Selected quad for the lemma: kingdom_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
kingdom_n david_n israel_n judah_n 1,785 5 9.8153 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A68818 A discourse plainely prouing the euident vtilitie and vrgent necessitie of the desired happie vnion of the two famous kingdomes of England and Scotland by way of answer to certaine obiections against the same. Thornborough, John, 1551-1641. 1604 (1604) STC 24035; ESTC S107314 12,497 44

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Hellespont but as al other most mightie Gouernors and the best Kings haue by a golden bridge of likenesse of loue of equitie of lawes and of cōmon comforts of societie and ioy all which were both profitable and needfull ioyned together two or more kingdoms for their owne greater honor and subiects more vndoubted happinesse VVhich thing likewise that noble and valiant Troian Aeneas long sithence put in vse who by Vnion euen of diuers nations Omnes Liu. lib. 1. eodem nomine eodem iure Latinos vocauit And thereby as Liuie reporteth of him he made many and diuers nations as one people most familiar and most friendly together Do not diuers Sunne beames come from one Sunne and all they of one nature Are not diuers lines drawne from one Center and all they of one fashion Are not diuerse boughes from one tree and all they of one and the same substance And may not diuers people vnder one Prince though they are deuided in persons yet be vnited in lawes and though they be sundred in Countries yet be knit together in hearts specially if emulation cause no incongruitie nor disorder confusion nor strife mischiefe only with sauing each mans honor with continuance of each good custome and with furtherance and establishing the common good of weale publique The King is the countries Parent who by Vnion non seruos sed ciues cogitat and as Iupiter was said to be Rex omnibus idem so would his Maiestie be idem omnibus one head to one bodie VVherefore if he desire to vnite the two kingdomes and to account them one and as one beloued sonne whose life is deare and whose happines ioy to him that all subiects as one sonne in common apparant vtilitie might participate common patrimony of iust Lawes for VVeale publique let none be so hardie with the harlot in the daies of Salomon to say to the king our common parent Deuide the child and cut it into two parts least such diuision part that into two which God in nature first made one and now in his greater goodnesse hath restored in the royall person of our gracious King into one what God hath so ioyned together let no man put asunder For her of may arise plaine incongruitie and fearefull inconuenience which may farther grow into confusion and mischiefe Onely I pray them which obiect against the happie Vnion to set before their eyes and to consider with their hearts the grieuous contention betweene the diuers people of the kingdome of Israell and the kingdome of Iudah for albeit the two kingdoms were vnited in the person of Dauid their king yet for want of more perfect Vnion in 2. Sam. 5. lawes and loue there arose heart-burnings on both sides for Israel complained The men of Iuda haue stolne the king from vs and they of Iuda challenged that the king 2. Sam. 19. was nearer in bloud to them then to Israell and Israell againe replyed that they had ten parts in the king and therefore had more right to him But what in end grew of this cōtention and emulation consider I pray and preuent such inconuenience and mischiefe there was not any one among the Tribes in the second generation that followed the house of Dauid but Iuda onely Omen auertat 1. King 12. Deus VVhen I was but a young scholer I learned to call that aequiuocation which was corpus monstrosum vnder one name of diuerse formes as homo pictus and homo viuus agree in the name of man but not in the same reason definition and nature so I can call the agreement of English and Scottish onely in subiection to one Soueraigne but without farther Vnion of lawes and true loue not liuely and indeede but painted and in shew not substantiall but aequiuocall not reall but nominall namely in the King as in the head which is but one but not in themselues as in the bodie which likewise is or should be but one This is true incongruitie whereof may arise such farther fearefull inconuenience as I wish may be to them that hate the State and the experience thereof vnto the kings enemies Touching the particulars of confusion c. surmised by the Obiectors I briefly answer first that exception taken of summoning future Parliament is not worth answer for the stile and title of the king chaunged may change also in future VVrits Secondly the changing of Seale is onely charge of a new cut Thirdly the great old Officers of the kingdome when they yet most worthie of office do hereafter weare out the kings Maiestie shall afterward by this Vnion haue more choice to preferre the worthiest for his Maiestie by this Vnion shall gaine more choice for all the publike seruices to be performed either at home or abroade Neither may it be reasonable for any man for priuate or particular respects to repine thereat like to Cato his sonne who feared lest by his fathers Plut. Cato mariage he might leese somwhat of his patrimonie and therefore murmured lest his father should beget mo sonnes but had his answer with a sound reply vnanswerable Sonne I desire to haue moe sonnes like thy selfe good Citizens and seruiceable for the Commonweale Fourthly touching lawes customes liberties and priuiledges it is to be wished that the rigour of ours were somewhat qualified and the libertie of theirs somewhat restrained neither is it a new thing in so large a kingdome that some should be more enabled and honored with priuiledges then others according to the Kings good pleasure in whom dwelleth and from whom is deriued all true honor Fiftly the feare of residence or holding in Scotland such Courts as follow the Kings person is the selfe same as if we feared that without Vnion the King wold hold personall Courts in Cornwall or as if we doubted that such Courts when our former Kings were personally in Fraunce were not for all that kept at VVestminster The seate of iudgment is the seate of the house of Dauid thither the Tribes go vp and there the peoples feet stand euen in the gates of Ierusalem which Ierusalem is a citie that is at vnitie in it selfe at vnitie concerning matters of religion at vnitie in matters touching publike iustice and gouernment therefore the king began his Psal 122. I was glad when they said to me VVe will go c. Lastly the exception taken against Vnion because of the kings oath at his Coronation which is neuer iterated is grounded on the selfe same reason as if it were also alleaged that because his Maiestie sweareth to mainetaine auncient and fundamentall lawes therfore vpon circumstance of time and occasion he might not alter any law but let it be remēbred that the kings oath concerneth the lawes not the title and we know the lawes may be preserued thogh the title be altered And as for Subiects I doubt not but they may without danger at the pleasure of the king sweare their allegiance and do homage and obedience after restitution of