Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
justice_n	baron_n	majesty_n	sir_n	4,646	5	7.4378	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A41429	The Royal College of Physicians of London, founded and established by law as appears by letters patents, acts of Parliament, adjudged cases, &c. : and An historical account of the College's proceedings against empiricks and unlicensed practisers, in every princes reign from their first incorporation to the murther of the royal martyr, King Charles the First / by Charles Goodall ...	Goodall, Charles, 1642-1712.	1684 (1684)	Wing G1091; ESTC R8914	319,602	530

remove presentments upon which process may be awarded in this Court The Reason why 't is not sufficient to plead the Tenor of Letters Patents or to shew or produce to the Court the Tenor of Letters Patents as in Pages case is resolved is because the Letters Patents are the private conveyance of a particular person and therefore he must plead and shew forth and produce to the Court the Letters Patents themselves and the Tenor thereof was not sufficient at the Common Law But upon nul tiel Record pleaded a Certificate of the Tenor onely and not of the Record it self hath always béen held a sufficient proof of that issue and the Tenor certified is to be filed in this Court and to remain here always to this purpose onely viz. as a proof of this issue but the Record it self remains where it was before to be made use of for any purposes that may happen hereafter The rest of the Iudges were of the same opinion and so Iudgment was given for the Plaintiff De Termino Sanctae Trinitatis Anno 28 Car. secundi 1676. Banco Regis The King and the President and College of Physicians Plaintiffs against Marchamont Needham Defendant THe President and the College qui tam c. brought an action of debt upon the Statute of 14 H. 8. cap. 5. for so much money against the Defendant for practising Physick for so many months without licence of the College whereby he was to forfeit 5 li. per month one moiety thereof to the King and the other moiety to the President and College The Defendant pleaded as to part of the money in the Declaration mentioned nul tiel Record as the said Act of Parliament and as to the Residue of the money the Defendant pleaded nil debet The Plaintiffs demurred to the Barr. The cause of the demurrer was for that the Defendant's plea was double viz. it contained two matters one whereof alone would go in answer to the whole money in the Declaration mentioned and would of it self be a good and full Barr to the Plaintiffs Action in case the said matter be true as the Defendant alledgeth and that is the matter of nul tiel Record and therefore the pleading of nul tiel Record to part onely and the pleading of other matter viz. nil debet to the residue makes the Defendant's plea in Barr to be vicious and to be an ill plea in Law The Councel for the Defendant did then object that the Plaintiffs Declaration is naught 't is an action of debt brought by the President and College qui tam c. upon the Statute and an action of debt doth not lie the Plaintiffs should have brought an information upon the Statute and not an Action of debt upon the Statute for the Statute doth not give an action of debt and therefore an action of debt doth not lie Twisden Iustice answered that an action of debt doth lie by equity and construction of the Statute Jones Iustice said that in the Statute of Tithes in 3 Ed. 6. no action of debt is mentioned and yet an action of debt lies upon that Statute and so here Thereupon Rule was given by the Court that Iudgment should be entred for the Plaintiffs In Mich. Term. Anno Car. secundi xxvi THe College brought their Action against John Bourne to which he pleaded nil debet and upon tryal of the Cause at Guild-Hall before Iudge Twisden the Plaintiffs recovered 40 li. Trin. xxxv Car. secundi THe President and College c. brought an Action of Debt upon the Statute of the 14 of H. 8. against Frederick Harder for practising Physick and thereupon had a Verdict against him at Westm for 25 li. which he paid and the Costs that were taxed The same Term they had a Verdict against Nathaniel Merry for 40 li. and against Richard Stone for 45 li. College Questions resolved by the Lord Chancellor and Judges in the fifth of King James his Reign An. Dom. 1607. THe King 's most Excellent Majesty having directed his Letters to the Right honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England and to Sir John Popham Knight Lord Chief Iustice of England and one of his Highness's most honourable Privy Council They the said Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Iustice by virtue of the same Letters called unto them Sr. Thomas Fleminge Knight then Lord Chief Baron of his Majestie 's Court of Exchequer Sir Thomas Walmesley and Sr. Peter Warburton Knights two of his Majestie 's Iustices of the Court of Common Pleas and Sir David Williams and Sir Laurence Tanfield Knights two of his Majesties Iustices of the King's Bench and after due consideration had both of the Charter of King H. 8. made unto the said President and College of Physicians in the tenth year of his Raign and several Acts of Parliament thereof made one in the 14 year of the same King and the other in the first year of Q. Mary for the ordering and governing of the said College and of all the Practisers in London and 7 Miles compass did on the first of May 1607. at the house of the said Lord Chancellor called York house resolve the several questions hereafter mentioned as is expressed under every Question Tho. Harries These Questions were resolved as is expressed under every question by the right honorable the Lord Chancellor of England Lord Chief Iustice of England the Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer Iustice Walmesley Iustice Warburton Iustice Williams and Iustice Tanfield being assembled by the King's Majestie 's appointment to examine view and consider of the Charters Statutes and Laws made for the government of the College of Physicians in London and the Practisers of Physick there the first day of May 1607. at the house of the Lord Chancellor Quest 1. Whether Graduates of Oxford and Cambridge may practise in London or 7 miles compass of the same without licence under the said College Seal by virtue of the clause in the end of the Statute of 14 H. 8. and whether that clause hath not relation to the Statute of 3 H. 8. onely or how far it doth extend Resp All resolved that no Graduate that is not admitted and licensed by the President and College of Physicians under their Common Seal could practise in London or within 7 miles compass of the same Quest 2. Whether by Graduates Graduates in Physick onely are to be understood Resp They resolved That the exception in the Statute of 14 H. 8. cap. of Graduates in the two Vniversities is to be understood onely of Graduates of Physick and of no others And all resolved That by that exception those Graduates may practise in all other places of England out of London and 7 miles of the same without examination But not in London nor within the said Circuit of 7 miles Quest 3. If Graduates not admitted to practise in London practise there whether for evil practice or misdemeanour therein they be not subject to the Correction and government

enjoyne all Iudges and Iustices of us our heires and successors to act and performe accordingly any Acte Statute Lawe Vsage or Provision whatsoever to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding AND WEE WILL and by these presents for us our heires and successors Doe ordaine and declare that all and every the Fynes Penalties Forfeitures and Amerciaments hereafter to be sett adjudged imposed or inflicted upon any person or persons whatsoever by force or colour of these presents or of any the Letters Patents or Acts of Parliament aforesaid or by force or colour of any Acts Ordinances Decrees or Constitutions made or to bee made by vertue of these presents or any the Graunts or Authorities aforesaid before any Action bée commenced or any Levy or Execution bee had or made thereof respectively the said severall penalties and forfeitures of Tenn pounds and five pounds per Mensem above mentioned allwayes excepted shall bée reported to and approved of by the Court or Corporation of the said President and Fellowes of the Kings Colledge of Physitians aforesaid to bée held by vertue of these presents or by any fifteene or more of the Fellowes of the same Colledge for the tyme beinge then present att such Court whereof the President or in his absence the Vice-president for the tyme being to bée one and then entered and registred in the Common Register Booke of the same Colledge And that from and after such approbation and entry thereof it shall and may bée lawfull to and for the President and Censors or Vice-president and Censors of the same Colledge of Physitians for the tyme being in the absence of the President or any thrée of them whereof the said President or in his absence the Vice-president for the tyme being to bée one by Warrant under the hand of the said President and Censors or Vice-president and Censors for the tyme being in the absence of the President or any thrée of them whereof the said President or in his absence the Vice-president for the tyme being to bée one duely made and directed to any Officer and Officers of the same Colledge in this behalfe to bée appointed to Commit and send every such person and persons soe offending and on whome any such Fyne Penalty or Amerciament shall be imposed sett or inflicted as aforesaid or by whom any forfeiture shall bée made as aforesaid to any of our Goales or Prisons except our Tower of London within our said Citty of London or the Suburbs thereof for the tyme being there to remayne untill he or they shall pay and satisfie unto the said President and Fellowes of the same Colledge of Physitians and their Successors for the tyme being the severall and respective fyne or fynes penalty or penalties forfeiture or forfeitures Amerciament or Amerciaments for which hee or they respectively shal bee soe Committed or charged as aforesaid or otherwise by like Warrant to levie all and every such fyne and fynes penalty and penalties forfeiture and forfeitures Amerciament and Amerciaments by distresse and sale of any of the Goods and Chattells of any or every such person or persons respectively offending as aforesaid rendering the overplus to bee ymployed and disposed as hereafter in and by these presents is directed PROVIDED allwayes that if any person or persons on whome any Fyne Penalty or Amerciament shall be sett or imposed as aforesaid shall find or conceive himselfe grieved thereby That then it shall and may bee lawfull to and for every such person and persons within one Moneth after such approbation and entry thereof made as aforesaid or sooner to appeale unto such person and persons for his or their releife therein as in and by these presents are hereafter nominated constituted and impowered in that behalfe AND Wée will and by these presents for us our heires and successors Doe make ordeyne constitute and appoint our right trusty and right welbeloved Cosin and Councellor Edward Earle of Clarendon our High Chancellor of England our right trusty and welbeloved Sir Robert Foster Knight Cheife Iustice of our Court of Kings Bench Sir Orlando Bridgman Knight and Baronett Cheife Iustice of our Court of Common Pleas and Sir Matthew Hale Knight Cheife Baron of our Court of Exchequer the present Visitors of the said Colledge and Corporation and the Lord Chancellor of England or Lord Keeper of the Greate Seale of England Lord Cheife Iustice of the said Court of Kings Bench Lord Cheife Iustice of the said Court of Common Pleas and Lord Cheife Baron of the said Court of Exchequer hereafter for the tyme being from tyme to tyme and for ever hereafter Visitors of the same Colledge and Corporation AND Wee doe by these presents for us our heires and successors give and grant unto them the said Visitors hereby constituted and every or any two or more of them full power and authority to receive entertaine heare examine adjudge and determine alter mitigate reverse or confirme all and every such Matter Cause Complaynt Iudgment Decree or Sentence whatsoever which att any time hereafter shall come or bée brought before them or any two or more of them by way of Appeale hereafter to be made by any person or persons whatsoever for or concerning any Fyne Penalty or Amerciament or other matter or thing whatsoever according to the tenor true intent and meaning of these presents as to them or any two or more of them shall seeme just and fitting AND to that end that it shall and may bee lawfull to and for our said Lord High Chancellor of England Lord Cheife Iustice of our said Court of Kings Bench our said Cheife Iustice of our said Court of Common Pleas and our said Cheife Baron of our said Court of Exchequer now being or any two or more of them and to and for all and every other Lord Chancellor of England or Lord Keeper of the Greate Seale of England Lord Cheife Iustice of the said Court of Kings Bench Lord Cheife Iustice of the said Court of Common Pleas and Lord Cheife Baron of the said Court of Exchequer hereafter for the tyme being or any two or more of them from tyme to tyme to send for remove or cause to come before them or any two or more of them all and every such Cause Complaynt Iudgment Decree and Sentence and all or any the proceedings thereof respectively whereupon or wherein any Appeale shall bée made to them or any two or more of them as aforesaid and from tyme to tyme to order and appoint certaine dayes tymes and places for the hearing and adjudging thereof and to summon heare and examine upon Oath or otherwise all and every person and persons that know or can say or testifie any matter of fact or other thing conduceing to the manifestation or discovery of the truth of the matter in question to the end a just and cleare judgment and determination may be had and made therein AND FURTHER to act proceed performe

ob raram praxin and that by the prescription of others he should have so severe a fine inflicted upon which the College Register was searched and there it appeared that before this Fine he had been 6 times accused for practice and several times had been fined in small mulcts Upon which account the Chief Justice declared that he thought it most reasonable that after he had been treated with so great clemency and yet render'd himself incorrigible he should have a severe Fine inflicted upon him And by reason that Physicians bills were often pleaded to justifie illegal practice he thought it most advisable that all Physicians for the future should write upon all their bills their Patients names and day of the month and year by which means the Cheats of Empiricks and other Impostors might more easily be detected Thus the Chief Justice having heard this cause and well approved of the censure of the College ordered that Ienkins should be forthwith returned back to Prison untill he had given satisfaction to the President and Censors Some friends of Ienkins moving that he might give security for his appearance and not be reimprisoned the Chief Justice answered that it was not in his power to grant their request for the Laws of the Kingdom had determined that as a Privilege belonging to the President and Censors It was then objected that by the Law no Citizen of London could be imprisoned per forinsecum aliquem The Chief Justice reading the words of the Statute and observing that they would bear no such sense replied that by such interpretations they might likewise infringe his authority As to Read he complained that the College had fined him more than the Statute would allow upon which complaint the Chief Justice diligently looked over the words of the Statute and declared that the College might inflict what penalty they pleased but the Keeper of the Prison was not obliged to detain his prisoner if they exceeded the fine of 20 l. He then justified his practice by a Statute made in the 34 35 H. 8. C. 8. By which it was lawfull for any person having the knowledge of herbs c. to practise at least in some diseases to which the Chief Justice answered that this he ought not to do because he was not admitted by the College In short the sum of the Chief Justice's opinion in hearing and deciding this cause was the following 1. There is no sufficient Licence without the College Seal 2. No Surgeon as a Surgeon may practise Physick no not for any disease though it be the great Pox. 3. That the authority of the College is strong and sufficient to commit to prison 4. That the censure of the College rising from lesser mulcts to greater was equal and reasonable 5. That it were fit to set to Physicians bills the day of the month and the Patient's name 6. That the Lord Chief Iustice cannot baile or deliver the College prisoner but is obliged by Law to deliver him up to the College censure 7. That a Freeman of London may lawfully be imprisoned by the College 8. That no man though never so learned a Physician or Doctour may practise in London or within seven miles without the College Licence Upon this the President and College presented the following Letter to the Lord Chief Justice To the Right Honorable Sir John Popham Knight Lord Chief Justice of England and one of her Majestie 's most honorable Privy Councill RIght honorable Albeit we acknowledge our selves to be most infinitely bound already to your good Lordship for many your most honorable favours extended to us and our Society heretofore for the which we render your Lordship most humble thanks Yet such is your Lordship's great care and continual good inclination to the maintenance of learning good orders and vertue That not onely we and our Societie that now is are now again more deeply obliged to your honor but also all our posterity in time to come shall have just cause to pray for your Lordship 's long lief and prosperity whose unspottable Integrytie hath been so well knowen to all England these many yeares and many moe shal be as we hope to the great good of our Countrie and to your Lordship's everlasting prayse and Memory and whose tender particuler favours have been so honorably and so willingly perfourmed to us of late in defence of our privileges against one Ienkins and Reade two ignorant intruders into the profession of Physick and two daungerous infringers and abusers of her Majestie 's Laws and Leege people as while the memory of the Society and College of Physitions of London shall remaine so long shall your Lordship's honorable most worthy name be celebrated and recorded among all such as ether love or professe the title of Learning And heere for our parts we protest we are right sorrie that our weaknesse is such as we are not any otherwise able moore then only by bare wordes and speeches to make manifest our inward affections and dutifull good meaning to your honor But yet all that lyttle whatever it is that lieth in our poore powre to perfourme we heere offer and present unto your Lordship with most humble devoted mynds to do your good Lordship any service that we can And so desiring to rest in your honor 's good conceyt and opinion we most humbly take our leave and praie for your Lordship 's long lief and prosperytie This 10th of Aprill 1602. Your Lordship 's most humble The President and Society of the College of Physitions in London After this upon the submission of Ienkins and request of the Chief Justice a third part of the fine of 20 l. imposed upon Ienkins by the Censors was remitted and he discharged from Prison Read likewise by the interest of the Bishop of London procured his discharge About 2 years and 4 months after Ienkins was again charged for practising of Physick which he denied but several instances of it being given he confessed that to some few Patients of Fevers c. he had prescribed purging physick c. Being then charged with selling of one sort of drink to all that came for it he confessed that he had sold such a Medicine but for the future would never do it and if in this manner or any other hereafter he should act contrary to the privileges of the College he would readily submit to the severest punishment Upon this modest confession of his and promise of not offending for the future but more especially out of respect to the Lord Chancellour in whose service he was the Censors inflicted no punishment upon him but onely interdicted him practice and then order was given by the College that 2 of their Members should wait upon the Chancellour to acquaint him how ill Ienkins had behaved himself towards the College and how candidly they had dealt with him upon his Honour's account This was taken very kindly by the Lord Chancellour who returned the College thanks for their

his hand and not by the drinks and liquours he gave This he understood by his mother who wished him having a scald head to stroke his head with his own hand whereby he was cured And therefore sometimes he used onely his hand sometimes he gave Wine whereinto he dipped his finger that the people might have somewhat to take but the virtue came from his hand Barton was censured to pay 20 l. and to remain a prisoner in Woodstreet Compter till released by the President where he continued till the 19th of October following never having all that time petitioned the College for his liberty And then by virtue of a Writ of Habeas Corpus which he had sued forth of the King's Bench he was carried with his cause to the King's Bench Bar at Westminster The Copy of which Warrant and the Return thereof here immediately ensue NOs Johannes Warner Thomas Adams Vic' Civitat ' London Serenissimo Domino Regi in brevi huic schedul ' annex ' nominat ' ad diem locum in eodem brevi content ' Certificamus quod ante adventum nobis praedict ' brevis scil ' duodecimo die Septembris Anno regni dicti domini Regis nunc Anglie c. decimo quinto Christoferus Barton in dicto brev ' nominat ' commissus fuit Prisone dom ' Regis scil ' Computator ' scituat ' in Woodstreet London praedict ' in eadem Prisona sub custodia Isaaci Pennington Johannis Woollaston tunc vic' Civitat ' praedict ' in eorum exit ' ab officio suo sub custodia nostra detent ' virtute cujusdam Warranti Otwelli Meverell Laurentii Wright Edmundi Smith Willielmi Goddard in Medicinis Doctor Censor ' Collegii Medicor ' in London sub sigillo communi Collegii Medicor ' London praedict ' custodi praedict ' Computatorii London praedict ' vel ejus deputat ' direct ' Cujus quidem Warranti tenor sequitur in hec verba ss We Otwell Meverell Laurence Wright Edmund Smith and William Goddard Doctors in Physick and Censors of the College of Physicians in London being chosen by the President and College of Physicians aforesaid to govern and punish for this present year all offenders in the faculty of Physick within the City of London and the Suburbs thereof and seven miles compass of the said City according to the authority in that behalf to us duly given by certain Letters Patents under the great Seal of England made and granted to the said College and Comminalty by the late King of famous memory King Henry the Eighth bearing date the 23th day of September in the Tenth year of his Raigne And one Act of Parliament made in the 14th year of the said late King Henry the Eighth concerning Physicians Whereby the Letters Patents aforesaid and every thing therein are granted and confirmed And by virtue of the said Act of Parliament and Letters Patents aforesaid and one other Act of Parliament made in the first year of the Raigne of our late Soveraigne Lady Queen Mary intituled An Act touching the Corporation of Physicians in London did cause to be brought before us the sixth day of this instant September at our College house in Pater noster Rowe in London one Christofer Barton and we have examined the said Christofer Barton and upon his examination and other due proofs we have found that the said Christofer Barton hath unskilfully practised the Art of Physick within the City of London and Precinct aforesaid upon the bodies of Richard Ballady of Aldermary Parish London Michael Knight of St. Buttolphs Parish Aldgate London and the child of one Iane Bigge and some others in the month of Ianuary in the year 1638. contrary to the Laws in that behalf made and provided whereupon we have imposed upon the said Christofer Barton a fine of 20 l. for his evil practice in Physick aforesaid and we have also for the same cause sent you the body of the said Christofer Barton Willing and requiring you in the Kings Majesties name to receive and keep him in safe custody as Prisoner there to remain at his own costs and charges without bail or mainprize untill he shall be discharged of his said imprisonment by the President of the said College and by such persons as by the said College shall be thereunto authorised according to the Statute in that behalf made And this our Warrant shal be your discharge Given at the said College the eleventh day of September in the 15th year of the Raigne of our Soveraigne Lord King Charles Otwell Meverell Law Wright Edm. Smith William Goddard To the Keeper of Woodstreet Compter London or his Deputy To Mr. John Penyall one of the Messengers of his Majestie 's Chamber in Ordinary to execute this Warrant ET hec est causa acceptionis detentionis praefati Christoferi Barton in Prisona praedict ' sub custodia nostra Corpus cujus quidem Christoferi coram praefat ' domino Rege apud Westm ' parat ' habemus Being at the Bar the said 19th of October for that the Lord Chief Justice Sir Iohn Brampston was not present the other Judges present would not accept of bail which the said Barton tendered but suspended the matter untill Tuesday the 12th of October following Barton for that time was returned back and coming to the Bar again on the said Tuesday with his Councel and Bail the Lord Brampston being then present my Lord demanded the return of the Warrant which was neglected by the Clerks of the Court and left in the Crown Office in the Temple so my Lord would not proceed but respited the cause untill Thursday the 24th of October following when all parties appearing with Councel on both sides the Warrant and Return was read and the Cause debated and there the Court plainly declared that he should not be Bailed it being against the Law and the Letter of the Warrant grounded upon the Statutes Then it was desired by Barton's Councel that he might go over to the King's Bench which also was denied because he was committed originally to the Compter and willed if he would have liberty to submit to the College and make his peace there Barton being in custody of the Serjeant that carried him up to the Bar exhibited his humble Petition to the President and Censors the 25 of October signed with his own hand for abatement of part of his fine and for his enlargement submitting in all things unto them Whereupon the President and Dr. Meverell one of the Censors were contented to abate the half of his fine of 20 l. and to accept of 10 l. the one half to be paid in hand which was paid and the other half at our Lady day next And so upon the 29th of October signed his discharge and set him at liberty he being put again before his enlargement into the said Prison Mr. President gave order that upon the commitment of any Offender the name of the