Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
kingdom_n	drink_v	fruit_n	vine_n	2,742	5	10.7149	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10777	Certe[n] godly, learned, and comfortable conferences, betwene the two reuerende fathers, and holye martyrs of Christe, D. Nicolas Rydley late Bysshoppe of London, and M. Hughe Latymer sometyme Bysshoppe of Worcester, during the tyme of their emprysonmentes. Whereunto is added. A treatise agaynst the errour of transubstantiation, made by the sayd reuerende father D. Nicolas Rydley. M.D.LVI.	Ridley, Nicholas, 1500?-1555.; Latimer, Hugh, 1485?-1555. aut; Ridley, Nicholas, 1500?-1555. Brief declaracion of the Lordes Supper. aut	1556 (1556)	STC 21048; ESTC S115941	68,037	134

Christ of his euangelists and of his Apostles that in this aforesayd controuersie the light of thy trueth by the lanterne of thy worde maie shine vnto all them that loue thee Of the Lordes laste Supper do speake especially three of the Euangelists Matt. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. 1. Cor. 10.11 Mathewe Marke and Luke But none more plainelie nor more fully declarethe the same then doeth S. Paule partelie in the 10. but especiallye in the 11. Chapiter of the firste Epistle vnto the Corinthianes As Mathewe and Marke doe agree muche in forme of woordes Soe doeth lykewise Luke and S Paule But all foure no doubte as they were all taught in one schole and enspired with one spirite so taughte they all one trueth God graunte vs to vnderstande it well Mathewe setteth forth Christes Supper thus Matthev Vuhen euen vuas comme he satt dovune vuith the 12. c. Matt. 26. As they dyd eate Ihesus tooke bread and gaue thākes brake it ād gaue it to the disciples and sayd Take Eate This is my body And he tooke the cuppe gaue thankes and gaue it to them sayng Drynke ye all of this For this is my bloud of the nevue testament that is shedd for many for the remission of sinnes I saie vnto you I vuill not drinke henseforth of this fruyte of the vyne tree vntyll that daye vuhen I shall drinke that nevue in my fathers kingdome And vuhen they had sayd grace they vuent out Marke Novve Marke speaketh it thus And as they ate Iesus tooke breade blissed and brake Marke 14. and gaue to them and saide Take eate This is my bodie And he toke the cuppe gaue thankes and gaue it them and they all dranke of it and he saide vnto them This is my bloud of the nevve testamente vvhich is shedde for manye Verelie I saie vnto you I vuil drinke no more of the fruite of the vine vntyll that daie that I drinke that nevve in the kingedome of God Here Matthew and Marke doo agree not onely in the matter but also allmost fullye in the fourme of wordes Sauing that for thies wordes in Mathew gaue thankes Marke hath one word blessed which signefieth in this place al one And wher Mathew saithe drinke ye al of this Marke saith and they all dranke of it And wher Matthew saithe of this fruyte of the vyne Marke leaueth owt the worde this and saith of the fruyte of the vyne Nowe lett vs see likewise what agrement in forme of wordes is betwixte S. Luke and S. Paule Luke Luke vuriteth thus He toke breade gaue thankes brake it and gaue it to them saing This is my bodye vuich is geuē for you This doo in remembraunce of me Likevuise also vuhen they had supped he tooke the cupp saynge Luc. 22. This cupp is the nevue testamēt in my bloud vuich is shed for you S. Paule S. Paule setteth fourthe Christes supper thus the Lord Ihesus the same night in the vuich he vuas betrayed tooke bread and gaue thankes and brake and said ● Cor. 11. Take eate this is my bodie vuiche is broken for you This doo in remembrance of me After the same maner he tooke the cupp vuhen supper vuas done saing This cupp is the nevue testament in my bloud This doo as often as ye drinke it in the remembraūce of me for as ofte as ye shall eate this bread and drinke this cuppe ye shall shevue the Lordes death tyll he comme Here wher Luke sayth which is geuen Paule saythe which is broken And as Luke addeth to the wordes of Paule spoken of the cuppe which is shedd for yow so likewise Paule addeth to the wordes of Luke this doo as often as ye shall drinke it in the remēbraunce of me The rest that followeth in S. Paule both ther and in the x. chapter perteineth to the right vse and doctrine of the Lordes supper Thus the Euangelistes and S. Paule haue rehersed the wordes and worke of Christ wherby he dyd institute and ordeine this holye Sacrament of his blessed bodye and bloud to be a perpetuall remembraunce of hym selfe vntill his comminge agayne of hym self I saye that is of his bodye geuen for vs and of his bloud shedde for the remission of sinnes But this remembraunce thus ordeined as the awthor therof is Christ both god and man so by thallmighty power of god farre passeth all kind of remembraunces that any other man is able to make either of hym self or of any other thing for who so euer receueth this holye sacrament thus ordeyned in remembraunce of Christ he receyueth therwith either deathe or lyfe In this I doo trust we all agree For saincte Paule saith of the godlie receuers in the x. chapter of his first epistle to the Corinthians 1. Cor. 10. The cuppe of blessing which we blesse is it not the partaking or felowshipp of Christes bloud And also he saieth the bread which we breake and meaneth at the Lords table is it not the partaking or felowshippe of Christes bodie Nowe the partakinge of Christes bodie and of his bloude vnto the faithfull and godlie is the partaking or felowship of life and of immortalitie And againe of the bad and vngodly receiuers S. Paule plainlie saieth thus 1. Cor. 11. He that eateth of this breade and drinketh of this cuppe vnworthily he is gilty of the bodie and bloude of the Lorde O howe necessarie then is it if we loue life and would eschewe death to trie and examine oure selues before we eate of this breade and drinke of this cuppe For els assuredlie he that eateth and drinketh vnworthilie eateth and drinketh his own damnation because he estemeth not the Lords bodie that is he receiueth not the Lords bodie with the honoure whiche is due vnto hym And yet by that whiche was saide that with the receipte of the holie Sacramente of the blissed bodie and bloude of Christ is receiued of euerie one good or badde either life or death it is not meant that they whiche are deade before God hereby maie receiue life or the liuing before God cā herby receiue deathe For as none is meete to receiue naturall foode wherby the naturall life is norished excepte he be borne and liue before so no man can feede by the receipte of this holie Sacramente of the foode of eternall life excepte he bee regenerated and borne of god before And on the other side no man her receiueth damnation whiche is not deade before God Thus hitherto withoute all doubte God is my witnes I saie so farre as I know there is no controuersie among thē that bee learned in the church of Englāde concerning the matter of this Sacramente but all doe agree whether they be newe or olde and to speake plaine and as some of them odiouslye either do call other whether they bee protestantes papistes pharisies or Gospellers And as all do agree hitherto in the aforesaide doctrine so all doe deteste the wicked herisie of the

to his disciples and that whiche he tooke brake and gaue to his disciples he sayd hym self of it This is my bodye So it appeareth plainlye that Christ called verye bread his bodye But very bread can not be his bodye in verye substāce therof therfore it muste nedes haue an other meanyng whiche meanyng appeareth plainlye what it is by the nexte sentence that followeth immediatlie both in Luke and in Paule and that is this Luc. 22. 1. Cor. 11. Doo this in remēbraūce of me wher vppon it seameth vnto me to be euidēt that Christ dyd take bread and called yt his bodye for that he wold institute therby a perpetuall remembraunce of his bodye specially of that singular benefyte of our redemptyon whiche he wold then procure and purchase vnto vs by his bodye vppon the crosse But bread retayning still his owne very naturall substance maye be thus by grace and in a sacramentall signification his bodye wheras elles the verie bread which he tooke brake and gaue them could not be in any wise his naturall bodye for that were confusyon of substances And therfore the verye wordes of Christ ioyned with the nexte sentence following bothe enforceth vs to confesse the verye bread to remayn still and also openeth vnto vs howe that bread maye be and is thus by his diuine power hys bodye which was giuen for vs. But here I remembre I haue redde in soome writers of the contrarie opinion An obiection whiche doo denye that that whiche Christ dyd take he brake For saie they after his taking he blessed it as Marcke doth speke Marc. 14. ād by his blessing he chaunged the naturall substance of the bread into the naturall substance of his bodye and so althowgh he tooke the bread and blessed it yet because in blessing he chaunged the substance of it he brake not the bread which then was not ther but onely the forme therof Vnto this obiection I haue ij playne answers Ansvuer boeth grounded vpon Godds woorde Thone I wyll here reherse thother aunsweare I will differ vntill I speake of the Sacrament of the bloude Mine aunsweare here is taken out of the plaine wordes of S Paule whiche doth manifestlie confound this phantastical inuention first inuented I wene of Pope Innocentius and after confirmed by the subtill sophister Dunse and latelye renued nowe in our daies with an eloquent stile and muche finesse of witte It is mente of a booke firste sette forth vnder the name of M. Antonius Constantius And after vuard of Ste ▪ Gard. Bishop of Vuinch But what can crafty inuention subtiltie in sophismes eloquence or finesse of witte preuaile against the infallible worde of god What nede we to striue and contēd what thing we breake for Paule saith speking vndoubtedlie of the Lordes table the breade saieth he whiche wee breake is it not the partakinge or felowshyp of the Lordes bodie Wherupō it foloweth that after the thankes geuing it is bread whiche we breake And how often in the Acts of the Apostles is the Lords supper signified by breakinge of breade They did perseuer saieth S Luke in the Apostles doctrine communion and breakyng of breade Act. 2. ibidem And againe they brake breade in euerie house And againe in an other place When they were come together to breake breade Act. 20. S Paule whiche setteth forth moste fullye in his writing boeth the doctrine and the vse of the Lordes supper and the sacramentall eatynge 1. Cor. 10.11 and drynkinge of Christes bodie and bloude calleth it fiue tymes breade breade breade breade breade The sacramentall breade is the misticall bodye The 2 reason and so is called in scripture 1 Cor. 10. as it is called the naturall bodye of Christe But Christes misticall bodye is the congregacion of Christians 1. Cor. 10. Now no manne was euer so fonde as to saye that that sacramentall bread is transubstantiated and changed into the substaunce of the congregatiō Wherfore no manne shoulde lykewise thynke or saie that the breade is transubstantiated and chaunged into the naturall substaunce of Christes humaine nature But my mynde is not here to wryte what maye bee gathered oute of scriptures for this purpose but onelye to wryte here briefelye those whyche seeme to me to be the mooste playne places Therfore contented to haue spoken thus muche of the sacramentall breade nowe I wyll speake a litle of the Lordes cuppe And this shal be my thirde argument grounded vpon Christes owne woordes The. 3. argument The naturall substance of the sacramentall wine remaineth stil and is the materiall substance of the sacramente of the bloude of Christe therfore it is likewise so in the sacramentall bread I knowe that he that is of a contrarie opinion will denie the former parte of my argumente But I will proue it thus by the plaine wordes of Christe himselfe Matt. 26. Mar. 14. both in Mathewe and in Marke Christes wordes be thus after the wordes saide vpon the cuppe I saye vnto you saieth Christe I will not drinke henseforth of this fruite of the vine tree vntill I shall drinke that newe in my fathers kingedome Here note how Christ calleth plainelye his cuppe the fruite of the vine tree but the fruite of the vine tree is very natural wine wherfore the naturall substance of the wine doeth remaine still in the sacramente of Christes bloude And here in spekinge of the Lordes cup it commeth vnto my remembrance the vanitye of Innocentius his phantasticall inuention whiche by Paules wordes I did confute before and here did promise somewhat more to speake and that is this Yf the Transubstantiacion be made by this worde blissed in Marke saide vpon the bread as Innocentius that Pope did saie then suerlie seing that worde is not saide of Christe neither in any of the Euangelistes nor in Paule vpon the cuppe there is no Transubstantiation of the wine at all for where the cause doth faile there can not folow the effecte But the sacramentall breade and the sacramentall wine do both remaine in their naturall substance alike and if the one be not changed as of the sacramētall wine it appeareth euidentlye then there is noe suche Transubstantiation in neither of them boeth All that put and afferme this change of the substaunce of breade and wine into the substance of Christes body and bloud called transubstantiation doe also saie and affirme this change to be made by a certaine forme of prescript wordes and none other but what they bee that make the chaunge either of the one or of the other vndoubtedlye euen they that do write moste finelie in these oure daies almoste confesse plainelie Vuinch in the ansvuer to the 48. obiection that they can not tell For although they graunt to certaine of the olde Soctours as Chrisostome ād Ambrose that these wordes This is my bodie are the wordes of Consecration of the sacrament of the bodie yet saie they these wordes maie well bee so