Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
kingdom_n king_n power_n regal_a 2,103 5 11.1413 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A36241 A defence of the vindication of the deprived bishops wherein the case of Abiathar is particularly considered, and the invalidity of lay-deprivations is further proved, from the doctrine received under the Old Testament, continued in the first ages of christianity, and from our own fundamental laws, in a reply to Dr. Hody and another author : to which is annexed, the doctrine of the church of England, concerning the independency of the clergy on the lay-power, as to those rights of theirs which are purely spiritual, reconciled with our oath of supremancy, and the lay-deprivations of the popish bishops in the beginning of the reformation / by the author of the Vindication of the deprived bishops. Dodwell, Henry, 1641-1711. 1695 (1695) Wing D1805; ESTC R18161 114,840 118

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View original text

the_o magistrate_n can_v conser_fw-fr no_n title_n to_o future_a and_o eternal_a reward_n to_o person_n otherwise_o never_o so_o well_o qualify_v for_o receive_v they_o he_o can_v oblige_v the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d to_o ratify_v in_o heaven_n what_o be_v transact_v by_o he_o on_o earth_n as_o the_o high_a priest_n can_v who_o be_v in_o the_o sense_n of_o those_o time_n take_v for_o his_o authorize_v representative_a god_n at_o his_o first_o permission_n of_o king_n neither_o suppress_v the_o priest_n hood_n nor_o unite_v it_o in_o the_o person_n of_o the_o king_n and_o therefore_o there_o can_v be_v no_o pretence_n that_o what_o be_v not_o otherwise_o in_o his_o power_n be_v put_v in_o his_o power_n thence_o forward_o by_o any_o particular_a provision_n or_o gift_n of_o god._n how_o than_o can_v he_o pretend_v to_o to_o that_o power_n how_o can_v he_o give_v or_o take_v away_o a_o power_n from_o other_o to_o which_o himself_o can_v not_o pretend_v how_o can_v he_o suppose_v his_o act_n will_v be_v ratify_v in_o heaven_n or_o how_o imagine_v god_n oblige_v by_o it_o to_o reject_v the_o priest_n who_o he_o as_o prince_n be_v please_v to_o reject_v and_o accept_v of_o other_o who_o be_v permit_v only_o by_o his_o authority_n to_o officiate_v at_o god_n altar_n and_o what_o can_v all_o his_o intermeddle_v in_o these_o matter_n signify_v if_o he_o can_v oblige_v god_n to_o ratify_v what_o be_v do_v by_o he_o if_o notwithstanding_o god_n shall_v accept_v of_o the_o person_n reject_v by_o he_o and_o reject_v the_o person_n obtrude_v by_o the_o civil_a magistrate_n nothing_o certain_o with_o regard_n to_o conscience_n which_o be_v the_o principal_a consideration_n in_o this_o case_n §_o xxxiii_o the_o ancient_a jew_n of_o the_o apostle_n age_n do_v believe_v their_o priest_n hood_n available_a to_o a_o future_a and_o a_o eternal_a state_n i_o can_v for_o my_o life_n conceive_v how_o our_o adversary_n can_v avoid_v the_o force_n of_o this_o argument_n if_o the_o benefit_n procure_v by_o the_o sacerdotal_a office_n be_v think_v spiritual_a and_o principal_o relate_v to_o a_o future_a and_o eternal_a state_n thing_n perfect_o out_o of_o the_o power_n of_o the_o magistrate_n and_o incomparable_o exceed_v whatsoever_o be_v within_o it_o and_o that_o this_o be_v the_o sense_n of_o that_o age_n i_o need_v not_o insist_v on_o the_o article_n of_o our_o own_o church_n it_o sufficient_o appear_v from_o the_o early_a coaeval_fw-fr monument_n of_o that_o age_n not_o only_o that_o they_o think_v the_o sacerdotal_a office_n to_o have_v influence_n on_o the_o future_a state_n but_o that_o they_o do_v on_o that_o very_a account_n believe_v it_o superior_a to_o the_o office_n of_o the_o civil_a magistrate_n beside_o what_o i_o now_o mention_v concern_v their_o agreement_n against_o the_o sadducee_n the_o two_o only_a jewish_a author_n that_o we_o have_v undoubted_o coaeval_fw-fr with_o the_o apostle_n philo_n and_o josephus_n be_v both_o of_o they_o sufficient_o clear_a in_o these_o particular_n that_o the_o priest_n ministry_n be_v think_v available_a for_o the_o future_a state_n what_o can_v be_v clear_a than_o those_o word_n of_o philo_n where_o he_o tell_v we_o that_o 1640._o priest_n and_o prophet_n be_v man_n of_o god_n and_o therefore_o do_v not_o vouchsafe_v to_o account_v themselves_o of_o any_o particular_a city_n in_o this_o world_n or_o citizen_n of_o the_o world_n in_o general_n as_o some_o of_o the_o philosopher_n do_v but_o soar_v above_o all_o that_o be_v sensible_a and_o be_v translate_v to_o the_o intellectual_a world_n fix_v their_o habitation_n there_o be_v register_v in_o the_o city_n of_o incorruptible_a incorporeal_a idea_n and_o it_o be_v easy_a to_o show_v that_o the_o language_n and_o notion_n of_o the_o n._n t._n concern_v the_o correspondence_n between_o the_o visible_a priest_n hood_n on_o earth_n and_o the_o archetypal_a 24._o priesthood_n of_o the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d in_o heaven_n and_o between_o the_o visible_a tabernacle_n in_o jerusalem_n and_o the_o true_a 2_o tabernacle_n in_o heaven_n not_o pitch_v by_o man_n but_o god_n be_v perfect_o agreeable_a to_o these_o notion_n of_o philo_n who_o be_v such_o as_o the_o apostle_n be_v before_o their_o conversion_n to_o the_o christian_a religion_n and_o that_o all_o the_o benefit_n of_o their_o outward_a ministry_n be_v think_v due_a to_o this_o mystical_a communication_n with_o that_o which_o be_v invisible_a by_o which_o it_o may_v appear_v that_o those_o word_n of_o philo_n be_v perfect_o agreeable_a to_o his_o avow_a principle_n now_o how_o can_v the_o magistrate_n pretend_v to_o promote_v or_o interrupt_v this_o mystical_a communication_n between_o the_o earthly_a and_o heavenly_a office_n how_o can_v he_o therefore_o advance_v any_o person_n to_o that_o dignity_n or_o exclude_v he_o from_o it_o josephus_n also_o be_v as_o clear_v in_o own_v a_o future_a state_n which_o by_o these_o principle_n can_v not_o be_v claim_v by_o any_o but_o on_o account_n of_o this_o mystical_a communication_n and_o consequent_o of_o that_o priest_n hood_n which_o be_v think_v to_o have_v a_o just_a title_n to_o it_o he_o also_o express_v that_o state_n by_o the_o laaguage_n of_o the_o 852._o christian_n also_o of_o that_o age._n to_o these_o i_o may_v add_v the_o testimony_n of_o a_o three_o tewish_a hellenist_n the_o author_n of_o the_o apocryphal_a book_n of_o wisdom_n he_o also_o personate_v solomom_n make_v the_o temple_n build_v by_o himself_o to_o be_v a_o resemblance_n of_o the_o holy_a 8._o tabernacle_n which_o god_n have_v prepare_v from_o the_o beginning_n which_o show_v that_o this_o mystical_a communication_n be_v understand_v even_o then_o when_o that_o author_n live_v who_o seem_v to_o have_v be_v elder_a than_o even_o the_o apostle_n themselves_o how_o can_v the_o magistrate_n pretend_v to_o any_o right_n in_o affair_n of_o this_o nature_n §_o xxxiv_o and_o consequent_o do_v express_o own_v it_o for_o mor_n honourable_a than_o the_o magistracy_n itself_o so_o far_o be_v he_o from_o any_o right_a to_o intermeddle_v in_o these_o matter_n that_o if_o these_o thing_n be_v true_a the_o priest_n hood_n must_v needs_o be_v own_a for_o a_o authority_n of_o a_o high_a nature_n and_o more_o noble_a than_o even_o the_o magistracy_n itself_o nay_o this_o very_a consequence_n be_v infer_v from_o those_o principle_n and_o own_a as_o true_a in_o that_o very_a age._n philo_n own_v it_o for_o the_o high_a honour_n possible_a speak_v concern_v the_o word_n of_o moses_n there_o mention_v 1640._o use_v say_v he_o a_o hyperbolical_a expression_n of_o honour_n god_n he_o say_v be_v their_o lot_n with_o relation_n to_o the_o consecrate_a gift_n on_o two_o account_n one_o of_o the_o high_a honour_n because_o they_o be_v partaker_n of_o those_o thing_n which_o be_v by_o way_n of_o gratitude_n allot_v to_o god_n the_o other_o because_o they_o be_v employ_v on_o those_o thing_n alone_o which_o belong_v to_o expiation_n as_o if_o they_o be_v guardian_n or_o gurator_n that_o be_v the_o roman_a word_n of_o the_o inheritance_n the_o similitude_n seem_v to_o be_v take_v from_o the_o roman_a custom_n of_o make_v tutor_n and_o curator_n of_o young_a heir_n who_o estate_n till_o they_o themselves_o come_v to_o age_n be_v say_v to_o be_v the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d of_o such_o tutor_n and_o curator_n be_v till_o then_o at_o their_o disposal_n suppose_v that_o the_o revenue_n of_o god_n be_v so_o at_o the_o disposal_n of_o the_o priest_n as_o the_o estate_n of_o the_o young_a heir_n be_v so_o at_o the_o disposal_n of_o the_o curator_n this_o philo_n take_v to_o be_v the_o reason_n why_o god_n be_v please_v to_o call_v himself_o the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d of_o the_o priest_n as_o if_o god_n himself_o have_v be_v their_o pupil_n which_o be_v indeed_o a_o very_a hyperbolical_a expression_n of_o the_o high_a honour_n that_o can_v be_v ascribe_v to_o mortal_n but_o this_o be_v general_a only_o he_o else_o where_o express_o equal_v nay_o prefer_v the_o dignity_n of_o the_o sacerdocal_a office_n to_o the_o regal_a he_o equal_v they_o in_o that_o same_o discourse_n it_o be_v manifest_a say_v he_o that_o 832._o the_o law_n prescribe_v that_o reverence_n and_o honour_n to_o the_o priest_n which_o be_v proper_a to_o the_o king_n in_o another_o place_n he_o prefer_v the_o priest_n hood_n these_o be_v his_o word_n †_o priest_n hood_n be_v the_o proper_a reward_n of_o a_o pious_a 819._o man_n who_o profess_v himself_o to_o serve_v the_o father_n who_o service_n be_v better_a not_o only_o than_o liberty_n but_o also_o than_o a_o kingdom_n nor_o be_v this_o a_o singular_a opinion_n of_o philo._n jesephus_n also_o be_v of_o the_o same_o mind_n the_o scripture_n itself_o own_v the_o power_n of_o moses_n to_o have_v be_v regal_a when_o it_o call_v he_o a_o 5._o king_n in_o