not properly an assent of Christian faith I prove thus To assent or dissent is an action of the Vnderstanding or of the Will if of the Vnderstanding the object of it is Truth or Falsehood if of the Will the object of it is goodnesse or evill For the assent of the Will the case is manifest that it doth never assent unto and allow of the goodnesse of the obiect or dissent from and disallow the evill of it untill there be knowledge and apprehension of both For this approbation or reprobation of any thing by the Will cannot bee without Election nor Election without foregoing deliberation and judgement of the understanding upon the thing that is chosen or refused Againe for the Vnderstanding how can it assent unto the Truth or dissent from the Falsehood of such things whereof it hath no apprehension at all For so here should be an Act without an Object at least an irrationall act of the rationall part of man For if the Vnderstanding assent or dissent without understanding of whereto or from what is not a non-ens the object of such an act and is not such an act more like the naturall propensions of senslesse creatures whereby they are carried to unknowne ends than the judiciall determination of a reasonable man Though the things beleeved exceed reason yet the revelations of them are not above our knowledge and our assent unto them must be so farre forth rationall that if wee cannot give a reason of the thing beleeved yet wee must give a reason of our beliefe A reason of our beliefe is then rendred when we understand that testimony and authority wherein the thing to be beleeved is revealed unto us This only makes our assent reasonable For as in Scientificall knowledge and opinion the understanding never assents till the nature of the thing it selfe be knowne either fully or in part so in beliefe the understanding assents not till the meaning of the relation or testimony be understood what that thing is distinctly whereto it must assent In the two former wee give the reason of our assent from the thing it selfe knowne in the last wee give the reason of our assent from the authority of the revealer In every one our assent presupposeth knowledge in the former of the thing it selfe in the later of the Revelation Wherefore that implicite faith of the ordinary Papist who following the doctrine of his Teachers contents himselfe that he gives his assent in grosse unto all what ever is in the Bible Churches traditions that it is true whilst yet he understands scarce any Article of his religion distinctly this their implicite assent is meerely bruitish and unreasonable Contrary to the expresse precept of the Apostle Paul Rom. 12. 1. commanding us to offer unto God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a reasonable service and Peter 1 Pet. 3. 15. bidding us be ready to give an answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not a bare answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but with a defence to every one that demandeth of us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Reason of our Faith Now it would be knowne of the Romish Laiety what reason they can give for their faith what Apologie they are able to make for it when as they are utterly ignorant of Scriptures the only reason and defense of our Faith And is not their service and worship of God the very unreasonable motion of an unintelligent beast that 's ordered by his driver but understands not why and for what reason and ground Where particulars are not knowne there may be a generall kinde of beliefe But this generall beliefe is not an actuall assent to the truth of any particular thing revealed till that particular bee knowne and understood Actuall assent to particular truths is then only when they are knowne and according to the increase of distinct knowledge so this assent increaseth Before there is this distinct knowledge there can be no more but Praeparatio animi a resolution of the minde to yeeld assent to any particular if it bee once knowne Which though it be good when wee can doe no otherwise by reason of unavoydable ignorance yet to teach that this is sufficient to true faith is to teach men to be carelesse of all religion T is good where there is knowledge in part and when for the rest ignorance is seene bewayled and avoyded by all earnest desire and possible endevour to get knowledge in all points but t is monstrous flothfulnesse to bee content with this that in generall we beleeve all though we assent to nothing in particular This were indeed a short cut to heaven if no more were required to Christian faith but to force upon ones selfe such a resolution as this Here is the Bible I am resolved to beleeve all that it saith but for particulars I le looke no further let the Church and those that are learned looke to that How farre such a blinde resolution is from Christian faith and pietie besides experience which testifies that all those who have true faith in some things doe alwayes much lament their ignorance and eagerly desire the increase of distinct knowledge the Scriptures also doe abundantly witnesse unto us Wherein no exhortation more common then this unto the encrease of Knowledge yea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. as the Apostle prayes for the Collosians Col. 2. 2. And for the Corinthians hee wisheth the like 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 8. 7. How many prayers of the Saints doe wee finde they have made for knowledge every where mentioned How often is Faith and Knowledge coupled together Ioh. 10. 38. 1 Ioh. 4. 16. c. yea many times confounded and taken one for the other 2 Cor. 4. 14. Esa. 53 â—1 Ioh. 17. 3. c Againe this knowledge is easie to be had by the ayde of the holy Spirit inwardly inlightening and teaching the faithfull when they use such meanes as hee hath appointed See for that purpose Ier. 31. 33 34. 1. Cor. 2. 10. 12. 2. Cor. 4. 6. Ioh. 14. 21. where Christ promiseth to shew himselfe visibly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to those that love him Were knowledge a thing impossible or very difficult or unprofitable some pretence there were to pleade for ignorance but when t is so often commanded us when it may be so easily had when t is so usefull in the having so dangerous to want it it s now impudence to patronize ignorance as a friend to Religion which is a professed enemy to mans reason Wherefore it is a shamelesse assertion of Bellarmine De Iustif. l. c. 5. That Faith may better be defined by ignorance than by knowledge A pestilent conceit which once rooted in men breeds in them an horrible contempt distaste and neglect of Scriptures and all Religion as matters not possible nor necessary for them to comprehend But this is a gull put upon poore people by the Clergy thereby to excuse their owne idlenesse in not teaching them or to gaine the
it unlesse himselfe had been acquainted with the like Revelations But this is certaine God-where he comes makes himselfe knowne and such were the lively characters of heavenly majesty brightnesse and cleernesse imprinted on those Revelations that mortall mindes were infallibly ascertained of their Divinity Yea Balaam himselfe though he could have wished with all his heart not to have knowne or beleeved those revelations that so unkindly crost his hope of preferment yet when once the Spirit of God comes upon him he utters his parable with this preface Balaam the son of Beor hath said and the man whose eies are open hath said Hee hath said which heard the words of God which saw the vision of the Almighty falling into a trance but having his eies open He that was at other times driven by the divell into furious motions of mind procured by spells inchantments is now as forcibly moved 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or borne away by the power of the holy Ghost who in this revelation makes so cleere a discovery and strong impression of divine truth in the minde of Balaam that the Wizard cannot but speake what he knowes and beleeves though it quite undoe his owne desire of Greatnesse and Balacks hope of Victory Whence also this rule followes generally true That where the revelation is infallibly knowne to be of God there will be a firme assent to the truth of the things revealed Now we are further to note that upon such immediate revelations and suggestions of the Spirit is grounded that Faith which is usually stiled the Faith of working miracles A gift proper to the primitive times of the Church bestowed then on many for the better establishment of the Gospell among unbeleeving Gentiles or Iewes Though the words of the Promise runne largely Marc. 16 17. yet it seemes not likely that every private true beleever had this priviledge but rather that it was bestowed on such as were Preachers and Publishers of the Gospell for confirmation of their doctrine And amongst them t was given not onely to the truely faithfull beleever but to others also as appears by Iudas to whom this power was given as well as to the rest of the twelve Matt. 10 1. and in many other reprobate Matt. 7. 22. Lord Lord have wee not by thy name prophesied c The proper ground of this faith and assurance of working some miraculous effect was the speciall and particular suggestion of the spirit Other motives there were further off as the generall perswasion of Gods omnipotency the beliefe of that promise which Christ made to his Disciples Matt. 17. 20. Verily I say unto you if yee have Faith as a graine of mustard-seed yee shall say unto this mountaine remove hence to yonder place and it shall remove and nothing shall be impossible to you but more specially that larger promise hee made at his Ascension Mark 16. 17. 18. And these signes shall follow them that beleeve in my name they shall cast out divells they shall speake with new tongues They shall take up Serpents and if they drinke any deadly thing it shall not hurt them they shall lay their hands on the sicke and they shall recover But these grounds were not sufficient to give assurance of performing this or that miraculous act without a speciall and particular suggestion of the Holy Ghost informing them inwardly both touching the time when and matter wherin they should worke a Miracle For as all beleevers had not that power so such as had it could not doe wonders when and in what kinde they pleased but were to expect a speciall warrant and direction from the Spirit like unto Peter who though a faithfull beleever yet durst not venture upon a miraculous attempt of walking dry-shod upon the water without a speciall word from Christ bidding of him come unto him in that manner Matt. 14. 28. 29. In these times wherein this speciall direction ceaseth and also miracles have no use unlesse for conversion of a Countrey where the Gospell hath never beene preached this gift also is ceased Thus much of the first sort of Revelations to bee beleeved the other followes 2. Some Mediate delivered from God by others unto us Such were the answers Sermons which the Prophets and Apostles made by word of mouth unto the people such is now unto us the whole written word of God which is now the only ordinary object of our Faith Now touching the Scriptures wee are to enquire how farre things revealed in them may be knowne how farre they must bee beleeved You have heard before the difference betweene Knowledge and Beliefe that is an assent to things evident this to things not-evident therefore seeing those things that are written are generally the object of our faith wee must diligently examine what evidence there is to bee found in these things or whether any at all that so wee may know what to judge of that assertion of our adversaries the Papists who make obscuritie one essentiall property of Faith In the opening of this question Whether things revealed in Scriptures be evident to Mans understanding let these distinctions be observed in the first place 1. The Scriptures containe in them matters of three sorts viz. 1. Precepts and Declarations of the doctrines of Religion whether in the higher mysteries thereof as of the Trinitie Incarnation of Christ c or in other inferiour points of Sanctification Piety and morall Practice And unto this head may be referred all such discourses of naturall things as are found in the Scripture as of the windes thunder c. 2. Histories of matters of Fact past and gone as of the Creation Fall of Man the Floud c. 3. Predictions of things to come hereafter whether they be meerely Propheticall or withall doe containe some speciall Promise or Threatning concerning those to whom the prediction is made 2. There is a twofold Evidence 1. One of the Narration when it is made in Words and Sentences so plaine perspicuous that the Vnderstanding conceives cleerely what the Speaker or Writen meanes 2. Another of the thing it selfe that is related when either our senses doe plainely perceive it if it be a thing sensible or our understandings doe manifestly behold the truth and reason of it if it bee only intelligible This distinction is most manifest in all discourses and specially in Mathematickes where the meaning of a Proposition or Probleme may be cleerely understood what is to bee knowne or done before one jot of the Demonstration be understood how and wherefore it must be so 3. Wee must distinguish of Mans understanding in a twofold estate 1. Of Naturall corruption as it attaines no further light of knowledge than that which may be gotten by the ordinary gift of God in the course of a learned education and painefull studie of Humanity and Divinity for such ends as men propose unto themselves 2. Of Grace and Regeneration when the Vnderstanding is inlightened and
not book-learned doe conceive to the infinite prejudice of Christianity But however must the Scriptures be obscure because men are carelesse is the Bible a hard booke because common people understand it not in Latine are all things in it darksome and intricate because one man understands not this or that particular which yet another doth or those of the present age perceive not the meaning of such or such a prophecy which the next age may cleerly understand These are weak inferences and such as cannot overturne our first conclusion namely that all Doctrines Histories Prophecies and whatsoever else in Scriptures may be knowne and understood by the perspicuity of the narration in the literall meaning thereof by all sorts of men bad and good For what history of the Bible can be named that may not be plainly understood I say not by a learned or godly but even by any man What prophecy the meaning whereof hath not or will not be plainly found out What text of doctrine whereof some have not or shall not understand the right meaning and when t is once found out may not all understand what one doth yea take the deepest mysteries of Religion as about the Trinity Incarnation of Christ Resurrection Life everlasting Regeneration and the like there is none of them so obscurely set downe in Scripture but that the declaration of them hath light enough to discover unto us what that thing is which we do beleeve so that we may give an account of our Faith in that behalfe Nor is this knowledge of divine things by tht evidence of the narration any peculiar priviledge of the godly but common unto the unregenerate For Charity though it could wish yet cannot be so blinde as to suppose that every one who is able to interpret Scriptures and to write or preach soundly of the doctrines of Divinity is a man truely sanctified by the Spirit of grace Experience and Reason make good the contrary that a singular measure of knowledge and no measure of sanctification are competible Who sees not abroad in the world many wicked and ungodly wretches abounding in knowledge and yet destitute of all true piety and is it not so in the Divell who as in knowledge he surpasseth the best of men so in malice far exceeds the worst of all creatures The cause is for that this knowledge is onely a degree and necessary antecedent unto saving Faith and is not so essentially linked unto it but that it may be where Faith is not It s easier to informe the understanding than to subdue the will and affections the minde may be plainely taught whilst yet the heart remaines froward unbroken and untractable the very heart and life of Faith is the strong inclination and union of the Soule unto the truth and goodnesse of spirituall things preferring them in our choyce above all other things whatsoever which gracious motion is the proper worke of Gods spirit powerfully binding and drawing the heart to embrace that good which is offered unto it but it doth not necessarily follow the right and cleere information of the Vnderstanding Whence it is both possible and easie for an unregenerate Christian by the helpe of common illumination to goe farre I say by common illumination understanding thereby that course of the Revelation of divine truths now usuall in the Church consisting in the knowledge of all Arts skill of Languages use of other mens labours in their Writings and Commentaries conference and hearing of the learned living and accustomed painfulnesse in study of any kinde of knowledge By these meanes a Christian presupposing the truth of holy Writ may in the state of unregeneration prove excellent in the understanding of Divine mysteries Hee may understand all and every the Articles of Christian beliefe all Controversies in matter of Religion all duties of Piety in Christian practice any Sermon or Treatise tending to holy instruction any place of Scripture of darkest and doubtfullest interpretation Yea in these things many times Sanctity goes not so farre as those common graces doe and you may know by experience that the holiest men have not beene alwaies the happiest expositors of Scriptures nor soundest determiners of Controversies but that both of Papists and Protestants many times men of ungodly lives and Idolatrous profession have equalled and exceeded others in their Commentaries and Treatises And doth not the triall of every day shew that many a wretched man and vile hypocrite may yet make so good a Sermon even about the most spirituall points of Christianity and so heavenly a prayer that those who are of quickest sight yet seeing him but a farre off may deeme him sound hearted So easie a matter it is for love of this world to learne Religion by rote and to teach the tongue to speake what the heart doth not affect This of the first conclusion the next is this 2. All Histories and Predictions are knowne unto the most illuminated understandings by no evidence of the things themselves but only by evidence of the relation I shall not need stand long in proving this conclusion In many precepts and doctrinall discourses sense and Reason may have something to doe but in matters Historicall and Propheticall Faith only beares sway For Histories of things past and gone there is no knowledge at all to be had of them otherwise than from authority of Scriptures relation That the world was drowned Noah saved in the Arke c doth not appeare unto us by any argument from the things themselves evident to sense or reason but only by the story So for Prophecies promises threatnings they are not evident till the event make them evident As that the Iewes shall bee converted the Papacy rooted out c. we know these things only by the Word foretelling them In neither of these kindes can our sense be informed or our understanding convinced of their truth and therefore wee must rest upon Revelation beleeved Of these two kindes principally is the Apostle to bee understood in that description of Faith which hee makes Heb. 11. vers 1. where he useth two words to expresse the objects of Faith the one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Things not seene the other 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Things hoped for Things not seene are of a more large extent and comprise all both past and to come things hoped for have a speciall relation to promises of some future good Both are the proper objects of Faith which is alwayes drowned in the sight of things that were unseene and possession of things that were hoped for The third and last Conclusion followes which is this 3. Precepts and discourses of Dogmaticall points mentioned in Scriptures are in part knowne by the evidence of the things themselves both to the regenerate also the unregenerate This conclusion is of manifest truth as shall appeare thus In Scriptures there are doctrinall discourses of divers sorts some of matters belonging to Nature and Morality others of mysteries peculiar to Divinity
In the like manner the Revelations of Scripture are like a cleere well polished glasse free from dust â—lawes crackes or other deformities in them wee may behold all the mysteries of Religion cleerly represented in their shapes and proper colours so farre forth as is needfull for us to see them in this life and when attentively we marke what is shewne unto us wee may take distinct notice of every thing that is to be beleeved by us in all articles of Christian Faith And this knowledge is in it selfe distinct and cleere though compared with that other proper immediate beholding of the things themselves face to face as the Apostle speakes it may justly be termed Darke and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let one instance make all plaine in Gal. 3. 1. the Apostle saith that Christ was described unto the Galatians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before their eyes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being crucified among them Why this was not possible that what was done at Ierusalem on mount Golgatha should bee seene in Galatia many hundred miles from it How then was Christ described and crucified in the sight of these Galatians It was in the cleere and manifest declaration of him by the Apostles preaching Which though it could not make the sufferings of Christ so evident unto the Galatians as they were unto such as stood by the crosse of Christ and saw him suffer yet so cleere and distinct was the representation thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the mirrour of the Apostles preaching that the Galatians faith in this case was not an assent to things obscure which they understood not It s one thing then for a matter to be present unto us in it owne nature another for it to be perspicuously plainly set forth in a narration in which latter sense we affirm against the Romanist that all objects of Faith are not Obscure but Evident in those Revelations of them which are made in Scriptures 2. Ex parte Dei Revelantis For non constat nobis clarè evidenter revelationemillam propter quam credimus articulas fidei à Deo factam esse No is it not evident to us that the Scriptures are of God To whom then was it evident to the holy men of God to whom they were first inspired Yes the Iesuite grants that but yet heare his words Num. 12. Prophetae Apostolâ— saith hee habuerunt tantùm evidentiam revelationis non autemevidentiam Primae veritatis Tamet si enim evidenter cognoscerent Deum esse qui ipsis revelabat mysteria fides non tamen evidenter cognoscebant Deum esse summè veracem qui nec falli possit nec fallere Vnde sequitur assensum illorum quem habuerunt circa mysteria fidei fuisse obscurum ejusdem speciei cum assensu fidei nostrae See ye this Iesuite how hee would blow away with one blast all the certainty of Christian faith and so bring the matter about that there shall be no sure footing for it unlesse it be in the authority of the Church and the Popes infallible fancy Revelations of Scripture are not evident to us that they are of God to the Prophets and Apostles they were indeed evidently knowne to bee of God but yet see the mischiefe the Truth of God the Revealer was not evidently knowne unto these holy men nor were they infallibly certaine but that God might and would tell them a lie A foule blasphemy and I know not whether hee doe deserve the name of a Reasonable creature who is not himselfe or thinkes there is any that is not infallibly evidently and most certainly convinced of this truth that God cannot bee deceived himselfe nor will deceive any But touching this point that wee have no such obscure tottering foundation for our faith but a most sure and cleere word full of brightnesse and majesty like light shining into our soules and by it owne characters discovering it owne divine originall of this hereafter more fitly in handling the certainty of Faiths assent Now in the meane time for conclusion of this first point touching the Objects of Faith How farre forth they are Evident or Inevident these two confectaries may be noted out of what hath been said 1. Knowledge by sight takes away Faith that is so far as sight goes but no further for as we said of Beliefe in generall so here Evident Experience of the truth in some things doth helpe our Faith in other Whence t is usuall with the godly to strengthen their faith in the promises for time to come by calling to minde Gods mercies of old and that evident triall of them they have had in time past And Thomas because hee saw the Evident truth of Ghrists Resurrection did more firmely beleeve the rest of the mystery of mans Redemption by him But otherwise in the same things as sight waxeth so Faith waineth the greater light certainty drownes the lesse where Knowledge is perfect the Faith though it remains in the Habit yet it ceaseth in the Act. This is manifest by that opposition which the Apostle makes betweene Faith and Sight 2. Cor. 5. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what this walking by Faith is is plaine Chap. 4. 18. We looke not on the things which are seene but on the things which are not seen for the things which are seene are temporall but the things which are not seene are eternall 2. A distinct explicite knowledge of divine things in the Revelations of them in Scripture is necessary to the being of Christian Faith By explicite knowledge I meane the understanding of the articles of Beliefe so farre forth as they are plainly declared in Scriptures This Historicall knowledge for so we may terme it synecdochicâ—â— of the letter and meaning of the Scriptures in such things as it proposeth to be beleeved is required to the being of Christian Faith as a necessary antecedent thereof For though this knowledge may be where Faith is not yet Faith can never be where this knowledge goes not before Ignorant in this sense and Vnbeleeving are termes reciprocall As perfect knowledge by sight excludes Faith of the thing seene so doth perfect ignorance of any thing destroy all Faith of the same thing I say of the same thing for a man may bee absolutely ignorant in some things yet a beleever in others and therefore wee doe not meane that such an explicite knowledge is necessary to faith as that wee must distinctly apprehend all points of Faith before wee beleeve for the Apostles when yet they were true beleevers were ignorant in many articles of Faith as Christs Resurrection Ascention c. But this wee affirme that where there is totall ignorance of any one article of Faith there can be no Beliefe at all of that article as for example Hee that saith I beleeve a holy Catholike Church and yet knowes not what a holy Catholike Church is what ever hee say hee doth not beleeve it That such a blinde credo is
and effect to the Word preached which wee maintaine and plead for This point will fall in more fitly to be discussed afterwards in the handling of a few Questions touching the manner of the Working of grace in mans conversion Whereinto though I am somewhat unwilling to enter because that Positive rather than Polemicall Divinity befits this place yet considering the danger whereinto mindes not rightly informed in these points may unhappily fall and that herein it is easie to slip from the truth to Arminianisme and thence to Popery there 's but a threed betweene them I have thought it would not bee unprofitable briefly and plainly to touch upon such materiall controversies as are moved in this matter that even the younger sort might have something to oppose against cauilling gainsayers of the truth and crafty seducers of the uninstructed You are therefore to understand that in point touching Mans conversion there is scarce any circumstance that wee have formerly spoken of but it is quarrelled at and corrupted with false opinions Not the nature and substance of our conversion which say they is not by the infusion of Habituall sanctity into the Soule but through Grace acquired by much paines and industrious actions of our own excited assisted by some helpe of the Spirit Not the moving Cause which is affirmed by them to bee not Gods speciall and actuall Love to his Elect but his common and equall love to all mankinde alike Not the Efficient cause which wee affirme to be the worke of Gods Spirit they say is the Freedome of our wills Not the manner of it without and above the strength of our naturall abilities as wee hold but so farre is the compasse of our owne power that we may helpe or hinder it at our pleasure Not the instrument of it the Word by the worke of the Spirit but as they would have it the Word working by it selfe without any inward vertue of the Spirit besides Lastly not the Subject the Elect only as we maintaine but all in Common upon whom sufficient grace to Conversion is bestowed if we will beleeve them All these Erroneous opinions are founded upon other rotten and unsound principles which are chiefly these 1. That God hath not precisely determined of any mans salvation or damnation in particular but hath left it to be decided by the libertie of their owne wills 2. That God doth not beare any speciall favour to one more than another but that his love is equall to all in generall and his desire of the salvation of all mankinde alike 3. That Christ hath dyed for all men alike procuring so much by his death that God is Placabilis toward all and all men indifferently are Salvabiles if they list to make use of the benefit purchased for them 4. That God requires Faith in Christ of all men whatsoever even of such Infidells as to whom Christ was never preached 5. That God cannot in justice demand of Man the performance of those things which since his fall hee hath no strength to performe and that if God require any such service he is bound in equitie to give unto man new strength for to performe it I doe but only name these articles of the Arminian Faith though even that 's enough to shew their weaknesse and untruth to any that can judge of sound doctrine but I say I mention them only that you may the better perceive what is that maine issue whereinto they are finally resolved and that in plaine termes is this That all men whether Christians or Infidells within or without the Church may bee converted and saved if they will You will say this is broadly spoken but I doe them no wrong reade their bookes compare their tenents and you shall see that this is the upshot of all their discourses God hath excluded none hee loves all alike Christ hath dyed for all Faith is required of all sufficient ability to beleeve and repent is given to all who then or what should hinder the Conversion or Salvation of any one but himselfe his owne meere free-will Surely an opinion that should not bee gainsaid by any but readily embraced by all if it had as much truth in it as it carries shew of Pity and Commiseration to mankinde Wee would be loth to be judged cruell but t is folly not pitie to take upon us to bee more mercifull than God hath declared himselfe to be and t is impiety to tell a lie for God by magnifying the glorious largenesse of his mercy beyond the bounds which himselfe hath prescribed unto it Wherefore against this wide and vast Conclusion of Arminianisme that God hath given sufficient grace to all the world to convert and beleeve if they will I oppose this directly contradictory God hath not given sufficient grace to all and in those to whom hee hath given such grace it depends not on their Free-will whether they will be converted or no. These two propositions destroy one another and one is confuted by that which confirmes the other I will proceed in the handling of them in this order Men that are capable of Vocation are of two sorts 1. Out of the Visible Church and of these the Question will bee Whether God have given to all Pagans and Heathens grace sufficient for their conuersion 2. Within the precincts of the Visible Church and of these the question will be double 1. Whether God doe give unto all Christians grace sufficient to worke their conversion 2. Whether those upon whom such sufficient grace is bestowed may if they list hinder their conversion by the power of their free-will Within the compasse of these three Questions will bee included all that is materiall touching this businesse I will use as much brevity in each as the matter will give leave of the first at this time viz. Whether the Gentiles out of the Church have grace given unto them sufficient for their conversion Wee maintaine the Negative part the Arminians affirme that all Pagans and Infidells have so much grace given unto them that by it they may be converted beleeve and worship God rightly in some sort even without the knowledge of the Gospell A monstrous assertion every way repugnant to Reason and Scriptures For 1. Let it be demanded what this sufficient Grace is that is given to the Gentiles Is it that knowledge of God and goodnesse whereto the Gentiles might come by the light of nature or it is some other supernaturall Revelation If the former there is a double error in it 1. That they call that Grace which is but Nature for if Vniversall Grace given to Heathens be but that knowledge of God and his worship which is attainable by the right use of the light of Nature through the contemplation of the creatures and remainders of the Morall Law in mans heart what is this grace but Nature what this opinion but Pelagianisme 2. In that they suppose this light of Nature well used is a sufficient
will also evidently appeare to him that shall but a little survey the writings of Philosophers both those that are extant in whole or in part and such whose titles onely wee have remaining recorded by those that have written their lives For among so many hundred volumes written by the Ancients how few or none almost shall we finde touching the matter of Religion Those great scriblers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Chrysippus was called who left no part of Logicke Oratory Mathematickes Morality Policy and Nature it selfe unattempted but with a curious and inquisitive eye pried into the smallest matters yet in those higher speculations concerning the Nature of Divine things were either miserably blinde or wilfully negligent Aristotle a man of the deepest reach that Antiquity ever bred among so many bookes that he wrote and are in part yet extant hath not left us any one discourse by which it might appeare that hee bestowed any paines in searching after the knowledge of God except a little here and there in some poore pitifull disputes Theophrastus his schollar who exceeded the master in numbersome writings composed sixe bookes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 three which we wish had remained to posterity albeit by the very titles we may suspect what stuffe they were not unlike to Hesâ—ods Theogonia and such other fooleries and that both his bookes and others written of the same subject by Crito Simon Xenocrates Strato Cleanthes Epicurus and many more as may be seene in Laertius were they now extant would give us but small satisfaction in this point unlesse it were to discover the grosse stupidity and dulnesse of those otherwise refined and sublimated wits Tullie who had read them and sets downe the summe of their opinions gives us cause to beleeve that the wisest of them all and himselfe too 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were here starke fooles and forsaking the right way of searching out the Deity in the footsteps of Nature by a due proceeding from the lower to the higher they gave heede to old fond fables or vanished away in their idle imaginations and new opinions Nor could it be otherwise if we respect either the corruption of Nature which how quick and forward soever it bee in other matters is dull enough in sacred imploiments as the experience of many dispositions proves who are excellent in many sorts of Learning yet dunces in Divinity or if wee regard the policy of Satan who blinding the eies of so learned and wise men made use of their wits and pens in darkning the cleerer light of divine knowledge by senselesse fables and foolish fancies which passed unto the ignorant vulgar with approbation under the authority of their deepe learning Wherefore seeing neyther the most wise and learned in former times have alwaies applied their industry in this part of knowledge nor yet the labours of such as have beene busied therein are preserved to our times nor those few monuments that are left doe give sufficient proofe that men have done their best in going so farre as they might we must without consideration of particulars first dispute in generall how deepe the eye of Naturall reason can pierce into divine mysteries and then see in briefe how far men whose inventions are come to our knowledge have proceeded therein Concerning the first you are to call to minde that Religion containes in it two chiefe branches 1. All Divine truths to bee knowne and beleeved in way of Spirituall contemplation and assent and the Summary of these are the Articles of our Creed which in general declare unto us what is to be beleeved touching God as Creator in the first Article Redeemer in the rest 2. All Divine and Morall duties to be done and practised by us the briefe wherof is in the Decalogue describing unto us the rules of 1. Pietie in Gods worship 2. Of Charity in righteousnesse towards man Within these bounds wee must seeke for the utmost extent of the meere naturall mans knowledge which wee will doe beginning with the knowledge of God the Redeemer touching which I lay downe this position as infallible and undeniable that The meere naturall man cannot by the most industrious use of all Natures helpes attaine unto any the least knowledge of God as hee is mans Redeemer in Christ. This is most apparant by the Scriptures wholly ascribing the knowledge of this mystery to the Sonne of God revealing it from the bosome of the Father and to the Spirit of God but utterly denying so much as a thought of it to any of the greatest or wisest of this world yea unto the blessed Angells themselves And t is no lesse agreeable to good reason which forbids to imagine that a man fallen corrupted by sin should ever attaine to the understanding of those things which Adam in his perfection never had knowledge of Now the knowledge of God as Redeemer with all the dependances thereupon as Adam had no need of it so was hee before his fall utterly ignorant of it and had so remained forever if God had not vouchsafed to reveale it to him Which revelation though made to Adam when wee were in his loynes yet was not as I may speake Generall and deriveable to all his posterity as the first connaturall and inprinted knowledge was but particular for the benefit of Adam and so many of his seed as were elect And though no doubt but Adam did instruct his children and they theirs for some descents in this mysterie yet wickednesse increasing in men as fast as men multiplied in the earth and by reason of the darksome obscurity of this mysterie in those first times of the world it came to passe that this knowledge quickly decreased being almost decayed even among the sonnes of God the Few of Gods Church whom therefore God was faine by new revelations continually to instruct but for the Sonnes of men the rest of the wicked world it was utterly extinct and no sparke of it left alive They soone forgot what they cared not to beleeve Wherefore wee must confine the meere naturall mans knowledge within these two limits 1. The knowledge of God as Creator 2. The knowledge of the morall Law and beyond these it is not possible for him to goe The knowledge of which though very much eclipsed in Adam himselfe but more and more darkned in his posterity as they further degenerated from his originall purity yet is it not so farre obscured except in such whose brutish and savage education have made them equall to the beasts that perish but that by carefull education and vigilant industry in the use of all helpes it may be somewhat repaired though this some what is but a very little part almost nothing of its first clearenesse Wherefore in the second place touching the knowledge God as Creator I suppose a meere naturall man may know these things touching God in his nature and attributes 1. That there is a God 2. That
settled plantation for many ages In which time learning Arts and all Civilitie seemed to have beene confined to those middle parts of the world the rest further remote being left in grosse ignorance and barbarisme And the same course is held to this day wherein Learning and Civility hath abandoned the Easterne countries which have forsaken true Religion and hath not yet approached to the Westerne Americans who have not heard the sound of the Gospell Now then in the course of times it could not bee but sundry accidents would fall out for the dispearcing of sacred knowledge as trading and commerce of Merchants both strangers into Iudaea and Iewes into forraine parts Entertaining of Slaves and Captives who if barbarous learned of their Iewish if Iewes taught their barbarous Masters many mysteries of Religion received and beleeved among the people of God The perigrination and sojourning of many Iewes abroad in forraine parts as no countrey soever but hath some of its people in all countreys which Iewes as they learned the superstitions of the Heathen so they brought in amongst them some pieces and relickes of true Religion Lastly the Curiosity of the Philosophers of those times shaming the negligence of the learned now who would with any cost purchase bookes of any Art in any Language which they thought contained some secret knowledge and rare mysterie as also spared no labour in travelling into forraine parts wherein they heard were any men or meanes whereby their knowledge might be increased Wherefore it is more than probable that those Ancients Zoroastres Hermes Orpheus Plato and others drew their knowledge which in part they had of many high mysteries out of a deeper and cleerer fountaine than the muddy shallow springs of their owne naturall reason though in the passage this water was much soyled by them with the mudde of many idle fables and silly conceits A reason whereof we may conceive to be either the darknesse of their apprehension not cleerely discerning what was perhaps plainely enough delivered or the corruption of those Idolatrous times which permitted not the least innovation in opinion or practice touching the matter of Religion as appeares in the case of Socrates which constrayned the learned in those dayes to conceale much of what they knew or to declare it darkly in many mistie and foggy fables whose interpretation aftertimes forgot and so beleeved a lie for a true tale Hitherto of the knowledge of a meere naturall man let us next descend to the Effects thereof in regard of Practice which admitting of a double consideration as theformer What may be what hath beene done shall yet here be handled joyntly together By the former discourse it appeares how imperfect the knowledge of the wisest naturall man is whence it followes that his practice will come as farre short of his knowledge as his knowledge doth of perfection For so t is even with the best Christians who practise farre lesse than they know much more with the naturall man whose knowledge is too darke and uncertaine to cause any powerfull and vigorous impression upon his will and sensuall affections which will be too too violent and untamed to give way to the commands of his understanding Yea should we suppose in a naturall man the cleerest apprehension of all duties in the morall Law yet could it not much better his practice so easily would the Naturall Conscience bee choaked and borne downe by the power of Corruption unlesse it bee supported by Faith which only puts life into our knowledge and strength unto our practice And in this case there is no difference betweene a Naturall Heathen and an Vnregenerate Christian who in knowledge may and doth exceed the other and yet come short of him in practice For seeing they both alike want Faith and Sanctification it is possible that goodnesse of naturall temper civility of education strictnesse of government due hope of reward and praise or feare of the contrary with the like motives may carry a Heathen as farre in vertuous courses as bare illumination can a Christian. The same corruption in both perhaps greater in the Christian than Heathen as sinne abounds more where unsanctified knowledge abounds I say the like corruption in both would imprison this knowledge in unrighteousnesse that it breake not forth into Religious practice Whence wee finde that Christians much more Philosophers have not beene the same men in the Chaire and in their Conversations but that their opinions and discourses have beene full of Sanctity and Temperance when their lives have beene defiled with all Impiety and Sensuality Wherefore for the generall let us set downe this Conclusion as most true that The meere naturall man never goes so farre in the application of his knowledge unto practice as hee might doe and as hee knowes he should doe And therefore the Gentiles are condemned for detaining the truth in injustice for sinning against their consciences accusing them for knowing God and yet not glorifying him as God So that t is cleere although the Naturall man cannot doe or know so much as he ought yet hee knowes more than hee is ever willing to practise and for that cause his knowledge is sufficient to condemne him of his unrighteousnesse towards man and false worship of God himselfe though it bee not sufficient to direct him in the true meanes and manner of Gods right worship or the practice of a holy life And thus in Gods wonderfull judgement he is left as without sufficient direction for well doing so without all lawfull excuse for his ill doing But come we to particulars the Naturall mans practice respects either God in his Inward worship Outward Man 1. In things concerning God and his worship the Naturall man utterly perverts himselfe in his practice there being in this case the greatest deformity and disagreement that may be betweene his knowledge in the speculation and his application thereof to practice Consider him in the Inward worship of the heart how hee stands affected toward the Deity in those inward affections of Love Feare Credence and Confidence which are required as part of our Spirituall worship of God It would be strange to see the disposition of a meere Naturall mans heart in this part of Gods worship how feeble cold and forced these affections would bee how full of hypocrisie and falshood being secretly fastned to the creature when they pretend to bee directed to the Creator just like unregenerate Christians that will make shew of Love Feare Faith and Trust in God when t is apparant they intend nothing lesse in their affections Consider him in the Outward worship of God and the Naturall man is farre more defective as appeares by the manifest experience of all ages who corrupted their waies in nothing so much as the service of God mistaking the object and seeking for that Deity which they apprehended in a generall Notion not onely in the Similitude but in Nature of the Creatures and those many times of the weakest and
not 2. Deut. 29. 3. 4. The Israelites in the wildernesse had all instruction and perswasion that might be by the VVord and by Miracles from God and his servant Moses they had heard Moses and God speake and seene the great tentations miracles and wonders with their eies But was this sufficient to convert them No there wanted that within which God denied them for saith Moses Yet tho Lord hath not given you an heart to perceive and eyes to see and eares to heare unto this day vers 4. Parallell to which is that touching the Iewes among whom Christ had preached so much and so plainely done so many so singular miracles Yet they beleeved not in him Ioha 1â— 37. But what was the cause of that was not the meanes sufficient No God had denied to reveale unto them his arme or power in giving them the knowledge of the Gospell That he proves out of the Prophet Esay who of all the Prophets preacht the Gospell plainest and yet found small credit to his doctrine That the saying of Esaias the Prophet might be fulfilled that he saith Lord who hath beleeved our report and to whom is the arme of the Lord revealed vers 38. A very unreasonable complaint saith the Arminian if we construe it so for t is as if Esay had said Lord only the Elect to whom thine arme was revealed they have beleeved it but none of the Reprobates have beleeved it because thine arme was never revealed to them and so they could not beleeve And what reason had Esay then to complaine of them for not doing that which they could not doe I thinke the wisedome of God hath of purpose to checke these pestilent gainsaying Spirits added in the next words vers 39. Therefore they could not beleeve because thus Esaias saith againe He hath blinded their eyes and hardned their hearts that they should not see with their eies and understand with their hearts and should be Converted and I should heale them So Gods Spirit brings that for a good reason which these men count an absurdity They did not beleeve and the Prophet complaines of it yet it was because they could not beleeve And why could they not â—was the want of that Inward worke of grace wee stand for God had not inlightned their mindes nor softned and sanctisied their hearts and therefore they could not beleeve 3. 2. Tim. 2 24 25 26. And the servant of the Lord must not strive but bee gentle unto all men apt to teach patient In meekenesse instructing those that oppose themselves Here 's the Ministers dutie to preach uncessantly using all gentle and good meanes to bring men to repentance but will this diligence in perswasion and patient industry bee effectuall at last It may prove so but when it doth 't is not by it selfe but by Gods speciall grace If â—od peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth After all outward meanes used an inward gift is still to be expected Let vs in the next place come unto reason and experience where we have these perswasive arguments to confirme us in this truth 1. From the like experience in Christs calling of his Disciples to whom he useth no other words but Follow mee or Follow me I will make you fishers of men it is wonderfull that so shortan Invitation should worke so strange so speedy an alteration Sraightway they leave all and follow him what forsake all to follow after a stranger they never knew before with such constancy and yet through so much perill and disgrace and all for a word spoken Follow mee Nay in that word there was more then a word there went with it that Power which could have commanded the attendance of the Armies of Heauen and Earth And those few words accompanied with this secret vertue did more upon the hearts of the Disciples than many a long Sermon upon the Pharisees and obdurate Iewes where Christ was not pleased to shew the like effect of his power So Christ appearing to Saul accosts him with this expostulatorie salutation Saul Saul why persecutest thou mee hee saith no more but only tells him being asked That hee was Iesus of Nazareth whom hee persecuted and that it was hard for him to kicke against the prickes But see what a change these few words have made in a fierce raging persecutor hee is on the sudden as meeke as a Lambe and now all for obedience to that name which before hee furiously persecuted Lord what wilt thou have mee to doe command what thou wilt I am ready to obey Was it externall morall perswasion trow yee that hath made this wonderfull alteration Nor are these examples to bee accounted so extraordinary as if for the substance the same course were not ordinarily observed Were not men wilfully perverse they would confesse that when of many thousands that heare one and the same Sermon some one or two it may be the worst in the company are in a moment so changed that they are not the same men they were new hearts new desires new affections all new in them they would I say confesse that this is the very â—inger of God touching the Heart and not the force of any outward perswasion whatsoever 2. If only a bare proposing of Divine things to the understanding joyned with perswasions of command threatning and the like towards the Will bee all that is needfull to mans conversion it would bee knowne what difference wee shall make betweene the working of Gods word and of Mans of a Divinitie Sermon and a good morall speech Nay more what difference can be made betweene Sathans temptations and all the sacred suggestions of Gods word yea whether Sathans seducements to evill are not likely to prove alwayes more powerfull than Gods perswasions to goodnesse because in both cases the worke it selfe is left wholly to our arbitrement and then Sathan hath the advantage of our naturall Corruption cleerely on his side So that by this Arminian doctrine mans conversion is even desperate seeing Sathan is as powerfull and certainely he is as willing to Pervert as God is to Convert This blasphemous absurditie the Arminians cannot shift their hands of though they strive in vaine about it 3. The old rule must here be remembred Passio râ—cipitur non tam per conditionem agent is quà m dispositionem patient is all exhortations promises commands take effect not according to their owne but according to the quality of him towards whom they are used And so wee see a word doth more with some than a frowne or sharp menace towards another All Speech workes as the Heart of the Hearer is affected not as he intends that utters it Wherefore if there be nothing more to be done on Gods part towards our Conversion but the only proposall and perswasion of the acceptance of Grace it is manifest to all that can judge of the state of Corrupted nature that wee shall never accept of Gods offer but out
Faith or Beliefe in generall as this word is taken in the largest extent in relation to all civill or naturall things 2. In the next place explaining the meaning of this word Faith as it is used in speciall about Divine and Supernaturall things declared to us in Scriptures The opening of the nature of Beliefe in generall will give much light for the understanding of the speciall consideration thereof therefore I begin with that first Not to trouble you with reckoning up all the improper acceptions of this word Fides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to tell you that sometime it is taken for Fidelity or Trustinesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as when a thing is done or spoken bonafide faithfully or trustily and in that exclamation Vestram fidem c. sometimes for Arguments or Proofes from Reason or Authority brought to breed beliefe in another which acception is usuall in Rhetoritians Arist. 1. Rhet. c. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Quintil. l. 5. cap. 10. Haec omnia argumenta generaliter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 appellant c. Faith or Beliefe in the proper acception of the word is an Assent to such matters a◠are knowne only by Revelation from another This definition agrees to beliefe as it is taken in the largest sense the Genus i◠Assent the difference is taken from the object whereto Assent is yeelded and that is such things as wee understand onely by anothers revelation Both parts will be plainly understood if we distinguish between three sorts of knowledge Cognitionis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are incident unto man 1. The first is Scientia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Knowledge properly so called which is bred in us by the evident certainety of things presented unto our reason or sense When wee understand such principles and conclusions in all arts and sciences as are demonstrable by evident and infallible reason or when we know such particulars as come under our senses when they are rightly disposed 2. The second is Opinio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Opinion an imperfect knowledge of things not cleerely presented unto reason or sense when we apprehend things in part and obscurely so that wee cannot absolutely say t is this or t is that 3. The third is Fides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Beliefe which is a knowledge grounded on testimony and authority of others when wee assent to those things whereof by our owne sense and reason we have no certainety nor evidence only we beleeve them because such and such have told us they are so These three divers apprehensions of things wee expresse in formes of speech agreeable the first when we say I know this to be so the second thus I thinke it is so the last in this I beleeve it is so A great difference there is betweene these three apprehensions of the understanding as every one may easily discerne but more cleerly thus it stands 1. Knowledge whether it be of things past present or to come hath evermore certainety in the subject and evidence in the object accompanying it For the things that are knowne must bee alwaies apparant to the senses or to the understanding To the senses by the proportionablenesse of the qualities in the Object and due application of them to the Organ To the understanding by the bright light of reason shining in the things themselves Wherefore the Object of knowledge is evermore evident and being thus evident and apparant the apprehension thereof in the Subject by the sense and understanding must needs bee cleere and most distinct whence ariseth such an assent unto the truth of the thing as is most firme and certaine excluding all doubting whatsoeuer as for instance that the Fire is hot the Water moist the Sunne light that Quicquid dicitur vel negatur de Vniversali dicitur vel negatur de Particulari Quae conveniunt in uno tertio inter se conveniunt with the like these things are evident making such a lively impression upon the senses and so cleerly discovering their reasonablenesse to the understanding that we strongly assent unto their truth without all doubting 2. Opinion is contrary unto knowledge and alwayes hath uncertainetie in the Subject and inevidence in the Object attending on it For some things there are of their owne nature uncertaine and contingent whereof our best knowledge is but a doubtfull conjecture as that a red evening and a gray morning should bring a faire day Againe those things that are in themselves certaine enough and necessary yet unto us they will be but onely probable and conjecturall if either our senses through weakenesse and distemper perceive them not throughly or our understanding doe not cleerely apprehend the nature and reason of them Whence it followes that for want of cleere evidence in the things themselves our assent unto their truth will be alwayes wavering doubtfull without any fixed determination to embrace any side resolvedly but so holding it selfe to that part which for the present seemes most probable as that it is ready to shift it selfe unto the other side when better reason shall bee discovered 3. Beliefe partly agrees partly differs both from the one and the other for it partakes but of one property namely certainety in the Subject though very variable but never of evidence in the Object Both shall appeare unto you in order For the Object of beliefe it may bee certaine and necessary in it selfe but quâ tale it is never evident to the beleever For evident as I said before those things onely are which by their owne proper qualitie and light worke a cleere apprehension of themselves in the senses or understanding or both Now such things are not beleeved but knowne as for instance what wee see heare touch taste or smell by these senses orderly disposed we doe not say we beleeve it but we know it as that the Fire is hot the Water cold He that relates unto mee an accident that himselfe hath seene He knowes it but I that heare him doe beleeve it Againe things that wee understand by manifest and infallible reason those also we know we doe not beleeve as for example If an Astronomer foretell an Eclipse to fall out an hundred years hence hee doth not beleeve but he knowes this effect will ensue by the infallible motion of the Heavens but an unlearned man that findes this in an Ephemerides hee onely beleeves it But now that which is the Object of Beliefe so farre as it is the Object thereof doth not fall under the cleere apprehension either of sense or understanding by its owne naturall light For things beleeved are of three sorts Past Present or to Come Of things Past before we were and of things to Come t is not possible for us to get any knowledge from the things themselves by our sense or reason unlesse it be Astronomicall demonstrations as was touched before or such Physicall effects as depend upon necessary connexion of their causes Touching things
much is our assent weakned But of the three the authority of the speaker is the chiefest whose wisedome and fidelity certainely knowne unto us will move us to a certaine beliefe of those things wherein we apprehend no great matter of consequence nor discerne any evidence of the truth at all whereas if one that hath neither wit nor honesty tell us of a matter of greatest moment wherof we also see the probability and truth in part yet doth he not perswade us to beliefe though he may move us to a strong suspicion Thus then you see that assent being the approbation of the truth of any thing is common to Knowledge Opinion and Beliefe but with this difference In exact Knowledge our assent is alwaies firme and unremoveable in Opinion t is alwaies wavering and mutable in Beliefe t is certaine but more or lesse according to the different concurrence of those three forenamed grounds Now out of that which I have spoken let these two conclusions be carefully observed 1. That all Knowledge is more certaine than Beliefe which rule you must understand in things of the same kind not of divers thus He that most firmely beleeves any truth upon the former grounds is not yet so certaine of it as hee that perfectly knowes it as a Countri-man who strongly beleeves that the Sunne or least Starre is bigger than the whole Earth upon the affirmation of a learned and honest Mathematician is not yet so certaine of it as when afterward he knowes it by infallible demonstration But now in divers kindes our beliefe of some things may bee more certaine than our knowledge of others as our beliefe of divine things upon Gods testimony may be more certaine than the knowledge of humane things by the light of our reason because our understanding hath alwaies this prejudice that in the generall it may possibly erre but Gods Word cannot erre at all 2. That perfect Knowledge takes away all Beliefe that is for so you must understand it perfect knowledge of any thing excludes all beliefe of the same thing otherwise perfect knowledge in one thing may helpe our beliefe in another and knowledge in part of the same thing doth much strengthen our beliefe of the other part But here in this opposition betweene knowledge and beliefe your must alwayes remember what knowledge wee meane namely Scientiam Intuitivam or per Visionem that knowledge which is had by beholding things in their proper nature but not Scientiam Disciplinarem or per Revelationeâ— that knowledge which is got by discourse and relation of others And so these two propositions We beleeve what we know not and We beleeve what we know are not opposite each to other for t is true we beleeve that which we do not know namely by the proper and immediate sight of the things themselves and t is true also we beeleeve that which we doe know viz. by relation which so far forth represents to us the nature of the thing related as that we are not ignorant what it is we doe beleeve Where it must also be observed that the difference is great between these two sorts of knowledge in regard of the assent that is given to matters thus known Knowledge that is by Vision or Intuition of things that are presented to the sense or understanding in their proper evidence inforceth assent unto the things knowne For in this case the apprehension of the thing is so cleere that the understanding cannot but approve the truth of it And therefore the Colledge of the Sceptikes of old was little better than a Society of fools and their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Perpetuall doubtfulnesse of all things was somewhat worse than madnes when they would not assent that they saw the Sunne shine when they looked on it nor that the fire was hot when they felt it burne nor would be certaine of any principles or conclusions in reason nature And such was Anaxagoras his dull melancholy or wilfull frenzy to maintaine in good sadnesse that the snow was blacke For such is the naturall assinity between evident truth and our understanding that though wee would yet wecannot but subscribe and yeeld our allowance and assent unto it Whence it falls out many times that a Vsurer a Chuch-robber or some other not willing to leave this or that course though doubtfull whether lawfull or not dares not for his life read such or such a booke written on those subjects for feare lest he should bee made to know more than hee is content to practise and that his conscience should bee convicted in spight of his will But now t is not so in that other knowledge by relation let a thing be never so plainly delivered so that we fully conceive the meaning of that which is spoken yet if neyther our owne sense nor reason doe convince us we may choose whether or no we will beleeve and assent unto it embracing it for a truth It is the very naturall property of man never to be satisfied with others reports till we our selves have seene and knowne the thing it selfe by evident experience Draw the liveliest picture of any man the most curious landship of any country it contents not wee must see both the one and other Set downe the most tried experiments in nature taken by most skilfull Artists this pleases not others till their owne triall confirm them Generally every man would faine see with his owne eies heare with his owne eares understand by his owne not another mans reason In which inclination of nature lies the originall of all the distrust and diffidence that is in the world and also the cause of those restlesse inquiries which we make one after another into the same things Whence it comes to passe that whilst we are bulâ—ed in examining our forefathers inventions and posterity also imployed in making triall of our examinations neither we nor they have much time to adde any thing unto the increase of learned knowledge Hence also may we ghesse at one cause why many Sciences even for some thousands of yeares have kept one pitch and not growne above that dwarfish stature they had in their infant invention and also what the reason is why many that reade most prove not the deepest schollars for no greater impediment to exact learning than to make use of other mens understandings and neglect our owne It would also hence appeare that History a pleasant and profitable imploiment is yet of all studied learning the weakest to give full satisfaction to the minde of man because that depends wholly upon such grounds of truth as mans minde desires not to depend upon at all namely anothers tongue eyes and eares And it is observable that very usually those that are of credulous and passive understandings least able to imploy their owne strength in painfull and attentive inquiries after knowledge such doe not unwillingly apply their diligence to that course of study But I
the meaning We have reason to yeeld as much respect to Gods writings as Socrates did sometime to an obscure booke of Heraclitus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so when in reading the Scriptures we meet with many hard sentences dark prophecies wee know not the meaning of we also can say That which I understand I beleeve for truth that which I understand not yet I beleeve too that is a truth whatsoever it be But in this case it is manifest that this assent is full of trouble and confusion and whereas faith gives rest and satisfaction to the minde this fills it with anxiety and distraction will any man not strangely carelesse and blockish becontent with such a faith as this I beleeve I know not what And if in some particulars even pure necessitie cause us for the present to bee contented with such a beliefe because of our ignorance must it therefore be brought in as a generall and essentiall property of Faith that t is an assent to things obscure or unknowne But this makes much for the advancement of the Catholike cause and therefore the factors for Rome have reason to stand stiffely in defence of this their doctrine for so when they have dropped in the eares of their disciples this poyson that the faith of a Christian is an assent to things obscure to he knowes not what they have at one stroke nayled their eares to the doores of their Church and made them their slaves for ever and wonne them over to their blinde Canonicall obedience as to beleeve so to doe they know not what The summe of our Adversaries doctrine in this point is briefly expressed by Becanus in his Theolog. Scholasttom 3. cap. 1. Quaest 3. who therein followes his leaders the rest of the Iesuites and Schoolemen To the Question An Revelatio primae veritatis ut sit formale objectum fidei debeat esse obscura he answeres affirmatively that Divine revelations as the objects of Faith must bee obscure and that in a twofold respect 1. Ex partâ— rei revelatae Revelatio enim non debet clard evidenter ostendere rem revelatam A very strange conceit Revelations must not declare things plainely and evidently why so When God revealed his will to the Patriarches Prophets and Apostles did hee not doe it plainely and did not they clearely understand what was meant by the Revelation They did But happly the Iesuites meaning is a little better The revelation must not clarè evidenter ostendere rem that is no revelation hath this force of it selfe Vt rem revelatam exhibeat nobis Praesentem ut clarè intuitivè videamus rem narratâ—â— If this were all the Iesuites meane by this doctrine wee would subscribe unto them and willingly grant that revelation doth not make things Present and offer them to our view for if they were present and seene what need a Revelation In this sense we easily admit the proofes which they bring for Faiths obscurity out of Heb. 11. 1. that faith is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of things which we behold not by the eye of sense or reason and out of 1 Cor 13. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 True the things that wee beleeve are now knowne by us in this life no otherwise than as wee doe know a man whose face we behold in a glasse but doe not behold his person but our knowledge of the same things in the life to come is as when we know a man standing before him and looking him full in the face So the Scriptures are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a glasse wherein we may behold the shape and picture of all things to be beleeved but t is the picture only not the substance and body it selfe Were this all our Adversaries intended the difference betweene us were at an end things beleeued are obscure id est Non-praesentes non-visae we grant it But this doth not fully fit their turne for though the things themselves bee obscure that is not immediatly seene and looked upon yet the narration of them in Scriptures may be perspicuous and plaine to be understood Now they like not this all is quite marr'd if they give way so farre as to grant that the Scriptures are plaine to be understood This may not bee tolerated in their Schooles and Pulpits and therefore t is that in their Sermons and writings upon that subject they so bestirre themselves like a heard of wilde beastes to raise up all the dust they can wherby to darken the light of that bright most Sunne And this is the thing that they aime at in their description of Faith when they tell us that it is an assent to obscure propositions their meaning is villanous to lay a ground for ignorance and implicite beliefe that it suffiseth a religious Christian to salvation that he beleeve in grosse the truth of all which the Scriptures and Church doe deliver though he understand nothing at all distinctly Let him jumble over his Creed in Latine and understand never a letter yet is he a good beleeving Catholike and it sufficeth that the Creed be recited by him in Persona Ecclesiae as Becanus out of Thomas very conceitedly affirmes So in stead of distinct knowledge necessary unto saving faith they breed in their people a dull turbulent and confused assent to something but they know not what which is indeede rather a stubbornnesse and wilfulnesse of resolution than the well advised beliefe of a Christian. Iust so doe Sorcerers and Witches beleeve confidently in the vertue of a number of Verses Spells Characters c. which they cannot tell what to make of and such is the Magicall Faith of those whom the Romish Whore hath bewitched with her inchantments Nor hath this opinion of Obscurity in matter of Faith any ground at all in those two places before alledged For the first in Heb. 11. ver 1. Faith is an argument of things not seene Most true they are not seene because Faith apprehends them and sight destroies Faith But what then are they unknowne too No for Faith is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an evident argument even of these things that are not seene Yea but whence doth Faith fetch this argument not from the things themselves for they are unseene Whence then from the Revelation and Declaration of them in the word which makes them cleer to the apprehension of the beleever Againe in that 1. Cor. 13. 12. Wee now see through a glasse darkely True wee see things but as in a looking glasse therefore wee see them darkely for let a man first view the shape of any thing in a glasse and afterward look on the thing it selfe his first knowledge of it will bee but dark in comparison of the latter Neverthelesse it is not so darke and obscure but that a man may describe what thing it is hee sees if hee behold a mans face in the glasse hee may distinctly tell that such a man hath such a visage
admiration to themselves for being the only oracles of Religion that so they may beare rule over the peoples faith Or else the god of this world hath blinded these Leaders eies and they not willing to goe to hell alone put out also the eyes of the people to the end they may not know more than themselves or all that themselves doe and so their knavery be discovered For us let us detest a doctrine so contrary to the profession of Christianity that takes away all care and study after godly knowledge and makes way for the entrance of Heresies Profanenesse and Irreligion nor rest we in our seach after divine things till wee bee able to say with the Apostle I know whom I have beleeved 2. Tim. 1. 12. and with the true worshippers of God Wee worship that which wee know Ioh. 4. 22. Hitherto of the First Part proposed to bee handled in the Definition of Faith generally taken namely the Obiect of it which are all Reuelations of what kind soeuer made by God vnto the Creature We come vnto the Second point namely the Subiect in which this Quality of Faith is inherent which in the Definition was expressed to be the Reasonable Creature Within which Latitude wee comprise all created vnderstanding whether of men or of Angels Of liuing men there is no Question not of the best of men that euer were Adam in his innocency and Christ. That Adam had Faith it cannot be doubted by any who knowes that the cause of his fall was his not perseuering in a firme beliefe of that threatning In the day that thou eatest thou shalt die When his ascent to the truth of this reuelation once tottered Satan presently closes in vpon him and so plyes him vpon the aduantage that he leaues him not till he had laid the Happinesse and Honour of that glorious creature in the dust For the Humanity of Christ what was in innocent Adam was also in him as is apparant by those Prayers and Supplications which in the dayes of his flesh he offered vp with strong crying and teares vnto him that was able to saue him from death Heb. 5. 7. and that complaint vpon the Crosse in his greatest agony My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee Mat. 27. 46. Those prayers were made in Faith and so Hee was heard in that which hee feared nor was his complaint though very pitiful and fetcht from the lowest depth of Misery without much strength of Faith whilst yet he cals him his God whom for the present hee found his enemy Moreouer though Christ as the Son of man was ignorant of the time of the end of the world yet no question but he did perfectly belieue the Article of the last iudgement Touching Angels wee haue S. Iames testimony of the euill Spirits Iam. 2. 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They belieue that those chaines of darknesse in which they are now imprisoned shall bee euerlasting and that they shall bee made much heauier vpon them by a multiplication of their torments in the iudgement of that great Day as Iude speaketh Iude 6. This they belieue with such horror besides a world of other particulars which by reuelation of Scripture they know will fall out For there is no doubt but the diuels though they tempt men to vnbeliefe yet doe themselues belieue the truth of the Scriptures which they know well enough to bee of God Their rage and malice against them proues it euidently For the blessed Angels we cannot deny vnto them nothing what wee grant vnto the accursed but as their knowledge of many things is more cleare and exact then it is in the Diuels so is their faith vnto others much more firme and resolued Whence though they know not the day and houre of the end of the world Mar. 13. 32. yet they belieue it with ioy expecting the augmentation of their owne happinesse by accesse of the Churches accomplished glory Nor doe the Spirits of iust men who liued by Faith in this life vtterly cease to liue by Faith after their translation into heauen for euen when they are there they yet still belieue many things both past and to come as the resurrection of their bodies euerlasting life c. And that prayer which the Saints in heauen make for auengment of their bloud-shed vpon the Earth How long Lord Holy and true doest thou not iudge and auenge our blood on them that dwell on the Earth Reu. 6. 10. is certainely a prayer made in Faith Wherefore you see that euery part of the world hath faith in it Faith on earth Faith in heauen and Faith in Hell too Whereas there is Created Reason there also there is Faith The reason is this because Perfect Vision only takes away all Faith and where all things that may be knowne are euidently seene and looked vpon being comprehended in their proper nature there is no faith at all But now there is no Created Intellectuall Nature but it may vnderstand more by reuelation then it can comprehend Intuitiuè by beholding the thing it selfe And therefore all Future things which doe nor naturally depend vpon necessary causes cannot be knowne vnto the Angels themselues but onely by reuelation from God Whence the Apostle Peter speaking of the mystery of mans redemption by Christ 1 Peter 1. 11. affirmeth that euen the Angels were greatly desirous to behold that wonderfull mystery 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to stoâ—pe downe and looke into it as wee doe into darke and obscure places For such was the mystery of the Gospell euen secret and hidden from the knowledge of Angels till God by reuealing it vnto the Church made it knowne also vnto them as the Apostle shewes Eph. 3. 10. In like sort for matters of Fact long agoe past euen the Saints in heauen haue no euident knowledge by Uision but onely by reuelation they must still belieue the stories of the Bible know them they cannot by sight vnlesse we should belieue that vaine opinion De Speculo Trinitatiâ— that the Saints beholding the face of God doe as in a glasse behold in Sin all things present to their view which is iustly reiected by the learned as an impossible thing Wee dare not be curious in these things pressing too farre into those matters which wee haue not seene thus much wee may with reason affirme that God alone is without all beliefe whatsoeuer because hee onely is Perfect in knowledge most distinctly comprehending at once all things past present and to come calling the things that are not as if they were in whose sight all things are manifest yea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 4. 13. stripped starke naked and presented to his view in their proper shapes Only such an absolute infinite knowledge takes away all Faith in any kinde whatsoeuer As for the creature it knowes but in part and therefore it mâ—st in part bee alwaies bound to belieue whatsoeuer the creator shall reueale vnto it Thus in the generall you see that
things past will fill the heart with boldnesse confident expectation of the like successe for the time to come And so much touching the three grounds of Certaintie and Strength in the Assent of Faith I come now to the second point proposed touching this Assent or the diuers degrees of it and those essentiall differences whereby sauing faith in Gods Elect is distinguished from that Faith which is in others We haue shewed you that faith may be in all reasonable creatures and the Scriptures testifie that there is some kind of faith in the Diuels and wicked men We must therefore enquire what their faith is and what the faith of Gods Elect is by what essentiall difference they are distinguished You are therefore to obserue that this assent by which generally all Faith was defined is two-fold 1 Generall to all Diuine Reuelations as good and true whilst barely considered in themselues or as they haue no opposition to our desires being applyed to ourselues 2 Particular when assent is giuen to all Diuine Reuelations as most true and good in regard of our selues when they are applyed to all our particular occasions and compared with all contrarie desires and prouocations Herein lies a substantiall difference of this assent of Faith there being a great Diuersitie betweene an Assent vnto the truth goodnesse of things taken in the generall and an Assent vnto the truth goodnes of the samethings particularly applied as you shall see in the progresse of this discourse The former is but an inferiour degree of Faith and only a step vnto that faith which is true and sauing It is commonly called by two names 1 Historicall Faith synecdochically from one part of the obiect of because it beleeues the Letter of the Scriptures whether Histories or doctrines that are expressed therein 2 Temporarie Faith from the Euent issue of it because it perseueres not vnto the end but failes in time of Temptation It is but one and same degree of faith that hath these two names which assenting to things in grosse flies off and disallowes when it coms to particular application Such a general assent there is in the Diuels who know the Scripturs to be of God and acknowledge the things contained in them to be in themselues true good because from God though mean-while they hate both the one other bitterly The truth of God his Word Essence Attributes works vpon their vnderstandings a deep apprehension of its certainty excellency euen when they with vnspeakable hatred and horrour thinke of it According Iames saith They belieue tremble Such a Faith there is in thousands of Hypocrites reprobates who being inlightened and conuinced of the Truth of the Word yeeld a generall assent vnto it for the time as in those Luk. 8. â—3 Who receiue the Word with ioy but they haue no root which for a while beleeue but in time of temptation goâ— away In those Heb. 6. 4 5 Which were inlightened tasted of the heauenly gift and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost And haue tasted of the good Word of God and of the Powers of the world to come are salue away In those Many that beleeued in Christs Name but yet Christ would not trust them because he knew them all that they were not found at heart Ioh. 2. 23 24. In those many againe that at another time beleeued in him but Christ giues them a caueat that they looke their faith be â—ound 〈◊〉 ye continue in my Word ye are verely my Disciples Ioh. 8. 30. 31. Such a faith was in Simon the Witch Act. 8. 13. who beleeued the Apostles preaching and was baptized euen whilst yet he remained in the gall of bitternesse and bond of iniquitie i. a â—ierce enemie to that truth which he seemed to beleeue and professe and fast bound vnto the loue of those sinnes that he seemed willing to forsake verse 23. Such a conception of Faith there was in Falix who trembled when he heard Paul dispute of righteousnesse temperance and the iudgment to come Acts 24. 25. He beleeued and like the Diuels trembled But Faelix was not temporate his wife Drusilla was another mans wife Felix was vnrighteous and couetous and looked for a bribe and this likes him not that Paul should come so close to him wherefore he hath a shift and put him off in complement to a more conuenient season which Faelix will take at leasure The same imperfect faith there was in King Agrippa who hearing Pauls Apologie could haue found in his heart to haue beene a Christian had it beene a thing in fashion with Kings at that time Acts 26. 28. So was the Case with Herod who heard Iohn Baptist gladly and reuerenced him as a Iust man and holy and did many things willingly Marke 6. 20. But if Iohn be so bold with Hâ—rod as to tell him of his Incest He shall to prison for it and for all that he is a Prophet yet he shall dye if Herod did not feare the multitude more then he reuerenced Iohn Matth. 14. 5. And thus it is with many men still who knowe the Scriptures and assent to the truth of such things as they containe but this goes no further then generalities whilst they approoue and allowe of such things as they know to be good and excellent considered abstractiuely and in the Vniuersalitie and as they doe not crosse them in any of their maine desires and delights And so long they seeme to bee as forward in faith and practise as the best The Causes of this Kinde of Faith in men are many as 1. That common grace of the Spirit whereby men are inlightened in the knowledge of heavenly things Which grace God bestowes upon the unregenerate and unsanctied more for others than their owne good Some light shines upon them whereby they may know and assent unto divine truths for a common good of the Church that others may be instructed by their teaching For Christ in the building of his Church doth also use the helpe and ministery of such men according as Salomon did in the building of the materiall Temple who imployed not the naturall Israelites but the reliques of the Cananites and strangers that lived in the land to be bearers of burdens and hewers of stone and overseers of the worke 2 Chron. 2. 17. And these men though unsanctified and such as doe not themselves heartily esteeme and affect that which they know yet in the generall they beleeve it and willingly teach it to the benefit of the Church Againe 2. Authority of men in high account for their knowledge and wisedome The esteeme that the people had of Iohn the Baptist to bee a great Prophet made Herod reverence him the more and the fame that went of Christ drew many to hearken to his doctrine And so t is still with hundreds whose faith in matters of religion standeth or falleth with their admiration or disesteeme of mens persons The same effect
Atheisticall to denie his truth or strangely subtle to shift it off from it selfe when t is pressed with it in particular But when the spirit of Grace hath overshadowed the soule sanctifying all the powers thereof throughout t is admirable to see how it stoopes to the command of the Word There is then a singular harmony betweene the holinesse of the Will and of the Word this food of spirituall life relisheth as sweet and savoury unto the soule as milke to Infants or strong meat to able and healthy men Regeneration hath restored health unto the soule whereby it hath recovered a true taste of the Lords bounty and goodnesse whence followes a constant appetite thereunto asmuch as unto corporall nourishment as the Apostle argues 1 Pet. 2. 1. 2. 3. Hence the soule begins to conceive a high esteeme of the dignity of the Word it sees now nothing so reasonable excellent as the wisedome thereof it beholds nothing â—o terrible as Gods threats nothing so lovely as his favour it sees no ornament of the soule comparable to Grace no pleasure like unto the peace of Conscience it comprehends an end of all other perfection but the further it lookes into Gods law the deeper wonders it discernes it lookes upon the world and reades Vanity in all the things thereof and strange folly in mens desires of them and now it counts no preferment any whit comparable to the hope of heaven it hath now Reall apprehensions of Divine things and conceives of Religion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as of a Worke to be done not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as a businesse to bee discours'd and talked of it judges now that there is an absolute necessity of obeying God though all the world bee displeased and that the regard of saving a mans soule must thrust out of the way all importunate pleasures and profits that would presse in upon us Being thus illightened and inwardly touched by the finger of God the soule presently puts it wholly upon the certainty and excellency of Gods truth revealed it stretcheth forth the armes of her strongest confidence affiance unto every branch of the Scriptures embracing absolutely and without all limitation the truth goodnesse power and wisedome of God shining therein it beleeves what it knowes and as it can where t is ignorant it prayes for knowledge where weake it sues for strength and increase of faith where stubborne it offers it selfe unto God to bee bowed or broken if he please counting it now a happy thing to be crossed in sinne to bee met with at every by-turning with some reproofe or chastisement let him chide or strike it falls downe at his feet and without quarrelling disputing and arguing the case takes all with a Benedictus Dominus c. Blessed be the Lord and blessed bee his Ministers and blessed be their counsell who have kept me from committing this sinne against the Lord. When thus the heart is softened and sanctified then and not before is wrought that habituall Grace and blessed disposition of the will which we call true Faith whereby the Creature is willing to resigne up its understanding desires affections thoughts words workes and all to the disposing of his Creator in such a sort as by his revealed Will hee hath or shall make known beleeving certainly that in every thing t is best to follow his counsell This for cause of true Faith next followes 2. The Object of this particular Faith which is twofold 1. The whole Will of God revealed unto us in his Word containing all Histories Doctrines Commands Threatnings Promises of what kind soever 2. The particular Promise of Remission of sinnes and Everlasting Life by the death of Christ which in one word we call the Gospell It is needfull thus to distinguish of the object of Faith because although it be but one and the same infused grace of true Faith which respects both forasmuch as by the same sacred Habite of the soule we are inclined to beleeve both the whole and each part of Gods will be it in it selfe more or lesse excellent or more or lesse needfull to us neverthelesse Faith as it hath reference to these Objects The whole Will of God and The particular Promise of the Gospell admitteth of divers considerations names and uses Faith as it assents to the whole Will of God in what kind soever I call Legall because it is such a Vertue as is immediately required by the Morall Law in the same manner as other duties of the Morall Law are Forasmuch as all men are bound by the Law of their creation to give full assent and affiance to all things whatsoever God shall reveale unto them And as all other Morall dueties are required of us in their degrees as parts of our outward obedience and inward sanctity necessary to salvation so is this of Faith commanded as 〈◊〉 principall grace of the soule and a prime part of our obedience to the first Commandement And so Faith in this respect may bee called Saving namely as all other Graces are because required in their measure as needfull to Salvation Faith as it assents unto the speciall promise of grace I call Evangelicall because it is such an Act as is expressely commanded in the Gospell the object thereof being not revealed by the Morall Law It is called also properly Saving and Iustifying in regard of the use it now hath through Gods gracious appointment to be the onely instrument of our Iustification and Salvation by Christ. In which distinction between Legal Evangelicall Faith we must not conceive of two distinct Habits of Faith it is but one gracious quality of the soule disposing it to the beliefe of all divine truth which for the substance of it was the same in innocent Adam with that which is in regenerate men The difference stands onely herein 1. In the Degrees Adams Faith was perfect because his understanding was fully inlightened and his affections absolutely conformable to all holinesse Wee know but little and by reason of our inward weaknesse beleeve but weakly what we doe know 2. In the Originall in Adam it was naturall by creation in us t is supernaturall from the holy Ghosts infusion 3. In the particular Object Adam beleeved God without reference to Christ the Mediatour wee beleeve chiefly the promise of Grace in Christ and all other things with some relation to him Here then is no new Faith but a New object of Faith not revealed unto Adam whereto our Faith is now directed and here 's also a singular priviledge newly granted unto Faith that God accepteth it to our Iustification in his sight Otherwise if wee looke unto the grace it selfe as it was in Adam a part of Gods Image given him by creation and is in us a part of the same Image restored by regeneration so there 's no difference at all and therefore in that question whether Iustifying Faith bee commanded in the Morall Law there needs no great dispute t is manifest that