Selected quad for the lemma: king_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
king_n write_v year_n yorkshire_n 31 3 11.3689 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A54680 The ancient, legal, fundamental, and necessary rights of courts of justice, in their writs of capias, arrests, and process of outlary and the illegality ... which may arrive to the people of England, by the proposals tendred to His Majesty and the High Court of Parliament for the abolishing of that old and better way and method of justice, and the establishing of a new, by peremptory summons and citations in actions of debt / by Fabian Philipps, Esq. Philipps, Fabian, 1601-1690. 1676 (1676) Wing P2002; ESTC R3717 157,858 399

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

be made In the seventeenth year of the Reign of King Edward the second a nihil habet being returned by a Sheriff upon a Distringas in wast a Capias was awarded by the Justices of the Court of Common Pleas against the defendant And that if a Sheriff return upon a pone a Tarde that the VVrit came so late unto him as he could not execute it and it be averred that the VVrit came time enough or that the Party was present and might be attached the Sheriff was to be amerced Personal Actions saith the Mirrour of Justice so much admired by Sir Edward Coke have their introductions by Attachments of their Bodies real by Summons and mixt actions By Summons and after by Attachment in personal Action And in the same Kings Reign if a Religious man Professed had forsaken the house and become vagrant a VVrit upon a Certificate of the Abbot or Prior issued out of the Chancery to the Sheriff to take him In the eight year of the Reign of King Edward the third presentatio facta fuit apud Lincolne contra Thomam de Carleton sub Vicecomitem Indictatum de extorsionibus aliis malefactis inter alia quod mittit homines arrestatos pro debitis in ergastulum strictum fetidum inter latrones quousque finem fecerint cum illo pro deliberatione sua extra c. Contra formam statuti plurima alia pro quibus fecit finem cum Rege postea pardonatur per breve domini Regis eo quod invenit Regi in guerra sua Scotiae tres homines armatos duos Hobelarios Thomas de Carleton under Sheriff of the county of Lincolne was indicted at Lincoln for several Extortions and Misdemeanors and amongst other things for that he did put such as were Prisoners and arrested for Debt in a close and loathsom Prison amongst Theeves until they gave him mony for their better accomodation against the form of the Statute and did commit many other Misdemeanours for which he paid a Fine to the King and was pardoned for that he furnished the King in his VVars in Scotland with three armed men and two Hoblers or common Soldiers By an Act of Parliament made in the 18 year of the Reign of the same King a Capias is to be awarded against such as not having wherewithal to live do refuse to serve 22. Ed. 3. It was held for Law that upon a Judgment obtained for Debt or Damages the Body of the Defendant might be taken in execution and by the opinion of Thorpe and Basset Judges where conusance of Pleas is granted there are also granted all things necessary unto it as to proceed by way of Capias Distresse c. And it was in those times agreed to be Law that the Judges have Power by Word of Mouth to command a Defendant to be Attached and that he that Bailed a man might by the Law without Process Arrest or take the partie Bailed and bring him into the Court. All which put together and brought to a due consideration with the small or no difference which is betwixt a Pone and a Capias as to the Attaching and Compelling of Defendants to appear in the Tenor and antiently practised and yet intended use of it may be enough to Rescue us from the imputation of Error or presumption if pace tanti viri we shall take that which hath been said in Sir Will. Herberts case by Sir Edward Coke in his third Reports that the Body of a Defendant in an Action of debt was not subject or lyable to an execution before the Statute made in the 25th year of the Reign of King Edward the third to be no more than an opinion built upon a great mistake for that Statute was not made only to give Process of Arrest by Capias upon a nihil habet or non est Inventus upon a Pone or a nihil habet or non est Inventus returned upon a Distringas by a Sheriff because it was so before by the Common Law of England it being altogether improbable that those who had Lands or any visible Estate in Goods or Chattels were before the making of that Statute always Resident or did never hide or absent themselves for Debt or some other Actions to avoid a Summons or some Arrest or compulsory way to bring them into Courts of Justice to answer and give satisfaction unto such as had cause to complain of them or that those who had no Lands or Goods were always to be free and exempted from any restraint or arrest of their Bodys upon actions of Debt or for any other matters commenced against them But was intended only to have Process to the Exigend and Utlary which could not be without a Write of Capias in Actions of Debt detinue of Chattels and taking of Beasts per Capias Exigend selon retourne du vicecount come home use en breifs daccompt by Capias and Exigen● according to the return of the Sheriff as was used in Writs of accompt and being at the petition of the Commons in Parliament priont les Commons the King as the record it self witnesseth did answer I l plese ou Roy que ainsi soit quil soit mys en Estatut it pleaseth the King that it should be so and that it be put or formed into a Statute And the reason of that petition of the Commons in Parliament to the King which introduced and procured that Act of Parliament many Acts of Parliament and good Laws in the former Ages being usher'd in and obtained by the Petitions of the Commons in Parliament to their King and Sovereign may in all probability seem to be for that they did not think either the former Process of the Law by Summons Pone Distringas or Capias to be severe or sufficiently coercive or so powerful to bring a Defendant to Justice as the fear of an Utlary which in the Saxons times were so Terrible as he that was outlawed was accompted to be a Friendless or Lawless man and was afterwards so formidable to those that by the contempt of the Laws incurred in the forfeiture of their Liberties Goods Chattels Profits of their Lands and Benifits of the Laws as it might well be believed every man would be careful to avoid so great a danger and trouble And therefore in the eighteenth year of the Reign of that King being but seven years before the making of that Statute it was deemed to be for the good of the People to have it declared by Act of Parliament in what cases process of Exigend and Utlary should be that is to say against such as received the Kings Wool or Mony and detained it such as transported Wool not Cocquetted or without Custom against Conspirators and Confederates of quarrels such as commited Ryots and brought in false mony if they could not be found or brought in by Attachment or Distress and not
should in such a case have a Writ de ldempuitate nominis as had been in time past And in the 38th year of that Kings Reign whereas many People were grieved and Attached by their body in the City of London at the Suit of the People of the same City surmising to them that they be Debtors and that they Prove by their Papers whereas they have no Deed or Tally It was assented that men may wage their Law upon Debts due upon such Papers And the Right use of that Act of Parliament of 25. F. 3. cap 17. did from time to time receive its Allowance and Approbation by several Acts of Parliament made by our Kings and Princes from the makeing of that Act until that never to be enough deplored infatuation and unruly Giddiness of a rebellious part of the Nation betwixt the year 1641 and his Majesties happy return in the year 1660. As by an Act of Parliament made in the first year of the Reign of King Richard the 2 it was enacted that Prisoner upon judgments given in any of the Kings Courtss of Justice should not be suffered to go at large that a fained confession of a Debt due to the King should not delay anothers Execution And that Priests should not be arrested doing Divine service And in the second year of that Kings Reign being but about 27 years after the making of that Statute of 25 E. the 3. to proceed to Utlary by way of Capias in Actions of Debt Robert de Hauley Esquire being Arrested upon an Action of Debt and upon his Escape pursued into Westminstar Abby Church where he took Sanctuary was in a Tumult in the Church Slain at the High Altar when the Priest was Singing high Mass and the offence and breach of Priviledg as it was then pretended to be complained of in Parliament by the Arch Bishop of Canterbury and the rest of the Prelates and Clergy who prayed that due Satisfaction and amends might be made of so Horrible a fact It was opposed by the Lords and Commons who Vouched records and called to witness the Justices and others that were Learned in the Laws of the Land that in the Church of England It hath not been accustomed that the offenders flying to a Church ought to have Immunity for Debt or Trespas or other cause whatsoever except for crime only and certain Doctors of Divinity Canon and Civil Laws being thereupon examined and sworn before the King himself to speak the plain truth said upon mature and sound deliberation that in case of Debt account or Trespass where a man is not to loose Life or Member no man ought to have Immunity in holy Church and said further in very high expressions that God saving his perfection and the Pope saving his holiness nor any King or Prince can grant such a Priveledge and that if the King should grant such a one the Church which is and ought to be favoured and nourished ought not to accept of it whereof offence or occasion of offence may arise for it is a Sin and occasion of offence saith the Record to delay a man willingly from his Debt or the just recovery of the same And so little did that great affray complaint of a then Powerful Clergy for that breach of Priveledge the trouble of the King and Parliament therein perswade our forefathers to any dislike of the way of proceedings by way of arrest by Capias or Utlary thereupon as at another Parliament holden in the same year for the avoiding of debtors withdrawing themselves and Flying into Places of Churches Priviledged It was ordained by the King upon the Petition of the Commons in Parliament that in such cases after the Creditor had brought an Action of debt and procured a Capias to be thereupon awarded and the Sheriff returned that he could not take the defendant because of places of Priviledge another Writ should be made with Proclamation to be made at the gate of such Priviledged place by five Weeks continually every Week once that such person render himself And the Succeeding Kings were so careful not to suffer particular grievances to disappoint the effects of good Laws made for the generality of the People As by a Statute made in the first year of the Reign of King Henry the fifth it was ordained that in every original Writ of Actions personal upon which an Exigend shall be awarded the names of the defendants and their additions shall be mentioned And by another made in the 7th year of the said Kings Reign upon the Petition of the Commons as the Statute witnesseth like process for the common profit of the Realm saith the preamble of that Statute shall be had in Writs of forging of Charters or evidences by Capias and Exigend as in Trespass By a Statute made in the 23 year of the Reign of King Henry the sixth Sheriffs shall take Bonds securities or sureties for the appearance of such as be Arrested except upon Writs of Execution Capias utlegatum or excommunicatum By a Statute made in the 19th Year of the Reign of King Henry the 7th because there have been great delays saith the Preamble of that Act like Process is given in Actions of the Case as in Actions of Trespas or debt By an Act of Parliament made in the sixth year of the Reign of King Henry the eighth Proclamation shall be awarded to give notice unto him that dwelling in one County shall be sued to an Exigend in another By a Statute or Act of Parliament made in the three and twentith year of his Reign because there are many delays in Actions of Annuity for that Process of Utlary saith that Act doth not lie like Process was granted by the King in Writs of Annuity as was formerly used in accompt Writs of Capias Exigent and Outlawry were allowed in Wales by a Statute made in the 34th year of the Reign of the aforesaid King And two several Statutes the one made in the 1. year and the other in the 5th year of King Edward the 6th taking notice that for want of such Proclamations many of the persons Inhabiting in Wales Lancashire Cheshire or Chester were without knowledg or cause of Suit wrongfully and unjustly Outlawed to their utter undoing did without abrogating the Right use of the proces of Utlary ordain that upon every Writ of Exigend against any Persons Inhabiting in every of the said Counties or Places Proclamations shall be made and awarded directed to the Sheriffs of the several Counties where the defendants inhabit do give notice thereof By an Act of Parliament made in the fifth year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth three several VVrits of of Capias with Proclamations with the Penaltie of 20l a time shall be awarded against an Excommunicate person that cannot be taken by the Sheriff upon the Writ of Capias excommunicatum granted out of the Chancery By a Statute
by discountenancing the present Laws to loosen the bonds of government to the end that all disorder and confusion might breake in upon him And in his answer to the above mentioned 19. propositions sent unto him by both houses of Parliament the 2. of June 1642. Declared unto them that those that had the conduct of that affair thought fit to remove a troublesome rub out of their way viz. the Law to the end they might undermine the very foundation of it Which every day after grew more and more visible when they being called together to council and advise him could not by their Votes which they would make as binding and obligatory as if they were Laws made and established by their Soveraign wrest and take from him the Militia or Sword wherewith he should protect and defend his people took it to be not a little advantagious to their purposes to ravel and dislocate the method and proceedings of his Laws and Justice By which his Throne was established that by overturning the long approved Laws and Customs of the Kingdom upon which the best Monarchy in the World was built they might open a passage to let in that gain and Anarchy which they aimed at which being once made known to their Emissaries and so much encouragement given by their members of that which was then untruly called a Parliament who rather then fail of Petitions unto them from the sons of Zerviah and Shimei out of every Countrey City Corporation and Market Town caused Printed Bills to be affixed upon the Posts and Corners of the Streets in London whose multitudes of Inhabitants in Masters Apprentizes Tapsters and other Illiterate and Vulgar kind of people could readily afford them good store of such as had been borne or lived in every County City and Corporation of England and Wales to give a meeting at a place appointed to some Members of Parliament for the framing of Petitions unto it And thus the Hounds being uncoupled and let loose to chase the Royal Hart and the Presbyterian Ministers like Huntsmen busied in the ha loo lo ho ha loo loo so ho. Whooping and following to cheer and set them on and busying themselves to remove all things that might hinder the pursuit of their Petitions for the presenting whereof Pulpit Granado men were employed to procure them to be brought with 100 or 200 or more of the factious on Horseback with the Petitions ready printed or Tackt to their Hats or Hatbands with Swords by their sides The London Porterswere set on to Petition against the Militia when they were only told it was against the Watermen for carrying Trunks and other Burdens by Water And a Schoolmaster at Stamford was so wickedly Ingenious as to make his Boyes subscribe a Petition to that Parliament against Episcopacy as if their Parents had actually done it In the mean time the Diurnals News Books and seditious Pamphlets the Stationers Arrowes and Artillery were day by day shot to wound him and incense the people against him and some of the Parliament men were heard to say That they could not do their work without them And the design was carried on so prosperously as too many thought their time best of all bestowed to pull down or take in pieces either all our old Laws or such a part of them as might not only undermine the frame and constitution of the Monarchy but innovate and introduce so much of their own Modells and Inventions as might either directly lead to a republique or some new devices of Anarchy A Book called the pollution of University Learning printed in 1642. Marched in the van together with another Book called the Observator and his Jesuitical principles Quod efficit tale est magis tale and that the King was singulis Major but universis Minor and those kind of Engines were greatly incouraged in their attempts by a Book of Junius Brutus his vindiciae contra Tirannos translated out of Latine into English to infect the people with Treasonable Doctrines And a Book intituled Maxims Vnfolded That the Election of the Kings of England ought to be by the consent of the people The Royal and politique power in all Causes and over all persons is properly the Parliament The Oath of Supremacy binds not in Conscience to the King against the Parliament but the Pope And another book written by Mr. William Prynn an utter Barrister of Lincolnes Inne Entituled the Soveraigne power of Parliaments and Kingdoms Printed at London in the year 1643. Wherein with heaped quotations and much Learning and reading the wrong way he was willing to invite his Readers to believe that the Court of Parliament had a lawful power to question the Kings Patents Charters Commissions Proclamations Grants Warrants Writts and Commandments whether they be legal and to Cancell and repeale them that be illegal or mischievous and onerous to the subject not only without but against his consent It is lawful for the people submitting themselves to prescribe the King and his successors what Laws they please the Sheriffs of every County were antiently elected by the Freeholders and had power to raise the Militia that the Navy Ammunition Armes and Revenue of the King though they be in his possession are the Kingdoms That Kings and their great Officers Counsellors and Justices were at the first created and elected by the people that the King hath an absolute Negative voice in the passing of Bills of common right and Justice for the publique good that the Parliaments present necessary defensive war is just and lawfull both in point of Law Divinity and Conscience and no Treason or Rebellion the Parliament hath a right and Jurisdiction to impose Taxes and Contributions upon the subjects for defence of the King in case of the King his wilfull absence or Arming against them Seconded by a Book entituled Lex Rex written as believed by one Rutherford a Scottish Divine Printed at London by John Field and published in the year 1644. By the then usurped authority wherein he falsly endeavoured to maintaine against all the grounds and fundamentals of Law and Religion That Kings and their Families have no calling to the Crown but only by the people Royalty is not transmitted from Father to Son if the people may limit the King they give him the power who is the servant of the people both objectively and subjectively and is inferiour unto them who cannot make away their power but do retain the fountain power of making a King that to swear non self preservation and to swear self Murther is all one The King is a Fiduciary Life-Renter not a Lord or Heritor the conscience of the people is immediately subordinate to God not to the King mediatly or immediately the Judges are the immediate Vicars of God not of the King The Parliament hath more power then the King The Crown is the Patrimony of the Kingdom not of him who is King or of his Father The Parliament
Officina Justitiae place and work-house of Justice Lex Terrae as it was in the year 1641. alleaged to have been by the then House of Commons in Parliament Take away a considerable part of the rights and priviledges of Parliaments Nobility Peerage and Parliament Men. And the Liberties not only of them but many of the Gentry and men of great Estates in the Kingdom some of them very largely extended in the Executing of Process and returna brevium by the Charters of our Kings and Princes or a long prescription have been granted or permitted and vested in them and their Ancestors and Predecessors and in 52 counties of England and Wales may after an account but of 20 in a county one with another amount to no less than one Thousand and of the Lords also of Mannors in their court Barons which according to the computation but of three hundred Mannors and court Barons in every of the said Counties one with another will in all probability make a total of fifteen Thousand and six Hundred if not a great many more which the Commons in Parliament in the 33. year of the Raign of King Henry the VI. were so unwilling to have invaded by the then undue practise of Attournys as they did Petition the King for the Love of God and in the way of Charity to forbid it under great Penalties which the King granted If it be thought to the Judges reasonable who being thereupon consulted an Allocatur of that Petition was entered in the Margent of the Parliament Roll. Overthrow or put into a Chaos or confusion all or much of the long used course and order of Process and Justice in the large and ancient Jurisdictions of the courts of Marshal-sea Principality of Wales Dutchy of Lancaster and country Palatines of Chester and Durham And do the like to those great Jurisdictions of the Cinque-ports and the Admiralty whose business and the ancient course and manage thereof cannot conform to the designs of such an unpracticable way of getting in of Debts Lame and discourage the very ancient and useful if something better ordered Offices of Sheriffs Under-Sheriffs and their Bayliffs in the Execution of Justice and the Proces of the courts thereof by turning much of their business into a worse condition Change and inconvenience the Government of the City of London and Borough of Southwark and of all the Cities Boroughs and Towns corporate of England and Wales in their several administrations of Justice And like a Hurricano whirling and passed through the Nation at once spoil or confound all the Courts of Justice great and little therein and abridge or take from them their antient and hitherto justly allowed Rights and Jurisdictions which to them and their predecessors have with our incomparable Magna Charta been no seldomer than 30 times confirmed by Acts of Parliament VVill be directly repugnant unto and against Magna Charta and the Statute of 42. E. 3. a branch or limb thereof which at the request of the Commons and for the good governance of them ordained that none be put to answer without presentment before Justices or matter of Record or by due Process of Law and Writ Original according to the Old Law of the Land And if any thing should from thenceforth be done to the contrary it should be void in the Law and holden for Error Be a great loss and damage to the King in his Fines and Seals of Original VVrits the Seals of the VVrits and Process Issuing out of his Courts of Kings Bench Common Pleas Exchecquer Principality of Wales Dutchy of Lancaster and County Palatine of Chester and the amercements and Issues forfeited or returned upon Caepi Corpus Writs of Habeas Corpus and Distringasses all which were intended by Law to be assistant to the defraying of his great charges in the Salaries and supports of the Lord Keeper Master of the Rolls Judges and Officers imployed in the Administration of Justice which taken away will render him to be in that particular less considered and in a worse case then Oliver Cromwel was who by his miscalled Parliaments and Instrument of an Arbitrary Protectorship was besides his charge of the Navy and Horse and Foot Guards allowed two hundred thousand pounds per Annum for the charge of the Government and Administration of Justice Take away from the King much of the Law Tax upon the writs and process which a late Act of Parliament consented unto for supply of his urgent occasions and bereave him of his never denied Prerogative and benefit of Utlaries Extirpate the Antiently and legally allowed Essoynes de malo lecti or veniendo de ultra mare or in servitio Regio or any hinderance which might happen to excuse their non-appearance after a lawful Summons in Debt which by the Laws of Nature and Nations have been in cases of necessity Inundation of waters or imployment for the publick never denied Turne all or the most of the proceedings upon Actions of Debt into Surprizes and Defaults and disturbe the more deliberate satisfactory and safe way of Tryals by Juries Make a default which no Law ever did to have the force and effect of a Verdict by Jury when there was none And debar the helps of Writs of Error when all Mankind as well Judges as Juries and the parties and their Councel on both sides may erre and can have no assurance to be Infallible Deprive the People of that part of our Magna Charta which would have no man amerced for a small fault but after the manner of the fault and for a great fault after the quantity thereof saving to him his Contenement and to a Merchant his Merchandise and that none be amerced but by the Oath of good and lawful Men of the vicinage which did not certainly intend a Debtor to be ruined for a small default or to be debarred of his Tryal by his Peers And obliterate the equity of the Act of Parliament of 13. E. 1. which providing that he that recovereth a Debt may Sue Execution by writ of Fieri facias or Elegit excepteth the Oxen and Beasts of the Plow and cannot be rationally supposed to favour such a Ruine upon a Debtor when for want of evidence and witnesses he shall not be able to escape the fury of such a default And likewise that part of Magna Charta which granted that the City of London should have and enjoy all the old Liberties and Customes which it hath been used to have and that all other Cities Boroughs and Towns and the Barons of the five Ports and all other Ports should have all their Liberties and free Customs and did not take it as it may be conjectured to be any reason that a surprize in Actions or Suits for Debts should by Malice or Tricks without pleading or reasonable time given for Defence destroy them and their Trade and Families and all their endeavors before and after VVhich the prudent Romans held
non prospexit recourse is to be had to the Body of the Tenant and if he be not to befound the Landlord is to impute it to his own negligence that he did not look better to it Cum quis ad warrantum vocatus fuerit Christianus vel Judaus qui terram non tenuerit in feodo quae capi possit in manum domini Regis per quam distringi possint pracipiatur vicecomiti quod habeat corpora eorum when any man is vouched to warranty be he Christian or Jew and hath not Land which may be taken into the Kings hands or by which he may be distrained the Sheriff shall be commanded to take his Body or bring him And a Bishop being Summond in a quare non admisit cum non venit nec se excusat per nun-nec per Essoniatorem attachietur when he neither comes nor sends his excuse nor essoins shall be attached Upon a writ awarded to a Bishop to command him to bring before the Kings Justices a Clark or Minister in holy Orders refusing to find Pledges because he was in holy Orders and had no lay Fee whereby he might be distrained if the Bishop did not after a Summons pone Distringas awarded against himself cause him to come the Court did proceed against the Clark upon the contempt and cause him to be arrested nor could the Sheriff or his Bayliffs incur any punishment for doing of it for the execution of the Law saith Bracton wrongeth no man By the Statute of Marlebridg made in the 52 year of the Reign of that King if any shall not obey or suffer Summons attachments or executions of the same according to the Law and customs of the Kingdom they were to be punished The word Attachment being saith the learned Vossius derived from a French word to apprehend or detain An Attachment is to arrest force or compel a man denying to come to judgement saith Sir Henry Spelman And by Skene a learned Scotch Lawyer is defined to be a certain Bond or Constraint of the Law whereby a Defendant is unwillingly compelled to answer in Judgment to the Party complaining In the Statute of 52 Henry the third where a Capias is given against accomptants it is said they shall be Attached by their bodies An Attachment made for disobeying a Writ of prohibition is in the very form of a pone the awarding and entry of a pone is that the defendant should be Attached And saith Bracton the course or solemnity of Attachments to compel the Defendant to come to the Court to answer his contempt was not so always observ'd but in trespas for the greatness of the offence or in favour of Soldiers that were going to the Wars or of Merchants or such as required haste in Actions of Debt and it is probable that the Actions or Suits of Merchants were most commonly of that nature the Judges granted an Habeas Corpus which to that purpose was in effect as much as a Capias whereby the Sheriff was commanded all delays set apart in regard of such haste and priviledge to bring the Body of the Defendant to answer the Plaintiff in an Action of Debt or Trespas as the case required with a Clause in the Later end or perclose of the Writ that the Sheriff should be grievously amerced if he refuse to do it By an Act of Parliament made in the 52 year of the Reign of the aforesaid King in a Plea of Common custody or guard by reason of ward if the deforcers came not at the great distress the Writ was to be renewed twice or thrice within the half year following and if after the Writ read and proclaimed in open County the deforceant absent himself and the sheriff cannot take his Body to bring before the Justice then as a Rebe●●e shall loose the Seisin of his ward By the Statute made in the third year of the Reign of King Edward the first if any under Sheriff or other do withhold Prisoners replevishable after they have offerd sufficient security he shall pay a grievous amerciament to the King in which act of Parliament men committed by the King or his Justices are excepted and declared to be not replevishable By a Statute of the aforesaid King made in the same year the title of it being against the arresting of men in Liberties great men and their Bayliffs the Kings Officers only excepted to whom special authority sayeth the Statute is given were not to attach men passing thorough their Jurisdictions with their goods compelling men to answer before them upon contracts and covenants c. And the writ of prohibition in the Register awarded upon that Statute is for attaching a man to answer upon contracts and covenants Britton who wrote his Book by the command of King Edward the first saith if any man will complain of a debt under forty shillings let him find Pledges to prosecute his debtor and if he that is sued in Trespas maketh default let him be distrained And that in an action of debt if there be not a sufficient distress the Difendants might be taken by their Bodies be they Clarks or Laymen Fleta or whosoever was the Author of the Book so called reciting the then manner of proceedings at law as an old and accustomed course saith they were by Summons Attachments and distress in personal actions the entries and awarding thereof upon record being the very same with little difference as they are now used If a debtor had bound himself to be in default of payment distrained by the Steward and marshal of the Kings house then upon security given by the Creditor to prosecute a distringas was awarded against the debtor until he found Pledges so as he were within the virge and if he were personally to be found was to be Attached by his body until he should by Pledges acquit himself and if he had not Pledges was to be held in Custody until that he answered the Creditor non tamen in vinculis or if he found Pledges and after made default the Pledges were to be amerced and the Defendant arrested and detained and not be bailed or let loose by Pledges before he had answered And that not only Marescallus sub suo periculo omnes captos infra virgam custodire debet sed de eis coram Senescallo respondere de Judicatis plenam facere executionem the Marshal should at his Peril keep all that were taken within the virge but answer for them before the Steward and ought to take in execution those against whom Judgment should be given and the Steward did of course command the Clark that keepeth the placita Aulae pro Rege Rolls and Records of the Kings Court to direct his writ Marescallo quod ipsum de quo fit sine dilatione attachiari faciat to the Marshal that he do without delay attach him of whom any complaint should
against any other And by another Statute of the same year no exigend was to be granted in trespass but where it was for breach of the Peace and at this day notwithstanding the Statute of 25. E. 3. ca. 17. no Writ of Capias can be made without a nihil habet returned nor could a Capias in accompt be otherwise made before the making of that Statute nor can be since without a nihil habet returned by the Sheriffe unless the Co●●t should by their coercive power of punishing contempts and contumacy think fit to do it as is now done by Attachment in Chancery upon a Defendants not appearing and was long before that Statute done by the Judges of our Courts of Common Law for not obeying prohibitions or VVrits Commanding the not Impan●lling of one above the age of 70 years to be of a Jury a VVrit to replevin or Bayl a man which was Imprisoned upon a moderata misericordia against a Steward or Bayliffe of a Manour for amercing too much against a Sheriffe for not Summoning or misreturning a Jury and the like they being as well enabled to cause a Defendant to be attached or arrested for a default or contempt in refusing to appear before them as they did usually before that statute and do yet award a grand Cape against the Lands of a Tenant for not appearing in a real Action make out a Capias pro fine Imprison a Defendant for Pleading non est factum to a Bond or other deed after it is found against him and a Capias to arrest such as shall make a Rescue as they did before that statute and do yet make a Capias upon a nihil habet returned upon an original in accompt when the Statute of Marlbridge 52. H. 3. cap. 23. only gives it upon a Distringas when the Defendant hath nothing to be distrained and as they did before the statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 17 and yet do in actions of Trespass make a Capias upon a nihil habet returned instead of a Distringas when the original Writ out of the Chancery is a Pone or attachment Otherwise they cannot do Justice to those that complain and their jurisdiction will be useless and to no purpose saith Mr. Selden and therefore where ever there is the one of necessity there must be the other and the Judges saith Glanvil in H. 2. time had power to Punish contempts and such as should absent themselves And had no less in the Reign of King Henry 3 when it was said by Bracton ex quo eis commissa est causa simpliciter extenditur eorum Jurisdictio ad omnia sine quibus causa terminari non potest quantum ad judicium executionem judicii when they are commissionated to hear a cause their jurisdiction is to be extended unto that without which the cause as to the judgement and execution thereof cannot be determined and did not want a coercive power in the Reign of King Edward the 1. when a man could not have a VVrit de homine replegiando when he is taken by the commandment of the chief Justice and upon all contempts made to any Courts of Record in disobeying the commandment of the King under his great Seal the offender is to be fined and imprisoned for jurisdictions saith the civil Law are maintained and upheld by such kind of coercions and is no more either as to the point of contumacy or when the defendants have not goods sufficient then is now usually done in the collecting the excise or monthly assessements when the collectors where no distress can be found are impowered to take and imprison the Body and even the System maker in the time of the late rebellion when the inclosures of the Law and all that supported or savoured of Monarchy were endeavoured to be thrown down and every discontented or foolish fancy would be a Legislator and busie it self in the alteration and spoiling of our Laws could not tell how to avoid the allowing of an arrest or Capias where the defendant had no visible and certain Estate whereby to be Summoned And with much more which might be alledg'd for the antiquity legality rationality long approbation and usefulness of the Writs and Process of arrest and Utlary which have been and are a great part of the power and ancient rights and customs of our Courts of Justice without which they can neither subsist exercise maintain or Keep their authorities or accomplish the design and ends of justice and their constitution may inform all those that would not bind or make themselves more than apprentices to those inconsiderate clamours which since that fatal and unhappy year 1641 have been raised by the mobile scelestum vulgus ignorant and plundering part of the People and their new Fangled devices and designs for the banishment or alteration of our Laws which they but a little before had cryed up and publickly professed to be their birth-right And by the Extirpation of Monarchy Kingly and Church government plow up the Kingdom to their own ungodly advantages and profits and render it to be in a worse and more barbarous condition then Wat Tiler Jack Cade or Ket could have brought it unto if their several Rebellions and Clounery had gained their expected success That there is nothing to uphold those their reasonless desires of Innovation And that our Fore-fathers were so well content with the benefit of that Act of Parliament of 25. E. 3. for the proceedings by Writ of Capias and by Process of Exigend to the Utlary in Actions of Debt detinue of Chattels and taking of Beasts for that may appear to be the only design and purpose of that Statute And did so little believe the Process by way of Capias and Arrest to be any invasion of their liberties and rights of Freemen as they did in the said Parliament Petition for and obtain an Act of Parliament that no man might be taken but by Indictment or Presentment or by Proces made by Writ origynal at the common Law or to be prejudicial unto them or their posterities and in the 38 year of the Reign of that Ki●g Although great mischiefes did as was complained to that King in a Parliament holden in the seven and thirtieth year of his Reign often happen and dayly come because that Escheators Sheriffs and other the Kings Ministers did seise the Lands Goods and Chattels of many surmising that they were Out-Lawed where they were not because they did beare such names as those that were Outlawed the benefits of the aforesaid Statute of 25 E. 3 for Process of Utlary by VVrits of Capias and Exigend which was made but two years before did so over ballanc● that or other inconveniences as might happen in some mens particulars as the VVisdom of that King and Parliament could not think it fit to repeal that Statute or forbid or discourage the right use of it but did only ordain that if any complained he
or not so necessary convenient or useful as was intended or expected or like unto some of the Laws of the Medes and Persians which were said to be irrevocable but the People had by the grace and favour of the Soveraign a remedy by Parliament to abrogate repeal explain or amend them by substracting of some clause or adding some other unto it for liberties are both by Civil and Common Law defined to be of things not forbidden otherwise vaga liber●● as may quickly come to be misera servitus and bring those that would use an unbounded liberty where it shall meet either with Laws or a greater force into a most miserable slavery And therefore just liberties do by our Common Laws saith Sir Edward Coke signifie the Laws of the Land And that which is the Law cannot be called Tyranny nor that which is against the Law liberty And that ancient manner of Trial for those who were criminally accused called Fire ordeal which ordained the Partie suspected to walk blindfold over certain Plow-shares of Iron heated red hot laid at a distance one from another and if the Party did not touch any of them or treading upon them received no harm he was declared to be innocent coming into this Land with the Eazons and the Law of Trial of Titles by Battle or Duel continuing here long after the Norman Conquest and to this day in force in certain doubtful cases though they had very much of blood and cruelty in them could be suffered to wear out into better Laws and yet be obeyed as Laws whilst they were such the Law of torturing or pressing such men to death in case of Felony as will not plead● or do refuse to be tryed by a Jury to be so many houres in dying and have no other drink but Kennel-water hath enough of horror in it to be found fault with if it were not the Law and the only means to preserve the Authority of Laws and Judicature and there were not toom enough for men to avoid that direful way of punishment For there was never since the blessing of Laws Magistracy and Government came into the World any legal liberty not to appear in Judgment or not to be compelled to do right one unto another by Judges and those that were in Authority commissionated by their Superiours And if ever there had been such a liberty it may be renounced or released by our own Acts as in the entring into Bonds and Contracts one with another wherein we oblige our selves to the performance of any thing which the Laws of God and Nature do demand of us the Obligees may dispense with it And if the Law of Nature could have given us such a vast liberty as some would pretend a right unto the same Law of Nature doth in civil Conversation and Society give us a power sufficient to restrain it and make that which at the first was merae voluntatis in our own wills to be postea necessitatis a necessity and out of any supposed freedom of our own wills or the power thereof Neither can any man by any rule of Law charge our Laws with oppression because positive or made in terror or binding to strict rules to avoid arbitrarines or oppression in the Judges or rigour and severity as in some particular mans case they may happen to be by an abuse of them but the fault is rather to be laid at the doors of those who do violate and break them For an unlimited or absolute liberty and the liberty of the Subject are each unto other contradictory and there are no Laws but do retrench or take away some liberty which People had or took to do ill or might be inconvenient to the publick good For God the greatest and wisest of all Legislative Powers did put the Jews who were as he saith himself as the Bracelet upon his arm and the signet upon his right hand under a Law of fourty stripes and of death if they disobeyed the Sentence of the Judge And yet we do find them in their Generations above two rhousand years after in such an opinion of their freedom as they thought nothing could be added unto it saying they were of the Seed of Abraham and under no Bondage and are yet above sixteen hundred years since bragging of those their Laws When David had slain Goliah and might justly have expected the reward of having his Fathers House to be made free in Israel as some of the promised rewards he did not when he durst not lift up his hand against the Lords Anointed believe it to have been such a freedom as might exempt him from the duty of a Subject When our King Athelstan by his Charter gave Lands to St. Wilfrid and the Church of Rippon in Yorkshire in the words Al 's frelich as I may and in all things be al 's free as Hert may think or eych may se. And King William the Conquerour granted the Earldom of Chester to his Nephew Hugh Lupus Tenendum sibi haeredibus ita libere ad gladium sicut ipse totam tenebat Angliam ad Coronam to him and his Heirs to be holden as freely by the Sword as he did himself hold England and the Crown thereof Those very large Grants did neither free the Lands so given to St. Wilfrid and the Church of Rippon and that Earldom to the Earl of Chester unsubject the Owners or give either of them as our Records and Law-Books in the course of the after Ages will testifie any liberty not to appear upon any Summons to the Courts of Justice of our Kings and Princes For legalis liber homo saith Sir Henry Spelman hath in our Laws no other signification then Qui stat rectus in Curia non exlex seu utlagatus non excommunicatus vel infamis c. sed qui in lege postulet vel postuletur who standeth right in the Kings Court is not outlawed excommunicated or infamous but may at Law sue and be sued And it cannot be denyed but that in order to Justice a Summons or citation only might be sufficient and would certainly be most consonant to the ease and liberty of the People if they were or could be so of one mind or inclination to Justice as to obey the first Summons either of the Parties complaining or the Courts of Justice commanding or not make excuses or delayes hide themselves or run away or be loath to come to it be so of one kind of affaires and business as never or seldom to be absent so alwayes provided of their Councel Witnesses and Evidences as not to need any further time to make their necessary deffences and to be of so much sufficiency of estate as to have wherewithal to make a speedy answer or satisfaction And that there were no such pravity or incertainty in the wills and actions of men as that the Creditor would be alwayes sure to demand no more
or otherwise destroyed but by lawful judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land And by 25 Ed. 3. ca. 4. That no Man shall be taken by Petition or suggestion but by Indictment or Presentment or by Process made by Writ original at the Common Law He is in his Comment upon Magna Carta and that Statute of 9 H. 3. of opinion that the words Per legem terrae do refer to all the procedent matters in that Chapter or Statute that that Statute was but declaratory of the old Law of England That a Commitment by Lawfull warrant either indeed or in Law is accounted in Law a due process or proceeding of Law and by the Law of the Land as well as by force of the Kings writ and that if a man be suspected and he flyeth or hideth himself it is a good cause to arrest him that in many cases a man may be by the Law of the Land taken and imprisoned by force of the Kings writ upon a suggestion made and that against those that attempt to subvert and enervate the Kings Laws there lyeth a writ to the Sheriffe in nature of a Commission ad capiendum impugnatores juris Regis ad ducendum eos ad Gaolam de Newgate to arrest the Impugners of the Kings Laws and to bring them to the Gaole of Newgate and if he had not been of that opinion the words of Magna Charta in that Statute of 9. H. 3. can if they were put upon the rack and tortured bear no other genuine sense or interpretation then that no man shall be taken or imprisoned but by lawfull judgment of his Peers or by the law of the land And those words of the Statute of 25. Ed. 3. ca. 4. that no man shall be taken by petition or suggestion but by indictment or presentment or by process made by writ original at the Common Law can receive no other construction but that a man may be taken by process made by writ original at the Common Law of which nature are the process or writs of Capias in the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster which are made upon original writs issuing out of the Chancery have been in use upon occasion and are matters of record before the Justices in this Kingdom long before the making of those Statutes And such an universal approved Ancient long and continued Praxis founded and fixt upon the Laws of God Nature and Nations in order to the preservation of Faith and Justice those grand Supporters of humane Societies should need no Advocate to plead and justifie the necessary use thereof but be sufficient to perswade the opponents to acquiesce in the reason and legality of it And that great Lawyer Sir Edward Coke might have had more lawrels to have encompassed and grown up by his urne and had not so much Eclipsed that great reputation which he had gained in his Studies and Profession of the Laws as he hath if he had not without a due and serious examination so much taken upon trust Caressed Magnified and recommended to posterity that Manuscript called the Mirror of Justice and some other Manuscripts so often by him appealed unto and vouched in his 2. part of the Institutis or Comment upon Magna Charta In which Consarcination called the Mirror of Justice that Mirror of Justice Maker or Deviser dreameth truly to have recited some exemplary Judgmeets or direful punishments inflicted by King Alured or Alfred upon 44. Judges of his times for supposed Errors and Misdemeanors by them committed And hanged them who with great probability may be believed not yet to have been hanged by that King or any other for that if any such remarkable things or Examples of Justice had ever been done by him they could not in all likelihood have escaped our old Historians Symeon Dunelmensis Ailredus Abbas Rievalensis John Brompton William Malmesbury Henry Huntington Roger Hoveden Henry Knighton Matthew of Westminster Ingulphus and all our other Ancient times Remenbrances nor would have been unrecorded by Asser Menvensis who for the fame of his Learning being sent for out of Wales to come and live with him was preferred by him and made a Bishop and residing in his Court Wrote his life and recommended to Posterity his most memorable Actions excellent Qualities and Endowments but was so far from the Registring of any such Severeties as on the contrary he doth make mention of the extraordinary clemency and lenity of that Virtuous Prince who although he was a most diligent inquisitor of any male administration of Justice by his Judges yet saith Asser Menevensis Leniter Advocatos aut per scipsum aut per alios suos fideles quoslibet Interrogabat quare Ita nequiter Judicassent utrum per ignorantiam aut propter aliam malevolentiam id est utrum pro aliquorum amore vel Timore aut aliquorum odio aut etiam pro alicujus pecuniae cupiditate Gently calling them to him he did by himself or others whom he might trust demand of them Wherefore they had given such Judgments whether ignorantly or for any ill will or for love fear hatred covetousness or love of Money Denique si illi Judices profiterentur propterea se talia Ita Judicasse eo quod nihil rectius de his rebus scire poterint tunc ille discrete moderanter illorum imperitiam insipientiam redarguens aiebat Ita inquiens nimirum admiror vestram hanc insolentiam eo quod dei dono meo sapientium gradus usurpati sapientiae autem studium operam neglexistis But if those Judges did confess that they had so Judged or done because they knew no better then he did discreetly and moderately shew them their ignorance and say unto them truly I do very much wonder at your folly for that by Gods guist and mine you have taken upon you the degree of my wise men and Judges but the study of the Laws you have neglected Qua propter aut terrenarum potestatum ministeria quae habetis illico dimittetis aut sapientiae studiis multo devotius docere studiatis impero Wherefore I command you either suddainly to leave your places or give your minds more unto study Quibus auditis verbis perterriti veluti pro maxima vindicta Correcti Comites praepositi ad aequitatis discendae studium totis viribus se vertere nitebautur ita ut mirum in modum illiterati ab infantia Comites pene omnes prepositi ministri litteratoriae arti studerent malentes insuetam disciplinam quam laboriose discere quam potestatum ministeria dimittere Whereupon they viz. His Earles and subordinate Judges being as much terrified as if they had been actually punished did wholly addict themselves to the study of the Laws so as to a wonder the Earles and Judges aforesaid many of whom from their youth were ignorant and illiterate did by study endeavour to make themselves more able choosing rather the hardship