Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
kingdom_n king_n lord_n subvert_v 2,748 5 13.0585 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A63214 The tryals and condemnation of Thomas White alias Whitebread, provincial of the Jesuits in England, William Harcourt, pretended rector of ]ondon, John Fenwick,procurator for the Jesuits in England, John Gavan alias Gawen, and Anthony Turner, all Jesuits and priests; for high treason: in conspiring the death of the King, the subversion of the government, and Protestant religion. At the Sessions in the Old-Bailey for London and Middlesex, on Friday and Saturday, being the 13th and 14th of June, 1679. Published by authority. Whitbread, Thomas, 1618-1679, defendant.; Barrow, William, 1610-1679, defendant.; Caldwell, John, 1628-1679, defendant.; Gawen, John, 1640-1679, defendant.; Turner, Anthony, 1628 or 9-1679, defendant.; Corker, James Maurus, 1636-1715, defendant. 1679 (1679) Wing T2248; ESTC R219768 109,846 92

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. your Supream and Natural Lord not having the fear of God in your hearts nor weighing the Duty of your Allegiance but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the Devil the cordial love true due and natural Obedience which true and faithful Subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King towards him should and of right ought to bear wholly withdrawing and devising and with all your strength intending the peace and common tranquility of this Realm to disturb and the true Worship of God within this Kingdom of England used and by the Law established to overthrow and the Government of this Realm to subvert and Sedition and Rebellion within this Kingdom of England to move stir up and procure and the cordial love and true and due obedience which true and faithful subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King towards him should and of right ought to bear utterly to withdraw put out and extinguish and our said Soveraign Lord the King to Death and final Destruction to bring and put on the four and twentieth day of April in the thirtieth year of the Reign of our said Soveraign Lord King Charles the second at the parish of St. Giles in the Fields in the County of Middlesex aforesaid You the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker with diverse other false Traitors subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King to the Jurors unknown falsly subtilly advisedly maliciously and traiterously did purpose compass imagine and intend Sedition and Rebellion within this Kingdom of England to move stir up and procure and a miserable slaughter among the subjects of our said Soveraign Lord the King to procure and cause and our said Soveraign Lord the King of his Kingly State Title Power and Government of his said Kingdom of England utterly to deprive depose cast down and disinherit him our said Soveraign Lord the King to death and final destruction to bring and put and the Government of this Kingdom of England the sincere Religion of God within the same rightly by the Laws of the same established at your will pleasure to change alter and the State of this whole Kingdom of England through all its parts well instituted ordained wholly to subvert and destroy and War within this Kingdom of England against our said Soveraign Lord the King to levy And to accomplish and fulfil your said most wicked Treasons and traiterous imaginations purposes You the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker and other false Traitors against our said Soveraign Lord the King to the Jurors unknown the said four and twentieth day of April with Force and Arms c. in the Parish aforesaid and County aforesaid falsly maliciously subtilly advisedly devillishly and traiterously did assemble unite and gather your selves together and then and there falsly maliciously subtilly advisedly devillishly and traiterously did consult consent and agree our said Soveraign Lord the King to Death and final Destruction to bring and put and the Religion of this Kingdom of England rightly and by the Laws of the same established to the Superstition of the Romish Church to change and alter and the Government of this Kingdom of England to subvert and that one Thomas Pickering and one John Grove should kill and murder our said Soveraign Lord the King and that you the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner James Corker and other false Traitors against our said Soveraign Lord the King to the Jurors unknown should therefore say celebrate and perform a certain number of Masses then and there amongst your selves agreed on for the soul of the said Thomas Pickering and for that cause should pay to the said John Grove a certain sum if money then and there amongst your selves agreed on and that you the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt otherwise Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker and other false Traitors to the Jurors unknown in further prosecution of the Treasons and traiterous Consultations and Agreements aforesaid afterwards the said four and twentieth day of April at the Parish aforesaid in the County aforesaid falsly subtilly advisedly maliciously devillishly and traiterously did severally each to the other engage your selves and upon the Sacrament traiterously swear and promise to conceal and not to divulge the said most wicked Treasons and traiterous compassings consultations and purposes aforesaid amongst your selves had traiterously to kill and murder our said Soveraign Lord the King and to introduce the Romish Religion within this Kingdom of England and the true reformed Religion within this Realm rightly and by the Laws of the same established to alter and changes and that you the said Thomas White otherwise Whitebread John Fenwick William Harcourt alias Harrison John Gavan Anthony Turner and James Corker and other false Traitors to the Jurors unknown in further prosecution of your said Treasons and traiterous intentions and agreements aforesaid afterwards the said four and twentieth day of April at the Parish aforesaid and County aforesaid falsly subtilly advisedly maliciously devillishly and traiterously did prepare perswade excite abet comfort and counsel four other persons to the Jurors unknown subjects of our said Soueraign Lord the King traiterously our said Soveraign Lord the King to kill and murder against the Duty of your Allegiance against the Peace of our Soveraign Lord the King his Crown and Dignity and against the form of the Statute in that Case made and provided How sayst thou Thomas White alias Whitebread art thou guilty of this High Treason whereof thou standest indicted or not guilty Whitebread My Lord I desire to speak one word I am advised by Council and I may and ought to represent it to this Court for not only my own life but the lives of others of his Majesties Subjects are concerned in it That upon the 17 th of December last I was tryed upon the same Indictment the Jury was impannell'd and called I put my self into the hands of the Jury and the Evidence was brought in and examin'd particularly against me and was found insufficient so that the Jury was dismissed without any Verdict I humbly submit my self to your Lordships and this noble Court whether I may not have Counsel in this point of Law to advise me whether I may and ought to plead again the second time for according to Law I am informed no man can be put in jeopardy of his Life the second time for the same cause Lord Ch. Just You say well Mr. Whitebread Whitebread I speak it not for my sake only but the sake of the whole Nation no man should be tried twice for the same cause by the same reason a man
in Oates or Bedlow's power to shew that Commission this is just like that of the Bill of Exchange neither does it in any of the letters Fenwick Here is Mr. Hilsly my Lord. Whiteb. My Lord we pray we may have the favour that they may be sworn Lord Chief Just North. By law they cannot L. C. J. N. In no Capital case against the King can the witnesses for the Prisoner be sworn but I will say this to the Jury That they are not sworn is because they cannot but the Jury is to take great heed of what they say and to be governed by it according to the credibility of the person and of the matter Gavan My Lord if you please to give me leave my Lord Coke in his Institutes sayes expresly That there is no positive Law against it his words are there is not so much as scintilla Juris against it L. C. J. No. We know that the constant usage and practice is so and you cannot produce any man that in any Capital case had his witnesses sworn against the King L. C. J. My Lord Coke says otherwise That the evidence should be so plain that nothing could be answered to it and therefore no evidence should be sworn against the King Gavan My Lord those are the words of my Lord Coo. L. C. J. You argue against the known practice of all Ages L C. J. No. There never was any man in a Capital cause sworn against the King The common Law is the custome of the Kingdom and we are bound to know it and must all be governed by it Whitebread In mr Ireland's Tryal pag 35 36. he says he came over with Sir John Warner Father Williams and mr Hilsley from St. Omers Mr. J. Pem. Nay you must not resort to the printed Tryals for evidence Fenwick If we can prove him perjured at any time I hope we may L. C. J. Suppose upon the taking of those printed Tryals they mistake shall mr Oat therefore be thought guilty of perjury If you have any thing to ask of your Witnesses which you can apply to the evidence given now you may Fenw. Mr. Oates did not you your self own then you came over with mr Hil●sh Dr. Oates Ask me any question about what I have given to day and if the Bench think it rea●●nable 〈…〉 answer it Fen. My Lord he 〈…〉 m that he came over with these persons in which he is for swrrn L. C. J. He is not convicted of perjury and therefore that must not be urged Fen My Lord we will prove by witnesses that were at the Tryal that he did affirm so And I do desire now to know ●f you M●●● whether ever you came over with mr Helsly Dr. Oates That which I said then and that which I say now is because you should not puzzle your selves that one Mr. Hilsly did come over with us when we did Hilsly My Lord I did not L C J How can you tell Hilsly I left him at St Omers L. C. J What say you Mr. Oates Dr. Oates 'T is true mr Hisly did leave me at St. Omers because he went out a Sunday morning and I came out of the munday morning but I overtook him at Calis Hilsly my Lord that is false and I have a great many here that can prove it L. C. J. What Religion are you of Hilsly I am only to serve his Majesty L. C. J. Are you not to serve God too Hilsly I am first to serve God and then his Majesty Mr. J. Pemberton Are you a Catholick L. C. J. Are you a Roman Catholick Hilsly Yes my Lord I am Mr. J. Pemberton Be not ashamed of your Religion do not deny that your Provincial here can give you a dispensation for what you say Hilsly I hope a Roman Catholick may be a lawfull witness L. C. J. Yes I deny it not This is that you say you left him at St. Omers you must call more Witnesses to back him Master Oates sayes 't is true you left him at St. Omers but he overtook you at Calis Dr. Oates This Gentleman lost his money at Calis and Father Williams did relieve him by my means Lord Chief Just What say you to that Hilsly Why my Lord yes it is true I did lose my money there but it is nothing to the purpose for I will affirm I was never in the ship with him in all my life Dr. Oates I desire he may be asked whether he be in the degree of a Priest or not L. C. J. That would be a hard question to put to him to make him accuse himself It would bring him into danger of Treason Mr. J. Pemberton He is a Boy very fit to make a Jesuit of L. C. J. How could he then come to know this Hilsly I confess 't is true that Mr. Oates did never come over with me And I have Witnesses to prove that they saw him there next day at St. Omers and two or three several weeks after Sir Christopher Levins Mr. Oates hath another Circumstance to prove it by Dr. Oates He went away from us by the way and did not come up with us to London Hilsly I know how he understood ●his There was a Gentleman that the Witnesses will prove he was very familiar with the 2d of May that told him L. C. J. Is that Gentleman here Hilsly Here is one here to prove it L. C. J. And did he tell him how you lost your mony Hilsly Yes my Lord I suppose so L. C. J. I speak seriously I do not understand how he could come by these things Parry my Lord I can testifie if it were lawful for us o wear and prove that he was at Saint Omers that day when he says he came over L. C. J. What is your name Parry my name is William Parry L. C. J. What Country-man are you Parry I am a Flintshire man L. C. J. When was he at St. Omers Parry He was there that 25th day that day he says he came over L. C. J. Was he there all day Parry He did not stir thence all the day L. C. J. How can you tell that Parry I din'd with him that day he went into the Infirmary he did not go out of the Colledg he was sick Fenwick Mr. Parry how long did Mr. Oates stay there at St. Omers Parry He staid till after the 20th of June I am sure for on the 20th of June I know he was present by a very good circumstance he was at an Action of ours a Latine Play Dr. Oates My Lord as to the going into the Infirmary at that time I deny it My Lord if your Lordship please I will shew that this Gentleman is not only a Votary of the Jesuits but hath been one of the Sodality several years And they have Dispensations and are bound by an implicite obedience to say what the Jesuits bid them who are their Superiours L. C. J. What say you to the 20th of June the time he says
Grove should Murther the King and that therefore Whitebread and the rest of the Persons Indicted should say a Number of M●sses for the Soul of Pickering And Grove for this piece of service was to have a Sum of Money And the Indictment says further that these persons did take the Sacrament to commit this Treason with more secrecy and that they did likewise Prepare Excite Abet and Counsel Four other unknown Persons to kill the King at Windsor All these Facts are said to be done Advisedly Maliciously Traiterously and Devilishly and against their Allegiance to the King To this they have pleaded Not Guilty if the Kings Evidence prove it you are to find it so And then Sir Creswell Levinz one of the King 's Learned Council in the Law proved the charge thus Sir Cr. Levinz May it please your Lordship and you Gentlemen of the Jury Th●se Prisoners at the 〈◊〉 by Persuasion Papists by Order and D●●●●● th●● are all Priests By the Law of the Land viz By a Statute made the 27th of Eliz. They are all Guilty of Treason for being Priests and they might be Tryed as such and ought todye for it but that is not the Fact that they are Charged with nor will they have the satisfaction to●ay that they suffer for their Religion No they are charged with a Treason of a blacker and darker Nature And tho I must tell you that it is now almost 100 years ago since that Statute was made against Priests coming into England Yet Examples have been very rare that any of this sort of Men have dyed for their Religion within that Queens time or any of her Successors yet they have dyed upon worse accompts and upon such accompts as they are now brought to this Bar for Such is the difference between their Religion and Ours they have been suffered to live here under a Law by which they ought to dye They kill the Protestants by Thousands without Law or Justice witness their Bloody doing at Mirendol Their Massacre as Paris Their Barbarous cruelty in Ireland since the year 1640. And those in Piedmont since 1650. But these are not the crimes they are charged with they are not accused for their Religion but for the blackest and darkest Treason that men can be charged with They are charged with an endeavour to Murder the King under whose protection they lived This murther of the King hath been carried on in the Design of it with all the malice and Resolution that can be from the first time that we can give you an account of it which was the 24th of April 1678. When these persons and several others did first Assemble about other matters of their own and among the rest to Murther the King there they came to Resolution that it should be done and persons were appointed to do it these were Grove and Pickering who have been Executed for it They were to kill the King in St. Jame's Park but it pleased God that the Flint of the Pistol failed to which we are more beholding than to them that he escaped that time They were not satisfiyd with that but they send down Four Butchers to murther him at Windsor who being disappointed they sent down Others after that to Murther him at New-Market and when all these failed they had Recourse to that Treacherous and Vnmanly way of Poysoning him and hired one so to do and they did not only intend to Murther the King but to make it good by force when they had done They intended to raise an Army they had got Commissions to several persons in the Kingdom to command these Forces They designed to raise 50000 men to maintain the Injustice when then they had done it And that was not all they had a recourse to Forreign assistance and depended upon Forreign succours if they were not made good at home Gentlemen they have been disappointed in all these things they had an intention further as I find it in my brief to make a general Massacre of all Protestants here A thing that they have done and we have heard of abroad but thanks be to God we never knew it Experimentally at home And I hope God that hath preserved us hitherto will preserve us still The mercy these Men have met with in being suffered to live under the danger of the Statute by which they might have justly dyed hath not prevailed upon or bettered them at all but been turned into Monstrous Ingratitude and made them more desperate than other people would have been Gentlemen when all this is opened I must tell you if th●se Persons be innocent God forbid they should suffer but if they be Guilty surely they are not fit to live among Men And truly if they be Guilty they do not only deserve to dye but to dye a more Cruel and miserable death then either the mercy of our Prince or the moderation of our Laws hath provided for such Offenders I shall detain you no longer but will call the Witnesses and then you shall Judg whether they be Guilty or not And we begin with Mr. Oates Who was Sworn Sir Cr. Levinz Pray what can you say to these Gentlemen begin with Mr. 〈…〉 Lord Ch. Just Mr. Oates apply your Evidence as distinctly as you can to one Person at first unless where the matter will take in all or more then one of them Dr. Oates My Lord I have Evidence I desire may be called in I shall have occasion to use them Gavan It may be inconvenint He may instruct his Witnesses Lord Ch. Just North. No he shall not for we will take care of that But name your Witnesses Dr. Oates There is Sir Richard Barker Mr. Walter a Minister Mrs. Mayo Philip Page Mr. William Smith and one Mr. Clay Mr. Butler Mrs. Sarah Ives Mr. Just Atkins Take a Note of their Names and send for them Lord Ch. Just Now Mr. Oates go on with your Evidence And when there is occasion to make use of these persons they shall be call'd Dr. Oates The prisoner at the Bar Mr. Whitebread was made constituted Provincial so as it was publickly known to us in the month of December last was 12 month he did Order by Vertue of his Authority one Father George Conyers to preach in the Sodality of the English Seminary on the Holyday which they call St. Thomas of Canterbury i. e. Thomas of Beckets day in which there was Order given that Mr. Conyers should Preach assert this Doctrine That the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy were Heretical Antichristian Devillish accordingly this Order was Executted and the Sermon preached Mr. Whitebread in the month of January wrote Letters or at least-wise in the beginning of February I will not be positive as to the time because it does not occur to my memory to St. Omers concerning the State of Ireland of which he had an accompt from Arch-bishop Talbot who wrote him word that there were several Thousands of Irish that were ready