Mr Solicitor had shortened his Labour by the pains he had taken to sum up the Evidence to them which he concluded he had without doubt done with all faithfulness to his Master He then proceeds to blacken the Defendant with all the foul Language that Malice could suggest and tells his old Friends of the Jury whose acquaintance with him disposed them to credit him that the Popish Plot was a sham and that under the pretence thereof another black and bloody Conspiracy was carried on Then he magnifies the evidence against the Defendant both from the number of the St Omers Sparks no less then twenty but also their harmony and he affirms that against the credit of their Testimony there was no objection really made but only Impudence that the Defendant had produced but two positive Witnesses that they were likewise positive in their contradiction of one another that they swore according as their humour led them and not according to any remembrance they had of the thing and that he rather believed it because the third Witness Page gave an evidence contrary to both of them how notoriously false these malitious Suggestions are will evidently appear upon the perusal of what these three honest and plain-dealing Witnesses swore Then he comes to the Defendants fourth Witness Mr Walter and positively affirms that he says nothing to the matter for that it did plainly appear the time which he speaks of was about a year and a half before the five Jesuits Tryal which must be in 1677 before the Defendant went to St Omers Mr Solicitor told the Jury that Mr Walter spoke of a year and a quarter before the discovery of the Plot had that been true it had run it back to the year 1677 and to a time before the Doctor went to St Omers His Lordship makes Mr VValter to speak of about a year and a half before the Jesuits Tryal which runs it back to December 1677 and then the King 's celebrated Witnesses and Mr VValter are agreed but Mr Vvalter speaking for himself says the time was near a year and a quarter before the Tryal of the Jesuits which brings us to April 1678. Though the Chief Justice and Solicitor were not agreed in this matter yet they would not quarrel about it provided the understanding Jury would credit either of them against Mr Walter and so serve the turn they aimed at the baffling the credit of the Popish Plot and not allow this Witness to be serviceable to the Vindication of Dr Otes Upon the following day after this Tryal Dr Otes was tryed upon an Indictment for another supposed Perjury but that prosecution being of the Complexion with what is here presented I shall not trouble the Reader with any thing further upon this subject then to present him with the Names of the Jury viz. Sr Thomas Vernon Nicholas Charlton Esq Tho. Langham Esq Thomas Hartop Francis Griffith John Kent George Tory Ano. Hen. Loades Tory Also John Midgley John Pelling Thomas Short and George Peck The Juries having according to the direction of that Man of Blood Jeffryes brought in the Defendant guilty of both the Perjuries Comes the Abhorrer of Parliaments the tender-hearted good natured Protestant Judge VVythens to pronounce the Sentence This very Person Wythens being Counsel for Knox did declare openly in the Court of King's Bench that Dr Otes had served the Nation too well to be vilified in that Court. previous to it he tells the Defendant That no Christian 's Heart can think of the innocent Blood which was shed by his Oath without bleeding That every knowing Man believed and every honest Man grieved for it He proceeds God be thanked our Eyes are now opened You had not one Word to justifie your self from that great and heinous Perjury you were accused of transcendant Impudence The Judgment of the Court inter alia is You shall upon Wednesday next be VVhipt from Algate to Newgate Vpon Friday you shall be VVhipt from Newgate to Tyburn by the Hands of the common Hangman This I pronounce to be the Judgment of the Court upon you and I must tell you plainly If it had been in my power to have carried it further I should not have been unwilling to have given Judgment of Death upon you I shall sum up all with the sense of the present House of Commons upon this whole proceeding which take in this Vote Martis 11th die Junij 1689. Resolved That the Prosecution of Titus Otes upon two Indictments for Perjury in the Court of King's Bench was a design to stifle the Popish Plot and that the Verdicts given thereupon were corrupt and that the Judgments given thereupon were cruel and illegal Notes upon the Tryal of Nathaniel Reading Esq for attempting to stifle the King's Evidence as to the horrid Popish Plot upon Wednesday the 24th of April 1679. before the Lord Chief Justice North c. THe Conspirators against our Religion Laws and Liberties being struck with astonishment and the Imprisoned and Impeached Traytors with no small Terror at the most providential and happy accession of Captain William Bedloe's Testimony to the discovery made by Dr Otes of the hellish Popish Plot in which he had stood single much discouraged we do quickly find their thoughts at work how to remove this newly acquired Witness Their way of taking off Sr Edmundbury Godfrey having so highly dis-served their Cause that is not to be again practised therefore the resolution taken in the present case is to tamper with and buy off Captain Bedloe they pitched upon Mr Reading to carry on this Intrigue whose parts and principles did very well qualifie him for such an undertaking but Mr Bedloe being above the reach of very powerful Temptations he very honestly detected the villainous Attempts upon him and the Suborner was brought to Justice as follows The Indictment sets forth the Plot against the King the Government and the Protestant Religion and that Colman Ireland and Grove were tryed condemned and executed for the same That several Lords viz. the Earl of Powis Lord Viscount Stafford Lord Bellasis Lord Arundel of Wardour Lord Petre and also Sr Henry Titchbourn stand impeached of the said Treason That Reading well knowing these things and to obstruct and stifle them and to retard the prosecution of Justice against the Lord Powis Stafford Bellasis Petre and Sr Henry Titchbourn did on their part the 29th of March last solicit suborn and endeavour to perswade Mr VVilliam Bedlooe whom he knew to have given Information of those Treasons against the said Persons to lessen stifle and not to give in evidence the full truth against them and to give such evidence as he should direct and to that purpose did give him fifty six Guineas and promised him other great Rewards to the hindrance and suppression of Justice The Jury were these Sr John Cutler Thomas Cass Joshua Galliard Rains. Waterhouse Edw. Willford Mathew Bateman Tho. Henslow Walter Moil Thomas Earsby
them to safe retirements and so were clap'd into the Tower and afterwards in different wayes butchered It was resolved that my Lord Russell the Honour of his Age should be cut off in a seeming way of Justice and as he was a Person of inestimable value so the art used to destroy him was extraordinary in the first place The Conspirators to introduce a belief of his Lordship's guilt procure two Persons charged with Keeling's Plot to be convicted just before my Lord is brought to Tryal reserving other two of them of whose Conviction they more doubted to be tryed after his Lordship Then a well prepared Pannel of Jurors many of them train'd and disciplin'd under L'Estrange and some Inferiour Clergy-Men his Prostitutes was returned by Sr John Moore 's Sheriffs Matters being thus prepared He is brought upon his Tryal at the Old-Bayly upon Friday the 13th of July 1683 At the instant of entring upon it the Conspirators cut the Eaâ—l Essex's Throat in the Tower and to facilitate the dispatch of the Lord then at the Bar they immediately intimate by an express to the Old-Bayly that the Earl of Essex had murdered himself from hence a wicked and unquestionably a premeditated Inference is raised of the good Lord Rassell's guilt and by this diabolical contrivance the Blood of the Earl of Essex is made a main Evidence towards the Prisoner's Conviction that being accomplished upon the day ensuing the Verdict of his guilt is made an Argument to seduce and delude the Coroner's Inquest into a belief that the Earl of Essex had destroyed himself The Jury being called his Lordship was over-ruled in his Challenges of those of them who were not Freeholders though the learned in the Laws did and do say that he was entituled to those Challenges not of Grace but Right and the same was allowed to others by my Lord's Prosecutors at such Seasons when it would not disserve their turn thus the Estate Honour and Life of this Noble Lord are put into the Hands and Power of Tradesmen and Shop-keepers He being charged with an Indictment for high Treason the right of my Lord 's Challenging for want of Freehold was argued and insisted upon by his Council Mr Pollexfen Mr Holt and Mr Ward But was opposed by The Attorney General The Solicitor General Sr George Jeffryes and Mr North. And was over-ruled by the Judges upon the Bench who were The Lord Chief Justice Pemberton The Lord Chief Baron Justice Jones Justice Wyndham Justice Charleton Justice Levins Baron Streete and Justice Wythens Then the following Jury were sworn Jahn Martin William Rouse Gervas Seaton William Fashion Thomas Short George Tory Ano. William Butler James Pickering Thomas Ieve Hugh Noden Robert Brough and Thomas Oneby Then Mr North the King's Counsel opened the Indictment to this effect That the Prisoner stood charged with no less than conspiring the Death of the King and that in order to it he with other Traytors the second of November 1682 conspired to raise War against him and to Massacre his Subjects and to seize his Guards and Person The Attorney General being so hot upon this bloody pursuit that he had before positively refused to defer the Tryal till the Afternooon * 'T is probable that he might imagine that by the Afternoon the suspition of the Earl of Essex's Assassination might reach the Ears of the Jury as it did in a few hours many about the Town and then Mr Attorney had lost that which he made a mighty part of his Evidence and imposed upon the Court to go instantly upon it did now apply himself totis viribus to impress the Jury telling them that the Prisoner was one of the Council of State as he in a scornful way expressed himself to give forth directions for the general Rising that as had appeared was to be in the Kingdom That the Rising was of great concern and expence and must be managed by Persons of Interest Prudence and Secrecy That they consulted in October and November how to seize the Guards and at several meetings they received Messages from my Lord of Shaftesbury touching the Rising That this was the great Consult and moved all the Wheels That there were Vnderlings who were to manage the Assassination who were an inferiour Council of seven That there was a great Council of six who were the Prisoner the Earl of Essex whom he pretended he was sorry to name he having that Morning prevented the hand of Justice upon himself * Note this was spoken within an hour or two after the Earl's death before any Inquisition taken or it could possibly be known how he came by his death but right or wrong this Jury must now pass upon him and find him Felo de se to facilitate and justifie the Murder they are now to commit and four others That they debated how they should make the Rising Resolved that before they fell upon it they would have an exact account of the time Method of the Scotch Rising and thereupon Colonel Sidney sent Aaron Smyth on purpose to invite Scotch Commissioners to treat with these Noble Lords that pursuant to this just before the Plot broke out several came from Scotland to treat how to manage the Work They demanded at first 30000 l. then fell to 10000 l. and at last to 5000 l. but they not coming to their terms it broke off the Week the Plot was discovered He concluded that they should shew that all the Inferiour party still look'd upon these to be the Heads I shall not here trouble the Reader with the particulars of the Evidence given against this Noble Lord by the Lord Howard Colonel Romsey and Mr Shepheard nor offer at any Remarks thereupon much less to touch upon the many Hardships and great Injustice put upon his Lordship in this Prosecution in point of Law all that having been admirably well done by the Learned Pens of the right Honourable the Lord Chief Baron Atkyns and of Mr Hawles of Lincolns Inn My purpose not only in extracting these Notes in my Lord Russell's Case but also in this whole Tract being only to present the World with some matters of History which they did not put down or remark upon and which indeed invited me to this work to gather together for publick use Abstracts and Remarks upon some memorable Tryals in the late unhappy Reigns upon which they never touched I shall therefore now proceed to represent something further of the carriage and exasperating Speeches of the King's Council c. against his Lordship The Solicitor General sum'd up the Evidence in this manner That the Prisoner stood Indicted for High Treason in conspiring the Death of the King That the Overt Act laid to prove that Conspiracy by is the assembling in Council to raise Arms against the King and to raise a Rebellion and that they had proved that by three Witnesses He then proceeded to state the substance of the Evidence which having done as
very Nature and shewed so much Venom as would make one think the whole mass of his Blood were corrupted Here is malice against the King malice against the Government malice against both Church and State malice against any man that bears any share in the Government indeed malice against all mankind that are not of the same perswasion with those bloody Miscreants Here is the sanctifying of Traytors justly executed Here is the Sainting of two horrid Conspirators the Lord Russell that blessed Martyr my Lord Russell that good man that excellent Protestant he is lamented and here is Mr Sidney Sainted and what an extraordinary man was he 't is a shame to think that such bloody Miscreants should be Sainted and lamented 'T is high time for all mankind that have any Christianity or sense of Heaven or Hell to bestir themselves to rid the Nation of such Caterpillars such monsters of Villany as these are These Letters tell you God would be sure to raise up Instruments but what Instruments do they mean Instruments of Rebellion and Faction and Sedition which they most falsly call his own Work. The question is whether the Defendant be guilty of writing these Venomous Malicious Seditious Factious Tumultuous Letters of which you have as full and plain proof as can be made And as to his publishing them can you think that he would write all this Malitious Stuff to put them in his Pocket but you have it sworn that the Defendant said they were sent to the Post-House Then the Jury immediately gave in their Verdict that the Defendant was Guilty of the Offence and Misdemeanor charged in the Indictment as no doubt they resolved to do before they heard one word of the matter The Judgment upon this Verdict was that the Defendant should pay 10000 l Fine and be Imprisoned till paid and to find Sureties for the good Behaviour for Life Accordingly he was committed for the Fine to the King's Bench and continued a Prisoner four or five years which satisfied not but Graham and Burton those Instruments of Rapine and Oppression broke in upon his Estate and besides the Waste and Destruction made they levyed to their own Use and the King 's about 6000 l. Notes upon the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong at the King's Bench the 14 th of June 1684. Before the Lord Chief Justice Jefferies Justice VVithens Justice Holloway and Justice VValcot SR Thomas Armstrong having been Out-lawed upon an Indictment of high Treason and betrayed and brought from Holland was Committed to New-gate upon the 10 th of June 1684. by the Warrant of Sidney Goldolphin Esq principal Secretary of State And upon the 14 th of June being brought to the King's Bench Bar Sr Robert Sawyer Attorney General moved the Court for an award of Execution upon the Outlawry Whereupon he was Arraigned on the Outlawry viz. that he had been Indicted of high Treason for conspiring against the King's Life and the Government That for not appearing to plead and try that Indictment he stood Outlawed and thereby Attainted of the Treason And it was demanded of him what he had to say why Execution should not be awarded against him Sr Thomas urged that he was beyond Sea at the time of the Outlawry and desired that he might be Tryed To which the Chief Justice answered We have nothing to do but to award Execution Sr Thomas desired that the Statute 6. Edward 6. might be read which gives the Person Outlawed for Treason a year to reverse it if he were beyond Sea and desired that Counsel might be assigned him The Chief Justice ordered the Statute to be read to which the Attorney General assented but said Sr Thomas would not find it to his purpose it was read to this effect That all process of Outlawry for Treason against Offenders being beyond the Seas shall be effectual in the Law but it provides that if the Party shall within a year yield himself to the Chief Justice and offer to traverse the Indictment he shall be received to traverse and being found not Guilty he shall be acquitted of the Outlawry and of all Penalties and Forfeitures by reason thereof Then the Attorney General said Sr Thomas now I suppose will shew he yielded himself to your Lordship and added that before he went out of England he might have rendred himself and been Tryed if he had pleased Sr Thomas Armstrong answered I have been a Prisoner the year is not yet out I now render my self and do conceive I am within the Benefit of the Statute and do desire it The Chief Justice replyed we are of another opinion we cannot take notice of it there is no doubt nor difficulty at all in the thing and applying to Richardson said Captain Richardson you shall have a rule for Execution on Friday next Then Sr Thomas offered to the Court that one in that place had the benefit of a Tryal offered him and that was it that he desired for he thanked God his Case was quite another then his That he knew his own Innocence And so did They too otherwise he had not been denyed a Tryal and desired to make it appear by a Tryal To this the Chief Justice answered that which you speak of was the Grace and Mercy of King who may if he please extend the same to you but we are satisfied that according to Law we must award Execution upon this Outlawry Thereupon Mrs Mathews Sr Thomas's Daughter said My Lord I hope you will not Murder my Father for which being Brow-beaten and checkt she added God Almighty's Judgments light upon you Then the Attorney General said that he would acquaint the Court with one thing in reference to what Sr Thomas had said That the King did indeed indulge Holloway so far as to offer him a Tryal and perhaps might have some reason for it but affirmed that the Prisoner deserved no sort of Indulgence or Mercy and then in effect went on to give Evidence against him saying that it appeared that after the disappointment to the meeting at the Rye by the New-market fire Sr Thomas was one of those who engaged to destroy the King by the way upon his hasty coming then to Town and affirmed that this did appear upon a full and clear Evidence and that when he was taken beyond Sea Letters of Communication with Foreign Ministers and other people were found about him The Chief Justice knowing a more expeditious way of murdering this Gentleman said he would not meddle with evidence telling the Attorney that that was not their business and no doubt they were both conscious that they had not evidence where with to convict him and said we have nothing more to do but to award Execution Sr Thomas still insisted that he was within the Statute that he was Out-lawed while he was beyond Sea and that the twelve Moneths not being past he ought to have the Law and demanded no more Thereupon the Bloody-Monster in a most insolent and
viz. April the 13 th 1681. The virulent and envenom'd Pen of L'estrange was set to work upon it and to vilifie the Evidence of the Plot Parliaments nay the Protestant Religion it self Addresses with thanks for the violation of our Rights in the Dissolution and likewise abhorring Parliaments our Bulwark against Tyrany were obtained and most graciously received The Presenters thereof being usually honoured with Knighthood and rewarded with Perferment to places of Trust and Profit By this art the common Cry of a profligate party in every corner of England was Popery is better then Presbytery at least the Papists and Dissenters are equally dangerous if not all one 't is therefore more then time that a Colledge be hang'd against a Pickering And the Nation was almost put besides it self by the doleful Cry of Blood Blood Associations Conspiracies Rebellion Treason and what not that was frightful and terrible Rome it self could not possibly have ordered matters better for the service of Holy Church â—…e Protestant Religion is now mocked â—…rliaments derided the Witnesses of the Plot vilified and the belief of any other then a Presbyterian Plot vanishes This proceeding gave new life and heart to the Popish Conspirators and stroke no small damp upon their Prosecutors of the Witnesses some were bought off and others terrified from their Testimony of which I should recount Instances but that I have dwelt too long upon the fore-going Melancholy Contemplations To proceed therefore to the matter intended and from which I have too long digressed Dr Otes the first discoverer of the Popish Plot being no way shaken but bearing with most undaunted Courage and Constancy innumerable Reproaches and Slanders from the Pulpit and Press nay and from the Stage also Hell it self seemed to be engaged to discredit and batter down the belief of his Evidence Knox and Lane to blast his Reputation were employed to accuse him of an unusual but most hainous Wickedness that Plot not obtaining and matters being prepared for placing unmasked Popery upon the Throne he was condemned in One Hundred Thousand Pounds for words spoken of the Duke of York and thereupon secured against the desired season for the Conspirators taking their full revenge upon him Upon the 8 th of May 1685. he was brought to Tryal in the Kings-Bench Court upon an Indictment to the effect following viz. that Whitebread Ireland Fenwick Pickering and Grove five Jesuites were Indicted of high Treason for conspiring the Death of King Charles the second and that Ireland Pickering and Grove were Tryed December the 17 th 1678. And that the Defendant gave Evidence that there was a treasonable Consult at the White-Horse Tavern in the Strand the 24 th of April 1678. at which Whitebread Fenwick and Ireland and the Defendant were present and that they there came to a Resolution to Murder the King and that the Defendant carried the Resolution from Chamber to Chamber to be Signed by the Jesuites whereas in truth he was not present nor carried any such Resolution to be Signed and so committed wilful Perjury The Jury upon this Tryal were Sr William Dodson Sr Edmund Wiseman Richard Aley Thomas Fowles Thomas Blackmore Peter Pickering Robert Bedingfield Thomas Rawlinson Roger Reeves Ambrose Isted Henry Collyer and Richard Howard And the Tryal was managed against the Defendant by Mr Attorney General Mr Solicitor General The Recorder of London Mr North Mr Jones Mr Molley and Mr Hanses L'Estrang's Assistant and Brother Burgess in Parliament for Winchester both of them being chosen by the direction of Mr Bernard Howard a noted Papist Brother to Cardinal Howard In the first place Mr Foster one of Ireland's Jury swore what the Defendant evidenced at that Tryal viz. his being at the White-Horse Consult the 24 th of April 1678. Then the King's Counsel produced about twenty Jesuites and Students of St Omers these all testified that the Defendant came to St Omers in December 1677. and went not from thence until June 1678. Whosoever reads this Tryal cannot but observe some things worthy noting as First The rage of the Chief Justice and extraordinary zeal of the King's Counsel both against the Defendant and the belief of the Popish Plot of which more in its due place Secondly The Caresses and tender usage of these Jesuited Sparks both by the Court and Counsel their Evidence was received without the least Interruption not one cross thwarting or doubting question being put to any one of them nay there did not appear so much temper as to permit the Defendant to propose his questions to them which made him with undaunted Courage cry out That his defence was under a very great prejudice and that there was a turn to be served and therefore he was not admitted to ask the Witnesses questions And said I do verily believe That at this rate it is more safe for Papists to be Traytors than for any Protestant to discover a Popish Plot. Thirdly The harmony and uniformity of their Evidence which was so extraordinary that any indifferent Reader must judge that they were instructed by their Tutors before they came from St Omers and had oft conn'd their Lessons by the way for they did to admiration agree in swearing to particular days and to most minute and trivial things as to the day of playing at Nine-Pins of a Ball being stroke over a Wall and the like In the next place to insinuate that the Defendants Evidence was not always true and credited the King's Counsel produced the Earl of Castlemain and Sr George Wakeman who decreed that what he swore against them at their Tryals was false Here the Chief Justice observing the Defendants undauntedness said I wonder to see any one that has the face of a Man carry it at this rate when he hears such Evidence brought against him To which the Defendant reply'd very well I wonder Mr Atturney will offer to bring this Evidence Jefferyes whose Character with King Charles the second was that he had the Impudence of ten Carted Whores in a raving fit retorted such Impudence was never seen in any Christian Nation you are a shame to Mankind to which the Defendant's Reply was No my Lord I am neither a shame to my self nor to Mankind what I have sworn is true and I will seal it with my Blood if occasion be Ah Ah my Lord I know why all this is and so may the World but this will not do the work to make the Plot to be disbelieved things are not to be done by great Noises I will stand by the Truth The Defendant in his defence observed that the Indictment against him was six years after the pretended Perjury That the Witnesses against him were some of those who gave Evidence at the Tryal of the five Jesuites and tho' there were some fresh Witnesses that they did evidence the same thing that was then offered but the Testimony rejected tho' then and also at Langhorn's Tryal sixteen St Omer's youths were brought to falsifie his
Richard Pagget John Serle John Haines Esquires The King's Counsel were Sr Creswell Levens The Attorney General Mr Ward The evidence of this practice subornation was very clear and full particularly Mr Bedloe witnessed that Reading had often treated with him about mincing his Evidence for the bringing off the Lords and Sr Henry Titchborne and gave him Money at several times and did draw up a Paper of what Bedloe should Swear and did carry it to the Lords in the Tower to be viewed and corrected by them Mr Speke testified that Bedloe had from time to time informed him how the Treaty was carried on that upon the 29 th of March 1679. Mr Speke and VViggins Bedloe's Servant being concealed in his Chamber Mr Reading came and in the first place asked whether any body could hear their discourse and being assured that he was secure and secret he told Mr Bedloe upon his demand what the Lords in the Tower said and what my Lord Stafford said that as to my Lord Stafford he should be sure of the Estate in Gloucester-shire which had been promised to be setled upon him for my Lord had ordered him to prepare a blank Deed which within ten days after his Discharge should be perfected and the rest of the Lords did assure him that after they were acquitted in proportion to the service he did them in lessening of his Evidence he should have a plentiful Reward That Bedloe did then demand to have something under their hands but Reading said that they think that not convenient but I do take their Words and you must take mine and then promised to go to the Lords in the Tower against Munday to prepare and bring him the Instructions from them for his Evidence Mr Speke added that upon the Munday morning he was to watch and see the Delivery of the Paper and did see Reading put it into Bedloe's hand in the painted-Chamber who immediately delivered it to Mr Speke This Paper was all of Mr Reading's writing and being read in Court was found to contain the purport of the Evidence to be given against the Lords and was so ordered that the whole was only hear-say and could no way touch them Wiggins agreed with Mr Speke in the Evidence given of the Transactions between Mr Bedloe and Mr Reading in Mr Bedloe's Chamber Reading coming to make his Defence offered nothing against the credit of the Witnesses but did in effect confess all they had testified and the whole matter charged in the Indictment and in truth he was the greatest witness against himself as was well observed after he was found guilty by the Right Honourable Sr Robert Atkyns then one of the Judges of the Common-Pleas but soon after thrust out for non-Compliance with Sr Francis North then Chief Justice and is now most deservedly Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer and Speaker of the House of Lords The Jury having brought him in guilty he was fined 1000 l. adjudged to a years Imprisonment and to be set in the Pillory upon the munday following for the space of one hour in the Palace-Yard in VVestminster When the late King James ascended the Throne he was a particular Favourite and his Suffering in this matter was well rewarded It may not seem impertinent to present the Reader upon this occasion with so much of Captain Bedloe's solemn Death-Bed Declaration as the Lord Chief Justice North allowed the World to see His Lordship was pleased to acknowledge that he took Captain Bedloe's Examination upon Oath at Bristol upon the 16 th of August 1681. And that he declared that the Duke of York had been so far engaged in the Plot that there was no part that had been proved against any Man that had suffered but he was to the full guilty of it all but what tended to the Kings Death from the trouble whereof the Jesuites had undertaken to deliver the Duke And his Lordship added that Mr Bedloe told him he lookt upon himself as a dying Man and that he must shortly appear before the Lord of Hosts to give an account of all his Actions and that because many persons had made it their business to baffle and deride the Plot He did for satisfaction of the World there declare upon the Faith of a dying Man and as he hoped for Salvation that whatever he had testified concerning the Plot was true and that he had many Witnesses to produce who would make the Plot as clear as the Sun. That the Jesuites had resolved the King's Death and would spare him no longer than he continued to be kind to them And that they resolved to set up an Head for their Cause here whatever came of it and said that if they should slip the opportunity they then had they should never have such another Notes upon the Tryal of Thomas Knox and John Lane for a Conspiracy to Defame and Scandalize Dr Otes and Mr Bedloe thereby to discredit their Evidence about the Popish Plot At the Kings-Bench Bar at VVestminster upon the 25 th of November 1679. The Judges then upon the Bench were Sr VVilliam Scroggs Lord Chief Justice Sr Francis Pemberton and Sr Thomas Jones THe unlucky miscarriage of Reading's attempt to corrupt the King's Evidence or to overthrow the credit of their Testimony deterred not others from prosecuting so pious a work for that is instantly succeeded by the cursed Conspiracy of Knox and of Lane and Osborne the one lately the other at that time a Servant to Dr Otes but Justice overtook them as the following Scheme of their Tryal shews The Indictment being read upon their pleading not guilty the following Jury was sworn Sr John Kirke Kt. John Roberts Thomas Harriot R. Waterhouse Henry Johnson Thomas Earsby Simon Middleton Joseph Ratcliffe Hugh Squire James Supple Francis Dorrington Richard Cooper Esq. The King's Counsel were Mr Attorney General Mr Solicitor General Mr Serjeant Maynard Sr Francis VVinnigton Mr VVilliams Mr Thomas Smith Mr Trenchard For Knox Mr Saunders Mr VVithens and Mr Scroggs For Lane Mr Holt assigned by the Court. The Indictment opened by Mr Trenchard was that whereas Colman Ireland Pickering and Grove conspired to destroy the King and change the Religion Established by Law to introduce Popery and were thereof Convicted Attainted and Executed And whereas the Lord Powis Lord Arundel of VVardour and others were accused of those Treasons and Impeached for the same in Parliament c. The Defendants knowing Mr Otes and Mr Bedloe had given Information of these Treasons to stifle the Evidence and scandalize them did conspire to represent them as wicked Persons and of no credit And the Indictment further sets forth that Knox with the agreement of Lane and Osborne caused Letters to be wrote with contrivance to accuse Otes and Bedloe that they had conspired falsly to accuse the E. of Danby And that Otes had attempted to commit Sodomy with Lane that to effect those wicked designs Knox gave several sums of Money to Osborne and
to wrest from them their undoubted priviledge of chusing Sheriffs I shall take leave to subjoyn a brief account of the Indignities Violence then used towards several of the Chief Magistrates of the City but shall by the way though it comes not in its proper place present the Reader with a Transcript of the New-fashion'd Summons issued by the Lord Mayor upon the extraordinary occasion which then appeared to have Sheriffs of Sr L. Jenkins his Nomination By the Mayor THese are to require you that on Midsummer day next being the day appointed as well for Confirmation of the Person who hath been by me Chosen according to the Antient Custom and Constitution of this City to be one of the Sheriffs of this City and the County of Middlesex for the Year ensuing as for the Election of the other of the said Sheriffs and other Officers you cause the Livery of your Company to meet Together at your Common-Hall early in the Morning and from thence to come together Decently and Orderly in their Gowns to Guild-Hall there to make the said Confirmation and Elections Given this 19th Day of June 1682. Wagstaffe To return to what was last proposed The accustomed day for Swearing the Sheriffs being come the Aldermen were called to Guildhall by Summons from the Lord Mayor as follows Sir your Worship is desired to be at a Cort of Aldermen at Guildhall on Thursday at nine of the Clock in the forenoon in your Violet Gown and Cloke it being the 28th of September Hereupon at that hour six Aldermen viz. Sr John Laurence Sr Robert Clayton Sr Patience VVard Sr Thomas Goold Sr John Shorter and Alderman Cornish went with Mr Papillon and Mr Dubois to Guildhall where Quiney in a very insolent manner came to them and told them he had a command to keep the Hall clear whereupon they demanded whether he did not know them to be Magistrates of the City and could believe his Order reach'd them he replyed that he knew them and they must remove They then said they were summoned and attended in all peaceableness quickly after he accosted them again saying Gentlemen you must withdraw I have a command to require it They then demanded a sight of his Warrant but huffing he said he would shew none to such as they were and then laid hold of Sr P. Ward saying Sr you must remove and in the same manner laid hold of Sr John Laurence pulling him with such violence that he had like to have thrown him down and treating the rest of the Aldermen in that manner they were all forced to retire in this proceeding he was abetted and supported by Mr Wythers Wiseman Nichols Steverton c. then present in Guildhall proper men to be returned to serve upon the Jury in the foregoing Cause The Lord Mayor being come to the Court Mr Papillon and Mr Dubois declared that they were ready and did there tender themselves to take the Office of Sheriffs and to be sworn and humbly prayed the Answer of his Lordship the Court but without condescending thereto the Mayor went to the Hustings calling Mr North and Rich to follow him and there calling them to the Book to be sworn Mr Papillon and Mr Dubois offered themselves to be sworn and Mr Papillon laid his hand on the Book but his Lordship and Sr J. E. Sr W. P. and some other Aldermen commanded them to forbear and keep the Peace and be gone Some of the Aldermen claimed to be heard but the Mayor refused it and proceeded to swear North and Rich whereupon the duely elected Sheriffs with the six Aldermen withdrew protesting against those irregular and arbitrary proceedings Remarks upon the Tryal of my Lord Russell upon the 13 th of July 1683. UPon the Discovery of the Popish Plot the Conspirators finding their measures to be broken as indeed were those of the French King all over Europe they advised King Charles the Second to make use of the Discovery as a Cripple to beg Money of the then approaching Parliament which was immediately to sit for the better effecting thereof the obsequious Clergy were privately instructed to Preach against Popery and to magnifie the Discovery of the Plot this Doctrine was thundered out from the Pulpits till the Dissolution of that notorious Pentionary Parliament Having then found their hopes dash'd new Instructions were given and the Clergy advertised that there was some fear from the Dissenters but yet for a time they were to Preach against Popery but not to talk of the Plot this humour continued till the Dissolution of the Parliament which met in March 1678. was dissolved in May following 1679. Then they received advice that there was a Presbyteterian as well as a Popish plot this made the Ecclesiastical Drums beat loudly against Dissenters and that work was closely followed till the breaking the Parliament at Oxford in the beginning of the year 1681. When the Conspirators influenced too many of the Pulpits to thunder against the credit of the Popish plot and to insinuate a belief of a Presbyterian Plot which they were all the while hammering and by this art they did at length usher it into the World. The Nobility and Gentry of England to make bold with their own words in their Memorial for our now Gracious King and Queen then Prince and Princess of Orange had been as they therein freely confessed too slow to believe the desperate Popish Plot and had been deluded with the King's Promises to protect and maintain the Protestant Religion and the Laws and Government of England until they saw them all undermined But many discerning this Delusion more early than others did the never to be forgotten Duke of Monmouth Earl of Essex Lord Russel and Colonel Sidney with some other great and valuable Persons who were of that well-grounded Opinion That a free Nation like this of England might defend their Religion and Liberties when Invaded and taken from them under pretence and colour of Law began to bethink themselves how to restore Parliaments to their antient freedom and to deliver the Nation from the fury of that Torrent of Popery which they wisely fore-saw ready to break in and carry all before it At this juncture the Conspirators laid hold of the Information given by Keeling of unadvised and rash Discourses of a very small number of Men nine or ten at the most all Strangers to the Persons and honest Consultations of those great Men before named and they cunningly and maliciously â—…atch'd and work'd it into one piece and emitted it to the World by their Declaration read in all Churches under the name of a Presbyterian or Fanatick Plot which they had long wanted Hereupon a Proclamation pursues the Duke of Monmouth and some others designed for destruction who chose to stand aside out of the reach of the Blood-thirsty Conspirators But the Earl of Essex my Lord Russell and Colonel Sidney would not be overcome by the perswasions of those who invited
inhumane manner concluded thus That you shall have by the Grace of God see that execution be done on Friday next according to Law. You shall have the full benefit of the Law. It may seem proper in this place to note to the Reader the reason why the Grace and Favour as termed by the Chief Justice and Attorney General of being admitted to Tryal was offered to Holloway upon the one and twentieth of April before and now denyed to Sr Thomas Armstrong which cannot be better done then by casting an Eye to the proceedings upon Holloway whereby it manifestly appears that that unhappy person had been wrought upon by the fear of Death and hope of Pardon to be very prodigal in his Confessions it being most evident that what he had declared was more then a thousand Witnesses against himself and that he had put down a multitude of Hear-says and Reports of others the truth whereof never did nor will appear Hereupon they who had before wheedled deluded him do now caress him Mr Attorney told him that at Law he was gone but if he had any thing to say to defend himself the King would not exclude him but extend his Mercy so far as to admit him to Tryal Upon which the Chief Justice said Mr Attorney it is exceeding well and told the Prisoner that the King was pleased to signifie his gratious Intention towards him in that he was contented to wave the Out-lawry and allow him to try the matter if he thought he could defend himself The Prisoner finding himself snared and that this Grace would serve him as it did all others that fell into their power at that time did only answer that he could not undertake to defend himself he having before thrown himself upon the King's mercy and confessed himself guilty of many things in the Indictment So he was sentenced and dyed without Mercy At the place of Execution Sr Thomas Armstrong deported himself with Courage becoming a great man and with the Seriousness and Piety suitable to a very good Christian Sheriff Daniel told him that he had leave to say what he pleased and should not be interrupted unless he upbraided the Government Sr Thomas thereupon told him that he should not say any thing by way of Speech but delivered him a Paper which he said contained his mind he then called for Dr Tennison who prayed with him and then he prayed himself In his Paper he thus expressed himself That he thanked Almighty God he found himself prepared for Death his thoughts set upon another World and weaned from this yet he could not but give so much of his little time as to answer some Calumnies and particularly what Mr Attorney accused him of at the Bar That he prayed to be allowed a Tryal for his Life according to the Laws of the Land and urged the Statute of Edw. 6. which was expresly for it but it signified nothing and he was with an extraordinary Roughness condemned and made a precedent tho' Holloway had it offered him and he could not but think all the world would conclude his case very different else why refused to him That Mr Attorney charged him for being one of those that was to kill the King He took God to witness that he never had a thought to take away the King's Life and that no man ever had the Impudence to propose so barbarous and base a thing to him and that he never was in any design to alter the Government That if he had been tryed he could have proved the Lord Howard's base Reflections upon him to be notoriously false He concluded that he had lived and now dyed of the Reformed Religion a Protestant in the Communion of the Church of England and he heartily wished he had lived more strictly up to the Religion he believed That he had found the great comfort of the Love and Mercy of God in and through his blessed Redeemer in whom he only trusted and verily hoped that he was going to partake of that fulness of Joy which is in his presence the hopes whereof infinitly pleased him He thanked God he had no repining but chearfully submitted to the punishment of his Sins He freely forgave all the World even those concerned in taking away his Life tho' he could not but think his Sentence very hard he being denyed the Laws of the Land. I shall here for the Readers more full Information in this matter subjoyn the Sence of our Present House of Commons of this Proceeding against Sr Thomas Armstrong and the Censure they have most justly passed upon it Martis 12. November 1689. A Petition of the Lady Armstrong and her Daughters was Read Whereupon a Committe was appointed to examine the matter and make their Report to the House Resolved That it be an Instruction to the Committee That they examine who were the Judges that gave the Sentence against Sr Thomas Armstrong and who were the Prosecutors of him and who had his Estate and how the Petitioner may have Reparation And also to examine what Proceedings were in order to a Writ of Error by him desired and how it came to be denyed and by whom And they are to make their Report with all convenient speed Martis 19. November 1689. Mr Chrisly reported from the Committee to whom the Petition of the Lady Armstrong and the Daughters of Sr Thomas Armstrong was referred An account of the whole Proceedings against him And that thereupon they had come to these Resolves 1. That Sr Thomas Armstrong's Plea ought to have been admitted according to the Statute of Edward 6. and that the Execution of him upon the Attainder by Outlawry was illegal and a Murder by pretence of Justice 2. That the Executors and Heirs of Sr Thomas Armstrong ought to have a Reparation of their Losses out of the Estates of those that were his Judges and Prosecutors 3. That a Writ of Error for the Reversal of a Judgment in Felony or Treason in the right of the Subject and ought to be granted at his desire and is not an Act of Grace or Favour which may be denyed or granted at Pleasure To all which Resolves the House agreed Resolved That leave be given to bring in a Bill to Reverse the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong and to make Reparation to his Widow and Children out of the Estates of the Judges and Prosecutors And the same to be without Fees. Munday the 20th of June 1689. Mr Chrisly reported from the Committee to whom the Bill for the annulling the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong was recommitted some Amendments to the Bill as also who were his Prosecutors also what Losses Sr Thomas Armstrong's Family had sustained by reason of the Attainder and thereupon it was Resolved That Sr Richard Holloway Sr Francis Wythens the Executors of the late Lord Jefferies and of the late Justice Walcot Mr Graham and Mr Burton do attend the House on Saturday morning next to answer to such matters as are
charged against them touching the Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong Then Mrs Mathews Sr Thomas Armstrong's Daughter was called in and examined what she knew of the Prosecution against her Father And Sr Robert Sawyer then Attorney General being named by her as one of the Prosesecutors After she was with-drawn he was heard in his place to what was objected against him and then he withdrew and upon debate of the matter it was Resolved That Sr Robert Sawyer 's name be put into the Bill as one of the Prosecutors of Sr Thomas Armstrong Resolved That Sr Robert Sawyer be expelled the House for the same Saturday the 25th of January 1689. The House being acquainted that according to their Order Sr Francis Wâ—thens Sr Richard Holloway Mr Graham and Mr Burton attended at the Door thâ—y were severally called in and examined touching the Prosecution and Proceedings against Sr Thomas Armstrong And also the Executors of the late Lord Jeffryes that were attending at the Door were likewise called in and asked what hey had to say why Reparation should not be made out of the Lord Jeffryes Estate to the said Sr Thomas Armstrong's Family No Persons appearing as Executors to the late Justice Walcot the House was acquainted that he dyed Intestate and had not left an Estate sufficient to pay his Debts After the Persons before-mentioned were heard and with-drawn Mr Blaney was called in who gave the House an Account of the Proceedings in the Court of King's-Bench upon the Awarding Execution against Sr Thomas Armstrong And then the House proceeded upon the Amendments made by the Committee to the Bill for annulling the Attainder of Sr Thomas Armstrong And after having inserted the Name of Sr Robert Sawyer as a Prosecutor and resolved That the sum of five thousand Pounds should be paid by the Judges and Prosecutors to Sr Tho. Armstrong's Lady and Children as a Recompence of the Losses they had sustained by reason of his Attainder the Bill was recommitted upon the debate of the House to the same Committee Notes upon the Tryal between Sr William Pritchard Alderman of London and Thomas Papillon Esq. at Guildhall upon the 6th day of November 1684. before Sr George Jeffryes Lord Chief Justice of the Kings-Bench THat Mr Papillon was second to none in his zealous and undaunted opposition to the wicked attempts of introducing Popery and Arbitrary Government is very well known and deserves to be for ever remembred with honour None out did him in a diligent and faithful discharge of his Trust in several Parliaments In the Year 1681 there appeared a Race of Men fond of Vassalage and Slavery to that degree that they made Addresses of Thanks to the King for breaking two Parliaments in the compass of three Months meerly upon the score of their steady Resolution to extirpate the Popish Plot and Popery One of these fawning Addresses with promise of venturing their Lives and Fortunes to maintain this Violation of the Constitution of the Government having been presented to the King by Sr William Pritchard Sr George Jefferies and others Mr Papillon in abhorrence of it promoted and personally prosecuted a Petition to the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Common-Council praying that the Thanks of the City might be returned to Sr Robert Clayton Sr Thomas Player Alderman Pilkington and Alderman Love their worthy and well deserving Representatives in the Oxford Parliament and shewing That as matters then stood the Papists being animated in their Bloody designs by the hopes of a Popish Successor a Declaration to have frequent Parliaments could not attribute to the safety of the Kingdom and the composing the minds of Protestants but that it must be the sitting of a Parliament so as to search the Plot to the bottom to Prosecute the Conspirators and provide suitable Laws against the impending Evils and that nothing else could be effectual Further This Gentleman having in the same year 1681. greatly added to his guilt by baffling the Popish designs upon the Lives Liberties and Estates of all Protestants in the attempt upon the Earl of Shaftesbury He exerts himself in the year 1682. in the defence of the great and undoubted Right of the Citizens to chuse their own Sheriffs but now arbitrary Power being by the aid of ill Men become rampant and uncontroulable he must be sacrificed to their Revenge Mr Papillon having been duly elected one of the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex he brought a Writ of Mandamus out of the Court of King's-Bench to command the Mayor Aldermen to swear him into the Office that being disobeyed he is advised by his Counsel that he is entitled to an Action at Law for the wrong done him he sends in a respectful way to the Mayor and Aldermen requesting them to give voluntary appearances to his Action that being refused he proceeds by a legal process to bring them to answer him at Law whereupon Sr William Pritchard being arrested by the Coroner of London to whom the King's Writ was directed and detained some hours upon his refusal to give an appearance to Mr Papillon's Action Sr William brings an Action against him for thus arresting him and demands 10000 l. damages wherein he committed a great over-sight for had he ask'd 100000 l. the usual damages given in that day he had not failed of it with the following Jury which tryed the Cause Bartholomew Ferryman an old Informer one of the Jury of the Guildhall Riot Thomas Blackmore One of Dr Otes's Jury and also of the Riot Jury Thomas Symonds William Whatton One of the Riot Jury John Greene Thomas Amy One of Sr S. Barnardiston's Jury Joseph Baggs Daniel Chandler John Reynolds John Allen. Joseph Caine and Will. Wythers junior Fathers own Son. Mr Mundy opened the Declaration to this effect That the Plantiff being Lord Mayor and to attend that Office in the diligent Government of the City The Defendant envying the happy Estate of the Plantiff and contriving unjustly to disturb him in the Execution of his Office did to vex him not having any probable Cause of Action against him maliciously prosecute the King 's Writ out of the Court of King's-Bench against him directed to the Coroner of London commanding him to take Sr William Pritchard at Mr Papillon 's suite in an Action of Trespass and did procure Mr John Brome The Coroner to arrest him and that he was detained in custody six hours To the disgrace and scandal of the Plantiff and of his Office Whereas in fact he had not any just Cause of Action against him to his damage 10000 l. Then the Attorney General told the Jury that the action was brought to vindicate the honour of the Chair from such Affronts as these which in no Age till our times of faction and confusion it ever met with and he said We shall shew you that there lay a further Malice in this case and that there was a design in it against the Government This design was laid to carry on the great