Selected quad for the lemma: king_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
king_n	write_n	year_n	young_a	28	3	5.8605	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A86253	The law of conveyances, shewing the natures, kinds, and effects, of all manner of assurances, with the manner of their several executions and operations. Also directions to sue out and prosecute all manner of writs, of extent, elegit, and judiciall writs upon statutes, recognizances, judgments, &c. A warrant to summon a court of survey: and the articles to be given in charge, and inquired of in that court. With an exposition of divers obscure words and termes of law, used in ancient records, &c. And also plaine decimall tables, whereby may be found the true values of lands, leases, and estates, in possession, or reversion. With a concordance of years, &c. / By John Herne Gent.	Herne, John, fl. 1660.	1655 (1655)	Wing H1570; Thomason E1597_2	165,473	258

THE LAW OF CONVEYANCES SHEWING The Natures Kinds and Effects of all manner of Assurances with the manner of their several executions and operations ALSO Directions to Sue out and Prosecute all manner of Writs of Extent Elegit and Judiciall Writs upon Statutes Recognizances Judgments c. A Warrant to Summon a Court of Survey And the Articles to be given in Charge and Inquired of in that Court With an Exposition of diverse obscure Words and Termes of Law used in Ancient Records c. AND ALSO Plaine Decimall Tables whereby may be found the true Values of Lands Leases and Estates in Possession or Reversion With a Concordance of Years c. By JOHN HERNE Gent. LONDON Printed by T. R. for Hen. Twyford and Tho. Dring and are to be sold at their Shops in Vine Court Middle Temple and at the George in Fleetstreet neer Cliffords Inne 1656. TO THE READER Courteous Reader THIS Tract for the drawing and right managing of all the Essentiall and Accidentall parts of the Laws touching Conveyances and Assurances which before lay diffusedly in the Books of Law in large Volumes are here now methodically handled being Composed by a very eminent Lawyer and Great Conveyancer in the City of London lately deceased which coming into my hands and being by men of good judgement held to be of excellent use I was perswaded to make the same publick for the Generall good which I have done accordingly And for the further advantage of those that desire knowledge in Records and in Buying and Selling Land c. I have added an Exposition of many obscure and abstruce words used in the Book of Doomsday and in other ancient Records Charters and Writings And likewise very exact Decimall Tables wherby the value of Lands sold or let in Possession or Reversion may easily be knowne And also a Concordance of years from King William the Conqueror to this present time in which the yeare of our Lord and the yeare of the Reigne of each King are plainly set down I doubt not but this peice will be of much use and little Charge which is the onely desire and end of J. H. THE LAW OF CONVEIANCES OR A perfect explanation of all the essentiall and accedentall parts of all sorts of instruments for the conveying of all things whether corporall or incorporall and what words actions and circumstances are required by Law thereunto THe Office of the Premises of the Deed is to expresse the Grantor Grantee Premises and the thing to be granted The Office of the Habendum is to limit the Estate and to explane the Premises Habendum And his Office is to give to enlarge and to be persuing to the Estate contained in the Premises of the Deed but his Office is not to be repugnant contrary lesser nor to exclude any of the interest before given in the Premisses for if it so doth the estate precedent given shall stand and the habendum shall be voide As if a Feoffment be made to one and his heires by the Premises of the deed Habendum to him and his heires during the life of I. S. Or if a Feoffment be made to one and his heires by the Premises of the Deed Habendum to the lessee for terme of his life those words of limitation during the life of I. S. or during the life of Tenant for life are void words for that the Habendum is repugnant to the Premises vide Lo. Cokes 2. Reports Baldwins Case Fol. twenty three touching repugnancy between the Premises and the habendum Sometimes the habendum doth controll and qualifie the generall implication of the estate which passeth by construction of Law by the Premises of the Deed as for example A Lease to two habendum to one for life the remainder to the other for life this limitation doth alter the generall implication of the joyntenancy which would have been without the habendum and therefore the habendum voide in that the Premises doth make them joynttenants the habendum would sever the joynter and make the one to have the whole during his life and the other the whole after him Plowden fo 133. vide Sir Ed. Coke 2. Par. fo 55. Buchlers case such a remainder is good And if two acres bee given to two habendum the one acre to one and the other to the other that is a voide habendum because it excludeth the interest of the one in the one acre and of the other in the other acre where the Premises of the deed hath made them joynt-tenants of every parcell Remainders Every remainder ought to have these severall properties and things following as Notes and Rules to discerne and know when remainders are good But note that where a remainder is once well raised by the Livery and Seisin though the perticular estate be afterwards avoided by condition in Law as by a recovery in wast or if a Feme Tenant for life disagree to the Livery after the death of her husband c. Yet he to whom the remainder is limited shall be Tenant in taile in remainder vi 1. part Shellies case fol. 101. good cases upon this An estate precedent made at the same time the remainder doth commence As if the lessor confirme the estate of his Lessee for yeares the remainder in Fee this remainder is void because the estate for yeares was made before the remainder and not at the time of the remainder If the lessor disseise his Tenant for life and then makes a new Lease to him for life the remainder in in Fee that remainder is void because the Tenant for life is remitted to the estate which was made long time before the remainder appointed so the estate precedent was not made at the same time of the remainder and therefore the remainder void So if the heire endow his mother the remainder in Fee this remainder is void though Livery and Sesin be made to the mother because the dowre hath relation to the death of her husband and so for that the estate precedent was not made when the remainder was appointed the remainder is voide The perticular estate must continue when the remainder shall vest and the remainder must commence in possession at the very time the perticular estate endeth as well in Wills as in the grants for there may not a meane time between them As if one make a Lease for life and that a day after the death of Tenant for life it shall remaine over this remainder is void because the first estate is determined before the appointment of the remainder So if one make a Leese for life upon condition that if he doth not such an Act that his estate shall cease and that then it remain over in Fee this remainder is void because it doth not vest during the estate precedent The remainder must be out of the lessor executed or executory at the time of the Livery and seasin made and at the time of the possession taken by

next jure propinquitatis that is by right of representation and by right of propinquity And Littleton meaneth of the right of representation for legally in course of discent he is next of blood inheritable And the issue of C. doth represent the person of C. and if C. had lived he had been legally next of blood And whensoever the Father if he had lived should have inherited his lineall heire by right of representation shall inherit before any other though a Mother be jure propinquitati●… neerer of blood But if there be Father and Son and the Father hath a brother that is Uncle to the Son and the Son purchase lands in fee and die without issue living the Father the Uncle shall have the lands as heire to the Son and not the Father yet the Father is neerer of blood because it is a Maxime in Law that inheritance may lineally descend but not ascend yet if the Son in this case die without issue and the Uncle enter into the land as heire to the Son and after the Uncle dieth without issue living the Father the Father shall have the land as heire to the Uncle and not as heire to his Son for that he cometh to the land by collaterall discent and not by lineall ascent and his Uncle enter into the land for if the Uncle in this case doth not enter into the land then cannot the Father inherit the land for there is another Maxime in Law herein implied That a man that claimeth as heir in Fee-simple to any man by discent must make himself heire to him that was last seised of the actual Freehold and inheritance And if the Uncle in this case doth not enter then had he but a Freehold in Law and no actuall Freehold but the last that was seised of the actuall Freehold was the Son to whom the Father cannot make himself heire And therefore Littleton saith And his Uncle enter into the land as he ought by the Law to make the Father to inherit as heire to the Uncle Note that true it is that the Uncle in this case is heire but not absolutely heire for if after the discent to him the Father hath issue a Son or a Daughter that issue shall enter upon the Uncle And so it is if a man hath issue a Son and a Daughter the Son purchaseth land in fee and dieth without issue the Daughter shall inherit the land but if the Father hath afterward issue a Son this Son shall enter into the land as heire to his brother and if he hath issue a Daughter and no Son she shall be Co-partner with her Sister As he ought by the Law These words as a Key do open the secrets of the Law for hereupon it is concluded that where the Uncle cannot get an actuall possession by entry or otherwise there the Father in this case cannot inherit And therefore if an Advowson be granted to the Son and his Heires and the Son die and this discend to the Uncle and he die before he doth or can present to the Church the Father shall not inherit because he should make himself heire to the Son which he cannot do And so of a rent and the like But if the Uncle had presented to the Church or had Seisin of the rent there the Father should have inherited For Littleton putteth his case of an entry into land But for an example if the Son make a Lease for life and die without issue and the Reversion discend to the Uncle and he die the Reversion shall not discend to the Father because in that case he must make himself heire to the Son If the Father make a Lease for years and the Lessee entreth and the Father dieth the eldest Son dieth before entry or receipt of the rent the younger Son of the half blood shall not inherit but the Sister because the possession of the Lessee for years is the possession of the eldest Son so as he is actually seised of the Frank-tenement and the Inheritance and consequently the Sister of the whole blood is to be heire And so if lands be holden by Knights service and the eldest Son is within age and the Guardian entreth into the lands An so likewise if Guardian in Socage enters But in the case aforesaid if the Father make a lease for life or a gift in tail and dieth and the eldest Son dieth in the life of Tenant for life c. the younger brother of the half blood shall inherit because the Tenant for life or Tenant in tail is seised of the Freehold and the eldest Son had nothing but a Reversion expectant upon the Freehold and therefore the youngest Son shall inherit the land as Heire to his Father who was last seised of the actuall Freehold And albeit a rent had been reserved on the estate for life and the eldest Son had received the rent and died yet it is holden by that the younger brother shall inherit because the seisin of the rent is no actuall seisin of the Freehold of the land but Liber Ass part 2. seemeth to the contrary Ideo quaere He that claimeth Lands Tenements Maxime upon collaterall discent or Hereditaments as collaterall heire to any one must claim from such an one that had an actuall possessession and died actually seised of the Frank-tenement and the inheritance in Fee-simple of those lands which he so claimeth by discent and not from such a one who had but a possession in Law or a reversion in Fees expectant on a Frank-tenement discendible unto him But to the lineall heire it sufficeth that the Ancestor should have been heire if he had lived But if such a collaterall heire claime from a collaterall Ancestor that had a possession in Law by his own purchase or reversion in Fee-simple expectant on a Frank-tenement by his own purchase it is sufficient Actuall possession Note that an actuall possession must be gained either by a mans own act or by the actuall possession of another but if neither by his own act nor by the possession of another he doth gain no more then discendeth unto him then the brother of the half blood shall inherit Possessio quid And this word Possessio is no other but pedis positio and extendeth onely to things whereof a man by his entry or other act may gain an actuall possession for when the eldest Son hath not an actuall possession or if it be such inheritance whereof any possession may not be gained per pedis positionem or by any other act then the inheritance by the Law shall discend to the brother of the half blood As for example The King by his Letters Patents createth a Baron and giveth the Dignity to him and his Heires and he hath issue a Son and a Daughter by one venter and a Son by another venture and dieth the eldest Son dieth without issue To whom shall the dignity discend To the younger Son for it may not be said that the