potestas judicandi non est justitia immo potest esse sine justitia ita potestas vel authoritas cognoscendi in aliqua causa potest esse sine cognitione aliqua Scot. lib. 4. dist 19. whereby they have power to make inquisition into and examine the case or the Penitent as a man that standeth by may know as much Law as he that sitteth upon the Bench although he hath not a Commission to examin the truth of a cause then in question according to his skill as the Judge hath for saith Scotus that authority whereby the Judge possesseth himself with the true information of the matter depending although it may require skill and discretion to manage the same aright even as the key of power requireth justice in the right use thereof notwithstanding as the power to judge is distinguish d from Justice and may be found where there is no justice as in Pilat so the power and authority to take cognizance of a cause may ofttimes be without any discretion or science at all as in Festus and Felix Saint Pauls Judges the gift then of knowledge and understanding is not the key but the guide thereof and the authority rightly placed when a man of understanding is in place 2. Clavis Potestatis The Second is the Authority of censuring or the key of power which we call the power of absolution consisting in the solemn denunciation of the Sentence for the former key which investeth the Priest with authority to discern Claves sunt discernendi scientia potentia judicandi i. e. solvendi ligandi usus harum Clavium 1. discernere ligandos solvendos 2. dâ—in ligare solvere Magistr l. 4. dist 18. and examine between leprosie and leprosie is but preparatory maturing onely and ripening the sinners case for sentence Judicium sumitur prout significat actum Judicis ut Judex est jus decit i. e. juridicam sententiam pronunciat Apol. pro Jure Princip pag. 173 174. final determination being the scope thereof wherein the Priest after a full notice and examination of the sinners case and comparing the same with the law of God the rule to direct his hand and key judgeth according to that law and pronounceth the sentence judicial I say as delegated from God whose Commissioner for such causes he is and proceedeth not as a Witness to give in Evidence nor as a Herauld or Crier or Pâ—rsevant to make intimation of the Magistrates decree as a Messenger onely but as a Judge though subalternate clothed with authority from Christ and Christ from his Father to give the sentence The Father saith Chrysostome hath given all power unto the â—on and I see thâ—t they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tom. 6. p. 16. the Priests to have bâ—en made partakers of all that power by the Son for witnesses discover and declare the fact and Judges proceed aâ—cording to their evidence for example whether such a Murder were committed or no the eye-witnesses are the evidence as present and observing the fact although the Magâ—strate denounce the sentence and punishment The Penitent then becomes a selfe-accuser and witness and the Priest turns the key according to Gods law whose Deputy and Steward in that case he is Nor doth this power to be a Judge contradict his office as a Minister for as Magistrates are the (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 13.4 Ministerâ— of God and bear not the sword in vâ—in so are Ministers the Magistrates of God and bear not the keys in vain But of this there will be occasion to say something in the exercise of this power whether it be judicial or no. Onely thus as the Magistrate is a temporal M n ster and the end of his power the preservation of publick peace and tranquility so is the Minister a Spiritual Magistrate to procure the salvation of souls and the enlargement of Gods kingdome and as the Magistrates sword is Terrestrial punishing evil doers and protecting such as do well so is the Ministers key Celestial binding the obstinate and loosing penitent offenders And it goeth well with Church and State when the Ecclesiastical Ministery and Civil government keep the bounds God hath set them and in truth the mutual incroachments and confusions of these two powers have been the occasions of all the alterations and combustions in Christendome For as when the roof of the Temple rent in sunder not long after followed the ruine of the Temple it self So if these two principal beams and Top-rafters the Prince and the Priest reâ—t asunder the whole frame of Christian religion will be shaken The abuse of the keys hath occasioneâ— the Câ—vâ—l Magistrate to abridg in some cases the lawful use thereof â—nâ— when the Church men began to use them like swords the Sword men seized upon them as belonging to their Regiment Know tâ—en O Priest what the inscription is that is ingraven upon thy k yâ— They are the keys of the kingdome of heaven and remember that he who gave the keys to Peter said unto the same man put up thy sword into thy sheath And let the Magistrate be afraid to draw too near unto this holy ground to handle the Câ—nser and approach unto the Altar or to Usurp upon the true function of the keys 2 Chro. 26.16 which appertain not unto them but unâ—o the Priests that are consecrated lest they participate in the judgment and leprosie of Vzziah As the Spiritual keys are of the kingdome of heaven because they open and shut the same to different offenders Revel 1.18 so are they of Death and Hell too from the dire effects thereof to such as are impenitent for Hell hath gates as well as Heaven and the same key that shutteth Heaven gates openeth Hell and where the gates of heaven are opâ—ned those of hell are shut Now heaven is opened and hell shut when a sinner is loosed and absolved in like manner hell is opened aâ—d heaven shut when a sinner is bound and his sins retained The next thing we are to consider Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth c. It had beâ—n more correspondent to the Metaphor and use of the keys to have used the termes of opâ—ning and shutting 2 Of Absolution â—ligation as did Esaias the Prophet and John the Dâ—vine but the Holy Ghost hath chosen to express this power under the words of binding and loosing Esay 22.22 Rev. 3.7 to signifie the miserable â—state of such to whom heaven is shut up as remaining bound with the cords of their own sins Nempè ut intelligamus quam misera sit conditio illorum quiâ—â—s Coelum clauditur manent enim ol stricti peccatorum vinculis Contrà verò quà m bâ—ati sunt illi quibus apertum est coelum qui scilicet à filio Dei liberati sunt sint ipsius cohaeredes Beza Annot. in Matth. 16. and contrariwise the blessed condition of those to
judgment seats But if no disease be more deadly than sin and no law hath so powerful an avenger as God it will follow no ordinance to be more acceptable and necessary than that which reconciles the lost favour of God unto the transgressors of his laws Thou then whosoever thou art that disesteemâ—st the power of God in the Ministery of his Priests be first without sin before thou cast the first stone against it and except thou beest exempted from common infirmities vâ—lifie not these Physicians It is not the least of Satans subtilties to weaken this ordinance in many mens estimations as no useful institution of God but an usurpation of the Prelates serving more to establish their tyrannie over the peoples consciences than to quiet and pacifie them and as the Priests are too supercilious to prescribe so the people may be too superstitious to observe thus the Serpent by degrees hath brought this laudable practice first out of credit and next out of use for the most part and so highly that by many transported with impudence the Priest is questioned as Moses was by the Hebrew Exod. 2.14 Quis te constituit Judicem Who hath made thee a Pâ—ince and Judge over us though his intents be onely to part the fray betwâ—xt God and the sinner and set them at peace as Moses betwixt his countrey-men And as Korah and his complices said to Moseâ— and Aaron Ye take too much upon you Numb 16.3 seeing all the congregation is holy and the Lord amongst them So is the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy traduced by our modern Schismaticks for Vsurpation Matth. 12. â—4 for Tyrannie for Lording it over Gods inheritance Are not all the Brethren Saints why do you Prelates then lift up your selves above them Saints let them be is there not principality amongst Saints as well as amongst Devils But are not all Gods people a royal Priesthood why do you Priests arrogate unto you any prerogative above your fellows to such tender ears the very name of absolution is odious and the keys themselves disliked because born cross-wise at Rome lest therefore such Monsieurs les Greffiers question us as the Scribes did our Saviour By what authority doest thou these things We will clear the coasts and evidence these disquisitions 1. what power is given unto the Priest in the matter of sin and therein whence this commission issueâ—h and to whom it is directed 2. what are the actâ— and exercises thereof and wherewithall the same is executed 3. then of the properties thereof whether the Priests sentence be absoluâ—e and infallible and whether Ministerial and judicial 4. and lastly the abuses shall be parallel'd with the positive truth and thereby measured and discerned The first grant of this power unto man Of the Power of the keys Matth. 16.19 is the promise of Christ made unto Peter under the meâ—aphor of the keys saying I will give unto thee the keys of the Kinâ—dâ—m of heaven and whatsoevâ—r thou stalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven and whatsoever thou shalt lâ—ose on earth shall be lâ—osed iâ— heaven a power of great latitude and extent equivalent in the opinion of Saint Chrysostome as to give the places on his right and left hand in his kingdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrys in Matth. 16. Tom. 2. pag. 344. whereupon that Father questioneth but answereth himself how shall Christ give the power of the keys that hath not in his hands the placing of the seats thereby also demonstrating himself to be God in conferring that property power of remitting sins which appertaineth to God onely These termes are to be opened 1. what the keys mean 2. next how they are to be used under these words of binding and loosing 3. in the third place about what they are imployed the object quicquid whatsoever 4. and lastly by whom Keys Tibi Dabo I will give unto thee For the first The holy Ghost compareth a sinners case to the estate of a person imprisoned the very termes of keys of opening and shutting seem to have relation as it were to the prison gate and the termes of binding and loosing as it were to the fetters and bonds as if sin were a prison and the case of sinners like theirs that are shut up whereupon the power given unto Christ as man Luke 4.18 was to preach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 remission or deliverance to captives And keys imply a faculty to that person to whose custody they are committed as when Eliakim was invested inâ—o Shebnahs place Esay 22.22 it is said I will lay the key of David upon his shoulder which words seem to be lent unto the Apostle and by him applied unto our Saviour Revel 3.7 These things saith he that is holy that is true he that hath the key of David he that openeth and ro man shutteth that shutteth and no man openeth with this difference the word house omitted in the latter Discrimon est quod illud videtur inferioris Ministri puta 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 idque tantùm in familia Davidis hoc supremi Gubernatoris atque quidem totius râ—gni Brightman Apocalyps cap. 3. 7. and that advisedly to distinguish betwixt the Type and the Truth Eliakim and Christ in Him resideth regal power and despotical in Eliakim Ministerial and Oeconomical onely as steward of Davids house for that room he sustained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aben Ezra Thesaurarius super domum regalem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 4 1. 1. Clavis authoritatis solius Dei 2. Clavis excellentiae solius Christi as appeareth 2 King 18. By the delivering then of this key Peter was made not a Lord over Gods inheritance but a steward of the mysteries of God for our case was thus As Adam was exiled and shut out of Paradise so are sinners from heaven and as Paradise was shut against him so was heaven against them also sin being the embargo betwixt us and heaven Now what key shall sinners find to open heaven gate God hath a commanding key who onely hath authority to forgive sin against whom it is committed and so often as a sinner is pardoned so often is heaven opened this key God keeps to himself 2. Christ hath an excellent key which openeth where no man shutteâ—h for by his merits hath this Angel of the Covenant like Peters Angel loosed our bands Acts 12.7 and set open the Prison doors enlarging the Captives and not them onely but the Palace doors Heb. 10.19 Sanguis Christi clavis Paradisi Tert. for by the bloud of Jesus we have boldness to enter into the holiest and elegantly it was said by Tertullian his bloud is the key of Paradise 3. The Apostles had an Oeconomical key as stewards in the Lords house for in Princes Courts the key is the ensign of that Office because unto their trust is committed the Ministery of Reconciliation 3. Clavis Ministerii of this key Saint
unto the Priest And for that confession prerequireth forgiveness of sin according to the more probable opinion by an antecedent sorrow and by reason whereof sin is never forgiven by confession but is presupposed by it Thou wilt reply how Biel speaketh of actual confession and not of potential or the purpose and resolution in the heart to confess which is ever concomitant with contrition I answer Holy vows and purposes not reduced into act are in themselves of no worth but in case where they shall earnestly be endeavoured to be put in act and to be effected but the ability being wanting or disappointed by some greater power then they are taken for the deed and a faithful promise of confession is as good as confession it self Here when a Priest is at hand there needs no such vow or purpose there being no likelyhood the same should be crossed or intercepted this actual confession then supposeth none that is promissory I desire therefore this popish block may no more be cast in the way 2. Nâ—cessitas Finis Ends prescribed in popish shâ—â—ft unnecessary Other ends then may be excogitated and for them confession may be thought a necessary mean for sure the shoe wâ—ll not fit this foot the Question is indeed and upon this occasion proposed by the Master of the Sentences If it be demanded why Confession should be necessary Ad quid confessio necessariâ— cùm in contritionâ— jam deletum sit peccatum Resp 1. per conf ssionem intelligit Sacerdos qualiter debeat judicare de crimine 2. per eam peccator fit humilior cautior Lomb. l. 4. dist 17. Sect. ult since the sin already is blotted out by Contrition In answering to that demand he flies to other ends 1. As to inform the Priest of the nature of the offence and what he is to judge thereof but there can be no great end of that information when the sin is cancelled for why should another man remember when God hath forgotten it 2. And to make the sinner more humble and more cautelous Conduce it may somewhat this way but there are better texts for those themes and auricular Confession left out some inducements these but no ncessary prescriptions Furthermore saith Gabriel If we will narrowly and circumspectly listen unto the virtue of Confession Si funditùs atten â—â—mus viâ—tutem Conf ssionis ipsa non est instituta sâ—ltem in actu tanquam necessaria remissioni pâ—ccatorum sed hanc praesupponit sâ—d propter tria institâ—ta est 1. sc ut Peccator innotescat Ecclesiae tanquam absolutus 2. ut certa satisfactioÌ„ per quam poena peccati tollitur à Confessore imponâ—tur 3. ut poenae pars virtute Sacramentalis absolutionis remittatur Gab. Biel. ib. it was not instituted at least in act as necâ—ssary for the forgiveness of sin but that it supposeth but it was ordained for three other purposes 1. that the sinner might appear unto the Church to be absolved 2. That a certain satisfaction might be imposed by the Confessor whereby the punishment of sin may be taken off 3. and that a part of the punishment might be remitted by Priestly absolution Grave considerations and weighty sure but the scales must then hang at Rome to weigh them in else with us on this side of the Alpes they will be found lighter than vanity it self and in Biels own judgment imposition of penance the second reason is not so necessary to a discreet Penitent that c n allot himself a just portion for his sin yea absolution saith he may be injoyned without any imposition of penance at all Non videtur necessarium praesertim ubi consitens non indiget infâ—â—mâ—tione poena quae hic non solvitur solvetur in futuro fient queque tales salvi sed non nisi per igâ—em Gab. ib. as he saith if the Penitent will run the hazard of Purgatory and not make payment here but defer till then where the utmost pardon shall be exacted And in truth prescription of penance is the principal mark aimed at in Popish shrift and satisfaction the choicest imployment where Penitents are taught more to rely upon that reed and arm of flesh than upon him that dyed upon the Cross Like the Ambassadours of Ptolomaeus and Cleopatra who acknowledged in their Masters name Plus eos S. P. Q. R. quà m parentibus ejus quà m Diis â—mmortalibus debere per quos obsidione miserrimâ liberati essent regnum propè amissum recepissent Tit. Livius lib. 45. Sect. 13. that their Countrey was more bound to the Senate and people of Rome for their deliverance from a miserable siege and for the restitution of their kingdome in danger to be lost than to their own dear Parents yea than to the immortal Gods Let I say their actions be scanned and their intentions thereby discerned and when these ends are resolved to be necessary let confession be decreed to be so also 3. Necessitas Praecepti But what say you to the third necessity which is of Precept and Command Indeed Divine precepts should not be questioned but observed Let there be shewed any mandamus from heaven with a peremptory command for Confession upon such conditions and we submittimus fasces will yield the Bucklers as extremely loth to espouse any contrary opinion to the express word of God Therefore speak Lord for thy servants would gâ—adly hear The Lord hath said indeed Except a man be born again of water and of the Spirit but no where Except a man repent and be shriven by a Priest he cannot enter into the kingdome of God This is it the School-men and Jesuites have sought for narrowly Quod Cajetanus in Commentariis super hunc locum asserit institutionem Sacramenti Poenitentiae indè haberi non praeceptum certissimè fallitur Canus Relect. de Poenit. pag. 899. and are yet to seek And how well they have found it in these words whose sins soever ye remit c. hath in part been discussed and Cajetan saith but is checked for so saying that the institution of repentance may there be found but no precept A late Sorbonist hath found another Precept Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart Tout homme qui a perdula grace est tenu obliegé de droit divine de la recouvrer attendu que pas commandment express il est tenu d'aimer Dieu de tout son Cour Diliges Dominum c. Or celui qui n'a point la grace n'aime point son Dieu l'homme pecheur est privé de cete grace il est donc tenu de la recouvrer il la recouvre en confessant ses pechez au Prestre Pierre Bess Caâ—esme Tom. 2. p. 723. A Paris 1628. c. But how is Auricular confession concluded here marry thus The man that hath lost the grace of God is by Gods law obliged to recover the same for so much as by the commandment
God and in that respect may all other sins be venial too as capable of Divine mercy So venial sin hath no prerogative that way nor may for that cause be justly exempted from auricular Confession For reserved cases wherin sins of the greater magnitude are made over to the Pope and whereby they shut up the kingdom of heaven before men without being opened by a golden key we have little to say save considering the great expences tedious journies continual delaies whereby much treasure was exhausted forth of this Land and many of the better sort of the Inhabitants made slaves we are to bless our God that this Antichristian yoke is cast off the tyrannie overthrown and our selves delivered from a more than Egypâ—ian servitude And while the matter was proposed and scan'd at Trent Rom non esse perspicuae veritatis à nullo Patrum mentionem ejus factam immò Durandum Gersoneni Cajetanum magni nominis viros affirmare non peccata sed censuras modò Pontificis judicio reservatas Colonienses Theologi affirmantes neminâ—m ex antiquis Scriptoribus reservationis mâ—minisse nisi in casu publicorum peccatorum certè haereticos eos accusare tanquâ—m pecuniarum aucupes Hist Concil Trid. l. 4. p. 283. the Divines of Lovain objected that it was not a point of evident verity mentioned not by one of the Fathers that Duâ—and Gerson and Cajâ—tan affirmed not sins but censures to be resâ—rved for Papal Judicature The Divines of Colen added how none of the ancient Writers mentioned Reservation but in case of publick sins and that the Hereticks would for certaine accuse them for contriving how to squeeze and empty mens purses and coffers So then if those men that stand so much for detection of all sins unto the Priest have made so bold as to cut off the two extremes vâ—z the greatâ—st and the least offences I see no reason but that we may use the like liberty Auricular's Câ—nsâ—ssiâ— prout in Ecclâ—sia Rom. usurpatur niâ—â—l sâ—rè â—st â—l uâ— qâ—â—m â—â—â—â—culâ—m ad hominâ—m sâ—creta arcana â—xâ—isâ—â—nda artificiosè contextam Quod quidâ—m non sit ut aegrès Mâ—dâ—cina vulâ— ratis câ—nsciâ—ntiis opobâ—lsâ—â—â—â— contritis solâ—tium solidum adhiberi possâ—t 〈◊〉 ut auâ—um argâ—ntum in lè conflâ—nâ—uâ— omâ—iaâ— ad ipsoâ—um lucâ—um convertantur Mason de Minister Anglic. lib. 5. c. 12. but upon far more likely and better reasons I shall conclude these exceptions with the saying of an able Divine at home Auricular Confession as it is used in the Church of Rome is almost nothing else but a Net artificially woven to fish after and comprehend the secret and hidden things of men nor is it so used as to afford Physick to the diseased or pretious balme for wounded consciâ—nces or sure comfort for broken and contrite hearts but thereby to compass Gold and Silver and to convert all into their own purses There are some Stories or rather superstitious Lies as Sir Tho Mâ—ore calls them devised to uphold this doctrine The one is of a Woman who having committed adultery could never in eleven years space be brought to utter the same in any Confession Two Priests whereof one was the Popes Penitentiary and another as holy as he Ad quamlibet expressionem unius pâ—â—cati Buho exibat de ore ejus Illi Bubones cum uno alio majoris enoâ—mioris formae turmâ—tâ—m ingrâ—ssâ— sunt in os mâ—licris ventrem coming into those parts and both being in the Church about their Priestly affaires the woman approached to the Penitentiary to be shriven at every sin she confessed the other Priest standing within view but not within hearing saw an Owle flutter out of her mouth and after the flight of many Owles she stopped it seemeth at her concealed sin and was no sooner absolved of the rest confessed by her and risen up then the same Priest saw all those Owles reenter into her mouth with another more ugly than any of the former The Priests proceeding onwards in their journey the one told unto the other what he saw The Penitentiâ—ry guessed that the woman had kept back some sin in Confession Spec. exâ—mplor d. 9. Sect. 31. Quo libro miraculorum monstra saepiùs quà m vera miracula legas Can. loc Theol l. 11. c. 6. pag. 540. Dist 3. Sect. 46. De omnibus pâ—ccatis quae modò protuli et quae non protuli culpabilem mâ— fateor coâ—am Deo vobis he returned therefore but at his return found her suffocated and dead to whom her soul appear'd tortured in a fearful manner and all for burying of that sin in silence and being questioned by the Penitentiary for what sins those of her sex were usually damned For Fornication said she wanton dressing and Painting and for shame in not confessing Hereby it is intimated that Confession en partie is of no validity and one sin concealed hinders all the rest from pardon But another Woman though faulty in the same kind yet had better success of whom the relation passeth thus She was otherwise very religious but in her younger dayes had fallen into a sin of that nature as she could not for shame utter the same unto the Priest but used to conclude Of all the sins which I have opened or not I confess my self to be guilty before God and you and could never be brought to specifie the same after her death and before her burial she revived and spake to this effect that she had committed one sin which for shame she could not confess but with many tears was wont to utter the same before the Altar and image of the blessed Virgin Coram ipsius altari vel imagine and desire her intercessions that she might not be damned for this concealed sin and told withall that after her death she was seised on by evill spirits Constituit in S. ecclesia nominem sine confessione salvari posse but rescued by the blessed Virgin and by her means to her Son restored from death to life to confess and be assoyled of that sin which was no sooner performed but she again yielded up the ghost Here three Popish tenets are confirmed at one blow 1. necessity to confess every sin 2. worshiping of Saints and 3. before Images and their Altars As this woman made her confession at the blessed Virgins altar so Gregory Turonensis relateth that Clotharius King of France confessed his sins at Saint Martins shrine Clotharius ad Sepulcrum Sancti Martini cunctas actiones quas fortassè negligenter egerat replicans orans cum grandi gemitu ut pro suis culpis B. Confessor Domini misericordiam exoraret Hist lib. 4. Sect. 21. and became an earnest suiter to that Confessor to become a mean for mercy for him but whether Saint Martin took that course with that Prince as the blessed Virgin did with her penitent to send him back after death to be shriven by a Priest or tendred
the kingdome of heaven against men by their wicked and adulterine expositions of the Law folding up the prophesies lest the people should read Christ therein and believe maliciously detaining the key of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophyl in Luc. 11. and not opening the Gates of the Law that is the obscurity thereof as Theophylact noteth So the good Scribes praise in the Gospel is to open to his hearers by preaching of the word the door of faith Acts 14.26 unlocking as it were the kingdome of heaven unto them by giving knowledge of salvation unto his people by the remission of sins Luke 1.77 79. to give light unto them that sit in darkness and in the shadâ—w of death and to guide our feet into the wâ—y of peace for to whom doctrine and instruction is committed that man hath the key of knowledge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophyl suprà saith Theophylact. The key of knowledge is the authority of teaching saith Lyra by which the true understanding lying inwardly hid ought to be opened Clavis Scientiae est authoritas docendi per quam dâ—bet intellectus latens interiùs aperiri ipsi è contrario claudebant perversè inâ—erpretando Lyra in Luc. 11. and they on the contrary did shut it up by perverse interpretation Upon the point then to shut up the kingdome of heaven is to handle the word of God deceitfully or not at all and Christs woe unto you Lawyers which take away the key of knowledge is equivalent with Saint Pauls woe unto me if I preach not the Gospel And this key is truly turned when the word is duly applied 2. Prayer The next means ordained by God for procuring remission of sins and wherein the Minister doth exercise his function is Prayer Jam. 5.14 15. Is any sick amongst you saith Saint James let him call for the Eldeâ—s of the Church and let them pray over him anointing him with oyl in the Name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith shall save the sick and the Lord shall raise him up and if he have committed sins they shall be forgiven him And as the chains fell off from Peters hands upon the prayers and intercessions of the Church Acts 12.6 so the Angel of the Covenant toucheth a Penitents soul and the bonds of sin are released upon the prayers of the Presbyters Saint Chrysostome informes us that Priests do not onely exercise this power of forgiveness of sins when they beget us again in Baptisme 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tom 6. pag. 17. but after the administration thereof that power of remitting sins continueth in them and for proof of that continuance he alleageth that former passage of Saint James and thereupon inferreth that Priests forgive sins not by teaching and admonishing onely but by helping us with their prayers Aug. de Bapt. contr Donat. l. 3. c. 17 18. And Saint Augustine maketh this one special way whereby the power of the keys is exercised in remitting sins and to this end he adviseth offenders to do publick Penance that the Church may pray for them Agite-poenitentiam qualis agitur in Ecclesia ut oret pro vobis Ecclesia Aug. hom 49. ex 50. and impart the benefit of absolution unto them and that which hath already been alleged from Leo Qui pro delictis Poenitentium precator accedit Leo in fine Epist 80. ad Episcop Campan that confession of sin is to be tendred to the Priest who cometh in as an intreater for the sins of the Penitent And that of Ambrose but lately quoted Isti rogant Divinitas donat humanum enim est obsequium sed munisicentia supernae est potestatis Ambr. de S. Spiritu l. 3. 19. The Priests intreat but the Deity bestoweth the service is from man but the bounty from an higher power And his reason is sound because it is the Holy Ghost onely that forgiveth sins by their function and none can send the Holy Ghost but God and stand he doth not at the Priests command but intreaty In the Schools two not of the meanest rank Alexander Halensis and Bonaventure are clear of opinion Alex. Hal. in sum part 4. Qu. 21. memb 1. that the power of the keys extendeth to remission of sins by way of intercession onely and deprecation not by imparting any immediate absolution whereof the later giveth reasons why the form thereof is deprecative and indicative Secundum quod ascendit habet se per modum inferioris supplicantis secundum quod descendit per modum superioris judicantis secundum primum modum potest gratiam impetrare ad hoc est idoneus secundum posteriorum modum potest Ecclesiae reconciliaâ—e ideò in signum hujus in forma absolutionis praemittitur oratio per modum deprecativum subjungitur absolutio per modum indicativum deprecatio grâ—tiam impetrat absolutio gratiam supponâ—t Bonav l. 4. d. 18. art 2. Qu. 1. for that by the former he looketh upward and ascendeth unto God by prayer and as a suppliant obtaineth grace and pardon by the second he reconcileth to the Church and for a sign and demonstration hereof to the form of absolution there is prayer premised by way of request then followeth the absolution it self by way of recognition the prayer begging for grace and the absolution supposing the same to be obtained And the ancient method or form of Divine Service observed in the absolving of a person excommunicate was first to repeat a Psalme or say the Lords Prayer Primò dicat aliquem Psalmum seu orationem Dominicam secundò dicat Salvum fac servum tuum Deus meus sperantem in te Vâ—rs Domine exaudi oâ—ationem meam Râ—sp Et Clamor meus ad te veniat Vers Dominus vobiscum Râ—sp Et cum Spiritu tuo Oratio Deus cui proprium est misereri semper parcere suscipe deprecationem nostram ut hunc famulum tuum quem excommunicationis catena constringit miseratio tuae pietatis absolvat per Christum Dominum nostrum Dein dicat Ego te absolvo c. Sum. Angel verb. absolutio 3. 1. secondly O Lord save thy servant which putteth his trust in thee Vers O Lord hear my prayer Ans And let my cry come unto thee Vers The Lord be with you Ans And with thy spirit The Prayer O God whose property is ever to have mercy and to forgive receive our humble petition that this thy servant whom the chain of excommunication bindeth the pitifulness of thy great mercy may absolve through Christ our Lord. Then say I absolve thee from the bond of excommunication in the name of the Father c. And accordingly in the new as well as ancient rituals of the Latin Church the form of absolution is expressed in the third person deprecatively as if it proceeded from God and not indicatively in the first person as if