he upon which they let him go The Clerk of the Crows said he knew this Spence and that he was very like Sir E. Godfrey Then John Oakeley's Affidavit was read which was made before Sir John Moore Mayor June 22. 1682. and was That he coming by Somerset-House upon Saturday Octob. 12. 1678. the very day on which Sir E. Godfrey was missing about eight or nine at Night he saw Sir Edmond-bury near the VVater-gate and past close by him knowing him very well put off his Hat to him and Sir Edm. did the like to him and having pass'd him he turned and looked upon him and saw him stand still and a Man or two near him And that he told this to Elizabeth Dekin two or three days after and to his Uncle Ralph Oakely of Little St. Bartholomew about a Week after and to his Father Robert Oakely and several others in a short time after Elizabeth Dekin's Affidavit who was his Fellow-Servant before Sir John Moore at the same time hereof and Mr. Robert Breedon's Affidavit who was their Master and a Brewer near Sir E. Godfrey's House made then also that Dekin had told him what Oakely had told her and that before the Body was found And Robert Oakely his Fathers Affidavit made at the same time that his Son had told him the same and his Uncle Ralph Oakeley's Affidavit of the same before Mr. Justice Dolbin July 4. 1683. were all annexed to corroborate his Testimony And whereas it had been reported that Sir E. Godfrey hang'd himself and that one Moore his Clerk cut him down the said Henry Moore made Affidavit before Justice Balam of the Isle of Ely July 28. 1681. That the Report was false and scandalous and that he neither said nor did any such thing John Brown and William Lock also of Maribone made Affidavit before Sir John Moore Mayor June 30. 1682. That they viewing the Body on Thursday Octob. 17. 1678. as it lay in the Ditch found that the Pummel of the Sword-Hilt did not touch the Ground by an handful c.. Benjamin Man also of London Gent. being not called at the Trial tho twice subpoened made Affidavit before Sir W. Dolbin July 3. 1682. That being in the Gatehouse when Green was took and about to be put into Irons and understanding his Crime saying he did not think to have found him such a Man Green thereupon replied He was a dead Man Robert Forset Esq of Maribone made Affidavit also before Sir VV. Dolbin on July 1. 1682. That he was a hunting with his Hounds on Tuesday Octob. 15. 1678. and beat that very place where the Body was afterwards found but there was neither Body nor Gloves nor Cane thereabouts then and that Mr. Henry Harwood who is since dead borrowed his Hounds and told him that he beat the same Ditch the next day and that no Body was there he was sure on VVednesday at Noon George Larkin of London Printer made Oath also before Sir John Moore Mayor March 22. 1681. That he going to see the Body on Octob. 18. 1678. he met Nat. Thompson there who then proposed the printing of a Narrative of this Murder to him desiring his Assistance which they afterward agreed to print and that contain'd how Sir E. Godfrey's Face was of a fresh Colour tho in his life-time Pale a green Circle about his Neck as if he had been strangled c. That there was no Blood in the place and his Shoes as clean as if he had but just come out of his own Chamber which was an evident sign that he was carried thither and that the Coroners Inquest found that he was suffocated before the Wounds were made c. And finally that one of the Jury affirmed that his Mother's Servant searched all those Grounds for a Calf that was missing Monday and Tuesday and at that time there lay no dead Body Belt Gloves Stick c. Farrell it seems was Trustee for Fenwick that was executed and Pain was Brother to Nevill alias Pain who was famous for scribling for Mrs. Cellier and the Papists The Court consulting together Mr. Justice Jones having first set out the greatness of their Crime gave the Judgment of the Court which was That Thomson and Farrell should stand in the Pillory in the Palace-Yard the last day of the Term for an hours space between ten and one and each of them pay 100 l. Fine and to be imprisoned till they had paid it Pain was excused from the Pillory but adjudg'd to the same Fine Accordingly on Wednesday July 5. 1682. Thompson and Farrell were Pillored with this Writing over their Heads For libelling the Justice of the Nation by making the VVorld belive that Sir Edmondbury Godfrey murdered himself The Trial of Nathaniel Reading Esq before the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer at the King's-Bench-Bar at Westminster on Thursday April 24. 1679. ON Wednesday April 16th 1679 His Majesties Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer did meet at Westminster-Hall in the Court of King's-Bench When and where the Commission was Read and the Grand-Jury Sworn and then Sir James Butler the Chief Commissioner that then appeared gave them their Charge informing them briefly of the Occasion of their meeting desiring them to go together and take the Witnesses being first sworn along with them which they did for about half an hour and then returned finding it Billa Vera. After which the Court Adjourned to Thursday April 24. On which day the Commissioners there met viz. Sir Francis North Kt. Ld. Ch. Justice of His Majesties Court of Common-Pleas William Montague Esq Ld. Ch. Baron of his Majesties Court Exchequer Sir William Wylde Kt. and Bar. one of his Majesty's Justices of the King's-Bench Sir Hugh Windham Kt. one of his Majesty's Justices of the Common-Pleas Sir Robert Atkins Kt. of the Bath another of the Justices of the Common-Pleas Sir Edward Thurland Kt. one of the Barons of the Exchequer Vere Bertie Esq another of the Justices of the Common-Pleas Sir Thomas Jones Kt. another of the Justices of the King's-Bench Sir Francis Bramston Kt. another of the Barons of the Exchequer Sir William Dolben Kt. another of the Justices of the King's-Bench Sir William Jones Kt. his Majesty's Attorney-General Sir James Butler Kt. one of the King's Counsel and the Queen's Attorney Sir Philip Mathews Bar. Sir Thomas Orbey Kt. and Bar. Sir Thomas Byde Kt. Sir William Bowles Kt. Sir Thomas Stringer Serjeant at Law Sir Charles Pitfield Kt. Thomas Robinson Esq Humphrey Wyrle Esq Thomas Haryot Esq Richard Gower Esq After Proclamation made for Attendance the Lord Chief Justice North discharged the Grand Inquest and Mr. Reading being set to the Bar his Indictment was read to him Being for Soliciting Suborning and endeavouring to perswade Mr. William Bedloe to lessen stifle and omit to give Evidence the full Truth according to his Knowledg against the Lord Powis Lord Stafford Lord Petre and Sir Henry Tichborn but to give such Evidence as he the said
nor indirectly and altho he was a little low at present and his Friends would not look on him yet he hoped God would never leave him so much as to let him swear against innocent Persons and forswear and damn himself Mr. John Yalden a young Barrister of Greys-Inn also affirmed that as he walked with Turbervil in February or March last in Greys-Inn-Walks he heard him say God damn me now there is no Trade good but that of a Discoverer but the Devil take the D. of York Monmouth Plot and all for I know nothing of it Afterwards Yalden being gone words passing between Turbervile and him they both complain'd of one another to the Court The Ld. Stafford then call'd for Oates again objecting against him his swearing before the Council that he saw in Spain Don John of Austria but the Lord Privy-Seal affirm'd that he only then said that he saw one whom he was told was that Person and that he did not know him of himself The Prisoner further objected that none of his Letters nor no Commission was produced that he knew neither Oates nor Fenwick nor ever saw Oates either at Fenwick's or Dr. Perrot's tho Oates instanced in a Circumstance at Dr. Perrot's how he offer'd him half a Crown to call Perrot home to him which he refused saying he was no Porter and that he was not to be look'd on as a credible Witness because he dissembled with God in as much as he deposed that he never was but seemingly a Papist Saying also that but last night he called the Lieutenant of the Tower Jaylor and Rascal which became not a Man of his Coat He charged then Dugdale again that he was a Prisoner for Debt in Stafford when he made his first Affidavit and Dugdale acknowledge'd he was then under the Serjeants hands He objected moreover Oates Poverty and that he said in a former Trial that he was 700 l. out of Purse Whereupon Dr. Oates confess'd his Poverty and offer'd to prove how he had disburss'd so much Mony relating how he had so much given him and got so much by printing some Copies And here the Prisoner ending his Defence the Managers offer'd before they summ'd up the Evidence to produce their Witnesses to fortify their Evidence and to discover what kind of Witnesses have been made use of against it and to falsify what the Prisoner's Witnesses have said in some Particulars And first of all Mr. William Hanson of Wilnal in Staffordshire deposed that he had seen Dugdale alone with the Prisoner in the Lord Aston's Parlour Then Mr. James Ansell of Heywood in Staffordshire deposed also that being of Tixal he saw the Prisoner and Dugdale walking alone together in the Court and that after the Plot was discovered that Dugdale was fearful of coming into Company That also he and Mr. Hanson was at Eld's the Ale-house Oct. 14. on Monday Morning and heard Mr. Dugdale tell of the Murther of a Justice of Peace of Westminster in the presence of Mr. Phillips and Mr. Sambidg who before have denied it and Hanson being called again deposed the same Mr. Birch also deposed that it was all about those parts by Tuesday and Wednesday Octob. 15 and 16. that a Justice of Peace of Middlesex was killed John Turton Esq deposed that he was told of the Rumor on Tuesday Octob. 15. and that it was Sir Edm. Godfrey that was murthered and as it was supposed by the Papists Then against the Testimony of William Robinson Mr. Booth a Member of the House of Commons deposed that he heard him in Cheshire talk the most atheistically as ever he heard any Man in his Life ridiculing the Sabbath it being on a Sunday and that from others he had heard how he went about the Country to cheat The Earl of Macclesfield deposed much to the same purpose and that he had heard him confess himself a Rogue and false Dice were found about him being before a Justice of Peace Against Samuel Holt another of the Prisoner's Witnesses Sampson Rawlins deposed that he was a Man of a very ill Report where he lived a lewd drunken Fellow and said to keep another Man's Wife and that he said none but Rogues would take Mr. Dugdale's part and be cause the Witness did so he would have murder'd him and that he broke the Lord Aston's Wine-Celler and my Lord bid Mr. Dugdale send him to Goal but he begg'd him his Pardon that he had known Mr. Dugdale this 14 or 15 Years in good Repute and an honest Man Thomas Launder deposed much to the same purpose against Holt adding that he was by a Consult of them at Tixal proffer'd Mony to have sworn Anselm a perjured Rogue at the Lord Aston's Trial. Against John Morrall Thomas Thorne deposed that he was a poor needy Fellow that wandred about the Country and but of an indifferent Reputation Then Simon VVright deposed that one Plessington had proffer'd him 700 l. to own himself perjured at Mrs. Price's Trial and to swear that Dugdale would have given him Money to swear against Sir James Simons and Mr. Gerard and they made him write Letters to this purpose this Plessington was the Lord Bellasis's Steward Then Elizabeth Eld deposed that she and her Sister help'd to burn Mr. Dugdale's Papers that Morning he went away from the Lord Aston's and one little Book he said had no Treason in it and needed not therefore to be burnt Why said the Witness is there Treason in any of the other Papers to which he only answered Do you think there is Ann Eld her Sister deposed also the very same things Then one Mr. Michael Noble deposed that he had help'd him to make up his Accounts and been with Mr. Dugdale at the Tower to account with the Lord Aston twice and one time the Lord Aston would not be spoke with and another time they spake with him with great difficulty but he would not produce the Book wherein Mr. Dugdale said the Discharges were Then Mr. Stephen Colledge deposed he was with Mr. Dugdale at the Tower when he went to make up his Accounts with him but they could not be admitted and that then he heard one of the Lord Aston's Men say that Mr. Dugdale was as honest a Gentleman as ever lived in their Family Then Mr. Nich. Boson who was with Mr. Dugdale at the same time with Mr. Noble and Mr. Colledge deposed to the same purpose Then for the Vindication of Dugdale's Credit Thomas Whitby Esq deposed that he had known Mr. Dugdale nine or ten Years in the Ld. Aston's Service and that he was his Steward and all the Servants under him and was entrusted with all his Estate and counted faithful to his Master's Interest only he hath heard some Tradesmen say that he hath put them off without Mony Then Mr. William Southall a Coroner of Staffordshire was sworn who testified to the Reputation of Dugdale having known him eight Years and gave a large account of his first Discovery of the
1684. was brought from thence by Habeas-Corpus to the Bar at the King's-Bench at Westminster where being Arraign'd he was told of his being Indicted and Outlaw'd and thereby Attainted for High-Treason and ask'd what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder To which be reply'd that since he had made an Ingenuous Confession to his Majesty of all that he knew of any manner of Conspiracy against him he hoped That would render him Capable of Mercy and Pardon Upon which the Attorny-General offer'd him a Trial that if he had any thing to say he Defend himself from the Indictment but he Confessing himself Guilty of many things therein declin'd it and threw himself wholly upon the King's Mercy But the Court telling him that the King was the Dispenser of his own Mercy and that they were only to Execute his Justice gave a Rule for his Execution upon Wednesday Sevennight after there being no other Judgment to be pronounced in such Cases as the Court told the Attorny-General when he moved for it the Outlawry it self being the Judgment Which accordingly was Executed upon him on Wednesday the 30th of April 1684. at Tyburn Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench against Sir Thomas Armstrong June 14. 1684. Sir George Jefferies being Lord Chief Justice SIR Thomas Armstrong Kt. was upon the 14th of June 1684. brought by a Writ of Habeas-Corpus from Newgate to the Bar of the Court of King's-Bench at Westminster and there Arraign'd upon an Outlawry of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King c. And being ask'd what he had to say for himself why Sentence should not be awarded against him upon that Attainder pleaded his being beyond-Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired to be tried upon the Indictment Which the Court refusing to grant him he pleaded the Statute of the 6th of Edw. the 6th which gives the Person Outlaw'd a Year's time to reverse the Outlawry and desired it might be read which accordingly was done But it appearing by the Statute That the Person Outlaw'd ought to render himself to the Chief Justice of England within a Year's time Sir Thomas was told this did not concern him for he had not rendred himself but was taken and brought thither against his Will To which he answered That the Year was not then expir'd fie was there and did now render himself and pray'd Counsel might be assign'd him to argue it in Point of Law but the Court over-rul'd him in it telling him There was no such Doubt or Difficulty in the Matter as to need any such thing Upon which insisting much upon his Innocency and offering to make proof of it if he might be admitted to a Trial he produc'd Holloway's Case as a Precedent for it who had but a little before been offer'd it at the same Place but the Court told him that what had been done therein was meerly from the King's Grace and Mercy and that the King might extend the same Mercy to him also if he so pleas'd but since he had not done so and it not being their Business they must proceed to award Execution upon the Outlawry Upon which Mrs. Matthews Daughter to the Prisoner call'd out to the Court not to Murder her Father For which the Chief Justice caus'd her to be committed to the Marshal and accordingly she wishing that God Almighty's Judgments might light upon them was carried away the Chief Justice saying That he thanked God he was Clamour-proof After which the Attorn Gen. offered to shew the Reasons why the King extended that Grace to Holloway but ought not to extend it to Sir T.A. as not at all deserving any sort of Indulgence or Mercy but that having relation to the Evidence and not to the Outlawry the Court refus'd to hear any thing of it and so proceeded to give a Rule for his Execution the Friday following telling him upon his earnest pressing to have the Benefit of the Statute he had cited the he should have the Full Benefit of the Law And accordingly on Friday the 20th of June he was Executed at Tyburn Mrs. Matthews upon a Petition being before releas'd out of Custody without Fees The Trial between Sir William Pritchard Kt. and Alderman of the City of London Plaintiff and Thomas Papillon Esq Defendant in an Action upon the Case at the Sessions of Nisi Prius holden for the Court of Kings-Bench at the Guild-hall in the City of London on Thursday the 6th of November in Michaelmas Term in the 36th Year of the Reign of King Charles the Second 1684. Before Sir George Jefferies Kt. and Baronet then Lord Chief Justice of the said Court of Kings-Bench SIR William Pritchard late Lord Mayor of the City of London having in Easter Term last brought an Action upon the Case for falsly maliciously and without probable cause procured him to be arrested and imprisoned in his Mayoralty against Thomas Papillon Esq The Defendant pleaded Not Guilty and thereupon issue being joined it came this day to be tried before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferys and the Jury sworn to try this Cause were these Bartholomew Ferryman Thomas Blackmore Thomas Symonds William Whatton John Green Thomas Amy Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynalds John Allen Joseph Caine William Withers jun. Then Mr. Munday being of Counsel for the Plaintiff opened the Case to which Mr. Attorney General added something And then Mr. Solicitor General called Mr. Keeling who being sworn deposed That on April the 24th he being sent for by a Letter from Mr. Goodenough came to Mr. Russel's a Cooks-shop in Iron-monger-lane to meet him where were 30 or 40 Persons together By whom while he was gone for a little while his Name was put into a Warrant to be a special Bailiff to arrest the Lord Mayor which he seeming unwilling to do was urged thereto for fear of displeasing the Discontented Party which he said were such as he and the Goodenoughs were of even such as would have killed the King and the Duke that being prevailed upon he went along with the Coroner Mr. Burton and Mr. Francis Goodenough to Grocers-hall where Sir William Pritchard kept his Mayoralty to whom the Coroner came up and said he had a Warrant against him and therefore pray'd him to give an Appearance at the Suit of Mr. Thomas Papillon and another at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois whereupon some Words passed between them and the Lord Mayor refusing to give any Appearance the Coroner bid us execute our Warrants upon which he came up to the Lord Mayor and touched him upon the Shoulder telling him that he did arrest him at the Suit of Thomas Papillon Esq and one Ferdinando Burley arrested him then again at the Suit of Mr. John Dubois and then the Coroner dismissing them and taking the Lord Mayor into his own Custody he went thence to Sir Henry Tulse's and arrested him also Then Sir Henry Tulse being called and sworn deposed that about
but e're long he should find a way to get 1000 l. Then offering to speak to Osborn as to the Thing it self he was not suffer'd as being no Evidence against the Defendants till somewhat had been proved upon them Therefore the King's Counsel proposed to prove that Lane and Osborn who tho laid in the Indictment to join was run away did accuse Dr. Oates and afterwards recant it and that Knox had an hand in all this And to this end Sir William Waller was called and deposed That Justice Warcup and he were order'd by a Committee of Lords before whom a Complaint of Dr. Oates had been brought of the horrid abuse of his two Servants Osborn and Lane to take their Examinations which he did and that Lane's Evidence upon Oath was That he had been induced by Mr. Knox to betray his Master and to swear several Things against him which Knox had drawn up and dictated to him which Osborn writ and he signed them That there were four Letters three or four Memorials and three or four Informations which they had carried Knox accompanying them to have sworn them before Mr. Cheney who not caring to meddle with them they applied themselves to Mr. Dewy who refused them likewise After this Knox took Lodgings for them removing them to several places lest Dr. Oates should hunt them out bidding them stand firm to what they were to do and they should not want for Reward that would maintain them with Footmen and to live well That Knox did at the One-Tun Tavern drop a Guiny upon the Table which he said he would not give because then they might swear that he never gave them any Mony And told them that the Lord Treasurer would never have surrendred himself to the Black Rod unless they had promised to stand fast to what he had dictated to them One part of which Information was that Mr. Bedloe should say to Dr. Oates that the Earl of Danby offered him a considerable Sum of Mony to go beyond-Sea and that Dr. Oates had a Design of abusing Lane's Body That Lane further confess'd that Dr. Oates would be something hasty and passionate but was very Religious and was constant in sending his Servants to Prayers and that he had accused him of a Falshood by the instigation of Knox who incouraged him to it by the Promises of a great Reward That also to prevent a Discovery it was agreed among them that if any one should betray it the other two should murder him That he did likewise declare that the Lords in the Tower would not be wanting to acknowledg the kindness in disparaging the King's Evidence And that at all the Places and several Lodgings and Entertainments they had been at were all at Knox's Charge except twice which might amount to about 18 d. and that he paid And upon the Examinations of Lane and Osborn he found they agreed together to a tittle That he took also the Examination of Knox who said that the Papers he received from Lane and Osborn who said they had writ them out of trouble of Conscience and desired him to go with them before some Justice to swear them denying that he paid for their Lodgings only that he did indeed drop a Guiny and another time 10 s. upon the Bed which they took up but he only lent it them Confessing that the Papers so drawn up and delivered into his Hands were by him delivered into the Hands of the Lord Latimer and were there for some time this Knox belonging to the Lord Dunblane That Knox confess'd also that he sent a Note to Osborn that day he was examin'd which was conveyed to him through the Door to this effect We always Club'd and you paid two Shillings at the Sugar-Loaf Tear this Which was to intimate that they should say he did not bear their Charges Then Justice Warcup being sworn deposed That he also had took Lane's Examination wherein he had confessed as before That also he was by when he was brought before the Lords of the Committee for Examinations and did hear him there first swear the things in these Notes contained and then come afterward and beg their pardon and God's for what he had sworn was false and this too was upon Oath That he heard Knox confess about the Note to Osborn and he took Lodgings for Lane and Osborn in VVhite-Friers by the direction of the Lord Dunblane's Coachman Then one Rix deposed That he help'd Osborn into Dr. Oates's Service and a while after he and Lane came to him and said they were both going off from the Doctor to preferment and should have 100 l. a Year and 500 l. apiece but would not tell how Another time Osborn came to him to borrow a Cravat for he was going to dine with one of the greatest Peers of the Realm at the other end of the Town this Discourse being at VVhite-hall and asking why he would leave Dr. Oates he said Let Dr. Oates look to himself for he had enough against him Then perceiving some Design he gave in his Testimony to Justice VVarcup and upon further inquiry into it the Lords ordered him to send out his Warrants for the taking of Knox Lane and Osborn which he assigned over to him and in a short time after they were taken Osborn then confess'd to Justice VVarcup and Lane to Sir VVilliam VValler Afterwards Rix drinking with Lane in the Prison would have paid but he would not let him for that he had 23 s. which he said Knox had sent him in Another day he came to him and Lane shew'd him a Note which he had put under the Door from a Gentlewoman That if he would stand firm to his Text he should have 500 l. nay he should not want 1000 l. But in case they would not the Lord Treasurer would never have come in and if they did not he would lose his Head And this Lane's Father and Mother told him afterwards and that one Hest did come and tell them so That also Lane told him his Heart was lighter now he had confess'd this and that Knox set him on drew up the Writings and promis'd him those Rewards Then Richard Slightam a Prisoner and Under-Goaler deposed That Knox gave him three half Crowns at one time and promis'd him a considerable Sum to carry Notes between him and Lane and Osborne but he carried none And when Osborne had confess'd he said it would signify nothing because two were better than one Then Mr. Dewy depos'd That at the end of April or beginning of May Knox came to him with two more with him and said the Ld. Latimer wish'd him so to do with Papers ready written which as said were the Informations of one Osborne and Lane who had over-heard Dr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe conspiring against the Lord of Danby but the Parliament then sitting he shifted them off and did not inspect them Then Mr. Henry Wiggens Mr. Bedloe's Clerk deposed That Knox came to him the latter
Allegiance for Mony but could never prove it and that he had an inn same in the Country But Bolron said one confessed to the Justice that he had given Pebles 40 s. but would not swear for what Hardwicke spoke only to the Unwillingness of Bolron's Wife to go to swear before a Justice of Peace William Clow said he had a Writ against Bolron at the Suit of Higgringil a Servant to the Prisoner which was served upon him May the 22d last and he begg'd he might not go to Goal till Higgringil came for he would make Sir Thomas pay his Debt for him or he would play him such a trick as he little dream'd of Mr. Hobart then gave some account of the Money returned by the Prisoner to London he having drawn the Receipts for it which was returned by Mr. Corker for the Prisoners Neece Mrs. Apleby who was beyond Sea Then a Woman witnessed that Mowbray was suspected of stealing while he lived with the Prisoner and proffered her 5. l. to have gone away intending as he told her to have clapped her in Prison and laid it upon her Then the Prisoner having no more Witnesses and referring himself to the Judgment of the Court the Kings Counsel endeavoured to vindicate the Credit of their Witnesses and first Sir John Nicholas Clerk of the Council deposed that the Prisoner did before the Council say that he had nothing to say to Bolron's Honesty till of late that he had not behaved himself so well in giving Informations against him But he did find him now what he did always take him to be a Fool And that he denied at first that he knew Rushton the Priest and afterwards the next time he came to the Council he said he did deny it because he was afraid of an old Law against harbouring of Priests Mrs. Bolron also deposed that her Husband never threatned her if she would not swear against the Prisoner Mrs. Bolron sen Mr. Bolron's Grandmother swore the same and that she heard the Prisoner say Mr. Bolron was an honest true Servant and he would do any thing he could for him Mr. Phiswicke also deposed that he knew no ill by Mr. Bolron but that he was an honest Man After this Serj. Maynard Mr. Sol. Gen. Mr. Justice Jones Mr. Justice Dolben and Mr. Justice Pemberton summ'd up the Evidence the Ld. Ch. Justice having been some time before gone off the Bench being to sit at Nisi Prius at Guild-hall And then the Jury withdrew for about half an hour and then brought the Prisoner in Not Guilty The Trial of Henry Care Gent. at the Guild-hall in London before the Ld. Ch. Justice Scroggs on Thursday July the 2d 1680. THen and there the Defendant appeared against whom ah Information in Hillary-Term the 11th of February had been brought in the Crown-Office charging him to be Author of the weekly Packet of Advice from Rome or the History of Popery particularly for that of the 1st of August 1679. and to which by his Attorney he pleaded then Not Guilty His Jury were Nicholas Bondy Leonard Bates Henry Avarie Randal Dod Nicholas Caplin Richard Cawtham Arthur Young VVilliam Yap James VVood Thomas Gilby John Odensel Emanuel Coniers Mr. Recorder having opened the Information Mr. Stevens Printer deposed that he printed the Pacquet and had several from Mr. Care and knew of none that ever was printed but by him or his order that he had treated with Mr. Care as if he were the Author which he always supposed and that his Boy had brought several of them to be printed The Printer's Servant deposed That he had fetch'd some of these Papers from Mr. Care 's own Hands and that sometimes his Boy brought them and that none came as he knew of from any Body else Then the Paper of Aug. 1. 1679. was read by the Clerk which was as followeth There is lately found out by an experienced Physician an incomparable Medicament called The Wonder-working Plaister truly Catholick in Operation somewhat of kin to the Jesuits Ponder but more effectual The Virtues of it are strange and various It makes Justice deaf as well as blind and takes out Spots of the deepest Treason more cleverly than Castle-Soap does common Stains It alters a Man's Constitution in two or three days more than the Virtuoso's transfusion of Blood in seven Years 'T is a great Alexipharmiek and helps Poisons and those that use them It miraculously exalts and purifies the Eye-sight and makes People behold nothing but Innocency in the blackest Malefactors 'T is a mighty Cordial for a declining Cause it stifles a Plot as certainly as the Itch is destroyed by Butter and Brimstone In a word It makes Fools wise Men and wise Men Fools and both of them Knaves The Colour of this precious Balm is bright and dazling and being applied privately to the Fist in decent manner and a competent Dose infallibly performs all the said Cures and many others not fit here to be mentioned Probatum est Then Sir Francis Winnington of Counsel for the Defendant pleaded That it was not proved that this particular Paragraph was writ by Mr. Care but it might be a Sham put upon him by some Papists that might have an ill will to him who had been no Friend to them by this means to have Justice come upon him And that however indiscreetly he might do it yet no Malice was proved therein Mr. Williams another of his Counsel pleaded That it could not be supposed that a good Man and a good Subject should do an ill Action And to prove him such Mr. Sutton deposed That Mr. Care had been with him at Church and that by the Conversation be had had with him he apprehended he might be the Author of the Pacquet Mr. Ambler only testified that Mr. Care had been at Church with him and that the common Report was that he was the Author of the Pacquet of Advice Mr. Ayliffe also testified that he had seen him at Church and Divine Service but that he never asked him whether or no he writ this After which Mr. Recorder reply'd upon the Defendant's Counsel That it was unlikely that the Papists did write this particular Paper because Mr. Care writ a Weekly Intelligence and no other Intelligence came out that Week but this c. The Ld. Ch. Justice then directed the Jury in a long Speech taking notice of the Noise and Shouts which had attended this Trial and which had quite altered the Case from Mr. Care 's to a Publick Concern telling the Court how they did the like in the Case of Harris whom yet they had forsaken as soon as he was in Goal for 500 l. which 5 s. apiece would have discharged him from if they were as free of their Purses as they were of their Noises and Acclamations So that in Truth they are only violent against the Government whilst they can make Shouts and Noises but if it come once to deliver a Man from a Penal Sum they will
burnt in the Hand for Felony and afterwards pardoned can be a good Witness Which being granted him he named Mr. Jones Mr. Saunders and Mr. Darnel for his Counsel But Mr. Saunders was not in Court and Mr. Jones said he was not prepared to speak But Mr. Darnal gave his Opinion in the Negative alledging for it 11. Henry 4.41 and 9. Jac. and the Lord Cook p. 154. To which the Attorn General and Mr. Justice Jones asserted the constant Custom and Practice of the Court the same did Mr. Sol. General and Mr. Recorder Then Mr. Justice Raymond went down to the Court of Common-Pleas to know their Opinion who brought word that it was the Opinion of their Brethren That a Man convicted of Felony and not burnt in the Hand a Pardon could not set him Upright but being convicted and burnt in the Hand they suppose he is a Witness Then Mr. Dangerfield was sworn who deposed That about 12 Months ago the Lady Powis sent him with a Letter to the Prisoner who writ back an Answer which the Lady Powis read to him and Mrs. Cellier the Contents of which were This Person I like well and though he be no Scholar he will serve to instruct the Youths as he shall be directed By the Youths he said was meant the St. Omers Witnesses whom the Prisoner was employed to instruct what to say before the Trial. That his Lordship employed him to get Lane out of the Gate-house That his Lordship was concern'd also in those Letters which related to the promoting of the Sham-Plot and were to be conveyed into the Houses of several Persons of Quality and sent 40 s. for his part to pay for copying them That the next day after he had been treated with in the Tower to kill the King which he refused he waiting upon the Prisoner his Lordship ask'd him why he would refuse to kill the King it being that for which he was took out of Prison and was violently angry with him upon which he left him After this the Prisoner began his Defence and against Oates produced a Record which was read in Court of his prosecuting a Man of Buggery at Hastings whom the Jury Acquitted After which coming to London he was converted to be a Papist by one Hutchinson whom since Oates hath converted to be a Protestant which Mr. Hutchinson then appearing testifyed but talking extravagantly the Court was informed he was a distracted Man Then one Armstrong appeared to testify that Mr. Oates was only a Common Scholar at Vallidolid and one Mr. Palmer that he was but the same at St. Omers Then Hilsley affirm'd That he left Oates at St. Omers in April and did not come over with him and to corroborate his Testimony one Osborn affirmed that Mr. Hilsley told him so about the latter end of April Then one Mr. Gregson at whose House Dr. Oates Iodged appeared only to testify to the Poverty of Oates and that he had nothing but what the Jesuits allowed him Then Mr. Littcot testified that he knew nothing of the Divorce but the Court refused to hear such Evidence as not being to the Purpose Then the Records were produced against Dangerfield of his being burnt in the Hand Outlawed for Felony and twice Pilloryed for putting away false Guineys and a gilt Shilling Then Mrs. Cellier testified that Dangerfield told her of the Prisoner's Anger this time 12 month which Dangerfield said was in August last and that she would have sent him with a Letter but he refused to go near his Lordship And Bennet Dowdal said That Dangerfield told him in June of the Prisoner's Anger and that it was because he went to the Tower and his Lordships Name unknown to him The Lady Powis affirmed also That she never sent a Letter by Dangerfield nor never read one to him in her Life and Mrs. Cellier affirm'd the same Sir Richard Barker then deposed of his seeing Oates in June and that his Servants told him they saw him in May 78 Then one Turner deposed That he saw Dangerfield with the Prisoner as he believes in July And one Woodman deposed that carried a Letter from Mrs. Cellier to the Prisoner and brought back 30 s. or 3 l. but for whom he knows not Then the Prisoner would have cleared his Reputation about instructing the Youths but the Court judg'd it needless Therefore Mr. Attorney General summ'd briefly up the Evidence and the Ld. Ch. Justice did the same both taking Notice of the Exceptions made against Dangerfield's Evidence leaving it to the Jury whether he ought to be believed or no and if not that then there would be but one Credible witness After which the Jury withdrawing for a while brought in their Verdict Not Guilty The Trial of John Giles Gent. at the Sessions-House in the Old-Baily on Wednesday July 14. 1680. THE Prisoner then and there appeared having been before Arraigned and pleaded not Guilty to an Indictment for a Barbarous and Inhumane Attempt to Assassinate and Murther John Arnold Esq one of his Majesty's Justices of Peace for the County of Monmouth and now a Member of the Honourable House of Commons The Jury sworn were Christopher Plucknet William Dodd Anthony Nurse John Burton Nathan Goodwin George VVood. James Partridge Laurance VVood. John Bradshaw VVilliam Withers Edward Proby Richard Bromfield To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Gibbs Mr. Holt and Mr. Thompson being of Counsel in this Cause for the King opened the same After which Mr. Arnold himself was sworn and deposed That upon April 15. being Thursday in Easter-Week last he was with some Company at the Devil-Tavern till 10 or past and recollecting he had Business with Mr. Phillip's a Counsellor at Law in Bell-yard that Night he left his Company and his own Servants being out of the way he went to the Room where several of his Neighbour's Servants were and called to some of them to go with him but it happen'd he went away without them And as he went cross Fleet-street he saw two Men in Campaign-Cloaks follow him whom he thought to be Servants belonging to some of his Company who had followed him on his calling But as he went into Bell-yard one of them got before him and turned and looked earnestly in his Face whom passing by when a Woman stood in a Door about the middle of Bell-yard with a Candle in her hand he saw to be this Prisoner at the Bar to whom when his Companion came up he heard them laugh aloud He took no Notice but went on and at the Kennel at the end of Jackanapes-Lane he looking down to find the Kennel a Cloak was thrown over his Head and then he found very rough Hands about his Shoulders and they can him into Jackanapes-Lane just cross the Lane against the opposite Wall and run his Head so hard that he thinks they broke it and then struck him and at the second blow he fell running him through his side into the Belly Then recovering he made what
seemed much concern'd and his Countenance altered and desired to lie down Then Mr. Gibbons deposed That when they had apprehended the Count they carried him to the Mayor's and thence to an Inn for 2 or 3 hours and there the Count asked him his Name because he said he would come and give him Thanks after his Trouble was over he owned his Name Gibbons and that he belonged to the Duke of Monmouth Said he the Duke of Monmouth hath no Command now and therefore how could he take him by his Order He said he did not come upon his Command but he had killed a very good Friend of his and a Country-Man and if Providence had not ordered it otherwise he had killed a more particular Friend of mine and a Master whom he had served many Years He said he did not think they would have done the D. of Monmouth any Injury After which walking up and down he said 'T was a stain upon his Blood but one good Action in the Wars or Lodging upon a Counterscrap will wash away all that Then he asking what the People said he told him the Captain had made a Confession though it was a thing he did not then know the Count said he did not believe the Captain would confess any thing To all this the Count by his Interpreter Sir Nathaniel Johnson reply'd That he came into England with a design to have got a Regiment and serv'd England against France hearing of an Alliance to be between England Holland and Sweedland against France That he lay incognito because he was broke out in Spots on his Arms and Breast and designed to take Physick and avoid drinking of Wine and his Equipage was not come to him till after That he removed his Lodgings the first because it was too cold for him and the second because of a smoaking Chimney That he sent for the Polander over to dress his Horses after the German way which he came to buy and had return'd 1000 Pistols for that end and had bought one Horse which the Count's Brother testified That had it not been for the stormy Weather the Polander had arrived sooner he having writ for him 4 Months ago That he had no Quarrel with Mr. Thynn nor to the best of his knowledg ever saw him That it was strange he should ask a Scullion-boy whether People might ride on Sundays when he himself over and over again has rid upon Sundays to Hide-Park which was testified by Major Oglethorp and divers other Gentlemen That Capt. Vratz visited him on Sunday only because he was sick That he gave the Polander to the Captain because he should have no use for him himself bought him Clothes and a Sword because he wanted them That he absconded because one Markham his Taylor told him he heard him named as concern'd in the Murder and that if the Common People should catch him they would tear him to pieces and so his Friends did counsel him to withdraw That he heard the People say the Murderers follow'd Mr. Thynn's Coach but would not shoot till the Duke of Monmouth was gone out That he spoke of his Apprehension and Imprisonment as being a stain to his Blood And then the Count speaking something of the Repute of his own Family and Zeal for the Protestant Religion and Love for the English c. Sir Francis Winnington summ'd up the Evidence whereat the People made a great shout but were rebuked for it by the Court Mr. Williams did also the like and then the Ld. Ch. Justice gave the Charge and the Jury withdrew and the Court Adjourned for half an hour and then sent for the Jury who brought in Borosky Vratz and Stern Guilty and the County Not Guilty Who being dismiss'd Mr. Recorder sentenc'd the other 3 to be hang'd Who were accordingly Executed in the Pall-Mall on Friday Mar. 10 following and Borosky was afterwards hung up in Chains a little beyond Mile-End by his Majesty's Command The Trial of Sheriffs Thomas Pilkington Esq Samuel Shute Esq Henry Cornish Alderman Ford Lord Grey of Wark Sir Thomas Player Kt. Chamberlain Slingsby Bethel Esquire Francis Jenks John Deagle Richard Freeman Richard Goodenough Robert Key John Wickham Samuel Swinock and John Jekyll sen Before the Lord Chief Justice Saunders at the Guild-Hall London on Tuesday May 8. 1683. THen and there the Defendants appeared for their Trial upon an information against them for the Riot at Guild-hall on Midsummer-day 1682. being the Day for Election of Sheriffs for the Year ensuing To which they had pleaded Not Guilty And the Jury appearing the Defendants Counsel challenged the Array because returned by Sir Dudley North whose legally being Sheriff was now in question Which Challenge was read in French and English and admitted of a long Debate but was over-ruled As was also another Challenge offered on behalf of the Lord Grey The Defendants Counsel then prayed a Bill of Exceptions which also was over-ruled The Jury sworn were Sir Benjamin Newland Sir John Matthews Sir Thomas Griffith Sir Edmund Wiseman Sir John Buckworth Percival Gilburn Henry Wagstaff Barthol Ferriman Thomas Blackmore Samuel Newton William Watton George Villars To whom the Information being read the same was opened by Mr. Dolbin and Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. and Mr. Serj. Jefferies opened the Evidence And then the Common Serjeant Mr. Lightfoot Mr. Wells the Common-Crier Mr. Man the Sword-Bearer Mr. King Sir William Hooker and Mr. Bancroft all being sworn deposed their knowledg about the Method of the City Elections all concurring That the Lord-Mayor always used to summon and adjourn and dissolve the Common-Hall and that the Sheriffs as Sheriffs were no more concern'd in the Case than any private Man Then Mr. Craddock deposed as to the Persons concern'd in the Riot That he was then standing where they poll'd and the Lord-Mayor coming thither also to protest against their manner of Proceeding Sheriff Bethel bid him oppose or resist him for that he had nothing to do there And that this was before the Poll was adjourn'd Mr. Reeves then depos'd That he saw Mr. Shute and Mr. Pilkington encouraging the People to Poll after the Lord-Mayor was gone and that while the Lord-Mayor was there he saw a great Contest among the People some saying he had nothing to do there another cried Stop the Sword stop the Sword whom he laid hold of but some Body got him again from him Mr. John Hill deposed That he saw then Mr. Robert Key Mr. Goodenough and the Lord Grey among the People as also Mr. Cornish Mr. Richard Fletcher deposed That he also was there on that Midsummer-day by Order of Sheriff Shute after the Lord-Mayor was gone to call all Men that were to poll to come forward for the Books were to be shut up and that he could only testify that Mr. Pilkington and Mr. Shute were both there Then Capt. Clark depos'd That when Proclamation was then made for adjournment of the Court and God save the King was
was his unhappiness he had no Witnesses to call The Ld. Ch. Justice therefore in a few words summing up the Evidence the Jury presently brought him in Guilty The Trial of Capt. William Blague at the Old-Baily on Friday July 13. 1683. THE Prisoner having been Arraigned the day before and pleaded Not Guilty to an Indictment for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government was then and there set again to the Bar and making no Challenges the former Jury was sworn viz. Robert Beddingfield John Pelling William Windbury Theophilus Man John Short sen Thomas Nicholas Richard Hoare Thomas Barnes Henry Robins Henry Kemp. Edward Raddish Edward Kemp. To whom the Indictment being read and briefly opened by Mr. North and Serjeant Jefferies Thomas Leigh deposed That the Prisoner in discourse with him and Goodneough about seizing the Tower told them that the only way was to do it with Mortar-Pieces that he would venture his own Ship and provide 200 Men and lay his own Ship on Southwark side and make up his 14 Guns he had already 24 and would undertake once in 20 times to dismount the five Pieces that fac'd towards Southwark-side That he ask'd Goodenough what Mony was provided who answering 40000 l. He answered the Seamen would swallow that up presently to which Goodenough replied there was more provided at any time Mate Lee swore That the Prisoner told him as they were in a Coach together that one of these days they should have a Ball to toss which afterwards he understood by Rouse and Leigh was the Ball that was to be toss'd on Black-Heath That about six Weeks ago Capt. Blague and he walking about the Tower and discoursing of seizing it his way was to scale it but the Captain said the best was to shoot Mortar-pieces on Southwark-side but about the Ship he could say nothing The Prisoner's Defence was That his Business with Rouse was to procure him Mony as being a Broker which brought him sometimes into Goodenough's Company but that he never discours'd about any Publick Affairs and as to the seizing the Tower it was only accidental Discourse And as for his 200 Men it was impossible his Vessel being but a Pink which had been in his Possession but three Weeks and what Arms he had he bought therewith and that he never heard any thing about either a Ball or Bank of Mony Calling his Witnesses Mr. VVright declared That he had waited on the Captain ever since he had been shipp'd and was in his Pay before he had the Ship in possession Robert Chappel Carpenter declar'd The Vessel was not able to do any Service three Weeks ago and that he had been shipp'd four Months and an half to go for New-York One Bellinger the Chirurgeon declared That he had belonged to the Ship seven Weeks and to the Captain before he had a Ship and for Guns belonging to the Ship there were fourteen Saker-Guns of which four were Wooden ones six above Deck and four in the Hold. The Lord Chief Justice then summ'd up the Evidence taking notice to the Jury that these Men belonged to the Captain a great while ago and that there was only one Evidence that did affect him Wherefore the Jury Withdrawing in a short time returned and brought him in Not Guilty THE next day being Saturday July 14. 1683. the Lord Russel Capt. VValcot Mr. Rouse and VVilliam Hone were brought to the Bar to receive Sentence Where the Lord Russel desired to hear his Indictment read in English which was granted and thereupon demanded an Arrest of Judgment because there had been no Evidence of his conspiring the Death of the King as it was in the Indictment but only of levying War But the Verdict being past the Court told him they must go by what the Jury had found and not the Evidence and therefore Sentence was pass'd upon him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd Capt. VValcot had nothing to say but desired that his Son and some Friends might come and see him Hone had no more to say but begg'd the same favour Rouse insisted on some Disadvantages he had when he came on his Trial and some difference between the Indictment and their Oaths but Verdict being past Judgment was given against them three as against the Lord Russel And upon Friday July 20. following VValcot being drawn to Tyburn in one Hurdle and Rouse and Hone in another and there put into a Cart attended by Dr. Cartwright the Dean of Rippon and the Ordinary of Newgate who urged them much to discover all they knew of the Plot after they had spoke to the People were executed accordingly The next day being Saturday July 21. the Lord Russel having taken leave of his Lady the Lord Cavendish and several others of his Friends at Newgate took Coach with Dr. Tillotson and Dr. Burnet who accompanied him to the Scaffold built in Lincolns-Inn-Fields where he deliver'd his Speech to the Sheriff and after some Preparation he ordered the Executioner after he had lain down a small moment to do his Office without a Sign and so his Head at three blows was severed from his Body and ordered by the Sheriff to be delivered to his Lordship's Friends and Servants as being given them by his Majesty's Favour and Bounty The Trial of Algernon Sidney Esq before the Lord Chief Justice Jeffreys at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster on the 7th 21st and 27th of November 1683. UPON Wednesday Nov. the 7th 1683. Algernon Sidney Esq was arraigned at the Kings-Bench Bar upon an Indictment of High Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and intending to raise a Rebellion in this Kingdom Which Indictment he excepted against as erroneous several Crimes being put together therein distinct in nature one from another and distinguished by Law offering to the Court a Parchment wherein were his Exceptions to the Bill but it was refused and he sorced to plead which he did at length Not Guilty And then he desired a Copy of the Indictment which was denyed him but upon his Request it was read to him again in Latin and his Trial appointed to be on Wednesday Novemb. the 21st 1683. Then and there the Prisoner again appearing he desired Pen Ink and Paper and that Mr. VVinn and Mr. Gibs might write for him which were granted him and then he shewed the reason he had before to desire a Copy of his Indictment which the Lord Stafford and the other Lords in the Tower had urging it for Law upon the Statute of 46 Edw. 3. But the Court over-ruled it Then the Clerk of the Crown called the Jury and after several Challenges the Jurors were John Anger Richard VVhite VVilliam Linn Lawrence VVood Adam Andrews Emery Arguise Josias Clerke George Glisby Nicholas-Baxter VVilliam Reeves VVilliam Grove John Burt. To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Dolben opened the same and the Attorney General opened the Evidence and then Mr. VVest was called against whom the Prisoner excepted
of the Season had chang'd their Opinion so that now they disbelived that which they believed before and perhaps for as little Reason as they believed him at first For he could not expect that a Man who believes without a Principle should not recant that Belief without a Reason But the Court call'd this a Reflection and spar'd him not for it The other part of his Defence consisted of his endeavouring to prove that he was here seen in London in April and May 1678. To this end Mrs. Cicilia Mayo Sir Richard Barker's House-keeper deposed That she saw Dr. Oates at her Master's House in Barbacan the latter end of Apr. or beginning of May being about a Week before Whitsontide in that Year the Plot broke out That the Coachman told her he had been there once or twice before but this was the first time she saw him he having on grey Clothes a white Hat and a short Periwig and dined there with her Lady's Sister and others Sir Richard being then sick in the Country That he came afterwards when she saw him in black Clothes a longer Periwig which was brown That she never knew the Prisoner before then but they told her who it was Then John Butler Sir Richard Barker's Coachman deposed That he also saw Mr. Oates at his Master's House the beginning of May before the Plot in a disguise having on a grey Coat and white Hat and his Hair cut short but without a Periwig enquiring for Dr. Tongue Mrs. Mayo then also looking upon him in the Court through the Window And that afterwards he came in a Cinnamon-coloured Coat and green Ribbons and a long black Periwig and that he dined there several â—â—mes Then Philip Page Sir Richard Barker's Man that used to make up his Physick for him deposed That he remembred he did see the Prisoner at his Masters in grey Clothes but he was not certain as to the time only he believes it was in May. Then Mr. Walker a Minister deposed he met the Prisoner in a Disguise between St. Martin's-Lane and Leicester-Fields not exactly remembring the Time when only he thought it about a Year and a quarter before he was first examin'd and that the Elm-Trees were then budded forth as big as an Hazle-Nut After this reflecting on the discredit the St. Omers Witnesses had once been in and of their not prosecuting of this Cause before this time he concluded his Evidence And the King's Counsel proceeded to answer his Defence producing the Records of Sir George Wakeman and Earl of Castlemaine's Trials to prove that his Evidence there was not believed which were read and Sir George Wakeman being sworn deposed what it was the Prisoner then swore against him and protested the falsity of it and his own Innocency The same also the Earl of Castlemain did in like manner And then the Lords Journals were produced where it was recorded that the Prisoner said he could accuse no Body else but those that he named and yet soon after he accused the present King and the Queen-Dowager but this upon search being not found to be a Record upon Oath it was not thought valid Evidence Therefore they proceeded to prove his Subornation of one Clay which was a Witness for the Prisoner at the Trial of the five Jesuits whom now he did not call and of Mr. Smith the School-master of Islington To this end part of Oates's Narative was read out of the Lords Journal wherein he accused this William Smith as concerned in the Plot as endeavouring to vilify the House of Commons c. And then a Certificate was read under Oates's Hand of this Smith's Honesty not three days before the Trial of the five Jesuits whence they would infer he had been tampering with him the which Smith himself being sworn was ready to have deposed but the Ld. Ch. Justice would not admit him to swear that he did forswear himself because such should never have the Countenance of ever being Witnesses again Therefore they proceeded to prove the Subornation of Clay and to this end Lawrence Davenport in whose keeping Clay was in Prison deposed that Sir William Waller and the Prisoner did hang'd for that they could prove him to be a Priest unless he would swear for Oates that he dined with him at Mr. Howards in May which he consented to so he might have his Mony restored that was taken from him saying he had been a Rogue before and did not know what he might be And this another Witness produced swore that Davenport told to him the next day in Prison Then Mr. Howard deposed That Clay was mistaken in his Testimony given at the Trials of the five Jesuits in being July and not May 1678 that he and Oates were at his House about which time there was no question of his being in England Then they read out of Oates's Narrative again wherein he had said how he return'd three or four days after the Consult of April 24 was over observing hence how his own Witnesses contradicted him who had deposed that they saw him here in London the latter end of May. And here the Counsel for the King concluding their Evidence Dr. Oates proceeded with his Defence only shewing out of the Lords Journal a Copy of their Resolve That there was a Plot and of their summoning up before them Thomas Bickley of Chichester for vilifying Dr. Oates and thereupon turning him but out of Commission objecting five things against their Evidence 1. Their Religion A Papist not being a good Witness in a Cause of Religion appealing to the Heavens Which the Ld. Ch. Justice call'd a Common-wealth appeal and bid him to be took away falling very foul upon the poor Doctor But stood in 't that 't was Law and the Lord Cooke's practice quoting Bulstrode's Reports 2d Part 155. He Objected 2. Their Education confessing themselves to be bred up in a Seminary which is against Law quoting 27o. Eliz. cap. 2. and 3. Car. 1. Cap. 2. Which also was over-ruled 3. Their Judgments in Cases of Conscience whereby they own they have Dispensations to swear Lies for the promotion of the Cause 4. It was refused at the Lord Shaftsbury's Trial to suffer the King's Evidence there to be Indicted of Perjury But all this the Ld. Ch. Justice told him was idle and nothing to the Purpose And therefore he went on to sum up his Evidence protesting the Truth of his Evidence and that he was resolved to stand by and seal it with his Blood which the Ld. Ch. Justice told him it was pitty but he should Then Mr. Sol. Gen. summ'd up the Evidence which while he was a doing Dr. Oates beg'd leave to withdraw being weak and ill with the Stone and Gout and having lien in Irons 21 weeks After him the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence with all the Virulency and Gall his Wit or Malice could assist him And then the Jury withdrawing for about a quarter of an hour deliver'd in their Verdict
one executed the other having a Reprieve The Prisoner then denyed what he had confest in his Examination saying it was false and that he did not know whence Kelloway and Lawrence came nor did they tell him he confess'd he lodged them but that what he had done was ignorantly and that when his Examination was taken he was in a Maze and he did not know what was put down After this the Ld. Ch. Justice briefly summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him in Guilty The Trial of John Fernley Barber at the Old-Baily on Monday October the 19th 1685. THE Prisoner then and there appearing was arraign'd upon an Indictment of High-Treason for harbouring concealing and relieving one James Burton whom he knew to be a Traitor c. to which he pleaded Not Guilty and the same Jury that was for Ring continued To whom the Indictment being read it was opened by Mr. Phips and Mr. Soliciter General and then the Record of the Outlawry of James Burton was produced and the said James Burton being sworn deposed That he came to London out of Monmouth's Army in the West on Wednesday about three Weeks after the Rout that he lodged two Nights with his Wife and then she being acquainted procured him a Lodging at Fernley's where he lodg'd two Nights more and was took there on Sunday Night That he had been gone two Years before being in the Proclamation for being with Rumbold at the Mitre-Tavern within Aldgate That he saw not Fernley till Sunday at dinner and then they discoursed of the Rout of Monmouth's Army Mrs. Mary Burton then swore how she being acquainted with Mrs. Fernley procured a Lodging for her Husband there not thinking him safe at home Then Mr. Reynolds deposed that he took Burton the beginning of August last at Mr. Fernley's House on a Sunday about eight a Clock at Night up one pair of Stairs who was got into the Chimney and tumbled down while he was there with the Soot about him and one pair of Stairs higher he took Fernley for harbouring him who then said he knew not who Burton was After this Burton's Pardon was produced and read whereby he was rendred a Legal Witness Then the Prisoner said he knew nothing of Burton till Sunday at dinner and then he discoursed him about his Escape in the VVest and that after dinner one Mr. Gaunt came to him and told Burton he should get him a Passage in a day or two's time and that he should take no care for Clothes or Money That he designed to have acquainted a Magistrate with his being at his House the next morning and because Gaunt said he would come again he delayed though he himself was a Constable with a design to apprehend them both And to testify his Conversation he called one Mr. William Rush a Distiller who appearing an Officer presently inform'd the Court he was a great Whigg Nay said Mr. Justice Withers if he be a Whigg he cannot be a little one Mr. Rush said Mr. Fernley always demeaned himself well among his Neighbours and was a good sober Man Mr. Justice Withins again reply'd in Scorn A Wapping Man A sober Wapping Man Then Captain Haddock and Mr. Dove were called but refused to come in But Mr. Whittal came in a Plumber who being ask'd if he went to Church answer'd he did constantly Yes said Mr. Justice Withins there were a parcel of them that went constantly to Church Trimingly Mr. Whittal testify'd to Mr. Fernley's sober Conversation and that he went always to Church and he never heard him speak against the Government The Prisoner then added that he was a poor Man and owed Money and he knew there was 100 l. for securing Burton and there was no Gain by concealing him which shew'd he had no design After the Lord Chief Justice then had summ'd up the Evidence the Jury withdrawing brought the Prisoner in Guilty The Trial of Elizabeth Gaunt the Wife of William Gaunt of St. Mary White-Chappel Yeoman at the Old-Baily on Monday October the 19th 1685. THE Prisoner then and there appearing was arraign'd upon an Indictment of High-Treason for harbouring James Burton and giving him five Pounds whom she knew to be a Traytor c. To which she pleaded Not Guilty And the Jury then sworn to try her and Mr. Cornish were these after Mr. Cornish had challenged thirty five Thomas Rawlinson Thomas Langham Ambrose Istead Thomas Pendleton John Grice Thomas Oneby William Clowdsley Richard Holford William Long-boat Steven Coleman Robert Clavel William Long. To whom the Indictment was read and opened by Mr. Phips and Mr. Attorney General And Mr. James Burton being sworn declared how through Keeling he was with Rumbold at the Mitre-Tavern within Aldgate where the killing of the King was discoursed of which he refused to meddle in and never therefore met but that one time but after Keeling had discover'd finding himself in the Proclamation he absconded for two Months and then Mrs. Gaunt procured him a Passage with Rumbold but the Vessel being leakie he durst not venture and so lay hid at his Daughter 's several Months after and then Mrs. Gaunt got him a Passage again and so he got to Amsterdam and she gave him about 5 l. and two Persons more went with him whom she helped away And this he supposes she did for him because her Husband had been with Capt. Walcot and him about seizing of the Tower Then Mary Gilbert Burton's Daughter deposed that Mrs. Gaunt fetched her Father away in order to send him beyond Sea Then Mr. Burton deposed that Mrs. Gaunt came and proffer'd to convey her Husband away c. And then Burton's Pardon was again produced To all which the Prisoner said very little only that she did not know that her Husband was concern'd in the Plot nor would she give any reason why she took so much care to send Burton away but left it to the Jury who after the Lord Chief Justice had summ'd up the Evidence brought her in Guilty The Trial of Henry Cornish Esq before the Lord Chief Justice Jones at the Sessions House in the Old-Baily on Monday October the 19th 1685. THE Prisoner then and there appearing was arraign'd upon an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the late King and Subversion of the Government c. To which after some Complaints he pleaded Not Guilty desiring his Trial might be deferr'd he having had no notice till last Saturday at twelve a Clock and he could get no Friend to him till eight at Night and then he was permitted to speak with no body but in the presence of the Goaler and had been allowed no Pen Ink or Paper The Court here told him he ought to have none without leave given on a Petition preferred by him He said his Children had petitioned the King the Night before to put off his Trial and it was referred to the Judges and that he did not know whether he was committed for High-Treason
he had not been quick enough in the Prosecution but had been too remiss and did threaten him that they would complain to the Parliament which was to sit the 21st of October following That about a week before he was missing he came to the Witness in a great fright and told him that several Popish Lords had threatned him and asked him what he had to do with it He said he went in fear of his Life by the Papists and that he had been dog'd several days Then Thomas Robinson Esq chief Prothonotary of the Court of Court of Common-Pleas and a Justice of the Peace for Middlesex and Westminster did depose that discoursing Sir Edmondbury about the Examinations he had taken about his Plot he said to him that he should have but little Thanks for his Pains that he did it very unwillingly and would fain have had it done by others And that he did believe upon his Conscience he should be the first Martyr Then Mr. Prance deposed that about two or three Weeks before Sir Edmondbury's Murder He Girald Green and Kelly met several times at the Plow Ale-House by the Water-side where Girald and Kelly inticed the Witness saying Sir Edmondbury Godfrey was a busie Man and had done and would do a great deal of Mischief and it was a piece of Charity and no Sin to kill him That they had dog'd him into Red-Lion Fields but had not an opportunity to kill him That Hill Girald and Green had dog'd him all Saturday October 12. last from his first going out Hill having first spoke with him upon some pretended story at his own House whereof Kelly gave the Witness notice at night they lodg'd him in a House at St. Clements and about seven a Clock Green call'd the Witness out of his own House in Princes-street to Semerset-House that about eight or nine a Clock Hill came before up the street and gave them notice to be ready and then stay'd at the Gate till Sir Edm. Godfrey came by and then told him there were two Men a quarrelling and desired him to come and try whether he could pacify them he was very unwilling but being intreated he went down till he came to the bottom of the Rails and then Green twisted his Handkerchief and threw it about his Neck and threw him behind the Rails and there throtled him and punched him and Girald a Priest as also was Kelly would have thrust his Sword through him but the rest would not permit him for fear it should discover them by the Blood That about a quarter of an Hour after the Witness came down and found he was not quite dead and then Green wrung his Neck quite round that he watch'd the Water-Gate and Berry the Stairs while the Murder was a doing but these Circumstances they all told him afterwards That when he came to them there was Hill Green Girald and Kelly about the Body and Berry came to them from the Stairs and they six help'd to carry the Body into Hill's Chamber in Dr. Godwin's House where it lay till Monday night something being thrown over it and then it was removed into Somerset-House and Hill shew'd it him with a Dark-Lanthorn Girald Hill and Kelly being then in the Room On Tuesday Night it was removed back again towards Hill's Chamber but somebody being there they lay'd it in a Room just over against supposed to belong to Sir John Arundel's Lodgings There it lay till Wednesday Night about nine a Clock when they removed it into the Room where it first lay and the Witness coming just as they were removing it they were affrighted and run away but he speaking Berry came back again and got the Body up into the Room and about twelve a Clock they carried it away in a Sedan which Hill brought that the Witness and Girald carry'd the Sedan Green and Kelly going before and Berry opening the Gate at an Hem that they carry'd him into Covent-Garden and then Green and Kelly to Long-Acre and then they again to Soe-hoe Church where Hill met them with an Horse on which they set the Body astride forcing open his Legs and Hill held him up and so leaving the Sedan in one of the new Houses there till they came back again Green Hill Girald and Kelly went away with him and as they told the Witness next morning they having run him through with his own Sword threw him into a Ditch and laid his Gloves and other things upon the Bank That Girald and Vernat did speak of a great Reward to be given for this from the Lord Bellasis That Girald was resolved to kill him that Night and if he could not otherwise he would kill him with his own Sword in the Street that leads to his own House That afterwards He and Girald and Vernat and one Luson Priests did dine at one Casshes at the Queens-Head at Bow having a Barrel of Oysters and a dish of Fish which he bought himself That Mr. Vernat sent a Note by a Cobler for one Mr. Dethick who presently came to them and then they all read the Writing of the Murder and were very merry but the Witness hearing the Door a little rustle went and catch'd a Drawer listning whom he told he could find in his Heart to kick down Stairs and so sent him away That this Vernat was to have been one at the Murder but something happen'd he could not That this Witness never knew Mr. Bedloe deposed That in the beginning of October last he was several times treated with by Le Faire Prichard Kains and several other Priests about murthering of a Gentleman refusing to tell him who it was promising 4000 l. and some to assist him in it Afterwards that he was commanded by them to insinuate himself into the Acquaintance of Sir Edmondbury Godfrey which he did by pretending to come for Warrants for the good Behaviour That the day before he was murder'd he sent his Boy to Sir Edm. Godfrey to invite him to the Tavern where were Prichard Le Faire Welch Kaines another 5 Jesuits that they also might have insinuated themselves into his Acquaintance but he was not at home That the next day Le Faire told him that there was a considerable Gentleman to be put out of the way that night who had all the Informations of Dr. Oates and Dr. Tongue and if he should not be put out of the way and those Papers took from him the Business would be so obstructed that they would not be able to effect it till another Age. The Witness then told him that according to his Promise he would assist and was appointed to meet him that Night in the Cloysters at Somerset-House And asking where the Reward was Le Faire told him that no worse a Man was engaged for it than the Lord Bellasis and Mr. Coleman had order to pay it That the Witness seeing Le Faire again on Monday night he was charged by him with his breach of Promise but excused
a Paper to the Court containing Observations upon the Indictment which she desired might be read but it was refused and she bid to give it her Husband Green produced for his Defence the Testimony of James Warrier his Landlord and his Wife and Maid which being found to relate to October 19. was deemed nothing to the purpose Berry produced Corporal William Collet who affirmed that he on that Wednesday Night placed his Sentinels at Somerset-House Nicholas Trollop from seven to ten who confessed that in his time a Sedan was brought in Nicholas Right stood from ten to one who said no Sedan came out in his time and Gabriel Hasket who affirmed the same for his time And Eliz. Minshaw Berry's Maid affirmed that her Master was in Bed that Night by twelve a Clock The Sentinels Evidence was only though material but in regard they could not be so positive but that they might be mistaken by reason of the darkness of the Night and Privacy of the Conveyance their Evidence was not thought substantial Mr. Attorney General then spoke to the Concurrency of Prance's and Bedloe's Evidences and Mr. Solicitor General to the Consistancy thereof After which the Ld. Ch. Justice sum'd up the Evidence and directed the Jury in a very tart Speech against the Cruelty of the Romish Principles Then the Jury withdrawing for a short space brought the Prisoners all in guilty Upon which the Ld. Ch. Justice told them that they had found the same Verdict that he would have found if he had been one with them and if it were the last word he were to speak in this World he should have pronounced them guilty At which Words the whole Assembly gave a great shout of Applause The next day the Prisoners being brought again to the Bar Mr. Justice Wyld who as second Judg in that Court pronounceth the Sentence in all Criminal Matters except High-Treason spoke an excellent Speech to them wherein he shewed them the Greatness of their Crime and gave them good Advice and then sentenc'd them to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd which was accordingly executed upon them at Tyburn on Fryday the 21st of Feb. they all denying the Fact to the last ADVERTISEMENT THE Tryals of Thompson Pain and Farrel tho not immediately succeeding the Preceeding yet relating to the same matter and giving not little light thereto is judg'd not inconvenient to be placed next The Tryal of Nathaniel Thompson William Pain and John Farrel at Guild-Hall before Sir Francis Pemberton Lord Chief Justice of his Majesty's Court of Kings-Bench on Tuesday June the 20th 1682. The Jurors Names were Peter Houblon John Ellis William Barret Joshua Brooks Gervas Byfield Jonathan Lee George VViddowes William Sambrooke William Jacomb John Delmee Samuel Bayly Samuel Howard TO whom an Information exhibited by the Kings Attorney General against the said Thompson Pain and Farrel was read for writing and printing several scandalous Libels about the Death of Sir Edm. Godfrey reflecting on the Justice of the Nation in the Proceedings against his Murtherers Which Information Mr. Thompson opened and Serjeant Maynard aggravated the Crimes therein contained Mr. Clare then was sworn and produced a Copy of the Record of the Conviction and Attainder of Sir Edm. Godfrey As also a Copy of the Inquisition take by the Coroner of Middlesex upon the view of the Body of the said Sir Edm. Godfrey whereby it was found by them that he was murthered strangled with a Cord by Persons unknown Both which Mr. Clare having sworn to be true Copies were read Then the Execution of Green Berry and Hill was attested by the Oath of Capt. Richardson and Mr. Prance and Curtis swore that they and Bedloe were Witnesses at their Tryals Then Sir John Nicholas Sir Philip Lloyd and William Bridgman Esq swore that the two Letters in the Information which were shewed them were the same that were shewed to Thompson Pain and Farrel at the Council and that Thompson owned the printing of both and Farrel owned the bringing of the first and Pain owned the bringing of the other to Thompson both which Letters was then read in the Court. The first which Farrel owned he writ was intitled A Letter to Mr. Miles Prance in relation to the Murder of Sir Edm. Godfrey The Design whereof was to contradict the Evidence given at the Trial of his Murderers and to fix the Guilt upon himself affirming that the Coroner's Inquest were first of Opinion he was Felo de se and there was much Art us'd to procure their Verdict to the contrary That the Body was refused to be opened and the Coroner of Westminster's Assistance rejected and he dismist with a Guiny That he was not dogg'd as was sworn but was seen in several places and about three in the Afternoon about Primrose-hill walking in the Fields That he was found in a place inaccessible by a Horse and in such a posture as inferr'd he could never be thrust into a Sedan That his Body was full of Blood and when the Sword was pulled out Blood and Water very much issued out of that Wound and that part of the Sword which was in the Body was discoloured and the Point which was through was rusty his Clothes Belt and Scabbord were weather-beaten to Rags his Body stunk and his Eyes Nostrils and Mouth were Fly-blown his Eyes shut his Face pale no Dirt on his Shoes nor Horse-hair on his Clothes and that Bedloe's and Prance's Evidence before the Committee of Lords very much differ'd And that all this would be proved by divers credible and undeniable Eye and Ear-Witnesses Dated from Cambridg Feb. 23. 1681. Subscribed Truman London printed for M. G. at the Sign of Sir E. B. G's Head near Fleet-bridg The other Letter writ by Pain was intituled A second Letter to Mr. Miles Prance in Reply to the Ghost of Sir E. Godfrey Which was a Vindication of the First in Reply to the Answer given thereto by a Paper Intituled The Ghost of Sir E. Godfrey Disclaiming the concurrence of any Papists in publishing that Paper asserting for Truth all that had been said therein which was ready to be proved by many Witnesses who were not willing to expose themselves to the fury of that Torrent which then carried all before it in favour of the Plot by appearing at the Trial running over all the Paragraphs of the other Letter asserting what had there been said for Truth endeavouring to wipe off the Objections given in a scurrilous manner imputing Melancholy to be predominant in Sir Edm. Godfrey's Family and that such Accidents were no News thereto c. Dated from Cambridg March 13. 1681. subscribed Truman London Printed for Nath. Thompson 1682. Then was read a Paragraph out of N. Thompson's Loyal Protestant Intelligence Numb 125. Tuesday March 7. 1681. which was a kind of Advertisement of this second Letter's coming out and an Assertion that all things in the first were true and were ready by undeniable Evidence to be made out Then a
with a solemn Imprecation and disclaiming all the Crime in this Matter that had been charg'd against him Against Corker Dr. Oates swore That he was privy to the Promise of the 6000 l. which was to be raised among the Benedictines for carrying on the Design and as being President of the Benedictines he assented thereto That the said Corker gave Le Chese and the English Monks at Paris an account of the Jesuits Proceedings in England And that he had a Patent to be Bishop of London which the Witness had seen in his hand And that he disposed of several parcels of Mony which they called the Queen's Charity for advancing the Design That also he was privy to the Grand Consult in April and excepted against Pickering's being made choice of for killing the King in regard that he being engag'd to say High Mass an Opportunity might be lost in the mean time Mr. Bedloe further depos'd against him That he had been with him in the Company of others at Somerset-House where he heard him discourse in general concerning the Plot of Letters of Intelligence and raising an Army What Agitators the Conspirators had in the Country and what Interest they had made To this Corker offer'd in his Defence That not knowing his Accusations he could not come with Evidences to support his Plea That there was nothing more easy than to accuse an innocent Person and that the Circumstances ought to be as credible as the Witnesses of which there was neither to be found in his Case using many Flourishes to move the Court and the Jury raising his Arguments from Improbability of Witnesses to maintain his Allegations And the more to invalidate Oates's Testimony he produced one Ellen Rigby Elizabeth Sheldon Alice Broadhead who testified That one Stapleton was President of the Benedictines and not himself and that the said Stapleton had been so for many Years Against Marshal Dr. Oates depos'd That he was present when the 6000 l. was agreed upon and that he made the same Exceptions against Pickering that Corker had done Mr. Bedloe swore also against him That he had carried several Letters to Papists in the Country that were in the Design and particularly one to Sir Francis Ratcliff And that he had sent Letters of his own twice to others concerning the subverting of the Government and introducing Popery To this Marshal throwing himself upon the Court whom he besought to manage his Cause for him as having had so much Trial of their Candour and Ingenuity he made some slight Reflections upon the King's Evidence and desir'd the Court to consider how-little concern'd he was at his being apprehended which was no small sign of his Innocency Relating the manner of it though very falsly as Sir William Waller then swore But the main of his Evidence lay upon this stress That Dr. Oates was a stranger to him and had mistaken him for some other Person which also was evidently made out to the contrary besides that the Prisoner brought no proof of what he affirm'd in that particular The Conclusion of his Defence was a smooth Harangue ad captandum populum and in justification of the Crimes of the five Jesuits that had already suffered which because it was look'd upon as an affront done to the Justice of the Court the Ld. Ch. Justice replied in a very smart and excellent Harangue whereat the people gave a Shout again upon him and the Court desir'd him to forbear his Flowers of Rhetorick which were all to no purpose Against Rumley only Dr. Oates swore That he was privy to the Consult for the raising the 6000 l. and that he pray'd for the Success of the Design And being but one Witness against him he did not think it needful to trouble the Court with a Defence And indeed it was the Opinion of the Court deliver'd to the Jury that they ought to discharge him After this the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidences taking Notice of the weakness of the Prisoners Defences only expressing himself dissatisfied at Dr. Oates's excuse of his own weakness and infirmity for not giving his full Charge against Sir George Wakeman at the Council Board Since he might have charg'd him in the same breath that he denied he had any thing more against him Saying it was strange that the Prisoners should have so little knowledg and so little accquaintance with Oates and Bedloe and so great a matter as they speak should be true c. As soon as my Lord had done speaking Mr. Bedloe told him he had not summ'd up his Evidence right His Reply was I know not by what Authority this Man speaks An Officer then being sworn to keep the Jury the Judges went off the Bench leaving Mr. Recorder and some Justices to take the Verdict And after about an Hours space the Jury returned and brought them all four in contrary to Expectation Not Guilty After which the Court Adjourned The Trials of Andrew Brommich and William Atkins Priests at the Summer-Assizes at Stafford As also of Charles Kern a Priest at Hereford-Assizes before the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs 1679. ON VVednesday Aug. 13. 1679. the Court sate And the Night before the Lord Chief Justice having charged the Sheriff to return a good Jury he now enquired of him if he had observed his Directions The Sheriff acquainted his Lordship That since he had impannelled the said Jury he had heard that one Allen who had being returned said in Discourse with some of his Fellows that nothing was done against the Popish Priests above and therefore he would do nothing against them here nor find them Guilty Whereupon his Lordship called for the said Allen and one Randal Calclough one of his fellow Jury-men and another Witness upon Oath who proving the words against him his Lordship discharg'd him of the Jury and committed him to Prison till he found Sureties for his good Behaviour And likewise three more of the Jury were discharg'd upon suspicion of being Popishly-affected his Lordship commanding the Sheriff to return good Men in their Places which was accordingly done and the Jury sworn viz. Thomas Higgin John Webb Edward Ward Thomas Marshall John Beech. Randal Calclough Richard Trindall James Beckett VVilliam Smyth VVilliam Pinson Daniel Buxton Richard Cartwright Then Andrew Brommich being set to the Bar was Indicted for being a Priest And to prove him so Ann Robinson deposed That she had received the Sacrament from him about Christmas last according to the Church of Rome in a Wafer and four times more before that time twice at Mr. Birch's and twice at Mr. Pursall's Then Jeoffery Robinson deposed That he heard him say something in an unknown Tongue and that he was in a Surplice but being a Papist was hardly induced to say so much Brommich's Defence was only a denial that ever he gave the Sacrament to Ann Robinson or if he did that it could be no Sacrament unless he was a Priest He desired also that it might be took notice
that Robinson and his Wife upon their Examinations before a Justice of the Peace said they did not know him Then the Statute of 27. Eliz. Cap. 2. was read and the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him in Guilty Then VVilliam Atkins was set to the Bar having been Arraigned for being a Romish Priest and his Indictment read to the same Jury Then VVilliam Jackson being sworn said He could say nothing Francis VVilden deposed That he heard him say Prayers in an Unknown Tongue in a Surplice and had seen him give the Sacrament to seven or eight according to the manner of the Church of Rome in a Wafer at Mrs. Stamford's House in VVolverhampton Then John Jarvis being called refused to be sworn saying He was troubled with a Vision last Night But the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he mistook for Old Men dream Dreams 't was Young Men see Visions and that he was an old Man Bidding him speak the Truth and he 'd warrant him he should not be troubled with Visions any more this being a Trick of the Priests So he being sworn deposed That he had often been relieved by this Atkins and had heard him say somewhat in an Unknown Tongue and had Confess'd to him and often received the Sacrament from him he being in a Priests Habit. Henry Brown also deposed That he was almost turned from the Protestant Religion to that of the Church of Rome but never went further than Confession and that was to this Man and then he left them Then Thomas Dudley deposed That he likewise was given that way and had been at Confession with one Atkins whom he believed to be this Man and had seen him perform several Rites of the Church of Rome at VVell-Head at Ham. Then the Statute was read and the Prisoner saying He had neither any Witnesses to call nor any thing to say The Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury brought him also in Guilty And the Ld. Ch. Justice sentenced them both to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd ON Monday Aug. 4. 1679. at Hereford Charles Kerne was brought to the Bar and being Arraigned he pleaded Not Guilty to the Indictment which was for being a Romish Priest Then the Jury being sworn whose Name 's are not inserted into this Trial only that one VVill. Barret was Foreman the Court proceeded to call the Evidence against him And first Edward Biddolph was sworn who deposed that he did not know the Prisoner that he had seen one of that name 6 Years agone at Mr. Somerset's at Bellingham but would not say this was he Then Margaret Edwards deposed That she had known Kerne five or six Years That the first time she ever saw him was at Mr. VVigmore's of Lucton who told her it was he That she hath seen him several times since twice or thrice at VVoebly and the last time was the 29th of May was Twelvemonth at Sarnsfield at Mrs. Monington's where she saw him deliver the Wafer and remembred the Words Corpus Christi to four persons that were there but she her self did not receive She gave also an account of the Reason of her then coming thither it being at the request of one Harris of Lempster whose Wife was sick to seek some Remedy from Mrs. Monington for her Telling how the Maid brought her up to the Mistress how she acquainted her with her Errand what advice was given her and how Mrs. Monington understanding she was a Papist took her into the Chappel whereof she gave a Description Then Mary Jones deposed That she knew Mr. Kerne about eight Years ago when she lived at Mr. Somersets and that Mr. Kerne lived in the House about half a Year That she hath seen several Persons come thither And that one Sunday Morning she saw several Persons go up with Mr. Kerne and listning she heard Mr. Kerne say something aloud which she did not understand there being but a Wall between them That also there was a Child Christned in the House and no one there but Mr. Somerset and his Wife Mr. Latchet and his Wife and Mr. Kerne to do it but she did not see him do it though she heard his Voice And that once she wash'd a Surplice but knew not whose it was Then the Prisoner in his own Defence called one Mr. Hyet who said That Margaret Edwards had denied to him that she knew Mr. Kerne but not being on her Oath when she said so it was not regarded Mr. Weston's maid affirmed That she saw Margaret Edwards and Mary Jones talking together and Marg. Edwards instructed the other what she should say but being called they both denyed it upon their Oaths Then Mrs. Monington appear'd who said She neither knew Marg. Edwards nor James Harris and Mrs. Monington's Maid denied that ever she saw her at her Mistresses House Then the Statute being read of 27 Eliz. the Prisoner urged that Persons that are not Priest's may say Mass except that of Bread and Wine and Christen too in extremis Then the Ld. Ch. Justice summ'd up the Evidence concluding Margaret Edwards to be a Positive Evidence but leaving the other doubtful to the Consideration of the. Jury who brought the Prisoner in Not Guilty The Trial of Thomas Knox and John Lane at the King's-Bench Bar on Tuesday Novemb. 25. 1679. before the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs and the other Judges of that Court. THen and there the Prisoners were indicted for a Conspiracy to defame and scandalize Dr. Oates and Mr. Bedloe thereby to discredit their Evidence about the Horrid Popish Plot. To which having pleaded Not Guilty the Jury was sworn viz. Sir John Kirke Thomas Harriot Henry Johnson Simon Middleton Hugh Squire Francis Dorrington John Roberts Rainsford Waterhouse Thomas Earsby Joseph Radcliffe James Supple Richard Cooper To whom the Indictment being read Trenchard Esq of Counsel for the King in this Cause opened the Indictment Serjeant Maynard pursued the Charge and Sir Creswel Levinz his Majesty's Attorney General opened the Evidence Then the Attainders of those Persons executed for the Plot and the Impeachments of the Lords in the Tower and of the Earl of Danby mentioned in the Indictment being allowed Robert Radford one of his Majesty's Yeomen of the Guard being call'd and sworn deposed That Richard Lane who was a Yeoman of the Guard extraordinary and Father of this John Lane told him about a Year ago that Doctor Oates did attempt many times to Bugger his Son but knowing him to be a lying Fellow he durst not speak of it again for fear he would have put it upon him Mr. Thomas Allen only deposed that in December last when Lane was out of Dr. Oates's Service he desired him to interceed for him which he did till he was admitted again Mr. Samuel Oates the Doctor 's Brother deposed That in April last about a Fortnight before Lane went from his Brother he heard him say having before wished for 1000 l. that he questioned not
And that this Statute was only ad Terrorem and ought to be taken most strictly in his favour The Ld. Ch. Justice then gave a short Charge to the Jury concerning him and set him aside And then the Jury was charged with James Corker as with the other against whom Dr. Oates deposed that he was Benedictine Monk and before 1674 one of the Queen's Priests that he had heard him several times say Mass in a Monks Habit at Sommerset-House and the Savoy and himself had received the Sacrament from him at the Savoy and had seen his Patent from Rome to be Bishop of London Mr. Bedloe deposed That he had seen him wear the Habit of a Benedictine Monk before the Suppression of the Convent in the Savoy and had seen him take Confessions and Absolve in Somerset-House Mr. Prance deposed That he heard him say Mass once at Mr. Paston's in Duke-street about two Years ago The Prisoner's Defence was only a flat Denial that ever he said Mass either in Somerset-house or Mr. Paston's So the Jury was charged with William Marshall as with the other against whom Dr. Oates also deposed that he had heard him say Mass several times within the compass of three Years in a Benedictine Monks Habit and seen him Absolve and consecrate the Host and give the Sacrament at the Savoy Mr. Bedloe could only depose that he saw him once in the Savoy in his Monks Habit and was told he was going to take Confessions Mr. Prance deposed that at his last Trial he heard Marshall say to Corker Tho we are Priests this does not reach us Mr. Dugdale deposed that he also then heard him confess himself a Priest To this the Prisoner pleaded that he made no such Confession or if he did it ought not to be Evidence against him That he was almost a Stranger to the Savoy and Oates was never seen there but once and was not to be believed now because the Jury did not convict him upon his Testimony when he was tried before and that it was now a Prosecution of his former Malice again to accuse him after he had been disbeliev'd For all which false Inferences having been rebuked by the Court the Lord Chief Justice summ'd up the Evidence And proceeded to William Russel alias Napper with whom the Jury being charg'd as the others Dr. Oates deposed that he had heard him say Mass in his Priests Habit and himself had received the Sacrament from him at Wild-house and that he was a Franciscan Friar Mr. Prance deposed that he had heard him say Mass twenty times and seen him give the Sacrament and hear Confessions at Wild-house Sir William Waller depos'd that when he took him he found Religious Habits among his Clothes which he owned to be his To all which the Prisoner had little to say more than denying all Therefore Charles Parris alias Parry was charged to the Jury as the rest And against him Dr. Oates swore that he had heard him say Mass at Wild-house and Mr. Paston's and consecrate the Host and give the Sacrament in Priests Habit. Mr. Prance swore that he knew him to be a Priest and had heard him say Mass at the Venetian Ambassadors and at Mr. Paston's and that he bought Oil-boxes once of him and brought him a Chalice and would not suffer him to touch it till himself had first broke it and that he heard him confess himself to be a Priest The Prisoner denied all and said that he knew not Prance and that he was a Windsor the time that Oates swore he heard him say Mass and produced one Lanscroon and Jacob Painters who testified to his being there from before Christmas 1677 to All-hallontide 1678 but the time Dr. Oates swore to was November before He offer'd the Venetian Embassador's Certificate that he never said Mass in his House which was refused the Embassador being gone away and Monsieur Rivier one of the Embassador's Servants testified he never saw him there but the Court rejected such Testimony And the Ld. Ch. Justice having summ'd up the Evidence went out of the Court and Henry Starkey was next set up with whom the Jury was charged as with the others And against him Dr. Oates deposed that the Prisoner was a Priest and he heard him once say Mass at Mr. Paston's in the Habit and saw him consecrate the Host and receive in both kinds Mr. Prance depos'd that he heard him confess himself to one Mr. Duncomb a School-master that is dead that he was a Priest and heard him say Mass at his House and the Lady Somerset's and Mr. Paston's and had heard him say that he said Mass in the King's Army To this the Prisoner pleaded how he had appeared for the King when he had but 500 Men that he was an Esquires second Brother and had spent in the King's Service above 5000 l. which he had got himself and bled for it before he had it and that he spent his Annuity of 140 l. a Year for the King and had lost his Leg for him and discover'd to him a Plot against his Person State and Government and that he suffer'd to this day for it But as to his being a Priest he said nothing but left it to the Proof which the Ld. Ch. Baron summ'd up And then the Jury was charged as before with Alexander Lumsden against whom Dr. Oates swore that he had heard him say Mass twenty times at Wild-house and had seen him consecrate the Host and had received the Sacrament from him and that he was a Dominican Friar and Procurator General for the Kingdom of Scotland being a Scotsman Mr. Dugdale swore that he heard him confess himself a Priest that day he was taken Mr. Prance depos'd he had heard him say Mass twenty times at VVild-house in his Habit and seen him consecrate the Host The Prisoner said he was a Scotsman born at Aberdeen The Ld. Ch. Baron summ'd up the Evidence and the Jury withdrew for about a quarter of an hour and brought in Anderson Corker Marshall Russel Parry and Starkey Guilty and Lumsden guilty of being a Priest and born at Aberdeen in Scotland Then the Judges went off the Bench and the Court proceeded to Judgment Anderson said he had gone out of England before but that the King kept him telling him he had need of his Service and he had a Protection from the Council-Board The Recorder promis'd him to acquaint the King with what he said but that he must now be sentenc'd Corker said little Marshall said much to little purpose urging his Majesty's Declaration for Liberty of Conscience and that there was no Crime in Priesthood it self Russel only deny'd what had been deposed against him Parry said that he was a French-Man tho of English Parents Starkey pleaded his Merits as he did before And then Lumsden being set aside Mr. Recorder sentenc'd these six to be drawn hang'd and quartered The Trial of Sir Thomas Gascoyne Bar At the King's-Bench-Bar at Westminster before
the Ld. Ch. Justice Scroggs on Wednesday Feb. 11. 1679. THere the Prisoner was arraigned upon an Indictment for High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King the Subversion of the Government and the Protestant Religion on Saturday January 24 1679. To which he pleaded Not Guilty desiring a Jury of his own Country-Men which was promised him and some Friend to assist him because he was deaf being above 85 Years of Age. On Wednesday Feb. 11 following the Prisoner being brought to his Trial the Jury sworn after several Challenges were Sir Thomas Hodson Richard Beaumount Esq Stephen Wilks Esq Jervas Rockley Esq Robert Leeke Esq William Batt Esq Charles Best Esq John Cross Esq Barton Allett Esq William Milner Esq John Oxley Esq Francis Oxley Esq To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Dormer Serj. Maynard and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened the same And then Mr. Bolron being sworn deposed that he came to live with Sir T. Gascoyne in 1674 as Steward of his Cole-works and in 1675 he being fearful of his Estate lest it might be liable to be forfeited to the King he was a Witness to a collusive Conveyance thereof and saw him colourably receive 1000 l. of Sir William Ingleby he and one Matthias Higgringil helping to count the Money In 1676 he heard the Prisoner say to one Christopher Metcalf that he was resolved to send 3000 l. to the Jesuits in London for the carrying on of the Design and that he would return it by 300 l. at a time to prevent Suspicion by the hands of Richard Phisicke and about the beginning of 77 he heard the Prisoner say that he had returned it and that if it had been a thousand times as much he would be glad to spend it all in so good a Cause In 77 that there was a Consult at Barnbow-Hall in Yorkshire which is the Prisoner's House where was Sir Miles Stapleton Charles Ingleby Esq Esquire Gascoyne the Lady Tempest Thomas Thwing Sir VValter Vavasor Sir Francis Hungate Mr. Middleton Robert Killinbeck a Jesuit and VVilliam Rushton a Priest their discourse was about establishing a Nunnery at Dolebank in hopes that the Plot of killing the King would take effect resolving they would venture their Lives and Estates to further it And the Prisoner concluded to give 90 l. a Year for ever for the maintenance of this Nunnery Upon which they all agreed that after his Death he should be canonized a Saint Accordingly the Prisoner did erect a Nunnery at Dolebank near Ripley where Mrs. Lashalls was Lady Abbess Mrs. Beckwith and Mrs. Benningfield her Assistants Ellen Thwing Eliz. Butcher Mary Root others were Nuns here they were to reside till the King was kill'd and then to remove to Heworth near York and here they did reside near a Year and an half till the Plot was discovered and he had seen several Leters from them to the Prisoner That about March last Esquire Gascoyne and Mr. Middleton got Licences from a Justice of Peace to travel to London and he heard them tell the Prisoner they designed to fly into France and accordingly sold off their Goods the Prisoner approving their Resolution That on May the 30th last the Prisoner bid the Witness go into the Gallery where one VVilliam Rushton his Confessor came to him and discours'd him about his having taken the Oath of Allegiance telling him it was a damnable Sin he having thereby denied the Power of the Pope to absolve him from it but that the Pope had Power to depose the King and had done it and that it was a meritorious act to kill the King and if he would undertake to do it he would assist him and give him Absolution quoting that Scripture Thou shalt bind their Kings in Fetters and their Princes in Chaines concluding that the King was deposed and it was meritorious to kill him and that unless he would turn Roman Catholick the Pope would give away his Kingdoms to another The same day the Prisoner talked with him in his Chamber and inquired of him what Rushton had said to him which he told him and then taking him by the hand the Prisoner told him if he would undertake a design that he and others had to kill the King he would give him 1000 l. but refusing to be concerned in Blood he desired him of all Love to Secresy That in September 1678. he heard the Prisoner tell his Daughter Lady Tempest that he would send 150 l. to Dolebanke in hopes the blow would be given shortly which she seemed to like and he heard a Letter read afterwards from Cornwallis that he had received it but it was too little for the carrying on so great a Design That he was a Protestant when he came first to the Prisoner's Service and turn'd Papist about VVhitsontide 1675. and left his Service in good Friendship July the 1st 1678. and turn'd Protestant again in June 1679. when he first made this discovery Mr. Mowbray deposed that he came to lie with Sir Tho. Gascoyne the beginning of 1674. and used to wait upon him in his Chamber and to be diligent in attending Mr. Rushton his Confessor at the Altar who therefore permitted him to be present in his Chamber where he heard him and other Priests discoursing in 1676 of a Design laid for setting up Popery and how likely it was to succeed most of the considerable Papists in England having engaged to act for it and if it could not be done by fair means force must be used declaring that London and York must be fired and that the King in Exile had promised the Jesuits beyond Sea to establish their Religion whenever he was restored which they now despaired of and therefore he was adjudged an Heretick and was to be killed and Rushton told the other Priests that according to Agreement he had given the Oath of Secresy and the Sacrament to the Prisoner and his Son and Daughter who had engaged to be faithful active and secret That about Michaelmas there was another meeting of these Priests and others where they declared that the King was an Heretick and that the Pope had excommunicated him and all other Hereticks in England Scotland and Ireland and that force was to be made use of And then did Rushton produce a List of about 4 or 500 Names of them that were engaged in the Design of killing the King and promoting the Catholick Religion which Rushton read over among which were the Names of the Prisoner Tho. Gascoyne Esq the Lady Tempest Mr. Vavasor Sir Francis Hungast Sir John Savile the two Townleys Mr. Sherborn and others and he knew the Prisoner's Name to be writ by his own hand They declared also that the Pope had given Commission to put on the Design with speed and had given a plenary Indulgence of 10000 Years for all that should act either in Person or Estate for killing the King and setting up Popery in England besides a Pardon and other Gratifications That the Priests that used
the third at Charing-cross and in every place some Parcels of her Books to be burnt by the Common Hangman before her Face and a Paper of the cause to be upon the Pillory and she to find Sureties for her good Behaviour during Life The Trials of Thomas Thwing and Mary Pressicks at the Assizes at York on Thursday July the 29th 1680. THen and there the Prisoners appeared having been arraigned and pleaded Not Guilty to an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and Subversion of the Government The Jury after 25 challenged by Thwing sworn were Sir George Cook Bar. Thomas Worsley Esq William Caley Esq Roger Lee Gent. John Dixon Gent. George Wray Gent. Henry Pinckney Gent. John Blackston Gent. William Hardcastle Gent. Nicholas Stone Gent. George VVesterby Gent. Charles Tucker Gent. To these the Indictment was read and afterwards opened and the Treasons therein aggravated by the King's Counsel Then Mr. Robert Bolron being sworn deposed that in 1674. he came to live with Sir Thomas Gascoyne and was Steward of his Colepits and in 1675. he turned Papist and about January 1676. Mr. Thwing Father Rushton and several others came to his House at Shippon and did there examine him how he stood affected to the Roman Catholick Religion and whether he was resolved to venture his Life and Estate in it if there were any occasion to which he agreed and resoved to obey his Ghostly Father in all things and Father Rushton his Confessor gave him the Oath of Secresy That in 1677. there was a Consult at Barnborow-Hall Sir Thomas Gascoyne's House in the old Dining-Room Sir Miles Stapleton Sir Thomas Gascoyne the Lady Tempest Thwing Rushton and others being present wherein it was agreed that the King should be killed and Thwing said that if they mist this opportunity of doing it they should never have the like again and the effecting of it would be very beneficial to the Church of Rome And in hopes this would succeed they agreed they would erect a Nunnery at Dolebank but their real Intention was to have it at Heworth within a Mile of York after the King was killed and to avoid Suspicion the Lady Tempest promised them Broughton for the present and Thwing was to be Confessor of the Nunnery for the present That he paid 10 l. to Rushton in Thwing's presence towards killing the King and saw a List in Rushton and Thwing's Hands of Money raised for that purpose He paid 5 l. also to have his Soul prayed for And Thwing told him afterwards that in Yorkshire Lancashire and Derbyshire 30000 l. was raised for the killing of the King and that the List was sent beyond Sea Against Mrs. Pressicks he deposed That in 1678. she told him that she being in London did hear a Woman cry after her Stop the Papist stop the Plotter but she got away and afterwards durst not appear publickly That discoursing with her about the Plot she said Father Harcourt was her Confessor and first engaged her in it and that Pickering told her he was to have killed the King saying she was sorry he did not and that Oates and Bedloe were two Rogues had it not been for them the Plot had not been discovered Telling him the Gun which was to have shot the King was found with Pickering which she believed was the cause of his Death And that she said the King was an Asse and not fit to govern that what Mony the Parliament gave him he spent on Whores and Concubines Then Mr. Lawrence Mowbray deposed That about Michaelmas 1676. there was an Assembly of divers Priests in Rushton's Chamber at Barnborow-hall whereat he was admitted he being one that waited upon Rushton at the Altar and having took the Oath of Secrecy from him and Thwing was there he and Rushton manag'd the Conference wherein they declared the King was an Heretick and excommunicated by the Pope and that he should be killed because he had broke his Promise made to the Jesuits when he was beyond Sea and that it was not only lawful but meritorious to kill him That there was a List of those engaged in the design That he did not accuse Mr. Thwing till his 2d Examination before Justice VVarcup and that he knew nothing against Mrs. Pressicks Then Mrs. Bolron deposed the same against Mrs. Pressicks of what she had said at Mr. Bolron's House as before adding that she said there would never be quiet in England till the Papists had got the upper hand and not left a Protestant and she hoped an Army of Catholicks would be raised to set up Popery Mrs. Bolron jun. deposed the same being then also present One John Hutchinson was present too and deposed the same adding that she said likewise that we should never be quiet till the D. of York was made King Then Thwing urged in his defence that all this was only out of Malice to Sir Thomas Gascoyne's Family to which he was related and called Witnesses Nathaniel VVilson said that about last Michaelmas Mr. Bolron asked him if he could tell any thing of Father Rushton and he told him no then he bid him keep his Secrets and he would give him more than he could earn in seven Years but that unless he could shed the Blood of some of them he should get nothing Then Mr. Lowther the Justice who took Mr. Bolron's Examination the 24th or 25th of June 1679. testified that he did not then mention Thwing Obediah Moor said that about last Candlemas was 12 Months Mr. Bolron told him that Sir Tho. Gascoyne nor none of his Family were concerned in the Plot and that he believed there was no Plot. But in August after he told him he had but equivocated with him in what he said before and that there was a real Plot and if he had sworn a thousand Lies he could have been forgiven them Stephen Tompson testified that Bolron was arrested by Sir Tho. Gascoyne for Debt to whom he was bound with him When the Plot came out he asked Bolron if Sir Thomas was concerned he said no he was as innocent as the Child unborn but afterwards he said if Sir Thomas did sue him he would do him a greater Mischief and that while he intreated Sir Thomas's Forbearance for three Weeks Bolron came up to London and swore Treason against him and as to Mrs. Pressicks Bolron's Grandmother told him she could say nothing against her but Bolron said she must say so and so Then Zachary Thorpe testified that he meeting Bolron in Long-Acre before the last Assizes he told him Sir Tho. Gascoyne was cleared but swore the Jury were Rogues And that he was now going down to the Assizes at York against the Lady Tempest and swore he would ruin them if one thing would not do another should do it And that Bolron would have had him been evidence against Shipton last Assizes But Mr. Justice Dolben knowing this Witness thought his Testimony very improbable William Hardwick
testified that he being to carry Mrs. Pressicks before Justice Lowther Bolron's Wife said she was sorry for it for she believed her to be an honest Woman and had been a good Neighbour amongst them Mary Walker Servant-maid to Mrs. Lassels Thwing's Sister testified that Bolron proffer'd her 10 l. to swear Thwing was a Priest Then William Bacchus said that when he served a Warrant on the two Mrs. Bolron's to go before Mr. Lowther they said they could say nothing against Six Tho. Gascoyne nor any of the Family Cuthbert Hamsworth said that fie heard Bolron swear Revenge against the Lady Tempest for prosecuting a Suit against him Then the Prisoner endeavoured to prove he was not at Barnborow-hall in 1677. by George Twisley Groom to Sir Tho. Gascoyne who could only say that he used to come there but a night or two in a Year Joseph Cooper said that about a Year ago he heard Mowbray say he knew nothing of the Plot and that he believed Sir Tho. Gascoyne was guilty of no such thing for if he had he should have known it as soon as Bolron and he was a Rogue and a Knave for saying any such thing Edward Cooper sen said he then heard Mowbray say he thought Sir Thomas Gascoyne was not guilty of the Plot. Isabel Heyward a Girle that lived with Bolron as a Servant testified that her Master and Mistrifs falling out she said she would not go to London and if he made her go she would swear that what he had sworn against Mrs. Pressicks was out of Malice Alice Dawson testified that the day after New-years-day was twelve-month Mrs. Bolron said she was sorry for nothing but that her Husband had meddled with Mrs. Tressicks One or two Witnesses more were called but nothing to the purpose Therefore Mr. Justice Dolben summ'd up the Evidence and Mr. Baron Atkins proceeded to do the same And the Jury withdrawing for a while brought in Thomas Thwing Guilty and Mary Pressicks not Guilty And on the Monday following Mr. Justice Dolben sentenced him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quarter'd The Trials of William Viscount Stafford in Westminster-hall from November the 30th to December the 7th 1680. before the House of Peers ON Tuesday Nov. the 30th the Right Honourable Henege Lord Finch Baton of Daventry Lord High Chancellor of England being constituted Lord High Steward for the present occasion and all things fitted for the purpose in VVestminster-hall and both Houses being seated and the Commons all bare VVilliam Viscount Stafford was brought to the Bar kneeling till the Lord High Steward bid him rise and a Chair set for him After which making a short Speech to him concerning the occasion of his appearing there the Articles of Impeachment High Treason against him and the other Lords in the Tower by the Commons of England were read which consisted of seven Heads The 1st That there hath for many Years a Plot been contrived c. 2ly Naming the Persons concerned therein and particularly the Noble Lord at the Bar. 3ly That consults had been held and the Murder of the King resolved on therein c. 4ly That consultations have been for the raising of Men Mony Arms c. 5ly That Commissions had been given and received and particularly a Commission for the Lord Stafford to be Pay-master of the Army 6ly That to hide and hinder a Discovery an Oath of Secresy and the Sacrament had been given and taken and Sir Edm. Godfrey murdered 7ly That the Guilt of that Murder was endeavoured to be put upon Protestants c. The Lord Stafford's Answer to which was then also read wherein he put himself upon his Peers for Trial affirming himself Not Guilty After this Serjeant Maynard Sir Francis VVinnington and Mr. Treby being of the Committee appointed for the Management of the Evidence opened the Charge and Evidence in very excellent Speeches And proposed to prove first the Plot in general and the Guilt of this Lord therein in particular And therefore as to the first Mr. Smith being sworn gave a full relation of his Travels and Perversion and of what he had heard beyond Sea and in England concerning this Plot. How Abbot Montague and Father Gascoyne in France and other Priests and Jesuits told him that if he would turn Catholick he should have Employment among them there and afterwards England for that they doubted not but the Popish Religion would come in very soon and that because as the Abbot said they doubted not to procure a Toleration of Religion and because the Gentry that went abroad did observe the Novelty of their own Religion and the Antiquity of theirs and the Advantages that were to be had by it But one Father Bennet and others said they doubted it not because their party was very strong in England and in a few Years they would bring it in right or wrong That it was Cardinal Crimaldi who perverted him about 1671 to the Romish Religion at Provence and that afterwards he lived several Years in the English Jesuits Colledg at Rome where he hath often heard it disputed and preached and exhorted that the King of England was an Heretick and that there was no King really reigning and whoever took him out of the way would do a meritorious Action particularly by Father Anderton Mumford Campion but chiefly Southwel one of the chief of the Jesuits That when he came away thence for England these Fathers for a whole Month were exhorting that the King of England was not to be obeyed and that in all private Confessions all Persons who might be thought capable of any design were to be instructed that they should use all their Endeavours for promoting Popery That while he was at Rome he read Coleman's Letters of Intelligence once a Month and therein how the Duke and the Queen and the chief of the Nobility were of their side how they carried matters several times the ways the Lord Clifford and Sir VVilliam Godolphin did use to effect the work and that they question'd not to get the Lord Danby on their side too That when he return'd into England he found all the Popish Clergy in great hopes of Popery coining shortly in That he knew of Money gathered in the North but refused to joyn therein That as to the Lord Stafford he knew nothing but that Sir Henry Calverley was turned out of Commission of the Peace through Complaint made to my Lord Stafford of his being active against Popery And that he writ to one Smith that he would not make over his Estate as others did for that he expected some sudden Change or Alteration That the Cardinal who perverted him at the same time spoke of great Assurances that Popery would prevail in England that there was but one in the way and tho that Man was a good natured Man yet they could not so far prevail upon him but that to accomplish their designs they must take him out of the way That now he had been a Protestant two
be Drawn Hang'd and Quartered and in the Courts and proceedings below they can take no notice of any Judgment for High-Treason but that Then Sir Creswell Levinz desired for the King being his Attorney-General to have that Judgment because if any other were given it would be prejudicial to his Majesty and be a Question in the inferior Courts as to his Attainder of High-Treason So it was ordered that the ordinary Judgment should be pronounc'd upon him Which their Lordships and the Commons being returned and the Court sate was accordingly by the Lord High Steward he premising a short pithy Speech wherein he acquainted him that what he had said in Arrest of Judgment had been found by the Lords to be of no moment at all speaking to the certainty of the Plot and of his share therein advising now to consider how God had left him and that he never leaves any but who leave him first To think what kind of Religion it is wherein he had been led to this And to consider that true Repentance was never too late moving him to give God the Glory by a free Confession c. After Sentence pronounc'd the Prisoner desired his Relations and Friends might come to him And the Lord H. Steward inform'd him that the Lords intended to become humble Suitors to his Majesty to remit all the Punishment but the taking off his Head The Prisoner weeping answered That their Justice did not make him cry but their Goodness Then the Lord High Steward broke his Staff and the Lords Adjourned into the Parliament-Chamber and the Commons returned to their House and the Prisoner with the Ax born before him with the Edg towards him it being carried contrarily during his Trial was sent back to the Tower On Wednesday December 29. 1680. About 10 in the Morning he was brought to the Scaffold on Tower-Hill And pulling off his Hat he pulled a Paper out of his Pocket and read it as his Speech which the very same day before two a Clock came out in Print as his Speech and he delivered divers Copies signed by himself to Mr. Sheriff Cornish and other Gentlemen about him He then desired he might have liberty to pray in his own Way which being granted he kneeled down by the Block and taking out of his Pocket another Paper he read a Latin Prayer which done he gave the Paper to Mr. Sheriff Bethel and then spoke to the People about the Scaffold to this effect God bless you all Gentlemen God preserve his Majesty He is as good a Prince as ever govern'd you Obey him as faithfully as I have done and God bless you all Gentlemen Then he strip's himself to his Wastcoat and after some few short private Discourses with his Friends he laid down his Neck on the Block and stretched himself The Executioner being demanded by the Sheriffs whether he had any Sign he answered No. Then the Prisoner raised up his Head and said He had no Sign to give but the Executioner might take his opportunity and laid his Neck on the Block again After which in a short time the Executioner did his Office by severing his Head from his Body and holding up the Head in his Hand carried it about the Scaffold shewing it to the People and saying Here is the Head of a Traitor The Body was put into a Coffin and conveyed to the Tower The Arraignment and Plea of Edward Fitz-Harris Esq c. at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster in Easter-Term 1681. ON Wednesday April 27. 1681. the Grand Juries for the County of Middlesex were sworn and after the Charge delivered by Mr. Justice Jones His Majesty's Attorney General desired That some of that Grand Jury which served for the Hundreds of Edmondton and Gore might be present at the swearing of the Witnesses upon an Indictment for High-Treason to be preferred against Edward Fitz-Harris Prisoner in the Tower of London which was granted But the Grand Jury being under some Scruples against receiving of the Bill desired the Opinion of the Court therein which Mr. Justice Jones alone thought not fit to give but ordered them to attend next day when the Court was full Accordingly on Thursday April 28. the said Grand Jury came to the Bar and Mr. Michael Godfrey Brother to Sir Edmond-bury Godfrey who was their Foreman requested the Court that before they proceeded upon this Indictment that this same Fitz-Harris might be examin'd about his Brother's Death of which he was supposed to know much and presented a Petition which the Jury own'd which desired the Opinion of the Court Whether it was safe for them to meddle with the Indictment of Fitz-Harris because he was impeached by the Honourable House of Commons which Impeachment being not received it was voted by them in their House That he should not be tried by any other Inferior Gourt To which the Ld. Ch. Justice Pemberton reply'd that it was the Opinion of all the Judges who had assembled to debate this Matter for their satisfaction that they ought not to take notice of any of these things but to proceed upon this Indictment according to the Evidence After which the Jury went away and found the Bill On Friday April 29 Serjeant Stringer moved for an Habeas Corpus to bring up Fitz-Harris to be examined by the Court about the Death of Sir E. Godfrey The Court granted the Writ And said he should be Arraigned upon the Indictment against him and then they would examin him On Saturday April 30. Edward Fitz-Harris was brought with a strong Guard to the King's-Bench Court Where desiring to plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court he put in his Plea which was read the substance of it being what the Grand Jury's Petition had express'd about his being Impeached by the Commons which not being sign'b by any Counsel the Court refus'd and upon his Request assign'd him Sir Francis Winnington Mr. Williams Mr. Pollexfen and Mr. Wallop giving to Wednesday May 4. to prepare his Plea After which The Prisoner being carried away to be examined was then return'd to the Tower On Monday May 2. Sir Francis Winnington and the other three of Counsel for Mr. Fitz-Harris came to the Bar and moved the Court for an Explanation of the Rule concerning themselves and the Business they were assigned for Praying for longer time to draw up the Plea and for a Copy of the Indictment Both which were denied them And upon Mrs. Fitz-Harris's Motion Sir William Jones Sir Geo. Treby and Mr. Smith were added to her Husband's Counsel and leave given for a Sollicitor to carry Papers to and fro in the presence of the Lieutenant Mr. VVallop desired Counsel might be assigned in his place because of the shortness of the time allowed them but it could not be granted On Wednesday May 4. the Prisoner appearing put in his Plea the which Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Serj. Maynard Serj. Jefferies Sir Francis VVithins and Mr. Sanders being the King's Counsel used great
endeavours to have over-ruled without so much as hearing the Prisoners Counsel for the maintaining it for that they said it was nought because it produced no Record of his Impeachment and did not specify what the High-Treason was for which he was Impeached and that the King had Power to proceed on an Impeachment or Indictment for the same thing at his Election Nevertheless the Attorny General demurred and the Prisoner joined in the Demurrer And then after much arguing a Day was given to argue the Plea till Saturday May. 7. At which time the Attorny General added to the Exceptions he took to the Plea Whether a Suit in a Superior Court can take away the Jurisdiction of the Cause of the Person and of the Fact at the time of the Fact committed To maintain the Plea Mr. VVilliams of Counsel for the Prisoner in a very long and learned Discourse first spoke stating the Prisoner's Case upon the Indictment the Plea to the Indictment and the Demurrer to the Plea Alledging the Difference of an Impeachment from an Indictment and offering some Reasons why this Court ought not to proceed upon this Indictment Then answering distinctly Mr. Attorney's Exceptions to the Plea producing some Presidents of this Courts Prosecution being stop'd by Pleas to the Jurisdiction shewing what had been done upon those Pleas What Doom they had Laying before the Court the Right of the Commons to Impeach in Parliament the Judicature of the Lords to determine that Impeachment and the Method and Proceedings of Parliament submitting it to them how far they would lay their Hands on this Case thus circumstantiated Here the Ld. Ch. Justice declared That all these Things were quite foreign to the Case and the Matter in Hand only was Whether this Plea as thus pleaded was sufficient to protect the Prisoner from being questioned in this Court for the Treasonable Matter in the Indictment before them To which Mr. VVilliams reply'd That 't was an hard matter for the Bar to answer the Bench. After which Sir Francis Winnington pleaded That he conceived that it was confessed by the Demurrer that there is an Impeachment by the Commons of England of High-Treason against Fitz-Harris lodged in the House of Lords Secundum Legem consuetudinem Parliamenti And that the Treason for which he was impeached is the same Treason contained in the Indictment So that now the general Question was Whether an Impeachment for Treason by the House of Commons and still depending were a sufficient Matter to oust the Court from proceeding upon an Indictment for the same Offence Which he learnedly endeavoured to make good by several Reasons as well as Presidents Mr. Wallop pleaded next on the same side whose Province was to prove That the Treason in the Impeachment and in the Indictment was the same and that this was well averred in the Plea Mr. Pollexfen pleaded That a general Impeachment in Parliament was a good Impeachment and the Judges had declared so to the King and Council concerning the five Popish Lords who could not therefore be tried upon Indictments so long as general Impeachments were depending for the same Treason and that therefore this Plea was good both as to Matter and Form c. In reply to vitiate the Plea it was insisted on by Mr. Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Serj. Jefferies and Sir Francis VVithens of Counsel for the King that the Plea concluded not in the usual Form That perhaps this Matter if the Prisoner had been acquitted upon the Impeachment might have been pleaded in Bar to the Indictment but it was not pleadable to the Jurisdiction of the Court That in the Case of the five Lords the Indictments were removed into the House of Lords and that the Judges Opinion given at the Council-Board was not a Judicial Opinion nor did any way affect this Cause After which the Ld. Ch. Justice thought fit not to give present Judgment but to take time for Deliberation Whereupon the Prisoner was carried back to the Tower And on Tuesday May 10. Mr. Attorney moved the Court to appoint a Day for their Judgment on the Plea and for Fitz-Harris to be brought up which they appointed to be the next Morning Accordingly on Wednesday Morning May 11. the Prisoner being brought to the Bar the Ld. Ch. Justice deliver'd the Opinion of the Court upon Conference had with other Judges That his Brother Jones his Brother Raymond and himself were of Opinion that the Plea was insufficient his Brother Dolben not being resolved but doubting concerning it and therefore awarded the Prisoner should plead to the Indictment which he did Not Guilty and his Trial ordered to be the next Term. The Trial of Edward Fitz-Harris at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster before the Lord Chief Justice Pemberton on Thursday June 9. 1681. THE Prisoner then and there appearing after several Challenges made for the King the Jury sworn were Thomas Johnson Lucy Knightly Edward Wilford Alexander Hosey Martin James John Viner William Withers William Cleave Thomas Goffe Ralph Farr Samuel Freebody John Lockier To whom the Indictment was read which was for High-Treason in conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government the which Mr. Heath Serj. Maynard and Mr. Attorn Gen. opened And then Mr. Everard deposed How the Prisoner was with him on Monday Feb. 21. 1681. having a little before been with him to renew the Acquaintance which had been between them while they were both in the French King's Service and to perswade him to re-ingratiate himself into the French and Popish Interest and gave him by word of Mouth Heads to write a Pamphlet to scandalize the King raise Rebellion alienate the Hearts of the People and set them together by the Ears Whereupon he acquainted one Mr. Savile of Lincolns-Inn Mr. Crown Mr. Smith and Sir William Waller with it And the next day Mr. Fitz-Harris coming again to his Chamber in Grays-Inn he convey'd Mr. Smith into a Closet Sir William Waller failing to come where he both saw and heard the Prisoner ask him What he had done as to the Libel and give him further Instructions about what to write viz. That the King was Popishly Affected and Arbitrarily Inclined That King Charles the First had an Hand in the Irish Rebellion and King Charles the Second did countenance the same c. That the People should therefore be stirred up to rebel especially the City c. That the Day after he coming again he had convey'd Sir William Waller into the next Room where he also might both hear and see shewing him to Copies of what he had drawn up which he marked that he might know them again and see what alteration would be made That Fitz-Harris did them read one of the Copies and amended it adding some things and striking out other things saying The Libel was to be presented to the French Ambassador's Confessor and he was to present it to the French Ambassador and that it was to beget a
you cannot be Private leave the Issue to God To the whole the Prisoner pleaded That the Witnesses had made long Speeches though very little of them relating to him though too much That he was sent for out of Ireland where his Habitation was being a Man of a competent Estate by the Lord Shaftsbury to go Governour to Carolina but it being some while before he came his Lordship gave his Commission to another That being in England the Lord Shaftsbury invited him to go with him into Holland which he did and upon his Lordship's Death he returned to London That he confess'd it was his folly to frequent this Company but it was plain that the Witnesses had sufficiently dipp'd themselves and therefore to save their own Lives they had combin'd to take away his That he did hear a deal of what they had now deposed but never had any hand in it either directly or indirectly and therefore supposed his Crime could be only Misprision of Treason The Jury then desiring he might be asked What he had to say to the Letter he replied That what he had promised he undertook upon his intimacy with Mr. Ferguson by whose means he believed he should have an Interest with the rest That he did according to his Promise give an Account of what he had heard but the King was not pleas'd with him because he did not descend to Particulars which he could not do he having never been at any of their Meetings or Debates nor knew any thing but what he had by a private Hand He then produced one Witness who testified his being ill of the Gout for about three Months but could not certainly tell the Time After this Mr. Sol. Gen. having summ'd up the Evidence the Ld. Ch. Justice gave his Charge to the Jury who after about half a quarter of an hours consideration returned and brought the Prisoner in Guilty The Trial of William Hone at the Old-Baily on Friday July 13. 1683. THen and there the Prisoner appearing having been arraign'd the day before for Conspiring the Death of the King and the Subversion of the Government and for providing himself with Arms to that purpose And after some frivolous Evasions pleaded Not Guilty though he confess'd himself then Guilty of the Conspiracy but not of providing Arms He desired now to retract his Plea and confessed the Indictment though still denying that he had provided Arms but owning that his Deposition before Sir William Turner was true and that he was asked by Mr. Richard Goodenough to go along with him but was not told whither though he understood it was to kill the King and the D. of York But this not being taken for a full Confession Serjeant Jefferies desired he might be tried So the Jury were sworn without any Challenges viz. Nicholas Charlton Christopher Pitts Robert Beddingfield John Pelling William Winbury Thomas Seaton William Rutland Thomas Short Theophilus Man John Jenew John Short Thomas Nicholas To whom the Indictment being read Mr. Jones and Mr. Attorny General opened the same And then Mr. Keeling deposed That he saw the Prisoner at the Dolphin-Tavern where the Arms were agreed upon and the King 's coming from New-Market discoursed on and about the Swans-Quills Goose-Quills Crows-Quills Sand and Ink c. After which he took acquaintance with him and after some time told him he was one of them that was to go down to Rye to Assassinate the King And since at a Coffee-House in Swithen's Alley he told him It would never be well till the Black-Bird and the Gold-Finch were knocked on the Head meaning the King and the Duke of York Mr. West then deposed That he was at the Meeting before-mentioned but that he was sure the Prisoner did not come in till the Discourse was over That he told him then that Mr. Goodenough had spoke to him about a little Job for the Duke That he had seen him often in the Company of Manning who was designed to be another of the Assassinates That being once at his Chamber the Prisoner said to him Master shall we do nothing Adding that if the Duke of Monmouth would be true and appear he could bring fifty or sixty honest Men of t'other side the Water to do the Business either a brisk Push or the two Brothers the Captain and Lieutenant which were the terms they used since the Van-Herring was printed That he thought him a pretty honest Fellow before this Time and that he thought him deluded by Goodenough in the thing Whereupon the Ld. Ch. Justice asked West if be came to justify these things West reply'd That he had been basely deluded and he was sorry for the poor Fellow Which caus'd the Ld. Ch. Justice to tell him that it was unusual for Men in his Condition to use such Expressions in such a Case And being afterwards told by Mr. Serj. Jefferies that he found him not worthy of the Mercy the King had shewn him Then Mr. West reply'd That it was a Word put from him unawares Then Sir Nicholas Butler deposed That he had long known the Prisoner and that he was always ready for plotting such Purposes as were now laid to his Charge For that when Sir Francis Chaplain was Lord-Mayor and the King stood at Mr. Waldo's the Prisoner came to his House and told him that now they had a fair Opportunity to take off the King and the Duke at once To which purpose there were to be half a dozen with Cross-Bows at a Window in Bow-Steeple just opposite to the Balcony That thereupon he acquainted the King and the Duke of York herewith and one Horsel was appointed to search and watch the Steeple but none came and that the Prisoner upon his Examination hereof before the King had confessed all this Capt. Richardson deposed That he was by while Sir Nicholas examin'd the Prisoner as to the Crime he now stood charged with and that he said that Mr. Goodenough came and told him he wanted Labourers and that it was to kill the King and the Duke of York and confess'd that he agreed to be one that would undertake it and that Goodenough promis'd him 20 l. to bu him an Horse and Arms. That at another Meeting he said he was for killing the King and saving the Duke but Goodenough was for both That he told them the Business of Rye which place he knew not but said it was the place where the King was to be murdered To all this the Prisoner said little or nothing only that he did not know the place where nor when it was proposed about the Rye and that he was drawn into it by Goodenough That as to the Cross-Bows he was only told it but never design'd it And being ask'd what Religion he professed he answered That he heard sometimes Baptists sometimes Independents and sometimes Presbyterians After a short Charge the Jury brought him in Guilty without stirring from the Bar. The Trial of William Russel Esq at the Old-Baily on Friday
July 13. 1683. THen and there the Prisoner appearing he was Arraigned upon an Indictment of High-Treason for conspiring the Death of the King and subversion of the Government To which being required to plead he desired a Copy of his Indictment but being told nothing could be granted till he had pleaded he pleaded Not Guilty And then complain'd of his being arraign'd and tried at the same time desiring a Copy of his Panel having had only some Names of Persons usually upon Juries and that his Trial might be deferr'd till the Afternoon in regard he had a Witness that was not in Town But the Attorn Gen. urg'd the Jury might be called Then the Prisoner desired a Pen and Ink and some to write for him and to have the use of his Papers all which were granted And then John Martin being named the Lord Russel asked if he were a Free-holder of forty Shillings a Year saying that he thought none were allowed but such as were Free-holders To which the Court replied That no Pannel was made in London by Free-holders for that London Estates belonging either to the Nobility or Gentry that lived out of the City or to Corporations London was excepted To this his Lordship urged the Statute of 2 Hen. 5. wherein he said it was positive that in Cases of Life and Death no Man should be judged but by those that have forty Shillings a Year But the Attorn Gen. not allowing the Prisoners Exceptions his Counsel were called and again assigned him by the Court Mr. Pollexfen Mr. Holt and Mr. Ward who learnedly urged what they took to be Law in that Case and were answer'd by the Attorn Gen. Mr. Sol. Gen. Sir George Jefferies and Mr. North the King's Counsel And then it was adjudged by eight of the Judges being present viz. the Ld. Ch. Justice the Ld. Ch. Baron Mr. Justice Wyndham Mr. Justice Jones Mr. Justice Charlton Mr. Justice Levins Mr. Baron Street and Mr. Justice Withens that in case of Treason Free-hold was no good cause of Challenge The Jury-men therefore were called and after the Lord Russel hah challenged 31 of them the following Persons were sworn viz. John Martin William Rouse Jervas Seaton William Fashion Thomas Short George Toriano VVilliam Butler James Pickering Thomas Jeve Hugh Noden Robert Brough Thomas Oneby To whom the Indictment being read the same was opened by Mr. North and the Attorny-General opened the Evidence And then Col. Rumsey being sworn deposed That about the latter end of October or beginning of November the Lord Shaftsbury sent him from his Lodging by VVapping to Mr. Shepherd's to the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Russel Lord Grey Sir Thomas Armstrong and Mr. Ferguson there met to know what Resolution they were come to about the rising of Taunton Their answer was That Mr. Trenchard had failed them that he had promised 1000 foot and 300 Horse but when he came to perform it he could not He thought the People would not meddle unless they had some time to make Provision for their Families That Mr. Ferguson made this Answer the Lord Russel and the Duke of Monmouth being present and the Lord Grey saying something to the same purpose And upon this it was the Lord Shaftsbury prepared to be gone That he was with them at Shepherd's about a quarter of an hour and that there was some discourse about seizing of the Guards at the Savoy and Mews in case the Insurrection had gone on which was to have been on Novemb. 19. and that the Duke of Monmouth the Lord. Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong undertook to view the Guards and that the Lord Russel assented to all this and the Witness was to have gone to Bristol by the order of the Earl of Shaftsbury against that time Then Mr. Shepherd deposed that in October Mr. Ferguson came to him in the Duke of Monmouth's Name to request the conveniency of his House for him and some other Persons of Quality to meet That in the Evening came the Duke of Monmouth the Lord Grey the Lord Russel Sir Thomas Armstrong Col. Rumsey and Mr. Ferguson one after another That Sir Thomas Armstrong desired they might be private and therefore what they wanted he fetch'd up himself not suffering his Servants to come up That their Discourse was about seizing the Guards and the Duke of Monmouth Lord Grey and Sir Thomas Armstrong went one time to view them and the next time they met at his House he heard Sir Thomas say the Guards were very remiss in their Places and not like Soldiers and that the thing was feasible if they had strength to do it That they met twice at his House and the Prisoner was there both times That Mr. Ferguson read a Paper in the Nature of a Declaration setting forth the Grievances of the Nation in order to a Rising He could not say the Lord Russel was present at the reading of it but Col. Rumsey was who then deny'd it saying it was over before he came Then the Lord Howard being sworn began his long Evidence with a low Voice pretending the News he had just then receiv'd of the Earl of Essex's Fate had sunk his Voice and a long Story of the Designs of the Earl of Shaftsbury an Account of which he had from Capt. VValcot whom he brought acquainted with the Earl of Shaftsbury and by whom the Earl of Shaftsbury sent for him while he absconded at one VVatson's at the end of VVoodstreet and there discover'd to him his Design of the Rising and that he had 10000 brisk Boys ready to follow him whenever he held up his Finger who were to possess themselves of the Gates and would in an Hour's time be 5 times multiplied But that his Design was much retarded by the backwardness of the Duke of Monmouth and the Lord Russel who failed him in not being ready prepared to concur with him in the Country that he then endeavour'd to shew the Earl of Shaftsbury the necessity of having those Lords concurrence in so weighty an Undertaking and proffer'd his Service to bring them to a right Understanding among themselves to this end he spoke with the Duke of Monmouth who deny'd that either he or the Lord Russel had given the Earl of Shaftsbury any incouragement to be so forward because they knew the Country could not be ready to stir so soon That a Meeting was then propos'd but afterwards put off by reason of the Earl of Shaftsbury's fears of being discover'd That the Duke of Monmouth told him that the Lord Russel had been with the Earl of Shaftsbury and preswaded him to put off his Rendezvouz for only a Fortnight against which time they would try to be ready for him But the Country not being ready that Design was disappointed That in October Captain Walcot acquainted him with the Design upon the King with which he acquainted the Duke of Monmouth who said he would never suffer it and they did all they could to prevent it This failing the
time coming again he said he knew nothing of this Plot and he was sure had Col. Sidney known any thing he would have told him And that he then telling my Lord he was not safe in his House the Ld. Howard said he had been a Prisoner and he had rather do any thing in the World than be a Prisoner again Then the Ld. Paget declared that seeing the Ld. Howard presently after the breaking out of this Plot he told him he was glad to see him abroad and that he was not concern'd in this Disorder Which he said he took as an injury to him for that his saying so looked as if he were guilty but that he knew nothing of himself or any Body else nor had he seen any Body that could say any thing of him or give him any occasion to say any thing of any Body else Mr. Edward Howard declared That as soon as the Plot broke out the Ld. Howard having a great intimacy with him he expressed a great detestation and surprizing in himself to hear of it and assured great Asseverations that he could neither accuse himself nor any Man living and that he was much concern'd for certain Persons of Quality that they should be so much reflected on or troubled about it And that this he verily thinks my Lord spoke sincerely and that he knew his Disposition so well that if he had had any Guilt upon him be would never have stood his being taken That another time discoursing the Ld. Howard about this Plot which he omitted at the Ld. Russel's Trial by reason of the reproof accidentally given him that it was certainly a Sham even to his Knowledg too black for any Minister of of publick Employment to have devis'd but that it was forged by People in the dark such as Jesuits and Papists and that this was his Conscience And that he consented to Address the King under his Hand to testify his abhorrency of the thing but upon the Lord Russel's being taken this was laid aside That he really believed what my Lord said then was true and were he of this Jury he would not believe what he said now For saying which the Court told him he ought to be bound to his good Behaviour The Prisoner then urged the Mortgage which the Lord Howard acknowledged Mr. Blake then declared that about 6 Weeks since the Ld. Howard sent for him to come and see him and talking then of his Pardon he said he had a Warrant for it and their Word and Honour for it but that he would do nothing in it till he had further order and that he heard nothing of it and could ascribe it to no other Reason but that he must not have his Pardon till the drudgery of Swearing was over The Prisoner then called Mr. Hunt and Burroughs to prove that the Ld. Howard said he could not have his Pardon till he had done some other Jobs but they did not appear Then Grace Tracy declared that the Ld. Howard protested his Ignorance of the Plot and of Colonel Sidney's being concern'd in it Elizabeth Penwick declared to the same purpose and that he desired withal that the Colonel's Plate might be sent to his House for Security for that he was apprehended through Malice Then one Mr. Wharton stood up and offer'd to the Court that if the sheets might be shewn him he would undertake to imitate them in a little time that they should not know which was which It being the easiest Hand that ever he saw in his Life Then the Prisoner proceeding in his Defence urg'd the Statute upon which he was Indicted as consisting of 2 Branches which were confounded in his Indictment together though they were distinct species of Treason And that the business of Aaron Smith was only conjecturally and implicitly sworn And the Papers were imperfect and had been writ many Years and never publish'd and could have no concatenation with the Select Council which the Ld. Howard had sworn though selected by no Body urging how unlikely it was for a War to be rais'd by 6 Men not knowing nor trusting one another the Ld. Howard putting such things upon them as were impossible for any one to do that had but the sense of Porters and Grooms The Solicitor General then summ'd up the Evidence making the Ld. Howard and his Papers two very good Witnesses against him Then the Ld. Ch. Justice declared his Charge to the Jury who withdrew for half an hour and then brought the Prisoner in Guilty And upon Monday November the 26th being set to the Bar the Prisoner pleaded that he conceived he had had no Tryal for that some of the Jury were no Free-holders and were not summon'd by the Bailiff but were agreed upon by the Under Sheriff and others desiring the Indictment might be read again which was done and then he urged it was void because it depriv'd the King of his Title of Defensor Fidei which was Treason by the Law Urging that there was no Treason in his Papers and desiring the D. of Monmouth might be sent for to testify if there were any such thing as a Design c. complaining that his Evidence had not been rightly summ'd up and appealing to God and the World he not being heard After which the Ld. Ch. Justice pronounced Sentence upon him to be Drawn Hang'd and Quartered c. Upon which Col. Sidney cry'd out Then O God O God I beseech thee Sanctify these Sufferings unto me and impute not my Blood to the Country nor the City through which I am to be Drawn let no inquisition be made for it but if any and the Shedding of Blood that is Innocent must be revenged let the weight of it fall only upon those that maliciously Persecute me for Righteousness sake Whereupon the Ld. Ch. Justice told him he pray'd God fit him for another World for he saw he was not fit for this But the Prisoner holding out his Hand bid his Lordship feel his Pulse and fee if he was disordered blessing God he never was in better temper than he was now On Friday December the 7th following his Sentence being mitigated by his Majesty's Grace and Favour he was brought from the Tower to a Scaffold on Tower-Hill where after a short Preparation he was beheaded by the Common Executioner The Trial of John Hambden Esq before the Lord Chief Justice Jeffries at the King's-Bench Bar at Westminster on Wednesday February 6 1683. ON Wednesday November 28th 1683. John Hambden Esq was Arraigned at the King's-Bench Bar upon an Indictment of High Misdemeanour for contriving and practising to disturb the King's Peace and stirring up Sedition in the Kingdom To which having pleaded Not Guilty and Issue being joyned Bail was taken for his appearing the next Term. Accordingly on Wednesday Feb. 6th following the Defendant appeared and the Jury were impannel'd Joshua Galliard Esq and Mr. Richard Shoveditch were challeng'd by Mr. Williams of Counsel for the Defendant because they were both
it Mr. William Rushton a Papist deposed that he saw Ireland in Wolverhampton from the 18th of August to the 25th every one of the days except the 23d whence he went to Litchfield Mrs. Katherine Wingford deposed that she also saw Ireland from August the 18th to the 25th sometimes at Mrs. Harwells and sometimes at her Father's House in Wolverhampton Mr. William Stanley deposed that he saw Ireland in Wolverhampton on Aug. 18 19 20 21 24 and 25 and entertain'd him twice at his own House Mrs. Dorothy Purcel swore she saw him also in the same Town on August the 18th to the 23d but would give no Circumstance whereby she might remember so particuâ—â—rly those days Then one Scot swore that he look'd to his Horse while he was in that Town and that he staid there about a Fortnight but could not 〈◊〉 particular as to the time Then Mr. John Stamford deposed that he also saw Mr. Ireland in the same Town from Aug. 18 to 25 having known him ever since 1675. Mrs. Katherine Fowler Mrs. Harwell's Daughter swore that she saw Ireland at her Mother's House from Aug. 17 till the 27th 1678. seeing him every day except the 23d when he went to Litchfield to the Fair. Mr. Gifford swore he saw him every day there from Aug. 17 to the 26th 1678. Mrs. Elizabeth Gifford swore she saw him all those days but two Elizabeth Keeling Mrs. Harwell's Maid swore she saw Ireland Aug. 17. till he went away except three days she was absent at her Mother's Funeral And she saw him again at her Mistresses from the 4th of September to the 7th 1678. Mr. Richardson an Apothecary in Wolverhampton and a Protestant deposed that he saw a Gentleman whom Mrs. Harwell told him was Mr. Ireland on Aug. 19. in that Town 1678. Mrs. Eleanor Graves deposed much the like as to seeing Ireland at that time there and that she moreover went with him Aug. 23d to Litchfield and return'd back with him that Night again her Uncle Winford being with them Then Sir Thomas Whitegrave a Justice of Peace in Stafforâ—â—â—â—re and a Protestant deposed that he saw Mr. Ireland on the 29th of August 1678. upon Tixhall Bowling-Green Mr. VVilliam Fowler a Papist deposed that he saw Ireland at Tixhall Aug. 10. 1678. and on the 27th at the Horse Race at Etching-Hill and on the 29th upon Tixhall Bowling-green where he saw Sir Thomas VVhitegrave also with him Mr. Howard swore also that the saw Ireland at the Horse-Race and again afterwards at Bellamore where he dined that time Then Mr. Drayton a Servant to the Lord Gerrard's Father deposed that he also saw Ireland at the Race and at Tixhall Aug. 29. when he went home with Mr. Heveningham to Aston where he saw him the next day and on the 31st a Hunting with his Master and Sept. 1. at Mr. Gerrard's of Hildersham Sir James Simmons deposed that he saw Ireland at the Horse-Race also and on Tixhall Bowling-Green Aug. 29. and that he came to Aston that Night with his Father Heveningham but he going the next day to Pancrass Fair left him Mr. Green who belonged to Sir James Simmonds deposed he saw Ireland at the Horse-Race Aug. 27. 1678. and the next day on Tixhall Bowling-Green which Night he came to Aston and saw him a Setting there the next day and the next day a Hunting Then one Fallas a Servant of Mr. Heveingham's and a Protestant deposed that Ireland came to his Master 's on Aug. 29. and the next day Fish'd and Sett and the next day Hunted and then went away he looking to his Hors while there Then John Proctor a Servant to Mr. Lowes and a Protestant deposed that he saw Ireland at his Master 's at Fulford on Aug. 31. 1678. and the next day at Esq Gerrards at Hildersome Then Mr. John King deposed that he saw Ireland at Hildersome Sept. 1. 1678. where he was all Night and the next day at Millage where he dined designing for Boscobel that Night Then Francis Lee a Servant to Mr. Gerrard deposed that he saw Ireland at his Masters Aug. 31. where he staid two Nights and went with him thence to Millage where they dined and then went to Pancrass with him for two hours and then Ireland went to Boscobel Then Mr. Biddolph swore that he dined with Ireland at his Aunt Crompton's at Millage Sept. 2. 1678. Mrs. Crompton her self deposed that Mr. Ireland dined at her House that day her Nephew Biddolph did but could not remember any otherwise the time Mrs. Palmer swore she also dinned with Ireland at Millage but could neither tell when nor who were there Mrs. Holmes swore she saw Ireland at Millage the beginning of Septemb. 1678. on a Monday Mrs. Gifford swore she saw Ireland at Pancrass Sept. 2. 1678. about four or five in the Afternoon Then Mr. Pendrel depos'd that Ireland lodg'd at his House at Boscobel on Sept. 2. 1678. and went the next day but one to Black-Ladies to Mr. John Giffords Mrs. Pendrel swore the very same Mr. Charles Gifford swore Ireland at his Father's House at Black-Ladies on Sept. 4. 1678. coming to see one Madam Wells there where he staid an hour and half and so went for VVolverhampton And thus was proved where Ireland was from Aug. 3. to Sept. 14. After which Dr. Oates began his Defence urging the great Hardship he lay under after six Years time to be put to disprove what was now offered against him many of his Witnesses being since dead and gone beyond-Sea and many Passages forgot by him besides that the Dispute was only about a bare Circumstance of Time when-as the Substance of his Evidence about the Plot was not assign'd as any Perjury at all and that this very Testimony was look'd upon as a Trick only to catch the Evidence and was judg'd invalid at the Trials of Ireland and the five Jesuits Urging also the Testimony of Bedloe at Ireland's Trial vvhich amounted to the same as his Mr. Blaney testifying it upon Oath as also Mr. Jennison's about Ireland's being in Town in August saying what Charges he had been at to find out Mr. Jennison and Sarah Pain who gave the same Evidence but could not calling for many Witnesses whom he had Subpaened but not one appeared Complaining therefore of his hard Usage He proceeded to sum up what more he had to say protesting the Truth of what he had deposed the little belief this Testimony formerly had and the Interest of Papists concerned now to bring it thus against him saying That he was confident had he been a Witness in any other Cause he might have had fairer Quarter And did verily believe that at this rate it vvas more safe for Papists to be Traitors than for any Protestant to discover a Popish Plot. Begging that Counsel might be assign'd him to argue the Errors in Yesterday's Indictment and a Weeks time to prepare and to withdraw because of his present Illness all vvhich vvere granted him And then Sol.