Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	lord_n	say_a	subvert_v	2,262	5	13.5092	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A63214	The tryals and condemnation of Thomas White alias Whitebread, provincial of the Jesuits in England, William Harcourt, pretended rector of ]ondon, John Fenwick,procurator for the Jesuits in England, John Gavan alias Gawen, and Anthony Turner, all Jesuits and priests; for high treason: in conspiring the death of the King, the subversion of the government, and Protestant religion. At the Sessions in the Old-Bailey for London and Middlesex, on Friday and Saturday, being the 13th and 14th of June, 1679. Published by authority.	Whitbread, Thomas, 1618-1679, defendant.; Barrow, William, 1610-1679, defendant.; Caldwell, John, 1628-1679, defendant.; Gawen, John, 1640-1679, defendant.; Turner, Anthony, 1628 or 9-1679, defendant.; Corker, James Maurus, 1636-1715, defendant.	1679 (1679)	Wing T2248; ESTC R219768	109,846	92

by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. your Supream and Natural Lord not having the fear of God in your hearts nor weighing the Duty of your Allegiance but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the Devil the cordial love true due and natural Obedience which true and faithful Subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King towards him should and of right ought to bear wholly withdrawing and devising and with all your strength intending the peace and common tranquility of this Realm to disturb and the true Worship of God within this Kingdom of England used and by the Law established to overthrow and the Government of this Realm to subvert and Sedition and Rebellion within this Kingdom of England to move stir up and procure and the cordial love and true and due obedience which true and faithful subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King towards him should and of right ought to bear utterly to withdraw put out and extinguish and our said Soveraign Lord the King to Death and final Destruction to bring and put on the four and twentieth day of April in the thirtieth year of the Reign of our said Soveraign Lord King Charles the second at the parish of St. Giles in the Fields in the County of Middlesex aforesaid You the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker with diverse other false Traitors subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King to the Jurors unknown falsly subtilly advisedly maliciously and traiterously did purpose compass imagine and intend Sedition and Rebellion within this Kingdom of England to move stir up and procure and a miserable slaughter among the subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King to procure and cause and our said Soveraign Lord the King of his Kingly State Title Power and Government of his said Kingdom of England utterly to deprive depose cast down and disinherit him our said Soveraign Lord the King to death and final destruction to bring and put and the Government of this Kingdom of England the sincere Religion of God within the same rightly by the Laws of the same established at your will pleasure to change alter and the State of this whole Kingdom of England through all its parts well instituted ordained wholly to subvert and destroy and War within this Kingdom of England against our said Soveraign Lord the King to levy And to accomplish and fulfil your said most wicked Treasons and traiterous imaginations purposes You the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker and other false Traitors against our said Soveraign Lord the King to the Jurors unknown the said four and twentieth day of April with Force and Arms c. in the Parish aforesaid and County aforesaid falsly maliciously subtilly advisedly devillishly and traiterously did assemble unite and gather your selves together and then and there falsly maliciously subtilly advisedly devillishly and traiterously did consult consent and agree our said Soveraign Lord the King to Death and final Destruction to bring and put and the Religion of this Kingdom of England rightly and by the Laws of the same established to the Superstition of the Romish Church to change and alter and the Government of this Kingdom of England to subvert and that one Thomas Pickering and one John Grove should kill and murder our said Soveraign Lord the King and that you the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner James Corker and other false Traitors against our said Soveraign Lord the King to the Jurors unknown should therefore say celebrate and perform a certain number of Masses then and there amongst your selves agreed on for the soul of the said Thomas Pickering and for that cause should pay to the said John Grove a certain sum if money then and there amongst your selves agreed on and that you the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker and other false Traitors to the Jurors unknown in further prosecution of the Treasons and traiterous Consultations and Agreements aforesaid afterwards the said four and twentieth day of April at the Parish aforesaid in the County aforesaid falsly subtilly advisedly maliciously devillishly and traiterously did severally each to the other engage your selves and upon the Sacrament traiterously swear and promise to conceal and not to divulge the said most wicked Treasons and traiterous compassings consultations and purposes aforesaid amongst your selves had traiterously to kill and murder our said Soveraign Lord the King and to introduce the Romish Religion within this Kingdom of England and the true reformed Religion within this Realm rightly and by the Laws of the same established to alter and changes and that you the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt alias Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker and other false Traitors to the Jurors unknown in further prosecution of your said Treasons and traiterous intentions and agreements aforesaid afterwards the said four and twentieth day of April at the Parish aforesaid and County aforesaid falsly subtilly advisedly maliciously devillishly and traiterously did prepare perswade excite abet comfort and counsel four other persons to the Jurors unknown subjects of our said Soueraign Lord the King traiterously our said Soveraign Lord the King to kill and murder against the Duty of your Allegiance against the Peace of our Soveraign Lord the King his Crown and Dignity and against the form of the Statute in that Case made and provided How sayst thou Thomas White alias Whitebread art thou guilty of this High Treason whereof thou standest indicted or not guilty Whitebread My Lord I desire to speak one word I am advised by Council and I may and ought to represent it to this Court for not only my own life but the lives of others of his Majesties Subjects are concerned in it That upon the 17 th of December last I was tryed upon the same Indictment the Jury was impannell'd and called I put my self into the hands of the Jury and the Evidence was brought in and examin'd particularly against me and was found insufficient so that the Jury was dismissed without any Verdict I humbly submit my self to your Lordships and this noble Court whether I may not have Counsel in this point of Law to advise me whether I may and ought to plead again the second time for according to Law I am informed no man can be put in jeopardy of his Life the second time for the same cause Lord Ch. Just You say well Mr. Whitebread Whitebread I speak it not for my sake only but the sake of the whole Nation no man should be tried twice for the same cause by the same reason a man

in Oates or Bedlow's power to shew that Commission this is just like that of the Bill of Exchange neither does it in any of the letters Fenwick Here is Mr. Hilsly my Lord. Whiteb. My Lord we pray we may have the favour that they may be sworn Lord Chief Just North. By law they cannot L. C. J. N. In no Capital case against the King can the witnesses for the Prisoner be sworn but I will say this to the Jury That they are not sworn is because they cannot but the Jury is to take great heed of what they say and to be governed by it according to the credibility of the person and of the matter Gavan My Lord if you please to give me leave my Lord Coke in his Institutes sayes expresly That there is no positive Law against it his words are there is not so much as scintilla Juris against it L. C. J. No. We know that the constant usage and practice is so and you cannot produce any man that in any Capital case had his witnesses sworn against the King L. C. J. My Lord Coke says otherwise That the evidence should be so plain that nothing could be answered to it and therefore no evidence should be sworn against the King Gavan My Lord those are the words of my Lord Coo. L. C. J. You argue against the known practice of all Ages L C. J. No. There never was any man in a Capital cause sworn against the King The common Law is the custome of the Kingdom and we are bound to know it and must all be governed by it Whitebread In mr Ireland's Tryal pag 35 36. he says he came over with Sir John Warner Father Williams and mr Hilsley from St. Omers Mr. J. Pem. Nay you must not resort to the printed Tryals for evidence Fenwick If we can prove him perjured at any time I hope we may L. C. J. Suppose upon the taking of those printed Tryals they mistake shall mr Oat therefore be thought guilty of perjury If you have any thing to ask of your Witnesses which you can apply to the evidence given now you may Fenw. Mr. Oates did not you your self own then you came over with mr Hil●sh Dr. Oates Ask me any question about what I have given to day and if the Bench think it rea●●nable 〈…〉 answer it Fen. My Lord he 〈…〉 m that he came over with these persons in which he is for swrrn L. C. J. He is not convicted of perjury and therefore that must not be urged Fen My Lord we will prove by witnesses that were at the Tryal that he did affirm so And I do desire now to know ●f you M●●● whether ever you came over with mr Helsly Dr. Oates That which I said then and that which I say now is because you should not puzzle your selves that one Mr. Hilsly did come over with us when we did Hilsly My Lord I did not L C J How can you tell Hilsly I left him at St Omers L. C. J What say you Mr. Oates Dr. Oates 'T is true mr Hisly did leave me at St. Omers because he went out a Sunday morning and I came out of the munday morning but I overtook him at Calis Hilsly my Lord that is false and I have a great many here that can prove it L. C. J. What Religion are you of Hilsly I am only to serve his Majesty L. C. J. Are you not to serve God too Hilsly I am first to serve God and then his Majesty Mr. J. Pemberton Are you a Catholick L. C. J. Are you a Roman Catholick Hilsly Yes my Lord I am Mr. J. Pemberton Be not ashamed of your Religion do not deny that your Provincial here can give you a dispensation for what you say Hilsly I hope a Roman Catholick may be a lawfull witness L. C. J. Yes I deny it not This is that you say you left him at St. Omers you must call more Witnesses to back him Master Oates sayes 't is true you left him at St. Omers but he overtook you at Calis Dr. Oates This Gentleman lost his money at Calis and Father Williams did relieve him by my means Lord Chief Just What say you to that Hilsly Why my Lord yes it is true I did lose my money there but it is nothing to the purpose for I will affirm I was never in the ship with him in all my life Dr. Oates I desire he may be asked whether he be in the degree of a Priest or not L. C. J. That would be a hard question to put to him to make him accuse himself It would bring him into danger of Treason Mr. J. Pemberton He is a Boy very fit to make a Jesuit of L. C. J. How could he then come to know this Hilsly I confess 't is true that Mr. Oates did never come over with me And I have Witnesses to prove that they saw him there next day at St. Omers and two or three several weeks after Sir Christopher Levins Mr. Oates hath another Circumstance to prove it by Dr. Oates He went away from us by the way and did not come up with us to London Hilsly I know how he understood ●his There was a Gentleman that the Witnesses will prove he was very familiar with the 2d of May that told him L. C. J. Is that Gentleman here Hilsly Here is one here to prove it L. C. J. And did he tell him how you lost your mony Hilsly Yes my Lord I suppose so L. C. J. I speak seriously I do not understand how he could come by these things Parry my Lord I can testifie if it were lawful for us o wear and prove that he was at Saint Omers that day when he says he came over L. C. J. What is your name Parry my name is William Parry L. C. J. What Country-man are you Parry I am a Flintshire man L. C. J. When was he at St. Omers Parry He was there that 25th day that day he says he came over L. C. J. Was he there all day Parry He did not stir thence all the day L. C. J. How can you tell that Parry I din'd with him that day he went into the Infirmary he did not go out of the Colledg he was sick Fenwick Mr. Parry how long did Mr. Oates stay there at St. Omers Parry He staid till after the 20th of June I am sure for on the 20th of June I know he was present by a very good circumstance he was at an Action of ours a Latine Play Dr. Oates My Lord as to the going into the Infirmary at that time I deny it My Lord if your Lordship please I will shew that this Gentleman is not only a Votary of the Jesuits but hath been one of the Sodality several years And they have Dispensations and are bound by an implicite obedience to say what the Jesuits bid them who are their Superiours L. C. J. What say you to the 20th of June the time he says