Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
justice_n lord_n sir_n treasurer_n 2,767 5 11.4861 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A36748 A letter from Monsieur de Cros (who was an embassador at the Treaty of Nimeguen and a resident in England in K. Ch. the Second's reign) which may serve for an answer to the impostures of Sir. Wm. Temple, heretofore ambassador from England at the Hague and at Nimeguen ... : together with some remarks upon his memoirs, to make appear how grosly he is mistaken in the greatest part of the most important matters he relates concerning what passed from the year 1672 until the year 1679.; Lettre de Monsieur Du Cros à Mylord **** afin de servir de réponse aux impostures de Monsieur le Chevalier Temple. English Du Cros, Simon, 17th cent. 1693 (1693) Wing D2436; ESTC R20449 18,902 38

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

did nothing but report up and down that the King gave the Authors of the Address presented to his Majesty by the House of Commons no better name than Rogues The King had his liberty to reject this Address as indeed he did and no ways apprehended the Consequences of it at that time yet for all that he banished Don Bern. de Salinas not in the least considering his Character nor the Kindness wherewith he had always honoured this Minister Yea and be Banished him too without any respect to the King of Spain But for me who had abused and deceived the D. of York My Lord Treasurer ay and the K. himself who had overthrown all those fair and vast Projects which the Confederates had contrived at London and Nimega●n● and Sir W. T. at the Hague which had disclosed the Kings dispatches a master piece of S●●r●●ry who was the cause of quite changing the 〈◊〉 of Christendom for me I say against whom the 〈◊〉 Orange had written and caused to be written so many thundering Letters against whom all the Ministers of the Confederates called for Vengeance against whom Sir W. T. levelled more of his endeavours to destroy me than the Court did to repair this Breach and patch up the business it lets me alone it does not make the least complaint to the Duke my Master the K. does me a great many favours and laughs in his Sleeve at the Surprise at the Sorrow and Complaints of the Confederates and Sir W. T. After all that can any body reasonably believe that the K. of England might have lookt upon me as a Rogue And when he told Sir W. T. after a droleing manner that I was a Rogue and had o● 〈◊〉 th●● all may it not be probable that he had a mind to jeer him and to make him sensible that he was taken but for Fool I● was very like so to he I have not gone about My Lord to say i● this place what I might say to wipe of all those scandalous impressions that Sir W. T. hath such a desire to fasten upon me I suppose I have given your Lordship sufficiently to understand that what he hath been pleased to say upon this Theme of me proceeds from inveterate Spite and Malice But what way is there to get clear of one of the most Haughty and most Revengeful of men who in his Memoires falls foul upon the reputation even of the greatest Minister who casts aspersions on the Duke of Lauderdale that most Zealous and most Faithful Minister that ever the King was Master of on My Lord Arlington whom Sir W. is bound to respect as his Master who was his Benefactor that raised him from his sordid obscurity and as it were from the Dunghill to bring him into play This ingreatful person forsooke him that he might catch at the shadow and appearance of mending his Fortune he would not have stuck to ruin My Lord Arlington by base indirect means This is no hard matter to make out even by Sir W. T. his own Memoirs but yet I am acquainted with some particulars upon this Subject that make my hair stand an end nay and I have not only learnt them from My Lord Arlingtons own mouth but also from a noted Minister of those times What a piece of impudence to call in question and tax the Principal Ministers and the soberest Magistrates of Holland viz. Monsieur de ●everning Monsieur Valknier and others generally esteemed by every body To arraign them I say some for A varice others for Partiality I had almost said for betraying their Trust But above all to give such disad antagious representations of the E. of Rochester and of Sir Leoline Jenkyns that it would have been all one if he had said that Sir Leoline was a man of the other World a plain downright Ideot void of insight and Experience And that Law Hyde now E. of Rochester was a Lord altogether unacquainted with and no ways fit for the imployment the King gave him at Nimeguen neverthetheless Sir Leoline was made Secretary of State and no notice at all taken of Sir W. As for Laurence Hyde Sir W. speaks first of him as if he were a Youth that should have been sent to the University I plainly perceive saith he that the chief design of that Commission was to introduce Mr. Hyde into this sort of employment and to let him understand the manner how the men behave themselves in the same then he adds He excused himself out of modesty to have any thing to do with any Conference and Compiling Dispatches Was it out of the respect he owed to Sir W. T. or for want of Capacity that My Lord shewed so much modesty that he would neither make Dispatches nor meddle with Conferences what he who had been ingaged already as he was afterwards in very important Affairs who had been Embassadour in the principal Courts of Europe who was chosen as Chief of the Embasie at Nimegnen one who in all respects is so far above Sir W. T. for all these great qualities yet My Lord affords Sir W. just as much difference as a petty Scholar does a famous Pedant And to reward him Sir W. T. would make him pass in the world for an Embassadour that was but at best his Scholar I make account to tell you what Sir W. dare not acknowledge Mr. Hyde being more subtile and of greater Abilities than Sir W and of that quality too that was not to be exposed would not intermeddle in a Mediation which was like to suffer so gross Indignities as the Mediation of England suffered at the Treaty of Nimeguen One time or other I shall publish those Indignities in my Memoires together with the weakness and tameness wherewith they were content to suffer them But now if Sir W. T. hath not spared such Illustrious persons as these No not so much as My Lord Treasurer at present Marquis of Caermarthen laying something to his charge whom also he does not do that right and Justice which is due to so great a Minister of State one of the greatest Wits of the Age for business a person so Loyal to the King his Master that he sacrificed himself for his sake and after all so full of zeal for his Country that he hath bethought himself of all expedients and hath not feared to expose himself to peril and utter undoing that he might deliver it from the mischiefs that throaten it If Sir Will. hath not spared the Kings person whose Dignity and Reputation he so often sacrifices can I hope to escape his foul mouthed Language Peradventure he had better have done something else something wiser great Confident of Princes and Ks. the sole preserver of Flanders as he is than to have entred the l●st with a Monk with a kind of an Agent and with a cunning Knave But his desire of revenge hath prevailed he believes himself cruelly wrong'd and he is in the right on 't for that at the Hague