former acts of limitation as W. 1. ca ' 38. W. 2. ca ' 2. doe not exclude a seisin sufficient at common Law And the Statute saith Actuall possession or seisin which Seisin is eyther actuall or in Law Resolved that the act doth not extend to such a rent or service which by common possibility cannot happen within sixty yeares as homage fealty for the tenant may live beyond or to cover the Hall or to goe in Warre so of a Formedon in Discender for tenant in taile may live sixty yeares after discontinuance and though In facto he dyes and the issue doth not pursue his Formedon yet he may have it at any time and the seisin of the donee was not traversable so of homage and other casuall services though the Lord might have had seisin So if the Lord release to the tenant so long as I. S. hath heires of his body though sixty yeares passe yet he may distraine for Impotentia excusat legem and there may be a tenure by homage c. and yet never done as if the Land be conveyed to a Maior c. or other Corporation aggregate of many they hold by fealty yet they cannot doe it A Writ of Escheate Cessavit Rescous are not within the Act for in them the seisin is not traversable but the tenure and in the Escheate and Cessavit they demand the Land and can lay no seisin and the Act extends onely to those Writs where the demandant or his Ancestors might have had seisin So Note Land shall escheate though there be no seisin of the services within the time of limitation for the Seigniory remaines though seisin wants so if the tenant cesse and the Land be not overt and sufficient to his distresse the Lord shall have a Cessavit though he wants seisin of the services Resolved if nothing be arreare and the Lord distraines the tenant may make rescous or if he be so often distrained that he cannot manure his Land he may have an Assise De souent distres but for such tortious distresse where nothing is arreare the tenant shall not have Trespasse Vi armis against the Lord for this is prohibited by the Statute of Marleb ca ' 3. See the Booke at large in what case an incroachment of more rent by the Lord then he ought to have shall be avoyded in what not Resolved that though a man hath beene out of possession of Land by sixty yeares yet if his entry be not taken away he may enter and bring any possessory action of his owne possession for the first clause doth not barre any right but prohibits that none shall have a Writ of right c. of the possession of his ancestors c. but onely of a seisin within sixty yeares the first and second clause extend onely to seisin auncestrell the third to an action of his owne possession not to entry the fourth to avowry the fifth to a Formedon c. Note Reader out of this that when the tenant hath done homage and fealty which the Lord may inforce him to doe this shall be a seisin of all other services as to avowry though the Lord nor those by whom he claimes had seisin within sixty yeares Actions of Slaunder The Lord Cromwells Case 20º of the Queene fo 12. THe Lord Cromwell brought an Action De Scandalis magnatum against D. Viccar Tam pro domina regina quam pro seipso upon the Statute of 2. R. 2. ca ' 5. The Defendant said to the Plaintiffe It is no marvell though you like not of me for you like of those that maintaine sedition against the Queenes proceedings the Defendant justifies specially that he being Viccar of N. the Plaintiffe procured I. T. and I. H. for to preach there who in their Sermons inveyed against the Booke of common prayer and affirmed it to be superstitious upon which the Viccar inhibited them for they had not license nor authority to preach yet they proceeded by the incouragement of the Plaintiffe the Plaintiffe said to the Defendant Thou art a false Varlet I like not of thee to whom the Defendant said It is no marvaile though you like not of me for you like of those innuendo the aforesaid I. T. and I. H. that maintaine sedition Innuendo seditiosam illam doctrinam against the Queenes proceedings Resolved in this case that the Statute aforesaid concerning the King the Judges Ex officio ought to take notice of it as they ought of all Statutes that concerne him Resolved that the justification is good for in case of slaunder the sence of the words is to be taken which may appeare by the occasion of speech Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est et sermones semper accipiendi sunt secundum subjectam materiam And here the sence of the words appeares and his meaning in speaking them and that he did not intend any publique or violent sedition as the word of it selfe imports and God defend that the words of one by a strict and grammaticall construction should be taken contrary to the manifest intent as in an Action for calling the Plaintiffe murderer 't is a good justification that the Plaintiffe confessing that he had killed diverse Haires with Engines the Defendant said Thou art a Murderer and the Defendant shall not be put to a generall issue when he confesses the words and shewes that they are not actionable as in maintainance the Defendant may justifie lawfull mainteinance whereupon the Plaintiffe replyed that the Defendant dixit c. Verba praedict de iniuria sua propria absque tali causa upon this they were at issue and after agreed Cutler and Dixons Case 27. and 28. of the Queene fo 14. IF one exhibite certaine Articles to a Justice of peace against one declaring divers great abuses and misdemeanours c. to the intent to bind him to the good behaviour In this case the party accused shall not have any action upon the case for it is in pursuite of ordinary justice and if such actions were permitted none would complayne for feare of infinite vexation Sir Richard Buckley and Woods Case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 14. WOod exhibited a Bill in the Starrechamber against Sir R. B. and charged him with divers matters examinable there and with other matters not determinable there as that he was a maintainer of Pyrates and Murtherers and a procurer of Pyracies upon which Sir R. B. brought this action c. Resolved that no action lyes for matter examinable there though 't was meerely false because that 't was in course of justice Resolved that an action lyes for these words not examinable there for 't is not done in course of Justice and great inconvenience would follow if matters may be inserted in Bills exhibited in so high and honourable a Court in Slaunder of the parties and they cannot answer there for their purgation nor have their action for purging themselves of the crimes and recover damages for
Clergy in an appeale 1. Because it is but to notifie to the Judges that he hath once had his Clergy and that he shall not have it againe by the Statute of 4. H. 7. c. 13. 2. Because it is no part of the judgement and the party shall goe at large although he be not burned by good construction of the Statute of 18. Eliz. c. 7. which provideth that after Clergy allowed and Burning he shall goe at large for otherwise when he is pardoned he shall be imprisoned for ever In the Starre-Chamber the King may Pardon corporall punishment for forgery c. but not if attainted at the common Law in an Action of forgery of false deeds Halls Case 2. Jacobi com banco fo 51. A. C. Libelled for defamation in the Court Christian against H. and had sentence and costs taxed at a day to be paid H. sueth an appeale and obtaines a Pardon from the King and brings a prohibition 1. Resolved all Suites in the Court Christian Pro salute animae or reformatione morum are for the King as suits in the Starr-chamber he may pardon them before or after the Suite comenced but he cannot Pardon where the party sueth for a thing in which he had interest as Tythes 2. All proceedings in the Court Christian Ex officio are for the King and he may pardon them 3. Although the suite may be pardoned yet he cannot pardon the costs which are taxed 4. Although the sentence by the appeale is suspended to many purposes yet untill reversall the party had interest in the costs not pardonable and after a consultation was granted for the costs Pages case 30. Eliz. in the Exchequer fol. 52. I. Demiseth to his wife who is an Alien and before the death of the Testator indenized the date of the Letters Patents is corrupted so that they bore date after his death shee obtaines an exemplification by Commission under the Exchequer Seale it is found that she was an alien and an Information is brought against her and she pleads the exemplification 1. Resol This office is voyde for every office of Intitling as this is ought to be by Commission under the Great Seale but an office of Instruction may be under the Exchequer Seale 2. It appeared not what authority the Commissioners had but Inquisitio capta virtute Cujusdam Commissionis c. 2. That the Exemplification was pleadable by the Statute of 13. Eliz. c. 6. which extends to all Patents whatsoever without any restraint An Exemplification and an Inspeximus as an Innotescimus and a Vidimus are all one A Constat cannot be had without Affidavit and it is when Letters are casually lost An Innotescimus or a Vidimus are alwayes of a Charter of Feoffment or other Instrument not of Record Knights case 31. Eliz. Communi Banco fol. 54. THe Prior of St. John of Je 29. H. 8. Leased divers houses reserving 5. li. 10. s. 11. d. per annum at the foure usuall feasts in L. viz. for one house 3. li. 11. d. and so severally of the others with condition of re-entry for non payment and after surrenders to H. 8. who in Anno 36. grants one house to the lessee and another in fee the lessee dyeth It is found by Inquisition in the Com' of Mid ' by Commission under the Exchequer Seale that 37. s. 5. d. parcell of the said rent was arreare at M. for a quarter of a yeare before the returne of the office or seisure the King grants the residue of the houses to one who leaseth to the Plaintiffe who upon entry of the Executors of the first lessee brings Trespas and the Court being divided it was argued in the Exchequer Chamber by all the Judges 1. Resol This is an intire Lease and the viz. is but a declaration of the severall values of the houses and no severance of the reservation but by apt words divers parcells may be severally leased by one demise and severall rents reserved 2. Admitting them severall rents yet the condition is intire and in case of a common person by severance of any part of the reversion will be extinct 3. This being in case of the King his patentee of part shall not take advantage of the condition but the King himselfe may and the Patentee to whom he grants the residue although the Lease originally made by a Subject 4. Although it be found that more was arreare then was reserved quarterly yet it sufficeth that the office had matter of substance and the Jury in M. may finde which are the usuall feasts in L. 5. The grant after office and before the returne of it is good and by entry without other seisure the Lease is voyde 6. This office under the Exchequer Seale is sufficient to intitle the King to a Chattell Specots case 32. Eliz. Banco Regis in Error fol. 57. S. sa feme bring a Qu impedit against the Bishop of E. and declare that J. A. was seised of a Mannor to which an advowson was appendant and demised it to the feme for life and they presented D. W. who dyed and so it belongs to them to present the defendant pleads that the plaintiffe presented one who is schismaticus inveteratus whereof he gave notice to the plaintiffe It was adjudged for the plaintiffe in the Common place and Error brought thereupon 1. Error Because no presentment alledged in J. A. but over ruled for the presentment of the plaintiffe is sufficient for themselves 2. The Bishop ought not to shew any particular schisme for the Court of the King cannot judge of it but the Bishop is Judge also it is cause to remove a Coroner quia minus Idoneus It was answered that he ought to shew the heresie in certaine and although the Bishop is Judge yet because his Act is not of Record it is traversable and although it belongs not to the Kings Court to judge of Heresies yet the generall cause of suite being in their conusance they shall determine of it by advise of Divines and the cause of removing a Coroner is not traversable 3. The Bishop is twice amerced and a man can be amerced but once towards one man c. It was answered that he was but once amerced for the Judgement in the Kings Bench was but a rehersall of the former yet admitting the second Judgement thereby voyde neverthelesse the first Judgement is good by the Common Law without damages Quod fuit concessum per totam Curiam Fostar 32. El. in Banco le roy fol. 59. IT was resolved that the Constable having a warrant to bring one coram aliquo Justiciar ' c. it is at the election of the Officer to bring the party so attached to what Justice he will For it is greater reason to give the election to the Officer who in presumption of Law is a person indifferent and sworne to execute his Office duly then to the Delinquent Wray chiefe Justice said that a Justice of Peace may make
his warrant to bring the party before himselfe and it is good and sufficient in Law for it is most like that he hath the best knowledge of the matter and therefore most fit to doe Justice in that matter upon refusall to finde surety the Constable may commit him without a new warrant Gooches case 32. El. in banco le roy fol. 60. WRay chiefe Justice said that if A. make a fraudulent conveyance of his Lands to deceive a purchasor against the Statute of 27. El. and continueth in possession and is reputed as owner B entereth in communication with A. for the purchase and by accident B. hath notice of this fraudulent conveyance Notwithstanding he concludes with A. and takes his assurance In this case B. shall avoide the said fraudulent conveyance by the said Act notwithstanding the notice for the Act by expresse words hath made the fraudulent conveyance voyde as to the purchasor And for as much as that is within the expresse provision of the Statute it ought to be taken and expounded in suppression of fraud Resolved that fraud may be given in Evidence because the estate is voyde by the Act of 13. Eliz. and fraud is hatched in secret in arbore cava opaca And according to this opinion it was resolved Per tot ' Cur ' in communi banco Pasche 3o. Jac. where one Bullock had made a fraudulent estate of his Lands within the Statute of 27. El. to A. B. and C. and after offred to sell the same to one Standen and before the assurance by Bullock Standen had notice thereof and notwithstanding proceeded and tooke the assurance from Bullock Standen avoyded the former assurance of fraud by the said act for the notice of the purchasor cannot make that good which an Act of Parliament hath made voyde as to him And it is true Quod non decipitur qui scit se decipi But in this case the purchasor is not deceived for the fraudulent conveyance whereof he had notice is made voyde as to him by the Statute and therefore he knew it could not hurt him Sparries case 33. Eliz. in Scaccar fol. 61. IN action of Trover and convertion the defendant pleads that there is another action depending in the Kings Bench for the same Trover and good for in actions which comprehend no certeinty as assize or trespas this is no plea before a Count because thereby it is made certeine and then it is a good plea and not before but in this action and debt and detinue it is a good plea at the first because they are certeine that an action is depending in an inferiour Court is no plea. Cases of By-Lawes Chamberlaine de Londons case 32. El. in Banco le roy fol. 66. THe Inhabitants of a village without any custome may make Ordinances or By-Lawes for reparation of the Church or of high-wayes or any such thing which is for the publicke weale generally and in this case the consent of the greater part shall binde all without any custome vide 44. E. 3.19 But if it be for their owne private profit for that Towne as for their well ordering of their common of pasture or such like then without custome they cannot make by-Lawes And if it be a custome yet the greater part shall not binde all if it be not warranted by the custome for as custome hath created them so they ought to be warranted by the custome 8. E. 2. tit ass As pontage murage Tolle and such like as appeareth in 13. H. 4.14 In which cases the summes for reparations of the Bridge walls c. ought to be so reasonable that the Subject may have more benefit thereby then charge Clerks case 38. Eliz in communi banco fol. 64. KIng Edward 6. did incorporate the Towne of St. Albones and granted them to make Lawes and Ordinances c. The Tearme was kept there and the Major c. by assent of the plaintiffe assessed every Inhabitant for the charges in erecting of the Courts there and if any did refuse to pay c. to be imprisoned c. the plaintiffe being Burges refused to pay c. and the Major justified c and it was adjudged no plea c. For this Ordinance is against Magna Charta ca. 29. Nullus liber homo imprisonetur which act hath been confirmed divers times viz. thirty times and the assent of the plaintiffe cannot alter the Law in this case But it was resolved that the Major c. might inflict reasonable penaltie but not imprisonment which penaltie ought to be Levied by Distresse for which offence an action of Debt lyeth and the plaintiffe in this case had judgement Jeffrays case Michaelis 31 32. en Bank le Roy. fol. 66. WIlliam Jeffray Gent. brought a prohibition against Abraham Kenshley and Thomas Forster Churchwardens of Haylesham in Com' Sussex for that they sued him in Court Christian before Doctor Drury for certaine money imposed upon him without his assent for repaire of the Church That the Church-wardens with the assent of the greatest part of the Parishioners juxta quantitatem qualitatem possessionum reddit ' infra dict' parochiam existent Determined and agreed to make a taxation for repaire of the said Church and that notice of such assembly was given in the Church at which day the Church-wardens and greater part of the Parish which were there assembled made a taxation viz. every occupier of Land for every acre 4. d. c. Geffray dwelt in another Parish and declared that the Parishioners of every Parish ought to repaire their Church and not the Church of another Parish Cooke of councell with the defendant demurred in Law and after many arguments a Writ of consultation was granted And it was resolved that the Court Christian hath conusans de reparatione corporis sive navis Ecclesiae Britton who writ in 5. E. 1. And in the Statute of Circumspecte agatis but in Rebus manifestis errat qui authoritates legum allegat quia perspicuè vera non sunt probanda It was also resolved that although Geffray did dwell in another Parish yet for that he had Lands in the said Parish in his proper possession he is in the Law Parochianus de Haylesham But it was resolved that where there was a Farmor of the same Lands the Lessor that receiveth the rent shall not be charged but the Inhabitant is the Parishioner and the receipte of the rent doth not make the Lessor a Parishioner Diverse of the civill Lawyers certified the Court that the Church Wardens and a greater part of the Parishioners upon a generall warning assembled may make a Taxation by their Law and the same shall not charge the Land but the Person in respect of the Land for equality and indifferency and this was the first leading case that was adjudg'd reported in Our Bookes touching these matters and many causes after were adjudged thus and now it is generally received for Law The Lord Cheneys Case 33. Eliz.
Heires Males of his Body c. And if A. or his issue c. shall attempt c. to alien c. by which any estate shall be barred c. that after such attempt and before any act executed the use and Estate of him so attempting c. shall cease onely as to him so attempting in the same degree as if he were naturally dead and not otherwise and that then it shall be immediately to such persons to whom it should come by the intent of the Indenture c. C. dyes A. suffers a recovery B. enters c. adjudged he could not for this proviso is repugnant impossible and against Law for the death of Tenant in taile is not a cesser of the Estate taile but death without issue Males and by this reason the issue should have it in the life of the Father c. And for every discent c. Death naturall or civill is requisite and t is not materiall though Tenant in taile had no issue at the time of the breach for t was repugnant at the beginning and the estate taile doth not commence by the having of issue and a gift in taile upon condition that if the Donee dyes his estate shall cease is a void condition Also the proviso is void for the incertainty as a gift to two Et haeredibus is voide though a Warranty be made to them and their Heirs in Jermine Arscotts Case the like proviso was adjudg'd voide for be the proviso a condition or a limitation the intire estate ought to be defeated by it and an Estate in Land cannot cease for part and continue for the residue nor cease for one person and continue for another nor cease for a time and revive after The like judgement was betwixt Chomly and Humble but the Parliament or Law may make an estate voide as to one and good to another as Tenant in speciall taile levies a fine the issue is barred not the wife so a release by the demandant to the vouchee is good not by a stranger so if an Executor surrender a tearme to one respect t is extinct to another t is assetts c. And uses are within the Statute De donis though it speakes onely of Lands and Tenements and there shall be a Possessio fratris c. of them for they are guided by the Rules of the common Law Richill in the time of R. 2. and Thirning in the time of H. 4. Justices intended for to make a perpetuity but could not Shelleyes Case 23. Eliz Fol. 94. EDward Shelley leased for yeares and after Covenanted to suffer a recovery which should be to the use of himselfe and after to the use of A. for 24. yeares and after to the Heires Males of the body of the said E S. and the Heires Males of the said Heires Males c. E. S. dyes 9 of Octob. the first day of the Terme in the morning betwixt five and six a clock the recovery passes the same day and an Habere facias seisinam awarded the recovery was executed the 19 of Octob. 4 Decemb. the Wife of the Eldest Son before dead of E. S. was delivered of a Son named Henry Richard the second Son of E. S. entered and made a Lease c. Henry entred upon the Lessee who brought an Eject firmae and Judgement was given for the Defendant and t was resolved that if Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery and dye before execution that execution may be sued against the issue for the intended recompence in favour of the common assurance resolved that the revertion in judgement of Law is not in the recoveror before execution sued for the judgement is Quod recuperet seisinam which cannot be executed till entry or claime as 't is of a Common c. granted upon condition for when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime The third and great point resolved was that the Uncle is in as by discent though he shall not have his age nor be in ward 1. Because the recovery being the Originall act had its Essence in the life of E. S. to which the execution hath retrospect 2. Because the use might have vested in E. S. if he were in life 3. Neither the recoverors by their entry nor the Sheriffe by making execution may make an Inheritance to whom they please 4. Because the Uncle claimed the use by the recovery and Indenture and by words of limitation not purchase Albanies Case 28. Eliz Fo. 111. A By Indenture infeoffed B. of two Acres to the use of A. for life the remainder in taile to C. the remainder in fee to D. with a proviso if E. dye without issue that A. at any time by indenture sealed c. in the presence of foure c. may alter c. any use c. A. of the one acre infeoffes F. and for the other Acre A. by Indenture renounces surrenders releases c. to B. C. and D. the said power condition authority c. E. dyes without issue A. by Indenture in presence of foure revokes the first uses and limits new resolved that by the feoffement the power to revoke as to limit new uses was extinct and by Wray chiefe Justice the future power may be released as a condition subsequent though the performance or breach cannot be done without an act precedent but as to this poynt the Court did not give their resolution but the whole Court agreed that if the power had beene present as t is usuall this might be extinct to any one who hath a free hold in possession reversion or remainder 'T was moved if the future power could not be released whether it might be defeated by the words of defeasance both being executory and 't was said that in all cases when any thing executory is created by a deed that the same thing by consent of all parties to the creation by their deed may be nullified as a warranty recognizance rents charge annuities covenant c. And of the same opinion was Wray chiefe Justice and the whole Court and judgement given according Chudleighs Case Or the Case of perpetuities Fo. 120. SIr Richard Chudleigh was seised in fee of the Mannor of D. and had issue foure Sonnes A. B. C. D. and 26º Aprill the third and fourth of Phillip and Mary infeoffed E. F c. in fee to the use of himselfe and his Heires of the body of G. then Wife of H. and after to the use of the performance of his Will for ten yeares immediately after his death and after to the use of the feoffes and their Heires during the life of A. the Eldest Sonne the remainder to the use of the first issue Male of the body of A. and the Heires of the body of the first issue Male and so to the second issue Male the remainder to the use of B. the second Sonne and the Heires of his body the remainder to C.
dyes after R. enters and dyes 18. Eliz. the executor of T. enters and assignes to J. S. the Successor of the Rector enters and Leases to B. who upon ouster brought an Ej. Firmae Resolved for the Plaintiffe and that the Lease to T. is voyd Argued for T. that his demise was good and a difference taken betwixt terminum annorum and tempus annorum as in this case of the demise to T. during so many yeares of the fourescore yeares c. not of the terme of fourescore yeares if a Lease be made for 21. yeares and after another Lease to commence from the end and expiration of the said terme of yeares and after the first Lease is surrendered the second terme shall commence presently not so if it were from the end of the said 21. yeares Resolved that the demises to R. and W. are voyd because the terme that El. had was sub modo if she should so long live which is determined by her death ergo no residue can remaine to R. and W. and so 't was adjudged between Greene and Edwards and the Court agreed the diversity betwixt the demises to R. and W. and the demise to T. 't was argued that the demise to T. was voyd 1. Because that the Lessor had not power for to contract for the land during the fourescore yeares for he had but a possibility to have the land againe during the fourescore yeares viz. if El. dyed which possibility cannot be demised but the Court delivered no opinion to this poynt 2. That the Lease to T. was voyd for the incertainty how many yeares should be behinde at the death of El. a termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behinde tempore mortis suae 't is voyd Locrofts case adjudged a man possessed of a terme of 90. yeares upon marriage of his Sonne demised the land to his Sonne for 70. yeares to commence after his death the Lessor dyes the lease was adjudged good because here he demised the land for 70. yeares which is certaine in which this differs from 7. E. 6. which diversity was agreed by the whole Court 3. That 't was voyd because he dyed in the life of El. so that the incertainty cannot be reduced to a certainty in his life time and so cannot rest in the executors a lease to one for so many yeares as his Executors shall name is voyd Note a diversity betwixt a covenant and agreement which is perfect and certaine though it takes effect in possession upon a future matter precedent and a covenant and agreement incertaine which is to be reduced to a certainty by matter ex post facto for in the first case the estate is bound presently in the other not which was agreed by the Court. 4. It was moved if T. had been in life the demise could not rest in him T. dyed before R. or W. and R. survived El. and by the expresse condition precedent R. could not take except El. dyed within the terme and W. could not take except R. dyed within the terme and this is as much as to say that if R. dyes before El. and T. cannot take except W. dye in the life of El. and R. survived El. So that both precedent contingencies faile viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. and though the demise to R. and W. are voyd yet the limitation precedent viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. to the demise to T. is not voyd for his interest may depend upon both the contingencies for so was the intention of the parties and this was affirmed by the whole Court by Popham Chiefe Justice The Lease to T. was voyd for another cause for it cannot commence upon a contingent which depends upon another contingent as here the demise to T. depends upon the contingent annexed to the demise made to W. and the demise to W. depends upon a contingency annexed to the demise to R. Digges Case 42. Eliz. fo 173. C. Digges was seised of the land in question and other lands in fee and by Indenture 6. Maij. 10. of the Queene covenanted in consideration of marriage betwixt him and his wife and for the advancement of T. their Sonne and for two hundred pounds paid to him before marriage that he and his heires would stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to T. in taile and after to the use of himselfe in taile with a proviso for the considerations aforesaid c. that it should be lawfull for him at any time during his life with consent of certaine persons by Indenture to be Inrolled in any of the Kings Courts to revoke any of the uses or estates and for to limit new uses 6. Maij. 12. of the Queene C. by consent c. by Indenture inrolled in the Chancery revoked the uses and estates aforesaid in part of the land and limitted the use of it to him and his heires after 20. Sept. 13. of the Queene by Indenture with consent c. inrolled in Banck M. 13. 14. of the Queene declared that for the payment of his debts that from the time of the inrollment of this Deed in Chancery all the uses in the first Indenture should be voyd and that the land should be to the use of himselfe in fee after C. 26. Octob. 14. of the Queene by Indenture covenanted for to levie a Fine of all his land part of which should be to the use of himselfe and his wife and his heires which Fine was levied the same terme after the Indenture dated 20. Sept. was inrolled in Chancery after C. enters and makes his claime and whether C. dyed seised in fee of the land mentioned in the Deed of Revocation of 20. Sept. was the question Adjudged 1. that C. D. might revoke part at one time part at another till he hath revoked all but he can revoke the same part but once except that he hath a new power c. to uses newly limitted for these words at any time amount to from time to time c. 2 That where the revocation is to be by Deed Indented to be inrolled this is as much as to say as by Deed Indented and inrolled and till inrollment no revocation shall be for otherwise perchance none shall be inrolled 3. That 't was no perfect revocation by the Indenture of 20. Sept. till the Deed were inrolled in the Chancery for though that the proviso of revocation in the first Indenture shall be satisfied with an inrollment in any of the Kings Courts yet for that the Indenture of revocation it selfe limits the revocation to take effect after the inrollment in Chancery it ought to be so 4. That the Fine levied before the inrollment in Chancery which was before the revocation hath extinct the power see Albaines case before adjudged and Popham Chiefe Justice said that without question such a power might be released for 't is not meerely collaterall but savours and tastes of
is insufficient for 't is incertaine whether it be in the necke arme or belly and Indictments ought to be certaine and shew in what part the wound is and the profundity and latitude that it may appeare to the Court to be mortall and one of the wounds incertainly alledged makes the whole Indictment insufficient 'T was said that the indictment ought to have been that if the party had 〈◊〉 dyed of the first stroke that he dyed of the other and this is the common course Upon a suddaine affray if the Constable or any of his assistants in suppressing it be killed 't is murder in Law though the murderer knew not the party killed for the Law adjudges it murder and that he had malice prepense for that he opposed him against justice So in case of a Sheriffe or any of his Bayliffs or Officers in execution of processe so of a Watchman Walkers case 41. of the Queene fo 41. REsolved that an indictment of murder upon which the party was outlawed that he stroke the dead in sinistra parte ventris circa umbelicum was good for sinistra parte was sufficient and the other superfluous but in Youngs before there was no certainty before the circiter Heydens case 28. of the Queene fo 41. EXceptions to the indictment 1. Because 't was taken before B. Coronatore in Com' praed ' and doth not say de com' praed Resolved it shall be so taken by reasonable intendment and the Writ de coronatore eligendo is quia A. B. nuper unus Coronator ' in Com' tuo diem clausit c. and so 't is taken in Willoughbyes case in Plodon 2 because he doth not say that E. S. dead fuit in pace Dei dominae reginae Resolved that they are only words of forme to amplifie the hainousnesse of the offence not of substance and perchance he was not in peace 3. Because he doth not say felonicè nor ex malitia sua praecogita dedit c. Resolved that the word et couples the sentences together so that these words felonicè ex malitia c. and tunc ibidem makes it cleare 4. The profundity of the wound is not shewne Resolved it cannot be here for all the panne of the knee was cut off 5. 'T is said tempore feloniae praed ' murdredi where it should be murdri Resolved the first words were sufficient and then murdredum being a word insensible is superfluous and shall not hurt 6. The wound was the fourth of August the death the nineteenth of December and the indictment is that T M c. tempore feloniae murdredi praed ' viz. 4. Augusti felonicè fuer ' praesentes c. auxiliantes c. 'T was objected that the death hath relation to the stroke Resolved that indictments have been often adjudged insufficient when the stroke is one day the death another and the Jury conclude the death to be done the first day But here it ought to have been that they were praesentes auxiliantes c. ad feloniam murd ' praed ' and relation which is a fiction shall make no man a felon And Wray said that without question the yeare of bringing the appeale shall be accounted from the death not from the stroke Hume against Ogle 32. 33. of the Queene fo 42. ADjudged that the count that the defendant gave the stroke the 27. of September at D. in the County of N. and that her husband of the same stroke at D. c. dyed and so the said defendant murdered him at D. aforesaid 't was repugnant and insufficient for as it cannot be said that he murdered him the first day as Heydons case is before so neither at the place where the stroke was but where he dyed Hudson and Lees case 31. of the Queene fo 43. IN an appeale H. counted that the defendant c. felonicè maimed him in his left hand the defendant pleaded that before c the plaintiffe recovered in Trespas for the same battery and wounding 200. l. and satisfaction acknowledged Resolved 〈◊〉 the barre is good for where the plaintiffe is to recover damage onely as in this case of the appeale 〈◊〉 shall not be twice satisfied for the same thing nem◠debet bis puniri pro uno delicto And here the wounding in the first action includes the mayhem more and the defendant hath averred that the wounding in the first action and the mayhem here is one Syers case 32. of the Queene fo 43. REsolved if the principall be pardoned or hath his Clergy the accessory cannot be arraigned for 't is a Maxime Vbi factum nullum ibi fortia nulla ubi non est principalis non potest esse accessorius and none can be principall before it be so adjudged by Law viz. by judgement upon verdict or confession or by Outlawry and it suffises not that in truth he be principall and the acceptance of pardon or prayer of Clergy is an argument but no judgement in Law that he is guilty But if the principall after attainder be pardoned or hath his Clergy the accessory shall be arraigned for it appeares judicially that there was a principall Bibithes case 39. of the Queene fo 43. REsolved that where the principall was found guilty of man-slaughter and not guilty of murder and had his Clergy the accessory shall be discharged for till judgement it doth not appeare judicially that there was a principall So if the principall upon his arraignment confesses the felony before judgement obteines pardon or hath Clergy Resolved that there cannot be an accessory before the fact in man-slaughter for 't is upon a suddaine affray and if premeditated 't is murder Vauxes case 33. of the Queene fo 44. REsolved that where a man was indicted for poysoning another perswading him that the potion mixt with Cantharides would cause him to have issue by his wife the indictment nesciens praed ' potum cum veneno fore mixtum sed fidem adhibens praed ' persuasioni dict' W. V. recepit bibit was insufficient for 't is not expressed that he received the poyson for venenum praed ' wants and the words after immediatè post receptionem veneni praed ' are not sufficient to maintaine an indictment which ought to be certaine and not by implication Resolved that Vaux who perswaded was a principall murderer though he was not present at the receit of the poyson and here he cannot be accessory for there is no principall and if any one had procured V. to doe it he had been accessory before which note a speciall case where principall and accessory both are absent at the time of the felony Resolved that auter foits acquite here is no plea for he was discharged upon an arraignement upon this insufficient indictment and the former acquittall or conviction ought to be lawfull and the Maxime is That the life of a man shall not be twice in jeopardy for one
grant after Office and before the retorne is good ib. The Bishop must shew the cause of refusing a Clerke Page 203 The Constable may bring an Offendor to what Justice he will ib. Vpon refusall to find surety the Constable may commit him ib. Where a man shall avoid a fraudulent deed by 27. Eliz. Page 204 The Defendant pleads another Action depending for the same Page 205 Cases of By-laws Where the Inhabitants of a Towne may make By-laws and where the consent of the greater part shall bind all ib. Who are liable towards the repaires of a Church Page 207 Against a devise of Lands by writing no averrment can be received Page 208 Cases of Usury What manner of contract is Vsury Page 208 209 A demurrer is a confession of all matters in fact well pleaded Page 208 What things may be released before the day Page 209 Daggs Pistolls c. are within the Statute of 33. H. 8. c. 6. ib. The Sheriffe or his officers may carry Weapons invasive or defensive ib. One man cannot have an Action for a common nusance Page 210 If an Orphan sue for goods in the Court Christian a prohibition lyeth ib. A Deed shewed in Court remaineth there all that Terme Page 211 In the K. B. imparlances in barre are entered but not to reply ib. The Wife Tenant for life dyes the Baron is not liable for wast ib. When amends may be tendered after a distresse but not after impounding tender to the Bailiffe is not good Page 212 The Plaintiffe may pray a Deed to be entered In haec verba the same Tearme but not after ib. An action of wast lies after the death of him in remainder for life ib. Every assignee of every Lessee mediate or immediate is within 11. H. 6. c. 5. Page 213 An award must be certaine and binds none but parties Page 214 A prescription for common where it is good ib. Where a warrāty comenceth by disseissin Page 214 215 A confirmation of the Land and of the terme a diversity Page 215 Cases of Customes Where a custome binds Strangers Page 216 Where property is altered by sale in a Market Overt ib. A custome which addeth more solemnity to the Law is good ib. Who shall have the Corne upon the ground Page 216 217 Where judgement finall shall be given in Wales Page 217 Cases of Executions One in execution escapeth yet the other is liable Page 218 VVhere the Defendant is in Execution for the King he shall be also for the Plaintiffe Page 219 If a Man be in custody and another VVrit commeth to the Sheriffe he is in custody of force of the second VVrit also Page 220 A judiciall VVrit needs no returne but not so of an Elegit ib. VVhere restitution shall be after reversall of Outlarly or judgement Page 221 VVhere the Sheriffe may breake the House to make Execution Page 222 That a House is not a defence of Strangers ib. A false consideration is void as to the Queene Page 223 224 The Law findeth not an assignee in Law where one in Fact Page 224 Foure bring a Quare impedit and one releaseth it barreth onely him ib. After a Divorce issue by the second Husband legitimate Page 225 False evidence to the Grand Inquest is not within 5 Eliz. ib. Commissioners of Sewers must tax all who are in danger ib. A Quod permittat for a Nusance where it lyeth without request Page 226 227 And where against a Feoffee or assignee Page 227 Two have Title to present by turne one presents I. S. who is deprived or Merè laicus it is a turne not if the admission be void ib. Vterque taken sometimes discretive sometimes collective Page 228 The Plaintiffe cannot refuse to joine in demurrer but the King may ib. A man cannot have an Action for damage by Coines ib. None may erect a Dovehouse but the Lord of a Mannor ib. Ancient demesne is a good plea in Ejectione sirmae not in Trespasse Page 229 Excellent diversity of Learning touching Wrecke ib. When the high Admirall shall have jurisdiction Page 230 Plentifull matter touching goods wayved goods of Fellons Deodands c. Page 231 What things may be gained by usage without matter of Record ib. Rendring rent to one and his heires and to one or his heires is all one Page 232 The King by his Proclamation may make forreigne Coine currant ib. A Tender of money in bagges is a good tender Page 233 In a writ of Estrepement the Sheriffe may take posse com ib. Estrepement lyeth in wast as well before judgment as after ib. Feme Copiholder durante viduitate soweth the Lord shall have it ib. Payment of parcell before the day is satisfaction for all Page 234 Grantee of a remainder liable for arreares of a rent charge ib. Debt against one joint obligor hee cannot plead Non est factum Page 235 But hee may if the deed become void by matter Ex-post facto ib. In Indictments certainty to a certaine in generall is good ib. False Latine shall not quash an Indictment ib. In Indictments of death Percussit must be except in case of poisoning Page 236 A lense for yeares is an interest within 4 H. 7. c. 25. ib. A libell may be as well against a private man as a Magistrate ib. Non refert whether it be true or the party of good fame ib. If a man finde a Libell advise how to to preserve himselfe Page 237 Gardian in chivalrie shall have the single value of the marriage without Tender ib. The great Case De jure regis Ecclesiastico upon the Statutes of 1 Eliz. c. 1. p. 2. Touching a Deprivation by the Bishop and the Kings supremacy in Causes Ecclesiasticall Page 237 238 THE SIXTH BOOKE VVHere services shall be multiplyed apportioned or extinct Page 239 Where the parole shall demurre for nonage of the demandant and where the Tenant shall have his age much good learning Page 240 The King grants the tenancy by attainder the mesnalty is revived Page 241 The K. grants land Tenendum by a rose pro omnibus c. what Tenure Page 242 Resolutions and Diversities when a barre in one action shall be a barre in another ib. Where a Writt shall be brought by Journeyes accounts Page 243 Who are Judges in Inferiour Courts Page 244 Jointenants cannot make partition by words after 28. H. 8. c. 1. ib. A Parson deprived for Adultery which is pardoned he is restored Page 245 A Visne must be from the most certain place ib. Tenant for life and hee in remainder joyne in a lease how it inureth Page 246 Riens passa tryed where the land is not where the patent dated ib. A devise to his brother paying 20. s. he hath fee ib. A devise to Baron and Feme and their children what estate it is Page 247 Where the will is directory and where declaratory without reference to power ib. A diversity betweene a suite by Citation and an Appeale Page 248 If a Statute speaks