Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
justice_n	court_n	king_n	plea_n	3,508	5	9.7258	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A26015	The law of obligations and conditions, or, An accurate treatise, wherein is contained the whole learning of the law concerning bills, bonds, conditions, statutes, recognizances, and defeasances ... : to which is added a table of references to all the declarations and pleadings upon bonds, &c. now extant : also another table to the forms of special conditions which lie scattered in our president [sic] books ... : with an index of the principal matters therein contained / by T.A. of Grays-Inn, Esq.	Ashe, Thomas, fl. 1600-1618.	1693 (1693)	Wing A3972; ESTC R9431	276,581	591

and to be inrolled within six months otherwise they will be void as to Purc●sors 27 Eliz. c. 4. But now by the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries the day of the month and year of the inrolment of the Recognizances shall be set down in the Margent of the Roll where the said Recognizances are acknowledged and no Recognizance shall bind any Lands c. in the hands of any Purchasor bona fide and for valuable consideration but from the time of such inrolment 29 Car. 2.1 By whom acknowledged and how BAron and Feme enter into a Statute or Recognizance this binds not the Wife albeit she survives her Husband 10 Rep. 43. 2 Inst 673. If an Infant acknowledge a Statute or Recognizance its voidable by Audita Querela during his minority but he cannot avoid it after his full age neither by Audita Querela nor Writ of Error because of Infancy only Moor n. 206. Yelv. 88. Randale and Wale Co. 2 Inst. 673. Dyer 132. and the way to avoid it must be by inspection which cannot be after his full age 1 Bulst 187 188. Infant acknowledgeth a Statute and was taken in Execution and at full Age he brought Audita Querela to avoid the Execution Per Cur. the Audita Querela shall abate he shall not avoid it it being matter of Record but if he will avoid it it must be during his minority Moor n. 196. Worsleys Case 1 Anderson 25. Noy p. 16. A Recognizance acknowledged by an Infant and he was inspected and adjudged to be within Age and thereupon had a Scire Fac. against the Conusee and upon a ni●hil returned it was adjudged the Recognizance should be void and he be discharged whereupon Error was brought for that there ought to be two nichils returned for two nichils amount to a Garnishment and without Garnishment and Oyer of the Party to whom the Recognizance was made it ought not to be adjudged to be cancelled and for this cause it was reversed And now because the Conusor is at present of full Age and cannot have a new Writ of Audita Querela to be inspected it was moved that he may have a new Writ comprehending the first Inspection and the Judgment thereupon and shew that the first Judgment was only reversed for Error in the Proceedings and upon all the matter to be relieved and so it was done Cro. Jac. 59. Yelv. p. 88. Randale and Wale A Recognizance within the Statute 23 H. 8. c. 6. cannot be good except the Seal of the Party be to it Before whom taken THey may not be acknowledged before any other Persons but such as are appointed by the Statutes Other Recognizances besides those on 23 H. 8. may not be acknowledged before any but such as have Power ex Officio as the Judges of the Courts at Westminster or by special Commission to take them Dyer 220. Out of the Commonalty of London there shall be two Merchants chosen and sworn and before one or both of these Merchants the Recognizances may be taken Stat 14 Ed. 3.11 8 R. 2.4 The Recognizance upon the 23 H. 8. c. 6. in nature of a Statute-Staple is always to be acknowledged before the Chief Justice of the Kings Bench or Common Pleas in the Term time or in their absence out of Term before the Mayor of the Staple at Westminister and the Recorder of London All the Judges may out of Term take Recognizances in any part of England and if it be taken before the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas at Serjeants-Inn in Fleet-street out of Term its good Hob. 195. Every Court of Record of any note hath this Authority incident to it to take Recognizances for all things which concern the Jurisdiction of the Court and of all things which arise of or by reason of the Matters there depending so it is taken before the Mayor and Aldermen of London 1 Leon. 384. Holinshead and Kings Case The Custom of London to take Recognizances and the Form of the Declaration Cro. El. p. 186. Chamberlein and Thorp 1 Leon. 130 131. Where Actions to be brought on Statutes and Recognizances H. Brought Debt against W. and declared upon a Recognizance taken before Chief Justice Hobart at Serjeants-Inn in Fleet-street London out of Term and laid his Action in London whereupon the Defendant demurred The Question was whether the Action ought to be brought in Middlesex where the Recognizance is recorded or in London where it was acknowledged Now in this Case the inrolment of the Record that the Recognizance was taken before Hobert at the time and place aforesaid by which it was a Record ipso facto then and there and the inrolment is but a confirmation of the same Record and makes no change but because they both concur to the making it a perfect Record the Action may be brought in either County but by Hobert in London as the more worthy part of the Act and a Scire fac upon such a Recognizance shall be directed to the Sheriff of London and not of Middlesex but if the entry of the Record were general that the Recognizance was taken before Hobert it shall be understood in Court and then the Action shall be brought in Middlesex Hob. Rep. p. 195. Hall and Winkfield 2 Rolls Rep. 182. 1 Brownl p. 69. Allen Rep. 12. Andrews and Harborn In the Common Pleas its good both ways in B. R. it ought to be where the Recognizance is taken Stiles p. 9. Andrews Case Debt brought in the Common Bench on a Recognizance in London Cro. Eliz. Wilfords Case Statute Staple suable in the Kings Bench or Common Pleas as well as in Chancery Cro. El. p. 208. Clavel and Mallory Audita Querela in the Common Bench for that the Conusor was within Age at the time of the acknowledgment and well brought there mesme Case 1 Leon. 303. so in B. R. and the entry of the Inspection vide Cro. El. 208. A Recognizance taken by the Custom of London makes the Debt local vide 1 Leon. 130 131 284. Scire Facias SCire Facias in the Kings Bench on a Recognizance may not be general without shewing the time of the Recognizance and other particulars for it is but a Pocket Record therefore it is to shew what date it is for otherwise the Party may not know what Matter to plead and perhaps it is released or cancelled and a Man may not plead a Release after nul tiel Record Qu. 2 Siderfin p. 156 159. B. R. Alston and Body He that sueth forth a Scire fac in Chancery to defeat an Execution on a Statute-Staple shall find Surety to prosecute with effect If the Statute hath but one Seal it shall take effect as an Obligation Moor n. 520. 2 Rolls Abr. 149. Aiscue and Hollingsworth Cro. El. p. 494. contra A Recognizance is entire and being discharged in part is discharged in the whole but if the defeasance be to be paid in several Sums there an Acquittance of part is not a

of Exeter and Star A Condition to appear in B. R. where the Process is returnable c. the Defendant said in facto that he had appeared secundum formam c. Et hoc petit c. there was a Repleader awarded for it must be tried per the Record A. is bound to appear such a day c. and A. at the said day goes to the Court but there no Process is returned then the Party may go to one of the chief Clerks of the Court and pray him to take a Note of his appearance Vide the Form of Entry in such Case if the other Party pleaded nul tiel Record it behoveth that the Defendant have the Record ready at his peril for this Court of Common Pleas cannot write to the Justices of the Kings Bench to certifie a Record hither 1 Leon. p. 90. Bret and Shepard Debt upon a Sheriffs Bond Jones for the Bail prayed the Principal being now in Person may be admitted to plead discharging th Amerciaments which is the course of the Court where the Prosecution is fresh but where the Defendant in the Original Action i. e. the Principal is become insolvent per Cur. the Bail Bond is the only remedy and they will not discharge that on the ordinary Rules but in this Case because the Bail appeared on the very day of the return and the default is the Plaintiffs own and the Bond not above a year old paying the Amerciaments and Costs the Bail was discharged and the Principal admitted to plead 2 Keble 545 553. Flood and Williams If the Defendant appears not to the Sheriffs Bond according to the Condition thereof the Plaintiff may by leave of the Sheriff sue the Bond in the Sheriffs Name but it s at the Plaintiffs Election to amerce the Sheriff Stiles Pract. Register p. 221. When Bail is put in de bene esse as Bail taken in a Judges Chamber is the Plaintiff cannot sue the Sheriffs Bond till it be refused or set aside but he ought to except against it in the Judges Chamber 1 Kebl● 478. Anonymus The Court cannot compel a Sheriff to assign his Bond the Party was arrested and through his default in not returning his Writ the Defendant died Per Cur. in this Case he shall not take advantage of his own wrong but shall now assign the Bail Bond or pay the utmost Amerciaments 2 Keble 388. Hill and Browning A Bail Bond was discharged upon motion the Mony being paid before the return of the Writ and appearance ordered 3 Keble 316. Randuls Case In Det sur Bond the Defendant pleads Stat. 23 H. 6. and shews that V. was in Execution and the Bond made for his deliverance against the Statute The Plaintiff replies tempore confectionis of the said Bond V. was at large absque hoc that he was in Prison tempore confectionis c. The Traverse is not good for one may be in prison and make a promise to make a Bond for which he is enlarged and within an hour after he makes the Bond the same is within the Statute it ought to be absque hoc that it was made pro deliberatione 2 Leon 107. Bowes and Vernon 2 Keb. 512. Die and Adams The Condition was if Thomas Manningham keep the Sheriff without damage against our Lord the King and one Th. P. and at all times be at the Commandment of the said Sheriff as a true Prisoner and appear before the Justices c. then the Obligation to be void The Defendant pleaded the Statute of 23 H. 6. and that the Body of Tho. Mannigham was in Execution upon a Recognisance and that the Sheriff made the Obligation for the Delivery of the said Thomas Manningham and demanded Judgment si actio i. e. if the Plaintiff ought to maintain his Action this is no good Conclusion of the Plea he ought to have concluded issint nient son fait For the Statute saith it shall be void and if it shall be void then it is void from the beginning and then it is not his Deed. And farther the Defendant had not wisely concluded his Plea for this special Conclusion had straitned the Defendant so that if the Obligation be void for any other cause the Defendant shall not have benefit of it and yet because it appeared to the Judges on the matter in Law that the Plaintiff had no cause of Action the Court gave Judgment against him for the Obligation is void by the Letter of the Statute for it makes void Obligations taken in other manner which extends to avoid Obligations for bayling those which are contained in the 2d Branch as those in Execution c. Plowd 66 67. Dive and Manningham Yet the Condition was that the Defendant should appear in B. R. to answer in a Plea of Trespass and satisfie the Damages The Defendant pleads the Statute of 23 H. 6. that the Bond was made for his enlargement and issint not his Deed. The Plaintiff demurs specially upon the Conclusion of the Plea which ought to be Judgment si actio and agreed the Plea to be naught Allen p. 58. Leech and Davies Det sur Obligat dated 25 Sept. The Defendant pleads a Ca. sa was awarded against B. who was taken on it 30 Sep. and that the Obligation was made for the enlargment of B. The Plaintiff demurs and had Judgment because it appears the Bond was made before the Arrest and so could not be avoided by 23 H. 6. but he ought to have pleaded that with a primo deliberat after the Arrest Noy 23. Collins and Phillips Det sur Bond by the Sheriff dated 13 Junij the Defendant demanded Oyer of the Condition which was that if he appear here Veneris prox post tres Trin. and pleads Veneris prox post tres Trin. was 14 Junij and that he was imprisoned by the Plaintiff till 19 Jun. and that the Obligation supra fuit primo deliberat per le def 19 Junij absque hoc that this was delivered as his Deed before the 19th of June The Defendant demurs Per Cur. this is not a good Traverse it ought to have been absque hoc that this was delivered as his Deed before die Veneris prox post tres Trin. For if the Traverse supra be allowed the Plaintiff shall be excluded from answering to the time alledged of the Return although it be false Siderfin p. 300. Courtney and Phelps 2 Keb. p. 108 109 122. mesme Case The Defendant pleads to the Sheriffs Bond that that there was no Writ ever delivered to the Sheriff and so would avoid it per Stat. 23 H. 6. The Sheriff after the Writ sent out but before delivery takes Security which per Cur. he may if the Defendant will give it 1 Keb. 554. Brumfield versus Penhay The Defendant pleads Stat. 23 H. 6. and that he was in Custody by Warrant of a Writ returned Veneris post Oct. Pur. The Plaintiff replied the Defendant was taken by a Warrant on a Writ returned Sab.

taken in Execution H. the other Bail gave him Security for the Mony and in consideration thereof the Plaintiff promised H. that he might take out Execution against the other Defendant and that he would not release him without the consent of H. whereupon H. procured him to be taken in Execution and he then moved the Plaintiff to discharge him who acquainted him with the promise made to H. at supra thereupon the Defendant made him this Bond and conditioned prout so he discharged him and H. brought an Action upon the Promise and recovered 150 l. damage and so damnificat the Defendant demurred Judgment pro Quer. this is a Breach for by the word damages is not only intended damages which arise directly by the Release but to any other collateral Act dehors as is this promise Hob. p. 269. Wilden and Wilkinson 1 Rolls Abr. 431. id Case vid. 1 Rolls Abr. 422. id Case Condition is to perform an Award which was That the Obligee staret acquietatus de qualibet materia contained in a Bill in Chancery which the Obligor had depending against him and that the said Suit shall cease and after the Obligor exhibits a new Bill in Chancery against the Obligee for the same matter and in the end of the Bill prays Process but never takes out Process thereon against him this is not any such molestation as shall be a forfeiture of the Condition for he is not at any damage by this P. 12 Jac. 1 Rolls Abr. 432. Freeman and She●n A. and B. are bound in an Obligation to perform certain Covenants contained in an Indenture and one is to pay Mony and C. covenants with A. and B. to save them harmless of all things contained in the same Indenture and after the Mony is not paid according to the Indenture by which the Obligation is forfeited yet C. is not bound to save them harmless of the Obligation for this is a collateral thing to the Indenture M. 5 Jac. 1 Rolls Abr. 432. Scot and Pope versus Griffin A Condition recites That the Plaintiff at the request of the Testator was bound in 2000 l. to the Commissioners of the Excise and if the Testator acquit and discharge or sufficiently save harmless from all Suits Troubles c. concerning the said Bond then c. the Defendant saith there were no Suits the Plaintiff replies there was a So. Fac. out of the Exchequer and he was forced to retain an Attorny and give him 3 s. 4 d. the Defendant demurs because no notice of the Suit is given to the Defendant per Cur. there needs no notice 2 Keb. 529 609 642. King and Atkins Cro. El. 613. Fox and Wright The Defendant is Security to the Plaintiff for payment of Mony as separate Maintenance to Williamsons Wife the Breach assigned is that Williamson brought an Action sur Case against the Plaintiff on his promise to pay so much if the Defendant now who was then Plaintiff would remit the rest It s a Cheat and the Defendant i● not bound to secure the Plaintiff 2 Keble p. 106. Campian versus Skipwith Counter-bond writ in a Book and good Cro. El. p. 613. Fox and Wright If the Condition be to save harmless from such a thing this doth not extend to Actions in which he might have lawful defence without the Obligor 2 H. 4.9 A Condition to save harmless from J. S. if J. S. after saith to him that if he will go to his House he will beat him by which menace he dares not go to his House about his Business the Obligation is forfeited 18 Ed. 4.28 To plead he had saved the Plaintiff harmless and not to shew how is ill Stiles p. 219. Shertliff vers Timberly Allen 72. Ellis and Box. If it be that from time to time he hath saved him harmless it s well enough Stiles p. 353. M. 1652. Bond and Martin But in Condition to save harmless from Escapes the Defendant pleads he had saved harmless but saith not how and the Plaintiff demurs generally Per Cur. its ill on special demurrer but aided by general demurrer 2 Keble 629. Henshaw and Warren 3 Keble 198. Fletcher and White To discharge and save harmless Qu. if any difference on Mansers Case 1 Keble 379. Morgan and Thomas In such Cases the Plaintiff ought to plead non damnificat for that he hath saved him harmless doth imply he was damnified Ibid. A Condition was to save the Obligee harmless of a Nomine poenae against M. To plead he had saved him harmless and not to shew how is not good had he pleaded non damnificatus in the negative it had been good Winch. p. 9. A Condition to keep a Parish harmless from a B●stard Child the Defendant pleads he had saved the Parish harmless but shews not how the Plaintiff replied That the Parish was warned before the Justices of the Peace at the Sessions and was there ordered by Record to pay so much for the keeping of the Child the Defendant pleads nul tiel Record the Plaintiff demure 1. The Plea of nul tiel Record is a good Plea because an Order of Sessions of Peace is a Record 2. Judgment pro Quer. because the Defendants Bar is ill in that he hath pleaded in the affirmative and shews not how Non damnificatus had been good and it is not helped by demurrer it being matter of substance March 121. n. 200. Anonymus A Condition to save harmless from all Obligations which he had entred into for him the Defendant pleads quod exoneravit indemp●em conservavit from all the Obligations and shewn not from what and yet good because there might be many and so to avoid perplexity of pleading and because he pleaded not qu●modo exoneravit but generally the Plea was ill Cro. El. p. 916. Braban and Bacon A Condition to save the Parish harmless of a Bastard Child vide the Form the Defendant pleads non damnificatus the Plaintiff replies That the Defendant nor any other for the space of a month provided for the Child wherefore the Parish paid 40 s. for its Maintenance the Defendant rejoins he offered to maintain the Child at his own Charge and the Parish refused to permit him Et hoc paratus c. this rejoinder is ill because it is a departure 〈◊〉 he ought to have pleaded this first in his Plea 2 Sander … 〈◊〉 Siderfin p. 444. 2 Keble 219. Mod. Rep. 45. Richards and Hodges Counter-Bonds Sureties IF the Condition be to discharge another against J. S. of an Obligation wherein he is bound he ought to discharge him of the Obligation by Release or otherwise and it is not sufficient to save him harmless 22 Ed. 4.40 b. The Defendant pleads non damnificatus the Plaintiff replies the Mony was not paid at the da● per quod the Plaintiff became on●rabilis and d … st not go about his Affairs the Defendant rejoins that the Mony was tendered and refused absque hoc that the Plaintiff was

Session pacis in Comit● praedict tenend ad stand ●ct in Curia siquis versus cum loqui voluerit de diversis feloniis transgressionibus unde idem R. B. judicatus existit ut dicitur ad respondend dicto Domino Regi de iisdem prout debet dat c. Recognisance of Bail Kanc. ss Memorandum Quo ●quinto die A. D. de c. G. H. de c. J. K. de c. personaliter venerunt coram nobis C. D. E. F. Justiciar dicti Dom. Regis ad pacem suam in Com. suo praedict conservand assignat● recogneverunt se deber● eidem Dom. Regi modo forma sequen viz. praedict A. B. 20 l. legalis c. uterque praedictorum G. J. 10 l. confi●lis ●nita de seperalibus bonis catalli● terris tenementis s● seperalis fieri le vari ad opus usum dicti Dom. Regis hared successor suorum si defult fieret in performatione conditionis indors Condition for appearance for Felony or suspicion of Felony The Condition of the Recognizance is such That if the within bound A. B. do personally appear before his Majesties Justices of Gaol-delivery at the next general Gaol-delivery to be holden for the within named County of Kent then and there to answer to our Sovereign Lord the KING for and concerning the felonibus taking and stealing of c. or for suspicion of his felonious taking c. wherewithal he standeth charged before c. and to do and receive c. and do not depart the said Court without licence for the same then c. If it be to appear at Sessions say Do personally appear before his Majesties Justices assigned to keep his Peace in the within named County of K. at the next General Sessions of the Peace to be holden for the said County of T. in the County aforesaid then and there to answer c. If the Party th● is bound to appear on Surety for the Peace be so sick that he cannot appear the Justices in their discretion have forborn to certifie or record such Forfeiture or Default and that they have taken Sureties for the Peace of some Friends of his present in the Court till the next Sessions If the Husband be bound that he and his Wife shall appear at such a Sessions and that they shall keep the Peace in the mean time c. and at the day the Husband appears alone Qu. if the Recognizance be forfeited A Supplicavit out of Chancery directed to the Sheriff and Justices to bind F. and two others to the Good Behaviour the Sheriff returns that the two non sunt inventi and quoad F. that such a Recognizance was taken before the Justices and that he had broken the Good Behaviour and F. pleaded to Issue in Chancery the Record being sent into the Kings Bench per manus Dom. Cancellaris thereupon a Writ of Nisi Prius issued and found for the Defendant this Recognizance was not well certified into the Chancery for they who take the Recognizance ought to certifie it Cro. Jac. 669. Ford against the King If a Man find Sureties for the Peace before the Justices of the Peace in the County yet if the same Party come in B. R. and there make Oath that he was afraid he shall be hurt by the said Party he may have surety of the Peace there against the Party and a Supersedas to the Justices to discharge the Bond taken before them for the Peace and Behaviour Moor n. 126. Upon motion on Affidavit that he was bound to the Peace for Malice his Recognizance was discharged Stiles p. 364 Sir Tho. Revels Case It s the Course of the Court when any are bou●d over to appear in B. R. and in the mean time to keep the Peace or be of Good Behaviour the Cause is to be exprest in the Recognizance also when ever the Court binds any Man to the Peace or Good Behaviour it s always for a year 1 Keble Hill 16 and 17 Car. 2. B. R. Sandford versus Atkinson What is or amounts to a Breach or Forfeiture THE Surety of the Peace is not broken without Affray made or Battery bujusmodi 2 H. 7.2 b. Words which threaten a Battery of the Body may forfeit a Recognizance but not to call one Lyar Drunkard and to say I will make him a poor Kirton Moor n. 378. If he threaten to beat him to his Face it s a Forfeiture or if he threaten in his absence and afterwards lies in wait to beat him Keb. Inst 615. If he that is bound do but command or procure another to break the Peace upon any Man or to do any other unlawful Act against the Peace if it be done it s a Forfeiture of his Recognizance 7 H. 7.34 a. There is a Surety of the Peace and a Surety of the Good Behaviour the Surety of the Peace cannot be broken without some Act as an Affray or Battery or the like but the Surety de bono gestu consisteth chiefly in doing nothing that may be cause of the Breach of the Peace the word Lyar Drunkard c. are not Breaches nor entring his Close nor taking Goods What is a Breach of the Peace is a Breach of the Behaviour riding with War-like Weapons but that is not Law now or in Company with riotous Malefactors Cro. El. 86. k. 4 Inst 180 181. Kings Case In Sc. Fac. upon a Recognizance for the Good Behaviour taken in the Crown Office the Breach is assigned because he assaulted land b●t ●ne on the Way and he saith not vi a● and for this Cause after Verdict Judgment was stayeth Cro. Jac. 412. The King and Hutchings Scire Facias upon a Recognizance of the Good Behaviour Breach assigned was That he said to a Constable in executing his Office thou art a lying Rascal and to a Woman that she was a Whore and a Jade c. The Defendant pleaded not guilty and found for the Defendant though the manner of speaking may be good cause in discretion to bind one to his Good Behaviour yet one being bound words only which tend not to the Breach of Peace terrifying others or to sedition c. shall not be sufficient cause of Forfeiture Nota In this Case the Witnesses in the behalf of the King did not prove that these words were i● disturbance of the Execution of his Office Cro. Car. 498. The King versus Hayward Farther Considerations of Bonds in respect of Assignment Statute of Bankrupt and Forgery c. Assignments of Obligations Vide Creditors as to Statute of Bankrupcy IF a Man assign an Obligation to another for a precedent Debt due by him to the Assignee that is not Maintenance but if he assign it for a Consideration then given by way of Contract this is Maintenance Noy 53. Harvey versus ●man Alit in Case of the King 3 Lion 234. Scoth and Marsh Upon the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. the Case

' its ill and per Curiam the Action for the Debt depending in this Court cannot be Attached 3 Leon. 210. After Imparlance Foreign Attachment not to be pleaded 3 Leon. 322. Babington's Case The Defendant pleads to Debt on Bond of 80 l. that the Plaintiff pendant the Bill brought against him a Plaint in London and there by Custom had attached 40 l. of a Debt due to the Defendant in the hands of J. S. in satisfaction of 40 l. due on this Bond and demanded Judgment of the Bill Per Cur. it s a Plea in Bar and not in Abatement for the Plaintiff for this part is to be barred for ever and this receipt of parcel is lawful and a Recovery in Law Aliter of a bare Acceptance Cro. Eliz. p. 342. May and Middleton The Debt follows the person and it s therefore called a Foreign Attachment because let the Debt rise where it will its attachable if the Debtor cometh or the Mony be brought into London 2 Keb. 320. Mollam and Hern. W. was bound to K. in a Recognizance of 400 l. and K. was bound to W. in a Bond of 100 l. W. according to the Custom of London affirmed a Plaint of Debt in the Guild-Hall against K. upon the said Bond of 100 l. and attached the Debt due by himself to W. in his own hands and now K. sued Execution against W. upon the Recognizance and W. brought Audita Querela and it was allowed 1 Leon. 297. Wallpool and King An Obligation for an 100 l. on Condition to pay 50 l. before the 25th of March. The Defendant pleads a Foreign Attachment of the 50 l. the 17th of February in the hands of Watts and a Retorn that it was attach'd but there was no Scire facias till April after Before the day of payment a Creditor of the Plaintiffs scilicet c. attaches the 50 l. and gives Security in the Court according to the Custom to pay the Debt if it be disproved within the year and day The Plaintiff demurs as being no sufficient Attachment being before the Mony was due The custom of London is to attach a Debt before its due contrary to 3 Cro. 184 yet it may not be levied till after the time of payment of the Obligation there is only a seizure and a Cesset Executio till the Mony be due Also the party against whom the Execution is sued is not to give Security but to pay the Mony but the party that sueth the Execution is to give it to return the Mony if the Debt be disproved within a year and a day Also the Judgment had there is pleadable Also per Cur ' its a good Bar for the whole but if it were for part as 20 l. this Record of the Attachment shall be pleaded in Bar for part i. e. pro tanto Siderfus p. 327. 2 Keb. p. 202. Robins and Standard Vide Co. Intr. 142. Ra. Entr. 158. Pleading to the Jurisdiction IN Debt on an Obligation in the Palace-Court averring neither of the parties were of the King's Houshold After Judgment on Non est factum the Defendant assigns for Error that the Plaintiff was the King's Brazier To which the Plaintiff demurred because the Defendant by the Record is estopt to say that but should have taken Issue on the Averment Which the Court agreed as on alledging a Cause infra that was out of the Jurisdiction this must be pleaded and cannot be assigned for Error 3 Keb. 372. Newnan and Rivet Condition to deliver a certain quantity of Tin at a certain place within the Jurisdiction of the Stannary And the Defendant pleaded to the Jurisdiction of the Court that it was a Tin Cause The Charters are to the Cause and shall not be restrained to persons though the Defendant be not alledged in the Plea to be a Tinner It was allowed 1 Rol. Rep. Pinson and Smale Obligations Conditions Recovery pleaded in Bar. THree are bound pro toto in solido the Obligee had Judgment to recover against one of them and afterwards sues an Action against the others this Recovery is not a Bar because no satisfaction of the Duty but Execution is a good Plea 4 H. 7. 8. b. Co. Rep. 6.46 a. Higgin's Case As long as Judgment remains in force a man shall not have an Action on the same Bond for the Debt is changed into a higher nature of Record Cro. El. p. 817. Preston's Case An Action of Debt brought by the Executor on Bond made to the Testator The Defendant pleads that the Testator in vita sua in Curia de Banco hic recuperavit debitum praedict ' cum 40 s. pro misis without alledging the Execution quod quidem Recordum recuperationis was removed per breve d'Error ibid. remanet minimè reversat ' The Plea was good 6 Rep. 44. Higgin's Case Aliter if Recovery be by Debt sur Bond in the Courts per Justices Ibid. And though the Recovery be erroneous yet so long as it remains in force it ought to be executed and when it is Reversed the Obligee is restored unto his new Action upon the said Obligation Ibid. If a man bring Debt upon Bond and he is barred by Judgment so long as the Judgment stands in force he cannot have a new Action So when he hath Judgment in an Action upon the same Bond so long as the Judgment remains in force he shall not have a new Action Ibid. The Defendant pleads the Plaintiff brought another Action upon the same Bond in London to which the Defendant there pleads Non est factum and so found there And upon this Verdict the Entry was That the Defendant should recover Damages against the Plaintiff and the Defendant be without Day but no Judgment that the Plaintiff Nil capiat per Billam And so per Cur ' no Judgment to bar the Plaintiff 1 Brownl p. 81. Levet and Hall Vid. 7 Cro. Jac. p. 284. Debt sur Bond of 600 l. vers K. in Bristol The Defendant pleads a Recovery in B. R. upon the same Bond against the same Defendant per the Plaintiff Et hoc paratus est verificare The Plaintiff Replies Nul tiel Record unde petit Judicium debitum suum praedict ' sibi adjudicari The Defendant Rejoyns Quod habetur tale Record ' prout per Record ' in B. R. apparet Per Cur ' he that will joyn Issue sur Record ought to say Et hoc paratus est verificare prout per Recordum illud vel verificare prout Curia hic consideravit and so are all the Presidents yet in Error Judgment was affirmed for the Defendant in the Writ of Error and that the first Judgment should be affirmed notwithstanding it was prout per Record ' illius plenius liquet Siderfin p. 329. Knight and Pitt Vide 2 Keb. 250 278. Two were joyntly and severally bound In Debt brought the Defendant pleads the Plaintiff recovered against the other the same Debt and had Execution It s a good