first Commandement with promise that it may be well with thee and thou maiest liue long on the earth The precept he setteth downe in the same words as it is written in the Law Exod. 20.12 The promise he a little changeth not in the substance and quality of it but in the circumstance of persons and place and that according to the rule of generall equity and conueniency for the better vnderstanding and enioying of the same The substance and quality of the promise to such children as honour and obey their Parents is one and the same be they Iewes or Gentiles viz. long life and a prosperous estate in this world and this is perpetuall as the precept it selfe is The circumstances of persons and place are different in both places For in the giuing of the Law Exod. 20.12 Exod. 20.12 the promise was at that time directed to the people of the Iewes to be made good in the Land of Canaan running in this tenor That thy daies may be long in the Land which the Lord thy God giueth thee But in the renewing and applying of the Law in and since the dayes of Christ the promise is directed to all beleeuers both Iewes and Gentiles as the Apostle doth here deliuer it to the Ephesians in these tearmes That it may be well with thee and that thou maist liue long not only in Canaan or in Ephesus but on the earth i. whatsoeuer thy estate or wheresoeuer thy abiding be How opposite and contrary to the Apostles judgement and dealing is your position and opinion You will needs wholly abolish the whole Morall Law the Apostle doth establish it you will needs haue it to be giuen to the Iewes only the Apostle saith it belongeth to the Gentiles also you will needs abolish the precept because of some circumstance wanting now in the promise the Apostle passing by or letting fall the circumstance as temporall preserueth and maintaineth the substance and equity of them both as perpetuall you will needs restraine and confine the blessing of long and happy daies vnto Canaan the Apostle doth extend and enlarge it to euery City and Countrey to euery corner and quarter of the earth euen ouer the vniuersall world Let this suffice for answer to the scriptures which you haue brought out of the 19. and 20. Chapters of Exodus Antinomus as for the rest which you heape vp out of Deuteronomy and the Psalmes to the number of a dozen more being all one in substance with the former and diuers of them the very same in the same words Me thinks you deale as wisely herein Answer as if hauing offered to pay a shilling in two sixpences you should to shew your store of siluer draw out twelue single pence also to discharge the summe as reckoning the payment to be better in many peeces than in few because the shew and flourish is not so great in few as in many But seeing it is so ordinary with you to deliuer in your Scriptures and Testimonies by number rather than by measure and so to carry out or couer an error with some colour and shew of truth I will follow you no further in this maze but either put you ouer for answer vnto that which I haue answered to the former of like nature or else giue you ouer to runne round in your owne circle vntill you waxe giddy with your owne conceit and course as many others of like temper haue done before you Those which you alledge out of the New Testament some of them are flat against you and not one of them will proue your point That the Morall Law was giuen to the Iewes only That of Matthew 10.6 I send and 15.24 Matt. 10.6 Matt. 15.24 See Calu Instit li. 2. cap. 11. sect 12. I am not sent but vnto the lost sheepe of the house of Israel would serue with greater shew of probability to proue that the Gospell was not sent vnto the Gentiles than that the Law was giuen only to the Iewes Howbeit the meaning of Christ is not to binde himselfe or the Gospell only to the Iewes and to exclude the Gentiles but that for his personall ministration he was first and so they a Act. 13.46 principally to offer the bread of life to the Iewes being Gods children and so to seeke the lost sheepe of the house of Israel And albeit he commanded his Apostles for a season that they should not go into the way of the Gentiles but vnto the lost sheepe of the house of Israel yet after his resurrection when he renewed their commission he gaue them in charge to goe and teach b Matt. 28.19 20. all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father the Sonne and the Holy Ghost The Apostles were first indeed to offer the food of the Gospell vnto the Iewes but when they as wanton or wicked children turned away their food from them they waxed bold and said Loe c Act. 13.46 we turne vnto the Gentiles that the Prophecy of Isaiah might so be fulfilled in all this Out of d Isa 2.3 Sion shall goe forth a Law and the word of the Lord from Ierusalem Isaiah 2.3 As for that of Acts 14.16 How doth this follow Antinomus The Lord in times past suffered all Nations to walke in their owne waies Ergo the Morall Law was giuen to the Iewes only for the time past and not vnto vs of the Gentiles for the time present Answer For although the Gentiles had not the Law e Rom. 2.15 written in Tables of stone to teach them to walke in the waies of God so euidently as the Iewes had yet had they the effect of the Law written in their hearts in times past but now since the daies of the Gospell the beleeuers of the Gentiles haue the same Morall Law written in the fleshy f 2 Cor. 3.3 Tables of their heart by the finger of Gods Spirit with much clearer light g