Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	drink_v	fruit_n	vine_n	2,742	5	10.7149	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A14721	Theologicall questions, dogmaticall observations, and evangelicall essays, vpon the Gospel of Jesus Christ, according to St. Matthew Wherein, about two thousand six hundred and fifty necessary, and profitable questions are discussed; and five hundred and eighty speciall points of doctrine noted; and five hundred and fifty errours confuted, or objections answered: together with divers arguments, whereby divers truths, and true tenents are confirmed. By Richard VVard, sometimes student in the famous vniversities of Cambridge in England: St. Andrews in Scotland: and Master of Arts of both the kingdoms; and now a preacher in the famous city of London.	Ward, Richard, 1601 or 2-1684.	1640 (1640)	STC 25024; ESTC S118017	1,792,298	907

to prove that by the world to come is meant the time betwixt death and the day of judgement but alwaies either for the last day or the eternity which is after that day Luke 20.35 And thus Augustine de Civit. Dei lib. 21. cap. 24. by the world to come in this place understands the day of the Resurrection And Damascene also de orthod fid lib. 2. cap. 1. saith Aeterna vita aeternum supplicium futurum seculum ostendunt And thus This world is taken for the distance of time to the end of the world and The world to come for that eternity which shall begin after Christs second comming And according hereunto there shall be two times in which sins are pronounced remitted to wit this world by the preaching of the Gospel to the repentant and that to come when Christ shall confesse with his own mouth before Gods Angels to whom they are remitted and by which remission they are made truly blessed for that remission to come shall be a confirmation of this present and those which are not remitted here neither shall there be so pronounced Wherfore from this speech of our Saviours this Argument is gathered from the Antithesis If the sin against the holy Ghost be neither remitted in this world nor in the world to come then other sins are remitted both in this and the other or at least either in this or in the other But it is not remitted in the other because it is not remitted in this as hath been said It followeth therefore that other sins are remitted both in this and in the other Now in this sense this place doth not onely not make for Purgatory but also repugneth it For these two remissions in this world and the world to come are conjoyned and one is not separated from the other Chrysostome expounding this place together with this partition of time saith thus Amongst men I. Some shall be punished for their sins both here and there as the Sodomites II. Some onely in this life present as the Corinthian fornicator III. Some onely in the life to come as the rich glutton IV. Some in neither as the Prophets and Apostles And from this partition he infers that the meaning of our Saviour is That the sin against the holy Ghost is so grievous and horrible that they which commit it shall feel the judgement of Gods wrath both here and in the world to come which hapneth not to all who commit other sins Certainly they which with a set purpose deny the known truth against their consciences feel a hell of torments in their consciences in this life at some time or other if not alwaies and in the life to come their pains shall be exquisite and unspeakable in the most rigorous manner And therefore from this place nothing can be gathered for their Plutonicall rather than Platonicall Purgatory Answ 4 Fourthly it follows not the sin against the holy Ghost shall not be remitted in the next world therefore other sins shall no more than this followeth which Christ saith I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine untill I drink it with you in my Fathers kingdom Mat. 26.29 That therefore he did drink of other things because he did not drink of the vine For it is a most foolish absurdity from two Negations to infer an Affirmation as for example Saint Peter neither in this life nor in the life to come shall be made an Angell therfore some Saints in the life to come shall be made Angels Now Bellarmine would justifie this Argument by that example where Christ saith My kingdom is not of this world And Pilate inferreth thereupon Art thou a King then where an Affirmation is concluded out of the Negative To this Doctor Willet Synops f. 405. answers That the reason is not alike except Bellarmine will reason as Pilate did Thy kingdom is not of this world Therfore thou hast a kingdom So Blasphemy shall not be forgiven in the next world Therefore there shall be Blasphemy then Thus he might have concluded truly and thus he should have concluded if he would reason as Pilate doth for in hell there shall be Blasphemy Answ 5 Fiftly it follows not some sins shall be forgiven in the other world therefore in Purgatory For many have thought that sins shall be forgiven after this life and yet not in Purgatory neither Thus Origen imagined that after some long and grievous torments both the sins of the devils and of wicked men should be remitted And the Chiliasts thought that after a thousand years from the day of judgement all should be pardoned yea Augustine lib. 6. contr● Iul. cap. 5. thought that in the day of judgement some sins should be forgiven And therefore Purgatory is not necessarily concluded from the remission of sins after this life Answ 6 Sixtly by this reason of Bellarmines it may be concluded that mortall sins shall be remitted in the world to come because Christ onely excepts the sin against the holy Ghost but this the Papists will not grant and therefore why should we grant the other Seventhly from a particular Negation contrary Answ 7 to all Rules of Logick they infer an universall Affirmation If the sin against the holy Ghost shall neither be remitted in this life nor in the life to come Then say they all the temporall punishments of all sins which are not here fully paid shall be paid and satisfied by the faithfull in the world to come The meaning whereof is temporall punishments are due unto the faithfull for their sins part of which punishment they suffer in this life and the remainder in the life to come The Argument is cast in the same mould with this Socrates or Solomon is no fool therfore all men are wise and he is a fool and not wise who admitteth of such Arguments Sadeel adver hum satisf object pag. 247. Eightly Bellarmine argues A subcontrariis and Answ 8 yet doth not observe the Law of Subcontrarieties from which the force of the conclusion should follow As for example I. Some sinne is not remitted Some sinne is remitted II. Some sinne is not remitted in this life Some sinne is remitted in this life III. Some sinne is neither remitted in this life nor in the life to come Some sinne is remitted both in this life and in the life to come Now these are contraries and concluded according to the Rules of Art But the Papists conclude thus Some sinne is neither remitted in this life nor in the life to come Therefore some sinne is not remitted in this life but in the life to come Where the errour is so plaine that a fresh man can tell that it doth not conclude aright For to a double negation should be opposed a double affirmation wheras they oppose onely one As if a man should argue or conclude thus Some neither love God in this life nor in the life to come Therefore Some shall love God in the life to come which

be denied this holy Sacrament for they may take it and give thankes although they lye for Vetus est ve●bum Catonis c. both old and true is that saying of Cato's God being a Spirit must be worshipped with a pure mind or according to our Saviour in Spirit and truth Iohn 4.24 Non ergo rixemur de gestu externo nemo ●b hunc vel illum condemnet alium Let us therefore notdisagree jarre about the outward gesture neither let any one condemne another for that Hence from these two proofes wee learne these two particular lessons viz. I. That the gesture of the body in the receiving of the Sacrament is not of the essence of the Sacrament but in it selfe an indifferent thing II. That the gesture of the body being not of the essence of the Sacrament but an indifferent thing is to be used according to the custome and constitution of that Church wherein wee live IV. He who refuseth to kneele at the receiving of the Lords Supper cannot be excused of uncharitablenesse and that both i● regard of the Church and also of the Minister of the Sacrament For First our Church having by a Canon enjoyned this posture of kneeling to be used by the Communicant he who refuseth it as an Idolatrous thing doth thereby intimate that the King and all those famous learned and pious Ministers who were assembled together in Convocation for the ordaining of orders for the uniformity of our Church were at least tainted with Idolatry or lovers of that which was meerly superstitious or else they would never have constituted such a Canon Charity the Apostle saith is not suspicious but he who refuseth this posture as supersticious doth suspect those of superstition and Idolatry who did enjoyne it and therefore is uncharitable to the Church wherein he lives Secondly our Church having by a Canon enjoyned this gesture of kneeling and threatned suspension to that Minister who shall give it to any that doth not kneele he who refuseth thus to receive it is very uncharitable to his Minister who by this his refusall is brought into a great strait that is must either dismisse and send him so refusing to kneele empty away and deny this blessed Sacrament unto him or else if the Minister doe give it to him though he kneele not doth thereby expose himselfe to the censure of suspension and the danger of loosing his living V. Kneeling is appointed by our Church not for the adoration of the Elements but for a signification of the humble and gratefull acknowledgement of the benefits of CHRIST given to the worthy receivers Archbishop Whitg answer to the admonition Page 100. And therefore none should be more reverend in their gesture at the receiving of this blessed Sacrament then those who come best prepared and most assured of true benefit and profit thereby VI. The lawfulnesse of kneeling at the receiving of these sacred Mysteries may be confirmed by this Argument Whatsoever spirituall benefits I may lawfully seeke on my knees with supplication that same J may lawfully receive on my knees with thankesgiving But I may lawfully on my knees with supplication seeke salvation by JESUS CHRIST Therefore I may lawfully receive the seales and pledges thereof on my knees Bp. Cooper If it be objected we must not kneele to an Idoll Object I answer we kneele to CHRIST Answ praysing him when we receive the holy Symboles and exhibiting instruments of his b●dy and blood and it is meere madnesse either to make them Idols as the Papists doe or call them Idols as male-contents doe VII Lastly this Sacrament of the Lords Supper is administred in our Church with a most effectuall prayer and thankesgiving and therefore what gesture can be fitter at that time then kneeling with the Elements the Minister utters these words The Body of our Lord Iesus Christ which was given for thee preserve thy body and soule c. The blood of our Lord Iesus Christ which was shed for thee preserve thy body and soule to everlasting life Drinke this in remembrance that Christs blood was shed for thee and be thankefull Now when the Minister in the behalfe of the receiver powres forth so patheticall a prayer and thankesgiving unto God how can the receiver but with his heart and upon his knees begge this at the Lords hands in his owne behalfe And thus we have heard what is required of us both in regard of the Precedent and Present time of receiving the last remaines Thirdly this Execution respects the Subsequent time and teacheth us a double duty after we have received the Lords Supper namely First we must depart and that I. With joy and thankesgiving Acts 8.8.38 39. Luke 17.17 And II. With a purpose of keeping our covenant and performing the promises of new obedience and true sanctification all the dayes of our life For the worthy and faithfull receiver who is assured that Christ died for him and offered up himselfe a sacrifice for his sinnes cannot but rejoyce hereat and breake forth in thankefulnesse unto God for so inestimable a grace and desire and endeavour to live wholly unto his Christ who hath purchased him at so deare a rate Secondly we must sanctifie that day unto the Lord whereon we have beene made partakers of this holy Communion For it is the festivall of the Lord. Jf we communicate upon the Lords day we must be very carefull to sanctifie that day strictly unto the Lord but if upon a weeke day then though we have no precept to equall it unto the Lords da yet we must not prophane that day as the manner of some is who make that day whereon they communicate a day of excesse and ryot and going from Alehouse to Alehouse And thus much may suffice to have been spoken of this Sacrament in this place Vers 29 VERS 29. But I say unto you I will not drinke henceforth of this fruit of the vine untill that day when I drinke it new with you in my Fathers Kingdome Object The Vbiquitaries object this place for the Vbiquitie of Christ arguing thus Christ saith I will not dri●ke henceforth of this fruit of the Vine untill that day when I drinke it new with you in my Fathers Kingdome But Christ often ate and dranke with his Apostles after his Resurrection and before visibly he ascended into heaven Therefore seeing he was in heaven before his visible ascension it is evident that heaven is every where and not limited or confined to any one place and consequently that Christ is not included in any determinate place but filleth all places and is every where Answ 1 First to the drift of the Objection J answer that it is true that CHRIST is every-where in regard of his Deitie but not of his Humanitie but this pleaseth not the Objecters who contend for the Vbiquitie of Christs corporall presence Secondly J could answer with some of the Fathers Answ 2 that it is true that wheresoever CHRIST is there is Heaven but

this must be understood figuratively not properly that is wheresoever Christ is there is joy and comfort and happinesse but this doth not overthrow a locall heaven the Seate of glory and the Throne of CHRIST where hee dwels in regard of his Humanity and where is the greatest manifestation of the Majesty and glory of GOD. But this pleaseth not the Objecters neither who strive to evert this locall heaven Thirdly CHRIST in these words Vntill I drinke Answ 3 it new with you doth promise a communion and participation of glory and eternally felicity unto his Apostles with himselfe For although meate and drinke doe not properly suite and agree with the Kingdome of God where wee shall neither be subject to hunger nor thirst yet it is usuall with the holy Ghost in Scripture in a figurative phrase of speech to expresse the participation and communion of Spirituall graces and Celestiall glory and felicity by corporall things And hence our Saviour speakes here of a new kinde of drinking untill I drinke it new to shew that the life which they shall have in heaven with him shall not need to bee sustained and conserved by eating or drinking but shall be an immortall and incorruptible life Fourthly it is false that these words of our Saviour Answ 4 Vntill I drinke it new with you in my Fathers Kingdome were fulfilled when hee ate and dranke with his Disciples after his Resurrection and before his visible ascension For when hee was in a middle state betweene a mortall and celestiall life then the Kingdome of God was not made manifest and therefore hee saith unto MARY Touch me not because I am not as yet ascended unto my Father the meaning of which words is this that the state of his Resurrection was not perfect and in every degree compleate and absolute untill he were seated at his Fathers right hand in the Kingdome of heaven Fifthly the Apostles were not as yet entred into Answ 5 the Kingdome of God when they ate with CHRIST after his Resurrection they being still in a mortall state And therefore this speech untill I drinke it new with you was not fulfilled when CHRIST ate and dranke with them after his Resurrection Sixthly Christ before his visible Ascension was Answ 6 not in regard of his humanity in heaven but on earth as shall elsewhere be shewed And therefore no●withstanding this Objection this truth stands firme That the name of Heaven doth declare a certaine region not seene or perceived by this visible world but concealed from it into which Christ entring with his body doth now sit at the right hand of his Father And consequently that neither heaven nor the humanity of Christ is every where Seventhly our Saviour in these words Answ 7 I will not henceforth drinke of the fruite of the vine untill I drinke it new with you in my Fathers Kingdome doth import these two things viz. I. That henceforth he will not drinke of the fruit of the earthly vine and hereby doth intimate that this shall be his last draught For as to men ready to dye is given drinke instead of a farewell so CHRIST being now about by the death of this corporall and earthly life to be changed into an heavenly condition by this draught would as it were bid his Disciples farewell II. He implies here that he will drinke new wine with them in his Fathers Kingdome Now this particular is two manner of wayes interpreted by Expositors to wit First it may be understood of his Resurrection which was the beginning of the New Testament and the Kingdome of the father And thus Chrysostome by the Kingdome of his Father understands his Resurrection and by the new wine which therein he will drinke with his Disciples understands that corporall eating and drinking of our Saviour with his Apostles after his Resurrection mentioned Luke 24.43 For thence it is evident that he ate corporally though not for any corporall necessity but onely to confirme the certainty of his Resurrection Indeed St. Luke in the place before cited mentioneth Christs eating but not his drinking but St. Peter Acts 10.40 41. saith Him God raised up the third day and shewed him openly Not to all the people but unto witnesses chosen before of God even to us who did eate and drinke with him after he rose from the dead Now by St. Peter it appeares that Christ both ate and dranke with his Disciples after his Resurrection but whether he dranke water or wine or some other drinke that is not mentioned and therefore it were a hard taske to prove that he dranke wine But grant that this which he dranke was wine and that this was the wine which in this verse he foretold that he would drinke with his Apostles then we must understand it to be called New because he dranke it after a singular new and unwonted manner that is not in shew or appearence onely but truly and really not with a phantasticall but with a true body he both ate and dranke although he were now changed into a celestiall immortall and incorruptible estate and was free from all corruptible conditions of body And thus we see if our Saviour speakes of his corporall drinking here what is meant by Kingdome what by wine and what by new wine Secondly these words of our Saviours mentioned in this verse may be and I conceive is rather to be understood of life eternall where many comming from the East and West shall sit downe and banquet with Christ Luke 13.29 For by the Kingdome of his Father is meant that Kingdome which the Elect shall enjoy after this life in Heaven and by his drinking of new wine with them is not meant any earthly drinke for there shall be no such in heaven but some celestiall liquor that is no other thing then that joy delight mirth and eternall consolation which ●fter the period of this miserable life the faithfull shall injoy ●n the celestiall Kingdome of their heavenly Father with their Lord Christ And thus which way soever we interpret these words they make nothing for the Vbiquity of the Body of Christ This verse serveth us as another Argument to confute the Popish Transsubstantiation Argum. There remained wine still after the consecration and distribution amongst the Apostles for Christ saith here That he will drinke no more of this fruit of the vine c. Therefore there remaineth wine still in the Sacrament and consequently no body or blood of Christ For Wine and Blood cannot be both there corporally and substantially as the Papstts teach VERS 30 And When they had sung an Hymne Vers 30 they went out into the mount of Olives For the understanding of this verse observe that the Booke of the Psalmes was divided according to the time when they were sung For Some were sung every morning as Psal 22. at the morning Sacrifice And One was sung upon the Sabbath day as Psal 92. And At the Passeover they sung from Psalm 112. to verse

Goe yee cursed but are also condemned unto eternall fire which is a sensible punishment Sect. 3 § 3. And he shall set the sheepe on his right hand and the goates on his left For the understanding of this phrase of the right hand and the left observe that when three are going together or sitting together he that is in the midst is in the chiefe place but he that standeth upon his right hand is in the second place he that standeth on his left hand is in the third place and in this sense we are to understand these places viz. Matthew 20.21 where the Mother of Zebedees Children desireth that one of her sonnes may sit at Christs right hand and another at his left where Christ is in the highest place and he that sits on his right hand in the second place and he that sits on the left in the third place So here He shall set the sheepe at his right hand and the goates at his left where Christ is in the highest place and the Sheepe in the second and the Goates in the third and last § 4. Come ye blessed of my Father possesse the Sect. 4 Kingdome prepared for you for I was hungry and ye fed me thirsty and ye gave me drinke sicke and ye visited me naked and ye clothed me a stranger and ye to●ke me in Why doth not the Iudge of all the World say Quest 1 Inherit the Kingdome prepared for you because you have worshipped and served God aright or because you have beleeved on him aright or because you have persevered in faith but omitting these onely reckons up the workes of mercy and charity In a word why doth the Lord here rather recite these workes of charity then others of piety or constancy in Religion even to the death First the Judge of all the World alleadgeth and Answ 1 mentioneth these workes because they were noted observed and made manifest even to the goates but the worship of God Faith and the true perseverance of the sheepe which consists in the integrity of the heart is onely knowne unto God and unknowne to the Goates The workes of mercy are more conspicuous to the eyes of the world then the workes of piety are and therefore the Lord doth rather alleadge those then these Secondly the Iudge of all the world doth rather Answ 2 mention these workes of mercy because there is nothing more naturall unto men then to doe good unto men the companions of nature Thirdly these workes of mercy are here mentioned Answ 3 because true faith is wont and ought to exercise it selfe by these principally towards her neighbour Fourthly because the workes of mercy directly Answ 4 and evidently include love and charity the Queen of all vertues Fifthly because Christ hereby would excite and Answ 5 provoke all men unto these workes of mercy seeing that they shall undoubtedly be rewarded with life everlasting verses 34 46. Sixthly the Iudge mentioneth the workes of Answ 6 mercy that the mouthes of the wicked Goates may be stopped and that it may evidently appeare how justly God denies mercy unto those who would shew none unto their brethren Seventhly that he might intimate that the estate Answ 7 of the godly is for the most part in this world full of calamity and misery and this Christ admonisheth them of lest being terrified hereby they should faint and fall under their burthen For it is the godly for the most part who are pinched and pained with hunger and thirst and persecution and the like and therefore our Saviour forewarnes them of this and warnes them to looke for this and lest they should hereby be too much discouraged he gives them a double consolation namely I. That this misery and affliction of theirs is his In as much as ye did it to them ye did it to me and hence the Apostle St. Paul cals his sufferings Christs sufferings 2. Cor. 1. and this he learnt from Christ himselfe who cryed unto him when he was going to afflict the members of Christ Saul Saul why persecutest thou me Acts. 9. And II. That the afflictions and miseries of this life shall be rewarded with life eternall Answ 8 Eighthly Carthusian in hunc locum saith the Judge of all the world alleadgeth these workes of mercy oney because the Scripture is most plentifull and copious in the commanding and commending of these workes And Answ 9 Ninthly the same Authour in the same place gives this excellent answer that Christ mentioneth onely the workes of mercy to teach us that our salvation and grace and whatsoever good thing else is in us proceeds from the mercy of God depends upon the mercy of God and is perfected by the mercy of God Carthus s Pag. 204. a. Object 1 Bellarmine produceth this place to prove the workes of charity and mercy or almes deeds to be meritorious Christ saith here Receive the Kingdom prepared for you for when I was hungry you fed me c. Therefore Almes merit eternall life Bellarm. de bon operib in particular lib. 3. Cap. 4. Answ 1 First this place proveth not that almes deeds merit heaven but it rather sheweth that Christ in mercy crowneth the charitable workes of his children heaven is given though not for their good workes yet according to their good workes And this Kingdome was prepared for them before the beginning of the world yea before they had done any almes-deeds therefore they could not merit that which was prepared for them and given them before they had done any good thing Answ 2 Secondly there is no proportion betweene the Almes which we give unto the poore and the glorious heavenly reward which God gives unto us therefore our almes-deeds cannot merit heaven Quest 2 Whether ought we to visite those who are sicke that our Saviour reckoneth up this worke amongst the rest Answ 1 First it is lawfull for Physitians to visite those who are sicke it being their profession and office to take care of such And therefore they are blame worthy who I. Will visite onely great and rich men and not poore and come onely to faire buildings not at all to poore Cottages And II. Who having skilfull Physitians neare them will neither when they are sicke send for them or unto them Secondly it is lawfull for people to visite those who are sicke if the sicknesse be not infectious and is their duty so to doe as appeares thus I. We must doe to others as we would have others doe unto us now who would not be glad to be comforted and visited by friends when they are sicke And therefore this is peoples duty one towards another And II. To visite the sicke is a Christian worke and a worke best beseeming a Christian and therefore no Christian should be a stranger unto it And III. Jt is a most equall and fitting thing to visite the sicke for who will hide his face from his owne flesh Esa 58.7 Now Christians are members of one another and