Infants are saued by Gods election albeit they be taken out of this life not only without baptisme but also without faith See more art 15. Scripture What shall it profit if a man say he hath faith but hath not workes Shall his faith be able to saue him Protestants Faith iustifieth without good workes Faith void of good workes is imputed to iustice See more art 17. Scripture Whosoeuer beleiueth that Iesus is Christ is borne of God Abraham beleiued and it was imputed him to iustice Protestants Faith doth not iustifie vs by the worke beleife Not iustifieth See more art 18. Scripture To him that beleiueth in him who iustifieth the Faith reputed to iustice impious his faith is reputed to iustice Protestants The act of beleiuing is not our iustice Not the Not reputed act or worke of our faith that is our beleife iustifieth vs. See more art 19 Scripture Of the Princes also manie beleiued in him but for Certaine princes beleiued They beleiued not Manie beleiued They beleiued not Faith cause of Saluation Not cause thereof SimoÌ„ Magus beleiued He beleiued not Faith by hearing Not by hearing the Pharises they did not confesse Protestants We do not graunt that thoses Princes had true faith We denie that they truely beleiued See more art 20. Scripture Ihon. 2. Manie beleiued in his name Protestants Their faith was not true but hypocrisie See art 20. cit Scripture Thy faith hath made thee safe Protestants Faith doth not worke cause or procure our Saluation See more art 16. Scripture Simon Magus also him selfe beleiued Protestants Some beleiue not at all as Simon Magus He was quite faithlesse indeed he beleiued not See more art 21. Scripture Faith is by hearing Protestants Faith cometh not by the labour of the preachers Faith riseth of the Scripture alone not of the authoritie of the Church Faith can not be gotten by words See more articul 22. Scripture For a time they beleiue and in time of temptation Faith some time lost they reuolt Protestants True faith can neuer be lost It cannot be by Neuer lost anie means that those who beleiue should leese their faith See more art 23. Scripture reporteth that Christ saied to Thomas Be S. Thomas faith not incredulous but faithfull And that Thomas saied Vnlesse I see c. I will not beleiue Protestants Faith was not vtterly extinct in Thomas Faith He lost it not lay in his hart See more art 23. cit Scripture He that beleiueth in the Sonne hath life euerlasting Faith rewarded Protestants There is noe reward to faith No reward can be Not rewarded rendred to faith See art 24. Scripture Reporteth that Christ saied to the woman The womans faith pure who touched the hem of his garment Thy faith hath made the safe Protestants It may be that some errour or vice was mingled Not pure with the womans faith Perhaps she slipt a litle out of the way See more art 25. CHAPTER XIV OF GOOD VVORKES IN GENERAL SCripture saieth to a sinner beleiuing that there is one Some workes of a sinner good God Thou doest well and Rahab the harlot was not she iustified by workes Protestants VVhat workes soeuer goe before iustification None good are euill What can sinners alienated from God doe but is execrable in his iudgment See more art 1. Scripture In all these things Iob sinned not with his lips The iust sinne not in euerie worke In euerie worke Good workes sweet before God Vnsweet Protestants The iust man sinneth in euerie good worke All saints in euerie good worke do sinne See more art 2. Scripture Noë offered holocaustes vpon the altar and our lord smelled a sweell sauour Protestants Our workes stincke before God if they be called to a strait account Whatsoeuer we can giue to God is stenchie See more art 3. Scripture Remember how I haue walked before thee in trueth Some workes perfect and in a perfect hart Protestants All our good workes are imperfect They are None perfect partely euill See more art 4. Scripture Phinees stood and pacified and the slaughter ceased Some workes iust before God None iust before hmi and it was reputed to him vnto iustice Protestants Who make their workes euen those which they imagin to doe by the grace of Christ iustice before God make idols of them See more art 5. Scripture What is our hope or ioye or crowne of glorie Are Glorie before God not you before our lord Iesus in his coming Protestants It can not be that anie haue glorie before God Not glorie before him See more art 9. Scripture He who ioyneth his virgin in matrimonie doth Some workes better then others None better then others Some workes counselled None counselled well and he who ioyneth not doth better Protestants Before God there is no worke better then other See more art 10. Scripture As concerning virgins a commandment of our Lord I haue not but counsell I giue Protestants There are not some precepts and others counsells See more art 11. Scripture If you will not forgiue men nether will your Father Some workes necessarie to forgiuenesse Not necessarie forgiue you your offenses Protestants The pardon which we aske to be giuen to vs dependeth not vpon that which we giue to others See more artic 12. Scripture Patience is necessarie for you that doing the will Some necessarie to saluauation Not necessarie Some profitable None profitable of God you may receaue the promise Protestants Good workes are not necessarie to saluation See more art 13. Scripture Pietie is profitable to all things hauing promise of the life that now is and of that to come Protestants To teach that workes are holesome and profitable is diuellish and apostaticall from faith workes are vnprofitable to Christian iustice and likewise to saluation See more art 14. Scripture Be ye in nothing terrified of the aduersaries which Affliction cause of saluation to them is cause of perdition but to you of saluation and this of God Protestants The Scripture no where teacheth that the afflictions Not cause of saluation which the Saints suffer of the wicked are cause of their saluation See more art 15. Scripture Possesse you the kingdome prepared for you For I Workes cause of enioying heauen Not cause was an hungred and you gaue me to eate Protestants None shal be saued for his workes The kingdome of heauen is not giuen for good workes The iust are not rewarded for the workes of iustice which they haue done See more art 15. cit Scripture Labour that by good workes you may make sure Workes make cerâ—aintie of saluation They make it not your vocation and election Protestants We are vtterly vndone if we be sent to our workes when we must seeke the certaintie of our saluation See more art 16. Workes cause that God loueth vs. Not cause Scripture The Father him selfe loueth you
for true doctrin Page 529. It is manifest that God giueth power of working these kinde of miracles to false teachers that he may tempt them to whome they are sent Which he repeateth againe page 530. and addeth Miracles may be wrought to confirme false doctrin And Controu 4. quaest 5. c. 3. pag. 688. I answere that though they Papists did worke true miracles such as the Diuel cannot imitate they were not therefore to be beleiued Daneus Controu 4. lib. 4. cap. 14. pag. 784. We denie True miracles not sufficient that true miracles are a sufficient testimonie of true doctrin Hospinian l. de Origine Templorum pag. 140. God permitteth the Diuels some times to worke true miracles God doth this partely to tempt the elect partely for the greater blindnesse of the reprobate Luther in capit 7. Matth. tom 7. fol. 92. I am nothing moued with miracles albeit in my sight they should raise the dead to life For all these may deceaue God also permitteth true miracles to be wrought for punishment of them who care not for truth THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that true miracles are a greater testimonie then S. Ihon that though we did not beleiue Christ yet we should beleiue his miracles that they are Gods confirmation of trueth that if one in the finger of God cast out Diuels certainly he preacheth the kingdome of God The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that euen true miracles are no sufficient testimonie or argument of true doctrin that though we could do true miracles such as the Diuel cannot imitate yet we were not to be beleiued that miracles may be done to confirme false doctrin that God giueth to false teachers power to worke true miracles for to tempt men that they are nothing moued with miracles no though they should see the dead raised to life THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF GOD. I did thinke that it would not be vngratefull or vnprofitable to the Reader if at the end of euerie chapter I set downe the summe thereof that thereby he might as once perceaue in how manie and how great matters which haue beene handled in eche Chapter Protestants contradict the pure word of God and also how like verie false Prophets they plaie the theeues in euerie chapter and steal some thing Caluin in Actor 22. v. 14. Writeth thus of Catholiks Papists haue made a new God They haue coyned for themselues a Whether Catholiks or Protestants make a false God young God The same he saieth otherwhere and manie Protestants which whether it agree to Catholiks or to them will easily appeare out of that which hath beene saied in this Chapter For as touching iniquitie or sinne the God of the holie Scripture and of Catholiks willeth it not worketh it not doth not predestinate nor tempt men vnto it doth not command necessitate or compell to sinne But the God of Protestants doth all these as appeareth out of the. 1. 4. 5. 6. 7. and 8. Article As concerning sinners the God of Scripture and Catholiks hateth all that worke iniquitie is angrie with the faithfull when they sinne and punisheth them for sinnes committed The Protestants God doth none of these as appeareth by the 9. 11. and 12. Article As for good workes the God of Scripture and of Catholiks is delighted with them is worshipped with them accepteth good works not commanded is appeased with good works will haue his commandments kept The Protestants God doth all the contrarie as is seene by the 13. 14. 15. 16. and 17. Arâ—icle As touching men or mankind the Scripture and Catholiks God loueth all would haue all saued would as a hen her chickins gather euen theÌ„ which will not come will not the death of a sinner nor damneth men but for sinne The Protestants God is quite contrarie as is euident by the 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Article And finally concerning power the Scriptures and Catholiks God is omnipoteÌ„t can do those things which shall neuer be can make a Camell passe through a needls eye Such is not the Protestants God as is to be seene by the 23. and 24. Article Seing therefore so manie and so great properties agree to the Protestants God quite contrarie to those which the God proposed vnto vs by the holie Scripture and Catholiks hath it is euident that it is an other and a new God different from the God which the Scripture teacheth yea that it is as Caluin speaketh of the Libertins God an idol Cont. libert c. 14. which ought to be more detestable to vs theÌ„ all the PagaÌ„s idols or rather that it is the verie Diuel him selfe For what other can he be who willeth iniquitie will haue men to sinne worketh sinne procureth sinne is author of obduration is in like sorte author of crueltie as of loue predestinateth to sinne preordaineth sinne euen as it is sinne decreeth by a speciall decree that sinne be done pusheth to euill by him selfe immediatly and by a peculiar action necessitateth coÌ„pelleth to sinne coÌ„mandeth to lie and is author of temptation to euill and consequently is the Tempter and Father of lying which names the Scripture appropriateth to the Diuel who careth not for good workes is not delighted nor worshipped with them will not haue Gods commandments kept who commandeth that which he would not haue done and promiseth that which he will not performe who made death and is the Author of death and damnation the fontaine of perdition finally who damneth them that deserue it not and that for his mere pleasure These diuers other qualities before shewed do plainly declare who and what one he is whom Protestants teachers haue proposed to the world to adore as God who in trueth can be no other then the very Diuel It appeareth also out of that which hath beene rehearsed How manie and great attributes Protestants take from God Goodnesse in his Chapter that those coyners of a new God do plaie the theeues and steale from the true God manie of his principall properties For they steall away his goodnesse in saying that he willeth worketh decreeth sinne tempteth necessitateth compelleth to sinne careth not for good works nor is worshipped with them They take away his iustice in teaching that he hateth not all that worke iniquitie is not angrie with the faithfull when Iustice they sinne imputeth not their sinne to them will not haue his commandments kept commandeth that which he will not haue done and promiseth that which he will not performe They robbe him of his omnipotencie OmnipoteÌ„cie whiles they affirme that there are manie things which he cannot doe And in place of these admirable vertues they giue to him the contrarie vices For in steed of goodnesse they attribute vnto him malice wherewith he willeth worketh decreeth iniquitie and predestinateth necessitateth and compelleth men vnto it For Iustice they giue him Iniustice wherewith he iustifieth the impious remaining impious and damneth those that deserue it not And for
a preaching of the grace of God The like hath Gesnerus in Compendio loco 15. Gerlachius to 2. disp 13. The law requiring workes properly belongeth not to the Ghospell Againe It is truely saied that not the Ghospell but the law requireth workes Lobechius Disput 9. The word of the Ghospell sheweth not what is to be done by working but what we must beleiue Caluin in Rom. 10. ver 8. As the law exacted workes the Ghospell requireth nothing else but that men bring faith to receaue Gods grace The like hath Beza in Catechismo compend and others THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that Ihon Baptist Christ and the Apostles begā the preaching of Ghospell by preaching pennance that Christ came to call sinners to pennance that pennance and remission of sinnes are to be preached in his name that God in the Ghospell denounceth to all mē that they doe pennance And the Ghospell euery where preacheth good workes The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the Ghospell properly taken doth not preach pennance that the Ghospell commandeth onely to beleiue in Christ requireth nothing but faith sheweth not what is to be done or vndone but what is to be beleiued that it requireth not workes cānot abide that workes be preached whatsoeuer they be preacheth not that this or that thing is to be done preacheth not newnesse of life or good workes containeth not doctrin of Good workes Which are so contrarie to Scripture as some Protestants confesse it See l. 2. c. 30. ART V. WHETHER THE GHOSPELL do reproue sinne SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Rom. 1. v. 17. For the iustice of God is reuealed in it Gospell The Ghospell reproueth sinne by faith into faith v. 18. For the wrath of God from heauen is reuealed vpon all impietie and iniustice c. Ihon. 16. v. 8. And when he the Paraclet is come he shall argue the world of sinne and of iniustice The same teach the places cited in the former article and others wherein the Ghospell commandeth men to abstaine from sinne and threatneth punishment thereto CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton Roman 1. vers 18. Absurdly and impiously is saied that it belongeth not to the ministerie of the Ghospell to reproue sinne PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther Concordiae cap. 5. pag. 593. When the law and The Ghospell reproueth not sinne the Ghospell are compared together we beleiue each and confesse that the Ghospell is not a preaching of pennance reprouing sinne but that properly it is nothing els but a most ioyfull message and a preaching full of comfort not reprouing or terrifying Luther Postilla in die Om. Sanct. fol. 441. The law commandeth Dot not threaten threatneth and vrgeth the Ghospell maketh no threats nor pusheth on Schusselb to 4. Catal. Haeret. p. 209. The Ghospell properly speaking doth reproue no sinne but this is the proper and most proper office of the law Caluin 2. Instit c. 10. § 4. The Ghospells preaching pronounceth nothing els but that sinners through the fatherly goodnes of God are iustified without their merit Beza in Rom. 1. v. 18. To reproue sinne rather belongeth to the ministerie of the law then of the Ghospell THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that in the Gholpell Gods anger is reuealed vpon all iniustice that the spirit of the Ghospell reproueth sinne The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that to reproue sinne rather belongeth to the ministerie of the law then of the Ghospell that the Ghospell properly taken reproueth not sinne but is nothing els but a message of ioy and comfort that to reproue sinne is the proper office of the law Which is so opposite to the Scripture as some times Protestants confesse it See l. 2. c. 30. ART VI. WHETHER THE GHOSPELL promiseth saluation with condition of good workes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Mathew 19. vers 17. If thou wilt enter into life keepe the The Ghospell promiseth saluation vpon condition of Workes commandments Luke 13. vers 3. Vnlesse you haue pennance you shall all likewise perish Roman 8. vers 13. If you liue according to the flesh you shall die Hebrews 10. v. 36 For patience is necessarie for you that doing the will of God you may receaue the promise C. 12. v. 14. Follow peace with all men and holines without which no man shall see God Ihon 3. v. 5. Vnlesse a man be borne againe of water and the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God c. 6. v. 53. Vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood ye shall not haue life in you c. 15. v. 10. If you keepe my precepts you shall abide in my loue CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 6. Can. 20. If anie shall say that a man iustified and neuer so perfect is not bound to keepe the commandments of God and the Church but onely to beleiue as if the Ghospell were an absolute and bare promise without condition of keeping Gods commandments be he accursed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Apol. Conf. Augustan fol. 60. Doth not the Ghospell promise remission of sinnes and saluation euen to those that haue no good workes at all ib. in resp ad arg If remission of sinnes do depend of the cōdition of our workes it wil be altogether vncertaine Luther in Colloq Mensal apud Vlemberg causa 5. The Ghospell promiseth saluation without condition of workes Whosoeuer saieth that the Ghospell requireth workes to saluation is a lyer Perkins in Gal. 3. to 2. The Ghospell offereth and giueth life freely without condition of anie worke and requireth nothing but the acceptance of the thing offered Willet Controu 19. quaest 1. pa. 1012. The Ghospell and the law are twoe distinct things The law saieth Doe this and thou shalt be saued The Ghospell Beleiue onely and it sufficeth vnto life Adamus Francisci in Margarita Theol. loco 8. The promisse of the Ghospell is not conditionall Gerlachius to 2. disput 13. The promisses of the Ghospell are not conditionall but absolute in respect of workes The Diuines of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg Scripto 6. p. 134. The promises of the law are conditionall because they propose reward with condition of obedience But the promises of the Ghospell are not conditionall but free Caluin in Antidot Concil Sess 6. Con. 20. In that the Ghospell differeth frō the law because it promiseth life by faith and not vnder the condition of workes as the law doth And 3. Instit c. 11. § 17. The promises of the Ghospell are free and relie vpon the onely mercie of God whereas the promises of the law depend of the condition of workes Peter Martyr in Rom. 11. We denie that Gods testament of remission of sinnes in Christ hath anie condition adioyned Pareus l. 4. de Iustif c. 1. The Ghospell properly is the doctrine of grace so it requireth onely the condition of faith And c. 2. The Ghospell strictly and properly hath promises of saluation vnder the onely condition of faith and
of these Princes a foresaied albeit weake yet was true and liuelie The same saieth Pareus l. 1. de Iustificat c. 15. Caluin in Antidoto Concilij Sess 6. Can. 28. I denie not Faith liuelie euen in most grieuous sinnes that some seed of faith remaineth in a man euen in most grieuous falls That how litle soeuer it be I confesse to be a parcell of true faith and liuelie also Zanchius in Confess c. 27. to 8. The faith of the elect alwaies liueth Contra remonstrantes in Collat. Hagae 396. It is not saied here If faith be defiled with any grieuous sinne that that faith is dead for so no man should haue liuelie faith Of the same opinion are all Lutherans who say that faith before and without good workes doth iustifie and Sacramentaries also who teach that iustification of faith remaineth in the faithfull what sinnes soeuer they commit For faith saieth doth not iustifie or giue life whiles it is dead but onely whiles it is liuelie if it iustifie without good workes yea with verie ill workes cleare it is that it is not dead or idle but liuelie without good or with ill workes THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that faith without good workes is dead is dead in it selfe is dead as a bodie without the soule that all faith without charitie is nothing The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that faith without workes is not dead is not nothing is not vnprofitable that though it be defiled with great sinnes yet it is not dead that it nether can be nor caÌ„ be saied to be dead that in grieuous falls it is liuelie euen in those Princes who loued the glorie of men more then the glorie of God ART XI WHETHER THE FAITH whereof S. Iames speaketh be true or iustifying faith SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Iames 2. vers 22. Seest thou that faith did worke with his Saint Iames speaketh of iustifying faith Abrahams workes and by the workes the faith was consummate and the Scripture was fulfilled saying Abraham beleiued God and it â—as reputed him to iustice Et v. 24. Do you see that by workes a man is iustified and not by faith onely CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l 1. de Iustif cap. 15 many waies proueth that S. Iames speaketh of iustifying faith PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker l. 1. cont Dureum sect 13. That Iames denieth He speaketh of a diuelish faith vs to be iustified by faith onely is to be vnderstood of a vaine feigned dead imaginarie and diuelish faith The like hath Iewel cited before art 8. Zuinglius in Iacob 2. to 4. saieth S. Iames speaketh of a counterfeit emptie and vaine faith Caluin in Iacob 2. v. 17. 19. He speaketh not of faith In v. Of a dead image of faith 14. He speaketh of a dead image of faith of a false profession Beza in Iacob 2. v. 14. It is not true faith but a dead image Peter Martyr in locis clas 3. c. 3. § 23. Iames maketh mentioÌ„ of a dead faith but that is no faith Pareus l. 4. de Iustif c. 18. For Iames deuideth not iustification He remoueth faith from iustification betweene faith and workes as the Sophisters would but wholy remoueth faith as a dead thing from iustification THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that S. Iames spooke of faith which did worke with the workes of Abraham which was consummate by his workes wherewith Abraham did beleiue which was reputed to him for iustice and by which a man is iustified but not alone The same say Catholiks Protestants say that the faith whereof S. Iames speaketh was not iustifying faith was not faith was not true faith was a vaine feigned imaginarie and diuelish faith was a counterfeite and dead image of faith ART XII WHETHER ANIE FAITH be full or perfect and of some account in the sight of God SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Mathew 15. v. 28. Then Iesus answering saied to her O Woman Some faith great Full. great is thy faith Act. 6. v. 5. And they chose Steuen a man full of faith and of the Holie Ghost Rom. 4. v. 18. Who contrarie to hope beleiued in hope Et v. 19. Strong And he was not weakened in faith 2. Cor. 8. v. 7. In all things you abuond in faith Aboundant Heb. 10. ver 22. Let vs approch with a true hart in fulnesse of faith Iames 2. vers 22. And by the workes the faith was consummate Consummate 1. Petri 1. v. 7. That the triall of your faith much more pretious Pretious then gould which is proued by the fire may be found vnto praise CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Rom. 4. v. 2. The act of faith wherewith the vnderstanding is captiuated vnto the obedience of Christ is an act of notable vertue PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Iacobus Andreae in Colloq Montisbel p. 106. Faith is Faith is imperfect imperfect and no man beleiueth so firmely as he is bound to doe Caluin 3. Instit c. 11. § 7. Faith albeit of it selfe it be of no Of no worth worth or value iustifieth vs bringing Christ as a pitcher filled with money doth enrich a man In Math. 9. v. 22. We see that faith hath need of pardon for to please God In Act. 6. v. 8. Nether must we imagin any perfection of faith because he Saint Steuen was saied to be full of faith Beza in Colloq Montisbel pag. 28. It neuer came in our Not perfect mynd to say that there was any perfect faith in any Peter Martyr in locis classe 3. c. 3. § 6. Which I say not that I thinke that we are iustified by faith as it is a worke for it is defiled with many spottes of our infirmitie c. 4. § 8. If faith it selfe be considered as it is worke we cannot be iustified by it sith it is a worke lame and inperfect and farre worse then the law requireth but we are saied to be iustified by it as by it we apprehend and applie to our selues the promises of God and iustice merits of Christ Imagin a most filthie hand leprous and of some beggar Like a most filthie and leprous hand with which he receaueth almes of the giuer surely that beggar is not holpen of the filthinesse or leprosie of his hand but of the almes which he taketh with what kinde of hand soeuer And in Roman 11. he compareth our faith to a weake leprous and scabbie hand Pareus de Iustificat c. 7. It is not absurd that with faith is Sinfull mingled sometimes distrust or incredulitie which is a sinne and that so by an accident faith is sinne Againe Faith iustifieth as a beggar by a scabbie hand receaueth almes Pareus in c. 31. Enchiridij S. Augustini If we consider how Not worthie the name of vertue faith is of it selfe and in vs it is imperfect lame polluted and defiled and mingled with infidelitie so that it is not truely worthie of the
WHETHER FAITH BEING alone and without good workes can iustifie SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Iames 2. v. 14. What shall it profit my brethren if a man say he hath faith but hath not workes Shall faith be able to saue him v. 24. Do you see that by workes a man is iustified and Faith alone doth not iustifie nor saue not by faith onely The same proue the places before cited which affirme that faith without workes is dead CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE Councel of Trent Sess 6. c. 7. Faith doth not perfectly vnite to Christ nor maketh a liuelie member of him vnlesse to it be adioyned hope and charitie PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Confessio Belgica art 24. We are iustified by faith in Christ and that also before we haue done any good workes Luther in Gal. 2 to 5. fol. 310. This faith doth iustifie before Iustified before workes and without charitie fol. 312. It is an errour and impietie to say that infused faith doth not iustifie vnlesse it be adorned with Faith without charitie doth iustifie the workes of charitie Et in Disput to 1. f. 371. vnlesse faith be without anie euen the least workes it doth not iustifie nay it is 〈◊〉 â—aâ—th Liber Concordiae Lutheran c. 3 We reiect and condemne That faith doth not iustifie without good workes and so good The presence of workes is not needfull workes to be necessarily required to iustification and that without their presence a man cannot be iustified Illyricus in Claue Scripturae part 2. tractat 6. It is falsely saied That faith is neuer without good workes if it be ment of their actuall and not onely potentiall presence especially in the first iustification Againe God iustifieth the impious euen not working Therefore in iustification good workes do not onely not cooperate but nether are they present Schlusselbug to 7. Catal. Haeret. pag. 837. Our proposition Faith without workes iustifieth remaineth straÌ„ge That faith in the first iustification of a wicked sinner is without all good workes actually present Wigandus in Schlusselburg lib. cit p. 792. Faith must needs be first and then workes follow albeit we cannot discerne the time For Luthers sentence is certaine Faith iustifieth before it doth good workes Et p. 764. The absence of our good workes doth Absence of workes hindreth not iustification not hinder God to impute iustice by Christ Authour de Iustif to 5. doctrinae Iesuit p. 241. The holie Scripture describeth manie iustified in whome is no good worke seene but onely faith Againe These and the like examples do clearly shew that in the beginning faith is truely without good workes and that it so voide of good works is imputed to iustice and receaueth remission of sinnes See more of their like sayings hereafter cap. 14. art 12. For the same beleiue as well the Lutherans who hould that the presence of good workes is not necessarie to iustification as Caluinists who teach that iustification of faith remaineth in the faithfull euen in most grieuous sinnes THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely sayeth that faith without workes profiteth not saueth not is dead that a man is not saued with faith onely The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that faith iustifieth before we doe any good worke without and before charitie without euen the least good workes without good workes actually present without the presence of good workes that in iustification good workes are not so much as present that manie are iustified in whome no good workes are seene that faith void of good workes is imputed to iustice and receaueth remission of sinnes ART XVIII WHETHER FAITH DO iustifie as it is Beleife or as it beleiueth or knoweth SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Ioan. 17. v. 3. This is life euerlasting that they know thee the Faith iustifieth as it is a knowledge onely true God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ 1. Ioan. c. 5. ver 1. Whosoeuer beleiueth that Iesus is Christ is borne of God v. 5. Who is he that ouercometh the world but he that beleiueth that Iesus is the Sonne of God Rom. 4. v. 3. Abraham beleiued God and it was reputed him to iustice c. 10. vers 9. If thou confesse with thy mouth our Lord Iesus and in thy hart beleiue that God hath raised him vp from the dead thou shalt be saued CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 6. cap. 6. They are disposed to iustice whilst stirred vp and holpen by Gods grace conceauing faith by hearing they are freely moued to God beleiuing these things to be true which are reuealed and promised PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Willet Controu 19. pag. 983. Faith doth not iustifie vs by Faith iustifieth not as it is a Beleife As it is a Beleife But as it is a Petition the worke of beleiuing As it is an act of beleiuing onely it iustifieth not Feild l. 3. de Eccles c. 44. Speciall faith hath sundrie actes but to this purpose specially two The one by way of petition huÌ„bly intreating for acceptation and fauour the other in the nature of confortable assurance consisting in a persuasion that that is graunted which was desired Faith by her first act obtaineth and worketh our iustification by her second act she doth not actiuely iustifie but finding the thing done certifieth and assureth vs of it Zuinglius l. de ver falsa relig cap. de Merito Faith in As it is a Trust a Confidence Scripture is taken manie waies First for beleife then for stedfastnes next for trust in God and of this onely it must be vnderdoost That faith saueth Respons ad Confess Lutheri f. 507. To say that this kind of faith and assent bringeth any comfort securitie peace tranquillitie or saluation to our soules were false and most foolish Hemingius in Enchirid. classe 1. pag. 109. It is manifest that none is saued by onely knowledge Whereupon euerie one seeth that iustifying faith is not onely the knowledge of the historie of Christ. Lobechius Disput 22. Sauing faith is saied to iustifie not by the foundation as it is a knowledge and assent in the mynd and trust in the will but by reason of the end or obiect which is Christ And of the same opinion are other Protestants as appeareth both by their words related before art 2. 3. and also because they teach that iustifying faith is not the Catholik faith wherewith we beleiue the misteries of faith but a speciall trust or confidence wherewith euerie elect faithfull man assureth himselfe of the remission of his sinnes or at least that it includeth this trust Herevpon Confessio Saxon. c. 4. saieth By faith is signified a trust resting Protâ—stants faith is Trust on the Sonne of God Which is repeated c. 7. 16. Luther Praef. in Epist ad Rom. to 5. Faith is a trust of the mercie of God towards vs. Ministri Saxonici in Colloq Aldeburg fol. 30. Faith in this matter we vnderstand to be trust relying vpon Christ. Zuinglius Respons
them that they are imperfect most imperfect lame vitious not wholy pure imperfectly good haue no perfect goodnesse are not absolutely good not absolutely or simply iust defiled with manie vices disgraced with infinit filth polluted as water running through a filthie channell in parte ill and sinnes and that there is no intire good of ours in this life ART V. WHETHER THE GOOD workes of the Iust be iust or iustice in the sight of God SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Deuter. 24. v. 13. But if he be pore the pledge shalt not lodge To restore a pledge is iustice before God Phinees zeale was iustice Noe Daniel and Iob had iustice Iustice in Daniel with the that night but forth with thou shall restore it vnto him that thou mayest haue iustice before our Lord thy God Psal 105. v. 30. And Phinees stood and pacified and the slaughter ceased and it was reputed to him vnto iustice Ezech. 14. ver 14. And if these three men shal be in the middest thereof Noë Daniel and Iob they by their iustice shall deliuer their owne soules saieth the Lord of hostes Daniel 6. ver 22. My God hath sent his Angel and hath shut vp the mouthes of the lyons and they haue not hurt me because before him iustice hath beene found in me Luc. 1. v. 75. That without feare being deliuered from the hand of our enemies we may serue him in holines and iustice before him all our dayes Hebr. 11. v. 33. Who by faith ouercame kingdomes wrought Saints worke iustice iustice 1. Ioan. 3. v. 12. Because his workes were wicked but his brothers iust CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton l. 6. de Iustif cap. 8. The iustice of good workes done in faith is true iustice before God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther in Disp to 1. f. 390. God rewardeth iustice which he Our iustice is wickednesse accounteth wickednesse and iniquitie Et in c. 53. Isaiae to 4. The iustice of Christians is onely in reputation iustice but not formally Kemnice in locis tom 2. tit de Argumentis To restore a pledge to the pore is truely a good and iust worke but not such as if it be examined according to the rigour of the law deserueth the title of iustice Caluin in Antidoto Concil Sess 6. c. 8. How farre is that Not iustice Nether wholy nor in parte newnesse which is begunne in this life from iustice Againe Will they bring me one place which witnesseth that God approueth the begūne newnesse of life for iustice ether wholy or in parte In c. 11. ver 183. It procedeth from free imputation that workes get the Farre from true iustice name of iustice which otherwise would be farre from the trueth of iustice In Rom. 3. v. 27. The law of faith leaueth no iustice No iustice in workes whatsoeuer they be In c. 11. v. 6. As often as grace is named the iustice of workes is brought to nothing Et 3. Instit c. 17. § 9. There is no worke which is not so defiled by it owne corruption that it retaineth not the honour of iustice Againe workes are iudged iust aboue their worth Pareus l. 1. de Iustif c. 19. Who make their workes euen those which they imagin to doe by the grace of Christ iustice or merits of iustice before God make idols of them and so in trueth make of them dung and dung-hill Gods l. 2. c. 10. Hou should it be true and absolute iustice which faileth in manie things l. 3. c. 8. That inherent iustice of charitie and workes is so vncertaine and doubtfull as in trueth it is none at all in the iudgment of God Et l. 4. c. 20. Whether God examine our iustice according to himselfe or according to the rule of the law it is found to be iniustice Ministri Electorales in Colloq Aldeburg p. 421. Nether Not to be called iustice can our workes be called iustice before God THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that the good workes of the Iust are iust are iustice are iustice before God that by him they are reputed for iustice that the iust shall deliuer their soules by their iustice The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that the good works of the Iust are far frō trueth of iustice retaine not the honour of iustice are not true and absolute iustice that before God they are nether wholy nor in parte iustice that the law of faith leaueth no iustice in workes that by grace the iustice of workes is brought to nothing that truely there is no iustice in the iudgment of God that God accounteth our iustice iniustice wickednesse iniquitie that who make good workes done by grace to be iustice before God make them idols and dunghill Gods ART VI. WHETHER IN THE GOOD workes of the Iust there can be any worth or worthinesse SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Philippens 1. v. 26. Onely conuerse yee worthie of the Ghospell Conuersation worthie of the Ghospell We are worthie of the lot of Saints of Christ Coloss 1. v. 12. God the Father hath made vs worthie vnto the parte of the lot of the Saintes in the light 1. Thessal 2. v. 12. As you know in what manner we desiring and comforting you haue adiured euerie one of you as a father his children that you would walke worthie of God who hath called you into his kingdome and glorie 3. Ihon. v. 6. Whome thou shalt do well bringing on their way in manner worthie of God Apoc. 3. v. 4. And they shall walke with me in whites because Saints worthie to walke with Christ they are worthie CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Ioan. 4. v. 14. This place teacheth the force and worth of workes which come of the Holie Ghost against the the wicked Heretiks of our time PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther de Seruo arb to 2. f. 453. In merit or Reward ether No worth in our workes we meane of the worth or of the sequele If you meane worth there is no merit no reward Hemingius in Enchir. Classe 1. p. 122. If we must iudge of Vnworthie of the sight of God workes according to their worth they are vnworthie to come in the sight of God Caluin in Rom. 9. v. 11. The worth of workes is not regarded which is none at all 3. Institut c. 17. § 8. If we must set a price of workes according to their worth we say they are vnworthie to come in the sight of God Et in Antidoto Concil Sess 6. c. vlt. They giue a false worthinesse to workes as if they please without forgiuenesse Bezal Quaest vol. 1. p. 674. I say that these workes of the regenerate do please not for anie worth of theirs but for the mere grace of the Father The like hath Bucanus in Institut Ioco 32. THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that we may conuerse worthily to the Ghospell of God walke worthily of God bring on others worthily of God that some are made worthie
to the parte of Saintes that some are worthie to walke with God in white The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that there is no worth at all in good workes that they are vnworthie to come in Gods sight ART VII WHETHER LIFE EVERlasting or reward be promised or giuen to good workes or good workers SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Mathew 20. vers 8. Call the worke men and pay them Hire giuen to workes their hire 1. Tim. 4. v. 8. Pietie is profitable to all things hauing promise Life to come promised to pietie of the life that now is and of that to come Apoc. 2. v. 7. To him that ouercometh I will giue to eate of the tree of life 2. Paralipomen 15. vers 7. For there shal be reward to Reward to workes your worke Math. 25. v. 34. Come ye blessed of my Father possesse you the The Kinkdome giuen for workes kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the world For I was an hungred and you gave me to eate c. CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 5. de Iustificat c. 3. The Scripture in expresse words saied that this reward is giuen to the worke not to the promise onely PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Zuinglius in Lucae 13. to 4. Workes are not the things to Saluation not giuen to workes Nor heauenlie rewards which God giueth euerlasting safetie Author libri de Iustif to 5. doctrinae Iesuiticae p. 240. It must not be demanded nor granted that heauenlie rewards are giuen to good workes Pareus l. 5. de Iustif c. 3. I say that it is a false glose Call the Nor life euerlasting workmen giue them their hire that is giue the workmen life euerlasting Againe I denie also that life euerlasting is giuen to workers Ministers of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg pag. 162. You neuer reade in the Scripture That euerlasting life is giuen to good workes THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that hire is giuen to workmē that to him that ouercometh is giuen to eate of the tree of life that to pietie is promised both this life and the next that there is reward to workes The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that life euerlasting is not giuen to workmen that it is a false glose Giue the workmen their hire that is giue workmen life euerlasting that God giueth not eternall life to workes that he giueth not heauenlie rewards to workes ART VIII WHETHER GOOD WORKES of the Iust be meritorious before God SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Eccles 16. v. 15. All mercie shall make place to euerie man Merit in good workes according to the merit of his workes Hebr. 13. ver 19. And beneficence and communication do not God promerited forgette for with such hostes God is promerited CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 6. c. 16. We must beleiue that nothing is wanting to those that are iustified whereby fully they may not be iudged to haue truely merited life euerlasting in due time by the workes which are done in God so they departe hence in grace PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confessio Wittenberg c. de Iustif Before the tribunall of God where true and eternall iustice and saluation is handled No place at all for merits there is no place at all for the merits of men Confessio Belgica art 15. We do good workes but not to Merit is vanitie merit any thing by them For what can we merit Confessio Scotica art 15. Whosoeuer brag of merit of their workes brag of vanitie Perkins Cathol reform Contr. 5. c. 1. We renounce all personall All personall merit renounced merits that is all merits within the person of any mere man c. 2. It must needs be a fanaticall insolencie for any man to imagin that he can by his workes merit eternall life who cannot We cannot merit bread merit bread Luther de Seruo atbit tom 2. fol. 480. There is no merit at all Zuinglius in Exposit Fdiei to 2. f. 558. It is manifest that the names of Merit and Reward are in the holie Scripture but in steed of a liberall guift Caluin 3. Instit c. 16. § 2. We take from men the opinion of meriting c. 7. § 3. The workes of Gods seruants perpetually deserue Not one drop of merit rather shame then praise In Rom. 4. v. 2. Who then of vs will chalenge one drop of merit In Gal. 6. ver 8. I say that they are not onely vnworthie of the basest reward but wholy worthie to be damned Beza in Ioan. 1. v. 9. Where are merits which we may bring before Away with the name of merit God Et l. Quaest vol. 1. p. 681. Away with the name of merit which is directly contrarie to grace Et 690. Thou shall not find in any place of the Scripture the name of merit Scarpe de Iustific Contr. 15. We say that the workes of the Nether condigne nor cōgruoue merit faithfull in Gods sight are no way meritorious ether condignely or congruously THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that euerie one shal be rewarded according to the merit of his workes that God is promerited by good workes The same say Catholiks Protestants say that there is no merit at all not a drop of merit in our workes that we cannot merit bread not the basest reward that our works are no way meritorious nether condignely nor congruously Which some Protestants confesse to be contrarie to Scripture See libro 2. cap. 30. ART XI WHETHER THE IVST may glorie in God of their good workes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Cor. 1. v. 30. He that doth glorie may glorie in our Lord. We may glorie in God c. 9. v. 15. It is good for me to die rather then that any man should make my glorie void Galat. 6. vers 4. Let euerie one proue his owne workes and so in himselfe onely shall he haue glorie and not in an other 2. Thessalon 2. versus 19. and 20. For what is our hope or ioy or crowne of glorie Are not you before our Lord Iesus in his coming For you are our glorie and our ioye 2. Corinth 1. v. 12. For our glorie is the testimonie of our In the testimonie of our conscience concience CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Rom. 3. ver 21. Abraham had workes by which he might glorie before God Cardinal Bellarmin libro quinto de Iustification cap 5. Faith excludeth all their glorying who glorie in themselues as if they could worke iustice by their owne strength and had of themselues all the good which they haue but it excludeth not the glorying of them who glorie in our Lord. PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther postilla in Natali Dom. fol. 374. There is no cause No glorie in anie worke why we should glorie neuer so litle in these works but rather that we should blush Caluin in Com. 4. vers 2. Abraham had not whereupon to glorie before God In cap. 3. vers
promise wil be abrogated In Philippen 1. ver 28. Certainly the Scripture no where teacheth that the afflictions which the Saintes suffer of the wicked are cause of their saluation Beza in Confess c. 4. sect 19. For these things are not so to be vnderstood as if our workes were cause of our saluation ether wholy or in parte Peter Martyr in Rom. 9. God workes are no true cause of eternall saluation Zanchius l. 5. de Natura Dei cap. 2. q. 7. The workes of the godlie are no true causes of euerlasting happines but onely the meanes by which as it were by degrees the elect are mercifully ledde into the euerlasting and heauenlie cittie Pareus libr. 4. de Iustificat cap. 7. Our aduersarie concludeth false that the kingdome of heauen is giuen for good workes Tilenus in Syntagmate cap. 48. Good workes in respect of No cause at all saluation can be no cause at all THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely teacheth not onely that we shall possesse the kingdome of heauen because we haue done good workes that we shall reape life euerlasting of the spirit that the soule liueth for iustification that sorrow according to God worketh saluation that afflictiction worketh glorie and is cause of saluation but also in the same manner saieth that the elect shall possesse heauen because they haue done good deeds as it saieth that the reprobats shall goe into euerlasting fire because they haue done ill deeds So it saieth that the soule liueth for iustification as it saieth the bodie dieth for sinne In like sorte it saieth that sorrow according to God maketh saluation as it saieth that sorrow of the world worketh death Euen in the same sorte it saieth that of sowing in spirit we shall reap life euerlasting as it saieth that of sowing in flesh we shall reape corruption And in the same kind of speach saieth that persecution is cause of saluation to those who suffer it as it saieth that it is cause of damnation to those who make it The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that affliction is not cause of saluation that the heauenlie in heritance cometh not to vs by workes that the life is not giuen for good workes that we are not rewarded for good workes not saued for workes that saluation dependeth not of workes that workes are no way cause saluation are no cause of it ether wholy or in parte Which do so plainely contradict the Scripture as therefore Illyricus is forced to reproue the Scripture For this he writeth in Claue tractat 6. cit tit de varia bonorum operum praedicat col 551. We heare that toto great effects and praises yea euen saluation it selfe is attributed of the Scripture to good workes It manifestly appeareth that very often to much paise is giuen by Scripture to good workes which doth not agree to them nor is to be attributed if we will speake exactly truely and properly Behould how plainely he saieth that Scripture attributeth to great effects vnto good workes attributeth saluation vnto them attributeth very oftentime to much praise vnto them and such effects as agree not to them nor are to be be attributed to them if we will speake truely But surely if the Scripture attributeth to much to good workes and that which doth not agree to them and which is not to be attributed to them if we will speake truely the Scripture in so doing doth falsely But whether the Scripture or Illyricus know better what is to be attributed to good workes let Christians iudge ART XVI WHETHER GOOD WORKES be a testimonie of iustice and predestination SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Ioan. 2. ver 5. But he that keepeth his word in him in By good workes we know we are in God That we are translated from death God workes make election sure very deed the charitie of God is perfited in this we know that we be in him cap. 3. ver 14. We know that we are translated from death to life because we loue the brethren And ver 21. If our hart do not reprehend vs we haue confidence towards God 2. Peter 1. vers 10. Wherefore brethren labour the more that by good workes you may make sure your vocation and election CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Rom. 9. ver 11. If we beleiue Saint Peter the certaintie of our saluation and consequently of the election is concluded in doing of good workes not in the onely purpose of God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confessio Wittenbergensis C. de Confess We know that Workes make but doubt and despaire if we looke vnto our workes we should not onely doubt but also despaire of our saluation Ministri Electorales in Colloq Aldeburg pag. 427. We No certaintie by good must certainely determine out of the word of God deliuered and proposed vnto vs and not out of the feeling of infused newnesse of life as it were by an effect that by faith freely for and by Châ—ist we haue remission of sinnes Caluin 3. Instit c. 2. § 38. If we must iudge by workes how God is affected toward vs I confesse that we can haue but a small ghesse all it De necessitate reform pag. 47. What shall man A small ghesse by workes Matter of doubt and despaire Of trembling find in his workes but matter of doubting and at length of despairing And in Antidot Concili Sess 6. cap. 8. As long as we looke what we are we must tremble before God so farre are we from hauing certaine and vnshaken hope of eternall life In Rom. 4. v. 14. We are vtterly lost and vndone if we be sent to our workes when we must seeke the cause or certaintie of our saluation In 1. Ioan. 3. v. 22. Woe to vs if we looke to our workes Nothing but matter of feare which haue nothing in them but matter of feare Pareus lib. 1. de Iustificat cap. 10. The trust of remission of sinnes nether dependeth nor riseth of a good conscience l. 3. c. 2. Our faith and trust doth reape nothing of our owne disposition but feare of deceit doubt and anxietie Et l. 4. p. 625. Of our owne Of doubt and anxietie accord we graunt that if faith must relie vpon inherent iustice we must not onely doubt of grace and iustice but also perpetually tremble THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that we know that we are in God by keeping of his word that we know we are translated from death to life because we loue our brethren that we haue trust toward God if our hart do not reprehend vs that we make our vocation and election certaine by good workes The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that by workes we haue no certaine trust that trust nether dependeth nor riseth of a good conscience that by workes we cannot haue anie small ghesse how God is affected towards vs that we are vndone if we must seeke the certaintie of our saluation out of workes that in workes is nothing found
neighbour that euerie good worke is to be directed onely for chastizment of our bodie or profit of our neighbour that it is not amōg the dueties of a Christian man which profiteth not our neighbour that before God we must cease from workes that our workes are to be directed to man onely and not to God Which sometimes Protestants themselues confesse to be contrarie to Scripture See l. 2. c. 30. THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF GOOD workes in generall The things which we haue rehearsed in this chapter do clearly shew that Protestants teach farre otherwise of of good workes then Scripture doth For the holie Scripture and Catholiks with it teacheth that good workes of the iust are not sinnes are a sweet sauour before God are intirely good are iust or iniust worthie meritorious vnequall not all commanded of God profitable and necessarie to iustification and saluation cause of saluation testimonie of iustice and election a cause why God loueth vs that we ought to do good workes and for Gods glorie and that we may also do them partly for reward All which are denied of Protestants They also shew that in this matter of good workes What Protest steale from goost workes if in anie whatsoeuer Protestants playe the thieues and steale For from the workes of sinnes they steale all goodnesse And from the workes of the iust they steale intire goodnesse true goodnesse true iustice sweetnes worth and merit before God who iudgeth of them as they are indeed They steale away also their necessitie and vtilite of iustifying and sauing their causalitie of saluation o◠of Gods loue towards vs their force of testifying iustification or election our obligation to do them and the end for which they are to be done to wit reward and Gods glorie And consequently they take out of the world all true vertue or iustice and the sweetnes thereof and also the worth the commoditie the efficacitie the testification and end and in their steed bring in mere sinnes mere iniquities stenches dung vnpleasant to God vnworthie of God and vnprofitable to vs yea hurthfull and pernitious And yet these men take it in euill parte to be called enemies of good workes or that they speake contemptuously of them But how I pray you can they speake more contemptuously of good workes they Protest enemies of good workes callling them ill sinnes mere sinnes mere iniquities mere pollutions stenches and dung in the sight of God who iudgeth no otherwise of them then they are indeed Or how can they be greater enemies of good workes then by taking away or denying that there are any true good workes in the world and by putting in their places their quite contraries that is euill workes and sinnes And hitherto of good workes in generall Now of them in par-particular CHAPTER XIV OF GOOD VVORKES IN PARTICVLAR ART I. WHETHER IT BE GOOD not to marrie SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. CORINT 1. cap. 7. vers 8. But I say to the vnmarried Good to abide vnmarried and to woddows it is good for them if they so abide as I also And vers 1. It is good for a man not to touch a woman vers 26. It is good for a Not no touch a woman man so to be CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 2. de Monachis cap. 9. Paul absolutely pronounceth that it is good not to touch a woman PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin in 1. Cor 7. v. 1. The Lord calleth it euill to want a Ill to want a wife wife In Gen. 2. v. 18. Maniethimke that single life is good for them and therefore lest they should be miserable they abstaine A wicked suggestion of Sathan from marriage But let the faithfull learne to oppose this sentēce of God against the wicked suggestions of Sathan Peter Martyr in thesibus p. 1002. It is not good for a man Not honest to be single to be single for it is not pleasant not honest not profitable And hereupon they condemne the vow of chastitie or single life Luther de votis to 2. fol. 273. Vowed chastitie is quite contrarie Vow of chastitie contrarie to the Ghospell Imptous to the Ghospell Zuinglius de Relig. c. de votis All vowes of chastitie are impious Caluin in Refutat Cathalani prg. 384. The vow of single life is a rebellion against God Perkins in Galat 2. tom 2. The vowes of perpetuall countinencie pouertie and regular obedience are indeed the state of abhomination CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture plainely saieth that it is good to abide single and not to touch a woman The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that it is euill to want a wife that it is a wicked suggestion of Sathan to abstaine from marriage that it is not good to be single and that the vow of chastitie or single life is nought ART II. WHETHER VIRGINITIE BE a vertue or a good that is honest SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Cor. 7. v. 35 after the Apostle had exhorted to virginitie Virginitie is honest or vertuous and single life he saieth And this I speake to your profit not to cast a snare vpon you but to that which is honest and that may giue you power without impediment to pray our Lord. Et v. 34. And the woman vnmarried and the virgin thinketh Holines in bodie and spirit Better then marriage More blessed on the things that pertaine to our Lord that she may be holie both in bodie and in spirit ver 38. He that ioyneth his virgin in matrimonie doth well and he that ioyneth not doth better v. 40. But more blessed shal s be be if she so remayne Math. 19. v. 12. There are Eunuchs which haue gelded themselues Desired for heauen for the kingdome of heauen CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME S. Thomas 22. q. 152. art 3. Virginitie is a speciall vertue hauing it selfe to chastitie as magnificence to liberalitie PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker ad Ration 8. Campiani Virginitie is not simply Virginitie is not simply good good Againe Of them who can alwaies keepe virginall chastitie virginitie is to be desired not altogether but for those troubles which ordinarily follow marriage Tindal in Fox his Actes p. 1141. Keeping of virginitie and Virginitie in the religious is diuelish A thing indifferent It is nothing chastitie of the religious is a diuelish thing Apologia Confess Augustanae cap. de votis Obedience pouertie single life are things indifferent Bidenbachius in Consensu Iesuit Christian p. 769. We thinke that virginitie widdowhood and marriage are nothing Caluin in Math. 19. ver 12. It is a foolish imagination that No vertue single life is a vertue for of it selfe it pleaseth God no more then fasting nor deserues to be reckoned among the dueties which he requireth of vs. Et de vera reform p. 321. Nether is virginitie praised as if of it selfe it were a vertue Beza in Confess cap. 4. sect 16. There is a thirde kinde
who aâ—ouÌ„d with iustice according to the doctrine of the law not of the Ghospell Scarpe de Iust CoÌ„t 1. IustificatioÌ„ effectiuely is immediatly of Christ alone but sanctificatioÌ„ is of the holie Ghost IustificatioÌ„ quitteth vs in the iudgemeÌ„t of God not sanctificatioÌ„ Et CoÌ„t 7. There is a twoefould ablutioÌ„ of sinne the first is of the guilt and this is iustâ—ficatioÌ„ the second is of the inherence thereof and this is sanctâ—fication Bullinger dec 3. serm 9. There is a duble iustice iustificant and obediâ—nt Polanus part 2. thes The grace which Adam receaued in creation was not grace which maketh gratefull Et in Disp priuat Sinnes are blotted out by pennance not causatiuely but osteÌ„siuely Riuet tract 3. sec 26. We are perfectiuely imputatiuely iust but inhereÌ„tly iust onely imperfectly Touching the law they distinguish in this new sorte It is Of Gods law abrogated from the faithfull according to rigor and imputatioÌ„ no according to obligation There is a twoefould fulfilling of the law legall and Euangelicall Mans law bindeth in generall not in particular Whitaker libr 8. cont Dur. sect 96. saieth The Decalogue is taken away in parte but not simply Caluin in Actor 15. vers 10. The commandements are an vnsupportable yoake for to be exacted not for doctrine Pareus l. 2. de Iustif cap. 7. They are heauie concerning perfection not for inchoation Reineccius to 4. Arm. cap. 13. They are light in respect of imputation and inchoation but not of perfect fulfilling Bucan in Instit loco 19. To the regenerate the law is possible by imputation of the satisfaction of Christ and by inchoation of newnesse Scarpius de Iustif CoÌ„t 12. The law is possible for outward precepts not inward in parte not in whole or by inchoation or in Christ not in our selues Musculus in locis titul de Legibus Christians fulfill the law perfectly in Christ imperfectly in themselues Polanus in disput priuat 40. The regenerate keepe the precepts of God by by imputation but themselues keepe them not Reineccius tom 4. Armat cap. 13. According to the law none is worthie before God but according to the Ghospell the godlie are worthie before God These and manie such other distinctions neuer heard What onely distinctions Protestants say they allow of before among Christians haue Protestants deuised against which at this present I obiect onelie this that themselues teach that no distinctions are to be admitted in Diuinitie which are not gathered out of expresse and plaine places of Scripture For thus Whitaker Contr. 4. quaest 1. cap. 3. That rule is much to be esteemed That in diuinitie no distinctions are to be allowed but such as are proued by plaine passages of Scripture And lib. 2. de Concupisc cap. 7. We may say and defend what we will if such distinctions be accepted Sadeel ad Repetit Sophism Turriani It is a theologicall rule All distinctions in diuinitie must be proued by expresse places of Scripture The like hath Perkins l. de Caena to 1. col 861. and others Their most vsuall distinctions wherewith most coÌ„monly Most vsuall distinctions with Protest they delude the testimonies of Scripture are these though perhaps all of them vse not the verie selfe same termes To wit Before men not before God or which cometh all to one It seemeth so but is not By this distinction they delude all those testimonies of Scripture which teach that reprobate or euill men may beleiue doe good workes be in the Church that reprobates may be iustified that good workes doe iustifie redeeme sinnes or the like Which they expound before men not before God or in shew not in deed An other vsuall distinction of theirs is In it selfe or in an other thing By this they delude those testimonies of Scripture which say that good men are iust worthie of God fulfill the law that baptisme forgiueth sinnes Almes deliuereth from death and such like which they expound in an other not in themselues as that good men are iust worthie of God fulfill the law in Christ not in themselues that almes deliuereth from death not in it selfe but in faith as saieth Confessio Augustana c. de Implet legis and that baptisme remitteth sinnes not in it selfe but in faith So Caluin in Act. 2. v. 38. A third vsuall distinction of theirs is SignificaÌ„tly not Causally By this they delude those testimonies of Scripture which teach that Sacraments worke grace Preists remit sinnes good works doe iustifie doe cause life euerlasting and the like Which they expound Significantly or ostensiuely not Causally Their fourth accustomed distinction is In parte not simply or wholy Thus they delude those testimonies which auouch that there is inherent iustice that sinners are taken away that good mens good workes are good and such like which they expound In parte not simply or wholy Their fift vsuall distinction is A saying of the law not of the Ghospell Thus they delude all the sentences of Scripture which declare that iustice and life euerlasting is to be purchased by good works that the keeping of the law is necessarie to life and such like For these kind of sayings they will haue to be onely of the law not of the Ghospell But their most vsuall distinction of all is Figuratiuely not Properly which kind of deluding the Scripture is most ample and containeth almost all the former kinds For what seemeth to be is not is figuratiuely not properly Likewise what is in parte and not simply what is not in it selfe but in another is figuratiuely and not properly Yet because this their distinction would wax stale if it were vsed vnder the same termes in all places and the vanitie thereof would easily appeare if nakedly it were applied to some places therefore at least in words and with some litle differences they haue deuided it into diuers Peculiarly by this distinction they delude all those testimonies of Scripture which teach that the Eucharist is the bodie and blood of Christ that eternall life is a reward that the Apostles are the foundations of the Church that the Ghospell is a law Christ a law giuer descended into hell that there is in the Church an altar a sacrifice and the like These forsooth are their fine plaisters which they applie to cure all the wounds which are giuen them by the sword of the word of God which if they will let other Heretiks vse in such sorte as they doe nothing at all will be proued out of Scripture Wherefore thus I frame my 22. argument They who besides their opposition to the expresse words of holie Scripture related in the first booke are forced in manie and great matters to deuise friuolous and verball distinctions and such as destroye themselues and were neuer heard of before among Christians they contradict the true sense of holie Scripture Protestants doe so Therefore c. CHAPTER XXIII THAT PROTESTANTS CONFESSE THE vniforme consent of Fathers Councels and of the Church to be against
of saluation in which he was set But it could not be other wise What then Is he therefore faultles Beza de Praedestinat cont Castel p. 415. That he saieth Necessarily do sinne the reprobats doe necessarily sinne is most true In 2. parte Respons ad Acta Colloq Montisbel p. 178. With an other necessitie Adam is saied to haue fallen necessarily to wit what belongeth to Gods appointement Gods decree necessitateth to sinne Tilenus disput 8. de Praedestinat By this decree of God a double necessitie falleth vpon the reprobats the one sinning the other of perishing Zanchius l. 5. de natura Dei c. 2. We graunt that reprobats by this appointment of God are tyed with the necessitie of sinning and consequently of perishing and so tyed as they cannot but sinne and perish Piscator l. 2. de the sibus p. 183. It is falsely saied that it was in mans will not to eate of the fruite of the forbidden tree that is Adam necessarily sinned not to transgresse the commandment And pag. 282. Through the decree of God man could not but transgresse Polanus in Disp priuat disp 3. Adam sinned necessarily CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely saieth that the lust of sinne is vnder vs that we haue dominion ouer it and that God will not suffer vs to be tempted aboue our power The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the wicked do necessarily sinne that the reprobats are tyed by Gods appointment necessarily both to sinne and perish that it was not in Adās will not to eate the forbidden aple that through Gods decree he could not but transgresse that he sinned necessarily and could not doe otherwise that Iudas was necessarily a traitor and could not change his mind that God cōpelleth the theefe to sinne Which are so impious as S. Prosper saieth He is no Catholike who saieth that by Ad c. 16. Gallor Gods predestination as it were with a fatall necessitie men compelled to sinne are forced to death and so contrarie to Scripture as Protestants some time confesse it lib. 2. cap. 30. And thus much of God touching sinne Now of God concerning sinners ART IX WHETHER GOD HATE ALL that worke iniquitie SCRITVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Psal 5. v. 7. Thou hatest all that worke iniquitie God hateth all workers of iniquitie Ecclesiast c. 12. v. 3. The highest hateth sinners Math. 7. v. 23. Departe from me you that worke iniquitie CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D Stapleton l. 3. de Iustificat c. 8. Sinne of it nature in whomsoeuer it is separateth from God and maketh him in whome it is hatefull to God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker l. 8. cont Dur. sect 34. The godlie though God hateth not all such they sinne grieuously yet are alwaies most assuredly perswaded of Christs loue and will Perkins de Praedest to 1. God being offended doth change the effects of grace into the effects of a certaine hatred not against the faithfull themselues but against their sinnes He doth not put away his fatherlie affection and they are still children concerning the right of eternall life Caluin 3. Instit c. 2. § 12. We see that God wonderfully is angred with his children which he leaueth to loue not that in him selfe he hateth them but because he will terrifie them with some feeling of his wrathe Beza de Praedestinat cont Castel p. 409. Albeit the lord God neuer hateth the elect hate all iniquitie yet hateth he not all in whome iniquitie is Zanchius l. 4. de natura Dei c. 7. q. 2. God neuer hateth the elect Agayne It cannot be that God at anie time hateth them And in depuls calum to 7. God is angrie with the elect whem they sinne but neuer hateth them Pareus l. 1. de Amiss Grat. c. 7. God doth not hate his children when they sinne CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely affirmeth that God hateth all who worke iniquitie that he hateth sinners that who worke iniquitie shall departe from him The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely denie that God hateth the faithfull when they sinne that euer he hateth the elect that the faithfull though they sinne are euer assured of Gods loue that God hateth all in whom iniquitie is Which are so opposite to Scripture as Protestants some times confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART X. WHETHER GOD IVSTIFIETH that is iudgeth him to be iust who is wicked SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Prouerb 17. v. 15. He that iustifieth the impious and he that Iustifier of the impious adhominable to God condemneth the iust both are abhominable before God Isaie 5. v. 23. Woe to you who iustifie the impious for giftes Rom. 2. v. 2. We know that the iudgment of God is according to veritie CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE Card. Bellarmin l. 2. de Iustif c. 9. A wicked man cannot be truly iustified that is pronounced iust vnles he who pronounceth him iust do withall make him iust PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Bucanus loco 31. de Iustificat q. 18. p. 313. Seing God God iustifieth the wicked forbiddeth to iustifie the wicked Prouerb 17. 15. Can he be saied to do that rightly which him selfe forbiddeth Rightly because he it aboue all law Caluin l. de Caena p. 2. Let vs be assured that albeit we be God accounteth wicked for iust wicked and impure yet we are acknowledged and accepted of the lord and accounted for iust Et 3. Institut c. 19. § 2. It is not inquired there how we may be iust but how being vniust and vnworthie we may be held for iust Pareus l. 2. de Iustificat c. 9. What he obiecteth that a wicked man cannot be truly pronounced iust vnles he be made The wicked may be iudged iust according to the Ghospell iust is true of inherent iustice and according to the law but it is false that he cannot be pronounced iust with imputed iustice and according to the Ghospell Illyricus Praefat. in epist ad Rom. It is all together contumelious against Christ that he cannot by his iustice and efficacie iustifie and saue such sinners as are impious and want all good workes Scarpius de Iustificat Controu 9. We are called iust by the imputation of Christs iustice but we are also called vniust for iniustice which is in vs. CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely saieth that it is abhominable before God to iustifie the wicked and pronounceth woe to him that doeth it and addeth that all Gods iudgments are according to veritie which that iudgment is not that pronounceth the wicked for iust The same saye Catholiks Protestants expressely saie that God doth that which him selfe forbiddeth to wit that he pronounceth the wicked for iust that though we be vniust we are held of the Lord for iust that Christ iustifieth and saueth such sinners as are impious that with imputed iustice the wicked are pronouncd iust ART XI WHETHER GOD BE ANGRIE with the faithfull when they sinne SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY
workes workes whereas there is no such God no such Godhead which is delighted with these things And to 7. Serm. in Hebr. 11. God careth not greatly what kind or what notable workes we doe Tindall in Fox his Acts printed 1610. p. 1138. There is no To make water pleaseth God as much as preaching work better then an other to please God To make water to wash dishes to be a sowter or an Apostle all is one To wash dishes and to preach all is one as touching the deed to please God Other Protestants as testifieth Schusselburg to 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 551. Melancthon in Respons ad artic Bauar to 3. and Manlius in locis tit de Eccles saye God careth not for good workes And the same also do they thinke who as we shall relate hereafter saye that before God good workes are mere iniquities filth stench and dung For surely God careth not for such things THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that good workes are a sweet sauour before God are liked of God please God are pleasing before God The like saye Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that God careth not for workes careth not at all for them doth not regard or respect them is not delighted with them careth not what notable workes we doe maketh no accounte of them yea greatly loatheth them that to wash dishes to make water to playe the cobler pleaseth God as well as to be an Apostle ART XIV WHETHER GOD BE WORSHIPED or serued with good workes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Isaie 19. v. 21. The Egyptians shall know our Lord in that day and shall worshippe him in hostes and in giftes God worshiped by workes Luke v. 2. c. 37. Who departed not from the temple by fastings and praiers seruing night and day CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Ioan. 4. v. 23. Therefore God is so serued inspirit and trueth that as this worshippe doth not exclude the outward acts of pietie and workes of charitie towards our neighbour wherewith we worshippe and serue God in iustice so c. PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther delibertate Christiana to 2. fol. 5. For we do not Not glorified by workes glorifie God by working but by beleeuing Ibid. cont Regem Angliae fol. 334. God is serued by faith onely De bonis operibus Not serued by them to 5. fol. 580. Onely faith is the true worshippe of God In c. 1. Ionae to 4. fol. 412. The true God is not serued with workes There is one onely worshippe pleasing to God to will true faith Tindal in Fox before cited God is honoured on all sides in Not worshiped by workes that we count him righteous in all his laws and ordinances and also true in all his promises Other worshippe of God is none except we make an idoll of him Confession of Basil art 13. Faith is the onely true worshippe of God The like saye other Protestants who as we shall see hereafter teach that good works are sinne before God For God is not serued or worshipped with sinne but disserued and dishonored by it THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that God is worshipped and serued with good works The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that God is not glorified by working that God is not serued by works that faith is the onely true worshippe of God that God is serued by onely faith that onely faith is the worshippe of the true God that there is no other worshippe of God but to beleiue him right in all his laws and true in all his promises ART XV. WHETHER GOD DO ACcount those good workes which are not commanded SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Mark 14. v. 3. and 6. There came a woman hauing an alabaster box of ointment of pretious spike-nard and breaking the A worke not commanded good in Gods sight alabaster box she powred it out vpon his head But Iesus saied let her alone why do you molest her She hath wrought a good worke vpon me 1. Corint 7. 25. And as concerning virgins a commandment of our Lord I haue not but counsell I giue CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarmin l. 2. de Monachis c. 16. God is worshipped with euerie act of vertue though not commanded yet done for God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confessio Heluet. c. 16. God liketh not workes and worshippes chosen by vs. And Confessio Saxon. c. 17. We teach that works as they say not due are no worshippe of God Luther Postilla in festo S. Ioan. fol. 92. Nothing pleaseth Workes not commanded not pleasing to God God vhich is done without his commandment Melancthon in Disput to 4. p. 602. Works not commanded from heauen are no worhippe of God Caluin 4. Institut c. 13. § 2. All voluntarie worships which we deuise without his commandment are abhominable to God In Rom. 5. v. 19. They dote who vaunte to God of their works deuised by themselues who esteemeth them no more then dung Lobechius in Disput 9. p. 184. Without Gods commandment Nor good a worke though done with neuer so good intention nor forbidden nether is nor can be good THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely affirmeth that S. Magdalens anointing of Christ though not commanded was a good worke gratefull to him that virginitie is good though not commanded The same saye Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that God liketh no worke not commanded by him that no worke not commanded is any worship of God that no worke whatsoeuer not commanded of God is good that what we do without Gods commandment is no more respected of God then dung and is abhominable to him ART XVI WHETHER GOD BE PACIfied with good works SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 〈…〉 11. and. 13. But Moyses besought the Lord his God pacified by workes God saying why 〈…〉 furie angrie against thy people c. And our lord was pacified 〈…〉 the euill which he had spoken against his people 2. Paralipomen 30. v. 18. and 20. And 〈…〉 for them saying c. Whome our Lord heard and was pacified to the people Psalme 105. v. 30. And Phinees stood and pacified and the slaughter ceased Ezech. 43. v. 27. The preists shall make your holocausts vpon the altar and those which they offer for peace and I will be pacified toward you saieth our lord God CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Matth. 17. v. 21. Diuers examples in Scripture do teach vs the force and power of fasting ioyned with praier for to pacifie God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther in c. 1. Ionae to 4. fol. 411. Papists haue an opinion that God can be pacified with our good workes whē as there is no No God that is pacified by workes where such a God In Galat. 2. to 5. fol. 363. The workes which I do according to Gods law do not pacifie his wrathe but prouoke it Workes prouoke Gods wrath Caluin 4. Inst c. 15. § 4. It is the doctrin of the Scripture that our good works are alwaies stained with
Christ merited to him selfe exaltation THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that Christ was exalted and had a name giuen him aboue all names because he humbled him selfe that he was crowned with glorie because of his passion The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that Christ did not merit his exaltation did not merit any thing to him selfe could not merit to be iudge of the world and head of Angels ART XVI WHETHER CHRIST REDEEmed vs with a sufficient price or truely merited our redemption SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Cor. 6. v. 20. You are bought with a great price Christ bought vs with a great price 1. Timoth. 2. v. 6. For there is one God one also mediatour of God and men man Christ Iesus who gaue him selfe a redemption in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for all 1. Peter 2. ver 18. Knowing that not with corruptible things gould or siluer you are redeemed from your vaine conuersation With his pretious blood of your fathers tradition but with the pretious blood as it were of an immaculate and vnspotted lambe Christ 1. Ihon 3. v. 16. In this we haue knowne the charitie of God because he hath yeelded his life for vs. c. 4. v. 10. He hath loued vs and sent his sonne a propitiation for our sinnes Mathew 20. ver 28. The Sonne of man is come to giue his life a redemption in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for manie Rom. 3. v. 24. Iustified gratis by his grace by the redemption in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in Christ Iesus Psalm 129. v. 7. Because with our Lord is mercie and with him plenteous redemption CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME S. Thomas 3. part artic 2. Christ suffering of charitie and obedience did giue God some thing more then the recompence of the offence of all mankinde did exact The passion of Christ was not onely a sufficient obut also a superaboundant satisfaction for the sinnes of mankinde PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Tindal in Fox his Acts printed An. 1610. pag. 1136. Christ Christ merited not heaueÌ„ with all his works did not merite heauen Daneus Controu 2. lib. 5. p. 210. Three necessarie conditioÌ„s of merite do faile in the workes of a creature and of Christ man towards God For by the vnion hypostaticall Christ doth not He did not merit merite Page 200. Christ as man properly merited nothing with God P. 202. Yea not in this forme of a seruant could Christ merite any thing to himselfe because in this forme he was a credture But a creature can merite nothing of his Creator Caluin 2. Instit c. 17 § 1. Truely I confesse that if any would simply and by himselfe oppose Christ vnto the iudgment of God there were no place for merite because there will not be found in man any worth which may merite before God § vlt. With what merits could man obtaine to be iudge of the world and head of Angels 3. Instit c. 11. § 12. It is fondly obiected of him that the power of iustifying farre supasseth both men and Angels seing this dependeth not vpon the worth of any creature but of Gods ordination If the Angels would satisfie God they would auaile nothing because they were not destinated to this end but this was proper to Christ man who was subiect to the law for to redceme vs from the curse of the law And Respons ad quaest Sozin Christ could merit nothing but through the pleasure of God Et in Ioan. 4. v. 10. When Christ is sated to haue appeased the Father towards vs this is referred to our sense For as we are guiltie to our selues we cannot conceaue God but as angrie and offended till Christ absolue vs from the guilt Wherefore touching the feeling of our faith God beginneth to loue vs in Christ Spindlerus apud Scusselburg l. 4. Theol. Caluin c. 5. The His death no sufficient redemption for all sinnes Lutherans erre in saying that Christs death was a sufficient redemption 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the sinnes of all and euerie man Piscator apud Vorstium in Parasceue c. 6. Christ died not sufficiently much lesse effectually for all Welsingius apud Homium in Specim Controuer Belgic His blood satisfied not Gods iustice art 21. That Christs blood satisfied Gods iustice for our sinnes is no where extant and it is plainly contrarie to the free and iust remission of sinnes which God hath offered to vs by Christ And the same say other Protestants as Caluin reporteth 2. Instit c. 17. § 1. and Beza in Absters calumn Heshusij p. 324. Slatius apud Homium loc cit There is question whether Christ properly satisfied not Christ properly satisfied for vs. We denie it And the same hath Vorstius ib. Who also addeth That Christ satisfied by a certaine acceptation not by exact identitie Pareus l. 5 de Iustific c. 3. To merit is the parte of seruants To merite is serutle and sordid serutle and sordid THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that Christ bought vs with a great price that he gaue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a ransom or price of redemption for vs that he redeemed vs with his pretious blood that God gaue his life for vs sent his sonne a propitiation for our sinnes that with God there is plentuous redemption Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely say the contrarie that Christ could not merite heauen had no place for merit if we respect the iudgment of God did not merite three conditions necessatie to merite wanted in his works that power of meriting in him depended of Gods pleasure and ordination That properly he did not satisfie for vs that his blood did not satisfie Gods iustice that his death was not a sufficient 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or ransom for all that to merite is seruile and sordid ART XVII WHETHER CHRIST REDEEmed vs by his blood or corporall death SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Coloss 1. ver 22. And you whereas some time alienated and Christ redeemed vs by his death By his blood By he oblacion of his bodie enemies in sense in euill works yet now he hath reconciled in the bodie of his flesh by death vers 20. Pacifying by the blood of his crosse whether the things in earth or the things that are in heauen Hebrews 10. v. 10. In the which will we are sanctified by the oblation of the bodie of Iesus Christ once c. 9. vers 12. By his owne blood entred once into the Holies eternall redemption being found Ephes 1. v. 6. In whome we haue redemption by his blood the remissâ—on of sinnes 1. Peter v. 19. You are redeemed with the pretious blood as it were of an immaculate and vnsported lambe Christ Acts 20. v. 28. The holie Ghost hath placed you Bishops to rule the Church of God which he hath purchased with his owne blood Apocalips 5. v. 9. Thou hast redeemed vs to God in thy blood CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME S. Thomas 3. part q. 48. art 5.
she fluck in his garmēt rather then by praier offered her selfe to be cured of him perhaps she slipt a litle out of the way through incōsiderate zeale In Math. 14. v. 36. cit It is credible that they were somewhat superstitious Some what superstitious seing they restrained Christs grace to the touching of his garment Daneus Cōtr. 4. p. 1348. He supposeth that they who did those Erroneous things Math 9. Act. 5. 19. cit did not erre which is false albeit sick persōs were heard of God cured of their diseases Againe God did not approue the manner which they chose Whose very words repeateth Hospin l. de origine Templorum p. 132. Confessio Heluet. c. 4. Who will beleiue that a shaddow or image of a bodie could bring any profit to the godlie THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely teacheth that Christ both by word and deed approued the faith of the woman which reuerently touched the hemme of his garment that he both suffered others to touch the hemme of his garment and by miracles allowed their fact and that by great miracles approued their faith who touched the shaddow of Saint Peter or the napkins of Saint Paul Catholiks say the same Protestants plainely say that perhaps there was some errour or vice in the faith of the woman who touched the hemme of his garment and that she slipt a litle out of the way that they were superstitious who touched our Sauiours garment that they erred who touched his garmēt or the shaddow of S. Peter or napkins of S. Paul and that God did not approue their manner of doing that none will beleiue that a shaddow can do any good to the godlie Which are so opposite to Scripture as Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF FAITH By those things which haue beene rehearsed in this chapter plainely appeareth how different a faith Protestants haue from the Scripture For the Scripture together with Catholiks teacheth that faith is a worke or action that it beleiueth all the articles of faith or words of God that it cannot be had without the holie Ghost that it is but one and distinct from hope and charitie and inferiour to charitie that it may be without confession of mouth and without charitie or good workes that without good workes it is dead and without them iustifieth not that it iustifieth as it is beleife that indeed it iustifieth and that we do not onely thereby know that we are iustified that it selfe may be imputed to iustice that sometimes it is perfect and is of great value before God that it is necessarie to iustification and saluation that it is not proper to the iust or elect that it is gotten by hearing that it may be lost and that reward is giuen to it All which Protestāts do denie It appeareth also that Protestants play the theiues euē What Protest steale from faith towards faith which they would seeme to esteme and and aduance more then all men and steale from it that it is a worke or action that it beleiueth all things reuealed of God that it is distinct from hope and charitie that it is one that it iustifieth as it is beleife that it iustifieth indeed that it is necessarie to iustification and saluation that it can be perfect that it can be imputed to iustice that it can be rewarded that it is a vertue or truely worthie of the name of vertue And if we take from Faith the nature of a worke or act the beleiuing of all that is reuealed of God the vnitie and distinction from hope and charitie all perfection power of iustifying necessitie to iustification and saluation worthinesse of reward nature of iustice or vertue and finally the very name of vertue we scarce leaue the name of Faith much lesse the thing it selfe Nether onely do they steale so many and so great good properties frō Faith but also attribute manie ill which are contrarie to the nature of it As that it is polluted with infidelitie like to a scabbie or leprous hand need pardon and is sinne Such a Faith foresooth it is which in steed of the Catholik Protest faith is true infidelitie faith described to vs in the Scripture Protestants haue brought into the world which is true infidelitie and sheweth what kinde of men the Authours thereof are And thus farre of Faith Now of good workes CHAPTER XIII OF GOOD VVORKES IN GENERALL ART I. WHETHER ANIE WORKES OF a Sinner before he be iustified may be good SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. IAMES 2. v 25. Rahab the harlot was not she iustified A Harlot did good workes by workes Et v. 19. it is saied to a Sinner Thou beleiuest that there is one God Thou doest well Luc. 7. v. 47. Manie sinnes are forgiuen her because A sinner doth well in beleiuing God she hath loued much Et c. 18. v. 13. The publican standing a farre of knocked his breast saying God be mercifull to me a sinner I say to you this man went downe into his house iustified more then he And other place teach that pennance and good workes go before iustification as we shall see hereafter CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 6. Can. 7. If anie shall say that all workes which are done before Iustification in what sorte soeuer they are done are true sinnes or deserue the hatred of God be he accursed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins in Gal. 3. to 2. We are tought that the actiōs of those The actions sinners are sinne that are not regenerate are sinnes So Rogers on the 10. and 13. article Apologia Confess Augustanae c. de Tradition It is false that he who out of grace doth the workes cammanded doth not sinne c. de Iustif It is false that men doing the precepts out of grace do not sinne Confessio Heluet. c. 15. We must be iust before we do good workes Lutherus Postilla in Dom. post Natiuit The Lord defineth All workes before iustification are euill Are sinnes in the Scripture what workes soeuer go before iustification are euill and of no moment Lobechius Disp 22. The workes of those that are not iustified cānot please God but in his iudgmēt are accounted for sinnes Bucer in Disput Cantabrig pag. 714. What good worke Prouoke Gods wrath soeuer we seeme to doe before iustification is indeed sinne and prouoketh Gods wrath against vs. Peter Martyr in Rom. 11. All workes that are done before iustification are sinnes Caluin in Antidoto Conc. sess 6. c. 9. What workes do they tell vs of that are before iustificatiō Posteritie will scarce be persuaded that there was so much blockishnesse in Poperie that they would set any worke before iustification albeit they denied that it merited so great a good Et 3. Inst cap. 14. § 7. What can sinners Execrable before God alienated from God doe but is excrable in his iudgment Bezal Qnaest resp vol. 1. p. 676. It is foolish to
say that there are any good workes of them which are not iustified CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture plainely saieth that a horlot was iustified by her workes that to an other manie sinnes were forgiuen because she loued much that a Sinner in beleiuing God doth well that the Publican did manie good workes before he was iustified The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that before iustification no workes are good all are badde are sinnes execrable before God and prouoke Gods wrath againe the workes ART II. WHETHER EVERIE GOOD worke of the Iust be sinne or the iust sinne in euerie good worke SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Iob 1. v. 22. In all these thinges Iob sinned not with his lippes Iob sinned not in some speeches nether spoake he any foolish thing against God cap. 23. v. 11. My foote hath followed his steppes I haue kept his way and haue not declined out of it 3. Reg. 15. v. 5. Because Dauid had done right in the eies of our Dauid declined not but in some things Lord and had not declined from all things which he commanded him all the dayes of his life except the matter of Vrias 1. Cor. 7. v. 28. But if thou take a wife thou hast not sinned and if a Virgin marrie she hath not sinned v. 37. He sinneth not if she marrie 2. Peter 1. v. 10. Doing these things you shall not sinne at any Doing some things we sinne not time Apoc. 3. v. 4. But thou hast a few names in Sardis who haue not defiled their garments CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE Councell of Trent Sess 6. c. 11. It is manifest that they are against true doctrine who say that the iust man sinneth in euerie act at least venially or which is more intolerable that he deserueth eternall paines PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Whitaker l. 2. de Peccato orig c. 3. Inherent concupiscence We sinne in euerie act maketh that we sinne in euerie action of ours eueÌ„ good Againe We teach that the iust do alwaies sinne mortally by nature of the thing and the acts themselues Et ad Ration 8. Campian All good acts are sinnes All good actions are sinnes in Gods iudgment mortall if God pardon them light This Luther saied and he saied truely Tindal in Fox his Act. p. 1139. There is no deed so good but that the law damneth it Luther de Ration Confitendi to 2. fol 26. Euen our good Good workes are sinnes workes if God iudge them according to rigour and not pardon them with mercie are damnable and mortall De Captiuit Babilon fol. 80. Yea good workes are found to be sinnes In Assert art 31. fol. 109. The iust sinneth in euerie good worke f. 110. He teacheth to sinne who denieth a good worke to be sinne In Confutat Latomi fol. 220. All iustice is vncleane euerie good worke sinne Tomo 5. in Gal. 1. f. 227. Let there be workes so it be knowne that before God they be sinnes 228. The workes of the law must needs be sinnes otherwise certainly they would iustifie In c. 2. f. 231. Workes of the most holie law of God are so farre from giuing iustice as that they are sinnes and make a man worse before God De bonis operibus fol. 581. Let a man know All our actions are nothing but daÌ„nable sinnes that all his life and actions are nothing but damnable sinnes in the iudgment of God Postilla in Dom. 4. post Pascha With all thy workes which thou doest thou canst do nothing els but sinne Postilla in Natali Christi f. 374. Christ teacheth that all that is ours is nothing but sinne before God Illyricus apud Schlusselburg tom 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 155. All Saints in euerie good worke do sinne Hitherto our men disputed against Papists that all Saints in euerie good worke do sinne Wigandus ib. p. 719. For this verie imperfection and pollution good works of themselues are sinnes Caluin 3. Instit cap. 17. § 11. There was neuer any worke of a pious man which if it were examined by the seuere iudgment of God was not damnable In Refutat Serueti pag. 655. Because God pardoneth vs like his children thereupon he by pardon imputeth free iustice to workes which of themselues are vniust Beza in Conf. c. 4. sect 19 If God in all rigour would examine The best workes are mere pollutions euen the excellentest workes of men nothing eâ—s would be determined of them then that they are mere pollutions of Gods guifts Et l. q. resp p. 674. If you examine the best workes of the most holie men according to the rule of the law I say they are sinnes Bullinger Decad. 3. serm 10. We say that the good workes of the faithfull are sinnes Serranus cont Hayum part 2. p. 188. Whatsoeuer is of maÌ„ is euill is sinne what shewsoeuer it hath of vertue Ianius Cont. 4. l. 3. c. 2. All the workes of a man though iustified are sinnes in themselues Pareus l. de Iustif c. 15. The workes of the iust if they be examined of God according to the rigour of the law are mere sinnes Et c. 20. The iust sinneth euen in well doing We sinne in well doing THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that Iob in some things did not sinne with his lippes did not decline from Gods way that Dauid declined not from all things that God commanded except the matter of Vrias that men sinne not in marrying that doing some things we shall not sinne The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that in euerie good act we sinne that the iust in euerie act sinneth that all Saints sinne in euerie good worke that in well doing we sinne that good workes are sinnes that good workes are of themselues damned of themselues in iust of themselues mortall sinnes that euen the workes of Gods most holie law make a man worse before God that euerie act in the iudgment of God is nothing but damnable sinne mere sinne nothing but sinne nothing but pollution of Gods guifts ART III. WHETHER WORKES OF the Iust be a sweet smell before God SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Gen. 8. vers 20. Noë offered holocaustes vpon the altar and A sweet sauour our Lord smelled a sweet sauour Numbers 29. ver 21. And shall offer an holocaust for a most A sweet â—dour sweet odour to the Lord. Apocal. 8. vers 3. And an other Angel came and stood before the altar hauing a goulden censor and there were giuen to him Incense manie incenses that he should giue of the praier of all Saints vpon the altar of gould which is before the throne of God And the smoake of the incenses of the praiers of the Saintes ascended from the hand of the Angel before God CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 4. de Iustif cap. 20. The Scripture eueriewhere praiseth the workes of the iust and saieth they are pleasing to God and accepted as a sweet odour PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther in Disp
de Mysterio Trinit to 1. fol. 418. God exacteth Iustice of the the law is dung before God Vncleane the ciuill iustice of the law and in earnest commandeth it though he know that before him it is dung Wigandus in Methodo Doctrinae c. 12. Our good workes are vncleane are dung Vrbanus Regin in Interpr loc com to 1. f. 43. Our workes Filthie generally art filthie Illyricus in Claue Scripturae part 2. tract 6. saieth that Our workes are rifraffe or outcasts vertly vncleane and that they need cleansing Schlusselburg to 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 55. Paul will haue all his righteousnesse to be accounted reiected and contemned as dung and outcasts and Isaias a defiled cloute Caluin in Refut Serueti p. 651. Whē I teach that workes are Stinke before God alwaies mingled as it were with some dreggs so that they stincke before God if they be called to a streit account he saieth that I blaspheme against the Spirit The like he hath de vera Ref. p. 317. Et 3. Instit c. 14. § 16 The Scripture teacheth that all our iustices do stincke in the sight of God vnlesse they draw some good smell from the innocencie of Christ Et c. 12. § 4. Workes if they be iudged according to their worth are nothing but pollution and filth Et concione 158. in Iob Whatsoeuer we can giue to God is stenchie Bucer in Epitome Doctrinae Argent art 9. All Saints account for nothing and dung what good soeuer they did Pareus l. 1. de Iust c. 19. The Apostle simply opposeth the iustice of faith or by faith or the iustice of Christ and God with which alone he wil be found in Gods iudgment against all his workes present past and to come accoūting them all farre lesse for nothing for dung Againe Hitherto the Apostle casting away all his workes as dung is no more blasphemous then the whole Propheticall Church was blasphemous calling all her iustices a defiled cloute which is as filthie a thing Let Bellarmin goe now and crie blasphemies that we call his workes and iustices dung Et l. 2. c. 12. saieth That inherent iustices euen in the state of grace are filth euen all in the rigour of Gods iudgment THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely faieth that the good workes of the Iust are a sweet odour a most sweet odour a smoake of incense before God The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the good workes of the Iust in the sight of God are filth dung nothing but pollution filth and dung that they are stenchie do stinck before God if they be thoroughly examined that inherent iustices are filth ART IV. WHETHER THE GOOD workes of the Iust be perfectly wholy and intirely good SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Isaie 38. v. 3. Ezechias praieth in these words I beseech Ezechias walked in a perfect hart thee Lord remember I pray thee how I haue walked before thee in trueth and in a perfect hart and haue done that which is good in thine eyes 3. Reg. 11. vers 4. Nether was his hart perfect with our Lord Also Dauid his God as the hart of Dauid his father cap. 15. vers 4. Because Dauid had done right in the eyes of our Lord. 1. Ioan. 4. v. 12. If we loue one an other God abideth in vs and Charitie perfiled his charitie in vs is perfited c. 2. v. 5. But he that keepeth his word in him in verie deed charitie of God is perfited CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 4. de Iustif c. 10. All Catholiks teach that the workes of the iust are simply and absolutely iust and in their manner perfect though not in that perfection but that they may increase PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker l. 8. cont Dureum sect 89. There is no intire good No intire good in this life of ours in this life l. 9. sect 34. Our workes are manie waies vitious and are not answerable to the perfection of Gods law Ad Ration 8. Campiani In euerie action of man though notable Some vice in euerie act there is some vice which wholy marreth the action and maketh it odious to God if it be examined by the weight of his iustice Perkins in Gal. 5. ver 17. The workes of the regenerate are in In parte euill parte euill Confessio Wittembergens c. de Bonis operibus All the Imperfect good workes which we doe are imperfect nor one can bear the seueritie of Gods iudgment Confessio Augustana c. de operibus The new obedience is farre from the perfection of the law And Apologia eiusdem cap. de Implet legis Our workes are vncleane and need mercie Confessio Heluet. c. 16. There are manie thinges vnworthie Haue manie imperfections of God and very manie imperfections are found in the workes of Saints The like hath Confessio Belgica art 14. and Scotica Defiled art 15. Luther in Gen. 15. to 6. Thy workes are alwaies defiled imperfect and polluted Kemnice 1. part Exam. tit de Iustif Inherent iustice in this life is onely begunne imperfect and vncleane Zuinglius in Marci 10. tom 4. In the iudgment of God all Impure our workes though neuer so good wil be found impure and vncleane Peter Martyr in 1. Cor. 7. ver 19. We do nothing how good Spotted and holie soeuer it seeme to be which indeed is not spotted with manie vices Againe As workes come from vs they are disgraced with infinit filth Caluin l. de lib. arb p. 141. There was neuer anie good worke Lame which euerie way pure and perfect wholy wanted any spot In Math. 5. v. 12. What good worke soeuer cometh from the best mē is lame and vitious In Actor 6. v. 11. The workes of Saints haue alwaies some fault mingled with them The like he hath often times Beza in Confess cap. 4. sect 19. So great is Gods goodnesse that he doth not onely not dislike our workes though most imperfect but also so farre alloweth them as he vouchsafeth them reward Vrsinus in Catechismo q. 62. Our best workes in this life are imperfect and consequently defiled with sinne Pareus lib. 4. de Iustif cap. 10. They proue that the workes of Saints are imperfect and consequently sinnes c. 15. The workes of the Iust haue an imperfect goodnesse their goodnesse whatsoeuer is polluted with the filth of our flesh like as water passing through a filthie channell Et Prooemio in l. 5. The good workes of the iust are not absolutely good but alwaies polluted with inhabiting sinne THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that the good workes of the Iust are good and right in the eyes of God that the charitie of those who loue one an other and keepe Gods word is perfect that Ezechias walked before God in a perfect hart that Dauids hart was perfect before God The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach rhat the good workes of the Iust are farre from perfection that there are manie imperfections in
See lib. 2. c. 30. ART XII WHETHER GOOD WORKES be necessarie to iustification SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Math. 6. v. 15. But if you will not forgiue men nether will your Some good worke necessarie to iustification Father forgiue you your offenses Ioan. 15. vers 10. If you keepe my precepts you shall abide in my loue CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Session 6. Can. 9. If any shall say that a sinner is iustified by onely faith so as he vnderstand that nothing els is required to cooperate to the grace of iustification and that it is not needfull in anie sorte that he be disposed and prepared by motion of his will be he accursed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confess Argentinensis c. 3. Whereas now some yeares it was tought that mans workes are required to his iustification our men haue tought that all iustification is to be ascribed to Gods good will and Christs merits Confessio Bohemica art 6. We teach that men freely by Iustification obtained without workes Christ by faith in Christ through mercie are iustified and obtaine saluation and remission of sinnes without any worke or merit of man Apologia Confess Augustanae c. de Respons ad argum tom 3. Melancthonis Doth not the Ghospell promise saluation Iustification promised to those who haue no good workes Presence of good workes not necessarie and remission of sinnes euen to them who haue no good workes at all Liber Concordiae Lutheran in Declarat artic cap. 3. It is false if anie say that faith cannot iustifie without good workes or that the presence of good workes is necessarie to faith for to iustifie or that the presence of good workes is necessarie to iustification or in the moment of iustifying Luther de libertate to 2. f. 5. Our faith maketh that none None haue need of workes to be saued haue need of the law or workes for to be iustified or saued f. 6. A Christian needeth no workes for to be iustified or saued Postilla in Dom. post Natale Nothing els is required to iustification then to heare and beleiue Christ Iesus our Sauiour And as Kemnitius in Schlusselburg to 7. pag. 530. saieth Luther clearly profâ—sseth that workes are pernitious with that addition which he calleth Leuiathan to wit if they be saied to be necessarie to iustification and saluation Ministers of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg p. 164. Whosoeuer Workes not necessarily present in the time of iustification saieth that our good workes are necessarily present in the moment of iustification he swarueth from the word of God from the confession and Apologie of Auspurg and from the doctrine of Luther Herbrandus in Compendio Theol. loco de Iustificat What excludeth that word Onely Not workes onely from the efficient cause if iustification and from worth and merit but also from all cause without which not and from all necessâ—rie of presence in the act of iustification For without workes a sinner beleiuing in Christ is iustified Otherwise iustifiâ—ation would be alwaies vncertaine and so we should doubt of it Againe To iustification there is need of no other thing but onely of faith Onely faith needfull to iustification Those that haue no good workes may be iustified Presence of good workes not necessarie Kemnitius in Schlusselburg to cit p. 711. It is false concontrarie to the Apologie it selfe that none can be iustified who hath not good workes p. 716. It is false if I say that faith doth not iustifie vnlesse it haue good workes actually present Morlinus in Schlusselburg to cit p. 171. It is simply a false proposition The presence of good workes is howsoeuer necessarie in the act of iustification Et 173. It stands for an inuincible trueth if the presence of good workes be accounted as necessarie in the act of iustification it is dung and losse Manie more like sayings of Lutherans may be seene in Schlusselburg to cit Rainolds in Apologia Thesium p. 263. Good workes are Not required to iustification not required to iustification Caluin in Math. 6. v. 12. The pardon which we aske to be giueÌ„ to vs dependeth not vpon that which we giue to others The like sayings of theirs we repeated in the former chapter art 17. and shall hereafter also c. 17. art 1. and 2. THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that God will not pardon our sinnes vnlesse we pardon others that we shall abide in his loue if we keepe his precepts The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that the pardon which me aske of God dependeth not vpoÌ„ that which we giue to others that our workes or good workes are not required to iustification that we may obtaine remission of sinnes without anie worke that the Ghospell promiseth remission of sinnes euen to them who haue no workes at all that faith can iustifie without good workes that the presence of good workes is not necessarie in the moment of iustification that we haue no need of workes to be iustified that workes are pernitious if they tought necessarie to iustificatioÌ„ that faith iustifieth though it haue no good workes actually present that sole faith excludeth euen the necessitie of the presence of good workes when we are iustified ART XIII WHETHER GOOD WORKES be necessarie to saluation SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Math. 5. v. 21. For I tell you that vnlesse your iustice abound Our iustice necessarie to saluation Likewise our conuersion And keeping of the commandments Patience necessarie And Holines more then that of the Scribes and Pharisees you shall not enter into the kingdome of heauen c. 18. v. 3. Amen I say to you vnlesse you be conuerted and become as litle children you shall not enter into the kingdome of heauen c. 19. v. 17. If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandments Hebr. 10. v. 36. Patience is necessarie for you that doing the will of God you may receaue the promise c. 12. v. 14. Follow peace with all men and holines without which no man shall see God CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 4. de Iustif c. 7. We say that good workes are necessarie for a iust man to saluation PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE The Confession of Bohemia and the Apologie of the Confession of Auspurg cited in the former article denie good workes to be necessarie to saluation Tindal in Fox his Acts p. 1143. We need not to labour for We need not labour for heauen all these things to be Christs heires and to haue heauen for these we haue already The English Translatour of Luthers coÌ„mentaries vpon the Epistle to the Galathians For if there haue beene since the Good workes not necessarie to saluation time of Luther and be yet some which openly defend that workes be necessarie to saluation where he before so mightly hath taught the contrarie what then would these haue done if Luther had not beene Who also forewarned vs of the same prophecying that after his times the doctrine of iustification would be
almost extinguished in the Church Liber Concordiae Luther in Declar. art c. 4. Those propositions of necessitie of good workes to saluation take away comfort Not necessarie to saluation from troubled and afflicted consciences giue occasion of doubting of the grace of God and are manie wayes dangerous Againe Those propositions of the necessitie of good workes to saluation are not to be taught defended painted but rather to be hissed out cast out of our Churches as false and not sincere Luther in Gal. 1. to 5. f. 286. The false Apostles did teach that Doctrine of false Apostles beside faith in Christ the workes of Gods law are necessarie to saluatioÌ„ l. de votis to 2. f. 281. Thou now vnderstaÌ„dest why I saied so oftentimes that nether vowes nor our workes are necessarie to iustice and saluation And as Schlusselburg to 7. Catal. Haer. pag. 312. reporteth This forme of speech God workes are necessarie Cast out of Luthers Churches to saluation he caused to be blotted and taken out of same mens writings and made a publike disputation of the same and therein cast it out of his Churches and sent it back againe to the Popes market or as Illyricus and Gallus ibid. pag. 567. write In publick disputation held at Wittemberg 1536. he more then fiue times iterated this speech That proposition good workes be Condemned necessarie to saluation we will haue to be condemned abrogated and quite shut out of our Churches and scholes The like saieth Scheptius cited in Colloq Aldeburg p. 153. 349. The Ministers of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg p. 6. and 7. condemne this proposition Good workes are necessarie to Popish and impious doctrine saluation and p. 129. say that it is Popish scandalous dangerous and impious contrarie to the word of God the Confâ—ssion of Auspurg and writings of Luther to which purpose they cite manie of Luthers sayings p. 134. they say it breedeth desperation Popish paradox p. 151. is the onely foundation of the Popes kingdome p. 349. a Popish paradox Schlusselburg tom 7. Catal. Haeret. pag. 69. Good workes Popish speech are necessarie to saluation is especially the speech and phrase of Papists and the foundation of all Popish and Antichrists workes This foundation standing all Poperie standeth If therefore we Foundation of Poperie shal be so madde as to admit this proposition we shall take away all distinction betwene vs and Poperie all our religion wil be condemned we iustly accounted Schismatiks accursed and ether compelled to recant our doctrine or to be damned for euer And to the same purpose he citeth manie famous Lutherans Morlinus in Schlusselburg to 4. Catal. Haeret. pag. 229. I am assured that it is the doctrine of SathaÌ„ if any say or thinke Doctrine of Sathan that to a sinner as he is now after his fall workes are any way necessarie to saluation To which Poach addeth p. 266. that it is doctrine of Sathan to say that good workes are necessarie to saluation ether in the law or in the Ghospell or in anie parte whatsoeuer of Christian doctrine Illyricus Praefat. in Epistol ad Rom. Workes are not any Not any way necessarie way necessarie to saluation Hunnius de Iustif p. 187. This proposition wherewith it is saied that workes are necessarie to saluation I iudge to be cast out of the Church howsoeuer it be painted or coloured Herbrandus in Compendio Theol. loco de bonis operibus Let this proposition God workes be necessarie to saluation be cast away The same say manie other Lutherans whome I name in my Latin booke c. 13. art 13. Confessio Heluet. cap. 16. We do not thinke that good God workes not necessarie workes are so necessarie to saluation that without them no man is euer saued And to this Confession subscribed the Protestant Churches of England Scotland France and Flanders as is reported in Syntagmate Confessionum Caluin in Antidoto Concilij Sess 6. Can. 20. In that the Ghospell differeth from the law that it promiseth life not vpon condition of workes as that doth but for faith Preus l. 3. de Iustif c. 12. Whence we vnderstand that workes Not absolutely necessarie are not absolutely necessarie to saluation l. 4. c. 1. We thinke euen the thiefe who in all his life hadde done no good when in his agonie he fled to Christ being preuented by death to haue beene saued with out workes Et. c. 2. Without new obedieÌ„ce the promise of life may be sure to the beleiuers And in Gal. 6. lect 73. They Contrarie to the Ghospell Interimists did hould no few points of doctrine contrarie to the Ghospell of seuen Sacraments of workes necessarie to saluation c. THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that patience is necessarie to attaine the promises that without holines none shall see God that vnlesse our iustice be greater then that of the Pharises we shall not enter into the kingdome of heauen that if we will haue life we must keepe the commandments The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that workes are not necssarie to saluation not absolutely necessarie that the thiefe was saued without workes that the Ghospell promiseth saluation without condition of workes that doctrine of necessitie of workes to saluation is Popish is the foundation of all Poperie the doctrine of Antichrist and Sathan Which are so opposite to Scripture as sometimes Protestants confesse it See l. 2. c. 30. ART XIV WHETHER GOOD WORKES be profitable or auaile any thing to iustification and saluation SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Tim. 4. v. 8. Pietie is profitable to all things hauing promise Good workes profitable of the life that now is and of that to come The same teach other places cited in the former article and others to be cited in the next article CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Catechismus ad Parochos cap. de Oratione By deuout praiers we appease God by almes we redeeme the offenses of men by fasting we wash away the filth of our owne life And albeit euerie one be profitable against all kinde of sinnes yet c. PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Apologie of the English Church We say we haue no meed No meed in workes in Latin praesidium at all by our owne workes and deeds but appoint all the means of our saluation to be in Christ alone Confessio Argentinensis c. 3. It is cleare that our workes Workes helpe nothing to iustice Of no momeÌ„t helpe nothing to this that of iniust we become iust Confessio Belgica art 24. Workes proceding from the true roote of faith are of no moment of all for to iustifie vs. Whitaker ad Ration 8. Campiani God in iustifying vs Of no reckoning makes no reckoning at all of our workes Tindal in Fox his actes p. 1143. All that thinke that good Profit nothing workes helpe or profit any thing to get the guift of saluatioÌ„ they blaspheme against God and robbe God of honour Which Fox also
maintaineth Luther l. de votis to 2. f. 279. To teach that workes are holesome Not profitable or profitable is diuelish and Apostaticall from faith seing faith alone is necessarie and profitable In 1. Petri. 1. to 5. fol. 453. All which tend to that end that we may learne that we cannot be holpen by workes In c. 40. Isaiae in Schlusselburg tom 7. Catal. Haeret. fol. 320. When workes are condemned they are Vnprofitable so condemned as vnprofitable to Christian iustice and likewise to saluation Postilla in Dom. 3. post Pascha fol. 257. Nether will anie workes helpe thither he meaneth to iustification In die AsceÌ„sionis f. 267. Workes do nothing at all for pietie and iustification Doe nothing In dom 13. post Trinit Albeit I had all the workes of Abraham Noë and all the beloued fathers they would profit me nothing In Dom. 13. he saieth that workes profit a man nothing In festo S. Annae that they doe nothing Et Serm. de 10. Leprosis to 7. he writeth Let him know that his workes are not necessarie and profitable to himselfe but onely to his neighbour Nor yet content to haue taught that good workes are vnprofitable he addeth that they are pernitious to saluation For thus writeth Hospin in Concordia discordi c. 20. Rorarius sheweth that Luther alwaies vsed this proposition Good workes pernicious to saluation Good workes are pernitious to saluation And the same confesse the Ministers of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg p. 205. and Luther himselfe intimateth in c. 40. Isaiae to 3. in these words The iustice and wisdome of the flesh is condemned as vnprofitable yea pernitious to obtaine iustice and saluation For by iustice of the flesh he vseth to vnderstand good workes And so Schlusselburg in the place now cited vnderstood him The Ministers of the Elector in Colloq Aldeburg p. 293. speake thus Amsdorfius hath written and after him or Pernitious to saluation by him Flacâ—ius workes are not onely not necessarie but also pernitious to saluation and his words are at large related by Coccius to 1. p. 1113. Besides they adde p. 121. that the saied Amsdarfius wrote a booke with this title Good workes are hurtfull to saluation And that no man may say that Amsdorfius spoake or wrote this onely of the trust of workes himselfe declareth saying That good workes euen according to their nature or Perniâ—ious euen of their nature and substance substance as they are commanded of God are pernitious to saluation And the same euasion reiecteth also Hospinian in place before alledged Kemnitius also in Schlusselburg to 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 529. confesseth that in their Church this doctrine is spread The good workes of the iust are pernitious to saluation The same confesseth liber Concordiae c. 4. Hutterus in Analysi Confess Augustan disput 13. Adamus Francisci in Margarita Theol. loco 10. Reineccius tom 4. Armaturae c. 15. Lubeccenses apud Schlusselburg to 7. Catal. Haeret. p. The law vnprofitable to iustification 607. The law is not onely not necessarie to iustification but altogether vnprofitable Gerlachius to 2. disput 14. The morall now since the fall of man is so vnprofitable to iustifie and saue as c. Caluin in Resp ad Sadolet p. 126. Surely we denie that in iustifying mans workes are worth a haire Againe we denie that workes haue any thing to doe in iustifying a man In Rom. 8. v. 3. The law hath no force at all to giue iustice Coccius tomo 1. pag. 1113. repeateth these words of Rather hindreth Luther out of his Sermon in Natali Christi It is now made euident that to this new natiuitie worke nothing but rather hinder precepts laws doctrine free will good workes innocent life c. THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that pietie is profitable to all things and hath promise of the life to come The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that good helpe nothing to iustification or saluation are not worth a haire haue nothing to doe there that they are not profitable worke nothing to saluation profit nothing to saluation that they are vnprofitable yea pernitious to iustice and saluation and that of their owne nature as they are commanded of God and that to teach that workes are profitable is diuelish and Apostaticall from faith ART XV. WHETHER GOOD WORKES be a cause of saluation SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Math. 25. v. 23. Because thou hast beene faithfull ouer a few Workes cause of entrance into ioye And of possessing the kingdome things I will place the ouer maniethings enter into the ioy of thy Lord. Et v. 34. Possesse you the kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the world for I was an hungred and you gaue me to eate Rom. 8. v. 10. The bodie indeed is dead because of sinne but the spirit liueth because of iustification 2. Cor. 4. v. 17. For that our tribulation which presently is momentarie and light worketh aboue measure excedingly an eternall Tribulation worketh glorie weight of glorie in vs. Et c. 7. v. 10. The sorrow that is according to God worketh pennance vnto saluation that is stable but the sorrow of the world worketh death Gal. 6. v. 8. He that soweth in his flesh of the flesh also shall Life reaped of sowing in spirit reape corruption but he that soweth in the spirit of the spirit shall reape life euerlasting Philippens 1. v. 27. And in nothing be ye terrified of the aduersaries Men worke their saluation which to them is cause of perdition but to you of saluation and this of God Et c. 2. v. 12. With feare and trembling worke your saluation CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton l. 8. de Iustific c. 34. Good workes are truely and properly the cause ether of reconciliation or of saluation PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker lib. 2. de Scriptura cap. 14. sect 5. The iust The iust not rewarded for for workes are not rewarded for the workes of iustice which they haue done Perkins in Serie Causarum c. 57. Saluation dependeth not of workes but of our faith Luther in Gal. 2. to 5. f. 308. Thus are we deliuered from sinne Saluation dependeth not of workes Life not giuen for workes Nons saued for workes iustified and life euerlasting is giuen vs not for our merits and workes but for faith In Catechismo f. 687. Surely our workes do nothing to saluation Illyricus in Claue part 2 tractat 6. None shal be saued for his workes Herbrandus in Compendio theol loco de bonis operibus Life euerlasting is giuen to vs freely by Christ and not for our good workes Zuinglius in Ioan. 5. tom 4. Workes do not saue do not Workes saue not iustifie Caluin in Rom. 4. v. 16. If the heauenlie inheritance come to Heauen cometh not by workes Affliction no cause of saluation Workes not in parte cause of saluation No true cause vs by workes faith will fall the
vayne Homius in Disput 70. Almes hath not that force which Papists blasphemously attribute to it to wit to dispose a man to the grace of iustification to wipe away sinnes and to satisfie for them Willet Contr. 19. q. 3. p. 1034. It is an abominable and blasphemous Not by workes opinion that anie man by his workes should be able to redeeme his sinnes THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that sinnes are redeemed by almes that sinnes are purged and redeemed by mercie Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely say that sinnes are not redeemed by almes or charitie that it is not possible to redeeme sinnes by almes that Christs eath had beene in vaine if sinnes could be redeemed by almes that it is abhominable and blasphemous to say that sinne may be redeemed by almes Which are so contrarie to Scripture as sometimes Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART IX WHETHER TO ABSTAINE from great sinnes be necessarie to saluation SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Cor. 6. v. 9. Do not erre Nether fornicatours nor seruers of Great sinners shall not enioy heauen Idols nor adulters c. shall possesse the kingdome of God Ephes 5. v. 5. Know you this that no fornicatour or vncleane or couetous person which is the seruice of idols hath inheritance in the kingdome of Christ and God Rom. 8. v. 13. If you liue according to the flesh you shall die Shall die CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 4. de Iustif cap. 9. It can no way be that faith accompanied with euill workes can saue a man PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Contr. 2. q. 5. c. 7. We say If anie haue an act of No sinne hurteth where faith faith that sinne cannot hurt him This Luther saieth this we all say Luther de Captiuit Babyl to 2. f. 74. So thou seest how rich A Christian cannot leefe his saluation by anie sinne a Christian or baptized men is who though he would cannot leese his saluation with what great sinnes soeuer vnlesse he will not beleiue For no sinnes can damne him but onely incredulitie De votis ib. fol. 281. There are none so ill workes of one that beleiueth in Christ which can accuse and condemne him De libertate ib. f. 8. No worke profiteth an infidell to iustice and saluatioÌ„ No sinne daÌ„neth infidelitie and contrariwise no euill worke maketh him euill or damned but incredulitie In c. 53. Isaiae to 4. No sinne can hurt him that beleiueth In Gal. 2. to 5. f. 313. The false Apostles taught that vnlesse you liue according to the law you are dead before God Paul teacheth the plaine contrarie In c. 4. f. 404. The true knowledge of Christ or faith disputeth whether thou hast done good workes to iustice or euill workes to damnation but simply thus determineth whether thou hast done good workes thou art not therefore iustified or whether thou hast done ill thou art not therefore damned Et to 1. Epist edit Ienae f. 345. Be a sinner and sinne No murther or fornication can draw vs from Christ Perseuerer in sinne are iust stoutly Sinne shall not draw vs from Christ albeit we commit fornication or murther a thousand times a daye Bergenses apud Hospin in Concordia discordi f. 86. Iustice is imputed euen to them who perseuer in sinne Melancthon in Ioan. apud Cocleum in Art 6. Confess Augustanae As by the Ghospell onely faith is iustice so that though thou hadst done all the sinnes of all meÌ„ yet if thou beleiuest that the Father hath mercie vpon thee for Christ thou shalt be safe So contrariewise by the Ghospell onely incredulitie is sinne Onely incredulitie is sine Reineccius to 4. Armaturae c. 15. Euill workes do not make an euill man to wit him that is in Christ Zuinglius lib. de ver falsa relig tom 2. c. de Peccato Onely increduliâ—ie is not pardoned It followeth that onely incredulitie is that to which pardon is denied Caluin in Rom. 8. v. 13. Howsoeuer we be yet subiect to sinne neuerthelesse he promiseth vs life so we prosecute our desire of mortifying the flesh Author resp ad theses Valentinianas p. 925. This would that notable Diuine Luther and all our men So we haue true faith no sinne how great soeuer shall hinder ws to be made partakers of the euerlasting inheritance See more in my Latin booke c. 15. art 8. THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely biddeth vs not erre for nether fornicatours nor adulterous nor such grieuous sinners shall possesse the kingdome of God and that if we liue according to the flesh we shall die Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely say that a Christian cannot be damned with what great sinnes soeuer so he will beleiue that onely incredulitie can damne him that though he commit fornication and murder a thousand times aday shall not be drawne from Christ though he had done all the sinnes of all meÌ„ he shal be saued if he beleiue that pardon is denied onely to incredulitie that so one haue faith sinnes can not hurt him that so we haue true faith no grieuous sinnes whatsoeuer shall hinder vs to enter into heauen What other I pray you is this but that voice of the Serpent to Eue Yee shall not die ART X. WHETHER SINNES BE THE cause for which men are damned SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Math. 25. v. 41. Get yee away from me you cursed into euerlasting Men are damned for not exercising charitie According to their workes fire which was prouided for the Diuel and his Angels For I was an hungred and you gaue me not to eate c. Apocal. 20. v. 12. And the dead were iudged of those things which were written in the bookes according to their workes CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 2. de Grat. lib. arb c. 16. The Scripture euerie where teacheth that eternall punishment is by the iust iudgment of God rendred to mens sinnes PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther in Ionae 1. to 4. f. 409. Let vs know that we are not Men are not damned in sinne Onely incredulitie damneth damned in sinne nor saued by good workes Postilla in Dom. 8. post Trinitat f. 300. I obserue that no worke is so euill as it can damne a man onely incredulitie daÌ„neth That a man committeth adulterie that worke condemneth not but adulterie doth shew that he hath lost his faith In Dom. 4. post Pascha Onely incredulitie is held for sinne In die Ascensionis Nether is there anie sinne so great which can coÌ„demne a man onely incredulitie damneth whosoeuer are damned Damnation followeth no sinne but infidelitie Iacobus Andreae in Colloq Montisbel p. 109. None but None but infidels are damned Men are not damned because they haue sinned the incredulous is damned 105. Vnlesse incredulitie were in those that are to be damned none should be damned p. 447. Those that are to be adiudged to eternall punishmeÌ„t are not therefore daÌ„ned because they haue sinned but
parte in working But this is wrongly giuen to man that he obeyeth preuenting grace with an attending will Et ib. § 10. It is false that men are drawne willingly Which also he hath in Ioa. 6. v. 44. In Actor 9. v. 5. The Papists attribute the praise of our conuersion He doth not cooperate to Gods grace but in parte onely because they imagin that we cooperate Beza in Confess cap. 4. sect 17. There can be no concurse of Doth not concurre grace and free will when the Spirit of God by his mere grace freeth vs from sinne Pareus l. 6. de Grat. lib. arbit c. 9. God taketh away the ill will and maketh a good In this the Scripture attributeth no operation to the will but mere passion THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely teacheth that a man must prepare his soule prepare his hart turne himselfe from iniquitie make a new hart cleanse and sanctifie himselfe The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely teach that a man doth not cooperate not concurre hath no parte in working is merly and purely passiue in his conuersion is like a block that the conuersion of a sinner is the worke of God alone as the raising of the dead yea that a man in his conuersion actually resisteth and rebelleth against God ART XVI WHETHER AFTER IVSTIFIcation there remayne at anie time any temporall punishment due SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 2. Reg. 12. vers 14. Nathan saied to Dauid Our Lord hath Dauid punished after he was forgiuen taken away thy sinne thou shalt not die Neuerthelesse because thou hast made the enemies of our Lord to blaspheme for this thing the sonne that is borne to the dying shall die Numbers 20. v. 12. And our Lord saied to Moises and Aaron Also Moises and Aaron Because you haue not beleiued me to sanctifie before the children of Israel you shall not bring in the peoples into the lād which I will giue them Et Gen. 3. v. 17. Punishment is imposed vpō Adam because he had eaten of the forbidden aple and yet it is not doubted but his sinne was forgiuen him CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 14. c. 8. The Councel declareth that it is altogether false and contrarie to the word of God that the fault is neuer remitted of God but that all the punishment also is pardoned PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin in Luc. 21. v. 43. Away with that naughtie deuise of No punishment after forgiuenesse the retaining of punishment when the fault is remitted In Rom. 4. v. 6. The Scholastiks do fable that the fault being remitted punishment is retained of God Beza in Math. 6. v. 12. It is not onely false but also a fond and foolish opinion of the Sophisters who thinke that punishmēt being retained the fault is remitted Daneus Contr. 6. p. 1204. It is an errour that the fault being remitted any punishment is retained Bullinger de Iustific Serm. 6. What I pray you had Christ Anie temporall punishment cōtrarie to Christs suffrances profited vs if yet punishment temporall were exacted of vs for sinnes Spalatensis l. cont Suarem c. 2. The fault is neuer remitted but the whole punishment is with all pardoned THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that Dauid was punished with the death of his sonne euen after his sinne was remitted The like it saieth of Moyses Aaron and Adam The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that it is false foolish and erroneous to thinke that the fault being remitted anie temporall punishment is retained that Christ had profited vs nothing if anie temporall punishment were exacted of vs for sinne Which is so coūtrarie to Scripture as sometimes Protestants themselues confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF iustification Out of that which we haue rehearsed in this chapter clearly appeareth that the Protestants doctrine of Iustification is quite contrarie to the holie Scripture For the Scripture and Catholiks with it teacheth that iustification is of workes and not of faith onely that the iustified are iust indeed and before God that they are cleane and that the sinnes from which they are iustified remaine not in them that there is in them inherent grace or iustice and that it is imputed to them that they are not certaine by infallible faith that they are iustified that pennance goeth before iustification that iustification may be lost and that the iustified ought to feare lest he fall that iustificatiō is not proper to the elect that a sinner cooperateth to his iustification and that sometimes after iustification temporall punishment remaineth All Which Protestants denie It appeareth also that Protestants euen in this matter keepe their ould custome of stealing For they take from iustification the vertue of abolishing sinne in those that are iustified and of making them truely iust and cleane and of giuing them internall iustice and of making that it be imputed to them They take also from it that it can be communicated to the reprobates And thus much of Iustification CHAPTER XVII OF LIFE AND DEATH EVERLASTING ART I. WHETHER LIFE EVERLASTING be a reward SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. MATH 5. v. 12. Be glad and reioyce for your reward Reward in heauen Euerlasting life rendered to vs. is very great in heauen Rom. 2. v. 6. God will render to euerie man according to his workes to them truelie that according to patience in good worke seeke glorie and honour and incorruption life eternall Colossens 3. ver 24. Knowing that you shall receaue of our Heauenlieinheritance a retribution or reward Lord the retribution Beza and the Anglish Bible translated Reward of inheritance CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 6. c. 16. Euerlasting life is to be proposed to those who worke well to the end and hope in God both as a grace mercifully promised to the childrē of God by Christ Iesus and as a reward and to be faithfully giuē by Gods promise to their good workes and merits PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins in reformed Catholik Contr. 5. p. 110. The kingdome Kingdome of heauen not a reward properly Not a reward or recompēse of heauen is called a reward not properly but by a figure or by resemblance Ministers of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg pag. 6. reiect this proposition Life euerlasting is giuen for good workes as a reward or recompense Illyricus in Math. 5. v. 12. The Lord calleth goods to come a Called a reward by abuse reward abusiuely And in Clane part 2. tractat 6. col 545. It vseth to be called sometimes a reward by abuse Gerlachius to 2. disput 26. These guifts do not properly deserue the name of a reward Zuinglius de Prouidentia cap. 6. to 1. These are hyperbols By ouerlashing of speech and ouerlashesse If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandments Who shall do the will of my father c. and what other promises soeuer haue beene made to workes Et in 2. Cor. 5. to 4. Not
that there is any reward of faith or workes but c. Caluin in Antidoto Concilij sess 6. c. 17. That they make No reward euerlasting life a reward in that I dissent from them 3. Instit c. 21. § 1. Saluation cometh to vs by the mere liberalitie of God He Mere liberalitie saueth of his mercie good pleasure and repaieth not a reward l. 18. § 3. Let them know that they haue receaued a guift of grace Not a reward not a reward of workes In Ephes 2. v. 8. That he saueth is mere grace not a reward or retribution Bucer in Math. 5. The things which come to vs from God Free guift are no reward but his free guifts Peter Martyr in Roman 4. Euerlasting life may haue some Farre from the nature of reward resemblance of reward but is farre distant from the nature thereof Wherefore euerlasting life cannot be called a reward but by some resemblance Piscator in Thesibus loco 16 If properly speaking life euerlasting If there were reward there were Merit were a reward surely we should merit it by good workes Wherefore it remaineth that life euerlasting be called a reward by a figure Luther apud Scioppium in Ecclesiast c. 67. If I saw heauē open and could merit it by taking vp a straw from the ground yet would I not take vp the straw CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture plainely saieth that euerlasting life is giuen according to workes and in that manner of speach as it saith that wrath and indignation is giuen according to workes that there is very great reward in heauen that we shall receaue the retribution or reward of inheritāce The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that euerlasting life is no retribution or reward that it is farre from the nature of reward that all the promises made in the Scripture to workes are hyperbols or ouerlashings of speach that is improperly a reward abusiuely a reward that it deserueth not the name of reward Which are so contrarie to Scripture as sometimes Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART II. WHETHER LIFE EVERLASTING be a Crowne of Iustice SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 2. Tim. 4. v. 7. 8. I haue fought a good fight I haue consummate Heauenlie reward is a crowne of iustice my course I haue kept the faith Concerning the rest there is laid vp for me a crowne of iustice which our Lord will render me at that day a iust iudge CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton l. 9. de Iustif c. 3. The Scriptures most manifestly shew that happines is a reward of iustice promised of God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins refor Catholik Contr. 5. p. 109. We must acknowledge life eternall to be euerie way the guift of God p. 108. It is a free guift Caluin 3. Instit c. 15. § 4. Beatitude it selfe is the mere goodnesse Of mere liberalitie of God c. 21. § 1. Saluation cometh to vs of the mere liberalitie of God In Rom. 6. v. vlt. Hence we gather that our saluation is wholy from Gods grace and mere goodnesse In 2. Tim. 2. v. 12. Paul acknowledgeth nothing in the whole cause of saluation Of mere grace but mere grace of God In Antidoto Concil sess 6. It cometh to vs by no other Title then of free adoption Beza in Confess c. 4. sect 7. We professe that euerlasting By not title but of free adoption life is wholy and in all partes the free guift of God lib. quaest vol. 1. p. 655. Wholy of his mere grace doth he giue vs the benefit of eternall life Bucer in Epitome doctrinae Argentinen Euerlasting life remaineth mere grace Zuinglius in Exposit fidei tom 2. f. 558. Eternall happines cometh by the onely grace and liberalitie of God Bullinger Decade 3. Serm. 9. None is so sottish as he vnderstandeth Wholy and merely of grace not that the whole benefit of saluation is attributed wholy and merely to grace THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that euerlasting life is a crowne of iustice to be giuē to him that hath fought a good fight and consummated his course and that of a iust iudge The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that life euerlasting is mere grace mere goodnesse in all partes a free guift that it cometh to vs of mere goodnesse not otherwise then by mere guift by no other Title then of free adoption Wholy of mere grace that it is nothing but mere grace that S. Paul acknowledgeth nothing in all the course of saluatiō but mere grace Which is so contrarie to Scripture as some Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART III. WHETHER SALVATION OR eternall life be of faith onely SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Iames 2. vers 14. What shall it profit my brethren if a man Saluation no◠of faith onely say he hath faith but hath not workes Shall faith be able to saue him Philippen 2. vers 12. With feare and trembling worke your Saluation is to be wrought of vs. saluation CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE C. Bellarm. l. 4. de Iustif c. 7. We say that good workes are necessarie to a iust man to saluation not onely in manner of pre-presence but also of efficiencie because they worke saluation and without them faith alone worketh not saluation PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Perkins in Gal. 3. to 2. col 157. They are deceaued who say Workes no cause of salua Faith onely saueth Workes not profitable to saluation that faith and workes concurre as causes of saluation Luther de votis to 2. fol. 273. Faith alone saueth fol. 279. This is the summe of summes Workes and vowes can nether be taught nor perswaded vnlesse we say that they be holesom and profitable to iustice and saluation But to teach that they are holesome is diuelish and Apostasie from faith because faith alone is necessarie and holesome ib. de Captiuit Baby l. f. 78. It is certaine Faith alone is holesome that none of them was saued by his vowes and religion but onely by faith in which we all are saued Postilla in die Ascensionis Workes helpe nothing to saluation It is enough to haue faith Faith alone by it selfe and without any workes saueth vs and workes do nothing at all to pietie or saluation In Dom. post Ascens Faith deliuereth from the Diuel hell sinne and all misfortune which if we haue it is enough Ministers in Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg p. 162. Whosoeuer teacheth that eternall life is giuen for good workes he departeth from the word of God the Confession of Auspurg and Life not giuen for workes the Apologie Thou shall neuer read in the Scripture that eternall life is giuen for good workes Liber Concordiae c. 3. p. 691. By faith alone we are iustified before God and saued 694. But this errour also is to be reiected when it is taught That a man is any other way or by anie other thing saued then by
of the Anthropomorphites then thou canst obiect it to vs in this mysterie For the Anthropomorphites in no place of Scripture had an expresse word which directly saied God hath a bodie We haue a most expresse word wherewith Christ saied most directly of that which he gaue to his Apostles This is my bodie The Anthropomorphites had no expresse word which was of purpose spoakē to tell vs what God was we haue an expresse word spoaken purposely to this end and onely to this end to tell vs what the Eucharist is The Anthropomorphites had no expresse word which anie circunstances of moment did conuince to be vnderstood in their proper sense we haue an expresse word which all circustances do confirme ought to be vnderstood in their natiue and vsuall signification The Anthropomorphites had a word but as a thing which the very light of reason did shew to be otherwise then the word did signifie we haue the word of a new thing neuer heard of before and which can no way be knowne by the light of reason but onely by the word of God Finally to omit al other differences taken from the Church Fathers and Councels the Anthropomorphites had the word of a matter which the Scripture other where most manifestly denieth we haue the word of a matter which Deuter. 4. Actor 7. Ioan. 4. the Scripture no where directly ether clearely or obsculy denieth nether the deniall thereof can any way be wroūg out of the Scripture but by adding a false humane principle and by making a deceitfull humane argument Thus manie and thus great differences are there betwene the word wherewith we make the Eucharist the bodie of Christ and the word wherewith the Anthropomorphites made God to haue a bodie as I thinke are not betwene the word which the Anthropomorphites alledged and the word wherewith anie other article of Christian faith is proued And thus much touching the first argument taken from the opposition betwixt the words of the holie Scripture and of Protestants in 260. articles and such words of the Scripture as were spoaken of purpose for to tell vs what we were to beleiue and in their open and plaine sense which they manifestly shew and in which such words vse to be spoaken and vnderstood of men which argument as a foundation of all the rest that follow shal be included in euerie one of them CHAPTER II. THAT PROTESTANTS CONFESSE that they contradict the sense of those words which the Catholik Church manie ages agoe and manie of themselues beleiue to be the words of God THE second argument wherewith we will proue that Protestants contradict the true sense of the holie Scripture we will take from their confession wherein they confesse that they contradict the sense of those words of which some of them to let passe all other proofes are acknowledged by diuers Protestants and all of them were manie ages agoe iudged by the Catholik Lutherans confesse that their doctrine is against S. Iames Epistle Church to be a parte of the holie Scripture For Luther and the Lutheran Protestants do confesse that the cheifest point of Protestancie to wit of Iustification by onelie faith doth verilie contradict the Epistle of S. Iames where he saieth Yee see that a man is iustified by workes and not by faith onely For thus writeth Luther in his Preface vpon that Epistle I iudge it to be the writing of no Apostle for this cause First because directly against S. Paul and all other Scripture it attributeth iustification to workes And in Luther saieth S. Iames doated c. 22. Gen. tom 6. fol. 282. Iames concludeth ill It followeth not as Iames doateth Therefore the fruites do iustifie let our aduersaries therefore be packing with their Iames. Melancthon de Sacris Concion to 2. fol. 23. But if they cannot be mittigated by anie exposition as those words of Iames Yee see c. these absolutely are not to be admitted Magdelburgenses Cētur 1. l. 2. c. 4. col 54. The Epistle of Iames swarueth not a litle from the analogie of Apostolik doctrine whiles it ascribeth iustification not to faith onely but to workes And Centur. 2. c. 4. col 71. The Epistle of Iames attributeth iustice to workes contrarie to Paul and all other Scriptures Schlusselburg lib. 1. Theol. Caluin art 15. fol. 50. Iames contrarie to Paul attributeth iustice to workes And tom 8. Catal. Haeret. pag. 500. he saieth of S. Iames. He fighteth directly with Paul and all the rest of the Scripture by giuing iustice before God to mans workes The same confesse Pomeranus and Vitus Theodorus cited by Coccius to 1. lib. 6. art 23. and Pappus cited by Gretser l. 1. de verbo Dei c. 18. and the same is insinuated by Hunnius de Iustific pag. 219. Wherevpon Daneus in Enchirid. Augustini c. 67. saieth It troubleth manie now a dayes so that some haue cast out the Epistle of Iames others haue called it straweish And Pareus l. 4. de Iustif c. 18. Luther could not accord Iames with Paul but by casting away the whole Epistle Beza also in Iac. 2. v. 14. Manie haue cast away this Epistle for this cause as if it were contrarie to true doctrine Nether do onelie Lutherans iudge thus of S. Iames his Epistle but also some Sacramentaries For Musculus de locis tit de Some Sacramentaries reiect Sainct Iames. Iustificat saieth That impertinentlie he alledgeth the examples of Abraham That he confoundeth the word of faith and setteth downe a sentence different from Apostolicall doctrine And ib. tit de Scriptur pa. 172. plainelie professeth that he houldeth it not for authenticall Scripture And the Confession Heluet. c. 15. saieth The same saied he Iames not contradicting S. Paul otherwise he were to be reiected And neuerthelesse commonly all Sacramentaries account S. Iames Epistle to be a parte of holie Scripture in so much as the English French and Flemish Protestants haue put it in their Confessions as a point of their faith Wherefore thus I argue in forme what contradicteth the Epistle of S. Iames contradicteth the holie Scripture The cheifest point of Protestancie touching Iustification by onely faith cōtradicteth the Epistle of S. Iames Therefore it contradicteth the holie Scripture The Maior or first Proporsition is not onely beleiued and tought of all Catholiks but also commonelie of Sacramentaries And the Minor or second Proposition is graunted by the Lutherans In like sorte all Protestants acknowledge their doctrine Protestants confesse that they teach contrarie to Machab. Tobie c. of not praying for the dead to be contrarie to those words of 2. Machab. c. 12. It is a holie and holesome cogitation to pray for the dead that they may be loose from their sinnes Wherevpon Caluin in Antidoto Concil Trident. sess 4. p. 265. saieth Out of the 2. of Machabes both Purgatorie will be proued and the Intercession of Saints out of Tobie Satisfactions Exorcismes and what not They will borrow no few matters of Ecclesiasticus
your sinnes Translate ill one to an other proue that we ought to confesse our sinnes to men the French Bibles An. 1605. 1610. translate them thus Confesse your faults one against an other as if the Apostle had bidden onely to confesse offences done against men The same insinuateth the Kings Bibles whiles for Sinnes it hath Faultes Because those words Actor 23. v. 11. And the night following Translate ill our Lord standing by him saied c. do proue that Christ was present with S. Paul in prison the French Bibles An. 1560 1562. 1568. 1605. in steed of Standing by translate He presented himselfe Tremellius hath He was seene Because those words Hebr 4. ver 14. Hauing therefore a Translate ill great high Preist that hath penetrated the heauens Caluin for Penetrated the heauenes translated He entred Beza He passed through Tromellius He ascended Because that Pronoune demonstratiue Hic This in those words of Christ This is my blood doth proue that it Translate ill is not referred to the word Cuppe or wine but to the word Blood Beza in Math. 26. v. 28. would not translate it Hic in the masculine gender but Hoc in the neuter gender For saieth he homilia 2. de ver present vol. 3. pag. 316. Surely who saieth Hic This is my blood pointeth at nothing but his owne blood The like he saieth in Cyclope pag. 268. Piscator l. 2. Thes p. 450. And yet as Illyricus saieth All both ancient and new and Caluin himselfe translate Hic This is my blood And Beza himselfe Hebr 9. ver 20. translateth the very selfe same Greek words thus Hic est sanguis This is my blood because there they proue not that the Euchariste is the bloud of Christ as they do Mathew 26. v. 28. cit Musculus also in locis tit de Caena pag. 360. affirmeth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vsed by S. Mathew and S. Mark is not well translated in the Masculin gender Hic Vnlesse we vnderstand Calix and neuerthelesse in the same place saieth that Mathew and Mark write that our Lord saied Hic This is my my blood of the new testament So that though twoe Euangelists teach that our Lord saied Hic This in the Masculine gender yet it is not well translated so Because those Greek words Luc. 22. vers 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is This is the new cuppe which the new testament in my blood that Cuppe which is shed for you do euidently shew that the word Shed is referred to the word Cuppe and consequently doe proue that it was a Cuppe of the true blood of Christ Beza vpon that place and Respons ad Illyr p. 198. and other Protestants after him saieth that ether there is a manifest Solloecophanes wherein the They call in do oâ— the words Nominatiue case is put for the Datiue or els these words are foisted into the text And yet confesseth that all our ancient Copies haue the nominatiue case or as Fulk saieth Praef. in nou testam not 49. All the Copies extant haue it in the nominatiue case And Beza herein is followed of Whitaker l. 1. cont Dur. sect 35. Daneus Contr. de Euchar. p. 544. Bucanus loco 48. Piscator in Refutat Sophismatum Hunnij p. 468. and of others Zuinglius resp ad Matthaeum Rulling tom 2. fol. 156. somewhat bolder translated these Greek words so as the word Shed cannot be referred to the word Cup to which alone S. Luke referreth it for thus he hath Hoc poculum in sanguine meo qui pro vobis funditur and Respons ad Confess Lutheri tom 2. fol. 511. saieth that it is an Enallage or Change of the Nominatiue case for the Datiue Moreouer Beza Luc. 22. vers 17. calleth in doubt those words Which is giuen for you Whereby the real presence is confirmed Because those words Math. 10. vers 2. The names of the They call in doubt twelue Apostles be these These first Simon who is called Peter proue the primacie of S. Peter Beza vpon that place saieth What if this word First be added by some who would stablish the the primacie of Peter And neuerthelesse addeth We find it so written in all Copies And so by his owne confession contrarie to the testimonie of all Copies calleth in question a word which fauoureth the Primacie of S. Peter Because the Pronoune Hoc or Hic in the words of They â—â—ll in doubt the Eucharist being taken adiectiuely helpeth to proue the Eucharist to be the bodie blood of Christ Daneus l. 1. de Euchar. c. 1. pag. 543. saieth What if I except that the proper words of Christ were onely these twoe Is my stesh I shall with one word frustrate all this proofe by the Pronoune Hoc But if thou canst nether proue thy exceptioÌ„ of Christs words nor canst denie but that the Euangelists haue the pronoune Hoc This is not thy exception both vaine and impious Because those words 1. Corinth 13. v. 2. If I should haue Translate ill all faith so that I could remoue mountaines and haue not charitie I am nothing do proue that no faith at all worketh iustification without charitie Beza therefore All translateth whole and saieth he doth it lest this text should deceaue anie Because those words Daniel 4. v. 24. Redeeme thou thy Translate ill sinnes with almes proue that good workes do redeeme sinnes The Kings Bible translateth it thus Breake of thy sinnes by righteousnesse And others say that our translatioÌ„ is naught And neuerthelesse P. Martyr on this place auoucheth That the Chaldee in which tongue this was written hath word for word Redeeme thy sinnes by iustices and so it is cited by Caluin 3. Instit c. 4. § 36. Apolog. Confess August c. de respons ad argumenta and also by others reported in the Protestants Apologie Tract 1. sect 4. subdiuis 7. Because those words Hebr. 2. ver 9. But him that was a They change the order of the words litle lessened vnder the Angels we see Iesus because of the passion of death crowned with glorie and honor proue that Christ was crowned with glorie because he suffered death Beza turneth the words thus But we see that Iesus crowned with glorie and honor who for a time was made inferior to Angels for suffering of death And King Iames Bible followeth him As if the Apostle had not saied why Christ was crowned with glorie but why he whas made inferiour to Angels And yet Beza is not ashamed to adde Let no man meruaile that I haue changed the placing of the words Because the words 2. Pet. 2. v. 8. For in sight and hearing They 〈◊〉 the 〈◊〉 he was iust dwelling with theÌ„ who from day to day vexed the iust soule with vniust workes proue that meÌ„ may be iuste in some deeds The King and Queens Bible turne the words thus For being righteous and dwelling amoÌ„g theÌ„ in seing and hearing vexed his soule Where they do not refer
from euill to good because it is saied absolutely Zacharie 1. ver 3. Conuert to me saieth the Lord of hostes and I will conuert to you they limitate this onely to outward conuersion Peter Martyr in Roman 11. The Prophet spoake not of inward iustification but of outward conuersion to good workes If we proue that we are not infallibly certaine of forgiuenesse Touching Iustification of sinnes or eternall punishment because it is saied absolutely Ioel. 2. v. 14. Who knoweth if he God will conuert and forgiue and the like is saied Ion. 3. v. 9. Kemnice in locis part 2. tit de Argum. limitateth this to forgiuenesse of temporall punishment and saieth All the speach of the Prophet tendeth to that he treateth of remission of temporall punishment In like sorte he limitateth manie other places of Scripture in which forgiuenesse is attributed to workes onely to forgiuenesse of temporall punishment That also of Tobie cap. 4. Almes deliuereth from death he restraineth to temporall death And in like manner promises made to good workes he limitateth to certaine blessings in this world or in the next but will not haue them extended to eternall life And finally wheresoeuer in the Scripture anie man praieth God to iudge or reward him according to his iustice he limitateth that to the iustice of his cause or quarell with other men If we proue that euerlasting happines is giuen for good Touching eternall life workes because S. Iames saieth cap. 1. ver 25. He that hath remained in it not made a forgetfull hearer but a doer of the worke this man shal be blessed in his deed they limitate this to blessednes in this life Schlusselburg to 8. Catal. Haeret. p. 497. thus answereth to this place To be blessed is not alwaies taken in holie writ for eternall saluation but for blessednes in this life If we proue that we must not onely beleiue but also keepe the law because Christ saieth Math. 5. ver 18. I am not come to break the law but to fulfill Caluin ibid. answereth Here is treated of doctrine not of life Touching doctrine we must not imagin anie abrogation of the law by the coming of Christ And v. 19. where is saied One iot or one tittle shall not passe of the law till all be fulfilled Caluin ibid. saieth I answere that word be done or fulfilled is not referred to mens liues but to the solide trueth of doctrine If we proue that our consciences are obliged by the particular Touching laws of men iust lawes of Princes because it is absolutely saied Rom. 3. v. 2. He that resisteth power resisteth the ordinance of of God and v. 5. Be subiect of necessitie not onely for wrath but also for conscience sake they limitate these words to the power of Magistrates in generall Daneus Contr. 5. p. 1127. To obey the Magistrate in generall is a matter of conscience but to obey this or that law of the Magistrate wholy and in all points we are not bound in conscience And Whitaker libr. 8. cont Dureum sect vlt. We must obey the Magistrate in generall for conscience sake because by a generall precept we are commanded to obey the Magistrate but particular lawes of Magistrates haue no command ouer our consciences In like sorte Caluin 4. Instit c. 10. § 5. Wherefore thus in forme I frame my ninth argument who not onely in so manie and so great matters do contradict such words of holie Scripture and in such sense as we haue seene but also take so much vpon them as limitate and restraine so manie and so weightie sentences of Scripture they are to be thought to gayne say the right sense of Scripture But Protestants do so Therefore c. CHAPTER X. THAT PROTESTANTS CHANGE manie absolute Propositions of Scripture into conditionals THE tenth argument shal be taken from that Protestants are forced to change manie and weightie absolute Propositions of Scripture into conditionals For if we proue that absolutely God will not the death Touching God of a sinner but rather his life and conuersion because he absolutely saieth Ezechiel 18. and 33. I will not the death of a sinner but rather that he be conuerted and liue Caluin l. de Praedestinat pag. 706. answereth Whereas the Prophets speach exhorteth to pennace no maruaile if God say he will haue all to be saued but the mutuall relation betwene threats and promises sheweth that such kind of speaches are conditionall So the promises which inuite all to saluation shew not what simply and precisely God hath decreed in his secret counsaile but what he is readie to doe to all that are brought to faith and pennance Touching the Church if we proue that the gates of Touching the Church hell shall not preuaile against her because Christ doth absolutely so promise Math. 16. ver 16. Besnagus l. de statu Eccles cap. 8. and others adde this condition If she forsake not her dutie and the word of God If we proue that simply we must heare the Pastors of the Church because Christ saieth Luk. 10. ver 16. He that heareth you heareth me and he that despiseth you despiseth me Caluin ib. addeth this condition If the Church do faithfully her dutie If we proue that the Church is simply infallible because 1. Timoth. 3. she is simply called the pillar and strength of trueth Vallada in Apol. cont Episcop Lusonensem cap. 20. answereth The visible Church cannot be the pillar of trueth but as it is grounded vpon the doctrine of the Apostles Vorstius in Antibell pag. 143. The Apostle speaketh conditionally to wit as long as the Church perseuereth to be the Church of Christ Academia Nemaus resp ad Tournon p. 546. Let it be a true and faithfull Church if it discerne trueth from falsitie by vndoubted and authenticall trueth If we proue that the Church is simply to be heard because Christ saieth Math. 18. ver 17. If he heare not the Church let him be to thee as an Ethnick and Publican White in his way p. 78. answereth The sense is that we must obediently heare the Church and obey her not simply in all things but conditionally as long as she speaketh agreably to Gods word And Author respons ad Theses Vademont pag. 688. The answere is easie and readie As long as the Church teacheth the word of God she is to be heard but her authoritie is none when she seperateth her selfe from Gods word And when Bellarmin had brought manie places of Scripture to proue that the Church cannot faile Vorstius libr. cit pag. answereth In them certaine conditionall promises are proposed vnto vs by which eternall saluation and securitie against Satan death c. is promised of God to all and euerie faithfull to wit as farre forth and as long as they shal be such or perseuer in true faith If we proue that there are some doers of the law as Touching Gods law well as there are hearers because Saint Paul saieth absolutely Rom. 2.
ver 13. Not the hearers of the law are iust with God but the doers of the law shal be iustified Caluin ibidem answereth This sentence hath onely this meaning If iustice be sought by the law we must fulfill the law because the iustice of the law consisteth in the perfection of workes Peter Martyr ibid. That which he saieth hath this meaning If anie were to be iustified before God by the iustice of the law he must fulfill the law Pareus libr. 4. de Iustificat cap. 14. The Apostlesaieth indeed Doers of the law shal be iustified but he meaneth conditionally if there be anie And Illyricus in Claue part 2. tract 4. writeth thus Roman 2. When Gentils doe those things which are of the law that is if they did them Againe Doe this and thou shalt liue is put for If thou doest them thou shalt liue If we proue that there are some which loue their neighbour and fulfill the law because it is saied Rom. 13. v. 8. Who loueth his neighbour hath fulfilled the law Caluin ib. answereth Paul saieth not what men doe or not doe but speaketh vpon condition which you shall not find any where fulfilled And if you proue that the law may be fulfilled because the Apostle saieth Galat. 6. v. 2. Beare yee one an others burdens and so yee shall fulfill the law of Christ Caluin ibid. answereth Because none performeth altogether that which Paul requireth therefore we are all farre from perfection If we proue that single life is simply good because S. Paul saieth absolutely 1. Cor. 7. v. 1. It is good for a man not to touch a woman P. Martyr in locis Classe 3. cap. 7. § 17. answereth They should see that what Paul hath of the praises of single life are neuer spoaken absolutely If we proue that virginitie may be absolutely counselled Of good workes to men because S. Paul 1. Corinth 7. v. 7. saieth absolutely I would all men to be as my selfe And ver 25. A concerning virgins a commandement of our Lord I haue not but counsaile I giue And ver 28. Art thou loose from a wife seeke not a wife Caluin in ver 25. cit answereth Because it is a slipperie matter and full of difficulties he speaketh alwaies vnder condition And in v. 27. This second member must be taken vnder condition If we proue that some may fall from grace because S. Of Iustification Paul saieth Gal. 5. v. 4. You are fallen from grace Pareus in Galat. 1. lect 7. answereth The Apostle speaketh that conditionally And in cap. 5. vers 4. lect 61. For the Apostle affirmeth not that the Galathians were fallen but threatneth that if that if they will be iustified by the law that it will come to posse that they fall wherefore thus I make my tenth argument Who beside the foresaied opposition on to so manie and such words of holie Scripture are forced to change manie and weightie absolute sayings of Scripture into conditionals they contradict the true meaning of the holie Scripture But Protestants doe so Therefore c. CHAPTER XI THAT PROTESTANTS CHANGE Conditionall Propositions of the Scripture into Absolute and delude them diuers other waies THE eleuenth argument for to proue that Protestants contradict the true sense of holie Scripture shal be because they are sometimes forced to change conditionall propositions thereof into absolute and to delude them diuers other waies For if we proue that our freindshippe with God dependeth of our keeping the commandements because Christ saied conditionally Ioan. 15. v. 14. Yee are my freinds if yee doe the things that I command yee Caluin ibid. answereth He meaneth not that we obtaine so great honor by anie merit of ours but onely admonisheth vs vpon what condition he receaueth vs into fauour and vouch safeth to reckon vs amongst his freinds But this wil be more euident by that we shall shew in the next chapter how they of causall propositions make no causall Diuers others waies they delude and frustrate the conditionall propositiōs of holie Scripture For if they can by anie colour they expound them of onely faith or of the holie ghost So they delude those places Ioan. 6. vers 53. Vnlesse yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood yee shall not haue life in yee and Ioan. 3. ver 5. Vnlesse a man be borne agayne of water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God Which teach that Sacraments are necessarie to saluation Or if they must needs expound them of good workes they will not expoūd thē of doing all necessarie good workes and auoiding all necessarie euill but of some onely or in parte or of endeauor to doe or auoid them so they delude those sayings of the Scripture Rom. 8. v. 13. If you liue according to the flesh you shall die but if by the spirit you mortifie the deeds of the flesh you shall liue Caluin ib. He promiseth vs life if we endeauour to mortifie the flesh For he doth not exactly require the death of the flesh but onely biddeth vs endeauour to tame the lustes thereof And the like he doth in manie other places as may be seene hereafter c. 16. And in like manner they delude all other sentences of Scripture which teach that if we wil be saued or iustified we must doe good workes and eschew euill And according to this they say that we must doe some good or haue some good workes that we must haue a begun or imperfect newnesse of life and keepe the lawe in some sorte or fashion Luther in Isaiae 8. to 4. f. 83. The holie Ghost is giuen that we may satisfie the law in some parte In some parte And in Psal 51. to 3. fol. 455. We will fulfill and keepe the law but with a large that is with a true Euangelicall dispensation Confessio Saxon. c. 9. It is needfull that there be some obediēce Protest dispensation Some obedience Some beginning In some sorte In some kind To begin in those that are iustified Schlusselb to 4. Catal. p. 176. The iustified are free from the accusation and damnation of the law not from beginning of obedience Bucer in Rom. 8. Christ giueth that spirit whereby we auoid sinne in some sorte Pareus l. 3 de Iustif p. 645. Saints doe not doubt of some kind of inherent iustice and l. 4. c. 7. It is enough if we endeauour to begin the new obedience of the law according to all the commandements So that wheresoeuer the Scripture saieth conditionally If thou wilt be iustified or saued doe this or doe not that they vnderstand it with a large dispensation that is doe somewhat or doe not somewhat of it or begin or endeauour to doe or not doe it But if this shift will not serue because the Scripture speaketh conditionally of keeping the whole law as Math. 9. v. 17. If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandements and the like thē they say it is the
Protestants expound of onely endeauour or desire to do it THE 16. argument shal be taken from thence that words of Scripture which signifie the working or doing of a thing Protestants are compelled to expound of onely endeauour or desire to worke or doe it Thus they delude those words of Scripture which say that some men are iust are perfect auoide euill doe the will of God loue him with all their heart fulfill the law keepe the commandements worke their saluation and the like Caluin in Math. 12. vers 33. those words Ether make a Make good 1. aspire to good tree good c. expoundeth thus It cometh of the free indulgence of God that he vouchsafeth them so honorable a title of good who aspire to goodnesse In Math. 6. v. 9. Thy will be done This sufficeth saieth he to testifie by desire that we Keepé 1. applie their endeauour hate and are sorie for whatsoeuer we see contrarie to Gods will and desire to haue it destroied In Ioan. 15. v. 10. If yee keepe my commandements The faithfull saieth he are accouÌ„ted to keepe Christs commandements when they applie thereto their endeauour albeit they be farre from the marke Vpon that Rom. 8. v. 1. Who walke according to the flesh He saieth they walke according to the flesh not who haue quite cast of all sense of the flesh but who diligently labour to tame and mortifie the flesh that the desire of pietie may seeme to reigne in them Et vers 5. He testifieth that he accounteth not them carnall who aspire to heauenlie iustice but them who are wholy addicted to the world In Philip. 2. vers 3. Worke your saluation We are Worke. 1. aspire to it Iust 1. aspire to iustice saied to worke it when gouerned by the holie Ghost we aspire to heauenlie life In 1. Tim. 1. v. 9. The law is not set for the iust I answere that Paul here calleth them iust not who are wholy perfect as there is none to be found but who with a singular desire of heart aspire to goodnesse Et ib. c. 4. v. vlt. Thou shalt saue thy selfe The Pastour is saied to saue himselfe because that is Worke. 1. Goe forward vsuall that the faithfull worke their saluation when they goe forewarde in the course thereof In 1. Pet. 4. v. 18. If a iust man shall scarce be saued He calleth them iust not who are perfectly iust but who endeauour to liue well In 1. Ioan. 2. vers 3. If Keepe 1. Endeauour we keepe his commandements He meaneth not to keepe the commandements to fully satisfie the law which example can neuer be found in the world but who according to mans infirmitie doe endeauour to frame their life to Gods seruice And ib. v. 5. But who keepeth his word truely in him the loue of God is perfect I answere saieth Caluin that it sufficeth so euerie one according to the measure of grace giuen to him doe aspire to this perfection And ib in c. 3. v. 5. There is no sinne in him They are esteemed of the cheifest parte that is they are saied to be iust and to liue iustly because with a sincere affâ—ction of heart they aspire to iustice This and manie such like Caluin Bucer vpon that Math 7. v. 21. But who doeth the will Doeth 1. Endeauoureth of my Father That is saieth he who with his mynd doth endeauour to frame himselfe to the will of the Father In Math. 12 v. 50. Whosoeuer doth the will of my Father We must must note that to doe the will of the Father is all one as to heare the words of Christ and to doe them that is to endeauour from our heart to doe them And in Ioan. 14. he saieth To keepe the commandement of the Lord here is nothing els but to beleiue that it is true and holesome and to loue it with all our heart Zuinglius in Explanat art 14. Here we vnderstand to doe according to the rule of Christ and precepts of God to come neare to the rule of God and with all endeauour to conforme himselfe to the word of God as farre as a man can in this mortall bodie Et in Luc. 1. tom 4. p. 183. Manie trouble themselues here how they are saied to haue beene iust before God whereas before him no mortall man can be iust This knot is easily loosed if we Iust 1. Endeauour to be vnderstand simply according to the phrase of the Hebrew tongue which calleth them iust before God who for feare of God and loue of iustice endeauour to be innocent and holie Schlusselburg to 7. Catal. Haeret. pag. 235. expoundeth those words Philip. 2. ver 12. in this sorte To worke in this place signifieth to labour and to be carefull of the true way which God hath proposed for to obtaine saluation Pareus l. 4. de Iustif c. 15. saieth Iob indeed is saied to be iust perfect and fearing God and auoiding euill because he was a sincere worshiper of God hauing an earnest desire to doe well Tilenus in Syntagm c. 46. They are called iust and perfect Iust 1. Labour to be who labour for iustice and aspire to perfection Perkins vpon that Galat. 6. ver 2. So yee shall fulfill the Fulfill 1. desire law of Christ Here the Galathians are saied to fulfill the law because God accepteth the sincere affection of the mynd for the full effect And Whitaker libr. 8. contr Dur. sect 49. They are saied to keepe who endeauour to keepe And sect 39. They loued the law with their heart and for that cause they are accounted iust Musculus in locis tit de Peccato What other thing is it I haue kept my feet from all ill way but I haue carefully endeauoured to commit no euill hIaue done iudgement and iustice but I haue had a desire to doe iudgement and iustice Wherefore thus I conclude Who beside the foresaied opposition to the expresse words of holie Scripture are also forced in so manie and so great matters to expound the words thereof signifying effecting working or doing of onely desire to effect work or doe they contradict the true sense of Scripture But Protestants doe so Therefore c. CHAPTER XVII THAT WORDS SIGNIFYING A CAVSE Protestants expound of a way or meane and what the Scripture attributeth to one cause they giue to an other THe 17. argument shal be taken from that Protestants are forced to expound words that signifie a Cause of a way order or meane Thus they depraue those words of Scripture which teach that faith or good workes are the causes of our iustice or saluation Perkins in Cathol reform Controu 4. c. 4. expoundeth those words 2. Corin. 4. v. 17. For that our tribulation which presently is momentanie and light worketh aboue measure exceedingly an eternall weight of glorie in vs in this sorte AfflictioÌ„s Worke. 1. are â—eans worke saluation not as causes effecting it but as means leading vs to it And he addeth
his commaÌ„dements which it saieth plainely but onely that they ought to keepe them Wherefore I thus argue They who besides the foresaied direct opposition to the expresse words of holie writt are also forced to expound that by Ought to be which the Scripture plainely saieth Is contradict the true meaning of the holie Scripture Protestants doe so Thererefore c. CHAPTER XIV THAT WORDS OF SCRIPTVRE SIGnifying a true thing they expound of an apparent or shew MY 19. proof shal be because words of Scripture which signifie a true thing Protestants are compelled to expound of an apparent or shew before men Thus they delude the words of Scripture which teach that Sacraments or good works doe iustifie or redeeme sinnes that euill or reprobate men may beleiue or be in the Church that reprobates may be iustified doe good workes and the like When the Scripture saieth 10. v. 10. With the mouth confession is made to saluation Luther apud Schlusselburg to 7. To saluation 1. to a signe thereof Catal. p. 234. answereth to wit to testifie saluation obtained by faith Kemnitius ib. p. 559. Paul speaketh so that confession saueth to shew what kind of faith obtaineth eternall life to wit firme and effectuall Wigandus ib. p. 746. The sense is By faith saluation is apprehended but by month is manifested and confession of saluation vttered Et P. Martyr in 1. Cor. 12. Saluation is attributed to confession because thence it beginneth to be declared as by an outward signe He would 1. He made such shew Luther in Postilla in Festo Stephani writeth thus What he here saieth How often would I gather together thy children as c. signifith that God delt so with the Iews as no man could thinke or imagin otherwise then that the earnestly would gather them For he behaued himselfe as a man should who indeed would it And Postilla in Dom. 1. Aduentus those words Redeeme thy sinnes by almes he thus expoundeth Shew that they are blotted out And Dom. 4. post Trinit those words Luke 6. Forgiue and yee shall be forgiuen in this sorte If I forgiue that forgiuenesse maketh meassured of the sinceritie of my faith and certifieth me and declareth my faith And in Dom. 9. Make your selues freinds of the mammoÌ„ of iniquitie that is by outward almes openly shew your faith whereby you may get freinds that poore men may be witnesses of your manifest worke that you beleiue sincerely Schlusselburg tom 7. Catal. p. 235. writeth thus Sorrow Worketh 1. sheweth according to God worketh pennance of worke to saluation that is according to Luthers interpretation is such a worke as testifieth of saluation And pag seq The saying of Ioel Euerie one that calleth vpon the name of the Lord shal be safe hath this meaning that calling vpon the Lords name is a testimonie of saluation receaued by faith Brentius homil 1. in Dom. 13 post Trinit writeth that that speach of Iosias 4. Reg. 23. He returned to our Lord in all his heart is to be vnderstood what Iosias was in the iudgement of men for the gouernement of his kingdome not what he was in the iudgment of God for his priuate faultes Reineccius to 4. Armat c. 15. those words Rom. 2. Gentils who haue not the law doe naturally the things of the law expoundeth of politike philosophicall and Pharisaicalliustice Kemnitius in locis tit de Argument part 2. saieth that those words Deuter. 6. It shal be iustice to vs before God if Iustitie 1. in title we keeepe his commandments are ether meant of legall iustice or that though our iustice be vncleane yet God giueth it the title of Iustice He would say that the keeping of the commandements is ether onely legall iustice or onely iustice in name sake And of the fast of Phinees he saieth of it selfe it could not haue the title of iustice but was reputed as a deed iustly done Herbrand in Compend Theol. loco de bonis oper If the letter Redeeme thy sinnes by almes be vrged it is cleare that the sense of those words are contrarie to the scope of the whole Scripture and to the analogie of faith But this is the proper and true meaning of the place of Daniel Beleiue God to be Redeemâ— 1. Shâ—w â—hy faith be angrie with sinne and to be appeased with the iust that is the beleiuers and shew this faith to be true by workes In like sorte speaketh Hunnius l. de Iustif p. 198. of those words Tobie 4. Almes deliuereth from all sinne and from death Zuinglius respons ad Confess Lutheri tom 2. fol. 477. Those sayings of Paul which he allledgetb out of Ephes 5. and Cleanse 1. Signifie cleansing Tit. 3. of the waters cleansing by the word and of the lauer of regeneration they vndestand not to be enallages that is changings of functions by which it vseth to be attributed to signes which they signifie onely Caluin in Ioan. 15. v. 2. those words Euerie branch in me c. expoundeth thus I answere manie are held by the opinion of meÌ„ to be the vine which indeed haue no roote in the vine In c. 16. vers 27. We are saied to be loued of God whiles we loue In. 1. in mens opinion Christ because we haue a pledge of his fatherlie loue In Actor 8. v. 13. He beleiued he expoundeth He thought he beleiued In Iust 1. in outward shew Ezech. 18. ver 24. How doth Ezechiel meane that the iust fall away This question is soone answered because he treateth not of the liuelie roote of iustice but of the outward shew or apparence In Ephes 5. v. 26. That Paul saieth we are washed by baptisme is because there God testifieth our washing vnto vs and with all doth what he sheweth In Colos 2. v. 12. We are buried together with him by baptisme he speaketh after his manner attributing the efficacie to the Sacrament lest it should in vaine signifie that which is not In Iacob 2. vers 23. He is iustified by workes Iustified 1. Knowne that is by the fruites his iustice is knowneand approued De Praedest pag. 714. It is no meruaile if the Scripture esteeming Sauls workes by the outward shew commendeth his innocencie and honestie Et 3. Instit c. 4. § 36. That to redeeme Dan. 4. is rather referred to men then to God And the same he saieth of that of Salomon Charitie couereth sinnes and of other such places Beza in Colloq Montisbel p. 388. We say that baptisme of water is the lauer of regeneration that is signifieth the inward RegeneratioÌ„ 1. Signe thereof regeneration In 1. Tim. 4. v. 1. It is one thing truely to embrace Christ an other onely with mouth to professe Christ with Simon Magus and Iudas and yet these are saied euen to beleiue to wit according to the common vse of speach because they seeme to beleiue In Math. 19. ver 2. If thou wilt be perfect c. That is if thou wilt
indeed shew thy selfe such as thou boastest to be Pareus Contr. 5. col 1009. Hauing damnation c. 1. Tim. 5. v. 11. Bucers and Martyrs opinion is true when they take the word Damnation in this place of Paul for damnation which is pronounced of men against those yoÌ„g widows who marrie againe And Marâ—yr l. de votis col 1355. Those words of the Apostle Damnation 1. in mens iudgement may be vnderstood of mens iudgement The same Daneus Contr. 6. col 1187. When Concupiscence hath coceaued c. Iac. 1. ver 15. Iames speaketh of that effect of sinne which appeareth to vs men Et p. 1205. Bellarmin answereth out of Dan. 4. v. 4. and Philip. 2. v. 12. that we can redeeme our sinnes But Bellarmin is deceaued for those places of Scripture onely teach what we can and ought to doe in regard of men not in regard of God Et Contr. 2. c. 16. Verbes actiue which are spoaken by the Scripture Causeth 1. Testifieth of the Sacraments doe not signifie cause or action causing and effecting but onely action testifying Pareus de Iustif c. 15. 1. Ioan. 3. c. 7. Who worketh iustice is iust That is he sheweth by workes that he is iustified by faith Et l. 3. c. 14. Ioan. 15. Euerie branche in me he expoundeth of those who adhere to Christ in onely outward profession and shew And that Math. 24. The charitie of manie shall wax could of those who in outward appearence are iust And that 1. Tim. 1. Some haue made shipwrack of faith of onely apparent faith Et l. 4. c. 18. saieth With Iames to Iustifie is to shew by workes before men the iustice of faith Zanchius in Summa Praelect to 7. col 276. The place 2. Pet. 1. Forgetting the purgation c. is to be vnderstood according to the custome of holie Scripture which according to the iudgement of charitie calleth all Saints Iust and Cleansed from sinne whosoeuer are baptized in Christ and professe Christ though all be not such before God Et ib. That Ezech. 18. If a iust man turne himselfe from iustice Is not meant of one that is truely iust but who to men onely seemeth iust Et de Perseuer c. 2. Manie beleiued in him Ioan. 12. Because to themselues they seemed truely to beleiue in Christ whereas notwithstandind they doe not truely beleiue Perkins in Cathol Reform Contr. 4. c. 4. vpon that Ps 105. It was reputed to him to iustice writeth thus Surely not Iustice 1. a Signe thereof because that fact was a full satisfaction of the law but because God aiâ— accept that iust worke as a note and signe of iustice and of that zele which he had for the glorie of God Et in Psal Happie Happie 1. a signe thereof is the man who walketh in the law He saieth He is happie that he is in Christ of which thing the obedieÌ„ce giuen to the law is a signe Et ib. We say that workes concurre to iustification and that we are iustified by them as by certaine signes and effects not as by causes And tom 2. in Galat. 5. They are saied to fall Fallen 1. shew they neuer stood from grace not that indeed all had beene vnder grace and after had fallen from it but because God made it manifest to men that indeed they had neuer beene vnder his fauour And Apocalips 2. When Dauid praied God to create a new heart in him Perkins saieth He speaketh not as he was before God and by faith but according to his feeling for his faith did not put forth it selfe before men and himselfe Polanus in Disp priuat p. 24. that Ezech. 18. He shall quickeÌ„ Quicken 1. testifie his owne soule expoundeth thus He by his workes shall testifie that he is truely regenerate Et pag. 108. Faith is perfected by workes that is perfectly knowne Bucanus Inst loc 18. Zacharias in these words Be conuerted to me speaketh of outward conuersion Et loco 30. Charitie couereth a multitude of sinnes not before God but before men Vrsinus in Catechis p. 40. That saying of Peter Denying the Lord who bought them Agayne He forgot that he was Cleansed 1. in outward Signifie cleansed from his ould sinnes and such like are manifestly spoakeÌ„ ether onely of outward shew and gloriation of redemption or purgation or c. Et q. 63. Who doeth iustice is iust to wit before men And in like sorte Piscator in Thes l. 2. p. 94. expoundeth that place Rom. 6. Who is dead is iustified from sinne Aretius in locis part 1. f. 9. saieth to that Tobie 4. 12. Deliuer 1. Sgnifie Almes deliuer from death They deliuer from eternall death that is are signes and firme arguments in the godlie that they are deliuered from that death Et Confessio Wittemberg c. de Eleemosyna We teach that almes doth so blot out sinne that it is the fruite of charitie towards our neighbour by which worke we testifie the faith and obedience which we owe to God P. Martyr in Rom. 9. Nether is proued out of this place If anie shall cleanse himselfe that men can cleanse themselues or make themselues honorable vessells Wherefore we must not gather more out of those words of Paul theÌ„ that such a cleansing is a signe whereby we iudge of the worthe or vnworthinesse of vessells in the Church Tilenus in Syntagmate c. 41. giueth this rule of deluding A generall of deluding words of Scripture all places of Scripture which teach that charitie hope feare or pennance doe iustifie to wit that ether by these names is vnderstood faith or that they onely declare iustification Scharpius de Iust Contr. 5. denieth that speach Luc. 8. They beleiue for a time or that 1. Tim. 1. They haue made shipwrack Faith 1. in shew of faith cap. 5. 6. they shall depart from faith They haue fallen from faith to be meant of true faith Nether will he haue that Ezech. 18. When a iust man shall turne himselfe Iust 1. in shew from iustice to be meant of one truely iust nor that Math. 18. When the vncleane spirit shall goe forth of a man to be meant of the Diuel truely gone forth Nor that Math 24. Charitie of manie shall wax could Of true charitie Nor that Galat. 5. Yee are fallen from grace of true grace Nor that Hebr. 6. Were illuminated or Hebr. 10. In which he was sanctified of truely illuminated or sanctified Nor that 2. Pet. 1. Forgetting the purgation c. and c. 2. A sowe washed c. of true purgation or true washing Nor finally that Actor 10. Simon beleiued of true faith And in like sorte Contr. 6. he denieth that Ioan. 12. Manie of the Princes beleiued and that 1. Cor. 13. If I haue all faith to be meant of true faith and Contr. 7. that Iacob 2. Not by faith onely of true faith And Contr. 12. When anie are saied to be perfect or iust as Gen. 6. 1.
c. 3. Nether is eternall life called a reward properly Piscator in Thes l. 2. p. 103. Faith properly speaking doth not purge sinnes Et p. 112. We must not properly vnderstand that Christ purged the Church by the lauer of water in the word but metonymically Imperpely In like sorte for improperly Caluin in Ioan 4. ver 39. The word Beleiue improperly signifieth that they were stirred vp by the speach of the woman to acknowledge Christ a Prophet In c. 6. v. 29. It is euident enough that Christ spoake improperly when he calleth faith a worke In cap. 12. ver 42. He seemeth to speake improperly whilest he seperateth faith from confession In Math. 6. v. 16. That he promiseth reward from God vnto fasting is an improper speach In illud Math. 12. v. 33. Make a good tree It is an improper speach In illud c. 13. v. 19. He scrapeth away that which was sowed in the heart That Christ saieth the word was sowed in their hearts is an improper speach In c. 26. v. 26. The word of Bodie is improperly trāsferred to bread of which it is a signe In illud Rom. 11. v. 22. If he remaine in goodnesse This should be improperly spoaken peculiarly of anie good man that God had mercie on him when he chose him if so he remaine in mercie †Goodnesse In illud Ephes 2. vers 20. Built vpon the foundation of the Apostles Properly Christ is the onely foundation Beza in Colloq Montisb pag. 120. saieth Baptisme was heth away sinnes is an improper speach Aretius in locis part 1. f. 84. There is an other improper forgiuenesse of sinnes as is that of the Ministers Bullinger Dec. 3. Serm. 9. The Apostles improperly attribute iustice to good workes but truely and properly to faith and most properly to Christ himselfe Piscator in Thes l. 2. p. 119. It is improperly saied that faith is imputed to iustice These and manie other things they say are spoaken improperly or not properly when the proprietie of the word maketh against them Something 's they say are to be vnderstood tropically Tropically or Figuratiuely or figuratiuely P. Martyr cont Gardiner col 623. We say That speach This is my bodie is not proper but metopharicall and tropicall And in Hospin part 2. Histor fol. 239. The words This is c. cannot be taken simply and without a figure They are a tropicall manner of speaking And Hospin himselfe ib. fol. 26. saieth Zuinglius expounded Christ his words This is c. by a metonymie interpreting Is for signifieth Fol. 35. OEcolampadius sheweth that the figure is in the word Bodie And fol. 161. Those of Strasburg and Zurich agree that the words are tropicall Caluin de Rat. Concordiae The word Bodie is figuratiuely giuen to bread Beza in Colloq Mōt pag. 302. Our men denie not this proposition Man is God but tell how it is to be expounded we say it is a tropicall speach Daneus Cont. de Euchar. c. 10. Bread it selfe is tropically called the bodie of Christ Vorstius in Antibel p. 394. It appeareth that those words of Christ must needs be meant by a figure Tilenus in Syntagm c. 64. The Apostle indeed saieth Christians haue an altar but not a materiall and visible but figuratiuely Some things they will haue be expounded Symbolically Symbolically Caluin in Admonition vltim ad Westphal Bread is symbolically called Bodie Et cont Heshus p. 844. Touching bread the speach is metonymicall that it may truely be symbolically called the true bodie of Christ Zuinglius in Subsid to 2. f. 245. The disciples vnderstood Christs speach rightly but symbolically Other things they vnderstand aequiuocally Pareus l. Aequiuecally 4. de Iustif cap. 4. I confesse that in Scripture the Ghospell is equiuocally called the law of faith the law of Christ the law of libertie In which sense we graunt that Christ is called a lawgiuer a law maker that is a Teacher Other things they expound Analogically Perkins in Cathol Refor Contr. 11. c. 2. Bread is the bodie of Christ sacramentally by analogie and no otherwise Some things they will haue to be taken Synecdochically Synechdochically Luther in Hospin l. cit fol. 76. There is a synechdoche in the words of consecration as a sword with a scabbard Westphalus in Schlusselb to 7. Catal. p. 176. Luther acknowledgeth a synechdochicall speach in the words of Christ This is c. and the same saieth Adamus Francisci in Margarita loco 16. Bucer l. de Ministerio pag. 609. It is euident that those Take Eate are synechdochicall and are referred to twoe things Peter Martyr contra Gardiner col 933. I alwaies pretēded that I did acknowledge a metonymie or synechdoche in those words of the Supper And he addeth It cannot be denied but there is a manifest alleosis And col 965. I confesse that Bucer liked better a synecdoche Vorstius in Antibellarm p. 42. Nothing hindreth by Soule synechdochically to vnderstand the bodie it selfe and that also dead Wigand in Schlusseb to 7. Catal. p. 754. Worke your saluation with feare and trembling is a synecdoche that is Doe true pennance Lobechius disput 22. The Scripture saieth that faith iustifieth vs and faith is imputed to iustice by metalepsis and synechdoche taking faith for the obiect of faith that is for Christ or the iustice of Christ Scarpius also de Iustif Cont. 1. saieth that this speach Faith iustifieth is synecdochicall Sometimes that words which make against them are Catachrestically taken Catechrestically or abusiuely Zuinglius l. de Relig. cap. de oration Christ abusiuely calleth faith a worke Agayne Testament is taken here abusiuely for the signe or symboll of the testament In Elencho fol. 31. Paul speaketh of twoe testaments but the one he calleth catachrestically a testament In Respons ad Billican O Ecolampadius saith that here in words of the Supper is a catachresis or metonymie In Math. cap. 9. That the Scripture calleth faith that which is dead is done by abuse of the word as we say the faith of Iews the faith of Turkes And in Hospin lib. 2. Histor fol. 35. When I say that by Catachresis This bread signifieth my bodie and OEcolampadius saieth metonymically This bread is a figure of my bodie what difference I pray you is there in the summe of the sense Illyricus in Mathew 5. vers 12. Christ abusiuely calleth future goods a reward Caluin 3. Institut cap. 2. § 9. The testimonie of faith is attributed to such but by catachresis Zanchius in Supplication tom 7. pagin 59. That speach To obey their concupiscences when it is attributed to the elect is to be vnderstood catachrestically Pareus l. 1. de Iustif c. 15. A dead faith is not a true faith though abusiuely it be called faith Author Resp ad thes Valent. Our men do say truely and orderly that the Ghospell cannot be called a law but catachrestically Otherwhile they will haue the words of Scripture which are contrarie to them to
be in it selfe cleare So Pareus in Gal. 2. lect 25. The Ghospell teacheth good works not of it selfe but borroweth the doctrine of workes from the law So the some Pareus Colleg. Theol. 9. disput 39. The Thessalonians tooke not vpon them to iudge or to debate whether Gods trueth were to be admitted but onely examined Pauls doctrine according to the touchestone of Scripture So Caluin act 17. vers 13. As if Paules doctrine and Gods trueth were not all one The Ghospell in a most large sense is taken for the whole doctrine of Christ and the Apostles Largely for the doctrine both of grace and faith and of repentance and new obedience but straitely and properly for the doctrine of grace by faith So Pareus l. 4. de Iustif c. 3. Finally the Scripture speaketh as the law not as the Ghospell by which distinction they delude manie places of Scripture as is to be seene in Luther de seru arbit to 2. f. 449. Caluin in Math. 19. vers 17. Pareus l. 4. de Iustif cap. 2. Schlusselb to 8. Catal. p. 441. to 2. p. 270. Of S. Peter and the Apostles they haue inuented these Of the Apostles new distinctions S. Peter is first of the Apostles in order not in iurisdiction The Apostles are foundations of the Church as those that found the Church not as those on which it is founded or as Iunius spaketh Cont. 3. l. 1. c. 10. The Church is founded vpon Peter as vpon a pillar not as on a foundation Of Pastors they distinguish That authoritie is in the Of Pastors word which they preach not in themselues That they gouerne the visible Church but not the Catholike That in case of necessitie they are made without mission but not otherwise See l. 1. c. 7. Of the Church they haue brought in these new distinctions Of the Church That for professiō of faith there is one Church visible an other inuisible That she is infallible in fundamentall points but not in others That she is to be heard when she preacheth Scripture but not otherwise That she is the pillar to which trueth is fastened not on which it relieth So saieth Riuet Tractat. 1. sec 39. Or as Andrews writeth in Resp ad Apol. Bellar. c. 14. She is so the pillar of trueth as that she relieth vpon trueth not trueth vpon her That the Church is necessarie to beleiue the Scriptures not to know them So whitaker lib. 3. de Script 396. That the Church is the staye and pillar of trueth not the foundation of trueth Heilbruner in Colloq Ratisb sess 7. Of the Sacraments they distinguish in this sorte They iustifie as signes or seales not as causes They are receiued Of Sacramēts whole and intire of the good but not of the badde that baptisme is the lauer of regeneration passiuely not actiuely So Daneus Contr. 2. c. 12. That baptisme is but one taken wholy but is twoe taken by partes So Beza part Resp ad Acta p. 44. That the Church is cleansed significatiuely by the baptisme of water but really by the baptisme of the spirit So Beza ib. p. 115. or as Polanus saieth in Disp priu p. 37. Sinnes are saied to be blotted out by baptisme not properly but in a figuratiue sense The same Beza in Hutter in Analysi p. 54. saieth I neuer simply saied that baptisme was the obsignation of regeneration in children but of adoption Perkins in Galat. 3. By baptisme actuall guilt is taken away but not potentiall Pareus in Gal. 2. lect 23. Absolutely we are all borne sinners but in regard of the couenant we are borne Christians or Gods confederats Of the Eucharist they haue these distinctions That it Of the Eucharist is the symbolicall bodie of Christ but not his true bodie That Christ his flesh killed doth profit vs but not eaten That it is exhibited in the Supper according to the vertue thereof not according to the substance That when S. Paul saieth 1. Cor. 11. He eateth iudgement to himselfe he meaneth not of damnation but of correction So wolfius in Schusselb l. 1. Theol. art 25. In like sorte they say that Preists forgiue sinne indirectly not directly directly as it is an offense of the Church indirectly as it an offense of God So Spalata l. 5. de Repub. c. 12. Of faith they make these distinctions That one is Catholike Of Faith or vniuersall or historicall an other speciall Againe that one is abstract naked simple an other concrete compounded incarnate So Luther in Gal. 3. to 5. That there is one habituall and actuall of men an other potentiall and inclinatiue of infants So Pareus l. 3. de Iustif c. 14. or as Polanus saieth part 2. thes p. 651. Infants haue not altogether the same faith that men haue yet they haue some thing proportionable Piscator in Thesibus l. 2. pag. 252. Adam before his fall had not iustifying faith or as Pareus writeth l. 1. de Amiss Grat. c. 7. Adam lost faith of the commandement but not faith of the promise Bullinger dec 5. serm 7. Infants are faithfull by the imputation of God Agayne They are baptized in their owne faith to wit which God imputeth to them Zanchius in Supplicat to 7. Manie reprobates are endued with a certaine faith much like to the faith of the elect but not with the same Perkins in Cathol 4. c. 5. There is one generall and Catholike faith wherewith a man beleiueth the articles of faith to be true and an other iustifying or particular faith Thus they distinguish of faith And in like sorte they distinguish of the iustification of faith to wit that it iustifieth relatiuely or correlatiuely not absolutely and as an instrument not as it is a worke Bucanus in Institit loc 3. Faith is saied to be imputed to iustice not properly but relatiuely Polan part 2. thes pag. 197. We are iustefied by faith not properly but relatiuely Reineccius tom 4. Armat cap. 21. Faith iustifieth as well absolutely as considered relatiuely Pareus in Galat. 3. lection 32. Faith is imputed to iustice relatiuely Agayne Faith iustifieth organically And in Colleg. Theol. 2. disp 10. We are saied to be iustified by faith but not formerly nor meritoriously but organically Touching the losse of faith they thus distinguish Zanchius in Supplication citat The elect loose faith in parte but not wholy Beza in Prefat 2. part respons ad Acta Faith sometimes sleepeth sometimes seemeth to be quite lost but yet is not lost Agayne There is a lethargie of faith but no losse The feeling or vse of faith is lost for a time but not faith it selfe Some reprobates do beleiue with a generall and historicall faith common to the Diuels themselues Tilenus in Syntagm capit 43. The faithfull become sometimes outliers but not runawaies or forsakers In like sorte they say that faith without works at the time of iustification is not dead but at other times if it be without workes it is dead Likewise Reineccius
tom 4. Armat cap. 15. saieth Faith is called a worke not absolutely as it is considered in it selfe but relatiuely as it apprehendeth Christ Hunnius de Iustificat pagin 157. Faith worketh by charitie towards our neighbour not toward God Finally Perkins in Casibus c. 7. That which euerie one is bound to beleiue is indeed true according to the intention of God who bindeth him but it is not true alwaies according to the euent Of good works in generall they coyne these distinctions Of good works in generall The good workes of the iust are good in parte not wholy They are all equall before God but not in themselues They are acceptable to God in his throne of mercie but not of iustice They are necessarie to iustification by necessitie of presence but not of cause They are necessarie to saluation not to iustificatioÌ„ See l. 1. c. 14. art 15. To which we adde that Pareus lib. 4. de Iustificat capite 17. saieth That good works are worthie of reward in the courte of mercie but worthie of punishment in the courte of iustice of God Et l. 1. c. 16. 23. 24. Works are required to regeneration not to iustification or as Reineccius speaketh 10. 1. Arm. c. 20. They are necessarie to sanctification not to iustification Who also to 4 c. 22. distinguisheth a worke in Giuing and Receauing and saieth that faith is a giuing worke not a receauing Schlusselb to 7. Catal. p. 446. writeth that obedience is necessarie to saluation but an others obedience not ours And addeth The dutie of obedience is indeed necessarie to saluation forsooth if it be not freely remitted Scarpius de Iustif Contr. 15. Iust men are worthie of the kingdome of God by the worth of aptnesse not of perfection or merit Riuet tract 3 sect 36. There may be a relation of Merit and Reward betwene men but not betwene God and men Perkins in Cathol Ref. Cont. 4. cap. 6. Good workes are necessarie to saluation not as cause but onely as a thing necessarie following faith Touching good works in particular they thus distinguish of good works in particular That to liue single is a good profitable but not honest or vertuous That virginitie is better then mariage in something but not simply That fasting is a parte of Gods worshippe in the law but not in the Ghospel That almes deliuereth from sinne and death not by it selfe but by the cause thereof That it is lawfull to pray for the elect not for others for the liuing not for the dead for things promised in the Scripture not for other things as appeareth by what hath beene rehearsed c. 15. To which we adde that Perkins in Cathol reform Cont. 3. c. 3. writeth that we pray not so much for the forgiuenesse of sinnes past as present Confessio Wittember saieth We may wish to the dead all rest and happines in Christ but we may not pray for them Luther in Postil Dom. 2. post Trin. graunteth that we may once or twise pray for the dead but not often And at home and in our chamber but not in the Church And the like hath Vrbanus Regius in formulis caute loquendi to 1. Who also in locis fol. 322. saieth that we may pray coÌ„ditionally for the soule of our brother but not absolutely Feild l. 3. de Eccles c. 17. teacheth that we may pray for one that is dead streigth after his death but not afterward Zuingle in art 60. saieth I condemne not if one being carefull for the dead doe implore or pray Gods mercie for them but to define any time for this is diabolicall Spalata l. 5. Repub. c. 8. n. 132. writeth that God at the intercession of the Church forgiueth litle sinnes soone after death but not long after Thus they distinguish about praier fore the dead Perkins in Apoc. 2. tom 2. The precept of repentance is directly giueÌ„ to the elect indirectly to the reprobate Et Tilenus in Syntagm c. 47. There is no counsaile inferred out of 1. Corint 7. but onely a desire and wish of one desiring the guift of continencie Touching sinne these new distinctions they make Of sinne That it is imputed to reprobates and infidels not to the faithfull and elect That it is veniall to the elect not to others that it may stand with iustice with some wrastling no otherwise that byting vsurie is condemned not other as we haue related l. 1. c. 16. Besides Perkins in Cathol ref Cont. 2. cap. 1. saieth that in iustification sinne is taken away not in it selfe but as it is in the person or as Riuet speaketh CoÌ„t tract 3. sect 26. Sinne remaineth in parte not wholy Caluin in IoaÌ„ 1. v. 29. Sinne is in vs but not in the iudgement of God Beza in 2. part resp ad Coll. Montisb p. 73. Dauid sinned but not whole but as he was not regenerate p. 79. He did not retaine the holie Ghost but some thing of the holie Ghost pag. 71. Sinne casteth not of the holie Ghost but hindreth his efficacie Et p. 87. It maketh the holie Ghost a sleepe for a time but doth not cast him of Pareus l. 1. de Amiss Grat. c. 7. Adam fell not as he was predestinate but as he was to be predestinated He lost the grace of creation but not the grace of iustification And Piscator in Thes loc 20. The elect do slide but are not cast downe Touching iustification these new distinctions they Of iustification frame It is declared by workes but not caused It forgiueth sinnes but taketh them not away It maketh that sinne is not imputed but not that it is no more It maketh a man iust not in himselfe but in Christ And others such like as may be seene lib. 1. c. 17. Moreouer Luther in Zanchius de Perseuer to 7. col 128. saieth When Peter sinned his loue towards God and Christ was not drowned but onelie floated Reineccius to 4. Arm. c. 15. Sanctification increaseth and decreaseth but not iustification Kemnice in locis part 2. tit de Argum. writeth that when in Scripture God is required to iudge vs or reward vs according to our iustice that speach is not of the iustice of person but of our cause or controuersie with other men And agayne That same yee are cleane Ioan. 13. And yee are washed and sanctified 1. Cor. 7. is to be vnderstood imputatiuely Whitaker ad Rat. 8. Camp Faith hope and charitie doe make vs iust inchoately not absolutely Perkins de Praedest to 1. distinguiâ—heth grace into that which represseth which he saieth is coÌ„mon to reprobates into that which reneweth which he maketh proper to the elect Et in Cath ref Cont 4. c. 4. saieth Adam had imputed iustice according to the substance thereof but not according to imputation Illyricusin Claue part 2. tract 6. Sinne is abolished by right promise for the time to come but not in act and deed Gesner in CoÌ„p loco 22. In Scripture those are called iâ—st
away or exhaust our sinnes but leaueth thē in vs. An other end of his coming and passion was to destroie and dissolue sinne Hebr. 6. v. 6. this that our ould man is Nor destroied sinne crucified with him that the bodie of sinne may be destroied And cap. 9. ver 26. But now once in the consummation of the worlds to the destruction of sinnes he hath appeared by his owne hoste And 1. Ioan. 3. vers 8. For this appeared the Sonne of God that he might dissolue the works of the Diuel But Protestants say that sinne is not destroied in the regenerate but that it abideth and liueth in them as is to be seene l. 1. c. 17. art 5. A third end was to cleanse vs from sinne Tit. 2. v. 14. Nor cleansed sinne Who gaue himselfe for vs that he might redeeme vs from all iniquities and might cleanse to himselfe a people acceptable Et 1. Ioan. 1. v. 7. And the blood of Iesus Christ his Sonne cleanseth vs from all sinne But Protestants say that the regenerate are not cleansed from sinne but remaine vncleane impure filthie as is to be seene l. 1. c. 17. art 4. A fourth end was that we might be truely sanctified Nor truely sanctified vs. and become holie and immaculate in the sight of God Ioan. 17. v. 19. And for them I do sanctifie my selfe that they also may be sanctified in trueth Ephes 1. v. 4. As he chose vs in him before the constitution of the world that we should be holie and immaculate in his sight in charitie But Protestants denie that we are truely sanctified or holie and immaculate in the sight of God See li. 1. c. 17. art 3. A fift end was that we should follow or doe good Nor made vs to follow good workes works Tit. 2. v. 14. That he might cleanse to himselfe a people acceptable a pursuer of good works But Protestants denie that our workes are truely good and say that they are mere sinnes See l. 1. c. 14. art 2. A sixt end was that we should liue iustly and piously in Nor mad vs liue in holinesse before God holinesse and iustice before God Luc. 1. v. 74. That without feare being deliuered from the hand of our enemies we may serue him in holinesse and iustice before him all our dayes Tit. 2. v. 12. For the grace of God our Sauiour hath appeared to all men instructing vs that denying impietie and wordly desires we liue soberly and iustly and godly in this world But Protestants denie that the workes or liues of the iust are pious holie or iust before God See lib. 1. cap. 14. art 5. A seuenth end of Nor made vs to fulfill the law Christs coming was that the iustification of the law might be fulfilled in vs. Rom. 8. v. 3. God sending his Sonne in the similitude of the flesh of sinne euen of sinne damned sinne in the flesh that the iustification of the law might be fulfilled in vs. But Protestants say that the law cannot be fulfilled in vs but onely in Christ See lib. 1. c. 19. art 1. An eight end was to preach a day of retribution Luc. 4. v. 19. To Euangelize vnto the pore he sent me to preach the acceptable yeare of our Lord and the day of retribution But Protestants denie that there is anie day of reward or retribution but onely of mere bountie and liberalitie See l. 1. c 18 art 1. To these I adde that thus writeth Perkins in Gal. 1. v. 3. It is the fault of our age that all professe Christ yet manie admit not Christ but their owne deuises to wit a Christ who must be a Sauiour to deliuer them from hell but not a Lord to giue them commandements this they cannot suffer But Protestants as we shewed l. 1. c. art 7. denie Christ to be a lawgiuer or Lord to giue commandements according to Perkins admit not Christ but their owne deuises Wherefore thus I make my 26. argument Whose doctrine Nor preached reward not onely in so manie and so great points is against the expresse words of God and in their vsuall sense but also doth make voide and frustrate so manie ends of the coming and passion of Christ it doth contradict the true sense of Scripture Such is the Protestants doctrine Therefore c. CHAPTER XXVII THAT PROTESTANTS TAKE AWAY encouragements to vertue yea all vertue and in steed of them put allurements to vice and remoue the impediments thereof MY 27. argument that Protestants contradict the true meaning of holie Scripture shal be because they take away the encouragements to vertue yea all vertue out of the world and in place of them put allurements to vice and remoue the impediments thereof They take away encouragements to vertue because as Protest take away encouragements to vertue we shewed l. 1. c. 2. art 13. they teach that God careth not for good workes art 14. that he is not honored with thē art 16. that he is not appeased with them And c. 14. Art 6. that there is no dignitie or worth in them Art 7. that there is no reward promised to them Art 10. that all good workes are equall before God Art 12. and 13. that they are not necessarie to iustification or saluation Art 15. that they are not cause of saluation Art 16. Not so much as a testimonie of iustification or saluation Art 18. that we ought not to doe them Cap. 17. artic 15. That a sinner doth not cooperate to his iustification Cap. 18. art 1. That saluation is no reward or retribution Art 2. No crowne of iustice Art 3. That it is of faith onely And cap. 21. art 1. That our will is not free in morall works Art 3. That it doth not cooperate with the grace of God to good works But who can denie but that Gods fauour towards good works their worth and reward their efficacie and necessitie to iustification and saluation mans freedome and cooperation to acts of vertue and saluatiō be great spurres and encouragements to vertue Which notwithstanding all and others such like Protestants take away They take also away all vertue For first they denie to fulfill the law diuers particular vertues as faith the roote of all vertue which they say is vitious and vnworthie the name of vertue l. 1. c. 13. art 12. They take away the highest degree of Chastitie to wit virginitie c. 15. art 2. and the perfectest part of Temperancie to wit Fasting ib. art 5. and all choice of meates artic 7. They takeaway also praier for all men art 8. Vows art 14. and Eremiticall life art 15. Besides they takeaway all inherent iustice c. 17. art 8. and denie that the iustified are truely iust art 3. or cleane art 4. but retaine sinne in them art 5. Finally they take away all vertue For they teach that all the good works of sinners or of good men are sinnes yea mere sinnes c. 14. art 1. and 2. that
conceaue how God in different manner willeth and willeth the same thing Againe Where we conceiue not how God will haue that to be done which he forbiddeth to doe let vs remember our weaknesse Et 3. Instit c. 24. § 17. When he had saied that God willeth that which he professeth that he will not he addeth Albeit according to our vnderstanding Gods will be manifould yet in himselfe he willeth not this and that but by his manifould wisdome maketh our vnderstanding astonished till it shal be graunted to vs to know that wonderfully he willeth that which now seemeth contrarie to his will And cap. 11. § 11. This is a meruailous manner of iustifying that they that are couered with Christ iustice feare not the iudgement which they deserue and whilest iustly they condemne themselues they are iudged iust out of themselues De Praedest pag. 704. Let our faith adore a farre of with decent sobrietie the hidden counsail of God wherewith the fall of man was preordained And pag. 711. How it was appointed by the foresight and decree of God what was to become of man and yet God is not to be madde partaker of the sinne as if he were ether author or allower thereof seing it is clearely a secret farre beyond the reach of mans wit let vs not be ashamed to confesse our ignorance In Ioan. 12. ver 27. But it seemeth that this doth not become the Sonne of God that an inconsiderate desire escapeth him which he must streight renounce for to obey his Father I confesse saieth he that truely this is the follie of the crosse which is a scandall to proud men Nay it is not the follie of the crosse but the impietie of Caluin to attribute an in cōsiderate desire to Christ And in Math. 26. vers 39. If anie obiect that the first motion which should haue beene bridled before it went further was not temperate as it beseemed I answere saieth he that in this corruption of our nature there cannot be seene the feruor of passions with that temper which was in Christ but we must yeeld this honor to the Sonne of God that we iudge not of him by our selues Forsooth the impostures of Caluin not onelie wāting all word of God but also quite cōtrarie thereto must be beleiued though they cannot be vnderstood and the Catholik doctrine of the Eucharist and the like must not be beleiued because it cannot be vnderstood Beza in Explicat Christianismi c. 3. After a wonderfull and incomprehēsible manner it pleaseth God that euen that which as it is sinne he alloweth not yet is not done without his will De Praedest cont Cast p. 340. When he had saied that God decreeth the causes of damnation and that none can resist his decree he asketh Is not then all the falut in God and answereth This difficultie is vnexplicable for men Agayne How God is not in fault if he ordayne the causes of dānation we thinke with the Apostle that it is a question vnexplicable for mans wit Et in Colloq Montisb p. 427. There is no parte of Christian doctrine from which sense and humane reason doth more abhorre Pareus l. 2. de Amiss Grat. c. 13. after he had saied p. 358. that God doth enforce mē to sinnes as they are his secret iudgements addeth p. 363. that this manner is vnexplicable Indeed this their excuse of the inexplicabilitie of the thing were tolerable if the Scripture did clearely teach what they say but seing it doth not clearelie teach so as appeareth by the answers of Catholiks yea so clearely teach the contrarie as Protestants are forced to confesse that they know not how to reconcile so manie of their positions with the Scripture it is a verie great proofe that in verie deed their doctrine is repugnant to Scripture An other manner whereby implicitlie they cōfesse that Protest confesse that the words of Scripture seeme against them their doctrine is repugnāt to Scripture is because in manie and great matters they acknowledge that the words of Scripture and such as are of purpose spoakē for to declare vnto vs what we ought to beleiue of such matters seeme to fauour vs more then them are hard to them and torment them shrewdly Luther in Postill Dom. 9. post Trin. This dayes Ghospell if it be nakedly looked into without the Protestant spirit is plainely Papisticall Zuinglius l. de Rel. c. de Merito None denieth but that in Scripture there are almost more places which attribute merit to our works then denie it And in Explanat art 20. The places of Scripture at first sight seeme to attribute some what to Merit Bullinger Dec. 3. Serm. 9. We acknowledge that the Scripture euerie were doth seeme to attribut life and iustice to good works Rainolds in Confer c. sect 1. What if in that other place the Scripture in shew do fauour you more then vs. And he addeth that he easilie graunteth that the shew of the words of Scripture maketh more for vs then for them Agayne I will graunt 〈◊〉 the words of Christ This is my bodie in shew do fauour more your reall presence then that sacramentall which we mantaine And in an other place In shew of words our Sauiour seemeth to haue promised the keys to Peter onely Herbrand in Compendio Theol. pag. 340. saieth If the letter be vrged in those The letter against Protestants words of Daniel Redeeme thy sinnes by almes they be contrarie to their doctrine The same confesseth Hunnius l. de Iustif of those words of Tobie Almes deliuereth from all sinne and from death And the same is euident by infinit places of Scripture which Protestants are forced to expound figuratiuelie because the proprietie of the word is for vs. Zuinglius Epist ad Matthaeum Rutling to 2. thus speaketh Now remaineth that which in this matter is the hardest A hard matter for Protest to wrest the words of all to wit how we may wrest the words of Christ which they terme words of consecration Here verily we must stretch all the veyns of faith Et in Resp ad Billican he saieth that he vseth pulleis and presses to wring out the sense of the words of consecration and addeth We denie that anie one They need pullies and presses litle droppe at least sincere and pure will come from them vn-vnlesse they be prest with the weight of other places And againe How manie had we some years agoe who could acquit themselues handsomely of those words of Christ Thou art Peter c. and shew the figure of the speach And yet it was no hindrance that we could not handsomely dispatch our selues of the word Caluin 3. Instit c. 2. § 11. I know it seemeth hard to some where faith is attributed to the reprobates In Luc. 3. vers 9. As for Merit that knot is to be loosed which hindreth manie For the Scripture so often promising reward to works seemeth to attribute some merit to them Peter Martyr in Dom. 4. Hom.
in manie places refuteth In like sorte Grauer in Absurdis Caluin c. 14. ser 10. Touching the Eucharist they denie that it is the bodie Of the Eucharist and blood of Christ l. 1. c. 11. art 1. Which is against Scripture For thus Muscul in loc tit de Caena I may not say the bread of the Supper is not the bodie of the Lord. For in so saying I should contradict the Lord saying This is my bodie Againe Otherwise bread should not be the bodie of the Lord against his expresse word Beza in Hosp part 2. f. 300. being asked whether he disliked that one should say The bread of the Supper is the bodie of Christ answered No for they are the words of Christ Et Hosp ib. f. 136. We denie not that bread and wine are the bodie and blood of Christ For Christ himselfe saied This is my bodie They say that those words This is my bodie must be thus expounded This signifieth my bodie Of which exposition Musculus in Schlusselb l. 1. Theol. Caluin art 22. giueth this iudgement We must beware of that exposition wherewith Christs words are thought to be the same as if he had saied This signifieth my bodie For this is not Christs meaning to shew that this bread signifieth his bodie They denie that Christ gaue vs his bodie to eate or his blood to drinke l. 1. c. 11. art 2. Which doctrine thus censureth Caluin l. de Neces ref Christ saied in plaine termes that he gaue them his bodie Beza epist 5. But I answere that is all one as to make Christ a lyer as who in cleare and plaine words saieth he gaue them that bodie which was deliuered for vs. Et Apol. 1. contr Saintem p. 292. To denie all eating of flesh were plainely to denie the very words of Christ They denie that the Cuppe is the new testament l. 1. c. 11. art 4. And yet Simlerus in Hosp part 2. f. 348. saieth The proper sense of these words is The Cuppe is the new testament or the blood of the new testament Iames Andreae in Colloq Montisbel p. 38. To me it seemeth altogether new and vnheard of that the Supper is denied to be the testameÌ„t of Christ against the plaine words alledged out of Luke Et Musculus in locis titul de Caena In Luke and Paul it is saied of this Cuppe that it is the new testament They denie that the Cuppe of the Eucharist was shed for vs. l. 1. c. 11. art 6. And yet Illyricus in Luc. 22. v. 20. writeth Which is powred out for you in the Greek text must needs be referred to the Cuppe Touching Matrimonie they denie that it is a SacrameÌ„t Of Matrimonie c. 12. art 5. And yet thus professeth the Confession of Wittemberg c. de Coniugio We confesse that Mariage is a kind of life instituted and approued by God and a mysterie as commonly it is expounded a great Sacrament in Christ and the Church as Paul saieth Touching faith they denie that it can be without good Of Faith works l. 1. cap. 13. art 8. which doctrine thus condemneth Schlusselburg l. 1. Theol. art 15. Aretius saieth that faith and good works are conioyned as the species and her proprietie as a man and reason But we out of the word of God teach and learne that this doctrine is false They denie that faith it selfe is imputed to vs for iustice l. 1. c. 13. art 19. And yet thus iudgeth Vrbanus Regius in loc fol. 46. Sincere faith on the mercie of God and Iesus Christ is our verie iustice Faith is imputed for iustice to the beleiuer Abraham beleiued and it was imputed to him for iustice They denie that the faith of the Hemorroïssa was pure libr. 1. capit 13. articul 25. And yet thus Bullinger in Marci 5. The power of true faith is singularly expressed Touching good works they denie that they are necessarie Of good workes to saluation l. 1. c. 14. art 13. And yet Piscator saieth in Thes loc 10. The Scripture teacheth that good works are necessarie to saluation The same say the Electorals in Colloq Aldeburgico They denie also that good works are cause of saluation lib. 1. cap. 14. art 15. And yet thus writeth Illyricus in Claue tractat 6. titul de Var. bonum operum praed We heare that to manie effects and praises and euen saluation it selfe is attributed in Scripture to good works It is plaine that oftentimes somewhat to much praise is ascribed to good works which doth not agree to them nor is to be ascribed to them if we will speake exactly truely and properly They denie that they are meritorious lib. 1. cap. 14. art 8. And yet thus professeth Apollog Confession in Melancthon tom 3. Seing works are some fulfilling of the law they are truely saied to be meritorious reward is rightly saied to be due to them Agayne The text of Scripture saieth that life euerlasting is rendered to them Which Protestants denie lib. 1. cap. 14. articul 7. They denie also that they are to be done for God lib. 1. cap. 14. art 20. Of which point thus iudgeth Kemnice in locis tit de bonis oper The testimonies of Scripture most clearely teach that good works are to be done for Gods sake Touching virginitie they denie that it is counsailed in Scripture l 1. c. 15. art 4. And neuerthelesse Vrbanus Regius in locis fol. 372. saieth Virginitie is counsailed in the Ghâ—spell not commanded And in Interp. loc 49. Virginitie is onely a counsaile not a precept Concerning sinne they teach that it can remayne with Of sinne iustice l. 1. c. 16. art 17. Yet thus pronuonceth Luther in Gal. 3. These are directly opposit That a Christian is iust and loued of God and yet with all is a sinner Againe How are these twoe coÌ„tradictories true at once I hâ—ue sinnes am most worthie of the wrath of God and the Father loueth me They denie that sinne putteth a man out of grace l. 1 c. 16. art 6. And yet thus writeth Hemingius in Enchir class 2. If a penitent sinne against his conscience as Dauid did with murder and adulterie he casteth of the holie Ghost and becometh guiltie of Gods wrath and vnlesse he doe pennance falleth into eternall punishment It is a horrible madnesse to say that such retaine the holie Ghost wheÌ„ as Paul saieth plainely Gal. 5. The works of the flesh are manifest and they that doe such shall not possesse the kingdome of God They denie that the widdows whereof S. Paul speaketh 1. Timoth. did sinne in marrying l. 1. c. 16. art 15. And yet thus Bullinger in Tim. 5. Surely to marrie of it selfe is no sinne But because they haue once giuen their promise to Christ the spouse and to the Church and of their owne accord haue left marriage hereupon their marriage turneth to the disgrace of Christ which is that which Paul termeth to become wanton against Christ Bucer lib. 2. de Regno
proper to the Elect 350 22. VVhether faith come by hearing 352 23. VVhether faith be euer lost 353 24. VVhether faith be rewarded 355 25. VVhether the faith of those who toucht Christs garments were pure 356 Chap. 14. Of good workes in generall Art 1. VVhether anie worke of a Sinner may be good p. 360 2 VVhether euerie good worke be sinne 362 3 VVhether good works be a sweet smell to God 364 4 VVhether good works be fully good 366 5 VVhether they be iust or iustice in the sight of God 369 6 VVhether in good works there be anie worth 371 7 VVhether eternall life be promised to good works 373 8 VVhether good works be meritorious 374 9 VVhether there may be glorie in good works 376 10 VVhether all good works be equall before God 378 11 VVhether good works be commanded of God 379 12 VVhether they be necessarie to iustification 381 13 VVhether they be necessarie to saluation 384 14 VVhether they be profitable to saluation or iustification 387 15 VVhether they be anie cause of saluation 390 16 VVhether they be a testimonie of iustification or predestination 393 17 VVhether they be a cause of Gods loue towards vs 395 18 VVhether we ought to doe good works 396 19 VVhether they may be done for reward 399 20 VVhether they be to be done for the glorie of God 401 Chap. 15. Of workes in particular Art 1. VVhether it be good not to marrie 406 2 VVhether virginitie be a vertue 406. 3. VVhether the state of virginitie be better then marriage 408 4. VVhether God would haue men to liue single 410 5. VVhether Fasting be a vertue 412. 6. VVhether fasting be a preseruatiue against the Diuel 414. 7. VVhether choice of meats be laudable 415. 8 VVhether we may pray for all 416. 9. VVhether we may pray for the dead 417. 10 VVhether we may pray for that which God hath not promised 419 11. VVhether anie obtaine for the worth of their praier 421. 12. VVhether we may pray in an vnknowne tongue 422. 13. VVhether we be commanded to say our lords praier 423 14. VVhether we may make vows 424 15. VVhether almes deliuer from death and sinne 426 16. VVhether we may giue all to the poore 427 17. VVhether pennance be commanded to all 428 18 VVhether affliction of the bodie be a parte of pennance 429. 19 VVhether pennance of the Niniuites was good 431 20. VVhether Eremitical life be lawfull Chap. 16. Of Sinnes Art 1. VVhether sinnes be imputed to the faithfull 435. 2. VVhether anie sinne be mortall to the Elect and faithfull 437. 3. VVhether onely incredulitie be sinne 438. 4. VVhether sinne ought to be ouercomen of vs 440. 5. VVhether anie that serue the flesh can serue God 441. 6 VVhether by greuous sinnes we fall from grace 442. 7 VVhether sinne can staÌ„d with iustice 8. VVhether sinne may be redeemed by good works 447. 9. VVhether to abstaine from great sinnes be necessarie to saluation 448 10. VVhether sinne be the cause of damnation 451. 11. VVhether we must giue account of our sinnes 453. 12. VVhether the iustified commit ill p. 454. 13. VVhether the iustified commit sinne 455. 14 VVhether the iustified euer do sinne wilfully 457. 15 VVhether the widows 1. Tim. 5. did sinne in marrying 458. 16 VVhether vsurie be sinne 459. 17. VVhether all sinned in Adam 460. 18. VVhether there is originall sinne 461. Chap. 17. Of Iustification Art 1. VVhether Iustification be of works 465. 2. VVhether it be of faith onely 467. 3. VVhether the iustified be iust in Gods fight 469. 4. VVhether the iustified be cleane 472 5. VVhether sinne remaine in the iustified 474. 6. VVhether sinnes be simply forgiuen 477. 7. VVhether all the iustified be equally iust 478. 8. VVhether there is anie inherent iustice 478. 9. Whether inherent iustice can be imputed 481. 10. Whether the iustified be infallibly certaine of their iustice 482. 11. Whether pennance goe before iustification 845. 12. Whether iustificatioÌ„ can be lost 487. 13. Whether the iustified may feare to fall 489. 14. Whether iustification be proper to the Elect 492. 15. Whether we cooperate to our iustification 493. 16. Whether after iustification anie punishment remaine 496 Chapt. 18. Of life and death euerlasting ART 1. Whether life euerlasting be a reward p. 499. 2. Whether it be a crowne of iustice 501. 3. Whether it be of faith onely 503. 4. Whether all men be to be iudged 505 5. Whether eternall life be to be rendered to anie 506. 6. Whether the soules of the Reprobates doe now suffer in Hell 507. 7. Whether Hell be anie place 509. 8. Whether Hell fire be true fire 510. Chapt. 19. Of Gods law ART 1. Whether Gods law be possible 513. 2. Whether euer anie kept Gods law 515. 3. Whether anie loued God in all theâ—â— heart 517. 4. Whether Gods law be in thâ— heart of anie 519. 5. Whether we ◠〈◊〉 â— that we may keepe Gods law 520. 6. Whether the keeping of Gods law be necessarie to saluation 521. 7. Whether the law of God be abrogated from the faithfull 522. Chapt. 20. Of mans law and superioritie ART 1. Whether there be anie Superioritie among Christians 526. 2. Whether man can make laws 527. 3. Whether mans law bindeth the conscience 529. Chapt. 21. Of free will ART Whether man be free in indifferent matters 532. 2. Whether man be free in morall matters 534. 3. Whether man cooperate with Gods grace to good 536. Chap. 22. Of mans Soule ART 1. Whether mans Soule be immortall 539. 2. Whether Mans soule be the forme of his bodie 545. 3 Whether there be anie resurrection of the dead 547. THE INDEX OF THE CHAPTERS CONTAINED in the second booke CHAPTER 1. That Protestants contradict the truâ— sense of Scripture because iâ— so manie points they gaynesay the expresse words thereof pag. 549. Chapt. 2. That Protestants confesse they contradict the sense of those words which the Cathol Church long since and manie of themselues now beleiue to be the words of God p. 611. Chapt. 3. That Protestants are forced to vse violence to that parte of Scripture which they receaue p. 615. Chapt. 4. That Protestants ouerthrow all force of the words of Scripture yea contemne and deride them p. 620. Chapt. 5. That Protestants say that words of Scripture which make against them were not spoaken of certaine knowledge p. 630. Chapt. 6. That Protestants saye that manie weightie sayings of the Scripture were not spoaken according to the mynd of the speakers p. 633. Chapt. 7. That Protestants are forced to say that the Scripture speaketh ironically c. p. 640. Chapt. 8. That Protestants are forced to turne the most generall speaches of the Scripture into particulars p. 647. Chapt. 9. That Protestants limitate manie propositions not limitated by the Scripture p. 654. Chapt. 10. That Protestants change manie absolute speaches of Scripture into conditionals p. 665. Chapt. 11. That Protestants change conditionall speaches of Scripture
Protest tormented with the words of Scripture 21. The Protestant interpreters do torment themselues in that Daniel seemeth to attribute redemption or remission of sinnes to mans iustice and works of mercie For they well admonish that it is repugnant to the chiefe point of our religion Daneus in c. 67. Enchir. Aug. saieth that saying of S. Iames We are not iustified by faith onelie doth this day tormeÌ„t manie so that some haue reiected the epistle others haue called it strawish Kemnice in loc to 2. tit de Argum. That saying of Daniel c. 4. seemeth very hard against free iustification The third way by which they tacitelie confesse that Protest forced to denie their doctrine their doctrine is contrarie to Scripture is because when it maketh for their purpose they denie that they teach manie of those points which in the former booke we haue clearelie shewed that they plainelie teach And because they do this so frequentlie as I need not bring manie examples thereof I will here cite onelie some few Touching God Pareus thus writeth Colleg. Theol. 9. disp 32. It is a slaunder that we simply say that God would and decreed that our first parents should fall See l. 1. cap. 2. art 5. Of Scripture thus Whitaker Cont. 1. q. 4. cap. 1. Our aduersaries attribute vnto vs this doctrine as if we saied that the Catholik Church could faile which is most false See lib. 1. cap. 8. art The same man q 3. cit c. 2. Our aduersaries slander vs when they say that we make such a Church which sometime is no where and can be seene of none See l. 1. c. 8. art 5. Touching the Eucharist Eliensis Resp ad Apol. Bellar. c. 1. We agree with you of the matter all the contention is about the manner A presence I say we beleiue nor lesse reall then you Perkins in Cath. refor Contr. 10. cap. 1. We beleiue and teach a reall presence of the bodie and blood of Christ in the Sacrament of the Supper and that not feigned but true and reall Argentinenses in Hospin part 2. Histor Be they accursed who will haue nothing to be exhibited here but a signe and figure And Hospinian himselfe Our men neuer denied that the bodie of Christ was truely in their Supper Beza l. qq saieth that it is a slander that they exclude Christ from their Supper Gratianus Antiiesuita p. 140. There is no controuersie whether the true bodie and blood of the Lord be contained in the Sacrament of the Eucharist Et Riuet tract 3. sec 12. The question betwene vs is not simply whether the bodie and blood of Christ be truely and really in this Sacrament Et Spalatensis libr. contr Suar. cap. 1. num 39. Who denieth that the Eucharist is the onely flesh and onely blood of our Lord Iesus Christ See the contrarie of all these lib. 1. c. 11. art 1. Touching faith thus writeth Peter Martyr in loc Class 3. § 24. We make faith hope and charitie three different things nether doe we confound them as our aduersaries accuse vs. See the contrarie lib. 1. c. 13. art 6. Of good works thus Tilenus in Syntag. cap. 46. It is a cruell slander of our aduersaries where they feigne that we teach that all the works of the iust be properly and simply sinnes Et Riuet tract 3. sect 31. None of ours saieth absolutely that all works are sinne nether say we that they are mingled with sinne absolutely See the contrarie lib. 1. c. 14. art 2. Touching good works in particular thus Riuet tract 1. sect 73. We reiect this position That it is one of the conditions necessarie to a Bishop that he be married See the contrarie lib. 1. cap. 15. art 4. Of reward thus the some Riuet 3. sect 39. We denie not the reward of good works See the contrarie lib. 1. c. 14. art 7. c. 18. arr 1. Of free will thus Serranus l. 3. cont Hayum Doth anie of ours denie or euer denied that those that are not regenerate doe fall to sinne of their prone and free will See the contrarie lib. 1. c. 16. art 14. But finally they doe plainely and expressely graunt that Protest confesse much of their doctrine to be against Scripture Of God manie points of Protestants doctrine are coÌ„trarie to Scripture For touching God thus writeth Confessio Saxon. c. God nether willeth sinne nor approueth nor helpeth it as it is written when the Diuel speaketh a lie he speaketh of his owne and 1. Ioan. 3. Who committeth sinne is of the Diuel Gerlachius tom 2. disput 15. It is impossible that God should will sinne of whome it is saied psalm 5. Thou art not a God that willeth ini-inquitie Et Polanus in Disput priuat p. 235. God nether willeth nor can will the ill of offence or sinne properly taken psal 5. vers 5. Melancthon in disput to 4. p. 623. The conference of the continuall doctrine in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles doth shew that God nether willeâ—â— nor worketh sinne as it is expressely saied Thou art not a Gad that willeth iniquitie And out of this same place Pareus in Colleg. Theol. 1. disp 2. proueth that Gods will is no efficient cause of sinne And yet Protestants teach both that God willeth sinne and worketh sinne See lib. 1. c. 2. art 1. 4. They teach also that God hath ordained and predestinated men to sinne l. 1. c. 2. art 5. of which doctrine Melancthon in disp to 4. p. 572. giueth this censure There are certaine frantike fellows much worse then the Stoicks who teach that God of himselfe doth ordaine and predestinate haynous sinnes and that he willeth them and not onely suffereth them And in locis tit de Causa Peccat Sinne is nether done of God nor ordained of him They teach that God commandeth vrgeth and tempteth to sinne lib. 1. cap. 2. art 7. Which is contrarie to Scripture by iudgment of Riuet tract 3. sect 33. The Scripture expressely saieth that God will not iniquitie that he commandeth none to doe ill that he cannot tempt to ill Moulins in his Bucler p. 97. God doth not stirre vp meÌ„ to doe ill as it is saied ps 45. Thou hast loued iustice and hated iniquitie Et Calu. in Math. 4. v. 1. Wherevpon we gather that tentations which incite vs to ill come not froÌ„ God They teach that God is not angrie with the faithfull when they worke iniquitie lib. 1. c. 2. art 11. Which to be contrarie to Scripture Protestants in Zanchius in Supplicat confesse in these words God doth threaten his anger to all the transgressors of his law and they cite thereto that Ps 5. Thou hast hated all that worke iniquitie They teach that God hath no will that all should be saued li. c. 2. art 19. Which is against Scripture as coÌ„fesseth Hemingius in these words in Enchir. clas 3. They accuse God of a lye whosoeuer thinke that he will not the saluation of some as farre as perteineth to