Lordships according to the unanimous Advice of all the Iudges of England and his Majesties pleasure signified therein That the First Article propounded viz. You shall do all your pain and diligence to destroy and make to cease all manner of Heresies and Errors commonly called Lollaries within in your Bayliwick from time to time to all your power and assist and be helping to all Ordinaries and Commissioners of the Holy Church and favor and maintain them as oftentimes as you shall be required shall be left out in the Oath to be given to Sir Edward Cook and shall ever hereafter be left out in all Oaths to be given to the High Sheriffs of Counties hereafter And their Lordships do likewise Order according to the unanimous Advice of all the Iudges of England That the other thrée Articles doubted of shall stand in the said Oath to be ministred to the said Sir Edward Cook and to all other High Sheriffs as heretofore hath béen accustomed and that the Lord Keeper do give order to such Officers and Clerks in the Court of Chancery to whom it appertained to make out the Oath for the time to come according to present Order The expectation of a Parliament gave encouragement to the Bishop of Lincoln who yet retained the name of Lord Keeper notwithstanding his Sequestration several moneths before from the presence of the King the Council Table and the custody of the Seal to make an Address to his Majesty for a favorable interpretation of his actions But his carriage towards the Duke at the Parliament at Oxford was fresh in memory where the Bishop told the Duke in Christ-Church upon the Dukes rebuking him for siding against him That he was engaged with William Earl of Pembroke to labor the Redress of the Peoples Grievances and was resolved to stand upon his own Legs If that be your resolution said the Duke Look you stand fast and so they parted and shortly after that he was sequestred though the Seal was not disposed from him till the Thirtieth of October at which time it was given to Sir Thomas Coventry at Hampton-Court who was that day sworn of the Privy Council and sate there and sealed some Writs and afterwards came to the Term at Reading and sate there as Lord Keeper and heard Causes The King being pressed with his own Necessities and the Cry of the Nation against the Fruitless Voyage of Cadiz summoned a Parliament to meet in February and before the time of meeting his Majesty enjoyned the Archbishops and Bishops in both Provinces to proceed against Popish Recusants by Excommunication and other Censures of the Church and not to omit any lawful means of bringing them to Publick Justice especially he recommended to their vigilant care the unmasking and repressing of those who were not professed Papists yet disaffected to the true Religion and kept close their evil and dangerous affection and by secret means and slights did encourage and advance the growth of Popery This Command was seconded by a Proclamation requiring That all Convicted Papists should according to the Laws of this Realm remain confined to their dwelling places or within five miles thereof unless upon special Licences first obtained in Cases necessary Immediately before the Parliament Bishop Laud procured the Duke of Buckingham to sound the King concerning the Cause Books and Tenets of Mr. Richard Montague and understanding by what the Duke collected That the King had determined within himself to leave him to a Tryal in Parliament he said I seem to see a Cloud arising and threatning the Church of England God for his Mercy dissipate it About the same time the King declared his purpose to celebrate the Solemnity of his Coronation on Candlemas-day at the Palace of Westminster and required all persons who by reason of their Offices and Tenures were bound to perform any Duties at the Solemnitie to give their attendance and to be furnished in all respects answerable to an action of so high State according to their places and dignities Wherefore by a Commission under the Great Seal of England Sir Thomas Coventry Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Iames Lord Say High Treasurer of England Edward Earl of Worcester Keeper of the Privy Seal Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey Earl Marshal of England William Earl of Pembroke Lord High Chamberlain Edward Earl of Dorset and Sir Randol Crew Cheif Justice of the Common Pleas were authorised to receive and determine the Claims exhibited by any Person concerning Services to be performed at the approaching Coronation And the more to credit the Solemnity the King resolving to make certain of his Servants and other Subjects in regard of their Birth good Service and other Qualities Knights of the Bath Authorised Thomas Earl of Arundel and Surrey and Earl Marshal of England William Earl of Pembroke Lord Chamberlain to perform in his Majesties Name and behalf all the Rites and Ceremonies belonging thereto At the same time Writs were directed to all Sheriffs in the Realm of England and Dominions of Wales commanding them to make Proclamation That all such as had Forty pounds a year or more of Lands or Revenues in their own hands or the hands of Feoffees for their use for the space of Three years and are not yet Knights do at their perils prepare to present themselves in his Majesties Presence by the One and thirtieth of Ianuary to receive the Order of Knighthood Upon the asswaging of the great Pestilence through the Mercy and Goodness of God in withdrawing and almost removing the Scourge the King by His Royal Authority ordained a Publick and General Thanksgiving to be celebrated upon the Nine and twentieth of Ianuary being the Lords day in the Cities of London and Westminster and the places adjacent and on the Nineteenth of February in all other places of the Kingdom the manner and form whereof was prescribed by a Book composed by the Bishops according to his Majesties special Direction The Contagion ceasing the restraint enjoyned to the Citizens of London from resorting to Fairs for a time was taken off The number of those that died this year within and without the Walls of the City of London and in the Liberties and Nine out Parishes from the Sixteenth of December 24. to the Fifteenth of December 25. Was in Total Fifty four thousand two hundred sixty and five whereof of the Plague Thirty five thousand four hundred and seventeen On Candlemas-day King Charls was Crowned Bishop Laud had the cheif hand in compiling the Form of the Coronation and had the honor to perform this Solemnity instead of the late Lord Keeper Williams who through the Kings disfavor was sequestred from this Service which belonged to his place as he was Dean of Westminster Mr. Iohn Cosens as Master of the Ecclesiastical Ceremonies kneeled behinde the Bishop when the Prayers were read and directed the Quire when to answer The Ceremony in going to and all the
the security of the River wherefore the Regiments then remaining in several of the States Garrison Towns which were reformed out of four Regiments under the Command of Sir Charles Morgan and supposed to consist of two thousand men were designed for this employment But in regard that by the capitulations at the rendring of Stoade these souldiers were first to touch in England before they could engage in War against the Emperour they were appointed to come to Harwitch and to saile thence to Luckâ—â—aâ— under the command of their former General and by reason of the absence of the English Fleet upon the service of Rotchel the States and the Prince of Orange were desired to accommodate them with Ships of convoy in crossing the Seas But a while after the King considering that the six months wherein that Regiment was bound not to serve against the Emperour were near expiring and the Winter approaching which by foul weather and contrary winds might expose both men and Ships to great danger in their crossing the Seas to England and cause unnecessary charge commanded Sir Charles Morgan to forbear to touch at Harwitch but to shape his course by the nearest straightest way from Holland to Luckstat and to stay at the place of imbarquing so many days as with the time which will be taken up in their passage may accomplish the full six months Moreover these Reformed Regiments brought from Stoade being found upon their mustering fourteen hundred the King made a supply of six hundred more by borrowing six or eight men out of every Company serving in the States pay under the conduct of the Lord Vere the season of the year not permitting to rely upon new recruits from England for which he engaged his royal word to the States and the Prince of Orange that for every man they lent him he would send them two as soon as his forces return from Rochel Touching the Horse levied in Germany and intended as was said to be transported into England about the last Session of Parliament the Privy Councel now wrote to Dalbeere upon certain overtures made by the King of Sweden and the Duke of Savoy to receive them into their pay and service that he might dispose of the said Cavalry to those Princes being his Majesties friends and Allies with condition that his Majesty be no further charged with their pay transportation or entertainment in any manner whatsoever After the death of the Duke the King seemed to take none to favour so much as Dr. Laud Bishop of London to whom he sent many gracious messages and also writ unto him with his own hand the which contained much grace and favour and immediately afterwards none became so intimate with his Majesty as the said Bishop BY Orders from the Bishop there were then entred in the Docket Book several Conge D'esliers and Royal assents for Dr. May to be Bishop of Bath and Wells for Doctor Corbet to be Bishop of Oxford and for Samuel Harsenet then Bishop of Norwitch to be Arch-Bishop of York In the University of Oxford Bishop Laud bore the sway The Lord Chancellour VVilliam Earl of Pembrook commiting his power into his hands And this year he framed the Statutes for the reducing and limiting the free Election of Proctors which before as himself said were Factious and Tumultuary to the several Colledges by course The meeting of the Parliament appointed to be the 20. of Octob. was by Proclamation the first day of that moneth Prorogued to the 20. of Ianu. following VVhilst Felton remained a Prisoner at London great was the resort of people to see the man who had committed so bold a murder others came to understand what were the Motives and Inducements thereunto to which the man for the most part answered That he did acknowledge the Fact and condemned himself for the doing thereof Yet withall confessed he had long looked upon the Duke as an evil Instrument in the Common-wealth and that he was convinced thereof by the Remonstrance of Parliament VVhich considerations together with the instigation of the Evil One who is always ready to put sinfull motions into speedy Actions induced him to do that which he did He was a person of a little Stature of a stout and revengeful spirit who having once received an injury from a Gentleman he cut off a piece of his little finger and sent it with a challenge to the Gentleman to fight with him thereby to let him know that he valued not the exposing of his whole body to hazard so he might but have an opportunity to be revenged Afterwards Felton was called before the Councel where he confessed much of what is before mentioned concerning his Inducement to the Murder the Councel much pressed him to confesse who set him on work to do such a bloody act and if the Puritans had no hand therein he denyed they had and so he did to the last that no person whatsoever knew any thing of his intentions or purpose to kill the Duke that he revealed it to none living Dr. Laud Bishop of London being then at the Councel Table told him if he would not confess he must go to the rack Felton replyed if it must be so he could not tell whom he might nominate in the extremity of torture and if what he should say then must go for truth he could not tell whether his Lordship meaning the Bishop of London or which of their Lordships he might name for torture might draw unexpected things from him after this he was asked no more questions but sent back to prison The Council then fell into Debate whether by the Law of the Land they could justifie the putting him to the Rack The King being at Councel said before any such thing be done let the advice or the Judges be had therein whether it be Legal or no and afterwards his Majesty the 13. of Novemb. 4. Car. propounded the question to Sr. Tho. Richardson Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas to be propounded to all the Justices Viz. Felton now a prisoner in the Tower having confessed that he had killed the Duke of Buckingham and said he was induced to this partly for private displeasure and partly by reason of a Remonstrance in Parliament having also read some Books which he said defended that it was lawful to kill an Enemy to the Republique the question therefore is whether by the Law he might not be Racked and whether there were any Law against it for said the King if it might be done by Law he would not use his Prerogative in this Point and having put this Question to the Lord chief Justice the King commanded him to demand the resolution of all the Judges First the Justices of Serjeants Inn in Chancery Lane did meet and agree that the King may not in this case put the party to the Rack And the fourteenth of November all the Justices being assembled at Serjeants Inn in Fleetstreet
called to the Councel-board at Hampton Court about some things which were complained of in reference to the Customs did then and there in an insolent manner in the presence or hearing of the Lords and others of his Majesties Privy Council then sitting in Counsel utter these undutiful seditious and false words That the Merchants are in no part of the World so skrewed and wrung as in England That in Turky they have more incouragement By which words he the said Richard Chambers as the Information setteth forth did endeavor to alienate the good affection of his Majesties Subjects from his Majesty and to bring a slander upon his just Government and therefore the Kings Attorney prayed process against him To this Mr. Chambers made answer That having a Case of silk Grogerams brought from Bristol by a Carrier to London of the value of 400. l. the same were by some inferior Officers attending on the Custome-house seized without this Defendants consent notwithstanding he offered to give security to pay such Customs as should be due by Law and that he hath been otherwise grieved and damnified by the injurious dealing of the under-Officers of the Custome-house and mentioned the particulars wherein and that being called before the Lords of the Council he confesseth that out of the great sence which he had of the injuries done him by the said inferior Officers he did utter these words That the Merchants in England were more wrung and screwed then in forreign Parts Which words were onely spoken in the presence of the Privy-Council and not spoken abroad to stir up any discord among the people and not spoken with any disloyal thought at that time of his Majesties Government but onely intending by these words to introduce his just Complaint against the wrongs and injuries he had sustained by the inferiour Officers and that as soon as he heard a hard construction was given of his words he endeavoured by petition to the Lords of the Council humbly to explain his meaning that he had not the least evil thought as to his Majesties Government yet was not permitted to be heard but presently sent away prisoner to the Marshalsea and when he was there a prisoner he did again endeavour by petition to give satisfaction to the Lords of the Council but they would not be pleased to accept of his faithful explanation which he now makes unto this honourable Court upon his Oath and doth profess from the bottom of his heart That his speeches onely aimed at the abuses of the inferiour Officers who in many things dealt most cruelly with him and other Merchants There were two of the Clerks of the Privy-Council examined as Witnesses to prove the words notwithstanding the Defendant confessed the words in his Answer as aforesaid who proved the words as laid in the Information And on the sixth of May 1629. the Cause came to be heard in the Star-Chamber and the Court were of opinion that the words spoken were a comparing of his Majesties Government with the Government of the Turks intending thereby to make the people believe that his Majesties happy Government may be tearmed Turkish Tyranny and therefore the Court fined the said Mr. Chambers in the sum of 2000 l. to his Majesties use and to stand committed to the prison of the Fleet and to make submission for his great offence both at the Council-board in Court of Star-Chamber and at the Royal Exchange There was a great difference of opinion in the Court about the Fine and because it is a remarkable Case here followeth the names of each several person who gave sentence and the Fine they concluded upon viz. Sir Francis Cottington Chancellour of the Exchequer his opinion was for 500 l. Fine to the King and to acknowledge his offence at the Council-board the Star-Chamber-Bar and Exchange Sir Tho. Richardson Lord chief Justice of the common pleas 500 l. Fine to the King and to desire the Kings favour Sir Nicholas Hide Lord chief Justice of the Kings Bench 500 l. and to desire the Kings favour Sir Iohn Cook Secretary of State 1000 l. Sir Humphry May Chancellour 1500 l. Sir Thomas Edmons 2000 l. Sir Edward Barret 2000 l. Doctor Neal Bishop of Winchester 3000 l. Doctor Laud Bishop of London 3000 l. Lord Carlton principal Secretary of State 3000 l. Lord Chancellour of Scotland 2000 l. Earl of Holland 1500 l. Earl of Doncaster 1500 l. Earl of Salisbury 1500 l. Earl of Dorset 3000 l. Earl of Suffolk 3000 l. Earl of Mountgomery Lord Chamberlain 1500 l. Earl of Arundel Lord High Marshal 3000 l. Lord Montague Lord Privy Seal 3000 l. Lord Connoway 2000 l. Lord Weston Lord Treasurer 3000 l. Lord Coventry Lord Keeper of the Great Seal 1500 l. So the fine was setled to 2000 l. And all except the two Chief Justices concurred for a submission also to be made And accordingly the copy of the submission was sent to the Warden of the Fleet from Mr. Atturny General to shew the said Richard Chambers to perform and acknowledg it and was as followeth I Richard Chambers of London Merchant do humby acknowledge that whereas upon an Information exhibited against me by the Kings Atturney General I was in Easter Term last sentenced by the Honourable Court of Star-Chamber for that in September last 1628. being convented before the Lords and others of his Majesties most Honourable Privy-Council Board upon some speeches then used concerning the Merchants of this Kingdom and his Majesties well and gracious usage of them did then and there in insolent contemptuous and seditious manner falsly and maliciously say and affirm That they meaning the Merchants are in no parts of the world so skrewed and wrung as in England and that in Turky they have more incouragement And whereas by the sentence of that Honorable Court I was adjudged among other punishments justly imposed upon me to make my humble acknowledgment and submission of this great offence at this Honorable Board before I should be delivered out of the Prison of the Fleet whereto I was then committed as by the said Decree and Sentence of that Court among other things it doth and may appear Now I the said Richard Chambers in obedience to the Sentence of the said Honorable Court do humbly confess and acknowledg the speaking of these words aforesaid for the which I was so charged and am heartily sorry for the same and do humbly beseech your Lordships all to be Honorable intercessors for me to his Majesty that he would be graciously pleased to pardon that graet error and fault so committed by me When Mr. Chambers read this draught of submission he thus subscribed the same All the abovesaid Contents and Submission I Richard Chambers do utterly abhor and detest as most unjust and false and never to death will acknowledge any part thereof Rich. Chambers Also he under-writ these Texts of Scripture to the said Submission before he returned it That make a man an offender
the Land had little effect in their execution to the increase of Murders Robberies Perjuries and Insecurities of all men living to the loss of their Lands and Goods to the great displeasure of Almighty GOD It was ordained for Reformation of the Premises by Authority of the said Parliament That the Chancellour and Treasurer of England for the time being and the Keeper of the Privy-Seal of the Lord the King or two of them calling to them one Bishop one Lord temporal of the most honourable Council of the Lord the King and two chief Justices of the Kings Bench and Common pleas for the time being or two other Justices in their absence by Bill or Information exhibited to the Chancellour for the King or any other against any person for any other ill behaviours aforesaid have Authority of calling before them by Writ or Privie-Seal such Malefactors and of examining them and others by their discretion and of punishing such as they finde defective therein according to their demerits according to the form and effect of the Statutes thereof made in the same manner and form as they might and ought to be punished if they were thereof convinced according to the due course of Law And by a certain other Act in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the eighth held in the one and twentieth year of his reign reciting the offences in the aforesaid Statute of the said late King Henry the seventh beforementioned by Authority of the said Parliament it was and is ordained and enacted That henceforward the Chancellour Treasurer of England and the President of the most honourable Privy-Council of the King attending his most honourable person for the time being and the Lord Keeper of the Privy-Seal of the Lord the King or two of them calling to them one Bishop and one temporal Lord of the most honourable Council of the Lord the King and two chief Justices of the Kings Bench and Common Pleas for the time being or two Justices in their absence by any Bill or Information then after to be exhibited to the Chancellour of England the Treasurer the President of the said most honourable Council of the Lord the King or the Keeper of the Privy-Seal of the Lord the King for the time being for any misdemeanour in the aforesaid Statute of King Henry the seventh aforesaid before recited from henceforth have full power and authority of calling before them by Writ or by Privy-Seal such Malefactors of examining of them and others by their discretion and of punishing those that are found defective according to their demerits According to the form and effect of the said Statute of the aforesaid Lord King Henry the seventh and of all other Statutes thereupon made not revoked and expired in the same manner and form as they might and ought be punished if they were convicted according to the due order of the Laws of the said Lord the king And by the aforesaid Writ under the foot of the great Seal it manifesty appears that the said Fine was imposed by the Lord the king and his Council and not by the Legal Peers of the said Richard Chambers nor by the Law of the Land nor according to the manner of the pretended offence of the said Richard Chambers nor saving unto him his Merchandize nor for any offence mentioned in the said Statutes all and singular the which the said Richard Chambers is ready to verifie to the Court c. and demands judgment and that he be discharge of the said 2000 l. against the said Lord the now King and that as to the premises he may be dismissed from this Court Waterhouse With this Plea he annexed a Petition to the Lord Chief Baron and also to every one of the Barons humbly desiting the filing of the Plea with other Reasons in the manner of a motion at the Bar because he said Counsel would not move plead nor set hand to it as further appeareth The Copy of the Order upon Mr. Atturneys motion in the Exchequer the 17 Iuly 1629. after the Plea put in and order to file it Per the Lord Chief Baron TOuching the Plea put into this Court by Richard Chambers to discharge himself of a â—ine of 2000 l. set on him in the Star-Chamber Forasmuch as Sir Robert Heath Kniâ—â—â— his Majesties Atturney General informed this Court that the said Chambers in his said Plea recites divers Statutes and Magna Charta and what offences are punishable in the Star-Chamber and how the proceedings ought to be and upon the whole matter concludes That the said fine was imposed by the King and his Council and not by a Legal judgment of his Peers nor by the Laws of the Land nor according to the manner of his offence nor saving his Merchandize nor for any offence mentioned in the said Statutes Which Plea Mr. Atturny conceiving to be very frivolous and insufficient and derogatory to the honour and jurisdiction of the Court of Star-Chamber Humbly prayeth might not be allowed of nor filed It is therefore this day ordered That the said Plea shall be read on Saturday next and then upon hearing the Kings Counsel and the Counsel of the said Richard Chambers this Court will-declare their further order therein and in the mean time the said Plea is not to be filed nor delivered out In Michaelmas Term following Mr. Chambers was brought by a Habeas Corpus out of the Fleet and the Warden did return THat he was committed to the Fleet by vertue of a Decree in the Star-Chamber by reason of certain words he used at the Council Table viz. That the Merchants of England were skrewed up here in England more then in Turky And for these and other words of defamation of the Government he was censured to be committed to the Fleet and to be there imprisoned until he made his submission at the Council Table and to pay a fine of 2000. l. And now at the Bar he prayed to be delivered because this Sentence is not warranted by any Law or Statute For the Statute of 3 Henrici 7. which is the foundation of the Court of Star-Chamber doth not give them any authority to punish for words only But all the Court informed him That the Court of Star-Chamber was not erected by the Statute of 3 H. 7. but was a Court many years before and one of the most high and honourable Courts of Justice and to deliver one who was committed by the Decree of one of the Courts of Justice was not the usage of this Court and therefore he was remanded As a concurrant proof of these Proceedings concerning Mr. Chambers we shall insert here a Petition of his though out of time to the Long Parliament and afterwards renewed to the succeeding Parliament viz. To the Parliament of the Commonwealth of England Scotland and Ireland The brief Remonstrance and humble Petition of Richard Chambers Merchant late Alderman and Sheriff of the City of
Edward 4.6 or by Bill and an Act of Parliament to attaint the Party An Order was made in the Upper-House of Parliament 21 Iac. That any Peer shall have Counsel in case Criminal or Capital and upon the Accusation of the Earl of Bristol in Parliament he made a motion for Counsel which matter was commended to the King by the Lords with voucher of the said former Order The King returned Answer that this was contrary to the Fundamental Laws of the Realm but inasmuch as it was for his Benefit and Prerogative with which he may dispence therefore out of his grace he would allow the Earl of Bristol to have his Counsel with protestation that he would advise in the general and the same Order was made without his privity and without hearing the Justices or his Counsel And upon the Trial of the Lord Middlesex in a Case Criminal and not Capital afterward that is to say Friday after upon the assembly of all the Justices the Attorney of the King by commandment of the King demanded their opinion and they with one voice agreed That where the Trial is upon Indictment no Counsel in Fellony or Treason is to be allowed unless a matter of Law happen or upon the Indictment or upon Plea of the Defendant or upoâ— Evidence and in such Cases the Prisoner may have Counsel but not otherwise The Lords by Order referred to the Justices this Question Whether the King may be a Witness in case of Treason Secondly Admit that this be for Treason done when he is privy Whether in this case he may be a Witness or not and before the Resolution this Message and Command came from the King to the Justices that in this general Question they do not deliver any opinion but if any point come in particular they upon mature deliberation may give their advice And this was declared by the Cheif Justice in the Upper House of Parliament and the said Matter surceased Sitting this Parliament the Duke of Buckingham was deputed Procurator by several Peers whose Votes on any occasion he had power to make use of viz. By the Earls of Bath Exeter Cumberland Northumberland Lord Teinham Colchester Tunbridge Evers Darcy Meynel Noel St. John of Basing Mansfield and Roberts Whereupon the House of Peers made an Order That after this Session no Lord of this House shall be capable of receiving above two Proxies nor more to be numbred in any Cause voted About a fortnight after the Charge was given in against the Earl of Bristol the Earl gave in his Answer which we have chosen to insert here for the Readers more conveniency though a little out of time And having the Answer in his hand ready to deliver to their Lordships he did crave leave that by way of Introduction he might speak a few words and began thus I Am not insensible upon what disadvantages I come to tryal in this Cause For first I am faln into this Majesties heavy displeasure and am to encounter with a potent Adversary highly in favor and am accused for Treason for which all Counsel and Friends abandon me as a man infected with the Plague I am become bound and under restraint whereas a man who is to encounter for his life and honor and with a strong Adversary had need to come upon equal terms But as to the Matter I finde my self charged with divers Articles of High Treason but looking into them with the eyes of my best understanding with the opinion also of my Council lately assigned me and taking them apart one Article from another I finde not any thing in them like Treason or that hath so much as the shew or countenance of a fault either in act or words onely by laying all things together and by wresting the wrests with a strained Construction directly contrary to the true sence and meaning of them and the occasion whereupon they were spoken it is informed and that by way of inference onely That the intent was evil and the matter to prove the intent to be evil depends upon two props viz. Ill affection to Religion and too much affection to Spain which if I shall clear the Inference grounded upon these props will fall of it self Therefore I crave leave of your Lordships before I give my Answer to the Charge that I may give you an account of these two particulars and I humbly beseech you that what I shall speak in my just defence may not be conceived to proceed of vain ostentation And first for Religion I was in my Childhood bred in the Protestant Religion and rather after the stricter manner then otherwise When I grew in years fit I travelled into France Italy and Rome it self In all which Travels I can produce some that I consorted withal who will witness with me that I ever constantly used the Religion I professed without the least prevarication no man being able to charge me that so much as out of curiosity I ever was present at any of the exercises belonging to the Roman Religion or did the least act of Conformity to any of their Rites or Ceremonies Secondly After my return home I was received into the service of his late Majesty of Blessed Memory whom I served some years as a Gentleman of his Privy Chamber and Carver in which time none of his Majesties Servants received the Holy Sacrament frequented Sermons and other exercises of our Religion more then I. Thirdly In that time of my youth not to avoid idleness but out of affection to Religion I translated that excellent Book of our Faith and great Points of our Religion Written by Monsieur Moulins which his late Majesty having sometimes after seen approved so well that he would needs have it Printed which accordingly was Printed in the name of Mr. Sampford my Chaplain to whom I gave the honor But it was my own act as Mr. Sampford will not deny though to this hour I had never before spoken of it Fourthly About Seven or eight and twenty years of my age I was employed Ambassador into Spain in that great business of the Treaty of the Marriage and whereas others before me carried with them but one Chaplain I had two viz. Mr. Sampford and Mr. Boswel and at my arival at the Court of Spain I caused it to be published that such a day God willing I purposed to have a Communion to the end that such English as were in the Town might resort thither Whereat the Duke De Lerma and other the great Ministers of Spain took offence and told me they might well perceive I brought no good affection to the business I came about that would so publickly and avowedly in that Court where never the like was done proclaim there a Communion and with high expression perswaded me to decline it Whereunto I answered I came to do my Master service which I would heartily and effectually endeavor but would not omit my service to God no though my Master commanded And at
likewise besides his Charge That he brake off ambiguously and abruptly with a Sentence of Cicero as if something else might be which was not yet discovered Sir Iohn Elliot thanked the Vice-Chamberlain for dealing so plainly with him and giving him occasion to clear himself And to the particular charged against him he answered First considering the Dukes plurality of great and different Offices together with his deceit and fraud in perswading the Merchants to go to Diep there to entrap them in colouring the Designs to the King which he had plotted to serve against those of his Religion in abusing the Parliament at Oxford and disguising his purpose as if the ships were to go to Rochel These particulars being so various and of such a nature he called by the name of Stellionatus from a beast discoloured uncertain and doubtfull that they knew not by what name to call it or by what colour to describe it and these he called a Character of the minde because they lie in the heart and were deceits to abuse the King and Parliament Secondly as to his saying He knew not the ships were come he answered he did not know it then and as yet he knew it not though it was true that he had heard it Thirdly he denied not that speaking of the Duke he sometimes used this word that man though at other times he was not wanting to give him his due titles and said That the Latines speaking of Caesar call him Ille Caesar and that the same is usual in all Languages nor did he think the Duke to be a God Fourthly he conâ—â—ssed That he paralleled him with the Bishop of Ely and Sejanus and though there were many particular censures of that Bishop yet he produced none but such as were within the compass of his Charge nor did he apply the Veneries and Venefices of Sejanus to the Duke but excluded them Lastly touching the Physick of the King he said he brake off so abruptly in aggravation of the Dukes offence who not content with the injury of Justice the wrong of Honor the prejudice of the State nor that of the Revenue his attempts go higher even to the person of the King making on that his practice in such a manner to such an effect that he said he feared to speak nay he doubted to think in which regard he left it as Cicero did another thing Ne gravioribus c. It was then resolved on the Question That Sir Iohn Elliot hath not exceeded the Commission given him in any thing that passed from him in the late Conference with the Lords The like for Sir Dudley Diggs both passed without a Negative the like Vote did pass for Mr Selden Mr Herbert Mr Glanvile Mr Sherland Mr Pym and Mr Wandesford who were also managers at that Conference The King in the time of this Parliament had committed the Earl of Arundel to the Tower but the cause of his Commitment was not expressed yet it was conceived to be about the Marriage of the Lord Maltravers the Earls eldest son to the young Duke of Lenox his sister which was brought about by the contrivance of the Countess of Arundel and the old Dutchess of Lenox The Lords were highly discontented at his commitment in time of Parliament concerning whose Liberties and their own Priviledges they had presented several Petitions to his Majesty but receiving no satisfactory answer thereto agreed on this ensuing Petition occasioned by the release of Sir Dudley Diggs May it please your Majesty THe cause that moves us now to attend your Majesty as at first we did is because we observe that the House of Commons have speedily received a Member of theirs who was committed We the Peers ambitious to deserve of your Majesty and to appear to the eye of the world as much respected in our Rights and Priviledges as any Peers or Commons have ever been acknowledging you a King of as much goodness as ever King was do now humbly beseech that the Earl of Arundel a Member of our House may be restored to us it so much concerning us in point of Priviledge that we all suffer in what he suffers in this Restraint In March last when the Earl of Arundel was committed the House of Lords purposed to take the same into their considerations and so to proceed therein as to give no just cause of offence to his Majesty and yet preserve the Priviledges of Parliament The Lord Keeper of the Great-Seal thereupon signified unto the House that he was commanded to deliver this Message from his Majesty unto their Lordships viz. That the Earl of Arundel was restrained for a misdemeanor which was personal to his Majesty and lay in the proper knowledge of his Majesty and had no relation to matters of Parliament Whereupon the House was put into a Committee and being resumed The Lords Committees for Priviledges c. were appointed to search for Presidents Concerning the commitment of a Peer of this Realm during the time of Parliament and the Lord Chief Justice Mr Justice Doderidge and Mr Justice Yelverton were appointed to attend their Lordships in that behalf The day following the Lord Teasurer delivered another Message from the King in haec verba WHereas upon a Motion made by one of your Lordships the Lord Keeper did yesterday deliver a Message from his Majesty that the Earl of Arundel was restrained for a misdemeanor which was personal to Majesty and lay in the proper knowledge of his Majesty and had no relation to matters of Parliament His Majesty hath now commanded him to signifie to your Lordships that he doth avow the Message in sort as it was delivered to have been done punctually according to his Majesties own Direction and he knoweth that he hath therein done justly and not diminished the Priviledges of that House And because the Committee appointed yesterday to search for Presidents c. had not yet made any Report to the House therefore the directions for this business were suspended for that time Not long after the Earl of Hertford made report to the House That the Lords Committees for Priviledges met on Monday last The first Question that arose amongst them was Whether those Proxies were of any validity which are deputed to any Peer who sitteth not himself in Parliament And it was conceived that those Votes were lost Whereupon the Committee found this House to be deprived of five suffrages by the absence of the Earl of Arundel unto whom they were intrusted And the Committee finding by the Journal Book that the Sub-Committee which was appointed to â—earch Presidents for Priviledges concerning the Commitment of a Peer in the time of Parliament had not yet made report to the House and then considering together their Notes of Presidents whereof they had made search found That no one Peer had been committed the Parliament fitting without trial of Judgement of the Peers in Parliament and that one only President of the Bishop of Winchester
Judgment and Execution of such Offenders as in time of War and some were executed by those Commissions Nevertheless the Soldiers brake out into great disorders they mastered the people disturbed the peace of Families and the Civil Government of the Land there were frequent Robberies Burglaries Rapes Rapines Murthers and Barbarous Cruelties Unto some places they were sent for a punishment and where ever they came there was a general outcry The High-ways were dangerous and the Markets unfrequented they were a terror to all and an undoing to many Divers Lords of the Council were appointed to repair into their several Countreys for the advancement of the Loan and were ordered to carry a List of the names as well of the Nobility and Privy Counsellors as of the Judges and Serjeants at Law that had subscribed to lend or sent in money for the Publick service to be a Patern and leading Example to the whole Nation But Sir Randolph Crew shewing no zeal for the advancing thereof was then removed from his place of Lord Chief Justice and Sir Nicholas Hide succeeded in his room A person who for his parts and abilities was thought worthy of that preferment yet nevertheless came to the same with a prejudice coming in the place of one so well beloved and so suddenly removed but more especially by reason the Duke appeared in his advancement to express a grateful Acknowledgment to that Knight for the care and pains he took in drawing the Dukes Answer to the Impeachment in Parliament against him This business of the Loan occasioned a Complaint to the Lords of the Council against the Bishop of Lincoln for publickly speaking words concerning it which was conceived to be against the King and Government Whereupon Sir Iohn Lamb and Dr. Sibthorpe informed the Council to this purpose That many were grieved to see the Bishop of Lincoln give place to unconformable Ministers when he turned his back to those that were conformable and how the Puritans ruled all with him and that divers Puritans in Leicestershire being Convented his Lordship would not admit proceedings to be had against them That Dr. Sibthorpe being desired to stay at Leicester this year as Commissary for the High Commission there the Countrey being much over-spread with Puritanism Sir Iohn Lamb and the said Doctor did inform the Bishop of Lincoln then at Bugden what Factious Puritans there were in the County who would not come up to the Table to receive the Communion kneeling and that there were unlawful Fasts and Meetings kept in the County and one Fast that held from nine in the Forenoon till eight at night and that Collections for moneys were made without Authority upon pretence for the Palatinate And therefore they desired leave from the Bishop to proceed against those Puritans Ex Officio The said Bishop replied He would not meddle against the Puritans for his part he expected not another Bishoprick they might complain of them if they would to the Council Table for he was under a Cloud already and he had the Duke of Buckingham for his Enemy and he would not draw the Puritans upon him for he was sure they would carry all things at last Besides he said the King in the First year of his Reign had given Answer to a Petition of the Lower House in favor of the Puritans It appeared also by the Information of others who were present at the Conference at Bugden That Sir Iohn Lamb and Dr. Sibthorpe did notwithstanding the Bishops aversness again press the Bishop to proceed against the Puritans in Leicestershire the Bishop then asked them what manner of people they were and of what condition For his part he knew of none To which Sir Iohn Lamb replied Dr. Sibthorpe being present That they seem to the World to be such as would not Swear Whore nor Drink but yet would Lie Cozen and Deceive That they would frequently hear two Sermons a day and repeat the same again too and afterwards pray and sometimes fast all day long Then the Bishop asked whether those places where those Puritans were did lend money freely upon the Collection of the Loan To which Sir Iohn Lamb and Dr. Sibthorpe replied That they did generally resolve to lend freely Then said the Bishop no man of discretion can say That that place is a place of Puritans For my part said the Bishop I am not satisfied to give way to proceedings against them At which Dr. Sibthorpe was much discontented and said He was troubled to see that the Church was no better regarded These Informations being transmitted to the Council Table were ordered to be sealed up and committed to the Custody of Mr. Trumbal one of the Clerks of the Council nevertheless the Bishop of Lincoln used such means as he got a Copy of them For which and some other matters an Information was afterwards preferred against him in the Star-Chamber Of which more at large when we come in our next Volume to treat of the great and high proceedings of that Court. Bishop Laud not long before this Passage with the Bishop of Lincoln was informed That the Bishop of Lincoln endeavored to be reconciled to the Duke and that night that he was so informed he dreamed That the Bishop of Lincoln came with Iron Chains but returned freed from them That he leaped upon a Horse departed and he could not overtake him The Interpretation of this Dream may not unfitly be thus applied His Chains might signifie the imprisonment of the Bishop of Lincoln afterwards in the Tower his returning free to his being set at Liberty again at the meeting of the Parliament his leaping on Hors-back and departing to his going into Wales and there commanding a Troop in the Parliaments Service and that Bishop Laud could not overtake him might portend that himself should become a Prisoner in the same place and be rendred thereby incapable to follow much less to overtake him At this time the King had Six thousand Foot Soldiers in the Service of the United Provinces under the Command of Sir Charls Morgan Sir Edward Herbert Sir Iohn Burlacy Sir Iames Leviston c. for the assistance of the States against the increasing power of Spinola Upon the present occasion these Forces were called off from the States services to joyn with the King of Denmark under the Command of Sir Charls Morgan against the common enemy the King of Spain and his adherents Some few moneths after One thousand three hundred foot more were embarqued at Hull to be transported by Captain Conisby to the Town of Stoad in Germany and there to be delivered over to the charge of the aforesaid Sir Charls Morgan General of the English Forces in the service of the King of Denmark a person of known Valor and fit for conduct of an Army But the Assessment of the general Loan did not pass currantly with the people for divers persons refused to subscribe their names
by the Books of our Laws that Liberty is a thing so favored of the Law that the Law will not suffer the continuance of a man in prison for any longer time then of necessity it must And therefore the Law will neither suffer the Party Sheriffs or Judges to continue a man in prison by their power and pleasure It doth speak of the delivery of a man out of prison with as reasonable expedition as may be And upon this reason it hath been resolved that howsoever the Law alloweth that there may be a Term between the Teste of an Original Writ and the Return of the same where there is only a Summons and no Imprisonment of the body yet the Law will not allow that there should be a Term between the Teste of a Writ of Capias and the Return of the same where the body of a man is to be imprison'd insomuch that it will give no way that the party shall have power to continue the body of a man longer time in prison then needs must so tender is the Law of the Subjects Liberty Monday the 27. of November the Attorney-General argued for the King That this was a very great Cause and hath raised great expectation and he was afraid that those Gentlemen whom it concerns have rather advised their Councils then their Councils them For the first Exception That the Return is not positive but hath relation to some others He did conceive it was positive enough For said he the words are Quod detentus est sub custodia mea per speciale mandatum Domini Regis The other words mihi significatum they follow after but are not part of the affirmation made before it And if they will have it as they seem to understand it then they must return the words thus Quod significatum est mihi per Dominos Privati Consilii quod detentus est per speciale mandatum Domini Regis And then it had not been their own proper Return but the signification of another the Lords of the Council The turning of the sentence would resolve this point the thing it self must speak for it self It is clear it is a positive Return that the detaining is by the command of the King and the rest of the Return is rather satisfaction to the Court then any part of the Return And for the other Exception That the Cause of the Cause is returned and not the Cause it self He said Among the Logicians there are two Causes there is Causa causans and Causa causata The Causa causans here in this Case is not the Warrant from the Lords of the Council for that is Causa causata But the primary and original Cause which is Causa causans is Speciale mandatum Domini Regis the other is but the Councils signification or testification or Warrant for him that made the Return And for the other Exception The Cause is imperfect because it shews only the Cause of detaining in Prison and not the Cause of the first Commitment He conceives it is sufficient for an Officer of the Law to answer That the Writ is a Command to make a Return of the detaining of the Prisoner and he accordingly makes a Return of the Detention and if the Keeper of the Prison had only said they were detained per speciale mandatum c. it had been good Then he proceeded to the matter of the Return and to answer the Book-Cases and Records that had been cited by the Council for the Prisoners and to produce Presidents on the Kings behalf which are extant in Print to which the Reader is referred Afterwards Sir Nicholas Hide Chief Justice Justice Dodderidge Justice Iones and Justice Whitlock being upon the Bench and Sir Iohn Heveningham and the forementioned Prisoners being brought to the Bar Sir Nicholas Hide Lord Chief Justice by the consent and direction of the Judges spake to this purpose That the Court hath seriously considered what hath been spoken by either side and are grown to a resolution And that his Brothers have enjoined him to deliver unto you the resolution of the whole Court And therefore said he though it be delivered by my mouth it is the resolution of us all I am sure you expect Justice from hence and God forbid we should sit here but to do Justice to all men according to our best skill and knowledge as it is our oaths and duties so to do But this is a Case of very great weight and great expectation and requires more solemn Arguments then the time will now permit The Exceptions which have been taken to this Return are two the one for the form the other for the substance First for the form because it is not returned as they say positively and absolutely but with reference to a Warrant of the Lords of the Council Now the Court is of opinion That this is a positive and absolute Return upon this reason That the Keeper of the Prison first returns that they are detained by the special command of the King And if they had ceased there it had been positive And for that which follows That it was signified to him by the Lords of the Council this is only to certifie the Court that he returned the Cause truly and not to shew us that he had no knowledge of the Cause but by the signification of the Lords of the Council There is not one word in the Writ that demands the cause why they were taken but why they are detained So that that point in the Writ is sufficiently answered which was only to certifie the cause of the detention And therefore we resolve That the form of this Return is good The next thing is the main point in Law Whether the substance or matter of the Return be good or no Where in the substance is this He doth certifie that they are detained in Prison by the special command of the King And whether this be good in Law or no is the Question Here the Lord Chief Justice did mention the several Presidents and Book-Cases cited by each side too long to be here related And concluded That that which is now to be judged by us is this Whether one that is committed by the Kings authority and no Cause shewn of his Commitment according as here it is upon this Return whether we ought to deliver him by Bail or to remand him back again Where by the way you must know that we can take notice only of this Return That when the Case appears to us no otherwise then by the Return we are not bound to examine the truth thereof but the sufficiencie of the Return We cannot judge upon rumors or reports but upon that which is before us on Record which is examinable by us whether it be sufficient or not Mr. Attorney hath told you That the King hath done it And we trust him in great matters And we make no doubt but the King if you seek to him knowing the cause why you
the Judges justly refused it but if the Judges did intend it we sit not here said he to answer the trust we are sent for if we present not this matter to his Majesty Let this business be further searched into and see how this Judgement lies against us and what the Judges do say concerning the same Sir Edw. Cook proceeded and said This Draught of the Judgement will sting us quia nulla causa fuit ostenta being committed by command of the King therefore he must not be bailed What is this but to declare upon Record that any Subject committed by such absolute command may be detained in Prison for ever What doth this tend to but the utter subversion of the choise Liberty and Right belonging to every free-born Subject of this Kingdom I fear were it not for this Parliament that followed so close after that form of Judgement was drawn up there would have been hard putting to have had it entred But a Parliament brings Judges Officers and all men in good order The Commons afterwards upon further debates of this matter desired that the Judges of the Kings-Bench might declare themselves concerning this business which was done accordingly and though it be a little out of time yet for coherence sake we bring it in here Judge Whitlock spake thus My Lords We are by your appointment here ready to clear any Aspersion of the House of Commons in their late presentment upon the Kings-Bench that the Subject was wounded in the Judgement there lately given If such a thing were My Lords your Lordships not they have the power to question and judge the same But My Lords I say there was no Judgement given whereby either the Prerogative might be enlarged or the Right of the Subject trenched upon It is true my Lords in Mich Tearm last four Gentlemen Petitioned for a Habeas Corpus which they obtained and Counsel was assigned unto them the Return was per speciale mandatum Domini Regis which likewise was made known to us under the Hands of Eighteen Privy-Councellors Now my Lords if we had delivered them presently upon this it must have been because the King did not shew cause wherein we should have judged the King had done wrong and this is beyond our knowledge for he might have committed them for other matters then we could have imagined but they might say thus they might have been kept in Prison all their dayes I answer no but we did remit them that we might better advise of the matter and they the next day might have had a a new Writ if they had pleased But they say we ought not to have denied bail I answer if we had done so it must needs have reflected upon the King that he had unjustly imprisoned theâ— And it appears in Dyer 2 Eliz. that divers Gentlemen being commâ—â—â—d and requiring Habeas Corpus some were bailed others remitted whereby it appears much is left to the discretion of the Judges For that which troubleth so much remittitur quousque This my Lords was onely as I said before to take time what to do and whereas they will have a difference between remittitur remittitur quousque My Lords I confess I can finde none but these are new inventions to trouble old Records And herein my Lords we have dealt with knowledge and understanding for had we given a Judgement the party must thereupon have rested every Judgement must come to an issue in matter in fact or demur in point of Law here is neither therefore no Judgement For endeavoring to have a Judgement entred it is true Mr Attorney pressed the same for his Majesties Servies But we having sworn to do right between his Majesty and his Subjects commanded the Clerk to make no Entry but according to the old form and the Rule was given by the Chief Justice alone I have spent my time in this Court and I speak confidently I did never see nor know by any Record that upon such a Return as this a man was bailed the King not first consulted with in such a Case as this The Commons House do not know what Letters and Commands we receive for these remain in our Court and are not viewed by them For the rest of the matters presented by the House of Commons they were not in agitation before us whether the King may commit and how long he may detain a man committed Therefore having answered so much as concerneth us I desire your Lorships good Construction of what hath been said Judge Doderidge concerning the same Subject said It is no more fit for a Judge to decline to give an accompt of his doings then for a Christian of his Faith God knoweth I have endeavored alwayes to keep a good Conscience for a troubled one who can bear The Kingdom holds of none but God and Judgements do not pass privately in Chambers but publickly in Courts where every one may hear which causeth Judgement to be given with maturity Your Lordships have heard the Particulars given by my brother how that Counsel being assigned to those four Gentlemen in the latter end of Mich. Term their Cause received hearing and upon consideration of the Statutes and Records we found some of them to be according to the good old Law of Magna Charta but we thought that they did not come so close to this Case as that bail should be thereupon presently granted My Lords the Habeas Corpus consisteth of three parts The Writ the Return upon the Writ or Schedule and the Entry or Rule reciting the Habeas Corpus and the Return together with the opinion of the Court either a remittitur or a traditur in Ballium In this Case a remittitur was granted which we did that we might take better advisement upon the Case and upon the remittitur My Lords they might have had a new Writ the next day and I wish they had because it may be they had seen more and we had been eased of a great labour And my Lords when the Attorney upon the Remittitur pressed an Entry we all straitly charged the Clerk that he should make no other Entry then such as our Predecessors had usually made in like Cases For the difference between Remittitur and Remittitur quousque I could never yet finde any I have now sate in this Court 15 years and I should know something surely if I had gone in a Mill so long dust would cleave to my clothes I am old and have one foot in the Grave therefore I will look to the better part as near as I can But Omina habere in memoria in nullo errare Divinum potius est quà m humà num The Lord Chief Justice Hide and Justice Iones delivered their opinions much to the same purpose The House proceeded in further debate of the Liberty of the Subject Mr Hackwel resumes the Debate of the matter concerning the Habeas Corpus The late Judgement said he which lies in Bar is
onely an Award and no Judgement and in the L. Chief Justice his Argument there was no word spoken that the King might commit or detain without cause For the King to commit a man is indignum Regi Mercy and Honor flow immediately from the King Judgement and Justice are his too but they flow from his Ministers the Sword is carried before him but the Scepter in his hands These are true Emblems of a good King The Law admits not the King power of detaining in Prison at pleasure In antient times Prisons were but pro custodia carceres non ad poenam sed ad custodiam Admit the King may commit a man yet to detain him as long as he pleaseth is dangerous and then a man shall be punished before his offence Imprisonment is a Maceration of the body and horror to the minde it is vita pejor morte Mr Selden last of all produced the Statutes Presidents and Book-Cases which were expresseâ— in point to the Question in hand and the House commanded that Case in the Lord Chief Justice Andersons Book all of his own hand-writing to be openly read And for the Presidentâ— cited by the Kings Council in 34 years of the Queen as the Opinion of all the Judges certainly there was a great mistake in it and the mistake was the greater when it passed as currant by the Judges of the Kings-Bench in the last Case of the Habeas Corpus And that the truth of the Opinion may clearly appear let us read the words out of the Lord Chief Justice Andersons Report out of the Book written with his own hand which will contradict all those Apocrypha Reports that go upon the Case The words of the Report were these Divers persons fueront committes a several temps a several prysons sur pleasure sans bon cause parte de queux estiant amesnes en banck le Roy. Et parte en le Commune banck fuerunt accordant a le ley de la terre mise a large discharge de le imprisonment pur que aucunt grands fueront offendus procure un commandment a les Iudges que ils ne fera ainsi apres Ceo nient meins les Iudges ne surcease mes per advise enter eux ils fesoint certain Articles le tenour de queux ensus deliver eux al seignieurs Chancelor Treasurer eux subscribe avec touts lour mainies les Articles sont come erisnoint We her Majesties Iustices of both Benches and Barons of the Exchequer desire your Lordships that by some good means some order may be taken that her Highness Subjects may not be committed or detained in prison by commandment of any Noble man or Councellor against the Laws of the Realm either else to help us to have access to her Majesty to the end to become Suitors to her for the same for divers have been imprisoned for suing ordinary Actions and Suits at the Common-Law until they have been constrained to leave the same against their wills and put the same to order albeit Iudgement and Execution have been had therein to their great losses and griefs for the aid of which persons her Majesties Writs have sundry times been directed to sundry persons having the Custody of such persons unlawfully imprisoned upon which Writs no good or lawfull cause of imprisonment hath been returned or certified Whereupon according to the Laws they have been discharged of their imprisonment some of which persons so delivered have been again committed to prison in secret places and not to any common or ordinary Prison or lawfull Officer or Sheriff or other lawfully authorized to have or keep a Goal So that upon complaint made for their delivery the Queens Courts cannot tell to whom to direct her Majesties Writs and by this means Iustice cannot be done And moreover divers Officers and Serjeants of London have been many times committed to Prison for lawfull executing of her Majesties Writs sued forth of her Majesties Court at Westminster and thereby her Majesties Subjects and Officers are so terrified that they dare not sue or execute her Majesties Laws her Writs and Commandments Divers others have been sent for by Pursevants and brought to London from their dwellings and by unlawfull imprisonment have been constrained not only to withdraw their lawfull suits but have been also compelled to pay the Pursevants so bringing such persons great sums of money All which upon complaint the Iudges are bound by Office and Oath to relieve and help by and according to her Majesties Laws And where it pleaseth your Lordships to will divers of us to set down in what Cases a Prisoner sent to custody by her Majesty or her Councel are to be detained in Prison and not to be delivered by her Majesties Court or Iudges We think that if any person be committed by her Majesties command from her person or by order from the Council board and if any one or two of her Council commit one for high Treason such persons so in the Cases before committed may not be delivered by any of her Courts without due Trial by the Law and Iudgement of acquittal had Nevertheless the Iudges may award the Queens Writ to bring the bodies of such Prisoners before them and if upon return thereof the causes of their commitment be certified to the Iudges as it ought to be then the Iudges in the Cases before ought not to deliver him but to remand the Prisoner to the place from whence he came which cannot conveniently be done unless notice of the cause in general or else in special be given to the Keeper or Goaler that shall have the Custody of such a Prisoner All the Iudges and Barons did subscribe their names to these Articles Ter. Paschae 34 Eliz. and delivered one to the L. Chancellor and another to the L. Treasurer after which time there did follow more quietness then before in the Cause before mentioned After the reading of this Report Sir Edw. Cook said That of my own knowledge this Book was written with my L. Andersons own hand it is no flying report of a young Student I was Solicitor then and Treasurer Burley was as much against Commitment as any of this Kingdom It was the White Staves that made this stir Let us draw towards a conclusion The Question is whether a Feeman can be imprisoned by the King without setting down the cause I leave it as bare as Aesops Crow they that argue against it Humores moti non remoti corpus destruunt It is a Maxime the Common-Law hath admeasured the Kings Prerogative that in no Case it can prejudice the Inheritance of the Subjects had the Law given the Prerogative to that which is taken it would have set some time to it else mark what would follow I shall have an Estate of Inheritance for life or for years in my Land or propriety in my Goods and I shall be a Tenant at will for my liberty I shall have
that this Colledge was first at Edmonton removed from thence to Camberwel and thence to Clerkenwell Hereupon it was Ordered that all the Knights and Burgesses of the House shall to morrow morning declare what knowledge they have of Letters and other means that have been used for the staying of proceedings against Recusants and Messengers were sent to Mr. Attourney to examine him touching that matter Mr. Long a Justice of Peace who was said to understand much in the same business was likewise sent for and examined and said that by the appointment of Mr. Secretary Cook he apprehended these persons and took their Examinations and said further that he heard they were delivered out of Newgate by Order from Mr. Attourney That Mr. Middlemore a general Solicitor for the Papists hired this house and that there are divers Books of Accompts of Receipts and Disbursements to the value of 300. l. per an with divers Recusants names who allowed towards the maintenance of this Colledge and these Books and papers are in the hands of Mr. Secretary Cook It was further reported from the Committee that the Priest taken at Clerkenwell which was condemned should be Reprieved by a Warrant from the King signified by a Privy Councellor and another Warrant was produced by the Keeper of Newgate under the hand of the Kings Atturney General to release the other 9. Priests to which Mr. Secretary Cook replyed the K. being merciful in case of blood gave direction for the Reprieving the condemned Priest but the House not willing to let this pass appointed certain of their Members to go to the Lord chief Justice and the rest of the Judges who were there present at the Trial to know why the Papers and Evidences which Mr. Long had to produce were not made use of The Committee appointed to examine the Atturny-General reported this answer I did receive said the Atturny order touching some Persons taken in Clarkenwel conceived to be Priests from the Council-Board and for that refer myself to the Order And I conceive I did follow the directions of that Order I did my self cause them to be sent for from the several prisons where they were formerly committed and I committed them all to Newgate as the Order from the Council-Board directed and I gave directions for Indictments to be drawn against them as for being Priests and I sent for and conferred with the witnesses and took their Informations and I sent for Mr. Long who was formerly acquainted with that business as I was advised to do by Mr. Secretary Cook and desired him to take special care thereof at the Sessions And I did not conceive that by the Order I was directed to go thither my self but if I had been so directed and had so conceived it I should not have declined the service I know not nor never heard of any Lands conveyed to the use of these persons or of any foundation there but there was some mention made thereof in some of the papers delivered to me by Mr. Secretary but so generally as I know not how to enquire thereof but I did take care to intitle the King to the goods as the special directions to me was by the Order of the Board and the Indictment failed to be found against all but one and I gave warrant to the Treasurers remembrancer of the Exchequer for a special commission to that purpose and I advised with Mr. Long who were sit Commissioners for that purpose and after with Mr. Scrivener and a Commission was granted to Gentlemen of very good quality and an inquisition is found and returned accordingly whereby the King is intitled to the goods I had warrant from his Majesty to bayl them but for the manner of that I must crave leave to acquaint the King therewith before I answer any further I understood that an Indictment was preferred against three of them for Treason and I did direct Mr. Long that if the Indictment should not be â—ound for Treason yet to tender them and all the rest the Oath of Allegeance to bring them within the Kings mercy upon a Premunire if they should refuse the Oath and I understood the Oath was ministred to them accordingly at that Sessions and I understood after that the Indictment was found against one of them onely to be a Priest and that the other were quit Therefore receiving an express commandment from the King for the bayling of them I did conceive they were baylable which otherwise of my self I would not have done the Bonds I took and keep them my self for the surety I refer my self to the bond and understand that some of them were house-keepers in the Town I gave directions for Indictments to be drawn against them but I gave no special directions whether it should be drawn as against Iesuits or Priests but left that to the care of Mr. Long and did not then conceive there was any difference in the substance of the Indictment for Treason between Priests and Iesuits I can give no special reason why I rather bound them to appear at the Council-Table then at the Sessions but only this because I received my first directions from the Council-Board When the Sessions was past I did enquire of Mr. Long what was the success of these Indictments who informed me that one only was found guilty of being a Priest and thereupon I gave order for the Commission before mentioned to enquire of their goods And being again sent unto for a clearer answer he said For he Warrant which I received for the discharge of the prisoners and the Bond taken by me upon their deliverance which has a dependance upon that Warrant and whereof ye require an account I have attended his Majesty but ye have no leave to shew them and the Bonds being taken but in December last I keep them with me as I conceive was proper for my place but shall be ready to deliver them when I shall receive a commandment to that purpose Wednesday the eighteenth of February the Fast was kept and the nineteenth of February Mr. Dawes one of the Customers being called in to answer the point of Priviledge in taking Mr. Rolls Goods a Member of this House said That he took Mr. Rolls Goods by vertue of a Commission under the great Seal and other Warrants That he knew Mr. Rolls demanded his Priviledge but he did understand his Priviledge did onely extend to his person not to his goods And he further said He took those Goods for such duties as were due in the time of King James and that the King had sent for him on Sunday last and commanded him to make no other answer Mr. Carmarthen another of the Customers being called in said That he knew Mr. Rolls to be a Parliament-man and told him He did not finde any Parliament-man exempted in their Commission and as for the words charged on him that he should say If all the body of the House were in him he
and condition he died in Summer 1658. being about the age of seventy years Trinity 5. Car. Banco Regis The first day of this Term upon a Habeas Corpus to Sir Allen Apsley the Lieutenant of the Tower to bring here the body of Iohn Selden Esq with the cause of Detencer he returned the same cause as was in Mr. Stroods Case And Mr. Littleton of the Inner-Temple of Counsel with Mr. Selden moved that the Return was insufficient in substance therefore pray'd that he might be bayled and said that it was a matter of great consequence both to the Crown of the King and to the Liberty of the Subject But as for the difficulty of Law contained in it he said under favour the Case cannot be said Grand And so proceeded to his Argument which for the Reasons before mentioned we have postponed and concluded that the Prisoner ought to be bailed The same day Sir Miles Hubbord Benjamin Valentine Denzil Holles Esq were at the Bar upon the Habeas Corpus directed to several Prisons And their Counsel were ready at the Bar to have argued the Case for them also But because the same Return was made for them as for Mr. Selden they all Declared they would rely on this Argument made by Mr. Littleton Some few days after Sir Robert Heath the Kings Atturney General argued that this Return was good and that Mr. Selden and the rest of the parties ought not to be bailed and that within the Return there appears good cause of their commitment and of their detaining also He said The Case is great in expectation consequence and concerns the Liberty of the Subject on one part whereof the Argument is plausible and on the other part it concerns the safety and Soveraignty of the King which he said is a thing of greater weight and that the consideration of both pertains to you the Judges without flighting the one or too much elevating the other and so proceeded to his Argument of which more at large hereafter and concluded that the Prisoners ought to be remanded When the Court was ready to have delivered their opinions in this great business the Prisoners were not brought to the Bar according to the Rule of the Court. Therefore Proclamation was made for the keepers of the several Prisons to bring in their Prisoners but none of them appeared but the Marshal of the Kings Bench who informed the Court that Mr. Strood who was in his custody was removed yesterday and put in the Tower of London by the Kings own warrant and so it was done with the other Prisoners for each of them was removed out of his prison in which he was before But notwithstanding it was pray'd by the Counsel for the Prisoners that the Court would deliver their opinion as to the matter in Law but the Court refused to do that because it was to no purpose for the Prisoners being absent they could not be bailed delivered or remanded The evening before there came a Letter to the Judges of this Court from the King himself informing the Court with the Reasons wherefore the Prisoners were not suffered to come at the day appointed for the resolution of the Judges These were the words of the Letter To our Trusty and welbeloved Our Chief Justice and the rest of Our Justices of Our Bench. C. R. TRusty and welbeloved we Greet you well Whereas by our special commandment we have lately removed Sir Miles Hubard Walter Long and William Stroud from the several prisons where they were formerly committed and have now sent them to our Tower of London understanding there are various constructions made thereof according to the several apprehensions of those who discourse of it as if we had done it to decline the course of Iustice We have therefore thought fit to let you know the true Reason and occasion thereof as also why we commanded those and the other Prisoners should not come before you the last day We having heard how most of them a while since did carry themselves insolently and unmannerly both towards us and your Lordships were and are very sensible thereof and though we hear your selves gave them some admonition for that miscariage yet we could not but resent our Honour and the Honour of so great a Court of Iustice so far as to let the world know how much we dislike the same And having understood that your Lordships and the rest of our Iudges and Barons of our Court of Common Pleas and Exchequer whose advices and judgments we have desired in this great business so much concerning our Government have not yet resolved the main Question we did not think the presence of those Prisoners necessary and until we should find their temper and discretions to be such as may deserve it we were not willing to afford them favour Nevertheless the respect we bear to the proceedings of that Court hath caused us to give way that Selden and Valentine should attend you tomorrow they being sufficient to appear before you since you cannot as yet give any resolute opinion in the main point in Question Given under our Signet at Our Mannor at Greenwich this 24 Iunii in the 5 yeer of our Reign Within three hours after the receit of those Letters other Letters were brought unto the said Judges as followeth To Our trusty and well-beloved Our Chief Justices and the rest of Our Justices of Our Bench. C. R. TRusty and well-beloved we greet you well Whereas by our Letters of this days date we gave you to understand our pleasure That of those prisoners which by our Commandment are kept in our Tower of London Selden and Valentine should be brought tomorrow before you now upon more mature Deliberation we have resolved That all of them shall receive the same treatment and that none shall come before you until we have cause given us to believe they will make a better demonstration of their Modesty and Civility both towards us and your Lordships then at their last appearance they did Given under our Signet at our Mannor at Greenwich this 24 day of Iune in the fifth year of our Reign So the Court this Term delivered no opinion and the imprisoned Gentlemen continued in restraint all the long Vacation Note That in this Term a Habeas Corpus was prayed to the Pursevant of Arms for four Constables of Hertfordshire to whose custody they were committed by the Lords of the Privy-Council and the Habeas Corpus was granted on their behalf but then they were committed to the Custody of other Pursevants and so upon every Habeas Corpus they were removed from Pursevant to Pursevant and could have no fruit of their Habeas Corpus all this Term. There wanted not some who upon the Kings dissolution of this Parliament and his ill success in two former Parliaments did advise that his Majestie for the future might be no more troubled with the impertinencies of Parliaments holding out for example the like
sufficient to raise a jealousie against our proceedings in such as were not well acquainted with the sincerity and clearnesse of them There followed another of no lesse skill for although Our proceeding before the Parliament about matters of Religion might have satisfied any moderate men of Our zealous care thereof as we are sure it did the most yet as bad stomachs turn the best things into their own nature for want of good digestion so those distempered persons have done the like of Our good intents by a bad and sinister interpretation For when they did observe that many honest and religious minds in that House did complain of those dangers that did threaten the Church they likewise took the same word in their mouth and their cry likewise was Templum Domini Templum Domini when the true care of the Church never came into their hearts and what the one did out of zeal unto Religion the other took up as a plausible Theam to deprave Our Government as if We Our Clergy and Councill were either senslesse or carelesse of Religion And this wicked practise hath been to make Us seem to walk before Our people as if We halted before God Having by these artifices made a jealous impression in the hearts of many and a day being appointed to treat of the Grant of Tunnage and Poundage at the time prefixed all expresse great willingnesse to grant it But a new strain is found out that it could not be done without great perill to the right of the Subject unlesse We should disclaim any right therein but by grant in Parliament and should cause all those Goods to be restored which upon commandment from Us or Our Councill were stayed by our Officers untill those Duties were paid and consequently should put Our Selves out of the possession of the Tunnage and Poundage before they were granted for else it was pretended the Subject stood not in fit case to grant it A fancy and cavill raised of purpose to trouble the businesse it being evident that all the Kings before named did receive that Duty and were in actuall possession of it before and at the very time when it was granted to them by Parliament And although We to remove all difficulties did from Our Own Mouth in those clear and open tearms that might have satisfied any moderate and well-disposed minds declare That it was Our meaning by the gift of Our people to enjoy it and that we did not challenge it of right but took it de bene esse shewing thereby not the right but the necessity by which We were to take it wherein We descended for their satisfaction so far beneath Our self as We are confident never any of Our Predecessors did the like nor was the like ever required or expected from Them Yet for all this the Bill of Tunnage and Poundage was laid aside upon pretence they must first clear the right of the Subject therein under colour whereof they entertain the complaints not onely of Iohn Rolles a Member of their House but also of Richard Chambers John Fowkes and Bartholomew Gilman against the Officers of Our Customs for detaining their goods upon refusall to pay the ordinary Duty accustomed to be paid for the same And upon these complaints they send for the Officers of the Customes enforcing them to attend day after day by the space of a month together they cause them to produce their Letters Patents under Our Great Seal and the Warrants made by Our Privy Councill for levying of those Duties They examine the Officers upon what questions they please thereby to entrap them for doing Our service and commandment In these and other their proceedings because We would not give the least shew of interruption We endured long with much patience both these and sundry other strange and exorbitant incroachments and usurpations such as were never before attempted in that House We are not ignorant how much that House hath of late years endeavoured to extend their priviledges by setting up generall Committees for Religion for Courts of Justice for Trade and the like a course never heard of untill of late So as where in former timos the Knights and Burgesses were wont to communicate to the House such businesse as they brought from their Countries now there are so many Chairs erected to make enquirie upon all sorts of men where complaints of all sorts are entertained to the unsufferable disturbance and scandall of Justice and Government which having been tolerated a while by Our Father and Our Self hath daily grown to more and more height insomuch that young Lawyers sitting there take upon them to decry the opinions of the Judges and some have not doubted to maintain That the Resolutions of that House must bind the Judges a thing never heard of in Ages past But in this last assembly of Parliament they have taken on them much more then ever before They sent messengers to examine Our Atturney Generall who is an Officer of trust and secrecy touching the execution of some commandements of Ours of which without Our leave first obtained he was not to give account to any but Our Self They sent a captious and directory message to the Lord Treasurer Chancellor and Barrons of the Exchequer touching some judiciall proceedings of theirs in Our Court of Exchequer They sent messengers to examine upon sundry questions Our two Chief Justices and three other of Our Judges touching their judiciall proceedings at the Gaol-Delivery at Newgate of which they are not accountable to the House of Commons And whereas Suits were commenced in Our Court of Star-Chamber against Richard Chambers John Fowks Bartholomew Gilman and Richard Phillips by Our Atturney Generall for great misdemeanours they resolved that they were to have priviledge of Parliament against us for their persons for no other cause but because they had Petitions depending in that House and which is more strange they resolved that a Signification should be made from that House by a Letter to issue under the hand of their Speaker unto the Lord Keeper of Our Great Seal that no attachments should be granted out against the said Chambers Fowks Gilman or Phillips during their said priviledge of Parliament Whereas it is far above the power of that House to give direction to any of Our Courts at Westminster to stop Attatchments against any man though never so strongly priviledged the breach of Priviledge being not in the Court that grants but in the Party or Minister that puts in execution such Attachments And therefore if any such Letter had come to the Lord Keeper as it did not he should have highly offended Us if he had obeyed it Nay they went so far as they spared not the honour of Our Councill-board but examined their proceedings in the case of Our Customers interrogating what this or that man of Our Councill said in direction of them in the businesse committed to their charge And when one of the Members of that House speaking of our
concerning the Electoral Bonds and to dissolve their League The Protestants in their Answer acknowledged the good will of the Emperor their Cheif and shewed that the Catholicks had oppressed them contrary to the Pacification and having sought Redress in vain they were compelled to use means of preserving Publick Tranquillity according to the Laws That their League and Union consisting onely of Protestant Germans was a known practice in the Empire and not against the Golden Bull and tended not to a separation from his Imperial Majestie but the Catholicks made their League with strangers and declared a stranger cheif over them The Count of Thurne and other Defenders Evangelick with the Estates of Bohemia assembled at Prague to advise of publick safety and conservation of priviledges The Emperor required his Council held at the Castle of Prague to oppose and hinder this Assembly which he said was called to raise Sedition and to plot against his person and Government Nevertheless in all their publick worship the Evangelicks prayed to God to confound the Emperors enemies and to grant him long to live and reign over them in Peace and Justice The Bohemian troubles took their first rise from the breach of the Edict of Peace concerning Religion and the Accord made by the Emperor Rodolph whereby the Protestants retained the free exercise of their Religion enjoyed their Temples Colledges Tithes Patronages places of Burial and the like and had liberty to build new Temples and power to chuse Defenders to secure those Rights and to regulate what should be of service in their Churches Now the stop of building certain Churches on Lands within the Lordships of the Catholick Clergy in which places the Evangelicks conceived a Right to build was the special grievance and cause of Breach On the Twenty third of May the cheif of the Evangelicks went armed into the Castle of Prague entred the Council Chamber and opened their Grievances but inraged by opposition threw Slabata the Cheif Justice and Smesansius one of the Council and Fabritius the Secretary from an high Window into the Castle Ditch others of the Council temporising in this Tumult and seeming to accord with their demands were peaceably conducted to their own houses Hereupon the Assembly took advice to settle the Towns and Castle of Prague with new Guards likewise to appease the people and to take an Oath of Fidelity They chose Directors Governors and Counsellors Provincial to govern affairs of State and to consult of raising forces against the enemies of God and the King and the Edicts of his Imperial Majesty They banished the Iesuits throughout all Bohemia Moreover to defend their own cause and to give an accompt of their late proceedings and present posture a Declaration was drawn up and sent with Letters to the Estates of Moravia Silesia and Lusatia and to all the Princes and States their Allies throughout the Empire with request of aid in case of need They declare to this effect THat they had endured infinite Injuries and Afflictions by certain Officers Ecclesiastick and Civil and by the Iesuits above all others who sought to bring them under the yoke of Popery reviled them with the names of Hereticks heaved them out of places of Dignity provoked the Magistrates to pursue them with Fire and Sword That their Ministers were banished and their Charges given to Roman Catholicks The Senators of Prague who were Evangelicks were evil-intreated and divers persons persecuted for Religion under pretence of Civil Offences And whereas in case of difference touching the Agréement and Edict of Peace the Estates of both parties were to hear and judge their Enemies procured Commands from the Emperor to bear them down before a due hearing Their lawful Méetings to advise and séek redress were declared to be manifest Sedition and Rebellion and themselves threatned with loss of estates and lives This Declaration they sent likewise to the Emperor with a submissive Letter asserting their own Fidelity and praying for the removal of those evil Counsellors that threaten so much danger to his Majesty and his Kingdoms The Emperor herewith was no way pacified but charged them with an evil design required them to lay down Arms and to make no more Levies but to live in peace as becometh faithful Subjects Upon which terms he promised to disband his own Soldiers to forgive what was past and to protect all that will obey him This prevailed nothing but the breach grows wider The Emperor published a Manifesto in Answer to the Apology of the Bohemian States and wrote Letters to the Electors Princes and States of the Empire with high Aggravations of the violence offered at Prague to his principal Officers against Divine and Humane Rights the Constitutions of the Kingdom and the Customs of all Nations without hearing without summoning without any form of Proces yea without giving a moment of time to Repent or make Confession or receive the Sacrament which is never denied to the worst offenders Forthwith a pernicious War and all confusion breaks out The Emperor raised forces under the conduct of divers Commanders of whom the cheif were Count de Buquoy and Count de Ampiere The Evangelicks raised two Armies under Count de Thurne and Count Mansfelt Moravia Silesia and Lusatia with all the Estates Protestant Germans and Neighbors of Bohemia very few excepted assist the Evangelicks with Counsel Men and Money Likewise the Prince of Orange and the States of the United Provinces promised to aid them with their forces The Electors and Princes Protestant favoring the Bohemians whose Countrey the Imperialists destroy with Fire and Sword perswade the Emperor to stop the rage of Civil War the success whereof is doubtful and the end ever miserable The Emperor propounded an Arbitration of these differences by the Elector of Mentz and the Duke of Bavaria Princes Catholicks and by the Electors Palatine and of Saxony Princes Protestants and Pilsen should be the place of Treaty The Evangelicks consent to the Arbitration but dislike the place where the people were wholly Catholicks and followed the Emperors party besides the Directors had designed the besieging of it New Actions of War made the overtures of peace more difficult Several Armies were now raising throughout Bohemia and the Neighboring Provinces As yet the Elector of Saxony stood Neutral the Duke of Bavaria cast in his lot with the Emperor whose estate was then every where imbroiled At this time there appeared a Comet which gave occasion of much discourse to all sorts of men among others a Learned Knight our Countreyman confidently and boldly affirmed That such persons were but abusers and did but flatter greatness who gave their verdict that that Comet was effectual as some would have it or signal as others judge it onely to Africa whereby they laid it far enough from England When this Knight out of the consideration of the space of the Zodiack which this Comet measured the inclination of his
King nor any other but with that express Clause and Condition That he should be bred in his own Religion and have such Tutors and Servants as his Father should appoint XI That the Lord Conway hath been the cause of all the Earl of Bristol's Troubles by his dubious and intrapping Dispatches and inâ—erring That the said Earl hath failed in his Directions when it shall be made appear that his Dispatches contained no such Directions as he hath alledged were given The House not being satisfied to commit the Earl to the Tower let him remain where he was before with the Gentleman Usher and further ordered That the Kings Charge against the Earl of Bristol be first heard and then the Charge of the said Earl against the Duke yet so that the Earls Testimony against the Duke be not prevented prejudiced or impeached The day following the Lord Keeper delivered a Message from the King to the House of Lords THat his Majesty taketh notice of the Articles exhibited against the Duke of Buckingham by the Earl of Bristol and he observeth that many of them are such as himself is able to say more of his own knowledge then any man for the Dukes sincere carriage in them That one of them touching the Narrative made in Parliament in the One and twentieth of King Iames trencheth as far upon himself as the Duke for that his Majesty went as far as the Duke in that Declaration and that all of them have been closed in the Earls own breast now for these two years contrary to his Duty if he had known any crime of that nature by the Duke and now he vents it by way of recrimination against the Duke whom he knows to be a principal Witness to prove his Majesties Charge And therefore That his Majesty gave them thanks that they gave no way to the Earl of Bristol's unreasonable motion of putting the Duke under the same restraint that they had put the Earl thereby eschewing what the Earl aimeth at to alter their dutifull Procedings toward his Majesty That thereby they had made his Majesty confident that as they have so they will put a difference between his Majesties Charge against one that appeareth as a Delinquent and the recrimination of the Earl of Bristol against his Majesties Witness and they will not equal them by a proceeding Pari Passu At this time there was an endeavor to take the Earls Cause out of the House and to proceed by way of Indictment in the Kings-Bench To which manner of proceeding why the Lords should not give way these ensuing Reasons were offered to consideration I. IT was ordered That in all Causes of moment the Defendants shall have Copies of all Depositions both pro and contra after publication in convenient time before hearing to prepare themselves and if the Defendants will demand that of the House in due time they shall have their learned Council to assist them in their defence And their Lordships declared That they did give their assents thereto because in all Cases as well Civil as Criminal and Capital they hold That all lawfull help could not before just Judges make one that is guilty avoid Justice and on the other side God defend that an Innocent should be condemned II. The Earl of Bristol by his Petition to the House complained of his restraint desiring to be heard here as well in points of his wrongs as in his accusations against the Duke whereof his Majesty taking consideration signified his pleasure by the Lord Keeper April the 20 That his Majesty was resolved to put his Cause upon the honor and justice of this House and that his pleasure was that the said Earl should be sent for as a Delinquent to answer the offences he committed in his Negotiation before his Majesties going into Spain whilest his Majesty was there and since his coming thence and that his Majesty would cause these things to be charged against him in this House so as the House is fully possessed of the Cause as well by the Earls Petition as by the Kings assent and the Earl brought up to the House as a Delinquent to answer his offences there and Mr. Attorney hath accordingly delivered the Charge against him in the House and the Earl also his Charge against the Duke And now if he be proceeded withal by way of Indictment in the Kings-Bench these dangerous inconveniences will follow viz. 1. He can have no Counsel 2. He can use no Witness against the King 3. He cannot know what the Evidences against him will be in a convenient time to prepare for his Defence and so the Innocent may be condemned which may be the Case of any Peer 4. The Liberties of the House will be thereby infrigned the Honor and Justice thereof declined contrary to the Kings pleasure expresly signified by the Lord Keeper All these things are expresly against the Order 5. The Earl being indicted it will not be in the power of the House to keep him from Arraignment and so he may be disabled to make good his Charge against the Duke Therefore the way to proceed according to the Directions and true meaning of the Order and the Kings pleasure already signified and preserve the Liberties of the House and protect one from injury will be First To have the Charge delivered into the House in writing and the Earl to set down his Answer to it in writing and that the Witnesses may be examined and Evidences on both sides heard by such course and manner of proceedings as shall be thought fit by the House and if upon full hearing the House shall finde it to be Treason then to proceed by way of Indictment if doubtfull in point of Law to have the opinion of the Judges to clear it if doutfull in matter of Fact then to refer it to a regal Fait And the rather for that 1. It appears that the Earl in the space of two years till now he complained hath not been so much as questioned for matter of Treason 2. He hath been examined upon twenty Interrogatories and the Commissioners satisfie that his Answer would admit of no Reply 3. The Lord Conway by several Letters hath intimated That there was nothing against him but what was pardoned by the Parliament Pardon of 21 Iac. And signified his Majesties pleasure That he might rest in that security he was and sit still His Majesty hath often declared both to the Countess of Bristol and others That there was neither Fellony nor Treason against him nor ought else but what a small acknowledgment would expiate Some Cases happened in Parliament 1 2 Caroli wherein the Judges opinions were had viz. THis Question was put to all the Justices Whether a Peer impeached for Treason shall be tried in Parliament And the chief Justice in the name of all the Justices delivered his opinion that the course by Law was Indictment and this to be signified in Parliament before the Lord Steward vide 10
then to believe That the said ships were never meant or any way in danger to be imployed against the Rochellors or those of our Religion in France and herein he did great injury and disservice to his Majesty to the great scandal and prejudice of our Religion and Affairs and highly abused both the Lords and Commons by this cautelous and subtile Speech and Insinuation and thereby gave both Houses occasion to forbear Petitioning or suing to his Majesty for Redress in this Business while the time was not then passed for the ships were not as then actually imployed against the Rochellors albeit in truth they were then delivered into the French Kings power And the same time before the Parliament was dissolved Captain Pennington who could have opened the whole truth of the business for the Service of the King and the Realm came to Oxford but was there drawn to conceal himself by means of the Duke and not to publish in due time his knowledge of the Premisses as was there shortly after reported The truth whereof the Lords in this Parliament may be pleased to examine as they shall see cause the Parliament at Oxford being shortly after viz. Aug. 12. unhappily dissolved In or about September 1625. The said ships were actually imployed against the Rochellors and their Friends to their exceeding great prejudice and almost utter ruine It hath been said by some of the French that the Vantguard she mowed them down like grass To the great dishonor of our Nation and the scandal of our Religion and to the disadvantage of the great affairs of this Kingdom and all Christendom Also the Ships themselves were in eminent peril to be utterly lost for lack of sufficient Cautions If they be come home since this Parliament sate down long after the matter was here expounded and taken into examination It may be well presumed that it is by some underhand procuring of the Duke and the secret complying of the French with him to colour out the matter which the Lords may examine as they see cause The one and onely English-man that presumed to stay in one of the Ships and serve against the poor Rochellors of our Religion at his return was slain in charging a Peece of Ordnance not by him well sponged In February last 1625. Monsieur de la Touche having speech with Master Thomas Sherwell a Member of the Commons House of Parliament at Salisbury as he was coming up to the Parliament and Monsieur de la Touche going down into Somerset-shire to Master John Pawlets to Monsieur Sobysa He told Master Sherwell in the hearing also of one Master Iohn Clements of Plymouth who is now in Town the words that the Duke had spoken to him the last Summer touching these Ships and thereupon used these words Ce Duque est un meshant homme Upon this whole Narration of the Fact touching the manner of Delivery of the Ships to the French divers things may be observed wherein the Dukes offences do consist As In betraying a Ship of the Kings Royal Navy unto a Foreign Princes hand without good Warrant for the same The dispossessing the Subjects of this Realm of their Ships and Goods by many artifices and subtilties and in conclusion with high hand and open violence against the good will of the Owners In breaking the duty of Lord Admiral and Guardian of the Ships and Seas of this Kingdom In varying from the original good Instructions and presuming to give others of his own head in matters of State In violating the duty of a sworne Privy-Counsellor to his Majesty In abusing both Houses of Parliament by a cautelous Misinformation under a colour of a Message from his Majesty And in disadvantaging the Affairs of those of our Religion in Foreign parts Offences of an high and grievous nature For the proof of some parts thereof which are not the least I offer to your Lordships consideration the Statute of the 2 3 E. 6. touching the Duke of Somerset wherein is recited That amongst other things he did not suffer the Piers called the Newhaven and Blackerst in the parts beyond the Seas to be furnished with victuals and money whereby the French were encouraged to invade and win the same Aud for this offence amongst others it was Enacted That a great part of his Land should be taken from him And if Non-feazance in a matter tending to lose a fixed Castle belonging to the King be an high offence then the actual putting of a Ship Royal of the Kings into the hand of a Foreign Prince which is a moveable and more useful Castle and Fortress of the Realm must needs be held a greater offence I will forbear to cite any more Presidents of this kind because some of those who have gone before me have touched at divers Presidents of this nature which may be applied to this my part Only because the abuse of the Parliament which is the chiefest Council of State and Court of Judicature in the Realm is not the least offence in this business I shall desire your Lordships to take into consideration the Statute of Westm. 1. cap. 30. whereby such as seem to beguile Courts of Justice are to be sore judged in the same Courts and punished as by that Statute appeareth So he concluded and left the Duke to their Lordships equal Justice The Ninth and Tenth Articles were read next IX Whereas the Titles of Honor of this Kingdom of England were wont to be conferred as great Rewards upon such vertuous and industrious Persons as had merited them by their faithful service The said Duke by his importunate and subtile procurement hath not only perverted that antient and most honorable way but also unduly for his own particular gain he hath enforced some that were rich though unwilling to purchase Honor As the Lord R. Baron of T. who by practice of the said Duke and his Agents was drawn up to London in or about October in the Two and twentieth year of Reign of the late King Iames of famous memory and there so threatened and dealt withall that by reason thereof he yielded to give and accordingly did pay the sum of Ten thousand pounds to the said Duke and to his use For which said sum the said Duke in the moneth of Ianuary in the Two and twentieth year of the said lake King procured the Title of Baron R. of T. to the said Lord R. In which practice as the said Lord R. was much wronged in his particular so the Example thereof tendeth to the prejudice of the Gentry and dishonor of the Nobility of this Kingdom X. Whereas no Places of Judicature in the Courts of Justice of our Soveraign Lord the King nor other like Preferments given by the Kings of this Realm ought to be procured by any Subject whatsoever for any Reward Bribe or Gift He the said Duke in or about the moneth of December in the Eighteenth year of the Reign of the late King Iames of famous
see them earthed before me My Answer to the several points in Charge I shall crave leave to deliver in brief and in form of Law but as naked as truth loves to be and so I leave my self and my cause to your Lordships Justice The humble Answer and Plea of George Duke of Buckingham to the Declaration and Impeachment made against him before your Lordships by the Commons House of Parliament THe said Duke of Buckingham being accused and sought to be impeached before your Lordships of the many Misdemeanors Misprisions Offences and Crimes wherewith he is charged by the Commons House of Parliament and which are comprised in the Articles preferred against him and were aggravated by those whose service was used by that House in the delivery of them Doth finde in himself an unexpressible pressure of deep and hearty sorrow that so great and so worthy a Body should have him suspected of those things which are objected against him whereas had that Honorable House first known the very truth of those particulars whereof they had not there the means to be rightly informed he is well assured in their own true judgments they would have forborn to have charged him therewith The Charge touching Plurity of Offices To the first which concerneth Plurality of Offices which he holdeth he answereth thus That it is true that he holdeth those several Places and Offices which are enumerated in the preamble of his Charge whereof onely three are worthy the name of Offices viz. The Admiralty the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports and Mastership of the Horse the other are rather titulary and additions of Honor. For these Offices he humbly and freely acknowledgeth the bounty and goodness of his most Gratious Master who is with God who when he had cast an Eye of Favor upon him and had taken him into a more near place of service about his Royal Person was more willing to multiply his Graces and Favors upon him then the Duke was forward to ask them and for the most part as many honorable persons and his now most Excellent Majesty above all others can best testifie did prevent the very desires of the Duke in asking And all these particular places he can and doth truly affirm his late Majesty did bestow them of his own Royal motion except the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports onely and thereto also he gave his approbation and encouragement And the Duke denieth that he obtained these places either to satisfie his exorbitant ambition or his own profit or advantage as is objected against him And he hopeth he shall give good satisfaction to the contrary in his particular Answers ensuing touching the manner of his obtaining the places of the Admiralty and the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports whereunto he humbly desireth to refer himself And for the Mastership of the Horse to his Majesty he saith it is a meer domestick office of attendance upon the Kings person whereby he receiveth some profit yet but as a conveniency to render him more sit for his continual attendance and in that place the times compared he hath retrenched the Kings annual charge to a considerable value as shall be made apparent And for the number of places he holdeth he saith That if the Commonwealth doth not suffer thereby he hopeth he may without blame receive and retain that which the liberal and bountiful hand of his Master hath freely conferred upon him And it is not without many Presidents both in Antient and Modern times That one man eminent in the esteem of his Soveraign hath at one time held as great and as many Offices But when it shall be discerned That he shall falsly or corruptly execute those places or any of them or that the Publick shall suffer thereby he is so thankful for what he hath freely received that whensoever his Gratious Master shall require it without disputing with his Soveraign he will readily lay down at his Royal Feet not onely his Places and Offices but his whole Fortunes and his life to do him service But the integrity of his own Heart and Conscience being the most able and most impartial witnesses not accusing him of the least thought of disloyalty to his Soveraign or to his Country doth raise his spirits again to make his just defence before your Lordships of whose Wisdom Justice and Honor he is so well assured That he doth with confidence and yet with all humbleness submit himself and his cause to your Examinations and Judgments before whom he shall with all sincerity and clearness unfold and lay open the secrets of his own actions and of his heart and in his Answer shall not affirm the least Substantial and as near as he can the least Circumstantial point which he doth not believe he shall clearly prove before your Lordships The Charge consisteth of Thirteen several Articles whereunto the Duke saving to himself the usual benefit of not being prejudiced by any words or want of form in his Answer but that he may be admitted to make further explanation and proof as there shall be occasion and saving to him all Priviledges and Rights belonging to him as one of the Peers of the Realm doth make these several and distinct Answers following in the same order they are laid down unto him For his buying of the Admirals place the said Duke maketh this clear and true Answer That it is true that in Ianuary in the Sixteenth year of his late Majesties Raign his late Majesty did by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England grant unto the Duke the Office of Admiralty for his life which Grant as he well knoweth it was made freely and without any Contract or Bargain with the late Lord Admiral or any other and upon the voluntary Surrender of that Noble and wel-deserving Lord so he is advised it will appear to be free from any defect in Law by reason of the Statute of 5 Edw. 6. mentioned in this Article of his Charge or for any other cause whatsoever For he saith the true manner of his obtaining this Office and of all the passages thereof which he is ready to make good by Proof was thus That Honorable Lord the late Earl of Nottingham the Lord Admiral being grown much in years and finding that he was not then so able to perform that which appertained to his place as in former times he had done to his great Honor and fearing lest his Majesties service and the Commonwealth might suffer by his defect became an humble and earnest Petitioner to his late Majesty to admit him to surrender his Office His late Majesty was at the first unwilling unto it out of his Royal Affection to his Person and true Judgment of his worth But the Earl renewed his Petitions and in some of them nominated the Duke to be his Successor without the Dukes privity or fore-thought of it And about that time a Gentleman of good place about the Navy and of long experience
to his duty To this Sir Thomas Darnell replied That such words never came into his thoughts And did humbly pray they might make no impression upon the Court to the disparagement of his Cause for he was accused of that he was in no manner guilty of Upon which Sir Nicholas Hide Chief Justice said That he had made a fair and temperate Answer And you may perceive said the Chief Justice the upright and sincere proceedings which have been in this business You no sooner moved for a Habeas Corpus but it was granted you you no sooner desired Council but they were assigned you though any Council might move for you without being assigned and should have had no blame for it The Kings pleasure is his Law should take place and be executed and for that do we sit here And whether the Commitment be by the King or others this Court is the place where the King doth sit in person to do right if injury be done And we have power to examine it and if it appear that any man hath wrong done him by his Imprisonment we have power to deliver and discharge him if otherwise he is to be remanded by us to Prison again And the Attorney-General after the Chief Justice had spoken said Though this be a Case which concerns the King in an high degree yet he hath been so gracious and so just as not to refuse the Examination and Determination thereof according to the Laws of the Kingdom Then the Court proceeded to hear the Arguments made in the Prisoners behalf Mr. Noy argued for Sir Walter Earl Serjeant Bramston for Sir Iohn Heveningham Mr. Selden for Sir Edward Hampden Mr. Calthrop for Sir Iohn Corbet who were all assigned of Council with the Prisoners by the Court of Kings-Bench upon a Petition delivered by them to that purpose After they had argued Mr. Attorney had a day appointed to argue for the King It is not our intention to take up the Readers time with the Arguments at large either by the one side or the other We shall only hint unto you some generals chiefly concerning the form of the Return of the Writ The first Exception taken by the Council for the imprisoned Gentlemen was to the form of the Return 1. For that the Return is not positive but referred to the signification made by another by the Lords of the Council 2. The Keepers of the Prisons have not return'd the Cause of the Commitment but the Cause of the Cause which they held not to be good 3. That the Return of the Commitment is imperfect for that it sheweth onely the Cause of the detaining in Prison and not the Cause of the first Commitment Lastly That the Return is contradictory in it self For that in the first part thereof it is certified that the detaining of those Gentlemen in Prison is per speciale mandatum Domini Regis And when the Warrant of the Lords of the Council is shewn it appeareth that the Commitment is by the command of the King signified by the Lords of the Council The second general Exception was to the matter of the Return and that was touching the Imprisonment per speciale mandatum Domini Regis by the Lords of the Council without any Cause expressed Wherefore said Mr. Selden by the constant and setled Laws of this Kingdom without which we have nothing no man can be justly imprisoned either by the King or Council without a Cause of the Commitment and that ought to be expressed in the Return The Law saith expresly No Free-man shall be imprisoned without due Process of the Law Nullus liber homo capiatur vel imprisonetur nisi per legem terrae c. And in the Charter of King Iohn there are these words Nec eum in carcerem mittimus We will not commit him to Prison that is The King himself will not This right said Serjeant Bramston is the onely means that a Subject hath whereby to obtain his Liberty and the end of it is to return the Cause of the Imprisonment that it may be examined in this Court whether the parties ought to be discharged or not Which cannot be done upon this Return for the Cause of the Imprisonment is so far from appearing particularly by it that there is no Cause at all expressed And the Writ requires that the Cause of the Imprisonment should be returned and the Cause ought to be expressed so far as that it ought to be none of those Causes for which by the Laws of the Kingdom the Subject ought not to be imprisoned and it ought to be expressed that it was by Presentment or Indictment or upon Petition or Suggestion made unto the King For said he observe but the consequence If those Gentlemen who are committed without any Cause shewn should not be bailed but remanded the Subjects of the Kingdom may be restrained of their Liberty for ever and by Law there can be no remedy We shall not reflect upon the present time and Government but we are to look what may betide us in time to come hereafter The Laws are called the great Inheritance of every Subject and the Inheritance of Inheritances without which we have nothing that deserves the name of Inheritance If upon a Habeas Corpus a Cause of Commitment be certified then said Mr. Noy the Cause is to be tryed before your Lordships but if no Cause be shewn the Court must do that which standeth with Law and Justice and that is to deliver the party The Commons did complain in Ed. 3. his time that the great Charter and other Statutes were broken They desired that for the good of himself and his people they may be kept and put in execution and not infringed by making any Arrest by special command or otherwise And the Answer which was given them was this That the said great Charter and other Statutes should be put in execution according to the Petition without disturbance of Arrests by special command And the King granteth the Commons desire in the same words as they were expressed in their Petition And afterwards complaining again That notwithstanding this Answer of the King they were imprisoned by special command without Indictment or other legal course of Law The Kings Answer was upon another Petition unto him That he was therewith well pleased And for the future he added further If any man be grieved let him complain and right shall be done And forasmuch as it doth not appear to the Court that there was any Cause of the Commitment of these Members no Charge against them no Indictment or Process according to the Laws Wherefore Mr. Noy prayed they might be no longer detained in Prison but be bailed or discharged Admit the Commitment of the Command of the King was lawful yet said Mr. Calthorp when a man hath continued in prison a reasonable time he ought to be brought to answer and not to continue still in prison without being brought to answer For that it appeareth
his person that the body of a man was not liable to be arrested or imprisoned for any other Cause at the Common-Law but for force and things done against the Peace For the Common-Law being the preserver of the Land so abhorreth force that those that commit it she accounteth her capital Enemies and therefore did subject their bodies to imprisonment But by the Statute of Marlebridge cap. 24. which was made 35 H. 3. who was the eighth King from the Conquest because Bailiffs would not render accompts to their Lords it was enacted that their bodies should be attatched And after by the Stat 23 E. 3.17 who was the eleventh King after the Conquest because men made no conscience to pay their Debts it was enacted that their bodies should likewise be attached But before those Statutes no mans body was subject to be taken or imprisoned otherwise then as aforesaid whereby it is evident how much the Common-Law favored the Liberty of the Subject and protected his body from imprisonment Here he enforced the Reason by a Rule in Law and mentioned some Cases in Law upon that rule and so proceeded to a second Reason drawn by an Argument à majore ad minus I frame it thus said he If the King have no absolute power over our Lands or Goods then à fortiori not over our Persons to imprison them without declaring the cause for our persons are much more worth then either Lands or Goods which is proved by what I have said already And Christ himself makes it clear where he saith An non est corpus supra vestimentum Is not the Body of more worth then the Raiment Nay I may well say that almost every leaf and page of all the Volumes of our Common-Law prove this right of Propriety this distinction of meum and tuum as well between King and Subject as one Subject and another And therefore my conclusion follows that if the Prerogative extend not neither to Lands nor to Goods then à fortiori not to the Person which is more worth then either Lands or Goods as I said And yet I agree that by the very Law of Nature service of the Person of the Subject is due to his Soveraign but this must be in such things which â—re not against the Law of Nature but to have the body imprisoned without any cause declared and so to become in bondage I am sure is contrary unto and against the Law of Nature and therefore not to be inforced by the Soveraign upon his Subjects 3. My next Reason is drawn ab inutili incommodo for the Statute de frangentibus prisonám made 1 E. 2. is Quod nullus qui prisonam fregerit subeat judicium vitae vel membrorum pro fractione prisonae tantum nisi causa pro qua captus imprisonetur tale judicium requirat whence this conclusion is clearly gathered that if a man be committed to prison without declaring what cause and then if either Malefactor do break the Prison or the Gaoler suffer him to escape albeit the Prisoner so escaping had committed crimen laesae Majestatis yet neither the Gaoler nor any other that procured his escape by the Law suffer any corporal punishment for setting him at large which if admitted might prove in consequence a matter of great danger to the Commonwealth 4. My next Reason is drawn ab regis honore from that great Honor the Law doth attribute unto Soveraign Majesty and therefore the rule of Law is that Solum Rex hoc non potest facere quod non potest justè agere And Hussey chief Justice 1 H. 7. saith that Sir Iohn Markham told King E. 4. he could not arrest a man either for Treason or Felony as a Subject might because that if the King did wrong the party could not have an Action against him and if the Kings Writ under his Great-Seal cannot imprison the Subject unless it contains the cause shall then the Kings Warrant otherwise do it without containing the cause that his Judge upon the return thereof may likewise judge of the same But I will conclude with that which I finde reported of Sir Iohn Davis who was the Kings Serjeant and so by the duty of his place would no doubt maintain to his uttermost the Prerogatives of the King his Royal Master And yet it was by him thus said in those Reports of his upon the Case of Tavistry-Customs That the Kings of England alwayes have had a Monarchy Royal and not a Monarchy Seignoral where under the first saith he The Subjects are Freemen and have Propriety in their Goods and Free-hold and Inheritance in their Lands But under the later they are as Villains and Slaves and have propriety in nothing And therefore said he When a Royal Monarch makes a new conquest yet if he receives any of the Nations ancient Inhabitants into his Protection they and their heirs after them shall enjoy their Lands and Liberties according to the Law And there he vouched this President and Judgment following given before William the Conqueror viz. That one Sherborn a Saxon at the time of the Conquest being owner of a Castle and Lands in Norfolk the Conqueror gave the same to one Warren a Norman and Sherborn dying the heir claiming the same by discent according to the Law it was before the Conqueror himself adjudged for the heir and that the gift thereof by the Conqueror was void Upon this and other Arguments made in this Case of the Habeas Corpus the House referred the whole Business to a Committee to examine all the Proceeding Concerning which Mr Selden afterward made report to the House that Mr Waterhouse a Clerk in the Crown Office being examined before the Committee did confess that by direction from Sir Robert Heath the Kings Attorney-General he did write the draught of a Judgement in the Case before mentioned which was delivered to Mr Attorney And Mr Keeling being examined before the Committee did confess that after Mich Tâ—â—m last the Attorney General wished him to make a special Entry of 〈◊〉 Habeas Corpus To which he answered he knew no special Entry in those Cases but onely a remittitur But said to Mr Attorney that if he pleased to draw one and the Court afterwards assent to it he would then enter it The Attorney did accordingly make a draught and the Copy thereof Mr Keeling produced to the Committee And further said that he carried this draught to the Judges but they would not assent to a special Entry Nevertheless the At. General divers times sent to him and told him there was no remedy but he must enter it Yet a week before the Parliament the Att. General called for the draught again which accordingly he gave unto him and never heard of it more Sir Robert Philips upon this Report gave his opinion That this intended Judgement in the Habeas Corpus was a draught made by some man that desired to strike us all from our Liberties but
and ought not to be denied and is directeâ— to the Keeper of the Prison in whose custody the Prisoner remains commanding him that after a certain day he bring in the body of the Prisoner cum causa detentionis and sometimes cum causa captionis and he with his return filed to the Writ bringeth the Prisoner to the Bar at the time appointed and the Court judgeth of the sufficiency or insufficiency of the retuâ—n and if they finde him baylable committitur Marescallo the proper Prison belongeth to the Court and then afterward traditur in ball But if upon the return of the Habeas Corpus it appear to the Court that the Prisoner ought not to be bayled nor discharged from the Prison whence he is brought then he is remanded and sent back again to continue till by due course of Law he may be delivered and the entâ—y of this is remittitur quousque secundum legem deliberatus fuerit or remittitur quousque c. which is all one and the highest award of Judgement that ever was or can be given upon a Habeas Corpus Your Lordships have heard the resolution of the House of Commons touching the enlargement of a man committed by the command of the King or the privy Councel or any other without cause shewed of such commitment which resolution as it is grounded upon Acts of Parliament already shewen the reason of the Law of the Land being committed to the charge of another to open unto unto you so it is strengthened by many Precedents of Records He then produced twelve Precedents full and directly in the point to prove that persons so committed ought to be delivered upon bayl which were distinctly opened and read to their Lordships then he also offered to their consideration other kind of Precedents which were solemn resolutions of Judges things not of Record but yet remain in Authentick Copies which Precedents and Authorities we omit for the length thereof He then proceeded and said The House of Commons desiring with all care to inform themselves fully of the truth of the resolution of the Judges in the 34. year of the Queen cited in the case of Sir Iohn Heveningham by the Kings Councel as Arguments against his not being bayled have got into their hands a Book of select Cases collected by the reverend and learned Judge Chief Justice Anderson all written with his own hand which he caused to be read being the same which hath been already mentioned in the Collections of this Parliament which Precedents saith he do fully resolve enough for the maintenance of the ancient and fundamental point of Liberty of the Person to be regained by Hab. Corp. when any is imprisoned Then he concluded that having thus gone through the charge committed to him by the House of Commons he should now as he had leave and direction given him lest their Lordships should be put to much trouble and expence of time in finding and getting Copies at large of those things which he had cited offer also to their Lordships Authentick Copies of them all and so left them and whatever else he had said to their Lordships further consideration LAst of all Sir Edward Cook took up the Argument as to the rational part of the Law and began with this Introduction Your Lordships have heard 7. Acts of Parliament in point and 31. Precedents summarily collected and with great understanding delivered which I have perused and understand them all throughly 12. of the Precedents are in terminis terminantibus a whole Jury of Precedents and all in the point I am much transported with joy because of the hope of good success in this weighty business your Lordships being so full of Justice and the very Theme and Subject doth promise success which was Corpus cum cansa the freedom of an English man not to be imprisoned without cause shewn which is my part to shew and the reason and the cause why it should be so wherein I will not be prolix nor copious for to guild Gold were idle and superfluous And after he had cleared some doubts made of the Statute of Westminster which saith That the Sheriffs and others in some cases may not replevin men in Prison he proceeded further and said That all those Arguments offered unto your Lordships in this last conference are of a double nature 1. Acts of Parliament 2. Judicial Precedents For the first I hold it a proper Argument for your Lordships because you my Lords temporal and you my Lords spiritual gave your assent unto those Acts of Parliament and therefore if these cannot perswade you nothing can For the second which are Judicial Precedents it is Argumentum ab authoritate and Argumentum ab authoritate valet affimative that is I conceive though it be no good Argument to say negatively the Judges have given no opinion in the point 3. It is good Law which I fortifie with a strong Axiome Neminem oportet sapientiorem esse legibus Now these two arguments being so well pressed to your Lordships by my Colleagues I think your Lordships may wonder what my part may be it is short but sweet it is the Reason of all those Laws and Precedents and Reason must needs be welcome to all men for all men are not capable of the understanding of the Law but every man is capable of Reason and those Reasons I offer to your Lordships in affirmance of the antient Laws and Precedents made for the Liberty of the Subject against Imprisonment without cause expressed 1. A re ipsa 2. A minore ad majus 3. From the remedies provided 4. From the extent and universality of the same 5. From the infiniteness of the time 6. A Fine The first general Reason is a re ipsa even from the nature of Imprisonment ex visceribus causae for I will speak nothing but ad idem be it close or other Imprisonment and this Argument is three-fold because an imprisoned man upon will and pleasure is 1. A Bond-man 2. Worse then a Bond-man 3. Not so much as a man for mortuus homo non est homo a Prisoner is a dead man 1. No man can be imprisoned upon will and pleasure of any but he that is a Bond-man and villain for that Imprisonment and Bondage are Propria quarto modo to villains now Propria quarto modo and the species are convertible Whosoever is a Bond-man may be imprisoned upon will and pleasure and whosoever may be imprisoned upon will and pleasure is a Bondman 2. If free men of England might be imprisoned at the will and pleasure of the King or his commandment then were they in worse case then Bondmen or villains for the Lord of a villain cannot command another to imprison his villain without cause as of disobedience or refusing to serve as it is agreed in the year books And here he said that no man should reprehend any thing that he said out of Books or Records he said he would prove
absurd and unreasonable thing to send a Prisoner to a Roman Emperor and not to write along with him the Cause alledged against him send therefore no man a Prisoner without his causes along with him Hoc fac vives and that was the first reason a tuto that it was not safe for the King in regard of Loss to commit men without a Cause The second Reason is That such commitments will destroy the endeavors of all men Who will endeavor to imploy himself in any profession either of War Merchandise or of any liberal knowledge if he be but Tenant at will of his Liberty for no Tenant at will will support or improve any thing because he hath no certain estate Ergo to make men Tenants at will of their Liberties destroys all industry and endeavors whatsoever And so much for these six principal Reasons A re ipsa A minore ad majus A remediis From the extent and universality From the infiniteness of the time A fine Loss of Honor. Loss of Profit Loss of Security Loss of Industry These were his Reasons Here he made another Protestation That if remedy had been given in this Case they would not have medled therewith by no means but now that remedy being not obtained in the Kings Bench without looking back upon any thing that hath been done or omitted they desire some provision for the future onely And here he took occasion to adde four Book Cases and Authorities all in the Point saying That if the learned Councel on the other side could produce but one against the Liberties so pat and pertinent oh how they would hug and cull it 16. H. 6. tit monstrance de faits 82. by the whole Court the King in his Presence cannot command a man to be arrested but an action of false imprisonment lieth against him that arresteth if not the King in his royal Presence then none others can do it Non sic itur ad astra 1. Hen. 7.4 Hussey reports the opinion of Markham chief Justice to Edw. 4. that he could not imprison by word of mouth and the reason because the party hath no remedy for the Law leaves every man a remedy of causless imprisonment he added that Markham was a worthy Judge though he fell into adversities at last by the Lord Rivers his means Fortescue Chap. 8. Proprio ore nullus Regum usus est to imprison any man c. 4. Eliz. Times blessed and renowned for Justice and Religion in Pl. 235. the common Law hath so admeasured the Kings Prerogative as he cannot prejudice any man in his inheritance and the greatest inheritance a man hath is the liberty of his Person for all others are accessary to it for thus he quoted the Orator Major haereditas venit unicuique nostrum a Jure legibus quam a parentibus And these are the four Authorities he cited in this point Now he propounded and answered two Objections First in point of State Secondly in the Course held by the House of Commons May not the Privy Councel commit without cause shewed in no matter of State where secrecie is required would not this be an hinderance to his Majesties service It can be no prejudice to the King by reason of matter of State for the cause must be of a higher or lower nature if it be for suspicion of Treason misprision of Treason or Felony it may be by general words couched if it be for any other thing of smaller nature as contempt and the like the particular cause must be shewed and no individuum vagum or uncertain cause to be admitted Again if the Law be so clear as you make it why needs the Declaration and Remonstrance in Parliament The Subject hath in this Case sued for remedy in the Kings Bench by Habeas Corpus and found none therefore it is necessary to be cleared in Parliament And here ends his Discourse And then he made a recapitulation of all that had been offered unto their Lordships That generally their Lordships had been advised by the most faithful Counsellors that can be dead men these cannot be daunted by fear nor muzled by affection reward or hope of preferment and therefore their Lordships might safely believe them particularly their Lordships had three several kinds of Proofs 1. Acts of Parliament judicial Precedents good Reasons First you have had many ancient Acts of Parliament in the Point besides Magna Charta that is seven Acts of Parliament which indeed are thirty seven Magna Charta being confirmed thirty times for so often have the Kings of England given their royal Assents thereunto 2. Judicial Precedents of grave and reverend Judges in terminis terminantibus that long since departed the world and they were many in number Precedents being twelve and the Judges four of a Bench made four times twelve and that is forty eight Judges 3. You have as he tearmed them vividas rationes manifest and apparent Reasons Towards the conclusion he declared to their Lordships That they of the House of Commons have upon great study and serious Consideration made a great manifestation unanimously Nullo contradicente concerning this great liberty of the Subject and have vindicated and recovered the Body of this fundamental Liberty both of their Lordships and themselves from shadows which sometimes of the day are long sometimes short and sometimes long again and therefore we must not be guided by shadows and they have transmitted to their Lordships not capita rerum Heads or Briefs for these compendia are dispendia but the Records at large in terminis terminantibus and so he concluded that their Lordships are involved in the same danger and therefore ex congruo condigno they desired a Conference to the end their Lordships might make the like Declaration as they had done Commune periculum commune requirit auxilium and thereupon take such further course as may secure their Lordships and them and all their Posterity in enjoying of their ancient undoubted and fundamental Liberties The two next days were spent in the Debate about Billeting of Soldiers upon the Subject against Law THursday the 10. of April Mr. Secretary Cook delivered this Message from the King That his Majesty desireth this House not to make any recess these Easter Holidays that the world may take notice how earnest his Majesty and we are for the publique affairs in Christendom the which by such a recess would receive interruption THis Message for non-recess was not well pleasing to the House SIr Robert Phillips first resented it and took notice That in 12. and 18. Iac. upon the like intimation the House resolved it was in their power to adjourn or sit hereafter said he this may be put upon us by Princes of less Piety let a Committee consider hereof and of our right herein and to make a Declaration And accordingly this matter touching his Majesties pleasure about the recess was referred to a Committee and to consider
discontinuance of assembling the three Estates in France which was in time about four years before the blazing Star by Lewis the eleventh King of France who by reason the third Estate representing the Commons did incroach as he declared too much upon the Clergie and Nobility the King dissolved that Parliament of the three Estates and never had a free Election of the third Estate afterwards but ordained another kind of meeting instead thereof which is called L' assembli des Notables An assembly of certain eminent persons of his own Nomination whereunto he added some Counsellour out of every Court of Parliament there being eight in all in France and being few in number and of his own Nomination would more readily comply with the Kings proposals and not dispute his will and pleasure as the general assembly of three Estates had wont to do when the King trenched upon the liberty and property of the Subject which alteration of the Government as to the third Estate hath ever since exposed the Commons to much vassalage and misery as at this day is apparent by the meanness of their livelyhood and wearing of wooden shoes That which gives us occasion to mention this last particular is a little Tract composed to the said end and purpose and which did this Trinity long Vacation walk abroad and went from hand to hand sometime at Court sometime in the Country and sometime at the Innes of Court which we here set down verbatim in the Appendix that the humour of the Author thereof may be the more clearly discerned and when we come to its proper time and place you shall see what success this Pamphlet had when it was questioned in the Star-Chamber Towards the latter end of his Vacation all the Justices of the Kings Bench being then in the Country received every one of them a Letter to be at Sergeants Inne upon Michaelmas day These Letters were from the Council-Table and the cause expressed in them was That his Majesty had present and urgent occasion to use their service The Judges came up accordingly on Tuesday being Michaelmas day The next morning about four a clock Letters were brought to the chief Justice from Mr. Trumbal Clerk of the Council then attending that he and Judge Whitlock one of the Judges of that Court should attend the King that morning so soon as conveniently they could which the Chief Justice and that Judge did at Hampton that morning where the King taking them apart from the Council fell upon the business of the Gentlemen in the Tower and was contented they should be bayled notwithstanding their obstinacy in that they would not give the King a Petition expressing That they were sorry he was offended with them he shewed his purpose to proceed against them by the common Law in the Kings Bench and to leave his proceeding in the Star-Chamber Divers other matters he proposed to the said Judges by way of advice and seemed well contented with what they answered though it was not to his minde which was That the offences were not capital and that by the Law the prisoners ought to be bailed giving security to the good behaviour whereupon the King told them That he would never be offended with his Judges so they dealt plainly with him and did not answer him by Oracles and Riddles both these Judges did at that time what good office they could to bring the King on to heal this breach The first day of Michaelmas Term it was moved by Mr. Mason to have the Resolution of the Judges and the Court with one voice said That they are now content that they shall be bayled but that they ought to finde sureties also for the good behaviour and Iones Justice said That so it was done in the Case which had been often remembred to another purpose two wit Russels Case in 9 E. 3. To which Mr. Selden answered with whom all the other prisoners agreed in opinion That they have their sureties ready for the bayl but not for the good behaviour and desire that the bayl might first be accepted and that they be not urged to the other and that for these Reasons First the Case here had long depended in Court and they have been imprisoned for these thirty weeks and it had been oftentimes argued on the one side and the other and those that argued for the King alwaies demanded that we should be remanded and those which argued on our side desired that we might be bayled or discharged but it was never the desire of the one side or the other that we should be bound to the good behaviour And in the last Term four several days were appointed for the Resolution of the Court and the sole point in question was If baylable or not therefore he now desires that the matter of bayl and of good behaviour may be severed and not conâ—ounded Secondly because the finding of sureties of good behaviour is seldome urged upon Returns of Felonies or Treasons And it is but an implication upon the Return that we are culpable of those matters which are objected 3. We demand to be bayled in point of Right and if it be not grantable of Right we do not demand it but the finding of Sureties for the good behaviour is a point of discretion meerly and we cannot assent to it without great offence to the Parliament where these matters which are surmised by the Return were acted and by the Statute of 4 Hen. 8. all punishments of such nature are made voyd and of none effect Therefore c. Curia The Return doth not make mention of any thing done in Parliament and we cannot in a judicial way take notice that these things were done in Parliament And by Whitlock The surety of good behaviour is as a preventing medicine of the damage that may fall out to the Commonwealth and it is an Act of Government and jurisdiction and not of Law And by Crook It is no inconvenience to the Prisoners for the same bayl sufficeth and all shall be written upon one peece of parchment And Heath Atturney General said That by the command of the King he had an information ready in his hand to deliver in the Court against them Hide Chief Justice If now you refuse to find sureties for the good behaviour and be for that cause remanded perhaps we afterwards will not grant Habeas Corpus for you inasmuch as we are made acquainted with the cause of your imprisonment Ashly the Kings Sergeant offered his own bayl for Mr. Holles one of the Prisoners who had married his daughter and heir But the Court refused it for it is contrary to the course of the Court unless the Prisoner himself will become bound also And Mr. Long that had found sureties in the Chief Justices Chamber for the good behaviour refused to continue his sureties any longer inasmuch as they were bound in a great summe of 2000 l. and the good behaviour was a
and Southcot Justices That offences committed in Parliament may be punished out of Parliament And 3 Ed. 3.19 it is good Law And it is usual neer the end of Parliaments to set some petty punishment upon offenders in Parliament to prevent other Courts And I have seen a Roll in this Court in 6 H. 6. where judgment was given in a writ of annuity in Ireland and afterwards the said judgment was reversed in Parliament in Ireland upon which judgment Writ of Error was brought in this Court and reversed Hide Chief Justice to the same intent No new matter hath been offered to us now by them that argue for the Defendants but the same Reasons and Authorities in substance which were objected before all the Justices of England and Barons of the Exchequer at Sergeants-Inn in Fleet-street upon an Information in the Star-Chamber for the same matter At which time after great deliberation it was resolved by all of them That an offence committed in Parliament that being ended may be punished out of Parliament And no Court more apt for that purpose then this Court in which we are and it cannot be punished in a future Parliament because it cannot take notice of matters done in a foregoing Parliament As to that that was said That an Inferiour Court cannot meddle with matters done in a Superior True it is That an Inferior Court cannot meddle with judgments of a Superior Court but if the particular members of a Superiour Court offend they are oft-times punishable in an Inferior Court As if a Judg shall commit a capital offence in this Court he may be arraigned thereof at Newgate 3 E. 3.19 and 1 Mar. which have been cited over-rule this case Therefore Whitlock accordingly 1. I say in this Case Nihil dictum quod non dictum prius 2. That all the Judges of England have resolved this very point 3. That now we are but upon the brink and skirts of the Cause for it is not now in Question if these be offences or no or if true or false but only if this Court have jurisdiction But it hath been objected That the offence is not capital therefore it is not examinable in this Court But though it be not capital yet it is criminal for it is sowing of sedition to the destruction of the Commonwealth The Question now is not between us that are Judges of this Court and the Parliament or between the King and the Parliament but between some private Members of the House of Commons and the King himself for here the King himself questions them for those offences as well he may In every Commonwealth there is one supereminent Power which is not subject to be questioned by any other and that is the King in this Commonwealth who as Bracton saith solum Deum habet ultorem But no other within the Realm hath this Priviledge It is true that that which is done in Parliament by consent of all the house shall not be questioned elsewhere but if any private Members exuunt personas judicum induunt malefacientium personas sunt seditiosi is there such Sanctimony in the place that they may not be questioned for it elsewhere The Bishop of Ross as the Case hath been put being Embassadour here practised matters against the State And it was resolved That although Legatus sit Rex in alieno solo yet when he goes out of the bounds of his Office and complots with Traytors in this Kingdom that he shall be punished as an offender here A Minister hath a great Priviledge when he is in the Pulpit but yet if in the Pulpit he utter speeches which are scandalous to the State he is punishable so in this Case when a Burgess of Parliament becomes mutinous he shall not have the Priviledge of Parliament In my opinion the Realm cannot consist without Parliaments but the behaviour of Parliament-men ought to be Parliamentary No outragious speeches were ever used against a great Minister of State in Parliament which have not been punished If a Judge of this Court utter scandalous speeches to the State he may be questioned for them before Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer because this is no judicial act of the Court. But it hath been objected That we cannot examine Acts done by a higher Power To this I put this Case When a Peer of the Realm is arraigned of Treason we are not his Judges but the high Steward and he shall be tryed by his Peers But if errour be committed in this proceeding that shall be reversed by errour in this Court for that which we do is Coram ipso Rege It hath been objected That the Parliament-Law differs from the Law by which we judge in this Court in sundry Cases And for the instance which hath been made That by the Statute none ought to be chosen Burgesse of a Town in which he doth not inhabit but that the usage of Parliament is contrary But if Information be brought upon the said Statute against such a Burgess I think that the Statute is a good warrant for us to give judgement against him And it hath been objected That there is no President in this matter But there are sundry Presidents by which it appears that the Parliament hath transmitted matters to this Court as 2 R. 2. there being a question between a great Peer and a Bishop it was transmitted to this Court being for matter of behaviour and although the Judges of this Court are but inferiour men yet the Court is higher for it appears by the 11 Eliz. Dy. That the Earl Marshal of England is an Officer of this Court and it is always admitted in Parliament That the priviledges of Parliament hold not in three Cases to wit in case of Treason secondly in case of Felony and in suit for the peace and the last is our very case Therefore c. Crook argued to the same intent but I did not well hear him he said That these offences ought to be punished in the Court or no where and all manner off offences which are against the Crown are examinable in this Court It hath been objected That by this means none will adventure to make his complaints in Parliament That is not so for he may complain in a Parliamentary course but not falsely and unlawfully as here is pretended for that which is unlawfully cannot be in a Parliamentary course It hath been objected That the Parliament is a higher Court then this is And it is true But every Member of Parliament is not a Court and if he commit offence he is punishable here Our Court is a Court of high jurisdiction it cannot take cognizance of real Pleas but if a real Plea comes by Error in this Court it shall never be transmitted But this Court may award a grand Cape and other Process usual in real Actions But of all capital and criminal causes we are originally competent Judges and by consequence of this matter But I am not
King 2. It stands not with the dignity of the King to arrest any man C. 4. 73. The King makes a Lease for years rendring rent with condition of re-entry for non-payment he shall take advantage of the condition without any demand and the reason there given is that a decorum and conveniency might be observed So it is not befitting for the King in person to arrest any man but the King may command another to do it Bracton lib. 2. de acquirendo rerum Dominio fol. 55. sayes That the Crown of the King is to do justice and judgment and facere pacem without which the Crown it self cannot subsist Severall constructions are to be made upon those severall words and the last words facere pacem imply that the King hath a coercive power Britton f. 1. amongst the Errata The King said in person Because we are not sufficient in person to do every thing We divide the charge into many parts We are the peoples Iustice and a Iustice implies one that hath power to do justice in every kind to wit by imprisonment or otherwise 20 H. 7.7 C. 11.85 it is said That the King is the chief Iustice. And Lambert in his Justice of Peace fol. 3. saies That in antient Histories the chief Iustice of England is called Capitalis Justicia Prima Justicia after the King in England So that the King hath the same power of Iustice as the Chief Iustice had This imprisonment here which is before conviction for any offenâ— is not used towards the Subject as imprisonment for any fault but is rather an arrest or restraint to avoid further inconveniencies 14 H. 7.8 A Iustice of Peace may arrest men riotously assembled for prevention of further mischief And the Book also saies That he may leave his servants there to arrest men for safeguard of the peace It is a case well known that if a house be set on fire every man may pull down the next house for prevention of greater mischief so it seems concerning the Incendiaries of the State they ought to be restrained and supprest lest others should be stirred up by them to the same combustion 22 ass 56. and 22 E. 4.45 in false imprisonment the Defendant justifies because the Plantiff was mad and out of his wits and that he had done some harm and that he had bound and beat him to avoid further harm which might have happened by his madnesse And the justification was held good So it is in matter of Government to avoid commotions the King ought to use his coercive power against those that are enraged The objection was that this course was against the Petition of Right But I answer That this case is out of the words of that Petition the words of the Petition were Whereas by the Statute called The great Charter and by the Statute of 28 E. 3. no free-man may be taken or imprisoned yet against the tenour of the said Statute c. divers of your subjects have of late been imprisoned without any cause shewed and when for their deliverance c. they were brought before the Iustices by Writs of Habeas corpus there to undergo and receive as the Court should order and their Keepers commanded to certifie the cause of their deteyner and no cause was certified but that they were detained by your Majesties speciall command signified by the Lords of your Council and yet were returned back to severall prisons without being charged with any thing to which they might make answer according to Law These last words are observable Without being charged with any thing to which they might make answer These words do not refer to the Return of the Habeas Corpus for the cause returned therein cannot be traversed 9 H. 6. 54. but the Court took it as true But the setting forth of the cause and the answer to the same cause is to be upon other proceedings to wit upon the indictment for the offence or otherwise And there is great difference between the return of a Writ to which a man may answer and the return of an Habeas corpus 10 E. 4. 3 H. 7.11 are that if the Sheriff return Rescous all certainties of every circumstance ought to be shewed because it is fitting that a thing certain be brought into judgment And upon shewing of the grievance as above the Petition is that no free-man in any such manner as before is mentioned be imprisoned or detained such and it hath relation to such imprisonment which is mentioned in the premises And imprisonment mentioned in the premises of the Petition is where no cause at all was mentioned then where any cause is shewed is out of the Petition and that such is the word relative appears by C. 11 62. where many cases are put to the same purpose which see The third objection was That the Return was generall and uncertain The Counsell on the other side had divided the words of the Return but that is to offer violence thereunto for an exposition shall not be made by fractions but upon the whole matter For the first words notable contempts It hath been said that the addition of the word notable is but to make a flourish But I say That notable is not the emphasis of the Return but it onely expresseth the nature of the offence and yet notable is a word observable by it self in the Law and implyes that the thing is known and noted By 27 E. 1. Sheriffs shall be punished that let notorious offenders to bayl and by the Statute of 4 H. 4. chap. 3. a notorious or common thief shall not make his purgation and 26 E. 3.71 in a trespasse for fals imprisonment the Defendant said That the Plantiff came into the Town of Huntington and because he was seen in the company of R. de Thorby who was a notorious thief he as Bailiff of Huntington took him upon suspition I confesse that for contempts is generall yea it is genus generalissimum and within the Petition of Right but the words are against Our Self It hath been said That this might be by irreverent words or gestures and Our Government It hath been said that this might be by contempt to the Kings Writ or by Retraxit as Beechers case is To this I answer That those words which are spoken to one purpose ought not to be wrested to another and this is against the common meaning of the words C. 4. Thou art a murderer the Defendant shall not afterwards explain it to be a murderer of Hares for the highest murder is intended So here the highest Government is intended 4. It hath been objected that for stirring up of sedition against Us may perhaps be but an offence Finable But those words joyned with the former words shew this to be an offence of the highest nature sedition is a speciall contempt And although sedition in it self may be but a generall offence yet here it is Sedition against Us and Our Government which makes
that it is but a Finable offence yet by the said Statute those which are imprisoned for open and notorious naughtinesse shall not be bayled the same naughtinesse is there intended high and exorbitant offence 2. It is fit to restrain the prisoners of their liberty that the Common-wealth be not damnifâ—ed It is lawfull to pull down a house to prevent the spreading mischief of fire it is lawfull to restrain a furious man And by the 14 H. 7. a Iustice of peace may restrain one rout Then the restraint of dangerous men to the Common-wealth is justifiable and necessary 24 E. 3.33 p. 25. Sir Thomas Figet went armed in the Palace which was shewed to the Kings Councell wherefore he was taken and disarmed before the chief Iustice shard and committed to the prison and he could not be bayled till the King sent his pleasure and yet it was shewed that the Lord of T. threatned him Out of which case I observe two things First that the Iudge of this Court did cause a man to be apprehended upon complaint made to the Council that is to the Lords of the Privy Council 2. That although he did nothing he is not mayn-pernable untill the King sent his pleasure because he was armed and furiously disposed So here UUherefore I pray that the Prisoners may be sent back again Davenport argued to the same intent and purpose and therefore I will report his Argument briefly 1. He said That the Return here is sufficient The Counsell on the other side have made fractions of this Return and divided it into severall parts whereas the genuine construction ought to have been made upon the entire Return for no violence ought to be offered to the Text. 7 E. 4.20 In false imprisonment the Defendant did iustifie and alledged severall reasons of his justification to wit because a man was killed and that this was in the County of S. and that the common voice and fame was that the Plaintiff was culpable And this was held a good plea although Bryan did there object That the plea was double or treble and the reason was because twenty causes of suspition make but one entire cause and indivisible unity in this ought not to be divided So C. 8.66 Crogates In an action of trespasse the Defendant justifies for severall causes and held good because upon the matter all of them make but one cause C. 8.117 It is said That it is an unjust thing unlesse the whole Law be looked into to judge and answer by propounding any one particular thereof and if it be unjust in the exposition of a Law it is uncivill in a Return to make fractions of it in the construction thereof especially it being a Return for Information and not for Accusation 2. Although the Counsell on the other side have taken this case to be within the Petition of Right yet this is Petitio principii to take that for granted which is the question in debate He said That he would not offer violence to the Petition of Right to which the King had assented and which shall really be performed But the question here is Whether this Return be within it and the Iudges are keepers not masters of this pledge and it seems that this Return is out of the letter and meaning of the said Statute 3. He said That this was the actuall commitment of the Lords of the Privy Councill and the habituall or virtuall commitment of the King But because upon these two matters he put no case nor gave any reason but what had been put or given in the Argument of the grand Habeas corpus Mich. 3 Caroli and afterwards in the House of Commons which was reported to the Lords in the painted Chamber all which Arguments I heard I have here omitted them And for the great respect which the Law gives to the commands of the King he put these cases 7 H. 3. Attachment of waste against the Tenant in Dower and the waste was assigned in the taking of fish out of a pond and the carrying them away The Defendant pleaded That her second husband by the command of the Lord the King took all the fish out of the said pond to the use of the Lord the King and held a good justification which proves that the command of the King there to her husband excused her of the said waste And yet it is clear that Tenant in Dower is liable to an action of waste for waste done in the time of her second husband But contrary is it where a woman is Tenant for life and took a husband who made waste and dyed no action lies against the wife for that waste And F. N. B. 17. A. If the Tenant in precipe at the grand cape makes default the King may send a UUrit to the Iustices rehearsing that he was in his service c. commanding them that that default be not prejudiciall to him and this command of the King excuseth his default be the cause true or no. 4. For the particulars of the Return it is for notable contempts against the Government But as to that it hath been said that the King hath sundry governments to wit Ecclesiasticall Politicall c. and it is not shewn against which of them This is but a cavilling exception they might as well have excepted to this Return because it is not shewen that these contempts were after the last generall Pardon that had been a better exception The last words of the Return are raising sedition against Us But as to this it hath been said That Seditio is not a word known in the Law and is alwaies taken either Adverbially or Adjectively and is not a Substantive To this he said That although it is not a Substantive for the preservation yet it is a Substantive for the destruction of a Kingdom And he said that he found the word Seditio in the Law and the consequent of it likewise which is seductio populi But it is not ever found to be taken in a good sense it is alwaies ranked and coupled with treason rebellion insurrection or such like as it appears by all those Statutes which have been remembred on the other side Therefore he prayed likewise that the Prisoners might be sent back Trin. 5 Car. B. R. THe first day of the Term upon Habeas Corpus to Sir Allen Apsley the Lieutenant of the Tower to bring here the body of John Selden Esq with the cause of detention He returned the same cause as above and Littleton of Counsell with him moved that the Return was insufficient in substance therefore he prayed that he might be bayled It is true that it is of great consequence both to the Crown of the King and to the liberty of the Subject But under favour for the difficulty of Law contained in it the case cannot be said Grand In my Argument I will offer nothing to the Court but that which I have seen with these eyes and that which
baylable And 33 Eliz. it was resolved by all the Iustices of England which I have viewed in chief Iustice Andersons Book under his own hand and it was produced in Parliament That all men committed by the Privy Councill are baylable if the commitment be not for high treason In all cases of commitment an accuser is understood Suppose that the accusation mentioned in Russel's case of sedition had been an accusation of treason then the Iudges ought not to have bayled him of right and no man will say but that the said accusation was a good cause to commit him But the discovery of the offence ought to be afterward in an Indictment Fourthly I come to the objections which have been made on the contrary 1 st It was objected That this was a case of great consequence I confesse it but this consequence is not to the King for if it be truly treason then they might have returned Treason and then the party was not to be bayled of right till there should be a failer of prosecution as was lately in Melvins case who was bailed for lack of prosecution the Return being for high treason 2 ly It was objected that there can be no conviction as this case is therefore there ought to be coercive power to restrain the prisoner This is strange newes to me that there shall be any offence for which a man cannot be convict And if there can be no conviction it hence followes that there is no offence and if there be no offence there ought by consequence to be no imprisonment 3 ly The case of 14 H. 7.8 hath been objected that a Iustice of Peace may commit Rioters without bayl I confesse it for this is by force of a Statute which ordains it 4 ly It hath been objected That if a house be on fire it is lawfull to pull down the neighbours house for the prevention of further mischief and the cases of 22 ass and 22 E. 4. that every man may justifie the coercion of a mad-man I answer That these cases are true for of necessity and no other evasion but here bayl is proffered which is body for body Fire is swift and cannot be punished and no caution can be obtained thereof But observe the true inference and consequence of this Argument If my house be on fire my neighbours house must be pulled down Mr Selden is seditious ergo Mr. Herbert his neighbour must be imprisoned 5 ly It hath been objected out of Br. Treason 24. 1 Mar. That the said Statute of 25 E. 3. is taken largely and that the detaining of a Castle or Fortresse is treason To this I answer That the bare detaining of a Castle is not treason unlesse it be with intention of the death of the King but the taking of a Castle is treason And the case there meant by Brook is Constables case Dy. 128. And I confesse 13 Eliz. Dy. 298. Doctor Story 's case that conspiracy to invade the Kingdom is treason for this cannot be without great danger of the death of the King for arma tenenti Omnia dat qui justa negat and all those Indictments were that they intended the death of the King but no such intention is expressed here 6 ly It hath been objected That this case is out of the Petition of Right because in this Return there is a cause shewed But the grievance whereupon the Petition of Right was framed was where no cause was returned It is true that the grievance goes no further but where no cause was returned for that was the grievance at that time But the words of the Petition of Right are further without being charged with any thing to which they might make answer by the Law which implies that such cause ought to be contained in the Return which being put into an Indictment the party may have his answer thereto 7 ly It was objected that the Return shall not be construed and expounded by fractions I answer That we need not make such an exposition for the joynt-construction thereof makes more for us then the severall as is shewed before 8 ly That a generall Return is sufficient and it need not have tearms of Art in it as an Indictment ought to have For answer I confesse it but I affirm as above that a Return ought to be so particular that the nature of the offence ought to appear out of it And it is not to be compared to generall Writs as Apostatâ capiendo Idiota examinando Leproso amovendo and the like for those Writs are good enough because they contain the very matter And although it hath been said that there are two kinds of Lepers yet I never heard but of one And the Writ de Haeretico comburendo is generall and good because it is but a Writ of Execution upon a Iudgment given by the Spirituall power But because they might not meddle with the blood of any man the execution is by the Secular power 9 ly It hath been objected out of 30 ass p. 19. that the King would have one drawn and hanged for bringing in into England the Buls of the Pope But the Book answers it self for he was not drawn and hanged 10 ly The Statute of Westm. 1. cap. 15. was objected But as oft as that Statute is objected I will alwaies cry out The Petition of Right the Petition of Right as the King of France cryed out nothing but France France when all the severall Dominions of the King of Spain were objected to him 11 ly A curious distinction hath been taken by Serjeant Davenport between stirring To sedition and stirring Up sedition for the first implies an inclination onely to do it the second implies an act done But this is too nice for if a man stir up sedition or to sedition if it be with intention of the death of the King the one and the other is treason 12 ly The opinion of Fortescue in 31 H. 6.10 b. hath been objected That for an offence done to the Court a man may be committed before conviction To this I answer 1 st That the Book does not say That he shall be committed without bayl 2 ly The offence being done in face of the Court the very view of the Court is a conviction in Law 13 ly There was objected the 24 of E. 3.23 Sir Fitchet's case who for going armed in the Palace was committed by this Court without bayl or mainprize which seems to be the strongest and hardest case that hath been objected But the answer to it is clear and undeniable for the Statute of 2 E. 3. c. 3. is That if any one come armed before the Iustices he shall forfeit his Armour and shall be imprisoned during the Kings pleasure so that by the expresse purview of the Statute such a man is not baylable So my conclusion remains firm notwithstanding any of those objections That the prisoner here being committed before conviction of any offence it being not possible to understand this
offence treason is baylable And that he is baylable here I will offer two other reasons 1 st The Return here is for sedition and there is an information in the Star-chamber against the Prisoner for seditious practises against the King and his Government I will not affirm that they are the same offence but there is some probability that they are the self-same and if they be the same offence then the sedition here intended is not treason and so the party is baylable 2 ly This Prisoner was ready at this Bar the last Term and here was a Grand-Iury at Bar the last Term and here was the Kings Counsell present who are most watchfull for the King and yet an Indictment was not preferred to them against this Prisoner Which things induce me to be of opinion that the offence here mentioned in this Return is not treason or so great as is pretended on the other side I will remember one case which perhaps may be objected and yet I think they will not object it and so conclude 11 R. 2. Parliament Roll 14. in the printed Statute c. 3. and 5. where it appears that divers questions were propounded by the King to Tresilian and Bealknap the two chief Iustices and to the other Iustices one of which questions was How they are to be punished who resisted the King in exercising his royall power c And the answer of the Iudges was una voce that they are to be punished as traitors and 21 R. 2. c. 21. this opinion was confirmed But afterwards in 1 H. 4. c. 3. and 4. and 1 H. 4. in the Parliament-Roll numb 66 67 the Iudges were questioned for their opinion in Parliament They answered That they were threatned and enforced to give this opinion and that they were in truth of the contrary opinion And Bealknap said That he acquainted and protested to the Earl of Kent aforehand that his opinion was alwaies to the contrary But the Parliament was not content with these excuses but they were all adjudged Traitors and Tresilian's end is known to all and Bealknap was banished for his Wife in 2 H. 4. brought a Writ without naming her husband because he was banished And the said Statute of 21 R. 2. was repealed Therefore upon the whole matter I conclude that the Prisoner ought to be bayled On the same day Sir Miles Hubbart and Benjamin Valentine and Densill Hollis Esquires were at Bar upon an Habeas corpus directed to the severall Prisons and their Counsell was ready at the Bar to have argued the case for them also But because the same Return was made as above they said That all of them would rely upon this Argument made by Mr. Littleton The case of the grand Habeas corpus for Mr. Selden and others was now argued by Heath the Kings Atturney Generall That this Return was good and that the parties ought not to be bayled And that within the Return there appears good cause of their commitment and of their detaining also The case is great in expectation and consequence and concerns the liberty of the Subject on the one part whereof the Argument is plausible and on the other part it concerns the safety and soveraignty of the King which is a thing of great weight The consideration of both pertaines to you the Iudges without slighting the one or too much elevating the other The Return which now is before you is entire but I will first consider it as divided in parts First The first Warrant which is that of the Lords of the Privy Councill is generall that it was by the command of the Lord the King and this in former times was held a very good Return when due respect and reverence was given to Government but Tempora mutantur And this Return is no way weakened by any latter opinion for notwithstanding that the first commitment of a man may be generall for if upon the Return the true cause should be revealed to the Gaoler by this means faults should be published and divulged before their punishment and so the complices of the fact will escape and it is not fit that the Gaoler which is but a ministeriall Officer should be acquainted with the secrets of the cause But when the cause is returned in Court more certainty is requisite for then as it hath been objected something ought to be expressed to which the party may answer and upon which the Court may ground their Iudgment And to this purpose it hath been much insisted upon the Petition of Right but the Law is not altered by it but remains as it was before And this will appear upon the view of all the parts of the Petition 1 st The occasion of the Petition and the grievance is shewed in these words Divers of your Subjects have been of late imprisoned without any cause shewed c. But in this Return there is a cause shewed to which the parties may answer Then secondly the prayer of the Petition is That no free-man in any such manner as before is mentioned be imprisoned or detained that is such manner of imprisonment the ground whereof doth not appear Then the answer of the King to the Petition was in sundry words 2 Jun. 1628. in these words The King willeth that right be done according to the Lawes and Customes of the Realm c. Which answer gave not satisfaction And afterwards his answer was in a Parliamentary-phrase Soit droit fait come est desire But afterwards on the 26 of June 1628. the King expressed his intention and meaning in the said Answer It must needs be conceived that I have granted no new but onely confirmed the antient liberties of My Subjects c. A Petition in Parliament is not a Law yet it is for the honour and dignity of the King to observe and keep it faithfully but it is the duty of the people not to stretch it beyond the words and intention of the King And no other construction can be made of the Petition then to take it as a Confirmation of the antient liberties and rights of the Subjects So that now the case remains in the same quality and degree as it was before the Petition Therefore we will now consider how the Law was taken before the Petition and for the discussing thereof we will examine the second part of the Return and in it two things 1 st if the Return as it is now made shall be intended for true 2. admit that it is true if there be any offence contained within it which is good to detain the Prisoners For the first It is clear that the cause shall be intended true which is returned though in truth it be false and so are 9 H. 6.44 and F. Corpus cum causa 2. and C. 11. Baggs case 2 ly It seems that there is such a crime contained in this Return which is a good cause for detaining the Prisoners It is true that it was confidently urged in Parliament
and others was now moved by Mason to have the resolution of the Iudges and the Court with one voice said That they are now content that they shall be bailed but that they ought to find Sureties also for the good behaviour And Jones Iustice said that so it was done in the case which had been often remembered to another purpose to wit Russell's case in 9 E. 3. To which Mr. Selden answered with whom all the other Prisoners agreed in opinion That they have the Sureties ready for the bayl but not for the good behaviour and desire that the bayl might first be accepted and that they be not urged to the other Sir Robert Heath the Kings Atturney-generall exhibited Information in this Court against Sir John Eliot Knight Denzill Hollis and Benjamin Valentine Esquires the effect of which was That the King that now is for weighty causes such a day and year did summon a Parliament and to that purpose sent his Writ to the Sheriff of Cornwall to chuse two Knights by vertue whereof Sir John Eliot was chosen and returned Knight for Cornwall And that in the same manner the other Defendants were elect Burgesses of other places for the same Parliament And shewed further that Sir John Finch was chosen for one of the Citizens of Canterbury and was Speaker of the House of Commons And that the said Eliot publickly and malitiously in the House of Commons to raise sedition between the King his Nobles and People uttered these words That the Councill and Judges had all conspired to trample under-foot the Liberties of the Subjects He further shewed that the King had power to call adjourn and dissolve Parliaments And that the King for divers reasons had a purpose to have the House of Commons adjourned and gave direction to Sir Joâ—n Finch then the Speaker to move as adjournment and if it should not be obeyed that he should forthwith come from the House to the King And that the Defendants by confederacy afore-hand spake a long and continued Speech which was recited verbatim in which were divers malitious and seditious words of dangerous consequence And to the intent that they might not be prevented of uttering their premeditate speeches their intention was that the Speaker should not go out of the Chair till they had spoken them the Defendants Hollis and Valentine lay violent hands upon the Speaker to the great afrightment and disturbance of the House And the Speaker being got out of the Chair they by violence set him in the Chair again so that there was a great tumult in the House And after the said speeches pronounced by Sir John Eliot Hollis did recapitulate them And to this information the Defendants have put in a plea to the Iurisdiction of the Court because these offences are supposed to be done in Parliament and ought not to be punished in this Court or in any other but in Parliament And the Atturney-Generall moved the Court to over-rule the plea to the Iurisdiction And that he said the Court might do although he had not demurred upon the plea. But the Court would not over-rule the plea but gave day to joyne in Demurrer this Tearm And on the first day of the next Tearm the Record shall be read and within a day after shall be argued at Barre But Hyde chief Iustice said to the Counsell of the Defendants So far light we will give you This is no new question but all the Iudges of England and Barons of the Exchequer before now have oft been assembled on this occasion and have with great patience heard the Arguments on both sides and it was resolved by them all with one voice That an offence committed in Parliament criminally or contemptuously the Parliament being ended rests punishable in an other Court Jones It is true that we all resolved That an offence committed in Parliament against the Crown is punishable after the Parliament in another Court and what Court shall that be but the Court of the Kings Bench in which the King by intendment sitteth Whitlock The question is now reduced to a narrow room for all the Iudges are agreed That an offence committed in Parliament against the King or his Government may be punished out of Parliament So that the sole doubt which now remains is Whether this Court can punish it And Crook agreed That so it had been resolved by all the Iudges because otherwise there would be a failer of Iustice. And by him If such an offence be punishable in another Court what Court shal punish it but this Court which is the highest Court in the Realm for criminall offences And perhaps not onely criminall actions committed in Parliament are punishable here but words also Mason of Lincolns-Inne argued for Sir John Eliot one of the Defendants The charges in the Information against him are three 1. For speeches 2. For contempts to the King in resisting the Adjournment 3. For conspiracy with the other Defendants to detain Mr. Speaker in the Chair In the discussion of these matters be argued much to the same intent which he had argued before upon an information brought in the Star-Chamber against the same Defendants and others for the same offences therefore his Argument is reported here very briefly 1 st For his speeches They contain matter of accusation against some great Peers of the Realm and as to them he said That the King cannot take notice of them The Parliament is a Councill and the grand Councill of the King and Councills are secret and close none other hath accesse to those Councills of Parliament and they themselves ought not to impart them without the consent of the whole House A Iury in a Leet which is sworn to enquire of offences within the said Iurisdiction are sworn to keep their own counsell so the House of Commons enquire of all grievances within the Kingdom and their counsells are not to be revealed And to this purpose was a Petition 2 H. 4. numb 10. That the King shall not give credit to any private reports of their proceedings To which the King assents therefore the King ought not to give credit to the information of these offences in this case 2 ly The words themselves contain severall accusations of great men and the liberty of accusation hath alwaies been Parliamentary 50 E. 3. Parliament-Roll numb 21. The Lord Latimer was impeached in Parliament for sundry offences 11 R. 2. the Arch-Bishop of York 18 H. 6. numb 18. the Duke of Suffolk 1 Mar. Dy. 93. the Duke of Norfolk 36 H. 6. numb 60. un Uickar Generall 2 3 E. 6. c. 18. the Lord Seymer 18 of King James the Lord of St. Albans Chancellor of England and 21 of King James Cranfield Lord Treasurer and 1 Car. the Duke of Buckingham 3 ly This is a priviledge of Parliament which is determinable in Parliament and not else-where 11 R. 2. numb 7. the Parliament-Roll Petition exhibited in Parliament and allowed by the King That
upon the suddain as occasion is offered And there is no necessity that the King should expect a new Parliament The Lords may grant Commissions to determine matters after the Parliament ended but the House of Commons cannot do so And also a new House of Commons consists of new Men which have no conusance of these offences 1 H. 4. The Bishop of Carlile for words spoken in the Parliament that the King had not right to the Crown was arraigned in this Court of high-treason and then he did not plead his priviledge of Parliament but said That he was Episcopus unctus c. 5 ly 4 H. 8. Strode's case hath been objected But this is but a particular act although it be in print for Rastall intitles it by the name of Strode so the title Body and proviso of the Act are particular 6 ly That this is an inferiour Court to the Parliament therefore c. To this I say That even sitting the Parliament this Court of B. R. and other Courts may judge of their priviledges as of a Parliament-man put in execution c. and other cases It is true that the Iudges have oft-times declined to give their iudgment upon the privileges of Parliament sitting the Court But from this it followes not that when the offence is committed there and not punished and the said Court dissolved that therefore the said matter shall not be questioned in this Court 7 ly By this means the priviledges of Parliament shall be in great danger if this Court may judge of them But I answer That there is no danger at all for this Court may judge of Acts of Parliament 8 ly Perhaps these matters were done by the Uotes of the House or if they be offences it is an imputation to the House to say that they had neglected to punish them But this matter doth not appear And if the truth were so these matters might be given in evidence 9 ly There is no president in the case which is a great presumption of Law But to this I answer That there was never any president of such a fact therefore there cannot be a president of such a judgment And yet in the time of Queen Elizabeth it was resolved by Brown and many other Iustices that offences done in Parliament may be punished out of Parliament by imprisonment or otherwise And the case of 3 E. 3.19 is taken for good Law by Stamf. and Fitzh And 22 E. 3. and 1 Mar. accord directly with it But it hath been objected that there was no plea made to the Iurisdiction But it is to be obser-served that Ployden that was a learned man was one of the Defendanâ—s and he pleaded not to the Iurisdiction but pleaded license to depart And the said Information depended during all the Reigne of Queen Mary during which time there were four Parliaments and they never questioned this matter But it hath been further objected That the said case differs from our case because that there the offence was done out of the House and this was done within the House But in the said case if license to depart be pleaded it ought to be tryed in Parliament as well as these offences here Therefore c. And the same day the Iudges spake briefly to the case and agreed with one voice That the Court as this case is shall have Iurisdiction although that these offences were committed in Parliament Afterwards the Parliament which met the 3d. of Novemb. 1640. upon Report made by Mr. Recorder Glyn of the state of the severall and respective cases of Mr. Hollis Mr. Selden and the rest of the imprisoned Members of the Parliament in tertio Caroli touching their extraordinary sufferings for their constant affections to the Liberties of the Kingdom expressed in that Parliament And upon Arguments made in the House thereupon did upon the 6th of July 1641. passe these ensuing Votes which in respect of the reference they have in these last mentioned proceedings we have thought fit though out of order of time to insert viz. Iuly the 6th 1641. REsolved upon the Question that the issuing out of the Warrants from the Lords and others of the Privy Councill compelling Mr. Hollis and the rest of the Members of that Parliament 3. Car. during the Parliament to appeare before them is a breach of the priviledge of Parliament by those Privy Counsellours Resolved c. That the Committing of Mr. Hollis and the rest â—f the Lords and others of the Privy Councill dureing the Parliament is a breach of the priviledge of Parliament by those Lords and others Resolved c. That the searching and sealing of the Chamber Study and Papers of Mr. Hollis Mr. Selden and Sir Iohn Eliot being Members of this House and dureing the Parliament and issuing of warrants to that purpose was a breach of the priviledge of Parliament and by those that executed the same Resolved c. That the exhibiting of an Information in the Court of Star-Chamber against Mr. Hollis and the rest for matters done by them in Parliament being members of Parliament and the same so appearing in the Information is a breach of the priviledge in Parliament Resolved c. That Sir Robert Heath and Sir Humphrey Davenport Sir Hennage Finch Mr. Hudson and Sir Robert Berkly that subscribed their names to the Information are guilty thereby of the breach of priviledge of Parliament Resolved c. That there was delay of Justice towards Mr. Hollis and the rest that appeared upon the Ha. Corp. in that they were not bayled in Easter and Trinity Tearm 5. Car. Resolved c. That Sir Nicholas Hide then chief Justice of the Kings Bench is guilty of this delay Resolved c. That Sir William Jones then being one of the Justices of the Court of Kings Bench is guilty of this delay Resolved c. That Sir Iames Whitlock Knight then one of the Justices of the Court of Kings Bench is not guilty of this delay Ordered That the further debate of this shall be taken into Consideration on to morrow Morning Iuly the 8th 1641. Resolved upon the Question That Sir George Crook Knight then one of the Judges of the Kings Bench is not guilty of this delay That the continuance of Mr. Hollis and the rest of the Members of Parliament 3. Car. in Prison by the then Judges of the Kings Bench for not putting in sureties of the good behaviour was without just or legall cause That the exhibiting of the Information against Mr. Hollis Sir Iohn Eliot and Mr. Valentine in the Kings Bench being members of Parliament for matters done in Parliament was a breach of the priviledge of Parliament That the over-ruling of the plea pleaded by Mr. Hollis Sir Iohn Eliot and Mr. Valentine upon the Information to the Jurisdiction of the Court was against the Law and priviledge of Parliament That the Judgement given upon a Nihil dicit against Mr. Hollis Sir Iohn Eliot and Mr. Valentine and fine thereupon imposed and
Articles of Marriage p. 86. The Oath taken by him p. 88. Swears to private Articles p. 88 89. And afterwards findes delays in Spain p. 102. Resolves to depart thence and leave a Proxy with Bristol p. 103. Feasts the Spanish Dons aboard his Ship p. 104. Arrives safe in England ibid. Left private Instructions with Bristol to contradict the Proxy ibid. Attests the Dukes Narrative in Parliament p. 119 Is Proclaimed King p. 169. New swears the old Privy Council ibid. Pursues their Advice p. 170. Puts forth a Proclamation of Government p. 171. Attends in person his Fathers Funeral ibid. Continues the Duke intimately in favor ibid. Levies Soldiers for the Palatinate p. 172. Signs the Articles of Marriage with France ibid. The Marriage solemnised in France p. 173. Sends the Duke of Buckingham into France to attend the Queen into England p. 174. And meets the Queen at Dover ibid. The Marriage consummated at Canterbury ibid. Brings her to London ibid. His first Speech in Parliament p. 175. The Lord Keepers Speech by his direction p. 176. Owns Montague as his servant p. 178. Adjourns the Parliament to Oxford ibid. His Ships employed against Rochel ibid. His Speech at the Parliament in Oxford p. 181. Seconded by the Lord Conway and Secretary Cook p. 182. He Answers the Commons Petition against Recusants p. 185. Sends a Message for supply p. 194. The Commons insisting still upon grievances he dissolves the Parliament p. 195. And follows his design of War ibid. Sends out Privy Seals for money p. 196. Disarms Recusants p. 198. Sends out his Fleet and Army under command of Viscount Wimbleton p. 198 199. Their unsuccessful Voyage p. 200. He now prohibites trade with Spain p. 201. Takes the Seal from Lord Keeper Williams p. 202. Calls a Parliament ibid. Prepares for his Coronation p. 203. Commands all of Forty pound per annum to appear and receive the Order of Knighthood ibid. The manner of his Coronation p. 204. The King is present at the opening of the second Parliament p. 206. And commands the Lord Keeper Coventry to speak what he intended himself to have said ibid. Forbids resort to hear Mass p. 216. The Kings Letter to the Commons to hasten supply p. 218. Seconds it with a Message p. 219. To which the Commons sent an Answer p. 220. The Kings Reply ibid. And sends another Message concerning Mr. Cook and Doctor Turner p. 222. Three Subsidies and three Fifteens Voted to be given him p. 225. And hot Debate against the Duke ibid. Whereupon the King speaks to the Parliament ibid. And refers to the Lord Keeper to speak further p. 225 226 c. And speaks again himself p. 229. His Speech explained by the Duke ibid. Receives a Petition touching Nobility p. 237. His Letter to Bristol p. 241. His Message concerning Bristol p. 243. Receives a Remonstrance from the Commons concerning the Duke p. 247. Adjourns the Parliament for a week p. 250. He is attended by some Bishops concerning the Duke p. 251. Leaves the House at liberty to present the matter concerning the Duke p. 252. His Message on behalf of the Duke against Bristol p. 260. His Speech on behalf of the Duke p. 361. Commits Sir Dudley Diggs and Sir John Elliot p. 362. Releases them p. 364. His Message concerning the Earl of Arundel p. 368. His Answer to the Lords Petition p. 371 372. His further Answer concerning the Earl of Arundel p. 373. Another Message from the King concerning the said Earl p. 374 375. The Earl of Arundel set at liberty p. 375. His Message to the Parliament that they hinder not the Election of the Duke as Chancellor of Cambridge p. 376 377. His Letter to that University on the Dukes behalf p. 378. His Letter to the Speaker concerning Supply p. 394. The Commons Petition him against Recusants p. 395. A Speech made to him by Sir Hennage Finch concerning the Duke p. 401. His Commission to dissolve the Parliament p. 403 The Parliaments Remonstrance to him p. 404 405 c. His Proclamation against the said Remonstrance p. 415. And another against disputing about Arminian Controtroversies p. 416. Causes an Information to be preferred against the Duke p. 417. Prohibites the Book of Bounty ibid. Takes the Forfeiture arising from Recusants ibid. Grants a Commission to compound with Recusants p. 418. His Proclamation to make his Revenue certain ibid. Sends to his Nobles to lend him money ibid. Demands of the City of London the Loan of One hundred thousand pounds p. 419. Requires Port Towns to furnish Ships ibid. Which the Ports in Dorsetshire dispute ibid. The City of London the like and are checked ibid. Issues forth Privy Seals p. 420. Requires inhabitants in Port Towns to repair to their Houses ibid. Sends Ships to the River Elbe ibid. Declares the King of Denmarks overthrow to be one ground of the Loan p. 422. Puts forth a Declaration concerning the Loan ibid. Gives private Instructions concerning the Loan ibid. Grants a Commission for Martial Law p. 423. Displaces Sir Randal Crew about the Loan and makes Sir Nicholas Hide Chief Iustice p. 424. Sends Six thousand English into the Netherlands pag. 425. Makes Sir Charles Morgan General of them ibid. Causes refusers of Loan money to be pressed for Soldiers p. 426. Dissatisfied with the French about the Queen p. 427. and dismisses them p. 428. His Declaration concerning a War with France p. 429. Makes the Duke of Buckingham Admiral and General and gives him a Commission ibid. Secures several Gentlemen for not paying the Loan money p. 433. Grant a Commission to sequester Archbishop Abbot p. 435. Appoints a supply to be sent to the Duke under the Earl of Holland p. 466. A List of the Debt the King owes for Fraights of Ships upon the two Expeditions to Cadize and Rhee p. 470. Calls a Parliament p. 476. Set at liberty the imprisoned Gentlemen about the Loan money p. 477. A List of those Gentry imprisoned by the King about Loan money ibid. His Commission for an Imposition in nature of an Excise considered of p. 478. His Privy Seal to pay Thirty thousand pound for raising of German Horse ibid. His Speech at the opening of the Third Parment p. 480. Lord Keepers Speech by his direction p. 481. The Speakers Speech to him p. 484. Petition to him for a Fast p. 494. His propositions for supply p. 502. His Propositions touching supply again mentioned p. 509. His Answer to the Petition against Recusants p. 511. His Propositions debated p. 525 526. His Message concerning words said to be spoken p. 529. Another Message to secure Liberties by Bill p. 530 531. Subsidies resolved to be presented unto him ibid. The Kings Answer concerning the same ibid. The Dukes Speech concerning the Commons liberal gift to the King ibid. A Message from him against a Recess at Easter p. 543. A Message from the King to hasten supply p. 544. The Speakers Speech unto him at the delivery of the Petition against Billeting
expressions at the time of his accusation p. 258. His Speech at the delivery of the Articles against the Duke p. 259. Articles exhibited by him against the Duke p. 266. And also against the Lord Conway p. 268. A Message from the King against Bristol p. 270. Reasons why he should onely be tried in the House of Peers p. 271. Iudges opinions concerning that particular p. 272. His Speech by way of Introduction before he gave in his Answer to the Articles p. 273 274 c. His Answer to the Articles p. 278 279 c. Dudley Sir Diggs p. 55 306 307 360 364 365 454 533 544 554 614. Doncaster Viscount sent Ambassador p. 11 13 22. Drummond Mr. p. 167. E. EArl Sir Walter upon a Habeas Corpus p. 462. Edmonds Sir Thomas p. 660. Elector vide Palatinate Elliot Sir John p. 224 357 360 366 433 529 532 561 563 544 554 614 660 669. Information against him in the Upper Bench p. 693 696 697 c. Emperor vide the Palatinate Essex Earl p. 200. F. FAirfax Captain p. 15. A Monument erected at Frandendale in memory of him and Mr. John Fairfax his Brother both slain in the defence thereof p. 155 Felton visited in prison and confesses the Fact p. 650. His examination before the Council ibid. Threatned to be rackt ibid. Tryed p. 652. Tendereth his hand to be cut off ib. Hung in Chains p. 653. Finch Sir Hennage Speaker p. 208 401 Finch Sir John Speaker p. 484 561 Fleetwood Sir Miles p. 561 France about a Treaty of Marriage p. 156 114. A Marriage there p. 172 173. Difference with France p. 428 G. GAge Mr. sent to Rome p. 23 66 121 Glanvile Serjeant p. 313 318 574 Glynn Mr. Recorder Ap. 56 57 Gundamor flatters King James p. 3. The Treaty on the Spaniards behalf ibid. Contrives Sir Walter Rawleighs death p. 4 16 18 20. Assaulted in London Streets p. 34. A Letter to him to expedite the Match 69 see 113 122 Gorge Sir Ferdinando p. 180 Germany vide Palatinate H. Habeas Corpus Debates and Arguments p. 462 463 c. Also vide Parliament quarto Car. and Appendix Hackwel Mr. p. 507 528 568 Hayman Sir Peter p. 528 Heath Sir Robert p. 216 667 689. Ap. 39 53 Henry Prince a Match proposed between him and a Daughter of Spain p. 1 Herbert Mr. p. 312 Herbert Sir Gerrard p. 15 69 Herbert Sir Edward p. 43 Heveningham Sir John brings his Habeas Corpus p. 462 Heidelburg p. 66 69 Hobby Sir Thomas p. 528 Holland Earl p. 173 469 470 Hollis Mr. p. 676 689 693 Hubbard Sir Miles brought upon a Habeas Corpus p. 689 Hide Sir Nicholas made Chief Iustice p. 424 I. Iames King of Scotland affects the Title of Peace-Maker p. 1. Desires to Match Prince Charls with somergeat Princess though of different Religion ibid. and 50. Inclines to a Match with Spain p. 2. Flattered by Gundamor p. 3. Delivers up the cautionary Towns ibid. Gives a Commission to Digby to Treat on a Marriages ibid. Receives Articles about Religion out of Spain p. 4. Imployes Sir Walter Rawleigh upon a design into America p. 4 5. Too credulous of the Spaniard p. 8. A Letter shewing upon what account the King gave way to the beheading of Sir Walter Rawleigh p. 9. Sends Viscount Doncaster Ambassador p. 11 13. His advice craved by the Count Palatine p. 12. He dislikes the Palatines acceptance of the Crown p. 13 a. 14 b. 16 a. Goes to war with one Regiment to assist the Palatines p. 14. Receives news of the defeat given the Palatine at Prague p. 17. Raises money by advice of Privy Council ibid. Flattered again by the Spaniard p. 18. The Spaniards secret Instructions in reference to the King ibid. He calls a Parliament p. 20. Forbids discourse of State affairs p. 21. His Speech to the Parliament ibid. Sends Digby Ambassador into Flanders p. 23. His second Speech in Parliament about Projectors p. 24. Speaks on behalf of the Duke p. 26 27. Sends a Message against Sir Henry Yelverton p. 33 d. Intends to adjourn the Parliament p. 35. The Commons Declaration about the Palatinate before the adjournment p. 36. Reforms grievances by Proclamation ibid. Again forbids speaking of State Affairs ibid. Gives the Great Seal to Dean Williams ibid. Reassembles the Parliament p. 39. In his absence the Lord Keeper speaks ibid. Is tryed with a Petition and Remonstrance from the Commons p. 40. Writes to the Speaker p. 43. Answers the Petition p. 46 47. His Answer qualified by the Lord Keeper p. 52. The Commons Protestation p. 53. The King tears it out of the Iournal ibid. Commits some Members of Parliament p. 55. Imployes others to Ireland ibid. Again forbids speaking of State Affairs ibid. Offers terms to the Emperor on behalf of the Palatinate ibid. Receives an Answer from the Emperor p. 56. Writes to Philip the Fourth to accelerate the Match p. 57. Also to Don Balthazar p. 59. Writes for the raising of moneys p. 61. Opposes the Arminian Sect p. 62. Shews favor to Recusants ibid. Lord Keeper excuses the Kings favor to Recusants p. 63. Writes to the Archbishop about regulating the Clergy p. 64. Gives direction concerning Preachers ibid. New conditions demanded of him by the Pope p. 66. His Answer to those demands p. 67. His Letter to Digby p. 68. Sends him a dispatch in a peremptory stile concerning Heidelburgh p. 70. Signs the Popes demands p. 73. Writes again to Bristol concerning the Palatinate p. 74. Sends the Prince into Spain p. 76. Archbishop Abbots Letter to the King against Tolleration of Popery p. 85. Articles of Marriage sworn to by him p. 86. The Oath taken by him p. 88. He swears also to private Articles p. 88 89. Pope Urban writes to King James p. 95. After the Princes arival sends to Bristol not to deliver the Proxy without restitution of the Palatinate p. 105. And writes to the Palatine to make his submission to the Emperor p. 108. The Palatines Answer p. 109. Seeks a match with France p. 114. Calls a Parliament about the Treaty with Spain p. 115. Makes a Speech ibid. Also another Speech in justification of the Duke p. 127. He makes a third speech unto them concerning their advice to break off the Match p. 129. Desires he may not have a Furrow of Land left without Restitution of the Palatinate p. 130. Scruples at the word insincerity of the King of Spain p. 136. Declares his resolution to dissolve the Treaties p. 138. Accepts Subsidies and makes another Speech to the Parliament ibid. Offers to go to war in his own person p. 139. Is troubled at a Petition against Recusants p. 140. That he hath broke the neck of three Parliaments ibid. His Answer to that Petition p. 143. Receives information concerning the Duke p. 144. His Speech at the adjournment of the Parliament p. 150. A Particular of what Laws he then passed p. 152. Desires a Match with France p. 156. Which he