Selected quad for the lemma: justice_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
justice_n aforesaid_a offence_n say_a 2,576 5 7.0481 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A78261 The case of the Marquess of Hertford touching the dukedome of Somerset 1642 (1642) Wing C1114AB; ESTC R231173 874 1

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

THE CASE OF THE Marquess of Hertford TOVCHING THE DUKEDOME OF SOMERSET EDWARD Earl of Hertford Great-grandfather of the said Marquess was by Letters Patents under the Great Seal of England bearing date ● 6 April 1 E. 6. created Duke of Somerset to hold to him and the Heirs males of his body upon the body of the Lady Anne his then wife begotten and to be begotten for ever with several other remainders over in tayle The said Duke afterwards viz. in Michaelmas Term 5 E. 6. was endicted of Felony for procuring and stirring up others to take and imprison John Earl of Warwick one of the Kings Privy Council which Indictment though void both in matter and form was pretended to be grounded on the 〈…〉 E. 6. which makes it Felony to stir up and procure others to take away the life of any of the Kings Council But this Indictment was only for stirring up others to imprison a Privy Councellor which was never reduced into Act and the same declared and branded in Print to be void by learned Judges yet the said Duke was found guilty of Felony and put to death for this fact which was but a pretended Felony and if true yet no entayled Estate forfeitable thereby The malice of his Enemies not satisfied with his bloud afterwards by their power in the infancy of the Dukes Heir who continued and was owned for Duke of Somerset for several moneths after his Fathers death procured an Act of Parliament in the same year of 5 E. 6. entituled An Act touching the limitation of the late Duke of Somersets Lands wherein there is a Clause obliquely inserted to take away the said Honour so entailed as aforesaid which by no Felony how notorious soever the same had been could by Law have been forfeited This being a Case unpresidented both in Law and History and so contrary to the rules of Law Justice and reason to have an Attainder of felony stand for an offence which apparently neither then nor at any time after was felony And if a felony yet to have a forfeiture extended beyond the offence if there were any and to be so maliciously prosecuted after the death of the said Duke who was mainly instrumentall in bringing about the blessed Reformation of Religion It is humbly conceived to be most agreeable to Justice to restore the said Marquess who is Heire male of the bodies of the said Duke and Lady Anne his wife to his ancient Honour so illegally taken away as aforesaid