Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
justice_n	earl_n	lord_n	viscount_n	2,789	5	12.4654	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34178	The Compleat statesman demonstrated in the life, actions, and politicks of that great minister of state, Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury : containing an account of his descent, his administration of affairs in the time of Oliver Cromwell, his unwearied endeavours to restore His Most Sacred Majesty, his zeal in prosecuting the horrid Popish Plot, several of his learned speeches during his being Ld. Chancellor, his two commitments to the Tower, the most material passages at his tryal, with many more considerable instances unto His Lordships going for Holland.	Dunton, John, 1659-1733.	1683 (1683)	Wing C5658; ESTC R35656	48,139	160

Gentry a learned Clergy and an understanding worthy People but yet we cannot think of England as we ought without reflecting on the condition thereof They are under the same Prince and the influence of the same Fav●…urites and Councils When they are hardly dealt with can we that are Richer expect better usage For 't is certain that in all absolute Governments the poorest Countries are always most favourably dealt with When the ancient Nobility there cannot enjoy their Royalties their Shrievaldoms and their Stewardies which they and their Ancestors have possessed for several hundreds of years but that now they are enjoin'd by the Lords of the Council to make deputations of their Authorities to such as are their known Enemies can we expect to enjoy our Magna Charta long under the same persons and Administration of Affairs If the Council-Table there can imprison any Nobleman or Gentleman for several years without bringing him to Trial or giving the beast Reason for what they do can we expect the same Men will preserve the Liberty of the Subject here My Lords I will confess that I am not very well vers'd in the particular Laws of Scotland but this I do know that all the Northern Countries have by their Laws an undoubted and inviolable Right to their Liberties and Properties yet Scotland hath out-done all the Eastern and Southern Countries in having their Lives Liberties and Estates subjected to the Arbitrary Will and Pleasure of those that govern They have lately plundered and harased the richest and wealthiest Countries of that Kingdom and brought down the barbarous Highlanders to devour them and all this almost without a colourable pretence to do it Nor can there be found a Reason of State for what they have done but that those wicked Ministers designed to procure a Rebellion at any rate which as they managed was only prevented by the miraculous hand of God or otherwise all the Papists in England would have been armed and the fairest opportunity given in the just time for the execution of that wicked and bloody design the Papists had and it is not possible for any man that duly considers it to think other but that those Ministers that acted that were as guilty of the Plot as any of the Lords that are now in question for it My Lords I am forced to speak this the plainer because till the pressure be fully and clearly taken off from Scotland 't is not possible for me or any thinking man to believe that good is meant us here We must still be upon our guard apprehending that the Principle is not changed at Court that those men that are still in place and Authority have that influence upon the mind of our excellent Prince that he is not nor cannot be that to us that his own Nature and Goodness would incline him to I know your Lordships can order nothing in this but there are those that hear me can put a perfect cure to it until that be done the Scottish Weed is like death in the pot Mors in Olla But there is somthing too now I consider that most immediately concerns us their Act of Twenty two thousand men to be ready to invade us upon all occasions This I hear that the Lords of the Council there have treated as they do all other Laws and expounded it into a standing Army of Six Thousand Men. I am sure we have Reason and Right to beseech the King that that Act may be better considered in the next Parliament there I shall say no more for Scotland at this time I am afraid your Lordships will think I have said too much having no concern there but if a French NobleMan should come to dwell in my House and Family I should think it concerned me to ask what he did in France for if he were there a Felon a Rogue a Plunderer I should desire him to live elsewhere and I hope your Lordships will do the same thing for the Nation if you find Cause My Lords Give me leave to speak two or three words concerning our other Sister Ireland Thither I hear is sent Douglas's Regiment to secure us against the French Besides I am credibly informed that the Papists have their Arms restor'd and the Protestants are not many of them yet recovered from being the suspected Party The Sea-Towns as well as the In-land are full of Papists That Kingdom cannot long continue in the English hands if some better care be not taken of it This is in your Power and there is nothing there but is under your Laws Therefore I beg that this Kingdom at least may be taken into consideration together with the State of England for I am sure there can be no safety here if these Doors are not shut up and made sure Some few daies after this Speech the King was pleased to make a great Alteration in his Council and to appoint the Right Honourable Anthony Earl of Shaftesbury President thereof About the 18th of April 1679. His Majesty was pleased to declare the Dissolution of the Late Privy Council and for Constituting a New one The Lords of the Council not to exceed Thirty besides the Princes of the Blood which His Majesty may at any time call to the Board being at Court and the President and Secretary of Scotland which are uncertain The Names of that most Honourable Council were His Highness Prince Rupert William Lord A. B. of Canterbury Heneage Lord Finch L. Chancellor Anthony Earl of Shaftesbury Lord President of the Council Arthur Earl of Anglesey Lord Privy Seal Christopher Duke of Albermarle James Duke of Monmouth Master of the Horse Henry Duke of Newcastle John Duke of Lauderdale Principal Secretary of Scotland James Duke of Ormond L. Steward of the Houshold Charles Lord Marquess of Winchester Henry Earl of Arlington L. Chamberlain of the Houshold James Earl of Salisbury John Earl of Bridgwater Robert Earl of Sunderland one of His Majesties Principal Secretaries of State Arthur Earl of Essex first L. Commissioner of the Treasury James Earl of Bath Groom of the Stable Thomas Lord Viscount Falconberg George Lord Viscount Hallifax John Lord Bishop of London Daniel Lord Roberts Henry Lord Hollis William Lord Russel William Lord Cavendish Henry Coventry Esq one of His Majesties Principal Secretaries of State Sir Francis North Knight L. Chief Justice of the Common Pleas. Sir Henry Capell Knight of the Bath first Commissioner of the Admiralty Sir John Ernby Knight Chancellor of the Exchequer Sir Thomas Chicheley Knight Master of the Ordnance Sir William Temple Baronet Edward Seymour Esquire Henry Powle Esquire This great Change put men upon various Discourses and Apprehensions suitable to their respective Dispositions and Inclinations but the most sober both of the Parliament and others hoped now to see the Popish Plot wholly Eradicated especially considering the daily fresh Discoveries that were brought before the Council and Parliament the last of which was of no long continuance for about June 1679.

timely prevented that there is no hurt done yet the very Design if it be but uttered and spoken and any waies signified by any Discourse that this was made Treason by this Act. Formerly it was said and said truly That words alone were not Treason but that since this Act words that import any Malicious Design against the King's Life or Government any Traiterous Intention in the Party such words are Treason now within this Act. Then as to the Indictments that were to be brought before them he advised them to consider 1. Whether the matter contained in them and which were to be given in Evidence were matter of Treason within the former or the latter Act of Parliament and if they doubted they were to enquire of the Court and they should be directed as to matter of Law And they were to examine whether the matters Evidenced to them were Testified by two Witnesses for without two Witnesses no man could be Impeached within those Laws If one man should swear to words that import●… 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 D●…sign or Intention 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 time and in one place and another Testifie to Traiterous words spoken at another time and another place that these were two good Witnesses which had been solemnly resolved by all the Judges of England upon a solemn occasion 2. That they were to enquire whether upon what Evidence should be given them there should be any reason or ground for the King to call the persons to account if there were probable ground it was as much as they were to enquire into He urged pretty much to this purpose and then told them Compassion or Pity was neither their Province nor his that there was no room for that in Enquiries of such a nature that it was reserved to a Higher and Superiour Power from whence theirs was derived Therefore he required them to consider such Evidence 〈◊〉 should be given them and prayed God to direct them in their Enquiry that Justice might take place Then a Bill of High ●…son reason was offer'd against the E. of ●…esbury and Sir Francis Withc●… moved that the Evidence might be heard in Court Then the Lord Chief Justice told the Jury that the King's Council desired and they could not deny it that the Evidence might be publickly given and prayed them to take their places and hear the Evidence that should be given The Jury desired a Copy of their Oath which the Court granted and then withdrew after some time they returned and then the Clerk called them by their Names Then the Foreman gave the L. C. J. an account that it was the Opinion of the Jury that they ought to Examine the Witnesses in private and it hath been the constant practice of our Predecessors to do it and they insisted upon it as their Right to Examine in private because they were bound to keep the K's Secrets which could not be done if the Examination were in Court Whereupon the L. C. J. told 'em that perhaps some late usage had brought them into that Errour that it was their Right that the Witnesses were alwaies sworn in Court and surely he said Evidence was alwaies given in Court formerly That it was for their advantage as well as the King 's that nothing might be done clandestinly that by their keeping Counsel was meant keeping secret their own private Debates To which the Foreman replied That he begg'd his Lordships pardon if he were in a mistake The Jury apprehend they were bound by the very words of their Oath to Examine in private for it says They shall keep the King 's Secrets and their own Counsels That there could be no Secret in publick Then Mr. Papillion spoke to this purpose That they had heard that what had been the Custom of England had been the Law of England and if it had been the Antient Usage and Custom of England that had never been altered from time to time Divers other Arguments were used on both sides but at last the Court denied a private Examination then the Foreman told the Court that the Jury desired it might be Recorded that they had insisted upon it as their Right but if the Court over-ruled it they must submit This was likewise refused by the Court. Then Sheriff Pilkington desired that the Witnesses might be put out of Court and called in one by one but he was refused it and told it was not his Duty And Mr. Attorney General said he appeared against the King However it was afterward granted to the Jury Then was Read the Indictment against Anthony Earl of Shaftesbury for High Treason against His Majesty which being too long here to insert we are forced to omit The Jury desired a ●…ist of the Witnesses Names but they were told they would have them Endorsed on the back of the Indictment when that was delivered to them Then the Foreman acquainted the Court that the Jury desired a Copy of the Warrant by which the Earl of Shaftesbury was Committed because there might several Questions depend upon it But my Lord Chief Justice answered That was not in the power of the Court to grant for that it was in the hands of the Lieutenant of the Tower which he kept for his Indemnity and they could not demand it of him upon any terms Then Mr. Papillion moved that they might hear what the Witnesses had to give in Evidence one by one and that after the Jury might withdraw to consider what proper Questions to ask them and after might come down again which the Court granted Then all the Witnesses were ordered to go out of the Court and to be called in one by one This done Will. Blith●… Esq was produced and a Paper delivered in Mr. Blithwayt gave account that that Paper was put into his hands by Mr. Gwin Clerk of the Council who had seized it amongst others in my Lord Shaftesbury's house and that he had took that and others out of a Velvet Bagg which Mr. Gwin had lockt up in the great Trunk Then Mr. Gwin testified that he had the great Hair Trunk in my Lord Shaftesbury's house when he was sent there to search for Papers by Order of the Council the second of July my Lord as soon as he came there delivered him the Keys and said He would seal them up with his own Seal but afterwards sent Mr. Gwin word if he pleased he might put his own Seal that he had taken a note how he had parted several parcels of Papers that there were several sorts of them in the great Hair Trunk and there was a Velvet Bag into which he had put some Papers that were loose in my Lord's Closet above Stairs that he had put his Seal upon the Trunk and being sent another way had put it into the Custody of Mr. Blithwait The Lord Chief Justice asked Mr. Gwin whether all the Papers in the Velvet Bag were in my L. Shaftesbury's Closet and whether there was nothing in that Bag but what he had taken in

other Discourse with the L. Shaftesbury the said Earl told him that the Duke of Bucks's Mother was descended of the Family of the Plant aginets naming some of the Edwards and that in her Right he should have the Barony of Ross and in her Right had as good a Title to the Crown of England as ever any Stewart had John Macknamara deposed That a little after the Parliament had been dissolved at Oxford the Earl of Shaftesbury said to him That the King was Popishly affected that he took the same methods that his Father before him took which brought his Head to the block and said We will also bring his thither and that the Earl had said the King deserved to be deposed as much as ever King Richard the second did Denis M●…cnamara declared that my Lord Shaftesbury had said The King was a man that ought not to be believed and that ●…e ought to be deposed as well as Richard the second that the Dutchess o●… Mazarine was one of his Cabinet Council that he did nothing but by her Advice Edward Ivey said that the Earl of Shafton soon after the Parliament was dissolved at Oxford speaking against the King said he was an unjust man and unfit to reign that he was a Papist in his heart and would introduce Popery That another time he heard him exclaim against the King and that they designed to depose him and set another in his stead Bernard Dennis deposed that amongst divers other things the Lord Shaftesbury had told him that they intended to have England under a Common-Wealth and no Crown to have no supream head particular Man or King nor owe Obedience to a Crown Lord Chief Justice told the Jury they intended to call no more Witnesses against the Earl of Shaftesbury the Jury being charged only with that Mr. Papillion desired to know what S●…atute the Indictment was grounded upon my Lord Chief Justice said it was contra formam Statut ' which might be understood Statutorum or Statuti so they might go upon all Statutes that might be the form o that Indictment The Jury desired to know whether any of the Witnesses stood indicted or no. To which the Lord Chief Justice answered they were not properly here to examine the credibility of the Witnesses for that would be a matter upon a Tryal before a Petty Jury where the King would be heard to defend the credibility of his Witnesses if any thing were objected against them That they were to see whether the Statute were satisfied in having matter that was Treasonable and witnessed by Two Men who are intended Prima facie credible unless of their own Knowledg they knew any thing to the contrary Mr. Papillion prayed his Lordships Opinion whether his Lordship thought they were within the compass of their own Understandings and Consciences to give Judgment for if they were not left to consider the credibility of the Witnesses they could not satisfie their Consciences To which the Lord Chief Justice replied that they ought to go according to the Evidence unless there were any thing to their own knowledg and that i●… they expected to enter into proofs concerning the credit of the Witnesses it were impossible to do Justice at that rate The Jury withdrew and the Court adjourned till Three a Clock When met the Jury put many questions to the Witnesses of which for brevity I can but take notice of some Mr. Gwin was asked by the Foreman whose writing the Paper was to which he answered he could not tell whether it was in the Closet before he came there he said it was certainly in the closet for there he found it he knew not the particular Paper but all the Papers in the bag were there They asked whether he knew not of a Discourse of an Association in Parliament He said he was not of the last Parliament but had heard an Association talked of Then the Foreman asked Mr. Secretary Jenkins whether he knew not of a Debate in Parliament concerning an Association whether he remembred not that it was read upon occasion of the Bill The Secretary answered that he was not present at the Debate that there was an answer to a Message from the House of Commons had somthing in it which did strongly imply somthing of an Association that he heard such a thing spoke of but was not present at the Reading Being asked the date of the Warrant for my Lord Shaftesbury's commitment he must he said refer himself to the Warrant that he thought it was about the beginning of July Being asked whether all the Witnesses had been examined before the Committee he answered they were and he was present at the Examination Being asked again whether all he said he knew not whether all but he was sure he was at the Examination of several but could not tell how many Then the Jury examined the rest of the Witnesses one by one Booth being asked whether he had easie admittance into my Lords company said he ever went with Capt. Wilkinson and had easie admittance whether Captain Wilkinson were with him every time he said no not every time not this time to divers other questions he answered That he had been in Orders that he had not been indicted for Fellony that he did not directly know any one man of the Fifty beside himself that he never was with my Lord but at his own House that he was never desired to be a Witness against my Lord until he had intimated something of it till he was told of Brownrigg the Yorkshire Attorney concerning somwhat my Lord had said to Irish men he then said he was sure there was somthing as to that purpose to English men that he thought he had no Commission to offer him a Reward that he was not acquainted with Callaghan nor Downing never heard their names nor was in their company that he knew of that he knew not one Mr. Shelden nor Mr. Marriot only had heard of one Marriot that belong'd to the D. of Norfolk but never was in his company nor discoursed with from him but had heard from Baines about Brownrigg about Irish Witnesses Mr. Godfrey asked whether he had never heard of Irish Witnesses sent down by Mr. Marriot to the Isle of Ely Then the L. Ch. Just. said We have given you all the Liberty in the World hoping you would ask pertinent questions but these are trifles he did not expect that any wise men would have asked such questions Then he asked of Mr. Godfrey what it was to the purpose whether Mr. Marriot sent any Irish Witnesses to his Tennant or no. To which the Foreman told his Lordship that he had it under the hand of the Clerk of the Council Mr. Turbervil answered to several questions that he had the Discourse with my Ld. Shaftesbury about the beginning of February and about July 4. communicated it to Mr. Secretary Jenkins The Foreman then asking whether he had met with no body about the beginning of July