2. c. 16. f. 24. That a King is created and elected by whom but by his kingdome to this purpose to doe justice unto all That a king cannot doe any thing else in earth seeing be is Gods Minister and Vicar niââid solum quod de jure a Luk. 2. 22. 23. 24. âotest but that onely which he can doe by Law That God the Law and his Court to wit the Earles ând Barons in Parliament are above the King and ought to bridle him and are thence called c Comites viâ quia a Comitatu âive a societate nomen sumpserunt qui etiam dicâ possunt Consules a consulendo Reges enim tales siââ associant ad consulendum regendum populum Dei. ordinaâtes eos in magna potestate honore nomine c. Idem l. â c. 8. f. 5. 6. Coâites because they are the Kings Companions Fleta an Ancient Law-booke written in King Edward âhe third his raigne lib. 3. c. 3. and 17. useth the selfe same words that Bracton doth and concludes âhat the King hath a Superior to wit God and the Law by which be is made a Kiâg and his Court of Earles ând Barons to wit the Parliament d De Laudibus Legum Argliae c. 9. to 15. Fortescue a great Lawyer Chauncellor to King Henry the 6. âroves at large That the King is not above but under the Law that be cannot alter the Law of Ergland âor âay any Taxes at all on his Subiects but by Parliament That all lawfull Kings and Kingdomes were at âârst created and erected onely by the unanimous free assent of the people that the kingdome of England is a Poâcie or Aristocraticall mixt Government not an absolute royall Soveraignety That the e Hanc potestatem â popâlo effluxam ipse habet c. p. 25. King hath his ââyall power DERIVED TO HIM FROM THE PEOPLE whereby it is unlawfull for him to âle his people by any other power which he prosecutes in sundry chapters too tedious to transcribe ând in one word f Chap. 8. vol. â pag. 173. Raphael Holinshed Iohn Vowell and others in their Description of England ârinted Cum Privilegio resolve thus of the Parliaments power This House hath the most high and âbsolute power of the Realme for thereby kings and mighty Princes have from time to time beene âeposed from their thrones and Lawes are enacted and abrogated Offenders of all sorts punished and corâpted Religion either disanulled or reformed It is THE HEAD AND BODY OF ALL THE âEALME and the place where every particular man is intended to be present if not by himselfe yet by âs Advocate and Attorney For this cause any thing that is there enacted is not to be withstood but obeyed ââ all men without contradiction or grudge and to be short all that ever the people of Rome might doe eiââer Centuriatis Comitiis or Tribunitiis the same is and may be done by the Authority of Parliament Now the Romans in their assemblies had power to enact binding Lawes to create and elect ââeir Kings and Emperours and likewise to judge censure and depose them to create and elect all kindes ââ Officers and to * See Bodine l. 2. c 5. l. â c. 10 Eutropius and Grimston in the life of Nero Maximinius Heliogabalits and others Livy Rom. Hist l. 1. ââ change the very forme of their State and Government as I shall hereafter manifest Therefore by these Authors resolution the Parliament hath an absolute power to doe the like when âhey see just cause Sir Thomas Smith one of the Principall Secretaries of State to King Edward the 6. ând Queene Elizabeth and a Doctor of Law in his Common-wealth of England l. 2. c. 1. in the old but ââ in the last Edition hath the same words in effect with Holinshead and addes that the Parliament giâeth forme of Succession to the Crowne c. Our kings royall power being then originally derived to âhem conferred on them by the peoples and kingdomes common consents in Parliament and all their âew additionall Prerogatives too as the premises evidence it cannot be denied but that the whole âingdome and Parliament are really in this sence above him and the most Soveraigne prime power ââom whence all other powers were and are derived See Fortescue c. 9. to 15. Fourthly This is undeniable because the whole kingdome in Parliament may not onely augâent but likewise * abridge allay abolish and resume some branches of the Kings royall power and ââerogative if there be just cause as when it becomes onorous mischievous and dangerous to the Subâects inconvenient to or inconsistent with the kingdomes peoples welfare peace safety Liberty or âhe Lawes this is most apparant by Magna Charta Charta de Forresta Statutum de Prerogativa Regis De Tallâgio non-concedendo 1. E. 3. c. 6 7. 2. E. 3. c. 2. 8. 3. E. 1. c. 35. 9. E. 3. c. 12. 5. E 3. c. â 10. E. 3. c. 2. 3 14. E 3. c. 1. 14. 18. E. 3. c. 8. 25 E. 3. c. 4. Stat. 3. c. 1 2. Stat. 5. c. 8. 11. 36. E. 3 c. 10. â 7. E. 3. c. 18. 42. E. 3. c. 3. 10. R. 2. c. â 11. R. 2. c. 1. to 7. 1. R. 3. c. 2. 4. H. 4. c 13. 21. Jac. c. 2. 3. 24. 7. H. 8 c. 3 âhe Petition of Right 3. Caroli most Statuts against Purveyens Pardons Protections the Acts made this Parliament against Ship-money Knight-hood Forrest-bounds Pressing of Souldiers the Star-Chamber High-Commission the Trienniall Parliament the Continuance of this Parliament whiles they please with g See the Arguments against Ship-money and Impositions and the Declarations against the Commission of Aray sunâry other Acts which restraine abridge repeale and resume divers reall and pretended branches of the âings royall Prerogative because they proved grievous and mischievous to the people and dangeous and pernicious to the kingdome This then answers that irrationall groundlesse position of Doctor Ferne That h Resolving of Conscience Sect 4. 5. the Subjects neither lawfully may nor ought in any case to resume al or any part of that Regall power wherewith they have once invested their Kings by common consent Which as it is contrary âo that received principle of nature and reason Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur That âll Governments created by mens consents may be altered diminished or repealed by their consents ââ i See Ioshua Iudges Samuel Kings Chron. Daniel throughout âsaiah Ieremy Ezickiel in sundry chap. sundry Presidents and Prophesies in Scripture concerning the alterations the Subversions and Dimiâutions of kings and kingdomes to the constant practise of k See Sleidan de 4. or Imperiis Mat. West Livy Iustin Opmerus Purchas Chronicon âhronicorum and all generall Histories all Realmes and States whatsoever from âdam till this instant who have undergone many strange alteratians eclipses diminutions yea Peââods of Government to the Resolution of l Polit. l.
Kings eldest sonne was created Duke of Cornwall by Parliament which then also entailed the Dutchy of Cornwall upon the eldest sonnes of the Kings of England See 21 R. 2. c. 9. * 7. H. 4. c. 2. Hals Chronicle 1. H. 4. f. 10. 15. Fabian parâ 7. p. 376. Speed p. 763. King Henry the fourth the âetâer to assure the inheritance of the Crownes and Realmes of England and France to him and his posterity caused them by a speciall Act of Parliament in the first yeare oâ his raigne to be entailed and setled on himselfe and the heires of his body begotten and Prince Henry hiâ eldest sonne to be established pronounced ordained and decreed heire apparant to him and to succeed hiâ in the said Crownes and Realmes to have them with their appurtenances after the Kings death to him anâ the heires of his body begotten And if he should die without heire of his body begotten then to remaine to thâ Lord Thomas the Kings second sonne with successive remainders to Lord John the third and Lorâ Humfry the Kings fourth sonne and the heires of their bodies begotten After which Act passed for tââ avoyding for all claimes titles and ambiguities to be made unto the Crowne he thought never by any of his Subjects to be molested or troubled the rather because in this Parliament it was first concluded that deposed King Richard should continue in a large prison and âe plenteously served of all things necessâry both for viande and apparell and if any persons should presume to reare warre or congregate a multitude âo deliver him out of prison that then he should be the first that should die âor that sediâious commâtion Which King Richard as * Fabian part 7. p. 373. Sir John Bâgot by his Bill exhibited to this Parliament averred hââ divers times at sundry Parliaments in his time holden said that he would have his intent and pleasurâ concerning his owne matters whatsoever betide of the residue and if any withstood his will or minde bâ would by one meanes or other bring him out of his life And further said to him at Lichfield in the one ââ twentieth yeare of his raigne that he desired no longer for to live then to see his Lords and Commons haââ him in âs great awe and dread as ever they had of any his Progenitors so that it might be chronicled of him that none passed him of honour and dignity with condition that he were deposed and put âârom his said dignity the next morrow after So wilfull was he as to preferre his will before his Crowne or safety n Hall An. 38. 39. H. 6. f. 176. to 183. Fabian Anâo 1441. p. 470. Grafton p. 643. to 648. Holins Stow Howes An. 1440 144â In the yeares 1440. and 1441. Edward Duke of Yorke came into the Parliament House anâ there in a large Oration laid claime and set forth his Title to the Crowne of England which King Heâry the sixth had long enjoyed desiring the Parliament to determine the right of the Title betweene theâ both âides submitting to their resolution as the proper Judges of this weighty royall controversie After lonâ debate and consideration of the case among the Peers Prelates and Commons of the Realme it wââ finally agreed and resolved by them That in as much as Henry the sixth had beene taken as King for 38. yeaââ and more that he shâuld enjoy the name and title of King and âave pâssessiân of the Realme during his nâturall life And if he either died or resigned or FOR FAITED THE SAME for breaking ââ part of this concord then tâe said Crowne and authority royall should immediately descend to the Duke ââ Yorke King Edward the 4. his Father if he then liveâ âr else to the next heire of his line And that the sâ Duke from thenceforth should be Protector and Regent of the Kingdome Provided alway that if the Kiââ did closely or apertly study or goe about to breake or alter this agreement or to compasse or imagine the deââ of the said Duke or his bloud then he TO FORFEIT THE CROWNE and the Duke Tâ TAKE IT These Articles made by the Parliament betweene them they both subscribed sealed â swore to and then caused them to be enacted Loe here we have these two Kings submiting their Titles â the Crowne and Kingdome it selfe to the Resolution of both houses of Parliament as the Soveraigâ Judge betwene them who settled the Crowne in this order under paine of âorfeiting it by Kiââ Henry if he violated their Decree herein and appointing a Lord Protector over the Kingdome in ââ full age as o Historia Angliae p. 458. Parliamentum fuit cânvâcatum in quâ Parliamento ex assensu omnium Statuum idem Dux Defensor seu Protector Angliae fueraâ nominaâus ordinaâus omniaque Regni offâcia beneficia ejus dispositioni sunt commissa Walsingâam informes us a Parliament cânstituted Duke Humsry to be protector of hiâ and hâs Kingdome of England and the Duke of Bedford to âe Regent of France during his minority whâ exercised all regall power by vertue of that authority which the Parliament derived to them Aââ this in these two Kings reignes p See Grafton p. 691. 692. Speed p. 869. 878. 859. 886. 1. E. 4. c. 1. 17. E. 4. c. 7. the Crown and its descent were variously setled by Parliament as I haââ formerly manifested yet so as that which one Parliament setled in this kinde continued firme till it ââ akered or reversed by another Parliament King q Speeds Hist p. 928. 931 Richard the third comming to the Crown by usurpâtion to strengthen his Title procured the Lords and Commons to passe an Act of Parliament where in thâ declare him to be their lawfull King both by election and fuccession entaile the Crowne upon him and the heiââ âf his body lawfully begotten create his Sonne Edward Prince of Wales and declare him heire to succeed him in âhe royall Crowne and dignity after his decease In which Act of Parliament recited at large by Speed there is this memorable passage That the Court of Parliament is of such Authority and the people of this land of such a nature and disposition as experience teachâth that manifestation or declaration of any Truth or Right made by the three Estates of this Realme Assembled ân Parliament and by the Authority of the âame makes before all other things most faith and certainty and âuieting of mens mindes removeth the occasion of all doubts and seditious language r Halls Chro. 1 H. 7. f. 855. Henry the seventh afâerwards slaying this usurping Richard at Boswell-field to avoyd all ambiguities and questions of his Title to the Crowne in his first Parliament procured the Lords and Commons by a speciall Act to setâle the inheritance of âhe Crownes of England and France on him and the heires of his body lawfully begotten perpetually by the grace âf God so to endure and on none
doth the use thereof also teach us It seemeth also agreeable unto reason that the same should be done in the Church that is in the Councell which is done in any Kingdome And so is this sufficiently apparent that the Pope is subject unto the Councell Thus the Bishop of Burgen Ambassadour of Spaine the Abbot of Scotland and Thomas de Corcellis a famous Divine reasoned in this Councell which voted with them Here we have a full resolution of this great Councell which the Papists call a generall one being l Surius Concil tom 4. p. 1. c. And Aeneas Sylvius hist concil Basilliensis approved by the Greeke and Romane Emperours and most Christian Kings and States and ours among others That the Kingdome in Parliament Assembled is above the King as ãâ¦ã Generall Councell is paramount the Pope which they manifest by five reasons First because Kings were first created and instituted by their Kingdomes and people not their Kingdomes and people by them Secondly Because they were ordained onely for their Kingdomes and peoples service and welfare not their kingdomes and people for them Thirdly Because their Kingdomes and people as they at first created so they still limit and confine their royall Jurisdiction by Lawes to which they are and ought to be subject Fourthly Because they oblige them by a solemne Oath to rule according and to be obedient unto the Lawes Fifthly Because they have power to depose them in case they contemne the Lawes and violently rob and spoyle their Subjects This then being the Doctrine of Papists concerning the Power and Superiority of Parliaments Peeres and Kingdomes over their Kings they have least ground of all others to taxe this Parliament or its Advocates as guilty of Treason and usurpation upon the Crowne for a more moderate claime then this amounts to Secondly I answer that Popish Parliaments Peeres and Prelates have heretofore challenged and exercised a greater Jurisdiction over their Kings then this Parliament or any other since the embracing of the Protestant Religion ever claimed and doe in a great measure disclaime For first of all they have challenged and executed a just and legall power as they deemed it to depose their Kings for not governing according to Law for following and protecting evill Counsellours and Officers oppressing their Subjects and making warre against them This is evident not onely by the forementioned passages of the Councell of Basil with infinite presidents in foraine Empires and Kingdomes which I pretermit bââ by sundry domesticke examples of which I shall give you a short touch m Speeds Hist p 207. 266 267. Matth. West An. 445. 454 c. See Holinshed Grafton others Anno Dom. 454. King Vortigern when he had reigned for yeares space for his negligence and evill Government for which Vodine Arch-bishop of London told him he had endangered both his Soule and Crowne was deposed from his Crowne by his Subjects the Britaines generall consent imprisoned and his Son Vortimer chosen and Crowned King in his stead After whose untimely death being poysoned by Roweâa Vortigern was againe restored by them to the Crowne and at last for his notorious sinnes by the just revenging hand of God consumed to ashes by fire kindled by Aurelius and Vâer as heavens ministers to execute its wrath Sigâbert n Speeds Hist p. 229. Matth. West an 756. Holinsh Graft in his life King of the West-Saxons setting aside all Lawes and rules of true piety wallowing in all se ãâ¦ã suall pleasures and using exactions and cruelties upon his Subjects and âlaying the Earle Cumbra his mo ãâ¦ã faithfull Counsellour for admonishing him lovingly of his vicious life the Peeres and Commons thereupon seeing their State and lives in danger and their Laws thus violated assembled all together and provida omniu ãâ¦ã deliberatione rose up in Armes against him deposed and would acknowledge him no longer their Soveraigne whereupon flying into the Woods as his onely safeguard and there wandring in the day like a forloââe person and lodging in dens and caves by night he was slaine by Cumbra his Swin-herd in revenge of his Masters death and Kenwolfe made King in his stead Anno Dom. 756. o Speeds Hist p. 245. 246. Matth. West an 792 See Holinsh Grafâon and others Osred King of Northumberland for his i ãâ¦ã government was expelled by his Subjects and deprived of all Kingly Authority Anno 789. So Ethelred th ãâ¦ã Sonneof Mâllo his next successor being revoked from exile and restored to the Crowne of which he was * Matth. West m. An. 758. p. 275. formerly deprived thereupon murthering divers of his Nobles and Subjects to secure his Crowne so far offended his Subjects thereby that Anno 794 they rose up in armes against him and slew him at Cobâe Thus Anno 758. the people of the kingdome of Mercia rising up against Beornerd their King because be governed the âeople not by just lawes but tyranny assembled all together as well Nobles as ignoble and Offa a most valiant âoung man being their Captaine they expelled him from the Kingdome which done unanimo omnium consensu by the unanimous consent of all as well Clergy as People they crowned Offa King n Matth. West An. 821. Speeds Hist p 255. And Ceolwulfe King of Mercia Anno 820 after one yeares reigne was for his misgovernment expulsed by his people abandoâing his Crowne and country for the saâery of his life Not to mention any more such presidents before the Conquest We finde the o Matth. Paris hist Angl. p. 264 to 280. Speede p. 585 c. Hollinshead Grafton Stow Daniel Walsingham Popish Barons Prelates and Commons disavowing King John whom they had formerly elected King for making warre upon them and âasting burning and spoyling the kingdom like an enemie electing Lewis of France for their King to whom âhey did homage and fealty There are none so ignorant but know that the Popish Prelates Lords and Commons in Parliament p Walsingham Hist Angl. p. 398 c. Fabiun part 7. p. 345. Polychron l. ult c. 9. Hollinshead Grafton Speed p. 758. to 766. An 1327 deposed King Edward the second their naturall King for his misgovernement and following and protecting ill Counsellors inforcing him by way of complement to resigne his Crowne threatning else that they would never endure him nor any of his Children as their Soveraigne but disclayming all homage and fealtie would elect some other for King not of his r blood whom themselves should thinke most fit and able to defend the kingdome After which they elected and crowned his sonne Edward the third for their King That An 1399 q Walsing Hol. Fab. Sp. p. 680. to 697. King Richard the second for sundry misdemeanours objected against him ân 32. Articles in Parliament and breach of his Coronation oath was judicially deposed by a Popish Parliament by ãâ¦ã definitive sentence of deposition given against him which you may read at large in our
presence and of all his Barons and himselfe was one of the Excommunicators That such a one should be maâ their Chiefe Justice who would judge according to Right without respect to poore or rich With other things concerning the kingdome to the common utility peace and honor of the King and kingdome To these their necessaââ Councels and provisions they did frequently and most constantly by way of advice desire the King to condescend swearing and giving their mutuall Faith and hands one to another That they would not defisââ prosecute their purpose neither for losse of money or Lands nor love nor hare no nor yet for life or deaâ of them or theirs till they had cleared England to which they and their forefathers were borne from up starts and aliens and procured laudable Lawes The King hearing this and that they came exquisitely arme that so he and his aliens might be enforced if they would not willingly assent tooke his corporall Oath aâ his Sonne Prince Edward also that he would submit âo their Councels and all those their Ordinances fââ feare of perpetuall imprisonment The Lords having by an Edict threatned death to all that resisted Whiâ done all the Peeres and Prelates tooke their Oath To be faithfull to this their Ordinance and made all whâ would abide in the Kingdome to sweare they would stand to the âryall of their Peeres the Arch-bishopâ and Bishops solemnely accursing all that should rebell against it And Richard King of Romans the Kings younger Brother comming soone after into England to visit the King and his owne Lands the d Matth. Par. p. 952 953. Spe. p. 636. Barons enforce him according to his promise sent them in writing before his arrivall to take this Oath as soone as he laâded in the Chapter-house at Canterbury Heare all men that I Richard Earle of Cornewall sweare upon ââ holy Gospels to be faithfull and forward to reforme with you the kingdome of England hithertâ by the councell of wicâed men so much deformed And I will be an effectuall coadjutoâ to expell the Rebels and troublers of the Realme fââ out of the same This Oath will I observe under paine to for feit all my Lands I have in England To such a high straine as this did these Popish Parliaments Prelates Peeres and Commons scrue up their âârisdictions to preserve themselves and the Kingdome from slavery and desolation whom Matthew Paris ââ continuer for this service stiles e History Angliae p. 95â Angliae Reipublicae Zelatores the Zelors of the English Republicke Neithâ is this their example singular but backed with other presidents In the second and third yeares of King Eâward the second f Walsing âpâdigma Neust An. 1309 1310 Hist Ang. p. 70. to 77. S. p. 608. c. with Holin Stow. Graf How and others Fâx Act. Mon. vâl â Ed. ult p. 480 481. Piers Gaveston his great proud insolent covetous unworthy Favorite miscounselling aâ seducing the young King from whom he had beene banished by his Father and swaying all things aâââ pleasure the Peâres and Nobles of the Realâe seeing themselves contemned and that foraine upstart pââfeâred before them all came to the King and humbly entreated him That he would manage the Affaires of â Kingdome by the Counsels of his Barons by whom he might not onely become more cautious but more safe from incââbent dangers the King Voce âenus consented to them and at their instance summoned a Parliament at Londââ to which he commanded all that ought to be present to repaire Where upon serious debate they earnââly demanded of the King free liberty for the Barons to compose certaine Articles profitable to himselfe to his kingdome and âo the Church of England The King imagining that they would order Piers to be banished a loââ time denyed to grant their demand but at last at the importunate instance of them all he gave his assent aâ swore he would ratifie and observe what ever the Nobles should ordaine The Articles being drawne up and agreed by common consent they propounded them to the King and by their importunity much against his well-liking caused him to ratifie them with his Seale and to take his corporall Oath to observe them Which done the Archbishop of Canterbury with his Suffragans solemnely denounced a sentence of excommunication against all who should contradict these Articles which they caused to be openly read in Pauls Church London in the presence of the Prelates Lords and Commons of the whole Kingdome the King being present Among which Articles they demanded That Magna Charta with other provisions necessary to the Church and Realme should be observed that the King âs his Father had commanded should thrust all Strangers out of his Court and kingdome and remove ill Councellours ââom him That he would thenceforth order all the affaires of the Kingdome by the Counsell of the Clergie and Lords ând begin no warre nor depart any where out of the kingdome without common consent The King notwithstanding âll these things seemed hard and insupportable to him consented to the Articles and banished Piers into âreland No * Note the credit of Princes Regall promises and Protestations sooner was the Parliament dissolved but the King neglecting his Fathers solemne adjurations âogether with his owne Oath never to reduce Piers sends for him backe to his Court marryeth him to the Countesse of Glocester his owne sisters daughter sheweth him more favour then ever Resolving with himselfe âo retaine this Gaveston maugre all his Earles Barons and for the love of him to put his Crowne and life in âerill when time should serve In which whither the King or his favourite shewed lesse discretion it is not ât the first easily determined it being as unsafe for the one with so offensive behaviour to affect immoderate ââew and use of grace as for the other to the injury of his name and Realme to bestow the same But upon âhe Queenes complaint to the King of France her Brother of Piers his insolence and prodigality and on the âarons message to the King by common consent That he should banish Piers from his company and observe the âffect of the foresaid Articles or else they would certainely rise up against him as a perjured person by a like vow which âpeech seemed hard to the King because he knew not how to want Piers but yet discerned that more danger would spring âp if he obeyed not the Lords Petition Piers rather by the Kings permission then good liking did the third ââme abjure the Realme with this proviso that if at any time afterward he were taken in England he should âe forthwith put to death as a perilous enemy to the Kingdome yet he returning in Christmas to the King at Yorke the Lords spirituall and temporall to preserve the Liberties of the Church the Kingdome and remove this âiper elected Thomas Earle of Lancaster for their Generall and sent honourable messengers to the King reâuesting him
which these Acts disable the King who is so farre inferior to the Law that he cannot so much as delay the smallest proceedings of it in any Court or Session by his supreame power by any meanes whatsoever to effect in his meanest Courts much lesse then in the greatest from whence the subvertion of Lawes Libertie Iustice and the whole Realme would ensue If any therefore cavill at the All for the continuance of this Parliament till both houses shall agree to adjourne or dissolve it or at the Bill for Trienniall Parliaments which when they meete shall not be dissolved without their consents for 40. dayes space next after their first meeting Let them now learne that this is no Innovation nor encroachment on the Crowne but an ancient Priviledge of Parliament both claimed practised and resolved in times of Popery in an higher degree then now it is And thus you see how in these particulars the Popish Parliaments Prelates Lords and Commons in former times have claimed and exercised far greater Priviledges and Iurisdictions then this or any other Pâorestant Parliament hath hitherto claimed or practised which I hope will for ever silence the clamourous tongues of all ill Counsellors Courtiers Royalists Malignants Papists and Cavaliers against the present Parliament of whose highest yeâ moderate proceedângs themselves alone have beene the occasions and therefore of all others have least cause to complaine against them But to returne againe to the first grand Objection Thirdly I answer that the High Court of Parliament and whole kingdome which it represents may in divers respects be truely and properly 3. The Parliament and kingdome proved to be above the king sayd to be the Highest Soveraigne power of all others and above the King himselfe which because it may âeeme a dangerous paradox and tends much to the vindication both of the Priviledges Honour and âurisdictions of our High Court of Parliament now so much undervalued because not really knowne to most and to the justification of the proceedings in this present Parliament which many out of ignorance and malice so much declaime against both by Word and writing in a most licentious manner I shall take a little liberty to demonstrate the truth of it by such convincing reasons of Authorities as no rationall man I hope shall be able to contradict but must necessarily submit to First it is undeniable that See Cromptons jurisdiction of Courts Title Parliament Brooke Title Parliament Holinsh Description of England c. 8. p. 173. Chron. of Ireland p. 120 to 130. Sir Th. Smiths CoÌmon-wealth of England l. 2. c. 1. 2. 3. Cowel and Minshew Tit. Parliament Camdens Brit. p. 177. the Court of Parliament hath a lawfull power to question all the Kings Paâents Charters Commissions Proclamations Grants Warrants Writs and Commitments whatsoever whether they be Legall yea to cancell or repeale them in case they be illegall mischeivous or onerous to the Subject not onely without but against the Kings consent and mandate to the contrary as appeares by infinite presidents in this and all former Parliaments the scourges of Monopolists Patentees and Projectors the Pests of the Commonwealth The like power have all other Courts of Iustice within the Kingdome in some degree when such Charters and Writs of the King are brought judicially before them because they are Courts of the Law to which the King and all his Actions are and must be subject Now that which can thus question cancell disanull revoke the Kings owne royall Charters Writs Commissions Patents c. though ratified with the great seale and regall power even against his will must certainely be a Soveraigne power and Authority which in point of Law and Iustice is fuâeriour to the King This is Bractons resolution l. 2. c. 16. f 34 a and Fletaes l. 1. c. 17. Where âhey affirme the Law and Parliament to be above the King because they may censure judge and rescinde the Kings Acts and Charters legally and judicially even against his personall though not legall Will which âs the Law Secondly It is unquestionably true that in all cases of difference betweene the King and all or any of his Subjects though they concerne the Kings Prerogative and the highest branches thereof the Parliament is the supremest and most proper judge and its resolution from which there is no appeale âo any higher tribunall shall finally binde not onely all the subjects but the King himselfe notwithstanding his owne personall disassent This is manifest by the many late resolutions given in Parliament against sundry Patents Commissions Writs Charters Impositions Loanes Shipmoney i See 21. Iacob c. 3. Co. l. 8. f. 125. to 130. l. 10. f. 113. l. 11. f. 84. to 89. Fitz Brooke and Ash Tit. Charters Grant le Roy Comissions Habeas Corpus Bayle and the Iudges arguments against Ship-money Forrest-Bounds Marshall Law Pressing and âilletting souldiers Imprisonment by speciall Command of the King or his Privie Counsell Tonnage and Poundage Knighthood and Taxes The Commission of Array and âhe like which obliege both King and Subject the King in receiving justice in such cases being subject âo the Law as well as the meanest of his subjects as k Rex in justitia reâ pienda minimo de âegno suo comparatur minimus esse debet vel quaâi in judicio suscipiendo Bracton l. 1. c. 8. f. 5. b. l. 3 c 9. f. 107. Bracton truely avers against all Royalists mistakes Now that which can thus finally conclude and binde the King himselfe even volens nolens ân cases of highest concernment entrenching farthest upon his Prerogative Royall must doubtlesse âe the most Soveraigne power Superiour to the Kings And in this sence every Court of Justice whose just resolutions and every petty Jury whose upright verdicts obliege the King because warâanted by the Law which is paramont the King as Bracton m Lib. 1. c. 5. 17. Fleta n Cap. 9. to 15. Fortescus o Speech in Parliament 1609 King Iames p In his âawes in Fox Acts Mon. Edit vol 1. p. 214. Edward the Confâssor yea and q Aristotle resolve may be truely sayd to be above the Kings âerson which they binde but not above the Parliament which by its suparlative power may examine âll Å¿ 1 H. 7. 1. Br. parliament 92. Ash tab 65. 67. judgements and verdicts in other Courts by way of error or appeale and reverse them if there be ââuse when as the King in person cannot by law examine or reverse them but onely in his Courts âf Iustice by his Iudges Thirdly Parliaments oft times doe and may as they see cause enlarge the Kings Prerogative and Royall âower in sundry particulars in which the King had no such jurisdiction before these Acts witnesse the âtatute de Praerogativa Regis 25. H. 8. c. 19. 20 21. 26. H. 8. c. 1. 3. 31. H. 8. c. 8. 9. 34. 35. H. â c. 23. 27 H. 8. c. 15. 28. H. 8. c.
7. 17. 3. 4. E. 6. c. 11. 12. 1. Eliz. 1. 2. with sundry more Now â Lib. 1. c. 8. l. 3. c. 9. f. 107. r polit l. 3. c. 1â 11. 12. that Parlimentary power which onely can create and conferre on Kings a greater regall Authority and Prerogative then they had before must needs be the Originall and supreame authoritie for as we rightly argue m See 1 Eliz. c. 1. Rastal T it Sewers or Commissioners Rastall Tit. Iustices c. that the Kings Authority is superiour to all other his greatest Officers and subordinate Ministers of Iustice because their power is by Patent or Commission derived from his So we may from the selfe-same reason conclude that the High Court of Parliaments power the representative body of the whole kingdome is the most primitive soveraigne and greatest authoritie of all other yea larger and higher than the kings n Quiâquid âfficit tale est magis tale nemo potest dare quod non habet are true in this case because it onely can enlarge the Kings prerogative whose originall or additionall Royalties proceede not from the king himselfe or his Ancestors owne inherent hereditary power for what king could justly without his peoples consents usurpe a Crowne or lawfull royall Prerogative to himselfe over an whole Countrey but meerely from the voluntary consent and grant of his people in the Parliament This is irrefragably evident not onely by the various o See Alex. ab Alexandro â 3. c. 2. Facile perspici potest regni multa esse genera nec eandemimperii formam in omnibus esse regibus Regalis potentiae genâra numero sunt quatuoâ Aristot Polit. l. 3. c. 10. 11. See Dan. c. 8. 11. kinds of kings whereof some are of greater power and authority others of lesse some by Election others by succession by reason of their Subjects originall institution by the diverse alterations of the Monarchy in this kingdome which hath beene sometimes divided into 7. sometimes into 5. sometimes into 3. or two kingdomes and at last reduced unto one by the great changes and alterations made in all forraigne Realmes which have sometimes multiplied sometimes diminished the number and power of their Princes and sometimes quite abolished the royall forme of Government changing it into an Aristocraticall or popular rule by the divine Authority of S. Peter who in this regard calls Kings and their Supremacy a r 1 Pet. 2. 13 14. Alex ab Alexandro Gen. Dierâm l. 3 c. 3. l. 4. c. 23. humane creature or Ordinance of man because instituted limited and moulded into severall degrees of power by men over whom they râigneâ by two expresse determinations of Aristotle in these termes s Politicorum l. 3. c 10. p. 209 2â0 Regna patriis moribus legibus FVNDATA CONFIRMATASVNT And t Ibid l. 5 c â3 p. 367. Verum Regnum est imperium majoribus praestantioribus viris VOLVNTAT â CIVIVM DELATVM seconded by v De Officiis l. 2. Caeliââ Rhodi Antiq. Lect l 8. c. 1 Alexander ab Alexandro Gen. Dierum l. 4. â 23. Livie Hist Rom. l. 1. Sect. 17. p. 14. 15. l. 4 p. 144. 145. Plââarchi Numââompilius Tully Livie and others but likewise by Andrew Horne an eminent Lawyer in Edward the 1. his raigne in his Myrroâr of Justices Chap. 1. Sect. 2. p. 7. 8. 9. where he thus writes of the originall institution of our English Monarches After that God had abated the Nobility of the Britans who rather used force then right he delivered it to the most humble and simple of all the neighbour Nations the Saxons who came from Germany to conquer it of which Nation there have beene 40. Kings all which held themselves to have COMPANIONS These Princes called this Land England which before was named Greater Britain These after great warres elected from among them a King to Raigne over them to governe the people of God and to maintaine and defend their persons and goods in peace by the Rules of Law or Right And at the beginning they caused the King to sweare that he will maintaine the holy Christian faith to the utmost of his power and guide his people by p See Mathew Paris Speed Holinshed Grafton and others Law without respect to any person and shall be obedient to suffer or undergoe Law as well as others of his people And afterwards this Realme was turned to an heritage according to the number of his Companions who divided the Realme into 38. Counties and delivered each one a County to keepe and defend from Enemies according to every ones estate And although the King ought to have no Pââres in the Land yet because if the King of his owne wrong should offend against any of his people neither he nor any his Commissaries can be both Iudge and Party OF RIGHT IT BEHOVES that the King should have q Livie Hist Rom. l. 1. Arist Polit. l. 2. c. 8. Goodwins Rom. Aâtiq COMPANIONS for to heare and determine in Parliaments all the Writs and Plaints of the wrongs of the King the Queene and their children and of those especially of whose wrongs they could noâ otherwise have common right These Companions are now called Counts after the Latine Comites and so at this day these Countries are called Counties and in Latine Comitatus c. Henry de Bracton who writ in Henry the 3. his raigne as in his forecited Passages so in others resolves x Lib. 1. c 8. f. 5. lib. 3. c 9 f 07. That the King is under the Law because the Law makes him a King by giving him dominion and power Now how doth the Law thus make him a kâng but by the Parliament the kingdomes great Counsel by whose counsell and consent alone all Lawes were first enacted and yet are as the y Hujusmodi leges Anglicanae cum âuerâm approbatae Sacramento Regis confirmatae mutari non poterunt c. Idem l. â c. 2 f. 1. 6. same Author informes us who further addes That the King ought to be under the Law because Christ whose Vicar he is on Earth when he came to redeeme mankinde made choyse of this way especially to destroy the workes of the Devill using not the strength of his power but the reason of his iustice and so would be z Gal. 4. 4. â under the Law that he might redeeme those that are under the Law Thus the Virgin Mary the mother of our Lord who by singular priviledge was above the Law yet to shew an example of humilitie refused not to be a subiect to Legall Ceremonies So therefore the King lest his power should remaine unbridled there ought not to be a greater then he in the Kingdome in the exhibition of Iustices yet he OVGHT TO BE THE LEAST or AS THE LEAST IN RECEIVING IVDGMENT if he require it b âract âââ 3. c. 9. f. 107. lib. 1. c. 8. f. 5. l.
2 3 4 5. Plato de Republica Bodius Common wealth The Repub of âundry Nations Aristotle and al other Polititions who hold all formes of Government changeable and revocable without any injustice if necessâry or convenient So likewise âo the very end for which kings haveregall power as well as other Governours and Governments were ordained to wit their kingdomes peoples m Rom. 14. 1 to 6. 1 Pet. 2. 13. 14. 2 Sam. 5. 12. Aristotle Pol. l. 3. 4. 5. Caelius Rhodig l 8. c. 1. Bracton l. 3. c. 9. f. 107. welfare safety peace protection c. Salus pâpuli being not onely that Suprema Lex but principall end for which all royall power was instituteâ by God and man and to which they must submit in case it become in compatible or cannot consist together without dammage or danger to the publike safety what therefore that learned Father Augustine Bishop of Hippo long since resolved touching the now much contested for Lordly State of Episcopacie which he and neere 300. African Bishops more were then ready to lay downe for the Churches peace I may fitly apply to the now over much contended for supposed royall Prerogatives of kings to effect Peace in the State in these times of uncivill military that I say not bloody dissentions raised about them betweene king and Parliament An vero c. n Augustinus de Geftis cune Emerita Donatist Epis Tom. 7. pars 1. p. 782. 783. What verily did ouâ Redeemer descend from heaven into humane members that we might he his members and shall we leât his very members be rent in pieces with cruell division feare to descend out of our thrones we are ordained BP â foâ Christian peoples âake what therfore may profit them for Christian peace that let us do with our Bishoprickes Quod autem sum propter te sim si tibi prodest non sim si tibi obest What I-am I may be for thee if it profit thee I may not be if it be hurtfull to thee If we be profitable servants why do we envie theâ eternall gaines of our Lord for our tempot all sublimities or Prerogatives Our Episcopall dignity will o See all Acts of Repeale and others which alter the common Law See Smiths Common-wealth l. 2. c. 2. 3. be more fruitfull to us if it shall more unite the flock of Christ then disperse it if retained If when I will retain my Bishoprick I disperse the âlock of Christ how is the dammage of the flock the honour oâ the sheapheard c. Old statute Lawes yea and the common Law of England may be and oft are repealed and altered by Parliaments though above the king and his Prerogative when they become mischieuous ââ inconvenient therefore any branches of the kings Prerogative inferiour to these Lawes when they prove grievous or dangerous to the subjects It is the kings own professed Maxime in full Parliamen p At the end of the Petition of Right 3. Caroli Printed and inrolled by his speciall command in all his Courts That the Kings Prerogative is but to defend the Peoples Liberties when therefore it either invades or subverâ them it may justly it must necessarily be restrained diminished or resumed by the Parliament from whose assent or grant it first proceeded The Emperour q See Eutropius Sabellicus Grimston Speed others of his life Otho the first and our king Richard the second as r Speeds History p. 757. some imagine voluntary resigned relinquished their Crownes to their immortall honour to prevent the effusion of their Subiects blood by civill warres and settle peace within theiâ Realmes and shall not other kings then most joyfully part with some Punctilioes of their reall oâ branches of their supposed Prerogatives for the selfesame ends if their Parliaments see good cause to resume them and of right may doe it Fifthly The king though he be the chiefe and principall yet he is onely one member of the Parliament and kingdome the least because but one person though the highest branch the Lords and Commons not elected by but assigned Counsellors to the king by the kingdome and people being the greatest and most considerable part as representing the intire body of the kingdome Now common reason Law and experience manifests t See Br. Tit. Corporations that the whole or greatest part in all politique or naturall Bodies is of greater power Jurisdiction then any one particular member Thus in all our t Corporations the Court of Aldermen and Common Councell is of greater power then the Major though the chiefe Officer the Chapter of greater authority then the Deane the Deane and Chapter then the s Keckerman Systema Logic. l. 1. c. 22. BPP the whole Bench then the Lord chiefe Justice the whole Counsell then the President the whole Parliament then either of the Houses and by like reason then the king especially since one of the three Estates is lesser then the three Estates together who in Parliament by the fundamentall Constitions of the Realme are not v See the fuller answer to Dr. Ferne. p. 2. 3. Subordinate but Coordinate parts of the same great Common-Councell of the kingdome It is Aristotles expresse determination x Quod eorum qui rempublicam gerunt majori parti placueâit id est ratum ac ââmum Arist Polit. l. 4. c. 8. l. 3. that in an Oligarchie Aristocrasie and Democrasie whatsoever seemes good to the Major part of the Governours of the Common-wealth that is ratified and that it is unfit the part should be above the whole And in all Courts of Iustice Corporations and Elections y Br. Corporations 34. 8. H. 6. c. 7. the major part have alwayes had the greatest sway and constantly over-ruled the lesse though it be but by one casting voyce as is evident to all in the Elections of Knights and Burgesses of and votes in the Parliament in which the z 14. H. 8. f. 3. b. King Lords and Commons by the Common Law make up but one intire Corporation since then even in Parliament it selfe the Major part over swayes the rest yea the king himselfe who hath no absolute negative voyce but onely in refusing to passe some kinde of Bills not all of which more hereafter doubtlesse the whole or Major part of the Parliament which in Law is the whole is above the king the chiefe member of it Which consideration together with the Statutes of 5. R. 2. Stat. 2. c 4. 6. H. 8. c. 16. Enacting That none elected to be in any Parliament shall depart or absent himself from the same Parliament till it be fully ended or proroged without speciall license of the Speaker of the Commons to be entred of record in the jornall Booke under paine of amercement losse of wages and other punishment nor * See the manner of holding Parliaments in England newly Printed London 1641 and Dyer f. 60. 2. any member of the upper House without that
1. c. 2. 19. H. 6. 63 a. 64. b. 31. H. 8. c. 10. Dyer 60 a. Cookes Institutes on Littleton f. 109. 110. Writers resolve is the most high and abâolute power the supreamest and most ancient Court of the Realme of England and hath the power of the whole Realme both Head and Body and amorg other Priviledges this is the highest that it is above the Law ât selfe having power upon just grounds to alter the very common Law of England to abrogate and repeale old Lawes to enact new Lawes of all sorts to impose taxes upon the people yea it hath power to declare the meaning of any doubtfull Lawes and to repeale all Patents Charters Grants and âudgements whatsoever of the King or any other Courts of Iustice if they be erronious or illegall not onely without but against the Kings personall consent so far as finally to obliege both King and Subjects Now it is cleare on the contrary side that the King hath not the power of the whole Realm âested in his person that he t Fortescue c. 10. to 1â Bracton l. 1. c. 8. l 3. c 9. Fleta l 1 c. 5. 17. Brooke Patents 25. 41. 12. 51. 53. 69 73. 100 Prerogative 15. 103. Commissions 15. 16. See Iudge Crooks and Iudge Huttons Arguments against Ship-money Petition of Right 3. Carol. Br. Parliament 42. and his Prerogative are not above but subordinate to the Lawes of the Realme that he cannot by his absolute regall power altar the Common Law of the Realme in any particular point whatsoever that he cannot repeale any old nor enact any new Law whatsoever norimpose the least taxe or common charge upon his people nor imprison their persons distraine s Sir Thomaâ Smith of the Common-wealth of England l. â c. 1. 2. Holinshed Description of England c. 8. p. 173. Cambdens Brittania p. 173. Iohn Vowels Order and usage how to keepe a Parliament in Holinsheads Chronicles of Ireland p. 101. to 120. Minshewes Dictionary Tit. Parliament their goods declare any Law or reverse any judgement in the meanest of his Courts without or against his peoples joynt consents in Parliament For Potestas sua Juris est non Injuriae Nihil âliud potest Rexin terris niâi ID SOLVM QVOD DE JVRE POTEST Bracton l. 3. c. 9. f. 107. Therefore without any peradventure the Parliament in this regard is the most Soveraigne Authority and greater in jurisdiction than the King v Of the Common-wealth l. 2. c. 10. p. 159. Iohn Bodin that great Lawyer and Polititian resolves That the chiefe marke of an absolute and Soveraigne Prince is to give Lawes âo all his Subjects in generall and to every of them in particular without consent of any other greater equall or lesse than himselfe For if a Prince be bound not to make any Lawes without the consent of a greater than himselfe he is then a very Subject if not without his equall he then hath a Companion as x l. 2. c. 16. f. 34. a. l. 1. c. 8. f. 5. b. Fleta l. 1. c. 17. Walfingham Hist p. 36 37. 40. Bracton and others forecited say our English King hath namely his Earles and Lords thence-stiled Comites if not without the consent of his inferiours whether it be of his Subjects or of the Senate or of the people he is then no Soveraigne Whence it followes that the Kings of England who cannot make any Law to obliege either all or any of their Subjects nor impose any * Taxes nor repeale any Common or Statute Law but in and by their Parliaments are no absolute Soveraigne Princes as some Royalists and Court Divines most falsly averre them to be but meere mixt Soveraignes inferiour to their Lawes and Parliaments the âole Law-makers and Law-alterers though not against but with the Kings assents considered not abstractively as Kings but copulative as a branch and member of the Parliament And indeede to speake impartially though the kings Royall assent y See Sir Thomas Smiths Common wealth of England l. z. c. 1. 2. 3. Holinshed Description of England c. 8. p. 173. Chronicles of Ireland p. 101. 102. M. Hackwels manner of passing B ãâ¦ã Sect. 8. p. 74. Brooke Parliament 4. 107. 33. H. 6. 33. 33 H. 8. c. 21. Cromptons Iurisdiction f. 7. b. Br. Parliament 26. 39. 40 41. be generally requisite to passe and ratifie Lawes yet I humbly conceive that the originall prime Legislative power of making Lawes to binde the Subjects and their Posteritie rests not in the kings owne royall person but in the Kingdome and Parliament which represents it For first admit the king should propound any Lawes to his people as kings and Lawgivers usually did at first yet these Lawes would no wayes obliege them unlesse they voluntarily consented and submitted to them in Parliament and the sole reason why our Acts of Parliament binde the Subjects in former times and at this day is not because the king willed them z 4. H. 7. 18. 7. H. 7 14. 11. H. 7. 27. 33. H 6. 17. Bro. Parliament 4. 40. 76. 107. Cromptons Iurisdiction f. 8. but because the people gave their a Bro. Ancient Demesne 2â 10. H. 7. 20. a. 33. H. 8. c. 17. generall consents unto them in Parliament as Sir Thomas Smith in his Common-wealth of England Holinshed the Prologues to most Ancient Statutes the King by the advise and assent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and Commons and at the speciall request of the Commons in Parliament assembled and by THE * See 2. 7. 8. 12. 14. 17. 4. H. 7. AUTHORITY OF THE SAME PARLIAMENT doth grant and ordaine c and all our Law-bookes resolve and that upon this received Maxi ne of Law Quod tangit omnes ab omnibus debet approbari The king doth but like the Minister in Marriage declare it to be a Law but t is the parties consents which makes the marriage and the people onely that makes it â Law to binde them whence those in a Cook 7. ââluins case 7. H. 6. 35. b. Dyer 373. Br. Parliament 98. Scotland Ireland Man Garnsey âââ Jerââe are not bound by our English Statutes nor we by theirs nor tenants in Ancient demesne because they consented not to them Therefore the chiefe Legislative power is in the people and both Houses oâ Parliament not in the king as it was in the Roman State Where the b Livy Hist â 1. 2. Bodin Common-wealth â 1 c. 10. people had the Soâeraigne Iurisdiction of making and confirming Lawes to binde them not their Kings Emperours oâ Senate as I shall hereafter manifest Secondly this appeares by the case of c Fiz Assise 413. Avowry 74. Praescriââion 67. Broo Custome 31. Co. 5. Rep. f. 63. 64. 67. 68 Kitâchin 45. 73 â0 Customes and By-Lawes in Corporations and Manoââs which binde all the Corporation and Tenants if they be reasonable without the Kings or Lords consents by reason of
their mutuall assents alone and as these private By-âawes obligâ all those who consent to them by reason of their owne free assents onely so doe all publike Acts of Parliaments obliâge all Subjects onely because of their generall assents to them in their Knights Citizenâ and Burgesses elected by and d See â âac c. 1. representing their persons Thirdly all e 33. H. 6. 17. Br. Parli 4. M. Hackwell of Pasââng Bills Cromp. Iuris â 8. Chron. of Ireland f. 127. âââ 30. Acts of Parliament are usually made framed altered thrice read engrossed voted and fully agreed upon in both Houses without the Kings personall knowledge or privity for the most part before they come to have his royall assent And when they are thus agreed on by both Houses the king cannot alter any one word or letter in them as the Houses may doe but must either absolutely assent to or consider further of them as the Houses tender them And if the king send any Bill he desires to have passe it must be thrice read and assented to in both houses which have power to reject aâter enlarge or limit it as they thinke meete else it can be no Act at all Aâ cleare demonstration that the chiefe power of enacting and making Lawes is onely in the people Commons and Peeres not the king who by his Writ doth purposely sommon them to meete anâ enact Lawes as the chiefe Legislators witnesse this notable clause in the y Cromp. Iuris of Courts f. 1. 2. and at the end of the Manner of âolding Parliaments in England Writ for the Election of Knights Burgesses Ita quod iidem Milites plenam safficientem âoteââatem pro S E COMMVNITATE Comitatus praedicti dicti Cives Burgenses prâ se COMMVNITATâ Civitatum Burgorum praedictorum divisim ab iâsis babeant AD FACIENDVM Eâ CONSENTIENDVM HIS quae ââne ibidem DE COMMVNI CONSILIO DICTI REGNâ not Regis nostri contigerint ORDINARI super negotââs antedictis Ita quod PRO DEFECTâ POTEST ATâS HVâVSMODI c. dicta negotia INFECTA NON REMANEANT quovâ modo answerable to which is that clause in * Pope Elutherius his Epistle to our first Christian king Lucius about An. 185. Exillis Deigratia PER CONSILIVM REGNI VESTRI SVME LEGEMâ per illam Dâi potentia vestrum reges Britaniae regnum Fourthly all publicke Acts are the whole Kingdomes Lawes made principally and solely foâ the subjects benefit if good their prejudice if ill therefore the whole kingdome represented iâ and by both Houses not the king knowing much better what is good or bad for themselves theâ the king alone it is z See ââtv before just and reasonable that they and not the king should be the principalâ Law-makers to binde or buâthen themselves with any new Lawes penalties or restraints Fifthly it is cleare that all Acts which give any Subsidie Tax Penalties or forfaitures to the king are made onely by the people in Parliament and not principally by the king since the king cannoâ be sayd in any propriety to give any thing to himselfe This is undeniable by the forme of penning all subsidie Bills granted by the Commons or Clergie Your Commons assembled in your Higâ Court of Parliament c. humbly present your Majestie with the free and cheerefull gift of two intire sâbsidies which we humbly beseech your Majestâe graciously to accept c. Your Majesties faithfull subjects the Prelats and Clergie c. with one agreement and uniforme consent have given and granted and by these presents doe give and grant to your Highnesse c. foure intire Subsidies in manner and forme as followeth And by the kings assent to these Bills a Hackwâls passing of Biâs sect 8 p. 78 Le Roy remercy ses Loaulz subjects accept LOVR BENEVOLENCE c. the Commons having the sole power to grant or deny b See Rostal Taxes and Tenthes The Acts of Subsiâies 21. Iac ââis present Parliament Speed p. 745. Subsidies and Taâes when they see cause and to limit the proportion of them the manner and time of paying them and to order how and by whom they shall be received and imployed aâ all Acts of this Nature âanifest If then they be the chiefe Law-makers in these Acts which layâ any imposition âpon the Subjects goods or restraint on his person then by like âeason in all other penall publik Lawes Sixâly All Acts of Paâliaments made in the raignes of âsurpers who have no Title to the ârown nor right to assent to Lawes are c See 1. E. 4. c 6. 4. E. 4. 10 9. E 4. 1. 2. âr Charters dââardon 22. 13. Eliâ c. â firme and good in Law and shall binde the right heires to the Crowne as iâ evident by the Lawes made by king John Henry the 4. 5. 6. reputed usurpeâs by Edward the 4. and Richard the third acknowledged an usurper whose Lawes are yet in force The reason is as is cleare by 1. E. 4. c 6. because the Lawes and all other Iudiciall Acts in Courtâ of Iustice are the Acts of the Parliament and Courts themselves which are lawfull not of the king who is unlawfull Therefore certainely the Legislative power is more in the Parliament thenin the king if not wholly in it there being Lawes and Kingdomes before kings were Seventhly admit the king should dye without heire no doubt the kingdome and Parliament have a just right either to alter the government or dispose of the Crowne to what familie they please as âhe constant practise of all kingdomes in such cases manifests and d The trâe difference c. part 3. p 416. Bishop Bilson himselfe assureth us that all Nations once members of the Roman Empire when the right heires failed were suffered to elect their Governours where they pleased as the Romans themselves might doe and no doubt they might make binding publike Lawes during the Inter-regâum yea if the king be an infant as Henry the 3. Henry the 6. Edward 3. 5. and Richard 2. with other ouâ kings were when the Crowne âescended to them or non Compos Mentis or taken with a dead palsie or Apoplexie or an Ideot by âirth or Age or a Monkeprofessed as e Fox Actâ Monument vol. 1. p. 173. Speeds Hist p. 244. some kings have beene or absent in a Pilgrimage to Rome or ââ voyage to the Holy Land or other remote forraigne Parts by reason of warres as f See Nubrigenfis Speed Holinshead Mat. Westmâ and others in the lives of R. 1. H. 1. 2. 3â 4. 5. 6. 8. Ed. 1. 2. 3. 4. divers of our Kings heretofore have beene and so unable personally to consent to lawes no doubt in all such âases the right of creating a Protector to executâ regall power sommon Parliaments assent to Lawes is ânely in the g Walsingh Hist Angl. A. 1422. p. 458. Speed p. 1108. Grafton p. 496. 447. 648. Fabian p.
470. Hall f. 176. to 183. Hovâden Annal. pars posterior p. 702. 703. 705. 706. Parliament which may in these cases make any publike Acts without the kings personall âresence or assent and the assent of the Regent or Protector usually created by them shall as firmely âinde the king as if he had personally consented as is evident by all the Acts of Parliament passed âuring the Minority of h Acts and Monuments Old Edition p. 705. See Holinshead Speed Grafton in their lives Henry the 3. who was but 9. yeares old Edward the 3. who was but 1â Richard the 2. who was but 11. yeares old Henry the 6. who was not 9. moneths old Edward the 5. âut 12. yeares Henry the 8. not 18. yeares Edward the 6. but 9. yeares of age when they began theiââaignes and so uncapable of giving any personall consent to Lawes by themselves of which they could not Iudge but by their Protectors and by all Acts made in the absence of King i See Hoveden Annal pars posterior â 702. 703. 705. 706. Richard the â Edward the 1. 2. 3. 4. Henry the 3. 2 3 4 5 6 and others out of the Realme all good as apâeares by 28. H. 8. c. 17. which altered and 33. H. 8 c. 22. which declareth the Law in these particuâars A cleare demonstration that the Parliament is the most absolute Supreame power and Law-âiver not the king Eightly the king hath little or no hand in making but onely in assenting to Lawes when they are made by the Houses as the usuall forme of passing Acts Le Roy âe veult The King wills or âssents âo it not before but after they have passed both Houses imports which assent of his if the Bills âe publike and necessary for the Common good is not meerely arbitrary at the kings will but the king by oath and duty is bound to give it and the Lords and Commons may in justice demand it of meere right as I shall shew anon His Royall assent then though it be the last act which compleats Acts and makes them Lawes yet since it is but an assent to a Law formerly made by both Houses which he cannot alter in any point yea an assent which the king in honour Law justice duty by âertue of his âoronation Oath is bound to give as appeares by the Prefaces of most statutes the staâute of Provisours 25. E. 3. Parl. 6. 20. E. 3. and other Acts is so farre from proving the king the Supreme power and Lawgiver that it manifests the contrary that this power principally resides in âoth the Houses not the king Ninthly this is apparant by those Coronation Oathes which Parliaments and the kingdome in * See Edward âhe âonfessors Lawes c. 17. in Laâbard and Fox king Edwards dayes even before the Coâquest have anciently prescribed to our kings before they would accept of them for their Soveraignes of which I shall give you a short account a Math. Westm An. 1088. Eadmerâs Hist l. 1. p. 13. 14. Maââaris Hist p. 12. 13. Speed Hist p. 456. Graften p. 21. 22. Malmesâury l. 4. p. 119. 120. After the death âf William the Conquerour William Rufus his younger sonne in the absence of Robert the elder broâher hastens into England to obtaine the Crowne and finding the greatest part of the Nobles against him he gave his solemne Oath and faith to Lanfranâe Archbishop of Canterbâry his Tutor that âf they would make choise of him for their king he would abrogate the over-hard Lawes of his father and âromise to observe justice equitie and mercy throughout the kingdome in every businesse and defend the âeace and Liberty of the Church against all men and ease them of all hard taxes Upon which conditions âolentibus omnibus Provincialium animis by the voluntary consent and voyces of all he was chosen k Sir Thomas Smiths Common wealth of England l. 2. c. 2. 3. Cromptons Iurisdiction f. 7. â Iohn Voâel Chronicles of Ireland f. 122. to 130. M. Hackwels Manner of passing Bils Sect. 8. and crowned king Which promise and Oath he soone after breaking saying Who is it that can ââââill all his promises Many of the Nobles levyed warre against him adopting Robert his elder Brother king b Mat. Paââs p. 52. 53. â4 Eadmerus Hist l. 2 p. 55. Wil. Masmes â 5. p. 1â6 H. âuntin l. 7. p. 378. Roger Hoveden Annal pââs 1. p. 4â8 Polych ââ c. 11. Fâbian part 7. c. 226. p. 318 Graft p. 32. Speed p. 466. 467. William Rufus dying Henry the 1. his younger brother in the life of Robert the right heire assembling all the Glergie and people together to London to procure their favour and love to chuse him for their king and Patron he promised the reformation of those Lawes by which England had beene oppressed in the raignes of his Father and Brother To which the Clergie and Nobles answered that if he would with a willing minde reforme those rigorous Lawes remit the Taxes imposed upon the Subjects and by his Charter confirme those ancient Lawes and customes which flourished in the kingdome in the time of Holy king Edward they would unanimously consent to him and consecrate him for their king Which he willingly assenting to and affirming with an oath that he would performe he was by the assent both of Clergie and people consecrated king at Westminster promising by oath to confirme king Edwards Lawes and renounce all oppression in pursuance whereof as soone as he was created he by his Chartar confirmed and reformed divers Lawes for the ease and benefit of his Subjects recorded at large by Matthew Paris Speed and otheâs The beginning of this Charter is observable Henry by the Grace of God of England c. Know ye that by the mercy of God and COMMON COVNSEL of the Barons of the kingdome of England I am crowneâ king And because the kingdome was oppressed with unjust exactions â out of respect to God and the love I beare towards you all make the Church of God free c. and all the evill customeâ wherewith the kingdome of England was unjustly oppressed I take from thence which evill customes I here in part set downe And in the end of his Charter he confirmed and restored to them king Eâwards Lawes with those amendments of them which his father made by the consent of hiâ Barons After which those Lawes of his were published through all England and Ranulph Bishop of Durham banished the Court and committed to the Tower for his oppression bribery and otheâ crimes Henry deceasing c Mat. Par Hist p. 73. Malâes Novellae Hist l. 1. p. 178. 179. 180 Henry Hunti l. 8 p. 386 387. Hoveden p. 481 482. Mat. West Aâ. ââ 36 p 35. Speed p. 483. 484. Graf p â1 42 Maude the Empresse his right heire to whom the Prelates and Nobleâ had sworne fealty in her fathers life time was put by the Crowne by the Prelates and Barrons whâ thought it
his finger he said * Neta Thou ââ in no wise be ruled by these men for these be those which brought me into this lamentable plight and the miâ thou seest me in A memorable strange speech of a distracted Prince And thus the Emperour 5 Grimstons Imperiall History p. 581 582. Sententia Exââctorationis Depositionis Wencestai An. 14â0 in Germani Hist Tom. 2. p. 180. 181. Iean Crespin L estate de Lesglise p. 465. Wenââus was likewise deposed by the Princes electors of the Empire For besotting himselfe so with pleasures â as that he became altogether unfit for the government and a man unprofitable for the Empire and Christian ââmonwealth and Rupert Count Palatine of Râine and Duke of Bavaria was elected Emperor in his stead ââ like no doubt might be lawfully done here in England by the whole Kingdome and Parliament if â such cases of incurable folly or frenzy should befal any of our Kings who might then either create a Lord âtector to governe both King or Kingdome during such disabilities of Government in the King as âhildricke for a time before his deposition was governed and over-ruled in all thingâ by the Marshall âhe Palace or else Crowne the next Heire King if he be capable to Governe Yea in the time of our âon Kings when the right Heire was an Inâant unable to governe the Crowne usually descended âhe next Heire of full age Hence * Speedâ hist p. 252 253. 262. 364 365 See Matthew West Polyâhâonicon Floren. Wigorniensis Holinshed Hunâândon and others Wibba King of Mercia deceasing Penda his Sonne being an Infant Crowne descended to his Nephew Ceorl of full age after whose death Penda being of ripe age inheriâ the Kingdome So King Wulfeher deceasing leaving his Sonne Kenred within age his Brother Ethelred ââeeded him who resigning his Crowne and turning Monke after he had Reigned 30. yeares Kenred ââ of full age enjoyed the Crowne So Ethelfred King of Northumberland dying Edelwald his Brother ââed the Government and Reigned Aldulfe Ethelherds Sonne being then a minor who enjoyed not â Crowne till after Edelwalds death So * Gaufredus Monu lib. 3. c. 20. Grafton p. 67. Cassebelan succeeded Lud his Brother in the Kingdome of Briâe Luds Sonnes being too yong and insufficient to Reigne The like was very usuall in Scotland of ââh there are divers precedents in Graâion Hector Bâetius and Buchanan which I pretermit All which 6 Aventine l. 3. f. 293. Friâingens l. 5. c. 13. Nauclerus vol. 3. Gen. 26. ââiculars laid together are a most cleare unanswerable demonstration that the Soveraignest power and âisdiction of all others resides in the whole Kingdome and Parliament not in the King hâmselfe since ââ may thus dispose of the very Crowne it selfe and determine all controversies all titles which conâe it The King alone having no power to transferre it to any other without the Lords and Comââs free consents as was resolved in the case of King John who resigned and granted his Crowne to the âe without the Kingdomes consent and therefore the resignation and grant were adjudged voyd not ây by the 7 Graâton l. 1. 112. French King and his Lords but by our owne Parliament as you may read in 40 Ed. 3. â 8. and Doctor Crakenââorpe Of the Popes temporall Monarchâ cap. 2. p. 251. to 255. This point âave thus copiouâly debated not out of any the least intention to derogate from his Majesties just âreâacy and Pâerogatives royall which I have ofâ solemnely sworne to maintaine to the utmost of my powâ and shall God willing performe but out of a serious desire to rectifie the generall mistakes of men âching a pretended Prerogative which their fantasies onely not the Law have unduely attributed to â King and to vindicaâe the just Liberties Priviledges and Prerogatives of the Parliament so much âyed declaimed against of laâe by a company of ignorant Papists Maâignanâs Royalists who know not ât the jurisdiction of Parlâaments is according to the Protestation the clearing of which points in my âke apprehension is the onely high and ready way to compose our present differences and settle all â distractions which the ignorance and mistakes of the Kings and Parliaments just Prerogaâives and âers next to the trecherous maâiâe of the Papists have principally raised among us almost to the âe of the Kingdome For my part I professe sincerely I love and honour both King and Parliament ââ and in the controversies now betweene them concerning their Jurisdictions stand as a man indiffeâ to doe right to boâh without prejudice to either the King being the Principall Member of the Parâent the elevating of its now disdaâned Power to its due altitude can be no depression but advancement âe Kings prerogative which shines most perspicuously in Parliaments whiles King and Parliament âânited and is most eclipsed onely when they are divided as the precedents in all ages manifest And â I dare confidently averre that there are no such enemies to the Kings Prerogative as those who adâcing it beyond due bounds doe necessarily draw it into dispute in which it commonly comes off with â and diminution in the end as in âhâ late cases of Loânes Ship-mony and the like If any here object against the premises f 1 El c. 2. that the King is the onely Supreme Governour of this Râaââ Object That g Li. 1. c. 8. f. 5 6. l 3. c 9. f. 107. Bracton h L. 1. c. 5. 17 Fleta and our i 3 E. 3. 19. Corone 161. 22 Answer E. 3. 3. b. Dyer 297 a. Stamfo 153. a. Law bookes resolve That the King hath no Peere in his Kingdoâ for so he should lose his Empire since Peeres or equals have no command over one another much more then ouââ he not to have a Superiour or mightier for so he should be inferiour to those who are subject to him and inferâours cannot be equall to Superiours The King ought not to be under man but under God and the Law If then Jâstice be demanded of him by way of Petition because no writ runs against him though k 22 E. 3. 3. b anciently some wââ did if he doe not justice this punishment may be sufficient to him that he may expect God will revenge it Neââ quidem de factis suis praesumat disputare mâlto fortius contra factum suum venire c. Therefore the Kââ is above the Parliament and whole Kingdome not they above him I Answer First that the meaning of all these Bookes is that the King is above every one of his Sââjects and hath no Peere nor Superiour if they be taken particularly and distributively as single mââ as the words Parem Superiorem in the singular number and the like explaine the meaning of the Bookâ to be But if we take them collectively in Parliament as they are one body and represent the whole Kiââdome then these very Authours resolve in their forequoted words
That they l Bracton l. 2 c. 16. f. 134. â Fleta l. 1. c. 17. are above the Kiââ and may and ought to restraine and question his actions if there be cause Secondly Bracton explaines himselfe how he is highest and without a Peere to wit In m Parem autem habere non debet nec multo forââus superiorem maxime in justitia exhibenda licet in justitia recipienda minimo de regno suo comparetur l. 3. c. 9. f. 167 a. distribuââ Justice that is he is the highest Justiciar in the Kingdome but as small as any in receiving justice Thirdly Even in Parliament it selfe the King is the Supreme Member and in that regard the Parlâment in most Acts and in all Petitions or Addresses usually stiles him n See Bodines Commonwealth l. 2. c 1 p. 192. the like of the Parliaments in France Their Soveraigne Lord Bâsides the Parliament it selfe is ever o See Modus tenendi Parliamentum Câmb Brit. p. 177. Crompt Juris of Ceurts f. 1. to 6. Sir Tho. Smithâ Common-wealth l. 2. c. 2. 3 Hol. Descââp of England c. 8. Cowel Minsh Tit. Parl. Mr. Hack. manner of passing Bils sect 8. summoned dissolved by his wâit in his name by his Authority Aâ in passing all Acts and Bils of Grace or such as are not simply necessary for the publicke safeây and ââliây of his people He hath an absolute negative voyce and his Royall assent is simply necessary for the passing ofâ binding Lawes In which respects he is and may be truely said to be above the Parliament it selfe and ââ onely supreme Governour but yeâ in the forenamed respects the Parliament may be truely said to be Pââ mount him and the highest power Fourthly The Oath of Supremacy That the King is the onely Supreme Governour relates onely or pââcipally to the Popes and foraine Princes authorities formerly usurped in this Realme as the Title Woââ and scope of the Statute of 1. Eliz. c. 1. and the very next words in the Oath of Supremacy manifââ and that NO FORAINE Power person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiââon power SUPERIORITY PREHEMINENCE or Authority Ecclesiasticall or spiriââ within this Realme and therfore I do utterly renounce and forsake ALL FORAINE Jurisdictions â Therefore it refers not at all to Parliaments or their Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminenââ Authority not so much as once thought of by the prescribers of this Oath which had its Authority âââ the Parliament and made some addition to the Kings Prerogative Fifthly p Common w. l. â c. 9. l. 2. c. 5. Bodine and others as I shall hereafter manifest assure us that the Soveraââ power and jurisdiction both in the Roman and German Emperours and most foraine Christian Kingdoââ was and yet is in the Senate people Parliaments and Dyets yet this is no empeachment at all to their Suprââcies no more then the asserting of generall Councels to be above Popes themselves by the learnedââ Papists is â derogation as they hold it is not to the Popes most absolute pretended Soveraignty q See p. 2 3. above all Emââours Kings Princes Prelates Subjects aâd the world it selfe of which they affirme him sole Monarch Thââfore by the selfe-same reason this asserting of the whole Kingdomes and Parliaments power to be abââ the Kings is no diminution at all much lesse a denyall of his Supremacy and just Prerogative Râ all If then the Parliaments power be thus higher and greater then the Kings personall power and Juriââction out of Parliament it will necessarily follow from hence First That in these unhappy times of division and separation of the Kings personall presence not âgall which cannot be severed from the Parliament the Lords and Commons Orders Votes and Oâânances made legally in Parliament it selfe are to be preferred obeyed by all the Kingdome before â his Majestiâs Proclamations Declarations Commissions Warrants or Mandates made illegally out of ââliament in affront of Both Houses proceedings and Decrees since when ever two disââ powers command different things that aâe lawfull or of the same nature the higher power ought â to be obeyed As if a Master commands his Servant one thing and the King another or the King âne ââ God another the King is to be obeyed before the Master because the Superiouâ power but God before the Kâ because the highest power as the r See Gratian causa 11. quaest 3 wher he quotes ãâã Hier. Isiâdor to this purpose Fathers and Canonists resolve most fully Yea the Parliament being the highest power the King himselfe ought to submit thereto and âââ ruled and advised thereby This conclusion though it may seeme a paradox to most men is an undââ table verity both in point of Divinity and Policy as is most apparent by the 1 Saâ 14. 38. to 46. anâ 29. 1. to 11. 2 Sam. 18. 2 3 4. c. 19. 1. to 9. 1 King 12. 1. to 25. 1 Chron. 13. 1. to 6. 2 Chron. â and 11. c. 30. 2 3. 5. 23. Esther 1. 13. to 22. Jer. 38. 4. to 28. Dan. 6. 4. to 20. Jonah 3. 7. Ezra 10. â âccles 4. 13. Prov. 11. 14. c. 15 22. c. 25 5. compared together and with Josh 22. 11. to 34. Judges 20. â to 20. and in point of Law and Conscience even in our owne Kings and Kingdome as is cleare by 20 â 3. the Preface and c. 1. 25 E. 3. Parliament 6. the Statute against Provisors 38 E. 3. Stat. 2. c. 1 2. 3 E. â c. 17. and 48. and other Statutes which I shall hereafter cite at large in answer to the fourth Objection âhich Texts and Statutes those who will may peruse at leââure for their better satisfaction And in Pauls âme the highest Powers in Rome were not the Roman Emperours as ignorant Doctors make the unleared world beleeve but the Romane Senate who had full power not onely to elect and command but âânsure and depose their Emperours and adjudge them unto death as * Commonw l. 2. c. 5. John Bodin acknowledgeth ând I shall hereafter abundantly manifest in the Appendix Secondly That the Parliaments resisting of the Kings personall Commands especially such as are ilâgall and destructive to the Kingdome or any private Subjects resisting them by vertue of a publique ârdinance or Countermand from the Parliament is no resisting of the higher Powers against Pauls inânction Rom. 13. 1. to 7. as Å¿ Resolution of Conscience sect 1 2. c. Revindication of Psalme 105 15. Printed at Cambridg 1643 Doctor Fearne and other ignorant Doctors vainly fancy but a direct âbmission and obedience to the highest powers the Parliament and those who resist the Parliaments ârdinances and Commands especially such as tend to the preservation of Religion Lawes Liberties âiviledges of Parliament and the Kingdome or bringing Delinquents to condigne punishment though âey doe it by vertue of any extrajudiciall countermand from the King or his ill Counsellours
The Treachery and Disloyalty of Papists to their Soveraignes both in Doctrine and Practise WHen I seriously consider the memorable Preamble of 3 Jac. ch 4. That it is found by daily experience that many of his Majesties Subjects who adhere in their hearts to the Popish Religion by the infection drawne from thence and by the wicked and divellish counsell of Jesuites Seminaries and other persons dangerous to the Church and State are so farre perverted in the point of their loyalties and due obedience unto the Kings Majesty and the Crowne of England as they are ready to entertaine and execute any Treasonable Conspiracies and Practises as evidently appeares by that more then barbarous and horrible attempt to have blowne up with Gunpowder the King Queene Prince âords and Commons in the House of Parliament assembled tending to the utter subversion of the whole State lately âdertaken by the instigation of Jesuites and Seminaries and in advancement of their Religion by their Schollars âught and instructed by them for that purpose With the Statutes of 35. Eliz. ch 2. and 3 Jacobi ch 5. which ââact That all Popish Recusants shall be restrained to some certaine places of abode and confined to their private âuses in the Country and not at any time after to passe or remove above five miles from thence under paine of forfeiting ââ their Lands Goods and Chattels during life That none of them shall remaine within ten miles of the City of âondon nor come into the Court or house where his Majesty or Heire apparent to thâ Crowne of England shall be nor âave in their owne houses or in the hands or possession of any other at their disposition any Armour Gunpowder or Muâtion of what kind soever And all this for the better discovering and avoiding of such Trayterous and most danârous Conspiracies Treasoââ Practises and attempts as are daily devised and practised against our most gracious âoveraignes Person and âââ Commonweale by rebellious and trayterous Papists And when I read in * Dated January 10. 1606. and Februa 22. 1603. two of King ââmes his Proclamations That those adhering to the profession of the Church of Rome are blindly led together âith the superstition of their Religion both unto some points of Doctrine which * Note this cannot consist with the loyalty of Subâcts towards their Prince and oft times unto direct actions of conspiracies and conjurations against the State wherin ââey live as hath most notoriously appeared by the late most horrible and almost incredible conjuration grounded upâ points of Doctrine in that Church held and maintained and contrived and practised with the privity and warrant of âany of the principall Priests of that profession to blow up our children and all the three Estates in Parliament assemâed And when we consider the course and claime of the Sea of Rome we have no reason to imagine that Princes of âr Religion and profession can expect any assurance long to continue unlesse it might be assented by the meditation of other ârinces Christian that some good course might be taken by a generall Councell free and lawfully called to plucke up âose rootes of dangers and jealousies which arise for cause of Religion as well betweene Princes and Princes as beâeene them and their Subjects and to make it manifest that no State or Potentate either doth or can challenge powâ to dispose of earthly Kingdomes or Monarchies or to dispense with Subjects obedience to their naturall Soveraignes Which was never yet attempted much lesse effected And in the Booke of Thankesgiving appointed for the ââh of November set forth by King James and the Parliaments speciall direction this observable Prayer âomewhat altered by the now a Who confesseth Justifieth it in his Speech in Star-chamber June 14. 1637. Arch-prelate of Canterbury in the latter Editions to pleasure his Friends the âpists To that end strengthen the hand of our gracious King the Nobles and Magistrates of the Land with Judgeâent and Justice to cut off these workers of iniquity the Papists whose Râligion is rebellion whose faith is factiâ whose practise is murthering of Soules and Bodies and to roote them out of he confines of this Kingdome I canâot but star damazed yea utterly confounded in my selfe at the Impudency and Treachery ofthose pernicious âounsellors who in affront of all these Lawes and premises have issued out sundry b See the Parliaments late Declaration Commissions under âs Majesties hand and seale to divers notorious Papists not onely to furnish themselves with all sorts of âmes and Munition but likewise to meet together armed and raise Forces in the Field to fight against the ârliament Kingdome and Protestant Religion even contrary to divers his Majesties late Printed Declaraâns and Protestations to all his loving Subjects advanced them to places of great trust and command in his âajesties severall Armies and procured them free accesse unto if not places of trust about his sacred person â if they were his loyallest Subjects his surest guard as many now boldly stile them and more to be confiâed in then his best and greatest Councell the Parliament whom they most execrably revile as Rebels ââd Traytors the more colourably to raise an Army of Papists to cut their throats and the throat of our Proâstant Religion first as they have already done in Ireland and then last of all his Majesties in case he refuse to become the Popes sworne vassall or alter his Religion which he hath ost protested and we beleeve he will never doe But I desire these ill Counsellours of the worst Edition to informe his Majesty or any rationall creature how it is either probable or possible that an Army of Papists should secure his Majesties person Crowne Dignity or protect the Protestant Religion the Parliament or its priviledges to all which they have shewed themselves most prosessed enemies We all know that Popish Recusants c See King James his Apology against Bellarmin Laurentius Byerlincke Opus Chronogr p. 319. Deus et Rex The Lord William Howards Sonnes late Booke in Defence of Papists taking the Oath of Allegiance obstinately refuse to take the Oath of Supremacy or Allegiance some of them that tooke it having beene excommunicated by their Priests for a reward Theâ summe of which Oath is * 3 Jac. c. 4. That they doe truely and sincerely acknowledge and professe That the Pope hath ââ authority to depose the King or to dispose of any his Kingdomes or to authorize any foraine Prince to invade his Countries or to discharge any his Subjects from their Allegiance to his Majesty or to license any of them to beare armes oâ raise tumults against him or to offer any violence or hurt to his royall Person Government Subjects That notwithstanding any Declaration Excommunication or deprivation made or granted by the Pope or any Authority derived from him against the King his Heires and Successors or any absolution from their obedience they will beareâ faith
and true allegiance to them and them protect to the uttermost of their power against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever against their Persons Crowne and Dignity by reason of any such sentence or Declaration or otherwise And that they doe from their hearts abhorre detest and abjure as impiâus and hereticall this damnableâ Doctrine and position prosessedly maintained by English Papists else why should the Parliament prescribe and they absolutely refuse to take this Oath that Princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope may be deposed or murdered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever Willthose then who refuse to take this Oath or abjure this King deposing King-killing Doctrine harbouring a Seminary Priest in their Tents and a Pope in their hearts prove a faithfull guard to his Majesties Person Crowne or Kingdomes Will those who so oââ conspired the death and attempted the murthers of Queene Elizabeth and King James onely because they were Protestants and Defenders of the Protestant Faith now cordially protect and assist King Charles without attempting any thing against his Crowne or Person who hath lately made and published so many Protestations and Declarations that he will never embrace nor countenance Popery but most resolutely Defend and Advance the Protestant Religion and makes this one principall motive how truely he taketh Heaven and Earth to witnesse of his present taking up of Armes Will they thinke you spend their lives for King and Parliament who but few yeares since lost their lives for attempting by a traine of Gunpowder to blow up both King and Parliament Will those secure his Majesty in his Throne now he is actually King of England who would have murthered him in his Cradle ere he was Prince to forestall him of the Crowne of England caââ those prove really loyall to his Majesty and his Royall Posterity who would have blowne up him and all royall House at once even long before he had posterity In a word if ancient presidents will not convince us are those who for d See Dr. Jones his Booke of Examinations two yeares last past or more have beene labouring with might and maine to uncrowne his Majesty and utterly extirpate the Protestant Religion by horrid conspiracies and force of Armes in Ireland and are now there acting the last Scene of this most barbarous bloudy Tragedy now likely to spend their dearest blood in fighting for the preservation of his Majesties Crowne and the Protestant cause in England if thiâ onely be the reall quarrell as is specioully pretended Or will any of that Religion who within these threâ yeares have by force of Armes both in Catalonia Portugall and elsewhere revolted from and cast off theiâ allegiance to their owne most Catholicke King to setup others of the same Religion in his Tribunall put tââ their helping hands to establish his Majesty the most Protestant King in his regall Throne admit it were really not fictitiously indangered to be shaken Certainely if the ground of this unnaturall warre be such aâ these ill Consellors pretend they would never be so farre besotted as to make choyce of such unfitting Champions as Papists for such a designe who are very well knowne to be the greatest enemies and malignants oâ all others both to King Kingdome Religion and Parliament whose joynt destructions what ever thesâ ill Counsellors pretend is questionlesse the onely thing really intended by the Popish party in this warre aâ the proceedings in Ireland the introducing of soraine the raising of domesticke popish Forces the disarminâ of Protestants and Arming Papists with their Harnesse clearely demonstrate to all whom prejudice hath noâ blinded Now that I may evidence to these pernicious Counsellours and all the world how dangerous and unsaââ it is for his Majesty and the Kingdome to put Armes into Papists hands and make use of them to protect thâ Kings Person or Crown I shall desire them to take notice both of the Papists traiterous Doctrine and Practise in these three particulars they maintaine First That the Pope by a meere divine right is the sole and supreme Monarch of the whole world and all âââ Kingdomes in it to dispose of them at his pleasure to whom and when he will without giving any account of his actions That all Emperours and Kings are but his vassals deriving and holding their Crownes from him by base uâworthy services worse then villenage that they call and repute them their Popes vassals curs packe asses wiâ Bels about their neckes and use them like such if they offend the Pope For full proofe whereof out of their owâ Authors and practise I shall referre them to Doctor e Dedicated to King Iames printed at London 1621. Richard Crakenthorps Booke Of the Popes Temporeâ Monarchy chap. 1. p. 1. to 27. worthy any mans reading to John Bodins Commonwealth Lib. 1. cap. 9. aââ Doctor John Whites Defence of the way to the true Church chap. 10. p. 43. Secondly That the Pope alone without a Councell may lawfully excommunicate censure depose both Emperours Kings and Princes and dispose of their Crownes and Kingdomes unto others That it is meet and necessary hee should âxcommunicate and deprive all Kings who are either Heretickes or Apostates as they repute all Protestant Princes ââr oppressers of the Common wealth That as soone as such Princes are actually excommunicated or notoriously knowne to ââe Heretickes or Apostates their Subjects are ipso factâ absolved from their government and Oathes of Allegiance whereby they were bound unto them and may yea ought to take up armes against them to deprive them of their kingdomes Thirdly That such tyranicall and oppressing Kings may be killed poysoned or slaine by open force of Armes not onely lawfully but with glory and commendations That this is to be executed by Catholikes and that it is not onely an heroiâall but meritorious act worthy the highest Encomiums These two last pro positions you may read abundantly proved by the words of Popish writers and 40. examples of several Emperours Kings and Princes which Popes Papists have excommunicated deprived violentây assaulted and murthered in e Dedicated to King Iames and printed at London 1624. Doctor John Whites defence of the way to the true Church chap. 6. pag. 14. to 22. and chap. 10. pag. 43. 44. in his Sermon at Pauls Crosse March 24. 1615. pag. 11. 12. in Bishop Bilsons true difference of Christian Subjection and unchristian rebellion part 3 throughout Aphorismi doctrinae Jesuitarum King James his Apologie against Bellarmine with his Answer to Cardinall Perron and sundry printed Sermons preached on the fist of November to which I shall referre the Reader What security or protection then of his Majesties royall Person Crowne or Kingdomes can now be expected from our Popish Recusants infected with these traytorous Principles and branded with so many ancient moderne nay present treasons and Rebellions against their Soveraignes let the world and all wise men seriously judge What faire quarter and brotherly assistance the
Parliament Protestants Protestant Religion Lawes and Liberties of the Subject are like âo receive from this Popish Army the late Gunpouder Treason the Spanish Armado the English and French booke of Martyrs the present proceedings in Ireland Yorkeshire and elsewhere will resolve without dispute And what peace and safetiè the Kingdome may expect in Church or State whiles Popery and Papists have any armed power or being among us f In his Sermon there Mar. 24. 1615. p. 43 44. Doctor John White hath long since proclaymed at Pauls Crosse and now we feele it by experience in these words Papistry can stand neither with peace nor piety the State therefore that would have these things hath just cause to suppresse it Touching our peace it bath not beene violated in our State these many yeares but by them nor scarce in any Christian State since Charles the great his time but the Pope and his ministers have had a hand in it All that these ill advisers to colour their close g See Plaine English designe of reestablishing Popery principally intended can alledge Obj. Crimination 1. for arming Papists against Law is That the Parliament hath traytorously invaded the Kings Prerogatives in a high degree claymed a power and jurisdiction above his Majesty in sundry particulars and âsurped âo its selfe a more exorbitant unlimited arbitrary authority in making Lawes imposing taxes c. then any Parliaments challenged in former ages to represse which insolencies and reduce the Parliament to its due limits his Majestie is now necessited to raise an Army and pray in avde of Papists who in former ages have beene more moderate in their Parliaments and are like to prove most cordiall in this service To answer which pretence more fully though it be for the maine of it most palpably false yet by way of admission onely I shall suppose it true and with all possible brevitie manifest That Parliaments Prelates Peeres and Commons in times of Popery have both claimed and exercised farre greater authority over our Kings and their Prerogatives then this or any other Protestant Parliament hath done Wherefore Papists of âll others have least cause to taxe the Parliaments proceedings and those ill Counsellors small reason to imâloy Answ or trust Papists in this service To descend to some particular heads of complaint involved in this generall First it is objected that the Parliament and some of its h The observations A suller answer to Doctor Ferne with others Advocates with its approbation affirme that âe Parliament being the representative body of the whole Kingdome is in some respects of greater power and authoritie âhen the King who though he be singulis major yet he is universis minor which is contrary to the oath of supremacy wherein every Subject * 1 Eliz. ch 2. doth utterly testifie and declare in his conscience that the Kings highnesse is THE ONELY SVPREAME GOVERNOVR of this Realme c. as well in all spirituall or Ecclesiasticall causes as Temporall ând a kind of unkinging his Majestie no wayes to be indured To which I answer first that if this Doctrine be either Traytorous or Hereticall the Papists were the first broaâhers of it long agoe For Hen. de Bracton a famous English Lawyer who writ in King Henry the third his âeigne lib. 2. cap. 16. f. 34. a. resolves thus i Rex habet superiorem Deum c. Item legem per quam factus est Rex-Item Curiam sâââ viz. Comites et Barones quia Comites dicuntur quasi socis Regis qui habet socium habet mââistrum Et ideo si Rex fuerit sine franâ i fine lege DEBENTEI FRAENVM IMTONERE c. But the King hath a SVPERIOVR to wil God Also the Law by âhich he is made a King likewise his Court namely the Earles and Barons because they are called Comites as being âe Kings fellowes or companions and he who hath a fellow or associate hath a Master and therefore if the King shall âe without a bridle that is without Law they OVGHT to impose a bridle on him unlesse they themselves with the King âall be without bridle and then the Subjects shall ery out and say O Lord Jesus Christ doe thou bind their jawes with it and bridle c. A cleare resolution That the Law with the Earles and Barons assembled in Parliament are âbove the King and ought to bridle him when he exorbitates from the Law which he also seconds in some sort âb 3. cap. 9. f. 107. This Doctrine was so authenticke in those dayes and after times that in the great Councell of Basil Anno 143â when this mighty question was debated whether a Pope were above a generall Councell or a Councell above him such a Councell was at last resolved to be above the Pope upon this reason among others k Fox Acts Monume Edit 1641. Vol. 2 p. 879 880. Aeneas Sylvius de gestis concilii Basiliensis Surius concil Tom. 4. The Pope is in the Church as a King is in his Kingdome and for a King to be of more authority then his Kingdome it were too absurd Ergo Neither ought the Pope to be above the Church In every well ordered Kingdome it ought specially to be desired that the whole Realme should be of more authority then the King which if it happened contrary were not to be called a Kingdome but a Tyranny And like as oftentimes Kings which doe wickedly governe the Common-wealth and expresse cruelty are deprived of âheir Kingdomes even so it is not to bee doubted but that the Bishop of Rome may be deposed by the Church that is to say by the generall Councell At the beginning as * Lib. 2. Cicero in his Offices saith it is certaine there was a time when as the people lived without Kings But afterwards when Lands and possessions began to be divided according to the Custome of every Nation then were Kings ordained for no other causes but onely to execute justice for when at the beginning the common people were oppressed by rich and mighty men they ran by and by to some good and vertuous man which should defend the poore from injury and ordaine Lawes whereby the rich and poore might dwell together But when as yet under the rule of Kings the poore were oftentimeâ oppressed Lawes were ordained and instituted the which should judge neither for hatred nor favour and give like eare unto the poore as rich whereby wee understand and know not onely the people but also the King to be subject to the Law For if wee doe see a King to contemne and dispise the Lawes violently rob and spoyle his Subjects dâflower Virgins dishonest Matrons and doe all things licentiously and temerariously doe not the Nobles of the Kingdome Assemble together deposing him from his Kingdome set up another in his place which shall sweare to rule and governe uprightly and be obedient unto the Lawes Verily as reason doth perswade even so
Historians and Henây the fourth elected and created King in his stead In both which depositions the Popish Prelares were chiefe ãâ¦ã ctors Å¿ Speed p. 869. 878. 879. 887. Holingshead Polychronicon Fabian Grafton Hall Stow Caxton in their lives Anno 1462. King Henry the sixt Queen Margaret and Prince Edward their Sonne were by a Popish Parliament disinherited of their right to the Crowne and Edward the fourth made King after which King Henry was by another Parliament recrowned and reestablished in his Kingdome and Edward the fourth declared ãâ¦ã Traytor and usurper of the Crowne And not long after Edward taking King Henry prisoner and causing him to be murdered in the Tower another Popish Parliament Anno 1472. abrogated King Henries Lawes and âeestablished King Edward All this have our Popish Parliaments Prelates Lords and Commons formerly done and that rightly and legally as they then supposed which far transcends the highest stâaines of pretended inâroachments on his Majesties royalties by the present Parliament which detests such presidents Secondly our Popish Parliaments Pecres and Prelates have oft translated the Crowne from the right heires ând setled it on others who had no lawfull right or title to it electing and acknowledging them for their oneây Soveraigne Lords in which actions the Popish Prelates and Clergy were commonly the Ring-leaders witnesse their t Speed p. 410. 411. 425 426. 404. to 407. 410. 416. 418. 419. 455 456. 466 467. 548 549. 550. 590. 591. See Matthew Paris Matth. Westminster Malmesbury Hunting don Eadmerus ãâ¦ã bian Walsingham Caxton Polychronicon Polydoâ Virgil Hall Grââtân Stow How Hollinshead Haywarâ Mââtin Daniel and Sir ãâ¦ã their severall lives of these Kings electing and crowning of Edward who was illegitimate and putting by Ethelred the right heire after âdgars decease An. 975. The electing and Crowning Canutus King a meere forrainer in opposition to Edmund âhe right heire to King Ethelred An. 1016. Of Harold and Hardiknute both elected and crowned Kings successiveây without title Edmund and Alfred the right heires being dispossessed and the latter imprisoned and tortuâed to death An. 1036. and 1040. yet after Hardiknutes decease Edward surnamed the Confessor was chosen King by consent of Parliament And the English Nobilitie upon the death of King Harold enacted That none âf the Danish blood should any more reigne over them After this Kings death Edgar Etheling who had best title was rejected and Harold elected and crowned King so after William the Conquerors decease Anno 1087. Robert âhe elder brother was pretermitted and William Rufus the younger brother crowned and established in the Throne After whose death Henry the first his younger brother though not next heire was elected King ây the Clergy Nobles and Commons who refused to admit of any King but with capitulations and caveats to their âwne liking upon faire promises for resorming bad and rigorous Lawes remission of Taxes exacted on the Subjects and âunishment of the chiefe causers of them and a solemne oath to frame good Lawes and ratifie Saint Edwards Lawes âll which he really performed So after the death of Richard the first John Earle of Morton was elected and crowned King and his Nephew Arthur the right heire disinherited And he dying his sonne Henry the third was âlected and crowned and Lewis made King in his fathers life by the Barons removed The like we finde in âhe case of King Henry the fourth King Edward the fourth and Richard the third made Kings by Acts of Parââament by our Popish Prelates and Nobles with the Commons consent upon unlawfull or doubtfull Titles ây way of usurpation and the right hereditary line put by Such a transcendent power and âurisdiction as this ãâ¦ã disinherite the right heire and transferre the Crowne to whom they throught meerest neither the present nor âny other Protestant Parliament Peeres or Subjects ever claymed or exercised though Popish Parliaments ârelates Lords and Commons have thus frequently done it of which you may reade more in 25. H. 8. c. 22. 26. ãâ¦ã 8. c. 12. 28. H. 8. c. 7. 35. H. 8. c. 5. Thirdly the Lords and Commons in times of Popery have sent our writs and summoned a Parliament in the Kings name and forced the King to call a Parliament without and against his full consent Thus they summoned and held a Parliament in Ireland Anno 1341 refusing to come to a Parliament there summoned by the Kings officers and authority as the u In Camdens Britania English p. 188. Irish Annalls doe more at large record Thus they x Walsingham Hist. Ang. p. 107. 398. Speed p. 681. 757. summoned and held two Parliaments here in England to depose King Edward the second and King Richard the second without these Kings consents and by two severall Acts of Parliament 4. E 3. c. 4. and 36. E. 3. c. 10. enacted That for the maintenance of the Lawes and Statutes and redresse of divers mischiefes and grievances which daily happeâeth a Parliament shall be holden every yeare once and more often if need be whereas this Parliament was ãâ¦ã called but by the Kings owne free consent and hath moderated these former Acts by changing the annuall into ãâ¦ã triennuall Parliament by a speciall Bill to which his Majestie gave his full and free assent y Myrror c. 1. sect 3. p. 10. Co. instit on Littleton f. 110. Spelman Concil p. 347. Long before which Acts King Alfred in an assembly of Parliament ordained this for a perpetuall custome that a Parliament should be called together at London twice every yeare or oftner in time of peace to keep the people of God from sinne th ãâ¦ã they may live in peace and receive right by certaine usages and holy judgements Fourthly Our Popish Barons Prelates and Commons have refused to meet in Parliament when the King ha ãâ¦ã summoned them by his writ z Matth. Paris An. 1233. p. 344 473 c. Speedes Hi. p. 607. to 613. Anno Dom. 1233. King Henry the third summoned his Earles and Barons to appeare at a Parliament at Oxford where the King now resides but they all joyntly sent him an expresse messag ãâ¦ã that they would not come upon his summons for that the Kings person went guarded with Poictovines othe ãâ¦ã strangers who swayed and miscounselled him as ill Counsellors doe now the King so as they could no ãâ¦ã there appeare with safety at which message the King grew very angry resolving that they should bee on ãâ¦ã twice and thrice summoned to appeare Whereupon Roger Bacon who usually preached before the King freely told him That if he did not remove from him Peter Bishop of Winchester and Peter de Rivallis his malign ãâ¦ã Counsellors he could never be quiet And Roger Bacon a Clergy man also of a pleasant wit seconding Robert advise told the King that Peirae and Rupes were most dangerous things at Sea alluding to the Bishops name Petrus de Rupibus The King hereupon comming a little to himselfe and taking that
good advice of * Who now give the King no such advice Schollers which he would not of his Peeres summons another Parliament to be holden at Westminster giving th ãâ¦ã world to know withall that his purpose was to amend by their advice whatsoever was to be amended But the Baro ãâ¦ã considering that still there arrived more and more strangers men of warre with horse and armes as now alas we s ãâ¦ã they doe and not trusting the Poictovine Faith as we have now cause to mistrust the perfidious Papists and malignant Cavaliers and seeing no footstep of peace our present condition refused to come at the appointeâ day sending the King word by solemne messengers that he should without any delay remove Peter Bishop of Winchester and the other Poictovians out of his Court which if he refused they all of them by the common consent of t ãâ¦ã who le kingdome would drive him with his wicked Counsellors out of the Kingdome and consult about creating ãâ¦ã new King Thesethings thus acted the King was much dejected in mind and all his Court hanging down ãâ¦ã their heads and fearing not a little lest the errors of the Sonne should become worse then the fathers errors whom hi ãâ¦ã Subjects indeavouring to depose from his royall Throne almost detruded him to that name which was give ãâ¦ã him by a certaine presage John the Banished Wheresore hee could easily have beene drawne to redeem ãâ¦ã the love of his naturall Liegemen with the disgrace of a sew strangers But the Bishop of Winchester with other his ill Counsellours and Poictovine Cavalieres counselled hi ãâ¦ã to take up armes against his rebellious Subjects as they stiled them and to give their Castles and Lands to them w ãâ¦ã would defend him and the kingdome of England from these Traytors The Counsell now given to his Majesty ãâ¦ã his ill Counsellours and Cavalieres Hereupon the King inclining to the worser part raiseth an Army of Poictovine and Foraine Souldiers which came to him being sent for out of Flanders from whence the King no ãâ¦ã hath many old Souldiers and Commanders sent him seiseth a Manour of Guilbert Bassers a Noble man give ãâ¦ã him by King John calling him Traytor when he demanded it sets downe a day wherein all his Lords he suspected should deliver him sufficient pledges of their loyalty and being at Glocester with his Army whith ãâ¦ã the Lords resused to come being required the King thereupon as if they were Traytors burnes their Manor ãâ¦ã destroyes their Parkes and Ponds besiegeth their Castles and without the judgement of his Court and of thei ãâ¦ã Peeres denounceth them exiles and banished men gives their Lands to the Poictovines and adding griefe to grie ãâ¦ã wound to wound commanded their bodies to be apprehended where ever they were within the Kingdome he likewise sends a Defiance to the Earle Marshall whose Lands he had wasted who thereupon understood himselfe discharged of that obligation by which he was iyed to the King and free to make his defence Whereupon h ãâ¦ã seeing * Note neither Faith nor Oath nor peace to be kept by the King or his ill Councellours who contrary to their promise and Oath refused to deliver up his Castle which they promised to render to him upon demand h ãâ¦ã raiseth a greaâ Army and takes his Castle On this the King upon better consideration did againe promise ãâ¦ã and affirme That by advise of his great Councell all that was amisse should be rectified and amended And at th ãâ¦ã day and place appointed he holds a great conference with the Lords But the evill Councellors he followed suffered him not to make good his promise For when divers there present greatly in the Kings favour with sundry Preachers and Fryers whom the King was wont to reverence and hearken to Humbly beseeched and earnestly exhorted the King to make peace with his Barons and Nobles and to embrace them with due affection being The Parliments present case his naturall Subjects whom without any judgement by their Peeres he had banished destroying their Manors Woods Parkes Ponds and being led and seduced by evill Councels lesse regarded his faithfull Subjects whose native bloo ãâ¦ã would not permit them to bow downe then Forainers and which is worse called them Traytors by whom âe ought t ãâ¦ã settle the peace order the Councels and dispose the affaires of his Kingdome The Bishop of Winchester ofâended it seemes at Peers takes the word out of the Kings mouth and answers That there are not Peeres in England as in the Realme of France and that therefore the King of England by such Justiciars as himselfe pleaseth âo ordaine may banish any offenders out of the Realme and by judiciall processe condemne them Which insolent âpeech the English Bishops relished so harshly that they presently with one voyce threatned to accurse and excommunicate by name the Kings principall wicked Counsellors of whom Winchester being the foreman appealed whereupon they accursed and I would our Bishops would doe so now if the God-dam-me Cavaliers accurse âot themselves sufficiently all such as alienated the heart of the King from his Subjects and all others that perâurbed âhe peace of the Realme and so the hoped accommodation vanished into greater discontents Hereupon the Earle Marshall and other Lords with their Forces sell pell mell upon the Kings Army slew divers of his forâeiners and in conclusion drew him to such straits that enforced him to be capable of better advise Then Edmund ârchbishop of Canterbury elect with other suffragan Bishops bewayling the estate of the Kingdome presented themselves before the King at Westminster telling him as his loyall liegemen and O that some Bishop or faithâull person if there bee any such about his Majestie would now deale thus clearely with him touchâng his evill Counsellors That the Councell of Peter Bishop of Winchester and his complices which now he had and âsed was not sound nor safe but euill and dangerous to himselfe and his Realme First for that they hated and deâised the English calling them Traytors turning the Kings heart from the love of the people and the hearts of the peoâle from him as in the Earle Marshall whom being one of the wortâiest men of the Land by sowing false tales they ârave into discontentment Secondly that by the Counsell of the said Peter his Father King John first lost the hearts of âis people then Normandy then other lands and finally wasted all his treasure and almost England also and never afâer had quiet Thirdly That if the Subjects had now beene handled according to justice and law and not by their ungodây Counsels these present troubles had not happened but the Kings lands had remained undestroyed his treasure unexâausted Fourthly that the Kings Councell is not the Councell of peace but of preturbation because they that cannot âaise themselves by peace must raise themselves by the troubles and disinherison of others Fiftly That they had the Trea ãâ¦ã re Castles Wardships
and strength of the kingdome in their hands which they insolently abused to the great hazard âf the whole estate for that they made no conscience of an Oath Law Justice or the Churches censures Therefore we ãâ¦ã King speake these things faithfully unto you in the presence of God and man and doe counsell beseech and admânish âou to remove such a Councell from about you and as it is the usage in other Realmes governe yours by the faithâull and sworne children thereof To which the King in briefe answered That he could not suddainely put off hââ Councell and therefore prayed a short respite Nothing âad hither to preserved the King more Then that he could âithout griefe forgoâ any favorities if he were nearely pressed the contrary quality whereof hath beene the cause of âiâall desolation to so many Princes For though choyce of Counsellours ought to be free yet by common inâendment they should be good or how ever they are or are not it is madnesse to hazard a Crowne or lose the love âf a whole Nation rather then to relinquish or diminish a particular dependance for which the publique must not be âazarded nor subverted The King therefore in this point not infortunate commands Bishop Peter from his Court to keepe residence at his Cure without once medling in State affaires removes all his evill Counsellors derives them of their Offices and puts good men in their places and commands all Poictovians and Foraine forces to deâart the Realme receives all his Nobles into favour restoring them to their lost Offices Lands Castles admits them ãâ¦ã to his Court and Councell puts all his ill Counsellours and Delinquent Officers to their legall trials and fines And âr Peter Rivales his Treasurer he was so vehemently incânsed against him for his ill Counsell that he sware ãâ¦ã would plucke out his eyes were it not for reverence of his holy Orders And at his Arraignment at Westminster ãâ¦ã e King sitting in person with his Justices upon the Bench and shooting Rivales through with an angry eye âake thus to him O ihou Traytor by thy wicked advise I was drawne to set my Seale to those treacherous Letters âr the destruction of the Earle Marshall the contents whereof were to me unknowne and by thine and such like Coun ãâ¦ã ll I banished my naturall Subjects and turned their mindes and hearts from me By thy bad counsell and thy com ãâ¦ã lices I was moved to make warre upon them to my irreparable losse and the dishonour of my Realme in which ânârprise I wasted my Treasâre and lost many worthy persons together with much of my Royall respect Therefore I ãâ¦ã act of thee an account and thou shall be carryed to the Tower of London to deliberate till I am satisfied And ãâ¦ã us were these civill warres and differences reconciled ill Counsellors removed enormities reformed De ãâ¦ã nquents punished not without reducing store of coyne to the King and peace established in the Kingâome Which History I have more largely recited because most of its passages are Paralell to the Kings ãâ¦ã d his evill Counsellors present proccedings on the one hand and to the Parliaments in some sort on the o ãâ¦ã er hand in the premises and I doubt not but they will prove parallels in the conclusion to the terrour of ãâ¦ã ill Councellours and Cavalieres the just punishment of Delinquents all good Subjects joy and contentâent and the reestablishment of our peace in truth and righteousnesse To end the point proposed * Walsingh Histâ p. 84. 44. Ypod. Neust p. 101 Anno Dom. 1315. King Edward the second by his Writ summoned a Par ãâ¦ã ment at London But many of the Lords refused to come pretending causes and impediments by which their ab ãâ¦ã nce might well be excused and so this Parliament tooke no effect and nothing was done therein In this Parti ãâ¦ã lar then Popish Prelates Lords and Commons have exceeded Protestants in this or any other Parliaâent Fifthly Popish Parliaments Prelates Lords and Subjects have by Force of Armes compelled their Kings to grant and confirme their Lawes Liberties Charters Priviledges with their Seales Oathes Proclamations the Popes Buls Prelates Excommunications and to passe confirme or repeale Acts of Parliament against their wills Thus the Barons Prelates aâd Commons by open warre and Armes enforced both a Mat. Pa. An. 1214 1215. p. 240 to 256. Mat. West Walsingham Ypodig Neu. An. 1214 1215 Fabi. Caxton Hol. Graf Daniel in the life of K. John Hen. 3. Sp. Hist p. 578. to 637. King John and King Henry the third to confirme Magna Charta and Charta de Foresta both in and out of Parliament sundry times with their hands Seales Oathes Proclamations and their Bishops Excommunications taking â solemne Oath one after another at Saint Edmonds upon the High Altar An. 1214. That if King John should refuse to grant these Lawes and Liberties they would wage warre against him so long and withdraw themselves froâ their Allegiance to him untill he should confirme to them by a Charter ratified with his Seale all things which thââ required And that if the King should afterwards peradventure recede from his owne Oath as they verily beleevââ he would by reason of his double dealing they would forthwith by seizing on his Castles compell him to give satisfaction Which they accordingly performed as our Histories at large relate Yea when they had enforceâ King b Matth. Par. p. 252. Sp. Holinsh accordingly John thus to ratifie these Charters for the better maintenance of them they elected 25. Barons ââ be the Conservators of their Priviledges who by the Kings appointment though much against his liking â afterwards appeared tooke an Oath upon their Soules that with all diligence they would observe thesâ Charters Regem cogerent and would COMPELL THE KING if he should chance to repent to observe them All the rest of the Lords and Barons then likewise taking another Oath to obeâ the commands of the 25. Barons After this c Matth. Paris An. 1258. p. 9. 940 941. Matth. West 1258. Sp. p. 635. Hol. Graft Dani. Polychron An. Dom. 1258. King Henry the third summoned a Parliament at Oxford whither the Lord came armed with great Troopes of men for feare of the Poictovines to prevent treachery and civill warres aââ the Kings bringing in of Foraine force against his naturall Subjects to which end they caused the Sea Ports ââ be shut up and guarded The Parliament being begun the Lords propounded sundry Articles to the King which they had immutably resolved on to which they required his assent The chiefe points whereof weââ these That the King should firmely keepe and conserve the Charter and Liberties of England which King John â Father made granted and ratified with an Oath and which himselfe had so often granted and sworne to maintaiâ inviolable and caused all the infringers ofit to be horribly excommunicated by all the Bishops of England in hâ owne
to deliver Piers into their hands or drive him from his company out of England as being perswaded âhile that King-âane breathed peace could never be maintained in the Realme nor the King abound in treasure nor the Queene enjoy his love But the wilfull King preferring the dearenesse of one stranger before the love of the âhole Realme would noâ condiscend Whereupon the Lords thus contemned and deluded presently raise ân Army and march with all speed towards Newcastle not to offer injury or molestaââon to the King writes âalsingham the case and purpose of the present Parliaments Army but that they might apprehend Piers himâelfe and judge him according to the Lawes enacted Which when the King heard he fled together with Piers like a proscribed and banished man to Tynemouth and from thence to Scarborough Castle Where Piers was forced to yeeld himselfe upon condition to speake but once more with the King And then carryed to Warwicke Castle where he had his head strucke off at the command and in the presence of the Earles of Lanâaster Warwicke and Hereford as one who had beene a subverter of the Lawes and an open Traytor to the Kingdome and that without any judiciall proceedings or triall of his Peeres though an Earle and so deare a Favourite of the Kings Which bred a lasting haâred betweene the King and his Nobles Who being afterwards charged by the King in Parliament with their contempt against him in the spoiles committed by them at Newcastle and wickâdly killing Piers They stoutly answered That they had not offended in any point but deserved his royall favour âor that they had not gathered force against him but against the publike enemy of the Realme And then obtained an Act âf Pardon that no man should be questioned for Gavestons returne or death printed in old g Tâtles Magnâ Charta part 2. f. 50 to 57. Magna Charta Not long âfter this unfortunate King doting upon the two h Walâing Hist p. 90. to â10 ypodig Neust p. 105. to 111 Speed Hist p. 674. to 683. See Fabiân Holm Graf Thoâââde ââ More Higdââ Caxton in his life Spencers as much as ever he did on Gaveston to whom they âucceeded not onely in pride rapine oppression and intolerable insolencies but even in height of familiarity and power with the King So as they ruled and lead the King as they pleased in so much that no Earle Baron or Bishop was able to dispatch any thing in Court without their advise and favour which made them generally envied of all because they domineered over all The Lords and Barons hereupon confederated together to live and die for juâtice and to their power to destroy the Traytors of the Realme especially the two Spencers And meeting together with âheir forces at Sbirborne Thomas of Lancaster being their Captain they took an oath to prosecure their designe to âhe division of soule body Then they spoyled these Spencers their friends goods take their Castles by vioâence waste their Manors through malice slay their servants utterly omitting the usuall wayes of Law equitie following the impetuousnes of their minds they march on to S. Albans with Ensignes displayed sent solemn messengers to the King then at London commanding him not only to rid his Court but kingdome too of the Traytors of âhe Realme the Spencers condemned in many Articles which they had framed against them by the commonalty of the Realme if he loved the peace of the Kingdome And they further required the King to grant letters Patents of indemnity to themselves and all such as had bore armes in their company that they should not be punished by the King or any other for their for epast or present trangressions The King denyed both these demands at first as unjust and illegall swearing that he would not violate his Coronation Oath in granting such a pardon to contempiuâus Delinquents Whereupon running to their armes they marched up to London entred the Citie and to avoyd dangeâ the King through the Queenes and others mediation condescended to their desires passing an Act for thâ Spensers banishment and the Barons indemnities which you may reade in ancient Part 2. â 50. Magna Chartaes Upoâ this the Barons departed neither merry nor secure despairing of the Kings Benevolence which made them goe alwayes armed and to retire to safe places The King soone after recalling the Spensers reversed the sentence against them as erronious gathers an Army encounters and defeats the Barons and puts many of them to deatâ by these Spencers procurements who not content with their blood procured also the confiscation of their goods aââânheritances Whereupon getting into greater favour and power then before puffed up with their good successe and new honours they discontented not onely the Nobles but Queene too who going over into Franâ with her sonne the Prince whose lives these favorites attempted She raysed an Army beyond the Seas and returning with it into England most of the Lords and Commons resorted to her and fell off from the Kingâ who being destituâe of friends and meanes demanded assistance of the Cirie of London whose answer was That they would honour with all dutie the King the Queene and Prince but would shut their gates against Foreineâ and Traytors to the Realme and with all their power withstand them And under the name of John of Eltham thâ Kings second sonne whom they proclaymed Custos of the Citie and of the Land they got the Tower ââ London into their possession placing and displacing the Garrison and Officers therein as they pleased Thâ King hereupon after he had commanded all men to destroy and kill the Queenes partakers none excepted but her self ââer sonne and the Earle of Kent and that none upon paine of death and losse of all that they might lose should ayde ââ assist them and that he should have a 1000. l. who did bring the Lord Mortimers head flies to Bristol in the Castle whereof the elder Spenser was taken by the Queenes Forces and without any formall tryall cruelly cut ââ alive and quartered being first at the clamours of the people drawne and hanged in his proper armour upon the common Gallowes without the Citie After which the King forsaken of all his Subjects flies into Wales for shelter wherâ he was taken prisoner and then by his Lords and Parliament forced to resigne his Crowne to his sonne confessing That for his many sins he was fallen into this calamitie and therefore had the lesse cause to take it grievously That ââ much sorrowed for this that the people of the kingdome were so exasperated against him that they should utterly abhââ his any longer rule and Soveraignty and therefore be besought all there present to forgive and spare him being so afflicteâ Soone after he was murthered in Barkly Castle And so the sicknesse and wounds which the Commonwealth sustaineâ by his ill raigne upon the chââge of her Physician recovered not onely health and strength
âll out for their advantage For the Duke of Ireland with the Kings privity such was his false dissimââtion had gathered a power in Wales and Cheshire which they intercepting neare Burford and Bablecke âew Sir William Molineux leader of the Cheshire men and made the Duke to flye in great feare Aâong the Dukes carriages was found as the devill or rather God would have it certaine Letters of the âings to the said Duke by which their Counsells were plainely discovered The Lords hereupon âarch with speed up to London having an Army of forty thousand men the Lord Major and City doubtâll whether to displease the King or Lords upon consultation receive the Lords into the City and supây their Army with provisions in the Suburbs Which the King hearing of seemed to slight them sayâg * Note the perill and policy of protracting Let them lye here till they have spent all their goods and then they will returne poore and empty to their âuses and then I shall speake with and judge them one after another The Lords hearing this were exceedâgly moved and swâre They would never remove theâe till they had spoken with him face to face And ârthwith sent some to guard the Thames lest the King should slip out of their hands and then scoââe at âem The King being then in the Tower and seeing himselfe every way encompassed sent a message ââ the Lords that he would treat with them who thereupon desired him That he would come the neââây to Westminster where they would declare their desire to him The King replyed That he would not treat âith them at Westminster but in the Tower To which the Lords answered That it was a suspicious place ââcause traines might there be laid for them and dangers prepared to destroy them Whereupon the King ânt word They shâuld send thither two hundred men or more to search and view all places lest any fraud should âe hid Upon which the Lords repaired to the Tower and in the Kings Bed-chamber laid open to ââm briefly all his conspiracy in causing them indirectly to be indicted They object to him his mutability âd underhand working producing his owne Letters to the Duke of Ireland to raise an Army to destroy them âgether with the French packeâs they had intercepted whereby it appeared he had secretly practised to flye with âe Duke of Ireland into France to deliver up Callice to the French Kings possession and such pieces as the ârowne of England held in those parts whereby his honour might diminish his strength decay and his fame âerish The King seeing this knew noâ what to doe especially because he knew himselfe notably âeâressed At last craving leave they left him confounded and shedding teares yet upon condition that âe should come to Westminster the next day where he should heare more and treaââ of the necessary affaires of the Kingdome Which he promised to doe retaining the Earle of Darby to sup with him ãâ¦ã before he went to bed O the ficklenesse of weake Princes and faithlessenesse of their royall words a ãâ¦ã Protestations some whisperers telling him that it was not decent safe nor honorable for the King ãâ¦ã goe thither he changed his resolution The Nobles hearing this were very sad and discontented a ãâ¦ã thereupon sent him word That if he came not quickely according to appointment they would chuse them anoth ãâ¦ã King who both would and should obey the Counsell of his Peeres The King strucke with this dart came t ãâ¦ã next day to Westminster there attending his Nobles pleasures To whom after few discourses the Nobles said That for his honour and the benefit of his kingdome all T ãâ¦ã tors whisperers flat terers evill instruments slanderours and unprositable persons should bee banished out of b ãâ¦ã Court and company and others substsâuted in their places who both knew how and would serve him more honora ãâ¦ã and faithfully Which when the King had granted though with sorrow they thought fit that Al ãâ¦ã anâer Nevill Archbishop of Yorke John Fordham Bishop of Durham with sundry other Lords Knights a ãâ¦ã Clergy men should be removed and kept in strait prison to answer such accusations as should bee object ãâ¦ã against them the next Parlia Whereupon they were apprehended forthwith and removed from the Co ãâ¦ã After the feast of Purification the Parliament much against the Kings will who would have shifted it ãâ¦ã at that time began at London The first day of the Session Fulthorpe and all the rest of the Judges w ãâ¦ã arrested as they sate in judgement on the Bench and most of them sent to the Tower for that having fi ãâ¦ã overruled the Lords with their Counsels and direction which they assured them to be according to Law ãâ¦ã afterward at Nottingham gave contrary judgement to what themselves had determined formerly Tresilian t ãâ¦ã chiefe Justice prevented them by flight but being apprehended and brought backe to the Parliament ãâ¦ã the forenoone had sentence to be drawne to Tiburne in the afternoone and there to have his Thro ãâ¦ã cut which was done accordingly The King seeing these proceedings by advise of his ill Counsellors * Grafton p. 348 349. 150 151. absented himselfe from his Parliament and sent Michael de la Pole then Lord Chancellor to demand foure fifteenes in his name âf the Commo ãâ¦ã for that without lesse he could not maintaine his estate and outward warre To which the body of the Parliame ãâ¦ã made answer that without the King were present they would make therein no answer and that unlesse the Ki ãâ¦ã would remove him from his Chaneellorship they would no further meddle with any Act this Parliament Th ãâ¦ã King upon this sent to the Commons that they should send to Eltham where he then lay 40. of the wis ãâ¦ã and best learned of the Commons who in the name of the whole house should declare unto him their minde Up ãâ¦ã which message the House were in more feare then before for there went a talke that the King intended ãâ¦ã betray divers of them which followed not his minde either that way or at a banquet appointed to be made purposâly aâ London if Nicholas Exton the Maior of London would have consented thereunto at which time t ãâ¦ã Duke of Glocester should have beene taken Wherefore the Lords and Commons assembled together agree ãâ¦ã with one assent that the Duke of Glocester and Bishop of Ely should in the name of the whole Parliament be se ãâ¦ã to the King to Eltham which was done and the King well pleased that they should come When they cam ãâ¦ã into his presence they most humbly saluted him and said Most high and redoubted Soveraigne Lord the Lor ãâ¦ã and Commons of this your Parliament assembled with most humble subjection unto your most royall Majesty desi ãâ¦ã your most gratious favour so that they may live in tranquillitie and peace under you to the pleasure of God a ãâ¦ã wealth of the Realme On whose behalfe
we also shew unto you that one old statute and laudable custome is approve ãâ¦ã which no man can deny That the King our Soveraigne Lord may once in the yeare lawfully summon his high Cou ãâ¦ã of Parliament and call the Lords and Commons thereunto as to that which is the highest Court of this Real ãâ¦ã In which Court all equity and justice must shine even as the Sunne when it is at the highest whereof poore and ri ãâ¦ã may take refreshing where also must be reformed all the oppressious wrongs exactions and enormities within t ãâ¦ã Realme and there to consult with the wise men for the maintenance of the Kings estate And if ãâ¦ã might bee knowne that any persons within the Realme or without intended the contrary there also m ãâ¦ã bee devised how such evill weeds might be destroyed There also must be studied and foreseene that if a ãâ¦ã charge doe come upon the King and his Realme how it may be well and honorably supported and sustained Hither ãâ¦ã to it is thought by the whole Realme that your Subjects have lovingly demeaned themselves to you in ayding ãâ¦ã with substance to the best of their powers and they desire to have knowledge how and by whom these goods be spe ãâ¦ã One thing resteth yet to declare in their behalfe unto you * Notâ The King should be present in Parliament once in 40. dayes how that by an old Ordinance they have an Act if t ãâ¦ã King absent himselfe 40. dayes not being sicke but of his owne minde not heeding the charges of his people ãâ¦ã their great paines will not resort to his Parliament they then may lawfully returne home to their houses And ãâ¦ã sir you have beene absent a longer time and yet refuse to come amongst us which greatly is our discom ãâ¦ã for t And our Parliaments present case To this the King answered by these words Well we doe con ãâ¦ã der that the people and Commons goe to rise against us wherefore we thinke we can doe no better then to aske a ãâ¦ã of our Cosin the French King and rather submit us to him then to our owne Subjects The Lords answered S ãâ¦ã that Counsell is not best but a way rather to bring you into danger For it is well knowne that the French King ãâ¦ã your ancient enemy and your greatest adversary and if he set foot once within your Realme he will rather dispo ãâ¦ã you invade you and depose you from your estate royall then put any hand to helpe you c. And as th ãâ¦ã King cannot be poore that hath rich people so cannot he be rich that hath poore Commons And all these inconven ãâ¦ã ãâ¦ã es be comne by the evill Counsell which are about you And if you put not your helping hand to the redresse âhe premises this Realme of England shall be brought to nought and utter ruine which clearely should be laid ãâ¦ã our default and in your evill Counsell Seeing that in the time of your Father this Realme throughout all the ãâ¦ã rld was highly esteemed and nothing ordered after these wayes Wherefore we be sent unto you to exhort you to ãâ¦ã uester all such persons as might be the occasion of ruine either of you or else of your Realme By these good ãâ¦ã swasions the King was appeased and promised within three dayes after to come to the Parliament and to ãâ¦ã descend to their Petitions And according to his appointment he came Where soone after John Fordham ãâ¦ã hop os Durham was discharged of the Treasurourship and the Bishop of Hereford ser in his place de la ãâ¦ã le was put from his Chancellourship for divers crimes frauds briberies and treasons by him com ãâ¦ã tted to the prejudice of the King and his Realme committed to the Tower and fined 20. thousand ãâ¦ã rkes to the King in releeving of the Commons Divers other Judges Knights and Delinquents of all ãâ¦ã t s were condemned and executed others banished and their states confiscated others put out of office ãâ¦ã this Parliament as you may reade in our Histories and in the k 10. R. c l 11. R. 2. c. l 29 3 4 5 6. 2 R. 2. c. 2. 3. 12. Statutes at large in which Statutes the ãâ¦ã schievous effects of these evill Counsellors to King Kingdome and people are at full related whereby ãâ¦ã e King and all his Realme were very nigh to have beene wholly undone and destroyed the Lords âayâg of Forces against them resolved to be lawfull and these traytorous Delinquents made uncapable of ãâ¦ã y pardon l See the Records of this Parliament published by order of both Houses Aug. 27. 1642. and their raysing of Armes against the Parliament and kingdome though with the Kings ãâ¦ã ne consent and his command declared and enacted to bee high Treason These proceedings ratified ãâ¦ã d assented to in Parliament by the King much against his will wrought an intolerable secret ãâ¦ã tred and desire of revenge in his heart against the Lords which for want of power he concealed neare ãâ¦ã yeares space but in the 20. yeare of his raigne being somewhat elevated in his spirit with a rumour ãâ¦ã at he should be elected Emperour he suddenly apprehended the Duke of Glocester the Earles of Warwicke ãâ¦ã d Arundell the chiefe sticklers in the premises committing them to severall prisons And to blinde the ãâ¦ã ples eyes lest they should riseup in Armes to rescue these Lords the King sent out a feigned Proclamation which he caused to be proclaymed throughout the Realme that these Lords were apprehended onely for ãâ¦ã w Treasons committed against him for which he would he prosecute them in the next Parliament and not for the ãâ¦ã trepasses After which he proclaimes those Lords Traytors Which done he summoned a m Grafion p. 329. c. Mr. Saint-Johns Speech 1640. p. 33. 1. H 4. No. 21. 21. 48. Parliament at Westminster to this Parliament the King commanded to ãâ¦ã me all such as he had best confidence in omitting the rest and the Knights were not elected by the Commons ãâ¦ã custome required they should be but by the Kings pleasure yea he put out divers persons elected and put in other ãâ¦ã their places to serve his turne which was one Article objected against him when he was deposed Against ãâ¦ã e time of this Parliament the King received a guard of 4000. Archers all Cheshire men as if he would ãâ¦ã ve gone in battle against enemies so that divers came armed to the Parliament out of feare These ãâ¦ã eshiere men were rude and beastly people and so proud of the Kings favour n As the Cavaliers do now that they accounted the ãâ¦ã ng to be their fellow and set the Lords at nought though few of them were gentlemen but taken from the ãâ¦ã ough and other trades After these âusticall people had a while courted they grew so bold that they ãâ¦ã uld not let neither within the Court nor without to beat and slay the Kings
first by the Ancient Treatise Of the manner of holding Parliaments in England which informes us That the first day of the Parliament publike Proclamations ought to be made in the City or Town where the Parliament is kept That all those who would deliver Petitions or Bills to the Parliament should deliver them in a certaine time That the Parliament should not depart so long as any Petition made thereto âangeth undiscussed or undecided or at the least to which there is not made a determinate answer the Kings Majestie being desirous of his grace and favour to give the âubject redresse of any injurie not to suffer his people to goe unsatisfied Hence departing of the Parliament OVGHT TO BE in such manner First IT OVGHT TO BE demaunded yea and publikely proclaimed in the Parliament and within âhe Pallace of the Parliament whether there be any that hath delivered a âetition to the Parliament and âath not received answer thereto If there he none such it iâ supposed that every one is satisfied or else answered unto at the least So farre forth as by Law it may be And then all may depart Hence it waâ that in 21. R. 2. c. 16. 17. 18. 19. divers Petitions not read nor answered in Parliament by reason of â See Walâingham Mat. Paris Fabian Holinshed Grafton Martyn Speed in their lives shortnesse of time and not determined sitting the Parliament were by speciall Acts of Parliament referred to divers Lords and Commons to examine answer and plainely determine all matters contained in the said Petitions as they should thinke best by their good advise and discretion even out of Parliament which they heard and determined accordingly and made binding Acts thereupon as appeares by the statutes themselves This Doctrine was very well knowne to King Iohn Henry the 3. Edward the 2. Richard the 2. Henry the 6. and Edward the 4. the Parliaments which opposed and deposed most of them sitting and continuing sitting both before and after their deposing sore against their wills as the fore-remembred histories manifest else no doubt they would have broken up all these Parliaments at their pleasure and never permitted such Acts Iudgements to passe against themselves Favorites ill Counsellours pretended Prerogatives had they lawfull power to dissolve them summoned in their names or the Parliaments actually determined by their depositions or resignations as we finde they did not and none ever yet held they did King Richard the 2 fearing the losse of his Crowne or some restraints by Lawes in the 11. yeare of his raigne proposed this question among others to his Iudges at Nottingham Castle which for ought I finde was never doubted before b See 21 R. 2. c. 12. Whether the King whensoever pleaseth him might dissolve the Parliâment and command his Lords and Commons to deparâ from thence or not Whereunto it was of one minde answered that he may and if any would proceede in c Walâingham Holinshed Fabian Graft Speed in 11. R. 2. the Statuts at large that yeare the Parliament against the Kings will he is to be punished as a Traytor For which opinion and others some of these Iudges and Lawyers as Trysiâian Blake were condemned of high Treason the next Parliament 11. R. 2. drawne upon a hurdle to Tyburne and there executed as Traytors to the King and Commonwealth others of them who delivered their opinions rather out of feare of death and bodily tortures then malice were yet condemned as Traytors and banished the Kingdome onely their lives were spared True it is that the packed and over-âwed Parliament of 21. R. 2. terrified by the Kings unruly great guard of Cheshire Archers fore-mentioned 21. R. 2. c. 12. being specially interrogated by the Kiâg how they thought of these answeres of the Iudges sayd That they thought they gave their answeres duely and faithfully as good and lawfull lâige people of the King ought to doe But yet the Parliament of 1 H. 4. c. 3. 4. repealed this Parliament of 21. R. 2. with all its circumstances and dependents revived the Parliament of 11 R. 2. with the judgements and proceedings given against these treacherous temporising Iudges as a thing made for the great honour and common profit of the Realme Besides the e Cooke 9. Rept f. 1. in the Epistle 4. E. 3. c. 14. â6 E. 3. c. 10. Statutes of King Alfred and Edward the 3. which enact that a Parliament shall be holden once every yeare and oftner if neede be for redresse of mischiefes and grievances which dayly happen strongly intimate that if a Parliament ought in Law to be called as often as need is of purpose to redresse the Subjects grievances and mischiefes then it ought not in point of Law to be dissolved till these greivances and mischiefes f Magna Charta 1556. part 2. f. 164. be redressed else the sommoning of it would be to no purpose and bring a great trouble and charge to the whole kingdome without any benefit at all Moreover the King by his Oath is bound to doe equall justice and right to all his Subjects in all his Courts of justice In Magna Charta c. 29. he makes this Portestation We shall deny nor deferre to no man either Iustice or right and by sundry other g 18. E. 3. Stat. 3. 20 E 3. c. â Acts all the Kings Iudges are sworne and commanded to doe even Law and execution of right to all his subjects rich or poore without having regard to any person and without letting or delaying to doe right for any Letters Writs or Commandements that shall come to them from the King or any others and shall doe nothing by vertue of them but goe forth to doe the Law and hold their Courts and Processes where the Pleas and matters be depending before them notwithstanding aâ if no such Letters Writs or Commandements were come unto you The makers therefore of these Oâthes and Lawes in dayes of Popery and the Parliaments of 2. E. 3. c. 8 14. E. 3. c. 14. 1. R. 2. c. 2. which Enact That it shall not be commanded by the great seale or little seale to delay or disturbe common right and though such commandments doe come the Iustices shall not therefore leave to doe right in ANY POINT that Iustice and right be indifferently ministred to every of the Kings Subjects did certainely beleeve that the King neither by his great nor privie seal nor by Writ or Letter could without just or lawfull cause assigned prorogue or adjourne the Teâme or sitting of any Courts of Iustice much lesse prorogue or dissolve his highest Court and grand Counsell of the Realme the Parliament or disable them to fit to redresse the Kingdomes and subjects severall grievances or secure the Realme from danger Which if he might lawfully doe at his pleasure without the Houses joynt assents there would necessarily follow not onely a deferring and deniall but likewise a fayler of Iustice in the highest Court or Session
houses license under paine a Major Pars est totum Brookes Corporations 34. Smiths Common-wealth of England l. 2. c. 3. âf inditement imprisonment or fine as appeares by the Bishop of Winchesters case 3. E. 3. 19. Fitz. âorone 161. and Stamford l. 3 c. 1. f. 153 compleatly answers that fond cavill of the Malignants ând Royalists against this Parliament that the king and many of the other members have wilfully âbsented themselves from the House of purpose to dissolve it if they could notwithstanding the late âpeciall Act made by their joyntconsents for its continuance Ergo this unlawfull Action of theirs to effect this pernicious designe must nullifie or at least invalid in their new non-sence Law and âogicke the lawfull proceedings of those worthy faithfull members who continue in it to preserve âoth Parliament Kingdome Religion Lawes Liberties from ruine and dissolution If these abâent members be the greater number why doe they not come and over-vote the rest in the House in peaceable legall usuall Parliamentary way rather then challenge them into the field in a military âlegall unusuall bloody manner unheard of in former ages If the lesser party then present or abâent the Major part must over-rule them volensnolens as it hath ever used unlesse they will be wilââller I cannot say wiser then all their predecessors put together As for his Majesties absence from Parliament by the pernicious advise of Evill Counsellors so Object âuch insisted on by Malignants I answer 1. That it was without any just cause given by the Parliament Secondly It was much Answ âgainst their wills who have a See their Messages and petitions to the king to this purpose oft importuned petitioned and used all possible meanes to procure âis returne 3. His absence was procured and is yet continued by those alone who most unjustly âaxe the Parliament for it and would take advantage of this their owne wrong Fourthly though âe be personally absent as a man yet he is still Legally present in Parliament called the kings preâence as he is a king as he is in al other his Courts of Iustice where all proceedings are entred b See Camdens Brit. p. 163. which stiles the Parliament the kings presence The Register of Writs Old New Natura Brevium old and new book of Entries Cookes Institures on Littleton f. 71. 6 Coâam Rege though the king never yet sate personally in either of them as he hath oft times done in his Parliament for the continuance whereof he hath passed such an Act as will inseperably tye his âoyall presence to it though his Cavaliers about him should by force withdraw his person from it âot onely as farre as Yorke but the remotest Indies yea he must first cease to be king of England ere âe can be legally absent from his Parliament of England This his wilfull personall absence from âis greatest Counsell which desires and needes it is as many conceive an Act of the highest in justice âhat ever any Prince could offer to his Parliament worse then a â King 12. 2 Chron. 18. Rehâboams forsaking the counsell âf his ancient Sages to follow the hare braind advise of his young Cavaleers for though he followâd not their ancient prudent counsell yet he withdrew not himselfe from them as his Majestie âoth now sever himselfe from his Parliament not onely without but against all prefidents of his âoyall predecessors except king b Richard the second who once absented himselfe from his Parliaâent above 40. dayes yet then returned to it upon better advise and the very common custome and âaw of the Land which he is obliged by his Coronation oath and many late protestations added âo it constantly to maintaine This appeares most clearely by the ancient Treatise of the manâer of holding of Parliaments in England both before and since the conquest * See Minshes Dictionary Title Parliament f. 526. tendeâed to and apâroved by the Conquerone himselfe newly printed 1641 which in the Section touching the kings âbsence from Parliament resolves thus The king is BOVND by all meanes possible TO BE PRESENT AT THE PARLIAMENT unlesse he be detained or let therefrom by bodily âicknesse and then he may keepe his chamber yet so as he lye not without the Manour or Towne ât the least where the Parliament is held and then he ought to send for 12. persons of the greaâest t Grafton p. 348. 349. 350. and best of them that are sommoned to the Parliament that is 2. Bishops 2. Earles 2 Baâons 2. Knights of the shire 2 Burgesses and 2. Citizens to looke upon his person to testifie and âitnesse his estate and give A uthority to the Arch-bishop of the place the Steward of England ând chiefe justice that they joyntly and severally should begin the Parliament and continue the same ââ his name expresse mention being made in that commission of the * Note this cause of his absence there âhich ought to suffice The reason is because there was wont to be a cry and murmure in the Parâiament for the kings absence because his absence is hurtfull and dangerous to the whole commoâalty of the Parliament neither indeede OVGHT OR MAY HE BE ABSENT BUT ONEâY IN THE CASE AFORESAYD And whereas Malignants clamour that most of the âords are absent as well as the king and therefore this can be no lawfull Parliament The same âuthor will in forme them that if the Lords be once sommoned to Parliament and then appeare âot or absent themselves the king may hold the Parliament with the commonalty and commons âf the kingdome every of which hath a greater voyce in Parliament then the greatest Earle in Engâând because he represents a whole county towne or city the other himselfe alone without Bishops âarles or Barons because in times past before there was either Bishop Earle or Baron yet even âhen kings kept their Parliaments but on the contrary no Parliament can be kept by the king and âeeres if all the Commons for the kings misgovernment or such like cause should absent themââlves This is the judgement of r In Holinsheads Chronicle of Ireland f. 127. 128. Master John Vowel too who writes in this manner Yet neâârthelesse if the king in due order have sommones all his Lords and Barons and they will not come or if they come they will not yet appeare or if they come and appeare yet will not doe or yeeld ââ any thing then the king with the consent of his Commons may ordain establish any acts or Laweâ which are as good sufficient and effectuall as if the Lords had given their consents But on thâ contrary if the Commons be sommoned and will not come or comming will not appeare or appeâring will not consent to doe any thing alleaging some just weighty and great cause the King in thesâ cases d Cromptons Iurisdiction of Courts f. 8. 4. H. 7. 18. 7. H. 7. 14. 11. H. 7. 27. Parliament
42. 76. 33. H. 6. 17. adjudged accordingly Br. Prerogative â34 cannot with his Lords devise make or establish any Law The reasons are these wheâ Parliaments were first begun and ordained there were no Prelates or Barons of the Parliament anâ the temporall Lords were very few or none and then the king and his Commons did make a fuââ Parliament which authority was never hitherto abridged Againe every Baron in Parliament doâ represent but his owne person and speaketh in the behalfe of himselfe alone But in the Knights Citizens and Burgesses are represented the Commons of the whole Realme and every of these gâveth not consent onely for himselfe but for all those also for whom he is sent And the king witâ the consent of his Commons had ever a sufficient and full authority to make ordaine and establisâ good and wholesome Lawes for the Common-wealth of his Realme Wherefore the Lords beinâ lawfully sommoned and yet refusing to come sit or consent in Parliament cannot by their folly â bridge the king and the Commons of their lawfull proceedings in Parliament Thus and moââ Iohn Vowell in his Order and usage how to keepe a Parliament Printed Cum PrivilegiÌo But we needâ not retire to this last refuge the Honorable faithfull Lords now present though not so many â could be desired are the intire House of Peeres in judgement of Law as those present at the Election of Knights of the shire or Burgesses though the major part be negligently or wilfully absent are the whole shire or Burrough and the wilfull absence of the residue though the greater number being e See Stamford â 38. 155. 3. E. 3. 19. Coro 161. contrary to Law contrary to the Priviledges of Parliament and their late Protestationâ tending to the very subvertion of Parliaments for which they and their posterities too may justly bâ disabled for ever to sit as members of that House which they have so dishonourably if not treacheâ rouâly deserted even as f Dyer f. 60. n. well as Knights and Bargesses whose personall attendance is so necessary thâ if during the Parliament they absent themselves from it about any businesses of their owne without leave â the House they may be presently expelled and others chosen in their place to make the House compleat caâ no more disable those now present from being a true and lawfull House of Peeres then the multitudes departing from the true Church of God to the false disproves it to be the true Church of Christ g Luke 12. 32 Mat. 13. 23. Mat. 7. 13. 14 whose true flock is but little In a word h See Bishop Iewell Defence of the Apologie part 6 c. 7. Diâis 1. Bishop Bilsonsââ true difference of Christian Subjection unchristiaÌ Reb part 3. p. 540. 541. 542. Bishop Pilkington of the burning of Pauls steeple Keilway f. 184. b. Cromptons Iurisdiction of Courts f. 19. 20. 10. E. 4. f. 6. Stamfords Plees l. 3. 6. 1. f. 153. Br. Corone 135. Antiq. Ecclesiae Brit. p. 299. 300. Speed p. 1156. Martyns Hist p. 450. to 454. Iohn Vowelâ Chronicle of Ireland p. 127. 128. divers Parliaments have beene kept and held and * 25. E. 3. stat 6. de Provisionibus 31. E. 3. c. 4. 36. E. 3. c. 8. 3. R. 2. c. 12. 1â R. â Preface c. 3. 12. 1. E. 3. c. 2. 14 E. 3. stat 3. Preface See 20. H. 3. c. 9. 21. H. 3. stat of Leape-yeare 4. H. 3. stat of Marlbridge 4. E. 1. de Big Prolog c. 6. 6. E. 1. stat de Gloster Preface 13. E. 1. Acton Burnel 13. E. â c. 43. ââââalefact in part 21. E. 1. Eschetors 3. E. 1. Quo warranto 9. E. 2. Artic. Cleri Pref. Actâ made without Bishops or Abbots heretofore even while they were reputed members of the Lords House anâ one of the 3. Estates in Parliament therefore this Parliament which hath taken away Bishops Vote for ever â may be lawfully held notwithstanding any Lords or Commons wilfuls absence from it iâ person who yet as long as they are members of the Parliament shall still be adjudged legally present wherher they will or no. One puny Iudge in the Courts of Westminster may and doth usually give judgement and make binding Orders though the Chiefe Justice and his fellowes be absent Sixthly It is most apparent both by i Sam. 19. 20. 2 Sam. 5. â 12. 2 Chron. 9. 8. Isay 49. 23. Rom. 13 4. 5. 1 Pet. 2. 13. 14. Scripture the verdict of all k Atist Polit. l. 3. 5. Plato Ageâilans Xenophon de Inââit Cyri. Hist Caelius Rhodig Antiq. Lect. â8 c. 1. Bodin de Republica Osorius de Rege Regum Inââit Polititians and writers â note the l The preambles of all ancient statutes Bracton l. 1. c. 8 l. 3. c. 9. Fleta l. 1. c. 5. 17. Fortescue c. 9. to 15. Statutes of our Realme and Lawyers that Kingdomes Subjects and Parliaments were not created by God for the wills pleasures profit or benefit of Kings who by birth and nature differ not at all from the meanest of their Subjects but Kings were at first constituted and stil continued for the protection welfare benefit service of their Kingdomes Parliaments People whose publike Servants Ministers Sheapheards Fathers Stewards and Officers they are Now nature reason and n Gen. 1. 26. to 31. c. 9. 2. 3. 4. Psal 8. 6. 7. 8. Scriptures resolve that he whâ is instituted meerely for the benefit and service of another as all the n Creatures were created for manâ use and therefore are inferiour unto man in dignity and power is of lesse dignity power and jurisdiction then the intire body of those for whose good he was instituted as the o Ephes 6. 5. Col. 3. 22. 23. 24. servant is inferiour to his Master the p Gen. 8. 18. c. 3. 16. 1 Cor. 11. 3. 8. 9. Ephes 5. 23. 24 1 Pet. 3. 1. 1. 3. 18. wife to her husband for whom they were created the Major to the whole Corporation and the King to his whole Kingdome and Parliament which consideration hath caused sundry Kings and Emperors not onely to adventure their lives in bloody battles but to lay downe their Crownes for the peace and safety of their Subjects witnesse q See Eutropius Grimston and others in his life Otho the first and others with the Examples of Moses m 1 Cor. 3. 21. 22. 23 Exod. 32. 9. to 15. 32. Numb 14. 11. to 15. of David â Saâ â9 â7 1 Chron. 21. 17. and Iohn 10 â1 15. with other presidents which I pretermit The King then being made King onely for the Kingdomes Parliaments Peoples service must needs ân this regard be inferiour to not Paramont them in absolute Soveraigne power though greater * 2 Sam. 18. â better then any particular Subjects Seventhly the Parliament as our q Law bookes and r Cromptons Iurisdiction of Courts f. 1. c. Bracton l.
basenesse for so many and great Peeres to be subject to a woman and that they were freeâ of their oath by her marying out of the Realme without their consents and Stephen Earle of Mortainâ who had no good Title assembling the Bishops and Peeres at London promising to them an amendment of the Lawes according to all their pleasures and liking was by them all proclamed kingâ whereupon they all toâke their oathes of Allegiance to him conditionally to obey him as their king so long as he should pâesârve the Churches Liberties and keepe all Covenants and confirme them with his Charter according to the old proverbe Quamdiâ habebis me pro Senatore âgo te pro Imperatore All this the king at his Coronation swore and promised to God the people and Church to performeâ And presently after going to Oxford he in pursuance of his oath there sealed his fore promised Charter of many indulgâuâ favouâs the summe whereof was this That all Liberties Customes and Possessions granted to the Church should be firme and in force that all bad usages in the lanâ touching Forrests exactions and annuall Taxes which his Ancestors usually received should beâ eâârnally abolished the ancient Lawes restored prefacing therein d Assensa Cleri Populi in Reg âe Angliaeelectus Mâlm p. 179. That he obtained the Crownâ by election onely Haec ââtem specialâter aliââulta generaliter se servaturâm juravit sed nihil âonum quae Deo promiserât observavit writes Mathew Paris Hovenden and Huntingdon Pene omniâ perperam mutavit quisi ad hoc tanâum jurâssââ ât praevaricatorem Sacramenti se regno toti ostenderet saith Maâmesâury * See Speed p. 483. 484. granting those inâââââties rather to blind their eyes than with any purpose to manâcle his oâne hands with such paâchment chaines Such faith is to be given to the soâemnest Oathes of kings But this his perjâry was like to cost him his Crowne his Prelates and Peeres thereupon revolting unto Maude The forme of King Henry the second his Oath I finde not onely I read e Hoveden p. 491. Graft p. 50. that upon his âoronarion he caused the Lawes tâ be reformed by advise of discâeet men learned in the Law and by his Proclamation commanded that the good Lawes of his grand father Henry should be observed and firmely kept throughout the Realme Whe ââore it is probable he tooke the same oath that he did f Mat. Par. p 147. Hoved. p. 657 Waâsiâ âpodigma Neustr An. 1189. p. 45. 46. Speed â âââ Richard the first succeeding at his Coronation in Westminster Church comming to the High Altar before the Clergie and people tooke this solemne oath upon the Holy Evangelists and many Saints reliques 1. That all the dayâs of his liâe he would beare peace honour and reverence to God and hâly Church and the ordinances thereof Secondly that to the people committed to his charge he would exercise Right Justice and Eâuitiâ Thirdly that he would abolish naughty Lawes and Customes if any were brought upon his kingdome and would enact good Lawes and the same in good sort keepe and without Mal-engyâ Which oath most solemnely taken Baldwin Archbishop of Canterbury standing at the Altar forbad him in the name of Almighty God to assume that âânââr VNLESSE HE HAD â FVLL PVRPOSE TO KEEPE WHAT HE HAD SWORNE Whereunto Richard ASSENTING and promisiâg by Gods helpe to performe all the premises WITHâVT FRAVD With his owne hand humbly taking âhe Imperiall Crowne from the Altar delivered it to the Archbishop who set it on his head g Hoveden p. 793. Mat. Par. p. 189. 190. Speed p. 548. 549 550. See Polydore Virgil Holins King Richard deceasing John his younger Brother to put by Arthur the next heire to the Crowne came âeedily out of Normandy into England where the great assembly at Northampâon to preserve their âights and Liberties were content to accept of him for their king and yeeld fealty to him to keepe âith and Peace to King John upon condition onely if he would restore to every of them their Rights which âfterwards was the occasion of great dissentions And-comming to London to be crowned Hubert ârchbishop of Canterbury the Pillar of the Common-wealths stabilitie ând incomparable for deepe âaching wisedome steps forth in the midst of all the Bishops Lords Barons and others there asâmbled at his Coronation and spake thus unto them Heare you all you are in discretion to know âat no man hath right or any other fore-title to succeede another in a kingdome * A strange Archiepiscopall Doctrin unlesse first with invoâtion for grace and guidance of Gods Spirit he bâ BY THE BODY OF THE KINGDOME THEREVNTO CHOSEN and âe indeede some choyce man and picked out for some âmenencie of âis vertues according to the example and similitude of Saul the first annointed Kiâg whom God set over âis people though neither the Sonne of a King nor of any royall discent So after him likewise David âe son of Iâsse the one for beiâg valorous and a person fitting Royall dignity the other for being holy and ââble minded To shew that whosoever in a kingdome excelleth all in valour and vertue ought to surâount all in Rule and Authority yet so as that if any of the Of spring of a deceased King surpâsseth oâers it is fit joyntly to consent in election of such a one This therefore we have spoken in favour of eminent âarle John who is present the brother of our most illustrious King Richard âow deceâsed wanting ââ heire of his body who being provident valiant and truely noble we haviâg invocated the grace of the âoly Spirit have all unanimoâsly ELECTED as well in regard of his Merits as of his royal Blood Neither durst any doubt or demurre on these things knowing that the Archbishop had not thus deâned without cause Wherefore Earle John and all men approving this speech they ELECTED ând ASSVMFD the Earle for their king and cryed out saying Let the King live But the Archâishop being afterwards demaunded why he had spoken these things answered that he was assured ââ some divining foresight that king John would worke the ruine of the kingdome corrupt the Crowne ând precipitate it into great confusion And that he might not have the reines free to doe this he OVGHT TO BE CHOSEN BY ELECTION NOâ BY SUCCESSION King John at this âis Coronation was involved in a threefold Oath namely That he should love holy Church and its Miâisters and preserve it harmelesse from the inâursion of Malignants That abolishing perverse Lawes be âould substitute good ones and exercise Right Iudgement in the Kingdome of England After which he âas adjured by the Archbishop in the behalfe of God and strictly prohibited not to presume to accept this âonour unlesse he fully purposed in his minde actually to fulfill what he had sworne To which he answeâng promised that by Gods assistance he would bona âide keepe those things which he
had sworne After âhich he rightly setled the affaires of England by the counsell of his Nobles and then passed over inâo Normandy But how ill he kept this his Oath and others of this Nature and how he violated the âtatutes of Magna Charta and Dâ Forresta which he had confirmed with his hand seale oath Proâamations the Bâshops Excommunications and the Popes Bull within three monethâ after he had on firmed them and procured a dispensation of his oath and abrogation of these Lawes making âloody warres upon his Barrons and Subjects who confiding to those confirmations and royall proâises expected no such strange performances spoyling robbing and destroying his people every âhere in the selfe-same manner as we now are plundered * See before p. 5. 8. Graf p. 11. Mat. Paris pâ 243. to 247. worthy reading and consideration the Histories of his life too manifestly ââ late which oft put his Crowne in danger of utter losâe Lewis of France being crowned king by the âârons in his steed who renounced their allegiance to him for his perjuries and breach of faith and âaking warre upon them John departing this life his sonne Henry being but 9. yeares old was proâaimed king through the peâswasion of the Earle Marshall and of Pembroke afterwards made his ârotector who informed the Lords and Commons h Fox Acts Mon. Ed. tâlt v. 1. p. 334 Speed p. 591. that though King Iohn for his evill demeanors âeserved their persecution and lâsse of his crowne yet his young child tender in yeares was pure and innoânt from his fathers doings Wherefore âith every man is to be charged with the burthen of his owne transâressions neither shall the child as scriptures teach beare the iniquity of his Fathers they oâght of duty ând conscience to beare themselves âildly towards this tender Prince and take compâssion of his age And âr as much as he was Iohns naturall and eldest sonne and ought to be their Soveraigne let us with one joynt âllistance APPOINT HIM our King and Governour let us renounce from us Lewis the French kings âonne and suppresse his people which are a confusion and shame to our Nation and the yoakes of their Serâitude let âs cast from our shoulders Vpon which perswasions Henry was presently proclaimed and crowned king at Glocesler And though he were but an infant yet being i Mat. Paris p. 278. 305. set before the High Altar he swore before the Clergy and people upon the Holy Evangelists and divers Saints Reliques Ioceline Bishop of Bath dictating the Oath That he would beare honour peace and reverence to God to ââ Church and Priests all the dayes of his life He likewise swore that he would maintaine right Iustice among the people committed to his Charge And that he would blot out ill Lawes and unjust customes if that should be any in the kingdome and observe good ones and cause them to be kept by all men How well â observed this solemne oath with many others of like nature made to his Lords and Subjects fâ confirmation of Magna Charta and their Liberties k In his Edition Tiguri 1589. p. 876. 938. 958. 959 960. Mathew Paris will informe us who writâ that the King in all his Oathes and promises did so farre transgresse the bounds of truth that the Prelaââ and Lords knew not how to hold this Proteus the King for where there is no truth there can be no âixâ confidence That thought he sometimes humbled himselfe confessing that he had beene often bewitched â ill Counsell and promised with a great Oath solemnely taken upon the Altar and coffin of Saint Edwarâ that he would plainely and fully correct his former Errors and graciously condescend to his naturall Subject good counsell yet his frequent preceding breaches of oathes and promises sepenitus incredibilem reddiderââ made him altogether incredible so that though he usually heard three Mosses every day but seldome aâ Sermons as l Hist Angl. P. 1. Walsingham notes yet none would afterwards beleeve him but ever feare and suspââ his words and actions and to avoyd the infamie of perjurie which he feared he sent to the âopeâ absolve him from those Oathes he repented of who easily granted him an absolution Such faith and assurance is there in the Oathes and Protestations of Princes to their Subjects whose Politicke capacities oft times have neither soule nor conscience This perfidiousnesse in the king made his long raigâ full of troubles of bloody civill warres and oft times endangered the very losse of his Crowne aâ kingdome as our Historians informe us for which he repented and promised amendment at hâ death m Lib. 3. c. 9. f. 107. Bracton an ancient Lawyer in this kings dayes writes That the king in his Coronation OVGHT by an Oath taken in the name of Iesus Christ to promise these three things to the people subject to hiâ First that he will command and endeavour to his power that true peace shall be kept to the Church and â Christian people in his time Secondly That he will prohibit rapines or plunderings and all iniquities â all degrees Thirdly That in all Iudgements he will command equitie and mercy that so God who is gracious and mercifull may bestow his mercy on him and that by his justice all men may injoy firme peace Fâ saith he a King is SACRED and ELECTED to wit by his kingdome for this end to doe justis unto all for if there were no justice peace would be easily exterminated and it would be in vaine to make Lawes and doe justice unlesse there were one to defend the Lawes c. And before the Conquest I reâ in n Fox Acts and Monuments Edition 1641. vol. 1. p. 214. and Lambards Archaion Leges Edwardi c. 17. Bilson par 3 p. 494. King Edward the Confessors Lawes not onely the Office but Oath of the King whom he anâ Bracton oft stiles Gods and Christ Vicar upon earth thus excellently described A King ought aboâ all things to feare God to love and observe his Commandments and cause them to be observed through hâ whole kingdome He ought also to set up good Lawes and customes such as be wholesome and approved sââ as be otherwise to repeale them and thrust them out of his kingdome Item he ought to doe justice anâ judgement in his kingdome by the counsell of the Nobles of his Realme All these things ought the King â his owne person to doe taking his oath upon the Evangelists and the blessed Reliques of Saints swearing â the presence of the whole state of his Realme as well of the temporalty as of the spiritualty before he ââ crowned of the Archbishops and Bishops Three servants the King ought to have under him as Vassals fleshly lust avarice and greedy desire whom if he keepe under as his servants and slaves he shall reigne well anâ honorably in his Kingdome He must doe all things with good advisement and praemeditation and thâ properly
belongeth to a King for hasty rashnesse bringeth all things to ruine according to the saying of thâ Gospell Every Kingdome divided in it selfe shall be brought to desolation Master o Vol. 1. p. 214. Fox informes us that William the Conquerour through the peoples clamour promised to confirme this King Edwards Lawes but the most part of them he omitted contrary to his Oath at his Coronation Indeede I finde not that the Conqueror tooke this Oath when he was crowned but I reade in * History p. 440. 441. Speed and others that William the Conquerour abrogating for the most part the ancient Lawes of the Land and introducing neâ hard Lawes of his owne written in the Norman tongue which the people understood not and thâ Iudges wrested at their pleasures to the forfeiture of Goods Lands Life hereupon the Nobility and Natives seeking to cast off these snares and fetters of his Lawes set up Edgar Athelin for theâ Generall once againe and âell into a new conspiracie raising great forces and resolving to make thâ sword their Iudge The King hereupon by Lanfrankes advise who as Reâoboams sages gave him counsell somewhat to beare with their abuses rather then to hazard the ruine of all in fight appointed a meeting at Berkhamâteed Anno 1172. where the King entring parly with the English Nobility did so farre winde himselfe into their good opinions that they all forthwith layd downe their weapons And he for his part fearing to lose the Crowne with shame which he had gotten with effusion âf so much blood gave his Oath upon the holy Evangelists and the reliques of Saint Albane the Martyr the same being ministred to him by Abbot Fredericke swearing to observe and inviolably to ââepe the ancient Lawes of this Land and most especially those compiled by King Edward the Confessor âhough as the event soone shewed he little meant to doe as he promised Peace thus established âis conference ended and the Kings oath received the English Armies disband themselves as dreaâing Note this they had now good fortune by the foote and hoping the greatest stormes of their dangers were âaât which presently proved but a vaine surmise For king William having compounded with the âanes began extreamely to hate the English Nobles and with full resolution of their destruction ââddenly set upon them apart which he durst not attempt when they were united so that * See Hântindon Hist l. 7. p. 369. Mat. Paris Hist p. 6. sâaying âny imprisoning others and persecuting all of them with fire and sword well was he that could âe first ââne Such little faith or assurance is there in the solemne Oathes and Protestations of Kings to ââeir Subjects which are seldome really performed and intended onely as snares to intrap them if ââey confide and rely upon them without any better security The forme of the kings Coronation âer since Edward the a hath beene this and is thus administred p Magna Charta Printed Cum Privilegio London 1558. part 2. f. 16ââ Iudamentum Regis quando coronaâuâ Remonstrance Nov 2. p. 25. to 38. The Metropolitan or Bishop ââat is to Crowne the King with a meane and distinct voyce shall interrogate him if he will confirme with an âath the Lawes and customes granted to the people of England by ancient just and devout kings towards âod to the samepeople and especially the Lawes and Customes and Liberties granted by glorious King Edward to the Clergie and People And IF HE SHALL PROMISE that he will assent to all these âet the Metropolitan or Bishop expound to him what things he shall sweare saying thus Thou shalt âepe to the Church of God to the Clergie and people Peace intirely and concord in God according to thy ââwer The king shall answer I will keepe it Thou shalt cause to be done in all thy judgements equall âdright justice and discretion in mercy and verity according to thy power He shall answer I will doe it ââou grantest just Lawes and Customes to be kept and thou dost promise that those Lawes shall be protected âd confirmed by thee to the honour of God QUAS VULGUS ELEGERIT which the people shall âse according to thy power He shall answer I doe graât and promise And there may be added to âe foresayd Interrogations what other things shall be just All things being pronounced he shall confirme that he will observe all things with an oath upon the Altar presently taken before all There âath beene a late unhappie difference raised betweene the q See the Parliaments Remonstrance of the 26. of May. p. 9. His Majesties Answer thereto p. 16. 17. and the Parliaments Reply Nou. 2. p. 2â to 38. king and Parliament about the word ELEGERIT the Parliament affirming the word to signifie shall chuse according to sundry written âoles and Printed Coppies in Latin and French the King on the contrary affirming it should be ââth chosen But he that observes the words of the ancient Oathes Populo tibi commisso rectam ââliciam exercebis malas leges iniquas consuetudines si aliquae fuererint in Regno tuo delebis bonas servabis all in the future tence and the verbes servabis Facies fierâ protegendas corâoborandas in âe former and same clauses of the Oath now used all of them in the future with the whole Scope âtent and purport of this part of the Oath must necessarily grant shall chuse to be the true reaâng and that it referres to the confirmation of * Iudge Huttons Argument against Ship-money p. 32. determines so future Lawes to be afterwards made in Parliament not those onely in being when the Oath was administred else kings should not be obliged by their âathes to keepe any Lawes made after their Coronations by their owne assents but onely those ââeir Predecessors assented to not themselves which were most absurd to affirme From these severall Oathes and Passages the usuall forme of the Nobles proclaiming such and ââch Kings of England with other r Page 4. ââ forecited Histories it is apparant First that Popish Parliaments Peeres and Subjects have deemed the Crowne of England not meerely successive and heâditaây though it hath usually gone by descent but arbitray and elective when they saw cause maâ of our kings comming to the Crowne without just hereditarie Title by the Kingdomes Peeres âd peoples free election onely confirmed by a subsequent Act of Parliament which was then reââted a sufficient Right by vertue whereof they then reigned and were obeyed as lawfull kings âd were then and yet so acknowledged to be their Right by Election of their Subjects being seldome or never adjudged an illegall usurpation in any Parliaments whence the statute of 1 E. 4. c. 1. â d â E. 4. â 2. declare king Henry the 4. 5. and 6. to be successively kings of England indeed and not right yet not usurpers because they came in by Parliament Onely Richard the third who treacherously murthered Edward the 5. his
Soveraigne and violently usurped his Crowne at first before any Parliament ââve it him compelling the Lords and Commons afterwards to Elect him King out of feare after his slaughââ in Bosworth field was declared an usurper by Act of Parliament 1. H. 7 c. 6. and so adjudged to by 1 E. 4. c. 1. 8. H. 7 c. 1. 9. E. 4. f. 1. 2. and Henry the 7. had the Crowne set upon his head in the ââld by my Lord Standly as though saith s Page 8 â ââ Grafton he had beene elected king by the voyce of the people â in ancient times past in divers Realmes it hath beene accustomed Secondly that those kings who have enjoyed the Crowne by succession discent or election have still taken it upon the condition and covenants conteined in their Coronation Oathes which if they refused to sweare to the Peeââ and people really and bona fide to performe they were not then to be crowned or received as kings ââ adjured in the name of God to renounce this dignity And though in point of Law t Cooke 7. Report f. 10. 11. Calvins case Marâil Patauinus Defen Pacis pars 2. c. 25. those who enjoy ââ Crowne by Succession be Kings before their Coronations yet it is still upon those subsequent * Littleton sect 378. 379. Cookes Instit Ibid. f. 232. 233. 234. Condition in Law contained in their Coronation Oathes which impose no new but onely ratifie the old conditions â separably annexed to the Crowne by the Common Law ever since Edward the Confessors dayes if not ââfore as the Oathes of all our kings to their people really to performe thâse Articles and Condition fully demonstrate Thirdly that these Oathes are not meerely arbitrary or voluntary at the kiââ pleasure to take or refuse them if he will but necessary and inevitable by the Law and constâââsage of the Realme yea of all v Baldus Proaem de Feud n 32. Dr Crakenth defence of Constantine p. 163. to 175. Grimst Imperiall Hist p. 653. Christian kingdomes whatsoever which prescribe like Oathes to tââ kings From all which I may firmely conclude that the whole Kingdome and Parliament are ââ Supreame Authoritie and Paramount the king because they may lawfully and doe usually prescrââ such conditions termes and rules of governing them to him and binde him by Oath faithfully to perfoââ the same as long as he shall continue king which oath our kings usually tooke or at least faithfuââ promised to take to their Subjects in ancient times before ever they did or would take an Oath â fealty homage or Allegiance to them as the premises evidence Claus Rot. 1. R. 2. M. 44. Tenthly Our Parliaments and kingdome anciently in times of Popery and Paganisme ââ both challenged and exercised a Supreame power over the Crowne of England it selfe to transfeââ it from the right heire and setled it on whom themselves thought meete to elect for their King ââ likewise to call their Kings to an account for their misgovernment and breach of Oath to the prejudice of their people so farre as to article against them and either by force of Armes or a judicââ sentence in Parliament actually to depose them and set up others in the Throne as many * See Fortescue c. 12. to 15 Iohan. Mar. de Rege Regis Instit l. 1. â 7. 8. 9. foreciââ presidents together with the examples of Archigallo and Emerian two ancient British Kings and Edwin King of Mercia deprived of allhonour and Kingly dignity by the unanimous consent of their Subjects for their Tyranny Oppression misgovernment and vicious lives and others elected and made Kings their places evidence which Acts of theirs they then reputed just and Legall Those Parliament then and Nationall Assemblies which have thus disposed of the Crowne and Kings themselves and exercised such jurisdiction over them must certainely be above them and the highest Soveraingâ power True it is our Protestant Peeres Commons and Parliaments never challenged nor exercised such jurisdiction and I presume they will never doe it However it is neither honourable nââ safe for Kihgs and the most destructive policy their ill Counsellours can suggest unto them so faâ to oppresse their Subjects or exasporate their Parliaments as to provoke them to use the extremity x See p. 4. 5. 6. their power and revive dead sleeping presidents the consideration whereof when they were fresh mââ succeeding Kings more just and moderate in their governments and reclaimed many Vitious and Oppressâââ * See Mat. West Jeofry Monmouth Polych Fab. Graft Holin Speed in their lives Princes as Archigallo and others witnes for their reliefe We know what Solomon saith y Eccles 7. 7. Surely ââpression maketh a wise man mad and if Kings or their evill Instruments shall so farre mad their Subject and Parliaments either by oppressions rapines misgovernment destroying making warre upon them putting them out of their protections as to make them cry out as they did against King Iohn z Mat. Par. p. 264. 265. 268. Grafton p. 111. 112. Bishop Bilson part 3. p. 480. Rex Iohânes factus est de Rege Tyrannus imo de homine in âestialem praerumpens feritatem Veâ tibi Iohanni Regâ ultime Anglorum Principum abominatio Nobilitatis Anglicanae confusio Heu Anglia vastata â plius vastanda c. Whereupon presently ensued a Nolumus hunc regnare Tandemque decretum â ut aliquem potentem in Regem eligerent per quem possint ad possessiones prisâinas revâcari credentes â nuâlus Iohanne peior vel durior possit dominari tale miserabile statuentes argumentum Fortuna miserima tuta est Nam timor eventus deterioris abest Cumque aliquandiâ quem eligerent âaeâitâssent demum in hoc pariter consensârunt ut Ludovicum filââ Philippi Regis Francorum sibi praeficerent ipsum in Regem Angliae sublimârent Which they did King Iohns their owne and the whole kingdomes great prejudice We know what the ill advise of Rââ boams rough young Counsellors produced 2 Chron. 10. And the King answered the people roughly ââ the advice of the young men saying My father made your yoake heavie but I will adde thereto â * See 2 Chro. 10. 11. father chastised you with whips but I will chastise you with scorpions And when all Israel saw that â king would not harken unto them the people answered the King though he came to the crown by succeââ on saying What portion have we in David and we have none inheritance in the Son of Iesse every maâ your tents O Israel and now David see to thine owne house So all Israel went to their tents and eleââ Ieroboam for their King and fell away from the house of David to this day being never after united to â but continuing a distinct Kingdome from it wherefore the best policy Kings can use to perpetuate their Thrones to them and their Posterity is to âââat their Subjects so
a Seneca de Clemeâââa l. 1. as may winne their hearts and affections and not to straine their pretended Prerogatives beyond the bounds of Law this being a most certaine experimented rule which b Polit. l. 5. c. 10 11. p 367 368 See Polybius Hist l. 6. Aristotle the Prince of Politicians gives That there are two intestine causes most perilous and frequent of all others by which a kingdome is usually lost and subverted The first is if the Nobles and people dissent from the King himselfe The second if Kings will Reigne tyrannically and usurpe a greater domination or prerogative then the Lawes of their kingdomes give them Then he addes Verily a kingdome is preserved by contrary remedies specially by a moderate kinde and temperate forme of Government For by how much the c Deut. 17. 19 20. See Prov. 16. 12. c. 20. 28 c. 29. 4. 14. c. 25. 5. more moderate the King shall be and contented with smaller and fewer prerogatives by so much the more constant and longer-lasting shall his kingdome necessarily be For by this meanes it recedes farther from the domination of Tyrants and it comes nearer to the equability of manners and humanity of life and is lesse envyed by their Subjects which he proves by the notable speech and example of King Theopompus And indeed this is the principall policy which God himselfe hath prescribed a King to prolong his dayes in his kingdome he and his children after him to keepe all the words of this Law and those Statutes to doe them that âs to governe himselfe and his Subjects onely by Law not power to doe justice and judgement avoid oppression and not to liftup his heart above his brethren as if they were his vassals and noâ men or Christians of the same kinde and quality as himselfe is Wherefore I shall close up this with old Bractons resolution d Lib. 3. c. 9. f. 107. Fleta lib. 1. c. 17. Potestas itaque Regis juris est non injuriae Exercere igitur debet Rex potestatem Juris âicut Dei vicarius Minister in terra quia illa potestas SOLIUS Dei est potestas autem injuriae Diaboli non Dei cujus horum operum fecerit Rex ejus Minister erit cujus opera fecerit Igitur dum facit justitiam vicarius est Regis aeterni minister autem Diaboli dum declinat ad injuriam * See Leges Edwardi Confessoris cap. 17. in Lambards Archaion f. 130. accordingly Dicitur enim Rex a bene regendo non a regnando quia Rex est dum bene regit Tyrannus dum populum sibi creditum violenta opprimit dominatione Temperet igitur potentiam suam per legem quae fraenum est potentiae quod secundum leges vivaâ quia hoc sanxit Lex humana quod leges suum ligent latoreâ alibi in eadem digna âox Majestate regnanââs est legibus alligatum se Principem profiteri Item nihil tâm proprium est imperii quam legibus vivere Et majus imperio est legibus submittere Principatum merito debet retribuere legi quia Lex tribuit ei facit enim Lex quod ipse sit Rex Item cum non semper oporteat Regem esse armaâum armis sed legibus addiscat Rex sapientiam conservet justitiam All which is notably seconded by Judge Fortescue De Laudibus Legum Angliae c. 9. to 15. worthy any Princes serious perusall And thus doing neither he nor his Posterity need âeare this Supreame Prerogative Power of Parliaments which hath âaine dead and buryed for many ages Et pereat positum rubigine telum 11. All Papists e See p 2 3. the Authours there quoted Bishop Jewels View of a seditious Bull and of the Popes Supremacy Cassanaeus Catagloria mundi part 4. attribute farre more divine authority and Soveraigne Jurisdiction over Emperours Kings Princes Kingdomes Subjects to the Pope their Lord and God whom they make the Supreame Monarch of the World and all kingdomes in it and give him greater Authority to summon ratify and dissolve generall Councels then ever any Christian King or Emperour challenged or usurped yet those who maintaine these Paradoxes of the Popes Supremacy confesse f See John Whites Way sect 36. n. 30. 34 35. p. 102. 104 105. Surius Tom. 3. 4. that a generall Councell is above the Pope and may upon just cause not onely convent and censure him for his misdemeanours but likewise actually depose him and set up another in his stead as the Councels of Pisa Constans Basil which deposed foure Popes namely Gregory the 12. Benedict the 13. John the 23. and Eugenius the fourth the Councell of Chalcedon against Pope Leo the Councell of Sinuessa against Pope Marcellinus the sixth seventh and eighth generall Councels against Honorius the Councels of q Wormes and Brixia against Hildebrand the Councell of Pisa summond 1511. of purpose to depose Pope Julius for his perjury h See John Whites Way sect 36. n. 30 p. 102 and n. 34 35. p. 104 105. sundry Popish Writers acknowledge Now the Councell of Basil as I shewed * See p. 4. before defined That the whole Kingdome and Parliament hath as great a power over their Kings as a Councell hath over the Pope therefore by Papists verdicts it is above the King in point of Soveraigne power as a Councell is above the Pope which John Mariana De Rege Regis Instit lib. 1. c 3. to 10. professedly proves at large 12. That Court which may lawfully coniure question depose banish execute the Kings greatest Favorites Officers Judges yea Lord Protectors themselves the highest Peeres of the Realme notwithstanding such are said to be i Psal 82. 1 2. Exod. 22. 2â John 10. 34. Gods k Rom. 13. 1 2 3 4. Ordained of God Gods Ministers To l Prov. 8. 15. decree Judgement g Fox Acts Monuments vol. 1. p 231. 235. 879 to 890. 962. by God to be the higher powers c. in Scripture as well as Kings and that not onely with but against the Kings Good will must questionlesse be the highest power and Jurisdiction in the Realme else the King and their Authority might protect them against its Justice But the Parliament may lawfully censure question depose banish execute all or any of these not onely without but against the Kings consent witnesse the proceedings in Parliament against m Hoveden p. 702 703. 705 706. with Speed Holinshed Grafton Stow Matthew Paris Polychronicon Fabian William Longchamp Bishop of Ely Chiefe Justiciaâ Lord Chancellor and Vice-roy of England in Richard the first his Reigne during his absence in the Holy Land from which Offices he was by the Peeres and Commons deposed for his misdâmeanours and oppressions n Walsingh Speed Holinsh Fabian in Edw. 2. Froyssards Chron. part 1. c. 12 13. Piers Gaveston and the two Hugh Spensers in Edward the seconds Reigâe oft banished
by Parliament and violently pât to death though the Kings highest Officer and darling Minions o Walsingham Holinsh Speed Grafton Stow in 11 R. 2. c. 1. 6 7. Froysards Chron. part c. 97. Michael De La Pole wiâh other great Officers and Favourites to King Richard the second condemned deprived of their Offices banished and executed by the Peereâ in Parliament together with Trisilian Belknap and their fellow Judges who misadvised him in point of Law p Hall Stow Speed Holinsh Grafton Fox in H. 6. Humphâey Duke of Glocester Protector to King Henry the sixt arrested of high Treason in a Parliament at Bury and there murdered q Hall Holi Grafton Stow in H. 8. Cardinall Wolsey that powerfull favourite âo King Henây the eight accused and put from his Chancellorship and other Offices by the Parliament r Fox Speed Holinshed Stow Grafton in Ed. 6 The Duke of Sommerset Lord Protector to King Edward the sixt accused and attainted of high Treason in Parliament for which he lost his head the great Earle of Strafford Lord Depuây of Ireland who lost his head this Parliament for Treason full sore against his Majesties and the Queenes wills with infinite others mentioned in our Stories and Records Nay Queenes themselves have undergone âhe censures of Parliament of which we have sundry precedents in Å¿ See Fox Hall Speed Holinshed Grafton in his life 28. H. 8. c. 7. p. 35. p. 8. c. 1. King Henry the eight his Reigne not onely to divorce but losse of their very heads and shall any Delinquent then thinke to be protected by any power against the Parliaments justice now 13. Not to mention the Parliaments Soveraigne Power and Jurisdiction t Matth. Paris p. 560. 562. 933 934 935. Speed p. 750. Grafton p. 188 189. 240 241. 221 222 223. The severall Acts for Subsidies and Rastal Warre Truce Armes Money Mint Musters Taxes Tonnage Poundage The Parliaments two Remonstrances concerning the Militia Câoks Instit on Artic Super Chartas in Making or proclaiming warre or Peace in which they have oft tiâes not onely advised but overswayed the King in creating the highest Officers in Ordering the Militia of the Kingdome by Sea and Land by setled Lawes of which more an on or in ordering the coyne and Money of the Land together wâth the Mint or designing how the Subsidies and Aydes granted by them to the King shall be disposed of to the Kingdomes use of which there are sundry precedents All which are strong See Bodines Commen wealth l. 1. c. 10. evidences of its Soveraigne Authority together with the Acts concerning his Purveyance and all Revenues royall Nor yet to remember this infallible Argument to prove Kingdomes greater and more valuable then Kings that Kings as publique Servants to their Realmes ought to hazard their lives for their Kingdomes safety and preservation as many have done in waââes against enemies but never ought the whole kingdome to be lost or hazarded to preserve its Kings Pâerogatives that of John 11. 48 49 50. and chap. 18. 14. being an undoubted rule in Divinity and Policy * That it is expedient that any one man though a King should dye for the people that the whole Nation perish not rather then the whole Nation dye for him There is one cleare Demonstration yet remaining to prove the Supreame power of Parliaments above Kings themselves which is this That it is the highest Court and power to which all x See Sir Thomas Smiths Common wealth l. 2. c. 1. 2. Holinsheds Description of England c. 8. p. 173 and Chronicles of Ireland p. 127. to 130. Cromptons Jurisdiction Appeales are lastly and finally to be made from all other Courts and Judges whatsoever yea from the Kings owne personall resolutiâns in or out of any other his Courts and such a transcendent Tribunall from whence âhere is no appeale to any other Court or person no not to the King himselfe but onely to another Parliament If any erroneous judgement be given in the Kings Bench Exchequer Chamber Chancery Court of Wards or any other Court within the Realme or in the Parliament in Ireland it is finally to be reversed oâ determined in Parliament by a Writ of y 1 H. 7. 1. Br. Parliament 92. 98. Error 65 88. 137. See Ash Error 65 66 67 68 70. Error or upon a Petition or Bill If any sentence be unjustly given in any Ecclesiasticall Courts or before the Delegates the finall Appeale for redresse must be to the Parliament Illegall sentences in the now exploded extravagant Courts of Star-Chamber or High Commission Injuries done by the King and his privy Councell at the Councell Table are examinable and remediabâe in this High Court Nay if the King himselfe should sit in person in the Kings Bench or any other Court as sometimes our Kings have done and there give any judgement it is not so obligatory or finall but that the party against whom judgement is pronounced may appeale to the Parliament for reliefe But if the Parliament give any judgement There * See 22 E 3. 3 Error 8. 8 H 4. 12 13 can be no Appeale to any higâer Tribunall Court or Person no not to the King but onely to the next or some other Parliament as is evident by experience by all z 21 R. 2. c. â to 15. 1 H. 4. c. 2 3 4. 8 H. 4. 12 13. See 1 Mariae c. 1. 1 Eliz. c. â 3. 21 Jac. c. 28. And all Acts for restitution in blood of Persons Attainted and Acts of repealing Sâatutes Bracton l. 1. c. â Attainders of Treason by or in Parlâament by all inconveent and unjust Actâ passed in Parliament which concerne either King or Subject Which cannot be reversed nor repealed though erroneous nor the right heire restored in blood by any Charter fâom the King but onely by an Act of repeale or restitution in bloâd by another Parliament Now this is an infallible Maxime both in the Common Civill and Canon Law that The Court or person to wâom the last appeale is to be made is the Supreamest power as the a See Ashes Tables Error 65 66 67 68 69 70. Kings Bench is above the Common Pleas the Escâequer Chamber * See Matthew Paris p. 268. Legimus quod multi alâ Reges imo Reguli usque ad mortem dimicaâunt c. above the Kings Bench and the Parliament above them all because a Writ of Error to reverse erroneous judgements given in the Common Pleas lyeth in the Kings Bench Errors in the Kings Bench may be reversed in the Eschequer Chamber and errors in all or either of them may be redressed finally in Parliament from whence there is no further appeale Hence the Canonists conclude a b Bodin l. 1. c. 10. Summa Angelicâ Rosella Tit. Appellatio Lindwood lib. 2 de Appellationibus Fox Acts and Monuments Vol. 1. p. 448 449. 452. 506. 24. H. 8. c. 12. All Papists and Protestants
in their Controversies of the Popes Supremacy of general Councels Generall Councell above the Pope the Pope above the Archbishop the Archbishop above the Ordinary because men may Appeale from the Ordinary to the Archbishop from him to the Pope but now with us to the Kings Delegates If there be any difference betweene c See Grafton p. 512 513. 161. Matthew Paris p. 954. Fox old Edition p. 508. King or Subject touching any inheritances Priviledges or Prerogatives belonging to the Crowne it selfe or any points of misgovernment yea which is more if there be any suite quarrell or difference betweene our Kings in Act and any other their Competitors d See Hoveden p. 724 725 for the Crowne it selfe which of them hath best title to it who of them shall enjoy it and how or in what manner it shall be setled the Lords and Commons in Parliament are and ought to be the sole and finall Judges of it Not to give you aây instances of this kinde betweene King and Subjects which I have formerly touched nor to relate how our e Walsingham Hist p. 514. Speed p. 647 648. Kings Edward the first King John f Matthew Paris p. 273. 274 275. condemned to death by a Parliament in France by French Peeres for slaying his Nephew Arthur trecherously with his owne hands and likewise to lose the Crowne of England Henry the third and other our Kings have Appealed to the Parliaments of France and England upon differences betweene the Peeres and Kings of France and them concerning their Lands and Honours in France Or how King Edward the third and Philip of France submitted both their Titles to the Kingdome of France to the determination in a French Parliament where they were both personally present which adjudged the Crowne to Philip Nor yet to repeate the i pag. 5. forementioned precedents how the Lords and Commons when the Title to the Crowne hath beene in dispute have transferred it from the rightfull Heires to others I shall give you some other pregnant evidences where the Parliament hath finally determined the Title to the Crowne when it hath beene in competition and setled it in a legall manner to avoid debates by way of Appeale to them by compeâitors or reference from the Kings themselves as the onely proper Judges of such a superlative controversie Not to mention any stories of our British Kings to this purpose where the * See Matthew Westm Fabian Grafton Holin Kingdom Lords and Commons then disposed of the Crowne in cases of minority want of Heâres misgovernment and cântroversies abâut the Title to the Crowne * Polichron l. 6. c. 18. Speed p. 399. See Grafton and Holinshed accordingly Canutus after the death of King Edmond Anno 1017. claiming the whole Realme against Edmonds Brethren Sons referred his Title upon the agreement made between Edmond and him foâ this purpose to the Parliament who resolved for Canutus Title and thereupon tooke an Oath of fealây to him Offering to defend his right with their swords against all others claimes After his decease the * Matthew Westminster and Malmesâwy Anno 1036. Holinshed l. 17. c. 13. p. 398. Speed p. 404. 406. Huntingdon Walsingham Anno 1036. 10â0 Title to the Crowne being controverted betweene Hardicanute the right Heire and Harold his elder but base Brother it was referred to a Parliament at Oxfoâd who gave their voyces to Harold there present and presently proclaimed and consecrated him King Anno 1036. After whose death the States of England sent and adjudged the Crowne to Hardicanute then in Denmarke He dying * Huntindon l. 6. Polychron l. 6. c. 18. Speed p. 410. Matthew Westân An. 1042. p. 415. Edward the Confessor by a generall consent of the Nobles Clergy and People who presently upon Harolds death enacted by Parâiament g Matthew Paris p. 893. 925. 930. 948. 954 655. Grafton p. 188 189 Speed p. 687 688 785 786. That none oâ the Danish blood should any more Reigne over them was elected King and declared âight Heire to the Crowne Anno 1126. k Hoveden Hunâingdon Matthew Westminster Matthew Paris Walsingham Polychronicân Fabian Anno 1126. Speed p. 477. See Hoâinshed Grafton Stow Anno 1126. King Henry the first having no issue male but onely one Daughter Maude to fucceed him summoned a Parliament in the presence of himselfe and David King of Scotland wherein the Crowne was setled upon Maude after his decease being of the ancient Royall English Blood whereupon Stephen his Sisters Sonne and all the Nobles presently swore fealty to âer As much as in them lay after King Henries death if âe dyed without issue male to establish âer Queene âf the Monarchy of great Britaine But Stephen after his decease usurped the Crowne against his Oath h Polyd. Virgil l. 19. Claudius Seyseââus his French Monarchy By the unanimous consent and election of the Lords and Commons And after seventeene yeares civill warres âo the devastation of the Realme l Walsingham Ypod An. 1113 Matthew Westm An. 1153 p. 42. Matthew Paris â 82 83. Speed p. 497. Hoveden p. 490. Hunâindon Hist l. 8 p. 598. Fox Vol. 1. p. 261. King Stephen and Henry the Sonne of Maude came to a Treaty â Walâingford where by the advise of the Lords they made this accord That Stephen if he would should âeaceably hold the kingdome during his life and that Henây should be his adopted Sonne and Successor enjoy âhe Crowne as right Heire to it after his death and that the King and all the Bishops and Nobles should âweare that Henry after the Kings death if he suâvived him should Pâssesse the Kingdome without any conradiction Which done the civill warres ceased and a blessed peace ensued and then comming to Oxford in a Parlâament all the Nobles did fealty to Henry who was made chiefe Justiciar of England and determined all the affaires of the Kingdome In the 8. and 25. E. 3. there was a m 25. E. 3. Parl 2. in the Statuts at large doubt moved in Parliament whether the children of the King or others borne beyond the Seas within his Allegiance should inâerit lands in England The King to cleare all doubts and ambiguities in this case and to have the Laâ herein reduced to ceâtainty charged the Prelates Earles Barons and other wise men of his Councell assembled in Parliamânt in the 25. yeare of his Raigne to deliberaââ of this point who with one assent resolved That the Law of the Realme of England is and alwayes hath beene such that the children of the Kings ââ England in whatsoever parts they be borne in England or elsewhere be able and owe to beare inheritance after the death of their Ancestors Which when they had declared the King Lords and Commons by a special Act did approve and affirme this Law for ever the onely Act passed in that Parliament And in a * Cooke l. 7. The Princes case Parliament 11. E. 3. this
the Crowne of England â the next and onely heire of the blood Royall to whom of right it descended which Dolman the Priest and soâ Jesuites opposed in Printed seditious Bookes So the z â Mariae Parl. 2. c. 2. Articles of Queene Maries marriage with Kâ Philip were limited appointed and ratified by Parliament And the Imperiall Ecclesiasticall Juâdiction usurped by the Pope and Prelates hath likewise by a 25 H. 8. c. 19. 21. 26 H. 8 c. 1. 3. 27 H. 8. c. 10. 28 H. 8. c. p. 16. 32 H. 8. c. 22. 24. 29. 31 H. 8. c. 10. 14. 3â H. 8. c. 29. 34 35 H. 8. c. 17. 19. 35 H. 8. c. 1. 3. 1 Eli. c. 1. 1 E. 6. c. 2. 1 Mariae c. 1. Parl. 2. c. 1. 8 El. c. 1. sundây Statutes beene restored and united to ââ Crowne and the Title of Supreame head and Supreame Governour in all causes and over all persons Spiriâ all Ecclesiasticall and Temporall seiled upon our Kings and Queenes Who during their minoriâies have ââ Guardians and Protectors appointed to them by b Walsingham Hist Angl. H. 5. p. 458. Speed p. 1 108. 28 H. 8. c. 7. 17. 1 E. 6. c. 11. Hals Chronicle 1 H. 6 Parliament to summen Parliaments assent to âils and exâcute all royall Jurisdiction in their names and steads And aâ the Title and Right to the Crowne of Englanâ and the Jurisdiction thereof hath thus from time to time beene decided and setled in and by our Parliâments so hath the Title and Jurisdiction of the Crowne of Scotland beene c Hist Angl. p 16. to 26. 31. to 33 42. 46. to 56. See Holin Grafton Stow Speed in the life of Edward the first âpodigma Neust p. 72. to 96. frequently discussed aâ setled in our Parliaments upon appeales made to them by the Kings of Scotland and their Corrivals to that Crowââ Witnesse the famous case and competition for that Crown long agitated and resolved in Parliament betweene ââ King of Norway Bailliol and Bruce to omit others in the Reigne of King Edward the first And âââ King Edwards title to the Crowne of Scotland declared and resolved by our Parliament here All which ââ Recorded at large by Thomas Walsingâam in the life of King Edward the first and in the Parliameââ Rols and Pleas of his Raigne with d 1 Jac. 1. sundry other instances of this nature frequent in our Historian â whâch for brevity I pretermit It is a e 35 H. 8 c 1 cleare case without dispute that if the King should dye without any Heire the Crowne wouâ ofcheate to the whole Kingdome and Parliament who might dispose of it in such a case to what persââ they pleased or quite change that forme of government if they saw good cause no particular kinâ of rule being so simply necessary by any divine right or Law to any state or Kingdome but that as it was â first instituted so it may in such a case be changed by the whole Kingdomes generall consent upon suffâcient grounds This appeares by the case of * Elondus Decad 2. l. 2. Regin l. 2. An. 800 Biââop Bilson of Christ an Suâjection c. part 3. p. 423. Charles the grosse who being deposed from the Empire aââ his Kingdomes for a mad man and dying without any Heire the Kingdomes which before were subject ââ him Destitute of a right Heire began to fall in sunder on every side and to choose Kings of themselves of anâther Family France elected Charles a childe sirnamed Simple for their King and after his simplicâty displeased them they Crowned Otho Sonne of Robert Duke of Saxony in his place At the same timâ the people of Italy meaning to have a King of their owne could not agree on the matter but some choâ Beringarius others Guido and so had two Kings in Italy both calling and bearing themselves as Empârours And the Germanes elected Arnolph Duke of Bavaria for their Emperour Thus * Zonas Annal. Tom. 3. f. 1 26. Grimstons Imperiall History p. 303. Zeno the Emperour dying without any Heire that might succeed him Anastasiuâ a man of great reputation yet of no Noââ Family was chosen his Successor by the Senate and Legions The like we read of divers other Emperouâ deâeasing without Heire of some of our Saxon and British Kings before the Conquest and of otheâ in other Kingdomes where the Crowne hath beene translated from one family to another by the Kingdomes consent for want of Heires Yea Bishop Bilson 1 The true difference betweene Christian Subjectioâ and unchristian Rebellion part 3. p. 418. to 422. himselfe though a great Royalist poââtively affirmes That if a King or right Hâire to any Crowne be borne or becomes a naturall Foole or starâmad or run besides himselfe so that he is not able to governe himselfe much lesse his Realme in these ââ cases ANY REALME BY PUBLICKE CONSENT and ADVICE MAâ CHUSE ANOTHER KING for what should he doe with a royall Office or by what dâvine or humane right can he enjoy a Crowne who is utterly unable to manage it Upon this grounâ 2 See the generall History of France in his life Sabellicus Ennead 8. l. 8. â 245 Nâuclârus vol. 3. gen 20. Blondus Decad. 1. l. ââ Aventinus l. 3. p. 293. to 300. Gaguinus l. 3. in Carolo. Mârt Herman Scheââ Chron. Aetas 6 f. 185. King Childericke was deposed by his French and German Subjects generall consents because he was â âe a Sot a Beast unable to governe his Kingdome and Pepin of another race elected and crowned King in âstead which act by Pope Zacharies resolution was adjudged both just and lawfull even in point of âscience before it was put in execution So 3 Goâfredus Viterbiensis Chro. pars ââ col 468 Regino l. 3. An. 887. H. Mutius Germ. Chr. l. 12 Grimstons Imperial History p. 404. Charles the third the last Emperour of Pipins race ââ deposed from the Empire by the Princes Dukes and Governours of the Provinces of Germany and ââce for that he became foolish and unfit to governe being bereaved of his senses and by common consent ââolph was elected Emperour in his stead Thus 4 Euagrius Eccl. hist l. 5. c. 11. 13 Zonaras Annal. Tom. 3. f. 150 151. Eutropius l 16. p. 211. Justinus the second falling into a frensie and madnesse âhat he had no sense nor understanding of any thing that was done was removed and Tiberius placed âhe Empire at his Coronation Justinus used this notable speech Let not the glory of these Imperiall ââes leade thee into errour neither be thou de ceived with the glorious shew of such things as are subject unto the ââs wherewith I my selfe now alâs being snared have brought my selfe foolishly into grievous torments ârefore in governing the Empire with great moderation and mildnesse of spirit redresse what is amisse and corâ what I have leudly committed And pointing at his ill Counsellours with
doe both â point of Law Divinity conscience resist the highest powers because they resist the Parliament and â shall receive damnation to themselves for it either here or hereafter if they repent not which I seriously âsire all those Delinquents Papists Malignants ill Counsellers and Cavaliers to consider who conâary to severall Orders and Declarations of Parliament yea contrary to the Law of God of Nature of the âealme have like unnaturall Vipers taken up offensive Armes against the Parliament and Kingdome to âine them with our Religion Lawes and Liberties at once Thirdly Hence it followes that the Resolutions and Declarations of the Lords and Commons in Parliaâent the supremest Court against the Commission of Array Arming of Papists raising of Forces impoâg Taxes to maintaine Warre against the Parliament plundering and the like ought to be obeyed and subâitted to as lawfull and binding both by the King himselfe the Kingdome and every private Subject âhatsoever and that the Kings extrajudiciall and illegall Declarations out of Parliament in direct oppoâion and contradiction to the resolutions and Votes of both Houses in Parliament ought not to be obeyed âe King himselfe as our Law Bookes resolve being no t 8 H. 4. 13. b. 24 H. 8. c. 12. 52 H. 3. c. 1. 25 H. 8. c. 21. Cookes 1 Institutes on Mag. Charta f. 103. See here p. 14. 34. competent Judge especially out of his Courts âhat is Law or what not in those Cases but the Parliament onely Which extrajudiciall new device of conâolling affronting the Resolutions and Declarations of both Houses by opposite Proclamations and ââclarations published in his Majesties name is such a transcendent violation of and contempt against âe knowne priviledge the sacred venerable Authority and power of Parliaments as I am confident ââ age can parallell and if not severely vindicated by exemplary punishments of the highest nature upââ those ill Counsellors and corrupt Lawyers who contrive and pen them will bring this Highest greaâst and most honorable Court wherein the u 31 H. 8. c. 1 1 Jac. c. 1. Dr. Student 44. a. whole Kingdome and every member of it are represented into âeater contempt and lesse estimation with all men whether Natives or Forainers then the basest Court ââ Pipouders is No King nor Subject ever yet attempted such affronts against the Resolutions of any Judâs in inferiour Courts Let no person whatsoever then presume by pen or tongue any longer to aââigne or traduce the Resolutions and Ordinances of this highest Tribunall If Kings or Counsellors of âate willinstruct or excite the Subjects peremptoâily to disobey and contemne the Ordinances the âudgements of the Parliament let them never expect the least obedience or submission to any of their âwn commands which are of lesser credit and Authority Fourthly That the Parliament and whole Kingdome being the highest power or any Member of ââe Parliament cannot by any publicke Acts or Votes of theirs consented to in Parliament become Trayââs or guilty of high Treason against the King either by the Common Law oâ the Sâatute of 25. Ed. 3. b page 4 5. â 2 of Treasons which running in the singular number If A MAN c. that is any private man â men by their owne private authority shall levy warre against the King c. it ought to be judged high âreason extends not to the whole Kingdome or Court of Parliament representing it of which no treaân was ever yet presumed and by this very act is made the Judge of all Treasons that are doubtfull being âver yet included within the words or meaning of any Law concerning Treasons and therefore cannot be âilty of it Hence the depositions of a Graf parâ 6. p. 62 63. Galfredus Moâââ Fabiaâ Polychr others Archigallo and Emcrianus two ancient British Kings by the unaniâous assent of the Lords and Commons for their rapines oppressions and Tyranny with other forenamed Saxâ Kings and of Edward the second Richard the second Henry the sixth Edward the fourth by Acts ââ Parliament the creating of Richard the third King and the frequent translations of the Crowne from âe right heire at Common Law to others who had no good title by the whole Kingdome or Parliament âo lesse then c Bracton l. 2 Glan l. 2. f. 112 Myrror c. 1 sect 4. Britton c. 8. f. 16. c. 22. f. 39 25. E. 3. â 2. See Rastal ârote Staââf Crompt Dalton in their Titles Chapters of Treason high Treason in private persons was never yet reputed much lesse questioned or adjudged âigh Treason in the whole Kingdome or Parliament or any chiefe active Members in these Parliaments which being above the King are uncapable of Treason for any their judiciall actions and resolutions in such cases being onely Tortious and Erroneous reversible by other Acts in Parliament not Trayterous and Rebellious as appeares by all the forequoted Statutes and by 13 Eliz. c. â which makes it high Treason d page for any person to affirme That the Queene by Authority of the Parliament of England is not able to make Lawes e Walsingham Holin Graf Sto. Speed Martyn Fab. Polychro in 21 R. 2. 11 R. 2. c. 3 4. 21 R. 2. c. 12. and Statutes of sufficient force to alter limit and binde the Crowne of this Realme and the descent limitation inheritance and government thereof And for direct Authorities in this very point Robert Tresylian and Belknap then chiefe Justices Holt Fulthorpe and Burgh Judges Locton Kings Sergeant and Blake the Kings Counsell in the Parliament oâ 1â Rich. 2. were condemned executed and banished the Realme as guilty of high Treason onely for affirming under their hands and seales f See the particulars more at large in 21 R. 2 c. 12. That the Duke of Glocester the Earles of Arundell aad Warwicke were and that other Lords and Commons might be guilty of high Treason for procuring a Commission and other proceedings in Parliament and be punished for it as Traytors Which opinion of theirs being afterwards affirmed for Law in a packed Parliament 21 Rich. 2. was the very next Parliament in 1 Hen. 4. c. 2 3 4. repealed and the judgement given against those Judges for this Trayterous opinion tending to the utter subversion of Parliaments resolved and enacted to be just This g See 1 H. 4. c. 3. and here p. 13. Judge h Spee p. 747 Belknap foresaw and therefore was unwilling to put his Seale to this opinion Saying There wanted but a hurdle a horse and halâââ to carry him where he might suffer the death HE HAD DESERVED for if I had not done this â should have dyed for it and because I have done it I DESERVE DEATH for betraying the Lords Which makes me wonder at a passage in i Hist p. 675 Speed who records it now frequent in Malignants moutheâ That the very shop where the Barons originall Treasons were forged was THE PARLIAMENT HOUSE wherein from time to time they
forced on the King Edward the second presumptuous anâ TREASONOUS ORDINATIONS not onely to reforme the Kings house and Counsell and tâ place and displace all great Officers at their pleasure but even claim a joynt interest in the Regiment of the Kingdome together with the King which William Inge a Judge of the Common Law with other like sticklers trayâerously perswaded them was according to Law which grosse slander of the Parliament House would have beeâ capitall at least in former ages and may now indanger the heads of those who speake or write the samâ of the present Parliament Never did any of our Kings charge any Parliament with high Treason hither to much lesse indict or wage warre against the Parliaments as Traytors which questioned or deposeâ them for offences against the Kingdome Let none then dare affirme that the Houses of Parliament are or can be Traytors now for providing for their owne and the Kingdomes safety Fifthly That to conspire or levy warre against the Parliament or Kingdome to dissolve or destroy it or the Members of it is no lesse then High Treason as hath beene solemnely adjudged in Parliament 15 E. 2. in the Act entituled Exilium Hugonis le de Spenser in 11 Rich. 2. c. 2 3 4. and in the Parliament Roll Printed by Order of both Houses August 27. 1642. And before both these in k Lib. 14. sect 112. Stamf. l. 1. c. 2. f. 1. b. and Cromptons Juâisdict f. 73. Glanvil who declares it to be Treason even at the Common Law Si quis machinatus fuerit vel aliquid fecerit in SEDITIONEM REGNI agreeable to l Instit l. ult Tit. 8. Vlpian and the m Tit. 3. Saxon Lawes which informe ââ of Treasons against the Common-wealth and Kingdome the case of n Ciceâo Orat. in Catil Cateline and o Liv. hist l. 23. sect 17. others as well as against the King and to the Statute of 13 Eliz. c. â which makes it High Treason for any person to stirrâ up aây Forainers or strangers with force to invade this Realme or Ireland And if it be no lesse then high Treason against the King to slay the Chancellour Treasurer or any of the Judges or Justiceâ of either Bench Eyer Assizâ or Oyer and Terminer being in their places doing their Offices though by the Kings command as is cleare by 25. E. 3. c. 2. and all our Law Bookes then much more must it be high Treason against the King and Kingdome to warre against the highest Court of Parliament or slay any member of it for doing theiâ Offices and executing the Houses just Commands as I shall in due place more fully manifest In briefe the Gun powder plot in 3 Jacobi to blow up the Parliament House was then adjudged resolved by the Parliament * 3 Jac. c. 1 2. 4 5. in his Proclamations for apprehending those Traytors The proceedings against Traytors Spee hist p. 1248. to 1257. King and Judges to be high Treason not onely against the King but Parliamenâ and Kingdome too and to blow up or assault the Parliament now in the Kings absence is question leââ high Treason both against the King Parliament and Kingdome Yea the statute of 28. H. 8. c. 7. declares those Who shall claime the Crowne even of right in any other manner then it limited by vertue and authority of that act after the Kings death with all their Counsellors and abettors to be deemed and adjudged HIGâ TRAITORS TO THE REALME not the King and such their offence to be repâted HIGH TREASON and they for it to suffer such paines of death and forfeiture of Lands anâ Goods as in any cases of high Treason is used And I read in * Par. 7. p. 186. Fabian that Eguiran chiefe Counsellor to Philip the third of France was judged to death and hanged on the Gibbet at Paris for Treason against King Philip and the REALME OF FRANCE as our powder Traytors were executed for high Treason against the King and Realme of England And by the Statutes of 5. R. 2. c. 6. II R. 2. c. 1. 3. 17. R. 2. c. 8. 21. R. 2. c. 2. 4. 20. 3. H. 5. Sâa 2. c. 6. 1. Mariae c. 6. certaine offences are declared and made high treason and the committers of theâ Trayters and enemies not onely to and against the King but likewise TO AND AGAINST THâ REALME and in particular the illegall indicting of some Lords to destroy them as guilty of High Treason for procuring a Commission in Parliament supposed prejudiciall to the King and his Crowne 10 R. 2. c. I. and the opposing and annulling of that Commission and of some Processe Judgements Executions made given and affirmed in some of those Parliaments raising forces and leâying warre against the Parliament and Members of it to destroy them were then * See Walsingh Holinshed Fabian Grafton Stow Speed in 10. 11. R. 2. 21. R. 2. c. 12. adjudged High Treason both against the King and THE REALME though done by the Kings expresse Commission and command The reason is because the King in judgement of Law * See here p. 20 21. 22. is ever legally present in and with his Parliament when they sit as I have already proved where ever his person is and his royall legall will of which alone the Law takes notice is ever presumed to concurre with his greatest Councell the Parliament against whose Priviledges safety and protection he neither can nor ought by Law or right to attempt any thing and if any personall Commands or Commissions of the King under his great Seale to doe ought against Magna Charta the Subjects liberty safety property the Parliaments Priviledges the Common or Statute Lawes of the Realme all which expressely prohibit the levying of warre killing wounding murthering imprisâning disinâeâiâing robbing or plundering of the Subjects without legall triall or conviction as dâe the Statutes of 2 R. 2. c. 7. 1 H. 5. c. 6. 1 H. 5. c. 6. which prescribe exemplary punishments against such Plunderers and Robbers especially the Welshmen issue out to any person or persons whatsoever especially to raise forces on levie warre against the Parliament or Subjects they are meerely void in Law and will rather aggravate then extenuate the guilt of those who obey or execute them as is clearely resolved not onely by 42. Ass p. 5. 12. Brooke Commissions 15. 16. Cooke b. 5. f. 50. 51. l. 7. f. 36. 37. l. 8. f. 125. to 129. but likewise expressely adjudged and enacted by the Statutes of 15. E. 3. Stat. 1. c. 1. 3. 42. E. 3. c. 1. 3. 11. R. 2. c. 1. to 6. 21. Jac. c. 3. the Petition of Right 3. Caroli 28. E. 2. Artic super Chartas c. 2. 4. E. 3. c. 4. 5. E. 3. c. 2. 25. E. 3. c. 1. 15. 34. E. 3. c. 2. and generally byall Statutes concerning * See Rastals abridgement Tit. Purveyors Purveyors by the memorable old Statute of 25.
E. 3. Stat. 1. c. 3. If any Minister of the King or any other person of what condition soever he be doe or come against any point of the great Charter or other Statutes or the Lawes of the Land he shall answer to the Parliament as well as the SUTE OF THE KING as at the sute of the party AS FARRE FORTH WHERE âT WAS DONE BY COMMISSION OR COMMANDEMENT OF THE KING as of his owne authority And by that parallel good Law recorded by * Part. 7 p. 376 Fabian made in Parliament in the first yeare of King Henry the fourth That no Lord nor other person of nâ degree should after that day lay for his excuse as some then did any constraint or coacting of his Prince in executing of any wrong judgement or other criminous or unlawfull deeds saying that for feare they durst not otherwise doe for such excuse after this day SHALL STAND HIM IN NO STEED And in this Parliament * Fabian part 7. p. 342. 375. Hals Chron. 1. H. 4. f. 10. Grafton p. 408. Walsingham Hist p. 393. 402. Hall was judged to be drawne from the Tower of London unto Tiburne and there to be hanged and quartered which was accordingly executed only because he was one of those who secretly murââ ered the Duke of Glocester at Calice illegally attainted of Treason in the Parliament of 21. R. 2. without due processe of the Law by King Richard the second his command and likewise the Dukes of Aumarl Surrey Exeter with other Noble men were deprived of their Dukedomes of most of their Lands Castles Honors for having a finger in this Dukes suffâcation and death by King Richards instigation and command and had lost their heads too if the common peopte had beene their Judges who murmured against King Henry for sparing their lives as you may read in * Histor p. 402. 403. Speed p. 763. Walsingham and Speed All which I would advise his Majesties Captainâs Cavalliers and ill Counsellors to consider The rather because all levying of warre either against the King or against the Kingdome and Parliament now made a matter of high Treason on both sides must and ought to be determined and resolâed which of them is high Treason and which not and the parties guilty of it must and ought to be tried arraigned judged and condemned for it onely in and by the Parliament and in and by no other Court or Judges as is punctually resolved by the severall Statutes of 11. R. 2. c. 1. 2. 3. 4. 21. R. 2. c. 2. 3. 4. 1 2. 20. 1. H. 4. c. 10. and the very words of the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 2. of Treasons especially being a new case If then the Parliament are and must be the onely judges of this question Which of the two parties now ân Armes are Traytors and the onely Court wherein all must be tried on this point they may easily judge who are and must be the Traytors in this case and those who by the Kings meere personall command and presence whom they have treacheronâly withdrawne from his Parliament fight now both against Parliament and King in his legall and regall capacity when the time of triall comes will be found reall Traytors both to King and Kingdome what ever their owne ignorance temporising Lawyers or hopes of prevailing may now suggest unto them In the Parliament of 15. Edward 2. the two Spensers were by â * Exisium Hugonis le Despensor f. 50. 52. speciall Act of Parliament adjudged Traytors banished and their lands and goods confiscated for miscounâelling their King and advising him to ride with armed Troopes of horses and men into Glocestershire to assault the good people there and to levy warre within the Realme to the destruction of the Church and people contrary to the forme of the great Charter and breach of the peace of the Realme What severe judgement then may those ill Counsellors and Cavalliers deserve who have actually levied warre not onely against the Counây of Glocester which they have pitifully harrowed and spoyled contrary to all Law sacked p See the Relation takinâ cest Cicester âo its utter ruine and led away the good people thence Captives to Oxford in triumph for the most part barefooted through dirt and mire in this cold Winter Season chained together in ropes more like to Turkish-Gally-slaves then English Christian Subjects onely for this new kinde of supposed Treason and Rebellion the defence of their Liberties lives and goods against theeving Cavalliers which they may defend by Law * Fitz. Corone 192. 194. 246. 258. 261. 330. Stamford f. 11 12 13. 22 H. 7. 39 24 H. 8. c. 5. Cooke I. 5. f. 51 52 53. and justifie the killing of all those who shall violently assault them to rob them of them denying them so much as a draught of cold water to quench their thirst by the way and keeping off all whâ would give it to them many of them being since dead at Oxford of samine and more then barbarous usage â but likewise against most Counties of England miserably wasted by them and the whole Kingdome Parliament and King himselfe in his politicke Capacity and raised an Army of Papists against expresââ late Acts of Parliament who not onely now set up their long exploded Masse openly in Yorkeshire Reading and other places but which my very soule abhorres to thinke of have even freshly moââ impiously Shit upon the English Bible in folio defaced and burnt many Testaments and godly English Bookâ in John Hamonds house a Bookeseller in Marleborough when they sacked it in contempt of our Religion setting the chimney on fire with their excessive flames and if reports be credible have since buâned divers English Bibles and other good Bookes in the publicke Market place at Reading under the very Gallowes in detestation of our Protestant faith whose utter extirpation is their chiefe designe Certainly if these ill Councellors once come to a legall triall a Gallowes will be too milde a punishment to expiate such a prodigious high Treason which former ages can hardly parallell especially if they perseverâ therein But of this more fully hereafter Sixthly Hence likewise it necessarily followes that the Houses of Parliament being the Soveraigne Power ought of right to enjoy and may when they see just cause for the Kingdomes safety and benefiââ order and dispose the Militia Navy Ports Forts and Ammunition of the Realme into such personâ custodies as they may safely confide in nominate both the great Counsellors publique Officers anâ Judges of the Kingdome of right require if not enforce if wilfully denyed the Kings Assent to all publicke Bils of Right and Justice necessary for the Commonweale and safety of his Subjects takâ up defensive Armes to protect their Priviledges Lawes Liberties and established Religion not onely against Malignants and Popish Recusants but the King himselfe if he raise Forces against them yea impose taxes upon the Subject and distraine imprison secure them for the publicke defence and safety when they deeme it necessary All which particulars I shall God willing fully prove by such Demonstrations Arguments punctuall Authorities and undeniable precedents in former ages as shall I troâundeceive the blinded world and convince if not satisfie the greatest Royallists and Malignants both in point of Law and Conscience in the next part of this Discourse which shall passe the Presse with aâ convenient expedition if God permit Finis partis Primae Errata Page 2. l. 31. read all the royall p. 15. l. 26. enact r. exact p. 17. l. 17. of and p. 20. l. 16. if it r. if being laâ downe it p. 22. l. 18. last doubtfull rising