Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
justice_n baron_n court_n sir_n 4,402 5 7.0244 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A88231 The peoples prerogative and priviledges, asserted and vindicated, (against all tyranny whatsoever.) By law and reason. Being a collection of the marrow and soule of Magna Charta, and of all the most principall statutes made ever since to this present yeare, 1647. For the preservation of the peoples liberties and properties. With cleare proofs and demonstrations, that now their lawes and liberties are nigher subvertion, then they were when they first began to fight for them, by a present swaying powerfull faction, amongst the Lords, Commons, and Army, ... so that perfect vassalage and slavery (by force of armes) in the nature of Turkish janisaries, or the regiments of the guards of France, is likely (to perpetuitie) to be setled, if the people doe not speedily look about them, and act vigorusly for the preventing of it. / Compiled by Lievt. Col. John Lilburne, prerogative prisoner in the Tower of London, and published by him for the instruction, information and benefit of all true hearted English-men. Lilburne, John, 1614?-1657. 1648 (1648) Wing L2153; Thomason E427_4; ESTC R202741 121,715 88

There are 11 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

this collectio abroad I shall draw towards a conclusion and let my Country men here reape the benefit of the answer I sent to the querys of some of my friends mentioned in the Epistle Dedicatory which was the originall and principall occasion of my compiling this book which thus followeth By the statute of Westminster the first made in the 3. of Edward 1. chap. 26. which you may reade verbatim in the 7. page of the following collection their are no fees due from any free man of England to any Officer of Iustice whatsoever but what they have immediatly from the publique treasure of the Kingdom for ther sallories or wages and it is aginst a Iudges Oath to take any whose oath you may at large read in the 10. page following read also that remarkable page in the merror of Iustice pag. 258. 233. for the proof of this but especially read the marginall notes in the 69. page following and he that exacts any shal by the formencioned statue pay back again twice as much c. but it is true by some latter statues as the 23. Hen. 6. chap. 10. which you may reade verbatim in the 18.19 following pages and 33. Hen. 6.12 and 21. Hen. 7.17 c. there are some small fees to be paid And also Sir Edward Cook in the 1. part of his institutes lib. 3. chap. 13. sect 70. fol. 368. saith such reasonable fees as have been allowed by the Courts of justice of an ancient time to inferior ministers and attendants of Courts for their labour and at●tendance if it be asked and taken of the subject it is no extortion But there is none at all due for entring and recording of apperance nor for the removing upon a Certionary But against Sir Edward Cooks opinion in this particular I offer this to consideration that by the Petition of right the King himselfe with all his Lords cannot justifiably lay a penny upon nor take a penny from the meanest man in England without common consent in Parliament and if the King c. the greater cannot doe it then undeniably the Iudges or justices the lesser can much lesse doe it And besides by the same right that under pretence of dues or fees by their arbitrary wills and pleasures they take one farthing from you or me they may take a penny yea a shilling ye a pound yea a thousand pound and so ad infinitum and so Levell and destroy al properrity of meum tuum see for the power of an act of Parliament the notable arguments of Iudg Hutton Iudg Crooke in the case of ship-money but especialy the Parliaments votes annexed to those arguments for which very thing divers of the Iudges in the case of ship-money were this very Parliament impeached of Treason and the Bishops for makeing their cannons by the Kings single authority to binde their Cleargies pursses without authority of Parliament were for that and the like defunct of all their power † † See Mr. Nat. Fines his notable speech against the Bishops Cannons made 1640 and printed in a book called Speeches and passages prsnted for Will-Crook at Furnivals Inne gate in Holborne 1641. page 49. 50. 51. and the house of Commons vote Dec. 15. 1640. ibim page 328. and the statute made this Parliament that abolished Eccelesiasticall Iurisdiction 2. The presentment is often brought in English but it it must be entred and recorded in lattin by the statute of the ●6 Ed. 3. 15. which you may reade in the 12. following page and no processe is to be awarded but af the presentment is entred and recorded in lattin the presentment must mention the offence and so must the writ or processe as clearly appeares in the last foremencioned most notable and remarkable statute see also Sir Edward Cooks second part instituts upon the 29. chap of Magna Charta fol. 51. 52. 53. see Vox plebis page 37 and the merror of Iustice chap. 5. sect 1. division 98. page 238 nay the last author in his 233 page division 71. saith that it is abuse of the Common Law that any plaint is received to be heard without sureties present to testifie the plaint to be true 3. The Iustices siting upon the bench may verbally commit a man for an offence lying under their cognizance but there must be a Mittitur or Commitment entred upon Record See the 14. Henry 7. fol 8. in Sir Thomas Greenes case See also the 70. page of the following discourse 4. The Iustices of peace cannot continue a man bound above two or three Sessions at most and if they continue him more they may aswell continue him for thirteen and so for thirteen score for it is a vexation and the Law gives him remedie by an action of the case against the Iustices wherein they shall be sined to the King for the vexation and pay damages to the partie Plaintiffe 5. An Indictment for extortion must be in the proper County before the Iustices of Oyer and Terminer or Iustices of the peace 6. Vpon an arrest the Officer must declare at whose suit for what and what returne the processe hath see the Countesse of Rutlands case of arrest in the sixt part of Cookes Reports 7. For a Plea against an Indictment for not comming to Church to heare Common Prayer c. It is framed to your hand in the 20 21 22 ●3 pages of my large Epistle to Col. Henry Martin of the 31. of May 1647. called Rash Oaths to which I referre you 8. Thou go you be committed justly and legally be sure as soon as you are committed if possible you can proffer legall Baile in person to those that commit you but for this I wholly referee the Reader to the 70 71 72. pages of the following discourse in which I have given some directions to my Country men how to guide themselves by the rules of the Law of England in all ordinary molestations that can befall them by Knaves malicious men or Tyrants saving in the point of panniling of Iuries upon them in case they come to any triall for their lives c. and for that point I doe wholly referre the Reader to the 24 25 26. pages of my notable book called the Resolved mans resolution where also the cheats and illegallities of Committees procedings are anotamised and to the 1. part of Sir Edward Cooks Inst lib. 2. chap. 12. Sect. 234 fo 156 157 and his 3. part fo 32. 33. My labours herein I desi●e may find a courteous acceptation at the hands of my oppressed friends and Country-men and I have my reward and shall therein reioyce and be incouraged for the future improvement of my poore talent to doe them further service Iohn Lilburne From my causelesse captivitie in the Tower of London upon a now account this 17 of Feb. 1647. For upon the 19. of Ian. last the House of Commons committed me to prison as their prisoner for treasonable and seditious practises against the state And
have forthwith granted unto him a writ of Habeas Corpus to be directed generally unto all and every Sheriffs Gaoler Minister Officer or other person in whose custody the party so committed or restrained shall be and the Sheriffs Gaoler Minister Officer or other person in whose custody the party so committed or restrained shall be shall at the return of the said writ and according to the command thereof upon due and convenient notice thereof given unto him at the charge of the party who requireth or procureth such Writ and upon security by his own bond given to pay the charge of carrying back the prisoner if he shall be remanded by the Court to which he shall be brought as in like cases hath been used such charges of bringing up and carrying back the prisoner to be alwayes ordered by the Court if any difference shall arise thereabout bring or cause to be brought the body of the said party so committed or restrained unto and before the Iudges or Iustices of the said Court from whence the same writ shall issue in open Court and shall then likewise certifie the true cause of his deteinour or imprisonment and thereupon the Court within three Court dayes after such return made and delivered in open Court shall proceed to examine or determine whether the cause of such Commitment appearing upon the said return be just and legall or not and shall thereupon doe what to iustice shall appertain either by delivering bailing or remanding the prisoner And if any thing shall be otherwise wilfully done or omitted to be done by any Iudge Justice Officer or other person afore mentioned contrary to the direction and true meaning hereof That then such person so offending shall forfeit to the party grieved his trebble dammages to be recovered by such meanes and in such manner as is formerly in this Act limitted and appointed for the like penaltie to be sued for and recovered Provided alwayes and be it enacted That this Act and the severall Clauses therein contained shall be taken and expounded to extend only to the Court of Star-chamber and to the said Courts holden before the President and Councell in the Marches of Wales and before the President and Councell in the Northern parts And also to the Court commonly called the Court of the Dutchy of Lancaster holden before the Chancellor and Councell of that Court And also in the Court of Exchequer of the County Palatine of Chester held before the Chamberlain and Councell of that Court And to all Courts of like Jurisdiction to be hereafter erected ordained constituted or appointed as aforesaid And to the warrants and Directions of the Councell-board and to the Commitments restraints and imprisonments of any person or persons made commanded or awarded by the Kings Majestie his Heires or Successours in their own person or by the Lords and others of the Privie Councell and every one of them And lastly provided and be it enacted That no person or persons shall be sued impleaded molested or troubled for any offence against this present Act unlesse the party supposed to have to offended shall be sued or impleaded for the same within of two yeares at the most after such time wherein the said offence shall be committed Anno XVII Caroli Regis An Act for the declaring unlawfull and void the late proceedings touching Ship money and for the vacating of all Records and Processe concerning the same VVHereas divers Writs of late time issued under the Great Seal of England commonly called Shipwrits for the charging of the Ports Towns Cities Boroughs and Counties of this Realm respectively to provide and furnish certain Ships for his Majesties service And whereas upon the execution of the same Writs and Returnes of Certioraries thereupon made and the sending the same by Mittimus into the Court of Exchequer Processe hath bin thence made against sundry persons pretended to be charged by way of contribution for the making up of certain sums assessed for the providing of the said Ships and in especiall in Easter Tearm in the thirteenth yeare of the Reign of our Soveraign Lord the King that now is a Writ of Scire facias was awarded out of the Court of Exchequer to the then Sheriffe of BVCKINGHAM-SHIRE against IOHN HAMDEN Esquire to appeare and shew cause why hee should not be charged with a certain summe so assessed upon him upon whose appearance and demurrer to the proceedings therein the Barons of the Exchequer adiourned the same case into the Exchequer Chamber where it was solemnly argued divers dayes and at length it was there agreed by the greater part of all the Justi●es of the Courts of Kings Bench and Common Pleas and of the Barons of the Exchequer there assembled that the said Iohn Hambden should be charged with the said summe so as aforesaid assessed on him The maine grounds and reasons of the said Iustices and Barons which so agreed being that when the good and safety of the Kingdome in generall is concerned and the whole Kingdome in danger the King might by writ under the Great Seale of England command all his Subiects of this his Kingdom at their charge to provide and furnish such number of Ships with Men Victualls and Munition and for such time as the King should think sit for the defence and safegard of the Kingdome from such danger and perill and that by Law the King might compell the doing thereof in case of refusall or refractarinesse and that the King is the sole Iudge both of the danger and when and how the same is to be prevented avoided according to which grounds reasons a● the Iustices of the said courts of Kings Bench Cōmon Pleas the said Barons of the Exchequer having bin formerly consulted with by his Majestis command had set their hands to an extraiudiciall opinion expressed to the same purpose which opinion with their names thereunto was also by his Maiesties command inrolled in the Courts of Chancery Kings Bench Common Pleas and Exchequer and likewise entred among the Remembrances of the Court of Star-Chamber and according to the said agreement of the said Iustices and Barons judgement was given by the Barons of the Exchequer that the said IOHN HAMPDEN should be charged with the said summe so assessed on him And whereas some other Actions and Processe depend and have depended in the said Court of Exchequer and in some other Courts against other persons for the like kind of charge grounded upon the said Writs commonly called SHIPWRITS all which Writs and proceedings as aforesaid were VTTERLY against the Law of the Land Be it therefore declared and enacted by the Kings most Excellent Maiestie and the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That the said charge imposed upon the Subiect for the providing and furnishing of Ships commonly called Ship-money and the said extraiudiciall opinion of the said Iustices and Barons and the said Writs and every of
protection of the Law and ought not to be condemned unheard neither agreeth it with the honour and justice of this Court to deny Councell to plead and open their Clyents cases as was done in your petitioners case which your petitioner hopes you will rectifie and alow his Councel to be reheard and to set forth the sufficiencie in Law of his Plea and Answer whereby your petitioner may not have cause or occasion to Appeale from this Court or complaine of you to the Parliament for obstructing of Justice which if your petitioner receive not timely redresse and reliefe in the Promises he must be constrained to do That without ever any order or further processe serving the said Mr. Hoyle for want of further answer hath prosecuted severall processes of contempts against your petitioner and threatned to lay your petitioner in Goale upon a Commssion of Rebellion for the same and hath served your petitioner with a Subpena for forty shillings cost upon your petitioners first plea and answer which Mr. Hoyle will without doubt do if your honour give not present order for stay of further proceedings upon the said last Subpena and processe of contempt already taken out against your petitioner Your Petitioner therefore humbly prayeth that you wil be pleased for the love and honour of justice and removeing the cause of your petitioners appeale from this Court and complaining of you that you will give direction for stay of the said cost and proceedings upon the said processes of contempts against your petitioner and that you wil declare and order that your Petitioners councel may be reheard without check or offence and allowed freely to shew out to the Court the sufficiencie in Law of your petitioners plea and answer to the end there may not be a failer of justice through you and your petitioner left without relief or remedy by being denied to be heard upon the mirit and equity of his cause according to Law which in the worst of times by the worst Iudges was never done to any either in the case of ship-money or any other cause as Burton Prinn and Bastwicks cases all which your petitioner refereth to your honourable consideration And prayeth as before he hath prayed c. William Browne To the right honourable the Commmons assembled in Parliament the humble petition of Will. Brown of Stepney alias Steben heath in the County of Midlesex SHEWETH THat Josua Hoyle Vicar of the parish of Stepney aforesaid in Michaelmas terme last exhibited his bill in the Court of exchequer against your petitioner and divers other parishioners there for substraction of tythes to which bill your petitioner by his learned councell pleaded and answered the same terme but the said Mr. Hoyle obtained an order from that Court for your petitioner to shew cause why his plea and answer should not be taken of the file as scandalous That your petitioner according to the order of that Court the 18. May last by his counsell Mr. NORBERY and Mr. KING offered to the Court to maintaine his said plea and answer to be good and sufficient in Law but Baron Atkins one of the Barons of that Court would not suffer your petitioners councel to open your petitioners cause in a threatning manner telling them that the Councellour who subscribed your petitioners Plea and answer should never be allowed in that Court and if they meaning Mr. NORBERY and Mr. KING or any other Councellour did appeare in any such cause they should never againe plead in that Court and so your petitioners said councell were overawed and silenced that without further heareing or debate the Court adjudged your petitioners plea and answer scandalous and futher ordered Mr. Fage who signed the same his hand should never be allowed to any pleadings in that Court and your petitioner to pay forty shillings cost to Mr. Hoyle as by the order in the Court in that cause will appeare which doing of the said Baron Atkins and the said last recited Order are contrary to the rule of justice and the great Charter of Liberty wherein it is said Iustice and Right shall de denied to no man That the said Mr. Hoyle since without ever serving the said Order upon your Petitioner having procured severall processes of contempts against him for want of further answer and served him with a Subpena for the 40. s. cost your petitioner thereupon having petitioned the Barons of that Court for justice and to have libertie to shew forth to the Court the sufficiencie in law of the said plea and answer which Mr. NORBERY and Mr. KING had before undertaken to your petitioner to doe and offered to the Court if they might have been heard as they were not to have maintained for good and sufficient in law which petition hereunto annexed Baron Trevers having read and acquainted his Brother Atkins with the contents thereof Baron Atkins replyed and said let Brown complain if he will I have done him justice his businesse shall be no more heard And thus your Petitioner being deprived and destitute of all meanes of obtaining right and justice in that Court is constrained for his own safetie to forsake his own house and familie and live as an exile and fugitive Mr. Hoyle threatning to cast him into prison upon the said Barons Order which doubtlesse he will doe to your petitioners undoing unlesse your petitioner be protected by the justice of this honourable house That your petitioner hath largely and many wayes manifested his good affection to the Parliament in his free and voluntary gifts and contributions over and above his abilitie and by his ready payment of all taxes and assessements having long voluntarily served the Parliament in this war against the enemy to the often endangering his life and the much impoverishing his estate having lost 16. Horses in the Parliaments service for which he hath not had one penny satisfaction besides almost 200. l. due to him in Arrears for his service as a Wagoner That as your Petitioner is informed Mr. Hoyle by law cannot sue your petitioner in any Court for substraction of Tyths then in the Court Christian so called * * 2. 3. Ed. 6. 13. Coo. li. 2. fol. 43. the same being now taken away by authority of Parliament * * See the act of the 17. of C.R. for abolution of Ecclesiastical jurisdiction And so Mr. Hoyle if in case the same were due as they are not he hath no meanes or the recovery of the same but by the Ordinance of this present Parliament which your petitioner did never oppose whensoever the said Mr. Hoyle did take your petitioners goods upon the same as sometimes he did amounting to a considerable value Your Petitioner therefore humbly prayeth this honourable House will be pleased to take your Petitioner under protection to stay the contempts and illegall proceedings of Mr. Hoyle in that Court against your petitioner and to call the said Barons of the Exchequer and in particular Baron
times a year and more often if need be Also there shall be assigned good and lawfull men in every County to keep the peace And at the time of the assignments 33. Ed. 1 30. 20. Ed. 3. 6. Fitz. N. B. fo 251. 1. Ed. 3. 16. 18. Ed. 3. ● 34. Ed. 3. 1. 13. R. 2. 7. mention shall he made that such as shall be indicted or taken by the said keepers of the Peace shall not be let to mainprise by the Sheriffes nor by none other ministers if they be not mainpernable by the Law Not that such us shall be indicted shall not be delive●ed but at the Common Law And the Iustices assigned to deliver the Gaoles shall have power to deliver the same Gaoles of those that shall be indicted before the keepers of the peace And that the said keepers shall send their indictments before the Iustices and they shall have power to inquire of Sheriffes Gaolers and other in whose ward such indicted persons shall be if they make deliverance or let to mainprise any so indicted which be not mainpernable and to punish the said Sheriffes Gaolers and others if they doe any thing against this Act. The 4. of Ed. 3. Ch. 10. fol. 122. Sheriffes G●olers shal receive offenders without any thing taking ITem whereas in times past Sheriffes and gaolers of Gaoles would not receive theeves persons appealed indicted or found with the maner taken and attached by the Constables and townships without taking great fines and ransomes of them for their receit whereby the said Constables and Townships have been unwilling to take thieves and felons because of such extream charges and the theeves and the felons the more incouraged to offend It is inacted that the Sheriffes and Gaolers shall receive and safely keep in prison from henceforth such theeves and felons 3. E. 1. 26. 11. Ed 4. fol. 4. 32. H 6 10. by the delivery of the Constables and townships without taking any thing for the receipt And the Iustices assigned to deliver the Gaole shall have power to heare their complaints that will complain upon the Sheriffes and Gaolers in such case and moreover to punish the Sheriffes and Gaolers ●f they be found guilty The 4. of Edward the 3. Chap. 14. fol. 122. A Parliament shall be holden once every yeare ITem it is accorded that a Parliament shall be holden every yeare once and more often if need be Stat. 36. ●d 3. 10. The 14. of Edward the 3. Chap. 5. fol. 133. Delayes of iudgement in other Courts shall be redressed in Parliament ITem because divers mischiefes have hapned for that in divers places as well as in the Chancery as in the Kings Bench the common Bench and in the Eschequer before the Iustices assigned and other Iustices to heare and determine deputed the judgements have been delayed sometime by difficulty and sometime by divers opinions of the Iudges and sometime for some other cause It is assented established and accorded that from henceforth at every Parliament shall be chosen a Prelate two Earles and two Barons which shall have commission and power of the King 2 H. 7. fo 19 22. Ed. 3. fo 3. to heare by petition delivered to them the complaints of all those that will complain them of such delayes or grievances done to them and they shall have power to cause to come before them at Westminster or else where the places of any of them shall be the ●●nor of records and processes of such judgements so delayed and to cause the same Iustices to come before them which shall be then present to heare their cause and reasons of such delayes Which cause and reason so heard by good advice of themselves the Chancellor Treasurer the Iustices ●f the one Bench and of the other and other of the Kings Councell as many and such as they shall thinke convenient shall proceed to take a good accord and make a good judgement And according to the same accord so taken the tenor of the said record together with the judgement which shall be accorded shall be remanded before the Iustices before whom the plea did depend And that they hastily goe to give judgement according to the same record And in case it seemeth to them that the difficultie be so great that it may not well be determined with out assent of the Parliament that the said tenor or tenors shall be brought by the said Prelates Earles and Barons unto the next Parliament and there shall be a finall accord taken what judgement ought to be given in this case And according to this accord it shall be commanded to the Iudges before whom the plea did depend that they shall proceed to give judgement without delay And to begin to doe remedy upon this ordinance It is assented that a commission and power shall be granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury the Earles of Arundell and Huntington the Lord of Wake and the Lord Raise Basset to endure till the next Parliament And though the ministers have made an oath before this time yet neverthelesse to remember them of the same oath It is assented that as well the chancellor treasurer keeper of the privie seale the Iustices of the one Bench and of the other the Chancellor Barons of the Eschequer as the Iustices assigned and all they that doe meddle in the said places under them by the advice of the same Arch-Bishop Earles and Barons shall make an oath well and lawfully to serve the King and his people And by the advice of said Prelate Earls and Barons be it ordained to increase the number of Ministers when need shal be them to diminish in the same manner And so from time to time when officers shal be newly put in the said offices they shal be sworn in the same maner St. 27 El. 8 Regist fo 17. Rast Pla. fo 30● The Oaths of the Iustices being made Anno 18. Ed. 3. Anno Domini 1344. fol. ●44 YE shall sweare that well and lawfully ye shall serve our Lord the King and his people in the office of Iustice and that lawfully ye shall councell the King in his businesse and that ye shall not councell nor assent to any thing which may turne him in damage or disherison by any maner way or colour And that ye shall not know the damage or disherison of him whereof ye shall not cause him to be warned by your selfe or by other and that ye shal doe equall Law and execution of right to all his subjects rich or poore without having regard to any person And that ye take not by your self or by other prively nor apartly gift nor reward of gold nor silver not of any other thing which may turne to your profit unlesse it be meat or drinke and that of small value of any man that shall have any plea or processe hanging before you as long as the same processe shall so be hanging nor after for the same cause And that ye take no see
and preaching according to the Canons and constitutions of the Bishops and their Clergie * * See the 13. Eliz. chap. 12. And what composition rate for tythes or other oblations this Defendant or any of the said Inhabitants have payed unto the said Complainant the same was unduly exacted by the Complainant so as the said complainant hath no right nor title by colour of any such prescription or custome to have and demand the said composition rate for the premises or any of them on this Defendant as in the said bill is set forth and demanded for that by authority of this present Parliament the function and Miniministrie of Bishops Parsons and Vicars are abrogated and avoided * * Hierarchy exterpated root and branch and government by Prelacy whereof Vicars be part See the Ordinances of the 9. of Octob. and the 16. Novemb. 1646 2. part book decl fol. 922. 932. see also the Covenant And likewise the book of Common prayer and the administring of the Sacraments and preaching according to the Bishops Canons and injuctions by authority of this present Parliament utterly taken away and disannulled † † See the Ordinances of the 3. Ian. 1644. and 23. August 1645. Parl. Decl. 2. part fol. 715. 716. And this Defendant doth conceive no tyth or composition rate for tyth nor any other oblations for Poultrie are due by law but have been taken no otherwise then by Iewish or Popish institution * * Tyths are not due iure divino and at this present there is no law to compell their payment Cook Rep. 2. Quen d. Winchester and provision as by the Statute made for the payment of tythes and oblations whereunto reference being had will appeare the same being made only for the maintenance of the Popish and prelaticall Clergie and Ministrie and no other And he this Defendant beleeveth is to be true and hopeth to prove that neither by the law of God nor man any tyths composition rates for tyths or other oblations for poultrie ought to be paid to any persons or Vicars or other Ecclesisticall Minister or Ministers whomsoever for this Defendant saith that by the Parliaments Protestation made by authority of this present Parliament the 5. day of May 1641. against popery and popish innovations all Lawes Customes Acts and Ordinances for the payment of tyths or manner of tything ra●e or composition for tyths or other oblation to any parson or Vicars of any parish within this Kingdome their names and offices being Popish and Antichristian the same having no foundation in the word of God are utterly void and null And this Defendant denyeth that he ever did nor now doth combin practice or confederate with the other Defendants named in the said Bill or any of them or with any other person or persons whatsoever to wrong the said Complainant as in the said Complainants bill is untruly suggested And without that this defendant had depastured within the said Parish eight and twenty Cowes within the said parish as in the Complainants bill is alledged or that the Complainant is Debtor or Accountant to the King or that the said Complainant is unlawfully intituled to have receive and take the Viccarage tyth or the composition rate for tyth and the said oblations as were formerly payed to the POPISH VICCARS HIS PREDICESSORS if in case the same had been payed as in the said bill is alledged And without that any other matter or thing in the said bill of complaint contained materiall or effectuall to be answered unto and not herein fully answered unto confessed and avoided traversed or denyed is true therefore this Defendant humbly prayeth to be dismissed out of this honourable Court with his reasonable costs and expences in this behalfe wrongfully had and sustained Mr Fage Senior Councellor But what just proceeding Mr. Brown had upon this Plea before the present Barons of the Exchequer his own Petition to themselves and to the House of Commons against them will very fully demonstrate the first of which thus followeth To the Right Honourable His Majesties Barons of the Court of Exchequer The humble Petition of William Brown SHEWETH THat Iosua Hoyle now Vicar of the Parish of Stepney ever since he got the Vicarage hath been very troublesome and vexatious to your Petitioner and other the Parishioners there endeavouring by illegall forcible and indirect wayes and meaness to extort from them tythes and certaine manner of tything which by law he could not demand nor they compelled to pay as by their learned councell they are informed and hope to prove if they may have the benefit of the Law which is the inheritance of every free-borne English-man That under colour of the Ordinance for tythes the said Mr. Hoyle did take from your petitioner goods of a considerable value for which your petitioner hath no satisfaction That the said Mr. Hoyle the more to vex your petitioner causelesly served your petitioner with a Subpena to answer a bill in the Court of exchequer for pretended tythes and other duties to which Bill your petitioner in Michaelmas terme last answered by advise of his Councel learned in the Law divers other of the said parishioners being named defendants in the said Bill but not served till Easter terme last of purpose to put them to the more charges and weary them out with Multiplicity of Suits and unnecessary Expences in Law That the said Mr. Hoyle procured an Order of this Court that your Petitioner should shew cause by a certaine day in the last Terme why your petitioners Plea and Answer should not be taken of the file as scandalous and your Petitioner ordered to pay cost and make a further and better answer That your petitioner in obedience to the order of the Court by his councell Mr. Norbery and Mr. King attended several dayes to shew cause for allowing his plea and answer but when that cause was called upon your petitioners Councellours were not suffered to shew forth to the Court the sufficiencie in Law of your petitioners said plea and answer Baron Atkins telling your petitioners counsellers that Mr. Fage who subscrib'd the same his hand should never be received again in that court further threatn'd your petitioners councellours saying that if they or any other Councellours should appeare in any such cause should be debarred from pleading in that Court whereupon though the said Mr. Norbery Mr. King were prepared able and ready had undertaken to maintain your petitioners said plea and answer to be good and sufficient in law was so overawed by Baron Atkins that for feare to offend him and the Court they were silenced and so without further debate or Councel heard your petitioners Plea was over ruled and this Answer Judged scandalous and insufficient and your petitioner further ordered to pay forty shillings cost and make further answer That your petitioner is a free-man of England and by the great Charter of Liberty ought to be under the
Atkins before you to answer this Petition to the end according to your many Declarations Promises and Protestations iustice may not be obstructed or your Petitioner denyed the benefit of the law or priviledge of a free borne Denizon And the said Barons receive such condigne punishment for their uniust dealing and proceedings against your Petitioner as shall seeme meet and agreeable to the wisedome and iustice of this honourable House The like not any of the Iudges in the worst of times durst ever doe that ever your Petitioner heard of And your Petitioner if he may be protected and allowed by this honourable House to prosecute this Petition he will give securitie to make good the contents thereof And as in duty bounden your Petitioner shall ever pray c. Will. Brown Take notice and marke it well that though tyths are by law to be sued for in Ecclesiasticall Courts only yet trebble damages for none payment of tyths are to be sued for by the same Statute of the 2. and 3. Ed. 6 13. in Civill Courts at the Common Law and therefore the best plea to a bill of trebble damages is that you owe the Parson c no tyths at all and put him to prove the first Here you see what gallant Iustice is to be found amongst the Iudges at Westminster Hall that the pleaders of honest causes cannot be suffered to presse the law freely for their Clyents but must be threatned and commanded to hold their peaces before they have pressed fully either law or reason for those that hire them to be their mouths to doe it for them Is this to performe their oath which you may read before pag. 10. In which they sweare to doe equall law and execution of right to all kinds of men rich and poore without having regard to any person or persons whatsoever And that they shall deny to no man common right by the Kings letters nor none other mans nor for no other cause and in case any letters or commands shall come to them contrary to the law that they shall doe nothing by such letters or commands but proceed to execute the law notwithstanding Or is not this their dealing with Mr. Brown and his Councell a cleare demonstration of their breaking their Oaths and absolutely forswearing themselves And therefore seeing neither Mr. Brown not no man else that complains to the parliament against the injustice of the Iudges can get the least justice against them is not this and other of their visible breaking of their Oaths a true and legall cause to indict them for perjury upon which if conviction follow they are ipso facto disabled for ever to sit Iudges any more or to be witnesses in any causes whatsoever betwixt party and party For this is to be taken notice of that if a Iury bring in a false verdict against the expresse evidence given in unto them that thereupon by law they are to have their houses rased down to the ground and never to be built againe their trees puld up by the roots their ground to lye follow and wast without tillage or use their names and their childrens to be infamous reproachfull and contemptable c. And therefore without doubt the Iudges punishment for palpable iniustice must needs be much more then theirs And an excellent piece of justice and worth the highest commendation it was in King Alfred to hang 44 Iustices in one year as murtherers for their false judgments * See Andrew Horns mirror of iustice in English chap. 5. Sect. 1. pag. 239 240 241. 242. c printed for Ma● Walbank at Grays Inne gate 1646 where all their crimes are set down which book is most extraordinarily well worth your reading But seeing the Parsons Vicars curates cannot recover their tyths by law they have unjustly illegally got up a custom to come or send their illegall Agents into mens grounds or houses to take away their goods and chattells and men are so foolish as to let them although by law if any man under any pretenc of authority whatever shall dare to endeavour by force to come into a free-mans house unlesse it be under pretence of Treason or Felony committed or suspition of Treason or Felony or to serve an execution after Iudgement for the King the free man may stand upon his guard as against so many Theeves and Robbers and if he shoot or kill them every one I know nothing to the contrary but they have their mends in their own hands and they nor none for them can iustly requ●e any of him or them that so in his or their own legall defence destroyes them And if they take away your goods as usually they doe you have your remedy at law by way of Replevie to get * Which writs of Replevy you may have out of the Cusitore office belonging to every County but get at one and the same time a writ of Replevin a writ of Al as and a writ of Pluries which last Writ runs with a penaltie and if the Sheriff doe not execute it there lyes an attachment against him and in case he return that the goods are sold and gone before he could repleve them or drove into another County then you may have a Capias in withernam to distrain and take the parties own goods that caused the first goods to be distrained or any of those that had a hand in distraining and no supersedeas whatsoever will lye to controule or dam the writ or hinder the execution of it which writs with all other in force you may read in the Law book called the Register by the help of which you may make all the Parsons in England goe whistle for their Tyths Which Register doth very well deserve your care and pains by authority to be translated into English your goods againe putting in baile to the Sheriffe to answer the law against him that distrained your goods so you shall bring him to a tryal at law to prove his title or clame to your goods and this I conceive to be cleare from the Statutes of Marle bridge in the 52. H. 3. Anno 1267. Chap. 1 2 3 4. 15 21. and 3. 8. 3. Chap. 17. Compared with Sir Edward Cooks Exposition upon those severall Statutes in the 2. part of his Institutes fol. 103 104 105 106 107. 131 132 133. 139 140 141. 193 194. and his discourse in his first part Institutes lib. 2. chap. 12. Sect. 219. fo 143. But that you may not rest in an implicite beliefe I shall give you the fore mentioned Statutes verbatum which thus followeth Chap. 1. fol. 16. The penaltie for taking a distresse wrongfully WHereas at the time of a commotion late stirred up within this Realme and also sithence many great men and divers other refusing to be justified by the King and his Court like as they ought and were wont in the time of the Kings noble progenitors and also in his time but took great revenges and distresses
arbitrary power like Turkish Janisaries In the rhird place I answer that it is against reason law conscience justice and equity to subject me at one and the same time or any other free Commoner of England under the sting and power of two distinct Lawes and such a bondage as is insupportable and such a snare of intanglement that no mans life whatsoever can be safe or secure under it that I shall be liable to be questioned and destroyed by the common Law of the Kingdome and then be at the wills of mercenarie Turkish Ianisaries in case the common Law will not reach me to be questioned and destroyed by an unjust arbitrary Martiall law and if it can be justly proved against me that I have made any tumults the Law and the ordinarie Courts of justice are open by which and by no other rules and proceedings J ought to be tryed and if it be said or can be proved that J have belied or scandalized the Generall to the taking away of his good name c. yet scandalum Magnatum is not to be tried by Martiall Law nor yet either by the House of Commons or the House of Lords but only alone now the Star-Chamber is down by an Action at cōmon Law † † As is cleare by the Statutes of 3. Ed. 1. 33. 37. Ed. 3. 18. 38. Ed. 3. 9. 42. Ed. 3. 3. 2. R. 2. 5. 12 R. 2. 11. 5. part Cookes reports pag. 125. 13. H. 7. Kelway 11. Eliz. Dier 285. 30. Affiz pla 19. Liev. Col. John Lilburnes Grand Plea of 20. October 1647. pag. 7. 8. by a Jurie of my equals no where else it being a Maxime in Law That wher remedy may be had by an ordinary course in law the party grieved shall never have his recourse to extraordinaries * * See Vox Plebis pag. 38. Lievt Col. Jo. Lilburnes Anatomie of the Lords Tyranny pag 10. And besides for you to proceed with me and to be both Parties Jury and Iudges is a thing that the Law abhorres † † See 8. H. 6. fol. 21. Eliz. Dier 220. Dr. Bonhams case 8. part of Cooks Repots and Lievt Col. Jo. Lilburnes grand Plea pag. 10. In the fourth and last place J answer that the Parliament it selfe neither by Act nor Ordinance can justly or warrantably destroy the fundamentall liberties and principles of the common Law of England * * See Mr. Henry Martins answer to the Scotchpapers called the Independency of England at the last end it being a maxime in law and reason both That all such Acts and Ordinances are ipso facto null and void in law and bind not at all but ought to be resisted and stood against to the death But for them to give you a power by Marshal Law or under any other name or title whatever by your arbitrary tyrannicall wills without due course and processe of Law to take away the Life or Liberty of me or any free Commoner of England whatsoever yea or any of your own Souldiers in time of peace when the Courts of Iustice are all open and no visible declared enemie in Armes in the Kingdome ready to destroy it is an absolute destroying of our fundamentall Liberties and a rasing of the foundation of the Common Law of England † † But besides all this I doe confidently believe that the Parliament never gave power unto the Generall since the wars ended to execute Martiall Law neither doe I believe that some chiefe Executors of Martiall Law have any Legall Commission from the Parliament who never that I could heare of ever gave power unto the Generall of himself to make generall Officers and besides all the Parliament men that are Officers in the Army were as I have been groundedly told formerly taken off by an Ordinance of both Houses which was never repealed since And therfore such a power of Arbitrary Marshall Law cannot justly by the Parliament in time of peace c. be given unto you nor if it were be justly or warantably executed by you And besides both houses themselves by an Ordinance unlesse they alter the whole constitution of this Kingdome can take away the life of no free Commoner of England whatsoever especially in time of peace And therefore that which is not within their owne power to do they cannot by an Order or Ordinance grant power to Sir Thomas Fairfax c. to do it being a Maxime in nature That beyond the power of being there is nor can be no being But it is in the power of the Parliament or the two Houses or the House of Commons themselves as the present constitutions of this Kingdome stands either by Order or Ordinance to take away the life of any free commoner of England * * See Sir E Cooks 2 part institut fo 47 48. 3. part fol. 22. and 4. part fol. 23. 25. 48. 291. all of which bookes are published for good law to the Kingdom by 2. speciall Orders of the present House of Commons as you may read in the last pa. of the second part institut see also the Petition of Right And therefore they cannot by an Ordinance or Order especially in times of peace give power to Sir Thomas Fairfax by Marshall Law unlesse they totally alter the Constitutions of the Kingdome to take away the life or lives of any free Commoners of England which all Souldiers are as well as others † † See the Armies Declaration of the 14. Iune 1647. Book of their Declarations pag. 39. and their Letter from Royston to the Lord Mayor of London of the 10. Iune 1647. which the Printer hath neglected to print in their book of Declarations * and therefore it is absolute murther in the Generall and the Councell of Warre now to shoot to death hang or destroy any Souldier or other Commoner what ever by Marshall Law for which they may be indicted at the Kings Bench barre And therefore J doe the third time as a friend advise you to cease your illegall arbitrary tyrannicall Marshall Law proceedings with me that am no Souldier and so not under the least pretence of your Marshall Iurisdiction least in time to come you pay as deare for your arbitrarie illegall proceedings with me as Sir Richard Empson and Mr. Edward Dudley Iustices did who as Sir Edward Cook declares in his 2. and 4. part of his Institutes where very officious and ready to execute that illegall Act of Parliament made in the 11. H. 7. cap. 3. which gave power unto Iustices of Assize as well as Iustices of the Peace without any finding or presentment by the verdict of twelve men being the ancient birth-right of the Subject upon a bare information for the King before them made to have full power and authority by their discretions to heare and determine all Offences or contempts committed or done by any person or persons against the form ordinance
effect of any Statute made and not repealed c. by colour of which Act of Parliament shalling saith he this fundamentall law viz. the 29. Chapter of Magna Charta it is not credible what horrible oppressions and exactions to the undoing of infinite numbers of people were committed by them for which though I cannot read they shot any man to death and though they had an expresse Act of Parliament to beare them out abundantly lesse questionable then an Ordinance for exercising Marshal Law they were both indicted of high treason both by the Common Law and Act of Parliament * * See 2. part Instit fol. 51. 4. part fol. 41. 196. 197. but especially read their Jndictment virbatim set down ibid. fo 198 199. and in the 2. yeare of Henry 8. they both lost their heads Therefore from all the premises by way of conclusion I draw up this protestation against you that by the lawes and constitutions of this Kingdome you have not the least Iudicative power in the world over me therefore I cannot in the least give you any Honour Reverence or Respect either in word action or gesture and if you by force and compulsion compell me againe to come before you I must and will by Gods assistance keep on my hat and look upon you as acompany of Murderers Robbers and Theives and doe the best I can to raise the Hue and Cry of the Kingdome against you as a company of such lawlesse persons and therefore if there be any Honour Honesty and Conscience in you I require you as a free borne English man to doe me justice and right by a formall dismissing of me and give me just reparation for my moneths unjust imprisonment by you and for that losse of credit I have sustained thereby that so things may goe no further or else you will compell and necessitate me to study all wayes and means in the world to procure satisfaction from you and if you have any thing to lay to my Charge J am as an English man ready to answer you at the common Law of England and in the meane time J shall subscribe my self Your servant in your faithfull discharge of your duty to your Masters the Commons of England that pay you your wages William Thompson From my arbitrary and most illegall imprisonment in Windsore this 14. Decem. 1647. The forementioned Letter thus followeth To his Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax Knight Captaine-Generall of the Forces in the Nation for Importiall Justice and Libertie these present May it please your Excellency I Here present unto you a Declaration and Protestation against the illegall and unjust proceedings of your Councell of Warre against me I being a free Commoner of England as in the presence of the just God before whose Tribunall both you and I shall stand to give an account of all ungodly deeds committed against him And so I rest Your Excellencies servant if you are a true servant to the most excellent God for justice and righteousnesse in the earth without respect of persons William Thompson Decemb. 14. 1647. The Petition thus followeth To the right Honourable his Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax Knight Captain Generall of all the forces raised in the Kingdome of England The humble Petition of some of your Excellencies Officers and Soldiers being under the custodie of the Marshall Generall Sheweth THat whereas there are misrepresentations of the intentions of the late Agents of the Army and their adherents by men of corrupt minds who would make all the end of your own and your Armies noble and valiant Atchievements under the power of God fruitlesse and would destroy justice and righteousnesse from amongst men and in stead of common good and equal distribution of justice would advance a particular selfish interest to accomplish their unworthy selfish ends amongst many other scandals cast upon the late Agents they have blazed abroad that they intended to murther the King and that one of them should affirm it was lawfull And whereas this was reported by one Lievt Col. Henry Lilburne it being altogether most abominable in our eyes and detracts from the purity and righteousnesse of our Principles tending only to make us odious to the people for whose good alone we have run not only all former but also these late hazzards We therefore desire that the said Lievt Col. Henry Lilburne may be speedily sent for to testifie upon Oath as in the presence of God who used those words where those words were used and when and what in particular the words were That so such a person may come under a publique cognizance and your Excellencies faithfull servants and souldiers may free themselves and others from such aspertions And your Petitioners shall ever pray c. Will. Eyers Will. Bray Will. Prior Iohn Wood. George Hassell Will. Everrard Iohn Crosseman Tho. Beverly Will. Thompson Commoner The forementioned plea of Iohn Crosseman which with his own hands he delivered to the Generall himself thus foloweth TO HIS EXCELLENCY SIR THOMAS FAIRFAX AND ALL his Officers that pretend to be Executors of Martiall Law May it please your Excellency I Was convened the 16. December last before certaine of your Officers that pretendedly called themselves a Court Marshall who attempted to try me by Marshall Law for certaine pretended crimes specified in a paper by way of Articles exhibited by a namelesse prosecuter 20. dayes after I was a prisoner only the said Articles were signed by Henry Whaley who calls himself Iudge Advocate And the same day and time unto the said Officers I delivered in a paper under my hand intituled John Crosseman his Plea against the proceedings of the Generall Officers to punish him by Marshall Law And after much debate by the said Officers upon the said Plea the said Officers seemed to be unsatisfied with it and therefore gave me time till this present Munday the 20. day Decemb. 1647. to consider with my self whether J would stand unto the said plea or give in any other answer Having thereupon largely considered with my self upon the ends of our late taking up Armes I can in my own conscience judge them to be no other but for the destruction of all arbitrary tyrannicall power in whomsoever the preservation of our Lawes and Liberties and the punishment of all those that have endeavoured the destruction of them And having since the delivery of the said plea read the Petition of Right from end to end And William Thompsons plea delivered to your Excellency c. upon the 14. Decemb. 1647. now in print intituled Englands Freedome Souldiers Rights † † Which you may read before pag. 1 2 3 45 46 47 48 49 50 51. upon the deep and weighty consideration of all which J am compelled out of the sense of avoyding the being too justly esteemed by all understanding rationall men a traytor and subverter of the Lawes and liberties of England to stand unto my said Plea without any further answer then this
of a Court Marshall And therefore the Petition of Right complained of executing such Marshall Lawes in time of peace Which Petition being granted it remaineth as a valid Act of Parliament against it And the Earle of Strafford was impeached of High Treason for proceeding against and condemning the Lord Mount Norris by Marshall Law † † See the 5. Article in the impeachment of the Earl of Strafford Se also the 15. and 19. Article of that Impeachment though the sentence was not executed Upon all these considerations I cannot but be confident that the justice and conscience which dwels in your Excellencie will compell you to restraine the proceedings of that Assembly of Officers against me who are my accusers And I hope your Excellencie is so carefull of your honour and reputation in the peoples eyes that you will not suffer my place to be taken from me unlesse my declining from the ends for which I associated with the Armie can be proved against me or else some crime which according to law and justice merits such a censure And I am not yet conscious to my self of the least unfaithfullnesse but doe remaine as ever Your Excellencies humble servant Iohn Ingram whom since they have cashiered because he was too honest and quick sighted for them and whom I heare hath a larger discourse comming out against their unjust proceedings with him December 23. 1647. The proceedings of the Grandees at Windsore being so furious unjust and illegall as they were in which they led the Generall on hoodwink as their stalking Horse to the pits brink of his own ruine and destruction and to the Apparent hazzard of shedding more innocent and precious blood of extraordinary choice English men and sweet Christians and to the visible rooting up by the roots of the fundamentall lawes and liberties of England and in its place set up and executed an arbitrary tyrannicall government of Marshall Law by the rules and justice of which they might have as well as justifiably and as warrantably condemned to death all the free men of England as those Souldiers they did The serious meditating upon all which perplexed my very spirit and therefore I drew out my pen to make an assay upon the Generall thereby if it were possible to stop those most desperate and unjust proceedings The substance of which Letter thus followeth To his Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax these present May it please your Excellency HAving hoard that your Excellency should say there was a great deale of reason in your apprehension in Thompsons plea And you wished the Offices would well weight it and returne an answer to It. And being yesterday at the House of Commons doore I met with divers of your Officers and in particular with Quarter Master Generall Ireton who in his discourse with me was pleased to say That the late Plea for the Agents was full of falsehoods and mistakes and my self in discourse came close to him before many people and proferred him to maintaine before any competent Iudges in England upon the perill of a sufficient disgrace to prove by the genuine sense of your own Declarations and the Lawes of England that there was not a false nor mistaken sentence in it all Now may it please your Honour having many Obligations upon me to your particular selfe not only as I am an English man but also as a sufferer And being much perplexed in my own spirit at those many late unworthy actions that are done pretendedly by vertue of your Authority by men of a powerfull and corrupt influence in your Armie the disgrace and danger of which lyes very deep upon your selfe which I am afraid in conclusion will cost you very deare yea the head upon your shoulders if you persevere or suffer them to persevere in their late murthering arbitrary tyrannicall illegall wayes and therefore out of that reall and strong affection that I truly beare unto your Excellency J am compeld to propose and offer unto your Honour that if you please under your hand to grant safe comming and going to my self and a friend or two and in dempnitie for our discourse upon the debate we will come and waite upon your Excellency at Windsore And against all your Officers in and belonging to your Army maintaine the legallity and rationality of every line and sentence of Thompsons Plea and the Plea for the Agents the printers faults excepted your Excellency in your own person at the dispute sitting as Moderator and Iudge So with my heartiest and truest service presented to your Honour I humbly take my leave of your Excellency and rest As true and faithfull a servant to you as any you have in your Army though an absolute abhorrer and detestor of the late actions of your pretended Councell of Warre John Lilburne From my most illegall and uniust Captivity which I am confident is continued by the powerfull influence of some great Officers in your Armie * * Viz. ●ievt Gen. ●rom●ell ●is po●tique Sonne in Law Com. Gen. Ireton who are I will maintaine it the principall supporters uphol●ers a betters preservers and defenders of the usurping House of Lords in all their usurpations ille●all oppressions tyranny and murthering crueltie for which if there were any justice to be had they ●eserved better to be impeached of High Treason for subverters of our lawes and liberties then the ●arle of Strafford did in that before their eyes they have seen his severe punishment and yet walk in ●s steps this 23. December 1647. Postscript Sir I have assigned the prisoners at Windsore to waite upon your Excellency for an answer to this my Letter and I desire further to let you know that if your Officers be unwilling to imbrace my desires herein It will be a cleare demonstration to your Excellency and all the people of the whole Kingdome that they have jugled with deceived and deluded you and brought you into life and honour destroying snares Iohn Lilburne This letter of mine was delivered to the Generals own hands as I have been informed by some that was by but I have not received the least answer unto it which makes me conclude that Cromwell and Ireton and there under Creaturers are convict in their consciences that there is not the least shaddow or ground in the world for them in times of peace to execut Marshall Law the full knowledge of which they would not willingly the Generall should be possessed with as it is probable at such a dispute as before I offer and am ready to performe he might be and so might be sorry for that murder committed upon the Soldier that was shot at Ware for which I am sure Cromwell Ireton Paul Hobson yea and my Brother Henry Lilburne if he were one that had a hand in the causing of him to be shot as well as all others that had may by the Law of England be apprehended indicted and tryed as wilfull murderers and I am sure in the eye of the Law
their rotten praises and uphold their new confu●●d Babell sandy interest though in this book by reason of the great distractions of the kingdome I thought to have been very tender of the House of Commons and its committees yet because slavery and tyranny is already goe over the threshold I must furnish my friends with some weapons to keep it out of the kitchine and Hall least it get possession speedily of the whole house and for that end I shall insert my Defiance to Tyrants in a plea which thus followeth A Defiance to Tyrants Or a Plea made by Lievt Col. Iohn Lilburne Prerogative Prisoner in the Tower of London the 2. of Decemb. 1647. Against the proceedings of the close and illegall Committee of Lords and Commons appointed to examine those that are called London Agents with divers large additions unto which is annexed a Plea for the said Citizens of London against the Committee for plundered Ministers for their illegall imprisoning them for refusing to pay Tithes ALL Magistracy in England is bounded by the ●o●wn and declared Law of England a a See the Petition of right and Sir Edw. Cooks 4. part institutes Chap. high Court of Parliament and while they Act according to Law I am bound to obey them but when they leave the rules thereof and walk by the arbitrarie rules of their own Wilt they doe not act as Magistrates but as b b See King Iames his speech to the Parl. at White Hal 1609. and 1. par book Decl. pag. 150. and my book called the Out-cryes of oppressed Commons pag 16 17. 18. and my Epistle to Mr. Martin of the 31. May 1647. called Rash Oaths pag. 56 Tyrants and cannot in such actings challenge any obedience neither am I bound to yeeld it but am tyed in conscience and duty to my self and my native Country therein to resist and withstand them and if their Officers goe about by force and violence to Compell me to obey and stoop unto their arbitrary and illegall command c c See Cooks 2. part inst upon the 29. chap. of Magna Charta fo 52. 53. and fo 590 591. and regall Tyrany p. 78. 79. 80 81. and Vox Plebis p. 37. and my plea before Mr. Mart●n of the 6. Novem. 1646. called an anatomy of the Lords tyrany pag. 5. 7. ● I may and ought if I will be true to my native and legall freedoms by force to withstand him or them in the same ma●ner that I may withstand a man that comes to rob my house or as I may withstand a man that upon the high way by force and violence would take my purse or life from me And therefore all Warrants comming from any pretended or reall Committees of Lords and Commons to command me before them that are not formed according to the Law of England I ought not to obey but withstand and resist upon paine of being by all the ambiased understanding men of England esteemed a betrayer and destroyer of the Lawes and liberties of England for the preservation of which I ought to contest as Naboth did with King Ahab for his vineyard 1 King 21.2 3 4 13. And by the Law of England no warrant or processe ought to issue out to summon up any man to any Court of Justice in England whatsoever till a complaint by a certain prosecutor be filed or exhibited in that Court of iustice from whence the warrant processe or Summons comes which warrant processe or Summons ought expresly to containe the nature of the cause to which I am to answer and the name of my prosecutor or complainants or else it is not legall and so not binding but may and ought to be resisted by me and the Court must be sure to have legall jurisdiction over the causes Secondly All the Capacities that either the House of Commons or Lords can sit in is First Either as a Councell and so are to be close and for any man whatsoever in that Capacitie to come or offer to come in amongst them that doe not belong unto them is unwarrantable and so punishable d d Se Cooks 2. part inst fol. 103. 104. 4. part inst Chap. High Court of Parlm and the book called the manner of holding Parlmts Mr. Prinns relation of the triall of Col. Nath Fines p. 13. and regall tirany pag. 82. 83. or else Secondly As a Court of Iustice to try and examine men in criminall causes and in this capacitie they or any of their Committees ought alwayes to Sir open for all peaceable men freely to behold and see e e See 2. part inst fol. 103 104. and my book called the resolved mans resolution p. 56. and regall tyrany p. ●● ●2 83. Mr. Prinns relation of Col. Nath. Fines his tryall p. 11 12 13. or else I am not bound to go to any tryall with them or answer them a word and therefore in this sense most illegall is the close Committee of Lords and Commons f f See my grand plea and my letter 11. Nov. 1647. to every Jndividuall Member of the House of Commons See Sir Edw. Cooks exposition of the 14. and 29. Chap of Magna Charta in his 2. part inst and regall tyranny p. 43 44 72 73 74 85 86. and Vox Plebis pag. 38 39 40 41 42. and my Epistle to the Lievt of the Tower the 13. Ian. 1646. called the oppressed mans oppressions declared p. 17. 18 19. for examining those they call London Agents or any other whatsoever And Thirdly that Close Committee is most illegall being a mixture of Lords with Commons seeing the Lords are none of their or my Peers and Equalls by Law and so cannot nor ought not to be there to be my examiners tryers or Judges and a traytor I am to the lawes and liberties of England if I stoop or submit to the jurisdiction or power of such a mixt Committee f Thirdly It is contrary to Law and expresly against the Petition of right either for this Committee of Lords and Commons g g See Vox Plebis p. 38. my anatomy of the Lords tyrany p. 10. and Thompsons plea against Marshall Law or any other Court of justice or Committee whatsoever to force mee or any man to answer to interrogatories against my self or my neer relations Fourthly Neither can they legally go about to try or punish me for any crime that is triable or punishable at Common law i i See the proofes in the third Maginall note at the letter C. k k Which Statute you may read before p. 6. and take notice of this that all misdemeanors whatsoever are Baileable l l See the 3. E. 1. c. 26. and 4. E. 3. 10. and 23. H. 6 10. Rast plea. fo 31. 7. Vox Plebis p. 55 56. 57. and my late Epistle to C. West late Liev. of the Tower calle● the oppressed mans oppressions declared p. 3 4. 1. part Cooks inst Lib. 3. chap. 13.
them and the said agreement or opinion of the greater part of the said Iustices and Barons and the said Iudgement given against the said IOHN HAMPDEN were and are contrary to and against the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm the right of property the liberty of the Subiects former resolutions in Parliament and the PETITION OF RIGHT made in the third yeare of the Reign of his Maiestie that now is And it is further declared and enacted by the authority aforesaid That all and every the Particulars prayed or desired in the said PETITION OF RIGHT shall from henceforth be put in execution accordingly and shall be firmly and strictly holden and observed as in the same PETITION THEY ARE PRAYED AND EXPRESSED and that all and every the Records and Remembrances of all and every the Iudgement Inrolements Entry and proceedings as aforesaid and all and every the proceedings whatsoever upon or by pretixt or colour of any of the said Writs commonly called Shipwrits and all and every the Dependents on any of them shall be deemed and adiudged to all intents constructions and purposes to be utterly void and disannulled and that all and every the said Iudgement Inrolments Entryes Proceedings and Dependents of what kind soever shall be vacated and cancelled in such manner and forme as Records use to be that are vacated Anno XVII Caroli Regis An Act for the prevention of vexatious proceedings touching the Order of Knighthood VVHereas upon pretext of an antient custome or usage of this Realm of England That men of full age being not Knights and being seised of Lands or Rents of the yearly value of forty pounds or more especially if their seising had so continued by the space of three years next past might be compelled by the Kings writ to receive or take upon them the order or dignity of Knighthood or else to make Fine for the discharge or respite of the same Severall Writs about the beginning of his Majesties reign issued out of the Court of Chancery for Proclamations to be made in every County to that purpose and for certifying the names of all such persons and for summoning them personally to appeare in the Kings presence before a certain day to be there ready to receive the said Order or Dignity Vpon returne of which writs and transmitting the same with their Returns into the Court of Exchequer and upon other Writs for further inquiry of the names of such persons issuing out of the said Court of Exchequer Processe by Distringas was thence made against a very great number of persons many of which were altogether unfit in regard either of estate or quality to receive the said Order or Dignity and very many were put to grievous Fines and other vexations for the same although in truth it were not sufficiently known how or in what sort or where they or any of them should or might have addressed themselves for the receiving the said Order or Dignity and for saving themselves thereby from the said Fines Processe and vexations And whereas its most apparent that all and every such proceedings in regard of the matter therein pretended is altogether uselesse and unreasonable May it therefore please your most Excellent Maiestie that it be by authority of Parliament declared and enacted And be it declared and enacted by the Kings most excellent Maiestie and the Lords and Commons in this Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That from henceforth no person or persons of what condition quality estate or degree so ever shall at any time be distrained or otherwise compelled by any writ or processe of the Court of Chancery or Court of Exchequer or otherwise by any meanes whatsoever to receive or take upon him or them respectively the Order or Dignity of KNIGHTHOOD nor shall suffer or undergoe any fine trouble or molestation whatsoever by reason or colour of his or their having not received or not taken upon him or them the said order or dignity And that all and every Writ or Processe whatsoever and all and every proceeding which shall hereafter be had or made contrary to the intent of this Act shall be deemed and adiudged to be utterly void and that all and every Processe proceeding and Charge now depending by reason or colour of the said pretended custome or writs aforesaid or of any the dependants thereof shall from henceforth cease and stand be and remain discharged and utterly void Any former Law or Custome or any pretence of any former Law or Custome or any other matter whatsoever to the Contrary in any wise notwithstanding I shall conclude this collection at present with the Bill of Attainder past against Thomas Earl of Strafford this present Parliament as I find it printed in the 303. pag. of a book printed for Will. Cook at Furnifalls Inne gate in Holbourne 1641. called Speeches and Passages of this Parliament from the 3. Novemb. 1640. to this instant Inne 1641. which thus followeth The Bill of Atainder that passed against Thomas Earle of STRAFFORD WHereas the Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the House of Commons in this present Parliament assembled have in the name of themselves and of all the Commons of England impeached Thomas Earle of Strafford of high Treason for endeavouring to subvert the Antient and Fundamentall Lawes and Government of his Maiesties Realms of England and Ireland and to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannicall Government against Law in the said Kingdoms and for exercising a tyrannous and exhorbitant power over and against the Lawes of the said Kingdomes over the Liberties Estates and Lives of his Maiesties Subiects and likewise for having by his own authority commanded the laying and asseising of Soldiers upon his Subiects in Ireland against their consents to compell them to obey his unlawfull commands and orders made upon paper Petitions in causes between party and party which accordingly was executed upon divers of his Maiesties Subiects in a warlike manner within the said Realm of Ireland and in so doing did LEVIE WARRE against the Kings Maiestie and his liege people in that Kingdome And also for that he upon the unhappie Dissolution of the last Parliament did slander the House of Commons to his Maiestie and did councell and advise his Maiestie that he was loose and absolved from the rules of Government and that he had an Army in Ireland by which he might reduce this Kingdome for which he deserves to undergoe the pains and forfeitures of high Treason And the said Earl hath been also an Incendiary of the wars between the two Kingdoms of England and Scotland all which offences have been sufficiently proved against the said Earle upon his impeachment Be it therefore enacted by the Kings most Excellent Maiesty and by the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament and by authority of the same that the said Earl of Strafford for the hainous crimes and offences aforesaid stand and be adiudged and attainted of high Treason and shall suffer such pain of