Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	heaven_n	violence_n	violent_a	1,901	5	9.3401	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A23664	A doubt resolved, or, Satisfaction for the seekers wherein the case touching an administrator of gospel ordinances, in these times, is handled : wherein also some other questions are more briefly touched, viz. I. Whether water-baptism was to continue in force after the ministry of John the Baptist ceased, II. VVhether Gospel ordinances are things spirituall, or carnall, III. VVhether a power to preach by immediate revelation of the spirit, be necessary in every Gospel minister?, IIII. What is is to be baptized with the Spirit : well worthy the consideration of many who in these times are unsetled in their judgements touching these points / by William Allen.	Allen, William, d. 1686.	1655 (1655)	Wing A1063; ESTC R15502	29,149	40

until Iohns ministry began not ended for when Christ said the law and the Prophets were until Iohn and that since that time speaking of a time already past the Kingdom of God is preached and every man presseth into it as they did to the baptisme of Iohn Luk. 16.16 I say when Christ spake these words referring unto a time past Iohns ministry was not as yet finished he being then alive as you may perceive plainly if you read Mat. 11. from Vers 2. to Vers 13. and therefore those words VNTIL Iohn cannot refer unto the ending but unto the beginning of Iohns Ministry Which is also yet more manifest in that Christ said even while Iohn and his Ministry were yet in being Mat. 11.12 From the days of Iohn the Baptist VNTIL NOW The Kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence and the violent take it by force which words from the days of Iohn the Baptist until now could not be spoken of the ending of Iohns Ministry because when this was said his Ministry was yet on foot as appears V. 2. So that cleerly Iohns preaching the Baptism of repentance for the remission of sins was the preaching of the Kingdom of God to wit the Gospel of the Kingdom as that which is distinguished from the Ministration of the Law and Prophets and therefore not legal but Evangelical Besides to shew yet further that water Baptism was not limited unto Iohns Ministry Iohns Ministry was confined within the Territories of Canaan or rather Judea as was also that of the Apostles till after the Resurrection of Christ Mat. 10.5 whereas after the Resurrection of the Lord and immediately before his Ascention Christ gave commission to his Apostles to teach and baptize all Nations in the doing of which as of other his commands he promiseth his presence with them to the end of the world Mat. 28.19.20 which clearly shews that Baptism was not confined to Iohns Ministry SECT. VI But if they say that 's not water Baptism but the Baptism of the spirit of which Christ speaks Mat. 28.19.20 which yet is too unreasonable to affirm yet the practice of the Apostles acting upon this commission will evince that they understood it otherwise For surely when Peter exhorted the Iews to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins Act. 2.38 he did not perswade them to be baptized with the spirit for the remission of sins because the Baptism of which he there speaks he perswades them to use in order to their receiving the spirit as it there follows Repent and be baptized c. and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost And those that will construe the baptism here spoken of of the Baptism of the Spirit take course to render the Apostle to speak as little sence as they do truth as will appear if you read the words according to their interpretation thus Repent and be baptized with the Holy Ghost and ye shal receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost And whereas the Eunuch desired Philip to baptize him in water Act. 8.36 will not every man conclude that Philip in preaching the Gospel to him had convinced him of it as a Christian duty how or why else should he desire Baptism up on Philips preaching Besides when Philips answer to his desire of being Baptized runs thus If thou beleevest withall thine heart thou mayest does it not cleerly imply that water baptism is a priviledge peculiar to Beleevers for if it had been then to be used only as a thing indifferent as they suppose circumcission was it might have been lawful for him to have been baptized whether he had beleeved or no unless we will suppose that his not beleeving would have made an indifferent and lawful thing to become unlawful to him Nor can it reasonably be thought that the men and women of Samaria deluded till then by Symon the Sorcerer would have been baptized by Philip but that they were by his preaching convinced that it was their duty so to be Act. 8.11.12 Nor will any I hope be so unreasonable as to say this was the Baptism of the Spirit since in the 15.16 verse this Baptism is cleerly distinguished from that of the Spirit For the Spirit saith he was fallen upon none of them only they were baptized in the Name of the Lord Iesus So that this Baptism went before their receiving the Spirit and therefore could not be their being baptized with the Spirit And when Peter said concerning Cornelius and his company Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Ghost as well as we Acts 10.47 and withall commanded them to be baptized in the Name of the Lord Iesus Verse 48. Will any imagine that Peters commanding them to be baptized was beside the business for which he was sent thither of God and not in direct pursuance of his commission or that mens having the Spirit though in an excellent degree as they had is any excuse from water Baptism or that it was a thing indifferent to be baptized or not baptized especially considering that the Angel had told Cornelius that Peter should tell him what he OVGHT to do Act. 10.6 and declare to him words by which he and all his should be saved Acts 11.14 And Cornelius his expectation accordingly was not to hear from him things which might be done or let alone but such things as were commanded him of God Act. 10.33 And doubtless when Peter commanded Cornelius to be baptized in the Name of the Lord Cornelius had reason to conclude that this as well as any thing else was that which he ought to do and that those Words as well as others were Words by which he should be saved according to the Item before given him by the Angel Or can it enter into the heart of any Christian to think that the holy Apostle would be so prophane as to command and cause a thing to be acted and done in the Name of the Lord which the Lord had not commanded All which considered what is more plain then that water Baptism was no indifferent thing but the express Will of God even after such time as the ministry of Iohn Baptist was at an end SECT. VII And whereas when we alledge the use and practise of water-Baptism after the ministry of Iohn ceased they to counter ballance this aleadge the use of circumcision at the same time though circumcision was at that time de jure abolished as they say To this I answer likewise 1. If Circumcision was used as an indifferent thing yet it was not commanded and enjoyned by the Apostles to be used in the Name of the Lord as Baptism was Act. 10.48 nor for remission of sins and in order to mens receiving the Holy Ghost as Baptism was Acts. 2.38 nor as a priviledge belonging onely to beleevers as Baptism was Acts 8.36 therefore water-baptism was not practised upon the same terms as circumcision was in the Apostles times 2. If Circumcision was allowed