immortal For it hath neyther the dimentions or limitations of a body nor shal haue end of life m Ezec. 37 4.5 Mat. 10.28 1. Cor. 15.19 The Faculties of the Soule which resemble the nature of God are chiefly two Vnderstanding and Will the one expressing the Image of God in the faculty of vnderstanding al things n Col 3.10 Eccl. 17.6 the other in the liberty of willing and choosing every object o 1. Cor. 7 37. Both as well the facultie of vnderstanding as the liberty of will is two-fold the Facultie of vnderstanding the one is Passible or suffering as mans mind is of it owne nature capable of all things the other Actiue or doing which effecteth that those things which in power may bee vnderstoode by Act bee vnderstoode Liberty or freedome the one is from compulsion because man is not compelled to that which is straÌ„ge from a Free-will the other from Impediment because he is not violently letted or hindered from that which he seeketh after with a free will p 1. Co. 7.37 Rom. 8.7 Rom. 8.2 1 Wherefore the first man could will the good and refuse the evill and againe refuse the good and chuse the evill The Habites which performe those faculties are two For wisedome perfecteth the vnderstanding but righteousnesse the will Wisedome is an excellent and perfect knowledge both of the supernaturall good whereby he knoweth God and his felicity in God and of the Naturall whereby he knoweth the things created and their natures q Col 3 10. Rom. 12.2 Righteousnesse is that vprightnesse of the mind whereby perfectly that is inwardly and outwardly it obeyed Gods will according to the whole law which righteousnesse was not onely of person but of nature because the first man was created in it and vnto it as the originall and roote of mankind â—herevpon also it is called Originall r Eph. 4.24 1. Thes 5 23. Eccl. 9.29 And this is the manner of Gods Image in the Soule Now in Body man resembleth the Image of God not according to the partes or according to it selfe in respect eyther of Substance or Figure but partly in respect of the soule whose Instrument it is partly of the Person a part whereof it maketh For it doth most readily execute things both well vnderstood and holily defined in the soule and in person as it were in a most cleare glasse it also representeth the whole world being the verity and dignity of the very Creator Originall or first patterne thereof Lastly in the whole and entire person the Image of God shineth forth because of the vnion of the soule and body both in respect of the constitution of that whole man which even the faithfull themselues haue so admired that by it they acknowledged Gods Image as also in respect of his rule over all in former thinges whereof the first man receyved from God not onely the right and power but also the vse and execution Å¿ Gen â— 19. Psal 8.6 The End of that first state of Man principall and chiefe is the glory of the Creator t Architectonicus Prou. 16.4 Psal 113.5 1 Cor 10.31 but subordinate the blessednesse and felicity of the Creature u Psal 144 15. Ioh. 17.3 OF THE FIRST Estate of Man The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS In Defence of the Verity of Gods Image according to which man was created against Bellar. Cap. 3. I. THe Grace that maketh gratefull taketh not away the naturall condition of man and his originall righteousnesse but proveth it For Man had from that Grace both the verity of Nature and the quality thereof II. THe Habite of Grace which maketh gratefull differeth from originall righteousnesse in the manner onely not in very deede or nature because that very righteousnesse wherewith the first man was indued of God was that habite of Grace for which man became gratefull and acceptable to God Against Bellarmine Cap. 4. THe Grace of God is two-fold the one whereby wee could if wee would not sinne the other whereby not onely wee could but also would not sinne The first was given to Adam but not the second and so wanted the one and receyved the other in his creation and the necessity of this special Grace and assistance in Adam doth Augustine plainely shew in his Treatise of Corruption and Grace Neyther do the Testimonies which are alleadged proue the contrary Against Bellarmine Cap. 5.6 I. A Thing is tearmed Naturall ambiguously eyther Causally which is from nature or Subiectiuely which is in Nature or lastly by propagation which is communicated with nature so also a thing is called Supernaturall which eyther our nature as touching it selfe cannot comprehend or is not capable of so is beyond or aboue the condition of nature or in which nature no way worketh but grace alone or lastly which is not propagated by naturall meane but by divine manner is communicated aboue the order of Nature Original Righteousnes is sayd to be natural partly because God hath communicated the same in Nature and with nature partly because by a naturall spreading it was to bee communicated to the posterity of Adam if hee had stoode or continued but supernaturall it can no way bee called II. THe condition of man in respect of one part whereof the place of Gen. 3. treateth taketh not away his condition in respect of the other or the whole for whole man both in body and in soule was made wholy according to the Image of God neyther doth the place of Ecclesiasticus inferre the contrary who treateth eyther of the outward ornaments of men onely or of their vertue not supernaturall but naturall as the very wordes do manifestly declare neyther doth the Parable out of Luke 10. which setteth out not the state of man after his fall but the duety of charity towardes them that are fallen and are in misery III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged deny not that that Integrity in Adam was naturall but testifie that grace was added to nature which indeed wee confesse and teach very gladly IIII. THe reasons which are alleadged are vaine or Idle The First because God conjoyned the matter and Forme though things most different to the naturall bond of peace and loue The Second because the corruption followed not from that Integrity wherin Man was created but from his mutable condition which with it was conjoyned The Third because there is a divers respect of Adams sinne by which hee revolted from that first Originall integrity and of our actuall sinnes The Fourth and Fift because the manner of reparation and recreation is not the same as that of the first creation For that was done in nature but this is done aboue Nature Neyther is it absurde that the name of the Sonne of God was granted to Adam in that state of Integrity as beeing hee who in that natural condition resembled the Image of God according to which hee was created OF THE SECOND Estate of MAN
and verity thereof The other concerning the order and Methode of our institution Divinitie wee meane not that first patterne which in God is of God himselfe nay is God himselfe for both God that which is in God is the selfe same in a simple Essence wherein by an indivisible and vnchangeable act he knoweth both himselfe in himselfe and out of himselfe all and singular thinges by himselfe but the stampe out of that former expressed and shapened by a revelation and gratious communication thereof eyther according to the vniversall nature in all men or according to speciall grace measure of the scripture in the Church Hee that would enquire the veritie hereof ought to consider two things first that it is secondly what it is That there is such a stampe of Divinity the Nature of God the light both of our owne Naturall conscience and supernaturall knowledge revealed as also the common experience of Nations and ages doe declare The Nature of God for sith hee is by all meanes infinitely good we must no way think that God wanteth a good meane to communicate good whose property it is to bee a communicator of himselfe or to communicate himselfe with other his creatures according to their condition a Mat. 5.45 The light both of our Naturall conscience by which clearely shining all men haue this setled in their heartes that there 's is a Divination and other kindes of divine communications b Rom. 1 1â—.19 2.24.25 as also of supernatural Knowledge revealed whereby wee know that whole truth to bee fully and plainely registred in the holy scriptures which was behoofefull for vs to know to our salvation Common Experience for even the Gentiles themselues being strangers from God had the Oracles of the Divell in stead of these from God rather then that they would deny that stamped Divininity or bee saide to want the same c Rom. 1.21.22.23 for hence it came to passe that whereas among the Heathen some of their Gods were thought to bee very Gods some others to be such spirites as they called Daemones the heathens Divinity was held to bee of two partes for the one treated of the Gods themselues the other of d Daemones those spirites which they called Daemones that which treated of their Gods August lib. 5. de Civit. Dei cap. 6. was held of them to bee three-sold as Augustine out of Varro teacheth to wit Poeticall Naturall and Civill that which did set forth the power of those spirites was two-fold for whereas of those spirites called Doemones some were good some evill that which discoursed of the evill spirites who were to bee pacified and appeased was called Magicke and Inchantment but the other which delighted the good with sacrifices was called Divine ministration and Expiation therefore there is a Divinity Now if you respect the true interpretation of the word it is defined thus to bee a knowledge of the Oracles or speeches of God but if the thing or matter it selfe it is a true wisedome of divine thinges from God communicated eyther by meane Naturall according to inbred principles or else by a meane more excellent according to grace supernaturall And of this Divinity wee speake in this place wee call it Wisedome by example of Scripture f 1. Cor. 26. first for the excellency of the thing as being the most certaine declarer of principles most noble Princesse of all sciences secondly for the singular meane or manner of knowing for this wisedome is distinguished from that which in the Scripture is called earthly sensuall and diuellish The subject of this Theological wisdome are matters divine both for their Nature and the manner of considering for whereas a Subiect hath two partes the one which containeth the place of the matter is called the thing considered the other of the forme and is the manner of considering it wee obserue them both in the explication of this subiect The thing considered is God himselfe and all thinges disposed vnto God that is all thinges divine eyther of their owne nature or by relation vnto God The manner of considering is proportionable to Gods truth even to the whole truth and everie part thereof alike or equally infused fitted to the dignity of the deliverer to the nature of the argument as also to the condition of those to whome it is delivered And this is the nature and verity of Divinity now wee will briefly shew the Methode of our Institution concerning the same There is a two-fold Methode of teaching the one from Principles the other vnto Principles the one a Priori proceeding from the Cause to the Effect and from the first and highest to the lowest and last the other a Posteriori proceeding from the Effect to the Cause or from the last and lowest to the highest and first The vse of the former is chiefest in sciences contemplatiue of the latter in the practicke or actiue Now whereas Divinity in both these holdeth the first principal place by reason wherof some haue distinguished it into Contemplatiue and Actiue and for that it affordeth a faculty both of knowing and doing well which is the right way of wisedome it hath fallen out that Dâ—vinity hath been handled in a diverse Mâ—thod by diverse men yet by all of them profitably and faithfully For whereas all order is taken eyther from the nature of thinges to bee considered or from our better and easier knowledge thereof Calvin Melanthon Vrsinus haue done well who observed an order of their better knowledge in a method vnfoulding by way of Analysis g Analytiâ—a in like manner Hiperius Musculus Hemingius Zanchius haue done well observing the order of Nature h Synthetiâ—a Synthesis also is contrary to Analysis beginning froÌ„ things granted to that vvhich is in question in a Method of composing and couching thinges handsomly together Wee in this our Institution will ioyne both these together borrowing i a Synthesi from the Methode of composing the disposition and k Ab Analysi from the Methode of vnsoulding the invention of the same that from both the l Systema full constitution of this body of Divinity which we haue in hand may arise Therefore by an order Syntheticall as wee tearme it wee will begin from the first Principles that by the Means wee may come to the last but we wil set downe a declaration such as wee call Analyticall of the first middle and last thinges first in teaching the truth by way of confirmation then in reproving the falshood by way of confutatioÌ„ that by the helpe and benefite of the Definition of every point of Divinitie and by the Analysis of the same through the causes thereof but this by the Appendix or addition of the generall solutions which wee will lay vnder every place or point and set against the principal arguments of our adversaries especially Bellarmines this is our Methode THE FIRST Booke of the Principles of sacred
eyther is not truely good or is inclined vnto those thinges which are not truely good But because when there is mention made of good eyther the naturall and morall good as touching man or morall divine good according to grace is vnderstoode Wee must here obserue a very great difference when there is speech of Free-will For the power of a naturall man if it be referred to the thing which this naturall light respecteth hath indeed her inclinations to naturall good and morall good as touching man f Rom. 1 19.20 Rom. 2.15 Rom. 2.14 but because the communicating of every good proceedeth from iudgement and iudgement from the choice and choyce from knowledge the power of man is limitted to the good according to the measure of the knowledge of that good in man Now that knowledge is not true becaus it erreth in the maner of the truth and strayeth from the true end and scope thereof g 1. Cor. 2 14. Ier. 13.23 Mat. 12.35 Ro. 14.23 Now the morall good according to grace which is supernaturall is not apprehended but by a supernatural knowledge which is not in the natural man therfore man being vnder sinne hath neyther inclinations nor motions to that good for he wanteth all power to supernaturall things even that power which the Philosophers haue called the receptiue or passiue power because every power is from a beginning but there is no beginning in a naturall man when there is speech of divine things â—eyther to doe them himselfe nor to â—ffer them to be done by an other h 2. Co. 3.5 Ioh. 3.19 Phil 2.13 1. Co. 1.18 â—oth being considered in man are from â—at beginning of all aptnes to good â—so of the working thereof which is in â—hrist Whence it is cleare that power 〈◊〉 the supernaturall good is not in the â—turall man and that there is indeede â—me power in him to the natural good â—ut such as straieth in the end maner â—d that therefore to speake properly it 〈◊〉 onely a power to the evill whether it â—e such Absolutely or Relatiueâ— i 1. Cor. 10.31 Rom. 14.20 Tit. 1.15 Ier. 13.23 Mat. 7.18 Rom. 3.10 Ioh. 3.6 The Forme is the Freedome in the â—biect to the Obiect and from the coÌ„â—ry impediment For the will of man 〈◊〉 touching it selfe is most free freely â—itteth it selfe for the bringing forth 〈◊〉 the action of evill without eyther â—y coaction or necessity of the â—ct The End is the glory of God in his iuâ—â—ce and the inexcusablenes or iust condemnation of man Comparatiuely Free-will is two wayeâ— considered according to the twofolde condition of man out of his State oâ— Corruption to witte of his integritie before his fall and of his restoring câ—â— regeneration after his fall In the State of Integrity Man had a Free will or freedome of an Electuâ—â— will to both Objects without any coaction or necessity For he had a power that he might sinne and not sinne But when he came to the act of disobedience by the act he lost the poweâ— to good because this was the nature oâ— man that hee abusing that his poweâ— to good should turne away the good from himselfe and himselfe from thâ— good into the contrary k 1. Cor. 3 12. 1. Ioh 3.12 2. Pet. 1.4 1. Cor. 15.28 In the State of Restoring or Regeneration after the fall free-will oughâ— divers wayes to be considered anâ— expounded For whereas man in thâ— state is the common Subject of grace and sinne Hence it commeth to passe that he hath free-will both to good according to Grace to evill according to Nature which two contraries sith they cannot be in one and the same subject in the highest degree thence â—t followeth that man Regenerate is to be considered according as his regeneration is more or lesse 〈◊〉 excellent As for him that is Regenerate according to the highest degree there can be in such a one no contrary matter as it shall bee with man in the life to come where free-will if we may so speake shall be vnto good onely and that vnchangeably so that a man can will nothing but good and that also after l 1. Cor. 13 12. Rom. 7.18 a good maner but he which is regenerate in the inferiour degree the contraries may be together in him in very deede are together in him the powers therefore of Free-will in man regenerate while hee is in this life ought diversly to be discerned both in the Subject Obiect and manner The Subiect is two wayes considered partly according to the old man in whom he is borne partly according to the New in whome hee is regenerate Of this Subiect there is also a double obiect the naturall evill in respect of the olde man the supernaturall good in respect of the New m 2. Cor. 3 17. 1. Ioh. 3.9 Rom. 8.2 Eph. 2.5 But the maner of all these is free because as the old maÌ„ freely inclineth to naturall things so doth the New man also to thinges which are supernaturall in respect therefore of the matter the Subiect is common but in respect of the Efficient Cause and of the beginning repugnant the one to the other on both sides there commeth a lett to the freedome Whence that strife of the flesh and the Spirite commeth wherof there is mention in the seventh to the Romanes OF FREE-WILL The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS I. THe Will or Desire is three wayes distinguished for one is Naturall an other sensuall another intellectuall The Naturall is a pure inclination of the Essential forme whereby man naturally laboureth towardes the perfection of himselfe The Sensual is the power of the inferiour part of the Soule led or moved by sense and not by reason to these or those particular things the Intellectual is in the creature indued with reason in respect of the Subiect inclining the will to diverse obiects which is called Reasonable II. THe reasonable will ought to bee discerned three wayes For one is called naturall whereby nature is simplie carried to desire after that thing which it apprehendeth an other Electiue whereby the will chooseth betweene two thinges opposite by a separating of them Lastly there is a will by the cause whereby man straieth from his end voluntas per causá through an accidentall error III. THat which we cal Arbitrium Free-will is sometime referred to the vnderstanding and sometime to the Will to the Vnderstanding eyther Contemplatiue or Actiue in respect of the things which belong to deliberation but to the Wil in respect of the things which pertaine to Election After the former manner it comprehendeth the mind alone after the latter as of vs it is here taken it comprehendeth both mind and will IIII. THere is one Freedom froÌ„ Bondage an other from Coaction an other from Vnchangeablenesse or necessity Freedome from Bondage is sayd to be that whereby one is not addicted oâ— subiect to the slavery of sinne or misery From Coaction is
Diuinity CHAP. I. ALL Sciences haue their proper principles aboue which as being those that cannot be demonstrated and are immediately the first wee may not ascend but among many sciences that is the more perfect which is or commeth of the superiour 〈◊〉 Principles and that the most perfect which resolveth a matter into the first Principles which depend not vpon any former of which sort Divinity alone is For the principles of other sciences are not simply the first buâ— onely in their owne kinde because indeed in their owne science they haue no other Former but there ought not to bee any other Former Principles of Divinity neyther in it selfe nor out of it selfe to wit neyther any Principle of being nor any principle of knowing For there are two Principles the one of the thing the other of knowledge those out of which other things are produced these on which the knowledge of other thinges doe depend both these a Analogiâ—e proportionably are of vs to bee considered in Divinity for the true exposition of the word intimateth vnto vs those two beginnings to wit God and the Word God is the Principle of being and the first cause of Divinity from which both the end of Divinity and the means vnto his end doe spring the Word is the principle of knowing by which the end of Divinity and the meanes vnto it may be knowne Both the principles are immediatly 〈◊〉 the first God is a Principle immediately first because nothing was beâ—â—hâ—â— the word is a principle imâ—ediately first because nothing was â—poken before it which two though â—hey goe together in dignity and office of beginning yet in the course of order in the manner of doing and in â—he producing of the effect they are distinguished and are mutually each to other subordinate for God first mediately speaketh vnto vs in the worde then the Worde mediately bringeth vs vnto the knowledge of God which knowledge sith it is entended to be the principall and proper subiect of whole Divinity the meane thereunto subordinate which wee called the Word ought first to be knowne Of the Word of GOD. The parte confirming CHAP. II. THe Primary Principle of Divinity for dignity is God but for the order of better knowledge the wordâ— is the first The word we vnderstand 1. Enâ—â—tiatiue or which is vttered whereby God hath communicated with man eyther specially through Revelation by Oracles visions or dreames or generally through a liuely tradition oâ— doctrine from hand to hand or through a more excellent manner by the Scripture The same wee thus define It is at holy Instrument concerning the truth necessary a Rom. 15 4. 1 Tim 4. â— Ioh. 5.35 to salvation faithfully and perfectly written in the Canonicall b Rom. 1. 2 Pet. 1.19 2 Pet. 3.15 16. bookes by the Prophets and Apostles c 2. Tim. 3 16. as the Secretaries of God for the healthfull instruction of the Church d 2. Pet. 1 22. Psal 1 19.1 1. Tim. 4 13 16. Wee call it an Instrument both in respect of the Covenant whereof God would haue an Instrument to be made and by a renued contract publikely to be registred as also in relation to another thing as in the proper vse and office thereof because the holy Scripture is not for it selfe but as the manner of â—struments is for another thing the â—hority perfection perspicuousnes â—d vse of this Instrument shall be made â—dent by a Methodicall e Analyst resolution the causes The Cause Efficient of the Scripture God f 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.21 the Father in the sonne by the â—rit for the same hath the Father layed â—en to the Church by the word Enunâ—tiue and by the workes of grace â—wer generally and specially ordinaâ—y and extraordinarily g Heb. 11. the Sonne â—th both wayes confirmed it in the â—ew Testament h Heb. 1.2 the holy Ghost seaâ—th the same in the hearts of the faithâ—ll by the word inwardly testifying or 〈◊〉 an inward Testimony i Esa 59.21 Ioh. 14.26 the Scripâ—re then is diuine by originall and by â—e things thereof both Essentiall and â—aturall as also assumed By Originall because every knowâ—dge of truth is from the first truth â—hereof the Scripture is an instrumenâ—ll badge and as it were a shapened â—mage hence it is that God both â—mmediately with his own finger wrote the Decalogue in Tables and k Exod. 34 27. mediately by servants as his l Actuaâ—ios Taâ—ulaâ—ios Notaries and publicke pennemen commaunded that whole m Systema compacted body of holy scripture with every part thereof to bee written n 2. Tim. 3.16 Insitis Adsitis The scripture also is divine for the matters both put therein and put thereto for both the Essentiall parts thereof are divine in matter and forme and the end divine also as hereafter shall bee declared yea and the apparant signification and demonstration of the Spirite and presence of God very antiquity the invincible force of the truth and many other pointes doe witnesse the same to be divine now it must needes bee that the Scripture which hath God to be the author hath also divine authority Further this authority is two wayes considered first in it selfe secondly in respect of vs the authority of the Scripture in it selfe is divine if we consider the cause subiect and certainty of doctrine The Cause because the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost o. 1 Ioh. 1 9. who endited both the matter and words thereof and whose Prophets and Apostles were onely the Amanuenses pennemen p Ioh. 14.16 The Subiect for whereas there is wont to be a double respect of testimonies concerning the authority of a thing one from the power or efficacy of him that witnesseth the other from the Nature and property of the Instrument the Scripture in respect of the thinges whereof it is the Instrument hath an exceeding great and infallible authority q Heb. 4 12. The certainty of doctrine which the Scripture hath from God by Vertue Verity and Complement by Vertue because he hath confirmed the same both at all times with his spirit and at convenient tyme with his workes of grace and power r 1. Thes 1.5 by Verity because it contayneth the whole truth communicable in it selfe both alone and perfectly Å¿ 2 Pet. 1.19 By Complement because as in substance so also in event all thinges are most certaine and most true in the Scripture t Mat. 24 35. Now in respect of vs or vnto vs the authority of the Scripture is divine by the testimony of God both particular and generall Particular because God hath both publikely testified that soveraigne Authority by ordinary and extraordinary meanes and privately sealed it by his everlasting spirite in the conscience of the godly u Ioh. 1.37 5.6 Generall because first God vsed the vndoubted Ministery of his servants as fiâ—te
Hyperbaticae out of Grammaticall order Phrases Tropes and Figures note any obscurity of them III. THe vse of commentaries doe not simply argue the obscurity of the Scriptures but our Infirmity for wee doe not conceyue the doctrine of the Scripture in it selfe perfect after a perfect manner but according to our size or measure by meanes vnperfect and as they speake proportionated IIII. THe doctrines which are propoundeâ— in the Scriptures are three wayeâ— considered first in themselues â—â—condly so farre as they are propoâ—â—ded in the Scriptures thirdly so far 〈◊〉 they are of vs vnderstood the first anâ— third way the Scriptures in some measure are obscure but the second way they are most playne The Places which Bellarmine there doth cite are these Psal 119.18 Ans It is one thing to treate of our Internall and Naturall blindnesse which must be holpen with the Internall Illumination of the eyes of the mind but another thing of the obscurity of the Scripture in it selfe and therfore the consequence from the persons to the doctrine is a consequence of no force Luke 24.32.17 Act. 8.31 24 An. The meanes which serue for the vnderstanding and exposition of the Scripture appertayne not to the Scripture but to our infirmity which is wont and ought to bee holpen by the interpretation of the same 2. Pet. 3.16 Ans Obscurity of thinges in themselues by reason of that Maiesty they haue ought to bee distinguished from the manner of delivering them for obscure matters may bee plainely delivered Neyther is that consequence of force which is from the integral part to the whole because it is one thing that the Scripture is hard and another thing that certaine points in the scriptures are hard OF GOD AND THE Attributes of GOD the Part Confirmatiue CHAP. III. THe second Principle of holy Divinity is GOD The second wee call it not in the order of Nature for nothing is before God but of our better knowledge or vnderstanding because as the Scripture is the first Instrument of every healthfull knowledge concerning God so God is the first and supreme Principle of the being of those things which serue to this knowledge on whom all thinges immediately depend Now concerning God whom to be both nature and reason hath sufficiently taught the naturall man to make him inexcusable as also the Scripture and Faith hath sufficiently taught the Christian man to his salvation Rom. 1.19.20.21 Ioh. 17.3 we must know two things first what hee is to witte his Nature secondly who he is that is his Attributes The Nature of God according to the manner of divine Revelation and measure of our knowledge may and should bee known two wayes the one is of the Name the other of the thing or definition by which two every knowledge touching any thing is wont to bee made playne or perfect Whatsoever is spoken of God certaine it is that that thing is not God which is spoken of him because hee is Ineffable or vnable to be spoken of yet sith a Name is the signification of that thing which might be comprehended as farre as might be divers Names are attributed vnto God in the Scriptures whereby the Nature of God is not so much expressed as that thing which may bee knowne of vs concerning the same And all those are wont to be expressed and declared in a double manner the one Negatiue the other Affirmatiue or Positiue The Negatiue names which are given vnto God as Incomprehensible Infinite remoue farre from him the imperfections of the Creatures Those which are Affirmatiue are eyther vttered Essentially or Relatiuely or by a Metaphor Essentially whether it bee properly such as that proper and Essentiall name of God IEHOVA and others equivalent vnto the same which cannot bee attributed no not Analogically to any Creature or commonly which may indeede be applied to men yet are meet for God both for the manner of excellency as God King good wise c. as also by meane of the cause not depending as Creator Redeemer c. all which are distinguished in God not in respect of the Essence but of the Effects Those which are sayed to bee Relatiue are the names of the persons of which there is no commeation or confusion but are severally proper to the severall persons to witte the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost These are vtered Metaphorically which are given to God eyther after humane affection or passion as man angrie sleeping or else by a congruency and similitude as a Lyon a Stone a River c. From the consideration of the names of God wee proceede to the explication of the thing or the description of God himselfe Now God is as the Hebrewes most briefly define IEHOVAH ELOHIM b Exod. 6.2 3.13 the Lord God that is one Essence of three persons Of this discription there are two members the one of the Essence and the Vnity of the Essence the other of the Persons and the Trinity of the persons which two can neyther bee separated from the declaration of the divine Nature nor ought to bee confounded in the same for as there is an exceeding great and indivisible vnity of the divine Essence in the plurality of the persons for the Essence of the Father is the Essence of the Sonne and the holy Ghost so is there a reall and different Distinction of the persons in the vnity of Essence for to be the Father is not to be the Sonne or the holy Ghost We discerne the vnity of the Essence two wayes first by the verity of the Essence secondly by the manner of Vnity The Essence is that wherby God both is and existeth by himselfe and of himselfe absolutely for hee alone is that thing which is and who is that is a being not leaning vpon any other The manner of vnity is not of knitting together nor of the generall nor of the speciall nor of consent but of number because there cannot be many Gods This manner of the vnity is proved by three arguments by the testimonies of Scripture both very many and evident even of the olde and new Testament c Deut. 6.4 Esa 44.6 1. Tim. 2.5 1. Cor. 8.4 by beginning which as it is the first so of necessity it ought to be but one for two or more infinite beginnings are not granted by Essentiall perfection which the persons haue in common whole in them all and whole in each one for the whole Godhead is equall in it owne perfection d Ioh. 5.26 Mat. 1.27 Through this Identitie of Essence in the persons or most single and very one vnity Christ is sayed to bee in the Father and the Father in Christ e Iohn 14 10. which thing of the Fathers is called an vnion of the persons This Essence which is one in number and individuall is improperly sayed to bee communicated from one person to another whereas that of the Essence is an Essence of it selfe and in respect of it the three persons in the
contradictory which in the Essence of God voide of all falshood and in truth most absolute and perfect haue no place yet not to bee able to doe these thinges is a token of power for hee is exceeding able who enioyeth a constant and vnchangeable power and by no meanes departeth from that very thing which is one for it is a point of infirmity to bee able to doe things opposite and the propertie of one that is altogether powerfull is to abide and persist in the best thing Knowledge in God is that whereby he knoweth both himselfe in himselfe and out of himselfe all and singular thinges by himselfe by an indivisible and immutable act for God alone knoweth and vnderstandeth himselfe x Mat. 11.27 by a most inward and perfect Act he being infinite comprehendeth himseâ—fe being infinite infinitely and yet while by vnderstanding himselfe he comprehendeth himselfe the vnderstanding of God whereby hee comprehendeth is not one and that which he comprehendeth another for to bee to vnderstand to comprehend are reciprocated or made to haue recourse each one to the other Hee knoweth also out of himselfe all thinges and each thing in a common and distinct knowledge y Heb. 4.13 of the matter of the forme and of both their Accidentes even of good and badde thinges but hee knoweth indeede the good thinges by himselfe the evill by the good opposite thereunto Yet hee knoweth both himselfe and other thinges by an indivisible act in that by one act of vnderstanding and a whole looking on at once hee comprehendeth the vniversall distance of thinges both locall and temporall possessing all thinges at once and alwayes which with vs by times are vnfoulded and this indivisible and present knowledge of God is vnchangeable as well of things contingent as of thinges neecessary laying the condition of coÌ„tingency on thinges contingent as also the law of necessity on thinges necessary Will in God is that whereby God freely and vnchangeably willeth his owne glory as the end and all other thinges as the meanes vnto this end this will for that it is of the end and of the meanes is the first and supreme cause of thinges comprehending with all other causes in it selfe and subordaining them to that first cause And albeit there is but one will in one Essence yet by reason of the Obiectes and Effectes of good and evill thinges wee distinguish the same into z Beneplacitum placitum good Pleasure and Pleasure for in respect of the good Effectes whereof God chiefly and by himselfe entendeth the ende and meanes wee tearme that Will his good pleasure a Eph. 1.5 but in respect of the evill effectes in which GOD indeed chiefly and by himself intendeth the end yet not the meanes themselues but for the end wee call it his pleasure b 1 Cor. 10.5 This will of pleasure and good pleasure in God is vnchangeable that it can neyther be deceyved nor deceiue not bee deceyved in respect of that secret will according to which God foreknew determined and willed all things from eternall c Rom. 9.19 Esa 46.10 Not deceiue in respect of that revealed will according to which God hath communicated the knowledge revelation of that eternall will as much as is necessary for our salvation OF GOD AND THE ATtributes of GOD the Part CONFVTING Distinctions for the VNITIE of ESSENCE I. THe name of God is taken eyther properly and that both essentially and personally or improperly that both by way of Concession and Imitation when the Scripture teacheth of false and fayned gods as also Appellatiuely and by a congruency when it treateth of gods not by nature but in respect of divine gifts and office II. ONe and three are not opposed privatiuely because both are truely vttered of God in a diverse respect one in respect of Essence three in respect of the persons Distinctions for the TRINITIE of the Persons and first for the distinction of them I. THere is one respect of those who are both finite and divisible who in this selfe same point are distinguished as in persons so also in Essence but there is another respect of God whose Essence as it is Infinite so is it indivisible also and therefore 〈◊〉 onely II. THose Actions which are common in cause effect are distinguished by the bound of the Action or Effect for the cause of working in thinges belonging vnto God is the same and the worke the same but the manner of working is diverse III. THose names which are given to the persons in the Scripture some doe point out the persons themselues some the properties of the persons and some the operations extra personas out of the persons The Places Ioh 14.9 Ans It is one thing to treate of the order of the persons among them selues and another thing of the order of our knowledge vnto them Ibidem 10. Ans Wee badly proâ—ede from the Phrase and manner of â—peaking concerning the Essence to â—hat which is concerning the person or some thinges are spoken absolutely â—f the persons in respect of the Essence â—nd some thinges relatiuely in that they â—re persons Col. 1.15 Answere There is one â—mage Accidentall and another Substantiall Secondly for the Coessence of the persons I. IT is one thing to treate of the Originall beginning of the Essence which â—n thinges pertayning to God is none and another thing of the originall of the persons the Sonne and the holy Ghost haue onely the originall of person the one by generation the other by procession eternall but neyther of Essence II. HE that hath al things hath them by nature not by grace is not lower then he of whome he hath theâ— for but one of both respects can be granted to be of Inequality III. A Sending and obedience take noâ— away equality of power neytheâ— is he that sendeth and hee that is seâ— distinguished by properties Essentiall but Personall Places of Scripture 1. Cor. 8.6 Eph. 4.6 God alone is called Father in Scripture in a double respect first oppositely to the Creatures and counterfeyted gods not exclusiuely to the Sonne and holy Ghost secondly by an excellency God alone is so called to witte because he is not from another no not in respect of person Luc. 11. the Name of Father is taken sometimes Hypostatically when the Godhead within it selfe is described and the persons of the God-head are among themselues distinguished someâ—es Essentially when the outwarde â—rkes and benefites of God towardes Creatures and the Church are deâ—bed Distinctions for the Attributes for the simplicity of GOD. WHatsoever is simple it is so eyther absolutely or by it selfe comparatiuely and in respect of boâ—s after the first manner God is â—ple after the second manner the â—gels and the Soules are but if any â—mposition seemes to bee given to â—OD it is altogether Accidenâ—l eyther in respect of the actiâ—s or the Subiects on which hee worâ—th or lastly in respect of the Propoâ—ion which
affection or relation to that calling And according as one part of this Invisible church doth warfare on earth and the other triumphantly in heaven so the manner of the forme hereof is diverse for in the triumphant church it is perfect in it owne kinde but in the Militant it is onely inchoatiuely or by way of beginning tending to perfection by more or lesse efficacy acording to the measure of the spirit faith And hence it is that in respect of this forme the state of the Invisible church is divers For as it is vnited to Christ her head it cannot erre because there is but one truth of the heade the spirit the body but as it is considered according to it selfe and the diverse members thereof it erreth in divers wayes and degrees k 1. Cor. 13.9 1. Cor. 3.12 Apoc. 3.1 for albeit the Spirite bee alwayes in it yet the same worketh not perfectly by it but onely according to that measure which it hath l 1. Cor. 12 7.11 but this invisible church cannot revolt frō her God because it hath God that promiseth a Mediator that redeemeth and saveth and lastly giftes that cannot bee repented of m Mat. 16 18. Ep. 4.1.29 The Forme of the Church visible the one is Constitutiue which ordayneth the Church the other Distinctiue that distinguisheth the true church from the false The Forme which maketh the visible Church is that outward calling which God mediately effecteth according to that holy kinde of government which hee would haue to bee kept in his house To this calling three thinges are as hand-maids the word of the Gospell the vse of the Sacramenrs and the lawfull communion of Saintes for God calleth outwardly by Worde Signe and Worke whereof wee haue more at large spoken in the place concerning the calling of men vnto Salvation The Forme that distinguisheth and maketh difference of the true Visible Church from the false is that which certaine markes doe limit and point out Now wee call them Markes by which the thinges which come into question are certainely knowne whether they bee to bee perceyved by sense or by vnderstanding or both wayes And as there is wont to bee of every thing a double knowledge the one which noteth out the Essence of the same by the true and immediate causes the other fette from the Accidents and affections declaring the vnseparable dispositions of the same or the other outward accidents which onely overcover the thing so also two sortes of markes are agreeable to this double knowledge for some are effectuall and necessary markes which they call Signes infallible and other some accidentall which they tearme Probable These former are the proper tokens of the church which certainely shew the Essence and nature of the same the latter are but common and probable signes thereof The proper and essentiall note of the visible church belonging to the Essence thereof immediately and properly and next of all flowing from the forme of the same is onely one to wit the truth of Gods word revealed and communicated wherevnto the truth of the Sacramentes as a thing inseparably tyed or knit with it is conjoyned n Heb. 4.12 Ioh. 10.27 Mat 28 10 Rom. 4.11 for the truth of both is so proper and so essentiall a token of the church that this truth and the church are alike changed The accidentall markes are two-folde for some are fet from those naturall dispositions of the Church which are inseparable which are also the naturall dispositions of that first marke to wit The pure preaching of the Word and the lawfull administration of the Sacraments o Ioh. 5 39. Act. 17 11 Mat. 26.26 1. Cor. 10 17. which are the two necessary and proper Adjuncts and Attributes of the church other some doe properlie pertaine to the order in the Church eyther publicke or private Such as are Ecclesiasticall power and publicke and private exercises of godlinesse and charity p Mat. 3.3 28.20 1 Tim. 2.1 The Power Ecclesiasticall is three-fold of Ministery of Order and of Ecclesiasticall Discipline The Power of the Ministery is an authority and right in the church to teach not every thing but that onely which the Lord hath prescribed by his Prophets and Apostles q Gal. 1.8 1. Tim. 6.3 and is the first part of the keies The Power of Order is an authoritie of the Church which is imployed partly about doctrine and partly about constitutions and lawes for the outwarde policie of the Church the one is commonly tearmed Doctrinall or Prescriptiue the other Constitutiue or Ordinate The Ecclesiasticall Discipline is a judiciall power of the Church whereby men receyved into the family of Christ are directed to godlinesse and are restrained least they should commit any thing vnbeseeming their christian profession but the offenders are reproved rebuked and corrected And this is the latter part of the keyes distinct from the former because that properly belongeth to the office of teaching but this is most of all practised in the correcting of mens offences and in the exercising of Ecclesiasticall Iudgements r Mat. 16.19 Ioh. 19.23 Mat. 18.18 1 Cor. 8.11 And according as there are two sorts of slippes to bee corrected some concerning doctrine and some others concerning manners so about both these Ecclesiasticall judgement is occupied for the private good of the offender and the publicke good of the Church Now there are three degrees of of that judgement rebuking conjoyned with admonishment Secondly an Excluding suspending or with holding from the Lords Supper whereby for a time the offender is forbidden or barred from the participation of the Supper Thirdly Excommunication whereby after a lawfull knowledge had before hand some person for his malitious contumacy is excluded from the communion of Saintes or as the Apostle speaketh is delivered vppe to Sathan to the destruction of the flesh that the Spirite might be saved ſ Mat. 18 18. 1. Cor 5.4 c. The publicke exercises of godlines and charity which notifie the true Church t Act. 2.42 1 Tim. 2.1 1. Cor. 1.2 are a gathering for the poore the Ministery the receyving of the word and sacrament Prayer u Ioh. 13.35 singing of Psalms c. but the private which indeede make for the ordering of our life are the exercises of repentance and those which respect our neighbour are the exercises of charity as Almes c. And of all those markes there is a common vse outward shew of them for the most part in all Churches but the right of possession and the lawfull vse of them is proper and particular to the true Church onely Whence judgement ought to bee given concerning the purity or impurity the cleanenesse or obscurity of the visible Church For that church which hath that Essentiall marke and all those which are accidentall is the purest that which hath that onely and not all these is the true Church but imperfect that which hath some of these and