a Paper to the Court containing Observations upon the Indictment which she desired might be read but it was refused and she bid to give it her Husband Green produced for his Defence the Testimony of James Warrier his Landlord and his Wife and Maid which being found to relate to October 19. was deemed nothing to the purpose Berry produced Corporal William Collet who affirmed that he on that Wednesday Night placed his Sentinels at Somerset-House Nicholas Trollop from seven to ten who confessed that in his time a Sedan was brought in Nicholas Right stood from ten to one who said no Sedan came out in his time and Gabriel Hasket who affirmed the same for his time And Eliz. Minshaw Berry's Maid affirmed that her Master was in Bed that Night by twelve a Clock The Sentinels Evidence was only though material but in regard they could not be so positive but that they might be mistaken by reason of the darkness of the Night and Privacy of the Conveyance their Evidence was not thought substantial Mr. Attorney General then spoke to the Concurrency of Prance's and Bedloe's Evidences and Mr. Solicitor General to the Consistancy thereof After which the Ld. Ch. Justice sum'd up the Evidence and directed the Jury in a very tart Speech against the Cruelty of the Romish Principles Then the Jury withdrawing for a short space brought the Prisoners all in guilty Upon which the Ld. Ch. Justice told them that they had found the same Verdict that he would have found if he had been one with them and if it were the last word he were to speak in this World he should have pronounced them guilty At which Words the whole Assembly gave a great shout of Applause The next day the Prisoners being brought again to the Bar Mr. Justice Wyld who as second Judg in that Court pronounceth the Sentence in all Criminal Matters except High-Treason spoke an excellent Speech to them wherein he shewed them the Greatness of their Crime and gave them good Advice and then sentenc'd them to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd which was accordingly executed upon them at Tyburn on Fryday the 21st of Feb. they all denying the Fact to the last ADVERTISEMENT THE Tryals of Thompson Pain and Farrel tho not immediately succeeding the Preceeding yet relating to the same matter and giving not little light thereto is judg'd not inconvenient to be placed next The Tryal of Nathaniel Thompson William Pain and John Farrel at Guild-Hall before Sir Francis Pemberton Lord Chief Justice of his Majesty's Court of Kings-Bench on Tuesday June the 20th 1682. The Jurors Names were Peter Houblon John Ellis William Barret Joshua Brooks Gervas Byfield Jonathan Lee George VViddowes William Sambrooke William Jacomb John Delmee Samuel Bayly Samuel Howard TO whom an Information exhibited by the Kings Attorney General against the said Thompson Pain and Farrel was read for writing and printing several scandalous Libels about the Death of Sir Edm. Godfrey reflecting on the Justice of the Nation in the Proceedings against his Murtherers Which Information Mr. Thompson opened and Serjeant Maynard aggravated the Crimes therein contained Mr. Clare then was sworn and produced a Copy of the Record of the Conviction and Attainder of Sir Edm. Godfrey As also a Copy of the Inquisition take by the Coroner of Middlesex upon the view of the Body of the said Sir Edm. Godfrey whereby it was found by them that he was murthered strangled with a Cord by Persons unknown Both which Mr. Clare having sworn to be true Copies were read Then the Execution of Green Berry and Hill was attested by the Oath of Capt. Richardson and Mr. Prance and Curtis swore that they and Bedloe were Witnesses at their Tryals Then Sir John Nicholas Sir Philip Lloyd and William Bridgman Esq swore that the two Letters in the Information which were shewed them were the same that were shewed to Thompson Pain and Farrel at the Council and that Thompson owned the printing of both and Farrel owned the bringing of the first and Pain owned the bringing of the other to Thompson both which Letters was then read in the Court. The first which Farrel owned he writ was intitled A Letter to Mr. Miles Prance in relation to the Murder of Sir Edm. Godfrey The Design whereof was to contradict the Evidence given at the Trial of his Murderers and to fix the Guilt upon himself affirming that the Coroner's Inquest were first of Opinion he was Felo de se and there was much Art us'd to procure their Verdict to the contrary That the Body was refused to be opened and the Coroner of Westminster's Assistance rejected and he dismist with a Guiny That he was not dogg'd as was sworn but was seen in several places and about three in the Afternoon about Primrose-hill walking in the Fields That he was found in a place inaccessible by a Horse and in such a posture as inferr'd he could never be thrust into a Sedan That his Body was full of Blood and when the Sword was pulled out Blood and Water very much issued out of that Wound and that part of the Sword which was in the Body was discoloured and the Point which was through was rusty his Clothes Belt and Scabbord were weather-beaten to Rags his Body stunk and his Eyes Nostrils and Mouth were Fly-blown his Eyes shut his Face pale no Dirt on his Shoes nor Horse-hair on his Clothes and that Bedloe's and Prance's Evidence before the Committee of Lords very much differ'd And that all this would be proved by divers credible and undeniable Eye and Ear-Witnesses Dated from Cambridg Feb. 23. 1681. Subscribed Truman London printed for M. G. at the Sign of Sir E. B. G's Head near Fleet-bridg The other Letter writ by Pain was intituled A second Letter to Mr. Miles Prance in Reply to the Ghost of Sir E. Godfrey Which was a Vindication of the First in Reply to the Answer given thereto by a Paper Intituled The Ghost of Sir E. Godfrey Disclaiming the concurrence of any Papists in publishing that Paper asserting for Truth all that had been said therein which was ready to be proved by many Witnesses who were not willing to expose themselves to the fury of that Torrent which then carried all before it in favour of the Plot by appearing at the Trial running over all the Paragraphs of the other Letter asserting what had there been said for Truth endeavouring to wipe off the Objections given in a scurrilous manner imputing Melancholy to be predominant in Sir Edm. Godfrey's Family and that such Accidents were no News thereto c. Dated from Cambridg March 13. 1681. subscribed Truman London Printed for Nath. Thompson 1682. Then was read a Paragraph out of N. Thompson's Loyal Protestant Intelligence Numb 125. Tuesday March 7. 1681. which was a kind of Advertisement of this second Letter's coming out and an Assertion that all things in the first were true and were ready by undeniable Evidence to be made out Then a
that Robinson and his Wife upon their Examinations before a Justice of the Peace said they did not know him Then the Statute of 27. Eliz. Cap. 2. was read and the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him in Guilty Then VVilliam Atkins was set to the Bar having been Arraigned for being a Romish Priest and his Indictment read to the same Jury Then VVilliam Jackson being sworn said He could say nothing Francis VVilden deposed That he heard him say Prayers in an Unknown Tongue in a Surplice and had seen him give the Sacrament to seven or eight according to the manner of the Church of Rome in a Wafer at Mrs. Stamford's House in VVolverhampton Then John Jarvis being called refused to be sworn saying He was troubled with a Vision last Night But the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he mistook for Old Men dream Dreams 't was Young Men see Visions and that he was an old Man Bidding him speak the Truth and he 'd warrant him he should not be troubled with Visions any more this being a Trick of the Priests So he being sworn deposed That he had often been relieved by this Atkins and had heard him say somewhat in an Unknown Tongue and had Confess'd to him and often received the Sacrament from him he being in a Priests Habit. Henry Brown also deposed That he was almost turned from the Protestant Religion to that of the Church of Rome but never went further than Confession and that was to this Man and then he left them Then Thomas Dudley deposed That he likewise was given that way and had been at Confession with one Atkins whom he believed to be this Man and had seen him perform several Rites of the Church of Rome at VVell-Head at Ham. Then the Statute was read and the Prisoner saying He had neither any Witnesses to call nor any thing to say The Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him also in Guilty And the Ld. Ch. Justice sentenced them both to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd ON Monday Aug. 4. 1679. at Hereford Charles Kerne was brought to the Bar and being Arraigned he pleaded Not Guilty to the Indictment which was for being a Romish Priest Then the Jury being sworn whose Name 's are not inserted into this Trial only that one VVill. Barret was Foreman the Court proceeded to call the Evidence against him And first Edward Biddolph was sworn who deposed that he did not know the Prisoner that he had seen one of that name 6 Years agone at Mr. Somerset's at Bellingham but would not say this was he Then Margaret Edwards deposed That she had known Kerne five or six Years That the first time she ever saw him was at Mr. VVigmore's of Lucton who told her it was he That she hath seen him several times since twice or thrice at VVoebly and the last time was the 29th of May was Twelvemonth at Sarnsfield at Mrs. Monington's where she saw him deliver the Wafer and remembred the Words Corpus Christi to four persons that were there but she her self did not receive She gave also an account of the Reason of her then coming thither it being at the request of one Harris of Lempster whose Wife was sick to seek some Remedy from Mrs. Monington for her Telling how the Maid brought her up to the Mistress how she acquainted her with her Errand what advice was given her and how Mrs. Monington understanding she was a Papist took her into the Chappel whereof she gave a Description Then Mary Jones deposed That she knew Mr. Kerne about eight Years ago when she lived at Mr. Somersets and that Mr. Kerne lived in the House about half a Year That she hath seen several Persons come thither And that one Sunday Morning she saw several Persons go up with Mr. Kerne and listning she heard Mr. Kerne say something aloud which she did not understand there being but a Wall between them That also there was a Child Christned in the House and no one there but Mr. Somerset and his Wife Mr. Latchet and his Wife and Mr. Kerne to do it but she did not see him do it though she heard his Voice And that once she wash'd a Surplice but knew not whose it was Then the Prisoner in his own Defence called one Mr. Hyet who said That Margaret Edwards had denied to him that she knew Mr. Kerne but not being on her Oath when she said so it was not regarded Mr. Weston's maid affirmed That she saw Margaret Edwards and Mary Jones talking together and Marg. Edwards instructed the other what she should say but being called they both denyed it upon their Oaths Then Mrs. Monington appear'd who said She neither knew Marg. Edwards nor James Harris and Mrs. Monington's Maid denied that ever she saw her at her Mistresses House Then the Statute being read of 27 Eliz. the Prisoner urged that Persons that are not Priest's may say Mass except that of Bread and Wine and Christen too in extremis Then the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence concluding Margaret Edwards to be a Positive Evidence but leaving the other doubtful to the Consideration of the. Jury who brought the Prisoner in Not Guilty The Trial of Thomas Knox and John Lane at the King's-Bench Bar on Tuesday Novemb. 25. 1679. before the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs and the other Judges of that Court. THen and there the Prisoners were indicted for a Conspiracy to defame and scandalize Dr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe thereby to discredit their Evidence about the Horrid Popish Plot. To which having pleaded Not Guilty the Jury was sworn viz. Sir John Kirke Thomas Harriot Henry Johnson Simon Middleton Hugh Squire Francis Dorrington John Roberts Rainsford Waterhouse Thomas Earsby Joseph Radcliffe James Supple Richard Cooper To whom the Indictment being read Trenchard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Indictment Serjeant Maynard pursued the Charge and Sir Creswel Levinz his Majesty's Attorney General opened the Evidence Then the Attainders of those Persons executed for the Plot and the Impeachments of the Lords in the Tower and of the Earl of Danby mentioned in the Indictment being allowed Robert Radford one of his Majesty's Yeomen of the Guard being call'd and sworn deposed That Richard Lane who was a Yeoman of the Guard extraordinary and Father of this John Lane told him about a Year ago that Doctor Oates did attempt many times to Bugger his Son but knowing him to be a lying Fellow he durst not speak of it again for fear he would have put it upon him Mr. Thomas Allen only deposed that in December last when Lane was out of Dr. Oates's Service he desired him to interceed for him which he did till he was admitted again Mr. Samuel Oates the Doctor 's Brother deposed That in April last about a Fortnight before Lane went from his Brother he heard him say having before wished for 1000 l. that he questioned not
Papers that had been charged upon him that they were none of his nor did he ever own them for his nor could he ever make Pictures nor did he ever in his Life and that that very Person whom Mr. Dugdale said he owned he got it to be printed by had denied it before the King and Council Then Elizabeth Hunt the Prisoner's servant appeared who testified That about 7 or 8 Weeks before the seizure of the Papers a Porter brought three Bundles of Papers for her Master in his absence which lay in a Box in his Counting-house a Week or Fortnight before she told him of them And as to Mr. Dugdale that she going to him for Mony he owed her Master after he was in Prison and he not paying her it as he promised she said to him Sir I think 't is very hard that you should keep my Master's Mony from him and yet go and swear against his Life too he said to her There was a great deal of do about his swearing against her Master more than needs but as he hoped for Salvation he did not believe Mr. Colledge had any more hand in any Conspiracy against his Majesty than the Child unborn Mr. Colledge inform'd the Court that this Maid moreover told him in the Tower before he came away that Mr. Dugdale desired to be remembred to Mr. Smith Colledge's Counsel and told her he had nothing against her Master that could touch his Life or an Hair of his Head and that he knew nothing of a Plot against the King and that if he could help it he had as lieve he had given 100 l. he had never spoken what he had Which she own'd for truth and Dugdale then denied evading it by telling the Story another way Then Mrs. Godwin being called appeared who related concerning the Papers that three Messengers coming to search for them on the Saturday after her Brother's confinement and they not finding them she got her Brother-in-law George Spur to carry them away to his House at Busshie to secure them till they should know what they did concern Then Spur being called did not appear Then the Attorny General called for one John Shirland who appeared to be a Man that lived by his Shifts and had been whip'd in Bridewel who swore that Mr. Bolron would have given him 10 l. and an Horse to go down and swear against Sir Miles Stapleton Which Bolron denied Then Smith deposed likewise against Mr. Bolron that he told him as they were traveling that he had as much to say against Colledge as any Body and that if he would speak for him he would evidence against Sir John Brooks for a discourse at Ferry-Bridge Which Mr. Bolron deny'd likewise Then no more Witnesses being called Mr. Colledge began to make his Observations upon the Evidence to the Court Professing his own Innocency as to what had been sworn against him and upon what had been attested for him owning his Zeal for his King Parliaments Church of England and against Popery Relating how he came acquainted with Haynes and the discoveries he made to him of the Popish Plot and of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey's Murder for which the Court interrupted and reproved him as not to the purpose and then he went on to sum up his own Evidence complaining of his close Confinement so that he could not procure that Evidence he otherwise might have done for himself The Statute of Decimo tertio was read to him and then Mr. Colledge very pathetically recommending himself to the Justice of his Jury concluded his Defence Then Mr. Sollicitor General largely summ'd up the Evidence and Mr. Serjeant Jefferies and the Lord Chief Justice did the same Then the Court called for two Bottles of Sack which the Jury divided among themselves at the Bar for their Refreshment in the presence of the Prisoner After which a Bailiff was sworn and the Jury withdrawing to consider of their Verdict the Court adjourned for half an hour and when they returned the Jury brought the Prisoner in Guilty At which there was a great Shout given whereat the Court being offended one Person who was observed by the Cryer to be particularly concerned in the Shout was committed to Goal for that Night but the next Morning having received a publick Reproof was discharged without Fees Then it being about 3 a Clock in the Morning the Court adjourned to 10. At which hour the Court being sat and first Mr. Aaron Smith having entred into a Recognizance of 500 l. to appear the first day of the next Term at the Court of King's-Bench the Lord Chief-Justice after a short speech directed to the Prisoner pronounced Sentence upon him to be Hang'd Drawn and Quartered which was accordingly executed upon him over against the Gate of the Castle at Oxford on Wednesday August 31. 1681. And his Head and Quarters through his Majesty's Grace were delivered to his Relations and by them brought up to London and privately interred The proceedings at the Sessions-House in the Old-Baily London on Thursday November 24. 1681. before his Majesty's Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer upon on the Bill of Indictment for High-Treason against Anthony Earl of Shaftsbury The Grand Jury Sir Samuel Barnardiston John Morden Thomas Papillon John Dubois Charles Herle Edward Rudge Humphrey Edwin John Morrice Edmund Harrison Joseph Wright John Cox Thomas Parker Leonard Robinson Thomas Shepherd John Flavell Michael Godfrey Joseph Richardson William Empson Andrew Kendrick John Lane John Hall THE Lord Chief Justice Pemberton gave the Charge wherein he explained the Nature of Treason particularly from the Statute of the 13th Car. 2. and explained the Validity of two Witnesses and the Jury's present Duty After which a Bill of High-Treason was offered against the Earl of Shaftsbury and Sir Francis Withens moved That the Evidence might be heard in Court Then the Jury desired a Copy of their Oath which the Court granted and then they withdrew After some little time they returned and being called over by their Names The Foreman acquainted the Lord Chief Justice That it was the Opinion of the Jury and they claim'd as their Right that they ought to examine the Witnesses in private But the Lord Chief Justice deny'd that it was their Right but was their Advantage and it was the King's desire it should be publick in which also the Lord Chief Justice North concurr'd and then therefore the Indictment was read wherein the Earl of Shaftsbury was charged with High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government The Jury then desired a List of the Names of the King's Evidence But they were told that they being indorsed upon the back of the Indictment which they were to have out with them it was needless Then they requested to see the Warrant by which the Earl of Shaftsbury was committed but that they being told that the Lieutenant of the Tower kept for his Indemnity could not be granted Then they requested that the Evidence might
and he should have a Pardon and that if the King did deny it as he durst not they would rise upon him and force him After him Bernard Dennis being sworn gave some account of his first coming into England and how he began his Acquaintance with the Earl of Shaftsbury and was recommended by him understanding him to be a Clergy-Man to Dr. Burnet and afterward to Mr. Ferguson in order to the bringing him over and how my Lord proffer'd him a Benefice And that one time being with him my Lord asked him How many there might be of his Name in his Country and told him that he would have him to advise those of his Name and Friends to be in a readiness when-ever occasion shall serve to stand by and assist the Common-Wealth of England for that they did really intend to have England under a Common-Wealth and would extirpate the King and all his Family as near as they could And said he admir'd at the Irish Nation to be such Fools for that it was very certain that King James Queen Elizabeth King Charles the First and the King that now is does wrong them to very Destruction But that a Common-Wealth would take more pity of them than any do now in this time wherein the King governs Here the King's Evidence ceasing the Jury enquired upon what Statute the Indictment was grounded and whether any of these Witnesses stood indicted To which the Court returning a satisfactory Answer they withdrew and the Court adjourned till three of the Clock When being sat again the Witnesses were all called one by one and examined by the Jury concerning what they had severally deposed Wherein nothing was remarkable but what they examin'd Mr. Secretary Jenkins Whether he heard not a Debate in the House of Commons about an Association And that Booth acknowledged himself to be in Orders tho now not Beneficed Turbervile and John Macnamarra that though they signed the Petition to the Common-Council for some Maintenance and that they were tempted to revoke their Evidence yet never read it nor knew what was in it And that Haynes further said That he heard the Lord Shaftsbury say at a Pastry-Cook's Shop in Iron-Monger Lane that the King had no more Religion than an Horse That when he came came first to England he was inclined to Popery but since he was degenerated from all the Principles of Christianity being just like a perfect Beast The Witnesses being examined the Jury withdrew and took the Statute-Book with them and returned the Bill Ignoramus Upon which the People fell a Hollowing and Shouting which Mr. Attorn Gen. desired might be recorded The Trial of Charles John Count Conningsmark Christopher Vratz Captain John Stern Lieutenant and Charles George Borosky alias Boratzi before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton At the Old-Baily on Tuesday February the 28th 1681. THE Prisoners then and there appearing were Arraigned for the barbarous Murder of Thomas Thynn Esq And being Foreigners Mr. Vandore and Sir Nathaniel Johnson were sworn Interpreters They pleaded Not Guilty and desired their Jury might consist of half Foreigners which was granted And the Count desired his Trial might be put off a day or two and that he might be tried by himself neither of which were granted Then after some Challenges on both sides the Jury sworn were Sir William Roberts Bar. Moses Charas Gent. Richard Pagett Esq Charles Beelow Gent. George Hocknal Esq Peter Vandenhagen Gent. Walter Moyle Esq Christopher Ripkey Gent. Thomas Henslow Esq Daniel Griggion Gent. John Haynes Esq John Lebarr Gent. To whom the Indictment was read and Mr. Keen and Sir Francis Withens opened the same and then William Cole deposed That on Sunday Feb. 12. about a quarter after Eight at Night his Master Thomas Thynn Esq was coming up St. James-Street from the Countess of Northumberland's and he was walking with a Flambeau in his Hand before the Coach and coming along at the lower end of St. Albans-Street he heard the Blunderbuss go off and turning his Face back saw a great Smoke and heard his Master cry out he was murdered and saw three Horsemen riding away on the right side of the Coach whom he pursued and cried out Murder He ran to the upper end of the Hay-Market till he was quite spent and then turning back again his Master was got into the House whom he understood was wounded One of the Men was upon a little Bay Horse William Ellers deposed That then and there he coming with his Master from the Lady Northumberland's there came three Men riding by the right side of the Coach and as they rid one of them turned about and said Stop you Dog And just as he looked about the Fire was let into the Coach upon his Master and the Men ran away as fast as they could and that he could not know any of their Faces Mr. Hobbs the Chirurgeon deposed That he was with Mr. Thynn about nine or ten a Clock that Night he was wounded and found him shot with four Bullets which entred into his Body tore his Guts and wounded his Liver and Stomach and Gall and broke one of his Ribs and wounded the great Bone below of which Wounds he died and believed there as never a Wound but was Mortal He shewed the Court the four Bullets two of which he thought might be Iron one he found in the Stomach one between the Ribs and the Skin and two were lodged in the Back-bone Then Mr. White the Coroner deposed That on Feb. 13. he sat upon the Body and found four Holes on the right Side behind his short Ribbs as if made with Bullets and he gave order to open the Body and saw Mr. Hobbs take out the four Bullets Boresky being then told what was said replied That he fired the Blunderbuss but did not know how many Bullets there were because he did not charge it but he could tell who did But the Ld. Ch. Justice said that would not be material because his Evidence could charge no Body but himself Then Mr. Bridgman and Sir John Reresby deposed That Borosky Vratz and Stern were examined by them and proffer'd to read their Examinations but the Ld. Ch. Justice would not suffer it because their Evidence could charge no Body but themselves and he would not let the Jury be possess'd by that which is not Evidence And therefore they were only suffer'd to help their Memories by the Examinations and to mention only what they had confessed as to themselves Therefore they said that Borosky then confessed that he came into England at the desire of Count Conningsmark But here the Ld. Ch. Justice interrupted again the Evidence and bid Mr. Bridgman only relate his Confession as to himself which was That he fired the Musquetoon by the Captain 's Order who had before bid him to fire as soon as ever he stopped the Coach Capt. Vratz confessed that he came with a Design to fight Mr. Thynn having sent him Challenges by Post from
seemed much concern'd and his Countenance altered and desired to lie down Then Mr. Gibbons deposed That when they had apprehended the Count they carried him to the Mayor's and thence to an Inn for 2 or 3 hours and there the Count asked him his Name because he said he would come and give him Thanks after his Trouble was over he owned his Name Gibbons and that he belonged to the Duke of Monmouth Said he the Duke of Monmouth hath no Command now and therefore how could he take him by his Order He said he did not come upon his Command but he had killed a very good Friend of his and a Country-Man and if Providence had not ordered it otherwise he had killed a more particular Friend of mine and a Master whom he had served many Years He said he did not think they would have done the D. of Monmouth any Injury After which walking up and down he said 'T was a stain upon his Blood but one good Action in the Wars or Lodging upon a Counterscrap will wash away all that Then he asking what the People said he told him the Captain had made a Confession though it was a thing he did not then know the Count said he did not believe the Captain would confess any thing To all this the Count by his Interpreter Sir Nathaniel Johnson reply'd That he came into England with a design to have got a Regiment and serv'd England against France hearing of an Alliance to be between England Holland and Sweedland against France That he lay incognito because he was broke out in Spots on his Arms and Breast and designed to take Physick and avoid drinking of Wine and his Equipage was not come to him till after That he removed his Lodgings the first because it was too cold for him and the second because of a smoaking Chimney That he sent for the Polander over to dress his Horses after the German way which he came to buy and had return'd 1000 Pistols for that end and had bought one Horse which the Count's Brother testified That had it not been for the stormy Weather the Polander had arrived sooner he having writ for him 4 Months ago That he had no Quarrel with Mr. Thynn nor to the best of his knowledg ever saw him That it was strange he should ask a Scullion-boy whether People might ride on Sundays when he himself over and over again has rid upon Sundays to Hide-Park which was testified by Major Oglethorp and divers other Gentlemen That Capt. Vratz visited him on Sunday only because he was sick That he gave the Polander to the Captain because he should have no use for him himself bought him Clothes and a Sword because he wanted them That he absconded because one Markham his Taylor told him he heard him named as concern'd in the Murder and that if the Common People should catch him they would tear him to pieces and so his Friends did counsel him to withdraw That he heard the People say the Murderers follow'd Mr. Thynn's Coach but would not shoot till the Duke of Monmouth was gone out That he spoke of his Apprehension and Imprisonment as being a stain to his Blood And then the Count speaking something of the Repute of his own Family and Zeal for the Protestant Religion and Love for the English c. Sir Francis Winnington summ'd up the Evidence whereat the People made a great shout but were rebuked for it by the Court Mr. Williams did also the like and then the Ld. Ch. Justice gave the Charge and the Jury withdrew and the Court Adjourned for half an hour and then sent for the Jury who brought in Borosky Vratz and Stern Guilty and the County Not Guilty Who being dismiss'd Mr. Recorder sentenc'd the other 3 to be hang'd Who were accordingly Executed in the Pall-Mall on Friday Mar. 10 following and Borosky was afterwards hung up in Chains a little beyond Mile-End by his Majesty's Command The Trial of Sheriffs Thomas Pilkington Esq Samuel Shute Esq Henry Cornish Alderman Ford Lord Grey of Wark Sir Thomas Player Kt. Chamberlain Slingsby Bethel Esquire Francis Jenks John Deagle Richard Freeman Richard Goodenough Robert Key John Wickham Samuel Swinock and John Jekyll sen Before the Lord Chief Justice Saunders at the Guild-Hall London on Tuesday May 8. 1683. THen and there the Defendants appeared for their Trial upon an information against them for the Riot at Guild-hall on Midsummer-day 1682. being the Day for Election of Sheriffs for the Year ensuing To which they had pleaded Not Guilty And the Jury appearing the Defendants Counsel challenged the Array because returned by Sir Dudley North whose legally being Sheriff was now in question Which Challenge was read in French and English and admitted of a long Debate but was over-ruled As was also another Challenge offered on behalf of the Lord Grey The Defendants Counsel then prayed a Bill of Exceptions which also was over-ruled The Jury sworn were Sir Benjamin Newland Sir John Matthews Sir Thomas Griffith Sir Edmund Wiseman Sir John Buckworth Percival Gilburn Henry Wagstaff Barthol Ferriman Thomas Blackmore Samuel Newton William Watton George Villars To whom the Information being read the same was opened by Mr. Dolbin and Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. and Mr. Serj. Jefferies opened the Evidence And then the Common Serjeant Mr. Lightfoot Mr. Wells the Common-Crier Mr. Man the Sword-Bearer Mr. King Sir William Hooker and Mr. Bancroft all being sworn deposed their knowledg about the Method of the City Elections all concurring That the Lord-Mayor always used to summon and adjourn and dissolve the Common-Hall and that the Sheriffs as Sheriffs were no more concern'd in the Case than any private Man Then Mr. Craddock deposed as to the Persons concern'd in the Riot That he was then standing where they poll'd and the Lord-Mayor coming thither also to protest against their manner of Proceeding Sheriff Bethel bid him oppose or resist him for that he had nothing to do there And that this was before the Poll was adjourn'd Mr. Reeves then depos'd That he saw Mr. Shute and Mr. Pilkington encouraging the People to Poll after the Lord-Mayor was gone and that while the Lord-Mayor was there he saw a great Contest among the People some saying he had nothing to do there another cried Stop the Sword stop the Sword whom he laid hold of but some Body got him again from him Mr. John Hill deposed That he saw then Mr. Robert Key Mr. Goodenough and the Lord Grey among the People as also Mr. Cornish Mr. Richard Fletcher deposed That he also was there on that Midsummer-day by Order of Sheriff Shute after the Lord-Mayor was gone to call all Men that were to poll to come forward for the Books were to be shut up and that he could only testify that Mr. Pilkington and Mr. Shute were both there Then Capt. Clark depos'd That when Proclamation was then made for adjournment of the Court and God save the King was
time coming again he said he knew nothing of this Plot and he was sure had Col. Sidney known any thing he would have told him And that he then telling my Lord he was not safe in his House the Ld. Howard said he had been a Prisoner and he had rather do any thing in the World than be a Prisoner again Then the Ld. Paget declared that seeing the Ld. Howard presently after the breaking out of this Plot he told him he was glad to see him abroad and that he was not concern'd in this Disorder Which he said he took as an injury to him for that his saying so looked as if he were guilty but that he knew nothing of himself or any Body else nor had he seen any Body that could say any thing of him or give him any occasion to say any thing of any Body else Mr. Edward Howard declared That as soon as the Plot broke out the Ld. Howard having a great intimacy with him he expressed a great detestation and surprizing in himself to hear of it and assured great Asseverations that he could neither accuse himself nor any Man living and that he was much concern'd for certain Persons of Quality that they should be so much reflected on or troubled about it And that this he verily thinks my Lord spoke sincerely and that he knew his Disposition so well that if he had had any Guilt upon him be would never have stood his being taken That another time discoursing the Ld. Howard about this Plot which he omitted at the Ld. Russel's Trial by reason of the reproof accidentally given him that it was certainly a Sham even to his Knowledg too black for any Minister of of publick Employment to have devis'd but that it was forged by People in the dark such as Jesuits and Papists and that this was his Conscience And that he consented to Address the King under his Hand to testify his abhorrency of the thing but upon the Lord Russel's being taken this was laid aside That he really believed what my Lord said then was true and were he of this Jury he would not believe what he said now For saying which the Court told him he ought to be bound to his good Behaviour The Prisoner then urged the Mortgage which the Lord Howard acknowledged Mr. Blake then declared that about 6 Weeks since the Ld. Howard sent for him to come and see him and talking then of his Pardon he said he had a Warrant for it and their Word and Honour for it but that he would do nothing in it till he had further order and that he heard nothing of it and could ascribe it to no other Reason but that he must not have his Pardon till the drudgery of Swearing was over The Prisoner then called Mr. Hunt and Burroughs to prove that the Ld. Howard said he could not have his Pardon till he had done some other Jobs but they did not appear Then Grace Tracy declared that the Ld. Howard protested his Ignorance of the Plot and of Colonel Sidney's being concern'd in it Elizabeth Penwick declared to the same purpose and that he desired withal that the Colonel's Plate might be sent to his House for Security for that he was apprehended through Malice Then one Mr. Wharton stood up and offer'd to the Court that if the sheets might be shewn him he would undertake to imitate them in a little time that they should not know which was which It being the easiest Hand that ever he saw in his Life Then the Prisoner proceeding in his Defence urg'd the Statute upon which he was Indicted as consisting of 2 Branches which were confounded in his Indictment together though they were distinct species of Treason And that the business of Aaron Smith was only conjecturally and implicitly sworn And the Papers were imperfect and had been writ many Years and never publish'd and could have no concatenation with the Select Council which the Ld. Howard had sworn though selected by no Body urging how unlikely it was for a War to be rais'd by 6 Men not knowing nor trusting one another the Ld. Howard putting such things upon them as were impossible for any one to do that had but the sense of Porters and Grooms The Solicitor General then summ'd up the Evidence making the Ld. Howard and his Papers two very good Witnesses against him Then the Ld. Ch. Justice declared his Charge to the Jury who withdrew for half an hour and then brought the Prisoner in Guilty And upon Monday November the 26th being set to the Bar the Prisoner pleaded that he conceived he had had no Tryal for that some of the Jury were no Free-holders and were not summon'd by the Bailiff but were agreed upon by the Under Sheriff and others desiring the Indictment might be read again which was done and then he urged it was void because it depriv'd the King of his Title of Defensor Fidei which was Treason by the Law Urging that there was no Treason in his Papers and desiring the D. of Monmouth might be sent for to testify if there were any such thing as a Design c. complaining that his Evidence had not been rightly summ'd up and appealing to God and the World he not being heard After which the Ld. Ch. Justice pronounced Sentence upon him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quartered c. Upon which Col. Sidney cry'd out Then O God O God I beseech thee Sanctify these Sufferings unto me and impute not my Blood to the Country nor the City through which I am to be Drawn let no inquisition be made for it but if any and the Shedding of Blood that is Innocent must be revenged let the weight of it fall only upon those that maliciously Persecute me for Righteousness sake Whereupon the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he pray'd God fit him for another World for he saw he was not fit for this But the Prisoner holding out his Hand bid his Lordship feel his Pulse and fee if he was disordered blessing God he never was in better temper than he was now On Friday December the 7th following his Sentence being mitigated by his Majesty's Grace and Favour he was brought from the Tower to a Scaffold on Tower-Hill where after a short Preparation he was beheaded by the Common Executioner The Trial of John Hambden Esq before the Lord Chief Justice Jeffries at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster on Wednesday February 6 1683. ON Wednesday November 28th 1683. John Hambden Esq was Arraigned at the King's-Bench Bar upon an Indictment of High Misdemeanour for contriving and practising to disturb the King's Peace and stirring up Sedition in the Kingdom To which having pleaded Not Guilty and Issue being joyned Bail was taken for his appearing the next Term. Accordingly on Wednesday Feb. 6th following the Defendant appeared and the Jury were impannel'd Joshua Galliard Esq and Mr. Richard Shoveditch were challeng'd by Mr. Williams of Counsel for the Defendant because they were both
burnt in the Hand for Felony and afterwards pardoned can be a good Witness Which being granted him he named Mr. Jones Mr. Saunders and Mr. Darnel for his Counsel But Mr. Saunders was not in Court and Mr. Jones said he was not prepared to speak But Mr. Darnal gave his Opinion in the Negative alledging for it 11. Henry 4.41 and 9. Jac. and the Lord Cook p. 154. To which the Attorn General and Mr. Justice Jones asserted the constant Custom and Practice of the Court the same did Mr. Sol. General and Mr. Recorder Then Mr. Justice Raymond went down to the Court of Common-Pleas to know their Opinion who brought word that it was the Opinion of their Brethren That a Man convicted of Felony and not burnt in the Hand a Pardon could not set him Upright but being convicted and burnt in the Hand they suppose he is a Witness Then Mr. Dangerfield was sworn who deposed That about 12 Months ago the Lady Powis sent him with a Letter to the Prisoner who writ back an Answer which the Lady Powis read to him and Mrs. Cellier the Contents of which were This Person I like well and though he be no Scholar he will serve to instruct the Youths as he shall be directed By the Youths he said was meant the St. Omers Witnesses whom the Prisoner was employed to instruct what to say before the Trial. That his Lordship employed him to get Lane out of the Gate-house That his Lordship was concern'd also in those Letters which related to the promoting of the Sham-Plot and were to be conveyed into the Houses of several Persons of Quality and sent 40 s. for his part to pay for copying them That the next day after he had been treated with in the Tower to kill the King which he refused he waiting upon the Prisoner his Lordship ask'd him why he would refuse to kill the King it being that for which he was took out of Prison and was violently angry with him upon which he left him After this the Prisoner began his Defence and against Oates produced a Record which was read in Court of his prosecuting a Man of Buggery at Hastings whom the Jury Acquitted After which coming to London he was converted to be a Papist by one Hutchinson whom since Oates hath converted to be a Protestant which Mr. Hutchinson then appearing testifyed but talking extravagantly the Court was informed he was a distracted Man Then one Armstrong appeared to testify that Mr. Oates was only a Common Scholar at Vallidolid and one Mr. Palmer that he was but the same at St. Omers Then Hilsley affirm'd That he left Oates at St. Omers in April and did not come over with him and to corroborate his Testimony one Osborn affirmed that Mr. Hilsley told him so about the latter end of April Then one Mr. Gregson at whose House Dr. Oates Iodged appeared only to testify to the Poverty of Oates and that he had nothing but what the Jesuits allowed him Then Mr. Littcot testified that he knew nothing of the Divorce but the Court refused to hear such Evidence as not being to the Purpose Then the Records were produced against Dangerfield of his being burnt in the Hand Outlawed for Felony and twice Pilloryed for putting away false Guineys and a gilt Shilling Then Mrs. Cellier testified that Dangerfield told her of the Prisoner's Anger this time 12 month which Dangerfield said was in August last and that she would have sent him with a Letter but he refused to go near his Lordship And Bennet Dowdal said That Dangerfield told him in June of the Prisoner's Anger and that it was because he went to the Tower and his Lordships Name unknown to him The Lady Powis affirmed also That she never sent a Letter by Dangerfield nor never read one to him in her Life and Mrs. Cellier affirm'd the same Sir Richard Barker then deposed of his seeing Oates in June and that his Servants told him they saw him in May 78 Then one Turner deposed That he saw Dangerfield with the Prisoner as he believes in July And one Woodman deposed that carried a Letter from Mrs. Cellier to the Prisoner and brought back 30 s. or 3 l. but for whom he knows not Then the Prisoner would have cleared his Reputation about instructing the Youths but the Court judg'd it needless Therefore Mr. Attorney General summ'd briefly up the Evidence and the Ld. Ch. Justice did the same both taking Notice of the Exceptions made against Dangerfield's Evidence leaving it to the Jury whether he ought to be believed or no and if not that then there would be but one Credible witness After which the Jury withdrawing for a while brought in their Verdict Not Guilty The Trial of John Giles Gent. at the Sessions-House in the Old-Baily on Wednesday July 14. 1680. THE Prisoner then and there appeared having been before Arraigned and pleaded not Guilty to an Indictment for a Barbarous and Inhumane Attempt to Assassinate and Murther John Arnold Esq one of his Majesty's Justices of Peace for the County of Monmouth and now a Member of the Honourable House of Commons The Jury sworn were Christopher Plucknet William Dodd Anthony Nurse John Burton Nathan Goodwin George VVood. James Partridge Laurance VVood. John Bradshaw VVilliam Withers Edward Proby Richard Bromfield To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Gibbs Mr. Holt and Mr. Thompson being of Counsel in this Cause for the King opened the same After which Mr. Arnold himself was sworn and deposed That upon April 15. being Thursday in Easter-Week last he was with some Company at the Devil-Tavern till 10 or past and recollecting he had Business with Mr. Phillip's a Counsellor at Law in Bell-yard that Night he left his Company and his own Servants being out of the way he went to the Room where several of his Neighbour's Servants were and called to some of them to go with him but it happen'd he went away without them And as he went cross Fleet-street he saw two Men in Campaign-Cloaks follow him whom he thought to be Servants belonging to some of his Company who had followed him on his calling But as he went into Bell-yard one of them got before him and turned and looked earnestly in his Face whom passing by when a Woman stood in a Door about the middle of Bell-yard with a Candle in her hand he saw to be this Prisoner at the Bar to whom when his Companion came up he heard them laugh aloud He took no Notice but went on and at the Kennel at the end of Jackanapes-Lane he looking down to find the Kennel a Cloak was thrown over his Head and then he found very rough Hands about his Shoulders and they can him into Jackanapes-Lane just cross the Lane against the opposite Wall and run his Head so hard that he thinks they broke it and then struck him and at the second blow he fell running him through his side into the Belly Then recovering he made what
endeavours to have over-ruled without so much as hearing the Prisoners Counsel for the maintaining it for that they said it was nought because it produced no Record of his Impeachment and did not specify what the High-Treason was for which he was Impeached and that the King had Power to proceed on an Impeachment or Indictment for the same thing at his Election Nevertheless the Attorny General demurred and the Prisoner joined in the Demurrer And then after much arguing a Day was given to argue the Plea till Saturday May. 7. At which time the Attorny General added to the Exceptions he took to the Plea Whether a Suit in a Superior Court can take away the Jurisdiction of the Cause of the Person and of the Fact at the time of the Fact committed To maintain the Plea Mr. VVilliams of Counsel for the Prisoner in a very long and learned Discourse first spoke stating the Prisoner's Case upon the Indictment the Plea to the Indictment and the Demurrer to the Plea Alledging the Difference of an Impeachment from an Indictment and offering some Reasons why this Court ought not to proceed upon this Indictment Then answering distinctly Mr. Attorney's Exceptions to the Plea producing some Presidents of this Courts Prosecution being stop'd by Pleas to the Jurisdiction shewing what had been done upon those Pleas What Doom they had Laying before the Court the Right of the Commons to Impeach in Parliament the Judicature of the Lords to determine that Impeachment and the Method and Proceedings of Parliament submitting it to them how far they would lay their Hands on this Case thus circumstantiated Here the Ld. Ch. Justice declared That all these Things were quite foreign to the Case and the Matter in Hand only was Whether this Plea as thus pleaded was sufficient to protect the Prisoner from being questioned in this Court for the Treasonable Matter in the Indictment before them To which Mr. VVilliams reply'd That 't was an hard matter for the Bar to answer the Bench. After which Sir Francis Winnington pleaded That he conceived that it was confessed by the Demurrer that there is an Impeachment by the Commons of England of High-Treason against Fitz-Harris lodged in the House of Lords Secundum Legem consuetudinem Parliamenti And that the Treason for which he was impeached is the same Treason contained in the Indictment So that now the general Question was Whether an Impeachment for Treason by the House of Commons and still depending were a sufficient Matter to oust the Court from proceeding upon an Indictment for the same Offence Which he learnedly endeavoured to make good by several Reasons as well as Presidents Mr. Wallop pleaded next on the same side whose Province was to prove That the Treason in the Impeachment and in the Indictment was the same and that this was well averred in the Plea Mr. Pollexfen pleaded That a general Impeachment in Parliament was a good Impeachment and the Judges had declared so to the King and Council concerning the five Popish Lords who could not therefore be tried upon Indictments so long as general Impeachments were depending for the same Treason and that therefore this Plea was good both as to Matter and Form c. In reply to vitiate the Plea it was insisted on by Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Serj. Jefferies and Sir Francis VVithens of Counsel for the King that the Plea concluded not in the usual Form That perhaps this Matter if the Prisoner had been acquitted upon the Impeachment might have been pleaded in Bar to the Indictment but it was not pleadable to the Jurisdiction of the Court That in the Case of the five Lords the Indictments were removed into the House of Lords and that the Judges Opinion given at the Council-Board was not a Judicial Opinion nor did any way affect this Cause After which the Ld. Ch. Justice thought fit not to give present Judgment but to take time for Deliberation Whereupon the Prisoner was carried back to the Tower And on Tuesday May 10. Mr. Attorney moved the Court to appoint a Day for their Judgment on the Plea and for Fitz-Harris to be brought up which they appointed to be the next Morning Accordingly on Wednesday Morning May 11. the Prisoner being brought to the Bar the Ld. Ch. Justice deliver'd the Opinion of the Court upon Conference had with other Judges That his Brother Jones his Brother Raymond and himself were of Opinion that the Plea was insufficient his Brother Dolben not being resolved but doubting concerning it and therefore awarded the Prisoner should plead to the Indictment which he did Not Guilty and his Trial ordered to be the next Term. The Trial of Edward Fitz-Harris at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton on Thursday June 9. 1681. THE Prisoner then and there appearing after several Challenges made for the King the Jury sworn were Thomas Johnson Lucy Knightly Edward Wilford Alexander Hosey Martin James John Viner William Withers William Cleave Thomas Goffe Ralph Farr Samuel Freebody John Lockier To whom the Indictment was read which was for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government the which Mr. Heath Serj. Maynard and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened And then Mr. Everard deposed How the Prisoner was with him on Monday Feb. 21. 1681. having a little before been with him to renew the Acquaintance which had been between them while they were both in the French King's Service and to perswade him to re-ingratiate himself into the French and Popish Interest and gave him by word of Mouth Heads to write a Pamphlet to scandalize the King raise Rebellion alienate the Hearts of the People and set them together by the Ears Whereupon he acquainted one Mr. Savile of Lincolns-Inn Mr. Crown Mr. Smith and Sir William Waller with it And the next day Mr. Fitz-Harris coming again to his Chamber in Grays-Inn he convey'd Mr. Smith into a Closet Sir William Waller failing to come where he both saw and heard the Prisoner ask him What he had done as to the Libel and give him further Instructions about what to write viz. That the King was Popishly Affected and Arbitrarily Inclined That King Charles the First had an Hand in the Irish Rebellion and King Charles the Second did countenance the same c. That the People should therefore be stirred up to rebel especially the City c. That the Day after he coming again he had convey'd Sir William Waller into the next Room where he also might both hear and see shewing him to Copies of what he had drawn up which he marked that he might know them again and see what alteration would be made That Fitz-Harris did them read one of the Copies and amended it adding some things and striking out other things saying The Libel was to be presented to the French Ambassador's Confessor and he was to present it to the French Ambassador and that it was to beget a
Lady Tempest would have hang'd him for breaking a Trunk but now he would be even with her and that Sir Miles Stapleton kept Priests in his House but he would apprehend them presently for he might have 20 l. apiece for taking of them Richard Pears Sir Miles's Man testified that three or four days after his Master was taken into Custody Bolron asked him if they did not blame him for accusing his Master and he saying he did not hear him named said he it was not him but I must not tell who it is and said he would have gone to have seen Sir Miles but I think said he he does not know me Then one Stephen Tompson declared some threatning Words of Bolrons against Sir Thomas Gascoyne that he would do him some ill turn but it not concerning the Prisoner the Court would not admit it The Lady Vavasor said she believed her Husband was not at Barnborow in any part of the Year because he was infirm at York Bolron having sworn that Sir VValter Vavasor was one at that Consult but this was not judg'd a conclusive Evidence Then Mr. Leggat said that he had heard Bolron say he knew nothing against Sir Miles Stapleton And Mrs. Elizabeth Holmes said that Bolron meeting her in London said he heard she was to be a Witness against him at York but if she would be kind to him he would be so to her and speak as favourably as he could and he said if he had known he should have been no better rewarded he would never have been a Witness the Devil should have been a Witness as soon as he Then Edward Cooper told what he heard Mowbray say as before in Thwing's Trial but the Court observed that being before his Discovery and while he was a Papist and on the High-way it could not be material Then Madam Sherborn testified that Bolron and Mowbray came to her house under a pretence to search for Priests and Bolron took away several parcels of Silver with him But the Court would not suffer such Evidence besides that Mowbray deposed it was only Chalices and other Popish Trinkets After this the Counsel for the King called one Dixon who swore that he had 40 s. proffer'd him to be a Witness for Sir Tho. Gascoyne in Novemb. 1679. Then Mr. VVilson deposed that Mr. Babbington Sollicitor for Sir Miles would have given him 10 l. and Hickeringil proffer'd him 10 l. to have been a Witness for Sir Miles Then Christopher Langley deposed also that VVil. Batley and John Ross proffer'd him two Oxen and ten Sheep to witness for Sir Miles those things they should direct him Richard Corker deposed that he was by and heard that very proffer made to Langley Then Mr. Baines deposed that Mrs. Holmes proffer'd him 60 l. per annum and Mrs. Hewit said she would give him more if he would say nothing against Sir Miles After this Mr. Justice Dolben summ'd up the Evidence and Baron Gregory proceeded to do the same and then the Jury withdrew for half an hour and gave in their Verdict Not Guilty The Trial of George Busby Priest at the Assizes at Derby on Monday July 25 1681. HE then and there appeared and having been Arraigned he now refused to plead in stead thereof presenting a Petition to the Court shewing that he was committed to the Goal in March last for being a Popish Priest and that having obtained his Habeas Corpus to be removed to London the Under-Sheriff then dying the Habeas Corbus was not executed Praying therefore that he may be removed to the King's-Bench that he may have time to make his Defence he depending upon his Habeas Corpus his most material Evidence to clear him and to prove his being an Alien being then in London c. But the Grand Jury having found the Bill the Court told him they must proceed and he was then Indicted as a Romish Priest and Jesuit upon the Statute of 27 Eliz. cap. 2. To which Indictment he excepted because it was not said therein that he took Orders beyond Sea But he was inform'd that his taking Orders any where from the Authority of the Bishop of Rome was Sufficient He then pleaded not Guilty and challenged of the Jury near the Number allowed by the Law Those Sworn were Samuel Ward Gent. Thomas Wilson Gent. John Steer John Ratcliff Ed. Wolmesly Gent. William Horn Gent. George Tricket Gent. Jeremiah Ward John Roper John Creswel Gent. Edmund Woodhead and Anthony Bowne To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Bridges of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the same and Mr. Coombes another of the King's Counsel opened the Evidence And then Mr. Gilbert a Justice of Peace for the County of Derby was called and Sworn who deposed that he lived within 2 Miles of Mr. Powtrells house at West-Hallam where Busby was took and whose Wife was Busby's Neece and had heard for 6 or 7 Years that he was a Priest and when the Plot broke out that he was a Person concern'd as appeared by a Warrant from the Lords of the Council for his Apprehension which he received March 22 1678. which he producing was read in the Court and on the Monday following searched Mr. Powtrells House for him but could not find him tho afterwards he was informed that he was then in the House In 1679 Mr. Powtrel travelling it was reported Busby was gone with him beyond Sea tho he still remained in that House and last Christmas he was informed that he was seen in Corn-Harvest walking in the Garden with one Anne Smally a Widow which caus'd him to search again for him in March last when this Smally assured him he had been out of England two Years yet he then found in Busby's Chamber Popish Vestments a Surplice Wafers an Altar-stone c. but could not find him About a fortnight after he searched again for him surprizing them at one in the Night but could have no admittance till they broke open the door and going into Busby's Chamber he found the fire had been lately extinguished and the Bed-Clothes laid in confused heaps on the bed some part of them warm and some cold but the feather-bed quite cold till feeling underneath he found it warm and that it had been turned which assured him that the Priest was in the House but the Persons in the house denied it and only jeered them for searching for a Person that was beyond Sea and those that were without tho they heard a trampling and directed the Searchers within to the place yet they were from one till after 10 next Morning before they could find him Which at last they did in a little hole under the Tiling whence they carried him to Derby and Mr. Gilbert having took his Examination committed him to Goal on March 16th and sent Word to the King and Council of what he had done The Prisoner then pleaded his being an Alien born at Brussels his Father removing his Family thither during the Troubles
Cornish and Bethel got in to be Sheriffs 3. Their arresting the Lord Mayor in his Mayoralty-year and not staying till that was ended did carry Vengeance and Malice in the very face of it as if they had a mind to affront the Government in arresting and imprisoning the Kings Lieutenant in one of the highest Places both of Trust and Honour Nay and because they would be sure their Malice and Revenge should take place 4. They took the very Scoundrels of the Party to be employed in this work 5. The Consequents designed herein which was the destruction of the Government all the Magistrates being took up that had any care for it And 5. The particular Persons that were to be sued being only some of the Aldermen and not all though the Mandamus was directed to all and the Return made by the whole Court yet Cornish and his Party were not to be medled with which is another Circumstance of Malice And if it had not been for some Purpose 6. Mr. Papillon is know to be a Person that would never have been so greedy of an Office he had before declined and fined for minding rather his Counting-house than a Scarlet-Gown And therefore the Design he told them was from the beginning to the end nothing but to cause a Tumult and Confusion in the City in order to put that damned hellish Conspiracy for the destruction of the King and his Brother and every Man that was honest and loyal in Execution That therefore they were to find for the Plantiff and to give Damages according to the Malice design'd not as to Sir William Pritchard but as Lord Mayor For that the Government was infinitely concern'd in this Cafe which made it so popular a Cause The Government of the City the Honour of their Chief Magistrate and indeed the Honour of the King whose Substitute he was and that was to put a weight upon their Inquiry into the Damages of this Case telling them that their severity in this Case would deter all People from entring into Clans and Cabals to make Disturbances and affront the Government Then the Jury withdrew to consider of their Verdict and after half an hours stay returned and found for the Plaintiff and assessed Damages to 10000 l. and costs to 4 Marks The Lord Chief Justice then told the Jury that they seem'd to be Persons that had some sense upon them and consideration for the Government and had given a good Verdict and were to be greatly commended for it Aster which the Court broke up The Trial of Titus Oates at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferies on Friday and Saturday the 8th and 9th days of May 1685. THen and there the Prisoner appearing upon an Information of Perjury shewing how that he had sworn falsly to a Consult of Jesuits at the White-Horse Tavern April 24. 1678. at the Trial of Ireland Pickering and Grove To which having pleaded Not Guilty the Jury sworn were Sir William Dodson Sir Edmund Wiseman Richard Aley Thomas Fowlis Thomas Blackmore Peter Pickering Robert Beddingfield Thomas Rawlinson Roger Reeves Ambrose Isted Henry Collier Richard Howard Then Dr. Oates moved that he might have three very material Witnesses who were Prisoners in the Kings-Bench brought into the Court but the Ld. Ch. Justice told him the Law would not allow it and it would be an Escape The Information therefore was read and Mr. Philips opened it and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened the Evidence Then in order to prove the Information the Record of the Trial of Ireland was produced and read Then Mr. Foster was sworn who deposed that he was one of the Jury at Ireland's Trial and heard Dr. Oates depose about the Consult's being April 24 1678 and that he was at it and carried the Resolution from Chamber to Chamber to be signed and saw it signed c. Then Martin Hilsley Esq a Papist deposed That he came from St. Omers April 14 Old Stile where he lest Oates and saw him but the day before and that he was not at all in his Company from thence to London where he arrived April 21 having staid four or five days at Bockston-street hard by where he met Mr. Burnaly at a Relations of his That afterwards he told Mr. Osborn that he had lest Sampson Lucy by which Name Mr. Oates went as also sometimes by Titus Ambrosius at St. Omers Then Dr. Oates would have ask'd this Witness What his Employment was at St. Omers Whether his Superiors did not set him on to do this And what Inducements he had to give in an Evidence now which he had given six Years ago at Langhorn's Trial and was not believed But these the Ld. Ch. Justice called Ensnaring Questions and would suffer no Answer to them Then Mr. John Dorrel now a Papist deposed that about the 15th or 16th of April he heard one Mr. Osborn telling his Mother of one Sampson Lucy alias Oates being then a Scholar at St. Omers as a Gentleman newly come from thence had assured him Then Mr. Osborn a Papist deposed About the 27th or 28th of April Mr. Hilsley talking to him about Oates telling that he lest him in the Colledg when he came away from St. Omers and this he told afterwards to Madam Dorrel and his own Mother who was since dead Then Mr. Bournaby a Papist supposed a Jesnit who went by the Name of Blunt deposed That he met Mr. Hilsley April 18 1678 that he arrived at St Omers April 21 and saw Oates there the next day and so from day to day to June 10. but that he neither knew or heard of any Consult Then Mr. Pool alias Killingbeck a Papist of the Sodality of the Virgin Mary as was supposed being sworn deposed That he came from St. Omers April 25 and saw Mr. Oates that very Morning and left him there and saw him there the 21st and 22d of the same Month That he heard something of a Triennial Congregation but of no Consult Then Mr. Henry Thornton a Papist deposed That he had been a Student at St. Omers seven Years and came thence about two Years after Mr. Oates that he knew Oates there very well and saw him almost every day in the Colledg from Christmass 1677 to the 13th of June 1678 that in all that time he was never out of the Colledg unless a day or two at Watton in January which is not a League out of Town That he saw him particularly the day of Mr. Hilsley's departure April 14 and Mr. Bournaby's coming April 21 and again the next day April 22 at a Play which the Scholars acted That he heard of a Triennial Congregation but of no Consult Then Mr. William Conway a Papist a Student of St. Omers who went by the Name of Parry when he was a Witness at the Trial of the five Jesuits deposed That he knew Mr. Oates at St. Omers that he came in December 1677 and stirr'd not out of the Colledg except one Night
against the present or the former King and that he had a material Witness in Lancashire 140 Miles off The Court told him they had ho power to put off his Trial and the King had left him to the course of the Law He complained he had no Copy of the Pannel but was answered it was not his right to have it and the Attorney General told him he had not deserved so well of the Government as to have his Trial delayed He desired then Pen and Ink and having challenged thirty five the Jury were sworn which had passed upon Mrs. Gaunt To whom the Indictment was read and opened by Mr. Phips and Mr. Attorney General and then Colonel Rumsey deposed that about the latter end of October or beginning of November the Earl of Shaftsbury desired him to go to Mr. Shepherd's House where was a meeting of the D. of Monmouth Ld. Russel Ld. Grey Sir Thomas Armstrong Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Shepherd He came late and they were just upon going away He deliver'd his Message and they told him that Mr. Trenchard had disappointed them He had not been there above a quarter of an Hour but Mr. Shepherd was called down and brought up Mr. Cornish who excused his not coming sooner and said that he could not stay for he was to meet about the Charter Whereupon Mr. Ferguson opened his Bosom from under his Stomacher pulled out a Paper They told Mr. Cornish they had had it read and desired to read it to him Mr. Ferguson read it while Mr. Shepherd held the Candle and afterwards asking Mr. Cornish how he liked it he said he liked it very well The Paper was a Declaration to have been dispersed when the Rising was which was intended about that time and 2 Points he observed and very well remembred the one was for Liberty of Conscience the other for Restoration of Church or King's Lands to them that would assist Mr. Cornish said he liked the Declaration and what poor Interest he had he would join with it That he had been acquainted with Mr. Cornish about 14. Years and had had great concerns together he having returned 3 or 400000 l. for him in 6 years Time while he was Collector of the Kings Customs at Bristol that Mr. Cornish was a very honest Man and it was out of Compassion he had not accused him before Then Goodenough was sworn and his Pardon read who deposed That there was a Design to rise in London and the City was divided into 20 parts and design'd out of each part to raise 500 Men who were to take the Tower and drive the Guards out of Town Before this was agreed on by chance he was at Mr. Cornish's House about the business of the Riot and discoursing alone with Mr. Cornish he said The Law will not defend us some other way was to be thought on Mr. Cornish reply'd he wondred the City was so unready and the Country so ready that he reply'd there was something thought to be done here but that in the first place the Tower ought to be seized where the Magazine is Mr. Cornish paused a little and said I will do what good I can or what I can or to that purpose He afterwards met Mr. Cornish on the Exchange who asked him how affairs went to which he gave a general Answer that not being a Place to talk in of such Discourse To this the Prisoner said It was strange that Col. Rumsey seeing him at Shepherd's about such a thing should never mention it to him afterwards so often as he saw him Protesting his ignorance and appealing to God urging the Improbability and adding that Rumsey at the Lord Russel's Trial swore that he had nothing else to swear against any Man And against Goodenough he urg'd the ill Opinion he had of him and that he never was with him but about the Business of the Riot which he manag'd as their Attorny And I tell you said Mr. Justice Withens then that was a Branch of the Plot take that from me Then Mr. Gosfright testified that Mr. Cornish opposed Mr. Goodenough's being Under-Sheriff and said he would not trust an hair of his Head with him he was so ill a Man obnoxious to the Government and had done ill things and he believ'd Mr. Cornish and Mr. Goodenough were never reconcil'd upon it Alderman Love and Mr. Jekyl testified to the same purpose which the Ld. Ch. Just had scarce Patience to hear saying it was all impertinent and Mr. Just VVithens said of Mr. Jekyl This Gentleman was in a limb of the Plot himself as great a Rioter and as hot as any of them Sir William Turner then testified to Mr. Cornish's aversness to Goodenough's being Under-Sheriff Mr. Cornish then call'd Dr. Tillotson and Dr. Sharp to testify as to his Conversation but neither appear'd Mr. Lane then testify'd that in the Printed Trial of the Lord Russel Rumsey swore he did not hear the Declaration read but he not hearing it himself that was no Evidence Then Dr. Calamy the Minister of his Parish testify'd that he did come often to Church and receive the Sacrament Then also Mr. Reeve Mr. John Cook Mr. John Knap Mr. Carlton Mr. Joseph Smart and Mr. VVilliam Crouch all testify'd as to his Conversation and Loyalty whence he argu'd the Improbability that he should be so concern'd After which the Ld. Chief Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury withdrew and after a considerable time returned And then the Prisoner begg'd one Word desiring to call Mr. Shepherd whom out of tenderness to offend he had omitted though he had him in his Note which with much ado was granted him as a great favour of the Court. And then Mr. Shepherd testify'd that he was Subpoened by Mr. Cornish before by the King and was desired by Mr. Cornish's Son to be at his Trial and had been attending in Court from eleven to three That Mr. Cornish at one of those Meetings at his house came to speak a few Words with the Duke of Monmouth or some other he could not be positive it being so many years ago that he stay'd not above half a quarter of an hour in the house and that there was not one word read nor no Paper seen while he was there and that he never was at his house but once when the Duke of Monmouth was there nor does he remember that Rumsey was there while he was nor that the Declaration was read that night He remembred a Declaration was read which Ferguson pull'd out of his Shoe but was positive Cornish was not by because he was not look'd upon to be one of the Company That there was now an Accompt depending between him and Mr. Cornish whereon there was about one or two hundred Pounds due to Mr. Cornish Then Mr. Sol. Gen. sum'd up the Evidence And the Jury withdrawing for a short time brought Mr. Cornish in Guilty and found 140 l. for the King in Mr. Shepherd's hands Then Mr. Recorder sentenced