6 Acres of Wood with the appurtenances in Wimondham which John Smith Gentleman to the aforesaid Arthur demised for a Term which is not yet past he entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did Eject and other harms did to him to the great damage of the said Arthur and against the peace of the Lord the King that now is c. and whereupon the said Arthur by Robert Love his Attorny complaineth that whereas the aforesaid John the 19 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 8 th at Wimondham had demised to the said Arthur the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold to the said Arthur his Executors and Administrators from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past for and during the Term of 3 years from thence next following to be compleat and ended by virtu of which demise the said Arthur into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Edward afterwards that is to say the 10 th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England the 9 th with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the aforesaid John to the said Arthur in form aforesaid demised for the aforesaid Term which is not yet past entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did Eject and other harms c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound And therof he bringeth sute c. And the said Edward by Thomas Blofield his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith he is not guilty of the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid as the said Arthur against him complaineth and of this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Arthur likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sherif that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in three Weeks 12. by whom c. And who neither c. Because aswell c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid put was between them in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of St. Michael then next following unless The Justices of the Lord the King to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Monday the 15 th day of July next At the Castle of Norwich in the County aforesaid first should come And now at this day cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Edward by their Attornies aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. send here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and John Crooke Kt. one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Justices of the said Lord the King to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be holden assigned by form of the Statute c. came aswell the within named Arthur as the within written Edward Cockle by their Attornies within written And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within is made mention being called likewise came whereof 12. that is to say Robert Seaman Adam Bale Bartholmew Harison Thomas Reynolds William Bidwel Henry Howlet Thomas Crooke Richard Russel Thomas Filney Iohn Freeman John Jewel and Edmond Johnson in the Jury aforesaid are sworn After which one of the Jurors aforesaid that is to say Robert Seaman with the assent of both parties aforesaid and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid from the Pannel aforesaid was utterly drawn c. Therefore with the assent of the parties aforesaid the Jury aforesaid was further put in respite here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary Therefore that the Sherif have the Bodies c. And appoint Decem Tales At which day here cometh aswell the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Edward by their Attornies aforesaid And the Sherif now sendeth That as to the distreyning of Bartholmew Stone that the Writ was so late delivered to him that for the shortnesse of the time he could not execute it but as to the putting of the Decem Tales whereof in the said Writ was made mention the said Sherif now sendeth That execution thereof doth appear in a Schedule to the said Writ annexed in which Schedule is contained the Pannel of the names of Ten Jurors whereof none c. Therefore the Jury aforesaid again is put in respite here until from Easter-day in 15. dayes unless the Justices of the King To the Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Wednesday in the first Week of Lent at Thetford in the County aforesaid first shall come for default of Jurors c. Therefore that the Sherif distrein the Jurors aforesaid by all their Lands c. And that the issues c. So that they be here unless c. to make the Jury aforesaid c. Norff. ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and John Crooke Kt. one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute c. cometh aswell the within named Arthur Legat as the within written Edward Cockle by their Attornies within contained And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid whereof within is made mention being called likewise come who to say the truth of the within contained chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 9 th day of July in the yeer of the Reigns of the same King and Queen Philip and Mary the 4th and 6th were seised of and in the Mannor of VVimondamâ— in the County aforesaid in their Demesn as of Fee in the Right of hâ—s Crown of England whereof the Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written then were parcel and the aforesaid late King and Queen Philip and Mary so as before is said of and in the Mannor aforesaid whereof c. being seised The said King and Queen the said 9th day of July in the yeer of the Reigns of the said late King and Queen Philip and Mary the 4th and 6th made their Letters Patents under the great Seal of Eng. to one George Howard Kt. of the aforesaid Lands and Tenements in the Declaration within written named amongst other By the names of 2 pieces of Lands called Nettlehamsted VVikemans containing by estimation 15. Acres lying and VVyndmondham aforesaid in the County aforesaid then or late in the tenure or occupation of Joh. Coleman late to the Monastery of VVyndmondham sometimes belonging and appertaining parcel of the
and Dignity c. And afterwards That is to say at the Gaol Delivery of the Lord the King at Newgate holden by the City of London aforesaid at the Justice Hall situate in the Old Baly in the Parish of St. Sepulcher in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid the 23d day of Iune in the yeer of the Reign of the said our Lord Iames by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland the 10th and of Scotland the 45th before Iames Pemberton Knight Mayor of the City of London aforesaid The right Reverend Father in God Iohn Bishop of London Thomas Flemming Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Edward Coke Kt. Chief Justice of the said Lord the King of the Bench Lawrence Tanfeild Knight Chief Baron of the Exchequer of the Lord the King Christopher Yelverton Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned David Williams Knight another of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned John Croke Knight another of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas to be holden before the King himself to be holden assigned Stephen Soan Knight John Garrard Knight Thomas Bennet Knight Baptist Hicks Knight Francis Bacon Solicitor General of the Lord the King Henry Mountague Knight one of the Kings Serjeants at Law and Recorder of the City of London aforesaid and other their Fellows Justices of the Lord the King To his Gaol aforesaid of Prisoners in the same being to be delivered assigned The aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng under the custody of Edward Barkham and George Smythes Sherifs of the City aforesaid to the Barr aforesaid brought in their proper persons came and severally being asked how of the Felony and Murder aforesaid they would acquit themselves The said Robert Carliel saith That he cannot deny but that he is guilty of the Felony and Murder aforesaid to him in form aforesaid imposed and the Felony and Murder aforesaid expresly confesseth and thereof putteth himself upon the Mercy of the King and the aforesaid James Irweng saith That he of the Felony and Murder aforesaid to him in form aforesaid imposed is not guilty and thereof for good and ill puts himself upon the Country Therefore immediately he cause a Jury to come c. And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid by the aforesaid Sherifs of the City aforesaid to this impannelled being called that is to say Humphry Slâ—cy William Morgan Rouland Healing Hugh Hawesh Henry Colthurst William Hicks William Hayes Richard Bridges William Wilde John Palmer Solomon Green and Richard Rudd came who to say the truth of and upon the premises to the said Iames Irweng imposed chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid John Irweng is guilty of the Felony and Murder to him in form aforesaid imposed in manner and form as by the indictment aforesaid against them it is supposed And that he the time of the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid committed or ever after had no Goods or Chattels Lands or Tenements to the knowledge of the Jurors aforesaid Upon which the said Robert Carliel and Iames Irweng being severally spoken unto If they had any thing for themselves or could say Wherefore the Court aforesaid to Judgement and Execution of them and either of them of the premises ought not to proceed who said nothing but what at first they had said Upon which then and there It is considered by the said Justices That the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng to the Gaol of Newgate aforesaid from whence they came should be sent back and thence be lead and either of them be lead unto the place of Execution and there be hanged and either of them be hanged until c. The Indictment of Robert Creighton Esq THE Jurors present for the Lord the King upon their Oath That Middle whereas Robert Carliel late of London Yeoman and James Irweng late of London Yeoman Not having God before their Eyes but seduced by the instigation of the Devil the 11th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. and of Scotland the 45th at London that is to say in the Parish of St. Dunston in the West in the Ward of Farrington without London aforesaid c. with Force and Armes c. Feloniously and of their fore-thought Malice in and upon one John Turner then and there in the Peace of God and of the said Lord the King being made an Aassult and Affray And the aforesaid Robert Carliel a certain Gun called a Pistoll of the value of 5. shillings then and there charged with Gunpowder and one leaden Bullet which Gun the said Robert Carliel in his Right Hand then and there had and held in and upon the aforesaid John Turner then and there Feloniously Voluntarily and of his Malice fore-thought did shoot off and discharge And the aforesaid Robert Carliel with the leaden Bullet aforesaid from the Gun aforesaid then and there sent out the aforesaid Iohn Turner in and upon the left part of the Body of him the said Iohn Turner then and there feloniously struck giving to the said Iohn Turner then and there with the leaden Bullet aforesaid neer the left papp of him the said Iohn Turner one mortal Wound of the Breadth of half an inch and Depth of 5. inches of which mortal Wound the aforesaid Iohn Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid instantly dyed And that James Irweng Feloniously and of his fore-thought Malice then and there was present ayding assisting abetting comforting and maintaining the aforesaid Robert Carliel to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in form aforesaid to be done and committed And so the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irwenge the aforesaid John Turner at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid Feloniously Voluntarily and of their fore-thought Malice killed and Murdered against the Peace of the Lord the King that now is his Crown and Dignity one Robert Creighton late of the Parish of St. Margaret in the County of VVestminster Esquire not having God before his Eyes but being seduced by the Instigâ—tion of the Devil before the Felony and Murder aforesaid by the aforesaid Robert Carliel and James Irweng in manner and form aforesaid done and committed that is to say the 10th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith the 10th and of Scotland the 45th the aforesaid Robert Carliel at the aforesaid Parish of St. Margaret in Westminster aforesaid in the County of Middlesex aforesaid to the Felony and Murder aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid done
THE DECLARATIONS AND OTHER PLEADINGS Contained in the eleven PARTS of THE REPORTS OF Sir EDWARD COKE Knight SOMETIME Lord Chief Justice of ENGLAND and one of his Majestes Council of ESTATE Rendred into English By W. HUGHES of Grayes-Inne Esquire For the benefit of all Students and Practizers of the Common Law With a Perfect TABLE of the Principal Matters thereunto Annexed LONDON Printed for W. Lee D. Pakeman and G. Bedell to be sold at their Shops in Fleet-street 1659. ACTIONS upon the CASE Easter Term Anno 43. in the Kings Bench Rott 569. 1 Lutterels Case Co. 4. part fol. 84. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Somer ss in the Term of St. Michael last past before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came Edward Cottel Gent. by John Nightingale his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then and there his Bill against George Lutterell Esq Robert Norcome and John Quick in the Custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Trespasse upon the Case And are Pledges of suit John Doo and Richaâ—d Roo which Bill followes in these Words ss Somerset ss Edward Cottell Gent. complaneth of George Lutterell Esq Robert Norcome and John Quick in the Custody of the Marshall of the Marshalsey of the said Lady the Queen before the Queen being for that viz. That whereas the said Edward the 4th day of May in the 41th year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England and before he was seized of and in Two antient and ruinous Fulling Mills with the appurtenances in Dunster in the County aforesaid in his Demesn as of Fee To which Fulling Mills a great part of the Water of the River in Dunster aforesaid from a certain place called the Headwear of the said River in Dunster aforesaid the said 4th day of May the 41. year aforesaid did run and also before time out of memory of Men continually accustomed and used to run And whereas also the said 4th day of May in the 41. year aforesaid and before time out of the memory of Men for the preservation direction and continuing of the right course of the said great part of the Water of the River aforesaid to run to the Fulling Mills aforesaid A certain thick bank was made of Timber and Earth neer and above the Mills aforesaid on the West part of the Course of the said great part of the said Water of the River aforesaid and was neer adjoyning to a certain Street commonly called West-street in Dunster aforesaid And also whereas the said Edward of the aforesaid Fulling Mills with the appurtenances in the form aforesaid being seized Afterwards that is to say the 28th day of October in the 41. year of the said Lady the Queen that now is The said two Fulling Mills as before is said being ruinous did totally pull down and afterwards that is to say The 20th day of June in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 42. at Dunster aforesaid in the County aforesaid in the places of them and where the aforesaid Two Fulling Mills before were made and built upon the aforesaid great part of the said Water of the River aforesaid Two Corn Mills for the grinding of Corn newly had builded erected and perfected By reason whereof the said Edward then was seized and as yet is seized of the said two Corn Mills so as before is said new built erected and perfected in his Demesn as of Fee and the aforesaid great part of the Water of the River aforesaid in Dunster aforesaid from the the said place called the Headwear of the said River in Dunster aforesaid from the time of the new building erecting and perfecting of the aforesaid his Corn Mills untill the 10 th day of September then next following did run By pretence of which The said Edward after the building of the said Two Corn Mills until the said 10th day of September divers gains and profits of the said people of the Lady the Queen that now is for the grinding of their Corn at the said Corn Mills had gotten Yet the said George Robert and John not ignorant of the premises maliciously devising and intending the said â—dward un justly to molest and him altogether to hinder and deprive of the profits of the grinding of their Corn Mills aforesaid the said 10 th day of September in the 43. year aforesaid The said thick bank aforesaid did dig and break And the whole aforesaid great part of the aforesaid Water of the River aforesaid which to the aforesaid Corn Mills of the said Edward from the said place called the Headwear did run and ought and used to run from his antient and used course That is to say in the said Sreet commonly called the West-street in Dunster aforesaid did divert and withdraw wherby the said Edward of the grinding of the whole profit of their Corn Mills afore for a great time That is to say from the aforesaid 10 th day of September in the 42. year aforesaid until the bringing of this Bill viz. that is to say the 20 th day of November in the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 43. wholly lost to the damage of the said Edward 200 l. And therefore he brings his Sute And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter this Term until which day the said George Robert and John had licence to imparl and then to answer c. before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the said Edward by his Attorney aforesaid as the said George Robert and John Quick by Stephen Brodrippe their Attorney and the said George Robert and John defend the force and injury when c. And say that they are thereof no wayes guilty And of this put themselves upon the Country And the said Edward likewise c. Wherefore a Jury was to come before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Thursday in 15. dayes of the Holy Trinity and who neither c. And because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards process was continued between the parties aforesaid of the plea aforesaid by Juries thereof respited between them before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster until Fryday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael then next following Unless the Justiceâ— of the Lady the Queen assigned to take Assizes in the County aforesaid First upon Thursday the 6 th day of August at the Castle of Taunton in the County aforesaid by the form of the Statute c. shall come for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneyes aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of the Assizes before whom c. sent hither their Record had before them in these words 1 ss Afterwards the day and place
within contained before William Periam Knt. Chief Baron of the Queens Exchequer and Edward Fennier one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas holden before the said Queen Assigned Justices of the said Lady the Queen Assigned to take Assizes in the said County of Somerset by the form of the Statute c. come as well the said David Cottell Gent. by Adrian Street his Attorney As the within written George Lutterell Rob. Norcome and John Quick by Henry Collier their Attorney And the Jury whereof mention is within made being likewise called came who being chosen tried and sworn to say the truth of the matter within conteined Say upon their Oathe That the said George Robert and John are guilty of the premises within put unto them As the said Edward Cottell within against them complaineth And they do assess the damages of the said Edward for the occasion within written besides Costs and Charges by him about his sute in his part expended set to 40. s. and for Charges and Costs of sute 10 5. s. Therefore it is granted That the said Edward shall recover against the said George Robert and John his damages aforesaid by the Jury in form aforesaid assessed As also 6. l. for his Costs to the said Edward by the Court of the Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 8. l. and 5. s. And the said George Robert and Iohn in mercy c. Hillary Term 38. Eliz. Anno 305. in the Kings Bench Slades Case Co. 4. part Fol. 91. a. MEmorandum At another time That is to say The Term of St. Michael Devon ss last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came John Slade by Nicholas VVeare his Attorney and brought there in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there a certain Bill against Humphrey Morley in the Custody of the Marshal c. Of a Plea of Trespas upon the Case And are Pledges of sute John Doo and Richard Roo which Bill followeth in these Words ss Devon ss John Slade complaineth of Humphrey Morley in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas the said John the 10th day of November in the year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 36th was possessed for the Term of divers years then and yet to come of and in one Close of Land with the appurtenances in Halberton in the County aforesaid called Rack Park containing by estimation 8. Acres and so hereof being possessed The said John afterwards That is to say the said 10th day of November in the 36th year aforesaid had sowed the said Close with Wheat and Rye which Wheat and Rye in the Close aforesaid by the said John so as before is said sowed afterwards That is to say the 8th day of May in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37th were grown into ears The said Humphrey the aforesaid 8th day of May in the sayd 37. aforesaid The said Wheat and Rye in ears upon the Close aforesayd as before is said then growing at Halberton aforesaid in consideration that the said John then and there at the special instance and request of the said Humphry had bargained and sold unto the said Humphry to the use and behoof of the said Humphry All the eares of Wheat and Coâ—n which then did grow upon the said Close called the Rack Park the Tithes thereof to the Rector of the Church of Halberton aforesaid due only excepted did assume and then and there faithfully promised That he the said Humphry sixteen pounds of lawful Mony of England to the aforesaid John in the Feast of St. John the Baptist then next following would well and truly content and pay Yet the said Humphery his assumption and promise aforesaid little regarding but endeavouring and intending the said John of the aforesaid 16. l. in that part subtilly and craftily to deceive and defraud the said 16. l. to the said John according to his assuming and promise hath not yet paid nor any way for the same contented him although the said Humphry thereunto afterwards That is to say the last day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37. aforesaid at Halberton aforesaid by the said John was oftentimes thereunto required but to pay him or content to pay him altogether refused and doth yet refuse Whereupon the said John saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 40. pounds and thereof he bringeth sute c. And now at this day That is to say Friday next after the 8. day of St. Hillary the self same Term until which day aforesaid the said Humphry had license to imparl to the Bill aforesaid and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh well the said John by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Humphery by John Halstaff his Attorny and he the said Humphry doth defend the force and Injury when c. And saith That he did not take upon him in manner and form as the said John Slade hath complâ—ined against him And upon that putteth himself upon the Country and the said John Slade likewise c. Therefore a Jury was to come before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Thursday next after 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary c. and who neither c. And because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards process was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Juries thereof respited between them before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Wednesday next after the fifteenth day of Easter the next c. following Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen to take Assises first upon Monday the second Week of Lent at the Castle at Exeter in the County aforesaid by the form of the Satute c. shall come for default of Jurors c. At which Wednesday before the Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the before said Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent hither their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within mentioned before Thomas Walmesley one oâ— the Justices of the Queen oâ— the Common Pleas and Edward Fenner one of the Justice oâ— the said Lady and Queen assigned to hold plea before the Queen her sel Justices oâ— the said Lady the Queen assigned to take Assizes in the County a oâ—oesaid by form of the Statute c. come as well he was named John Slade by Thomas Clayton his Attorny as the within written Humphry Morley by Henry Collier his Attorny and the Jurors sworn whereof mention is within made likewise being
William Banes then and there faithfully That she the said Mary the aforesaid 77. pounds to the said William Banes then at that next Quarter that is to say at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following the promise aforesaid in the 7th year aforesaid well and truly would pay and content Or otherwise the said Mary then and there would assign to the said William Banes for his security in that behalf for the payment of the aforesaid 77. pounds All the Interest of the Term of years which she the said Mary then had to come of and in the Gardens and Bowling-Ally aforesaid if the said Mary the said 77. pounds to the said William Banes according to her assumption and promise aforesaid had not paid And the said William Banes further saith That he the said William Banes giving Faith to the promise and undertaking of the said Mary did not trouble or sue the said Mary for the said 77. pounds but did forbear the payment thereof from the time of the promise aforesaid until the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next following the promise aforesaid in the year aforesaid And the said William Banes further saith That after the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid that is to say the 10th day of November in the 4th year aforesaid at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the said Mary took to Husband the aforesaid Edward Paine Yet the aforesaid Mary whilest she was single or the said Edward and Mary after the Mariage between them solemnized the undertaking promise of the said Mary whilest she was single little regarding but threating and fraudulently intending the said William Banes of the aforesaid 77. pounds craftily and subtilly to deceive and defraud of the said 77. pounds nor the said Mary whilest she her self was single to the said William Banes at the aforesaid Quarter that is to say at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next following the promise aforesaid in the 7th year aforesaid according to the promise and undertaking aforesaid in this behalf paid or any was for the same contented or otherwise then and there at that Feast did not assign to the said William Banes All the Interest of the Term of years which she the said Mary then had to come of and in the Gardens and Bowling-Alley aforesaid Nor the said Edward and Mary the Mariage betwixt them being celebrated at any time after he his the aforesaid 77. pounds to the said William Banes according to the promise and undertaking of the said Mary aforesaid have paid or any wayes for the same have contented him Or all the Interest aforesaid of the Term of years of the said Edward and Mary of and in the Gardens and Bowling-Ally aforesaid according to the promise and undertaking of the said Mary to the said William Banes for his security in that behalf hitherto have assigned although this to do by the said William Banes the said Mary whilest she was single and the said Edward and Mary after the Mariage betwixt them celebrated that is to say the last day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England the 8th at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid often were required By which the said William Banes all the gain commodity and profit which he with the aforesaid 77. pounds in buying selling and lawfully bargaining could have had or gained if the said Mary her promise and undertaking aforesaid in form aforesaid had performed utterly lost whereupon the said William Banes saith That he is the worse and hath damage to the value of one 100. pound And hereof bringeth sute c. And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary this same Term untill which day the said Edward and Mary had License to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to Answer c. before the Lord the King at VVestminster cometh as well the aforesaid VVilliam Banes by his Attorney aforesaid as the said Edward and Mary by Isham Novell their Attorney and the said Edward and Mary defend the force and injury when c. And say That the said Mary did not take upon her in manner and form as the aforesaid VVilliam Banes above against them hath declared And of this put themselves upon the Countrey and the aforesaid VVilliam Banes likewise c. Therefore a Jury thereof was to come before the Lord the King at Westminster upon Monday next after 15. dayes of St. Hillary and who neither c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards the Prosess was continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors thereof put between them in respite before the Lord the King at Westminster untill Tuesday next after 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady then next following unlesse the beloved and faithful of the Lord the King Thomas Flending Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of Pleas in the Court of the said Lord the King before the King himself to be holden assigned first upon Monday next after the aforesaid 8. dayes of Purification of the blessed Lady at the Guild-hall London by form of the Statute c. cometh for default of Jurours c. At which day before the Lord the King at Westminster cometh the aforesaid William Banes by his Attorney aforesaid and the aforesaid Chief Justice before whom c. Sent here his Record before him had in these words Afterwards the day and place within conteined before the beloved and faithful of the said Lord the King Thomas Flending Knight Chief Justice within written associating to himself William Price according to the form of the Statute came as well the within named William Banes as the within written Edward Paine and Mary his wife by their Attorneys within written and the Jurours of the Jury whereof within is made mention likewise came and to speak the truth of the matter within conteined elected tryed and sworn say upon his Oath That the within named Mary took upon her in manner and form as the within written William Banes within against them hath declared and they assesse the damages of the said William by occasion of not performing the promise and undertakings within written besides the Charges and Costs by him about his sute in his behalf expended to 80. pounds and for his charges and costs to 53. shillings and 4. pence Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid William Banes shall recover against the said Edward Paine and Mary his wife the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 5. pounds 6. shillings 8. pence for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said William by the Court of the said Lord the King here with his assert of encrease adjudged Which damages in the whole do amount to 88. pound and the said Edward Paine and Mary his wife in mercy c. Assise
a sufficient replication on his part the said William prayeth Iudgement and that the said Robert from his action aforesaid against him to have be barred and the said Robert in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to him the said Robert his action aforesaid against the said William to have and maintain above by replying hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid William doth not deny nor to the same in any wayes answereth but the averment aforesaid to admit doth altogether refuse as at first prayeth Iudgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of detayning his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And because the Iustices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here on 8 dayes of Saint Michael to â—ear their Iudgment thereof because the Iustices here thereof not yet c. Debt Trinity Term. Anno 10. of King James Rott 2413. In Brownlow the Common Pleas. The Case of the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne Concerning Misnaming of Corporations C. 10. part fol. 120. a. IOhn Payn late of Catton in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of Norff. the Testament of John Payne late called John Payne of Kings Linne in the County of Norffolk Esq was summoned to Answer to the Mayor and Burgesses of Kings Lynne in the County of Norfolk of a Plea that he render to them 3000. pound which he unjustly deteineth from them c. And whereupon the said Mayor and Burgesses by Henry Bastard their Attorney say That whereas the aforesaid John Payne the Testator in his life the 27 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is c. The 6 th at Gaywood by his writing Obligatory had granted himself to be bounden to the said Mayor and Burgesses in the aforesaid 3000. pound to be paid to the said Mayor and Burgesses when thereof he was required yet the said John Payne the Testator in his life time the aforesaid John Payne the Executor after the death of him the Testator John Payne although often required the aforesaid 3000. pound to the said Mayor and Burgesses rendred not but the same denyed to them to render and the aforesaid John Payne the Executor doth deny the same yet to render to them and unjustly deteineth the same whereupon they say that they are the worse and have damage to the value of 100. pound and thereof bring Sute and bring here into Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid testifieth c. whose date is the same day and year aforesaid c. And the aforesaid Iohn Payne Executor by Thomas Blofield his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And saith that hee of the debt aforesaid by virtue of the writing aforesaid ought not to be charged Because he saith That it is not the Deed of the said Iohn Payne the Testator and upon this puts himself upon the Countrey and the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of Holy Trinity in 3. weeks â—2 c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid were put between them in respite here untill this day that is to say in 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. upon Monday the 27 th of day Iuly next following at the Castle at Norwich in the County aforesaid first shall come And now at this day comes as well the aforesaid Mayor and Burgesses as the aforesaid Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices to Assises before whom c. Send here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within conteined before Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and Iohn Croke Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Justices of the said Lord the King to Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. come as well the within named Mayor and Burgesses as the within written Iohn Payne the Executor by their Attorneys within written and the Jurors of the Jury wherefore within is made mention being called likewise come who to say the truth of the within conteined chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the making of the writing Obligatory within written The Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 7 th day of Iuly in the year of his Reign the 29 th By his Letters Patents under his Great Seal of England bearing date at Westminster the same day and year and to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed Reciting by the said Letters Patents That whereas the said late King by his Letters Patents whose date was the 27 th day of Iune in the 16 th year of his Reign of his special grace and of his meer motion late had granted and by the said his Letters Patents confirmed for him his Heirs Successors to the Mayor and Burgesses and Inhabitants of his Borough of Lynn Bishop in his County of Norfolk that they for ever should be one body Corporate and one Cominalty perpetually in thing and name and that they should have perpetual succession and the name of the Mayor and Burgesses of the Borough of aforesaid Bishops Lynne in the County of Norfolk should have and bear and by the same name should be persons able and capable in Law to have purchase Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels other possessions whatsoever and to plead and to be impleaded answer and answered defend and might and could defend before any Justices whatsoever whether spiritual Judges or temporal in whatsoever Courts and in all and singular Actions Causes Matters Plaints and Demands of whatsoever kind they should be or nature in the same manner as the other the Leige people of the said late King persons able and capable in Law to plead and be impleaded to answer and to be answered defend or might defend and that the said Mayor and Burgesses and their Successors should have or might have one Common Seal for their businesses and others to be done within the Borough aforesaid happening or arising with divers other Liberties Franchisles Grants Articles and immunities in the said Letters Patents conteined and specified as in the said Letters Patents more fully and manifestly is appeared And whereas afterwards by a certain Statute late in Parliament of the said late King at London holden the third day of November in the 21
the Queen that now is the 29th day at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex before Christopher VVray Knight then Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas before the said Queen holden Assigned by their certain writing Obligatory Sealed with their Seals had granted themselves to be bounden and did acknowledge themselves to owe to the aforesaid Titus by the name of Titus VVestbie Citizen Merchant Taylor of London or to his certain Attorny shewing the said writing his Heirs or Executors in the feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and if they should make default in the payment of the debt aforesaid Then the said Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard they willed and granted that then there should run upon the said Thomas Edward and Anthony and every of them their Heirs and Executors the penalty in the Statute staple of debts for Merchandizes in the same bought to be recovered ordained and provided and whereas also the said Thomas Edward and Anthony the said 440. pound by them in the form aforesaid acknowledged in the Feast aforesaid to the aforesaid Titus had not payed nor any of them had paid By which afterwards that is to say the Eleventh day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Queen that now is the 30th One Iohn Chomley Esquir the Clark of then said Lady the Queen that now is the Recognisance for debts to be recovered according to the form of the Satute in the like case provided deputed by his writing Sealed with his Seal the Recognisance aforesaid in the Chancery of the said Queen that now is at VVestminster aforesaid then being at the request of the said Titus did Certifie And the said Titus thereupon afterwards that is to say the 31th day of August in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid sued forth out of the said Court of Chancery at VVestminster aforesaid then being a certain Writ of the said Lady the Queen to the then Sheriffs of London directed By which Writ reciting Because the aforesaid Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard the 20th day of Ianuary in the year of the Reign of the said-Lady the Queen that now is the 29th before Christopher VVray Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of Pleas before the said Queen to be holden assigned did acknowledge themselves to owe to the abovesaid Titus 440. pound which he the same Titus they ought to have paid in the Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and the same day of issuing out of this Writ had not payed nor any of them then had paid as was said The said Lady the Queen by the said Writ the then Sheriffs of London commanded That the bodies of the said Thomas Smith Edward VVinter and Anthony Bastard if they were Lay-men to take and in the prison of the said Lady the Queen that now is untill the said Thomas VVestbie of the debt aforesaid of the debt aforesaid safely to be kept and all the Lands and Chattels of the said Thomas Edward and Anthony in the Bailywick of the said Sheriffs by the Oaths of honest and lawful men of their Bailywick they should diligently extend and apprize and seize into the Lands of the said Lady the Queen that the same to the beforesaid Titus untill to him of his debt aforesaid he should be fully satisfied they should make delivery according to the form of the Statute at VVestminster for the like debts to be recovered thereof made unprovided and how the said Sheriffs aforesaid should execute the same they should make known to the said Lady the Queen in her Chancery in 15. dayes of Saint Martin then next coming wheresoever it should then be by their Letters Sealed and that they should have there the said Writ which said Writ the said Thomas VVestbie afterwards and before the said 15. day of Saint Martin that is to say the 8th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid at London that is to say in the Parish of Christ-Church in the Ward of Farrington within delivered to the said Themas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London in form of Law to be executed And the said Titus further saith That the said Anthony Bastard at the same time of the delivery of the said Writ to the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher as before is said made was a Layman and yet is a Layman And that by virtue of rhe said Writ after and before the Retorn thereof that is to say The said 8th day of September in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid the aforesaid Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London the aforesaid Anthony Bastard at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by virtue of the Writ aforesaid took and arrested and the said Anthony in Execution for the said aforesaid 440. pound then and there had according to the exigencie of the said Writ and the said Anthony under the Custody of the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher Sheriffs in execution in the form aforesaid being The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher Sheriffs The said Anthony Bastard afterwards that is to say the 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid from the Custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher Sheriffs at large where he would go did suffer the said Titus of the aforesaid 440. pound not being satisfied Be which Action acrued to the said Titus to require and have of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher the aforesaid 440. pound for his debt aforesaid by the said Anthony in form aforesaid acknowledged yet the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Gatcher although often requested c. the aforesaid 440. pound to the said Titus have not yet rendred but have hitherto denyed to render the same unto him and do yet deny so to do Whereupon the said Titus saith that he is the worse and hath Damage to the value of 400. pounds and thereof he bringeth his Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Monday next after 8 bh of St. Hillary the self same Term until which day the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher had license to imparle to the said Bill and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the said Titus Westbie by his Attorny aforesaid as the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher by Christopher Rust their Attorny And the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher defend the force and injury when c. And say That they do not owe to the aforesaid Titus the aforesaid 440. pounds or any penny thereof in manner and form as the said Titus above against them delareth And of this
they put themselves upon the Country And the said Titus likewise c. Therefore a Jury came before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Saturday next after 15. dayes of Easter And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. Afterwards the proceeding thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in Respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill Monday next after three Weekes of Holy Trinity then next following Unlesse the Beloved and Faithful of the said Lady the Queen Iohn Popham Kâ— Chief Justice of the Lady of Pleas in the Court of the said Lady the Queen to be holden assigned first upon Saturday next after 15. dayes of Holy Trinity at Guildhall London by form of the Statute c. cometh for default of Jurors c. At which Monday next after three Weekes of Holy Trinity before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and the before said Chief Justice before whom c. sent here his record before him had in these words That is to say Afterwards the day and place within contained before Iohn Popham Kâ— Chief Justice within written associating to him Thomas Povey by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Titus VVestbie as the within written Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher by their Attornies within contained and the Jurors sworn whereof within is made mention some of them came and some of them did not come as it appeareth in the Pannel and some of the said Jurors now appeared that is to say Iohn Sly Thomas VVorship Arthur Parkins William Tegoe Iohn VViggenton appeared and were sworn in the Jury aforesaid and because that the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore others of the Standers by chosen by the Sheriffs of London at the request of the said Titus VVestbie and by the command of the Chief Justice aforesaid were new put whose names are fyled to the Pannel within written according to the form of the Statute in that case made and provided Which Jurors so a new put appeared that is to say Iohn Patson George Clarke Alexander Sharp Edward Flory Thomas Chapman Emanuel Trambel and Henry Field appeared who being sworn to the Truth of the matters which is contained with the other Jurors chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the within written Thomas Smith Edward Winter and Anthony Bastard the within written 21th day of Ianuary the 29th year within written at Westminster in the County of Middlesex within written before the within named Christopher Wray Kâ— then chief Justice of the Lady within written of Pleas before the Queen holden assigned by their writing Obligatory within written sealed with their Seales granted themselves to be bounden and acknowledged that they did owe to the aforesaid Titus the within written 440. pounds To be paid to the same Titus or his certain Attorney shewing that writing their Heirs or Executors in the within written Feast of the Annunciation of the blessed Mary the Virgin then next following and if they should make default in payment of the said Debt That then the said Thomas Smith Edward Winter and Anthony Bastard willed and granted that then should run upon them the said Thomas Edward and Anthony and every of them their Heirs and Executors the penalty in the Statute of Debts for Merchandizes in the same bought to be recovered ordained or provided in manner and form as the said Titus likewise within against them declared And that the said Statute by the said Thomas sueth Edward Winter and Anthony Bustard in form aforesaid acknowledged Afterwards that is to say the within written 11th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th within written by the within named Iohn Chomley Esq then Clark of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Recognizances of Debts to be recovered according to the form of the Statute in the like case provided deputed by his Writing within written sealed with his seal into the Chancery of the said Lady the Queen within written it was certified in manner and form as the said Titus within likewise against the said Thomas Skinner Iohn Catcher alledged And that thereupon the said Titus afterwards that is to say the within written the 31th day of August the 30th year within written sued forth out of the said Court of Chancery within written the Writ aforesaid within specified of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the Sheriffs of London directed By which Writ the said Lady the Queen that now is then commanded the Sheriffs of Lond. That the bodies of the within named Thomas Smith Edward Winter and Anthony Bastard if they were Laymen to be taken and in the Prison of the said Lady the Queen until the said Titus Westbie of the Debt aforesaid fully satisfied they should cause safely to be kept And all the Lands and Chattels of the said Thomas Edward and Anthony in the Balywick of of the said Sheriffs by the oath of honest and lawful men of their said Balywick by whom the truth of the matter may best be known according to the true value thereof they diligently cause to be extended and apprized and into the hands of the said Lady the Queen they make to be seised that the same to the aforesaid Titus until he should be fully satisfied of the Debt aforesaid they might be delivered according to the form of the Statute at Westminster for the like Debts to be recovered thereof made and provided And how the said Sheriffs have executed the said Command that they make known to the said Lady the Queen in the Chancery within 15. dayes of St. Martin then next wheresoever it should then be by their Letters sealed and that they should have here that Writ which said Writ the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Titus Westbie afterwards that is to say the within written 8th day of September in the 30th year aforesaid at London aforesaid that is to say in the within written Parish of Christ Church in the Ward of Farrington within delivered to the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher then being Sheriffs of London in form of Law to be executed in manner and form as the aforesaid Titus within likewise against them declared And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their oath aforesaid That the said Anthony Bastard then that is to say the aforesaid 8th day of September in the 30th year aforesaid was in the Goale of the said Lady the Queen that now is of Newgate under the Custody of the said Tho. Skinner and J. Catcher then Sheriffs of London aforesaid in Execution at the sute of one Robert Dighton for the Debt of 240. pounds and the said Anthony Bastard so there
the 8th the 11th at Pettesâ—o aforesaid By her certain Writing of Release which the said Warden or Rector and Scholars with the Seal of the aforesaid Sibil sealed here in Court bring whose date is the same day and yeer remised released and altogether for her and her Heirs for ever quit claimed to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Coteford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor then of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized in their full and peaceable possession then being their Heirs and Assignes for ever All her Right Claim Title Use Interest and Demand which ever she had now hath or at any time after might have of and in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances And further the said Sibil by her aforesaid Writing granted for her and her Heirs That she the said Sibil and her Heirs the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Richard Lyster Martin Linsey John Coteford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor their Heirs and Assignes against the then Abbot of Westminster and his Successors would warrant and for ever defend as by the said Writing of Release more fully appeareth And this the said Warden or Rector and Scholars are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement if the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain against the aforesaid Writing of Release the said Warranty of the said Sibil his Ancestor whose Heir the said Robert is in it contained his Action aforesaid against them ought to have c. And the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain saith that he for any thing before alleged to have his Action aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith That long before the aforesaid Deed and before the aforesaid Alured Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow had any thing in the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances The aforesaid Richard Chamberlain was seized of the aforesaid Mannors with the appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee And the said Richard so thereof being seized before the gift aforesaid that is to say the 12th day of June in the yeer of the Lord Edward late King of England the 4th after the Conquest the 11th The aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Cornburgh Nicholas Stathum and William Collow out of the Court of the Chancery of the said late King Edward the 4th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex then being brought and prosecuted a certain Writ of the said late King Edward the 4th of Right against the said Richard Chamberlain then being Tenant of the Free hold of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenaces amongst other things to the then Sheriff of the County of Buckingham directed By which Writ the said late King then and there commanded the said Sherif That he should command the said Richard Chamberlain by the name of Richard Chamberlain Esq that justly and without delay he render to the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William by the names of Richard Danvers Alured Gorneburgh Esq Nicholas Stathum and William Collow the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other by the names of the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances 6. Messuages 200. Acres oâ— Land 20. Acres of Medow 200. Acres of Pasture 100. shillings Rent with the appurtenances in Pettesho Eckney Emberton which he claimeth to be his Right Inheritance And whereupon they complained Chamberlain them unjustly deforced and unlesse he do and the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William Collow should him the said Sheriâ— secure to prosecute their claim That then he summon by good summoners the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain that he be before the then Justices of the said late King Edward the 4th here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid from the 15. day of St. John the Baptist then nexâ— following to shew wherefore ye shoâ—ld not do And that he have then this summons and that Writ Because Thomas Rokes Esq Chief Lord of the same Fee remised thereof his Court to the said late King Edward the 4th At which 15. dayes of John the Baptist before Thomas Brian Kt. and his Companions then Justices of the said late King Edward the 4th of the Bench here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid came aswell the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas Stathum and William Collow by Thomas Gurney their Attorny as the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain by John Wildstall then his Attorny And then the Sherif of the aforesaid County of Buckingham that is to say Reginald Gray Esq then there returned the Writ aforesaid to him in form aforesaid directed in all things served and executed and sent that the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and VVilliam Collow found to the said then Sherif sureties to prosecute his Writ aforesaid that is to say Richard Doo and Iohn Roo And that the said Richard Chamberlain was summoned by Iames Tye and Iohn Baker good summoners c. And hereupon The said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas Stathum and William Callow by the said Thomas Gurney their Attorney in the said Court of the aforesaid late King Edward the 4th of the Bench here that is to say at Wostminster aforesaid at the 15. dayes aforesaid of St. Iohn Baptist Declared against the said Richard Chamberlain of and upon their Writ aforesaid and upon their Writ aforesaid by the same Thomas Gurney demanded against the aforesaid Richard Chambrlain the Mannors Tenements Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified as their Right and inheritance by the aforesaid Writ of the said late King Edward the 4th because the aforesaid Thomas Rokes Chief Lord of the same Fee Released thereof his Court to the said late King And whereupon then they said That they themselves were seized of the Mannors aforesaid and of the Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified in their Demesn as of Fee and Right in the time of Peace in the time of the said late King Edward the 4th taking the profits therof to the value c. And that such is their Right then they did offer c. And the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain by the aforesaid John Wildstaâ—e by his Attorny came and defended the Right of the said Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William when c. And their seisin of which seisin c. as of Fee and Right c. And all c. And chiefly of the Mannors Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified and then vouched hereof to warranty Robert King who was present in the same Court in his proper person and willingly the Mannors and Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in the said Writ of Right specified to them then did warrant c. Whereupon the aforesaid Richard Danvers Alured Nicholas and William then demanded against the aforesaid Robert Tenant by his warranty the Mannors Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid in the said Writ of Right specified in form aforesaid c.
the aforesaid Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop did not infeoff the foresaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances By Protestation also That the aforesaid Sibil for the better security of the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin John Cottesford Iohn Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor in the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances according to Agreement between them the said Edward Sibil first before the aforesaid Recovery above supposed to be had by her Writing of Release aforesaid did not remise and release to the aforesaid Richard Lyster Martin Iohn Cottesford Iohn Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars above in their Rejoynder have alleged By Protestation also That the aforesaid Edward Chamberlain at the day of the bringing of the Original Writ of the said Nicholas Evan and Thomas Hartop out of the Court of the Chancery of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th that is to say the second day of Iune in the yeer of the Reign of the same late King the 4th or ever after was Tenant of the Freehold of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances For Plea The said Robert Chamberlain saith That the aforesaid Pâ—eâ— of the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars above by Rejoynder pretended is not sufficient in Law to bar him the said Robert from having his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars aswel for that that the Rejoynder is a Departure from the aforesaid Barr of them the Warden or Rector and Scholars as for want of sufficient matter in the said Rejoynder contained And this he is ready to aver wherefore for want of a sufficient Rejoynder of the said Warden or Rector Scholars in this part The said Robert Chamberlain as at first demandeth Judgement seisin of the Mannors aforesaid with the Appurtenances to him to be adjudged c. And the Warden or Rector Scholars in as much as they sufficient matter in Law to bar the aforesaid Robert from having his Action aforesaid against them the Warden or Rector and Scholars above by rejoyning have alleged which they are ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Robert doth not deny nor to the same any wayes Answereth so to admit of the same averment altogether refused as at first demand Judgement And that the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain to have his Action aforesaid be barred And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement because that the said Justices here therof not yet c. At which Day come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of upoÌ„ the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until from the day of Easter in 15. Dayes to hear their Judgment therof because the said Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof further Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here are thereof not yet At which Day here come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of upon the Premiseâ— before they give their Judgement thereof further day is given to parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here come aswell the aforesaid Robert as the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this the premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Justices here That the Plea of the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars above by Rejoynder pretended is sufficient in Law to barr the said Robert to have his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Robert take nothing by his Writ aforesaid that he be in Mercy for his false Clamour And that the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars go thereof without Day c. Indictment At the Sessions of Gaol Delivery at Newgate 5 to Decembris in the 8 th Year of King JAMES Machalleys Case Co. 9. part fol. 61. b. AT the Sessions of Gaol Delivery of Newgate holden for the City of London at the Justice Hall in the Old Baily in the Parish of St. Sepulchre without Newgate in the Suburbs of the said City upon Wednesday the 5th day of December in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord James by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith the 8th and of Scotland the 44th Before William Craven Knight Mayor of the City aforesaid Thomas Flemming Knight Chief Justice of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned George Snigg Knight one of the Barons of the Exchequer of the said Lord the King John Croke Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King to Pleas before the King himself to be holden assigned Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench Edward Bromley Knight one of the Barons of the said Lord the King of his Exchequer aforesaid John Sotherton another Baron of his Exchequer aforesaid Henry Mountague Knight Recorder of his said City of London and other of his Companions Justices of the said Loâ—d the King by Letters Patents of the said Lord the King to them and others and to any 4. or more of them thereof made To enquire by the Oaths of good and lawful men of the City London aswel within liberties as without by whom the truth of the matter might best be known of what Treasons soever Misprisions of Treasons Insurrections Rebellions And of whatsoever Murthers Felonies Man slaughters Killings Burglaâ—ies Misdeeds Offences and Injuries whatsoever within the City aforesaid committed in the said Letters Patents specified and to the said Treasons and other the premises according to the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of the Lord the King of England to hear and determine As also Justices of the said Lord the King to Gaol delivery of Prisoners there being assigned by the Oaths of Ralph Edmunds Leonard Harwood John Frost Edward Dames John Lyssant Francis Barton Edward Parnell Thomas Hyet Henry Kent Edward Motley
Westminster aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised After whose death The Reversion of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley with the Appurtenances whereof c. descended to the Lord Edward late King of England the 6th as Son and Heir of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th By which The said late King Edward the 6 th was seised of the Reversion of the said Manor with the Appurtenances as of Fee and right and so thereof being seised The said late King Edward the 6 th afterwards and before the time in which c. at Westminster afores dyed of such his estate therof seised with out issue of his body issuing After whose death the Reversion of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesly with the appurtenances descended to the Lady Mary late Queen of England as Sister and Heir of the said late King Edward the 6 th By which the said late Queen Mary was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and so thereof being seised the said late Queen Mary afterwards and before the time in which c. at Westminster aforesaid dyed of such her Estate thereof seised without issue of her body issuing After whose death the said Reversion did descend to the said Lady the Queen that now is as Sister and Heir of the aforesaid late Queen Mary By which the said Queen that now is was seised of the said Reversion as of Fee and right and the said Lady the Queen that now is so thereof being seised and the aforesaid Walter Walsh the Son of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley whereof c. in his demesn as of Fee tail in form aforesaid being seised The said Walter afterwards and before the time in which c. at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised After whose death The said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. did descend to one William Walsh his Son as Son and Heir of the body of the aforesaid Walter VValsh the Son issuing By which the said William afterwards and before the time in which into the said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body issuing and so thereof being seised The said William afterwards that is to say the third day of July in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30 th at Abbottesley aforesaid by his Indenture of Bargain and Sale between Robert then Earl of Leicester By the name of the Right Honourable Robert Earl of Leicester Baron of Denbigh of the both most Noble Orders of the Garter and Saint Michael Knight Lord High Steward of her Majesties Houshold Lord Chief Justice of Oyer and Terminer of all the Forests of her Majestie and Chaces by South Trent and one of her Majesties most Honourable Privy Councel of the one Part And the afores Willi. Walsh by the name of Will. Wash of Witley in the County of Worcester Esq of the other party made afterwards the 8 th day of the said Month of July according to the form of the Statute in that Case made and provided in the Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid in the said County of Middlesex then being in due manner of Record Inrolled One part of which Sealed with the Seal of the said William Walsh the said Richard Bushopp here in Court sheweth forth whose Date is the same third day of July in the 30th year aforesaid For and in consideration of a certain sum of Money to the said VVilliam by the aforesaid Earl of Leicester then and there before had paid bargained and sold to the said Earl of Leicester The Wood aforesaid with the Appurtenances in which c. To have and to hold to the said Earl of Leicester his Heirs and Assigns for ever By colour of which aforesaid Bargain and Sale and Inrolment thereof The said Earl of Leicester into the Wood aforesaid with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised The said Earl of Leicester afterwards that is to say the 5 th day of Septemb. in the year of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 30th aforesaid at Abbottesley aforesaid dyed of such his Estate thereof seised without issue of his body issuing After whose death the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances descended to Ambrose then Earl of Warwick as Brother and Heir of the aforesaid late Earl of Warwick By which The said Ambrose Earl of Warwick into the Wood aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereoâ— being seised The said Ambrose Earl of Warwick afterwards that is to say the 24th day of January in the year of the Reign of the â—â—d Lady the Queen that now is the 32th at Abbottesley aforesaid By his Indenture between him the said Ambrose Earl of Warwick by the name of the Right Honourable Ambrose Earl of Warwick of the most Noble Order of the Garter Knight of the one part and Edward then Earl of Bedford and William Russel Knight Charles Morrison Knight Ambrose Copinger Esquire by the names of the Right Honourable Edward Earl of Bedford William Russell Knight Charles Morri on Knight Ambrose Copinger Esq one part of wch sealed with the Seal of the said Aâ—brose Earl of Warwick the said Richard Eushop here in Court brings whoâ—e date is the same day and year For and in consideration of the natural entire and cordial love and affection which the aforesaid Ambrose Earl of Warwick then had and bore to his most dear and beloved then wife the said Ann Countess of â—arwick in the Information aforesaid above named Daughter of the Right Honourable Francis Earl of Bedford deceased Grandfather of the said Edward then Earl of Bedford and Father of the said William Russel as for and in consideration of a Mariage before that time had between the aforesaid Ambrose then Earl of Warwick and the aforesaid Lady Ann now Countess of Warwick then his wiâ—e and for and in consideration of the encrease of the Joynture of the said Ann before that time made in the respect of the aforesaid Mariage in consideration also of the better advancing of the said Ann after the death of the said Ambrose then Earl of Warwick if shee the said her beloved husband should survive to support and sustein her Honourable Estate and to pay such debts which the said Earl owed at the time of his death and also such Legacies as the said Earl by his last Will in writing should bequeath The said Earl Covenanted and agreed for him his Heirs Executors and Administrators to and with the aforesaid Edward Earl of Bedford William Russell Charles Morrison and Ambrose Copinger their Heirs and Assignes and every of them That immediatly from and after the Sealing and delivery of the
unto him Which being read and heard The said Richard saith That in the Record and Processe aforesaid and in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is in nothing erred and prayeth That the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer do proceed aswell to the Examination of the Record and Processe as to the aforesaid matters for Errors alleged according to the form of the Statute aforesaid And the aforesaid Attorny of the said Lady the Queen saith as above and prayeth likewise c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurey will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given here to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the next day after Tuesday falling the 3d. day of May to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer into the Chamber aforesaid the said Richard Bushop comes by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the first Tuesday following the Term of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the abovesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the second Tuesday in the Term of Michael next comming to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid did not come But John Popham Knight and Edward Anderson Knight Chief Justices of each Bench come at the same day and then are there present according to the form of the Statute in such case made And the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid comes by his Attorny aforesaid before the said Justices And the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors by the said Justices is adjorned and continued by virtue of the said Statute until Tuesday next And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop to hear their Judgement thereon c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday falling the 8th of November following to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Treasurer and the aforesaid Chief Justices present in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because for the absence for the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal in the aforesaid Businesse and Sute of Error it cannot be proceeded the same cause is continued and adjorned by them the Lord Treasurer and Chief Justices by virtue of the Act aforesaid made until Tuesday falling the 22th day of November then next following in the Chamber aforesaid And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the same Chamber to hear his Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the aforesaid Justices in the Chamber aforesaid comes the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid the aforesaid Lord Treasurer there then not comming the Business and Sute of Errors aforesaid is continued and adjorned by them the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Chief Justices by virtue of the aforesaid Act thereof made until the second Tuesday in the Term of St. Hillary then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer came not in the Chamber aforesaid but the aforesaid Chief Justices of each Bench came into the same Chamber and are there present And the aforesaid Richard Bushop at the same day in the Chamber aforesaid before the said Justices likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned further by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made until the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter next following And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the aforesaid Chief Justices comes here the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid by his Attorny aforesaid and the said Lord Treasurer then and there not comming the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the last Tuesday of the aforesaid Term of Easter in the Chamber aforesaid and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesa to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer aforesaid come not But the aforesaid Chief Justices come into the same Chamber and are there present And the aforesaid Richard Bushop likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid and the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors by them is continued and adjorned further by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made until the first Tuesday in the Term of the Holy Trinity then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer then and there come not the aforesaid Business and Sute of Erors is continued and adjorned according to the form of the Statute thereof made further until Tuesday the 4th day of July in the same Term of the Holy Trinity the same day is given to the aforesaid Ric. Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear his Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Ric Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Lord Treasurer come not therfore the aforesaid Business Sute of Errors is
continued and adjorned according to the form of the Statute aforesaid further until the third Tuesday in the Term of St. Michael next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber afores to hear their Judgment therof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the 21th day of November in the same Term of St. Michael and the same day is given to th aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesa to hear their judgment thereof c. â—At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Businesse and Sute of Errors is adjorned and continued according to the form of the Statute aforesaid until the second Tuesday of the Term of St. Hillary next following And the same day is given to the afores Rich. Bushop to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer come not therefore the aforesaid Business and Sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further until the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter then next following and the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Treasurer come not therefore the Business and Sute of Errors aforesaid until the first Tuesday in the Term of the Holy Trinity next following And the same day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber afores to hear their Judgement thereof At which day before the aforesaid Thomas Egerton Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Thomas Lord Buckherst now Lord Treasurer of England in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen as at first prayeth c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Treasurer will further avise of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises before c. Further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until the second Tuesday in the term of St. Michael then next following to hear their Judgement therof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not avised yet of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 23th day of October the same Term of St Michael to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorney aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard bushopp in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the 30th day of the said Moneth of October the same Term of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer do not come in the Chamber aforesaid but the aforesaid Chief Justices in the Chamber aforesaid come and the aforesaid Richard Bushopp at the same day in the same Chamber and before the same Justices likewise cometh by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid business and sute of Errors is continued and adjorned by virtue of the Statute aforesaid thereof made further untill Tuesday the 6th day of November the same Term of Saint Michael and the same day is given unto aforesaid Richard Bushopp to hear their Judgement therof c. At which day neither the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal nor Lord Tresurer nor the aforesaid Chief Justices come unto the Chamber aforesaid Afterwards the said Lady the Queen that now is sent here another her writ close under her Great Seal out of her Court of Chancerie to the Tresurer and Barons of this Exchepuer directed the Tenor of which writ followeth in these words ss Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Tresurer and her Barons of her Exchequor Greeting Because in the Record and Process and because of giving of Judgement in the plaint which was in our Court before you the aforesaid Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid in the Term of the Holy Trinity in the yeer of our Reign the 37th by Bill between us and Richard Bushopp of certain Trespass and Intrusion in certain Woods with the appurtenances called Alton otherwise Aluington Wood conteyning by estimation 3000 Acres of Wood in Alton otherwise Aluington and Rock in our County of Worcestor manifest Error intervened to our great damage and because in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Edward late King of England the 3d. our Progenitor at Westminster in the 31th yeer of his Reign holden made amongst other things it is agreed unto and established that in all cases the King or other persons concerning where any one complaineth of Error done in process in the Exchequer the Chancellor and Tresurer cause to come before them in some Chamber of Councel nigh unto the Exchequer the same Record and process out of the said Exchequer and taking to them the Justices and other sages such as to them they shall seem to be taken to call before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid to hear their Informations and the causes of their Judgement and upon this business duly cause to be examined and if any Error should be found the same cause to be mended and the Rolls amended and after them into the Exchequer to do execution therof to be sent back as belongeth as in the said Statute it is conteyned We therefore willing Error if any such were according to the form of the Statute aforesaid to be corrected and full and speedy Justice to be
of his Serjant at Arms Attendant upon his Chancellor of England for the time being and had made Ordained and Constituted by his said Letters Patents him the said Richard his Serjeant at Arms for the term of his life And moreover by his said Letters Patents had given and granted to the aforesaid Richard Hatchman for the exercising and holding the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have hold and receive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day for the term of his life from the time of the death of his Serjâ—â—nt at Arms which should next dye of the issues and profits of the Hamper of the Chancery eâ—â—her by the Hands oâ— the Clerk or the Keeper of the said his Hamper for the time being at the Feasts of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any wayes anciently due and accustomed as by the said Letters Patents more fully appeareth And because the said Richard Hatchman is now willing to deliver up the aforesaid Letters Patents in our Chancery to be cancelled Which Letters Patents there now are cancelled as we have certain Knowledge to the intent that we would be gratiously pleased to grant to our well Beloved Mark Steward Gentleman other Letters Patents of the premises We therefore taking Consideration of the premises Of our special Grace certain Knowledge and meer Motion have given and granted and by these presents for us the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady the Queen do give and grant to the said Mark Steward the aforesaid Office of our Serjant at Arms Attendant upon our Chancellor of England for the time being And him the said Mark our Serjeant at Arms do make Ordain and Constitute by these presents To have and enjoy the said Office to the said Maâ—k Steward for the term of his life And moreover we have given and granted and by these presents for us the Heirs and Successors of the said Lady the Queen we do give and grant to the aforesaid Mark Steward for the exercising and holding the Office aforesaid the Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day To have enjoy and perceive yeerly the said Wages and Fee of 12. pence by the day to the aforresaid Mark for the term of his life of the issues and profits of our Hamper of our Chancery by the Hands of the Clerk or Keeper of the said our Hamper and the Heirs of our said Lady the Queen for the time being At the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by equal portions yeerly to be paid together with all other Profits Commodities Emoluments Allowances and Advantages to the said Office any wayes anciently due and accustomed c. Although the certain expresse mention of the premises or any of them or of other gifts or grants by us or by any of our Progenitors to the aforesaid Mark Steward before this time made in the premises there is not made or any Statute Act Ordinance Provision or any other thing cause or matter whatsoever in any thing notwithstanding In Witnesse whereof these our Letters we have caused to be made Patents Witnesse our selfs at Westminster the 23th day of September in the yeer of our Reigns the third and 4th By Colour of which Letters Patents the said Mark Steward well and truly to execute the said Office was sworn And further the said Jurors say That the last day of November in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 11th The said Lady the Queen at the humble Petition and request of the Right Honourable â—ord the Earl of Leicester and Robert Huyck Doctor of Physick granted that the said Mark Steward might absent himself from the exercising of his Office of Sergeant at Arms Attendant in his proper person upon her Chancellour of England for the time being during the good pleasure oâ— the said Mark until the said Lady the Queen should command him to serve in his Office aforesaid as by the deposition of the said Robert â—uyck and by a certain Letter under the proper hand writing of the said Earl of â—eicester which we found to be true in these English words following here unto the Court to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence given and shewed it more fully appeareth The Deposition of which Robert Huyck followeth in these words That is to say I was an humble Suter unto her gracious Majesty about ten years past that she would licence Mark Steward Serjeant at Arms Attendant upon the then Lord Keeper to give off his attendance in his own person to the end he might withdraw himself into the Country to play the good husband in his own house so long only as she should permit him and not recall him to his former attendance and the Office should be served otherwise to her Majesties contentation and the Lord Keepers well liking the which my Suâ—e she did very graciously grant me And after that upon the Lord Keepers praising Augustine Steward I commended him to the Queen as one very fit to discharge his brothers absence with his attendance I did sue to my Lord of Leicester and divers other of the Lords to speak in my behalf for the furtherance of the sute so in the end the Queen said I do like well and am right well content that Mark Steward do cease from his Waiting untill We shall Resolve otherwise And if his Brother be found sit he shall serve in his place during the time of his absence which Letter subscribed under the proper hand writing of the said Earl of Leicester followeth in these words To my very good Lords the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice of England and to either of them ss After my most hearty commendations to your Lordships This Bearer Mark Steward hath earnestly besought me to advertise your Lordships of my knowledge touching her Majesties leave for the said Stewards not attendance to his Office of Sergeant-ship Wherein this is very true that about Michaelmass as I take it in the 10th year oâ— her Majesties Reign the Court being then at Windsor Mark Steward both himself and his friends for that he had a desire to remain in the County earnestly travelled with me to be his mean for the obtaining of her Majesties good leave and favour that without any prejudice for not attending he might at his pleasure so do and for the supplying of his place which he had to serve about the late Lord Keeper of the Great Seal as Serjeant at Arms he acquainted me with the good liking and contentation my said Lord Keeper had to have a Brother of his to attend in his place To which also I gave my best furtherance afterwards Whereby her Majesty pleased both to grant her favourable License to Mark Steward for his absence and to allow his brother to supply his place who was accordingly
Maunsfield exercised and from thence hitherto do exercise and enjoy and all and singular Wages Fees Commodities Profits to the said Office due and by reason of the exercising of the said office within the Manor of Maunsfield aforesaid of right belonging to their own use had and took and the said Earl to exercise the said Office within the aforesaid Manor of Maunsfield and the Wages Fees and Profits to the said Office of right belonging and from the whole time whereof the memory of Man is not to the contrary to have and take with force and Arms then and there hindred and as yet doth hinder and other harms to him c. to the great damage c. and against the peace c. and whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 100. pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Robert and Thomas by William Cragg their Attourny come and defend the force and injury when c. and say that they are not guilty of the Trespass aforesaid as the aforesaid Earl above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid Earl likewise therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause of come here from the day of the Holy Trinity in 3 weeks 12 c. by whom c. and who neither c. to recognize c. because aswell c. Afterwards the day and place within contained before Peter Warberton one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the bench and Thomas Foster another of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Bench Justices of the said Lord the King to Assises in the County of Nottingham to be taken by form of the Statute c. come aswell the within named Roger Earl of Rutland as the within named Robert Spencer and Thomas Woldwood by their Attorneys within contained And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within is made mention being called some of them that is to say Edward Bould of Holloughton Esquire Edward Coppinger of Francfield Esquire George Hutchinson of Balford Gent. Francis Hollingworth of Stapleford Gent. VVilliam Gresley of the same Nicholas Hamond of Lound Gent. Anthony VVhitwell of VVeyston Gent. Joh. Sturtevant of Calverton Gent. Richard Griggs of Gringly up the Hill and John Seywell of Normanton against Plumtree come and are sworn Jurors of the Jury aforesaid and because the rest of the Jurors of that Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid at the request of Roger Earl of Rutland and by the command of the Justices aforesaid of new are added whose names are fyled to the Pannel within written according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided and the Jurors of new added that is to say John Hutten and John Templemem likewise come who to say the truth of the premises with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England was seised in her demesn as of Fee in right of her Crown of England of and in the Manor of Maunsfield in the County of Nottingham and of and in the Manor of Bolsover and Horsley in the County of Derby and so thereof being seised the 14th day of June tn the year of her Reign the 42th By her Letters Patents under the great Seal of England sealed and to the Jurors aforesaid shewed in evidence graunted to the aforesaid Earl of Rutland from the time of the full age of the said Earl of 21 years to the term and for and during the whole term of the natural life of him the said Earl the office of Steward of the Lordships or Manors aforesaid with the Wages and Fees to the said Office of old due and accustomed as in the said Letters Patents is contained the Tenor of which followeth in these words Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen Defender of the Faith c. To all to whom these present Letters shall come Greeting Know ye that we of our special Grace and of our certain Knowledge and meer Motion have given and granted and by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors do give and grant to our Well Beloved Cosin Roger Earl of Rutland the Office of Constable of our Castle of Nottingham and Keeper oâ— the Gates of the said Castle as also the Office of Steward Keeper Guardian and Chief Justice of our Forrest of Sherwood and our Parks of Billow Birkland Romwald Owseland Folwood Beskwood and Clipson with their Aupurtenances in the said County of Nottingham and him the said Roger Earl of Rutland Constable of our Castle aforesaid and Keeper of the Gates of the said Castle as also Steward Keeper and Justice Itinerate of the Forests and Parks aforesaid we â—o make ordain and constitute by these presents giving and granting to the said Roger Earl of Rutland by the Tenor of these presents full power and authority All and all manner oâ— Pleas Quarrels and Causes within the Forest and Parks aforesaid or any of them arising according to the Law and Custom of the Forest to hear and determine To have enjoy use and exercise the Offices aforesaid and every of them To the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland by him or by his sufficient Deputy or Deputies from the time of the full age of 21. yeers of the same Earl to the Term and for and during the whole Term of the natural life of the said Roger Earl of Rutland together with power in the said Offices to make and appoint all Officers of old due and accustomed and for the exercising and occupation of the Office aforesaid we give and grant by these presents to the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland the Wages and â—ee of 40. Marks by the year from the time of the full age of 21. years of the said Earl to the Term and for the whole natural life of the said Earl of Rutland As also an Annuity or yeerly Rent of 9. pound from the time of the full age of the said Earl to the Term for and during the whole Term of the natural life of the same Earl of Rutland for the Wages or Stipends of 9. Foresters assigned by him the said Earl to keep the Forest aforesaid To be taken yearly to be received the said Wages and Fee of 40. Marks from the Treasury of us our Heirs and Successors at the Receipt of our Exchequer at Westminster by the Hands of our Treasurer or Chamberlains or anâ— oâ— their Hands for the time being at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel and Easter by even portions And also the said Annuity or yearly Rent of 9. pound for the Wage and Stipend of the aforesaid Roger Earl of Rutland from the time of the full age of 21. years of the said Earl to the Term and for and during the whole Term of the natural life
the 22th day of June in this present 9th yeer of his Reign over England upon the humble Sute of the said Thomas to give License Power and Authority to him the said Thomas Sutton to place found and erect an Hospital and Free-school in the House called the late dissolved Charter-House besides Smith field in the County of Middlesex And like License Power and Authority for him the said Thomas Sutton at any time during his life to ordain appoint and place a Master of the said Hospital And that the said Hospital should be called by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And where furthermore by the said Letters Patents The Master of the said Hospital for the time being is ordained and appointed to be one of the 16. Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the said Hospital And that the same 16. Governours are by the said Letters Patents incorporate to purchase and take Lands to them and their Successors for ever for the maintainance of the said Hospital by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and the onely costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire as by the said Letters Patents amongst other things more at large may appear By reason whereof there must be a Master made before such time as the said Thomas Sutton can convey the Lands intended by the said Thomas Sutton to be conveied for the maintaiance of the said Hospital unto the said Governours according to the said Letters Patents Now the said Thomas Sutton minding the performance of the said charitable Act hath according to the power given him by the said Letters Patents and by these presents doth place nominate constitute and appoint his Right trusty and Well-Beloved John Hutton Clerk the first and present Master of the said Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire To have and to hold the said Office Room and place of Master of the said Hospital to him the said John Hutton from henceforth during the good will and pleasure of the said Thomas Sutton In witnesse whereof the said Thomas Sutton hath put his Hand and Seal dated the 13th day of June in the yeer of the Reign of our said Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. And of Scotland the 45th And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Thomas Sutton of all and singular the premises aforesaid in form aforesaid being seized Afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is of England c. the 9th abovesaid made a certain Indenture between him the said Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the Right Reverend Father in God George â—ord Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of â—lie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the common-Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet the Kings Attorny General that now is John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of St. Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk By the name of the Reverend Father in God George Arch Bishop of Canterbury Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Edward Coke Knight Lord Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of common-Common-Pleas Henry Hobert Knight and Baronet Attorny General of the Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of the Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and John Hutton Clerk Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and at the onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex at the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire of the other part made and within 6. Moneths then next following that is to say the 4th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord JAMES now King of England the 9th abovesaid in the Court of Chancery of the Lord the King that now is at Westminster aforesaid then being in due manner of Record inrolled according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And whereof one part sealed with the Seal of the said Thomas Sutton to the Jurors aforesaid was shewed in Evidence bearing date the same day and yeer The Tenor of which Indenture followeth in these words This Indenture made the first day of November in the yeer of our Lord God 1611. and in the yeers of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord JAMES by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. that is to say of England France and Ireland the 9th and of Scotland the 45th Between Thomas Sutton of Balsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire of the one part And the most Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitan of all England The Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England The Right Honourable Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England The Right Reverend Father in God John Lord Bishop of London The Right Reverend Father in God Launcelot Lord Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Sir Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the Court of common-Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorny General of our Sovereign Lord the King John Overal Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London
And Andrew Windsor of the same house Esquire William Vavsor of Linton in the County of York Gent. Peter Vavasor the younger of Spallington in the County of York Gent. and John Laundere of Staple Inn near London Gent. on the other party witnesseth that it is Covenanted concluded condescended declared and fully agreed betwixt the said parties and either of the said parties for him and his Heirs and their Executors and Administrators do Covenant condescend declare and agree by these presents to and with the other his and their Heirs Executors and Administrators in manner and form following That is to say Whereas the said Andrew Peter William and John have this present Term of Saint Hillary recovered to them and to their Heirs for ever by writ of Entry of disseisin in the Post had and prosecuted against the said Peter Vavasor Esquire before Sir James Dyer Kt. Richard Harper Roger Manwood and Robert Mounson Justices of our said Lady the Queens Majesty of her Court of Common Pleas at Westminster according to the usuall Order and form of Common recoveries heretofore used The mannor of Spaldington with the appurtenances and diverse other Lands Tenements and Hereditaments siituating and being in the Towns Parishes Hamlets and Fields of Spaldington Willytost Cripthorpe Bubarch Brighton Southcave and Replingham in the said County of York at the time of the said recovery had being the Inheritance of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire other than such Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments as the said Peter Vavasor Esquire lately purchased of one Henry Johnson Esquire by the names of the Mannor of Spaldington 40 Messuages 30 Tofts 30 Gardens 3 Dovehouses 1 Windmill 2000 Acres Land 500 Acers of Meadow 2000 Acres of Pasture 500 Acres of Wood 2000 Acres of Moor with the appurtenances in Spaldington Bubarch Brighton Willitost Gripthorp Southcave and Replingham That the intent and true meanning of all the said parties now is and at the time of the said Recoverie so had and suffered was That the said Andrew William Peter the younger and John and their Heirs and his Heirs or every of them immediately from and after the said Recoverie so had and executed should and shall stand and be seised of the said Mannor and of all other the Lands Tenements Hereditaments in the said Recovery meant and intended to be comprised that is to say of and in the said Mannor of Spaldington with the appurtenances and also of and in the Messuages Tofts Gardens Lands Tenements and Hereditaments with the appurtenances in Spaldington Willytost Gripthorp Bubarch Brighton Southcave and Replingham at the time of the said Recoverie had being the Inheritance of the said Peter Vavasor the Lands Tenements Hereditaments lately purchased by the said Peteer Vavasor of Henry Johnson only excepted as is aforesaid To the only uses intents hereafter by these presents set forth and declared and to none other uses intents or purposes That is to say To the use of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for term of his natural life without impeachment of any manner of wast after the decease of the said Peter Vavasar Esquire then to the use and behoof of the eldest Son lawfully begotten of the said Peter Vavasor of the Heirs males of the Body of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten And for default of such Issue male of the bodie of such eldest Son to the use of the second Son of the body of the said Peter Vavasor Lawfully begotten and the Heirs males of the body of the said second Son Lawfully begotten c. And so to the 9th Son of the said Peter and for default of such Issue male of the body of such 9th Son To the use of Edward Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for the term of his natural life without impeachment of any wast and after his decease to the use of the eldest Son Lawfully begotten of the Body of the said Edward and of the Heirs males of the Body of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten And for default of such issue male of such Eldest Son To the use of the second Son of the body of the said second Son Lawfully begotten c. And so to the 9th Son of the said Edward and for default of such issue male of the body of such 9th Son to the use of George Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for term of his natural life without impeachment of wast and after his decease to the use of the eldest Son Lawfully begotten of the body of the said George Vavasor and of the Heirs males of the body of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue male of the body of the said eldest Son To the use of the second Son of the body of the said George Vavasor Lawfully begotten and of the Heirs males of the body of second Son Lawfully begotten c. And so to the 9th Son of the said George And for default of such issue male of the body of such 9th Son to the use of Ralph Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for term of his natural life without impeachment of wast and after his decease to the use of the Eldest Son Lawfully begotten of the body of the said Ralph Vavasor and the Heirs males of the body of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue male of the body of such Eldest Son To the use of the second Son of the body of the said Ralph Vavasor Lawfully begotten and the Heirs males of the body of the said second Son Lawfully begotten c. And so to the ninh Son of the said Ralph and for default of such issue male of the Body of such ninth Son To the use of Marmaduke Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for the term of his natural life without impeachment of waste and after his decease to the use of the Eldest Son Lawfully begotten of the Body of the said Marmaduke Vavasor and of the Heirs males of the body of the said Eldest Son Lawfully begotten c. And so to the ninth Son of the said Marmaduke And for default of such issue male of the Body of such ninth Son To the use of Robert Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for the term of his natural life without impeachment of any waste and after his decease To the use of the Eldest Son Lawfully begotten of the Body of the said Robert Vavasor and of the heirs males of the Body of the said Eldest son Lawfully begotten and so to the ninth Son of the said Robert and for default of such issue male of the Body of such ninth Son To the use of Thomas Vavasor Brother of the said Peter Vavasor Esquire for term of his natural life without impeachment of any waste and after his decease to the use of the Eldest Son Lawfully begotten of the Body of the said Thomas Vavasor and of the Heirs males of the Body
c. in Gosfield aforesaid entred and was thereof seised in his Demesn as of Freehold for the Term of his life And the said Thomas Lawrence and Marcy further say That at the time of the death of the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes Husband c. the aforesaid Zachary was within the Age of 21. yeers that is to say of three yeers by which the said Marcy whilest she was single as Guardian and for nurture of the said Zachary into the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in Wetherfiald aforesaid being seised and that the said Zachary of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid in form aforesaid being seised And the said Marcy in form aforesaid being possessed Afterwards and before the making of the aforesaid Writing of Release here in Court brought at Gosfield aforesaid It was concluded and agreed between the said Marcy whilest she was single and the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son that the said Marcy should release to the said Thomas Nash the Son all her Dower happening to her after the death of the aforesaid Thomas Nash sometimes the husband c. in all Lands and Tenements of the said Thomas in Wetherfield aforesaid And that the said Thomas Nash the Son should enfeoff John Tiler the elder and John Tiler the younger and their heirs of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid to the use of the said Zachary and the heirs of his body Lawfully begotten and the said Thomas Lawrance and Marcy farther say that the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son of the Tenements aforesaid in Wethersfield aforesaid in the form aforesaid being seised and the aforesaid Marcy of the Tenements with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid being possessed the said Marcy afterwards that is to say the aforesaid 27th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 35 th abovesaid whilest she the said Marcy was single at Gosfield aforesaid the aforesaid writing of Release to the aforesaid Thomas the Son sealed and delivered And the aforesaid Thomas Nash the Son the 28th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said late Queen the 35 th aforesaid at Gosfield aforesaid enfeoffed the aforesaid John Tiler the elder and John Tiler the younger and their heirs of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid To the use of the aforesaid Zachary and the heirs of his body Lawfully begotten and this they are ready to aver whereupon they demand Judgement and seisin of the third part of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. in Gosfield aforesaid to be adjudged to the said Thomas Lawrance in manner and form aforesaid and that the matters above in the replication aforesaid are not sufficient in Law them the said Thomas and Marcy the Dower of the said Marcy in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. against the said Edward and Margaret to have and maintain and that they need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient Replication of the aforesaid Thomas and Marcy in this part the said Edward and Margaret as at first demand Judgement And that the said Thomas Lawrence and Marcy from the Dower of the said Marcy of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. against them to have be barred And the said Thomas and Marcy for as much as they sufficient matter in Law the said Thomas and Marcy to have and maintain their Action aforesaid against the said Edward and Margaret above by Replication have alleged which they are ready to aver Which matter the said Edward and Margaret do not deny nor to the same any wayes Answer but the Averment aforesaid altogether Refuse to admit as before demand Judgement and seisin of the third part aforesaid to be adjudged unto them And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the said Justices here thereof not yet c. Debt Ester Term 26. of Queen Elizabeth Rott 1608. RIchard Mauser late of London yeoman otherwise called Richard Mauser of Gillingham in the County of Kent Yeoman was summoned to Answer to William Painter Esq of a Plea that he render to him 40. pound whicb he oweth him and unjustly deteineth c. And whereupon the said William by Thomas Antrobas his Attorney saith That the said Richard the 6th day of April in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 12th at London in the Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap by a certain writing Obligatory granted himself to be bounden to the said William in the said 40. pound to be paid to the said William in the Feast of the Ascension of our Lord then next following Yet the aforesaid Richard although often required the aforesaid 40 pound to the said William hath not yet rendred but the same to him hitherto hath denyed and yet doth deny whereupon he saith he is the worse And hath damage to the value of 10. pound and thereof he bringeth sute And he brings here in Court the writing aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid doth testifie the date of which is the day and year aforesaid c. And the said Richard by John Cook his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And prayeth the hearing of the writing aforesaid and it is read unto him in these words The Condition of this Obligation is such That whereas the within bounden Richard Mauser and John Mouser his Son by their deed of â—eoffment bearing date the date of this Obligation have given granted and confirmed unto the within named William Paynter and his Heirs all that parcel of Wood-land called South-wood conteining by estimation 10. Acres be it more or lesse lying together in the Parish of Gillingham within said and Bedherst in the County within said to the Lands of one Thomas Remsby towards the East West and North and to the Kings way towards the South as the same do more at large it appear If the said William Paynter and his Heirs shall and may at all times hereafter have hold and injoy all the aforesaid parcell of Wood-land with the appurtenances and charged or saved harmlesse of and from all and every former Bargain Sale Gift Grant Lease Right Copihold Dower Rent Charge and all other things and incumbrances whatsoever had made or suffered to be done by the said Richard Mauser or his Heirs or Assignes and also if
the said Richard Mauser and John Mauser his Son and their Heirs and the Heirs of either of them do at all times hereafter upon request to them or any of them made at the costs and charges of the said William Paynter his Heirs and Assigns make seal deliver acknowledge and do all and every such further reasonable Act and Acts thing and things devise and devises in Law as shall be reasonably devised or required to be done by the said William Paynter his Heirs or Assigns or his or their Counsel learned in the Law for the further assurance surety and sure-making of the aforesaid parcel of Woodland with the appurtenances unto the said William Paynter his Heirs and Assigns That then this present Obligation to be void or otherwise to remain in his force and vertue Which being read and heard The said Richard saith That the said William ought not to have his Action against him because he saith That the aforesaid William from the time of the making of the writing aforesaid untill the day of the bringing of the Original Writ of the said William that is to say the 16th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 24th had held and enjoyed all the said parcell of Wood with the appurtenances called Southwood in the Condition aforesaid above specified kept free of and from all and singular former Bargains sales gifts grants demises rights joyntures dowers rent charges and from all other charges and incumbrances whatsoever had made or suffered to be made by the said Richard Mauser his Heirs or Assigns according to the form and effect of the Endorsment thereof And the said Richard Mauser further saith That after the making of the writing aforesaid and before the day of the bringing of the Original Writ aforesaid That is to say The 10th day of April in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 24th The aforesaid William Paynter at Gillingham in the County of Kent devised in writing a certain writing of Release between the said William Paynter and him the said Richard Mauser and the before said John Mauser and then and there required the said Richard and the said John that they would deliver the said writing as their Deed whereupon the said Richard the said writing at Gillingham aforesaid sealed and delivered as the Deed of the said Richard to the aforesaid William And further the said Richard saith That the said John Son of the said Richard in the condition aforesaid named upon the request of the said William made to the said John to Seal and deliver that writing as his Deed upon the shewing of the said writing of Release so devised because the said John was not lettered and could not read nor discern the contents or matter of the said writing at Gillingham aforesaid then required of the said William Paynter the writing aforesaid to be delivered unto him to shew the same to a man learned who could read the said writing to him so that he upon the reading of the contents of the writing aforesaid might inform himself whether that writing were made according to the Tenor of the Condition aforesaid or not and the said John said then and there That he would Seal and deliver that writing if that writing were according to the Tenor of the Condition aforesaid But the said William then and there refused to deliver to the said John the writing aforesaid to shew to a man learned in the Law who could read the same to the â—aid Iohn By reason of which The said Iohn did not seal nor deliver the writing aforesaid to the said William upon the request of the said William in manner and form aforesaid made And the aforesaid Richard Mauser saith That from the time of the making of the writing aforesaid untill the day of the bringing of the Writ aforesaid there were not any other farther Act or Acts devise or devises by the said William or his Counsel learned devised and required to be done to the aforesaid William Paynter for the further assurance security and sure making of the aforesaid parcell of Wood with the appurtenances by the said Richard Mauser and Iohn Mauser or any of them to the aforesaid William Paynter his Heirs and Assigns according to the form and effect of the Condition aforesaid to be done And this he is ready to averr whereupon he prayeth Judgement if the said William his Action aforesaid against him ought to have And the said William saith That the Plea of the said Richard in manner and form above pleaded is not sufficient in Law to Barr the said William to have his Action aforesaid against the said Richard and that he to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded needeth not by the Law of the Land to Answer and this he is ready to averr Whereupon for default of a sufficient Plea in this party The said William demandeth Judgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages by occasion of deteining his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And the said Richard for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to barr the aforesaid William of having the Action aforesaid against the said Richard above hath alleged which he is ready to averr And which matter the said William doth not deny nor to the same in any manner Answer but the same averment to admit doth altogether refuse as before he demandeth Judgement and that the said William from his action aforesaid having against him the said Richard be barred c. And because the Justices here will advise of and upon the premises before they give Judgement day is given to the parties aforesaid untill the day after the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement c. Because the said Justices hereof not yet c. At which day here come as well the said William Paynter as the said Richard Mauser by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further advise of and upon the premises before they give Judgement further day is given to the parties aforesaid untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Judgement because the said Justices here hereof not yet c. At which day come as well the said William Paynter as the said Richard Mauser by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this the premises considered and by the Justices here fully understood It seemed to the Justices here That the aforesaid Plea of the said Rich. Mauser above in Barr pleaded is not sufficient in Law the said Rich. as to barr the said Wil. to have his ActioÌ„ aforesaid against the said William Paynter above hath alleged Therefore it is granted that the said William Paynter recover against the said Richard Mauser his debt aforesaid and his damages by occasion of deteining of his debt to 20. pounds to the said William with his assent by the Court here adjudged and the aforesaid Richard in mercy c. Afterwards that is
them and to their Heirs males of their bodies or to the Heirs of their bodies lawfully begotten minding at the time of such gifts not only to prefer advance presently the donees but also their Heirs in blood of their bodies according to the limitatioÌ„ of the said gifts to the intent that the RecoÌ„pence for the service of such donees should not only be a benefit for their own persons but a continual profit and commodity to and for their Heirs coming of their bodies whereby such Heirs should have in special memory and daily remembrance the profit that they have and take by the service of their Ancestors done to the Kings of this Realm of England and thereby be the better incouraged to do the like service to their Sovereign Lords as to their duty and Allegiance appertaineth And because divers such Donees in tail and their Heirs daily before the making of the Act aforesaid have suffered by their assent false and feigned Recoveries to be had against them with common Voucher or otherwise of Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements or Hereditaments so given or provided in tail by the aforesaid Lord the King or his Noble Progenitors as is aforesaid to the intent by fraud loin and undue meanes not only to binde and defraud their Heirs inheritable by the limitation of such gifts but also the said Lord the King of his prerogative Wardship primer seisin and other his rights whereby Questions and diversity of opinions have risen and yet be Whether such false and feigned Recoveries against such Tenants in tail by their own consents of Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of which the Reversion or the Remainder were in the King at the time of such Recovery or Recoveries had should after the death of Tenant in tail binde the Heirs in tail or not For full Declaration thereof and to avoid and extinct from henceforth diversities of opinions in the like Cases It was enacted by the said Act That no such feigned recovery from henceforth after to be had by assent of parties against such Tenant or Tenants in tail of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whereof the reversion or remainder at the time of such recovery should be in the Lord the King should binde or conclude the Heirs in tail whether any Condition or Voucher should be in any such feigned recovery or not but that after the death of every such Tenant in tail against whom any such recovery should be had the Heirs in tail might enter have and injoy the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments so recovered according to the form of the gift in tail the said Recovery or any other thing or things hereafter to be had and suffered by or against any such Tenant in tail to the contrary notwithstanding And further by the said Act by authority of the said Parliament It was enacted That the Heirs of every such Tenant in tail against whom any such feigned Recovery should be had should take no advantage for any Recompence in value against the Voucheenor his Heirs as by the said Act amongst other things more fully it appeareth And the said Iohn further saith That the said Thomas so of the aforesaid one Moyety of the Island aforesaid and of the Râ—version of the other Moyety thereof in form aforesaid being seised The Recovery aforesaid in form aforesaid by the said Iohn Godfrey against the beforesaid Thomas Wiseman the Son was had and executed contrary to the form of the Statute aforesaid and this he is ready to aver Wherefore he demands Judgement and his Debt aforesaid together with his Damages by occasion of the detaining of the said Debt to be ajudged unto him c. And the said Richard Barnerd saith That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Iohn Wiseman above by Replication pleaded and the matter in the same conteined are not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Iohn to have his aforesaid Action gainst the said Richard and that he unto the Plea aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid pleaded needeth not to answer by the Law of the Land And this he is ready to aver wherefore for default of sufficient Replication of the said Iohn in this part The said Richard demandeth Judgement and that the said John from having his Action aforesaid against him be Barred c. And the said John Wiseman for as much as he sufficient matter to have his Action against the said Richard by the Replication aforesaid hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Richard doth not deny nor to the same doth any wayes answer but doth altogether refuse to admit the averment aforesaid As before he demandeth Judgement and his debt aforesaid together with his damages for the deteining of his debt to be adjudged unto him c. And because the Justices here will advise of and upon the premises before they give Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here in 8 bis of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement because the Justices here are not yet c. at which day here come as well the said John Wiseman as the said Richard Barnard by their Attorneys aforesaid upon which the Plea of the said John VViseman upon the Replication pleaded being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the Justices here that the said Plea and the matter in the same conteined are not sufficient in Law for the said John to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Richard Therefore it is granted That the said John take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but that he be in mercy for his false clamour And that the said Richard go thereof without day c. Debt Hillary Term 34. Eliz. in the Kings Bench Rott 169. Westbies Case Co. 3. part MEmorandum that at another time that is to say the Term of Saint Lond. ss Michael last past before the Lady and Queen at Westminster came Titus VVestby by Thomas Cooke his Attorney and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then here his Bill against Thomas Skinner and John Catcher late Sheriffs of London in the Custody of the Marshal c. of a Plea of Debt And are Pledges of Sute Iohn Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss London ss Titus VVestby complaineth of Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher late Sheriffs of London in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being of a Plea that they render to him 440. pound of lawful Money of England which they owe him and unjustly do detein for that That is to say That whereas one Thomas Smith Gent Edward VVinter Gent. Anthony Bastard Gent. by the names of Thomas Smith of Camden in the County of Glocester Gent. Of Edward VVinter of VVorthington in the County of Leicester Cent. and Anthony Bastard of Alderbury in the County of Oxford Gent. the 20th day of Ianuary in the year of the Reign of the Lady
in Execution being The said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher then being Sheriffs of London within written the 8th day of September the 30th year aforesaid by virtue of the Writ aforesaid at London aforesaid took and arrested the within named Anthony Bastard in manner and form as the said Titus within likewise against the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher declared And that the said Anthony Bastard so taken and arrested under the custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Cacther then Sheriffs of London aforesaid in form aforesaid being The said then Sheriffs of London the said Anthony Bastard in Execution for the aforesaid 440. pounds then and there had according to the Command of the said Writ And moreover the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Anthony Bastard so in custody of the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher for the aforesaid 440. pounds for the aforesaid other Debt of 240. pounds to the said Robert Dighton in form aforesaid being The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher afterwards that is to say the within written 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid in the going out of their Office aforesaid the said Anthony Bastard by Indenture delivered to Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall in Execution for the aforesaid Debt of the said Robert Dighton without any other mention of the said Execution of 440. pounds made to the aforesaid Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall or to any of them given or notified And fuâ—ther the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That then That is to say The 20th day of October in the 30th year aforesaid The said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher from their Office aforesaid were discharged And further the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That after that the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher from their Office aforesaid in form aforesaid were discharged That the said Anthony Bastard without payment of any of the aforesaid Debts in the Custody of the aforesaid Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall in form aforesaid being for the said 240. pounds the said Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall the said Anthony Bastard having none nor any of them ever having any Notice to them or either of them given of the said Execution of the aforesaid 440. pounds at London aforesaid out of the Prison aforesaid suffered to go at large where he would But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found The said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher ought to be charged for the aforesaid said Debt of 440. pounds in Law or not the Jurors aforesaid are altogether ignorant And they pray the Advice of the Court of the said Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being And if it shall seem to the said Court That the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Catcher ought not to be charged for the said 440. pounds in Law upon the whole matter above found The said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Skinner and Iohn Cacther do owe to the said Titus VVestbie the said 440. pounds in manner and form as the said Titus within against them declared And they do also assesse the damages of the said Titus Westbie by occasion of detaining of the said Debt besides his charges and costs by him about his Sute in this part expended to 20. pounds and for his charges and costs to 53. shillings and 4. pence And if it shall seem to the Court aforesaid That the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher do not owe to the said Titus Westbie the said 440. pounds in manner and form as the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher within pleading have alleged c. And because the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here of their Judgement of and upon the premises to be given are not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until Tuesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael for to hear their Judgement thereof c. because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plaint aforesaid was Adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Queen at Westminster until the day of St. Michael in a moneth At which day the Plaint aforesaid was further adjorned by another Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment before the Queen until the next of All Souls then next following at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford At which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Court of the Lady here of their giving of their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is given to the parties aforesaid before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford aforesaid untill Tuesday next after 8 th of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet c. And so from Term to Term until Thursday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement c. cause the Court of the Lady the Queen here c. At which day be-before the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid Upon which Seen and by the Court of the Lady the Queen here all and singular the premises looked into and understood and mature deliberation be thereof had because that it seemes to the Court of the Lady the Queen that now is here That the said Tho. Skinner and John Catcher ought to be charged for the said 440. pound It is granted That the said Titus Westbie shall recover against the aforesaid Tho. Skinner John Catcher his debt aforesaid his damages aforesaid by the Jurors aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed as also 10. pound 13. shill and 4. pence for his charges and costs aforesaid to the said Titus by the Court of the said Lady the Queen here with his assent of increase adjudged Which damages in the whole do amount to 33. pounds 6. shillings 8. pence and the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in mercy c. Afterwards that is to say Upon Monday the 10 th day of February in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th The Transcript of the Record and proceedings between in the parties aforesaid with all things touching the same by a certain Writ of the Lady the Queen of Errors correcting by the said Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in the premises was brought to the Justices of the Lady of the Queen of the Common Pleas and the Barons of the Exchequer of the Lady the Queen In the Chamber of the Exchequer aforesaid according to the form of a Statute in the Parliament of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster the 23 th day of November in the year of her Reign the 27 th holden and made in the same
Court of the said Lady the Queen here before the Queen her self were sent The aforesaid Thomas Skinner and John Catcher in the Court of the Exchequer aforesaid divers matters for Errors in the Record and Proceedings aforesaid for the revoking and annulling of the Judgement aforesaid assigned To which the said Titus in the said Court appearing pleaded That neither in the Record nor in the Proceedings aforesaid for the revoking and annulling of the Judgement aforesaid in any thing was there Error After which that is to say Monday the 20 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 37 th the premises seen And by the Court of the said Lady the Queen there diligently examined and fully understood as well the Record and proceedings aforesaid and the Judgement upon the same given as the Cause aforesaid for Error by the said Thomas and John above assigned and alleged It seemed to the Court here That the Record aforesaid was in nothing vitious or defective and that in the Record aforesaid is Error in nothing Therefore then and there in the same Court it was granted That the Judgement aforesaid should be affirmed in all things and stand in all his force and effect the said Causes for Error here assigned in any thing notwithstanding And further It was granted That the said Titus should reover against the said Thomas and John 80. shilings to the said Titus by his Assent by said Court of the Lady the Queen there adjudged according to the form of the Statute late made and provided for his costs and charges which he had by reason of delay of the Execution of the Judgement aforesaid by Colour of prosecuting the said Writ of Error c. And thereupon the Record aforesaid as also the proceedings thereupon before the Justices of the Common Pleas and the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid in the premises had before the Queen wheresoever c. by the Justices and Barons aforesaid were sent back according to the form of the Statute aforesaid c. And in the same Court of the said Lady now here before the Queen they remain c. Ejectione Firme Mich. 30. 31. Eliz. in the Exchequer Sir William Pethams Case co 1. part MEmorandum That at another time that is to say in the Term of Lond. ss St. Hillary in the year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth that now is the 30 th Henry Page Debtor of the Lady the Queen that now is before the Barons of the Exchequer of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex by John Hawkesworth his Attorney and brought then and there his Bill against Edward Griffin of a plea of Trespass Ejectment out of his Farm The Tenor of which Bill followeth in these words ss London ss Henry Page Debtor of the Lady Elizabeth the Queen that now is cometh before the Barons of the Exchequer the 27th day of January this Term by John Hawkesworth his Attorny and complaineth against Edward Griffin present here in Court the same day by Richard Hatton his Attorny of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of him out of his Farm for that viz. That whereas one Thomas Bowes Mr. of Artes the 10 th day of January in the yeer of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29 th at London in the Parish of St. Mary Wolnoth in the Ward of Langborn London had demised granted and to farm letten to the said Henry Page one Capital Messuage then or late in the tenure or occupation of Edward Griffin of London Haberdasher situate lying and being in Lomberstreet in the Parish of St. Mary Wolnoth in the Ward aforesaid within the City of London commonly called and known by the name of the White Lyon together with all Shops Sellers Chambers Places Easements Advantages Profits and Commodities with their appurtenances whatsoever to the said Messuage belonging or in any wise appertaining To have and to hold the said Messuage and all other the premises with their appurtenances to the said Henry Page his Executors Adminstrators and Assignes from the Feast of the Birth of our Lord then last past untill the end and Term of 6. years from thence next and immediately following to be compleat and ended By virtue of which Demise the said Henry Page into the Messuage aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof Possessed and so being thereof Possessed The said Edward Griffin afterwards that is to say the 11 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 29 th aforesaid with Force and Armes c. into the Messuage aforesaid which the said Thomas Bowes to the said Henry in form aforesaid demised for the Term aforesaid which is not ended entred and the said Henry from his Farm aforesaid thereof his Term aforesaid not ended did eject expell and amove and other wrongs did unto him to the great damage of the said Henry and against the peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is Whereupon the said Henry saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. Marks So as the less the aforesaid Henry cannot satisfie the Queen that now is the Debts which to the said Queen he oweth at her Exchequer And thereupon he bringeth Sute c. Pledges of Sute John Doo and Richard Roo And now this day that is to say in 8 â—â— of St. Michael this Term that is to say the 30 th year Until which day the said Edward Griffin prayed license to imparle and then to answer come here as well the said Henry Page as the said Edward Griffin by their Attornies aforesaid and the said Henry demandeth that the said Edward Griffin answer him in the premises c. And upon this The said Edward Griffin by his aforesaid Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. And saith That he of the Trespasse and Ejectment aforesaid is no way thereof guilty And of that he puts himself upon the Country and the said Henry Page likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they make come here from the day of St. Michael in one Moneth 12. c. of the Nighbourhood of the Parish of St. Mary Wolnoth in the Ward of â—augborn within the City of Lond. whereof every one c. by whom and who never c. And the same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. At which day come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the Sheriffs of London That is to say Hugh Offley and Richard Saltonstall send here the Writ of Venire Facias of the Jurors aforesaid with the Pannel of the names of the Jurors to the said Writ annexed and the said Jurors being called did not appear Therefore it was commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they destrein the Jurors aforesaid by their Lands c. So c. upon Wednesday the 6 th of
within conteyned before Thomas Walmsley one of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Edward Fennes one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of pleas before the Queen her self holden assigned Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assises in the County of Dorset assigned by the form of the statute c. came aswell the within named George Stroud Esquire by Thomas Clayton his Attorny as the within named Ralph Horsey Knight Richard Veal and Edward Goor by Henry Collier their Attorny and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made some of them appeared and some of them did not appear as it appeareth in the pannel c. and some of the Jurors now appearing that is to say Richard Ham Thomas Tooner John Burt Henry Hâ—rbyn Gentleman John Young Gentleman John Butler Gentleman William Withington John Payn and Christorher Dolling in the Jury aforesaid are sworn and some of the said Jurors now appearing that is to say Thomas Heal Edward Carter Robert Chippe Henry Squib and George Frome because they between the parties aforesaid are found to be suspicious from the pannel aforesaid they were utterly drawn out and because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear therefore others of the standers by by the Sheriff aforesaid to that being chosen at the request of the said George Stroud and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid were of new put whose names to the pannel within written are fyled according to the form of the statute in such case thereof late made and is provided and the Jurors so nâ—w put that is to say Clement Jay Nicholas Brown and Thomas Eyres being called likewise appeared who to say the truth of the matters within conteyned together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impanelled Chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath aforesaid that the Tenement within written in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment within written to be are and time whereof the memory of men is not to the Contrary were parcel of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise called Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances and that the said Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Biugham with the appurtenances whereof c. lyeth within the Parish of Melcum in the County aforesaid and that before the time within written in which the Trespass and Ejectment within written was supposed to be done one Robert Bingham the elder was seised for the aforesaid Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham with the appurtenances whereof c. in his demesne as of Fee and so thereof seised held the said Mannor with the appurtenances of one John Hrosey Knight as of his Mannor of Melcam otherwise Horseys Melcum otherwise Starges Melcum in the County aforesaid by Knight service that is to say by Homage and Fealty and Escuage to the Lady the Queen of 40. shillings when it should happen 2. shillings and for more more and less less c. and the said Robert Bingham being so seised before the time within written in which c. that is to say the morrow of the Holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 12 a sine was levyed in the Court of the said Lady the Queen at Westminster in the County of Middlesex before James Dyer Richard Weston Richard Harper then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench and other the Queens faithfull people then present between Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen Gentlemen plaintifs and the said Robert Bingham the Elder Deforceant Of the Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. by the names of the Mannor of Nether Melcum otherwise Melcum Bingham aforesaid with the appurtenances and 5 Messuages 4 Tofts 4 Barns 5 Gardens 2 Orchards 120 Acres of Land 30 Acres of Meadow 300 Acres of pasture 8 Acres of Wood and 20 Acres of Furze and Heath with the appurtenances in Nether Melcum other wise Binghams Melcum whereupon a plea of Covenant was between them in the said Court that is to say that the said Robert Bingham did acknowlege the said Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Thomas Buckley as that with the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen had of the gift of the said Robert Bingham and then released and quit claimed from him and his heirs to the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen and the heirs of the said Thomas for ever And afterwards the said Robert Bingham granted for him and his heirs that they would warrant to the said Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen and to the heirs of the said Thomas the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances against all men for ever the Tenor of which Fine followeth in these ss Dorset ss This is a final concord made in the Court of the Lady the Queen at Westminster in the morrow of the holy Trinity in the year of the Reign of Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. from the Conquest the 12th before James Dyer Richard Weston and Richard Harper Justices and other the Queens faithfull people there present Between Thomas Buckley and Henry Gawen Gentlemen plaintifs and Robert Bingham Esquire Deforceant of the Mannor of Neither Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum with the appurtenances and of 5 Messuages 4 Tofts 4 Barns 5 Gardens 2 Orchards 12â— Acres of Land 30 Acres of Meadow 100 Acres of pasture 8 Acres of wood and 20 Acres of Furz and Heath in Nether Melcum otherwise Binghams Melcum whereupon a plea of Covenant was between them in the said Court that is to say that the said Robert acknowledged the aforesaid Mannor Tenements with the appurtenances to be the right of the said Thomas and those which the said Thomas and Henry had of the gift of the aforesaid Robert and the same released and quit claimed from him and his heirs to the said Thomas and Henry and the heirs of the said Thomas for ever And farther the said Robert granteth for him and his heirs that they warrant to the aforesaid Thomas and Henry and to the heirs of the said Thomas the aforesaid Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances against all men for ever and for this Recognition remission and quit claym warranty and Concord the said Thomas and Henry give to the said Robert 150 pound sterling which said Fine of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid whereof c. in form aforesaid Levied was had and Levyed to the use of the said Robert Bingham the Elder and Jane his wife and the heirs of the said Robert for ever by virtue whereof and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of transferring of uses into possession made at Westminster in the year of the Reign of the late King Henry the 8th of England the 27th made and provided the said Robert Bingham the elder and Jane were
and Edward Goor be taken c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Term 290. Elizabeth Rott 790. in the KINGS BENCH Barastons Case C. 3. part fol. 19. a. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say Michaelmass Term last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Richard Hynde by James Long his Attorny and brought here in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against William Ambry in the Custody of the Marshal c. Of a Plea of Trespasse and Ejectment of his Farm and are Pledges of Sute that is to say Iohn Doo and Richard Roo Which Bill followeth in these words ss Hartford Richard Hynde complaineth of William Ambry in the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Queen her self being for that that is to say That whereas one Thomas Brand and Constance his Wife and Milliam Davyes and Margaret his Wife the 4 th day of Iuly in the yeer of Reign of the said Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England the 28 th at Aldenhan in the County aforesaid Demised and granted and to Farm let to the aforesaid Richard Hynde amongst other things 10. Acres of Land with the appurtenances called the upper part of a Close named Reddings in Aldenham aforesaid in the County aforesaid To have and to hold the aforesaid 10. Acres with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Hynde and his Assignes from the Feast of St. Iohn the Baptist then last past until the end and Term of 7. years from thence next insuing and fully to be compleat and ended By virtue of which demise The said Richard Hynde into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Land with the appurtenances the aforesaid 9 th day of Iuly in the 28th yeer aforesaid with Force and Armes c. into the aforesaid 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances upon the possession of the said Richard entred and him the said Richard from his Farm aforesaid the Term thereof not yet ended did eject expel and amove and then the said Richard from his possession thereof held out and as yet holdeth out And other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Queen to the damage of the said Richard of 10. pounds and thereof he bringeth Sute c. And now at this day that is to say Monday after 8. dayes of St. Michael this Term until which day the said William had license to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come as well the aforesaid Richard by his Attorny aforesaid as the said William by Richard Belfield his Attorny and the same William doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith That he is not guilty thereof and of that he puts himself upon the Country And that said Richard likewise Therefore a Jury thereof before the Lady the Queen at Westminster Wednesday next after 15. dayes of Easter who neither c. Because as well c. the same day is given to the parties aforesaid there c. Afterwards the processe thereof was continued between the parties aforesaid in the Plea aforesaid by Juries put between them in respite before the said Lady the Queen until Wednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael then next following Unlesse the Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned First upon Friday the 12 th day of July at Hartford in the County aforesaid by form of the Statute c. come for default of Jurors c. At which VVednesday next after 8. dayes of St. Michael before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Richard Hynde by his Attorny aforesaid And the aforesaid Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record before them had in these words ss Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Gawdy Knight one of the Justiceâ— of the Lady the Queen of Pleas before the Lady the Queen her self to be holden assigned and Robert Clark one of the Barons of the said Lady the Queen of her Exchequer Justices of the said Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County of Hartford assigned by form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Richard Hynde by Henry Brantwayte his Attorny as the within written William Ambry by his Attorny within mentioned and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made some of them that is to say Richard Penifather Thomas Glascock Iohn Harmer and Stephen Nebbes came and in the said Jury are sworn And because the rest of the Jurors of the said Jury did not appear Therefore other of the Standers by chosen by the Sherif at the Request of the said Richard Hynde and by the Command of the Justices aforesaid are of new put whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such Case late made and provided and some of the Jurors so a new put that is to say Edward Vyall Thomas Cooker Thomas Trow Edward Asher Iohn Dermer William Tiverton Edward Iorden and Robert Carpenter came who to say the truth of the matters within contained togeether with the Jurors aforesaid first unpannelled and sworn chosen tryed and sworn Say upon their Oath That long before the Trespass and Ejectment of the Farm within supposed to be done One Thomas Boraston was seised of and in the within written 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances called the upper part of a Close called Reddings in Aldenham within written in his demesn as of see the said 10. Acres of Lands with the appurtenances held of one Robert Stepnigh Esq as of his Mannor of Aldenham in his free socage And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That the aforesaid Tho. Boraston had issue of his body lawfully begotten Hum Boraston his Elder Son Hen. Boraston his Younger Son and the aforesaid Hum. Boraston had issue of his body Lawfully begotten Constance Boraston now the wife of the within named Thomas Brand and the within named Margaret wife of the within named William Davis and that afterwards Humphrey Boraston dyed living the said Thomas Boraston and that the aforesaid Constance and Margaret were and are Daughters and Co-heirs of the aforesaid Humphry Boraston and farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the aforesaid boraston so of and in the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances being seised as before is said afterwards that is to say the 12 th day of the moneth of August in the year of our Lord 1559 in the year of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen the first made his Testament and last Will in writing in these English words following In the name of God Amen Item I give unto Thomas Amerie and Amphillis his wife all that my upper part of my close called Redding for the Term of 8 years after my decease in recompence of one yearly Annuity of 46
of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench and Edward Fenner one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned Justices of the Assiise of the Lady the Queen in the County of Wilts to be taken Assigned by the form of the statute came aswell the within named James Linche as the said within written William Spencer and Tho. Spencer by their Attorneys within mentioned and the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called some of them that is to say William Garret of Shaw Gentleman William Bury of Crickland Thomas Puckley of Nether Haven Gentleman William Marse of Haydon John Noyse of Graston Richard Legge of Nether Haven Thomas Smith of Kinnett Thomas Stoper of Moanton and VVilliam Gouldesborough of the same came and are sworn of the same Jury and because that the rest of the Jurors of the Jury did not appear therefore other of the standers by chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid at the request of the said James and by the command of the Justices aforesaid were new put whose names to the Panâ—nel within written are filed according to the statute in such case lately made and provided And the Jurors so of new put that is to say Thomas Stringer VVilliam Bundy and VVilliam Hascal likewise called came who to the truth of the matter within conteined together with the other Jurors aforesaid first impannelled chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the aforesaid VVilliam Spencer is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment within written as the said VViliam hath within alleged and further the said Jurors as to all the Trespass Ejectment aforesaid within written besides the Trespass and Ejectment in the Messuage within conteined and 26 Acres of the Tenements within written by the aforesaid Thomas Spencer within supposed to be done they say upon their Oath that the said Tho. is not thereof guilty as the said Tho. likewise therof within allegeth and as to the Trespass and Ejectment within written into the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land within supposed to be done the same Jurors say upon their Oath that long before the within written time in which it is supposed the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid to be done one Richard Bridges Knight was seised as well of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land with the appurtenances as of the other Tenements within written residue with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised the said Richard long before the time aforesaid in which c. by his certain writing of Feoffment Indented in Consideration of a certain Ioynture of one Iohanna the wife or Daughter of VVilliam Spencer Knâ—ght deceased from thence after to be had and ended gave and granted and in his said writing Indented confirmed to Iohn VVinchcomb the Elder of Newberry in the County of Berks. and John Knight of Newbery aforesaid the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to have and to hold the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said John VVinchcomb and John Knight their heirs and assignes for ever under this Condition following that is to say That the said John VVinchcomb and John Knight within one moneth next ensuing after the date of the said writing by their sufficient writing in Law as by the learned Councel in the Law of the said Richard â—ridges it should be avised should give grant and deliver the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said Richard and the said Johanna his wife to have and to hold the said Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to the said Richard and the said Johanna and to the heirs of the bodies of the said Richard and the said Johanna his wife betwixt the said Richard and the said Johanna Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the right heirs of the aforesaid Richard for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services therefore due and of right occasioned as by the said writing of Feoffment Indented Sealed with the Seal of the said Richard Bridges and bearing date the 23 th day of January in the year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8 th the 32 th to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence shewed more fully appeared and that by virtue of the said Feoffment the aforesaid John Winchcomb and John Knight were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Lands in which c. amongst other in their demesn as of Fee upon the condition aforesaid And farther the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath That the said John Winchcomb and John Knight being so thereof seised long before the aforesaid time in which c. and within the said one Moneth next insuing after the date of the said writing of Feoffment Indented at Walcot aforesaid in performance of the condition aforesaid and at the request of the said Richard Bridges by their certain writing Indented of Feoffment delivered enfeoffed and delivered and by the said their writing Indented they did confirm to the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna his Wife the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other things to have and to hold the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other to the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna his Wife and the heirs of the bodies of them the said Richard and Johanna betwixt them Lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remaynder thereof to the right heirs of the said Richard Bridges for ever of the chief Lords of the Fee by the services thereof due and of right accustomed as by the said writing of Feoffment Indented with the Seals of the said John Winchcomb and John Knight Sealed and bearing date the 6th day of February in the year of the Reign of the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th the 32 th aforesaid and to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence shewed it more fully appeareth And that by virtue of the said Feofment the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna were seised of the aforesaid Messuage and 26 Acres of Land in which c. amongst other in their demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to the said Richard and Johanna and the heirs of their bodies between them Lawfully begotten the remaynder thereof to the right heirs of the said Richard as above is said And the said Richard and the said Johanna so thereof being had issue of their bodies between them Lawfully begotten one Anthony Bridges his Son yet living and in full life being that is to say at West Shefford in the County of Berks and that afterwards and before the time in which c. the aforesaid Richard Bridges and Johanna of the aforesaid
year of our Lord 1595 above said in the University aforesaid at Cambridge aforesaid in the County of Cambridge was duly and lawfully ordained and made a Graduate of â—â—e University aforesaid that is to say Doctor in Physick according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid and that he the said Thomas Bonham then and there had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid by his form without grace from time to time according to the Lawes Statutes Constitutions and Ordinances of the said University of Cambridge aforesaid By colour whereof the same Thomas Bonham a Graduate of the University of Cambridge aforesaid that is to say being Doctor in Physick in the form aforesaid who had accomplished all things concerning his Degree aforesaid for his form without any grace The said faculty of Physick from time to time in the said City of London that is to say in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap aforesaid did exercise as it was lawful for him to do until the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden together with c. the aforesaid 10th day of November in the 4th yeer abovesaid with force and Arms him the said Thomas Bonham at London aforesaid in the aforesaid Parish of the blessed Mary of Bow in the Ward of Cheap took and imprisoned and him there in Prison long that is to say by the space of 7. dayes against the Law and Custom of this Kingdom of England did detain as the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above against them complaineth and this he is ready to averr Whereupon in as much as the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid above have acknowledged The said Thomas Bonham demandeth Judgement and his damages by reason of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. And the aforesaid Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to the Action of the aforesaid Thomas Bonham against them the said Henry Atkins George Turner Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden to maintain and that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid by Replication pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to answer and this they are ready to averr whereupon they demand Judgement and that the said Thomas Bonham from having his Action aforesaid against them to be barred And the aforesaid Thomas Bonham for as much as he sufficient matter in Law to maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Henry Atkins George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden above hath alleged which he is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid Henry George Thomas Moundford John Argent John Taylor and William Bowden do not deny nor to the same any wayes answer but the same averment altogether to admit do refuse as at first he demands Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse and Imprisonment aforesaid to be adjudged to him c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises aforesaid whereof the parties have put themselves to the Judgement of the Court aforesaid before that they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here are not yet c. Formedon Michaelmass Term Anno 37. 38. Eliz. Rot. 82. in the COMMON PLEAS Lincoln College Case C. 3. part fol. 53. a. Robert Chamberlain Esq by Apollo Plain his Attorny demandeth against the Warden or Rector and Scholars of the Blessed Lady Mary and All Saints of Lincoln in the University of Oxford the Mannors of Pettesho and Eckney with the appurtenances Except 120. Acres of Pasture in Pettesho aforesaid and 30. Acres of Pasture in Eckney aforesaid which Alured Cornburgh Esq Richard Danvers Esq Nicholas Statham and William Callow gave to Richard Chamberlain Esq and Sibil Fowler and the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten And which after the death of the aforesaid Richard and Sibil and of Edward Son and Heir of the said Edward Chamberlain and of Leonard Son and Heir of the said Edward and of Francis Son and Heir of the said Leonard to the aforesaid Robert Son and Heir of the aforesaid Francis ought to descend by the form of the gift aforesaid c. Whereupon he saith That the aforesaid Alured Connâ—burgh Richard Danâ—â—rs Nicholas and William gave the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil and to the Heirs Males of the Body of the said Richard Chamberlain begotten in form aforesaid c. By which gift the said Richard and Sibil were seised of the said Mannors with the appurtenances that is to say the said Richard in his Demesn as of Fee and Right and the said Sibil in her Demesn as of Free hold by the form c. in the time of peace in the time of the Lord Ed. late King of England the 4th after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the yeerly value c. And from him the said Richard the Right descended by the form to one Edward as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Edward the Right descended by the form c. to one Leonard as Son and Heir c. And from him the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to one Francis as Son and Heir c. And from the said Fran. Son of the said Leonard the Right descended by the form c. to this Robert who now demandeth as Son and Heir c. And which after the death c. And thereof bringeth Sute c. And the aforesaid Warden or Rector and Scholars by William Pain their Attorny come and defend their Right when c. And say That the aforesaid Robert Chamberlain his Action aforesaid against them ought not to have By protestation taking it That the aforesaid Alured Cornburgh Richard Danvers Nicholas Stathum and William Collow did not give the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Richard Chamberlain and Sibil Fowler in manner and form as in the Declaration aforesaid is alleged For Plea say That long after the time in which the gift aforesaid is supposed to be made Richard Lyster Gent. Martin Linsey John Cotesford John Clayton William Hogeson and Robert Taylor Clerks were seised of the Mannors aforesaid with th appurtenances in their Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seised The aforesaid Sibil Great-Grandmother of the said Robert Chamberlain whose Heir the same Robert is The 5th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England
after was Servant of the said late King Henry the 8th and one of the Grooms of the Privy Chamber of the said late King and many good laborious and laudable Services to the said late King Henry the 8th before the making of the said Letters Patents did and performed and that he said VValter the aforesaid other Letters Patents of the aforesaid Mannor of Grafton Fleuard and the said VValter and Elizabeth the aforesaid other Letters Patents of the said Mannor of Charleton with their several members and appurtenances in form aforesaid made to the said late King Henry the 8th before the making of the said other Letters Patents to them in form aforesaid made and here in Court shewed forth in his Chancery aforesaid at VVestminster aforesaid had surrendred and procured to be cancelled as in the said Letters Patents here in Court shewed forth it is alleged and testified By virtue of which Letters Patents here in Court shewed forth The said VValter and Elizabeth were seized of the said Mannor of Abottesly with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other that is to say The said VValter in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing and the aforesaid Elizabeth in her demesn as of Free hold for the Term of her Life and the said VValter and Elizabeth so being thereof seized the said Elizabeth afterwards and before the time in which c. at Abottesly aforesaid dyed And the aforesaid VValter over-lived her and held himself in the aforesaid Mannor of Abottesly with the appurtenances whereof c. and was thereof seized in his demesn of Fee tail in form aforesaid by right of Survivour And the said VValter so thereof being seized By an Act of Parliament of the same late King Henry the 8th at VVestminster aforesaid the 8th day of July in the yeer of his Reign the 28th holden made reciting by the said Act Whereas the aforesaid Ann Countess of VVarwick in the Fine aforesaid above named in the yeer of the Reign of the late King Henry the 7th the â—â—ihrd by Fine then levied before the Justices of the King of common-Common-Pleas at VVestminster had given granted unto the said late King Henry the 7th amongst other things The Lordship and Mannor of Abottesly with the appurtenances in the County of VVorcester To have to the said King and the Heirs Males of his Body issuing as by the same Fine remaining on Record amongst other things it more fully appeared By virtue of which the said late King was seized of the said Mannor with the appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee tail and so thereof being seized The said Countess dyed After whose death the Reversion of the said Mannor with the appurtenances in Fee simple did descend and come to Edward late Earl of Warwick which Reversion and Fee simple of the said Mannor amongst other Castles Honours Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments then after escheated and came into the Hand and possession of the aforesad late King Henry the 7th and his Heirs by the Attainder of High Treason of the said Edward Earl of Warwick as by the Record therefore more fully appeareth And the aforesaid late King Henry the 7th so thereof being seized dyed After whose death the same Castles honours manors lands tenements and Hereditaments and other the premises in the Fine aforesaid contained amongst other Lands Manors Tenements and Hereditaments descended came to the said late K. Hen. the 8th as Son Heir of the aforesaid late K. Hen. the 7th by due course of Inheritance By virtue wherof the said late K. Henry the 8th had been and was then thereof seised And because the aforesaid Castles Manors Lordships Lands Tenements and other the premises were of great value and had many great and ample Liberties Preheminences Commodities â—â—d delights to the same belonging Therefore then and there It was Enacted by Authority of the same Parliament That the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors from hence after should have hold and injoy for ever all and singular the aforesaid Castles Mannors Tenements Lands and Hereditaments with the Appurtenances and all and singular the premises and that the said Castles Manors Tenements Lands and Hereditaments with the Appurtenannances and all and singular other the premises by Authority of the said Parliament should be adjudged in the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors in Fee simple for ever without the aforesaid or any other thing or things before then had made or used or to be allowed to the contrary in any thing notwithstanding as by the same Act more fully appeareth Saving alwayes to all and singular person and persons Bodies politique and corporate their Heirs and Successors and to the Heirs and Successors of every of them other than the aforesaid late Countess of Warwick and her Heirs and the Heirs of the said Richard late Earle of Warwick Father of the late Countesse all such Rights Titles Uses Interests terms of years Demise Demises Rents Fees Annuities Possessions Reversion Remainder Distresses Entries Actions Grants Offices Commons Commodities Liberties Profits Sutes in such manner form conditions as they or any of them their heirs successors or the heirs or succes of any of them had could might or ought to have had if the Act aforesaid never had bin made any thing in the said Act of Parliament to the contrary notwithstanding as by the said Act amongst other things it more fully appeareth By colour of which Act the Reversion aforesaid to the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley otherwise Abberley and the Manor aforesaid in Reversion after the Estate and Interest of the aforesaid Walter Walsh and Elizabeth his wife so as before is said granted to the aforesaid late King Henry the 8th his Heirs and Successors in Fee simple did belong according to the form and effect of the Act aforesaid By which the said late King Henry the 8th was seised of that reversion as of Fee and right and the said late King so being thereof seised and the said Walter of the aforesaid Manor of Abbottesley with the Appurtenances whereof c. in form aforesaid being seised The aforesaid Walter at Abbottesley aforesaid before the aforesaid time in which c. died of such his Estate so seised After whose decease The said Manor with the Appurtenances whereof c. descended to one Walter Walsh his Son as Son and Heir Male of the body of the same Walter Walsh his Father Issuing By which the said Walter Walsh the Son after and before the time in which c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee tail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body issuing and the aforesaid late King Henry the 8 th was seised of the Reversion thereof as of Fee and Right and so thereof being seised The said late King afterwards and before the time in which c. at
done in his behalf command you that if Judgement be thereof given then the Record and Process aforesaid with all things touching the same before our beloved and faitfull Councellor Thomas Egerton Knight Keeper of our Great Seal of England and you you the aforesaid Tresurer in the Chamber of Councel nigh the Exchequer aforesaid called the Councel Chamber upon Tuesday that is to say the 15th day of February next comming cause to come that the same Keeper of our Great Seal and you the aforesaid Tresurer the Record aforesaid seeing and the process aforesaid and hearing your Informations you the aforesaid Barons cause to be done what of right according to the form of the statute aforesaid was to be done Witnesse my self at Westminster the 29th day of January in the yeer of the Reign the 42th Symons And at the aforesaid 5th day of February in the aforesaid Writ mentioned The aforesaid Thomas Egerton Knight Keeper of the Great Seal of England and Thomas Lord Buckhurst Lord Tresurer of England caused to come before them the Record aforesaid in the aforesaid Chamber nigh the Exchequer aforesaid called the Council Chamber And at the same day and place come before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen and for the said Lady the Queen saith That in the Record and processe and also in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid It is diversly erred in manner and form as by the aforesaid Articles of Errors by him first alleged and assigned above it is alleged And for the said Lady the Queen prayeth another Writ of the Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid Richard Bushopp to be before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer at a certain day to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid and also the Errors aforesaid c. and it is granted unto him And it is commanded to the Sherif of the County of Worcester That by good and lawful men of his Balywick he warn the said Richard Bushopp that he be before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Treasurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster the first Tuesday in the Term of Easter next following to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid as also the Errors aforesaid above alleged and further c. What to the Court c. At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid the Sherif of the County of Worcester aforesaid that is to say William Childe Esquire Retorned the Writ aforesaid endorced thus ss By virtue of this Writ to me directed I gave warning to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by John Jolley John Harris Thomas Penington and John Wemb good and lawful men of my Balywick to be before the said Keeper of the Great Seal at the day and place within contained as within to me is commanded And upon this the aforesaid Richard Bushop by Arthur Salway his Attorny at the same day in the Chamber aforesaid likewise cometh and demands the hearing of the Record and Processe as also of the Errors aforesaid and they are read unto him c. Which being read and heard the said Richard saith That in the Record and processe aforesaid in nothing it is erred And prayeth That the aforesaid Lord proceed to the Examination aswel of the Record and Processe aforesaid as of the businesse aforesaid for Errors by the said Attorny of the said Lady the Queen above alleged according to the form of the aforesaid Statute thereof made And the aforesaid Attorny of the Lady the Queen for the said Lady the Queen saith as before he had said and prayeth likewise c. And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushop in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday next to hear their Judgement thereof c. At which day before the said Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushop by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday to hear their Judgment thereof c. At which day before the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at VVestminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid and because the aforesaid Lord Keeper and Lord Tresurer are not yet a vised of the giving of their Judgment of and upon the premises further day is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until the first Tuesday in the Term of Holy Trinity then next comming to hear Judgement thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the great Seal and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid untill Tuesday the third day of June the same Term of Holy Trinity to hear Judgment thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Gâ—eat Seal and Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh the aforesaid Richard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid And because the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and Lord Tresurer are not yet avised of giving their Judgement of and upon the Premises day further is given to the aforesaid Richard Bushopp before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid until Tuesday the 10th day of June next the same Term of the Holy Trinity to hear their their Judgment thereof At which day before the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Tresurer in the Chamber aforesaid at Westminster cometh Rchard Bushopp by his Attorny aforesaid And upon this the premises being seen by the aforesaid Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England and the aforesaid Tresurer and mature deliberation thereof amongst them being had and taking to them the aforesaid John Popham Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen for Pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned and Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justice of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench as also of Francis Gawdy one of the Justices to Pleas before the aforesaid Lady the Queen to be
holden assigned and calling before them the Barons of the Exchequer aforesaid and the reasons of the Judgement aforesaid of the said Barons being heard Because it seemeth to the aforesaid Keeper of the Great Seal of England and to the aforesaid Tresurer with the Counsel of the Justices aforesaid That in the Record and Processe aforesaid and also in the giving of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly erred Therefore it is granted by the said Keeper of the Great Seal of England and the aforesaid Tresurer That the Judgement aforesaid be conversed and annulled And that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp of the Entry Intrusion Trespasse and Contempt aforesaid be convicted And that the aforesaid Richard Bushopp be amoved from the possession of the premises And be Attached by his Body wheresoever c. To make fine with the Lady the Queen for the aforesaid his Trespass and Contempt whereof in form aforesaid he is convicted And that the Record aforesaid be sent back into the Exchequer aforesaid for the Execution therof for the aforesaid Lady the Q. to be done according to the form of the Statute aforesaid thereof made Therfore it is agreed by the Barons here That the Writ of the Lady the Queen that now is issue forth out of the Court here to amove the aforesaid Richard Bushopp from the possession of the premises aforesaid And to attach the aforesaid Richard by his body wheresoever c. to make fine for the Trespass aforesaid and contempt whereof in form abovesaid he is convicted retorneable here in 8 dayes of Saint Michael and it is commanded to the said Sheriff of the said County of Worcester that him the said Richard he amove attach in the form aforesaid Monstrans de Droit C. 1. part Digges Case fo 157. a. England ss Memorandum That Thomas Egerton Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England Tuesday next after 8. dayes of St. Hillary this Term before the Lady the Queen at Westminster by his own proper Hands delivered here into Court a certain Record before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery had in these words Pleas before the Lady the Queen in her Chancery at Westminster in the County of Middlesex of the Term of Easter in the veer of the Reign of our said Lady Elizabeth by the Grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the Faith c. the 40 th THe Lady the Queen that now is sent her writ closed to the Sheriff of Sussex directed in these words Elizabeth by the grace of God of England France and Ireland Queen defender of the faith c. To the Sheriff of Sussex greeting c Whereas by a certain inqusition Inacted taken at Dartford in our County of Kent the 8th day of November in the year of our Reign the 35th before Edward Fenuer one of our Justices to pleas before us to be holden assigned William Sydley Justinian Champnes Edward Cook Esquiers and William Kneaplock Gent. Deputy of our Escheator of our County aforesaid by virtue of our Commission to them and others in that behalf directed to enquire after the death of Thomas Digges Esquire by the Oaths of good and lawfull men of the County aforesaid amongst other things It is found that the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the same commission named was seised in his demesn as of Fee amongst other things of and in the Manor of Owtelmestone with the appurtenances and in all Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances to the same belonging and appertaining lying and being in the said County of Kent and of 110 Acres of Land Meadow Pasture and Wood with the appurtenances called Estendown and Beacondown lying and being in Barham and Kingstone in the said County of Kent and of and in the Manor of Yoke and Yokes Court and Fokeham and in all Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments to the said Manors belonging and appertaining lying and being in the said county of Kent and of 40 Acres of Land Wood and Pasture called Throuhgly Close and Tyllers in Barham aforesaid which late were purchased of William Boyes Gentleman by way of Exchange and of 2 Acres of Land and Wood lying and being in Wemingswold in the aforesaid County and farther by the Inquisition aforesaid it is found that Thomas Arch. Bishopp of Canterbury being seised in his demesn as of Fee as in the right of his Arch Bishoprick of Canterbery aforesaid of and in the Manor of Bishopps Born with the appurtenances in the said County of Kent by an Act of Parliament at Westminster in the County of Middlesex in the yeer of the Reign of Henry late King of England the 8th the 34th made and provided amongst other things it is enacted established that one Thomas Culpeper Esq should have hold and enjoy by authority of the said Act aforesaid to him and his heirs of the bodie of him the said Thomas of the bodie of one Elizabeth somtimes his wise deceased lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the Heirs of the bodie of the aforesaid Elizabeth and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the right Heirs of one William Hante for ever the aforesaid Manor of Bushops born with the appurtenances in the said County of Kent and then parcel of the possessions of the said Arch-Bishop to hold the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other things of the aforesaid Lord the King his Heirs and Successors in Capite by the 20th part of a Knights Fee and the Rent of 38 shillings by the yeer By virtue of which Act of Parliament the said Thomas Culpeper entred into the aforesaid Manor with the appurtenances and was thereof seised as the â—aw required and so being thereof seised the same Thomas Culpeper by sufficient conveyance and assurance in Law conveyed and assured the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborn with the appurtenances to one Anthony Awcher Knight to have and to hold to him and his heirs By virtue of which the said Anthony Awcher Knight in the aforesaid Manor of Bishopsborn with the appurtenances entred and was there of seised in his demesn as of Fee the estate of which Anthony Awcher of and in two parcels of Land and Wood with the appurtenances called the Haute and Reed conteyning by estimation 60 Acres of Land late were purchased by Christopher Digges Father of the aforesaid Thomas Digges in the said Commission named lying and being in Barham aforesaid and in Bourn of which he died seised the said Thomas Digges was of the aforesaid parcels of Land Wood with the appurtenances seised in his demesn as of Fee which parcel of Land and Wood with the appurtenances called the Haute and Reed at the time of the making and ordeyning of the said Act of Parliament time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary were parcel of the said Manor of Bishopsborn the said Tho. Digges of the Manors Lands and Tenements other the premises aforesaid with the
Purificaiion of the blessed Mary wheresoever c. to Recognize in form aforesaid c. And the same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come aswel the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and the said Edward by their Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And the Sherif sent not his Writ thereof c. There again as before It is commanded c. That he destrein the Jurors aforesaid by all their Lands c. So that he have their Bodies before the Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in 15. dayes wheresoever c. Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of KENT to be taken assigned first upon Monday in the 5th Week of Lent at Rochester in the aforesaid County of KENT according to the form of the Statute shall come for default of Jurors And therefore that the Siherif have their Bodies c. to Recognize in form aforesaid And the same day is given to the parties aforesaid At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came aswel the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Son and Edward Digges by their Attorny as the aforesaid Thomas Palmer and Margaret in their proper persons And the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. sent here the Record had before them in these words After wards the day and place within contained before Francis Gawdy one of the Justices to Pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned and George Kingsmill one of the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench Justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizeâ— in the said County of Kent to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. come aswel the within named Christâ—pher Digges and Edward Diggs by Edmond Gibbon their Attorny within written as the said Thomas Palmer and Margaret by Nathaniel Manley their Attorny And the Jurors of the Juâ—y whereof within mention is made likewise being called come who to say the truth of the within contained chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oaths That long before the day of the bringing of the Monsirans de droit within written one Christopher Digg otherwise Digges Esquire in the Monstrans de droit within named Father of the aforesaid Christopher Digges and Edward Digges was seized of the Mannors Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances in the Monstrans de droit specified and of and in Lands and Tenements in the Indenture hereafter specified in his Demesn as oâ— Fee And so thereof being seized The said Christopher Digges the Father before the day of the bringing of the Monstrans de droit within written that is to say the 6th day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 10th By his Indenture between him the sâ—id Christopher Digges the Father of the one part Henry Cripps Knight John â—rook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leason and Richard Horewood Gent. of the other part made one part whereof with the Seal of the said Christopher Digges the Father sealed to the Jurors aforesaid in Evidence was shewed whose Date is the same day and yeer For the Considerations and Causes in the same Indenture specified covenanted and granted for him and his Heirs To and with the aforesaid Henry â—ripps John Brook Francis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas â—eison and Richard Horewood and their Heirs That the said Christopher Digges the Father and his Heirs then from thenceforth would stand and be seized of and in all and singular the aforesaid Mannors Lands and Tenements to the Behoofs and uses Provisons and intents in the same Indenture specified The Tâ—nor of which Indenture followeth in these words ss This Indenture made the 6th day of May in the 10th yeer of the Reign oâ— our Sovereign Lady Elizabeth by the Grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. Between Christopher Digg otherwise Digges of Outelmeston in the County of Kent Esquire on â—he one part and St. Henry Cripps or Thenett in the said County Knight John Brook Francis Gatacre Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood Gent. on the other part witnesseth That whereas the said Christopher Digges did â—eretofore mary and take to Wife Martha Brook Sister of the said John Brook and Richard Brook and now Wife of the said Christoper and during the said Mariage had and continuing they had and have issue be ween their Thomas Digg otherwise Digges now being Son and Heir apparent of the said Christopher Therefore aswel in Consideration of the said Mariage so had betwâ—en the said Christopher and Martha As alâ—o for and in consideration of the sum of 200. pounds of good and lawful money of England before the solemnization of the Mariage aforesaid unto the sâ—id Christopher well and truly contented satisfied and paid As also for the Preferment and certain Advancement of the said Thomas â—igges and of the Heirs Males of the said Thomas Digges of his Body lawfully to be begotten And also for diverse other good considerations the same Christopher Digges thereunto specially moving It is now Covenanted Granted Concluded Condescended and Agreed between the parties to these presents and the said Christopher Digges and his Heirs doth by these presents Covenant Grant and Agree to and with the said Sr. Henry Cripps Knight John Brook â—rancis Gatacre Richard Brook Thomas Leweson and Richard Horewood their Executors and Administrators in manner and form following That is to say That aswell the said Christopher Digges and his Heirs and all and every other person or persons and their Heirs which now stand or be seized or at any time hereafter shall stand or be seized of and in all and singular his Manors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services whatsoever with their appurtenances set lying and being in the said County of Kent shall from the day of the Date of these presents stand and be seized of and in all and every the said Manors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments and other the premises in the said County of Kent to the only uses and intents hereafter in these presents mentioned and expressed and to none other use intent or purpose That is to say To the use of the said Christopher Digges for his natural life and after the decease of the said Christopher Digges Then to the use of the said Thomas Digges and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such Heirs Males Then to the use of the Heirs Males of the body of the said Christopher upon the Body of the said Martha lawfully to be begotten Provided alwaies and it is neverthelesse Covenanted and Agreed by these presents between the said parties to these presents upon the Considerations above mentioned That for the Preferment and Advancement of the other Children of the said Christopher Digges and
consent and agreement do covenant and grant to and with the said Thomas Ovington and Thomas Diggss their Heirs and Assigns by these presents that from the time of the Inrollment of this present Indenture in the Queens Majesties Court of Chancery that all and every the said use and uses considerations and intent in any wise limitted declared and mentioned in the abovesaid Indenture in these presents above comprised and for and as concerning all and singular their Manors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever with the appurtenances in any wise mentioned meant comprised and specified in the abovesaid Indenture in these presents above comprised except or Meadow lying and being in the Parish of Bishopsborne in the said County of Kent contayning by estimation or thereabouts and now or late in the occupation or possession of one Vincent Edley or of his Assigns shall be utterly void and frustrate and be determined and ended and that the said Christopher Digges and his heirs and all and every person and persons which now stand and be seised or at any time hereafter shall stand and be seised of and in all and singular the said Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever with the appurtenances or any parcel thereof in any wise mentioned meant comprised or specified in the abovesaid Indenture in these presents comprised except before excepted shall from the time of the Inrolment of these presents stand and be seised of and in all and singular the said Manors Messuages Lands and Tenements Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments whatsoever with the appurtenances in the said former Indenture or in these presents meant contained or specified and of and in all and every part and parcel thereof except before excepted to the only use of the said Christopher Digges his Heirs assignes for ever to no other use or uses purposes or intents In witness whereof the parties abovesaid to these present Indentures their Seals enterchangeablie have set dated the day and yeer first above written as by the said other Indenture further recited more fully appeareth And the aforesaid Christopher Digges the Father so as before is said of the Manors Messuages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments aforesaid with the appurtenances in the aforesaid Indenture bearing date the 20th day of September in the 13th yeer abovesaid as the same requireth being the said Christopher Digges the Father afterwards and before the day of the being of the Monstrans de droâ—t within written that is to say the 20th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 14th By another certain Indenture between the said Christopher Digges the Father of the one part and Richard Gaunt Gentleman and Lawrence Applegate of the other part made one part of which with the Seal of the said Christopher to the Jurors aforesaid in evidence was shewed whose date is the same day and yeer covenanted and granted for him and his Heirs to and with the aforesaid Richard Gaunt and Lawrence Applegate in manner and form as in the Indenture aforesaid is conteyned the Tenor of which followeth in these words Thiâ— Indenture made the 25th day of ctober in the 14th yeear of the Reign of our Soveraign Lady Elizabeth by the gâ—ace of God Queen of England France and Ireland defender of the Faith c. Between Christopher Digges of Barham in the County of â—ent Esquier on the one party and Richard Gaunt of the City of Canterbury Gentâ—emâ—n and Lawrence Applegate of the Parish of Saint George of the same City Draper on the other party Witnesseth That it is Covenanted granted condescended and agreed by all the parties to these Indentures by these presents in maner and form following that is to say that first the said Christopher Digges for him and his Heirs Executors and Administrators doth Covenant and grant to and with the said Richard Gaunt and Lawrence Appâ—egate their Executors and assigns by these presents that he the said Christopher and Martha his Wife before the end of this Instant Term of Saint Michael upon the writ of Covenant to be persued by the said Richard and Lawrence out of the high Court of Chancery and retornable before the Queens Majesties Justices of the common plea at Westminster shall acknowledge and levy a fine of all those the Manors Lands Tenements Meadows Marshes Pastures Feedings Woods Underwoods Rents and Services to any the same Manors appertaining or in any waies belonging set lying and being in the Parishes of Barham Kingstone Bishop Borne Patiâ—chborne Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey Harrisham Saint Stephens Hackington Netherherds Lenham Brensted in the County of Kent and also all other the Lands Tenements whatsoever which he the said Christopher Dighes now hath or late had in the same County and that by he names of Owtelmestone Mayton Hackington and Yokes Court with the appurtenances 40 Messuâ—ges 20 Tofts 1 Mill 3 Dovehouses 20 GardeÌ„s 10 Oâ—châ—rds 1000 Acres of Land 100 Acres of Meadow 100 Acres of Pasture 600 Acres of Wood 10 Acres of Heath Furze 5 pound Rent the Rent of 10 Quarters of Barley with the appurtenances in Barham Kingstone Bishopsborne Bridge Patricksboone Littleborne Wellborne Sturrey St. Stephens Hackington Netherherds Lenham Harrisham Frensted Sutton Repple and Sholden and nevertheless it is covenanted granted and agreed between the said Christopher Digges Rich Gaunt Lawrence Applegate they their Heirs Executors Assignes do covenant and grant by these presents to and with the said Christopher Digges his Heirs Executors and Assignes in form following that is to say that the same Fine and the use and execution of the same as to the Manor of Yokes Court with the appurtenances and one Messuage called Fokeham 500 Acres of Land Meadow and Pasture by estimation be it more or less with the appurtenances set lying and being in the parishes of Fremsted Lenham Harrisham in the County of Kent aforesaid 160 Acres of Land Meadow and Pasture in the Parish of Netherherds Nackington and Patricksborne in the said County And all those Lands arable and Pasture conteyning by estimation 200 Acres called Gore and Ilding lying and being in the Parishes of Barham and Kingstone now late in the 〈◊〉 of James Herenge and John Nethersale or of their assigns all Woods Wood-Lands Underwoods Courts Rents perquisites of Court to all the same only excepted shall be to the use of the said Christopher Digges and Martha and the Heirs and Assignes of the said Christopher Digges for ever And that the said Fine use and execution thereof as well to the said Manors of Owtelmestone Mayton and all the Lands Meadows Marshes Feedings Woods Underwoods Rents and Services to the same Manors or any of them belonging or in any wise appertayning and also all other the Lands Messuages Tenements Meadows Pastures Marshes Woods Underwoods and other Hereditaments whatsoever above in these presents specfiâ—ed mentioned or comprised the
that the Tax aforesaid for the Reparations of the Church aforesaid in the case aforesaid is a matter determinable at the Common Law and not in the spiritual Court Yet the said spiritual Judge to admit the same Plea Allegation utterly refused And the aforesaid Abraham and Tho. Foster him the said William Jeffrey in the spiritual Court aforesaid in the premises to be condemned and to the payment of the aforesaid several sums of Mony upon him the said William Jeffrey for the Reparations of the Church aforesaid above in this behalf specially imposed and taxed which then by the Law of the Land as before is said to pay for the reason aforesaid ought not or is bounden to do by the definitive Sentence of the said spiritual Court with all his strength endeavoreth and daily threatneth in contempt of the Queen that now is and to the losse prejudice impoverishing and manifest grievance of him the said William as also contrary to the Law of the Land aforesaid And this the said William Jeffrey is ready to aver and humbly imploring the aid assistance of the said Court of the said Lady the Queen that now is here demands remedy And the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Prohibition to the aforesaid spiritual Judge in form aforesaid to forbid him that he the Plea aforesaid nor any thing touching the same before him he futher hold not and it is granted unto him c. And thereupon cometh John Porter of Cheddingley in the County aforesaid of Sussex Esquire Ard Thomas Aynscomb of Buxted in the County aforesaid Gent. in their proper persons and undertake for the aforesaid William Jeffrey That if it happeneth the aforesaid Abraham Kenshley and Thomas Foster To the Court of the Lady the Queen hereafter to come to demand the said Queens Writ of Consultation or otherwise to sue for Justice there of and upon the premises That then the said William the said matter or suggestion should follow with effect untill the Plea thereof by some lawful means be ended that is to say each of the Bail aforesaid upon the penalty of 10. pound which said sum of 10. pound the Bail aforesaid acknowledged and each of them acknowledged of their Lands and Goods and of every of them to be levied to the use of the said Lady the Queen If it shall so happen the said William not to prosecute in form aforesaid with effect c. REPLEVIN Michaelmas Term Anno 23. Eliz. Rot. 1160. in the Common Pleas C. 1. part Capels Case Fo. 54. THomas Gately was summoned to answer John Hunt of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of the said Iohn and them deteined against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon the said Iohn by Iohn Lutwich his Attorney complaineth that the aforesaid Thomas the 27th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 22th at Howcaple in a certain place called Stockins took his Cattel that is to say 6. Oxen and 6. Cows of him the said Iohn and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath loss to the value of 100 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. and the aforesaid Thomas by Thomas Willis his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as Bayliff of Anthony Capel Gent. acknowledgeth the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. and justly c. Because that he saith that the place in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be done doth contein and at the time of the taking of the Cattle aforesaid supposed to be done did contein in it 300. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in Howcaple aforesaid and that long before the aforesaid time in which c. One Thomas Capel Esquire was seised of the Manor of Howcaple with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid whereof the aforesaid 300. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in which c. are and at the aforesaid time in which c. as also time whereof the memory of men is not to the contrary were parcel in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised after the fourth day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 27th and before the time in which c Of the said Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other enfeoffed Iohn Warmcombe Richard Wahrein Alexander Whittington Thomas Walwem Iohn I loid and Henry Iones To have and to hold the said Manor with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other to the said Iohn Warmcombe Richard Walwein Alexander Whittington Thomas Walwein Iohn Llud and Henry â—ones their Heirs and Assigns for ever To the use of the aforesaid Thomas Capel and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Edward Capel and the Heirs Males of the body of the said Edward lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Richard Capel and the Heirs Males of the body of the said Richard lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of William Capel and the Heirs Males of the body of the said William lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to the use of Giles Capel for the term of the life of the said Giles and after the decease of the said Giles to the use of the Right Heirs of the said Thomas Capel for ever By virtue of which Feoffment and by force of a certain Act of Parliament of the aforesaid late King at Westminster of transferring uses into possession in the 27th yeer abovesaid holden made The aforesaid Thomas Capel was seised of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof amongst other in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Edward Capel and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue the Remainder thereof in form aforesaid expectant and the aforesaid Thomas Capel of the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. amongst other in form aforesaid being seised before the aforesaid time in which c. at Howcaple aforesaid dyed of such his estate thereof seised after whose death The Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances amongst other descended to one William Capel as Son and Heir of the body of the aforesaid Thomas Capel lawfully begotten by which the said William Capel the Son before the aforesaid time in which c. into the Manor aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Feetail that is to say to him and the Heirs Males of his body lawfully begotten for default of such issue the remainder thereof to the aforesaid Edward and the Heirs Males of his
Thomas Gateley by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves before they give their Judgement of and upon he premises day is given to the parties here untill in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John Hunt as the said Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves before that they give their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgment thereof because the same Justices here are not thereof yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given to the parties here until from the day of Easter in 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here are not thereof as yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves before they give their JudgemeÌ„t of upoÌ„ the premises day is given to the parties aforesaid here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves before they give their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given to the parties here until the Morrow of ALL SOVLS to hear their Judgment thereof because the same Justices here are inot yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjourned by the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment from Westminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen of Hertford in the County of Hertford untill the aforesaid morrow of All Soules at which day that is to say at the aforesaid Castle of Hertford cometh as well the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves before that they give their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given unto the parties aforesaid untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof are not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Laâ—y the Queen of Common Adjornment from the aforesaid Castle of Hertford unto Westminster aforesaid at the aforesaid 8. dayes of St. Hillary at which day here that is to say at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof further day is given here to the parties aforesaid untill from Easterday in 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here are not thereof as yet c. At which day cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the said Thomas Gately by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here are not thereof as yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves before they give their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given to the parties here untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael for to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here are not thereof as yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves before they give their Judgement of anâ— upon the premises day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. days of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the said John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gately by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves before they give their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given to the parties here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here are thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid John Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves before that they give their Judgement of and upon the premises day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here are not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof are not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid until from the day of Easier in t5 dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof are not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill In the morrow of Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before that they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear
aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here of their Iudgement thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because â—he Iustices here will further avise themselves before they give their Iudgement of and upon the premises day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes â—o hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices will further avise themselves of and upon the premises day is given to the partis aforesaid here untill in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of the premises before they give their Iudgment thereof day is given to the parties aâ—oresaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Michael to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is further given to the parties aforesaid untill in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Iudgement thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. at whiâ—h day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn Hunt as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day furthe is given to the parties aforesaid here untill in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgment thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof day further is given to the parties aâ—oresaid here untill from the day of Easter in 15. dayes to hear their Iudgment thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgment thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Iudgment thereof because the same Iustices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgement thereof further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the morrow of All Soules to hear their Iudgment thereof because the said Iustices here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Common Adjornment from Westminster in the County of Middlesex unto the Castle of the Lady the Queen of Hertford in the County of Hertford at the same morrow of All-Soules c. At which day here that is to say at the Castle of Hertford cometh as well the aforesaid Iohn as the aforesaid Thomas by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Iustices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Iudgment thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here in 8. dayes of St. Hillary to hear their Iudgment thereof before the said Iustices here thereof not yet c. Before which day the Plea aforesaid was adjorned by the Writ of the Queen of Common adjornment from the said Castle of the said Queen of Hertford in the County of Hertford unto Westminster aforesaid in the aforesaid County of Middlesex at the same 8. dayes of St. Hillary c. And now here that is to say at Westminster aforesaid cometh as well the aforesaid John as the aforesaid Thomas Gateley by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this the premises being seen and by the Iustices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Iustices here That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Iohn Hunt above in Barr of the Conusance aforesaid pleaded is sufficient in Law to him the said Thomas Gateley as Bayliff of the said Anthony justly acknowledging the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which to Barr as the aforesaid Ihhn Hunt above alleged for which the aforesaid Iohn Hunt his damages for the occasion of the taking and unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid against the aforesaid Thomas Gateley ought to recover But because it is not known what damages the aforesaid Iohn Hunt for the occasion of taking and unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid susteined It is CoÌ„manded to the Sheriff that by the Oaths of good and lawful men of his County he diligently enquire what damages the said Iohn Hunt susteined as well by the occasion of the taking unjustly deteining of the Cattel aforesaid as for his Costs and Charges by him about his sute in this behalf expended and the Enquire which c. The Sheriff make to appear here
Henry Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heis for ever And that the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes so of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. for the Term of the said John and Agnes and the longer liver of them in form aforesaid being seized the Remainder thereof after the death of them the said John and Agnes to the aforesaid William Cary and the Heirs oâ— his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Robert Cary and the Heirs of his Body lawfully begotten the Remainder thereof for default of such issue to the aforesaid Heny Cary Knight Lord of Hunsdon and his Heirs expectant Before the levying of the aforesaid Fine in the Conusance of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above second mentioned The aforesaid other Fine in the aforesaid Plea of her the said Agnes above specified was levied in the aforesaid Court of the Queen here from the aforesaid day of Easter in 15. dayes in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 31th before the aforesaid then Justices and other the faithful people of the Lady the Queen then there present Between the aforesaid David Bulward and Robert Ham Plaintiffs and the aforesaid William Cary Deforceant of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. And of the aforesaid 20. Messuages One Dove house 20. Gardens 300. Acres of Land 100. Acres of Meadow 200. Acres of Pasture 30. Acres of Wood 1. pound 6. shillings 4. pence Rent and the Rent of 4. Capons and 1. pound of Wax with the Appurtenances in Stow-market Newton Gipping and One house Which Fine in form aforesaid levied and had was had and levied to the use of the aforesaid David and Robert Ham and to their Heirs for ever to the intent in the Plea of the aforesaid Agnes above mentioned the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances whereof c. for the Term of the lives of them the said John Gardiner and Agnes and the longer liver of them so as before is said being seized the Remainder thereof to the aforesaid David and Robert Ham and their Heirs expectant the aforesaid Recovery in the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above mentioned in form aforesaid was had And the aforesaid Agnes further in Facto saith That the aforesaid John Gardiner and Agnes from the time of the levying of the Fine in the Conusance of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon second mentioned in form aforesaid was levied Without that that the aforesaid David and Robert Ham the aforesaid day of bringing of the Writ of the Lady the Queen of Entry Sur Disseisin in the Post in the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above mentioned or ever afterwards were ever Tenants of the Freehold of the Manor Tenements and Rents with the Appurtenances in the Recovery aforesaid above mentioned as the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon above have alleged And this she is ready to aver Wherefore she demandeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Cattel aforesaid to her to be adjudged And the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon say That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Agnes to the Conusance of them the said William and John as to the aforesaid 20. pound residue of the 40. pound at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer 35th abovesaid payable above by Rejoynder pleaded is insufficient in Law to bar her the said Agnes from having her Action aforesaid of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which against them the said William and John or to bar the said William and John from the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. And that they to that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded need not nor by the Law of the Land are bound to Answer for that that is to say That the aforesaid Induction of the Plea of the said Agnes to the Traverse aforesaid in her Plea aforesaid to the Conusance of them the said William and Iohn above rejoyning pleaded is not sufficient in Law to induce that Traverse And that the Traverse of the aforesaid Tenances of the David and Robert Ham the day of the bringing of the aforesaid Writ of Entry upon Disseisin in the Post of the aforesaid Manor Tenements Rents with the Appurtenances in the same Plea pleaded is not material in Law And this they are ready to aver wherefore for want of sufficient Plea of the said Agnes in this behalf the said William and John as at first demand Judgement and the retorn of the Cattel aforesaid together with damages c. to be to them adjudged And the aforesaid Agnes for as much as she hath alleged sufficient matter in Law and the aforesaid William Bredon and John Bredon from their Conusance aforesaid as to the aforesaid 20. pound of the aforesaid 40. p. residue at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel payable to have to bar and the said Agnes to have her Action aforesaid against the said William and John above hath alleged which she is ready to aver which matter the aforesaid William and John do not deny nor to the same do any wayes Answer but the the same Averment utterly refuse to admit as before demandeth Judgement and her damages by occasion of the taking and unjustly detaining of the Cattel aforesaid to her to be adjudged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes from Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh aswelthe aforesaid Agnes as the aforesaid Wil. Bredon J. Bredon by their Atornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day further is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh aswel the aforesaid Agnes as the aforesaid Wil. Bredon and John Bredon by their Attornies aforesaid And upon this The premises seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the said Justices here That the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid Agnes to the Conusance of the aforesaid William and John as to the aforesaid 20. pound residue of the aforesaid 40. pound at the aforesaid Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel in the yeer 35th abovesaid payable by Rejoynder pretended is not sufficient in Law for the said Agnes to have her Action aforesaid of the taking of the Cattel aforesaid against the said William and John or to
in which c. the said Walter and the aforesaid Robert who c. demand Judgement and their damages by the occasion of the taking and unjust deteining of the Cattel aforesaid to the said VValter to be adjudged And the aforesaid Nicholas as at first saith That the aforesaid John Bevill was seized of the aforesaid Services by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hand of his very Tenant as he above alleged And of this puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid Walter and the aforesaid Robert Smith the Son who c. likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to be here from the day Saint Martin 15. dayes 12. c. by whom c. and who neither c. to Recognize c. Because as well c. Processe against the Jurors to try the issue aforesaid is conteined until 15. of Easter in the 19th yeer of Queen Elizabeth unless the Justices to Assizes in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. Upon Monday in the 5th Week of Lent the said 19th yeer first come At which Assizes the Verdict was given as followeth The Jurors say upon their Oath That the within named John Smith the Father held the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances called Newton of the within named John Bevill as of the within written Manor of Keligath by Knights Service within written And that the said John Bevill was seized of the Fealty and Sute of Court only parcel of the Services within written by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hands of his very Tenant But whether the aforesaid seisin of Feâ—lty and Sute of Court aforesaid be a good and sufficient sâ—isin of the whole Services within written or not the Jurors are altogether ignorant And pray thereof the advice and diâ—cretion of the Justices aforesaid And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the same Justices That the aforesaid seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court be not a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services aforesaid Then the Jurors say upon their Oath That the aforesaid John Bevill was not seized of the within written Services by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hand of his very Tenant as the said Walter within alleged And then they assess the damages of him the said Walter by occasion of the taking and unjust detaining of the Cattel aforesaid besides his costs and charge by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Justices That the said seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid be a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services within written Then the said Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said John Bevill was seized oâ— the Services within written by the Hands of the aforesaid Robert Smith the Father as by the Hands of his very Tenant as the aforesaid Nicholas within alleged And then they assess the damages of the said Nicholas by occasion of the premises besides his costs and charges by him about his Sute in this behalf expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 40. shillings And because the Justices here will avise themselves of upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof day is given to the parties here until in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. And so the Plea aforesaid was continued until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity in the 25th yeer of Queen Elizabeth which day Judgement was given as followeth At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Walter Parker by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Nicholas Francis by William Aylesbury his Attorny And upon this The premises being seen and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the Justices here That the aforesaid seisin of Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid is a good and sufficient seisin of the whole Services aforesaid Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid William Parker take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in mercy for his false clamour And the aforesaid Nicholas Francis thereof go without day and that he have Retorn of his Cattel aforesaid to be kept by him irreplegible for ever c. It is also granted That the aforesaid Nicholas Francis recover against the aforesaid Walter Parker his damages aforesaid to 41. shillings by the Jurors in form aforesaid assessed as also 13. pound to the said Nicholas at his request for his costs and charges aforesaid by the Court here of Encrease adjudged which damages in the whole do amount to 15. pound 1. shilling c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 7 mo JACOBI Rot. 3661. in Salop. the COMMON-PLEAS Co. 8. part John Talbotts Case IOhn Pendleton was attached by the Writ of the Lady the Queen of second deliverance to answer to John Chapman of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of him the said John Chapman and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges c. And whereupon The said John Chapman by Thomas Salter his Attorney complaineth That the aforesaid John Pendleton the second day of September in the yeer of the Lord the King that now is of England c. the 6th at Albrighton in a certain place called Bromly took his Cattel that is to say two Bullocks of the said John Chapman and them unjustly deteined against Gages and Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof he bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Iohn Pendleton by Nicholas Gibbens his Attorny cometh and defendeth the force and injury when c. and as Bayliff of Jo. Talbot Esquire doth well avow the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. and justly c. Because he saith That the place in which it is supposed the taking aforesaid to be done doth contein and at the time of the taking thereof above supposed to be done did contein in it self 3. Acres of Pasture lying in the aforesaid field called Bromley in Albrighton aforesaid and that long before the taking of the Cattel aforesaid supposed to be done One John Chapman Father of the now Plaintiff was seised of the aforesaid 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and the said 3. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in which c. held of the aforesaid John as of his Manor of Albrighton in the County aforesaid by Fealty and the Service of doing sute at the Court of the said John Talbot of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks at that Manor to be holden As also by the service of rendring after
be to him adjudged c. And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties c. REPLEVIN Trinity Term Anno 6 to of King James Rot. 1611. in the common-COMMON-PLEAS C. 9. part Henry Conneys Case BArtholmew Colpit was summoned to answer to Iohn Crane of a Plea wherefore he took the Cattel of the said John and them deteined against Gages and Pledges and whereupon The said Iohn by Thomas Ganton his Attorney complaineth that the aforesaid Bartholmew the 19th day of October in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 5th at Fidde St Giles in a certain place there conteining in it two Acres of Pasture the Cattel that is to say 3. Steers of the said Iohn c. them unjustly deteined against Gages Pledges untill c. whereupon he saith he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20. pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid Bartholmew by William Dany his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury c. and as Bayliff to Iohn Welby Esquire doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the place in which c. and justly c. Because he saith that the said place in which it is supposed the taking of the Cattel aforesaid to be done doth contein aforesaid time in which it is supposed the aforesaid taking to be done did contein in it self 2. Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Fidde Saint Giles aforesaid lying there in a certain Field called South graftfield neer the Lands foot of Richard Welby Gent. sometimes Richard Delaland on the part of the North and the Kirkland on the part of the West and that one Henry Conny Esquire before the time in which was seised of the aforesaid 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee and held the same of one William Stermin Esquire as of his Manor of Richards with the Appurtenances in Tidde St. Giles aforesaid by Fealty and the Rent of 13d yeerly at the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel to be paid as also by the Service of doing Sute at the Court of the said William Stermin of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks upon seasonable warning at the Manor aforesaid to be holden Of which Services the said William Stermin was seised by the hands of the aforesaid Henry Conny as by the hands of his very Tenant that is to say Of the Fealty and Sute of Court aforesaid as of Fee and Right and of the Rent aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee Of which Manor with the Appurtenances the aforesaid William Stermin was seised in his demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seised the aforesaid William Stermin before the time in which c. Of the aforesaid Manor with the Appurtenances the aforesaid John Welby enfeoffed To have and to hold to the said Joh. Welby his Heirs Assigns for ever To which Feoffment by the aforesaid VVilliam Stermin to the aforesaid John VVelby in form aforesaid made the aforesaid Henry Conny afterwards and before the time in which c. that is to say the first day of November in the yeer of the Reign of Lord the King that now is the first then of the aforesaid two Acres of Lands with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seised at Fidde St. Giles aforesaid attorned By colour of which Feoffment and attorment aforesaid The said John VVelby was and yet is seised of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his demesn as of Fee and because 40. shillings and 4 pence of the Rent aforesaid for 4. whole yeers was at the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 5th and after the Attornment aforesaid in form aforesaid had to the aforesaid John Welby the aforesaid time in which c. behind not paid The said Bartholmew as Bayliff of the aforesa Jo. Welby doth well acknowledge the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which for the aforesaid 4. shillings and 4. pence of the Rent aforesaid so being behind and justly c. as within his Fee and Lordship And the aforesaid John Crane saith That the aforesaid Bartholmew as Bayliff of the said John Welby for the cause above alleged the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which ought not avow to be just Because by Protestation that the aforesaid Henry Conny held not the aforesaid 2. Acres of Land with the Appurtenances of the aforesaid William Stermin as of his Manor of Richards aforesaid by Fealty and the Rent of 13. pence for every yeer at the Feast of Saint Michael to be paid as also by the Service of doing Sute at the Court of the said William Stermin of his Manor aforesaid from 3. Weeks to 3. Weeks upon reasonable warning at that Manor to be holden as the said Bartholmew above hath alleged And for Plea he saith That the aforesaid Henry before the time of the taking aforesaid done at the time of the taking c. was yet is seized of the aforesaid 2. Acres of Pasture with their Appurte in his demesnas of Fee held the same of Martin by Divine Providence then Bishop of â—ly as of his Manor of Fidde St. Giles with the Appurtenances in Fiddy Saint Giles aforesaid by Fealty only for all Services Without that that the aforesaid Henry at Fidde Saint Giles aforesaid to the aforesaid John Welby attorned Tenant in manner and form as the said Bartholmew above hath alleged And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for as much as the aforesaid Bartholmew the taking of the Cattel aforesaid in the aforesaid place in which c. above acknowledgeth The said John demandeth Judgement and his damages by the occasion of taking of the said Cattel to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid Bartholmew as at first saith That the said Henry did attorn Tenant to the aforesaid John Welby in manner and 〈◊〉 as the said Bartholmew above hath alleged And oâ— this puts 〈…〉 lf upâ—â— the Country and the said John likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he cause to come here from the day of the Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. By whom c. And who neither c. Because as well c. And afterwards the day and place within conteined before Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Bench and William Daniel Knight one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the Bench aforesaid Justices of the said Lord the King to Assizes in the County of Cambridge to be taken assigned by the â—orm of the Statute c. this turn associated the presence of the aforesaid William Daniel not expected by virtue of the Writ of the said Lord the
King of 〈◊〉 c. came as well the within named John Crane as the within written Bartholmew Colpit by their Attornies within conteined And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within mention is made being called come who to say the truth of the within conteined chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That the within named Henry Conny before the time within written in which c. was seized oâ— the within written 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in which c. in his demesn as of Fee by discent from his Father And that the said Henry the said 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances held of the within named VVilliam Stermin â—s of his Manor of Richards with the Appurtenances in Fidde St. Giles within written by Fealty and the Rent of 13. pence at the Feast of Saint Miâ—hael the Archangel to be paid as also by the service of doing Sute at the Court of him the said VVilliam Stermin of his Manor aforesaid from 3. weeks to 3. weeks upon reasonable warning at the Manor aforesaid yeerly to be holden and that of the services aforesaid the said VVilliam Stermin was seised by the hands of the aforesaid Henry Conny as by the hands of his very Tenant that is to say of the Fealty and Sute of the Court aforesaid as of Fee and Right and of the Rent aforesaid in his demesn as of Fee as the aforesaid Bartholmew within hath alleged And further the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid William Stermin of the Manor aforesaid with the Appurtenances was seized in his demesn as of Fee And so thereof being seized The said William Stermin before the within written time in which c. of the said Manor with the Appurtenances enfeoffed the within named John Welby To have and to hold to the said John Welby his Heis and Assigns forever And that the aforesaid Henry Conny being of the Age of 20. and within the Age of 21. yeers at the aforesaid Feoffment by the said William Stermin to the aforesaid John Welby in form aforesaid made of the aforesaid 2. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid being seized at Fidde Saint Giles aforesaid agreed and the payment of the Rent aforesaid to the aforesaid John Welby promised And if upon the whole matter aforesaid in form aforesaid found It shall seem to the Court here That the agreement of the aforesaid Henry Conny to the Feoffment aforesaid and his promise of the payment of the Rent aforesaid so as before is said by him the said Henry Conny he being within the Age of 21. yeers are an Attornment Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid That the aforesaid Henry did Attorn Tenant to the aforesaid John Welby in manner and form as the aforesaid Bartholmew Colpit within hath alleged And if upon the whole matter aforesaid by the Jurors in form aforesaid found it shall seem to the Court That the Agreement of the said Henry Conny to the Feoffment aforesaid and his promise aforesaid of payment of the Rent aforesaid so as before is said by him the said Henry being within the age of 21. yeers be not an Attornment Then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Henry Conny did not Attorn Tenant to the aforesaid John Welby as the aforesaid John Crane in pleading hath alleged and then they assesse the damages of the said John by occasion within written besides his costs and charges by him about his Sute expended to 12. pence and for his costs and charges to 5. shillings Therefore c. RESTITUTION Trinity Term Anno 13. JACOBI Rot. 23. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 11. part James Bagges Case fol. 93. a. JAMES by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. To the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough of Plymouth in the County of Devon greeting c. Whereas James Bagg one of the 12. Chief Burgesses or Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid according to the custom of the Borough aforesaid hithereto used was duly chosen and made And whereas the same James in the Office in of the 12. Chief Burgesses or Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid a long time carried and well governed himself Yet you the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough aforesaid little regarding the aforesaid Iames unduly and without reasonable cause from the Office of one of the 12. Chief Burgesses and Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid unjustly and have amoved in contempt of us and to the no little damage and grievance of him the said Iames and the hurt of his Estate as we by his complaint have understood We therefore to the said Iames willing due and speedy Justice to be done in this behalf as is just command you and every of you as before time we have you commanded firmly enjoying you That immediatly after the Receipt of this Writ the aforesaid Iames in the aforesaid Office of one of the 12. Chief Burgesses or Magistrates of the Borough aforesaid you restore with all the Liberties Privileges and Commodities to the Office aforesaid belonging and apperteining Or that you signifie the cause thereof unto us least in your default complaint thereof again to us come And how this our Writ shall be executed to us from the day of Holy Trinity in three Weeks wheresoever we shall be England you make it to appear under the penalty of 40. pound this our Writ then sending back c. Witnesse E. Coke at Westminster the 12th day of June in the yeer of our Reign of England France and Ireland the 13th and of Scotland the 48th By the Term of Trinity Anno 130. Jac. King JAMES Rot. 23. Execution of this Writ doth appear in a certan Schedule to this Writ annexed John Clement Mayor The Answer of the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough of Plymouth to the Writ to this Schedule annexed According to the command of the Writ aforesaid To the Lord the King we most humbly certifie That the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England by her Letters Patents with the great Seal of England sealed bearing date at Westminster the 28th day of February in the 43th yeer of her Reign for her self her Heirs and Successors granted to the Mayor and Cominalty of the Borough of Plymouth aforesaid and their Successors amongst other things That the Mayor and Recorder of the Borough aforesaid for the time being the time that they should happen to be in their Offices And further the Predecessors of the said Mayor then alive and for the time being and their Successors should be Justices of the said late Queen her Heirs and Successors to keep the Peace in the said Borough and within the Limits Precincts and Liberties thereof and to be kept and to cause to be conserved and kept without any Command Commission or Warrant for the same to be had or to be obteined And further to the said Lord the King we certifie That
Integrity and gravity And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That afterwards that is to say the first day of February in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 8th the aforesaid James Bagg continuing in his evil disposition and intent aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid in the Guild-hall of the Borough aforesaid in the presence of one Thomas Fowens then being Mayor of the Borough aforesaid in the presence and hearing as well of the Chief Burgesses as of the other Inhabitants of the Borough aforesaid scornfully and without reasonable cause spake to the aforesaid Thomas Fowens these false and injurous words following that is to say Thou the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then Mayor intending art an Insolent Fellow whereas in Truth the said THOMAS in the whole course of his Life bore himself towards all Men Honestly Civily and with Praise And further to the said Lord the King we certifie that the afterwards that is to say the first day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the King that now is the 9th at Plymouth aforesaid in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens and of very many other of the Burgesses of the Burough aforesaid being gathered together in the Guild Hall of the Burough aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg continuing his evil disposition and intent aforesaid divers contemptible words of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then being Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid with a loud voice spake and uttered upon which the aforesaid Thomas Fowens with mild words admonishing the aforesaid James Bagg that he would desist from uttering such contemptible words aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg thereupon then and there that is to say the 10th day of August in the 9th yeer abovesaid at Plymouth aforesaid and in the presence and hearing of the aforesaid Thomas Fowens then Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and very many other of the Burgesses and Inhabitants of the Burrough aforesaid and in contempt and disdain of the said Thomas Fowens then Mayor turning the hinder part of his Body in an unhumane and uncivil manner towards the aforesaid Thamas Fowens scoffingly contemptuously and uncivily with a loud voice said to the aforesaid Thomas Fowens these words following that is to say come and Kâ—ss And further to the said Lord the King we certifie that afterwards that is to say the 20th day of August in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 19th at Plymouth aforesaid the aforesaid James Bagg with most arrogant words threatned the said John Fowens then being Mayor oâ— the Burrough aforesaid without any reasonable cause and then and there to the said John Fowens threatningly and malitiously spake the words following that is to say I will make thy neck crack And further to the said Lord the King we certify that afterward that is to say the third day of May in the yeer of the Reign of the Lord the King that now is the 12th A certain Order and friendly Instrument of admonition was made by Iohn Scobb Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid and the greater part of the Chief Burgesses of the same Burrough in these words that is to say The 9th day of May 1614. the day and year above written It was agreed by John Scobb Mayor and such other of the Maisters here under written that if Mr. Iames Bagg the Elder do not before the next sâ—ssions to be holden within the Burrough of Plymouth Reconcile himself to the said Mayor and his brethren for such wrongs as he hath committed against them and withall faithfully promise to demean himself more orderly temperately for the time to come that then he shall be clean removed from the Bench and a new Master chosen in his Room which Order or Instrument was made and subscribed by the said Mayor and other of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That the aforesaid James Bagg before the aforesaid next sessions in the Order aforesaid mentioned did not make any such reconciliation or promise of Conformity as in the Order aforesaid is specified although full notice of the aforesaid Order immediately after the making thereof before the aforesaid next sessions was given to him at Plymouth aforesaid And further to the said Lord the K. we Certifie that afterwards that is to say the 20th day of Febr. in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lord the K. that now is the 12th the afores Jam. Bagg continuing his evil dispositioÌ„ in his intent aforesaid at Plymouth afores in the Guild-hall of the Borough aforesaid in the presence hearing of John Scobb one of the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid And then being a Justice for the keeping of the Peace within the Borough aforesaid by virtue of the Letters Patents aforesaid by reason of his Mayralty of the Borough aforesaid the yeer then next before and in the presence and hearing of the then Mayor of the Borough aforesaid and of diverse other of the Burgesses and Inhabitants of that Borough contemptuously these words following spake uttered of the aforesaid John Scobb openly and publickly falsely and scandalously that is to say You the aforesaid John Scobb intending are a Knave whereas the aforesaid John Scobb honestly and with praise carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That afterwards that is to say the 10th day of December last past then the Mayor of the said Borough and diverse of the Chief Burgesses of the Borough aforesaid at Plymouth aforesaid being assembled together in the Almes-house of the said Borough to require and receive an Account of the Overseers of the Borough of the Borough aforesaid as in times past and time whereof the Memory of Man is not to the contrary it was used the aforesaid James Bag then and there in the presence and hearing of the said Mayor and other of the Chief Burgesses aforesaid without any reasonable cause openly and publickly sayd to the said Thomas Shervill there then present and one of the Chief Burgesses of the Burrough aforesaid and for the space of 10. yeers then last past being these false and scandalous words following that is to say You the said Thomas Shervill intending are a seditious Fellow whereas in Truth the aforesaid Thomas Shervill alwaies lived not suspected of any such crime of Sedition and from time in the Office of Mayor of the Burrough aforesaid as in the place and Office of Chief Burgesse Honestly Discreetly and with great Integrity carried and governed himself And further to the said Lord the King we Certifie That whereas the said Lord the King the day of January in the 12th yeer of his Reign aforesaid at Westminster in the Counâ—y of Middlesex with the Advise of the Lords of his Privy Council of this his Realm of England Ordained and Commanded by publick Proclamation and by Letters written under
of the aforesaid Arthur in manner and form aforesaid above by Replication pleaded is not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Arthur to have his Action aforesaid against him and that he to that Replication in form aforesaid pleaded needeth not nor is bound by the Law to Answer And this he is ready to aver Wherefore for want of a sufficient Replication in this behalf The said Rowland demandeth Judgement and that the aforesaid Arthur from having his Action aforesaid against him be barred c. And the aforesaid Arthur in as much as he sufficient matter in Law to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the said Rowland above by Replication hath alleged which matter the aforesaid Rowland doth not deny nor to the same any wayes answereth but that averment utterly refuseth to admit as at first demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespass aforesaid to him to be adjudged And because the Justices here will avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties aforesaid here until in 8. dayes of the Purification of the blessed Mary to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the said Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day is given to the parties here until from the day of Faster 15. dayes to hear their Judgement thereof because the same Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises further day is given to the parties here until the Morrow of the Holy Trinity to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judement thereof Day is given to the parties here in 8. dayes of Saint Michael to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet c. At which day here cometh as well the aforesaid Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid And because the Justices here will further avise themselves of and upon the premises before they give their Judgement thereof Day further is given to the parties here until in 8. dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement thereof because the Justices here thereof not yet At which day here cometh as well the said Arthur as the aforesaid Rowland by their Attornies aforesaid and upon this the Plea aforesaid being seen as also the Plea of the aforesaid Arthur above by Replication pleaded and by the Justices here fully understood It seemeth to the same Justices here that that Plea in manner and form aforesaid pleaded is not sufficient in Law to maintain the said Arthur to have and maintain his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid Rowland Therefore it is granted That the aforesaid Arthur take nothing by his Writ aforesaid but be in Mercy for his false clamour and that the aforesaid Rowland thereof go without day c. Afterwards that is to say the 30th day of Aprill in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is the 42th The Record and Processe of the Plaint aforesaid with all the same by virtue of a Writ of the said Lady the Queen for Correcting Errors whose date is at Westminster the 12th day of Aprill in the 42th yeer aforesaid to Edmond Anderson Knight directed and the aforesaid Defendant touching before the said Lady the Queen wheresoever c. are sent c. TRESPAS Easter Term Anno 21. ELIZABETH Rot. 58. in the KINGS-BENCH C. 1. part Shelleys Case fol. 88. b. MEmorandum That at another time That is to say in Hillary Term Sussex last past before the Lady the Queen at Westminster came Nicholas Wolfe by Nicholas Mosley his Attorny And brought in the Court of the said Lady the Queen then there his Bill against Henry Shelley Esquire of a Plea of Trespass are Pledges of Sute that is to say John Doo Ric. Roo which Bill followeth in these words that is to say ss Sussex ss Nicholas Wolfe complaineth of Henry Shelley Esquire in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsey of the Lady the Queen before the Lady the Queen her self being of that That he the 7th day of November in the yeer of the Reign of the said Lady the Queen that now is of England the 20th with force and Arms c. The Close and House of him the said Nicholas called Barhamwick otherwise Barhamweek at Augmering in the County aforesaid broke and entred and his grass there to the value of 100. Marks there late growing with certain Cattel that is to say Horses Oxen Cows Hoggs and Sheep fed trod and consumed and other harms to him did against the Peace of the said Lady the Queen that now is to the damage of the said Nicholas 100. pound and thereof he bringeth Sute c And now at this day that is to say Wednesday next after 18. dayes of Easter this Term until which day the said Henry Shelley had leave to the Bill aforesaid to imparl and then to Answer c. before the Lady the Queen at Westminster cometh as well the aforesaid Nicholas Wolfe by his Attorny aforesaid as the aforesaid Henry Shelley by Richard Best his Attorny and the said Henry doth defend the force and injury when c. And saith He is not thereof guilty And of this puts himself upon the Country And the said Nicholas likewise c. Therefore a Jury thereof is to come before the Lady the Queen at Westminster upon Friday next after the Morrow of the Holy Trinity And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. Afterwards the Processe thereof is continued between the parties aforesaid of the Plea aforesaid by Jurors put thereof between them in respite before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until the day of June next after 3. Weeks of Easter then next following for default of Jurors c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid And the Jurors of the Jury aforesaid being called likewise come who to say the truth of the premises chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That long before the time of the Trespass supposed to be done The Lord Henry late King of England the 8th Father of the Lady the Queen that now is amongst other things was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in the Declaration aforesaid above specified in his Demesn as
done are and the aforesaid time in which it is supposed the Trespass aforesaid to be done were 10. Acres of Land called Bromfield with the appurtenances in Marton aforesaid which 10. acres of Land with the appurtenances are the Soil and Freehold of the said Christopher And that the said Christopher the aforesaid time in which c. the Close aforesaid as his own Close Soil and Freehold of him the said Christopher in the said 10. acres of Lands with the appurtenances brake and the Corn there as his own Corn there growing in the aforesaid 10. acres with the Appurtenances as in his own Soil and Freehold there trod and consumed as it was lawful for him to do and this he is ready to aver Whereupon he demandeth Judgement if the aforesaid Anthony his Action aforesaid against him ought to have c. And the aforesaid Anthony saith that he by any thing before alleged ought not to be barred from having his Action aforesaid Because he saith That the Close aforesaid as also the places in which the Trespass aforesaid above complaineed of was done are and the time aforesaid of the Trespass aforesaid done were 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances called Scarhill Set and VVatersey Mire in Marton aforesaid others than the aforesaid 10. acres of Lands called Bromfield with the Appurtenances in the Bar of the said Christopher above specified And this he is ready to aver Wherefore in as much as the aforesaid Christopher to the Trespass aforesaid in the aforesaid 4. acres of Lands with the Appurtenances above new assigned done doth not answer The said Anthony demandeth Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespass to be to him adjudged c. And the aforesaid Christopher as to any Trespass in the aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the appurtenances new assigned above supposed to be done saith that he thereof is not guilty as the aforesaid Anthony against him complaineth And of this puts himself upon the Country And the aforesaid Anthony likewise Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff That he cause to come here in the Morrow of the Holy Trinity 12. c. by whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because as well c. At which day here come the parties And the Sheriff sent not the Writ c. Therfore as at first it is commanded to the Sheriff That he cause to come here from the Holy Trinity in 3. Weeks 12. c. To Recognize in form aforesaid c. At which day the Jurors between the parties aforesaid of the aforesaid Plea between them were put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8. dayes of Saint Michael then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lady the Queen to take Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned by the form of the Statute c. Upon Monday the 14th day of July last past at the Castle of York in the said County should first come And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid Anthony as the aforesaid Christopher by their Attornies aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices to Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within written within contained before John Clench one of the Justices of the Lady the Queen to Pleas before the Queen her self to be holden assigned And Shomas Walmesly one of the Justices of the said lady the Queen of the Bench Justices of the said Lady the Queen to Assizes in the County of York to be taken assigned by the form of the Statute c. came as well the within named Anthony Baldwin as the aforesaid within written Christopher Marton by their Attornies within mentioned And the Jurors of the Jury whereof within is made mention some of them that is to say William VVharton of Dunkeswick Gentleman Adam VVyre of Ayrton Yeoman John Brown of Pathorn Yeoman Ralph VValker of Bolton Gentleman Thomas Preston of Whengille Yeoman and Henry Laycock of Felliface Yeoman come And the Jurors aforesaid are sworn And because that the rest of the Jurors of that Jury did not appear Therefore others of the Standers by to this chosen by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid are at the request of the said Anthony and by the Commandment of the Justices new added whose names to the Pannel within written are filed according to the form of the Statute in such case made and provided And the Jurors so a new added now appearing that is to say Gabriel Green William Newby John Hawton John Brorcey John Craven and WILLIAM RICHARDSON come who to say the truth of the within contained together with theother Jurors aforesaid first impannelled and sworn to say chosen tryed and sworn say upon their Oath That before the within written time in which it is supposed the Trespass within written to be done The aforesaid 4. acres of Land with the Appurtenances in which c. were parcel of the possessions of the late Monastery or Priory of Bolton in Craven and that one Richard late Prior of the Priory or Monastery aforesaid was seized of one Tenement Messuage or Farm called Vngthorpe in the Parish of Marton in Craven whereof the aforesaid four Acres of Land with the Appurtenances within new assigned are and the within written time in which c. were parcel in his Demesn as of Fee in the Right of his Monastery aforesaid and so thereof being seized The said late Prior with the assent of the Covent of the same place the 26. day of December in the year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the 8th the 25th By an Indenture sealed with the Common Seal of the aforesaid Prior and Covent to the Jurors in evidence shewed demised the aforesaid Tenement Messuage and Farm whereof the within written 40. Acres of Land with the appurtenances then were and yet are parcel to one Hugh Baldwin and Agnes his Wife To have and to hold to the said Hugh Baldwin and his Assigns from the date of the Indenture aforesaid unto the end and term of 31. years fully to be ended By vertue of which Demise The said Hugh and Agnes in the aforesaid four Acres of Land with the appurtenances in which c. entred and were thereof possessed the Reversion thereof to the aforesaid Prior and his Successors And the aforesaid Hugh and Agnes of the aforesaid four Acres of Lands with the appurtenances in which c. for the Term aforesaid being possessed the Reversion thereof to the aforelate Prior in form aforesaid ezpectant By a certain Act in Parliament of the said late King Henry the 8th at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 28th day of April in the 31. year of his Reign begun and continued until the 28th day of June then next following and there then holden amongst other things it is Ordained and established by the said late King and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in the said Parliament
Essex with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever As also of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Bustingthorp otherwise Buslingthorp and Dunnesby in the County of Lincoln with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And of and in all those Manors of Salthorp otherwise Saltrop otherwise Halthrop Chilton and Black-grove in the County of Wilts with their Rights Members and Appurtenances And of and in all those Lands and Pastures called Black-grove conteining by estimation 200. Acres of Pasture with the Appurtenances in Black-grove and Wroughton in the County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors of Mihenden otherwise Missenden otherwise called the Manors of Mussenden in the Parish of Wroughton Lydepard and Tregose in the said County of Wilts with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances and of all that Manor of Elcomb and Park called Elcomb Park with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Wattlescote otherwise Wigglescote otherwise Wiggetscete with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Mannor of Wescot otherwise Wescet with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Lands and Pastures conteining by estimation 100. Acres of Land and 60. Acres of Pasture in Wigglescot Wroughton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all that Manor of Vscot with the Appurtenances in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those two Messuages and 1000. Acres of Land 2000. Acres of Pasture 300. Acres of Pasture and 300. Acres of Wood with the Appurtenances in Broadhinton in the said County of Wilts And of and in all those Manors and Lordships of Campes otherwise Campes-Castle otherwise called Castle Campes with the Appurtenances situate lying being and extending into the Counties of CAMBRIDGE and ESSEX or either of them or elsewhere in the Kingdom of ENGLAND And also of and in all that Manor of Balsham in the County of Cambridge with all and singular Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever And also of and in all and singular those Messuages and Lands situate and being in the Parish of Hackney and Tottingham in the County of Middlesex with their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever which Messuage was lately purchased of Will. Bowper Knight the said Lands in Tottenham now are or late were in the Tenure or Occupation of William Benning Yeoman And of and in all and singular Manors Lordships Messuages Lands Tenements Reversions Services Feedings Pastures Woods Advowsons Patronages of Churches and Hereditaments of the aforesaid Thomas Sutton whatsoever situate lying and being in the said Counties of Essex Lincoln Wilts Cambridge and Middlesex or any of them with all and singular their Rights Members and Appurtenances whatsoever in his demesn as of Fee And the said Jurors further say upon their Oath aforesaid That the said Thomas Sutton so thereof being seised before the time in which that is to say At the 4th Session of Parliament begun and holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the 9th day of February in the yeer of the Reign of our Lord James by the grace of God of England France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith c. the 7th and of Scotland the 3d. and there continued untill the 24th day of July then next following and then prorogued until the 16th day of October then next following amongst other things it was Enacted and established by Authority of the same Parliament as followeth in these words Humbly beseecheth your Majesty Your Loyal and dutiful Subject Thomas Sutton of Bedsham in the County of Cambridge Esquire That it may please your most excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled To Enact Ordain Establish And be it Enacted Ordained and Established by the Authority aforesaid That in the Town of Hallingburn otherwise called Hallinborn Bowchers in the County of Essex there may be builded and erected at the Costs and Charges of your suppliant one meet fit and convenient House Buildings and Rooms for the abiding and dwelling of such number of poor People Men and Children as your suppliant shall name by limit and appointment to be lodged harboured abide and be relieved there And for the abiding dwelling and necessary use of one School-master and Usher to instruct the said Children in Reading Writing and the Latine and Greek Grammar And of one Divine and godly Preacher to instruct and teach all the rest of the same House in the knowledge of God and his word And of one Master to govern all these persons of in or belonging unto the same House And that the same shall and may be called The Hospital of King James founded in Hallingbury in the County of Essex at the humble Petition and at the only Costs and Charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And that the Right Reverend Father in God Richard now Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and his Successors Arch-Bishops there Thomas Lord Ellesmore Lord Chancellor of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Lord Chancellors or Lord Keepers of the Great Seal of England for and during the time they shall so continue or be in the same Office Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England and such as after him shall succeed to be Treasurers of England for and during the time they shall continue or be in the same Office The Reverend Father in God Launcelot Bishop of Ely and his Successors Bishops there Richard Bishop of Rochester and Dean of the Cathedral Church of Westminster and his Successors of and in the same Deanery Sir Thomas Foster Kt. one of the Justices of your Majesties Court of common-Common-Pleas usually holden at Westminster Sir Henry Hobart Knight your Majesties Attorney General John Overal Doctor of Divinity Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London and his Successors Deans there Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of your Majesties Court of Chancery Thomas Fortescue Thomas Paget Geffrey Nightingale and Richard Sutton Esquires John Law and Thomas Brown Gent. and such others as shall be from time to time for ever hereafter chosen and nominated in and to the places and steads of such of them as shall decease by your suppliant during his life and after his decease by the most part of them which them shall be Governors of the said Hospital to be and succeed in and to the place and places of him and them deceasing shall and may be the Governors of the said Hospital and of the Members Goods Lands Revenews and Hereditaments of the same at all times hereafter for ever And that the same Governors and Hospital shall for ever hereafter stand and be incorporated Established and founded in name and indeed a body Politick Corporate to have continuance for ever By the name of the Governors of the Hospital
And that the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors for ever and the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall have full Power License and lawful Authority at his or their Wills and Pleasures from time to time and at all times hereafter to place therein such number of poor Children or Scholars as to him the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his decease to the said Governours and their Successors and to the Survivors or Survivor of them and his and their Successors and to the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall seem convenient And also one godly and learned Preacher to teach and preach the Word of God to all the said persons poor People and Children As also one learned able and sufficient person to be the School-Master of the said School and one learned able and sufficient person to be the Usher thereof to teach and instruct the said Children in Grammar And further we of our said special Grace certain Knowledge meer Motion have ordained constituted assigned limitted appointed and by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors do ordain constitute assign limit and appoint That the said House and other the premises shall from henceforth for ever hereafter be remain continue and be converted imployed and used for an Hospital and House and Place for the abiding sustentation and relief of such number of poor People Men and Children as the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and all and every the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being and their Successors shall name assign limit or appoint to be lodged harbored abide and to be maintained and relieved there and for the abiding dwelling sustentation and relief of such number of poor Children as the said Thomas Sutton during his life and after his death the Governours hereafter named and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and the Governours of the said Hospital for the time being shall from time to time name assign limit or appoint to be lodged harbored abide and to be maintained and relieved there And for the abiding dwelling sustentation and finding of one School-Master one Usher and one Preacher as is aforesaid and of one Master or Head of the said House and Hospital And that it shall and may be lawful to and for the said Master Preacher School-Master Usher poor people Children Men and Officers of the said Hospital or therein to be placed for the time being to assemble be remain abide and cohabit together in the said Hospital And that the said Hospital shall for ever hereafter be incorporated named and called the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq And the same Hospital and Free-school by the name of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esq We do firmly by these presents for us our Heirs and Successors erect found establish and confirm to have continuance for ever And for the better maintainance and continuance of the said Hospital and Free-school and the said godly and charitable uses intents and purposes and that the same may have and take the better effect and that all and every the Manors Lands Tenements and Rents Reversions Services and Hereditaments Goods and Chattels granted conveied assigned devised willed limitted and appointed for the maintainance sustentation and relief of the persons aforesaid in the same Hospital may be the better governed used imployed and bestowed for the mantainance of the persosn in the said Hospital for the time being to have continuance for ever We Will Ordain and do appoint assign limit and name and for us our Heirs and Successors do grant and ordain by these presents That there shall be for ever hereafter 16. persons who shall be called Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire And for that purpose we have elected nominated ordained assigned constituted limitted and appointed and by these presents do for us our Heirs and Successors elect nominate ordain assign constitute and appoint The Right Reverend Father in God George now Arch Bishop of Canterbury our trusty and Well-Beloved Counsellor Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England our trusty and Well-Beloved Cosin and Counsellor Robert Earl of Salisbury Lord High Treasurer of England John the elect Bishop of London Launcelot now Bishop of Elie Sir Edward Coke Knight Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas Thomas Foster Knight one of our Justices of our Court of common-Common-Pleas Sir Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet our Attorny General John Overal now Dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint Paul in London George Mountain Dean of the Collegiate Church of Westminster Henry Thursby Esquire one of the Masters of our Court of Chancery Jeffery Nightingale Esquire Richard Sutton Esquire John Law Gentleman Thomas Brown Gentleman and the Master of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of the said Thomas Sutton Esquire and such person and persons as shall be from time to time Master or Masters of the said Hospital for and during such time as they shall be Master or Masters thereof to be the first and present Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition and onely costs and charges of Thomas Sutton Esquire and that they and the Survivors of them and such as the Survivors or Survivor of them from time to time Elect and Chuse to make up the number of 16. when and as often as any of them or any of their Successors shall happen to decease or to be removed from being Governours or Governour thereoâ— shall be incorporated and have a perpetual succession for ever in Deed Fact and Name and shall be one Body Politick and Corporate And that the said persons and their Successors and the Survivors and Survivor of them and his and their Successors and such as shall be elected and chosen to succeed them as aforesaid shall be incorporated named and called by the name of the Governours of the Lands Possessions Revenews and Goods of the Hospital of King JAMES founded in the Charter-House within the County of Middlesex At the humble Petition
the Queen that the re-entry of the aforesaid William Ambry into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the said Richard Hynde be or in Law ought to be adjudged a good and Lawfull re-entry then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath that the said William Ambry is not guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment of the farm aforesaid as he before for himself hath alleged And because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement further of and upon the premises is not yet avised day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state that now it is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster untill thursday next after 8 dayes of Saint Hillary to heare their Judgement thereof because the Court of the Lady the Queen here thereof not yet have avised c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attornies aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised further day thereof is given to the parties aforesaid in the state it now is before the Lady the Queen at Westminster until wednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. And so from Term to Term until the plaint aforesaid was farther adjroned by another writ of the said Lady the Queen of Common adjournment before the Queen until the morrow of All Souls at the Castle of Hartford in the County of Hartford at which day before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Queen here of giving their Judgement of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day thereof is farther given to the parties aforesaid in state as it is now before the Lady the Queen at the Castle of Hartford until Tuesday next after 3 dayes of Saint Hillary to hear their Judgement c. because c. Before which day the plaint aforesaid was adjorned by a writ of the Lady the Queen of common adjornement before the said Lady the Queen untill 8 dayes of Saint Hillary at Westminster at which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and because the Court of the Lady the Queen here of giving their Judgment of and upon the premises is not yet avised Day is further given to the parties aforesaid in state as now before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster untill VVednesday next after 15 dayes of Easter to hear their Judgement thereof c. because c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at VVestminster come the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Upon which seen by the Court of the Lady the Queen here and the premises diligently looked into and thereof mature deliberation being thereof had Because it seemeth to the Court of the said Lady the Queen here that the entrie of the aforesaid VVilliliam Ambry above specified into the aforesaid 10 Acres of Land with the appurtenances in and upon the possession of the aforesaid Richard Hynde was a good and lawfull re-entry therefore It is granted that the aforesaid Richard Hynde take nothing by his Bill aforesaid but that he for his false clamour be taken c. and the aforesaid VVilliam Ambry be thereof without damage c. Ejectione Firme Hillary Terme 36. Eliz. Rott 440. in the Kings Bench. Sir George Browns Case C. 3. part fo 45. WIlliam Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman and Thomas Spencer late of Swindon in the County aforesaid Yeoman were attached to answer to James Linche of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage one Barn 80 Acres of Land 80 Acres of Meadow and 80 Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances in Swindon which George Brown Knight to the aforesaid James demised for a Term which is not yet ended they entred and him from his Farm aforesaid did eject and other harms did unto him to the grievous damage of the said James and against the peace of the Lady the Queen that now is c. and whereupon the said James by Thomas Cooper his Attourny Complaineth That whereas the aforesaid George Brown the 22 th day of October in the year of the Reign of the Queen that now is the 35 th at Swindon aforesaid had demised to the said James the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the said James and his assigns from the Feast of Saint Michael the Archangel then last past until the end and Term of 4 years from thence next ensuing and fully to be compleated By virtue of which demise the said James into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so thereof being possessed the aforesaid William and Thomas afterwards that is to say the 22 th day of October aforesaid in the 35 th year aforesaid with force and armes c. the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which the said George Brown to the said James in form aforesaid demised for the term aforesaid which is not yet ended entred and him the said James from his Farm aforesaid held out and other harms c. To the grievous damage c. and against the peace c. whereupon he saith that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 20 pound and thereof bringeth sute c. And the aforesaid William and Thomas by John Paxton their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And say that they in nothing are guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment aforesaid as the aforesaid James above against them complaineth and of this put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid James likewise c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff that he have here in 8 dayes of the Purification of the blessed Lady 12 good and Lawfull men c. by whom the truth c. and who neither c. Because aswell c. afterward the process between the parties aforesaid was continued of the plea aforesaid by Jurors put between them put in respite here until this day that is to say in 8 dayes of Saint Michael in the year of the Reign of the Lady the Queen that now is the 37 th Unless the Justices of the Lady the Queen for Assises in the County aforesaid to be taken assigned by the form of the statute upon Thursday the 17 day of July last past at New Sarad in the County aforesaid first came And now here at this day come as well the aforesaid James Linche as the aforesaid William Spencer and Thomas Spencer by their Attorneys aforesaid and the aforesaid Justices of Assise before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Afterwards the day and place within contained before Thomas Walmesley one