Selected quad for the lemma: king_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
king_n	write_n	write_v	young_a	33	3	6.8038	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A53696	Exercitations on the Epistle to the Hebrews also concerning the Messiah wherein the promises concerning him to be a spiritual redeemer of mankind are explained and vindicated, his coming and accomplishment of his work according to the promises is proved and confirmed, the person, or who he is, is declared, the whole oeconomy of the mosaical law, rites, worship, and sacrifice is explained : and in all the doctrine of the person, office, and work of the Messiah is opened, the nature and demerit of the first sin is unfolded, the opinions and traditions of the antient and modern Jews are examined, their objections against the Lord Christ and the Gospel are answered, the time of the coming of the Messiah is stated, and the great fundamental truths of the Gospel vindicated : with an exposition and discourses on the two first chapters of the said epistle to the Hebrews / by J. Owen ...	Owen, John, 1616-1683.	1668 (1668)	Wing O753; ESTC R18100	1,091,989	640

by way of eminency to be called Canonical or regular as the Book wherein it is contained is called the Bible though in it self that be the Common name of all Books § 5 And this Appellation is of ancient use in the Church The Synod of Laodicea supposed to have praeceded the Council of Nice makes mention of it as a thing generally admitted for the Fathers of it decree 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That no private Psalmes ought to be said or read in the Church nor any uncanonical Books but only the Canonical books of the new and old Testament whose names they subjoin in their order And some while before the Bishops who joyned with the Church of Antioch in the deposition of Paulus Samosatenus charge him as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that in the introduction of his heresie departed from the Canon or rule of the Scripture Before them also it was called by Irenaeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Chrysostome calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sentence of the divine Laws 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the exact ballance square or rule and Canon of all truths and duties wherein he hath evidently respect unto the original use and importance of the word before explained and thereupon calls on his hearers that omitting the consideration of what this or that man sayes or thinks they should seek and require 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all these things of or from the Scriptures which are the Canon of our faith and obedience And Austin demonstrent ecclesiam suam non in rumoribus Africorum sed in praescripto legis in Prophetarum praedictis in Psalmorum cantibus hoc est in omnibus canonicis Sanctorum librorum authoritatibus Let them demonstrate their Church not by the rumors of the Africans but by the praescription of the Law the praedictions of the Prophets the Songs of the Psalms that is by the Canonical Authority of the holy books of the Scriptures And he pursues the Metaphor of a scale and a measure in many words elsewhere And thus Aquinas himself confesseth the Scripture is called Canonical because it is the Rule of our understanding in the things of God And such a Rule it is as hath Authority over the Consciences of men to bind them unto faith and obedience because of its being given of God by inspiration for that purpose Moreover as the Scripture upon the accounts mentioned is by way of eminency § 6 said to be Canonical so there is also a Canon or rule determining what books in particular do belong unto the Holy Scripture and to be on that account Canonical So Athanasius tells us that by the Holy Scripture he intends Libros certo canone comprehensus the books contained in the assured Canon of it And Ruffinus having reckoned up those books concludes hi sunt quos patres intra Canonem concluserum These are they which the Fathers have concluded to be in the Canon that is to belong unto the Canonical books of Scripture And Austin to the same purpose Non sine causa tam salubri vigilantia Canon Ecclesiasticus constitutus est ad quem certi Prophetarum Apostolorum libri pertinerent not without good reason is the Ecclesiastical Canon determined by wholsome diligence unto which certain books of the Prophets and Apostles should belong About the Assignation of this Canon of the Scripture or what books belonged unto the Canonical Scripture there have been some differences in the Church since the time of the Synod of Carthage confirmed by that in Trulla at Constantinople The first Church having agreed well enough about them excepting the haesitation of some few persons in reference unto one or two of them of the New Testament From this rise and use of the word it is evident what is intended by the Canonical § 7 Authority of the Scripture or of any particular book thereunto belonging Two things are included in that expression First the spring and Original of any book which gives it Authority and Secondly the design and end of it which renders it Canonical For the first it is required that it be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 given by immediate inspiration from God without this no book or writing can by any means any acceptation or approbation of the Church any usefulness any similitude of style manner of writing unto the books that are so any conformity in matter or doctrine to them have an interest in that Authority that should lay a foundation for its reception into the Canon It is the impress of the Authority of God himself on any writing or its proceeding immediately from him that is sufficient for this purpose Neither yet will this alone suffice to render any Revelation or writing absolutely Canonical in the sense explained There may be an especial Revelation from God or a writing by his inspiration like that sent by Elijah unto Jehoram the King of Judah 2 Chron. 21.12 which being referred only unto some particular occasion and having thence Authority for some especial end and purpose yet being not designed for a Rule of faith and obedience unto the Church may not belong unto the Canon of the Scripture But when unto the Original of divine inspiration this end also is added that it is designed by the Holy Ghost for the Catholick standing use and instruction of the Church Then any writing or book becomes absolutely and compleatly Canonical The Jews of latter Ages assign some difference among the books of the old Testament § 8 as to their spring and Original or manner of Revelation though they make none as to their being all Canonicall The Book of the Law they assign unto a peculiar manner of Revelation which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mouth to mouth or face to face which they gather from Numbers 12.8 whereof afterwards Others of them they affirm to proceed from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the gift of Prophesie whereof as they make many kinds or degrees taken from the different means used by God in the Application of himself unto them belonging to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of divine Revelation mentioned by the Apostle Heb. 1.1 so they divide those books into two parts namely the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or former Prophets containing most of the historical Books after the end of the Law and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the latter prophets wherein they comprise the most of them peculiarly so called The Original of the remainder of them they ascribe unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or inspiration by the holy Ghost calling them peculiarly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written by that inspiration as though the whole Canon and systeme of the books were not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Scripture or writing and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or divine inspiration the only means of their writing But they do herein as in many other things The distribution of the books of the old Testament into the Law

unto the remainder of his Ministry These brief remarks being given upon the preparation for and the manner of the giving of the Law we shall summarily consider the general nature of the Law and its Sanction in our next Exercitation Exercitatio XX. What meant by the Law among the Jews The common distribution of it into Moral Ceremonial and Judaical by them rejected The ground of that distribution 613 Precepts collected by the Jews Reasons of that number Of these 248 Affirmative 365 Negative Twelve Houses of each sort First House of Affirmatives concerning God and his Worship in twenty Precepts The second concerning the Temple and Priesthood in number 19. The third concerning Sacrifices in 57 Precepts The fourth of Cleanness and Vncleanness 18. The fifth of Alms and Tithes in 32 Precepts The sixth about things to be eaten in seven commands The seventh concerning the Passover and Festivals 20. The eighth of Rule and Judgment in 13 Precepts The ninth of Doctrine and Truth whose commands are 25. The tenth concerning Women and Matrimony in 12 Precepts The eleventh of Criminal Judgments and Punishments in eight Precepts The twelfth of civil Judgments in 17 Precepts Censure of this Collection Negative Precepts in 12 Families 1. Of false Worship in 47 Prohibitions c. THe Law it self and its Sanctions are the next thing that our Apostle makes § 1 mention of in the Oeconomy of the Judaical Church By this Law he especially understands the Law given on Mount Sinai or partly there partly from the Tabernacle the Type of Christ after it was erected The Jews by the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Law generally understand the whole five books of Moses as they are also called in the New Testament and all Precepts that they can gather out of them any where they refer to the Law wherein they are not to be contended withall This whole Law is generally distributed into three parts First the Moral Secondly § 2 the Ceremonial Thirdly the Judicial part of it And indeed there is no Precept but may conveniently be referred unto one or other of these Heads as they are usually explained That which is commonly called the Moral Law the Scripture terms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exod. 34.28 The words of the Covenant the ten words from whence is the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Law of ten words or precepts all which in their substance are moral and universally obligatory to all the sons of men That part of the Law which the Scripture calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judgments Exod. 21.1 determining of Rights between Man and Man and of punishments upon transgressions with especial reference unto the interest of the people in the Land of Canaan is by us usually termed the Judicial Law And the institutions of Ceremonial Worship are most commonly expressed by the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the whole system whereof is termed the Law Ceremonial The Jews either acknowledge not or insist not much on this distinction which § 3 is evidently founded in the things themselves but casting all these parts of the Law together contend that there is amongst them 613 Precepts For the numeral Letters of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denote 611 of them and the other two which as they say are the two first of the Decalogue were delivered by God himself to the people and so come not within the compass of the word Torah in that place whence they take this important consideration namely Deut. 33.4 Moses commanded us a Law that is of 611 Precepts two being given by God himself compleats the number of 613. There is none who sees not the vanity and folly of these things which yet is a part of their Oral Law whereunto as hath been shewed they ascribe more oftentimes then to the written Word it self Of these 613 Precepts 248 they say are Affirmative Precepts because there are as § 4 they affirm which I leave to our Anatomists to judge of so many distinct members or bones in the body of a man And 365 Negative Precepts because there are so many days in the year man being bound to keep the Law with his whole body all the year long both which numbers make up 613. And lest this observation should not seem sufficiently strengthned by these arguments they add that which they suppose conclusive namely that in the Decalogue there are 613 Letters if you will but set aside the last two words which in common civility cannot be well denied unto them § 5 These 613 Precepts they divide or distinguish into twelve Families according to the number of the Tribes of Israel that is either general part into twelve First the Affirmative and secondly the Negative And although their distribution be not satisfactory for many Reasons and hath been also represented by others yet for the advantage of the Reader I shall here give a summary account of them § 6 The first Family which hath Relation to God in his Worship consists of twenty Precepts which I shall briefly enumerate as those following without any examination of their stating of them and due fixing to their several stations 1. Faith and acknowledgment of God's divine Essence and Existence Exod. 20.2 2. Faith of the Vnity of God Deut. 6.4 chap. 32.39 3. Love of God Deut. 6.5 chap. 10.12 4. Fear of God Deut. 6.13 5. Acknowledgment of God's Righteousness in Afflictions Deut. 8.5 6. Prayer unto God Exod. 23.25 Deut. 11.13 7. Adherence unto God Deut. 10.20 8. To swear by the name of God Exod. 6.13 Deut. 10.20 9. To walk in the ways of God Deut. 28.9 10. To sanctifie the Name of God Levit. 22.32 11. Twice a day to repeat that Sanction Hear O Israel Deut. 6.7 chap. 11.19 12. That we learn and teach the Law Deut. 5.1 chap. 11 8. 13. To wear Philacteries or Tephilin on the head Deut. 6.8 14. To wear them on the arm in the same place 15. To make Fringes Numb 15.38 39 40. 16. To put Writings of the Scripture on the posts of our doors Deut. 6.9 17. That the People be called together to hear the Law at the end of the Feast of Tabernacles Duet 31.12 18. That every one write him a Copy of the Law Deut. 31.19 19. That the King moreover write out another for himself as King Deut. 17.28 20. That at our eating of meat we give thanks or bless God Deut. 8.10 This is the first Family which though it sometimes fail in educing its precepts from the Word yet good use may be made of the observation in reducing these things to one certain head § 7 The second Family of the first general Head of Affirmative precepts contain those which concern the Sanctuary and Priesthood being nineteen in number 1. That a Sanctuary Tabernacle or Temple should be built Exod. 25.8 2. That being built it should be reverenced Levit. 19.30 3. That the Priests and Levites always keep the Temple and no others Numb 18.2 4. That the work or

the miraculous power of God shall no more in the like kind be exerted it is an infallible evidence and demonstrative note of the true Messiah He and he alone was to be born of a Virgin so alone was Jesus of Nazareth and therefore he alone is the true Messiah The Jews being greatly pressed with this Prophecy and the Accomplishment of it § 21 do try all means to escape by breaking through one of them And we might expect that they would principally attempt the story of the Evangelist but circumstances on that side are so cogent against them that they are very faint in that endeavour For if it was so indeed that Jesus was not born of a Virgin as is recorded and as both himself and his Disciples professed why did they not charge him with untruth herein in the dayes of his flesh Why did they not call his Mother into question especially considering that the being espoused unto an Husband they might upon conviction have put her unto a publick and shamefull death None of this being done or once undertaken by their fore-fathers no less full of Envy and Malice against the Person and Doctrine of Jesus then themselves and much better furnished and provided for such an undertaking might any colour be given unto it then they are they insist not much upon the denyal of the Truth of the Record but to relieve themselves they by all means contend that the words of the Prophet are no way applicable unto the birth of our Lord Jesus which the Evangelist reports them prophetically to express And to this end they multiply Exceptions against our interpretation of the Prophecy First They deny that here is any thing spoken of the conception or bearing of a § 22 Son by a Virgin For the word here used say they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth any Young Woman married or unmarried Yea sometimes an Adulteress as Proverbs 30.18 so that the whole foundation of our interpretation is infirm and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here intended was they say no other but either the Wise of the Prophet or the Wife of Ahaz the King or some young Woman in the Court then newly married or to be married to the King or some other person Secondly They say that the birth of this Child with the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or young Woman mentioned was to conceive was immediately to ensue so as to be a sign unto Ahaz and the house of David of the deliverance promised unto them from the Kings of Dam●scus and Samaria and so could not be Jesus of Nazareth whose nativity happening seven hundred years after this would be no pledge unto them of any thing that should shortly come to pass Thirdly They insist that v. 16. it is promised that before that Child which should be so conc●ived and born should come to the years of discretion to know to refuse the evil and to choose the good the Kings of Damascus and Samaria should be d●stroy●d Now this came to pass within few years after and therefore can have no relation to the birth of Jesus of Nazareth Fourthly Th●y affirm that in the following Chapter the accomplishment of this Prophecy is decla●ed in the Prophets going in unto the Prophetess and h●r conceiving a Son concerning whom it is said that before he should have knowledge to say my Father and my M●ther the Land should be forsak●n of both her Kings in answer unto what is spoken of the Child of the Virgin Chap. 7. v. 16. Chap. 8. v. 1. Fifthly That the name of this Child was to be Immanuel whereas he of whom we speak was called Jesus Mat. 1.21 Sixthly That the Child here mentioned was to be fed and nourished with butter and hony which cannot be spoken nor is written of Jesus of N●z●reth § 23 In answer unto th●se Obj●ctions some l●arned men have granted unto the Jews that th●se words of the Prophet were literally fulfilled in some one then a Virgin and afterwards married in those dayes and that they are only in a mystical sense applyed by Matth●w to the bir●h of the Lord Jesus as they say are sundry other things that are spok●n p●imarily of oth●●s in the Old Testament But the truth is this Answer is neither ●a●e in its self nor n●edfull as to the Argument of the Jews nor consist●nt with the sen●e of the place or Truth of the words themselves First It is not safe as to the faith of Chris●i●ns For wher●as the birth of the Messiah of a Virgin was so signal a Miracle and so emi●ent a charact●ristical note of his person if it be not directly fo●e●old and proph●si●d of in this place there was no one prediction of it made unto the Church of the Jews Now how this should seem reasonable whereas things of far less concernment are foretold is not easily made to appear S●condly Upon th●s interpretation of the words there is no ground left for the application of th●ir mystical sense which they pretend to be made by Matthew For if indeed the Person primarily directly and literally spoken of did not conceive a Child w●ilest she was a Virgin but only that she who was then a Virgin did afterwards upon marriage conceive in the ordinary course of nature there remains no ground for the application of what is spoken concerning her unto one who in and after her conception and the Birth of her Child continued a Virgin For although it be not required that there be an agreement in all things between the Type and the Antitype yet if there be no agreement between them in that wherein the one is designed to signifie the other they cannot on any account stand in that relation David as he was a King was a Type of Messiah the Great King There was we know not an absolute similitude in all things between David and him nor was there any necessity that so there should be that he might be his Type But yet if he had not been a King he could have been no Type of him at all in his Kingdom No more can any person here spoken of unless she did conceive a Son and bring forth continuing a Virgin be a Type of her who was so to do For how can the miraculous work of the Conception of a Virgin be signified or expressed by the ordinary Conception of a Woman in the State of Wedlock Besid●s this Answ●r is wholly needless as to the objection of the Jews and inconsistent with the sense of the place as will be seen in the consideration of the words themselves § 24 We have formerly e●inced that the foundation and end of the Judaical Church and State and of the preservation of the Davidical family was solely the bringing forth of the promised M●ssiah And this the Event hath fully demonstrated in their utter rejection after the accomplishment of that end And hence the pr●mise of the Messiah was the Foundation Cause and Reason of all other promises made unto that people as