not onely in their Pulpits but likewise in sundry late Pamphlets wherewith they have filled the World That every particular Congregation of visible Saints and Independent Church is under the Government of Christ alone as the ONELY Head King Governour Law-giver of it and subject TO NO OTHER IVRISDICTION then that of Christ his word and Spirit That NO POWER ON EARTH NOR EARTHLY LAW-GIVERS MAY CAN OR OVGHT TO GIVE LAWES FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THIS REPVBLIKE nor claime nor exercise an Headship or undertake the Government of this Body That neither KINGS NOR PARLIAMENTS NOR SYNODS have any Authority to prescribe Lawes or Rules for the Churches Government to order the affaires of Christs Kingdome or institute the Government of his Churches or to make coactive Lawes in any Ecclesiasticall matters to bind the conscience of any Church or Christian to outward conformity or inflict any mulcts or penalties for contempt or disobedience Christ onely being the Lord of mens consciences which ought to be left at liberty That the Members of the Parliament are chosen but by a secular Root by the Generality and Riffe Raffe of the world Papists Atheists Drunkards Swearers Men voyd of the knowledge feare and grace of Christ And therefore the Independent Brethren conceive as great AN IMPOSSIBILITY that a Legitimate Ecclesiastick Power should according to the mind of Christ bee by them conferred upon any men or that they should have any Power or Authority from Christ to nominate or appoint who shall bee the men by vertue of such nomination or election to enact Lawes and Statutes in matters of Religion and to order under mulcts and penalties how men shall worship and serve God as it is in Jobs expression to bring a cleane thing out of an uncleane That the Parliaments claiming or exercising any such Ecclesiasticall Power or others attributing of it to them is a meanes to awaken the eye of Jealousie upon them and seven times more destructive and under-mining of not onely their Power but Honour Peace nd Safety also than any thing that is found in the Independent Way so ill entreated That it is a claiming of the sacred and incommunicable Royalties of Heaven an accounting it no Robbery to make themselves equall with God and such an high provocation in the eyes of the Most High as IF CONTINVED IN by the Parliament will kindle a fire in the brest of him whose name is Jealous which will consume and devoure Yea one of them puts this Question If the whole Kingdome may deny obedience unto Popish Acts and Canons or upon any other like just occasion and they themselves bee Judges whether the occasion bee just or no Whether MAY NOT INDEPENDENTS a part of the Kingdome onely doe the like in all respects Or Whether ought they because a Lesser part of the Kingdome yeeld obedience to Popish Acts and Canons because a Major part approve of and agree with a Parliament and Synod in approving them What if they should be for Popery again Judaisme or Turcisme t is no offence to make a Quere nor impossible to come to passe the greatest part of those that chose our Parliament men being thought to be Popishly or Malignantly affected c. Putting divers such like Queries destructive to the very fundamentall Power and Being of Parliaments and as bad or worse than the Popish Gun-powder Plot to blow up the Soveraign Ecclesiastick and Civill Authority of this High Court in all succeeding Ages These with infinite other Anti-Parliamentall Anti-Synodicall and Anti-Monarchicall Paradoxes at which I professe I stand amazed have not onely dropped from the Lips but Pens of sundry Independents who have avowed them publikely in Print with their Names affixed to their Bookes even before the face of Your Right Honourable Parliamentary Assembly and Supreme Tribunall in such open affront and high contempt of Your undoubted Rights Power Priviledges which Your Honours and wee all are obliged by Late Solemne Oathes Covenants Protestations to defend maintaine with our very Lives and Estates and to discover oppose all others who shall invade them to our uttermost power as I am confident no Age nor History can ever parallel in the least measure the very Malignant Prelates and Anti-Parliamentary Cavaliers having not proceeded in this kind so farre as they which I speake with deepest griefe of heart and spirit out of Conscience of that common Vow and Covenant which bindes mee to discover oppugne reveale abhorre it and detestation of their most pernicious Assertions not out of the least malice or hatred to any of their Persons What the Independents end of publishing these desperate Anti-Parliamentary Paradoxes should be unlesse to prepare their party and all others as much as in them lies utterly to reject whatever publike forme of Church-Government Discipline Reformation and Directory of Worship Your Honours by the advice of the Reverend Assembly shall establish in our Church for the future after all your serious consultations debates paines Prayers and Fastings about it and to set up their owne Anomolous Platforme which they averre is Christs Kingdome and Government and which may upon probable and higher grounds than of reason bee thought in time to overthrow and put downe all other Governments whatsoever and to stand up alone in their stead since Christs Kingdome shall stand up when all opposite earthly Kingdomes like earthen vessells shall with an Iron Rod bee dashed in peeces Which they close up with a Faxit Deus festinet in despight of Your Authority and all humane Power whatsoever I cannot conjecture And their owne late printed Passages with Mr. Iohn Goodwins Sermon that it would be more easie for him and hee should rather yeeld to bee torne in pieces by wild horses than submit to such a Government which proceeded from a Parliament chosen by the Riffe-raffe of the world c. intimate and expresse as much Which what an high contempt it is against Your undoubted Power and pious Ecclesiasticall proceedings in Reforming setling the Doctrine Discipline and Government of our Church the grand desire and prayer of all wel-affected spirits I most humbly submit to Your saddest thoughts and deepest wisedomes who have both Power and Authority in Your hands to suppresse incomparable Prudence and Providence to prevent these growing dangerous Insolencies before they become Masterlesse or Epidemicall past Your cure Farre be it from my thoughts to exasperate Your Power or Iustice against any Delinquents of this kind some whereof are so neare and deare unto mee that it is my heaviest affliction to mention their extravagancies in this kind of which I trust they and all their followers will be now ashamed and a Brotherly Admonition to their Persons though their Writings undergoe the sharper Censure will I hope induce them upon second thoughts both to discerne lament recant their fore-mentioned Paradoxes and abhorre themselves for them even in dust and ashes as one of them professeth hee will doe in case hee be convinced And
in the Kingdome of Britaine The Romane and Caesarean Lawes Wee may at all times reject but the Law of God by no meanes You have lately by Gods mercy received the Law and Faith of Christ in the Kingdom of Britaine You have with you in the Realme both Testaments out of them by Gods grace PER CONSILIVM REGNI VESTRI SVME LEGEM By the Councell of Your Realme not of your Clergy or Prelates take a Law and by it through Gods power You may governe Your Realm of Britain For You are Gods Vicar as Bracton likewise stiles our Kings in Your Realme c. Lo here the Pope himselfe resolves the King and great Councell of this Realme the Parliament not Clergy or Convocation to bee the only proper makers of Lawes to govern the Church and Kingdom by Anno 446. Germanus and Lupus two learned Bishops being sent hither out of France to suppresse the spreading dangerous Pelagian Heresie there was upon this occasion a Synod assembled at Verolam whereunto a numerous multitude of men together with their wives and children repaired ADERAT POPVLVS EXPECTABATVR FVTVRVS IVDEX The People were present expected to be the future Judge Adstabant partes dispari conditione consimiles Indè divina fides hinc humana praesumptio indè Christus hinc Pelagius autor perversae pravitatis c. After a long dispute Vanity is convinced confounded perfidiousnesse refuted being unable to answer the objections POPVLVS ARBITER vix manus continet JVDICIVM CVM CLAMORE CONTESTANDO c. The People being Arbitrator scarce hold their hands GIVING IVDGEMENT with a shout These things thus acted an innumerable company of both Sexes were converted to the Lord. In this first Synod that wee read of held within our Island the People were present as well as the Clergy and that not only as Auditors but Judges giving the finall Sentence in this great controversie concerning Religion Anno 449. There was another British Councell held by the said Germanus and Severus MAGNOQVE Clericorum ET LAICORVM NVMERO and a great number of Clergy-men and LAY-MEN against the reviving Errors of Pelagius and King Vortigerne 's incestuous marriage with his daughter OMNIVMQVE SENTENTIA pravitatum perversitas cum suis Autoribus condemnatur So that the Laity as well as the Clergy gave Sentence in this Synod against this Heresie and the Authors of it Nennius cap. 37. addes of this Councell concerning Vortigerne Dum conventa esset magna Synodus Clericorum ET LAICORVM in uno Concilio c. Ipse Rex maledictus est damnatur à beato Germano OMNI CONCILIO BRITONVM So that Lay-men were present and gave sentence together with the Clergy in this second Synod held in this our Isle About the yeare 612. King Ethelbert Genti suae Decreta Judiciorum as well in Ecclesiasticall as Temporall causes juxta exempla Romanorum CVM CONCILIO SAPENTVM INSTITVIT c. as Beda witnesseth About the yeare 627. Edwin King of Northumberland being perswaded to become a Christian returned this answer That he was about to conferre with his friends and COVNSELLORS concerning this thing and that if they would agree in opinion with him they would all be consecrated to Christ together in the Fountaine of life Hee did as hee had said Habito enim CVM SAPIENTIBVS CONCILIO For holding a Councell with his wise-men hee demanded severally of them all What this Doctrine which they had not hitherto heard of and the new worship of the Deity which was preached seemed to them And after some debate Coifi declaring his opinion that their former Religion had no vertue in it and that the Christian was farre better and to bee imbraced the rest of the Elders and Kings Counsellors concurred in opinion with him Whereupon they resolved forthwith to anathematize and burne with fire the Altars and Temples they had consecrated without fruit with the Idols in them Which done King Edwin with all the Nobles of his Nation and very many of the common people imbraced the Christian Faith and were Baptized Leo here a Pagan King and his Parliament determine the Christian Religion to be truest and thereupon renounce their former Idolatry and resolve to embrace the Christian Faith In the yeare 663. there was a great Councell held at Strenaeshale to decide the controversie concerning the due time of keeping Easter in which Councell King Oswey and his sonne Alfred with MANY NOBLES Bishops Clerks and LAY-MEN were present Colman and his Scottish Clergy maintained that it ought to bee kept after the Jewish computation Agilbert and his party held the contrary that it ought to bee observed at the time the Westerne Church solemnized it The Councell being sate King Oswey who presided in it before any debate of the Controversie made a solemne Speech unto them to this effect necessary for our times That it behoved those who served one God to hold one rule of living and serving him and not to differ in the celebration of heavenly Sacraments since they all expected one Kingdome in heaven Therefore they should rather inquire which was the truer tradition and that this should bee commonly followed by all Which said hee commanded Bishop Colman to relate what Rite it was which hee observed and whence it derived its originall Which Colman doing the King then commanded Bishop Wilfrid who was of the contrary party to declare his opinion and the grounds of it which hee did After long debate on either side the King gave sentence for VVilfreds opinion against Colman and his party because St. Peter who had the custody of Heaven Gates did by Colmans owne confession keep Easter as VVilfred held they ought to doe The King giving this resolution with his hands lifted up to heaven faverunt assidentes quique sive astantes majores unà cum mediocribus et abdicata minus perfecta institutione ad ea quae meliora cognoverant sese transferre festinabant all the great and meane Persons sitting and standing by concuring with the King gave sentence against Coleman for VVilfred and observed Easter accordingly ever after in their practice Here we finde the Clergy men only the debaters but the King Nobles and Commons the sole Judges and Resolvers of this Controversie and that in a most eminent generall Nationall Councell Anno 673. there was a Councell held at Hertford under Theodor Archbishop of Canterbury praesentibus Episcopis Angliae ET REGIBVS ET MAGNATIBVS VNIVERSIS writes Mathew Westminster at which all the Bishops Kings and great men of England were present All these sitting together Theodor propounded some Chapters or Canons concerning Church affaires before Them all which were afterwards assented to and subscribed Anno 684. There was a Councell held neare the River of Alne sub praesentia Regis Egfridi in the presence of King Egfrid who sate president in it Anno 692. King Ina made and published sundry notable ecclesiasticall laws concerning Religion Church government and
Canons of the Church in and by a Common Councell and Parliament as well of the Nobles and Commons as of the Prelates and Clergy as is evident by this passage in the Manuscript Tables of Robert Winchelsy Arch-Bishop of Canterbury WILLIELMUS Rex Angliae DE COMMUNI CONCILIO Archiepiscoporum Abbatum OMNIUM PROCERUM REGNI SUI Leges Episcopales quae non berè nec secundum Sanctorum Canonum praeceptae fuerunt sicut nec sunt his diebus OBSERV AND AS IN CONCUSSE JUDICAVERIT c. And by this his rescript to Remigius Bishop of Lincolne WILLIELMUS Gratia Dei c. Sciatis vos omnes caeteri mei fideles qui in Angliamanent quod Episcopales leges quae non berè nec secundum Sanctorum Canonum praecepta usque ad mea tempora in regno Anglorum fuerunt COMMUNI CONCILIO et consilio Archiepiscoporum meorum caeterorum Episcoporum Abbatum OMNIUM PRINCIPUM REGNI MEIEMEND AND AS JUDICAVI Proptereamando Regia authoritate praecipio ut nullus Episcopus vel Archidiaconus de legibus Episcopalibus amplius in HUNDRET placita toneant c. In the Councell of Rhoan Anno 1073. William the Conqueror sate chiefe President And decreed many things as well touching Ecclesiasticall Affaires as the benefit of his new Kingdom of England Among other things it was there decreed Judicatum est praesidente Rege Anglorum Gulielmo writes Matthew Westminster the King himselfe being president that Monkes who by force assaulted their Abbotts as the Monkes of Andoem had assaulted and slaine their Abbot at that time whiles hee was saying Masse in any Abbies should there be thrust into prison for it which before it seemes they could not be This Councell was no other then a Parliament diverse temporall Lawes as well as Ecclesiasticall being enacted therein and both ratified approved by this King who as Eadmerus stories of him would not so much as suffer the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Primate of all his Realme when hee sate President in a generall Councell of Bishops assembled together to decree or prohibite any thing but such things as were suitable to his will and had first been ordained by himselfe In the Councell of London under Lanfranks An. 1075. Concessum est Regia MUNIFICENTIA Synodali authoritate Episcopis de villis transire ad Civitates By the Kings Royall munificence and the authority of the Synod liberty was granted to Bishops to remove from the Villages wherein they resided unto Cities whereupon Herman Bishop of Schiroburne removed to Salisbury Stigand from Selescia removed to Chichester Peter from Litehfield removed to Chester the King ratifying the constitution of the Synod and ordering this removeall An. 1093. King William Rufus assembled a Councell of his Bishops Abbots and Nobility of the whole Kingdome that they might By their common assent determiue and discusse whether Anselme Archbishop of Canterbury could Keepe his faith to the King or not saving that faith reverence and obedience which he owed to the Apostolike See of Rome which he would by no means violate A weighty question surely of a loyall Prelate The Bishops Abbots and Nobility of the whole Kingdome almost Ex Regia Sanctione assembled at Rochingham Castle on the fifth day of March at one a Clocke in the afternoone to debate this businesse but the King commanded all things to be adjourned till the morrow Quia Dies Dominica erat because it was the Lords Day an unmeet time to discusse such a businesse as this was On the morrow in medio Procorum conglobatae multitudinis eos assistentem Monachorum Clericorum LAICORUM numerosam multitudinem sic loquitur c. Lo here the Nobles Commons as well as the Bishops Abbots and Clergie assembled in a Councell to wit a Parliament to determine a case of conscience and that at Anselms request This matter being long debated and Anselme continuing refractory the busines was defetâ—ed till after Whitsuntide In the Councell of London under Lanfranke summoned by King William Rufus Anno 1095. Vlstan Bishop of Worcester was deprived of his Bishopricke by the Kings sentence and verdict quasi homo idiota c. Ipso rege consentiente hoc dictante decernitur deponendus saith Matthew Paris the King sitting chiefe president in it In the Councell of London Anno 1102. under Anselme the King and his Nobles were present as well as the Bishops and Ahbots that whatsoever was therein decreed might be approved ratified and observed by the unanimous care and solicitud of both orders For soit was necessary A plain testimony that the Councells of England in antient times were no other but Parliaments and that their Canons ound not any unlesse confirmed by King and Parliament At this Councell write Wil. Malmesbury Eadmerus Anselme the Archbishop requesting it of the King Primates Regni the great men of the Kingdom were present quatenus quicquid ejusdem Concilii authoritate decerneretur VTRJVSQVE ORDINIS CONCORDI CVRA ET SOLJCITVDINE RATVM SERVARETVR SJC ENIM NECSSE ERAT quum multis retre annis Synodali cultura cessante viciorum vepribus succrescentibus Christiana religionis fervor in Anglia nimis reripeat which they thus preface out of Anselmes owne Copy and relation Anno 1102. quarto autem Praesulatus Paschalis Summi Pontificis tertio Regni Henrici gloriosi regis Anglorum ipso annuente celebratum est Concilium in ecclesia beati Petri in â—ccidentali parte juxta Londoniam sita communi consensu Episcoporum et Abbatum et Principum totius regni In this Councell held at Westminster therewere 26. Canons compiled some against Priests mariage and Wives which when Giraldns Archbishop of Yorks enjoyned his Clergie to observe all the Clergie of his Province refused to submit to them being unwilling to part with their Wives or to vow Chastity as some of those Canons enjoyned them to the execution whereof the great discord betweene the King and Anselme concerning the investitures of Bishops being an obstacle produced to this effect Necanones hujus Synodi legum vim ac potestatem sortirentur That those Canons should not obtaine the force and power of Lawes Anno. 1107. another Councell was held under Anselme in King Henry the first his owne Palace in which Councell The King assented and enacted that from thenceforth no man should be invested into any Bishoprick or Abbie of England by the King or any Layman by giving him a pastorall staffe or a Ring Proceres Regni the Peeres of the Realme writes Eadmerus were called to this Councell and the King assented to and ratified this Act Astante multitudine ac per Consilium Anselmi et Procerum Regni the Commons standing by him by the Councell of Aâ—selme and of the great men of the Realme This Councell then was a Parliament and this Canon assented to both by the Commons Peeres and King â—o make it valid Not long after this King
Canterbury and Yorke to London to celebrate a Councell of all England there on the day appointed for the beginning of his Councell when all having taken their Robes and ensignes were about to go in Procession to it there fell out a vehement contention between the Archbishops themselves about the priority of place in the Councell For that rule of the Apostle in honour preferring one another was so abrogated by the Bishops of our time that neglecting their Pastorall diligence and care Bishops by how much the more stubbornly by so much also the more vainly contend about Praecedencie and almost all Episcopall Controversie is wholy conversant about the praerogative of their honours In conclusion Yorke comming soonest praeoccupied the first seate alleadging that the same belonged to him by the ancient decree of Saint Gregory by which it is known to bee enacted that of the Metropolitans of England he should be accounted the chiefe who was first ordained But Canterbury having made a solemne complaint of the preoccupying of his place as if he suffered prejudice refused the second seate Whereupon his subjects or Clerkes of his Province contending more fiercely for him presently the simple contention of words grew into a brauling Yorke the adverse party being stronger was thrust with ignominy from the place he had so early taken who exhibited his torne Myter to the Legate as a signe of the injury offered to him and cited Canterbury to the Apostolicall See The Metropolitans therefore thus contending and things thus disturbed the Councell was not celebrated but dissipated and they who had assembled as called forth to a Councell returned to their own homes Matthew Parker in his Antiquitates Ecclesiae Britannicae out of Gervasins and Radulphus de Duceto relates the story in these words A Legate called Flugonius came into England from the Pope at King Henry the seconds request that hee might both separate Queene Eleaner from him by a Divorce and comprimise the Controversie between the Archbishops of Canterbury and Yorke touching the precedency which had continued for many successions of Bishops and been oft times determined but never finally ended till the Statute of 31 Hen. 8. cap. 10. such was the pride and ambition of these Arch-Prelates whose more than civill contentions for superiority our Historians have at large recorded to their infamy This Legate assembled a Councell at Westminster in the Church of the infirme Monkes whither the Clergie of both Provinces plentifully assembled and when the day of beginning the Councell was come the Legate sitting on an high Throne gave the right hand to the Archbishop of Canterbury But Yorke hoping that the King would bee more propitious to him than to Canterbury refused the left hand and striving most impudently with his breech to sit between the Legate and Canterbury at last sate downe in the lap of his Primate He had scarcee touched Canterbury with his breech with which he strove to get the second place but he was shamefully reprehended both by many Bishops and also by many Clerkes and Laymen The Archbishop of Canterburies servants provoked with the indignity of this wicked fact and the vehemencie of the just reproofe pulling York out of their Lords bosome and throwing him down on the ground trampled him under their feet and his Archiepiscopall Robes being most shamefully pulled off and torne they buffeted him with their fists But Canterbury when as he could not call away nor hold off his servants enraged with so great anger departed out of the Councell that at least hee might draw them away with him by his departure The servants following their Master left Yorke lying prostrate on the ground environed with his torne Garments At last Yorke fetching many deep and frequent sighes ariseth halfe dead and goeth all bloody to the King who with his son was present in the Councell the thing for which I principally relate the storie and makes his complaint against Canterbury The King having received Yorks relation only was at first in censed against Canterbury but afterwards the truth of his owne rashnesse and impudency being manifested he dismissed Yorke who departed from the King with disgrace the most reviling him with clamors go go said they thou betrayer of Saint Thomas thy hands doe yet stinke with blood But he poore wretch did now welter in his owne not Thomas his blood Hugocius among these tumults perplexed with feare having pronounced a blessing sodainly dissolved so unluckie a Councell and appealled Canterbury to the Pope as guilty of this battery Yorke also did the like At last Canterbury least he should be overwhelmed with appeales on both sides submitted himselfe and his servants to the Popes protection by appealing both the Legate and Yorke to Rome so all equally appealed But the next day Canterbury who knew the manner of the Pontificians pacified the Legate with gifts and they thus reconciled remitted their Appeales on both sides Afterwards the Archbishop of Cant. and Geoffry of Ely were againe accused by the Bishop of York before the King that in the Councell of Westminster they had laid violent hands on him which when they had denyed and purged themselves upon Oath they were reconciled by the Kings command and by him a truce for five yeares was made between Canterbury and Yorke who promised betweene themselves upon Oath that they would firmely stand to the Arbiterment of the Bishops of Normandy and France as well concerning this battery as all other controversies depending between them And so this fray and Councell ended wherein you see the King Prince and Laymen were present it being in truth a Parliament accompanied with a Convocation Anno 1226. there was a Synod held at London under Otho the Popes Legate where the King with the Clergy Magnatibus Regni and the great men of the Kingdome assembled with many Bishops Priests Laâ—corum Turbis and Troops of Laymen when they were all assembled Otho read the Popes letters to them before them all in which the Pope alleaged that it was a most ancient scandall and reproach to the Church of Rome that she was branded for coveteousnesse the roote of all evill and in this especially that no men could expedite any businesse in the Court of Rome unlesse by disbursing great summes of money and giving store of gifts but because the poverty of the Church of Rome was the cause of this scandall and infamy her naturall sons ought to relieve the want of their Mother for unlesse we should receive gifts from you and other good and honest men we should want necessaries to supply our lives which would be altogether incongruous to the Roman dignity Therefore utterly to roote out this scandall by the Councell of our Brethren the Cardinalls of the holy Church of Rome we have provided a certaine forme to which if you will consent you may free your Mother from scandall and obtaine Justice in the Court of Rome without giving any bribes Now the forme provided is this First of
Common State before all controversies of Religion and causes Ecclesiasticall had beene concluded King Canute in his Parliament holden at Winchester upon Christmas day after sundry Lawes and Orders made touching the faith the keeping of holy Dayes publike prayers learning of the Lords Prayer receiving of the Communion thrice in the yeare the manner and forme of Baptisme fasting and other like matters of Religion in the end thereof saith thus Iam sequitur institutum Legum secularium Now followeth an Order for temporall Lawes Thirdly we see that the Godly Catholique Princes in old times thought is their duty before all other offices of the Common weale first to determine matters of Religion and that even BY THE PARLIAMENTS OF THIS REALME In a Parliament holden by King William the Conquerer it is written thus The King for as much as he is the Vicar of the highest King is therefore appointed for this purpose that he should Rule and defend the Kingdome and People of the Lord and above all things the holy Church c. Hereby it appeareth that Kings and Princes are specially and of purpose appointed by God not only to defend but also to Governe and Rule the holy Churh How be it if any imperfection shall appeare in the former Parliaments we give God thankes for the same that is and trust that for his owne names sake he will confirme what he hath begun The hearts of Princes and determinations of Parliaments are in his hands If any thing want the arme of the Lord is not Shorted he is able to supply the same So our incomperable Iewell enough to satisfie and silence all our Opposites Thomas Bilson Warden and afterwards Bish of Winchester bringing in the Prelates and Iesuiâ—s objecting against our reformed Protestant Religion that it was brought in and ratified not by a Councell and Synod of the Clergy but by the Prince Queene Elizabeth and the Parliament who say they had no power to determine or deliberate of those matters returnes this answer May not the Prince command for truth within hee Realme except your consents be first required and hadâ— May not her Highnes serve Christ in making laws for Christ without your likeing Claime you this interest and prerogative that without you nothing shall be done in matters of Religion by the Laws of God or by the liberties of this Realme By the Lawes of the land you have no such priviledges Parliaments have beene kept by the King and his Barons the. Clergy wholy excluded and their Acts and statutes good And when the Bishops were present their votes from the Conquest to this day were never negative By Gods Law you have nothing to do with making Lawes of Kingdoms or Common wealthes You may teach you may not command persuasion is your part compulsion is the Princes If Princes imbrace the truth you must obey them If they pursue truth you must abide them By what authority then claim you this Dominion over Princes that their laws for Religion shall be voyde unles you consent seeing they are the maintainers establishers and upholders of the faith with publique power and positive Lawes which they and their Parliaments may make without a precedent councel of Clergy men to guid them as he there proves at large by sundry presidents If any Concurre not with me in this undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction of Christian Princes and Parliaments after all these pregnant testimonies I must tell them in plaine english they directly violate their late vow and Covenant and symbolâ—e herein with Jesuites and Popish Prelates whose doctrines they have abjured by their Nationall Covenant and therefore cannot may not ever hereafter embâ—ace without the highest Perjury and plaine Apostacy unto Popery I shall finish this Section of the Authority and power of Parliaments in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline and enacting Lawes in all and every of these particulars with some forraigne presidents in the Parliaments Diers Assemblyes of Estats in other Realme republikes Should I now relate unto you the many ecclesiasticall Laws of all sorts made in them I might swell this Treatise into many folio volumes I shal therefore only give you a brief touch catalogue of some few which the Studious may peruse make use of at their leisure For FRANCE you may survey the Decrees of King Childebert debated and agreed by him and his people in a Parliament de quibuscunque conditionibus una cum Optimatibus nostris c. 2. 4. c. 15. For sanctifying the Lords Day prohibiting the dressing of any but necessary food on it all Bodily labour under pecuniary mulcts The ecclesiasticall laws of Charles the great Ludovicus pius Charles the Bald collected into one volum by Abbot Ansegisus Benedictus Levita Lindebrogus others printed with some pettinent additions Parisijs 1640. stiled Capitula Regum Episcoporum Maximeque OMNIVM NOBILIVM FRANCORVM were made GENERALI CONSENSV PIDPLIVM SKORVM ET GENERALI CONSVLTV ET COMMVNI CONCILIO by generall consent of the King Bishops and especially of the Nobles and states of France in Common Councells Parliaments and Assemblies of the estates Who had so great a power in making rejecting Canons ecclesiasticall Lawes that when in the yeare 846. the Bishops of France and their suffragans had in their Synods compiled certaine Canons by the command of Charles the Bald and tendered them to him as he had commanded in Sparnaâ— a Village of the Church of Rhaemes to peruse and approve the King Dissidentibus regni sui PRIMORIBVS ab eorundem episcoporum admonitionâ— by reason that the Nobles and other men of his Realme differed from the Bishops in opinion in most of those Canons the King and Nobles out of all their Canons or Chapters haec tantum observanda complacenda sibi colligerunt Episcopis scripto tradiderunt dicentes NON AMPLIVS DE FORVM CAPJTVLIS ACCEPTASSE QVAM ISTA ET ISTASE VELLECVM PRINCIPE OBSERVARE which were Stiled Captule Regis CAROLI not the Bishops Canons By which it is evident that no ecclesiasticall lawes or Canons could be made in France to bind either Clergy or Laity but such at the King Nobles Parliament and three estates approved and confirmed I shall add to this that Anno 1307. King Philip the 4. of France assembled a Parliament at Paris wherein the Laity of France exhibited 65. Articles against the Clergy to regulate their jurisdiction and abuses which were there largely handled and debated as you may read at leisure in Masters Fox who records the passages very fully in the French Histories What the Parliament Estates in France have done enacted in matters of Religion Church-Government and discipline of ancient and latter times you may read at large in Liurentius Bochellus his Decreta Ecclesiae Gallicaiae in Carolus Molinaeus Contra parvas Datas c. in William Ranchin his Survay of the Councel of Trent but above all in Antonie Fontanon
his Les Edicts et Ordonnances dos Royes de France A Paris 1585. Tom. 4. throughout wherein you may see an whole Folio volume of Ecclesiasticall Lawes and Edicts made by the Kings and Parliaments of France to which for brevity I shall remit the Reader For Spain the forecited Councels of Toledo which were but Parliament and assemblies of the Estates The lawes of the Wisigothis especially lib. 1â— De removendis OMNIVM HAERETICORVM SECTIS exterms DE OMNIVM HAERETICORVM ATQVE IVDAEORVM ERRORIBVS AMPVTANDIS which you may read at large in the third some of Hispâ—â— Illustrata p. 992. to 1014. and in Fredericus Lindebrogus his Codex Legum Antiquarum France-furtii 1613. p. 210 to 238. together with the Generall history of Spain Joannes de Laet. Hispaniae Descriptio Hieronimus Blanca Rerum Arragenensium Commentarius will furnish us with sufficient Presidents of their Parliaments Iurisdiction in matters of Religion and making Ecclesiasticall Lawes in all Church matters For Bohemia Georgius Bartholdus Pontanus his Bohaemia pia l. 7. De Rebus Gestis sub Ludovico Rege lib. 1. c. 8 9 10 12 24 25 21 29 30 31. lib. 2. c. 3 to 24. l. 3. c. 2 6. l. 4. c 1 711 18 33 34. Pauli Geschinii Majestas Carolina sine Constitutiones Caroli 4 Romani Imperatoris quibus illo Regniâ—â— Bohemiae firmandum ornandumque censuit Handviae 1607 Rubr. 1. De fide Catholica Rub. 2 4 5. De hareticis c. Aeneas Sylvius his Historia 〈◊〉 Pauli Stranhii Respub Bohemiae Master Fox his Acts and Monuments 〈…〉 Grimstons Imperiall History will furnish us with sundry Presidents where their Kings and Parliaments have determined and settled matters of Religion and Church-government in that Kingdome not Synods of their Clergy For Denmarke Hungary Poland and Sueden the Lawes and Historians of these Kingdomes abundantly testifie that their Parliaments and generall Assemblies of State have alwayee settled matters of religion and Church-government See Guagninus Chromerus Saxogrammaticus Pontanus Chyâ—â—â— Rer um Ungarirarum Scriptores For Italy I find that Theodoricus King of Italy among his temporall Laws intiteled Edictum Theodorici Regis hath many Ecclesiasticall constitutions intermixed as cap. 26. 70. 71 168 125 143. and 174. De die Dominico prohibiting arrests or citations thereon The like I finde among the Lawes of the b Burgundians made by Gundebald their K. by the advise and consent of his Nobles Coram positis Optimatibus nostris universa pensavimus iam nostra quam eorum sententia mansuris in aeuum legibus sumpsimus statuta praescribi cap. 28. 44 45. 51. â— Additamenti primi cap. 18. Additamentum 2. cap. 12. Among the Lawes of the Almains made in the time of King Chlotair una cum Principibus suis id sunt 33. Episcopis 33. Ducibus 72. Concitibus vel cetero populo constiâ—â—ta est writes my Author I finde sundry Ecclesiasticall Lawes intermixed with temporall as cap. 1. 24. and cap. 38. De eo qui die DOMINICO opera servilia fecerit Which first enacts Die dominico nemo opera servilia prasumat facere quia hoc Lex prohibet sacra Scriptura in omnibus contradicit And then prescribes bast inadoing to a servant that shall worke on the Lords day and to a freeman after three admonitions the forfeiture of the third part of his inheritance and for the 4th offence perpetuall villainage Quia noluit Deo vacare in sempiernum servus permanâ—â—â— In the Lawes of the Bavarians first compiled by King Theodoricus by the advise of Wisemen skilfull in the Lawes afterwards proceeded in by King Childebert and Clothaire and renued by King Dagobert by advise of his Parliament as this Preface to them attests Hoc DECRETUM est apud Regem Principes ejus â— apud CUNCTUM POPULUM CHRITIANUM qui intra Regnuâ—◠〈◊〉 consistunt I finde the first Title to bee DE ECCLESIASTIC IS REBVS De libris legum justitutionum qua ad CLERVM pertinent Concerning whom there were many very good Lawes enacted I meet with sundry Lawes made by Tassilo Duke of Bavaria Anno Do. 772. Et per PRIMATES Imperij unmerso CONSENTENTE MVLTITVDINE c. Est ab universis uno ore confirmatum c. Many of which Lawes are meerely Ecclesiasticall As the first for the honour and sanctifying of the LORDS DAY Sicut in Lege Scriptum est in decretis Canonum and cap. 2 3 4 6. De Popularibus legibus cap. 10. 11 12 20. So also in the Aditions of Charles the Emperour to the Bavarian Lawes Addit 1. c. 1. 8. and Addit 2. cap. 7. 8 10. Among the Lawes of the Saxons cap 2. sect 8 9. There are some Lawes relating to the Church In the Prisons Laws chap. 18. There is this Law concerning the LORDS DAY Qui opus servile die Dominico fecerit ultra Laubachi sol 12. in caeteris locis Prisiae 4. Sol. culpabilis indictum Siseruus hoc fecerit vapuletur aut Dominus ejus 4. Solidos pro illo componet Additio Sapientum to these Laws Tit. 1. and 12. Concerne the Church Among the Lawes of the Lombards l. 1. tit 2. chap. 2. lib. 2. tit 8 38 39. lib. 3. tit 1. De Episcopis Clericis tit 3. De decimis tit 10. De Rectâ—â—ibus Ecclesiarum tit 11. De Pontificibus tit 26. De excommunicatione and tit 30. 32 40 are wholly Ecclestasticall In the Lawes and Constitutions of those of Napleâ— and Sicily made in the yeare 1221. lib. r. tit 1. 2. Dâ— Haereticis 〈◊〉 eorum Receptoribus Fauctoribus c. tit 3. De Apostatis tit 5. De Crimine sacrilegij tit 7. De Decimis and Tit. 29. 65 68. lib. 3. tit 1. 2 3. 20 25 26 28 43 51 58 59. are meerely Ecclesiasticall concerning Religion the Church and Clergie Not to mention the many Ecclesiasticall Lawers and edicts made by some of the Roman and Greeke Emperors with the consent of their Senators recorded in Iustinian in Codice Theodosij lib. 16. throughout and many of them inserted by Gratian himselfe into his Decrees and body of the Canon Law and reduced under severall heads by Paulus Windeck in his Theologia Iurisconâ—â—â—torum Canonum Legum Consensus Not to rehearse the many Lawes and edicts of the German Emperors Princes Diets touching Religion and Church affaires of all sorts mentioned scatteringly in Abbas Usâ—eigensis Sabellicus Rerum Germanicarum Scriptures Ioannes Aventinus Auâ—alium Boyorum Master Fox Fasciculus Rerum expetendarum Hermaennus 〈◊〉 Grimstons Imperiall History Constitutiones Imperat Parisijs 1606. 〈◊〉 Comment Chytraus Chron Saxoniae and Augustana Confessto fidei Dictrina Electorum Principum Ordinum Imperij atque corundem Theologorum qui Augustanam Confessionem amplectuntuâ— subscribed by all the Protestant Princes Dukes Earles Barons Councels Senates Senators of Germany presented to the Emperor and printed yea reprinted by all their speciall Commands
civill Magistrates as you have plentifully done even with some colour of reason as well as insanire cum ratione which is all I shall answer to your reasons Fourthly Hee writes Let Master Prynne Or any other evict mee of any wilfull or unwilfull violation of the priviledges of Parliament and I shall bee as willing as willingnesse it selfe can make me to further such a conviction and no man shall be more ready then I to crave their pardon or undergoe their Justice nay I shall repent my selfe and abhor my errour in dust and ashes Certainely this your promised late Repentance which is yet contingent and improbable after so many publike offronts and oppositions against the power and proceedings of Parliament will bee a very poore recompence and satisfaction for all your former misdemeanors and scandalls to the Parliament yet late repentance being better then none at all I shall now challenge you to make good this your promise since your owne Conscience and judgment cannot but informe you I have written enough in the former Sections to evict and convince you and all the world besides that you have not only violated but denyed oppugned those priviledges of Parliament in Ecclesiasticall affaires which our owne Parliaments in all ages and Parliamentary Assemblies in all other Kingdomes have unquestionably exercised enjoyed without any such publique opposition as you have made against them And if you now make not good your promise few or none will ever credit you hereafter 5ly For the Authors you cite to justifie yourselfe they are miserably wrested and mistaken for the most part The first you quote is Master Edwards who maintaines point blancke against you throughout his Treatise a Legislative and coerceive power in Parliaments and civil Majestrates even in Church-affaires and matters of Religion in the very pages you quote and else where Therefore you palpably abuse the Author and Reader in quoting him to the contrary who is so point-blancke against you For the passage you quote out of his Page 256. The Parliament interposeth no Authority to determine what government shall be whence you inferre p. 7. Therefore his opinion appeares to be either that the Parliament hath No authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a government It was written only with reference to that present time the Parliament having at that time when he writ during the Assemblies debate and consultation interposed no Authority to determine what government shall be yet before that it had declared the old prelaticall Lordly government to be abolished and called an Assembly to advise with about a New But to inferre from thence as you doe Therefore his opinion is either that the Parliament hath no Authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a Government Is an inference quite contrary to the next ensuing words and pages to the whole scope of the Authors Booke Humbly submitted to the Honourable houses of Parliament contrary to his expresse words p. 138. 281. to all his reasons against Toleration of your Way and to the Parliaments intent in calling the Assembly to assist them in determining and setling a Church-government agreable to Gods word Be ashamed therefore of this grosse perversion of your first Authors passages diametrally contrary to this meaning Your Passages out of Master Hayward Bishop Iewell Master Fox Mr. Calvin Iacobus Acontius Junius Peter Martyr and Gulielmus Appolonius make nothing at all against the Legislative Authority of Parliaments in matters of Religion and Church government and have no aâ—â—inity with your Passages words most of them Bishop Iewel especially as I have already proved vindicating propugning the very ecclesiastical power of Parliaments which you oppugne Indeed some of their words seeme to diminish the Coercive power of Majestratâ—s enforcing of mens consciences in matters of Religion which I shal answer in due place and manifest how you abuse the Authors herein as well as Mr. Edwards not hitherto answered by any of your party but how they militat against the jurisdiction of Parliaments in making Lawes touching Religion discipline and Church-government I am yet to seeke For the Passages he aleageth out of the Divines of Scotland That the Prince or Majestrate may not make or publish any Ecclesiasticall Law without the free assent of the Clergy c. That he may not by HIMSELFE define or direct such matters nor make any Lawes therein That the King hath not a Nomotheticke Legislative Power in matters ecclesiasticall in a constitute Church That the ordinary power of the King is not to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes c. I Answer 1. That their only meaning if I mistake not in these passages is that the Prince or chiefe civill Majestrate of HIMSELFE without a Parliament or without the assistance and consent of his Nobles Commons Clergy cannot legally make any ecclesiasticall Lawes to obliege his people upon which reason our Brethren of Scotl. rejected the late New service booke and Canons and our selves the late Canons c Oath which Canterbury wold have obtruded on us because they were made and prescribed only by the Kings Authority and the Prelates or Convocations not the Parliaments upon which very reason the Parliaments of both Kingdomes have respectively adjudged both one and other illegall But that the King or supreame temporall Majestrates assisted by a Parliament and Orthdox Divines may not make binding ecclesiasticall Lawes or that their or our Parliaments have not a reall Legislative power in any matters ecclesiastike the only point controversed is directly contrary both to the constant Doctrine and Practise of our Brethren and their Church used ever since the Reformation to the proceedings of their last Parliaments and generall Assemblies as I have formerly manifested You may therefore blush at this your perverting of their meaning as if they held that the Parliaments of England or Scotland had no power to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes for Religion or Church gouernment when as their Bookes Actions addresses to our present Parliament their presence assistance in our Assembly proclaimes the contrary And the very publique Confession of faith professed and subscribed in their Church Anno 1560 Chap. 14 since confirmed by severall Acts of Parliament doth the like But admit all those Authors really as not one of them is in verity opposite to the Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and Legislative power of Parliaments yet the unanimous practise and resolution of all Christian Realmes Synods Parliaments in all ages contrary to their private novell opinions is sufficient infinitly to overbalance them in the Judgements of all prudent men And thus much for Mr. Goodwins Innocencies tryumph as to the present point I shall next apply my selfe to Answer such Objections as my deare Brother Master Henry Burton hath lately made against the premises in his Vindication to my 12. Queeres touching Church-Government my Independency examined His first and principall Objection is this
ends of the World shall turne unto the Lord and all the kindreds of the Nations shall worship before him for THE KINGDOME is the Lords and he is the Governour among the NATIONS That ALL NATIONS shall serve and worship before him That he shall have DOMINION from sea to sea and from the Rivers to the ends of the earth That all DOMINIONS shall serve and obey him That the KINGDOMES of the earth shall sing unto the Lord c. All pregnant proofs of Nationall Churches which should serve and obey Christ But that Independent particular Congregations of visible Saints and they only should be Christs Kingdom Republick and Governed immediately by him rests yet on my Brothers part to make proofe of when he is able Thirdly I shall request my Brothers to satisfie me others by that Texts he can make good these Paradoxes of his That those who will not submit to his Independent Church-government Covenant become members of such Churches have no interest in the Covenant Sacraments or Seal of the Covenant or right to any Church-Communion That they are not within the Covenant visibly and therefore their Children not visibly to bee baptized That they professe not Christ to be their King and are afraid or ashamed to be in Covenant with Christ as their King c. Do not these uncharitable Paradoxes good Brother un-Church un-Saint all Christians and reformed Churches whatsoever which submit not to your new way excluding both them and their Children from the Covenant and Seales of Grace and all Church-communion at least in and among your Congregations as professed enemies to the Kingdome and Soveraignty of Christ Is not this the very language Doctrine of the Antichristian Church of Rome who vaunts herself the onely true Church of Christ out of which there is no salvation un-Churching all Churches and un-Saincting all Christians but their owne professed members as haeretickes Schismaticks and enemies to Christ yea is it not an higher strain of spirituall pride and uncharitable Behaviour against your brethren then ever the Donatists or Nouatians broached I beseech you deare Brother in the bowels of Christ to consider and recant these harsh passages which you can never justifie before God or men and have given great offence to many who cordially affect you These generall questions being demanded I shall next addresse my selfe to a more particular answer of the premised Objection by reducing it into these Logical arguments which wil best detect the fallacies imbecillities of it The first is this Christ is the only immediate supreame King Head Ruler and Governour of every particular Church Ergo no Kings Parliaments Councels Synode or any human Power can make any Lawes Rules Canons for the setling of Religion or reforming Governing well ordering of any particular Churches of Christ This is the summe of all my Brothers Passages I answer that this is a meere Independent Argument which will introduce a world of absurdities if admitted as I shall cleare by these following Instances 1. The Scripture is expresse That God himselfe is King yea a great King over all the earth That Christ is the ONLY Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords yea a great King over all Gods That all the Kingdomes and Nations of the earth are the Lords and that he giveth them to whomsoever he willâ— That his kingdome ruleth over all That his is the greatnes the Kingdom the power and the glory and the Majesty that all that is in the Heaven and in the Earth are his that he is exalted as head over all and raigneth over all That he is Lord and King of all as well of their bodies estates as soules and consciences Ergo By my Brothers forme of Arguing No Kings Parliaments Potentates Rulers Kingdoms Republikes ought to make any Lawes for the government of their Realmes publikes Nations Corporations or the ordering of mens persons or temporall estates but God and Christ alone and all particular Kingdomes Societies States Corporations Families are and ought to be immediatly subject to no King Majestrat Parliament or human power whatsoever even in temporall things but only to God and Christ 2ly God is more frequently stiled in Scripture The Lord of HOSTS and God of BATTLE then he is called the only King of his Church a Title you can hardly show me in direct termes in sacred writ Yea his power and providence principally appeares in mannnaging and disposing all occurrences and particulars concerning Hosts Armies Battles as your Brother Burroughs in his Glorious name of the Lord of Hosts hath largely manifested Ergo by this Logicke No King Parliament Generall Captaine or Councell of Warre may or ought to make or prescribe any Martiall Lawes for the regulating governing mustering Marshaling or disciplyning of their Hosts but God alone 3ly Christ is our only Soveraigne Lord Master Father Ergo no Landlord Master Father ought to prescribe any Lawes Rules orders for the better Government of their Tenants servants families Children but Christ alone by your argumentation 4ly Christ is the chiefe Shepherd Bishop Prophet Teacher and Instructor of his Church Ergo none ought by your reasoning to seed teach or instruct the Church and people of God but Christ alone We must have no Ministers teaching Elders Pastors Teachers to instruct Vs henceforth who are but men and not Christ himselfe 5ly Christ is the only Mediator Advocate Intercessor for his Church and people Ergo none ought by their Prayers and intercessions to soltcite the throne of Grace for the peace prosperity reformation and deliverance of Christs Churches and people but Christ alone Ministers must not pray for their people nor Saints one for another noreither of them for the whole Church of God if your Argumentation be solid 6ly If this argument stand firme then marke the inevitable consequences of it Independent Subjects will argue with their Princes Majestrates Superiors thus Christ is our only King Head Lord. Therefore we must not be subject to any Lawes and commands what soever but only to the lawes and precepts of Christ Wives Children servants will reason thus Christ is our onely Head Husband King Lord Father Master Therefore we will not we ought not to be subject to any of the Lawes Orders precepts of our Husbands Parents Ministers but only to the immediate Rules Laws edicts of Christ himselfe Mutinous or Independent Souldiers will thus argue with their Generalls and Commanders Christ is our only Captaine Generall and our Lord of Hosts Ergo we will be commanded conducted ordered by none but Christ not by any other Captain or Generall whatsoever Nay people and every member of your Independent Congregations upon any discontent wil thus dispute with their Ministers Ruling Elders Congregations Christ is our only head King lawgiver Judg. Therefore neither Councels Synods nor any Independent Ministers or Congregations may prescribe any Laws covenants Orders or directions to us or exercise any jurisdiction
severall Iurisdictions to submission and reall obedience especially when just and agreeable to Gods Word or at least to passive whiles in force where unjust or contrary to the Word Hence the publike Laws Ordinances Edicts of Parliaments and general Assemblies of the Estates have in all Kingdomes Ages without the least dispute oblieged regulated all Corporations Societies Persons within their severall jurisdictions because they are the Representative Body and supreame power of those Realms where all are virtually present and consenting when all or the major part at least assent Hence the whole World have ever held the determioations Creeds Canons Decrees of Oeumenicall Nationall or Provinciall Councels ratified by Emperors Kings and Parliaments obligatory in point of jurisdiction to all Churches persons within their jurisdictions And in truth the chiefe end use of Parliaments Councels Synods approved by God and the higher powers ordained by him is not to advise admonish perswade debate or deliver their opinions of doubts errors mischiefes for this every private man hath power to do and containes no stampe of jurisdistion Power or Authority in it But authoritatively to prescribe Lawes Canons Rules and determinations oblieging otherrs to obedience under paine of exemplary censures and penalties Sixthly It cannot be gainsayd but every man and woman in the world considered meerly as such or as single persons stript of all their naturall civill or Ecclesiasticall relations are of equall Authority and have no jurisdiction power or superiority at all one over another no more than fellow servants fellow Citizens or neighbors out of office have over one another yet look upon the selfe-same persons as they stand cloathed with their severall Relations as members of a family Corporation City Kingdome Church and their very relations make them subordinate and lyable to sundry superiour jurisdictions not only by way of counsell but command Thus children servants wives Pulpits are by a naturall relation established by a Morall Law and sundry divine Precepts subject to all the just Lawes Orders commands of their Parents Masters Husbands not onely by way of Counsell or advise which they may obey or reject at pleasure but of Iurisdiction and Authority so farre as to be enforced to obedience and justly punished for disobedience or neglect according to the quality of the offence and contempt Thus inferiours of all sorts in a politicke relation onely as subjects to their Princes to all subordinate Magistrates Officers in their respective places of power Kingdomes to their Parliaments Cities to their Majors Aldermen and Common-Councell Companies to their Masters Wardens and Assistants Souldiers to their Generals Commanders of all Rankes Schollars to their Tutors Colledges to their Rectors mariners to their Masters both by the Law of God Nature Nations Dictat of common reason are subject to all just orders Mandates of these their superiours to which they must yeeld obedienceâ— under paine of such punishments as are answerable to their contempt and disobedience The same rule and reason holds as firmely in all Ecclesiasticall Relations Take severall private Christians as Christians or severall Parishes or Congregations as they are such and it is certain one of them hath no Iurisdiction nor power at all over another in any Ecclesiasticall matters either to prescribe Lawes to or inflict censures upon one another but only a power to exhort admonish reprove advise or assist one another in a brotherly way But yet looke upon the selfe-same particular persons Churches as Members of a Parochiall or Nationall Church and then in this Relation they are and ought to be subject to the just rules precepts Canons Orders of the Ministers and whole Congregation of which they are Actuall Members even in point of conscience and every particular Church must and ought readily to submit to the just Canons Constitutions Orders determinations Ecclesiasticall Censures of the whole Representative Nationall or Provinciall Church Councell â—ynod ratified by Authority of Parliament in a Regular way under paine of Obâ—inacy Contempt Disobedience and exemplary punishment there being the selfe-same reason and equity for severall combined Churches in a Councel Synod Presbytery to have a coeâ—cive power over every particular Church within their limits as for any particular Congregation to claim or exerise a jurisdiction in point of direction or correction over any or every particular member of it Our Independents no doubt will grant that if two or three severall Congregations unite themselves into one Church they do by vertue of this union become all lyable to the Iurisdiction Canons Orders Determinations Censures of that one Church and those who whiles divided had no authority nor power but onely of their owne members have by this union a Iurisdiction over the Members of all these Churches thus eonjoyned into one As it is with several persons united into one Corporation Society Church or when severall powers Or jurisdictions meet and joyne together in one as the Parliaments Commissioners Armies of two Provinces Kingdome in one Parliament Councel Army the Lords Commons Knights and Burgesses of every County Citty Town and Burrough in both Realmes in one Parliament they have by this their union the whole power and authority of both united Kingdomes Armies Parliaments and a joynt Iurisdiction over both which they had not before whiles seperated even as a Major or King hath when as severall Cities Townes Villages Kingdoms as our ancient Saxon Heptarchy are all conjoyned into one City Realm and therby subordinated to one new Iurisdiction If this then must be yeelded to me it will inevitably follow by the selfe-same reason that severall particular Churches being united together in one Synod Councell Assembly Parliament or Presbytery even for this very end and purpose to prescribe such generall Canons erect such a uniforme Church-government and Discipline for the publicke peace and benefit of the Church as shall equally binde all Churches victually present and combined in it must have a lawfull Iuridicall Legislative power in them to make such Laws Canons as shall binde all particular Congregations not onely as advises or brotherly counsels but as vigorous Lawes which subject the particular persons or Churches who transgresse or contemne them to condigne punishment as the reasons Scriptures formerly alleaged to prove that humane Lawes obliege the conscience in point of obedience abundantly demonstrate These uncontrolable verities never yet so much as doubted in any Age till this clearely discover the falsity and vanity of my Brothers objection to which I will give this further direct answer 1. I deny that every particular Church or Congregation in a Christian State where there are many adjacent Churches under the selfe same Civill Government is an absolute compleat independent Body City or Republike of it selfe as is objected to all intents and purposes without dependency on or relation or subordination to any other True it is that in some respects so far as concerns its own private interest it is a compleate body having a Minister
things to make good his Argument 1. That if there were no other particular Church in the world then one as that of Abrahams family should it not be a compleat Church untill there were other Churches on whose jurisdiction it should depend I answer yes But this is not the case nor question We in our Realme blessed be God have in all parts not only one particular christian family church but many thousand Parochiall Churches Congregations as our very Almanacks as well as Cosmographers will informe you What then Brother will you inferre from this sole Church in Abrahams family to our Churches now Will you argue Abraham in his dayes had a compleat absolute Independent Church in his own family onely Ergo now there ought to be such an Independent absolute Church in every family at least where there is a sufficient number requisite to make up a ministeriall body as you interpret it what then will become of your congregationall Churches and our Parochial consisting of many great families they must by this new Doctrine divide themselves presently into so many families or Independent Churches as there are great families in them and then I hope the Master of the family onely not an Independent Minister must be their Paster and Ruler as Abraham was in his and then farewell the office of Minister which some of your Lay Elders exercise without scruple denying the very calling of Ministers and all our Churches too Brother will you argue thus Adam was a compleat and absolute man alone therefore he needed not a helper or wife or family to be joyned to him Suppose you should take a single person who formerly lived alone by and of himselfe without relation to or communion with any other men like a Popish Hermite or Anchorite into your family Church or incorporate him into this City or any company in it will you say that because this man was absolute and under no command at first Ergo he must continue so still in your family Church this City and his company and neither you nor any of them may or can of right enact any thing to controle him I trow not When there were only single Families living remote from others in the world they were absolute and compleate Churches Republikes of themselves but when these single families multiplyed and combined themselves into Villages Cities Provinces Republikes Kingdomes they thereby lost their pristine liberty absolutenesse independencie compleatnesse and of intire small bodies Churches Republikes became onely parts and members of those larger ones to which they were thus combined So it is with particular Mother Churches when there was but one particular Church in the world or in one State or Kingdome the case of all the first Churches planted by the Apostles without any Neighbour Churches to combine with this Church being under no superiour Christian Magistrates was absolute and independent in it selfe there being no other Church to joyne with But if this one Church through the encrease of Christians shall swell so great as to spread it selfe over all the City or Republike wherein it is and so upon necessity must divide it selfe into sundry particular Congregations then all these Churches being under one and the selfe-same Republike and united together under one supreame Civill Magistrate as members of the same Nation Kingdom City Republike and of the self-same nationall or Provinciall Church doe thereupon lose their absolutenes and Independency and become subject to the Power Lawes Canons Determinations Government and Discipline of the whole Nationall Church and Kingdome of which they are but members which to preserve publike peace unity order amity ought constantly to be governed by the self-same generall Ecclesiasticall Lawes setled by the common consent of all their severall National Synods and Parliaments as Civill Lawes are which oblige all But this saith my Brother in the second place takes away the lawfull Jurisdiction and rights of particular Churches Ergo it is not to be admitted I answer first By the like reason you may argue the joyning of many particular persons into one family of divers families into one Parish of sundry Parishes into one City of divers Citie into one State of sundry States and Kingdomes into one Monarchy or Empire of divers Companies and Regiments into one Army of sundry Knights Citizens Burgessâ—â— and Peeres into one Parliament and many Ministers into one Synod deprives them of their Independency their particular Rights Interests and subjects them to a new superiour power Iurisdiction command and to their publicke Lawes and Ordinances Ergo it is unlawfull intollerable and such Corporations Republicks Kingdomes Empires Parliaments Synods ought not to be If this be a good consequence you will subvert all humane Societies Corporations Republicks Synods Parliaments Independent Churches and Families to by like reason â— This takes not away the lawfull rights of particular Congregations but rather improves them for their owne particular and the publick good for Brother I pray informe me which is best of the two for a particular Church or Corporation to be subject only to such Lawes Rules Government and Discipline as shall be made decreed declared most agreeable to the Word of God and fit to be generally received in all Churches by an whole Parliament and Assembly of the most wise ablest and best experienced Christians Nobles Divines after long debate and consideration or by the private rash Opinions and perchance passions humours of two or three private persons perhaps directed swayed by particuler interests relations ends Which is justest safest or most remote from Tyrannicall Arbitrary and Papall Government for Churches States Persons to be all confined to certaine publicke Lawes and Canons enacted by common consent in Parliament limiting who shall be admitted to who secluded from the Congregation Sacrament communion of Saints c. and for what causes offences in certaine c. then to be left Arbitrary to the meer mercy wills determinations of the Ministers and Elders of every particular Congregation or to the pleasures of Princes or some few temporall Magistrates without any Lawes or limits to restrain them We all hold it the greatest happinesse freedome of our Kingdom and the chiefest part of our Priviledge which we enjoy as free-men of England That we neither may nor can be legally bound by any Lawes Canons Taxes or Commands but only such as are made and imposed on us by full consent in Parliament and not subject to the meere Arbitrary Lawes Ordinances wills commands of our Princes Magistrates Iudges Prelates or any other private men And shall it be then held the slavery injury and not rather the liberty or priviledge of particular Churches and their members to be subject only to such Ecclesiasticall Rules Canons Orders Covenants Government and Discipline as shall be publickly agreed on consented to and setled in Parliament to which all Churches Christians shall be equally obliged without exemption then to be left at six and
then Heresie or hereticall Doctrin by such extravagant inferences and incoherent Arguments for fear you dishonour both your Master and your self 3. Though Christ hath left no absolute exact forme of Church-Government in Scripture for all Churches and Ages yet he hath left his Word to be a light to the feete and a Lanthorne to the pathes of all his Saints and Churches and said downe such generall Presidents rules and directions therein as may serve for ordering directing and regulating of all Churches herein yea he hath given us some more particular rules for some things which concerne the Government of his Churches The Scripture hath generall Rules for our faith life manners thoughts words actions apparell eating drinking praying preaching receiving the Sacrament c. applicable to all particular cases and occurrences concerning them though not particular punctuall rules for deciding all those cases of conscience and controversies that frequently arise concerning them yet Christ is not unfaithfull because he hath left his Church sufficient rules and meanes of salvation in generall or particular to bring it safe to heaven 4 The providing of godly and faithfull Ministers Magistrates and Governours of the Church to put good Laws Disciplin and Government in execution is a great part of Christs charge and care as well as providing his Word and a Government for his Church Will you charge Christ then with negligence and leaving his Church to six and seven because every Minister of Christ hath not the selfe-same measure of gifts and endowments to discharge his Ministery or because some Ministers are more negligent in their places then others and some sheep are left oft-times without a Shepheard or committed to a Iudas a Thiefe or to Wolveâ— false Teachers Seducers which teare and devoure instead of feeding them or because he set not up and maintained this forme of Church Government you now contend for as his and none else beside in all Churches for so many hundred yeares together but reserved this honour in this latter age to some of you or rather to the Anabaptists and Brownists your Predecessors herein to advance it Brother you may easily discerne by this where your owne pretended inconveniences and inferences will drive you at the last if you rely upon them I beseech you therefore as a loving Brother to forbeare them for the future 4. Whereas you object We should have a mad world of it if Civill States Magistrates Kings and Parliaments should set up such a Government 〈◊〉 they conceived to be agreeable to Gods Word and the good Lawes and Customes of their Realmes I answer 1. That it is your own position that every particular man and Church ought to walke according to the rule of their own consciences and judgement not anothers Christ only being Lord of their consciences If then a whole Kingdome Parliament Church or Realme shall conceive and be perswaded in their consciences that such and such a Church Government is most consonant to Gods Word most suiteable to their condition and therefore shall upon solemne debate after much seeking of God by Prayer and Fasting make choise of this government before another as by electing a Presbyteriall rejecting an Independent way What madnesse or inconvenience meer slavery tyranny humane invâ—ntions superstitions or corruption will this introduce Shall they be Hereticks presently for such a choise as you define them Shall private men have more liberty of choise or conscience then whole Nations Synods Parliaments or more wisedome temper knowledge discretion conscience then they Indeed I have read of one Parliament stiled the Mad and another the unlearned because there were no Lawyers in it and no doubt both Parliaments Councells Synods generall Assemblies may and doe sometimes erre and that grosly as well as private persons or congregations But doubtlesse all reasonable men will and must acknowledge that two are better then one a whole Court of Iustice lesse liable to errour and corruption then a particulâ—r Judge a whole Parliament then a Committee an whole Synod then a private Conventicle or congregation Then tell me in sober sadnesse good Brother whether your Independent Assertion That every particular Minister hath power to gather and set up a Church of his owne Independent from any other and to choose such a Discipline Government to themselves as they CONCEIVE to be most suiteable to Gods Word though in truth it be not so but a meer CONCEITE as I feare your New way is That particular Christians have power to unite themselves into a Church and elect a Minister and Government of their owne choise most agreeable as they thinke to the Word And that every Sect and Person ought to have free liberty of conscience in the exercise of what they beleeve Or my Position be likely est to produce more madnesse in the world or mischiefes in the Church Certainely it will be a madder world and Church too indeed when every private Minister and Christian may follow their owne opinions fancies crochets waies every Sectary set up his owne congregation sect and vent his owne erronious schismaticall Opinions without control when every man shall have priviledge to doe What seemes right in his owne eyes as if there were no King in Israel no Parliament in England when every Anabaptist Enthusiast or brainsick Melancholico shall not only build Churches in the ayre different from all others but set them up openly in our Cities Counties Kingdomes without impediment in contempt of Lawes Parliaments all Civill or Ecclesiasticall Authority as too many I feare doe now and I hope the High Court of Parliament will remedy it in due time because they deem their owne fancies Gospel their owne Juventions Christs Oracles Certainly the world and Church will both be mad in good earnest when such a licentiousnesse shall be proclaimed under the Notion of Christian Liberty every mans own private way christned with the Name of Christs Kingdom c. though it hath small affinity with it The God of peace order of his infinite mercie preserve us safe from this Maniaca Insania this deadly madnesse into which we are running and hath already desperately seized upon the Braines and hearts of many My Brothers sixth Objection is this That Parliaments Councells Synods are not now infallible but subject unto errour many of them having erred and that grosly in former and late times That neither Parliament nor Assembly can now say as that Synod Act. 15. 28. It seemeth good to us and to the Holy Ghost they being not endued with an infallible spirit Therefore they can make no binding Determinations Lawes Canons Decrees in any Ecclesiasticall matters to oblige any particular Churches or christians Good Brother writes he for all your punctuall quotations of that Scripture Acts 15. you doe not all this while tell us that which is the maine of all which we finde in the 28. verse IT SEEMED GOOD TO THE HOLY
in this point let him consult William Ranchin his Review of the Councell of Trent who is copious and zealous in this point though a Papist Bishop Jewels Defence of the Apologie part 6. cap. 12. 13 14. 15. and the ensuing Sections But to returne to the point proposed As in the forecited Councels abroad so in our Councels Synods and Convocations at home as our Kings and their Nobles were usually present and president as I shall shew hereafter so the Prelates could debate propound and conclude nothing without their privity and licence Hence Eadmerus records of King William the Conquerour that all divine and humane things did expect his approbation for he would not suffer any man living within any of his Dominions to receive the Bishop of Rome as Apostolicall unlesse he commanded him nor yet to accept his Letters upon any termes if they had not been first shewed to him Yea he did not suffer the Primate of his Kingdome to wit the Arch-bishop of Canterbury or Dover if he sate President in a generall Councell of Bishops gathered together to decree or prohibit any thing but those things which were sutable to his will and had been first ordained by himselfe William Rufus his sonne tooke the same jurisdiction on him and challenged it as part of his Prerogative Royall For when as Anselme Arch-bishop of Canterbury moved him to command if he pleased Councels to be renued according to the ancient use because there had not been a generall Councell of Bishops in England since his comming to the Crowne not in many yeares before he gave him this reply When I shall thinke fit I will do something concerning these things not at thine but my owne pleasure But of this I shall thinke some other time and adds by way of scoffe but thou whence speakest thou in a Councell After this the King demanded of him from what Pope he would receive his Pall he answered from Urbane which the King hearing replyed That he had not yet taken him for Apostolicall neither had it been the Custome in his or his Fathers time that any one should name a Pope in the Kingdome of England without or besides his license or election and whosoever would wrest from him the power of this dignity should do all one as if he had endeavoured to take his Crown from him If therefore thou recivest the same Vrban or aeny other for Pope in my Kingdome or holdest him being received thou doest against the faith and allegiance which thou owest to me neither dost thou offend mee lesse in this than if thou shouldest endeavour to take my Crown from me Wherefore know that thou shalt have no share or portion in my Kingdome if I shall not see thee by open assertions to deny all subjection and obedience to Vrban at my desire Which he refusing to doe the Bishops and Noblemen sent to him from the King told him Thaâ— the whole Kingdome complained against him that he endeavoured to take away from their common Lord the dignity of his Empire and his Crowne For whosoever deprives him of the customes of his Royall dignity takes away his Crown and Kingdome together with it for one cannot be decently enjoyed without the other So little power had the Pope or Prelates here in England in those times Anno 1234. there was a Councell held at Glocester to which the King sent this Mandate Mandatum est omnibus Episcopis qui conventuri sunt apud Gloucestriam die Sabbati in chrastino Sanctae Catharinae firmiter inhibendo quod sicut Baronias sua quas do lege tenent diligunt nullo modo praesumant Concilium tenere de aliquibus quae ad coronam Regis pertinent vel quae personam Regis vel statum suum vel statum Concilii sui contingunt scituri pro certò quod si fecerint Rex inde se capiet ad Baronias suas Teste Rege apud Hereford 23. Novembris c. Anno 1237. in the Councel held at London under Otho the Popes Legate the King sent the Earle of Lincolne with others to the Legate sitting in Councell with an Inhibition in the Kings name to determine of nothing against the Crowne and Dignity Ut dicto Legato writes Matthew Paris ex parte Regis Regni inhiberent ne ibi contra Regiam coronam dignitatem aliquid statuere attemptaret and William de Reel one of the Messengers remained in the Convocation house to see this Inhibition observed clothed in a Canonicall Cap and Surplis the others departing thence So in 26. Hen. 3. rot 21. 9. E. 1. rot 2. 11. E. 2. rot 10 18. E. 3. rot 21. in the Tower and in many other Records I finde a generall Prohibition usually directed to the Convocation the Prelates and Clergie therein such loyall subjects usually were they Ne quid attemptarent contra jus Regium Ne quid statuant contra Regem in Concilio suo Ne aliquid tentetur contra Coronam Regis in congreganâ—ione Cleri c. the King confining them of what to treat and conclude of what not to entermeddle without his speciall license Not to mention That our Kings have frequently prescribed the Convocation what Subsidies they should grant and how they have handled them in case they refused to grant them The Statute of 25. H. 8. c. 19. Records ` That the Clergie of the Realm of England submitting themselves to the Kings Majesty then promised in verbo Sacerdotii that they would never from thenceforth presume to attempt alleadge claime or put in ure or enact promulge or execute any new Canons Constitutions Ordinance provinciall or other by whatsoever other name they shall be called in the Convocation unlesse the Kings most Royall assent and Licence may to them he had to make promulge and execute the same and that His Majesty doe give His most Royall assent and authority in that behalfe And thereupon enacts according to the sayd submission and petition of the Clergie that they assembled together in Convocation ne any of them to wit in their severall Visitations Synods Constitutions Chapters from henceforth Shall presume to alleadge claime or put in ure any Constitutions or Ordinances provinciall or Synodals or any other Canons nor shall Enact Promulge or execute any such Canons Constitutions or Ordinance provinciall by what name or names they may be called in Convocation for time to come unlesse the sayd Clergy may have the Kings most Royall assent and licence to make promulge and execute such Canons Constitutions and Ordinances provinciall or Synodall upon pain of every one of the said Clergy doing the contrary to this being thereof Convict to suffer imprisonment and make fine at the Kings will Hence the whole Clergy of England in their Booke entituled The Institution of a Christian man dedicated to K. Henry the eight Anno 1543. subscribed with all their names in a Convocation Chapter of Orders acknowledge this sovereign jurisdiction of the Prince
that in a Parliament or Councell wherein the King Nobels Senators and Elders of the people were present as well as Bishops and Clergy men Witnesse this preface to those Lawes of his Ego Inas Dei beneficio Occiduorum Saxonum Rex suasu et instituto Conredi Patris mei Heddae et Erkenvaldi Episcoporum meorum omnium Senatorum meorum et natu majorum sapientum populi mei in magna servorum Dei frequentia religiesè studebam tum animarum nostrarum saluti tum communi Regni nostri conservationi ut legittima nuptiarum faedera justaque judicia per omnem ditionem nostram fundata stabilitaque sint atque ut nulli liceat imposterum Senatori sive alteri cuivis in ditione nostra degenti haec nostra antiquare judicia Anno 694. there was a great Councell held at Becanceld wherein Withred King of Kent sate President and Bertuald Archbishop of Britain with Toby Bishop of Rochester the Abbats Abbesses Presbiters Deacons DVKES EARLES all assembled together deliberating about the state of the Churches in England The King subscribed the Lawes there made for the liberties of the Church in this manner Ego Withredus auxilio Christi his Legibus constitutis Rex pro Mo et Werburga Regina itemque pro filio nostro Arico subscripsi Anno 697. there was a Councell held at Berghamsted in the 5th yeare of the Reigne of Withred King of Kent under Birtuald the high Priest of Britanny Gybmund Bishop of Rochester and all the Ecclesiasticall Orders qui cum viris utique militaribus humanissimè et communi omnium assensu has lâ—ges decrevre Cantuariorumque Iuribus et consuetudinibus prout sequitur addendas edixere The Lawes are 28. in number all concerning Ecclesiasticall matters and are stiled in the Saxon Copy Juditia Withredi made in a Councel at Berghamsted praesentibus omnibus Ordinibus illius gentis cum viris quibusdam militaribus So that this was no other but a Parliament wherein the King Nobles Commons and Souldiers were present as well as the Bishops promulging and conâ—enting to these Lawes About the yeare 712 â—ae King of Westsex assembled a great Councell of all his Bishops PRINCES NOBLES EARLES AND OF ALL THE WISEMEN ALDERMEN AND COMMONS OF THE WHOL REALM wherein he made certain Ecclesiasticall Lawes concerning mariages to suppresse all fornication and uncleanesse Exhortatione doctrina per COMMVNE CONCILIVM ASSENSVM OMNIVM Episcoporum OMNIVM ALDERMANNORVM PRINCIPVM PROâ—ERVM COMITVM OMNIVM SAPIENTVM SENIORVM POPVLORVM TOTIVS REGNI or MVLTAQVE CONGREGATIONE SERVORVM DEI as some others render it About the yeare 714 Naitan King of Picts received a letter from Abbot Celfred concerning the time of celebrating Easter and Priests tonsure which he desired the King to cause to be observed throughout the Nation over which God had made him Kings the King hereupon assembled a Councell of learned men and of his Nobles and reading the said letter before them Rex surgens DEMEDIQ OPTIMATVM SUORUM CONSESSV kneled downe upon his knees giving thanks to God that he had deserved to receive such a gift from the Land of England and professed that he would have this forme of keeping Easter and tonsure to be perpetually observed throughout his Realme which was presently commanded by a royall Edict to be put in publique execution and was accordingly performed Anno 724. There was a Synod held in Northumberland by the Authority and favour of King Osred wherein wilfrid by the Kings favour got the superiority of his enemie About foure yeares after there was another Councell held at Worcester under Archbishop Bertuald by Pope Constantines advise not only of Religious persons Sed etiam regni Procerum But likewise of the Nobles of the Realme The Councell of Clovesho or Cliffe Anno 747. Cui Concilio interfuerunt Ethelbaldus Mâ—rciorum Rex CVMOMNIBVS REGNI SVI PRINCIPIBVS ET DVCIBVS as well as the Bishops and Clergy made sundry Ecclesiasticall Constitutions consented to and approved by the King all the Princes Dukes Nobles of his Kingdom not made or promulged by the Bishops only At this Councell were present 33. Princes and Dukes The Ecclesiasticall Canons in the Councell of Calchyth Anno 787. were made and confirmed by Offa King of Mercians and the secular Princes and Senators of the Land therein assembled as well as by the Ecclesiasticall Persons Convenerunt Omnes Principes regionis â—tam Ecclesiastici quam Seculares c. Tam REX QVAM PRINCIPESSVI CVMSENATORIBVS TERRAE DECRETA SIGNO CRVCIS FIRM AVERVNT Anno 7â—9 Pope Alrians Legates held a Councell at Chalchyth where Jambert Archbishop of Canterbury resigned part of his Archbishoprick to the Bishop of Litchfield and Offa King of Mercians who sate chiefe in it caused his Sonne Egfride to be crowned King it being in truth a Parliament as well as a Synod antiently and yet stiled a COVNCELL Anno 793 King Offa held a Councell at Verolam with Archbishop Humbert and his suffragans ET PRINCIPIBVS SVIS VNIVERSIS and all his Princes where they consulted about and resolved to build an Abbey to Saint Aâ—ban and to endow it with great priviledges and that the King should goe to Rome about it which he did Iuxta sententiam praedicti Concilii Anno 794. at the great Councell of Celichyth there were present 9. Kings 15. Bishops and 20. Dukes wherein the Reliques of Saint Alban were elevated adorned and a Monastery sounded to enshrine his bones And the same yeare King Offa having assembled another Councell of his Bishops and Nobles at Verolam REX VNANIMI OMNIVM CONSENSV et benevola voluntate beate Albano amplas contulit terras et possessiones innumeras Monachorum quoque conventum ad tumbam congregavit c. Cyneulf King of Westsex about the yeare 796. writ a letter to Lullus Bishop of Mentz una cum Episcopis meis neenon CVM CATERVA SATRAPARVM to settle matters of Religion In the Councell of Clovesho under Kenulf King of Mercians An. 800. who summoned to that Synod Episcopos DVCES Abbates CVJVSCVNQVE ORDINISVIROS there were severall Canons made concerning matters of faith and the lands and revenue of the Church At the Synod of Celichyth held on the sixth of August An. 816. under Kenulf King of Mercians there were not onely Bishops Abbots Priests and Deacons present in it but the King himselfe cum suis Principibus Ducibus Optimatibus with his Princes Dukes Nobles who made and published 11. Canons concerning matters of saith and Church affaires Anno 822. there was a Synodall Councell held at Clovesho under king Beornulfe wherein this king sate President Archbishop Wilfred with the rest of the Bishops and Abbots OMNIVMQVE DIGNITATVM OPTIMATIBVS Ecclesiasticarum scil SAECVLARIVM PERSONARVM being present in it debated such things as concerned the profit and necessity of Churches the rule and observance of a Monasticall life and likewise
Henry the first summoned another Councell about Easter ad Curiam suam apud Londoniam cunctis Majoribus Regni having assembled to his Court at London not only his Archbishops and Bishops but all the great men of his Kingdome to suppresse the Marriages of Priests contrary to the Canons of the Councell of London Anno 1102. For the extirpation of which evill the King Regali authoritate atque potentia fultos roboravit by his royall Authority and power ratified those Canons and thereupon Anselmo Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas elect Archbishop of Yorke and all the Bishops of England Decreed in the presence of the said Glorious King Henry Assensu omnium Baronum suorum with the assent of all his Barons that Priests and Deacons should live chastly and keepe no Women in their Houses but those who were of their neare kindred as the Councell of Nice had defined this Canon being ratified both by the King and Peeres in Parliament to make it obligatory In these three Councells under Archbishop Anselme a great stickler for the Popes and Clergies Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction we see the King and great men of the Realme were present and ratified the Decrees and Canons therein concluded to make them valid and binding Anno 1114 King Henry the first commanded all the Bishops and Nobles of the Kingdome to meete together at his Court whereupon a rumour was spred over all the Land that the Archbishop of Canterbury was about to celebrate a generall Councell in presence of the Popes Legate and that he would promulge some new things worthy so great a Councell for the reformation of Christian Religion in every order On the sixteenth of October they all met together in the Kings Pallace at Westminster where the multitude which assembled together at last perceived that the tumour of celebrating a Councell and of the reformation of Christianity was nothing so There Anselme in the behalfe of the Pope brought a letter directed from him to the King and Bishops wherein hee taxeth the King for conferring Bishopricks claiming that right as belonging to Peters See for determining Ecclesiasticall matters and the affaires of Bishops without his or his Legats privity which belong only to the Apostolike Sea for stopping appeales to Rome as also for calling and keeping Synodall Councells without his privity when as it was unanimously ratified in the great councell of Nice consisting of 318 Bishops that no Councells ought to be summoned or kept without the privity of the Bishop of Rome and for translating Bishops without his consent Which letters much offending the Kings mind he sent his Nuntioes by common consent to Rome to give the Pope an answer and justifie his proceedings herein as warranted by his Royall Prerogative The same yeare upon the thirteenth of Aprill there was an Assembly held at Salisbury of the Bishops Abbots and great men of all England the Kings Writ compelling them to appeare there where the King appointed William his sonne lawfully begotten to be heire to the Crowne to which all the Nobles condescended and presently tooke an oath of Allegeance to him to be his men But the Bishops and Abbotts swore only and gave their faith that if he survived his Father they would forthwith conferre both the Kingdome and Crowne of the Kingdome on him without any controversie or exception In August following one Anselm the Archbish of Canterburyes kinsman came from Rome to King Henry being then in Normandie bringing the Popes Letters which authorized him to exercise the Office of the Popes Legate here in England which in a short time being knowne in the Kingdome of England the Bishops Abbots and Nobles admiring at it assembled together at London about it and certaine other things the Queen being present to discusse the matter Communi Concilio in a common Councell whereupon they all accorded to send the Archbishop of Canterbury whom it most concerned to the King to acquaint him with the ancient custome of the Kingdome and the liberty thereof and if he thought fit that he should goe likewise to Rome to annihilate This Novelty Who comming accordingly to the King found Anselme there expecting his passage into England to exercise his Legatine office there But King Henry the first not suffering any prejudice to happen to the ancient Customes of England kept him from entring into England that not without presidents For in the first yeare of this Kings Raigne Guido Archbishop of Vienna came into England having as he said the power Legatine of all England by the precept and authoritie of the Apostolicall See which being heard of throughout England was admired by all men all knowing that it was a thing unheard of in Britaine that any man except the Archbishop of Canterbury should take upon him to supply the Popes Apostolicall turnes Wherefore as he came so he returned being received as a Legate by no man nor exercising the Office of a Legate in any thing After this one Peter having obtained from the Pope a power Legatine over England Ireland France and the Iland of the Orcades at the same hereof all England was astonished the King sent the Bishop of Saint Davids and another Clergie man beyond Sea to conduct him to him enjoyning them that after his entrance into England they should not suffer him to enter into any Churches or Monasteries to lodge or eate Being brought to the King and honourably received by him having declared the cause of his comming the King answered him that hee had now no leasure to minde so great a businesse and that his Legatine power could not be established and ratified but by the connivance and assent of the Bishops Abbots Nobles and the Assembly of the whole Kingdome in Parliament moreover hee affirmed that he could not by any meanes willingly loose any of the Customes of his Country granted him by the Apostolicall See so long 〈…〉 lived whereof this was one of the chiefest and greatest that hee made the kingdome of England free from all Legatine power Whereunto Peter affented and promised to doe his endeavour to have this priviledge preserved and augmented And so being gratified with rich presents Ille qui Legati officio fungi in toto Britania venerat nimirum ab omni officio tali cum ingenti Pompa vâ—a qua venerat extra Angliam a Rege missus est writes Eadmerus of him by way of derision So little jurisdiction had the Popes Legates here in England in those dayes who became an intollerable vexation oppression to it in succeeding Ages in the Reignes of King John Henry the third and others In the Councell of Westminster under Iohn de Crema the Popes lecherous Legate Ann. 1125. there were 17. Canons made ab omnibus confirmata and confirmed by all there present to wit by 20. Bishops 40. Abbots Cuminumera Cleri Populi multitudine with an innumerable multitude of the Clergie and people who were present at it as the Continuer
Cremensis on Victors part and by Gulielmus Papiensis on Alexanders side In conspectu Regum Praesulum coram universa quae convenerat multitudine cleri et opuli In the presence of the Kings and Prelats and before all the multitude of the Clergy and People there assembled where Papiensis pleaded Alexanders cause so well and answered retorted what ever the opposite partie had alleaged soe substantially Vt neuter ulterius Princeps cunctaretur repudiata parte Octaviani Dominum Alexandrum recipere et cum Regnis sibi subditis ei de caetero in ijs quae Dei sunt tanquam Patri parere The forenamed Schismatickes therefore departing with confusion and shame Our Princes and Prelates Principes et Pontifices having solemnly pronounced a sentence of excommunication against the Schismatickes dissolved the Synod Loe here both the Emperor the Kings of England and France with their Nobles as well as Prelates present in a severall Councells directing and determining this great controversie in them who was Peters rightfull successor ratefying and receiving him for Pope whom they conceived in their indifferent Judgments to have the best title yea the Laity had here their voyces as well as the Clergy consented to the decrees of both Councells So when there was a former Schisme between Clement Vrban concerning the Title of the Papacie VVilliam Rufus enquiring who had the best right commanded Vrban to be reputed Apostolicall and true Pope throughout his Dominions eique vice beati Petri IN CHRISTIANA RELIGIONE not in any temporall affaires obedire claiming this as a part of his prerogative royall that none should acknowledge or receive any man for Pope or Peters successor within his Kingdome but by his election and authority and him whom he should declare to be the man accounting him no lesse then a Traitor that should deprive him of this right which his Ancestors claimed and enjoyed An. 1170. at the request of King Hen the 2d two Cardinalls Albert and Theodine were sent into France from Rome who having called a great Assembly of Ecclesiasticall persons and Noblemen within the Teritorries of the King of England they solemnly admitted the King to purge himselfe before them of the murther of Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury which purgation the King there made and submitted himselfe naked to Ecclesiasticall discipline Anno 1175. Richard Archbishop of Canterbury kept a great Councell at Westminster to which almost all the Bishops and Abbots of the Province of Canterbury came Et coram pranominatis Regibus and before King Henry the second and King Henry his Sonne and the Bishops and Abbots Richard Archbishop of Canterbury standing in an high place promulged certaine Decrees Canons concerning Clergy-men the Eucharist Tythes recorded by Hoveden to be firmely and inviolably observed by all his Provincials so that both the Kings assented to them though they were but Collections of some Decrees out of former Councels In the same yeare King Henry the Father called another Councell at Windesore eight dayes after Michaelmas Praesentibus Rege Filio the King and his Sonne being present Richard Archbishop of Canterbury with the Bishops of England and Laurence Archbishop of Dublin Praesentibus etiam Comitibus Baronibus Angliae the Carles and Barons of England being also present In which Councell being a meer Parliament there was a generall Concord made between King Henry the second and Rodericke King of Conact in Ireland and the King in that Councell gave the Bishoprick of Waterford to one Augustine an Irishman whom he sent to Donatus Archbishop of Cassels to be Consecrated Anno 1176. King Henry the second assembled and held a great Councell at Nottingham concerning the Statutes of his Kingdome and before the King his Sonne and the Archbishops Bishops Earles and Barons of his Kingdom communi omnium Concilio by the common Councell of them all he divided his Kingdome into sixe parts through each of which he appointed three Iustices Itinerant whom he caused to swear upon the holy Evangelists that they should bona fide and without any sinister intention keep and cause the people of his Kingdom inviolably to observe the Articles of Assize there renued and confirmed recorded at large by Hoveden To this Councell by the Kings command came William King of Scots with all his Bishops whom the King commanded by the fealty and Oath of Allegiance they had taken to him to do the same subjection to the Church of England which they ought to do and were went to do in the times of his Predecessors To whom they answered that they never had made any subjection or homage to the Church of England nor ought so to do To which Roger Archbishop of York replyed That the Bishop of Glascow and of Candida Casa or Whitterne had in the time of his Predecessors been subject to the See of Yorke and for proofe hereof he shewed divers priviledges of the Bishops of Rome which made it appeare To which Jocelin Bishop of Glascow answered That the Church of Glascow was a speciall Daughter of the Church of Rome and exempt from all Archiepiscopall and Episcopall jurisdiction and if the Church of Yorke had any jurisdiction over the Church of Glascow at any time it appeared that he deserved not to have any dominion over it for time to come And because Richard Archbishop of Canterbury endeavoured that the Church of Scotland should be subject to the Church of Canterbury such was his ambition then he so crossed the King of England That he permitted the Bishops of Scotland to return home without making any subjection of themselves to the Church of England as they had formerly done Anno 1176. Hugo Cardinalis Hoveden stiles him Hugozun the Popes Legate by the Kings permission and asistance called a generall Councell at London in the midst of Lent where the Archbishops of Canterbury and York and all the Bishops and Abbots of England with a great number of Clergie-men assembling together the Cardinall sate on an high throne in the Chappell of the infirme Monkes of Westminster and the Bishops and Abbots with him every one in his place according to his order and dignity But there arose a contention between the Archbishops of Canterbury and Yorke which of them should sit at the right hand of the Cardinall And when as the Archbishop of Yorke would sit there the Bishop of Canterburies servants rushed violently upon him threw him down upon the ground trampled on him with their feet and brake his Miter whereupon the Councel was dispersed and the Cardinall flying to hide himselfe out of their sight was so hindered that he held no Councel Both sides made appeales to the Pope and complained to the King of the injuries done unto them So Hoveden Gulielmus Nubrigensis relates the story in these words When the Cardinall assisted by the Kings favour had called together the Ecclesiasticall persons of both Provinces of
all we desire two Prebends to be given us by all Cathedrall Churches and out of Abbies where the Monkes and Abbots have divers portions of each one Monkes intire allowance one from the Covent another from the Abbott which demand Otho urged the Bishops and Prelates to grant on the foresaid grounds Who consulting together hereupon returned this their common Answere by Iohn Archdeacon of Bedford That those things he had propounded to them did specially concerne the King of England and generally all the Patrons of Churches Archbishops Suffragans and Prelates of England since therefore the King was then absent by reason of his infirmitie and some Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates were absent likewise that in their absence they neither could nor ought to give any Answer And upon these words uttered came Iohn Lord Marshall of England and other Messengers from the King strictly commanding all what held Baronies of the King in Capite that that they should not obliege their lay Fee to the Church of Rome whereby he might be deprived of the services due unto him And so all returned to their owne home The same yeare there was another Councell assembled at Westminster under Stephen Langhton Archbishop of Canterbury about the same matter To which the King conferring a part with some of the Nobles and Bishops gave this Answer that these things concern all Christendom because we are placed in the remotest parts of the world when we shall see what other Kingdomes will say to these exactions and shall have an example from them the Pope shall finde us more ready to obey him And so this Councell brake up By both which presidents it is evident that Councells in those dayes were no other but Parliaments the King Nobles and Commons being present in them and that the Clergy alone could treat or conclude of nothing but by their concurring assents Anno 1231. There was a great Synod of Abbotts Priors Archdeacons with almost the whole Nobility Masters and Clerks of the Realme assembled at Saint Albans by the Popes Command to celebrate a divorse betweene the Countesse of Essex and her Husband if there were cause This divorse was but an Ecclesiasticall matteâ— as the Canonists deemed it yet both King Nobles and Commons as well as Abbots and Clergy-men were present at it and called to it by the Popes command In the yeare of our Lord 1236. there was a Councell of all the great men Prelates and Clergie of the Realme summoned to meet at London by King Henry the third under Othe the Popes Legate which being assembled together at Paules the second day thereof the King sent John Earle of Lincolne Iohn the son of Jeffery and William de Reele a Canon of Paules to inhibit the Legate in the behalfe of the King and Kingdome that he should not there Attempt or decree any thing against his Royall Crowne and dignity William Reele remained there to see this inhibition observed the others departed The next day folowing the Legate supported with divine assistance astantis concilij Suffragits et consensu and by the suffrages and consent of the Councel there present to conserve and reforme the State Ecclesiasticall in the parts of England besides other Canonicall institutions promulged certaine Canons digested into Chapters and Articles which Edmond Archbishop of Canterbury with divers others who departed from the Councell with little joy resolved to nullifie and revoke as not confirmed by the King the Lords and Commons for ought appeares which Otho understanding writ to the Pope to ratifie them who accordingly did it by his decretall Epistle Anno 1288. John Peckam Archbishop of Canterbury held a Provinciall Councell at Redding in which he made five Constitutions purposing to draw the conusance of Patronages of Churches anciently belonging to the Kings Court to the Ecclesiasticall to rescinde all Royall Prohibitions in suites depending in the Ecclesiasticall Court for goods and Chattels and to inhibitu that Ecclesiasticall Judges should be thenceforth prohibited to proceed in them But the King hearing of this designe sent certain selected messengers both to the Archbishop and the whole Councell commanding them with threats to resist whence it came to passe that the Archbishop wholy receeded from his presumption and the Councell being dissolved all the Prelates returned frustrate of their hope 31. An. 1296. Robert Winchelsee Archbishop of Canterbury held a Provinciall Councell at London where the Clergy to disapoint the King of his Subsidies and Tenths decreed among other things Ne quid inconsulto Papa Regibus a Clero solveretur That nothing should be payed to Kings without the Popes privity and consent A right loyall Constitution worthy Prelates The King having then called a Parliament to re-inburse his monyes spent in the Scottish Wars had a large Subsidie granted him by the Commons and Burgesses But the Clergy neither offered nor granted him any thing by reason of this their Constitution for confirmation whereof the Archbishop had gotten the Popes Bull The King being moved therewith proroged the Parliament to London commanding the Clergy to be there on the first day of Saint Hilary to give him a better answer The King in the mean time commanded all the Clergy mens Barnes which were full of corne to be sealed up with publike Seales which whiles his Officers were executing the Archbishop commanded the Popes decree to be published in Cathedrall Churches inhibiting under pain of Excommunication that no Tribute or ayd should be payd to the King or to any secular Prince out of Ecclesiasticall livings or revenues an high straine of Papall usurpation and presumption and when he and his Suffragans met in Pauls they resolved to stand to their former Constitution and to grant the King nothing Such dutifull good Subjects were these lordly Prelates Whereupon the King sending messengers to them to demand a supply from them they all returne him this answer It is sufficiently known that under God the Lord of all we have two Lords a spirituall the Pope our Lord and a temporall the King our Soveraigne and though we are bound to obey both yet we ought to obey our spirituall Lord more than our temporall And therefore we intend to send a Legate to the Pope that his leave first obtained wee may give the King what he desires of us The King receiving this answer tooke it very disdainfully that he should be thus mocked in his own Kingdome by the Pope and his Clergie and thereupon thrust the Clergie out of the Parliament and held a Councell with his Barons and Commons alone and presently put all the Clergie out of his protection that none of them should have power to sue any man in any of his Courts but might be sued there by any of his subjects upon which all the Clergie but the Archbishop were content to offer the King the fith part of their Ecclesiasticall goods and the Archbishop persisting in his obstinacy had all
That every particular Church now consisting of visible Saints is under Christ as the SOLE Head King Governour Law-giver of it and so is subject to no other jurisdiction then that of Christ his Spirit his Word We hold that every particular Church is under Christs Government as the SOLE Head King Lord Governour thereof That it is a spirituall House whose only builder and Governour is Christ and not man A spirituall Kingdome whose only King is Christ and not man A spirituall Republique whose only Law-giver is Christ and not man A spirituall Corporation whose only head is Christ and not man That no man nor power on earth hath a Kingly power over this Kingdome That no earthly Law-givers may give Lawes to this Kingdome or Republique That no man may claime or exercise a head-ship over this body That no man can or ought to take the Government of this Communion of Saints That men may not appoint limit constitute what Congregations of all sorts they please to be Churches of Christ as Nations and Parishes That Christ is King over every mans conscience so that no power on earth may sit with him in this his Thror c. yea so as no human power not Law may intermeddle to prescribe rules for the Government or formes of this Church of Christ That the Children of those Parents who will not thus acknowledge Christ to be their only King and Law-giver and are ashamed or afraid to be thus in Covenant with Christ in the Independents way as their King are not to be baptized such Parents not being within the Covenant A very hard and uncharitable censure of all Churches Persons who are not Independent That Christ is the ONLY Potentate Law-giver Lord King Governour over Churches and not men Not Councells or Senates That this is Christs Royall Prerogative which is incommunicable to ANY or All the powers on earth That Christ hath not delegated his Kingly Office to any Princes Magistrates PARLIAMENTS to set up any forme of Worship of Church-Government who have no authority to make Lawes to rule or binde any particular Churches and if they make any such they shall be apt to transgresse them but yet men must take heed how they punish them for that transgression with any enseresciderdum or Club-law This is the summe and oft repeted Argument of my deare Brothers Booke To give a satisfactory Answer to this Objection I shall first demand of my dear Brother what he meanes by this frequently incultated assertion That every particular Church is under Christ as the only Head King Lawgiver Lord and Governour thereof c. and that none ought to have any power rule or Jurisdiction in the Church but Christ alone If he intends that he is the only immediate HEAD KING Law-giver and Governour as he clearely doth I desire some solid scripture proofes for it since he produceth none to evince it the rather because it is quite contrary to sundry expres Texts which stile Kings Majestrates Ministers Heigher powers Rulers Overseers Fathers Nursing Fathers Pastors of over their Churches people flocks who are ever enjoyned to obey submit unto them yea Rulers of the Templ Congregation Church Rulers Chife Rulers of the Synagogu â—ay sometimes Gods sitting upon Gods throne to whom men must yeeld obedience for the Lords sake as to Gods Christs Vicegerents and Embassadours Yea Brother your selfe informe us out of Scripture pag. 51. That the members of Christs body are Superiour and inferiour as Pastors Teachers Teaching and RVLING Elders Helps GOVERNMENTS Bishops or OVERSEERS c. If Christ then be the onely Head King Ruler Shephard Governour of his Church and none else in that sense you object what will become of these Pastors Ruling-Elders Governours Overseers which you averre Christ hath fixed in his Churches What will become of those Independent Ministers who take upon them like absolute kings Popes Lawgivers to erect gather new Chruches of their own forming and prescribe both Lawes Rules Covenants to them which Christ never made Brother you must expunge the 1 Tim. 5. 17 Let the Elders that RULE well be counted worthy of double honour Rom. 13. 1. Let every soule BEE SVBIECT to the HIGHER POWERS c. even for CONSCIENCE SAKE Tit. 3. 1. Put them in minde to be subject to Principalities and Powers to obey Magistrates c. Heb. 12. 17. Obey them that have THE RULE OVER YOU and SVBMIT your selves for they watch for your soules as they that must give an account c. Remember Salute all them that have the RVLE OVER YOV Acts 20. 28. Take heed to the floke over which the Holy Ghost hath made you OVERSEERS or Bishops to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his bloud Rom. 12. 8. HE that RVLETH let him do it with diligence 2 Chron. 9. 8. Blessed be the Lord thy God who delighted in thee to set thee VPON HIS THRONE to BE KING FOR THE LORD THY GOD c. with infinite other Texts yea the very names of Kings Princes Governours Elders Rulers Magistrates Overseers Bishops Teachers Fathers Pastors Masters c. out of the Bible and all Christian States Churches if you will make Christ alone the only immediate King Ruler Governour Lawgiver of his Church in the sence you here object it and that no person nor humane power whatsoever hath or ought to have any rule power or jurisdiction in or over the Churches people of God But if you meane no more but that Christ is the onely supreame Head King Lord Governour Lawgiver Pastor and Ruler of his Church and that all other Kings Princes Magistrates Rulers Pastors Ministers Governours are subordinate unto him as to the King of Kings Lord of Lords and chiefe Shepheard of his flockâ— your proposition is true but your conclusion miserably false that therfore there are no subordinate Kings Magistrates Rulers Pastors Governours Lawgivers under him to rule governe order instruct direct his Churches and people which the forequoted Texts your owne experience reason and the whole world will contradict Secondly I shall demand of my Brother how he proves all his forementioned Paradoxes concerning Christ and the Church in the sense he propounds them Or that his own or other Independent Churches lately gathered erected by no other but by men and consederated by a new Covenant framed by men not Christ to be built governed ordered onely by Christ and not men to be the spirituall Kingdome of Christ c. whole onely King Governour Head is Christ and not man Or in what Text he can shew me any particular Independent Church stiled Christs spirituall Kingdom and Republike I find it prophesied Revl 11. 15. That when the seventh Angel foundeth The KINGDOMES of this World which must be meant of Nationall Churches which you deny not of Particular Congregations which are no such Kingdoms shall become the Kingdomes of the Lord and of his Christ That all the
liberty left them to elect what civil government they by publique consent shall deem most convenient provided it be generally agreeable to Gods Word which hath prescribed generall rules applicable to all civill Governments actions as well as Ecclesiasticall and spirituall though no one Government in particular And why the Government of the CHVRCH MILITANT should be more particularly uniformly unalterably said down in scripture then the Government of Christian Kingdoms Nations states under the Gospel which leaves both of them equally undetermined since both of them were alike limited among the Israelites under the Law no rational man cangive any solid reason Christ being King of Kings Lord of Lords yea a great King over all the Earth the only Potentate and Lord of Kingdoms Nations Republiques and of mens bodyes estates as well as KING and Lord of his Church Saints or of mens soules and consciences 9ly There was not only one uniforme Church-government at first under the Gospell in all Churches no not in the Apostles times for in the originall gathering and planting of the Christian Churches they had at first only Apostles Brethren no Elders or Deacons After that their Churches increasing they proceeded to elect ordain Deacons in the Churches of Ierusalem and afterwards some other Churches though not in all for ought we read Not long after the Apostls ordained Elders in Churches which had none at first after that Widowes in some Churches not in all In the primitive Churches some Congregations had Apostle s Evangelists Prophets workers of miracles Healers by miraculous extraordinary gifts of healing men endued with diversities of Tongues Interpretation of Tongues GOVERNMENTS that is men gifted with an extraordinary faculty of Governing Churches all which the Scriptures many Divines distinguish Other Churches at that time had none of these Officers or members and all Churches have beene deprived of them since those dayes these Officers not being perpetuall but temporary as all acknowledge though Christ might have continued a succession of them still had he pleased Therefore the Government and Officers of all Churches not being de facto one and the selfesame in all particulars in the very Primitive times as well as since it can never be proved to be of divine right but one the sel same in al succeeding ages without the least variation since it was not so in the Apostles days 10ly The Apostles speech 1. Cor. 12. 4 5. 6. c. There are diversities of gifts but the same spirit and there are differences of administrations but the same Lord and there are diversities of operations but the same God which worketh all in all compared with v. 8. to 13. ch 9. v. 19. to 24. I made my selfe servant unto all that I might gaine all And unto the Jew I became as a Jew that I might gaine the Jew to them that are under the Law as under the Law that I might gaine the Jew to them that are under the Law To them that are without Law as without Law that I might gaine them that are without Law To the weake I became as weake that I might gaine the weake I am made all things to all men that I might by all meanes save some paralleld with Acts 15. 1. 2. 5. 6. to 32. Ch. 21. 18. to 30. by which it is evident that many Churches of the Iewes and those in Jerusalem did still rotain the use of Circumâ—ition purification other Iewish Rites Ceremonies which the Churches of the Gentiles by the Apostles owne resolutions WERE NOT TO OBSERUE And with Acts c. 2. to cap. 22. where it expresly appeares that the Apostles and other Christians equally frequented the Iewish Temple Synagogues conforming themselves to the Orders discipline thereof and their owne private Assemblie Cougregations consisting all of professed Christians Wil expresly clear it that all particular Churches Congregations in the Apostles times had not one and the selfe same Church-government Orders Ceremonies Therefore it is most cleare there is no such uniforme general government or discipline necessarily prescribed in the Gospel unto al without the least variation as is objected Eleventhly It must be granted to me till disproved that before the Law from Adams Creation till Moses there was no one universall set forme of Church Government and discipline enjoyned to be observed by all the world from which none might vary in any particular That under the Law it selfe there was one forme of Government Worship Discipline Ceremonies and Solemnities to be observed in the Wildernesse another in the Lind of Canaan One forme in and under the Tabernacle revealed by God described by Moses another in and under the Temple shewed by God and appointed by David and Salomon Yea the second Temple and its Ornaments services differed somwhat from the first and all of them expired when the Gospell came If then there were no one universall constant forme of Church-Government Discipline before and under the Law it selfe then by parity of reason till direct Scripture proofes be produced to the contraty there neither is nor can be any such under the Gospell Twelfthly The Scripture as all must acknowledge gives not many particular but mostly generall Rules for the Government and regulating of our thoughts words actions lives Children Servants Families callings the fashion of our apparell gestures eating drinking sleep c. Yea the promises and threatnings in it are for the most part generall and indefinite yet applyable to every particular person and occasion If then there be for the most part only generall Rules precepts which admit some Latitude and variety in particulars prescribed to us for the very ordering and regulating of our thoughts words actions lives apparell meat drinke c. Then certainely there are but generall Rules and Precepts given us for the Government Discipline of the Churches which admit varieties of Government discipline in sundry particulars so as they agree in the generall with the Word and bee not repugnant to it as well as the generall Rules for regulating our words thoughts actions conversations callings apparell meat drinke and family Governments admit of variety which more immediately concerne every man then the more remote and generall Government of the Church But against this my Brother Burton Objects 1. That God in the Old Testament did give this charge to Moses See that thou doe all things according to the patterne shewed thee in the Mount Hee must not vary ONE PIN And when the Temple was built God was so exact in this that he would not leave it to David himselfe though both a King and a Prophet and a man after Gods owne heart to set up what worship he pleased in the Temple but God gave him an exact patterne of all and that not only by his Spirit but in writing that he might neither adde to nor omit IN THE LEAST TITLE 1 Chron. 28. And it was never left