Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
justice_n lord_n sir_n treasurer_n 2,767 5 11.4861 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A47446 The state of the Protestants of Ireland under the late King James's government in which their carriage towards him is justified, and the absolute necessity of their endeavouring to be freed from his government, and of submitting to their present Majesties is demonstrated. King, William, 1650-1729. 1691 (1691) Wing K538; ESTC R18475 310,433 450

There are 21 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Master of the Rolls Dennis Fitzgerald his Deputy Masters Dr. Alexius Stafford Popish Dean of Christ-church 2d May. Ignatius Berford Esq Dr. of the Laws 6th May. Dr. Matthew Kennedy 10 May. Dr. Michael Plunket a Romish-Priest 23 July Thomas Arthur Soldier Clerk of the Crown and Hanaper This is in Trust for Robert Arthur's Wife Niece to Lord Tyrconnel 1st Aug. William Dorrington Register James Nagle Cursitor and Ingrosser of all Original Writs Henry Temple Esq and Owen Coyle who was Indicted and Outlawed of Forgery Examinators Six Clerks John Newel John Maynard .... Power Thady Meagher John Herny and Geoghegan Baskervile Polewheel Pursuivant KINGS BENCH Thomas Lord Nugent Baron of Riverston L. Chief Justice 2d Justice Vacant not being worth Fees of passing Patent Sir Brian O Neil Baronet Third Justic. 6th July 1689. Randal Mac Donnel Esq Clerk of the Crown and Prothonorary Francis Nugent Deputy Prothonotary Brian Kerny Deputy Clerk of the Crown COMMON PLEAS John Keating Esq Lord Chief Justice 2. Justice Dennis Daly Esq 3. Justice Peter Martin Esq 23 Jan. 1689. Edmond Fitzgerald Esq Chief and only Prothonotary Richard Fenner his Deputy 16 Jan. 1689. Robert Barnwel Esq Custos Brevium and Chirographer James Nagle Clerk of the Outlawries EXCHEQUER Buno Talbot Esq Chancellor Treasurer Vacant Sir Stephen Rice Lord Chief Baron Sir John Barnwel Knight Second Baron Sir Henry Lynch Baronet Puny Baron 1st Aug. 1689. Oliver Grace Esq Chief Remembrancer Second Remembrancer not disposed of formerly an Office of great Perquisites but now not worth Fees of passing Patent 8 Aug. Walter Lord Dungan Clerk of the Common Pleas. Murtagh Griffin his Deputy Philip Dwyer his Sub-Deputy 6 Jul. 89. Richard Talbot of Malahide Esq Auditor General 23 Jul. 89. Chr. Malone Sergeant Dillon's Clerk Surveyor General This in Trust for Lady Tyrconnel and her Daughter married to Col Dillon 3 Oct. 1689. James Nagle Clerk of the Estreats and Summonister 24 October Richard Morgan Pursuivant 28 Nov. 89. Francis Stafford Esq Clerk of the Pipe 20 Dec. 89. Charles White Esq Clerk of the First Fruits and 20th Parts Marcus Baggot First Sergeant at Arms. 7 Jan. 1689. Thomas Haughton Second Sergeant at Arms. 16th Jan. Brian Mac Dermot Esq Clerk of the Pels and Tallies and Clerk of the Treasury 13 Feb. 89. Patrick Kennedy Gent. Comptroller of the Pipe 18 Feb. 89. Thady Meagher Clerk of the Errors This is on the Statute for Writs of Error from the King's-Bench to the Exchequer Chamber 27 February John Barry Gent. Chief Chamberlain Simon Carrick Second Chamberlain 6 March Oliver Grace Esq Transcriptor and Forein Opposer Lords Commissioners of the Treasury 9th July 89. Duke Tyrconnel Henry Lord Dover Lord Riverston Chief Justice Sir Stephen Rice Lord Chief Baron Buno Talbot Chancellor of the Exchequer and Mr. Adam Colclough Secretary 27 August Hugh Reilly Esq Clerk of the Privy Council Commissioners of the Mint in Dublin 26 Aug. 1689. John Trinder William Talbot Thomas Goddars Esq William Bromfield Francis Rice Edward Fox and Walter Plunket Gent. 31 Jan. 1689. Grant to Alderman James Malone and Rich. Malone of the Office of Printer General Commissioners of the Revenue Sir Patrick Trant Sir William Ellis John Trinder Richard Collins Fr. Plowden Esq Sir Theobald Butler Charles Playdel Secretary Receivers General Sir Henry Bond Lewis Doe Esq Nicholas Fitzgerald Solicitor Robert Longfield Clerk of the Quit-Rents and of Forfeited Estates c. N o 11. 2d June 1690. An Account of the General and Field Officers of King James's Army out of the Muster Rolls DUKE of Tyrconnel Captain-General Lieutenants-General Duke of Berwick Richard Hamilton Count Lozune General of the French Monsieur Leary alias Geraldine Lieut. General Dom. Sheldon Lieut. General of the Horse Major-Generals Patrick Sarsfield Monsieur Boisteau Antho. Hamilton Wahup Brigadeers Tho. Maxwell John Hamilton Will. Dorrington Solomon Slater Muster-master-General Robert Fitz-Gerald Comptroller of the Musters Sir Rich. Nagle Secretary at War Receivers General Sir Henry Bond Louis Doe Sir Michael Creagh Pay-master-General Felix O Neile Advocate-General Dr. Archbold Physician to the State Patrick Archbold Chirurgeon-General HORSE Duke of Tyrconnel Collonel Dom. Sheldon Lieut. Coll. Fra. Meara Major Lord Galmoy Coll. Laur. Dempsy 1st Lieu. Coll. Char. Carrole 2d Lieu. Coll. Robert Arthur Major Patrick Sarsfield Coll. Lord Kinsale Lieut. Coll. Roger Magilligan Major Hugh Sutherland Coll. Edm. Pendergast 1st L. Coll. Talbot Lassells 2d L. Coll. Will. Cox Major Lord Abercorne Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major Henry Luttrell Coll. Sir James Moclare Lieu. Coll. Major John Parker Coll. Tho. Gifford Lieu. Coll. John Metham Major Nicholas Pursel Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major DRAGOONS Lord Dimgan Coll. Lieut. Coll. Major Sir Neile O Neile Coll. Lieut. Coll. Major Lord Clare Coll. John Mac Nemara 1st L. Coll. James Philips 2d L. Coll. Francis Browne Major Symon Luttrell Coll Lieut. Coll. Edmund Moclare Major Robert Clifford Coll. Alex. Mackenzie Lieut. Coll. Major Fran. Carroll Coll. Tarens Carroll 1st L. Coll. Fran. Boismoroll 2d L. Coll. Major Tho. Maxwell Coll. Daniel Magennis Lieu. Coll. Callaghane Major FOOT Will. Dorrington Collonel of the Guards Will. Mansel Barker Lieu. Coll. Tho. Arthur Major John Hamilton Coll. James Nugent Lieu. Coll. Majors John Talbot 1st James Gibbons 2d Lord Fitz-James Coll. Edw. Nugent 1st Lieu. Coll. Porter 2d Lieu. Coll. Dodsby Major Earl of Clancarty Coll. John Skelton Lieu. Coll. Philip Rycaut Major Earl of Clanrickard Coll. Edmund Madden Lieu. Coll. Major Earl of Antrim Coll. Mark Talbot Lieu. Coll. James Woogan Major Earl of Tyrone Coll. Tho. Nugent Lieu. Coll. Richard Nagle Major Richard Nugent Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major Lord Gormanstowne Coll. Richard Eustace Lieu. Coll. Major Henry Dillon Coll. Walter Bourk Lieu. Coll. John Morgan Major Lord Galway Coll. John Power Lieu. Coll. Major Lord Bellew Coll. Nich. Fitz-gerald 1st L. Coll. Le Sir Doge 2d L. Coll. John Dowdale Major Lord Kinmare Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major Lord Slane Coll. Maurice Connell Lieu. Coll. Major Cormuck O Neile Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major Charles Cavenagh Coll. James Lacy Lieu. Coll. Gros. Pordevarande Major Tho. Butler Coll. D' Busby Lieut. Coll. Major Lord Kilmallock Coll. John Power Lieu. Coll. John Chapell Major Sir Maur. Eustace Coll. John Woogan Lieu. Coll. Major Sir John Fitz-gerald Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major Lord Lowth Coll. Lieu. Coll. Major Earl of Westmeath Coll. Mich. Delahoyde Lieu. Coll. Gowen Talbot Major Major-General Boisteau Coll. Monsieur Beaupre Lieu. Coll. Hurly Major Lord Bofine Coll. Will. Connock Lieu. Coll. John Bodkin Major Oliver O Gara Coll. Tady Connor Lieu. Coll. Major John Grace Coll. Robert Grace Lieu. Coll. Cha. Moore Major Edward Butler Coll. John Innis Lieu. Coll. Garret Geoghegan Major Art Mac Mahon Coll. Philip Reyley Lieu. Coll. H●gh Magennis Major Charles Moore Coll. Ulick Bourk Lieu. Coll. ....... Major Dudley Bagnall Coll. James Power Lieu. Coll. .... Corbet Major Gordon O Neile Coll. Conn O Neile Lieu. Coll. Henry O Neile Major Nicholas Brown Coll. George Traps Lieu. Coll. Dermot Mac Auliffe
that we could promise our selves no help from his Negative Vote 13. The House of Lords if regularly assembled had consisted for the most part of Protestants and might have been a Check to the King's Intentions of taking away our Laws in a legal Method there being if we reckon the Bishops about Ninety Protestant Lords to Forty five Papists taking in the new Creations and attainted Lords But first to remove this Obstacle care had been taken to reverse the Outlawries of the Popish Lords in order to capacitate them to sit in the House 2. New Creations were made Sir Alexander Fitton the Chancellor was made Baron of Gosworth Thomas Nugent the Chief Justice Baron of Riverston Justin M'Carty Viscount Mountcashell Sir Valentine Brown Viscount Kenmare A List was made of more to be call'd into the House if there were occasion 3. They had several Popish Titular Bishops in the Kingdom and it was not doubted but if necessity required those would be call'd by Writs into the House 4. It was easie to call the eldest Sons of Noble-men into the Parliament by Writ which would not augment the Nobility and yet fill the House But there were already sufficient to over-vote the Protestants for there remain'd of about Sixty nine Protestant Temporal Lords only four or five in Ireland to sit in the House and of Twenty two Spiritual Lords only seven left in the Kingdom of which Dr. Michael Boyle Arch-bishop of Ardmah Dr. Hugh Gore Bishop of Waterford Dr. Roan Bishop of Killal●o were excused on the account of Age and Sickness The other four were Dr. Anthony Dopping Bishop of Meath Dr. Thomas Otway Bishop of Ossory Dr. Simon Digby Bishop of Lymerick and Dr. Edward Wettenhall Bishop of Cork and Ross these were oblig'd to appear upon their Writs directed to them and King James was forced sometimes to make use of them to moderate by way of Counterpoise the Madness of his own Party when their Votes displeas'd him But in the general they protested against most of the Acts and entered their Dissent It is observable that all these Acts of this pretended Parliament are said to be by the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal whereas not one Spiritual Lord consented to many of them but on the contrary unanimously protested against them and at passing the Act of Attainder of which more hereafter they were not so much as present They complain'd of this but were refus'd redress and the express mention of their consent continued Of Thirty seven Papist Lords there appear'd besides the new created Lords Twenty four at times of which Fifteen were under Attainders by Indictments and Outlawries two or three were under Age and there remain'd only Six or Seven capable of Sitting and Acting Chancellor Fitton now Baron of Gosworth was Speaker of the House of Lords King James was present constantly in the House and directed them not only in their Debates but likewise in their Forms and Ceremonies hardly one in either House having ever sate in a Parliament before 14. The House of Commons makes the Third Estate in Parliament and 't is by them that the People have a more immediate Interest in the Legislative Power the Members of this House being such as are return'd by the Peoples Free Election which is look'd on as the Fundamental Security of the Lives Liberties and Properties of the Subject These Members of the House of Commons are elected either by the Free-holders of Counties or the Free-men of Corporations And I have already shew'd how King James wrested these out of the Hands of Protestants and put them into Popish Hands in the new Constitution of Corporations by which the Free-men and Free-holders of Cities or Boroughs to whom the Election of Burgesses originally belongs are excluded and the Election put into the Hands of a small number of Men named by the King and removable at his pleasure The Protestant Free-holders if they had been in the Kingdom were much more than the Papist Free-holders but now being gone tho many Counties could not make a Jury as appear'd at the intended Tryal of Mr. Price and other Protestants at Wicklow who could not be tried for want of Free-holders yet notwithstanding the Paucity of these they made a shift to return Knights of the Shire The common way of Election was thus The Earl of Tyrconnel together with the Writ for Election commonly sent a Letter recommending the Persons he design'd should be chosen the Sheriff or Mayor being his Creature on receipt of this call'd so many of the Free-holders of a County or Burgesses of a Corporation together as he thought fit and without any noise made the return It was easie to do this in Boroughs because by their new Charters the Electors were not above Twelve or Thirteen and in the greatest Cities but 24 and commonly not half of these on the place The Method of the Sheriffs proceeding was the same the number of Popish Freeholders being very small sometimes not a Dozen in a County it was easie to give notice to them to appear so that the Protestants either did not know of the Election or durst not appear at it By these means the pretended Parliament consisted of the most Bigotted Papists and of such as were most deeply Interested to destroy the Protestant Religion and Protestants of Ireland One Gerrard Dillon Serjeant at Law a most furious Papist was Recorder of Dublin and he stood to be chosen one of the Burgesses for the City but could not prevail because he had purchased a considerable Estate under the Act of Settlement and they fear'd lest this might engage him to defend it Several Corporations had no Representatives either because they were in the Enemies hands or else because the Persons named by the Charter for Electors were so far remote that they could not come in such Numbers as to secure the Elections for Papists against the few Protestants that were left still in the Charters and who lived generally on the place I have mark'd the Boroughs and Counties that had no Representatives in number about Twenty nine few Protestants could be prevail'd with to stand tho they might have been chosen because they foresaw no possibility of doing good and thought it unsafe to sit in a Parliament which they judged in their Conscience Illegal and purposely design'd for Mischief to them and their Religion however it was thought convenient that some should be in it to observe how things went and with much perswasion and Intreaty Sir John Mead and Mr. Joseph Coghlan Counsellors at Law were prevail'd on to stand for the University of Dublin the University must chuse and it could not stand with their Honor to chuse Papists and therefore they pitch'd on these two Gentlemen who were hardly brought to accept of it as thinking it Scandalous to be in so ill Company and they could not prevail with themselves to sit out the whole Session but withdrew before the Act of Attainder
the assistance of so wise a Council will disperse I must needs say both from my own Observation and the Information I have had from my Lords the Judges who often visit the whole Kingdom that there is a great readiness and willingness in all People to serve and obey the King I must here a little enlarge to your Excellency because I reckon my self bound to give the King an account of his Subjects and I would not willingly say any thing when I am at such a distance which I have not mentioned here The English in this Country have been aspersed with the Character of being generally Fanaticks which is a great Injury to them I must do them the justice to say that they are of the Church of England as appears by their Actions as well as Professions The Churches here are as much frequented and the Discipline of the Church as well observed as in England it self which is to be attributed to the Piety and Labour of my Lords the Bishops We of the Church of England can brag that when Rebellion overspread the three Kingdoms not one Orthodox Member of our Church was engaged against the Crown And in our late Disorders we can boast we were Opposers of the Bills of Exclusion and the Sense his Majesty has been graciously pleas'd to express of our Loyalty will never be forgotten by us I had the happiness to be born a Member of the Church of England and I hope God will give me the Grace to die one One thing the English of this Country have to glory in That of all his Majesty's Subjects they made the earliest Advances towards his Majesty's Restoration when the three Kingdoms were governed by Usurpers And after all the Endeavours of his Loyal Subjects in England seemed to be disappointed and there appeared no Hopes by the total defeating of Sir G. Booth the English then in this Kingdom offered to submit to his Majesty's Authority I do not say this my Lord to detract from his Majesty's R. C. Loyal Subjects many of whom I my self knew serv'd and suffered with him abroad but I speak it in justice to the others who did their Duty There is but one thing more I shall trouble your Excellency with I am sorry that I cannot say that I leave a full Treasure but I can say that I leave no Debts The Revenue is in good Order which must be owned to be due to the unwearied Industry and Diligence of the Commissioners The Army is intirely paid to Christmass day last and I have advanced a Month's Subsistence-money for January The Civil and Pensionary Lists are likewise cleared to Christmass I doubt not but your Excellency's Care will carry all things on in the same Method God Almighty bless the King and grant him long Life and I beseech God to prosper this excellent Country I received this Sword in Peace and I thank God by the King's Command I deliver it in Peace to your Excellency and I heartily wish you Joy of the Honour the King has done you A General Abstract of the Gross Produce of his Majesty's Revenue in Ireland in the three first Years of the Management beginning at Christmass 1682. ending Christmass 1685.   1683 1684 1685. Customs Inwards Impt. Excise 85844 17 2⅜ 91424 8 8● ● 91117 13 65 ● Customs Outwards 32092 11 4½ 33425 15 2 29428 8 11½ Seizures and Fines 965 2 3½ 615 1 5● ● 460 11 5¼ Prizage 1452 1693 1882 Inland Excise 68344 1 3⅜ 77580 3 7¼ 79169 4 4¾ Ale Licenses 8283 14 11● 4 9538 4 46 8 99●5 14 11● ● Wine c. Licenses 2736 12 3114 10 2● 2 3467 11 3¾ Quit Crown and Custodiam Rents 68699 9 7⅜ 68385 8 0¼ 68922 4 5● 2 Hearth-Money 31041 31646 32953 12 00 Casual Revenue 820 3 3 1745 16 2 1564 16 11¼ Totals l. 300297 11 11● 4 319168 7 9 318961 18 0● 8 Arrears of each of the above-Years remaining uncollected at Christmass 1685. 7659 1 6⅜ 9799 9 8½ 34971 9 3⅞ Net Cash paid into the Treasury in the three Years above-mention'd over and besides the Charges of Management and Sallaries to the Officers of the Revenue in the said time 712972 17 2⅜ Cash remaining in the Collectors Hands at Christmass 1685 ready to be paid in 55655 10 3½ The Solvent Part of the above-mention'd Arrears which was actually levied and paid into the Treasury before Christmass 1688. 30000 00 00 Total Cash l. 798628 07 5⅞ Which at a Medium for three Years amounts for each Year to the Sum of 266209 00 00 Sheriffs for the Year 1687. Febr. 16. 1686. Counties Sheriffs Ardmagh Marcus Clarke Antrim Cormuck O. Neil Cavan Lucas Reily Clare John Mac. Nemara of Cratelag● Corke Nicholas Brown of Bantrey Catherlogh Sir Lawrence Esmond Dublin Thomas Warren Downe Valentine Russell Donnegall Charles Hamilton Fermanagh Cohonnagh Mac-Gwire Galway John Ke●● Esq Kildare John Wogan King's County Hewar Oxburgh Kilkenny John Grace Esq Kerry Donogh Mac-Gellicuddy Leitrim Alexander Mac-Donnel Lowth Patrick Bellew Limerick Edward Rice of Ballynitty Longford James Nugent Esq Meath Walter Nangle Esq Monoghan Sir John Flemming Mayo Dominick Browne Queen's County Edmond Morris Esq Roscomon John Dillon Esq Sligoe Henry Crafton of Longford Tyrone Terence Donelly Wexford Patrick Colclough Westmeath Thomas Nugent Wicklow Francis Meara Waterford John Nugent Londonderry Elected by the Charter Cipperary Appointed by the Duke of Ormond John Plunkett Lessee of Christ. Lord Baron of Dunsany Plantiff Philip Tuite and John Rawlins Defendants Sir Edward Tyrrell's Affidavit about packing of Juries WHereas there issued two several Venire Faciases at the Plantiff's Suit returnable to his Majesty's Court of Exchequer directed to Edward Tyrrell Esq then High Sheriff of the County of Meath the first Year of his now Majesty's Reign Now Sir Edward Tyrrell Baronet came this day before me and made Oath That one Mr. Plunket Brother to the said Lord of Dunsany came to Longwood to this Deponent's House and desired this Deponent to stand the Lord Dunsany's Friend and to give him a Jury that would do him Right and withal said this Deponent should have after the said Lord of Dunsany should be restored to the Possession of his Estate the sum of three or four hundred Pounds To which this Deponent answered He would do him Justice The said Mr. Plunket desired this Deponent to meet him at Mr. Nugent his Counsel's House where he would further discourse the Matter This Deponent did accordingly meet the said Thomas Plunket where several Proposals and Overtures were made all to no purpose This Deponent further deposeth That in some short time after the said Lord of Dunsany came to this Deponent's said House and after some Discourse he the said Dunsany desired this Deponent to befriend him against those that wronged him and kept him out of his Estate Whereupon this Deponent told the said Lord of Dunsany what offer his Brother made him The said Lord of Dunsany replying said His Brothers
beating and injuring Protestants ibid. 12. In disarming them p. 67 13. The Dispensing Power of more mischief still than ill Administration First Only to be allowed in Cases of Necessity ibid. 14. Secondly In such Cases the People have as much right to it as the King Instance in the Sheriff of Warwickshire from Dr. Sanderson p. 68 15. Thirdly The wickedness either in King or People in pretending Necessity where there is none p. 69 16. King James's employing Popish Officers was such a Dispensation ibid. 17. And no Necessity for it unless such as was Criminal p. 70 18. King James dispensed with all when it was against Protestants p. 71 Sect. 4. Thirdly King James's dealing with Civil Offices and the Privy Council p. 72 1. Several outed notwithstanding Patents ibid. 2. Act of Parliament for voyding Patents Irish hereby made Keep●rs of Records which before they had corrupted when they could get to them p. 73 3. Revenue Officers changed for Roman Catholicks though to the Prejudice of the Revenue p. 74 4. Sheriffs and Justices of Peace from the Scum of the People ibid. 5. Privy-Councellors all in effect Papists p. 76 Sect. 5. Fourthly King James's dealing with Corporations p. 77 1. The Peoples security in these Kingdoms is the choice of Representatives in Parliament To preserve this Papists excluded from Corporations in Ireland Protestants had made great Concessions to the King by their New Rules for Corporations The King not satisfied with this but would have all p. 77 78 2. Rice and Nagle's managing of Quo Warranto's a horrid Abuse of the Kings Prerogative and the Law p. 78 79 3. Other methods of destroying Charters p. 80 4. Particular Corporations in Dublin how ordered ibid. 5. Voyding Charters led to voyding Parents for Estates ibid. 6. Corporations by the New Charters made absolute Slaves to the Kings Will. First by Consequence no free Parliament could be Returned Secondly Protestants could not serve in the Corporations p. 80 81 7. Protestants hereby driven from the Kingdom ibid. Sect. 6. Fifthly King James's Destruction of the Trade p. 82 1. Trade to be destroyed that the King might have his Will of his Subjects Poor People willing to serve for little in an Army as in France ibid. 2. In order to ruin the Protestants who were the chief Traders Driven hereby out of the Kingdom p. 83 3. This ruined a great many that depended on them ibid. 4. The Irish in employ who had the ready Mony gave it only to Papist Tradesmen p. 84 5. Exactions of the Revenue-Officers great discouragement to Merchants and Traders p. 85 6. Protestant Shoopkeepers quitted for fear of being forced to Trust ibid. 7. Transportation of Wooll connived at by Lord Tirconnell to ruin our woollen Trade p. 86 8. Roman Catholick principal Traders ruined also by King James by the Act of Repeal p. 87 Sect. 7. Sixthly King James's Destruction of our Liberty p. 88 1. No general Pardon at King James's Accession to the Crown Protestants hereby questioned for things in the Popish Plot on false Evidences ibid. 2. Protestants sworn into Plots and seditious Words Instance 1. In County Meath 2. In County Tipperary p. 88 89 3. New Magistrates in Corporations plagued Protestants p. 90 4. New Levies and Rapparee's imprisoned those that resisted their Robberies Instance in Mr. Brice of Wicklow Maxwel and Levis Queens County Sir Laurence Parsons p. 91 5. General imprisonment of Protestants from Midsummer 1689. to Christmas No Habeas Corpus's allowed Protestants of Drogheda barbarously used at the Siege and of the County of Cork by imprisonments p. 92 93 6. Hard Usage of Protestants in Prisons Powder placed to blow them up Leak's Evidence against the Prisoners in Dublin defeated by an Accident p. 93 7. K. James aware of all the ill Treatment of Protestants informed at large by the Bishop of Limrick All Protestants confined by his Proclamation to their Parishes p. 94 8. Arts to conceal this in England Intollerable staying in Ireland Necessary to close in with King William p. 95 Sect. 8. Seventhly King James's destruction of our Estates 1. By disarming the Protestants by Lord Tirconnell p. 97 1. Government dissolved that does not preserve Property ibid. 2. The Irish very low at the Prince of Oranges's Invasion Would easily have been brought to submit Protestants able to have mastered them Lord Mountjoy opposed seizing Tirconnell p. 97 98 3. Protestants resolved not to be the Aggressors were inclined to submit to King James till they found his destructive designs Monsieur d' Avaux complained of the Measures put on King James by Tirconnell p. 98 99 4. Tirconnell's Arts and Lyes to gain time pretending to be ready to submit to King William till he form'd his new Levies Lord Chief Justice Keatings Letters and Observations on it p. 99 5. New Levies necessary to be subsisted on Plunder This gave credit to the Letter to Lord Mount Alexander Decemb. 6. 1688. p. 101 6. And made Derry shut its Gates against the Earl of Antrims Regiment p. 102 7. Obliged to do thus by their Foundation p. 103 8. Provoked to it by the unjust taking away their Charter p. 104 9. This made also the Enniskiliners refuse two Companies sent by Lord Tirconnell and the Northern Gentlemen to enter into an Association for their own defence ibid. 10. Lord Tirconnell hastened to run them into blood before King James's coming p. 106 11. Justification of their declaring for their present Majesties ibid. 12. Their defence of themselves of great benefit to the Protestant Cause and almost miraculous p. 107 13. Lord Tirconnell's Lyes and Wheedles to Lord Mountjoy to send him to France p. 109 14. Lord Mountjoy's Reasons to accept it Articles granted to him by Tirconnell for the Protestants not kept p. 110 15. Lord Tirconnell proceeds to disarm the Protestants Manner of doing it and taking away their Horses A perfect Dragooning p. 111 16. Proclamation issued after it had been done by verbal Orders p. 113 17. The Arms for the most part embezled by the Soldiers who took them This had like to have occasioned a worse Dragooning prevented by the Bishop of Meath p. 113 114 18. The manner of taking up and embezling Horses p. 114 19. Miserable condition of the Protestants being disarmed amongst their Irish Enemies Protestants had the highest Legal Property in their Arms. The Government by taking them away must design their ruin p. 115 20. No Reason for disarming us but to make us a Prey p. 116 21. It was necessary in King James's Circumstances but the Necessity occasioned by his own fault ibid. Sect. 9. Secondly Lord Tirconnell's Attempts on the Protestants Personal Fortunes p. 117 1. Which he destroyed by encouraging Popish Tenants against their Protestant Landlords and swearing them into Plots Gentlemen forced to live for some time before the Turn on their Stocks p. 117 118 2. Forced into England with little ready Mony Many burnt out of their Houses in the Country Many robbed and some murthered
Thirdly From Orders about Garrisoning Mansion-Houses Sending the Protestant Owners to the Goal who must never have expected either their Houses or Lives if King James had prevailed ibid. Estates of Absentees disposed of and promised to Papists p. 162 20. Objection That King James did not know the Consequence of Repealing the Acts of Settlement ibid. Answer First King James understood them better than any and held ten thousand pounds a year by them when Duke of York ibid. Secondly King James would not hear the Protestants plead at the Bar against the Repeal p. 163 Thirdly Bishop of Meath in a Speech in the House set forth the ill Consequences at large ibid. Fourthly The Protestants opposed it from Point to Point ibid. Fifthly Protestants were resolved to use their utmost that the ill intents of their Adversaries might appear the more p. 164 Sixthly Lord chief Justice Keating's Paper given to King James in behalf of Purchasers rejected ibid. 21. Protestants lost more in Ireland than all that favour King James's Cause in England are worth p. 165 Sect. 13. Eighthly The danger into which King James brought the lives of his Protestant Subjects in Ireland ibid. 1. At King James's Coming no General Pardon though it had been his Interest in respect of England ibid. 2. Is not chargeable with particular Murders further than by arming such Men as would be guilty of them p. 166 3. The Governments Design upon our Lives ibid. First by feigned Plots and Protecting the Perjured Witnesses Instance in Spikes Case The Dumb Friar p. 167 Secondly By wresting Facts to Treason Nugent declar'd Protestants having Arms to be so p. 168 Thirdly By violating Articles Mr. Brown of Cork Town of Bandon Earl of Inchiquin Captain Boyle Sir Thomas Southwell and his Party Lord Mountjoy's Soldiers Fort of Culmore King James's approach to Derry Captain Dixy Kenaght Castle p. 169 170 Fourthly By violating Protections p. 171 Protestants of Down p. 171 Protestants brought before Derry by General Rosen Bishop of Meath applyed to King James about it King James excused Rosen p. 173 174 Captain Barton of Carrick Mac Cross p. 175 Fifthly By private Orders and Proclamations with the penalty of Death Several Instances p. 178 Sixthly By the Act of Attainder Abstract of it Archbishops 2 Duke 1 Temporal Lords 63 Ladies 22 Bishops 7 Knights 85 Clergymen 83 Esquires and Gentlemen 2182 2445 p. 179 180 Not equalled by the Proscription at Rome Great part Attainted on Common Fame p. 182 Observations on the Act ibid. 1. Leaves no room for the King to Pardon ibid. 2. The Act concealed Out of the Power of an English Parliament to Repeal it by the Act for cutting off Ireland from England p. 183 3. The hast in drawing it up ibid. 4. Many left out particularly the Collegians and how ibid. 5. Applications in behalf of Protestants made their Case worse p. 184 6. Allowing of time to prove Innocency a meer Collusion ibid. 1. None knew what time was given ibid. 2. None knew what they would call Innocency Instance Desmineer and Ginnery ibid. 3. The Embargo on this side would not let them know on the other side 4. The Embargo on the other side would not let them come hither 5. To have come would have been an unwise Venture p. 177 4. Objection That few Protestants lost their Lives p. 178 Answer 1. When it is known how many have perished they will not appear few ibid. 2. The Irish Papists would not venture at much Murthering till they were past an after Reckoning they feared such Cruelty would be revenged on Roman Catholicks in England ibid. 3. Protestants were cautious not to provoke them and were true to one another p. 179 4. We dont know what would have been done with Attainted Persons ibid. 5. Protestants if Obnoxious absconded or escaped ibid. 6. The Support of King James's Army depended on the Protestants p. 179 Scotch Officers that came here wondered to find how Protestants were used having heard so much the contrary at home p. 180 The same given out in England Pity but those who believed and forwarded it had been sent hither ibid. The Irish doing what they did in their Circumstances what would they have done if left to their swing ibid. Sect. 14. Ninthly The method King James took to destroy our Religion p. 181 1. The Attempts against our Lives and Fortunes no sudden thing but the result of a long Design for which Tirconnel had 20000 l. per annum ibid. 2. King James pretended Liberty of Conscience but not to be expected from a Roman Catholick ibid. 3. The Laws and Coronation Oath secured our Religion The Clergy had merited from King James by opposing the Exclusion and disobliged their People p. 182 4. At his coming to the Crown the Roman Catholicks declared that his Promises to the Church were not intended for Ireland p. 183 Sect. 15. First By taking away our Schools and Universities p. 184 1. Lord Tirconnell put the Schools contrary to Law into the hands of Papists ibid. 2. And would have put in Popish Fellows into the College ibid. 3. Stopt the College Pension of 388 l. per annum from Easter 1688. turned out the Fellows and Students seized on the Library and Furniture p 193 4. Forbid three of them on pain of Death not to meet together p. 194 5. King James did not fill up vacant Bishopricks and Livings in his Gift ibid. 6. And allowed nothing for supplying the Cures p. 195 7. All the Bishops and Livings in the Kingdom would soon have come into the Kings hands p. 196 8. This not the effect of our Constitution the same in Popish Countries Thirty five Bishopricks void in France in 1688. King James's Ungratefulness to the Protestant Clergy ibid. Sect. 16. Secondly By taking away the Maintenance of the Clergy p. 197 1. Book-Mony denyed by the Papists from King James's coming to the Crown ibid. 2. Priests put in for Tythes Hardly recovered by Protestants p. 198 3. An Act of their Parliament applied Papists Tythes to the Priests ibid. 4. And Protestants Tythes too when the Priests had the Benefices ibid. 5. The Priests forc'd into Possession of Glebes where there were any p. 199 6. Protestant Clergy little better for the Tythes left to them Protestants had little Tythings left Priests by Dragoons seized what there was never wanted Pretences ibid. 7. House-Mony in Corporations taken away by their Parliament Pleaded against before the House of Lords but in vain p. 200 8. The same took away Ulster Table of Tythes p. 201 9. Duties payable to the King out of Livings were exacted wholly from the Protestant Incumbents though they had nothing left to them of their Livings their Persons seized and sent to Goal ibid. Collonel Moore Clerk of the First Fruits imprisoned because he would not be severe against them p. 202 Sect. 17. Thirdly By taking away the Jurisdiction of the Protestant Church ibid. 1. The Churches Right by Prescription to Jurisdiction ibid. 2. Act
really believed that in few years he would by some contrivance or other have given away most of the Protestants Estates in Ireland without troubling a Parliament to Attaint them which was a more compendious but not a more certain way to destroy them than the Methods he took It was he that without Hearing after he had Dissolved the Corporations by giving Sentence against their Charters declared void all the Leases of Lands or of Perquisites made by them though long before their Dissolution and on very good considerations and thereupon outed several Protestants of their Leases but it were endless to mention all the Oppressions and unjust proceedings of this Court it were in effect to transcribe the Records of it Let me only observe that the Chief Baron was assisted by Sir Henry Lynch as Second Baron who came indeed short of him in Parts but yielded nothing to him in Malice to the Protestant Religion and Interest 7. The Court of Common Pleas had little to do the business so far as concerned the Protestants and Papists was intirely carried out of it to the Kings Bench or Exchequer and therefore they permitted the Lord Chief Justice Keating still to sit in it but Pinioned with two of their own sort that if any thing should chance to come before him he might be out-voted by them The truth is they were jealous of this Court not only because a Protestant was Chief Justice in it but likewise because Judg Dally sat as puny Judg who though a Roman Catholick yet understood the Common-Law so well and behaved himself so impartially that they did not care to bring their Causes before him so much did they dread the prospect of Justice though before Judges that were of their own Party and Persuasion 8. The Circuits are an extention of the Courts whereby Justice is carried into the Country these were managed much at the same rate with the Courts and where the Sheriff and Judg were both Papists it is not difficult to guess what Justice Protestants must expect what packing of Juries there was amongst them and how deeply the Judges themselves were concerned in such Practices is evident to all that had any Concerns in the Country at that time 9. It will be requisite to say something of the Attourney General which King James made instead of Sir William Domvile whom he turned out after near thirty years supplying the place but he was a Protestant and would not consent to reverse the Popish Outlawries nor to the other Methods they took to destroy the Settlement of Ireland and therefore he was laid aside In his place King James substituted Mr. Richard Nagle whom he afterwards Knighted and made Secretary of State he was at first designed for a Clergy-Man and educated amongst the Jesuits but afterwards betook himself to the Study of the Law in which he arrived to a good Perfection and was employed by many Protestants so that he knew the weak part of most of their Titles Every Body knows how great a part the Attorney General has in the Administration of Justice it being his Office to prosecute and in his power to stop any Suit wherein the King is concerned How he used this Power will appear in one instance tho many may be given One Fitz Gerald of Tycrohan the Heir of a forfeiting Papist had a Suit for a great Estate against Sir William Petty it was tryed in the Exchequer before Chief Baron Rice and Fitz Gerald carried the Cause by the Perjury of two Friars and a Woman who swore a person to be dead in Spain and themselves to be present at his Burial upon whose Life Sir William's Title depended This person soon after appeared to be alive and is so still for ought we know and his being alive was so notorious and manifest that the Attorney General could not deny it Sir William's Counsel and Lawyers designed to indict the Friars and Woman for their Perjury but the Grand Jury refused to find the Bill and I was credibly informed that the Attorney General said that if they did not desist he would enter a Noli prosequi It is certain he refused to prosecute it and it was imputed to his Contrivance that they escaped By such means the Course of Justice was stopped to Protestants and the like Tenderness the Courts generally shewed to Perjurers when the Perjury served their Interest And sure the Protestants were in an ill case whose Lives and Fortunes lay at the Mercy of such Judges and Juries and they must conclude that nothing less than Destruction was designed for them by a King who put them under such Administrators of Justice The same Sir Richard Nagle was the Speaker of the House of Commons in their pretended Parliament and had the chief Hand in drawing up their Acts King James confided chiefly in him and the Acts of Repeal and Attainder were looked on as his Work in which his Malice and Jesuitical Principles prevailed so far that he was not content to out two Thirds of the Protestant Gentlemen of their Estates by the Act of Repeal by which all Estates acquired since 1641 were taken away and to attaint most of those that had old Estates by the Bill of Attainder But to make sure Work he put it out of the King's Power to pardon them therein betraying the King's Prerogative as the King himself told him when he discovered it to him Of which and of him we shall have occasion to give a further account hereafter 10. Into such Hands as we have been speaking of the Administration of Justice and of the Laws was put which were so far from preventing our Ruin that they were made the Means and Instruments thereof and it had been much better for us to have had no Laws at all and been left to our natural Defence than to be cheated into a necessity of Submission by Laws that were executed only to punish and not to defend us 11. It was common for some of those that served King James to come upon the Exchange and without any reason or provocation to fall upon Protestant Gentlemen if they looked a little more fashionable than other people and beat them One was thus beaten with a Cane severely before the Gentleman was aware he was advised for an Experiment to indict the Ruffian that used him thus to see what protection the Law would give us after they had taken away our Swords but the Grand Jury did not think it worth while to trouble the Courts with redressing the Grievances of Protestants and so would not find the Bill A Merchant in Thomas street Dublin found a Fellow that had broken into his Ware house and was conveying his Goods out at the Window to his Fellow Soldiers that stood in the Street to receive them he seised him and brought an Indictment against him for Felony but the Jury acquitted him and then he brought his Action against the Merchant for false Imprisonment and Slander and it cost a good Sum
of Money to compound the Matter This Trick was very common and at last no Protestant tho he had ever so good Evidence against a Papist durst prosecute him for he was sure to be acquitted and then the Prosecutor was liable to the Revenge of an Action of the Case and the Damages that a Popish Jury pleased to give against him 12. There is an Act of Parliament 10 Henrici 7. cap. 12. That forbids keeping Guns or Ordnance without License from the Lord Lieutenant or Deputy The Design of it was to prevent the Irish from fortifying themselves in their little Castles whereby at that time they created the Government great Trouble and raised daily Rebellions But the Lord Chief Justice Nugent interpreted this to the disarming of all Protestants and because there chanced to be a Sword and Case of Pistols found September 6 1689 in some outward by place in Christs Church Dublin one Wolf the Subverger was committed to Newgate indicted and found guilty and had good luck to escape with his Life the Chief Justice declaring it was Treason tho Wolf was only indicted for a Misdemeanour 13. But had the Laws been in never so good Hands it could not have secured us from Destruction when the King who designed that Destruction against us pretended to be above all Laws and made no Scruple to dispense with them every Law in these Kingdoms is really a Compact between the King and People wherein by mutual consent they agree on a Rule by which he is to govern and according to which they oblige themselves to pay him Obedience But there is no general Rule but in some Cases it may prove inconvenient it is therefore agreed by all that in Cases of sudden and unforeseen Necessity there is no Law but may be dispensed with but then first it is observable that this Necessity must be so visible and apparent that all reasonable Men may see and be satisfied that it is not pretended and where the Necessity has been thus real no Man can shew that either the People or Parliament ever quarrelled with a King for using a dispensing Power 14. Secondly It must be observed that this Power of Dispensing in Cases of Necessity is mutual and belongs to the People as well as the King it being as lawful for a Subject in Cases of Necessity to dispense with his Obedience to a Law nay with his Allegiance to his King as for a King to dispense with the Execution of a Law or the exacting Obedience and this mutual power of dispensing with the Laws which are publick Compacts in Cases of Necessity is tacitly understood in them as well as in all other Covenants Doctor Sanderson proves this Power of Dispensing to belong to the People as well as to the Prince in his tenth Praelection N. 21. and he gives an Example in N. 22. The Case is thus The Conspirators after the Gunpowder Treason was discovered fled into Warwickshire and made an Insurrection the Sheriff raises the Posse Comitatus against them they fled from thence into Worcestershire where by the Law the Sheriffs of Warwick could not follow them but the Sheriff dispensed with the Law Judging saith he as he ought to have done That if he would perform right the Office of a good Subject the Observation of the Law in that Case of Necessity was very unseasonable and he ought to obey the Supreme Law which is the Safety of his Country The Sheriff did accordingly and was highly commended by King James the First for it There might be many Examples of this kind given in which the People are allowed to dispense even with their Allegiance in case of Necessity It is against the Allegiance of a Subject to own the Power of an Usurper to bear Arms to judge of Life and Death or administer Justice between Man and Man by his Commission and yet Dr. Sanderson determines it to be the Duty of a good Man to do all these if required by an Usurper Praelect 5. N. 19. and accordingly we find Judge Hales acted under the worst of Usurpers Oliver Cromwell and executed the Office of a Judge as may be seen in his Life 15. Thirdly 'T is the most wicked as well as hazardous thing that a King or People can do to pretend a necessity for dispensing with those publick Compacts when the pretence is not real for the publick Faith is hereby violated the party unconsulted is abused a just reason of Distrust raised between the King and People and they of the two that assume to themselves this power of dispensing upon a pretended not real necessity in Cases of great Moment to the Kingdom are in a fair way to lay a real necessity on the other party to dispense with their part of the Compact that is to say if the King will pretend a Necessity where there is none for his not governing by Laws in Cases that concern the common safety of the Kingdom he gives a shrewd Temptation and a justifiable Colour to his People to dispense with their Submission and Allegiance to him And it is full as good a Reason for a Peoples taking Arms to defend themselves against illegal Violence to alledge that they were necessitated to do so to prevent the Ruin and Destruction of them and their Posterity as it is for a King to alledge that he uses illegal Officers and Force to preserve himself and his Kingdoms And if the Allegation be real I do not see why it should not justifie the one as well as the other tho the one be against the Oath of Allegiance and the other against the Coronation Oath Cases of extreme Necessity being tacitly excepted in both Kings therefore that take on themselves to dispense with Laws without the consent either tacit or express of their People give an ill Precedent against themselves and must blame themselves if their People taught by them return it upon them 16. 'T is plain the Officers employed by King James in Ireland both Civil and Military were unqualified and uncapable by Law of those Employments If Lord Tirconnell for instance claimed Subjection of us by the Laws I do not see why he should expect the People to be better Observers of the Laws than he was Suppose that it was against the Law for them to resist him it was likewise against the Laws that he should command them if he dispensed in one Case they only dispensed in the other and in this Case it was as lawful for the one to dispense as the other I suppose the only Reason in a settled Government why one Man can claim our Submission and not another is because the known Laws give the one and not another the power of commanding but the Laws as well as the Interest of this Kingdom said positively that the Earl of Tirconnell and Men of his Character and Religion should not have any Office Civil or Military and therefore those Protestants that stood on their Defence against him
Robbers and Tories immediately they were Besieged and though they Surrendred themselves as soon as Summoned having no design to resist Authority and put themselves into the Hands of King James's Officers upon promise of Freedom nay on Articles yet afterward they were imprisoned and prosecuted as Mr. Price of Wicklow Some of them Condemned and Executed which happened to Mr. Maxwel and one Lewis in the Queens County They thought it not safe to Execute some till the War was over and therefore only kept them in Prison So Sir Laurence Parsons and many others were served 5. At last it came to a general Seizure and almost all the Protestant Gentlemen without Reason or pretence of Reason without so much as a Warrant or Form of Law were put in Goals under the custody of mean and barbarous Guards Whose very Captains had had no better Education than that of Footmen or Cowherds who exercised what understanding they had to invent new methods of vexing their Prisoners This general Confinement continued with most from the middle of Summer 1689 till Winter and with some till his Majesties Victory at the Boyne set them all at Liberty during all which time no Reason or Ground of their Committal was given nor were Habeas Corpus's allowed them though earnestly sollicited One indeed was allowed to Mr. Thomas King a Minister which being the only one that took place it may be proper to give the Reader an account of the Case The Reason of his Committal was really a Quarrel picked designedly with him by an Officer of the Guards because he refused to admit one Ambrose the Popish Quarter-Master of the City for a Godfather to a Protestant Child whom he Christened in Revenge whereof the Officer intruded into his Company whilst at Meat as was common with them and would needs oblige him to drink Confussion and Damnation to the Prince of Orange which he modestly declining and alledging that it was unfit for a Christian much more for a Clergy-man to drink Damnation to any the Officer hurried him away to Newgate by his own Authority and after lying there till the Term his Habeas Corpus was allowed him Upon the Return made by the Goalour the Court was so vexed at it that they fined the Goalour for making such a Return but in earnest because he made any for that was the contrivance they had to keep People in Goal and after all he was still kept a Prisoner notwithstanding his Habeas Corpus till most were bailed and then upon Bail of five thousand pound he was permitted to go out under which Bail he continued as all the rest did under the like sums till the general Deliverance After his no more Habeas Corpus's were allowed Most of the Prisoners towards the depth of Winter were indeed bailed and continued so from Term to Term till the news of his present Majesties arrival and then all were confined anew notwithstanding their Bail with some that had not been confined before At the hour when the last of King James's Forces were leaving Dublin they were ordered to carry away four hundred Prisoners along with them but the Officers were too much afraid of a Pursuit and too busie in carrying off their own Baggage to embarrass themselves with Prisoners and therefore for a little Gold dismissed them How the Protestants of Drogheda who were all made Prisoners were used whilst the Town was surrounded is not to be forgotten They carried them to the Mount where they expected the Canon would play tyed them together and set them to receive the Shot if the Town had been Attacked but their Hearts failed them who were to Defend it and so it pleased God to preserve the poor Protestants they being delivered together with the Town to his Majesty upon Summons and Articles The Protestants of Cork and other Towns were yet worse used they were carried from their own Homes to some remote Castles and there kept without Conveniencies till many of them perished There were some very barbarous Circumstances in their Sufferings which I must leave to the Persons themselves to relate having not yet had full Information 6. During their Confinement the Prisoners were kept very strictly their Servants Children and Wives were often debarred from seeing them or when admitted not suffered to speak to them but in presence of the Soldiers In Dublin when they had filled the Goals the Hospitals the College and other places of Confinement they at last imprisoned the Citizens in Churches They were crowded into stinking nasty unhealthy Rooms sometimes twenty sometimes forty in a Room At the College and at a House called White Friars where there were many Prisoners they put Barrels of Powder under them threatning to blow them up if they should be prest and not able to keep the Places Collonel Luttrell Governor of Dublin denyed indeed that this was done by his Order but yet when he was informed of it by Sir John Davis then a Prisoner and Witness of it he commended the Discretion of the Officer that did it This Confinement did not only fall on Gentlemen but also on the Clergy nay on the meanest Citizens Whoever pleased had a power to Commit Protestants and if at any time they asked by what Authority they were committed those that committed them made no other answer than that they committed them let them get out as they could Some few Gentlemen were indeed committed by C. J. Nugents Warrant upon a kind of Affidavit made by one Leak whom most of them had never seen several of these by express Orders of the Lord Chief Justice were sent to Newgate and committed in the Common Goal in the same Room with Thieves and Common Rogues though Gentlemen of the best Quality in the Kingdom and so hasty was his Lordship in it that he did it before he knew some of their names which he was forced afterward to send for and learn from themselves A Bill was prepared against them and offered to the Grand Jury but Leak was unwittingly clapt up by one of themselves for a former Robbery at the time he should have given Evidence and so the Gentlemen escaped being tryed The Confinement was yet more severe and uneasie in the Country the Gentlemen being at such distances from their own Homes that they could hardly be supplyed with Necessaries 7. It may be thought that these things were unknown to King James and therefore are not to be imputed to him but it is certain that if he did not Contrive and and Order them he yet consented to them neither did he seem to have the least resentment or pity for their Sufferings as appeared from his Carriage to the Bishop of Lymerick His Lordship by his Majesties Command on a particular Service waited often on him he took one of those Opportunities that seemed most favourable to lay before his Majesty the manifold hardships which were put on the Clergy and the Protestants in general of his Diocess He represented to him how they
best it was left to the discretion of a Dragoon what he would count a Serviceable Horse and what he would do with them when he had taken them so that of 10000 Horses at least that were taken from the Protestants at that time the King received not 100 nor had he one Troop raised out of them but whoever could get a Horse whether he were Officer or Soldier from a Protestant went away with it and converted it to his private use of which the Lord Deputy complains in a Proclamation dated March the 1st 1688 but this Proclamation though dated the 1st of March was not published till the 12th the reason of the delay was this the Proclamation ordered Horses that were not fit for Service to be restored and if it had come out according to the date thereof many Protestants that knew in whose Hands their Horses were would have claimed them To defeat them therefore some that had interest with the Deputy got the Proclamation delayed till those that took them might have time to convey them far enough from being found And this was their usual Method they first did the mischief they intended to the Protestants and then they published some antedated Proclamation forbidding it to be done and sometimes when a Proclamation came out before they had gone through with what they intended they denyed to be concluded by it alledging it came out surreptitiously as it happened in this very case of Searching for Arms. 19. Now Arms are the Hedges that secure and preserve our Goods and Lives especially in a Conquered Country such as Ireland is and it was but reason that the Law did allow none but Protestants to have them though they never hindred any Man from arming himself so far as was necessary for his own Defence When therefore they saw the keeping of Arms was made penal to them in the highest degree King James's Proclamation having made it Treason and Rebellion as I shewed before and some would needs perswade them it was really so to which opinion the Lord Chief Justice inclined when he gave charge to the Jury concerning one Wolf who was indicted for keeping some Arms and fined for it as a Misdemeanor when I say they saw that which the Law required them to do made so highly criminal for the Law requires every Freeman of Dublin to keep Arms and those Arms put into the Hands of Tories and Ruffians who had already robb'd them of a great part of their Substance had they not reason to believe that they were disarm'd purposely that they might be the more easily Robb'd or Massacred and that it was as easy for a Government that in one day disarmed them through the whole Kingdom against Reason Law and Justice to find a pretence at another time to take away their Lives they could neither doubt their inclinations nor question their ability to do it If one should tye a Mans Hands and turn him naked amongst Wild Beasts all the World would believe he designed they should devour him and sure we had reason to suppose the same of our Governours and they that treated us thus without provocation and against the Laws could not expect that we should be unwilling to change our Masters if a fair opportunity offered By the Law we have as much property in our Arms and Horses that we buy with our Mony and in a conquered Country such as Ireland is where every Forty Years we constantly have had a Rebellion they are as necessary for us as our Cloathes or Estates which indeed can signify nothing without them And the King might as justly pretend that he had occasion for them and take them from us without consideration as our Horses and Arms the oppression to us in our circumstances was really equal 20. It may perhaps be imagined by those who are Strangers to our Affairs that we had abused our Arms to oppress and wrong our Neighbours or to oppose the King and therefore deserv'd to lose them but it is observable that it doth not appear that any one Protestant in Ireland before this Disarming had used his Arms to injure any R. C. nor did they hurt any that was not either actually robbing them of their Goods or assaulting their Persons no not in the North where they refused to give up their Arms they kept even there on the defensive and offended no Man but when first Assaulted So that there was not the least reason or colour to disarm us except that we might be Plundered and Robb'd without being able to make resistance Our crime for which we lost our Arms for which we were exposed naked to our Enemies and for which the best Gentlemen in the Kingdom were obliged to walk without a Sword was because they suspected that we would not otherwise tamely part with our Goods or suffer our selves to be abused and affronted in the Streets by every Ruffian which was the condition of the best amongst us 21. 'T is true King James could not carry on a War for the advancement of Popery without our Goods and he could not be secure of them whilst we had Arms but I hope all the World is convinced that it was not our Counsels nor Actings that brought him to these Straits nor was it to be expected that we should be content to be undone to repair the errors and faults of those Wicked Counsellors who put him on those desperate courses which lost him his Crown All our crime is then that we could not be content to be undone with him and by him and rather chose to desire Protection Liberty and the restitution of our Priviledges and Arms from their present Majesties than to be in the condition of the Vilest of Slaves under King James a crime for which I am confident no Papist condemns us in his Conscience however he may rail at us and call us disloyal SECT IX The attempts made on the Personal Estates of Protestants before the Revolution in England 1. THe Earl of Tyrconnel when made Deputy of Ireland found the Riches of the Kingdom in the Hands of Protestants the Flocks the Herds the rich Houshold-Stuff and Plate Beneficial Leases improved Rents Trade and Mony were almost intirely theirs whereas the Papists by their Idleness Ignorance and numerous Begging Clergy were so low in their Fortunes that they were in no condition to raise or maintain such an Army as was necessary to carry on his Designs in this Kingdom and he was sure the Protestants that had the Riches would not contribute to support them He therefore applied himself with all art and industry to impoverish them He did what he could as I have already shew'd to destroy their Trade he put all the hardships imaginable on Protestant Tenants that they might not be able to pay their Rents and he encouraged the Popish Tenants to oppose their Landlords It was whispered amongst them that they need not pay their Rents for the Land in a little time would be their own
Retinue All the Houses in Town were taken up with such Guests who were often treacherous Spies on their Hosts and reckoned themselves very kind if they did not procure them to be clapt up by a false Information The Story of one Gentleman is remarkable related to a good Family in England of his Name as he pretended which was Brown he lodged at one Mr. Brocks from whom he stole several things of value and sold them Mr. Brock found him out but he thought to have prevented the discovery by Swearing Treason against him which he did before Chief Justice Nugent but the Justice of the Peace who took the Examinations of the Theft having gotten some of the things into his custody traced them so clearly to the Thief that there was no denying it The Gentleman upon this to prevent further Prosecution was forced to certify under his Hand that he was prejured in what he had Sworn before the Lord Chief Justice How heavy these things fell on the Citizens may be conjectured from this the Rents of the City were considerable and many Gentlemens Estates consisted in them But now they thought themselves happy if their Tennants would stay in their Houses and keep them in Repair though they paid no Rents at all In the best inhabited Places of the Town where Houses about Two Years before yielded Sixty Pound apiece they were well contented if they got Ten Pound or the Ground-Rent but it was a chance if they got so much 2. Thus Estates both in City and Country were rendred Fruitless to Protestants but yet whilst the Cattle and the great Manufactories and Staple Commodities of the Kingdom were in their Hands whilst they had the Wool the Hides the Tallow and Butter which bring in all the Mony that is in the Kingdom all the former Arts would not have undone them and therefore some means must be used to get their Stocks from them it seemed not decent for the Government to Seize on them as they Seized on our Horses and Arms it was not thought fit to give a positive Order for doing it the truth is there was no need of it it was sufficient to connive at the new raised Men to have it effectually done the Priests had made every Man that came to Mass to get a Skean and half Pike at least and they whispered to the People that it was not for nothing that they were thus Armed They assured them that whatever Injury they did their Protestant Neighbours would be forgiven them only they advised them not to shed Blood Sometimes they went along to see it effectually done and sometimes they imposed it as a Pennance on such as came to them for Absolution to rob some of their Protestant Neighbours This may seem improbable but we have had credible Informations of it and it will not seem so unlikely if we consider that the Priests often led them out to these Plunders and stood by whilst they committed them that all these Robbers are absolved by them without restoring one Sheep which could not be if the Priests reckoned the taking and keeping them a Sin And lastly that some of the greatest of these Robberies were committed in Lent when they do their Pennances and eat no Flesh and therefore they could not be tempted at that time to Steal and Kill in order to eat For in some places they killed whole Flocks and left them dead on the Place These Robberies began in November 1688 and by the end of March next after they left hardly one Protestant in Ireland a Cow or Sheep Ireland has always been famous for its Pastures and the Riches of it has always consisted in Cattle of which many Gentlemen had vast Stocks for a Man to have Six Eight or Ten Thousand Sheep was very common some had more even to Twenty Thousand All these were gone in Three Months to the value of at least a Million of Mony which if rightly managed would with the Cows and Bullocks of which there were likewise great Herds have furnished an Army of an Hundred Thousand Men with Flesh enough for Three Years Those who took them from the Protestants destroyed them without consideration they killed them by Fifties and Sixties and threw them into Bog-pits they took off their Skins and left their Carcases to rot and made all the hovo●k of them imaginable 3. Nor was the Government at all displeased at this but on the contrary did plainly encourage them no Complaints made against them were minded none of them were punished or called to account for it and there happened two or three remarkable things that plainly discovered it to be their design that the Protestants should lose all For First when these Robberies began some Protestants got together overtook the Robbers rescued the Prey from them and killed some of them this being done in two or three places they were frightened and quiet for some time but the Lord Deputy saw that if this were suffered his design would not take and therefore ordered our Arms to be Seized this was the true motive of his taking away so suddenly the Arms of the Protestants These Arms he put into the Hands of those very Robbers whom the Protestants in the defence of their Cattle had beaten and wounded and whose Relations they had killed who now knowing that their Adversaries could make no further Resistence vowed Revenge and perfected what they had begun not leaving them a Beast and forcing them to flee for their Lives and then they plundered their Houses as well as their Cattle and left them nothing that could be found with them Nay so far did the Government Countenance them that they had suffered those Men who had thus defended their Cattle to be indicted and Bills were found against them who had killed some of those Robbers in the actual fact of Robbing to do which they are empowered and ought to have been rewarded by a particular Statute of Ireland 4. But Secondly it appears that the Robbing of the Protestants was designed by the Government from the Confession of Chief Justice Nugent who boasted of it as a piece of Policy and own'd that they could not have done their work without it and at the Assizes at Cork publickly called such Robbers necessary Evils and from the beginning he took care not to discourage them The forementioned Proclamation February 21 1686 acknowledges that the Robberies were occasioned by the carelessness and neglect of the Civil Magistrate And Thirdly That it was a meer design to ruin the Protestants is manifest from this that as soon as their Stocks were gone and those who took them began to rob their Papist Neighbours the Government put a stop to it and issued out a Commission to hang them which accordingly was executed at Wicklow and the Naas and several other Places and that it might be effectually executed they joined some Protestants in it which might as well have been done before and there is no reason that it was
so kept them in Heart by countenancing them that they did not doubt some time or other to recover their Estates and they often told the English when heated by Drink or Passion that the time was drawing near when they would out them of their Estates and Improvements and send them to Dig or Beg. This Hope kept the Irish Idle and hindred them from applying themselves to any thing else and they were so sure of regaining their forfeited Estates that they disposed of them by Wills and Settlements as if in Possession which Wills and Settlements made by them whilst out of Possession are confirmed by a particular Act made in their late pretended Parliament 2. When King James came to the Crown they reckoned they had gained their Point and did not fail to labour it with all possible Industry and no doubt but his Majesty designed to gratifie them in it but he did not think fit to let the Protestants know his Intentions on the contrary he industriously concealed them He sent over the Lord Clarendon Lord-Lieutenant in the Year 1685. who arrived here January 10. he gave him in Charge to declare That he would preserve the Acts of Settlement and Explanation inviolable And accordingly the Lord Clarendon made this Declaration in Council and further gave it in Charge to all the Judges who solemnly declared on the Bench in their respective Circuits the Kings firm Intentions to preserve those Acts and in them the Protestant English Interest of Ireland At the same time Sir Charles Porter was sent over Chancellor of Ireland and he likewise had a Command from the King to assure all his Subjects that he would preserve these Acts as the Magna Charta of Ireland and Sir Charles at his entrance on his Office declared this solemnly on the Bench as Chancellor Fitton also after did and used withall to term it The Darling of the Nation and that it was the King's Pleasure to give his Subjects this Assurance These kind of Declarations were often repeated and gain'd Belief from the credulous Protestants especially that made by Sir Charles who behaving himself with Courage and Integrity in his Office went a great way to perswade them But the Papists were nothing daunted at it they knew that this was only a piece of Policy to ●ull us asleep till the Army was modelled and things fitted for repealing these Acts and then all the Protestations to the contrary would signifie nothing The new Attorney General Nagle was the first that durst openly propose the Repealing of them in his Letter from Coventry dated October 26. 1686. in which he endeavours to shew some Nullities and Invalidities in the Acts but mainly insists on the Inconveniency it would bring to the Popish Interest to have those Acts continued When the Earl of Tyrconnel came to the Government things were Riper and so King James ventured to discover his Intentions a little further and therefore in the first Proclamation issued out by the Lord-Deputy Tyrconnel and dated Feb. 21. 1686. he promised to defend the Laws Liberties and established Religion but upon debate at the Council-Board leaves out the Preservation of the Acts of Settlement and Explanation In Spring 1688. he sends over to England Chief Justice Nugent and Baron Rice to concert the Methods of repealing it That this was their Errand was publickly known and is confessed by my Lord Sunderland in his Letter to his Friend in London dated March 23. 1689. and if we believe him they bid 40000 l. to gain his Lordship to assist them but whatever his Lordship did with them it is certain they succeeded in their Design though perhaps a little delay'd in point of time and agreed on the several Steps by which they were to bring it to pass they knew it was generally discoursed that they went on this Errand and it would have alarm'd the whole Kingdom if they had own'd their Success they therefore dissembled it and contrived to have it given out that the King had rejected their Proposals but granted others that were very Beneficial to the Kingdom the Heads of which they took care to have published In the mean while they fell on prosecuting their Design according to the Secret Resolutions agreed on and began immediately to put things in order to have a Parliament that would be sure to answer their Intentions they proceeded to finish the Regulations of Corporations against which Quo Warranto's had before been issued as we have already shewed and that things might not stick in the House of Lords by reason of the Numerousness of the Protestant Peers and Bishops a List was drawn up of such Papists as the King might by Writ call into the House to Out-vote them The Sons of such Lords as had been Indicted and Out-lawed for the Rebellion in 1641. had brought Writs of Error to reverse their Father's Outlawries which made them uncapable of Sitting which was in effect to destroy the Act of Settlement that was founded on those Out-lawries The Protestants saw the Consequence of the Reversing them and therefore earnestly opposed it but Lord Chief Justice Nugent and his Fellow-Judges over-ruled all Oppositions that could be made and reversed as many as desired it Some of them when they had reversed the Outlawries ask'd the Attorney General whether they might not now Sue for their Estates He answered that they should have a little Patience perhaps they would come more easily meaning that when a Parliament sate it would by repealing the Act of Settlement give them their Estates without a Suit 3. But many had not Patience to wait the General Restitution and therefore as soon as they had Judges and Sheriffs to their mind they set up Counterfeit Deeds and easily obtained Verdicts if the Protestants brought a Writ of Error yet that did not benefit them nor stop their being outed of Possession for the Sheriffs on their own Heads gave the Old Proprietors Possession and left the Protestants to recover it by Injunction out of Chancery or by Common-Law Thus Doctor Gorge was outed by Mr. Barnwell of a great Estate and many others notwithstanding their Writs of Error Some Old Proprietors had gotten some Conditional Orders from the Commissioners of the Court of Claims for Estates many of which only enabled them to bring their Actions at Common-Law These had la●● dormant since the sitting of the Court of Claims which was above Twenty Years but now instead of bringing their Actions into the Court they carried their old Injunctions which they had procured from the Court of Claims and which they thought not fit in all this time to execute as knowing legally they could not yet I say so long after the Dissolution of the Court which granted them they carried them to the Sheriffs and they without any more ado put them into Possession whereby they deprived the Subject of the Benefit of those Laws that make Fines levied with Non-claim a perpetual Bar and also dispossess'd and put by all intermediate
his Government over them 6. The Case of the Purchasers and Improvers in Ireland seem'd the hardest the Land forfeited by the Rebellion in 1641. was set out to those that had been Adventurers and Soldiers in that War and many of these had sold them at Twelve or Fifteen years Purchase the Purchasers had built fair Houses and Villages on them inclos'd Deer-Parks planted Orchards and Gardens and laid out vast Sums in these and other Improvements it seem'd hard to turn them out without consideration to try therefore whether any thing would make King James relent they endeavour'd to see what he would do for these poor Men how their Case was prest and represented to King James may be judged by a Paper given him by the Lord Granard and drawn up by the Chief Justice Keating with the Approbation of other Protestants 't is in the Appendix King James read it and made no other answer to it but That he would not do evil that good might come of it the meaning of which Words as then apply'd is not easily understood It has been a common Question put to the Gentlemen of Ireland by some that neither know them nor their Affairs What have you lost But sure whosoever knows the extent of Ireland and the value of Land in it will see that the Interest of the English Protestants ruined by King James since he came to the Crown is of greater value than the Estates of all that favour his Cause in England and Scotland and I suppose it would put them out of conceit with him or any other King that should take away but one half of their Estates from them SECT XIII Eighthly King James brought the Lives of his Protestant Subjects in Ireland into imminent danger 1. I Suppose from the former Sections it is sufficiently apparent what Invasions King James made on the Liberties and Fortunes of his Protestant Subjects there remained to them only their Lives and these as will appear from this Section were put in imminent danger by him many were lost and the rest escap'd with the greatest hazard When King James came into Ireland it was certainly his Interest to exercise his Clemency towards his Protestant Subjects and he knew it to be so and therefore in his Declaration which he sent privately into England he made large Professions of his tenderness towards them and boasted how much their safety had been his care every body expected a Proclamation for a General Pardon and Indemnity should have been sent before him and that ●e would have put an effectual stop to the illegal Prosecutions against their Lives and to the Robberies of their Fortunes that every where were going on at his coming but on the contrary he rather pusht on both and not content with the Laws that already were in force which Partial Judges and Juries wr●sted to destroy them he made new snares for them by Acts of his pretended Parliament and by several private declarations whereby not only he but his inferior Officers took on them to dispose of the Lives of Protestants 2. It is not reasonable to charge his Majesty with the private Murther committed on Men in their Houses which were many up and down the Kingdom several even in the City of Dublin Only thus far in some degree he may be thought responsible for them he knew very well with what barbarous Murthers the Papists of Ireland had been charg'd in the Rebellion of 1641 he knew what inveterate hatred they carried towards the Protestants and how many Tories and Robbers constantly disturbed the Peace of the Kingdom and yet without any necessity at all he threw himself upon these People he encouraged them he Armed them he gave Commissions even to those that had been Tories and guilty of Murthers and therefore cannot altogether be excused from the Irregularities committed by them especially when there was no search made after or Prosecution of the Murthers as it happened in the case of Colonel Murry of Westmeath Brother in law to my Lord Granard an old Gentleman who had serv'd King Charles the first and second and suffered considerably for his Loyalty he was way-laid and shot dead as he rode to his own House under King James's Protection and with some marks as he imagined of his Favour Yet no enquiry was made after it There were many such private Murthers but I do not think it necessary to insist on them I shall confine my self to such as are of a more publick Nature which gave us just reasons to fear that the Government had a design upon our Lives 3. Such were first encouraging Witnesses to swear us into feigned Plots and Conspiracies of these there were many set up in the Kingdom almost every County had one set up in it and many were put into Prison and indicted for high Treason as Captain Phillips and Mr. Bowen in the County o● Westmeath and several others in other places some of which I have before mentioned and when the perjuries of the Witnesses came to be plainly discovered they yet were encouraged and protected from any Legal prosecution Of this nature a Conspiracy was framing against one Mr. William Spike and if it had taken effect it would have reached to a great many more The contrivance was thus one Dennis Connor had a mind to a small Employment which Mr Spike held in the Castle he had petitioned for it but Spike by the Interest of my Lord Powis tho a Protestant kept his place being found diligent in it Connor resolv'd to try another experiment to get him removed he framed a Letter as from one in Inniskilling directed to Spike in which the writer thanks him for his Intelligence and refers to a method agreed on for seizing the Castle of Dublin on a certain Day The Letter to make the thing more credible abuses King James in very ill terms Connor drops this Letter in the Castle where Spike came every Day knowing that as soon as it was found Spike would be seized and then he might manage the Plot as he pleased but his Contrivance was spoiled for the Sentinel saw him drop the Paper and procured him immediately to be seized he was examined before the Chief Justice and I think before King James also why he wrote such a wicked Letter he said it was for the Kings service to remove Spike whom he believed to be a Rogue and who being a Protestant would betray the King Spike Prosecuted him in the Kings-Bench but after all that could be done the Jury brought Connor in not Guilty pretending that it did not appear that this was the very Letter dropt by Connor tho he had confest it before the King and the Lord Cheif Justice and tho it was proved and owned to be his hand and a rough draft of it found with him and the Sentinel swore he dropt a Letter which he delivered to the Officer and the Officer swore that was the Letter delivered by the Sentinel to him tho
but by the legal course of Juries But King James and his Parliament intended to do the work of Protestants speedily and effectually and not to wait the slow methods of proceeding at the Common Law They resolv'd therefore on a Bill of Attainder and in order to it every Member of the House of Commons return'd the Names of such Protestant Gentlemen as liv'd near him or in the County or Burrough for which he serv'd and if he was a stranger to it he sent into the County or Place for information they were in great haste and many escaped them on the other hand some that were actually in King James's Service and fighting for him at Derry of which Cornet Edmund Keating Nephew to my Lord Chief Justice Keating was one were return'd as absent and attainted in the Act. When they had made a Collection of Names they cast them into several Forms and attainted them under several Qualifications and accordingly allow'd them time to come in and put themselves on Tryal the Qualifications and Numbers were as follow 1. Persons Attainted of Rebellion who had time given them till till the Tenth of August to surrender themselves and be tryed provided they were in the Kingdom and amenable to the Law at the time of making the Act otherwise were absolutely Attainted One Archbishop One Duke Fourteen Earls Seventeen Viscounts and one Viscountess Two Bishops Twelve Barons Twenty six Baronets Twenty two Knights Fifty six Clergymen Eleven hundred fifty three Esquires Gentlemen c. 2. Persons who were absentees before the Fifth of Novem. 1688 not returning according to the Proclamation of the Twenty fifth of March attainted if they do not appear by the First of September 1689. One Lord. Seven Knights Eight Clergymen Sixty five Esquires Gentlemen c. 3. Persons who were Absentees before the Fifth of November 1688. not returning according to the Proclamation of the Twenty fifth of March attainted if they do not appear by the First day of October 1689. One Archbishop One Earl One Viscount Five Bishops Seven Baronets Eight Knights Nineteen Clergymen Four hunder'd thirteen Esquires Gentlemen c. 4. Persons usually resident in England who are to signifie their Loyalty in case the King goes there the First of October 1689. and on His Majesties Certificate to the Chief Governour here they to be discharged otherwise to stand attainted One Earl Fifteen Viscounts and Lords Fourteen Knights Four hunder'd ninety two Esquires Gentlemen c. 5. Absentees by reason of sickness and noneage on proving their Loyalty before the last day of the first Term after their return to be acquitted and restor'd in the mean time their Estates Real and Personal are vested in His Majesty One Earl Seven Countesses One Viscountess Thirteen Ladies One Baronet Fifty nine Gentlemen and Gentlewomen 6. They vest all Lands c. belonging to Minors Ladies Gentlewomen in the King till they return and then upon Proof of their Loyalty and Faithfulness to King James they are allow'd to sue for their Estates before the Commissioners for executing the Acts of Repeal and Attainder if sitting or in the High Court of Chancery or Court of Exchequer and upon a Decree obtain'd for them there the Sheriffs are to put them in possession of so much as by the Decree of one of those Courts shall be adjudged them The Clauses in the Act are so many and so considerable that it never having been printed intire I thought it convenient to put it into the Appendix Perhaps it was never equall'd in any Nation since the time of the Proscription in Rome and not then neither for here is more than half as many Condemned in the small Kingdom of Ireland as was at that time proscribed in the greatest part of the then known World yet that was esteemed an unparallel'd Cruelty When Sir Richard Nagle Speaker of the House of Commons presented the Bill to King James for his Royal Assent he told him that many were attainted in that Act by the House of Commons upon such Evidence as fully satisfied the House the rest of them were attainted he said upon common Fame A Speech so very brutish that I can hardly perswade my self that I shall gain credit to the Relation but it is certainly true the Houses of Lords and Commons of their pretended Parliament are Witnesses of it and let the World judge what security Protestants could have of their Lives when so considerable a Lawyer as Sir Richard Nagle declares in so solemn an occasion and King James with his Parliament approves that common Fame is a sufficient Evidence to deprive without hearing so many of the Gentry Nobility and Clergy of their Lives and Fortunes without possibility of pardon and not not only cut off them but their Children and Posterity likewise By a particular Clause from advantages of which the former Laws of the Kingdom would not have deprived them though their Fathers had been found guilty of the worst of Treasons in particular Tryals 7. I shall only add a few Observations on this Act and leave the Reader to make others as he shall find occasion 1. Then this Act leaves no room for the King to pardon after the last day of November 1689. if the Pardon be not Enroll'd before that time the Act declares it absolutely void and null 2. The Act was conceal'd and no Protestant for any Money permitted to see it much less take a Copy of it till the time limited for Pardons was past at least Four Months So that the State of the Persons here attainted is desperate and irrecoverable except an Irish Popish Parliament will relieve them for King James took care to put it out of the power of any English Parliament as well as out of his own Power to help them by consenting to another Act of this pretended Parliament Intituled An Act declaring that the Parliaments of England cannot bind Ireland and against Writs of Errors and Repeals out of Ireland into England 3. It is observable with what hast and confusion this Act was drawn up and past perhaps no man ever heard of such a crude imperfect thing so ill digested and compos'd past on the World for a Law We find the same Person brought in under different Qualifications in one Place he is expresly allow'd till the First of October to come and submit to Tryal● and yet in another Place he is attainted if he do not come in by the First of September many are attainted by wrong Names many have their Christian Names left out and many whose Names and Sirnames are both put in are not distinguished by any Character whereby they may be known from others of the same Names 4. Many considerable Persons are left out which certainly had been put in if they could have gotten their Names which is a further proof of their hast and confusion in passing the Bill It is observable the Provost Fellow● and Scholars of the Colledge by Dublin are all omitted the Reason was
Clergy were established in Ireland by as firm Laws as the Properties of the Laity The King by his Coronation Oath was obliged to maintain them Their Tithes and Benefices were their Free-holds and their Priviledges and Jurisdiction were settled and confirmed to them by the known and current Laws of the Kingdom according to which the King was obliged to govern them and whereof he was the Guardian The Clergy had beside all this peculiar Obligations on him and a Title to his Protection for they had espous'd his Interest most cordially Whilst Duke of York they used their utmost diligence to perswade the People to submit to Gods Providence and be content with his Succession to the Crown in case his Brother dyed before him and they prest that point so far that many of their People were dissatisfied with them and told them often with heat and concern what reward they must expect for their pains if ever he came to the Throne they saw their danger but could not imagine any man would be so unpolitick and ungrateful as to destroy such as had brought him to the Throne and could only keep him safe in it and therefore they ventured all to serve him and many of them by their Zeal for him lost the Affections of their People and their Interest with them It was chiefly due to their diligence and care that his Title from the beginning met not the least opposition in Ireland tho the Army in it were intirely Protestant Had they and the rest of the Protestants in this Kingdom been in any measure disloyally principled in the time of Monmouth and Argile's Rebellion they might easily have made an Insurrection more dangerous than both those and the least Mutiny or revolt amongst them could hardly have failed to have ruined King James's Affairs at that critical time but they were so far from attempting any such thing that they were as ready and as zealous to assist him as his very Guards at Whitehall which he himself could not but acknowledge how he rewarded them I have already shewn and how grateful he was to the Clergy that thus principled them will appear by the Sequel 4. First therefore when his Majesty came to the Crown he declared that he would protect the Church of England in her Government and Priviledges under which we suppos'd the Church of Ireland to be concluded And accordingly the Clergy and People of this Kingdom return'd his Majesty their Address of Thanks though they very well knew that this was no more than was due to them by the Laws and by the King's Coronation Oath in particular But they were soon told by the Roman Catholicks that his Majesty did not intend to include Ireland in that Declaration and that it must be a Catholick Kingdom as they term'd it Every discerning Protestant soon found by the method they saw his Majesty take that he in earnest intended to settle Popery in England as well as Ireland but he thought himself so sure of effecting it suddenly in Ireland that his Instruments made no scruple to declare their intentions nay they were so hasty to ruin our Religion that they did not so much as consult their own Safety but even before it was either seasonable or safe in the opinion of the wiser sort amongst themselves they began openly to apply all their Arts and Engines to effect it 1. By hindring the Succession and Supplies of Clergy-men 2. By taking away their maintenance 3. By weakning and then invading their Jurisdiction 4. By seizing on their Churches and hindring their Religious Assemblies 5. By violence against their Persons And 6. By slandering and misrepresenting them and their Principles SECT XV. 1. King James in order to destroy the Protestant Religion hindred the Education and Succession of Clergy-men 1. THE Good and Support of Religion doth very much depend on the educating and principling Youth in Schools and Universities and the Law had taken special care that these should be in the hands of English men and Protestants and the better to secure them the Nomination of the Schoolmasters in every Diocess except four is by a particular Act of Parliament lodged in the Lord Lieutenant or Chief Governour for the time being The Clergy of each Diocess by the Act are obliged to maintain a Schoolmaster and his Qualifications are described in the Act. But when the Earl of Tyrconnel came to the Government he took no notice of those Laws but when any School became void he either left it unsupplyed or put a Papist into it And in the mean time great care was taken to discourage such Protestant Schoolmasters as remain'd and to set up Popish Schools in opposition to them Thus they dealt with the School of Killkenny founded and endowed by the charitable Piety of the late Duke of Ormond they set up a Jesuits School in the Town and procured them a Charter for a Colledge there they drove away the Protestant Schoolmaster Doctor Hinton who had officiated in it with great industry and success and seiz'd on the School-house commonly call'd the Colledge and converted it to an Hospital for their Soldiers Thus in a few years they would not have left one publick School in the hands of a Protestant for the Education of their Youth 2. There is but one University in Ireland and there is a Clause in the Statutes thereof that gives the King Power to dispense with the said Statutes it was founded by Queen Elizabeth and certainly never designed by her or her Successors to be converted against the fundamental Design of its Institution into a Seminary of Popery yet advantage was taken of this Clause though we had reason to believe it would have been done if there had been no such Clause to put in Popish Fellows as soon as the Fellowships became vacant one Doyle a Convert was the first who was named a Person of so exceedingly lewd and vicious a Conversation as was fully prov'd before the Lord Tyrconnell and of so little Sence or Learning that it seemed impossible that any Government should have countenanc'd such a Man yet this did not much weigh with his Excellency and therefore the Colledge insisted upon another Point the Dispensation that Doyle had gotten through his ignorance was not for his purpose for it required in express Terms that he should take the Oath of a Fellow and that Oath includes in it the Oath of Supremacy the Provost tendered it to him but he durst not take it for fear of disobliging his own Party upon this they refused to admit him he insists on his Claim and complains to the Lord Deputy upon a hearing Justice Nugent Baron Rice and the Attorny General supplyed the Place of Advocates for him but the Case was so plain that even Justice Nugent had not the confidence to deny the insufficiency of his Dispensation and therefore they ordered him to get another But to be even with the Colledge for demurring on the King's Mandate they stopt
Provided that in case it happen that any of the Persons hereby Attainted or to be Attainted do now abide or dwell in this Kingdom and are amenable to the Law that then and in such case if such Person and Persons do by the Tenth day of August One thousand Six hundred Eighty nine without compulsion of his own accord come in and deliver himself to the Lord Chief Justice of your Majesties Court of Kings-Bench in Ireland or to any other of the Judges of the said Court or of any other of your Majesties Four Courts in Dublin or to any Judge of Assize in their Circuits to be charged with any Treason to be charged or imputed to him or them that then and in such case such Person and Persons if after acquitted by the Laws of this Land or discharged by Proclamation shall be freed dlscharged and acquitted from all Peins Punishments and Forfeitures by this Act incurred laid or imposed any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding And whereas the several Persons hereafter named viz. John Veazy Lord Archbishop of Tuam Arthur Chichester Earl of Donnegal Folliot Wingfield Viscount Powers-Court William Morton Lord Bishop of Kildare William Smith Lord Bishop of Raphoe Narcissus Marsh Lord Bishop of Fernes and Laughlin Edward Jones Lord Bishop of Cloyne Capel Wiseman Lord Bishop of Dromore Sir John Peyton Baronet Sir Thomas Domvile of Temple oge Baronet Sir Arthur Jones of Osberstown Baronet Sir John Morgan Baronet Sir Edward Crofton of Mose Baronet Sir Henry Bingham of Castlebarr Baronet Sir William Evans Baronet Sir Abel Ram Knight Sir John Coghil of Drumconragh Knight Sir William Wentworth of Dublin Knight Sir Henry Ponsonby Knight Sir William Lemon of Knockanelewer Knight Sir John Dillon of Lismullin Knight Sir Robert Cole of Ballymackey Knight Sir Toby Poynes of Brecknock Knight Bartholomew Vanhumrigh of the City of Dublin Merchant Philip Crofts Gent. Stephen Ludlow Esq Anderson Sanders Esq Robert Pooley Gent. Luke Lowther late Alderman Abraham Tarner Esq Edward Harris gent. Robert Bridges Esq William Swift gent. Dr. Ralph Howard John Linegar late of Dunbree Henry Ashton Glover Edward Reyly gent. Adam Swift gent. Thomas Putland Merch. John Carr gent. Matthew French Jun. Samuel Jackson gent. Henry Salmon Merch. Charles Carter Sadler Henry Ecclin Esq late one of his Majesties Sergeants at Law Nehemiah Donneland Esq Counseller at Law Peter Westenra Esq Henry Monk Esq William Manle Esq Murtagh Dowling Esq Isaac Dobson Esq Robert Stopford Esq Robert Peppard Esq John Gowrney Esq Thomas Tilson Esq Joseph Deane Esq late Seneschal of St. Pulchers Liberties James Grace Esq late Seneschal of Christ-Church Liberties Robert Sanders Esq Robert Alloway Esquire late one of the Officers of the Ordnance Doctor .... Miller John Thompson late Agent for the Commissioners Thomas Spranger late Examinator of the High Court of Chancery Captain James Gardner of Pimlicoe Capt. Thomas Cooke of St. James's Street Capt. John Rawlins of Strand Street William Ralphson Gent. William Scott gent. Temple Briscoe gent. William Ormsby gent. Anthony Nixon gent. John Bate gent. Richard Thompson gent. Benjamin Chitwood Thomas Osborne gent. John Gardner gent. John Theacker gent. Giles Spencer gent. Jacob Peppard gent. Michael Harborne gent. Andrew Lloyd gent. Isaack Ambrose gent. Jeremiah Roscoe gent. Philip Harris gent. Richard Flemming gent. William Tisdall gent. Christopher Caldwell gent. Thomas Carter gent. Charles Grolier gent. Faustine Cuppage gent. Richard Hacket gent. Charles King gent. John Rotten gent. Henry Reeves gent. Zachary Foxal gent. Thomas Fisher gent. Gilbert Holmes gent Thomas Sisson Scrivener John Gay the younger Charles Campbel gent. Thomas Twigg gent. Daniel Cooke gent. Edmond Reynel gent. Samuel Frith gent. George Osborne gent. John Edge gent. John Hill gent. Robert Curtis gent. John Curtis gent. Henry Whitfield and .... Whitfield Sons to Counsellor Whitfield Mordecay Abbot gent. Tobyas Creamer of St. Thomas Street gent. Charles Wallis of the same gent. William Berry gent. William Wybrants gent. Benjamin Burton Banker Edward Lloyd Merchant John Abbot late Steward of the Inns John Cuthbert of Skinnerow Goldsmith John Pierson of St. Thomas Street Brewer Samuel Bell of the same gent. Abraham Maw of Castle Street Merchant John Ashhurst of St. Nicholas Street Merchant Henry Steevens of High-Street Merchant Charles Batty of Corn-Market Upholsterer Robert Briddock of Skinner-Row Merchant Edward Brookes of St. Warburgh-Street Merchant John Lovet of the Bli●d●ey Merchant William Stowel of Highstreet Ironmonger Simon Sherlock of Backlane Brazier William Covett of Cornmarket Hozier Henry Smith of Skinner-Row Haberdasher Henry Rogers of Highstreet Merchant-Taylor Arthur Fisher of the same Plate-maker Vincent Bradston of St. Patrick-street Pewterer Walter Harris of Smithfield Merchant Samuel Price of Pottle Ironmonger John Hudson Maulster Francis Prichard gent. Jonathan Taylor Chandler Samuel Care of Highstreet Merchant Thomas Doran of the Glib Vintner Philip Green of the same Chandler Dennis Cash of Highstreet Merchant Thomas Bodely of the same Merchant Caleb Thomas of the same Merchant John Boosby of the same Taylor Thomas Mason of the same Merchant Robert Teats of St. James-Street Skinner Henry Salmon of Meath-Street Clothier Richard Boose of the same Clothier Joseph James of Highstreet Merch. Robert Roper of the Comb Clothier Barnet Wells of the same Clothier William Lemon of St. Francis-Street Baker Josias Smith of Cavan-Street Brewer George Duxberry of the Comb Clothier Patrick Campbel Stationer Eliphel Dobson of Castle-Street Stationer William Norman of Damas-Street Stationer Charles Carter of Skinner-Row Merchant Francis Stoyt of Copper-Ally Merchant Richard Tygh of Smithfield Merchant John Green of Ormonds-key Carpenter James Cottingham of Skinner-Row Goldsmith Charles Thompson of Corkehill Chyrurgeon Samuel Trevers of St. Marys Abby Merch. John Shelly of Skinner-Row Goldsmith Thomas Elliot of the same Cook John Quin Son to Alderman Quin William Hill of St. Patrick-Street Merch. ... Eastwood of Colledge-Green Clothier James Hartly of Church-Street Merch. Walter Hitchcock Querister Dean John Pooly John Allen Esq Son to Sir Joshua Allen William Clerk of Highstreet Merchant-Taylor John Hetherington Perrywig-maker Henry Rowlandson of Skinner-Row Merch. William Founds of Temple-Bar Merch. Thomas Taylor gent. Samuel Care of Highstreet Merchant-Taylor John Haslack Tanner Doctor John Maddin Francis Roberts and Kender Roberts Brothers to the Earl of Radnor John Wallis of St. Thomas-Street Gent. and William Flood of Colledge-green gent. All late of the City of Dublin John Beatham of Killeck in the County of Dublin Esq Edward Dean of Tyrenure Esq Samuel Folio Chancellor of St. Patricks Robert Meade of Foblestown gent. Martin Basil of Drumcarny gent. Francis Spring of Colledruth gent. William Wybrants of Grange Bally Boyle gent. Isaack Dobson of Dundrum gent. Josias Smith of St. Patricks Close gent. John Rawlins of Newstreet gent. Thomas Baily of St. Patricks Close gent. John Way●lock of Newry Tanner Thomas Shaw of Crookedstaff Tanner Philip Parker of St. Patricks Street Tanner John Ridgeway of Oldbawne gent. John Williamson of Clondalcan
were all on the catch and that he would do his own Business and not trouble them or any of them or words to that purpose and desired this Deponent to return him a good Jury and that he the said Dunsany would give this Deponent twenty Guinnies in hand and three or four hundred Pounds when he should be restored to the Possession of his Estate To which this Deponent made answer That he would impose nothing on his Lordship and that he would do him Right Then the said Lord Dunsany swore that this Deponent should not repent what Kindness this Deponent would shew him in that Affair and said he would not fail paying the twenty Guinnies upon the return of the said Venires This Deponent desired the said Lord of Dunsany to imploy his Brother Thomas Plunket in the prosecution of that Concern which he promised he would do and thereupon began to name such as he would have of the Jury Which this Deponent desired he should forbear telling him if this Deponent should be examined to that the Aray would be quash'd The said Dunsany then said he would put the Venires into this Deponent's Hands and do what he thought fit and said this Deponent should hear from him within some short time which he performed And this Deponent deposeth that he did receive the said two Venires either from the said Lord Dunsany's Messenger or from himself or one of his Servants But this Deponent having recollected his Memory is more apt to believe that it was the said Lord of Dunsany's Messenger or Servant whom this Deponent hath seen before in the said Lord's Company that came according to his the said Lord Dunsany's Promise that delivered the said Venires to this Deponent for he desired to know at his departure from this Deponent where and when the said Mr. Thomas Plunket should meet this Deponent in order to return the said Writs or words to that effect That this Deponent appointed him to give the said Thomas Plunket notice to meet him at Trim at one Mr. Eveys House on such a day as this Deponent cannot tax his Memory now with That this Deponent having several Occasions to this City waited on Mr. Daley this Deponent's Counsel now Mr. Justice Daley and advised with him about the Proposals and said Overtures betwixt him this Deponent and the said Lord of Dunsany and thereupon resolved to serve the said Lord Dunsany gratis and not to take or accept of any manner of Consideration from the said Lord of Dunsany and that he this Deponent would be very just to him which Resolution was approved of by the said Mr. Justice Daley This Deponent further deposeth That according to appointment being met with punctually had some Discourse with the said Thomas Plunket who said The said Lord of Dunsany his Brother was not prepared for a Trial and that he would go on soon with all his Estate at once and that them two Parcels were inconsiderable in respect of the Bulk of his Estate and desired this Deponent to reserve the best Men in order to return them on the Juries when he should put other Venires for that purpose in this Deponent's hands or words to that purpose This Deponent desired him to consider what he had to do and he should not blame him this Deponent hereafter He the said Thomas Plunket then replied That he would be satisfied with what Returns this Deponent should make on the said two Venires and desired that the best Men might be reserv'd as aforesaid Whereupon this Deponent soon after return'd the aforesaid Venires with Pannels to them severally annexed This Deponent further deposeth That he having notice from the Lord Bp of Clogher that he heard that the said Lord of Dunsany should reflect on this Deponent saying He would not return him a good Jury without a Consideration and having met the said Thomas Plunket in the said Lord Bishop's Lodgings in Michaelmass or Hillary Term last he desired the said Lord Bishop to acquaint the said Thomas Plunket with the Expressions he heard of the said Lord of Dunsany Which he having done the said Thomas Plunket said That this Deponent desired no Consideration and that the Lord Dunsany aforesaid was much obliged to him this Deponent and that he was mighty kind to him and would justify the same This Deponent further deposeth That the said Thomas Plunket having met this Deponent at Longwood after some Discourse he had with this Deponent the seventeenth day of March last past shewed him a List of the Juries and asked this Deponent if he returned them To which this Deponent answered That he had as he believed He the said Thomas Plunket thereupon said most of them were Phanaticks and that they would hang the said Lord of Dunsany if they could This Deponent made answer then That if they prov'd inconvenient that it was the said Thomas Plunket's fault for that he had desired this Deponent to return what he this Deponent pleased and to reserve the best Men for the Bulk of the said Lord Dunsany's Estate or words to that effect The said Thomas Plunket said He would never consent to the return of such Juries and passionately said If he had the twenty Guinnies to give this Deponent that he would have better Juries This Deponent asked the said Thomas Plunket if this Deponent desired any such Sum or any Sum of him when he met at Trim he then replied that he did not but that the said Lord Dunsany did promise it After a while he likewise said That he told the said Lord of Dunsany that this Deponent could not be supposed to have made that Return for Ill-will or Gain for that none would give any Sum of Money where the Party could Nonsuit himself as also that this Deponent had returned good Juries for several of his Country naming Mr. Evers and others and that it was his ill Luck that hindred him or words to that effect This Deponent further deposeth That neither of the Defendants directly or indirectly desired this Deponent for to return the said Juries Neither did this Deponent give them notice that he had any Venires neither did he know that there were any Venires ordered to be granted by this Court until he received the said Venires either from the said Lord or Tenants or Messengers as aforesaid and further saith not Mr. Burridge's Affidavit about Robbers Sept. 27. 1690. THen came before me Ezekiel Burridge Clerk and saith That about the beginning of the late Earl of Tyrconnel's Government he was set upon by three Men near Glasneven within a mile of Dublin who gave this Deponent four Wounds with their Swords and tore his Gown so that he could never afterwards wear it They likewise attempted to rob him had they not been prevented by the coming in of Company Two or three days after he heard that a Fellow was seen on the same Ground who looked suspiciously and being pursued was taken in the Suburbs Whereupon the
said Deponent went to him in a Disguise to Newgate and took him into a private Place and made large Promises to him if he would discover any of the Robberies and be an Instrument of bringing in the Rogues who infested the Roads about the Town and robbed almost every Night To effect this he spoke Irish and wore the ●arb of a considerable Irish Officer and call'd himself Mac-Carty The first time he could do but little good with him but he bid him come to him the next day and after he had seen a Friend he would do something Accordingly he went to him the next Morning and renewing and enlarging his Promises to him after some time he told him if he would make my Lord Chief Justice Nugent his Friend and perswade him to remit his Punishment which was to be burnt in the Hand and stand his Friend in other things he would do more Service than any Man in Ireland was able to do He thereupon ventur'd upon large Promises to him and used all the Rhetorick he could to bring him to an ingenuous and full Confession Whereupon he told the Deponent that he knew all the Robberies that were committed the three Years last past in the Counties of Dublin Meath Kildare Longford and Louth That he would engage to clear all those Counties of Rogues that he knew all those that rob'd in the Roads about Dublin that there were four several Companies of them that the great Company were at that time robbing about Kilkenny and that they would be at Dublin within a Week for they were withdrawn thither only to be out of the way here in the Term time that there were 26 of them in all besides Souldiers whom he said he durst not discover but all the rest he said he would engage to take in Ale-houses where he would appoint them to meet him if my Lord Chief Justice would allow him Men to assist him This he told the Deponent he would do and shewed him what Methods he would use and he said he would willingly be hang'd if he did not succeed Besides he knew he said where Rogues might be found in Dublin who were proclaimed and had Money offered for their Heads He knew likewise where two Men were who murdered a Broguemaker at Kil●ock a little before but was loth to hang one of them he said because he thought he then lived honestly in his own House He knew likewise he said a House that was to be robb'd at Stephens-green by some Acquaintance of his within a Week and told the Deponent what Method they design'd to use in robbing it He knew likewise who robb'd a House at Killmainham that very Week whilst be was in Prison He knew where a Silver-hilted Sword was which was taken from a Gentleman a little before and could go directly to abundance of Goods taken by Robbery He knew where several pieces of the Gold which was taken from Mr. Starling the Minister in the County of Longford then lay and said that he himself had changed one of the Pieces since his Committal All this he said he would prove and would give his Head if he miscarried in any Particular And when the Deponent told him that perhaps he only pretended those things that he might have an opportunity to escape he thereupon said that they might to prevent that set Guards over him and besides he would procure my Lord Gormanstowne and several Gentlemen to be bound for him The Deponent having received this Encouragement from the Prisoner whose Name was Patrick Launan he went to my Lord Chief Justice Nugent told him what he had suffer'd himself and what the Country suffer'd daily and gave him an account of his conferring with the Prisoner and shewed him in writing the above-named Particulars which he wrote from his Mouth in Prison which my Lord presently was pleased to call Extraordinary great Service and said that the Government ought to take notice of it My Lord was likewise pleased to promise the Deponent he would pardon the Fellow and make the best use he could of him to bring in the Rogues Afterwards my Lord sent for him and had him private two hours and when the Deponent afterwards waited upon him my Lord told him he had found out an extraordinary useful Man and that he was well satisfied all he said was true and he believed he could do more service than the Account he gave the Deponent and withal my Lord shewed the Deponent a List of the Rogues he had from Launan the Prisoner But either my Lord did not read the List fairly to the Deponent or Launan made some omission for the Deponent remembers there was one Naugle or one or two Nugents in his List which my Lord omitted in reading After the Deponent had managed the Fellow thus far he asked him concerning particular Robberies and he gave him a very satisfactory Answer to all He asked whether he heard of a Gownman that was assaulted between Dublin and Glassneven he thereupon turned his Head aside and blush'd and said that he knew of it but could not be perswaded to discover the Men What he said upon this Head made the Deponent suspect that my Lord Chief Justice had discovered him to the Prisoner for he found not that freeness of discourse with him after he had been with my Lord that he had before Neither after all his Pains could he do any good with my Lord but he deposes that after he was importunate with him three or four times to bring in the Rogues yet nothing was done and the Prisoner was afterwards sent away to Trim Goal which this Deponent verily believes was to avoid his importunity He believes my Lord thought those Rogues might be afterwards serviceable and therefore had no mind to bring them to Justice Jurat coram me 27 Septembris 1690. Dud. Loftus Account of Mr. Thomas Corker's House Burnt by the Irish the 5th of May 1689. AS One of the Thousand Instances that may be given of the Natural Antipathy the Irish have to the English and Protestants in general let the Obligations of Neighbourhood Conversation and other endearments be never so great Mr Thomas Corker's Usage by them is remarkable He liv'd at Donoghmore within a Mile of Navan in the County of Meath and observing about All Saints 1688 that the English and Protestants began to remove and fly he freely ask'd the Irish Gentlemen in his Neighbourhood What Advice they would give him as to his Remove having a great Family Who Answer'd O dear Sir do not stir for if the World were on Fire you have no reason to fear For you have been so obliging to us your Neighbours and to all sorts that none will harm you but rather protect you Yet immediately they fell upon his Stock without doors and took part of it away He then removed with his Family to Dublin leaving his Haggard and most of his Houshold Goods behind him and sometimes or about once a Month went down to
Fran. ô Cahan Donegal Conel ô Donnel Manus ô Donnel   Tyrlagh Oge ô Boyle   Daniel ô Donnel Downe Lord Iveagh Shilling Magennis   Arthur Magennis Antrim Earl of Antrim Shane ô Neil Sheriff   Col. Thady ô Hara Fermanagh Lord of Eniskillen Cuconaght Mac Gwyre A List of the Principal Officers employed in the Revenue 24 Jun. 1690. Dublin Port Chief Commissioners and Officers established by Patent Commissioners of the Revenue SIR Patrick Trant Knight Francis Plowden Esquires John Trinder Esquires Prot. Richard Collins Esquires Prot. Sir William Ellis Knight Charles Playdel Secretary Nicholas Fitz-Gerald Solicitor Prot. James Bonnel Accomptant General Collectors and Officers appointed by the Commissioners Viz. Doctor James Fitz Gerald Collector Prot. Nathaniel Evans Clerk to the Commissioners Prot. William Alcock Examiner of the Port-Accounts and Warrants and Casheer Prot. Sinolphus Bellasis Clerk of the Coast. Prot. John Kent Land Surveyor and Comptroller of the Store Prot. Edward Prescott Land-Surveyor Land-Waiters Prot. John Robinson Prot. Dennis Boyle Prot. Francis Isaackson Henry Fitz Gerald. Prot. Bartholomew Wybrantz Store Keeper Robert Longfield Chief Clerk of the Quit and Crown-Rents Surveyors of Ringsend William Briscoe Phelim Dempsy Francis Creagh Surveyor at Dunlary Dublin Excise Viz. Prot. Francis Babe Collector Prot. Bernard Waight Surveyor General of Excise _____ Carol Examiner of Excise Accounts Surveyors of Excise Prot. Benjamin Powning Examiner of Diaries Prot. Henry Davis Prot. Jacob Walton Philip Clayton Ports and Districts Athlone Christopher Nicholson Collector Peter Duffe Survveyor Baltimore Dominick Nagle Collector Clonmel Terence Magrath Collector Edward Morris Surveyor Cork Port Sir James Cotter Collector Edward Trant Surveyor Florence Mac Carty Surveyor at Cove Cork Excise Francis Garvan Collector James Griffith Surveyor Dingle Ambrose Moore Collector Drogheda Bernard Byrne Collector Walter Babe Surveyor of Excise Morris Morierty Survey at New-key Dungarvan Thomas Mead Collector Ennis John Mac Nemara Collector James Dalton Surveyor Foxford Valentine Kirwan Collector Nicholas Toppin Prot. Surveyor Galway Port Arthur Nagle Collector Galway Excise James Brown Fitz Jeffrey Collector Kilkenny Caesar Colclough Collector Samuel Pigeon Prot Surveyor Kinsale Dominick Rice Collector Dominick Murrogh Surveyor Limerick John Rice Collector Nicholas Skiddy Surveyor Loughrea Stephen Dean Collector Maryburrow Garret Trant Collector William Bourne Surveyor Moyallow John Longfield Collector Richard Aylward Surveyor Naas Edmond Fitzgerald Collector Robert Dowdal Surveyor Rosse James Butler Collector Mark Whitty Surveyor of Excise Sligoe Owen Dermot Collector Trim Richard Barnwal Collector Hugh Mac Donogh Surveyors Richard Barton Waterford Councellor Butler Collector James Heas Surveyor Wexford Anthony Talbot Collector Wicklow Barnaby Hacket Collector Youghal Patrick Fitzgerald Collector David Fitzgerald Surveyor A List of the Names of the New Burgesses of Strabane and Londonderry Viz. STRABANE Commonly call'd Soveraign JOhn ô Neile Shane Mac Con Backagh ô Neile Burgesses Gordon ô Neile Son of Sir Phelim ô Neile the Great Rebel who was Hang'd Drawn and Quarter'd He burnt Strabane in 1641. John ô Neile Shane Mac Neile Rammar Ô Neile William Roe Hamilton Constantine ô Neile James Cunningham Robert Adams Cloud Hamilton Brian ô Neil Mac Brian Mac Cormuc Mac Rory Grana ô Neil John Browne Robert Gamble Patrick Bellew James Mac Gee Art ô Neile Art Mac ô Neile Ramar ô Neile John Donnelly Shane fadda ô Donnelly James Mac Enally John Mac Rory Shane groom Mac Philip Mac Rory Burnt in the Hand Terence Donnelly Turlogh ô Donnelly Henry ô Neile Henry Mac Phelmy Duff Mac Art Mac Rory ô Neile His Father hang'd Roger Mac Cony Rory Mac Brian Mac Con modura Mac Conway His Father hang'd Dominick Mac Hugh Dominick Mac Rory Ballagh Mac Hugh Charles ô Cahan Cormuck Mac Manus Keiogh ô Cahan Charles ô Conway Cormuck Mac Owen oge Mac Owen Modera Mac Conway LONDONDERRY COrmuck ô Neile Mayor Sheriffs Horace Kennedy and Edward Brooks Aldermen Cohanagh Mac Gwire Gordon ô Neile Constantine ô Neile Constance ô Neile Manus ô Donnel Peter Manby Peter Dobbin Antho. Dobbin John Campsie Daniel ô Dogherty William Hamilton Roger ô Cahan Daniel ô Donnel Nicho. ●urside Alexander Lacky Constance ô Dogherty Daniel ô Sheile Roger ô Dogherty Brian ô Neile and John Buchanan Daniel ô Sheile Chamberlain Burgesses Francis ô Cahan Robert Butler Cornelius Callaghan Thomas Moncriefe Hugh ô Hogan John Mackenny John Campsie Henry Campsie James Lenox John ô Hogan William Stanly James Connor Hugh Eady John Donnogh Alexander Gourdon John Crookshanks Phel Mac Shaghlin John ô Linshane Art ô Hogan Charles ô Sheile Johnlius ô Mullan John Sheridan James Sheridan Constance ô Rorke Dom. Boy Mac Loghlin John Nugent William ô Boy John ô Boy William ô Sullivan Dionysius Mac Loghlin Manus ô Cahan Hugh Mac Loghlin Hugh More ô Dogherty Ulick ô Hogurty Henry Ash Tho. Broome Pet. Mac Peake Hen. Dogherty Robert Shenan Cornelius Magreth Art ô Hogan N o. 9. Privy Councellers appointed by Letters from King James Dated the 28th of February 1684 and such as are Sworn since by particular Letters for the Time being LOrd Primate Lord Chancellor Lord Archbishop Dublin Lord High Treasurer Secretary of State Chancellor of the Exchequer Master of the Ordnance Lord Chief Justice of the King 's Bench. Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer Lieut. General of the Army Colonel of the Regiment of Guards James Duke of Ormond not sworn Henry Earl of Thomond Cary Earl of Roscomon ... Earl of Ardglass Henry Earl of Drogheda Hugh Earl of Mount-Alexander Richard Earl of Ranelagh not sworn Francis Earl of Longford Maurice Viscount Fitzharding Murrogh Viscount Blesinton Robert Fitzgerald Esq not sworn Sir Charles Fielding not sworn Sir Richard Reynel not sworn Sir Thomas Newcomen Sir Robert Hamilton Esquires not sworn Adam Loftus Lemuel Kingdon Sworn afterwards by particular Letters Sir Paul Rycaut Thomas Heitley Esq Earl of Tyrconnel Earl of Lymerick Lord Viscount Ikerin Lord Viscount Galmoy Esquires Thomas Nugent Dennis Daly Stephen Rice Rich. Hamilton Sir William Wentworth Earl of Ballymore Nicholas Purcel Esq Earl of Clanrickard Earl of Antrim Justin Mac Carty Esq Lord Viscount Gormanst own Lord Viscount Rosse Earl of Tyrone Lord Viscount Netterville Lord Lowth Sir William Talbot Esquires Anth. Hamilton Thomas Sheridan Symon Luttrel Fitzgerald Villers Esq Colonel Garret Moore Lord Bellew Charles White Esq Col. Cormusk ô Neil Francis Plowden Esq Privy Consellors Sworn before King James after his coming to Ireland DUke of Powis Duke of Berwick Earl of Abercorne Lord Thomas Howard Earl of Melfort Lord Chief Justice Herbert Lord Dover Colonel William P Colonel Dorrington Marquis D'Albeville Lord Kilmallock Colonel Sarsfield Lord Merryon Earl of Carlingford Earl of Clanrickard Lord Kenmare Lord Clare N o 10 The Civil List of Officers and the Times of their Entring on their Offices CHANCERY SIR Alexander Fitton Knight Created Lord Fitton and Baron of Gosworth in the County of Lymrick Lord High Chancellor of Ireland 23 April 1689. Sir William Talbot Baronet made
Successors to give them relief in a Case of so great moment and general concern as this is As for the general Reprizal mentioned to be made them out of the Rebels Estate which must not be conceived to give any colour to this manner of proceeding and ought to be equal to the Estate which the Proprietors shall be outed of that will be very uncertain for it must be known who the Rebels are and what their Lands amount to since it may be probably concluded that there are many of your Subjects now in England no way concerned in the Rebellion and would have ere this attended your Majesty here if they had not been hindred from coming by duress and Imbargo and many other legal and justifiable excuses too long for this present Paper and withal that where any of them are seised of any new Estates so much must be restored to the old Proprietors and what is also subject to their Settlements and other Incumbrances After all this it is in the power of your Majesty to prevent the total ruine of so many of your Subjects as have been Purchasers and Improvers in this Kingdom by prescribing more moderate ways than depriving them of the whole of what they have legally and industriously acquired and that Committees of both Houses may hear and enquire whether any medium may be found out betwixt the Extreams for the accommodating as near as may be the Purchaser and the old Proprietor so that if there because of Complaint it may not arise from a total disappointment of either Party This is a little of what may be said on this occasion but the hast of those who drew on this Bill will allow no further time at present It is proposed that his Majesty will hear Council on this occasion No. 23. The Lord Bishop of Meath's Speech in Parliament June the 4th 1689. Spoken on the Bill of Repeal of the Act of Settlement My Lords YOur Lordships have now under yo●● Consideration a Bill of great Weight and Importance for the future Prosperity or Ruine of the King and Kingdom depends upon it A Bill that unsettles a former Foundation upon which this Kingdom 's Peace and Flourishing was superstructed and Designs to erect another in its stead the Success whereof is dubious and uncertain I shall therefore humbly crave your Leave to represent my Thoughts candidly and impartially upon it And that so much the rather because I am here summoned by the Kings Writ to give his Majesty my best Advice for his own Service and the good of the Nation My Lords In every Law two things are to be consider'd First that it be just and doth no Man wrong Secondly and that it be pro bono publico And I am humbly of Opinion that this Bill is faulty in both these Respects and therefore ought not to pass this House It is unjust to turn men out of their Possessions and Estates without any Fault or Demerit To deprive Widows of their Jointures and Children of their Portions when they have done nothing to forfeit them But the Injustice will rise much higher if we consider it with a respect to Purchasers who have laid out all their Substance upon Estates deriv'd under the Acts that are now design'd to be Repeal'd What have they done to make them Delinquents except it be the laying out their Money on the Publick Faith of the Nation declared in two Acts of Parliament and on the Publick Faith of his Majesties Royal Brother expressed in his Letters Patents Their Case is yet harder If we consider the great Improvements they have made upon their Purchases which by this Bill they are like to lose without any Reprizal for them And if it be reasonable to restore the Old Proprietors to their Estates 't is enough for them to enjoy them in the same plight and condition that they left them But I see no Reason why they should have them in a better Condition or enjoy the Benefit of other mens Labours and Expences to the utter ruine of them and their Families Here Mercy should take place as well as Justice for the Purchasers are the Objects of them both Two things I am sensible may be reply'd to this and I am willing to consider them both First That if it be unjust to turn them out It is as unjust not to restore the Old Proprietor who hath been so long kept out of his Estate Secondly That there is no injury done to the present Possessor because he is to be repriz'd for his Losses As to the first of these I shall not at present meddle with the Reasons why they lost their Estates nor touch upon the Grounds and Occasions of their forfeiting their Interests in them being sensible that neither the time nor the place will admit a Discourse of this nature I shall therefore take it for granted that they were unjustly put out that it is just and reasonable that they should be restored but then it must be granted that it is unjust to turn out the present Purchaser and Possessor What then is to be done in this Case where the Justice or the Injury is alike on both sides If we restore the Old Proprietor we injure the present Possessor if we do do not we injure the Old Proprietor My Lords It is my humble Opinion which I submit to your Lordships better Judgments that we are to consider in this Case who hath most Justice on his side and incline the Ballance that way If it lies on the Old Proprietors side let him have it If not let the present Possessor enjoy it Now it appears to me that the Purchaser hath more Justice on his side than the Old Proprietor For he has both Law and Equity on his side he hath the Law on his side by two Acts of Parliament and the Kings Letters Patents and he hath the Equity by his Purchase Money whereas the Proprietor hath the Law against him and nothing but Equity to pretend to And I hope your Lordships will never think it reasonable to relieve a bare Equitable Right against a Purchaser that hath both Law and Equity If you do I am confident it is the first President of this kind As for the Reprizals I hear the Name of them in the Bill but I find nothing agreeable to the nature of them There are certain Conditions agreed on all hands to make up the Nature of a Reprizal None of which are like to be observed or kept here I shall name some of them and leave it to your Lordships Consideration how far they are like to be performed with the present Purchasers It is necessary to a Reprizal that it be as good at least if not in some respects better than the thing I am to part with That I my self be Judge whether it be better or worse That I keep what I have till I am reprized If my Neighbour comes to me and tells me that he hath a mind to my Horse
Encouragers and Abettors of them by an unpardonable neglect in the Execution of his Royal Orders And whereas the Issuing out Commissions of Oyer and Terminer in all the Counties of the Kingdom which was done some Months ago was judged by his Majesty with the Advice of his Privy Council the most Efficacious means to prevent and quash such horrid Disorders I. You are Ordered by his Majesty on sight hereof to let Me his Principal Secretary of State know what you can alledge to justifie your selves from the Imputation of having strangely Neglected all this time the Execution of your Commission which proves the chiefest Cause of this general Desolation of the Country II. You are Commanded by his Majesty to proceed without the least delay to the Execution of your Commission and send to me for his Majesties information a Weekly Account of your Proceedings III. That you Adjourn from one Week to another and at farthest not above a Fortnight IV. That you proceed with all Just Severity against such of the Justices of the Peace as have Bayled contrary to Law Malefactors And against all such as favour in any manner Robbers and Thieves V. That you proceed against all persons whatsoever who have given or will give any Obstruction to the Execution of your Commission And if they prove Officers of the Army or Absent so as you do not think fit to proceed against them that you forthwith send me an Account thereof VI. That you proceed with all Rigour against all persons found Guilty of Counterfeiting the Kings Coyn. VII And lastly That you Order all men to fall upon publick Robbers who have no regard of their Duty towards GOD their King or Country destitute of all sense of humanity and consider them but as wild beasts who live upon Prey and Rapine This is Gentlemen what I have at present in Command from his Majesty to send to you to which I will adde this Advertisement That you cannot light upon better Measures to Allay the KINGS just Resentment of your former Neglects the occasion of a world of Mischief then by a speedy and vigorous Execution of your Commission Let the present general cryes of the people for Justice and the present general Oppression under which the Country groans move you to have a Compassion of it and to raise in you such a publick spirit as may Save it from this inundation of Miseries that break in upon it by a Neglect of his Majesties Orders and by a general relaxation of all Civil and Military Laws Consider that our Enemies leaving us to our selves as they do conclude we shall prove greater Enemies to one another than they can be to us and that we will destroy the Country and enslave our selves more than they are able to do What Inhumanities are daily committed against one another gives but too much ground to the truth of what our Enemies conclude of us I had almost forgot a special Command of his Majesty that is That you will consider the Liberty of Conscience granted by Act of Parliament and to punish the Infringers of that Law who by an indiscreet and inconsiderable Zeal usurp his Majesties Prerogative not reflecting how much his Majesties and the Nations interest and not only the Religion of the Nation but the Catholick Religion in all the parts of Christendom is involved in a Religious Execution of that Liberty of Conscience Dublin-Castle Jan. 2. 1689. I am Gentlemen Your most humble Servant Marquis D Albaville To the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer for the County of Dublin or to any or either of them to be Communicated to the rest To the Lord Chief Justice Nugent No. 26. A Copy of a Petition of the Minister of Wexford for his Church and the Order thereupon To the KING 's most Excellent Majesty The humble Petition of Alex r. Allen of Wexford Clerk Most humbly Sheweth THAT your Petitioner being Minister of the Parish Church of St. Iberius in the Town of Wexford hath therein for several Years past daily celebrated Divine Service and exercised all other Offices of his Function with Piety to GOD and constant Loyalty to your Majesty Yet Your Petitioner on the 25th of October last was Dispossessed of his said Church contrary to the late Act of Liberty of Conscience by Edward Wiseman Esq Mayor of Wexford who a few dayes after did not only by the Rabble introduced by him brake down and demolish all the Pewes and Altar of the said Church but did seize and unjustly deny your Petitioners Vestmonts Church Book and other Ornaments thereof to the great prejudice of your Petitioner and his Parishoners although your Majesties Roman Catholick Subjects have several Chappels fit for the free Exercise of their Religion both within and without the Walls of the said Town and whereunto several Protestant Inhabitants have given liberal Contribution Your Petitioner further sheweth That he the said Edward Wiseman as Magistrate of the Town of Wexford is obliged as usually it hath been by Act of Vestry to encourage and provide for the relief of distressed Orphans and other poor of the said Town of Wexford yet uncharitably refuseth to interpose his Authority in the behalf of such poor whereby they must inevitably perish if not speedily Relieved May it therefore please Your Majesty to Restore your Petitioner to his Parish Church which was never Forfeited by Absence or otherwise And that the said Edward Wiseman may be obliged to Repair it and leave it in the same condition he found it and that such care may be taken for Relief of distressed Orphans and other Poor from Famine as is usual And Your Petitioner shall ever pray c. At the Court in Dublin-Castle Jan. 28th 1690. Present the KING 's most Excellent Majesty in Council WHEREAS His Majesty is Informed upon Oath That Edw. Wiseman late Mayor of the Town of Wexford did Illegally seize upon the Parish Church of St. Iberius in the said Town of Wexford broke down the Pews and Altar of the said Church and detained the Vestmonts Church-Books and other Ornaments thereunto belonging His Majesty was Graciously pleased to Order Mr. Nicholas Stafford present Mayor of the said Town of Wexford forthwith to cause the said Church and Goods to be Restored to Alex r. Allen Minister of the said Parish in the same condition they were in when Seiz'd upon by the said Edward Wiseman Hugh Reily No. 27. Mr. Prowd Minister of Trim his Account of the Remarkable Accident that hapned upon Plundring the Church of Trim. SIR THIS will give you an Account of an eminent Instance of Gods Vengeance shewn on one John Keating a Church Rapparee who in the very act of Plundring and Breaking of our Church was struck with a sudden Madness in which he continued for the space of Three Weeks and that day three weeks he was struck Mad dyed in a sad and miserable Condition The manner of it was thus This Keating was a Souldier in the Lord of Kinmares
malitiosus pernitiosus nequissimus machinansque ●…ns pacem commune tranquilit ' hujus Regni Hibernioe perturbare discord ' inter Dominum Regem subditos suos incitare movere dict' Dom ' Regem gubernationem suam in odium contempt ' vilipendentiam inducer ' in Insurrectionem Rebellionem in hoc Regno Hibernioe suscitar ' mover ' inferr ' vicessimo die Januar ' Anno Regni Domini nostri Jacobi secundi De● gra ' Angl ' Scot ' Franc ' Hiberniae Regis Fidei Defensor ' c. quinto apud Castrum de Dublin ' in Com' Dublin ' proedict ' seditiosam malitiosam illicit ' scripsit ' vel scribi fecit quandam seditiosam malitiosam Epistolam sive Chartam cujus quidem seditiosam malitiosam Epistoloe tenor sequitur in hoec verba scilicet Eniskillin the 10th of January 1689. Cosin Spike YOurs I'receiv'd January the 1 st it being the greatest satisfaction I could expect to hear of your good Health and Welfare and the rest of your good Family getting the convenience of the honest Bearer makes me acknowledge your often kindnesses to me Yesterday we received Letters from Londonderry they all agree with our Proposals as in carrying on our Design in Dublin The day appointed is the 4th of February at Supper-time in the Castle and for some of our men intended for that purpose to go in a little before as many as can well not being suspected others to stay in the Street and Houses thereabout till the Word is given GOD be with Us Then all to Force in Killing the Guards after giving the Tinker and the rest of his Function their last Supper Mr. Drury he is intended to Fire the Suburbs with others of his assistance as might be thought fit it being a means to force the Souldiers out of the City We question not but our People is in number enough to do the Work as well in the City as Castle One night does all We have here in these parts 14000 Horse and Foot in readiness to be with you in Dublin in five or six dayes at farthest I hope God will inspire into our peoples hearts to persevere with Undaunted Hearts to pull down that Yoke of Popery which we are likely to lie under unless by God prevented We are in the Truth and I hope God is with Us although our Expectations being Failed hereto we might think it rather Punishment for our Sins than in any wise hindrance of our Victory Last Week we had an Account from Derry that there Landed two Ships laden with Ammunition and Provision and to the number of Fifty-Six Volunteers the most of them now being here with Us They giving us an Account of our English Resolution That they will every man Die rather than be yeilding to Popery likewise that great Preparations are made for our English to come over this Spring to the value of Two and Twenty Thousand Souldiers and Inhabitants to settle the Country Cosin I desire you 'l direct the Bearer to Mr. Pains with a Letter he has for him And likewise I desire you to go to my Cosin and give my kind Love to him the rest of his good Family I suppose the Pacquet of Letters as touching this Matter wholly is directed to Mr. Smith which meeting with him will give you the full at large My kind Love to my Cosin George and your Wife This being all at present Your loving Cosin to command during Life These For Mr. Will. Spike Living at Colledg-Green in the old Parliament-house Dublin Mary Smith Et ulterius Jurator ' proedict ' super Sacrament ' suum proedict ' dicunt proesent ' quod idem Dionisius Connor sciens eandem Epistolam sive Chartam fore falsam malitiosam seditiosam postea scilicet eodem vicessimo die Januarii Anno Regni dict' Domini Regis quint ' supradict ' apud Castrum Dublin ' in Com' Dublin ' proedict ' seditiosam malitiosam Epistolam sive Chartam proedict ' publicavit publicari fecit contra debit ' ligeantiam suam in malum exemplum aliorum in tali casu delinquentium contra pacem dicti Domini Regis nunc coronam dignitatem suam c. Copia vera Examnat per F. Nugent No. 36. Capt. Browns Acknowledgment That he Perjured himself Whereas I John Brown Gent. Did on or about the last day of December last come before the Right Honourable the Lord Chief Justice Riverstown L d Ch. Justice of all Ireland and did in an Examination taken before him upon Oath accuse Edward Brock of the City of Dublin for speaking and uttering several Seditious Words reflecting on His Majesty and the Government Now I the said John Brown do hereby Acknowledg and Declare That I did very much Wrong and Abuse the said Edward Brock in the said matter he never having uttered or spoke any such or the like Words wherewith I accused him before the said Lord Chief Justice As Witness my Hand this Third day of February 1689. Witness present The Words upon Oath being first Interlined John Brown Fra. Rica Ja. Somervill No. 29. Advertisement as it was published by Mr. Yalden in his Weekly Abhorrence concerning Dr. King and Dr. Foy THERE was lately published by John Yalden Esq the substance of Fifteen Sermons Entituled An Abhorrence from the Bishop of Ely c. of the proceedings of the Prince of Orange and the Lords c. that Invited Him But some Protestants believing the said Book to be a Popish contrivance and that such Doctrines as were therein were never Preached by the Divines there named Upon which a Gentleman of Quality to satisfie these Doubts applyed himself to two Reverend Divines of this City viz. Dr. King and Dr. Foy who both certified under their hands that the Doctrines contained in the said Book were honest and true Christian Divinity and obliging to all Christians to put immediately in practice upon the peril of their Salvation Which Certificate satisfied several Protestants here and confirmed them in an unchangeable Loyalty March 8th 1689. Reverend Sir I Intended to have waited on you this Afternoon but found my self so Indisposed that I durst not venture abroad I have been made sensible That the Publisher of the Weekly Abhorrence has made use of your Name and Mine And Affirms That WE have Certified under our Hands That the Doctrines contained in a Book published by one John Yalden Esq containing a Collection of the Substance of Fifteen Sermons were honest and true Christian Divinity and Obliging to all Christians to put immediately in Practice upon the Peril of their Salvation And he intimates that this Certificate has been shewn to several Protestants here Sir For my own part I do profess that I never Read the aforesaid Book nor did any Gentleman of Quality as he affirms ever apply himself to me to satisfie him in any doubts concerning it that I remember I am sure never any