since we are restored to our Ancient Government to give to our Soveraign Lord the King his Dues and desires all to joyn with him in the Conclusive Prayer for the Morning Service in our Church Liturgy for the King NOW since as the living Members of a Body natural united together maintain life so it is in a Kingdom by concord of the People the state thereof is maintained but by their discord it is destroyed And accordingly Holy Scripture tells us that Houses or Kingdoms divided within themselves cannot stand but true Peace is the quiet and tranquility of Kingdoms burying all Seditions Tumults Uproares and Factions and planting Ease Quietness and Security with all other flourishing Ornaments of Happiness Now would you be happy and would you have your Posterity happy also Pray to God as you are directed by the Prophet Jeremiah in 32. chap. and the 39th verse that he would give you one Heart and one Way that you may fear God for ever for the good of you and of your Children after you Labour therefore to be at unity within your selves and above all be advised that when you again shall have a Lawful call to Elect Members for a subsequent Parliament you be sure unanimously to choose such Men as are Men well affected to the better half of the Government that is Established by Law in the Church For nunquam bene res succedunt humanae ubi negliguntur divinae things Temporal and Humane never succeed well where things Spiritual and Divine are neglected Subjection is required by St. Peter where before cited to the King as Supream and with me be pleased to consider the Authority of the words too and marking the difference between the Primitive and more Modern times you shall not need to fear the introduction of Popery again in these Kingdoms who writes them Observe they come from St. Peter from whom the Successors of St. Peter derive their Title of Supremacy above Kings So that howsoever they will have the Authority Entailed upon them from St. Peter yet St. Peter himself challengeth no such Supremacy for he says To the King mark the Epethite as Supream 't is true we read that Cardinal Bellarmine and Boniface the Eighth and Innocent the Fourth with others of that Party being carried on by their Pride and Ambition maintain the Head of their Church to have both the Swords and therefore say they is above all Kings and Emperors that have but one yet here we see That in the beginning it was not so St. Paul denies it St. Peter disclaims it and the Ancient Church and according to the practise thereof all our Kings of England Successively from time to time even to this present time have disowned it Remember and never forget we had heretofore the Minor part of a House of Commons Exercising the Soveraign Power the corrupt Majority as they then termed them being ejected and cast out for Delinquents and Malignants And by them we had the Government Changed or rather purposed to be changed regality it was then death to say the King and House of Lords were cast of next this we had nothing Visible but a General and an Army Next this we had the whole Constitution Laws and Liberties of the Kingdom at once subverted certain Men being called by the Name of a Parliament and the Soveraign Power pretended to be given them that were never chosen by the People but by we know not whom such a fact as was never heard or read that any King of England was Guilty of since Parliaments were known Next this we had a Protector Governing by an instrument made by God knows who After this we had the same Protector Governing according to the humble Petition and Advie and Sworn to both And unto God be thanks for the same by his late Sacred Majesties happy Restauration we are also restored again to our Ancient Government Established by Law both in Church and State and to the fruits and benefits of the same Mark therefore what St. Peter saith in the 13th chap. to the Rom. give to all their Dues Tribute to whom Tibute is due Custom to whom Custom Honour to whom Fear to whom Fear St. Paul hereby adviseth us to our bounden Duties and due Subjection to the Magistrate Supream and Subordinate And his advice may be reduced to these Three Heads 1st Supply to their Estates 2ly Fear to their Authority 3ly Honour and Reverence to their Persons First Their Estates are to be supported for as one says Pecunia nervus Imperii without which the Work of the Magistracy can neither be effected nor respected and as it is necessary so it is convenient that he that is imployed for the good of the Commonweale be supported by the Publickweale for as saith Seneca cited by Mr. Stanf. in his Prerogat 5. a. Omnium somnos illius vigelantia defendit omnium Otium illius labor omnium delicias illius industria omnium vocationes illius defendit Occupatio his Watchfulness keeps us in our Rest his Pains secures our Pleasures his Calling defends us in all our Callings Secondly Fear his Authority the Apostle gives the reasons Rom. 13.4 for he beareth not the Sword in vain he is the Minister of God he comes Warranted with Authority and as he hath Authority so he hath Power too Might and Right are both in him he is the fountain of Justice and the life of the Law he bears the Sword and he bears it not for naught therefore if thou dost Evil fear Thirdly Yield Honour and Reverence to their Persons for though they are Men subject to the same Natural infirmities that we are yet we must remember whose Person they bear upon them they are the Deputies of God And therefore Honoured with his Name I have said ye are Gods It is said of the Persians that when they come into the presence of their Prince they draw their Hands into their Sleeves in token of their Reverence and Loyalty they will not have a Hand stirring while Majesty is in presence Now as to the concluding this my present Discourse I pray not only your Hands be lifted up to Heaven but your Hearts also and that all may fervently joyn with me in the conclusive Prayer of our Church Liturgy for the Morning Service every Sabbath-day which is as followeth ALmighty God whose Kingdom is Everlasting and Power Infinite have Mercy upon the whole Church and so rule the Heart of thy chosen Servant James our King and Governour that he knowing whose Minister he is may above all things seek thy Honour and Glory and that we and all his Subjects duly considering whose Authority he hath may faithfully Serve Honour and humbly Obey him in thee and for thee according to thy holy Word and Ordinance through Jesus Christ our Lord who with thee and the Holy Ghost Liveth and Reigneth one God World without End Amen FINIS ERRATA PAge 5. l. 23. for Petion r. Petition p. 18. l. 2. for Priviledges r. Prerogatives p. 21. l. 21. for agrreing r. agreeing l. 36. for joyned r. enjoyed p. 25. l. 6. for datam fit r. datum sit l. 8. for reprsentons r. repraesentans p. 28. l. 2. for Pallainum r. Pallatinum p. 29. l. 24. for tiahit r. trahit p. 30. l. 1. after Sword add in p. 42. l. 36. after King dele and.
those Loyal Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament in the 12th year of his late Sacred Majesty well knew that he must needs want the necessary supplies to maintain defend and uphold the Government as the late Vsurpers had to offend alter and destroy the same The Kings Charges are great as well for the security and safety of his own Royal Person as for the preservation of the publick Peace of his Realms and Dominions for the general good of the whole Community A few Yeomen of the Guard before the late times of Rebellion called Beef-eaters were not enough for to nor could rescue his Sacred Majesty King Charles the First from that impious Act execrable Murther and unparalel'd Treason against his Sacred Person and Life committed the 30th of January 1648. neither was nor could such a Guard have been sufficient to secure the late Vserpers so ridiculous was their Right to what they Vsurped from that time to the time of his late Majesties Restauration We see before how in Ancient times King Canutus was served so soon as he was I grant Politickly but how Wisely I know not perswaded to withdraw and disband his Guards it may be his Arms or Armies might be attended with many inconveniencies but the present Guards of our Soveraign Lord the King may be necessary to be continued if ever in this our present Age which hath been very changeable and one Plot or other hath been too much threatning alteration of the Government in Church and State and these Guards of his Sacred Majesty are not attended with any inconveniencies nor are chargeable to any but the King himself Sir Edw. Coke saith That the Kings Treasure is the sinews of War and the Honour and safety of the King in times of Peace that it is firmamentum belli ornamentum pacis It is so but I deny any War to be justifiable against the Lord our King within his Realms and Dominions and therefore every Rising and Force raised within the Realm is properly called a Rebellion improperly a War Nor do the Kings Laws Protect any Subject to trade get and gain a great Estate to the end to impower him to ascend the Throne and to stand in competition with or to distast the Person or the Government of our rightful Soveraign Lord the King but rather it is the bounden duty of all in general to Love Honour and obey their Lord the King and proportionably according to their Estates Qualities and Degrees to give Aides and Supplies to his necessities for the just defence and security of his Royal Person and the preservation of the Peace and quietness of him and all his People in all his Realms and Dominions We say quo ditior est quisque eo nobilior by so much as every Man is the more Rich by so much he is the more Noble by so much he is the better respected and the more Esteemed But I say Principem habere ditiorem confert ad dignitatem subditorum ditiores habere subditos confert ad nobillitatem principis to have the Richer Prince conduceth to the dignity of the Subjects and to have the Richer People conduceth to the dignity of the Prince Now all here last mentioned is to this end and purpose that all old Animosities Jealousies and Fears laid aside after his Gracious Majesty shall have convened his Parliament unto him be given quod defunctus Antecessor suus habuit what his deceased Ancestor had Believe the word and promise of his Gracious Soveraign he beginneth his Reign with Clemency and Mercy to all his Subjects and will certainly be so far from invading your Properties that having what was thought needful for his late Royal and Dear Brother nay I say the Richer you make him the more he will be respected at home the more safe he and all his People will be and the more he will certainly be feared and dreaded abroad But least with the Foolish Architect I make the Porch too big for the House I say no more only recommend to you the reading of this ensuing Treatise which was written for the confirmation only of the more knowing and Loyal and for the information of the more Ignorant and therefore less Loyal Subjects So I commit every Man to Gods protection and rest Every Mans well Wisher J. B. The Contents CHAP. I. SHeweth how things stood at the latter end of King James the First and something is said of the High Court of Parliament p. 1. CHAP. II. Sheweth how King Charles the First found things at his first coming to these Crowns and there is also said something as to the learning of the Customs the chief Maintenance of the Crown in his time p. 4. CHAP. III. Sheweth how the late Rebellion broke out and sâ—mething is said of the great Advantages the Rebels had with what Advantages only the Loyal Party had p. 12. CHAP. IV. Sheweth how the King the Loyal party and the Law suffered Violence p. 14. CHAP. V. Sheweth about what time the Kings Writs were first framed for the induction of the Commons into the Parliaments of England p. 16. CHAP. VI. Sheweth the difference between Parliamentary Priviledges and the Prerogatives of the King and sheweth how at the first Kingly Goverment was constituted by God himself and that by Gods Law also the Legislative Power and the Power of the Militia was given to the King and that in these highest Points of the Kings Prerogative the Law of England is agreeing with the Law of God and that God is vindex sui Ordinis the avenger of his own Ordinance p. 18. CHAP. VII Sheweth that vindictive Justice is also derived from God to the King as supream and that all Subordinate Officers derive their Jurisdiction from the King and through his Mediation from God also and that herein the Law of England is also agreeing with the Law of God p. 23. CHAP. VIII Sheweth that the Subjects of England are bound by their bond of Allegiance to serve the King only in his Wars and that the King is the Fountain of Honour and by way of Induction to the same something is said of a Countee Palatine Davids worthies and good old Barzillai the Gileadite p. 25. CHAP. IX Herein you have a Subject defined you have Ligeance defined and is shewed that the King hath two Capacities the one Natural and the other Politick and that the Body Politick cannot be separated from the Body Natural that Ligeance is due to the Natural Body of the King that the Kingdom of England admits of no interregnum and that the Disherison of the Right Heir of a Kingdom is wont to be the beginning of Civil Wars p. 29. CHAP. X. Herein you have an Heir defined and divided and is shewed that the Right Heir of the Crown ought not nor can Lawfully be Disinherited that a Bastard ought not nor can be Heir to to the Crown and further something is said to the late Bill for the Exclusion of the late most
Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now our Soveraign Lord King James the Second p. 31. CHAP. XI Sheweth that Ignorance of the Law will excuse none and that therefore all Dissenters to the Government in Church and State are advised to Conformity p. 36. CHAP. XII Sheweth that all Subjects owe true Ligeance to their Soveraign though they never were or ever shall be Sworn to the same and is shewed the diversity between Enemies and Rebels then all are advised from Rebellion and is shewed that the King hath no Peer and therefore cannot be judged by his Subjects for his Actions p. 38. CHAP. XIII Sheweth that no Action lyeth against the King but in place thereof Petition must be made unto him and that due circumstances observed the Subject shall have his remedy against the King by way of Petition as readily as one Subject may recover against another Subject by way of Action in any of the Kings Courts for that all his Majesties Subordinate Officers are Sworn to do Justice between the King and his Subjects which if they do not they are Answerable for the injury not the King p. 41. CHAP. XIV Sheweth what inconveniencies happen in the Realm of France through Regal Government alone with the Commodities that proceed of the joynt Government Politick and Regal in the Realm of England And all the Community are herein disswaded by mutinous and Rebellious practises to Disinfranchise themselves p. 43. CHAP. XV. Sheweth how tender this Government Politick and Regal conjoyned is of the safety of the Kings Person and of all his Royal Rights and Prerogatives And that our Law doth not reject Women or Infants in the high point of the Descent of the Crown and that our King holdeth immediately of God to himself and acknowledgeth no Prince on Earth his Superior p. 46. CHAP. XVI Sheweth that all Vnlawful Assemblies or Meetings for the Plotting of harm to the King or the Alteration of the Government are Vnlawful and further sheweth what Misprision of Treason is and that it is the Duty of every good Subject presently to discover Treason p. 49. CHAP. XVII Sheweth that all Writs Process Executions and Commandments are and ought to be in the Kings Name only p. 51. CHAP. XVIII All Freeholders are advised as to what manner of Persons they are or ought to Choose for future Parliaments p. 52. CHAP. XIX Sheweth that the King of England is and always hath been Supream Head of the Church not the Pope p. 55. CHAP. XX. As to the Kings Supremacy is shewed the difference between the Primitive and more modern times herein the Author adviseth all to be at Vnity within themselves and since we are restored to our Ancient Government to give to our Soveraign Lord the King his Dues and desires all to joyn with him in the conclusive Prayer for the Morning Service in our Church Liturgy for the King p. 58. ADVICE TO THE Commons of England c. CHAP. I. Sheweth how things stood at the latter end of King James the First and something is said of the High Court of Parliament AS Noah rendred in the Word of God Gen. 6. and 9. ver to be a just and perfect Man and one that walked with God and that with his Family after the great deluge survived the whole World is fictitiously said to have had two Faces the one looking backward the other forward the one looking upon the World before the Flood the other on the World after the Flood so an old indigent Officer of the Kings Majesties Army King Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory may not improperly be said to have two Faces the one looking backward the other forward the one looking on this Kingdom of England before the late Civil War the other on the same since the said War Taking leave to look backward and to examine how and in what state of Affairs things stood in the latter end of the Reign of King James the First and how the said King Charles the First found things upon the demise of the Kingdom to him upon the death of the natural Body of His said Royal Ancestor I collect out of what I have read long since that about the Ninteenth year of the Reign of the said King James the First in a Speech to his House of Peers he expressed himself that he intended not to derogate from or Infringe any of the Liberties or Priveledges of their House but rather to fortifie and strengthen them for never any King had done so much for the Nobility of England as he had done and ever would be ready to do and whatever he should say or deliver to them as his thought yet when he had said what he thought he would afterwards freely leave the judgment thereof wholly to their House he knew they would do nothing but what the like had been done before and prayed them not to be jealous that he would abridg them of any thing that had been used for whatsoever Presidents in good times of Government could warrant he would allow acknowledging them to be the Supreme Court of Justice wherein he was ever present by Representation But his said Sacred Majesty then inferred that the Priviledges of the Commons which they claimed to be their natural Birthrights were but the favours of former Kings Against which the Commons then protested That the Liberties c. o◠Parliament are the Ancient and undoubted Birthright and Inheritance of the Subjects of England that the urgent Affairs concerning the Kings State and defence of the Realm and the Church of England and the Maintenance and making of Laws and redress of Mischiefs within the Realm are proper matter for Debate in Parliament and that this Debate ought to be free c. And no Member to be Imprisoned other than by censure of the House it self for debating Parliament business and if any Member is complained of for any thing done or said in Parliament the same is to be shewed the King by assent of the Commons before the King is to give credence to any private Information In Counsel afterwards this King expressed that he never meant to deny the House of Commons any Lawful Priviledge they had enjoyed by any Law or Statute by Custom or uncontrolled and lawful President In the Protestation some words viz. arduis Regni are cunningly mentioned but the word quibusdam which restraineth the generality to such particular Cases as his Majesty pleaseth to consult with them upon was purposely omitted Now as to what he is pleased to consult with them upon it is Customary for the King at the first opening of every Parliament in a short Speech to declare to the Three Estates the certain Occasions urged him to convene them on which or the particular Heads thereof the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England for the time being more Copiously enlargeth observing those measures the King his Master prescribeth him thô in fewer words for non-observance whereof and for
amongst the rest he gave him a special charge to shew kindness not unto Chimham only but unto all the Sons of Barzillai the Gileadite charging him that he let them be of those that Eat at his Table rendring this for reason for so they came to me when I fled because of Absalom thy Brother Absit be it far from me I do not mention this matter as if I would thence infer that King David was obliged to have done this Honour to Barzillai and his Sons No! Cujus est dare ejus est disponere he that hath the power to give Honour or Reward hath also the disposing power to give to whom what and when he pleaseth and the very words of Barzillai and why should the King recompence it me with such a reward manifest that good old Barzillai thought it his bounden Duty to do what he had done And as appears by the preamble of the Statute of 11th H. 7th ca. 1. Every Subject of this Realm of England by Duty of Allegiance is bound to serve his Prince and Soveraign Lotd in his Wars for the defence of him and the Land against every Rebellion Power and Might reared against him and with him to enter and abide in service in Battel And Sir Edward Coke also in the 7th parr of his Reports Fol. 7. b. 8. a. saith that all Subjects are bound to go with the King in War infra extra regnum both within and without the Kingdom CHAP. IX Herein you have a Subject defined you have Ligeance defined and is shewed that the King hath two Capacities the one Natural and the other Politick that the body Politick cannot be separated from the Body Natural that Ligeance is due to the Natural Body of the King that the Kingdom of England admits of no interregnum and that the Disherison of the Right Heir of a Kingdom is wont to be the beginning of Civil Wars NOW whosoever is born under a natural Ligeance due by the Law of Nature is a Subject And it is neither caelum Heaven nor solum the Soil that makes the Subject but Ligeance which is of as large extent and Latitude as the Royal Power and Protection of the King is which Allegiance or Ligeance is a true and faithful Obedience of the Subject due to his Soveraign and is or ought to be an incident inseperable to every Subject because Ligeantia est vinculum fidei the bond of Faith est quasi Legis essentia est ligamentum quasi ligatio mentium quia sicut ligamentum est connexio articulorum juncturarum c. As the Ligatures or Strings do knit together all the Joints of all the parts of the Body so doth this Ligeance joyn together the Soveraign and all his Subjects quasi uno ligamine as in one knot or tye In some Acts of Parliament Subjects are called Leige Subjects or Leige People and again in some Acts of Parliament the King is called Leige Lord of his Subjects so that I may further say Ligeantia est quid quodamodo reciprocum a certain Reciprocal thing hence it is we say Protectio Regis tiahit subjectionem subditi subjectio subditi trahit protectionem Regis The Protection of the King doth draw or attract the Subjection of the Subject and the Subjection of the Subject doth draw or attract to it the Protection of the King So that this Ligeance is the mutual Bond and Obligation between the King and his Subjects whereby Subjects are called his Leige Subjects because they are bound to Obey and Serve him as well in times of War as in times of Peace and he is called their Leige Lord because he is to maintain them in their just Rights and Liberties by the power of the Sword times of War and by the Legislative power to defend them in times of Peace from Injuries and Oppressions Now the King is said to have Two Capacities one Natural the other Politick one framed of God the other by the Policy of Man one subject to Infirmities the other not And the Estate Royal or Politick doth not confound the capacity of his Body Natural but their Capacities remain distinctly as in other Persons that have double capacity as a Bishop or a Dean c. Plow 234. a. and the Body Politick of the King may not be disjoyned or separated from his Body Natural Plow 230. a. 242. b. So that when the King is Sworn to his Subjects as he is at his Coronation he taketh Oath in his Natural Person for the Politick Body is immortal and invisible nay the Politick Body hath no Soul for as is aforesaid it is framed by the Policy of Man and therefore the King cannot be said to Swear in his Politick Capacity In likewise when at the Assizes by the Judge of the Goal delivery at the Sessions of the Peace by the Justices or the Commissioners of the Peace when at or in the Leet by the Steward there the Subject is or shall be Sworn to the King to bear Faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors then the Subject is Sworn to bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Natural Body of the King And accordingly in all Indictments of Treason when any intend or compass mortem destructionem Domini Regis which must needs be intended and understood to be of his Natural Body for his Politick Body is Immortal and not subject to Death the Indictment always concludeth with contra Ligeantiae suae debitum contrary to the Duty of their Allegiance and therefore Ligeance is due to the Natural Body of the King And Sir Edward Coke says this Ligeance or Faith of the Subject is proprium quarto modo to the King a degree beyond the Grammarians Superlative omni soli semper to every King to the King alone and always to the King And it will be material and not contrary to Sir Edward Cokes meaning to add these words de jure to every of his omni soli semper And so Ligeance will be due as it is to every King that is so de jure of Right to him alone that is so and always to him that is King de jure of Right Thereby every King de facto and Usurper will be excluded and the greater safety will be secured to the King and to the Subject too for the Disherison of the Right Heir of a Kingdom is always wont to be the beginning of Civil Wars But however Sir Edward Coke omitted those words de jure yet his meaning was without question the same as if those words had been added because C. 7. 10. b. he saith that the King holdeth the Realm of England by Birthright upon which Succession is ever attendant and in the same place he saith that the King in individuo moritur but not in genere which is as much as to so say that the Natural Body of the King is subject to Death but the body Politick of the King dyeth not And therefore
the Death of the Natural Body of the King is called Plow 234. a. the Demise of the King because that thereby he Demiseth the Realm to another and the Body Politick is transferred from one Body Natural immediately to another Body Natural that Right hath and that because our Realm doth not admit of any Interregnum Hence it was that in the year of our Lord 1660. at the very instant of his late Sacred Majesties most happy Restauration all Charters and Writings whatsoever were Written Reputed and Esteemed to be made in the Twelfth year of his Reign though that from 1648. to that time he was injuriously and wickedly Deprived Robbed and kept out from his Inheritance of all his Regal Rights of the Crown whereof he was the undoubted right Heir by the late Usurpers CHAP. X. Herein you have an Heir defined and divided and is shewed that the Right Heir of the Crown ought not nor can lawfully be Disinherited that a Bastard ought not nor can be Heir to the Crown and further something is said to the late Bill for the Exclusion of the late most Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now our Soveraign Lord King James the Second NOW Sir Edward Coke in the First part of his Institutes Fol. 7. b. saith that in the Legal understanding of the Common Law he is said to be haeres an Heir that is ex justis nuptiis procreatus for haeres legittimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and is he to whom Lands Tenements or hereditaments by the Act of God and right of Blood do descend of some Estate of Inheritance for solus deus haeredem facere potest non homo God alone can make an Heir not Man And Heirs are either Lineal who ever shall first Inherit or Collateral who are to Inherit for want of Lineal Lineal descent is conveyed downwards in the right Line as from the Grandfather to the Father from the Father to the Son c. Collateral descent is derived from the side of the Lineal as Grandfathers Brother Fathers Brother c. Now in Mr. Swinb 5th part Fol. 289. he that hath Issue Natural but not Lawful is said to die without Issue and in such Case the Fathers Brother shall Inherit and not the Issue Natural of the Father for such Issue Natural in our Law is said to be nullius filius no Mans Son whence may be Inferred that no Mans Son shall Inherit no Mans Land much less a Crown And in the 23d chap. of Deuteron the 2d verse is said a Bastard shall not enter into the Congregation of the Lord even to his Tenth generation shall he not enter into the Congregation of the Lord. And 10. H. 7. 18. it is said that Rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote quia tam Ecclesiasticam quam temporalem habet jurisdictionem The King is a person mixt or participating with the Priest in the Priesthood because he is said to have Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction as well as Temporal And Sir John Fortescue Fol. 95. a. b. saith that it is convenient that Mans Law in the benefit of Succession should cut them short whom the Church judgeth unworthy to be received into Holy Orders yea whom Holy Scripture judgeth as touching their Birthright inferior to the Legitimate or Lawfully Begotten as we read in the 25th chap. of Gen. 5 and 6th verses Abraham gave all his Inheritance to his Son Isaac and to the Sons of his Concubines he gave Gifts And again in Mr. Swinb part 5th Fol. 17. is said A King may ex plenitudine potestatis make his unlawful Issue capable of whatsoever by Will deviseable he doth give or bequeath unto him But Mr. Plowden saith 247. a. b. It is an evil or unlawful thing to Disinherit the Right Heir And Mr. Swinb in his 2d part Fol. 118. saith that by the Civil Canon and Common Laws also of this Realm of England It is unlawful for a King to give away his Kingdom from his Lawful Heirs However we had lately a House of Commons or rather a Major part of them that had framed a Bill for the Excluding and Disabling the then most Illustrious Prince James Duke of York now King James the Second for ever from Possessing Having Holding Inheriting and Enjoying of the Imperial Crowns of this Realm and Kingdoms It was a Presumptuous Bill for the Excluding of the Presumptive Heir of these Crowns However it was refused by the Lords House and so could not be offered to his late Majesty for his Royal Assent to make it a Law Have me excused for saying it was a Presumptuous Bill Matters of that nature have been in times past esteemed so in 35o. Eliz. Mr. Peter Wentworth and Sir Henry Bromley delivered a Petition to the Lord Keeper desiring the Lords of the Upper House to be suppliants with them of the Lower House unto her Majesty for entailing the Succession of the Crown whereof a Bill was ready drawn the Queen was highly displeased herewith and charged her Council to call the Parties before them so Sir Thomas Heneage was sent to fetch them they were first commanded to forbear going to the House and not to go out of their several Lodgings afterwards they were called before the Lord Treasurer the Lord Buckhurst and Sir Thomas Heneage Wentworth was Committed to the Tower Bromley to the Fleet together with Mr. Stevens as also Mr. Welch Knight for Worcester-shire and yet it was then thought no Breach of Priviledge They that meddle with this matter of the Succession to the Crown do not only trench upon the Power and Priviledge of Almighty God who as the Prophet Daniel tells us in his 4th chap. is the most High that Ruleth in the Kingdom of Men and giveth it to whomsoever he will but also we have found by woful experience that they Praevaricate with the King himself for in the very word King is included all Succession so that where a Guift is made to the King a Fee-simple passeth without the words either of Heirs or Successors or both as may be seen C. Inst. 1. part 9. b. and in the same Book Fol. 22. b. is said a Man cannot have an Heir during his Life for non est haeres viventis And Mr. Plowden 45. b. saith no Heir hath Right or Title till after the Death of his Ancestor that hath the Inheritance be the Heir either Lineal or Collateral and not in his Life and this is because let all the provision imaginable by Man nay by a Parliament be appointed yet the same by the death of the Presumptive Heir or Heir apparent in the Life time of the Ancestor by the Act of God not otherwise may and can be disappointed And Anciently and now also as in C. 8. 28. it is held That Princeps coruscat radiis Regis censetur una persona cum Rege the Prince is enlightned and made splendid by the shining brightness of the King and is esteemed to be one and the same Person with the
of the Kings foundation and the Kings of England are the Founders of them all and they sit in Parliament and have the Names of the Lords of the Parliament non ratione Nobilitatis sed ratione Officii not by reason of their Nobility but by reason of their Office and in respect of their Ancient Barronies annexed to their dignities C. Inst 1. part 97. a. And in C. 5. 1. part Cawdreyes Case it may be seen That King Kenulphus by Charter in Parliament in the year of our Lord 755. Exempted the Abbot of Abingdon from Episcopal Jurisdiction and gave it him That amongst the Laws of Edward the Confessor it was Ordained that he should Govern the Kingdom and his People and above all the Holy Church not the Pope That William the Conqueror Appropriated Churches with Cure That King Henry the First presented to Abbeys as well by his Ecclesiastical as his Kingly Power That Henry the Third granted Prohibitions and in Issue of Loyalty of Marriage and general Bastardy the King wrote to the Bishop as his immediate Officer That in the time of Edward the Third the Temporalties of the Archbishop of York were lost during his Life for refusal of a Clark of the King by reason of a Provision of the Pope That by 25. Edw. the Third a Man might kill those that procured Provisions from Rome and those that executed them Also by 25. Edw. 3d. It was Enacted that the Pope shall not give Archbishopricks Bishopricks c. but that the King them shall give c. That by 16. Rihard the Second chap. 5th It is Enacted that because the King holdeth his Crown immediately under God they who purchase or pursue in the Court of Rome Translations Processes Excommunications Bulls Instruments c. and their Fautors and Councillors shall be out of the Protection of the King and Praemunire facias shall be awarded against them That 2. H. 4. 9. It is resolved that Collectors of the Pope by their Bulls have not any Jurisdiction here and that the Archbishops and Bishops are called the Spiritual Judges of the King And 11. H. 4. 37. it is said Papa non potest mutare leges Angliae that the Pope cannot change or alter the Laws of England That 2. Henry the Fourth chap. 3d. he that obtaineth from the Bishop of Rome to be exempt from regular Obedience is within the Case of a Praemunire That 6. H. 4. chap. 1. Forfeiture was imposed upon those who payed great sums to the Chamber of Rome That by 2. H. 5. chap. 1. The King not the Pope gave power to the Ordinary to enquire of the Foundation and Government of Hospitals and to correct c. That in 9. H. 6. 16. The King only can give License for the Foundation of a Corporation Spiritual not the Pope That 12th Edw. 4th 16. A Legate of the Pope was compelled to Swear that he would not attempt any thing against the Crown c. That in 2. Rich. 3. It is said that Excommunication or Judgment at Rome is of no force here That in First Henry the 7th 10th It is said that in time of King Henry the Sixth Humphry Duke of Glocester burnt the Letters of the Pope that were in Derogation ot the King and his Crown And 1. H. 7. 20. It is adjudged that the Pope may not grant Sanctuary And 25. Henry the 8. chap. 21. It is Enacted by the Statute forementioned of faculties that none shall make suit to Rome but that the Archbishop of Canterbury may grant to the King and his Subjects such Licenses Dispensations Grants Faculties Escripts Delegacies Instruments c. not repugnant to Holy Scripture as been used to be granted by the Pope yet it is to be noted that such Cannons Constitutions Ordinances Synods Provincials c. were provided to be in force which had been allowed by general Consent and Custom within the Realm not repugnant to Law or the Prerogative of the King and so by the same general Consent may be Corrected Enlarged Explained or Abrogated hence we may rest satisfied that for many Hundreds of years last past successively in the time of one King after another King when all our Ancestors were Papists and of that profession that yet the Government of the Church ever was inherent to the Imperial Crown of the Kings of England In the time of King Henry the Third the Usurped Jurisdiction of the Pope was elevated more high than ever before or since yet it may be observed that in the Ninth year of his Reign in the very first Chapter of the great Charter Entitled and Called The Confirmation of Liberties is mentioned First We have granted to God and by this our present Charter have confirmed for Us and Our Heirs for ever that the Church of England shall be free and shall have all her whole Rights and Liberties inviolable And by the Statute of 24. H. 8. chap. 12. by 24. Bishops and 29 Abbots it is recited that England is an Empire and that the King is the Head of the Body Politick consisting of the Temporalty and the Spiritualty impleet and furnished with full Power to render final Justice in all matters whatsoever as well Ecclesiastical as Temporal And that part of the said Body Politick called the Spiritualty hath been always thought sufficient and meet of it self without the intermeddling of any Forreign Pope or any exterior Person or Persons when any cause of the Law Divine happened to come in question or of Spiritual Learning to declare and determine all such doubts and to adminster all such Offices and Duties yet as the Spiritual Judges of and under the King as to their several Roomes Spiritual doth appertain And the Laws Temporal for Trial of Property of Lands and Goods and for the conservation of the Realm in Unity and Peace without Rapine or Spoil were and yet are Administred Adjudged and Executed by sundry Judges and Ministers of the other part of the Body Politick called the Temporalty And their Authorities and Jurisdictions do conjoyn together in the due Administration of Justice the one is a help to the other and both are a help to and in ease of the King the Head of this Body Politick here you have concisely and in few words discovered unto you the Ancient form of the Government of England both in Church and State and accordingly in Ancient times the Parliaments of England consisted only of the King the Lords Spiritual and the Lords Temporal who were Anciently the Representatives of the whole Kingdom in Parliament Assembled under the Kings or Queens thereof but for some Hundreds of years last past a Writ hath been framed for the Election of Knigts c. to sit in Parliament and these Knights c. are to be chosen by the Freeholders in their several Counties CHAP. XX. As to the Kings Supremacy is shewed the difference between the Primitive and more modern times herein the Author adviseth all to be at Vnity within themselves and
King And as in Bracton cited by Stanf. 99. b. Since nihil aliud potest Rex in terris cum sit Dei Minister Vicarius quam quod de jure potest ita quod potestas juris sua est non injuriae c because the King as he is Gods Minister and Vicegerent can do nothing upon the Earth but what he may do by Law so that the Power of Equity and Justice not of injury and Injustice is properly said to be his Power Therefore his late Sacred Majesty not being minded to Calm the Stormes of some discontented Spirits by stirring up a Tempest in his own Bosom was pleased at the opening of the late Parliament at Westminster to signifie to the Two Houses that he desired them to preserve the Succession of the Crown in the right Line and withall intimated to them that he would give his Royal Assent to any Laws they should devise or make for the Security of the Protestant Religion as it is now Established by Law in the Church of England or to that Effect but we are living in faece seculi in the very Dregs and the very last and worst of Days we are Jealous again of our own shadows nay we mistrust Gods Providence and Protection and the Kingdom again is like to be ruined by secret Plots and Machinations We have for many years by the wonderful Providence of God been delivered from the Slavery and Superstition of Popery And yet nothing is now more feared than the Introduction and Publick exercise of Popery again in these Kingdoms Although as King James the First the Royal Grandfather of our gracious Soveraign Lord King James the Second in his first Speech to his first Parliament next after his Advent to the Crowns of England and Ireland did declare that it was then our happiness that our Head meaning himself was of the same Religion that the Body was of and that as he was no stranger to us in Blood no more was he a stranger to us in Faith or in the matters concerning the House of God so likewise his Sacred Majesty whom God long preserve in his first Speech to his Privy Counsel next after his first Advent to the Crowns of Great Brittain and Ireland hath been Graciously Pleased to Declare that he will do his utmost endeavours to Preserve and Defend the Government in Church and State as it is now Established by Law in his several Realms and Dominions And besides divers other undeniable Arguments might demonstrate that his late Sacred Majesty or his dear Royal Brother now King James the Second never intended in their Imaginations the least thought to make any alteration of the Protestant Religion as it is Established by Law in the Church of England that further happy alliance of Marriage contracted and Consummated between the Eldest Daughter of his Royal Majesty and the most Illustrious Prince of Orange And a later Marriage contracted also and Consummated between his Younger Daughter and the most Illustrious Prince George of Denmark most clearly confirms the reality of their intentions herein by which Nuptial engagements it appears further that their joint endeavours have been not only to defend uphold and maintain a bare profession thereof in these his Majesties Dominions but also to enlarge and corroborate it abroad as much as lyeth in their Power Do we not know that when a Protestant Prince is to intermarry with a Forreign Princess of the Catholick Religion what great care and provision is made by the Parents or Friends on either side by Articles made and confirmed by some Ministers of State equally chosen and impowered for the purpose of her having a set number of Priests and other Ministers and Servants of her Judgment and Profession for the due Administration and Execution only of such Rites and Ceremonies as are proper for her having and enjoying that Freedom and Liberty that is agreeable to the Rule of her Conscience in that Religion wherein she hath been born and educated And I pray in the time of his late Sacred Majesty by whom the true Protestant Religion was professed that by Law is Established why might not some wholesome Law or Laws have been made by the great Council the Parliament for the prevention of the extirpation of the Protestant Religion and the setting aside those Idle and Aiery Jealousies of the Massacre of the true professors thereof after his Demise or Death But alas I fear I am mistaken in or do not put the question right there are divers Sects and not Religions such as are called Presbyterians Anabaptists Independents Quakers and I know not how many sorts of Novelists amongst us that had not only their Birth and Production but also their full growth in the late times of Usurpation and Rebellion who though they differ in judgment amongst themselves yet in this as formerly they are all still agreeing that if they had but the opportunity they would all shake hands and join together in being against the Kings Supremacy in Church and State as much if not more than the Papists For these several sorts of Sects do not so much differ from us in points of Religion as in their confused form of Policy and Parity being ever discontented with the present Government and are impatient to suffer any Superiority which maketh these Sects unable to be suffered in any well governed State or Kingdom But if we take into serious consideration that it is above Forty years since the late times of Rebellion and that every Individual person now living and that hath since attained to the Age of Fifty years or thereabouts were then Children and had not the discretion to discern or put a difference between good and evil if we consider the great changes and mighty revolutions the Metamorphosis and Transposition of all things in point of Government then and afterwards in time till his late sacred Majesties most happy Restauration then all these Sects or most of them I hope will be ready to conclude with me that they did not nor could know better because that in their Youth in stead of better and more wholsome nutriment they sucked in were nursed and educated in those bad times upon Venomous and Rebellious Principles Quo semel est imbuta recens fervabit odorem Horace Testa diu c. Accordingly what Children have been instructed or Grammard in in their Youth it is hard for them to leave in their Old or Elder years some of these several Sects do still retain their first drunken in Liquor upon a certain shamefacedness to be thought curious or changeable others of them that are more Willful and Obstinate will not be reformed because contrary to St. Pauls advice Rom. 12.16 they are wise in their own conceit and will not be informed CHAP. XI Sheweth that Ignorance of the Law will excuse none and that therefore all Dissenters to the Government in Church and State are advised to Conformity IT is horrible that St. Paul saith they that