and lawfull Knights of his County and in his proper person came to the same Court of the said G.W. and in full Court there held the tenth day of May An. c. 13. abovesaid and caused to be recorded the Plaint aforesaid which was in the same Court without the Writ of the said Lady the Queen between the parties aforesaid in the Plea aforesaid And hath the Record before the Justices here at the said Cro. Trinitatis under his Seal and the Seals of I.F.I.P.I.P. and T. L. four lawfull men of the same Court of those who were present at the same Record And had prefixed the same day to the parties aforesaid that they should be here to proceed in the same Plaint as shall be just And now here at this day came as well the same Marquesse by Rich. Lee his Attorney as the same Eliz by W. Plomer her Attorney Judgment that the cause is insufficient to remove the cause and a writ of Procedendo is granted whereupon the cause aforesaid being seen in the Writ aforesaid recited It seemed to the Justices here that cause to be insufficient in Law to remove the Plaint aforesaid out of the same Court of the said G.W. of his Mannor aforesaid And that the Court of the Queen here ought not to take Cognizance of the Plea therein And that the Bayliffs of the said G.W. of his Mannor aforesaid in the same Court of the said G. ought to proceed in the Plaint aforesaid Therefore it is considered that the same Bayliffs notwithstanding the Writ aforesaid in the Plaint aforesaid according to the Law and Custome of the Mannor aforesaid at the prosecution of the said Marquesse proceed with effect and that they exhibit to the parties aforesaid full and speedy Justice therein according to the custome of the Mannor aforesaid c. P. 11. Iac. Rot. 2215 ss Entry of a writ of Accedas ad cur to remove a plaint out of an inferiour Court and a Procedendo awarded for that the damages in the plaint are under 40 â— The Lord the King sent to the Sheriff of Lincoln his Writ closed in these words Iames by the Grace of God c. to the Sheriff of Lincoln greeting We command you that taking with you four discreet and lawfull Knights of your County In your proper person come to the Court of Edward Dymock Knight of his Soak or Mannor of H. and in full Court there cause to be recorded the Plaint which is in the same Court without our Writ between I. c. and W. in a certain Trespasse upon the case to the same I. by the same W. done as is said And have that Record before our Justices at Westm Mense pas under your Seal and the Seals of four lawfull men of the same Court who shall be present at that Record and that you prefix the same day to the parties that then they should be there to proceed in the same Plaint as shall be just and have you the names c. Teste c. because the same Defendant for the favour which the same Plaintiff hath in the same Court cannot have Justice there as it is said Let execution be done upon that Writ if the cause be true and the same Defendant shall desire it or otherwise not And now here at this day to wit at the same Mens pas I. L. Knight Sheriff of the County aforesaid returned that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid took with him I. D. R. R. I. D. and F. Fenn four discreet and lawfull men of his County in his proper person came to the Court of Edward Dymock aforesaid and in full Court there caused to be recorded the Plaint whereof mention is made in the same Writ And the Record thereof hath before the said Justices here at the same Mens pas under his Seal and the Seal of I. Hart R.S.I.N. and W. Stoke four lawfull men of the same Court who were present at that Record and prefixed the same day to the parties that then they should be here to proceed in the Plaint aforesaid as should be just Horncastle cum Soca ss At the Court of Pleas of Edward Dymock Knight Tenant or Farmer of the Reverend Father in Christ H. Bishop c. held such a day and year c. T. complaineth against W. late of c. of a Plea of Trespasse upon the case Pledges to prosecute Io. D. R.Ro And now here at this day came the same T. by R.O. his Attorney Cause alledged for a Procedendo because the damages exceed not 40 s. and the Common Bench cannot take cogâ—izance of the plea. and given the Court here to understand and be informed that the Damages to the said T. in that Plaint supposed to be sustained do not amount unto four shillings And for that cause prayeth a Writ of the Lord the King de procedendo in this behalf to be granted him And because the same W. nor any other on the behalf of the said W. came not nor alledged any thing in Court here to the contrary for certain causes the Justices here specially moving and chiefly for that the damages which the same T. supposed himself to have sustained in the said Plaint do not amount to forty shillings in which case it belongeth not to the Court here to hold Plea thereof It is considered that the Stewards and Suitors of his Soak of the Mannor aforesaid may further proceed in the Plaint aforesaid between the parties aforesaid Therefore it is considered that the Steward and Suitors of the Soak of his Mannor aforesaid that they further proceed in the Plaint aforesaid according to the law and custome of his Soak of the Mannor aforesaid the same Writ of the said Lord the King Procedendo awâ— ded non obstante c. before therein to the same Sheriff directed notwithstanding And that they exhibit full and speedy justice therein to the parties aforesaid according to the Law and custome of his Soak of the Mannor aforesaid should be to be done c. Allowance H. 3. I. Rot. 220. c. Brownlow Entry of a Writ of allowance for one of the Justices of the Common Bench by reason of his infirmity The Lord the King sent to his faithfull and beloved George Kingesmill Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench his Letters Pattents in these words James by the Grace of God of England Scotland France and Ireland King Defender of the Faith To the Treasurer Chancellor Chamberlain and Barons of our Exchequer And also to our faithfull and beloved George Kingesmill one of our Justices of the Common Bench greeting Know yee that we considering the debility of the body of the said George K. broken with infirmities and old age And also the tediousnesse and prolixity of labour which attendeth the Office of one of the Justices of the Common Bench which he is wont to undergo as in the Letters Patents c. And
Court with his owne hands the writ aforesaid directed to the said Mayor Aldermen sheriffs in Forme aforesaid The writ delivered in Cou t. The party comes in his proper person Returne de causes And before the said chief Justice by the same Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs the 10th day of Jan. last past retorned and executed and the same cheif Justice hath certified here in court that then and there before the said Châ—ife Justice at his chamber aforesaid came the said P. in his proper person under the custody of the said sheriffs and Martin L. and P. P. Sheriffs of the City aforesaid now retorne that before the coming of the said writ the 15th day of Dec. An. R. c. 12. The same Peter was taken in the City aforesaid and detained in the prison of the said Lord the King under the custody of the said Sheriffs by vertue of a complaint levied against him the same day and year in the Court of the Lord the King held before the same M. L. by the name of Peter Furbusher Gent. at the suit of H. R. in a plea of Trespasse 1 Cause in a plea of Trespass Damages 40 l. to the Damages of forty pounds the said Peter was also detained by vertue of a complaint against him 20 Ja. praed levaet in the Court of the sayd Lord the King held before the said Martin Limny by the name of P. F. at the suit of Alexander Ratcliffe in a plea of Debt upon demand of sixty pounds 2 Cause in debt for 60 l. and so recite all the causes whereof the partyes aforesayd have pleaded and so depend undetermined and that these were the causes of taking and detaining of the sayd Peter in the prison aforesaid whose body they have ready as by the sayd Writ to them it is commanded c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the said cheife Justice then and there fully examined and understood The party and She iffs are discharged it seemed to the said cheif Justice that the sayd P. ought then and there to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid whereupon the same Peter was then and there dismissed from the custody of the said Sheriffs by the said cheif Justice Vpona forraign Attachment accordingly 1 H 15 Elâ—â—t 588 and the same Sheriffs then and there were discharged by the same cheif Justice from his custody and hereupon the same P. and R. H. of Stepney c. and I.B. of the same Dyer undertook and every of them did undertake Mâ—ch 8 and 9 El. rot 329. Entry of a priviledge for diverse causes and the bail entred severally and there rot 1754. Recognizance to appear to Writs or Actions to be brought Note that in this case the Originall ought to be brought the next Terme ensuing but in a reversall the plaintiff hath liberty of two Termes to bring his Writ to wit the same P. in the summe of one hundred and twenty pounds and the same R. and I. severally in the summe of sixty pounds at the suit of Alexander Ratcliff and Sic de ceteris c. That the said P. should appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law and answer to the severall Actions or Writs of the same H.R. c. against the same P. of and upon the severall pleas aforesaid before 15 Pasch then next coming to be brought and prosecuted here in Court and also if it shall happen judgment after the apperance of the sayd P. here in Court made in the same pleas for the same H. and A. and against the said P to be given to satisfie the same H. c. of their Damages and the sayd Alexander of his Debt and Damages for the same H. c. and A. against the same Peter in the same Court here to be recovered or adjudged in the pleas aforesaid or that the same P. render himself to the prison of the Fleete of the Lord the King for those occasions which sayd severall summs by the said Manucaptors in forme aforesaid acknowledged the same Manucaptors acknowledge to be made of their Lands and Chattells and which sayd severall summs by the same P in form aforesaid acknowledged the sayd Peter acknowledgeth to be made of his Lands and Chattells and to be levied to the use and behoof of the sayd H. and A. in form aforesaid if it happen the same P. make Default in any of the premisses and in lawfull manner to be convinced thereof Brownlow T 41 Eliz. rot 1229. ss That the said R shall appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law to the Action or Writ of the said A against the said R. of and upon the cause aforesaid before such a day to be brought and prosecuted in Court here and to answer to the said A. in the plea aforesaid and also if it happen c. Entry of a priviledge returnable immediat in banck H 12 Jac. rot 2262. Brownlow As before in the president for P.F. untill or one of them should have before the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of the said Writ that the same Justices of the said Lord the King seeing the cause aforesaid c. untill the end of the Writ Afterwards to wit the ninth of February that same Terme came here into Court the same Michael in his own person under the custody of the Bailiff of the Marshall and Judges c. And recite the Return of the Writ whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood it seemeth to the said Justices here that the sayd M at present ought to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid and so as in the president before Alit T 14 Eliz. rot 1288. Divers causes returned wherein are diverse Complaints in Trespasse and debt and the Entry is that he shall appear in Court in his proper person or his sufficient Attorney in Law of and upon the severall Actions of and for the summs aforesaid against the same W. by the said T. M. and M. or any of them before 8 Michaelis next coming to be brought or prosecuted here in Court severally to the same T. M. and M. or either of them in the said Court here in the severall pleas aforesaid P. 28 Eliz. rot 328. the like against the said W. severally to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same W. render himselfe upon that occasion or occasions to the prison of the Fleet of the Lord the said King which sayd summ of fifty pounds to wit twenty pounds thereof the same T. ten pounds to the said M and O. to the sayd I. I. acknowledged every of them acknowledgeth severally to be made of their Lands and Chattells and to the use c. Speciall Amerciament of the Sheriff for not returning of a Writ of Habeas corpus in debt after
no other writ besides that writ came to his hands thereof And that he could not deliver the oxe aforesaid to the said Margaret For that the said E. and W. claimed the propriety of that Oxe by the command and to the use of Ralph L. his Master The said Lady the Queen being unwilling that the said Margaret should be defrauded of the said Oxe by such a false retorne Property claimed by the defendant of the goods distrained but being willing without delay to replevy him to the said M. If he should be Summoned according to the Law and custome of the Realme of the Lady the Queen of England by her writ commanded the said sheriff that taking with him the Keepers of the pleas of the Crowne of the said Lady the Queen in the presence of the said Marg. and of the said Ralph Edmond and W. by the same sheriff to be premonished if they will be present by the oath of honest and Lawfull men of the county aforesaid by whom the truth of the matter may be the better knowne he diligently inquire whether the propriety of the said Oxe should be to the said M. or to the said R. L. and if he shall find by that Inqisition that the propriety of that Oxe should be in the said M. then without delay he should replevy him to the said M. according to the Tenor of the command of the said Lady the Queen at other times to the said sheriff directed A Writ of proprietate probanda awarded and should put by sureties and safe pledges the said Edmon and VVilliam that they should be before the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at VVestminster in Oct. S. Trin. then next following to answer aswell the said Lady the Queen of the contempt as to the said Margaret of the damages and injuries to her in this behalf don and the said sheriff to the Justices of the Lady the Queen here at that day retorned that he took with him the Kepers of the pleas of the Crown of the said Lady the Queen Property found in the Plaintiff and that the Oxe is eloyned in the presence of the Parties aforesaid by the oath of 12 c. And made diligent Inquisition of and upon the premisses by which it was found that the propriety of the Oxe aforesaid then and at the time of the taking of the same was the said Margarets And that the said Oxe before the comming of the writ aforesaid was eloyned and the said E. and W. to places unknowne to the said sheriff so that he could not replevy the said Oxe to the said Margaret Capias in Withernam awarded of the defendants Cattle as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And the said sheriff also retorneth that the said E. and W. have nothing in his Bayliwick by which they could be attached wereupon the said sheriff the said Lady the Queen now commandeth that of other cattle of the said E. W to the value of the Oxe aforesaid before taken he should take in Withernam and deliver them to the said M. to hold to her untill the said Oxe before taken should be retorned and in as much c. he should make appeare here to wit at Westminster in Ost. S. Hil. An. 5. Eliz. The Lady the Queen also commanded to the said sheriff that he should take the said E. and W. if c. and them safely keep Capias for contempt so that he should have their bodies here at the same Terme to answer aswell the said Lady the Queen for the contempt of the said M. for damages and injuries to her in that behalf don And the said Sheriff to the said Justices here to wit at Westminster at the said 8. Hilli retorneth that the said E. and W. had no Cattle in his Bayliwick which he could take in Withernam As by the said writ it was commanded him Return that the defendants had no Cattle that could be taken in Withernam and not to be found as to the Capias for contempt nor were found in the same whereupon the Queen commanded the said sheriff as other times she had commanded him that he should take the said E. and W. if c. and them safe c. so that he should have their bodies here to wit at Westminster in 8. Pur. S. Mariae then next following to answer to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt aforesaid as to the said M. of the damages and injuries to her in this behalfe don And the said sheriff to the said justices here to wit at Westminster the said Oct. Pu. B. Mariae retorneth that the said R. and W. were not found in his Bayliwick whereupon the said Lady the Queen commanded the said She. as more times she had him commanded Capias awarded geneâ—ally that he should take the same E. and W. if c and safely c. so that he should have their bodies here to wit at Westminster 15. Pas then next following to answer aswell the said Lady the Queen of the contempt aforesaid as to the said M. of the damages and injuries to her in this behalf don non invent â—ened And the same sheriff to the said Justices here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at the said 15. Pas retorned that the said E. and W. were not found in his Bayliwick whereupon the Qu. commanded the said sheriff quod exigi Fac. the said E. W. from County to County untill c. if not Exigent awarded c if c. then he should take them and safely keep them so that he should have their bodies here to wit at Westminster in Oct. S. Mich. then next following to answer aswell to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt aforesaid as to the same M. of the damages and injuries to her in this behalfe don adjornment of the time at which said Oct. S. Mich. The plaint aforesaid was adjorned by writ of the Lady the Queen de Com. adjorna mento Further adjorment at Westminster untill Oct. S. Hil. then next following At which day here to wit at Westminster the Plaint aforesaid was Further adjorned by writ of the said Lady the Queen de Com. adjornamento from VVestminster aforesaid unto the Castle of the said Lady the Queen of Hertford Non mi. bre in the county of Hertf. untill 15. Hilarii then next following at which day before the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen at the Castle of Herf the said sheriff sent not the Writ whereupon the Lady the Qu. commanded to the said sheriff that he should of new put in exigent the said E. W. from county to county untill c. they should be utlawed if not Exigi fac de Novo awarded c. then they should take them them safely keep so that they should have their bodies here before the said Iustices at the said Castle of Hertf in Octab.
against the law of the land of the Realm of the Lord the King of England unjustly constrained by arrest of his body whereas in truth neither the said I. L. nor the said I. C. nor either of them at the time of the levying of the said plaint or any time afterwards hitherto was Tinner working in any Stannary worke within our Counties of D. or C. And whereas in truth the account aforesaid doth not concerne any Tinner or matter or matters belonging to the said Stannaries Averment that neither Plaintiff or Defendant were Tinneâ—â— Averment that the account did not concern Tâ—nning and although the same I. L the matter aforesaid by him above alleaged before the said Warden Subwarden and steward often pleaded and alleaged in the Stanuary Court aforesaid and offered to prove with inevitable truth and Testimony Neverthelesse the said warden Subwarden steward Deputy or Keeper of the place would not admit of that plea or allegations but altogether refused and the same I. C. notwithstanding the plea alegation probation of the said I. L. aforesaid in the premisses aforesaid the said I L. before the said warden underwarden steward Deputy or Keeper of the place in the plea aforesaid to be condemned with his whole strength indeavoureth and tryeth from day to day in contempt of the Lord the King now and manifest damage impoverishment and greivance of the said L. and against the lawes of the Realme of England and this he is ready to verifie whereupon the said L. humbly imploring the aide and munificence of the Court of the Lord the King now prayeth remedy and a writ of the Lord the King de Prohibitione to the said warden underwarden c. And to the said C. Counsellors Attornies and Solicitors of the said C. in this behalf whatsoever to be directed in Forme of law to prohibit them and every of them that they nor any of them proceed not further in the cause aforesaid or any thing that concerneth the premss in the court aforesaid before the said Warden c. or presume to attempt any thing more in the cause aforesaid in the court aforesaid which may give way to indamage the said I.L. or prejudice of the Law of the Lord the King now his Crowne or dignity and to him it is granted c. Warburton Mich. 25. H. 6. Rot 323. Prohibition without a cause depending against the Bishop of Winchester for excommunicating a man for serving a warrant of peace upon his Chaplain EAster 44. Eliz. Rot. 1738. The like Causa non pendente out of the Court of Request against the corporation of Myners THat this Prohibition causa non pendente being granted upon the motion of Serjeant Hele Justice Gawdy and Warburton Walmesly being absent Nota. And at another day Justice Walmesly being present and Justice Gawdy being absent Justice Walmesly said that the prohibicion lay not Causa non pendente And thereupon the Prohibition did not issue forth though Warburton put his hand to it Yet Gawdy and Walmesly denyed Quare Impedit H 12. H. 7. Rot. 315. Mordent Leic. ss Tho. and Eliz. his wife In Quare Impedit the Plaintiffs have a Writ to the Bishop upon the Bishops plea after the death of the Patron bring their writ of Q. Impedit to present to the Church of N. which is voyd c. And count in right of their Fee of an advouson in grosse against W. Bishop of Lincolne I G. Kt. and R. M. Clerk issue upon the traverse of the advouson in grosse and judgment against the Bish with a cessat c. and the plea depending the patron incumbent dye the Plaintiffs pray execution of the judgment against the Bish and have it c. Ravishment de Gard. Ravishment de gard brought by the King the Kings Attorney by force of the Letters Patents under the privy seal sealed Waives his issue and saith that the Defendant is not guilty and judgment that the defendant go without day the Kings right being saved H 12. H. 7. Rot. 228. Mordant Oxon. ss the King brought his writ of Ravishment de Gard. against I. G. and A. his wife for Ravishment of Richard Son and heire of Edward Bockingham c. the defendant Pleads non cul and afterwards James Hobard attorney of the King and the Defendants come in their proper persons and the Kings Attorney Relicta verificatione c. by vertue of a certaine warrant with the signe manuall of the said Lord the King signed directed to the same James and shewed here in Court on the behalfe of the said Lord the King saith they are not guilty prout c. Therefore it is considered that the said Io. and Anne goe thereof without day c. the Kings right being reserved when at an other time therein she would speak c. Retorn Recordi Return of the Record sent to the Iustice at Lanc. to be tryed after triall in the Bench. AFterwards to wit upon Monday next after tres Pas next following the said C. came back here into Court in his proper person And Humphery C. Justice of the said Lord the King at Lanc. before whom c. sent the record and proceedings cum toto facto suo in the premisses before him at L. in the county aforesaid had in these words Afterwards on monday in quarta septimana LX. before H. C. Iustice of the Lord the King at Lanc. came aswell the within named R. R as the within named R. B. in their proper persons And hereupon the same R. prayeth a writ of the said Lord the King of ve fac here 12. Ven. fac aWarded at Lanc. c. before the said Justice at L. c. to trie the issue within written to be directed to the sheriff of the county of Lanc. which was granted him c. wherupon it was commanded to the sheriff of Lan. that he cause to come before the said Justice at Lanc. upon Tues quarta septimana XL. prox next comming 12. c. of the neighbourhood of C. by whom c. and who neither Return of the Ven. fac c. to recognize c. because aswell c. At which day here came the parties aforesaid c. in their proper persons And E. S. Knight sheriff of the said county of Lanc. returned before the Justices here to wit at L. aforesaid the writ aforesaid in all things served and executed together with the names of the jurors between the parties aforesaid impanelled annexed to the same writ which said jury being solemnly caled came not whereupon it is commanded to the said sheriff of Lanc. that he have before the said Justices here to wit at Lanc. aforesaid upon Wednesday Iury came not in dec quart Sept. 40. next coming the bodies of the said Jurors between the parties aforesaid before impaneled to make that jury the same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. at which day of Wednesday here to wit at L.
aforesaid here c. came aswell the same R. as the same R B. in their proper persons and the jurors of the jury aforesaid being called came who being elected tried and sworn to speak the truth of the within contayned said upon their oath ut in Recordo where upon the same Justices at L. peâ—fixed a day to the parties aforesaid before the Justices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench at Westminster Iustice at Lanc. prefixeth a day for the parties to be at West to wit upon Monday nâ—xt after tres Pas next to come to heare their judgment thereof c. therefore c. AFterwards to wit in Oct. Mich. next following Iudgment in Banco after issue tried in the county Pâ—ll of Lanc. upon a mittim of the record there P 4. 5 P. Ma. rot 632. Iudgment in debt here to wit at Westminster which same day the same plaintiff and Defendant have by the prefixment of W R. and N. P. Justices of the said Lady the Queen at L. to heare theire judgment here c. came aswell the said Plaintiff as the said Defendant by their attornies aforesaid and the said Justices at L. sent here his record in these words Afterwards c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the justices here fully understood it is considered that the said plaintiff recover against the said defendant his debt aforesaid And his damages to ten shillings by the jury here in Form aforesaid assessed and also 40 s. to the same plaintiff at his request for his costs and charges aforsaid by the Court here adjudged of increase which said damages in the whole do amount unto 50 s. and the Defendant in mercy c. P 4. Eliz. Rot. 503. Brownlow ss Entry of a Resuâ— in debt against an heir he prayes the Plaint may cease till plea in age and it was granted and after full age a Resum is awarded against a Baron and Feme P 8 Jac Rot 205. Satisfaction for part It was commanded the sheriff whereas I. H. late of c. Spinster daughter and heire of D. H. Gent. lately called c. in the county of Cornwall Gent late in the Court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England of the Common Bench was summoned to answer E. V. of a plea that she render to him 40 l. which shee then ought him and unjustly detayned for that to wit that whereas the said D. Father of the said Jane whose heir she is in his life time to wit the 21. day of I. An. 22 Eliz Reg. at L. by his certaine bill obligatory which the said S. with the seale of the said D Sealed into the said Court of the Queen brought the date hereof was the same day and year acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said S. 43 l. 16 s. to be paid to the said S. when he shall be thereof required for which payment well and truly to make the said D. had bound his heires executors by the same B. and the said D in his life time of 96 s. thereof to the said S. afterwards satisfied and that the said D. in his life time and the said Jane daughter and heir of the said D. after the Death of the said D. although often required the said 40 l. residue have not rendred but the same to him to render have gainsaid and the same I. to the said D to render yet doth gainesay as the said S. then said The said I. appearing in the said Court of the said Lady the Queen said that she was within the age of 21. Plaint remaineth untill c. yeares And that she intended not nor ought during her minority aforesaid to answer the said S. in the plea aforesaid and prayeth that the plaint aforesaid might remaine unto the full age of the said Jane And because the same S. in the same Court of the Queen did not gainesay that it was considered that the said plaint should remaine untill the full age of the said I. as by the Record thereof in the court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth and whereas the said S. afterwards to wit the 23. day of I. An. Reg. nunc 3. came into the court of the Lord the King before his Justices Averment of the full age of the Feme and that she is married c. And said that the said Jane was of full Age and that the said Jane after that the said plaint remained without day and before the said 23. of Jan An. 3. c. abovesaid to wit such a day and yeare at L. had taken to husband one A. P. Gent. and is now marryed to the said A. Resummon by good summoners the same A and I. his wife that they be before the Justices of the Lord the said King here at this day to wit such a day to heare the record their judgment of the plaint aforesaid that he should then have here the summons and that writ and now here at this day came the same S. by I. H. his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the said A. and I. in the plea aforesaid and they came not Nihil returned And the sheriff to wit N P. Esq now retorneth that they had nothing in his bayliwick whereby they could be summoned and hereupon it is testified in the said court of the Lord the Kâ—ng here that the said A. and I. have sufficient in the county whereby they may be resummoned Testat resummons Therefore the Sheriff of Devo is commanded that he resummon by good summoners the said A. and I. of being here 15. Trini to heare their judgment in the plaint aforesaid the same day is given to the said S. here c. Remissio Recordi The Record remitted Justic Lanc. upon a forraign Voucher P 26 H. 8. rot 337. AFterwards the processe being continued between the parties aforesaid in the plea aforesaid by the Jury put therein between them is respited here untill this day to wit Oct. Mich. then next following unlesse the Justices of the Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by forme of the Statute c. on Munday at the Feast of Saint Lawrence next past at Salop in the sayd County of S. first came And now here at this day came the same Executors by their Attorney aforesaid and the same Justices of Assizes before whom c. sent here their Record in these words Postea c. And because the Court of the King here cannot proceed further in the plaint aforesaid therefore the said plaint is remitted to the Iustices of the said Lord the King of his County Palatine to proceed in the said plaint as of right and according to the Law and Custome of the County Palatine aforesaid is to be done c. And it is sayd to the said F. F. Attorney of the said Executors that the same Executors be before the Iustices of the Lord the King
of his County Palatine of Lancaster upon Munday in Quarta sepquadrag next coming to answer there in his plea aforesaid if c. ss BE it remembred That T. E Knight H 25 H 8 rot 121. Remissio recordi sent by the Justices of Chester into the Bench to determine a forraign voucher and at a day in the Bench the Tenants make default and the cause for that was determined Iustice of the Lord the King of Chester the twenty third of J that same Term by vertue of a writ of the Lord the King to him directed which followeth in these words Henry the eighth by the Grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland to his Iustice of Chester or to the Keeper of his place there greeting Whereas T T in our Court in our County aforesaid had demanded against R. B. Esquire T.W. and P. A. one windmill one water-mill c with the Appurtenances in N as his right and inheritance and into which the same R. T.W and P. had to entrance unlesse after the Demise which R.T. Knight kinsman of the sayd T. T whose heir he is thereof made to R. S. for a Terme which is past and which after that Terme ought to revert to the said T. T. and the same R.T. and P. pleading in the same Court lately vouched thereof to warranty P.B. summoned in our County of Wilts by the ayd of our court of Chester because the same P. B. had no lands within our County of Chester aforesaid by which he could be summoned which said Warranty in our said Court of Chester for the cause aforesaid cannot be determined to the great Damage of the said T.T. and manifest hinderance of the obtaining of his Right whereupon he hath besought us to provide him a fit remedy in this behalfe We who are Debtors to exhibit Iustice to every one within our Kingdome willing to do what is just to the said T.T. in this behalfe Command you that if it be so far proceeded in our Court of Chester then the Record and proceedings therein with all things touching the same to our Iustices of the Bench under your seal you distinctly and openly send and this Writ so that they may have them at Westminster in Octab. Hil. prefixing the same day to the parties aforesaid that they may be then there to do and receive what shall be considered in our Court there in this behalfe that that warranty being determined before our said Iustices in the Common Bench the said Record and proceedings may be sent you to proceed in the plaint aforesaid as of right and according to the Law and Custome of our County of Chester is to be done witnesse our self at Westminster 6 November Anno c. 25 ANd the said Iustice sent there the Record and proceedings of the said plaint whereof mention is made in the sayd Writ annexed to the same Writ the Tenor whereof followeth in these words Pleas of the County of Chester at Chester before T. E. Knight Justice of the Lord the King upon Thursday next after the Feast of Saint Iames the Apostle Anno H. 8. post Conquest of England 25. Count in Entre ad term qui pret in the County Palatine of Chester CHester ss Thomas Torhet by H. H. his Attorney in the Court of the Lord the King here demandeth against R B. Esquire T W. and P A one wind mill c. with the appurtenances in N. as his right and inheritance and into which the same R T. W. and P. have no entrance unlesse after the demise which Robert S. Knight Kinsman of the said T T. whose heir he is thereof made to R. Scot for a Terme which is past and which after that Term ought to revert to the same T. T. whereupon he saith that the said Robert kinsman c. was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee in the time of peace in the time of Edward late King of England the second after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the value c. and the same Robert being so thereof seised demised those Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said Richard Scot for a Terme which is past and from the same Robert the right descended c. to one Robert as son and heire c. and from the said Robert the son the right descended to one Thomas as son and heir c. and by many descents the right came to Iohn and from the said Iohn the right came to the said Thomas who is now Demandant as son and heir c. And which after that Terme c and thereof bringeth suit c. And the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. by T. B. their Attorney come and defend their right when c. and pray licence thereof to imparl here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast c next coming and have it c. The same day is given to the said T. T. here c. At which day here came as well the said T. T. by his Attorney aforesaid as the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. by their Attorney here c. and hereupon the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. vouch thereof to warrant P. B. who hath no Lands or Tenements in the County of Chester but all in the County of Wilts and prayeth that the said Peter may be summoned in the County of Wilts A forraigner vouched to warrant by ayde c. and the said T. T. well alloweth the said vouchee c. let him have it c. And because their vouchee to warrant cannot be determined in the said County of Chester day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the feast of the Translation of Saint Edw. next coming c. And in the mean time the writ of the Lord the King may be followed if c. At which day further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast of Saint Martin the Bishop next coming c. And in the mean time c. At which day a further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast c. And further the said Justice C to the Justices of the Common Bench here to wit at W aforesaid returneth That he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed prefixed a day to the parties aforesaid at the said Oct. Hil. that they should be here to do and receive as that Writ in it selfe commandeth and requireth At which said Octab. Hill before the said Iustices of the Bench here to wit at Westminster aforesaid Remandment of the plaint came the same T. T. by R. Jenour his Attorney and offered himself the fourth day against the said R. B. T. W. and P. A. in the plea aforesaid and
they came not being solemnly called but made Default whereupon the default of the said R B T. W. and P. A. by the said Iustices of the Bench here being recorded because the Court of the Lord the King cannot proceed in the plaint aforesaid in this behalfe therefore the plaint is remitted to the Iustices of the Lord the King Cestr or keeper of his place there to proceed in the plaint aforesaid as of right and according to the Law and custome of the county of Chester is to be done And it is said to the said R. I. Attorny of the said T. T. that the same T. be before the Iustices of the Lord the King Cestr or Keeper of his place there at the next County to wit upon Thursday in S. septimana quadragessimae next coming there to be held to prosecute there his plea aforesaid if c. Secunda Deliberatio H 15. Eliz. Rot. 708. Entry of a wâ—it of second deliverance after cattell were taken in Wirhernam and the defendants attorney was compelled to gage deliverance of the cattell taken in Withernam Som ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas T P. Esq was summoned to be here in the court of the Lady the Queen here to answer P. B. of a plea wherefore he took the cattle of the said Peter and them unjustly detayned against Sureties and privileges c. the same Peter afterwards in our said court here made default for which it was considered here that he and his pledges to prosecut should be in mercy c. and that the said Thomas should goe thereof without day and should have retorne of his Cattle aforesaid For which it was comanded to the said sheriff that he shall make retorn of the cattle aforesaid to the said Thomas and should not deliver them at the complaint of the said Peter without a writ of the Lady the Queen that shall make expresse mention of that judgement and in as much c. the said sheriff make appear here in 8. S. Michaelis last past c. At which day the sheriff then returned That before the coming of the writ aforesaid the Cattell were cloyned to places to him unknowne by the same Peter so that he could not return them to the said Thomas as by the said writ it was commanded him whereupon it was commanded the said Sheriff that of the cattell of the said Peter to the value of the cattell aforesaid before taken in Withernam he should take and deliver them to the said Thomas to hold to him untill he could returne the cattell aforesaid before taken and that he put by sureties and safe pledges the said Peter that he be here in Oct. Hill then next following to answer as well to the said Lady the Queen of the contempt c. as to the said Thomas for damages and injuries to him in this behalfe done At which day here came aswell the said T by I. W. his Attorney as the said Peter in his proper person and the Sheriff now returneth here that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed took in Withernam of the cattel of the said Peter one Mare and one colt to the value of the cattell of the said Peter before taken and those cattell delivered to the sayd Thomas P. to be kept untill the cattell of the said Peter before taken may be returned to the sayd T. P. as by the said writ to him it was commanded A writ of second deliveronce granted after a withernam Defendant praies that the plaintiff may finde pledges as well to prosecute as for his second deliverance and that he put the same Peter by pledges I D and R R. and hereupon the same Peter prayeth to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the contempt aforesaid and is admitted for three shillings and four pence which the same P in the Court of the Queen here by the command of the Iustices here payd to Tho. Foster Clark of the Essoines of the Court here for diverse reparations by him here in Court to be made And afterwards to wit at the said 8 Sancti Hillarii came here into the Court the said Peter by W. B. his Attorney and by the statute c. prayeth a writ of the Lady the Queen De Secunda deliberatione and it is granted to him returnable here 15. Pas c. At which day here came as well the said Peter as the said Thomas by their Attornyes aforesaid whereupon the said Thomas prayeth that the said Peter may finde pledges as well to prosecute his complaint as to return the cattell first taken Pledges given if return of them should be adjudged for that that the Sheriff of the County aforesaid hath not received sufficient pledges of the said P upon the said writ of second deliverance hereupon the said P. here in Court found pledges as well to prosecute his complaint as to return the cattell aforesaid before taken The Plaintiff prayes that the Defendants Attorney may gage deliverance of the Cattell taken in Withernam if c. To wit the said VV B of S. in the County of Dorset Gent. and VV B. of c. And hereupon the said Peter prayeth that the said I. VV. Attorny for the said T. P. may gage deliverance of the cattell aforesaid taken in VVithernam and because the Iustices will advise of and upon the premisses of making deliverance day is given to the parties aforesaid here A die pas in 15 dies of heareing their judgement therein because the Iustices here not as yet c. At which day here came as well the same P. as the same T. by their Attornye aforesaid and because the Iustices c. untill Cro. Trin. At which day here came aswell the said P as the said Tho. by their attornies aforesaid whereupon the premisses being seen and by the justices here fully understood The Court will advise it seemed to the same Justices here that the said I W. attorney of the said T. P gage to the P. deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid taken in Withernam Judgment that the Defendants Attorney gage deliverance for the Cattell raken in Withernam And whereupon the said I. gageth deliverance of the chattles taken in Withernam and assumed upon himselfe for the said Thomas that the said Thomas should make deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam to the same Peter about the Feast of S. Peter next following at C. in the county of Som. at the common pound there under the panalty of 20 l which said 20 l. the said I. W. acknowledgeth to be made of his lands and Chattles to be levyed to the use of the said P The Attorney gives secuâ—ity in Court for his Client to deliver the Cattell aboue such a day 25. E 3. Gager 25 6 E 4. 8. 1 H 7. 11. 15 E 3. Gager 4. accord that the attorney may gage if the Defendant appear
by attorney if it shall happen that the said T. P. not to make deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam or the value of them c. Scire Facias TRini 9. Jac. Roll. 3510. Entry of a Scire facias upon a Recognizance against sureties in Replevin after Averia elongat returned Otherwise as it appeareth in Easter Term in the 9. yeare of the Reign of the Lord the King now Roll. 2982 it is thus contayned London ss It was commanded the sheriffes whereas I. A. of the City of Coventry Taylor B A. of L. in the county of N. clerk and W. S. of C. in the county of Warr Gent. to wit the fift day of Ju being there in Trinity Term in the 7. yeare of the Reigne of the Lord now King of England before Peter W. Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the common Bench at his chamber in Chancery Lane London in their proper persons undertook and every one of them did undertake for H. A. in the sum of 20 l. and the same H. A. then and there before the said Justices of the Lord the King in his own person undertook for himself in the summ of 40 l. that the same H. should cause to be retorned to David Harris certaine cattle of the same H. formerly taken by the same David and which were adjudged by the court here to the said David for the default of the said Henry The Recognizance recited See the statute West cap 2. 13. E 1. if retorn of them to the same David by the court here should be adjudged which said summe of 20 l. every one of the Manucaptors do acknowledg to be levied upon their lands and chattles And which said sume of 40 l. the same Henry acknowledgeth to be levied of his lands and chattles to the use and behoof of the same David if it happen that the said Hen. make default in the premisses therof be lawfully convicted which said recognizance in Form aforesaid taken afterwards to wit the same fift day of July in the said Term of the holy Trinity in the seventh yeare of the Reigne of the Lord the Keng now of England abovesaid the said Justices of the same court of the said Lord the King before his then Justices with his owne hands delivered to be inroled upon record Delivery of the Recognizance in Court to be inrolled Count upon the second deliverance as by the record thereof remayning in the same court here manifestly appeareth wheras therupon the same David was attached by the writ of the said Lord the King de Sec. Delib to be in the Court here to wit at Westminster aforesaid to answer the same H. A. of a plea wherefore he such a day and year at W. in a certaine place there called Woodpark had taken the cattle that is to say 35. heifers of the same H. and unjustly detayned them against sureties and pledges untill Avowry c. the same David in the said court of the said Lord the King appearing for a certaine reason by him alleaged as Bayliff of G. C. Kt. well acknowledged the taking of the cattle aforesaid in the place aforesaid to be just Nonsuit of the Plaintiff for default of Bar to the Avowry Return Haben awarded whereupon the said Henry afterwards although solemnly called in the same court of the said Lord the King came not nor hath not further prosecuted his said writ wherupon it was considered in the same Court here that the said Hen. and his pledges for prosecution should be in mercy c. And that the same David should goe thereof without day c. and that he should have retorne of the cattle aforesaid to hold to him for ever irreplevishable whereupon the said Lord the King by his writ commanded the sheriff of Devon that without delay he cause to be retorned to the said David the cattle aforesaid to hold to him irreplevishable Averia elongat returned and as much c. he should make to appeare here in Oct. Mich at which day the said sheriff of Devon retorned to the Justices here that before the coming of the said writ to him directed the cattle aforesaid by the said Henry A. were conveyed to places unknown to him so that he could not make retorne of the same cattle of the said David and therefore the said Lord the King commanded the said sheriff of Devon that of other Catles of the same Henry to the value of the Catle aforesaid before taken Capias in Withernam awayded he should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said David to keep by him untill the cattle aforesaid before taken could be retorned to the same David and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges Nâ—lla averria returned the said Henry that he should be here in Oct. S. Hill aswell to answer the said Lord the King of his contempt as the same Da. of his damages injuries in this behalf done The same sheriff of Devon at that day retorned to the Justices here that the same A. H. had no Cattle in his Bayliwick Sci fac against the party and Manucaptors severally which he could take in Withernam according to the Exigency of that Writ and that the same Henry had nothing in his Bayliwick by which he could be attached as by the record and proceedings in the same court here remayning doth manifestly appeare And because c. That by honest c. it should be made known to the said I. B. W. and H. that they should be herein Oct. Pur. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same David ought not to have execution against the same I. for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of his lands and chattles and against the said Bartholomew for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be levyed of his lands and Tenements and against the said William and others as before The Plaintiff offiers himselfe against the Defendant c. according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same David by R R. his attorney offered himself the 4. day against the said I. B W. and H. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not the sheriffs of Lond now return that the same I. B. W H. have nothing Nichil returned nor any one of them hath any thing nor are found nor any one of them is to be found c. Therefore as before it is commanded the said sheriffs of London that they should make known to the said I. B. W. and H. that they be here 15. Alias Sci fac awarded Pas to shew in Form aforesaid and now here at this day came aswell the same David by his attorney aforesaid as the same I. B. W. and H. by H. W. their attorny
suit paid to the same M and I twenty five pounds and eight shillings of the said thirty six pounds and five shillings in full satisfaction and payment of the said one hundred pounds nine shillings and four pence to the same M and I in Forme aforesaid owing as by the Record thereof in the same Court of the said late Queene at Guildhall aforesaid remaining manifestly appeareth And the same A further saith That neither the same T at the time of his Death nor the same A after the Death of the same T. before the Day of purchasing the said Writ of Scire facias nor at any time afterwards Nothing else in her hands but goods to such a value which the executrix brings into the Court to pay the plaintiff in part of his debt had any goods or chattells which were of the same T at the time of his Death in her hands to be administred besides goods and chattells to the value of one and thirty pounds five shillings by her in Forme aforesaid administred and besides the goods and chattells to the value of ninety shillings residue of the sayd thirty six pounds five shillings yet remaining in the hands of the sayd A not administred which sayd summ of ninety shillings the same A bringeth here into Court to pay the said E and this she is ready to verifie whereupon she prayeth Judgment if the same E ought to have execution against her for the said 150 l. c. ANd the said E. saith That he by any thing before alledged Replication that no such record of recovery is had in London from having his Execution aforesaid against the same A. for the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T. in forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the said T. at the time of his death in the hands of the said A to be administred ought not to be barred because he saith That there is not had any such Record of the plaint aforesaid betweene the same M. and I. and the same T. in the Court aforesaid remaining as the said A hath above alledged and this he is ready to verifie whereupon as before hee prayeth Judgment and Execution against the said A. of the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T. in forme aforesaid acknowledged of the goods and chattells which were of the said T. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said A to be administred to him to be adjudged c. Rejoynder that such a record is had of a recovery in Lond. ANd the same A. as before saith That such a Record is had of the plaint aforesaid between the same M and I. and the said T. M. in the Court aforesaid remaining as she hath above alleadged and this she is ready to verifie here when and how the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider And hereupon the same A further saith That the Mayor Sheriffs and Aldermen of the City of London Custome of L. alledged by the defendant amongst other Liberties Franchises and priviledges of the Citizens of London by diverse late Kings and Queens of England progenitors of the Lord the King now granted and by the said Lord the King now confirmed they have their liberty that they ought to record every Record pleaded before them made or had presently and not otherwise and therefore prayeth for that the Record aforesaid being now in the custody of the sheriffs of the City aforesaid A certiorare awarded to the Sheriffs of L. to certifie c. a writ of the said Lord the King to be directed to the said now Sheriffs of the city of L to certifie the lustices here whether such a Record be had or not and to her it is granted c. Therefore the Sheriffs of London are commanded that searching the Records and other memorables upon Records in the time of the said late Sheriffs of London being in the custody of the said now Sheriff they make appear to the Iustices here in Cr. Trin. whether there is had such a Record of the plaint aforesaid in their custody as the said A. hath above alledged or not the same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. AT which day here came the same E. by his Attorney aforesaid and the same A. the Record of the plaint aforesaid by her above alleadged Judgement for the plaintiff for failer of the record here at this day hath not but made Default thereof therefore it is considered that the said E. have Execution against the said A. of the said one hundred and fifty pounds by the said T in forme aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of the goods and chattells which were of the same T. M at the time of his death in the hands of the said A to be administred c. Brownlow Nota. NOte That after a Scire facias nulla min. Note and study the diversity 19 H 6 19 tr Record 24. Continuance of â—ul tiel record NOte That the Court held that the Defendant ought to procure the Record to he certified at his perill and not stay the Returne or certificate of the Sheriffs against the opinion of Master Brownlow Prothonotary ANd hereupon by the consent of the said Plaintiff further day is given to the said Defendant to have the Record aforesaid by him above pleaded here untill in Oct. Mich. To shew in form aforesaid c. T 43 Eliz rot 1822. Gibson against Brooke Bar upon a Sci. fac against an executor to have execution of his proper goods after a Devastavit returned upon in a writ to inquire what goods came to his hands after suggestion that diverse goods came to his stands and that he had wasted them after a Nulla bona returned upon a fi fa. of the goods of the Testator Suggestion that the executor had wasted diverse goodr of the Testator See the new book of entries fol. 268. 269. 271 and 272. pl. 5. Petâ—fers case title error A writ of fi fa. de bonis testatoris with a writ of inquiry what goods of the testator the executor had wasted M 2 Jac. rot 1812 H 6 Jac. rot 1806. H against B. T 38 Eliz. rot 910 demurrer upon Scire facias quod bre est insufficiens H 33 Eliz rot 612 W against S H 9. H 6 rot 134 Return vic per inquest de office That the goods of the Testator to the value of 110 l after the death of the testator came to the hands of the executor to be administred and that the executor had wasted the goods Scire facias awarded against the executor to have execution of his proper goods ss Otherwise as it appeareth in Hillary Terme last past roll 1434 London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs that of the goods and chattells which were of W B late c. at the time of his death in the hands of G B. Executor of the Testament
tâ—e Pl. la non comorâ—ns Travers was Comorant and conversant at N. aforesaid within the Isle of Weight in the said county of Southampton without this that he the same day or at any time afterwards was Comorant and coversant at Grayes Inne in the County of Midd. As by the said Record of emanation of the said writ of Exegint above is supposed and this he is ready to verifie whereupon for that the writ of proclamation was not directed to the sheriff of the said county of South wherein the said P. at the day of the issuing forth of the said writ of Exig was comorant and conversant as of right it ought to have beene directed according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid the same P. prayeth judgment and he from the court here of the utlawry aforesaid may be acquitted discharged and set at large c. ANd the said W. saith that he cannot gainesay but that the allegation of the said P. in his discharge of the utlawry aforesaid is true Confession of the garnishee nor but that the same P. at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said writ of Exigent whereupon the same P. was utlawed issuing from the court here was commorant conversant at N. c and that no writ of proclamation in this behalfe was directed to the sheriff of the County of S. as the same P. hath above alleaged c. ANd E. Coke Esquire Attorney generall of the said Lady the Qu. who followeth for the said Lady the Queen in this behalfe Confession of the attorney generall upon a testimony thereof consulting if he knew or would say any thing wherefore the said P. ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid of which credable information is given him by W. M. of c. and others faith worthy that the allegation of the said P. in the discharge of the same P. from the utlawry aforesaid is true whereupon the same E giveing credit to them sayeth that he cannot gainesay but truly confesseth Judgment that the utlawry be reversed salvo jure Reginae c. that the said P. at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said writ of Exigent whereupon the said P. is utlawed issuing out of the court here was commorant and and conversant at N aforesaid c in the county of S. and that no writ of proclamation was ever directed to the said sherff of S. in this behalfe as the said P. hath above alleaged wherefore it is considered that the same P. be discharged of the utlawry aforesaid and upon that occasion not be molested in any thing nor grieved but goe thereof quiet c. reserving a writ to the Lady the Queen otherwise if c. Entry of a speceill writ of Cap. utlagat amerciament of the sheriff for bad attendance upon the court and not coming to receive a speciall Cap. utlagat Recitall of the speciall Utlagat H 2. Jac. Rot. 1362. Broker Cardigan ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but by the oath of honest and lawfull men of your county you should inquire what goods and chattels lands and Tenements M U c. with all his additions hath or had in his Bayliwick such a day and yeare or at any time afterwards which day he was utlawed in the County of the City of the city of O. at the suit of I. S. in a plea of debt whereof he was convicted As the sheriff of the City of Oxon to the Justices of the Lord the Ki. now here at a certaine day now past retorned P. 24 Iac. rot 323. Vict. in mia 5. marks for retorning trade upon a writ that was ent ed upon Record P. 6 H 8 rot 296. the like sur nichil fec nec remisit H. 8 H 6 rot 333 vic in mia 40 l. for not returning of a writ of Nisi prius H 24 Eliz rot 1702. entry of a speciall amerciament for an insufficient retorn upon an Habere fac possessionem emii Recitall of days given to the sheriff to come and receive the writ sin court And that upon their oath he cause them to be extended and appraised according to the true value of them And such things as shall be found by that Inquisition he cause to be taken into the hands of the Lord the King now safely to be kept so that he may answer to the Lord the King of the true value and issues of them and with them so extended and appraised he make knowne to the Justices of the Lord the King here tli retorn distinctly and openly under his seale and the seales of them by whose oath he had made that extent and appraisment And for that the same M. did ly hid wander and runn from place to place in the county aforesaid in contempt of the Lord the King now and prejudice of his Crowne as the King hath been informed That wheresoever it shall happen the same M. to be found in his Baylickwick aswel within as without the liberties he should take him and safely keep so that he might have his body before the Justices here at the said Terme to do and receive whatsoever the said Court of the Lord the King shall consider in that behalf and it is to be known that at the two severall dayes in that same Term given to the said sheriff of Cardigan by the Court here To come here into the Court and receive the Writ aforesaid to be executed in Form of Law the same sheriff came not here into the Court to receive that Writ therefore the same sheriff to wit R. P. Knight in miserec And he is fined by the Justices here to 12 l. c. TRin. 8. Jac. Rot. 2700 Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the Coro of the Lord the Ki of the C. aforesaid that whereas it was testified for the Lord the Ki. in the C. of the said Lord the K. here that divers wits of the said Lord the Ki. by exig of late directed to the sheriff of N. issuing out of the said Court here A special amerciament of the coroners for not certifying of an utlawry after a Cerciorare to them made and before the Iustices here at certain dayes aswell past as to come retornable and many utlawries into the said Court here not as yet certified against the parties Defendants in the same writs named in the county aforesaid published and judgments thereupon are given by the said Coroners And Especially one utlawry against one R. B. late of P. c. in the County of Norff. Gent. at the suite of R. W. in a plea of Debt and because the Lord the King will adhibit due and speedy remedy to the said R. W. in his action aforesaid he doth command the same Coroners that scearching theire Roles and Record and other memorables T. Io 21 23 bayle to an ulawry being in theire custodyes the utlawry aforesaid upon the writ aforesaid
may be spared about the Issue of the Country in this behalf to be tryed prayeth himself to be admitted to make a Fine with the said Lord by occasion of the premisses c. And hereupon the said T. R. found pledges in Court here to the said Lord the King for that contempt to wit T. S. and R. C. whereupon the Justices of the Lord the King here do assesse the Fine of the said T. R. by occasion of the Premisses ad propert sup dict Therefore the said T.R. of that contempt be quiet and go thereof without day c. P. 3. Ca Reg. rot 42. amongst the Pleas of lands Brownlow The admission of the third Prothonotary unto his Office Be it remembred That the seventh day of May that same Tearm Thomas Richardson Knight chief Justice of the Lord the King of the Common Bench here freely granted to R. M. Gent. one of the Clerks of Richard Brownlow Esquire chief Prothonotary of the Court of Common Bench aforesaid here the Office of the third Prothonotary of the Bench aforesaid here now being void by the death of Thomas Waller Esquire late third Prothonotary of the same Court of the Bench aforesaid here And admitted the same Robert to that Office to have hold and enjoy to the same Robert for term of his life as his free Tenement according to the custome of the Court aforesaid from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary used and approved And also the same Robert as wel the Oath of the Kings Supremacy according to the form of the Statute in this case made and provided as his corporall oath well and faithfully to carry and behave himself in the same Office before hand taken as the custome is into corporall possession of the same office put and instituted to hold occupy and enjoy the same in form as aforesaid so fully and wholly and in the same manner and form Vad. as the same Thomas Waller late had and occupyed the same office perceiving in the same office Wages Fees Profits Commodities and Emoluments to the same office due and accustomed c. T. 12. Ed. 4. Rot. 494 Copley Midd. ss The admission of the second Prothonotary unto his Office Be it remembred that William Comberford lately having and occupying in the Court of the King here the Office of one of the Prothonotaries of this Court the same to wit the office which Thomas Brown during his life-time in time past and immediatly before the same Thomas Brown had exercised and occupyed and which said office William Wakefeild during his life time in time past and immediatly before the same Thomas Brown had exercised and occupyed the eleventh day of June that same tearm died after whose death that office was vacant and continued so vacant until the fifteenth day of June then next following which said fifteenth day John Fogge Knight chief Clerk of the Lord the King and Keeper of the Rolls of the said Lord the King of this Court to whom by reason of that office the Donation or Presentation of one of the Prothonotaries of this Court is known of right to belong Came here in Court in his proper person and gave to the Court here to understand that the said office of one of the Prothonotaries by the death of the said William Comberford was void and gave and granted to Roger Brent and constituted and ordained him to have and occupy that Office And the same Roger being in his proper person to be admitted to the said office was presented to Thomas Bryan chief Justice of the Lord the King of this Court to whom by reason of his office belongeth the admission of every person to the same office whensoever it is void by the chief Clerk of the Lord the King and keeper of the Rolls and Writs of the said Lord the King of this Court for the time being present requiring the same chief Justice that he would admit the same Roger to the said office of one of the Prothonotaries and that he would think worthy to put in full possession of the same And hereupon the same chief Justice here in the premisses by mature deliberation and advisement And as well to the ability as to the long and tedious continuance attendance and exercise of the said Roger in this Court consideration and respect being had admitted the same Roger to that office and swore him well and faithfully to occupy and exercise the same office and put the same Roger into full possession of the same office to have and exercise the same to the said Roger for tearm of his life as fully and entirely and in the same manner and form as the same William Wakefeild T. B. and W. Comberford or any of them or any other the said office before their times had and occupyed receiving in the same Wages and Fees Profits Commodities and Emoluments to the same office due and accustomed Accedas ad cur to remove a plaint cut of a Court Baron c. and a Procedendo granted for that the cause is sufficient to remove the plaint and the Common Bench will not hold plea thereof M. 13 44. Eliz. Rot. 2175. T 18 Iac. Rot. 1959 H. 9 Jac. Rot. 2008 1425. Accedas ad Curiam T. 13. Eliz. Rot. 1276. ss The Lady the Queen sent to the Sheriff of Southampton her Writ closed in these words Elizabeth c. That taking with you four discreet and lawfull Knights of your County In your proper person you come to the Court of Gabriel White Esquire in O. in full Court there and cause to be recorded the Plaint which is in the same Court without our Writ according to the custome of the same Court between William Marquesse of Winchester and the Lady Eliz. Warham Widow of a certain Trespasse to the said Marquesse by the same Eliz. done as is said and bring that Râ—cord before our Justices at West in Cro. Trinitatis under your Seal and the Seals of four lawfull men of that Court who shall be present to the same Record and that you prefix the same day to the parties that they should be then there to proceed in the same Plaint as shall be right And have you there the names of the same four lawfull men and this Writ Witnesse our selfe at Westminster the eigth day of May An. c. 13. because the same Eliz claimeth to hold the Tenements wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be done by the Common Law Cause and not according to the custome of the Mannor of O. for which that Plaint in the same Court ought not further to be drawn let execution be done upon that Writ if the cause be true and the same Eliz. shall desire this or otherwise not By vertue of which said Writ G. Wells Esquire Sheriff of the County aforesaid now here at the said Cro. Trinitatis returned that he took with him S. C. I. H. G. H. and I.H. four discreet
further of our more abundant and speciall grace certain knowledge and meer motion and for the laudible service to us and our dear Sister the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England And also for all things to the republique heretofore in the Administration of justice performed for us our heires and successors we give and grant to you the said George K. one Annuity or annuall Rent of a hundred pounds of lawfull monie of England yearly to you the said George Kingesmill and your Assignes for and during the naturall life of you the said George Kingesmill to be paid at the receit of our Exchequer our Heirs and Successors by the hands of our Treasurer and Chamberlain and of our Heirs and Successors for the time being out of our Treasury in the hands of our Heirs or Successors from time to time hapning to be at the four Feasts c. by equall portions yearly to be paid during the naturall life of you the said George K. Wherefore we will and by these Presents firmly enjoyning we command as well to our T. C C. and Barons of our Exchequer our Heirs and Successors for the time being as to all and singular other our Officers and Ministers and all our Heirs and Successors whatsoever for the time being to whom it shall belong in this behalf that they and every of them upon the sole demonstration of these our Letters Patents or the Inrolement of them without any Writ or Warrant from us our Heirs or Successors to be prosecuted or obtained the said Annuity of a hundred pounds by the year to the said E. K. and his Assignes they should pay and deliver in form as abovesaid or should cause to be paid and delivered And that these our Letters Pattents or the Inrolement of them shall be as well to the said Treasurer C â— and Barons of our Exchequer aforesaid and of our Heirs and Assignes As to all and singular other our Officers and Ministers our Heirs and Successors whatsoever for the time being to whom in this behalf it shall belong a sufficient Warrant in this behalf for that no expresse mention of the true yearly value or of the certainty of the Premisses or of any of them or of any other Gift or Grants by us or any of our Progenitors to the said George Kingesmell before these times made in these Presents be not made or any Statute or Ordinance Provision Proclamation or Restriction to the contrary thereof before now be had made done ordained or provided or any other thing cause or matter whatsoever in any thing notwithstanding in Testimony c. Amercement The Sheriff amerced for making of an insufficient return upon a Writ in wast M. 19. H. 8. Rot. 260. At which day here came the said Elizabeth by her Attorney aforesaid whereupon the Premisses being seen and by the Justices here sully understood It seemeth to the Justices here that the return of the Writ aforesaid is insufficient in Law for that in the same return no mention is made that the said Sheriff in his proper person came to the places aforesaid wasted Therefore the same Sheriff to wit H. A. Esquire in mercy And he is fined by the Justices here at twenty shillings And as before let another Writ be made thereof to the said Sheriff in form aforesaid returnable here in 8. S. Trinitatis c. The Sheriff is amerced for not returning of a Capias utlagat E. 12. Iac. Rot. 2243. ss Edw. R. Esquire Sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here into the Court a certain Writ of Capias utlagat against P. P. at the Suit of T. T. in a plea of Debt returnable before the Justices of the said Lord the King here 1. die c. that same term in mercy and is fined by the Justices here at ten pounds The Sheriff amerced for not returning of a Cap. sat after severall daies given him by the Court. ss I. P. Esquire for that that at severall daies to him given by the Court here he returned not the Writ of the Lord the King of Capias ad satisfaciendum for forty pounds for debt and sixty pounds for damages to the same Sheriff directed to satisfie M.T. Knight Plaintiff against E. D. of c. Gent. returnable here Mense Mich. that same term in mercy And is fined by the Justices here at a hundred and three pounds six shillings eight pence c. The Marshall of â—he Court of Common Bâ—nch foâ— that he attended not up on the Iudge upon the Ess in day is fined twenty pounds M. 10. Eliz. Kot primo Whoteley ss It is considered by the Court for that that Andrew Billesly Marshall of the Court aforesaid kept not the day of Essoynes here in Court S. Trinitatis that same term nor attended upon Humphrey Brown Knight oâ—â— of the Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Bench here then at that day being for the receiving of the four Essoynes of the same Cro. S. Trinitatis And also further because those things which appertained to his Office of Marshall in that behalf were not done Therefore the same Andrew in mercy and is fined by the Justices at twenty pounds Appearance LOndon ss It was commanded the Sheriffs Entry of an appearance upon an attachment of priviledge in discharge of an Obligation made to the Sheriff for his appearance and baile in Court to the Action T. 3. Car. Reg. rot 2002. H. 19. Jac. rot 1. c. Brownlow the like E. t y of the appearance that they should attach T. F. so that they might have him here at this day to wit upon Saturday next after the morrow of the holy Trinity to answer I. C. one of the Attorneys of the Court of Common Bench of the Lady the Queen here according to the liberties and priviledges of the same Court for such Attorneys and other Ministers of the same Bench from the time whereof no memory is extant used and approved in the same in a plea of Trespasse And the Sheriff now returneth that he is attached And now here at this day came the said T. in his proper person and saith that he and divers other persons of his friends at his request who are bound by their writing obligatory to the said Sheriffs of London in a great summ of monie that he should personally appear here this day to answer to the said I. in the plea aforesaid And as well for his indempnity as for his security aforesaid prayeth that his appearance by the Justices here at this day may be recorded c. whereupon the appearance of the said T. at this day is recorded c. And hereupon came here into the Court certain N. F. of c. and W. S. of c. and undertook and both of them undertook in the summ of a hundred pounds for the same T. and the same T. being likewise present in Court in his proper person Entry of the Recoâ—nizance upon the
Manucaption Bayl in Tresâ—ass and assumed upon himself in the summ of two hundred pounds that if it should happen the said T. to be overcome in the said plea that then the said T. should satisfie to the said I. of the damages for the same I. against the said T. in the plea aforesaid in the Court aforesaid to be recovered or adjudged Or that he the same T. for that occasion render himself to the Prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet which said summ of a hundred pounds both of the Manucaptors aforesaid acknowledge to be made of their lands and Chattels and which said summ of two hundred pounds the said T. acknowledgeth to be made of his Lands and Chattels to be levied to the use and behoof of the said I. if it shall happen the said T. to make default in any of the premisses and thereof to be lawfully convicted c. Mâ—dd ss It was commanded the Sheriff Entry of an appearance upon on attachment of priviledge and bail thereupon that he attach I. H. so that he might have him here at this day to wit upon Fryday next after Cr. Trin. to answer I.F. chief Prothonotary of the Court of Common Bench of the Lady the Queen here according to the liberties and priviledges of the same Court for such Officers and other Ministers of the same Bench from the time c. in a plea of Trespasse as in the President before mutat mutandis untill you come to And the said I. H. being likewise present here in Court in his proper person assumed upon himself in the summ of eighty pounds that if it should happen the same J.H. in the plea aforesaid by any lawfull means to be convinced then the same R.R.G.W. and J. grant and every of them for himself granteth that all damages costs and charges to be assessed to the said J. F. by occasion of the Trespasse aforesaid or in any manner to be addjudged may be made of their Lands and Chattels and levied to the use and behoof of the said J.F. if it shall happen the laid J.H. not to pay to the said J. F. all such damages Bail in Trespass costs and charges or upon that occasion render himself to the Prison of the said Lady the Queen of the Fleet c. Entry of an appearance upon an arrest in discharge of the Manucaptors upon mean proces ss T. 8. Jac. Rot. 2257. Waller Be it remembred that David D. late of c. came here into the Court the twentieth day of June that same Tearm in his proper person and said that he and divers other persons of his friends at his request by their Writing obligatory are held to the Sheriff of the County aforesaid in a great summ of money that he should appear here at this day to wit tres Trin. to answer to T. M. in a plea of debt See the old book of Entries title apparance fol. 42. the like entry And as well for his own proper indempnity as for the security of his friends aforesaid prayeth that his appearance by the Justices here at this day should be recorded whereupon the appearance of the said D. by the same Justices here at this day is recorded c. Attachment H 15 Eliz. rot 557. the like for Wilson MIch 19 Jac. Rot. 1873. Precipe for Broke Attachment for debt in the Court of the Mayor c. the Attachment was disattached by Bail and the Plaint was removed by a common Writ of Priviledge without a Certiorare Entry of an attachment in a Quare Impedit and awarding of a Distress P. 4. Jac. Rot. 2259 North. ss G.C. Esquire by his Attorney offered himself the fourth day against Thomas Bishop of the Burrough of Saint Peter otherwise Peterborough and W.C. his Clerk of a Plea that they permit him to present a fit person to the Church of W. which is void and belongeth to his Gift c. and they came not and the Sheriff is commanded that he attach them c. And the Sheriff returneth that they are attached by Pledges I.P. and R. S. Therefore they in mercy c. And the same B. and W. are distrained that they be here Quinq Pas Note that the distresse is peremptory in this Writ and this by the Statute of Marlburge Cap. and daies are given from fifteen dayes in fifteen dayes Natura Br. fol. 26. a. T. 11. Jac. Rot. 3910. c Wâ—llaston Ebor. ss It was commanded the Sheriff that he attach G. B. of C. E. E. Gent. and I. T. Clerk that they should be here at this day to wit Entry of an attachment in a Quare Impedit and Summons and severance one of the Plaintifs comes not Iuâ—gment the other Sequat solus and the Bishop essoins which day is given to the others in Cro. Trin. to answer M.W. and F. S. Esquire of a plea that they permit them to present a fit person to the Church of S. which is void and belongeth to their donation c. And that he summon by good Summoners the said F. that he should be here at the said Tearm to follow his plea aforesaid against the said B. E. and I. together with the said M. if c. And now here at this day came the said M. by A.B. his Attorney and the said F. the fourth day of the Plea being solemnly called came not And the Sheriff now returned that he is summoned by J.D. and R.F. Therefore he in mercy c. And it is considered that the said M. follow alone without the said F. the Plea aforesaid c. And it is to be known that the said B. cast himself an Essoyn de malo veniend against the said M. and F. in the plea aforesaid and as well the said B. as the said E.E. and I. T. have therein day by the Essoin of the said B. here untill Oct. S. Mich. c. T. 13. Jac. Rot. 3668. Brownlow ss Amerciament vic upon attachment of priviledge It was commanded the Sheriff that he attach I.H. so that he have him here die lunae Proxime post 15. S. Trin. to answer Jo. Martin Gent. one of the Attorneys c. in a plea of debt And now here at this day came the said Martin in his proper person Cepi corpus returned and offered himself against the same I. H. in the plea aforesaid and he came not and the Sheriff now returneth that he took the body of the said I.H. whose body he hath ready here at this day according to the intent of that Writ to him thereof directed Merciament 40 s. And because the same Sheriff the body of the said I.H. at this day hath not ready Therefore the same Sheriff to wit William K. Baronet in mercy c. and he is fined by the Justices here at forty shillings Habeas eorpus awarded And it is commanded the Sheriff that he have here upon Munday next after Cr. Annimarum the body of the
the same S to amend the said writ in the test and retorne of the same which said Sebastian rased the said writ in the test and retorne of the same And put in the said writ le test 11. die Julii and retorne of the same writ A. die S. Mich. in tres Septim And immediatly after the amendment of the said writ so made the same I F delivered to the said W. Y. that writ so rased and amended but not new sealed and the same I F being asked by the Court here wherefore he caused not that writ to be new sealed said that he knew not whether that said writ ought to be new sealed or not And further the said I. F. said that by vertue of the said writ the same H. M. then being under-Sheriff of the said county of Midd. at the request of the said I. F. in the name of the said executors made made a certaine warrant to take the same T. T. for the debt and damages aforesaid And that the said T. T. by vertue of that warrant was taken in the said County of Midd. and afterwards brought to the dwelling house of L. D. scituate in London there one of the Sheriffs of the same County of Midd. And also the said Sebastian having taken his corporall oath was likewise by the Court here conferred with and examined whether he rased and altered les Testes and retorns of the said writ as aforesaid at the request of the said I. H or not or whether he made any continuance of the same writ in any record or rolle of plea thereof in the same court here remaining or not said that he at the request of the said I. Clerk of the said R. L. his Master rased and altered the said writ in the les Test and retorne of the same as is aforesaid And that he made not any continuance thereof any record or Roll in the Court here here of remaining whereof the roll of the entries of Pleas of Hillary term last past in which term judgment to have execution for the debt and damages aforesaid was entred being brought here into the Court it evidently appeareth and the Court here by the inspection of the said Justices in the roll of Pleas number 941. the said writ had day of continuance from the said tribus Septi S. Trinitatis untill the said tres Septi S. Michi then next following And being by the court there asked who made that continuance und when the same continuance was made it is given to the Court here furrher to understand that one H. S. one of the Clerks of the said R. L. had made it which said I. S present here in court after he had taken his oath being conferred with and by the court here fully thereupon examined said that he the first day of that Terme of S. Michael at the request of the said I made the continuance for that he is one of the Clerks of the said K. L. attending in the Office and entred the Plea thereof in the same Roll 940. And the same W Y. being likewise present here in court and having likewise taken his oath by the same court being examined of and upon the premisses said that he in the beginning of the Term of the holy Trinity last past received by the hands of the said I. H. the writ aforesaid then sealed and long after the end of the terme of the holy Trinity the same I F came to him desiring him the same W to make a certaine warrant upon the same writ to takâ— the same T. T. to which said I. F the said W then said that the day of the return of the said writ was then past And further the said I. H. that he should cause any of the Clerks of the said K. L. to amend the test and the retorne of the said Writ And that the same W. afterwards received from the said I. H. the writ aforesaid in Form aforesaid rased and amended but not new sealed And that the same T. T. by vertue of that writ and by vertue of a certaine warrant upon the said writ as aforesaid made was taken and arrested And further the said W. said that the next day betimes in the morning to wit about 4. a clock before noone of the same day by the command of Humphry Moseley his Master came to the house of W. Forrest scituate in Fleetstreet London in whose custody the seale of the Lady the Queen deputed to seal Writs in the Bench aforesaid remained and caused the said Writ to be so sealed Fee for the common Seale in the Bench seven pence and paid for the sealing of the said Writ seven pence to the said W. F. And afterwards to wit the same day the said W. Y. that writ so newly rased and then newly sealed delivered to the said H.M. his Master which said H.M. being likewise present here in Court having taken his oath and by the same Court here being examined of and upon the premisses said that he at the time of the taking and arresting of the said T.T. knew no otherwise but that the writ so rased Commitment of the offendors to the Fleet. was sealed of new but as soon as the same H had understood that the same writ after the alteration of the same was not sealed of new said to the said W.Y. his Clerk that he should cause the same writ to be sealed And thereupon the same W. Y. caused the same VVrit to be sealed the same H further said that hee having the writ aforesaid sealed of new at W in the County of M that Writ to the same T. T. then and there being under the custody of the same H shewed and read it The plaintiffs examined in ihe Court whether they were consenting to the alteration or not The Plaintiffs pray that the Defendant may ce committed in Execution by force of the Writ or of the record of the Judgement in Court if it may be by the Law af the Land and the same T. by vertue of that writ to one P. delivered to be safely kept in the prison of the said Lady the Queen for the debt and damages aforesaid and hereupon the same I F S T and W Y present here in Court by occasion of the premisses are committed to the prison of the said Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to abide untill c. Afterwards to wit the third day of November then next following the said then Sheriff of Middlesex came here to the bar and brought the Writ aforesaid together with the body of the same T T under the custody of the said Sheriff being by vertue of the Writ aforesaid detained and the same Sheriff prayeth that the Writ aforesaid here in Court may be filed c. and that he from the custody of the same T T may be discharged c. whereupon the same Executors the same third day of November by the command of the Justices being present here in
Court having taken their oath were examined by the said Court here whether they were conscious or consenting to the rasure and alteration of the said Writ and to the taking and arrest aforesaid who sayd that not and the same Executors being conferred with by the Court here that they would have done against the said T T in this behalf or require who say that if the said T T by vertue of the Writ aforesaid here shewed in Court or by vertue of the judgment aforesaid against the same T here remaining upon record and to the Justices here in Court shewed The Justices will advise ought to remain in execution for the debt and damages aforesaid by the Law of the Land then the same Executors prayeth Execution against the same T T and that he may be committed to the prison of the Fleet for the said debt and damages and hereupon it is said to the said Executors by the Justices here that the same Justices wil advise themselves at another day therein for that not as yet c. And aftrwards to wit the fourteenth day of November then next following all which premisses aforesaid with their circumstances The writ is received and filed and the Defendant at the prayer of the plain iffs is committed in execution The Delinquents come to the Barr and pray to be discharged and are discharged One makes a fine before he be discharged Admitted to his fine at a hundred shillings by pledges The Sheriffs are fined at ten l. The Prothonotary of the Bench payes the fine by him received of the party for a misdemeanour to the barons of the Exchequer by the commandement of the Justices of the Bench. by the same Justices here being fully examined seen and understood upon great diligent advisement and consultation by the Court here in that behalf before had the Writ aforesaid by the Court here is received and filed and the same T T at the petition of the said Executors for the debt and damaâ—es aforesaid by the same Court here is committed to the prison aforesaid there to remain untill c. And afterwards to wit the sixteenth day of November then next following came the same I F. S T and W Y in their proper persons brought here to the barr by the Keeper of the prison aforesaid and pray that they may be delivered from the prison aforesaid c. Whereupon the same S. F. and W. by the Court here by occasion of the premisses out of the prison aforesaid are discharged and set at liberty and it is said to the Court here that the same I F that he should make a Fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses before he should be delivered out of the prison aforesaid and hereupon the same I prayeth to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses and is admitted at a hundred shillings by pledge therefore the same I go therein quiet c. And that he should be delivered and discharged from prison to go at large c. And afterwards to wit the same sixteenth day of November came here into Court the said W. and E. I. late Sheriff of the County of Middlesex in their proper persons and pray themselves to be admitted to make a fine with the said Lady the Queen by occasion of the premisses and are admitted for ten pounds paid into the Court here by the hands of the said H. M. late under-sheriff of the said late Sheriff to the said R. L. to the use of the said Lady the Queen which said ten pounds the same R. L. the eight and twentieth day of November then next following by the command of the Justices aforesaid before the Barons of the said Lady the Queen of her Exchequer in full Court there brought and by the command of the same Barons paid it to one I. H. to the use of the said Lady the Queen therefore as well the said I. D. as the same E. I. and the said Humphry M. as the said Richard Love of the said ten pounds are quiet c. Entry of a Habeas corpus and commitment of a prisoner to the Fleet in execution in the Terme time at the cheif Iustice his chamber the writ bore teste 4 July 1â— Jac. And note that the Term ended 5 July 18 Jac. and the party was committed to the Fleet in the Term from the Judges Chamber in Serjeants Inn in the afternoon and the Iudge delivered the Commitment to be inrolled the next day being the last day of the term T 18 Jac rot 3060 Brownlow London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs of London that they should have the body of Leonard Bawtry Serjeant at Law by whatsoever name reputed in the prison of the Lord the King under the custody of the same Sheriffs together with the day and cause of his taking and detaining before H H Knight and Baronet cheif Justice of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench at his chamber scituate in Serjeants Inn in F street L T. 17. Jac. rot 3094. 3279. 3270. 2871. 2000. 2170 T 24 Eliz. rot 2142. the like immediatly after the receiving of this Writ that the same Cheif Justice seeing the cause aforesaid may do in that behalfe what of right according to the Law and Custome of the Realm of the Lord the King of England and the liberties and priviedges thereof ought to be done and that they should have then there that Writ afterwards to wit the fifth day of July Anno Reg. c. 18. immediatly after the receiving of the said Writ before the same cheif Justice at his chamber aforesaid came the same Leonard in his proper person under the custody of R. D. and I. C. Sheriffs of the City aforesaid and the same Sheriffs to the said cheife Justice then and there returned that the execution of the said Writ did appear in a certain Schedule annexed to the said Writ the Tenor of which said Schedule followeth in these words London ss We R.D. and I. C Sheriffs of the City of London do certifie to H. H. Knight and Baronet Cheif Justce c. that before the comming of the said Writ annexed to the Schedule to wit Return of the causes by the Sheriffs the fourth day of July Anno c. 18. Leornard B. Serjeant at Law in the same writ named was taken in the City aforesaid and kept in the prison of the said Lord the King under the custody of us the said Sheriffs by virtue of a Writ of the said Lord the King directed the Tenor whereof followeth in these words James c. To the Sheriffs of London greeting Attach Leonard B. one of the Serjeants at Law otherwise called L. B. of Boston in the County of Lincolne Serjeant at Law otherwise called L. B. De Boston in Com. Lincoln ob ad legem so that you may have him before our Iustices at Westminster on wednesday next
after Tres septim S. Trin. to satisfie Richard W. Gent. as well of a certain debt of eight hundred pounds which the same R in our Court c. as of forty shillings which to the same R. in the same Court were adjudged c. whereof he is convicted Commitment and this was outo sCourr and whereupon it was considered in our said Court that the said R. have Execution against the said L. for the debt and damages aforesaid for default of the said L. and have you there their writ teste H H at Westminster 16. Junii Anno 18. and Scot. 53. Maier Waller And this is the cause of taking and detaining of the said L. B. in the prison aforesaid whose body they have ready according to the Tenor and Exigency of the writ aforesaid to this schedule annexed which being seen read and by the same cheif Iustice understood the same L was committed to the custody of Allexander Harris Esquire VVarden of of the prison of the said Lord the King of the Fleet being then present in his proper person for the occasions aforesaid there to remain until c. which said Leonard the said VVarden then received into his custody into the prison aforesaid for the occasions aforesaid to remain untill c. Which said commitment of the same Leonard unto prison the same Cheif Iustice the said fifth day of July that same Terme delivered here into Court with his owne proper hands to be enrolled upon Record c. Entry of a Commitment to the Fleet brought by the Sheriffs of London in their custody in vacation time P 1 Car. Regis rot 5010 London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs that the body of I. M. c. before Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet Cheif Iustice c. at his Chamber c. immediate c. As in the Writ next before which writ bore Teste 10. Aprilis apud Camer praedictam Anno Kegni Car. Reg. primi propter mortem Regis Jacobi super 27 diem Martii 20 precedend Afterwards to wit _____ day of Aprill Anno Rigis nunc primo before the same cheif Justice at his Chamber aforesaid came the same John in his proper person under the custody of the said Sheriffs and the same Sheriffs reciting the Return whereupon the same I by the said cheif Justice then and there was committed to the prison of the Fleet c. to remain untill c. which said commitment c. as in the next before afterwards to wit the fourth day of May that same Terme c. which was the first day of the same Terme following c. Entry of a commitment of a prisoner to the Fleet in Terme time brought to the Bar by Habeas corpus P 1. Car Regis rot 700. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs that they should have before the Justices of the said Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster on Satturday prox post Cr. Assen Domini the body of W. R. c. And now here at this day came the sayd W. in his proper person under the custody of the same Sheriffs and the Sheriffs to wit c. shewing the Return whereupon the same W. R. by the Court of the King here is committed to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet for the occasions aforesaid there to remaine untill c. One who forged a Cirographe of a fire supposed to be levied in the Common Bench where no such was levied was brooght to the barr by a Habeas corpus and upon his own confession and examined was taken in the County by speciall commissions and read in Court be was committed to the Fleet fined at C I. H 6. Jac. rot 1002. Hereford ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should have here at this day to wit on Friday next after the morrow of the Purification of the blessed Mary the body of Philip Philpot of Rosse in the County aforresaid Gent. in the prison of the Lord the King under the custody of the same Sheriff detained to answer the Lord the King now upon those things which to him on the behalfe of the said Lord the King should be objected and to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in this behalfe And now here at this day came the same John in his proper person by the sheriff of the County aforesaid to the barr here brought and the same Sheriff to wit John Kirle Esquire then here returned that hee by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed the body of the said Iohn hath ready here at this day as by the same Writ it was commanded him c. whereupon one Iohn Brewster one of the Clarkes of _____ Chirogapher of the Court of the Common Bench here on the behalf of the said Lord the King now giveth the Court here to understand and to be informed that the same John after the last generall pardon of the Lord the King now in the Parliament held at Westminster aforesaid the fifth day of November in the third year of his Reign falsely and corruptly procured one Adam Launder to write in parchment indented to the like form of the Cirographer of fines in the Court here levied the Cirographie of the same Fine betweene Tho Holland and Thomas Woodward Plaintiffs and one Edw. Woodward Deforceant of Tenements in the County of Worcester whereas in truth there was never any such Fine between the parties aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid levied nor any Cirographie of any such fine by the Cirographer of this Court made and the same Cirographie so written for a true and just Cirographe of a fine levied of the Tenements aforesaid between the parties aforesaid published and delivered to the same Thomas Holland receiving of the same Thomas Holland therein fifty shillings falsely and in deceit of the Court aforesaid and in contempt of the Lord the King now c. as if it had been duely made by the Chirographer of the same Court here and because as well by the examination of the said John Powell of the same Adam Launder before Robert Pye of Hereford and Thomas Connisby Knight and in Court here openly read as by the proper acknowledgment of the same John Philpot here in Court made who hath confessed his falsity and deceipt aforesaid it evidently appeareth upon the same information of the said John Brewster on the behalfe of the Lord the King against the said Iohn Philpot in forme aforesaid made to be true therefore the same Iohn P. for his falsity and deceipt aforesaid by the Court here is committed to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet there to remain untill the Court here shall consider of his corporall punishment c. And further the same Justices here do assess for a fine upon the said I Philpot for his falsity deceipt and contempt aforesaid in this behalfe done and committed to be forfeited
the Form of the statute aforesaid untill he shall have levyed the debt and damages aforesaid And in as much as that command shall be executed he shall make appeare here in Cr. Anim. by the letters of the same Bishop sealed c. T 18. Iac. Rot. 3057. Brownlow Essex ss Whereas Iohn Hill lately in our court before our Justices at Westminster by the consideration of the same court had recovered against Mary Wroth late of London widdow otherwise called M. W. c aswell a certaine debt of 400 l. as 80 s. which c. whereof she is convicted the said Iohn afterwards came into our said court and by the statute c. chose to be delivered to him all the goods and chattles of the said Mary besides Oxon and cattle of her plough and likewise the moyety of all her lands and tenements of which the same Mary in Crastino S. Trin. last past upon which day the judgment aforesaid was given against her or at any time afterwards was seised without delay Entry of an Elegit after an elegit he should cause to be delivered to the same Iohn by reasonble price and extent to hold to him the goods and chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and chatties and also to hold to him the moyety aforesaid as his free tenement to him and his assignes according to the form of the statute aforesaid untill the debt damages should be levied thereof and in asmuch c. he should make appeare to our Justices here at Westminster in Cr. Pur. S. Mariae last past And you at that day returned to our Justices at Westminster a certaine Inquisition taken before you at S. L. in your county the 12. day of Dec. last past by the oath of 12. c. taken by which it is found that the same Mary at the said Cr S. Trinitat and after that day was seised in her demesnes of Fee tenant for terme of life of and in the Mannor and cheife mesuage of L. al. L. with all their right members and appurtenances c. And further that the same Mary at the said day of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards had any other goods or chattells or any other or more Mannors lands tenements in your County which to the knowledg of the Jurors of the Inquisition aforesaid could be extended or appraised you further retorned to our Justices at the same day that none came to you on the behalf of the said Iohn to pray deliverance to be made to him of the moyety of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid by the inquisition aforesaid found so that to further execution of the said writ you could not proceed whereupon the same Iohn came into our said Court saying that the same Mary a the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards had divers lands and Tenements in your County to the value of 40 l besides the Mannor and Tenements in the inquisition aforesaid specified and also was possessed of divers goods and chattles to the value of 100 l. which you could have extended and apprised and delivered to the same Iohn And therefore wee command you as more times we have commanded you that all the goods and Chattles of the same Mary besides Oxon c. And likewise the moyety c. besids the same mannor and Tenements in the Inquisition aforesaid specified of which the same Ma. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards was seised possessed of and also the moyety of the Mannors and Tenements in the inquisiton aforesaid specified you cause to be delivered to the said Iohn by reasonable price and extent to hold as his Free tenement to him and his assignes according to the form of the statute c. untill the debt and damages be thereof levyed And in asmuch as you shall have executed this our command you make appeare c. SVff ss Whereas E. T. and Mary his wife in our Court before our Justices at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recoverd against Iohn Addams 20 l. for the value of the dower of the same Mary of one messuage and one Garden with the appurtenances in Bury S. Ed. from the time of the death of R. Cage her late husband Entry of an Elegit for the value in Dower As for theire damage which they had by occasion of the detayning of the said dower whereof he is convicted And the same Io. and Mary afterwards came in to our said Court and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to them c. As in others to hold to them and their assignes according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid untill the said 20 l. for the value and damages aforesaid shall be thereof levyed c. in asmuch c. he should make appeare here Men. Pas c. P 29. or 30. Eliz. Rot. 651. Tender of the body in execution in discharge of the Manucaptors London ss Be it remembred that the third day of May that same terme came here into the court M. F. in this own person And offered his body in execution upon the judgment for damges cost and charges which W. F. in the Queens Court here recovered against him as in a certaine action of trespasse upon the case according to the Form of a certaine Recognizance here by the same M. and certaine Henry Lues of the Parish c. Butcher and Giles Holden of the Parish c. haberdasher in Mich. term Ann. Reg. Regin 27 and 28. acknowledged for in discharge of his Manucaptors aforesaid c. And hereupon William Knight attorney of the said W. F. by the court here conferred with if he would commit the body of the said M. in execution for the debt and damages aforesaid to the prison of the Fleet there to stay upon that occasion or not said that not Therefore aswell the said Manucaptors as the said M. from the Recognizance aforesaid and summes of money contayned in the same Recognizance by the Court here are discharged c. Tender of the body in execution after judgment had against the principall in discharge of his â—ureties M 9. Jac Rot 2739. H 10. J. Rot 3241. H. 22. J Rot. 2429 Errour brought T 20. Eliz. Rot. 125. Between Younger and Tompson Afterwards to wit such a day An. c. came here into the Court W. T. in his proper person and aswell for his owne proper indemnity as of his suerties aforesaid prayeth that he by the court here may be committed to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet by occasion of the judgment aforesaid there to stay untill c. And L. and T. Manucaptors of the said W of their Manucaptions and acknowledgment in this behalf made by the court here are fully discharged c. And afterwards Error was entred upon the Roll and the Record sent into the Kings Bench And after the end of the same it is
the Court here made that the same Iohn who otherwise to wit the second day of August Ano. 3. R. nunc before Iames Story Lon. and Robert Cotton Esquires by vertue of a certaine writ of the Lord the King de Dedmi Potestatem to them and certaine Thomas Hutchison and Robert Smith Esquries directed to give power to three or two of them to take the acknowledgment which the same Iohn before the said I. S. K. C. T. H. and R. S. three or two of them would make upon which said writ of covenant depending before the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench between certain Tho. Fortesceu Esq and Io. Slany and the same Io. Zouch of the Mannor of Alfreton ali Awfreton with the appurt and of 120. Mes 100. Cottages 500 tofts 4 Mils c. with the appurt in A. otherwse A.S. otherwise S. S. otherwise S. c. And also of the profits of the markets and Faires and Toll in A. otherwise A. in the same County of Derb. acknowledged the Mannor Tenements Rents and Profits aforesaid to be the right of the same Thom. and the same remised and quit claimed from him and his heires to the same Thomas and Iohn Slany and the Heires of the same Thomas for ever at the time of that acknowledgment upon thâ— writ aforesaid was and yet is within the age of one and twenty years Therefore it is considered by the court here _____ of May that same Terme that the acknowledgment aforesaid by the same Io. Zouche before I. S. and Rob. Cotton made is void and of no Force in Law and that as well the said Writ of Covenant as the said writ of Dedimus Potestatem are quashed and adnulled and in the Files of the writs of this Court are not to be received or Filed nor that any record be made thereof in the court here Brev. de Gardiano admittendo H 10. J. Rot. 2002. Brownlow ss Entry of a Writ De gardiano admittend in a Writ of Partition M 22 Jac Rot 554. the like in debt T 33 Eliz Ro 1556. like in Dower Int. S. G. The King sent to the Justices here his Writ closed in these words James by the grace of God of England c. To his Justices of the Bench Greeting Know ye that we have admitted Nicholas S. Gent. the Gardian of Mary B. and Grace B. Daughters and heires of Richard Barret Esq being within age as is said to prosecute and defend the Sute which is before us by our Wirt between the same Rich. Barret and one Ralph Raulin in a Plea of making partition as is said And therefore we command you that you admit the same in Gardian of the same M. and G. to prosecute and defend the Plaint aforesaid Witnesse our selves at Westminster the 19. day of May An. 10. and 45. Habeas Corpus ss IT was commanded the sheriff as more times it was commanded to the same Sheriff that he should have here at the third day Entry of a Hab. corâ— in a plea of debt and the Sheriff returneth that he was not taken nor ever in his custody And a Writ awarded de distring nup vic to wit ter die the body of E. T. c. whom by precept of the Lord the King he took and him detayneth and the same sheriff to the Justices here ter die last past retorned to answer T. S. in a plea that he render unto him 20 l. which he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. And now here at this day came the said T. by T.C. his Attorney and the sheriffe retorneth that the said E. was not taken by the said sheriff by vertue of any writ either is or ever was in the custody of the said sheriff either by I. N. Knight his Predecessor by indenture between him the late sheriff or the said sheriff to the sheriff now was over delivered And therefore the body of the said E. before the Justices here at this day he could not have Distring nup vic Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff now that he distrain the said late sheriff by all his lands c. and that of the issues c. so that he may have here 15. Martini the body of the said E. whome to answer to the said T. in the Plea aforesaid c. Entry of a Writ of Hab corp upon priviledge wi h the recognizance H 12. Iac. Rot. 2271. It was commanded the Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs of London and every of them whereas it was shewed to the Lord the King now on the behalf of Peter Furb that whereas he and every leige man of the Lord the King in coming to the Court of the said Lord the King of common Bench here to wit at Westminster to prosecute or defend any plea or writ there ought to be under the protection of the said Lord the King and customs according to the Liberties and Privileges of the same Court from the time whereof the memory of man is not extant used and approved in the same Cause of priviledges Notwithstanding some malevolent indevouring much to prejudice the same Peter the same Pet. after he came to the Court here to consult with his Councell and attorny to have their advice in a certaine plea of debt upon demand of 30 l. prosecuted by the same P. in the said Court of the Lord the King against one James Robinson wherupon the parties aforesaid pleaded to issue of the Country to be tryed in London to be arrested by the ministers of the said Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs and in the Prison of the Lord the King under the custody of the said Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs procured to be detained unjustly to the imoderate dammage and grievance of the said Peter and against the liberties and Privileges aforesaid whereupon he supplicated to the Lord the King to exhibet to him a remedy the said Lord the King willing to do to the same P. in that behalf which was just and consonant to reason and inviolably to observe the liberties and privileges aforesaid That if the same Peter should be detayned in the prison aforesaid under the custody aforesaid Then the same Peter by whatsoever name reputed together with the day and cause of his taking and detaining they should have or one of them should have before H. Hobert Knight and Baronet Cheife Justice of the said Lord the King of the common bench at his chamber Scituate in Lincolns Inn in the county of Midd. immediately after the receit of the said Writ Hab corp rem immediatly before the Chief that the same cheife Justice of the Lord the King seeing the cause aforesaid should do in that behalf what of right and according to the law and custome of the Lord the King of England and the liberties and privileges aforesaid should be don and that they should have then there that writ Afterwards to wit the 24. J that same Terme the chief Justice delivered here in
three aâ—e s given him to do it T 2 Car. Regis Rot. 841. Brownlow Berks. ss John B. Sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he in Easter Terme last past at the severall dayes that same Terme by the Court of the Lord the King here to him given as in the bill of pleas this Terme it doth appear hath not returned to the Court here a certain Writ of the said Lord the King of Habeas Corpus issuing on of the Court here and to the same Sheriff directed and delivered to be executed in form of Law against one I W Esquire at the suit of R. B. Esquire in a plea of Debt of two hundred pounds returnable before the Iustices here Quinque pas last past in mercy c. And he is fined by the said Justices here for the said four defaults at twenty five pounds c. H 43. Eliz. Rot 451. Prisoner in the Fleet brought to the barr by Hab corp at the petition of an estranger a who brought Writ in debt against him and he is demanded by the Justices that he would appeare to the said writ who said he wâ—n duâ—â— therefore processe of Ouâ— lawâ—y is awarded against him ss It was commanded to the Warden of the prison of the Fleet that he should have here at this day to wit upon Satturday next after Octob. S. Hillar the body of W. A. Esquire in the prison of the said Lady the Queen under the custody of the said Warden detained to do and receive what the Court of the Queen here shall consider of him and now here at this day came here into the Court H. T. by A.S. his Attorney and brought here into Court a certain Originall Writ in Debt upon demand of an hundred and twenty pounds directed to the Sheriffs of London and before the Justices of the Lady the Queen here returnable against the said Walter by the name of W A. Esquire of Tomby in the County of Lincolne Esquire and prayeth that the said Walter may appeare to his sayd Writ whereupon by the same Warden of the Prison aforesayd brought here to the bar present in Court in his own proper person being spoken to saith that hee will not appear to the Writ Therefore let processe be made against the sayd Walter upon the Originall Writ aforesaid c. T 25 El. rot 860. G against I.C. like Hab. corp and such an Originall and demand who saith that he is not the same person against whom the said G. brought the said originall writ and that he wil not appear c. Therefore let further processe be made against the said I. C. late of L Gentleman against whom the sayd Originall VVrit was brought upon the said Originall and the sayd I.C. who is now brought to the Barr is sent back to the prison under the custody of the Warden for the occasion that he is therein detained there to remain c. H 13 Jacorot 588. Entry of a Capias ad respodend and thereupon a Non inventus returned and a Habeas Corpus to the Warden of the Fleet is awarded received such a day and then thus and now here at this day came the said Defendant in his proper person under the custody of the Warden aforesaid brought to the Barr who being demanded if he would appear to the said Writ or not sayd that not Therefore let processe of Outlawry be made c. M 5. Jac. rot 2254. Fleet ss Entry of an Habeas corpus of a prisoner committed to be Fleet by the Commissioners in causes Ecclesiasticall and his enlargement without baile It was commanded to the Warden that he should have here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of this Writ the body of Anthony Rooper Knight in the prison aforesayd under his custody detained by whatsoever name he is reputed together with the day and cause of taking and detaining of the said Anthony that the same Justices here viewing the cause may cause to be done what of right and according to the Law and custome of the Realme of the Lord the King of England The like for Langton P. 8. Jac. rot 819. The lik for Melton there rot 1939. The like for Throckmorton T. 8. Jac. rot 1675. But they entred into a Recognizance of a 100 l. iâ— the Bench to appear from day to day P. 9. Jac rot 1510 P 8. Jac. rot 1939. ought to be done And no where at this day to wit on Satturday next after Octab. Martini that same term came the same A in his proper person under the Custody of the same Warden brought here to the Bar and the same Warden then returned that before the coming of the Writ to wit the ninth day of October last past the sayd A.R.M. rendred themselves to the prison aforesaid before committed by vertue of a certaine Warrant dated the thirtieth day of I last past which followeth in these words These are in his Majesties name straightly to charge you by vertue of his Highnesse Commission for causes Ecclesiasticall under the great Seal of England to us and others directed That herewith you receive and take into your custody the body of Sir Anthony Rooper Knight and him safely detaine prisoner at this our Commandement untill we shall give you order for his enlargement signifying unto you That the cause of his commitment is for that there being a certain cause referred unto us by his Majesties especiall direction betwixt him the said Sir A.R. and I.B. Vicar of B. for that he detaineth wrongfully from the said Vicar a certain yearly pension due unto him from the said Sir A. R being called before us after ful hearing of the cause in the presence of the said Sir A. R. and of his Councill three or four severall times and at last adjudged by us to pay the said pension he having some time of deliberation given unto him by us to consider therof hath notwithstanding obstinately disobey our said Order and doth so still persist and this shall be your Warrant in that behalfe given at Lambeth this thirtieth day of Iune 1607. And that this was the cause of taking and detaining of the said Anthony in the prison aforesaid the body notwithstanding of the said A he hath now here ready as by the said Writ it was commanded him c. whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood Judgment by the Court. it seemeth to the said Justices here that the said cause of Commitment of the sayd A. to the prison of the Fleet aforesaid in the Returne aforesaid above specâ—fied to be insufficient in Law to detain him the said A in the prison aforesaid or to deprive the said A from his priviledge of the Court of the Lord the King here therefore the same Anthony is dismissed from the prison aforesaid by the Court here and the same Warden is fully discharged by the Court here of such custody c. T 18 Iac.
rot 3157. Brownlow Entry of an Habeas corpus cum causa for B the Sheriff returned that he was detained by vertue of a certain Warrant c. And that he had brought his body c. Pro ut pro breve c. whereupon the said I is committed to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet Ib. remans quousque c. M 9. and 10. Eliz. Rot. 1667. London Nota. one Thomas L. one of the Attornies c. was committed to the Fleet upon a warrant from the High Commissioners And one cause of his commitment was expressed in the warrant and the Justices granted him a Writ of Priviledg because he was an atorney with a Corpus cum causa directed to the wardens of the Fleet who returned the warrant in haec verba c. wereupon his body being brought to the bar he was allowed his priviledg and discharged from prison Inquiry H 41. Eliz. Rot 1119 Bark ss Entry of a Writ of inquiry of better issues directed to the Justices of Assises upon a Writ De Distring Balliv Burgeness upon a Cepi corpus by them returned upon a Testat in debt against the late Sheriff for finding petty issues upon return of a Distringas T 6 H 6. Rot. 303. Sil. M 24. H 6. Rot â—09 Issues six shillings eight pence West 2. cap 40. Alias Distringas awarded P 8. H 6. Rot 113 Amercement against the return of the Sheriff upon a Distringas Jur. T 23 H 6. scil upon a Rescous P 226. Rot 2 the like Writ awarded to the Coroners to enquire de quantis exitibus quere quia non est lex Plur. Distringas It was commanded the sheriff that he should distrain the Mayor Baylifes and Burgesses of the Borrough of Abington in the County aforesaid by all their Lands c And that of the issue c. so that he should have here in Osto Mich. last past the body of F. E. late of c. whom the same Mayor and Burgesses late took as c To answer R.B. of a plea that he render unto him 10 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detaineth c. At which day here came the said R. by I. D. his attorney and offered hmiselfe the fourth day against the same F. in the same plea and he came not c. And C. L. then sheriff of the said county of Berk then here retorned that the said Mayor Bayliffes and Burgesses were distrained by their chattels to the value of 6 s 8 d. And that the said Mayor B. and B. were bayled by I. D and R. R Therefore they in mercy c. And as before it is commanded the sheriff that he should distraine them by all their lands c. And that of the issues c. so that should have here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Hill the body of the said F which the same Mayor B and B of late took c. As c. To answer the said R B. in the plea aforesaid and now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. S. Hilli came the same R by his attorny aforesaid and offered himself the 4 th day against the said F. in the plea aforesaid and he came not And the sheriff did nothing therein nor sent the writ thereof as more times It is commanded the Sheriff that he destrain them by all their lands c. And that of the issues c. so that they may have here 15. Pas the body of the said F who the same M B. and B. of late took as c. to answer the said R in the plea aforesaid And thereupon it is testified in the court of the Lady the Queen here on the behalf of the said R. that the said C. L. late sheriff after the said writ of distresse was first delivered to him of greater issue to wit of 100 l. the lands and Tenements of the said Mayor Bayliffes Burg. in his bayliwick to the Lady the Queen might have answered Averment of the party aginst the sheriff or retorning the petty issues upon â—he first w it of distress after the al 's and plur distr wee reenter upon the Roll. Therefore it is commanded to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen assigned to take the assizâ—s in the county aforesaid that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the County aforesaid in the presence of the said sheriff if he will be present they diligently inquire of what and how much issues the said sheriff of the issues of the lands and Chattles of the said Mayor B and B. of Abingdon aforesaid in his bayliwick from the time in which the said writ of distresse was delivered unto him untill the said Oct. S. Mich. could have answered to the said Lady the Queen and the inqâ—isition which c. they make knowne here 15 Pas by their letters sealed c. See the old book of entries in the title of issues retorned 1. 2. and 4. for such a Writ and entry And for a Writ awarded to the Justices of Assize see the statute of Westminster the 2. Cap. 40. A djudged to the Justices at the assize to inquire of what issuâ—s the sheriff could answer T 9. lac Rot. 3623. Brownlow Wigor ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should distraine R. G. Knight late sheriffe of the county aforesaid by all his Lands c. So that he should have here at this day to Wit in C S. Trinitatis the body of R. Y. late of C. in the county aforesaid Yomam which he took by the precept of the Lord the King now And detayneth by him as the said sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster 15. Pas An. R nunc Angl. 8. retorned to answer to M. F. widow of a plea that he should render unto her 20 l. which to her he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. And to heare his judgment of more defaults c. And now here at this day came the said Mary by I. F. her attorney and the sheriff now retorneth that the said R. G. is distrained by his chattles to the value of 40 s. and bayled by I. D. and R. R Therefore they in mercy Amercement that the sheriff can answer the King of greater Issues c. And here upon it si testified in the court of the King here on the behalf of the said Mary that the said now sheriff of greater issue to wit of 20 l to the said Lord the King could answer therefore it is commanded to the Justices of the Lord the King assigned to take the assizes in the county of Worcest that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid in the presence of the said sheriff if he will be present Note that the statute saith die impetr Br. they diligently inquire of what and how much issues of the lands and Chattells of the said R. G. the said
sheriff might have answered to the said Lord the King from the day of the receiving of the writ aforesaid untill the said day of the retorne thereof and the Inquisition which c The same Justices make appear here in S Mich. by their letters Sealed c. M 13. Jac. Rot. 2096. Brownlow Wiltes ss It was commandethe Justices of the Lord the King at the assize in the County aforesaid whereas the King had commanded the late sheriff of the county aforesaid as otherwise he had commanded him that he should distrain W. Dutton Knight late sheriff of the county aforesaid his predecessor by all his lands and chattles in his Bayliwick so that neither he nor any one for him put their hands upon them Entrey of a wâ—it to inquire de quantis exitiff c. See the statute Westmi 2.29 which granted this writ Hn. 13. E. 1. untill he shall have an other precept therein from the Lord the King and that he should answer of the issues of them to the said Lord the King so that he should have before the Justices of the said Lord the King there to wit at Westminster in Cr. S. Trinitatis last past the body of R. G. late of c. otherwise called R. G. c. which by the precept of the Lord the King he had lately taken as Fr. Popham Knight late sheriff of the county aforesaid predecessor of the sheriff now otherwise retorned to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid to answer to W. Mariat of a plea that he should render unto him 30 l. which c. And to heare his judgment of more defaults c at which day the said now sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster aforesaid T. 18. Rot. 1674. retorneth that the said W. D. was distrained by his Chattells to the value of 66 s. and 8 d. where upon it was test fied in the Court of the King here on the behalf of the said W. M. that the said sheriff of greater issues to wit of 20 l. might have answered that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid in the presence of the said now sheriff if he will be present they should diligently inquire of what and how many issues of the lands and chattels of the said W. D P. 12. H 6. Rot. 2 a ve fac awarded to the Coroneâ—s to inquire de quantis exitibus besides the said 66 s. 8 d. in his bayliwick the now sheriff could have answered to the Lord the King c. from the day of the receiving of the said Writ untill the same day of the returne of the same And the said Inquisition which c. the said Justices of assize should make appeare here at this day to wit in 8. S. Mich. by their letters sealed and now here at this day came the said W. M. by Tho. P his attorney and the said Justices of assize to wit Laurance Tanfeild Kni. Cheife Baron of the Lord the King of his Exchequer and Henry Mountague one of the Serjeants at law of the said Lord the King assigned to take the assize in the county afaresaid The Justices of assizes â—â—toâ—ne into the bench an â—â—quisition taken by them now retorne here a certaine Inquisition at new Salisbury in the county aforesaid the 19. day of I. last past by vertue of the said writ by the oath of 12. c. taken by which it is found that the said W. D. Kni. late sheriff of the county of the said Cr. S. Tri. last past and long before had divers lands and chattells in the county aforesaid whereof the said now sheriff to wit H. M. from the day of the receiving of the said writ of Distring above mentioned untill the retorne of the same of twenty pounds in issues besides the 66 s. and 8. d. above might have answered to the said Lord the King to wit at L. in the county aforesaid Therefore it is considered that the said H. L. for his concealement in this behalfe in gui Sit. Mia of the Lord the King And that he answer the Lord the King of the said 20 l. whereof he besides the said 66 s. 8 d. of the lands and chattells of the said W. D. as aforesaid could have answered according to the Form of the statute in this case provided c. statute 13. E. 1. Cap. 39. A Wâ—it to enquire of damages awarded de novo where the Sheriff returned that he could not execute the old Writ for that some of the Iurors refused to take their Oath and a Capias awarded against them for contempt Capias awardeâ— P 20. H. 8. Rot. 461. At which day here came the said Plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriff to wit W P. Knight now retorneth that he such a day and yeare last past caused to come before him at L. in the County aforesaid A. B. C. D. and others to inquire of and upon the premisses which said C. D. their corporall oath of and upon the premisses to performe or swear altogether refused and denied in manifest contempt of the Lord the King now and the lawes of his Kingdome So that execution of the said Writ he could not then do Therefore as before the sheriff was commanded that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid he diligently inquire what damages the said plaintiff sustained aswell by occasion of the entry aforesaid as for his costs c. and in as much c. he make appeare here such a day under the seale c. and Seales c. And also it is commanded to the said sheriff that he omit not for any liberty but that he take the said C. and D. if c. and safe c. so that they may have their bodies here at the said Terme to answer unto the Lord the King of the contempt aforesaid c. The same day is given to the said Plaintiff here c. Entry of a Writ of inquiry against an Attorney in Covenant LOndon ss Whereas Hugh Beeston Knight in our Court before our Justices at Westmin exhibited to our said Justices his certain bill against R. G. Gent. one of the attornies c. otherwise called R. G of Cliffords Inn London Gent. in a plea of covenant for that whereas the same Ricard by his certain Writing sealed with his seale and into our Court before our Justices brought made at London in the parish of St. Mary Bow in the ward of Cheape the 29. day of Nov. An. Dom. 1616. whose date is the same day and year acknowledged himself to have his custody two Fether beds 1. Bolster 4. Stooles covered with Scotish worke c. of the proper goods and chattles of the same Hugh Beeston which same Goods and Chattles after the delivery of them to the said Hugh were left in the custody of the said Richard And whereas
that they should have his body here at this day to wit 15. Pas to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in that behalf and now here at this day cometh the said Henry by W. C his attorney and sayeth that after the utlawry aforesaid against the said Henry had and published by a certain Act in Parliament of the said Lord the King now by continuance held at Westminster in the county of Midd. the 9 th day of Febru in the seventh yeare of the Lord the King now amongst other things it is inacted established by authory of the same Parliament that all and singular subjects of the said Lord the King aswell spirituall as temporall of this kingdom of England Wales the Islands of I. and G. and the Towne of Barwick the heires successors executors and administrators Pardon pleaded of them and every of them and all and singular corporations in any wise incorporated Cities Borroughs Counties Rideings c. and every of them And the Successor and Successors of them and every of them by the authority of the same Parliament should be acquitted pardoned released and discharged against the said Lord the King his heires and successors and every of them of all Treasons Felonyes offences contempts Trespasses entries injuries deceipts misdemeanors penalties Summes of monies Punnishment by death corporall punishments and pecuniary and generally from all other things causes complâ—ints suits judgments and Executions in the statute aforesaid not excepted nor Foreprised which by the said Lord the King by any meanes or in any other manner could be pardoned before and untill the 9. day of November then last past before the making of the said Act to every or any of his subjects Corporations incorporat Cities Burroughs c. or any of them yet so notwithstanding that every person utlawed shall prosecute his writ of Scire Facias against such party or parties at his or at whose Suit he or they were utlawed before the pardon in such case be allowed to the party utlawed as in the same Act is more fully contayned and the said Henry further saith that the utlawry aforesaid is not excepted nor Foreprised in the same statute Averment that the Utlary is not Averment that he is a Subject and that he is and at the time of the making of the said Act and long before was a subject and leige man of the said Lord the King now born under his obedience to wit at London in the parish c. and this he is ready to verifie where when and how the Court of the Lord the King now shall consider thereof whereupon it is not intended that the said Lord the King will impeach the said Henry by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry and because it is expedient and there is a necessity that the same Griffin should be premonished for his interest in this behalfe before the discharging of the same Henry from the utlawry aforesaid be further proceeded in according to the Form of the staute aforesaid The sheriffs are commanded that by honest c. they make knowne to the same G. that he be here in Cr. Ascen Dom. to prosecute against the same Henry his plea aforesaid if c. at which day came the same Henry by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriffs Sci fac awarded Sheriffs returne Sci fac Mercy to wit E. R. and A. P. now retorne that they by vertue of the writ aforesaid to them directed by I. W. and R. G. honest c. made knowne to the same G. of being here to this day to prosecute in Form aforesaid he the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called came not nor any whit further prosecute his said Writ therefore he and his pledges are thereof in mercy let the names of the pledges be inquired of And that the said Henry goe thereof without day Generall Pardon allowed c. and that the generall pardon aforesaid be allowed him c. Count in debt upon a Sci fac upon the generall pardon PAsch 12. Iac. Rot. Brownelow retorn Mense Pas to follow in Form aforesaid c. and now here at this day to wit Mens Pas came aswell the said William by his attorny aforesaid as the said Tho. by R. D. his a torny and the sheriffs as before now retorneth here that he hath nothing c. nor is to be found c. And hereupon the same Tho. declaring against the said Will upon his originall writ in the plea aforesaid said that the said W. had not rendred to the said T. 20 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. for that to wit that whereas the said W. the 20. day of Octo. An. c 3. at London in the parish and ward aforesaid by this certaine writing obligatory granted c. M 1. and 2. Eliz. Rot 1248 in a Scire facias against B. and A. upon a Recognizance one of the defendants is alleaged to be dead and one other processe against him and the others prayeth imparlance ss THe sheriff was commanded whereas R. C. and I. his wife in the Court of the King here had recovered against I. H Sci fac against a Tenant by Elegit and part of the monie levied the Tenant against whom the execution was brings the residue and a redelivery awarded 68 s. for their damages which they had by occasion of the detaining of the dower of the same I. of the Tenements in N. of the indowment of I Son of I. H. her late husband as by a certaine Jury of the country before the Justices of the King assigned to take the assize in the county aforesaid such a day and yeare at Wigo thereof between them Summoned and taken was convicted and the same R and I. came afterwards into the court of the Lord the King here and chose to be delivered to them all the goods and Chattles of the said I. H. besides the Oxen and Cattles of the Plough and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in his Bayliwick to hold as their free Tenements to them and their assignes accor to the Form of the statute in such case provided untill 68 s. for the damages aforesaid should be thereof levyed whereupon the King commanded them that al the goods and chattles of the said I. H. besides his oxen Cattle of the Plough and likewise the moyety of his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick without delay you cause to be delivered to the same R. and C. by the resonable price and extent to hold to them and their assignes as their Free Tenement in Forme aforesaid untill 68 s. for their damages aforesaid should be thereof Levyed and in what sort Elegit awarded Return of the Elegit c. should be made Known here such a day c. the same sheriff to the justices of the King
with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid to the said Edward should be delivered and c. And hereupon the sheriff is commanded that he remove the same Hum. from the possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid without delay he should cause to be delivered And in asmuch c. the sheriff make to appeare here 15. Hill at which day here came the said Edward by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff of the said County of Stafford to wit R. M. Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed the 20 day of January An. c. 10. came to the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances And the same Humphery P from the possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances removed And the moyety of the same mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to wit one Close called the Mills of the yearly in all issues besides reprises 8 l. and so recite such premisses as are expressed in the Writ by the first Inquisition unto beyond reprizes 4 l. being the equall and just moyety of the whole Mannor and of all the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the same Edward B. made to be delivered according to the extent aforesaid in the Inquisition aforesaid above made as by the said Writ it was commanded to him c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Conusee in a statute merch brought by the conusor to have back the possession of lands extended for that he is satisfied M. 47. E. 3. fo 11 Pl. 9. fit Sci. fac 96. T. 17. E. 3. fo 43. Pl. 38. T 19 Jac. rot 2159. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should take the body of Thomas Leake of L. in the County of Nottingham Gent. if he were a Lay-man and in the prison of the Lord the King under their custody should safely keep untill unto G. Woodnot of S in the same County Gent. of four hundred pounds which the same Thomas the thirtieth day of October Anno Regni c. 4. before I. R. then Mayor of the City of Lincolne and Leonard Carr Clark deputed to take the Recognizance of Debts within the City acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said George and which to him at the Feast c. then next following he ought to have paid and the same to him hitherto he hath not payd as it is said and insomuch as shall be executed of that precept of the Lord the King they should make knowne to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster in Cr. S Trinitatis An. Rs. c. 18 And the same sheriff to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster at that day retorned H. 17. Jac. rot 293 â— L. a. R. and F. the like Scire fac upon a promise that the conusee is satisfied pro fluxum temporis That the said Thomas was not found in their bayliwick Therefore it was commanded to the sheriff of B. that all the goods and Chattles of the same Thomas and all his Lands and Tenements whereof the same Thomas at the day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid or at any time afterwards was seised unto those hands soever they have came unlesse they descend to some heir being within age by hereditary descent you cause to be delivered to the said George by resonable price and extent to hold to him the goods and Chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and Chattels And to hold the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his Free Tenements to him and his assignes according to the Forme of the statute thereof provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with reasonable Damages costs charges as in labours suits delayes and expences he had therein levied T 39 Eliz rot 1711. the Defendant after judgment and before execution makes a Feoffment in fee to I S who enfensss J N and then the lands are extended the second Feoffee bring the moneys into the Court and prayeth restitution the Plaintiff warned comes and receives the money and restitution was awarded and in asmuch as the said sheriff had executed the said precept of the said Lord the King he should make appeare to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westm from the day of the holy Trinity in three weeks An. R. c. 18. At which day Humphery Foster Baronet sheriff of the County of Berke then returned to the justices of the Lord the said King at Westm a certaine Inquisition before him at Winsor in the County aforesaid the first day of Iuly then last past taken by which it was then found that the said Thomas after the Recognizance of the Debt aforesaid and at the time of taking of that Inquisition was seised in his Demesn as of Fee and right of and in the Mannor of W. otherwise E. W. and also of the Scite and Mansion house of the same mannor of W. otherwise E. W. And so recite the whole Inquisition verbatim unto the issues besides reprises of 50 l. which said mannor and Scite and of the mannor aforesaid with all their appurtenances the sheriff aforesaid the first day of July delivered by the extent aforesaid to the said George to hold to him and his assignes as his Free Tenement untill the Debt aforesaid together with the reasonable and necessary Damages costs and charges should be levyed thereof as by the same writ and returne thereof in the same Court of the Lord the King here of Record remayning manifestly appeareth And although after the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid the said George was satisfied of his Debt Damages costs necessary and resonable charges Neverthelesse the same G. possession of the Mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances yet holdeth as by the information of the said Th. the King understandeth The Lord the King willing to do in this behalfe what is just and consonant to reason doth command the sheriffs of London that by honest and lawfull men of their bayliwick they should make knowne to the said George W. that he should be here at Westminster in Crastino S. Trinitatis to shew if any thing c. Testat Sci Fac awarded wherefore the same George whereas to him of his Debt Damages Costs and resonable and necessary charges it hath been satisfied possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he ought or can hold At which day the sheriff returne to the Justices of the Lord the King here that the said G. hath nothing in their bayliwick whereby they could make knowne to him neither was found in the same whereas it was Testified in the same Court of of the Lord the King here that he hath sufficient in the County of Nott. whereby the same sheriff can make knowne to him whereupon it was commanded to the
pray execution against the said Ter-tenants of the Debt and Damages of the severall Lands and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which were of the said Richard at the time of the judgment aforesaid given to be adjudged to them Execution by default c. Therefore it is considered that the same Samuel and Iohn have Execution for the debt and Damages aforesaid against the said severall Tenants of the said severall Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances by default of the said severall tenants to be levyed c. And hereupon the same Sam. and Iohn have chosen to be delivered to them the moyety of the severall Lands and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold as their Free tenement to them and their assignes according to the forme of the statute therein made and provided untill the Debt and Damages aforesaid shall be thereof levied Elegit awarded and pray a Writ of the Lord the King to be directed to the sheriff of the county aforesaid and it is granted to them retornable here from the day of the holy Trinity in three weeks c. P 39. Eliz. Rot 1347. a Scire facias against Ter-tenants 2. are retorned 1. makes default and the execution awarded against him of the Lands whereof he is Tenant And the other Tenant pleads c. H 7. Eliz. Rot. 1357. divers testats Scire fac awarded into severall Counties at one time against the Ter-tenants M 7. Jac Rot. 45. in t Plit ter Brownlow Nott. ss It was commanded the sheriff Scire fac brought by the heire and exec of the demandant to have execution of a judgment in an Assize of nusance quod nocumentum amoveatur and for damages after the record of the assize is certified unto the Bench 43. E. 3. 2. br Execut. 3 z. accord Assize of nusans brought in Confinio Com. P. 10. H. 4 Rot. 225. Scire fac brought by the heire of the defendant upon the recovery in an assize to have execution upon the land and the tenant pleads no tenure for want whereas latly to wit upon Monday the 21 day of September An of the reigne of the Lord the King now 5. before T. G. Knight and Leonard B. Esq and N. C. Esq late Justices assigned to take the Assizes of the said Lord the King in the Countyes of No L. at D. P. in the same C. of L. and at Ha. in the said C. of Nott by the recognitors of the same Assize of Nusans it is found that Tho. Conians Esq unjustly without Judgment raysed a certaine banck in B. in the County of Nott. to the hurt of the Free Tenement of Tho. Taylor Esq in D. aforesaid within 30. yeares now last past to wit whereas the same T. T. was seised of and in one Close of pasture contayning by estimation 100. acres with the appurtenances called D. Carres in D. aforesaid in his demesne as of Fee And whereas also the same T. T. is likewise and of a long time was seised of and in one Close of pasture contayning by estimation 40. Plaint in an assiz of nusans acres with the appurtenances called H. in B. aforesaid in his demesne as of Fee nere adjoyning to the same Close of pasture called D. C. And the same T. T. and all those whose estate the same T T. then had in the same close of pasture of the same T. T. called D. C. from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary good presedent have had and were accustomed to have a certain gutter or Sewer leading of and from the same close called D. C. through the same close of the said T.T. called H. otherwise H. and from thence unto the common River called the Fosse in the county of Lincoln aforesaid in which said Gutter the water running falling and flowing in and upon the same close of pasture of the same T. T. called D. C. from time to time and by the whole time abovesaid was continually accustomed and wont to run through the same close of the same T. C. called H. otherwise H. and from thence unto the said common river called the Fosse and the same T. T. being so seised of the same close of pasture called D. C and of the same Gutter in F. aforesaid and the same T. T. being likewise seised of the same close of pasture called H. otherwise H. in F. aforesaid the same T. C. before the purchasing of the originall writ of the assize aforesaid to wit the 21. day of May An. Rs. nunc 5. a certaine banck in and upon the same gutter in the same close of the same T T. being unjustly and without judgment made erected and exalted And the watercourse into the gutter aforesaid from the same close called D. C. falling and descending and being wont to fall and descend into the gutter aforesaid by the exalting making and erecting of the banck aforesaid obstructed and stopped by reason whereof the water in and upon the same close of the said T. T. called D C. from the time of the exalting making and erecting of the banck aforesaid running falling and descending from the same close of the said T. T. by the ancient course through the said close of the said T. T. And from thence unto the said common river called the F. aforesaid as before it was wont accustomed to run and to be convayed is hindred where by the water by the gutter aforesaid out of and from the same close of the same T. T. by its ancient course descending and running untill the banck aforesaid newly exalted back againe in and upon the said close of the said T. T. doth reflow and over-flow the same Close whereby that close by the overflowing aforesaid became Sterrill and unfertill And the same T. T. the Profit of his close by a long time to wit from the said 21. day of May untill the day of purchasing of the originall Writ of the assize aforesaid to wit the 22. day of June An. Rs. nunc 5. abovesaid lost to the nocument of the Free tenement of the same T. T whereupon before the same Justices it was considered that the hurt aforesaid by the view of the Recognitors aforesaid should be removed and that the banck aforesaid should be cast downe Iudgmenn in an assize of nusans so that the water aforesaid by the gutter aforesaid through the same close of the same T. T. called H. otherwise H. and from thence unto the common River called the Fosse in the same County of Lincolne into its ancient course at the charge of the said T. it should be reduced and that the said T. T. should recover against the same T.C. his damages to eight pounds by the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid assessed and also 8 l. and ten shillings to the same T.C. at his request for his costs and charges at the discretion of the Justices here adjudged of encrease which sayd Damages in the whole do amount to
make knowne to the same Iohn that he should be here at this day to wit 8. Hill to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Thomas execution against him for the said 20 l. the arreareges of the yearly rent aforesaid after the judgment aforesaid given as aforesaid being in arreare ought not to have according to the Form of the recovery if Judgment Nota bene P. 26. and 27. H. 8. rot 359. M. 29. and 30. E. rot 1024. hil 7 H. 8. rot 526. tiel judgment that Pl. have execution de arreragis tam tante diem impetr brev de Sci. fac qu. post incursis c. And here now at this day came the same Thomas by George N. his attorney and offered himselfe the fourth day against the said Io. in the plea aforesaid And he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath nothing c nor is found c Therefore it is considered that the said Tho. have execution against the said Iohn aswell of the said 20 l of arrearages of the yearly rent aforesaid after the judgment aforesaid given and before the day of the purchasing of the same writ of Scire fac as of 40 s. of arrearage of said yearely Rent after the day of purchasing of the same writ of Scire fac incurred which said arreages in the whole doe Amount unto twenty two pounds by default c. T. 22. Eliz. Dyer fo 377. Pl. 28. record T 24. Eliz. Rot. 1856. Forde London ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should not omit for any their liberties but that they should take Iohn Davis late of Scire fac to take baile where one comes to the bar and pleads matter in discharge of an utlawry c. utlawed in London ter die c. at the suite of Thomas Jurdaine in a plea of debt c. and safely c. so that they should have his body here at this day to wit in Cr. S. Tri. to do and receive what the Court of the Lady the Queen here shall consider of him in this behalfe c. And now here at this day came the same Iohn in his proper person and the sheriffs now retorne that they tooke the body of the same Iohn and the same have now ready hereupon the same I. so taken and brought to the Bar saith that he ought not to be injured in this behalf and that he by the Law of the land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that he at the day of the originall writ of the said Thomas and the day of publishing of the utlawry was conversant and commorant in the parts beyond the Seas Allegation that he lived beyond Sea the day of publishing of the utlawry to wit at the City of Valencia in the parts of Spain without this that the same daies or any of them was commorant or conversant at L. Reg. aforesaid in the same County of Dor. as by the writ aforesaid is supposed For which the utlawry aforesaid against the same John in form aforesaid published and had is altogether void and of no force nor effect in Law And this he is ready to veryfie whereupon he prayeth judgment and that he from the utlawry aforesaid quiet and discharged may be dismissed from the Bar here c. And because it is expedient and needfull that the said T. for his interest in this behalf be premonished before it be further proceeded in to discarge the same Io. from the utlawry aforesaid The sheriffs are commanded that by honest A Scire fac to premonish the party for his Interest c. c. they should make knowne to the said Thomas that he be here tres Tri. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same I ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid and hereupon W.W. of c. Merchant and I.B. of L. c. undertook to have the body of the same I here at the same Term so from day to day and at every day of the plea until the plea aforesaid should be ended and judgment therein should be given to wit each of them body for body Bayle body for body c. and the same Iohn Davis assumed for himself to be then here and at every day of the plea under the penalty of 10 l. which said 10 l. the same I. D. acknowledgeth to be made and levied of his Lands and Chattells to the use of the Lady the Queen to whose hands soever c. it shall happen the said Iohn Davis at the same Term or at any other day to him by the Court here in the premisses to be prefixed to make default or not to prosecute his Suit in this behalfe with effect At which day here came the said Iohn in his proper person And the sheriffs now retorne that the said Thomas Jurdaine hath nothing c. nor is found c. therefore as before the sheriffs are commanded that by honest c. they should make knowne to the said Thomas that he be here Men. Mich. to shew in Forme aforesaid Alias Scire fac awarded c. and in the interim the same Iohn Davis is dismissed by the bayle aforesaid c. P 12. Iac. Rot. 448. Walter Tarne of New Castell upon Tyne ss Entry of a Scire fac awarded and returned after a Capias upon statute merchamt into the Bench for the administration of the Conusce of the statute where the Conusee dyed after the capias returned Sâ—e M. 19. Iac. rot 726. P. 2. El. Dy fo 150 Pl. 49. 2. R. 3 fo 8. Pl. 16. that such a Sciâ—e fac lyeth not in this case F. N. B. fol. 13 Register of writs fo 1486 It was commanded the sheriff whereas it was latly commanded by Writ of the said Lord the King to the same sheriff that the body of I. H. late of H. in the County of Durham Knight if he were a Lay man and found in his bayliwick he should take and in prison of the Lord the King should safely keep untill he had fully satisfied to I. H. c. Gent. of 1600 l. which the same I. H. Knight the 10. day of August An. c. 8. before T. L. then Mayor of the towne of New-Castell upon Tyne and W. I. then Clerk deputed to take Recognizances of deb according to the Form of the statute merchant within the same Towne acknowledged himself to owe to the same I.H. Gent. which to him he ought to have paid at the Feast of the birth of our Lords then next to come the same to him hath not paid c. and in asmuch c. he should make appeare to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid Men. Pas last past and the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King to wit at Westminster aforesaid at that day retorned that the same I. H. Knight is a lay man
and not found in his bayliwick as by the record and proceedings therein in the same court of the Lord the King before the Justices of the same Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid remayning manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon and the same I. H Gent. is dead as by the information of Robert Broundling Esq Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of the same I H. at the time of his death during the minority of W. H. and R H. Executors of the Testament of the said I. H. Gent. the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. be should make knowne to the said I. H. Knight that he should be here at this day to wit 15. Pas to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Robert ought not to have Execution against him of the debt aforesaid ought not to have c. according to the form of the acknowledgement aforesaid c. now here at this day came the same Rob. by I. Gill his attorney and offered himself the fourth day against I. H Knight in the plea aforesaid and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff to wit Henry Chapman now retorneth that the said I. H. Knight hath nothing c. nor is found c. And hereupon the same R. saith that after the said 15. Pas last past the same I. H. Gent. at the Towne of New-Castell upon Tyne made his last will and Testament the same William H. and Ralph his Sons being then within the age of 17. yeares Executors of the same Testament made and ordayned And that the Administrators of all the goods and Chattles which were of the said I H. Gent. at the time of his death during the minority of the same William and Ralph by Clement Colmor c. The 19. day of November in the yeare of our Lord 1613. at the Towne of New Castell upon Tyne after the death of the said I. H. Gent to the same Robert was committed And he bringeth here into Court aswell the letters Testamentary of the same I. H. Gent. by which it sufficiently appeareth to the Court here the same William and Ralph to be Executors of the Testament aforesaid And thereof to have the administration As the letters administratory of the said officiall which the Commission of the administration aforesaid in Form aforesaid do testifie whose date are the same 19 day of November An. Do. 1613. abovesaid with this that the said Robert will verifie that the same William and Ralph are yet living to wit at the Towne of New-Castell upon Tyne and are within the age of 17. yeares and hereupon the same Robert payeth execution against the same I. H. Knight of the Debt aforesaid by default c. and hereupon the same Robert prayeth a writ of the Lord the King by the statute c. to the Reverend Father in Christ William Bishop of Durham or keeper of his place there to be directed And it is granted him retornable here in Cr. S. Trin c. ss BRownlow ss Whereas A. M Gent. and W. H. late of Entry of a Sci fac against manucaptors c. Gent. at an other time to wit 29 day of June An. 21. before Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet our Cheife Justices of the common bench at his Chamber in Serjeants Inne Fleetstreet London undertook and each of them did undertake to wit the same A. in the summe of 160 l. And the same W. in the summe of 80 l. that he the same A. should appeare in our Court before our Justices at Westminster in his proper person or by his sufficient attorney in Law to an action or writ of one R. S. against the same Arthur of and upon an action of debt upon demand of 80 l. before 8. Mich. then next to come to be commenced and in our said Court before our Justices at Westminster to be prosecuted and to answer to the same Richard in the plea aforesaid And also it should happen judgment after the appearance of the said A. in the Cour here made in in the same plea for the said Richard against the same A. to be given to satisfie to the said Richard of the debt and damages for the same Richard against the same A in the same Court in the plea aforesaid to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same A upon that occasion should render himselfe to the prison of the Fleet Which said summe of 160 l. the same A acknowledgeth to be made of their lands and chattles which said 80 l. the same W. acknowledgeth to be made of his lands and Chattles to be levied to the use and behoof of the said Richard if it should happen the said A. to make default in any of the premisses and thereof lawfully to be convicted which said Recognizance in Form aforesaid taken The said Cheife Justice afterwards to wit the 30 day of June then next following in our said Court with his owne hands and delivered to be inroled upon Record and now there before our Justices of the common Bench aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid in the Terme of the holy Trinity An. 21. abovesaid is inroled of which said plea of Debt a certain plaint before them was levied in our Court before Iohn Hodges Esq then being one of the sheriffs of London and the same plaint by our Writ upon our Command before our Chief Justice at his Chamber aforesaid was sent and had As by the record and proceedings therein in our said Court before our said Justices at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth And although the same Richard before the said Oct. S. Mich. to wit the 17. day of September An. c. 21. abovesaid our certaine originall Writ in a plea of debt of 80 l. against the same A. out of our Chancery at Westminster aforesaid then being before our Justices of the Common Bench at Westminster aforesaid Oct. S. Mich. then next following retornable Commenced and the same A. at the said 8. S. Mich. by I. R. then his Attorney to the said Writ in Debt aforesaid as by the same Richard against the same A. in Forme aforesaid commenced according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid appeared And afterwards to wit in 8. S. Hill then next following the same A. aswell of the said Debt of 80 l. aforesaid as in 7 l. which to the same Richard in our said Court were adjudged for his Damages which he had by the occasion of the detayning of that Debt whereof he was convicted and judgment there against the same A. for the same Richard in the same plea in our Court aforesaid was given as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court before our Justices at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the same A. hath not rendred his body in execution of the Judgment aforesaid in our said Court at the said Oct. S. Hill nor satisfied the said Richard for the
said Debt and damages aforesaid and because we will that those things which before our Chiefe Justice were rightly acted and known to be duely executed we command you that by honest c you should make knowne to the said A. and W that they be before our justices at Westminster quinq Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the same A. wherefore the same 160 l. by the same A. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged to be made of his Lands and Chattles and the same W. wherefore the said 80 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be made of his lands and Chattles and to the same Richard ought not to be rendred according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And have you there the names c. And this writ c. Test 14. Aprillis An. c. 22. Entry of a Scire fac in an audita qâ—erela M 21. Jac. rot Brownlow ss Whereas wee were â—nformed by the great complaint of S. A. Clerk that whereas one R. B. lately in the Court to wit in Hillary Terme An. c. 19. before our Justices at Westminster had recovered against the same S. aswell a certaine debt of 12 l. as 40 s. which c. whereof he is convicted And although the same S. in execution of the Debt and Damages aforesaid by vertue of a certain Writ of ours of Capias ad satisfaciendum thereof to our sheriff of Lincolne directed by Edward Hussey Knight and Baronet late sheriff of the same County at the suit of the same Richard was taken and imprisoned and by the same sheriff out of the same prison was permitted to goe at larg whither he would and from the execution aforesaid was delivered As by the same S. by waies and meanes convenient is ready to informe Neverthelesse the same Richard for the debt and Damages aforesaid against the same S. upon the recovery aforesaid hath againe now prosecuted and unjustly hath procured the same S. for that occasion againe to be taken and hitherto to be detayned in our Prison unto the immoderate Damage and grievance of the said S whereupon he hath be sought us to adhibit to him a fit remedy And because we will not that the same S. be injured in this behalfe And being willing to doe what is just we commanded our Justices that hearing the complaint of the same S. in this behalfe and calling before them the parties aforesaid and hearing their reasons therein they cause to be done to the same S. full and speedy justice as of right and according to the Law and custom of our Realm of England ought to be done we command you that by honest c you make knowne to the said Richard that he be here c. retornable Oct. Hill Test 30. Oct. An. 21. c. Scot. 47. H 20. Jac. in Mr. Brownlowes remembrance litera B. ss Entry of a Sci fac after a Sci. fac against Ter-Tenants Whereas wee have lately by our writ we have commanded the sheriffs of London that by honest and Lawfull men of their Bayliwick they should make knowne to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of F. C. late of W. c. otherwise called c. in Fee-simple from the day of S. Martin c. An. 42. Eliz. Regin which day E. G. in the Court of the said late Lady the Queen of the Common Bench at Westminster before E. A. c. by the consideration of the same court had recovered against the said F aswell a certaine debt of 24 l. as 6 l. which to the same Edmond in the same Court were adjudged c. whereof he is convicted or at any time afterwards in their bayliwick that they should be before our Justices at Westminster in Oct. Pur. S. Mariae last past to shew if they had or knew any thing for themselves to say wherefore the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the lands and tenements which were of the said F at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the seisin of the same Tenants in your Bayliwick ought not to be made and rendred to the said Edmond according to the Forme of the recovery aforesaid if it shall seeme expedient to them and our sheriffs of London to our said Justices at Westminster at that day retorned that there were not any Tenants of any of the lands or Tenements which were of the said Francis at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards who had any thing where or by which they could make knowne to them whereupon it was testified in our said Court on the behalfe of the said Edmond that there are divers Tenants of divers lands and Tenements which were of the said F at the time of the judgment aforesaid given in the County of Suff. to whom the same sheriff may make knowne Good president Therefore it was commanded to the same sheriff of Suff. that by honest and lawfull men of his bayliwick he should make knowne to the Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said F. R. in Fee-simple at the said 15. S. Martin An. 42. abovesaid that they should be before our Justices at Westminster 15. Pas last past to shew if they had or knew any thing for themselves to say wherefore the debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be made of the Lands and Tenements and rendred to the same E. in Form aforesaid And our said sheriff of Suff. to wit W. H. Esq to our said Justices at Westminster at that day renorned that he by P. K. and L. S. honest and lawfull men of his bayliwick made knowne to certaine F. B. Esq Tenant of the mannor of P. with the appurtenances in W. in the same County of Suff. And to R. L. Gent. Tenant of the rectory of the Church of L. in the County of S. which were of the said F. B. Esq at the time of the judgment aforesaid given of being before our said Justices at Westm at that day to answer in Form aforesaid c. and that there are no other Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said F. B. in his Bayliwick to whom he could make knowne and the same F. B. and R. at the same 15. Pas in our said Court appearing said that the same E. Execution against the said F. B. of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances and against the same Richard of the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances ought not to have because they say that before the writ of Scire sac to the sheriff of Suff. directed to wit such a day and yeare one Thomas B Gent. was Tenant as of his Free Tenement of the mannor of E otherwise E. Court with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said mannor with the appurtenances the same Francis Burnall at the same 15. Martin An. 42. abovesaid which day the judgment aforesaid was given was seised in his
or Coppice called Weston Wood aforesaid and also the third part of the profits of the Mannor-Court of Weston upon the green aforesaid Tythes of wood Third part of the profits of Mannor Couâ—t 3d part of the the advowson of the vica ridge of W. and of one Close called Cow-lease c. And also the Advowson of the vicaridge of the Church of Weston aforesaid to hold to the said Countesse and her assignes in severalty by metes and bounds in the name of her whole Dower to her out of the Hundred Mannor Tenements Rectory and Advowson aforesaid after the death of the sayd Francis late Earl of Berks her late Husbandhapning as by the sayd Writ to him it was commanded c. The like assignment of Dower between the same parties upon the same Roll. Summons ss JUry of twenty four Knights of the Neighbour hood of T. ven recogn if the Jury by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned in the Court of the Lady the Queen Entry of a writ of summons in an attaint executed and awarding of a resummons against the defendant hab corp against the grand Iury and Distring against the petii jury before the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by writ of the Lady the Queen and afterwardr before the Beloved and faithfull of the said Lady the Queen R. C. Knight Cheif Iustice of the Lady the Queen assigned to hold pleas before the said Queen and G. G. Esquire Attorney Generall of the said Lady the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lady the Queen of Nisi prius by Form of the statute c. at Stonystratford in the County aforesaid taken between R M. Gent. plaintiff and I.Y. of T. c. and R. W. of T. c. of a certain Trespasse to the same R. by the said I. and R. done as it was said made a false oath as the same R. greivously complaining hath shewed to the said Lady the Queen or not And now here at this day to wit in Octab sancti Hillarii came the same R. M. by T. his Attorney and the said I. Y. and R.W. summoned c. 4 Die pl. being solemnly called came not and of them the sheriff now returned that he summoned Summons returned c. therefore let the same I.Y. and R W. be resummoned that they be here 15. Pas to hear the sayd Iury of twenty four Knights and also J. Jugram I. S. I. S. c. twelve Iurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid being called came not and of them the sheriff now returneth that every one of them is severally attached by pledges J Denn and R Fenn Hab. corp Iur. 24 Milit. Therefore they in mercy c. therefore the Iury of twenty four Knight aforesaid is respited here untill the said Terme Distring Iur. prim inqisitionis c. and that the sheriff have then and there the bodyes of the same Iury of twenty four Knights to make the said Recognizance c. their Lands c. and that of the issues c so that he may have their bodies here at that Terme to heare the Recognizance the same day is given to the same R.M. here c. P 8. Jac. rot 1938. Brownlow Lincoln ss Entry of a writ of summ and resumm in attaint and Distring awarded against the grand Iury the party and the petit Iury. Iury of twenty four Knights of the Neighbourhood of W. vid. Recogn si Jur. by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned before the Lord the King at Westminster by Bill without the writ of the said Lord the King between Henry Earl of Lincolne one of the Peeres c. of England and Ed. Dymock Knight of certain Trespasses and contempts against the Forme of the statute De scandalis magnat therein lately made and provided and afterwards before the beloved and faithfull Peter Warburton Knight one of the Iustices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench and Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench Iustices of the said Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lord the King De nisi prius by Forme of the statute therein made and provided P 4. Eliz rot 532. Cerciorare to certifie a retorn whereupon an attaint is brought The grand jury the Defendant and the petit Jury make default Quaere the sheriff returns not the writ Resummons awarded against the grand Jury parties and petit Iury. at the Castle of Lincolne in the County aforesaid taken made a false Oath as the said Earl to the said Lord the King now greiviously complaining sheweth or not And now here at this day to wit Tres Sept. Pasch here came the sayd Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the Iurors of the Iury of twenty four Knights aforesaid as the same E. D. and also Lawrence Coddington of C. with eleven other Iurors of the first inquisition aforesaid being solemnly called came not therefore let the same jurors of the jury of twenty four Knights be resummoned that they be here in Octab. Sancti Trinitatis to make the jury of twenty four Knights and that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill that Terme and as well the said E as the said jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid are resummoned that they may be here at the same time to hear the said Iury of twenty four Knights the same day is given to the said Earle here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff did nothing therein nor sent the writ thereof therefore as before let another writ thereof be made returnable here 15. Michaelis the same day is given to the said Earl here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the sayd Edward as the said twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid resummoned Al. resum awarded c. 4 Die pl. being called came not c. and also the jury of twenty four Knights aforesaid likewise being called came not therefore that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill Cr. sancti Martini and the sheriff is commanded that he distrain as well the sayd jury of twenty foure Knights that they be then here to make the jury of twenty foure Knights aforesaid A Distring awarded See the like between the parties aforesaid M 9 Iac rot 3127. Br. as the same Edward as the same Iury of twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid that they be here at the same time Auditur Recognitionem illam c. the same day is given to the said Earle here c. and it is to be known that a writ thereof the Iustices here in Court that same Terme have delivered a writ thereof to R. S.
the cattell fi st taken you make known to our Iustices at Westminster 15 Michaelis last past and that you put by sureties and safe pledges the same I that hee should be before our Iustices at Westminster at the said 15 sancti Michaelis to answer to the said W. and T. of the taking of the cattell aforesaid and in the mean time if you could to replevy to the same W and T their cattell aforesaid and afterwards for that it seemed to our said Iustices at VVestminster for certain causes propounded before them and them specially moving that our Writ aforesaid Quoad Cap. in VVith The writ of cap. in Withernam inconsulte emanavit therefore a Supersedeas is therein awarded The cattell of the Defendant taken and and delivered to the pl intiff in withe n. before the delivery of the sup and that he by force of the supersed cannot redeliver them for that they were eloyned Withernam post Withernam The cattell taken in Withernam eloyned before the reception of the Writ of Sup. Plur. cap. in Withernam for the Def. with a writ in the mean time to deliver the cattell first taken in Withernam of the cattel of the said I for the cattell of the said VV and T by him taken before improvisely issued out of our Court aforesaid by another Writ we have commanded you that of any cattell of the said I to be taken in VVithernam for the same cattell of the said W and T by him before taken you be altogether superseded and if you shall have taken any of the cattell of the said I in VVithernam by occasion of the premisses then you shall redeliver them to the said I without delay and inasmuch as you shall execute this our precept you shall make appear to our Justices at Westminster at the said 15 Michaelis and then our said Justices at VVestminster at the said 15 Mich. returnest that by vertue of the said Writ De Capiend in VVithernam to you before directed to wit such a day and year abovesaid of the cattell of the said I. L. four Cowes c. to the value of the said cattell of the said W. and T which I took thou have in VVithernam and that afterwards such a day and year abovesaid our said Writ of Supersedeas was delivered thereof to you and at the same 15 sancti Michaelis you certified to our Justices at Westminster that the cattell of the same I in Forme aforesaid taken in Withernam and delivered to the same W and T. you could not redeliver to the said I after the coming of the said Writ of Supersedeas according to the Tenor of the said writ of Supersedeas for that the same cattell were eloyned and yet are eloyned and transmitted by the same W. and T. to places to you unknown so that by no meanes you could have sight of the sayd cattell after the coming of the said Writ of Supersedeas and therefore we command you as more times we have commanded you that of the cattell of the said W and T in your Bailiwick to the value of the said cattell of the said I taken in Withernam you take in Withernam and deliver them to the said I to be kept untill the said cattell of the said I. taken in Withernam you can redeliver to the same I. And inasmuch as you shall execute this our precept you make to appeare to our Justices at Westminster such a day and in the mean time if you can to make redelivery to the said I of the cattell aforesaid first taken in Withernam and have there this writ Teste c. Entry of a Sup. to an Exigent and pledges de novo after the retorn of a nichil upon a cap. in Withernam awarded after averia Elongata retorned af er nonsuit of the plaintiff and before declaration in replevin T 3. Jac. rot 612. Brownlow Cornub. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas I. H. and O. R. were summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster to answer I. K. Esq of a plea wherefore they took a certaine Cow of the same I. K. and her unjustly kept against sureties and pledges c. the same I. K. afterwards in the same Court of the Lord the King here to wit at VVestminster aforesaid made default whereupon it was then considered in the said Court of the Lord the King here that the same I. K. and his pledges to prosecute should be in mercy and that the said I. H. and O. should goe thereof without day c. And that they should have retorne of the Cow aforesaid whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that without delay he should retorne the Cow aforesaid to the said I. H. and O. And her at the complaint of the said should not deliver without a writ of the said Lord the King which should make expresse mention of the judgment aforesaid Reto habend awarded and in asmuch c. he should make appeare here 15. Pas last past at which day the sheriff retorned to the Justices here that before the comming of the writ aforesaid the said Cow was cloyned by the said I. K. to places to him altogether unknowne whereby he could not retorne the Cow aforesaid to the said I. H. and O. as by the said Writ it was commanded him vacca elongata retorned c. whereupon it was commanded the sheriff that of the Cattle of the said I. K. to the value of the Cow aforesaid before taken he should take in VVithernam and should deliver them to the said I. H and O. to hold to them untill he could retorne the Cow aforesaid before taken Capias in Withernam awarded Cap as for the contempt and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges the said I. K that he should be here in 15. Trin. in the second yeare of the Lord the King now to answer aswell the said Lord the King now of the contempt Nichil habet that the sheriff could take in Withernam As to the said I. H and O. of the injuries to them in this behalfe offered and that he should have here the names of the pledges and that writ at which day the sheriff retorned to the justices here that the said I. K. had no Cow in his bayliwick which he could take in VVithernam Qâ—ere if good because the Capias is not awarded before the Exigent Exigent awarded nor had any thing in his Bayliwick by which he could be attached whereby as more times the sheriff was commanded that he put in exigent the same I. K. from county to county untill c. he should be utlawed if not c and if c. then he should take him and safely c. so that he should have his body here 15. Trin. aswell to answer to the said Lord the King of the contempt as to the said I. H. O of the damage and injuries to
pregnant with his brother is past and prayed Justice to be exhibited to him so that the same Muriel come come before the justices of the Bench upon command upon VVednesday next before the Feasts of the Appostles Peter and Paul in the second year following And the same Muriel said that before to wit that she was pregnant and by the said William and well acknowledgeth that his terme of being borne is past and she expects the mercy of God and the said Peter likewise said that the terme is past and prayeth this to be allowed him And hereupon it is found that 48. weekes have passed since the first Wednesday wherein she acknowledge that her husband departed from her but afterwards she acknowledged that she was not with child but long since being sore greived with such an infirmity that she thought herâ—elfe to be with child Confession that she is not pregnant Iudgment Therefore it is considered that Peter be received as heire of the said VVilliam and may have his inheritance notwithstanding this that she made herself impregnant Et habeat brevia ad dominos suos c. hereupon came the same Peter and prayeth juâ—gment whether she ought thereof to have her dower because she to disinherit him falsely made her selfe impregnant Vtlawry P 4. Jac. rot 808. Brownlow ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but should take R. W. late c utlawed in London Entry of a non omit upon a Cap. utlagat Denbigh Vtlawry such a day and yeare at the suite of H. B. in a plea of debt if c. and safely c. so that he might have his body here this day to wit in Pas to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in that behalfe c. And now here at this day came the said H. by â— Guy his attorney and the sheriff to wit I W. Esq now retorneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed commanded the Bayliff of the liberty of the Towne and liberty of Denbigh Mand. Ballio who hath the returne of al the writs and the execution of them within the liberty aforesaid which said Bayliff gave him this answer to wit that they have taken the body of the said R. and have him ready Amerciament vir Notwithstanding the said Bayliffs have not delivered his body to the said sheriff according to the strictnesse of that command but yet keep the body of the said R. under the custody of the said Bayliffs so that the sheriff could not have his body at the day and place aforesaid as it was commanded him And because it seemeth to the justices here that the said â—etorne is insufficient in Law the said sheriff Attachment awarded to the Coroners for Contempt to wit I. W Esq in mercy and fined by the Court here to 6 l. 13 s. 8 d. And it is commanded the Coroners of the county aforesaid that they attach the said sheriff so that they may have his body here in 15. Trin. to answer the Lord the King of the contempt c. Entry of the reversall of an Vilary against the Intestate prosecuted by the Administrator for defect in the return of the writ of Exigent for that three Hust were held after the return of the Exigent Letters of administration shewed Pas 36. Eliz. rot 1990. ss Afterwards that is to say 12. February An. 39. Eliz. came here into the Court one T.H. of c. and said that the same I. N. after the utlawry aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid published died dyed instate c. And that the same T. is Administrator of the Goods and Chattels which were of the same I. at the time of his death bringeth here into Court the letters administratory of I. by divine providence Arch-Bishop of Cant. Primate and Metropolitan of all England which are dated at London 14. Feb. An. Do. 1596. which the commission of the administration of the goods and Chattles which were of the same I. at the time of his death to the same T. in form aforesaid testifie c. and prayeth the hearing of the return of the said vvrit of Exigent retorned in the Bench here against the said N. in Oct. S. Mich. and it is read to him in these words at the Hustings of the pleas of Land held at Guild-Hall in the City of London upon Munday next after the Feast of S. Dunstan the Arch-Bishop An. 38. within written the within named I N. was the first time called and appeared not At the Hustings aforesaid upon Munday next after the Feast of Boniface Bishop An Suprad the said I. was the second time called and appeared not at the Hustings of the pleas of land held in G. in the Citty aforesaid upon Munday next before the Feast of the Annunciation c. An. Supr the said I. was the third time called and appeared not At the Hust of the pleas of L. and held in Guild-Hall in the City aforesaid upon Monday next before the Feast of S. Marg the Virgin An. Sup. the said I was the fourth time called and appeared not at the Hustings of the pleas of land of the City aforesaid held c the said I. was the fiâ—â—t time called and appeared not therefore he is utlawed The answer of T. L. L. H. sheriffs that writ is above indorsed we the now she of L. have received of the laâ—e Sh. of L. the going from their Office the answer of I. W. R.G. sheriffs which being read and heard the same T H. saith that the utlawry aforesaid against the said I. in Form aforesaid publ shed and had is void in law and of no force nor effect Error for that the three Hust was hâ—ld after the day of the return of the Exigent for that that it appeareth by the retorne aforesaid that the same I. was the third time called upon Monday next before the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary which said day of Monday next before the Feast of the Annunciation c was long after the retorne of the said vvrit of Exi whereupon the retorn being seene And by the justices here fully understood it seemed to the Justices here that the allegation of the said T. is true Therefore for the defect aforesaid Judgment that the Vtlary be reversed and divers others in the retorne aforesaid it is considered that the utlawry aforesaid be adnulled vacated and altogether taken for nothing c. Pas 4. Eliz. That an utlawry was reversed for that Nota. Utlawry reversed for that the 3. proclamations upon the writ of proclamacion in a forreigne county was made that day the pes Was 5. exact upon the Exig that it appeared upon the retorne of the proclamation the third proclamation in the County of Essex was made the same day that the guinto Exactus was made upon the exigent in
in Forme aforesaid published and the judgment thereupon by the said Coroners given they have here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Trin. That the same justices may doe therein what of right and according to the Law and custome of England ought in this behalfe to be done and now here at this day came the same W. H. by W. B. his attorney and because the Coroners of the County aforesaid the writ aforesaid which was otherwise delivered to them to be executed in Form of Law had not here at this day Miserec XL s. Therefore the said Coroners to writ H. T. and I. L. in Miser And are fined by the Iustices here at 40 s. P 12. Jac. Rot. 2243. Goldesbursh Montgomery ss E. P. Esquire sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here in court a certaine writ of Capias utlagat against M. P. at the suite of R. O. Kni. in a plea of Debt retornable before the Justices here Mens Pas that same Term. in mercy c. And is fined by the Iustices aforesaid at 60 s. See Grislyes case Cok. 8. fo 40. B. according to the old book of entryes title record M. 27. H. 7 rot 531. Amerciament det ver at 10 l. for not returning the Habeas Corpus Jur. Devant the Justices de Nisi prius P 13. Jac. rot 733. Brownlow Sar. ss Reversall of an Utlary for insufficient return of a Certiorare It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but that he should take H N. of c. utlawed in London on Monday next after the Feast of S. Leonard the Abbot An. regis c. 12. at the suite of Henry Breton in a plea of debt if c. so that he might have his body here at this day to wit A dâ—e Pas in 15. dies To do and receive what the court of the King here should consider of him in this behalfe and now here at this day came the said Henry N. in his proper person and the sheriff to wit Rowland Traps Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the said writ to him directed took the body of the said He. N. whose said body he now hath here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon the said Henry N. prayeth the hearing of the writ of Cerciorare whereupon the utlawry aforesaid by Iohn Gore and William Gore then sheriffs of London To the court of the Lord the King here was certified and to him it is read in these words London ss we I. G and W G. sheriffs of London do certifie to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster in the writ to this schedule annexed specifyed that searching the roles records and other memorables being under our custody we find in the same that Henry N. of A. in the County of Sur. Esquire in the writ aforesaid named put in the hustings of London being five times called and not appearing he was utlawed in mannor as followeth That is to say at the hustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall in the City of London upon Monday next after the Feast of c. An. Rs. c. 12. the said Henry N. was the first time called and appeared not and at the bustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall c. on Munday next after the Feast c. An. Sup. the same H. was the second time called and appeared not The answer of H. Iay and T. B. sheriffs That writ as above indorsed was delivered subscirbed to the sheriffs by the said sheriffs at their departure from theire office At the hustings of common pleas held at Guild-hall of the City aforesaid on Munday next before the Feast c. An. Supr the said Henry was the third time called and appeared not At the hustings of the common pleas held c. The said Henry was the fourth time called and appeared not at the husting c. The said Henry was the fift time called and appeared not Therefore he was utlawed The answer of P. P. and M L. sheriffs and this is the utlawry in manner and Forme as it is published against the said Henry Nudigate which we have ready before the Justices at the day and place contayned in the same writ according to the intent of that writ The answer of Iohn Gore and William Gore sheriffs which being read and heard the same H. Nudigate saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that in the retorne aforesaid between these words said sheriffs a certaine materiall word is omitted to wit late so that by the omission of the said word it doth not appeare by the returne aforesaid by which sheriffs the said Henry N. was the third fourth and fift time called or by the said sheriffs now or by the said late sheriffs as it ought to appeare by the said retorne For that cause the said returne is insufficient in Law and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry whereupon the said return being seen and by the said Justices here being fully examined and understood It seemed to the Justices here that the allegation of the said H. N. is true in his discharge from the utlawry aforesaid therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said H. N. for that occasion be unmolested not in any thing grieved But goe therein quiet c. Vtlary reversed for variance between the Record and the writ of Exig fac T 7. Jac. rot 3608. Brownlow Sussex ss It was commanded the sheriff and so recite the Capias utlagat as in the next before as by the said writ to him it was commanded c. which said Francis being so taken and had prayeth bearing of the writ of Exigent whereupon the same F. at the suite of the said W. in Forme aforesaid is utlawed And it is read unto him in these words James by the Grace of God c. reciting the writ and Test untill you come to and of Scotland the XL. he also prayeth the hearing of the record whereupon that writ Issued And it is read unto him in these words ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should take Francis Challoner late of c. in the county aforesaid Esquire otherwise called F. C. de L. in the County of Sussex Esquire if c. and safely c. so that he shall have his body c. and so recite the whole entry untill you come to in Forme of Law to be executed c. which being read and heard the said Francis saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that he by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that there is manifest variance between
been held And this they are ready to verifie whereupon c. T 8. Iac. rot 4640. which being read and heard onerari non Vtlary reversed for omitting the second exact between the first and third because he saith that by the retorne aforesaid it evidently appeareth that the said R. was never the second time called upon the said Writ of Exi fac so that the utlawry aforesaid against the said Ric. the second calling of him the said R. upon the Writ aforesaid being omitted was published and had so that the utlawry aforesaid against him the said R. so published and had is void and this c. The utlawrie is reversed Januaii for Januarii Vtlary reversed for omitting the return of the Plu. cap. in the close of the Exigent H 22. Iacobi rot 1404. Ianuaii for Ianuarii H. 7. Iac. rot 3503 utlawry reversed for omitting the retorn of the plu cap. in the close of the Exigent P 10. H. 4. rot 337. One renders himselfe prisoner to the Fleet upon an utlawry And because it appeareth that the exigent was not entred upon record in any other Terme he is discharged of the utlawry and set at large Norff. I. at the suit of D. Veiwe Entry of a writ of view in Formedon in discender and a quashment of the same for a speedier returne thereof then by Law it ought TRin. 8. Iac. roll 485. Wolastone City of Yorke ss It was commanded the sheriffs that without delay they should cause to be had to the Gardian searcher or master of the Scoole and Elemosinary poore of the Hospitall of S. Iohn the Baptist in K. R. the view of one Mesuage with the appurtenances in the parish of Arpon the pavement which William Lister in the court here claimeth against them as his right by writ of the Lord the King de forma donationis in discendere and that it should be said to 4. Knights who should be present at that view That they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Trin. to testifie the said view And that they should have here the names of the Knights and that writ and now here at this day came aswell the said W. L as the Gardian c. by their attorneys aforesaid and upon this Writ of view is quashed because it appeareth here that the said writ is vitious to wit in this that it issued forth retornable here on the said morrow of the holy Trinity where it ought by due course of Law to have beene made retornable here tres Trin. because the plea aforesaid had his last continuance untill Oct. Pur. Beat. Mariae last past Therefore at the petition of the demandant A new writ of view awarded and by the consent of the attorny of the said Guardion c. let another writ thereupon be made in Form as aforesaid retornable here in Cr. Anim. And in the meane while c. at which day here came the parties c. by their attornies and the sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore let another Writ thereof be made in Form aforesaid retornable here tres Pas the same day is given to the same W. L here c. TRin. 11. Iac. roll 3388. Goldesburgh Ebor. ss The sheriff was commanded that he should attach William Denton so that he might have him here at such a day to answer W. H. Gent. one of the attornies Entry of a baile taken upon an attachment of Priviledge in an action of debt c. according to the liberties and priviledges c. of a plea of debt c. and now here at this day came aswell the said W. H. in his proper person as the said W. D. in his proper person under the custody of the sheriff of the county aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid here brought to the bar And hereupon such a day that same Term before Peter W. Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King c. at his chamber in Chancery-lane London came the said W. D. in his proper person under the custody of the sheriff of the county aforesaid And hereupon one R. W. of Cliffords Inne London being present in his proper person before the said Justices undertooke for the said W. D. H 8. b. 8 rot 1. an appearance entred upon an attachment upon an information in the summe of 20 l. and the said William D. assumed for him selfe in the summe of 40 l. to have the body of the said W. D. here in court from day to day at every day of pleading untill the plea be determined and judgment be thereupon given and also if it happen judgment in the same plea to be adjudged for the same W. Hamp against the said W. Denton would satisfie or render his body in execution to the prison of the said Lord the King of the Eleet upon that judgment which said sum of 20 l. the said R. acknowledged to be made out of his lands and chattles and which said summe of 40 l. the said Will. Denton acknowledged Recognizance enrolled c. as in others which said recognizance the said Justice with his owne hands delivered here in Court that same Terme to be inroled upon record T 28. H. 8. rot 328. View View was granted in a Writ de consuetudinibus and Servitiis M 2. and 3. P and M. rot 315. Norff. ss Alias writ of view awarded where the Sheriff retu ned upon the first writ of view that none of the Demandants would shew him the lands It was commanded the sheriff that justly c. he cause to be had to T. K. Knight the view of the mannors of B. B with the appurtenances which Geo. O. Esq in the Court of the Lord the King and the Lady the Queen here claymeth against him by Writ of the said Lady the Queene de ingru in le per And that he should say to 4. Knights who would be present at that view that they should be here at this day to wit tres Mich. to testifie the said view And now here at this day came aswell the said G. by I. C. his attorney as the said T. by P. P. his attorney And the sheriff to wit I. S now retorneth that none on the part of the said demandant came to shew the said sheriff the Mannors aforesaid and for that default he could by no meanes execute the execution and command of that Writ As that Writ in it selfe doth exact and require Therefore as before let the said Thomas have view of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances the same day is given aswell to the said George as to the said Thomas here c. in Cr. Pur. and in the meane time c. THat the view ought to be examined in an assize and Wast and that there ought to be 6. Nota. Recognitors to have the veiw and that 4. of them be hundreders c. Venire Facias P 3. and 4. P. and M. rot 126. Whotly
that the moyety should be redelivered remayneth against the said I.N. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the said I. N. of the moneys received by the same I. aswell for the issues and profits of the moyetyes aforesaid as of the woods and under-woods aforesaid in the said moyety late growing by the same I. N. cut downe and sold should account with the said T. B. And also that the moyety of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances should be redelivered to the said T. B. And hereupon the same T. B. prayeth a Writ of the Lord the King and of the Lady the Queen de Reliberand to the same T. B. the moyety aforesaid to the said sheriff of Warr. to be directed and it is granted him retornable in Cr. S. Martin c. Entry of a Venire facias direct d by the 〈◊〉 of the common Bench to the keeper of the Pallace of the Lord the King of West who is the warden of the Fleer to retuâ—ne a Iury of attornies of the Common Bench to inquire of all misdemeanours done in the same Court ss It was commanded the Keeper of the Pallace of the Lord the King of Westminster that he should cause to come before the Justices of the Lord the King of his Bench here the 29 day of November that same Term 12 attornies of the Court of the Common Bench here whereof every one of them should have 100 s. in lands Tenements or rent by the yeare at the least by whom the truth of the matter might be the better knowne to inquire upon theire oath of all Felonies Falsehoods rasures and deceits whatsoever in the court of the Lord the King here done or committed c. At which day W. B. Esquire keeper of the pallace aforesaid retorneth here a certaine Paunell with the names of the Jurors c. 16. of whom to wit W. K. c. are elected and sworne to inquire of and upon the premisses whreupon further day is given to them by the Court here to inquire of and upon the premisses here untill Cr. Pur. At which day here came the said Jurors And hereupon for certaine causes the Court here moving further day is given them by the court here to inquire of and upon the premisses untill tres Sept. Pas At which day here came the Jurors aforesaid who say upon their oath that whereas otherwise to wit in the Term of S Hillary An. Rs. nunc 17. before Io. Br. Knight and his associats then Justices of the Lord the King of the Common bench at Westminster one 1. Allen Knight prosecuted a certaine account of debt against Robert Hodgson late of Presentment made by the inquest of the attornies c. Gent upon demand of 20 l. And the same R. in the said Court by R Swinlow his attorney appearing in the defence by him made saith nothing in Bar of preclusion of the action of the said I. A. aforesaid for which it was then considered there that the same I. should recover against the said R. his debt aforesaid and his damages by occasion of the detayning of that debt as it appeareth in the same Term rot 325. and the same R. afterwards for that cause was put into the Hustings of London to be utlawed and for that cause afterwards was utlawed as it doth appeare in Trinity Term An. Rs. nunc 18. rot 260. and afterwards to wit 12. November An Rs. nunc 21 at Westminster in the county of Midd. in the Tresure-house there whereunto the records of the Lord the K. belong to the Common Bench under the custody of Geo. Roll Clearke of the Tresury aforesaid were kept these words or sayings to wit Wassan and Sinhowe by the procurement of the said Ro. Hodgson were rased to the intention to vacat and altogether to make null the utlawry aforesaid and of the same word or saying called Wassand was made warrand and of the same word or saying of the name of the attorney of the said Robert Hodgson called Swinhow the letter H. at the end of the same Writ was cased and abstracted and the letter H. was made the letter B. so that the name of his attorney on the plaint aforesaid by the procurement of the said Ro. Hodgson by reason of the said rasure now is Swinbowe in contempt of the Lord the King but who or whom rased that record the Jurors hithrto are altogether ignorant and hereupon the Jurors aforesaid have further day to inquire of and upon the premisses to wit untill the feast of St Iohn Baptist then next following c. At which day here came the Jury aforesaid and upon this day is further given to the Jury aforesaid to inquire of and upon the premisses here untill 15. Mich. then next following c. Withernam P 44. Eliz. rot 1201. ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of pledges of new after withernam and warding of second deliverance and awarding of a writ ad Deliberan averia capt in Withernam upon an nonsuit beore appearance whereas W. H. bad been summoned to be in the Court of the Lady the Queene here to wit at Westminster to answer I K of a plea wherefore he took a certaine Oxe of the said I. and him unjustly detayned against sureties and pledges c. The same I. afterwards in the same Court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster made default by which it was considered in the same court of the said Lady the Qu. here that the same I and his pledges of prosecuting should be thereof in mercy And that the same W. should goe thereof without day and that he should have retorne of his Oxe aforesaid whereupon it was commanded to the same sheriff 30 H 8 Dier so 41. Pl 4 and fo 59. Pl 14 Pasch 27 Eliz rot 1134 entry of a w it of Capias in withernam in like case H. 19 7 rot 401. like entry P 44 Eliz. rot 1935 inter L and P and others that without delay he should make retorne of the said Oxe to the same W. And should not deliver him at the complaint of the said I. without a Writ of the said Lady the Queen that of the said judgment should make expresse mention And in asmuch c. he should make appare here in Cr. Pur. last past And the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King here at this day retorned that before the comming of the Writ aforesaid the said Oxe was inlarged by the same J. to places altogether to him unknown so that he could not make retorne of the Oxe aforesaid to the said W as by the said Writ to him is was commanded Therefore c. that of the cattle of the same I. to the value of the Oxe aforesaid before taken he should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said W. to hold to him untill the Oxe aforesaid before taken could be retorned And that he should put by Sureties and
follow in these words Henry by the Grace of God c. to the Sheriff of Kent greeting whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England our Father at Westminster lately held amongst other things it was ordained and established that such who are Sheriffs Bayliffs for one year should not be in any such Office for three years next following except Sheriffs Bayliffs whose Sheriffaldries are Hereditary And you by your Oath lately taken are bound firmly to observe the statute aforesaid And we have understood that N. K. one of your Bayliffs of your County which Sheriffraldry is not hereditary to you as it is said hath continued by more years in the same Office against the form of the statute aforesaid we willing inviolably to observe the statute aforesaid command you as other times we have commanded you that if it be so that then you remove without delay the same N. from his said Office and suffer him not further to execute in the same Office in the County aforesaid against the form of the statute aforesaid or signifie the cause to us wherefore you have non-obeyed our command at another time therein to you directed Teste humfr Duce Glouc. Keeper of England at West 17. Febr. An. Reg. nostri 9. Capias ad Satisfaciendum Entry of a Testat Casam for residue of a debt whereof parcell was levied upon a Testat Fi. fac Here the return of nulla bona by the Sheriff of Wilts is not recited which ought to have been Parcell levied nulla bona returned P. 6. H 8. rot 158. T. 5. Eliz. rot 381. Cap. after Elegit after an nihil is returned Non invent returned Testat casam awarded to the Sheriff of Glouc. T 13. Jac. Rot. 632. Brownlow C. Glouc. ss The Sheriffs were commanded that of the Lands and Chattels of R.F. c. otherwise called c. Gent. they would cause to be made as well a certain debt of a hundred and sixty pounds which R. F. in the Court of the Lord the King now here recorded against him as eighty shillings which to the same R. in the same Court of the Lord the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detaining of that debt And that he should have those monies here at this day to wit in Cro. Trin. to render to the same R. for his debt and damages aforesaid whereof he was convicted And now here at this day cometh the same R. by J. T. his Attorney and the Sheriff to wit R.B. Esquire now returneth that he by virtue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed of the Lands and Chattels of the same R. in his Bayliwick caused to be made sixty shillings parcell of the debt and damages aforesaid And further that the said R. had no other Lands and Chattels in his Bayliwick whereof he could make the residue of the debt and damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof hereupon the same R. prayeth a Writ of the Lord the King to be directed to the Sheriff of Witls where his originall Writt first issued to take the said R. to satisfie to the said R. of a hundred and sixty one pounds residue of the debt and damages aforesaid And it is granted to him returnable here Tres Trin. whereupon it was commanded the Sheriff of Wilts that he take the said R.F. if c. and safely c. that he may have his body here at the said Tearm to satisfie the said R. of the residue of the debt and damages aforesaid in form aforesaid And now here at this day to wit tres Trin. came the same R. by his Attorney aforesaid And the Sheriff now returneth that he is not found c And hereupon it is testified in the Court of the said Lord the King here that the said R. doth lye hid and run from place to place in the said County of Glouc. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of Glouc. that he take the same R. if c. and fafely c. so that he have his body here in Cro. Annimarum to satisfie the said R. of the residue of the debt and damages aforesaid in form aforesaid c. Capias pro fine and entâ—y of an Exigent thereupon H. 26. Eliz. Rot. 1737. c. Ford. Angl. ss The entry of an Exigent upon a Capias pro fine T. 26. Eliz. Rot. 2148. c. Ford. Monmoth Lennard Custos br Crompton Chirographer Comâ—osition made by the Justices for Fines in Monmoth a composition made by the Justices for Fines in Monmoth shire SVff ss Hil 41. Eliz. Rot. 2118. ss It was commanded the Sheriff that of the goods and Chattells which were of R. S. of Entry of a Casam after a Fâ—fac and special return de devastavix against the Executrix upon the Inquisition c. at the time of his death in the hands of A. F. and M. his wife Executrix of the Testament of the said R. in your Bayliwick he cause to be made as well a certain debt of sixty pounds which T. B. in the Court of the Queen here to wit at Westm recovered against the said R. Smith as twenty shillings which to the said T. in the same Court of the said Queen were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detaining of that debt And that he should have the monies before the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westm Mens Mich. to satisfie the said T. of the debt and damages aforesaid whereof he was convicted And whereupon it was considered in the same Court that the said T. should have execution against the same A. and M. of the debt and damages aforesaid of the Goods and Chattells which were of the same R. at the time of his death in the hands of the same A. and M. to be administred by default Recitall of the Testat fi fac de bonis testatoris Suggestion de bien And whereupon our Sheriffs of London returned to the Justices here to wit at Westm tres Trin. last past that the said A. and M. had no Goods or Chattells which were of the said R. at the time of his death in their hands in their Bayliwick to be administred whereof the debt and damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof they could cause to be made whereas it was testified in the same Court here that the said A and M. had sufficient of Goods and Chattells which were of the said R. at the time of his death in their hands in your Bayliwick to be administred Vic Mandavit ballino libertatis Nulla bona Suggestion that the Executor wasted divers goods with the intention that execution might not be done whereof they might cause to be made and levied the debt and damages aforesaid And the same Sheriff to the Justices here at that day returned that for the execution of that Writ he had commanded the chief Bayliff of the Lady the Queen of her liberty of
Bury St. Edmund in his County who hath full power to execute all Writs and Warrants within the liberty aforesaid and return of them To which said Bayliff execution of that Writ doth wholly remain to be done for that execution of the same Writ elsewhere out of the said Liberty in his County by the said Sheriff cannot be done which said Bayliff did answer the Sheriff that there were no Goods or Chattells in his Bayliwick which were of the said R. S. deceased in the hands of the said A. and M. to be administred whereof the debt and damages aforesaid or any parcell therof he could cause to be done And because the return aforesaid doth seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen here insufficient and in delay of execution of the Recovery aforesaid to be done And in the Court aforesaid before the said Justices here on the behalf of the said T. it is testified that the said A. and M. divers Goods and Chattells which were of the said K. at the time of his death in the hands of the said A. and M. to be administred have sold and the monies received for those Goods and Chattells have converted to their own uses and the residue of the Goods and Chattells which were of the said R. with intention that the said execution should not be thereupon done by the same A. and M. are eloyned or converted unto the uses of the said A. and M. The Lady the Queen now unwilling that such things which in the Court here are rightly acted and adjudged by art or ingeny to be avoided A Writ awarded to enquire of the wast commands the same Sheriff of Devon that of the Goods and Chattells which were of the said R. at the time of his death being in the hands of the same A. and M. in his Bayliwick he would cause to be made the debt and damages aforesaid if they could be found in his Bayliwick Otherwise it was commanded to the same Sheriff that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of his Bayliwick he should make diligent enquiry what Goods and Chattells which were of the said R. at the time of his death were by the said A. and M after the death of the said R sold eloyned or converted to their own uses And if it shall appear to the said Sherif by that Inquisition that the said A and M the Goods and Chattells which were of the said R at the time of his death to the value of the Debt and Damages aforesaid or of any parcell thereof after the death of the said R. have sold eloyned or converted to their own uses then of the proper Goods and Chattells of the said A and M in his Bayliwick he should cause to be made the Debt and Damages aforesaid to the value of the Goods and Chattells which were of the said R at the time of his death so sold eloyned or converted to their own uses and that he should have those monies here at this day to wit in Oct. S Hil to answer the said T of the debt and Damages aforesaid At which day here came the said T in his proper person And the Sherif now returneth that the said A and M have no Goods nor Chattells which were of the same R S at the time of his death in his hands to be administred whereof the Debt and Damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof could be made And the same Sherif further returned here a certain Inquisition taken at St. E B in his County the sixteenth day of January An 41. Eliz Reg before the same Sherif by vertue of that Writ by the oath of twelve honest and lawfull men of his County who say upon their oath that the said A and M have sufficient of the Goods and Chattells which were of the said R S at the time of his death in their hands to be administred to satisfie the Debt and Damages aforesaid And that the same A. and M. have sufficient of the goods and chattells which were of the sayd R. S. at the time of his death in their hands to be administred to satisfie the debt and damages aforesaid Devastavit found by Inquisition and that the same A and M. the same goods and chattells have sold eloyned and converted to their own uses and that the same A. and M. have no proper goods or chattells in his bayliwick whereof hee could make the debt and damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof therefore it is commanded the Sheriff that he should take the same A and M if c. And safely c. so that he might have their bodies here A die Pas in fifteen dayes to satisfie the said T of the said Debt and Damages aforesaid c. Pettifers case Coke 5 fol. 32. Where such course is adjudged ill and erronious such a president is in Mich. 2. Jac. rot 1756. Quaere if this form be usuall or not because the case aforesaid is adjudged to the contrary H 7 Iac. rot 904. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the Sheriffs Entry of a writ of Testat ca. sat in the County Palatine after resort upon a Devastavit returned against the Executors upon a Testat fi fac de bonis testatoris Entry of a fi fac de bonis testatoris Nulla bona testatoris returned that of the goods and chattells which were of T L late of c. otherwise called c. at the time of his death in the hands of F L late of c. Executor of the Testament of the same T being in your bailiwick you cause to be made as well a certaine debt of one hundred seventy three pounds eighteen shillings four pence which Francis Nedham in the Court c. as forty shillings which c. If the said Francis Looker hath so much goods and chattells which were of the said T at the time of his death in his hands to be administred and if he have not then the damages aforesaid to be levied of the proper goods and chattells of the said Francis Looker and that they should have those monyes here at this day to wit in Oct. ab S. Hillarii to render to the said Francis Needham for his debt and damages aforesaid whereof hee is convicted and now here at this day came the said Francis Needham by Iohn Gulston his Attorney and the Sheriffs now returned that the said Francis Looker hath no goods nor chattells in their Bailiwick which were of the said T at the time of his death in his hands to be administred whereof the debt and damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof could be made or levied nor any proper goods or chattells in their Bailiwick Testat fi fac awarded whereof they could make or levy the damages aforesaid or any parcell of them And hereupon it is testified in the Court of the King here that the said Francis Looker hath sufficient goods and chattells which were of the said T at the time of his death
execution upon that writ which had no continuance upon the roll prayeth to be discharged of the execution and because to the Justices here it sufficiently appeareth upon Record that the allegation of the said W. C. is true Therefore the said W. G. at the prayer of the sayd W. O. is committed to the Prison of the Fleet by occasion of the premisses there to stay untill c. M 7. and 8. Eliz. Rot. 1848. It was commanded the Sheriff that he should take Thomas Thurland late of Savoy in the county of Midd. Clerk or otherwise called T. T. c. if c. and safely c. so that he shauld have his body here To. Mich. to satisfy to W. Whitaker and Ralph Daye executors of the Testament of Jo. Ward of S. in the County of Hertford Yoman otherwise called c. and R. D. of Puckeridg to be my executor aswell of a certaine debt of 60 l. which the said John in the Court of the Queen here recorded against him as of 27. l. 11 s. 4 d. which to the said Iohn in the same Court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted And whereupon it was considered in the same Court here that the same Executor should have execution against the sayd Thomas for those Debt and Damages And whereupon the Sheriff of the County of Hertfort aforesaid retorned to our Justices here A die Pas in 15. daies last past that the said Thomas was not found in his Bayliffwick whereas it was testified in the same Court here that the said Thomas did lie hid wander and run from place to place in the said County of Midd. now here at this day came the same W. W. R.D. by Antony Stebbnig their attorney the Sheriff of the said County of Midd. to wit I. R. and I. H. now retorneth the Writ aforesaid by L. D. and E.I. late Sheriffs of the County of Midd. indorsed in Form following to wit that the same late Sheriff by vertue of the said Writ to him directed had took the body of the said T. T. whose body together with that Writ in his departure from his he delivered to the said I.R. I. H. now Sheriff of the same County of Midd. And which said body of the said T. T. together with the Writ aforesaid in Forme aforesaid indorsed the same now Sheriff of Midd. before the Justices here at this day hath ready As that writ in it selfe doth exact require And the said now Sheriff the body of the same T. T. by vertue of that Writ by him to the Barr brought and had prayed that the Justices here would receive that Writ from the said now Sheriff amongst other Writs de trib Septim S. Mich. is to be Filed in the Bench here by the Custos br of the Lady the Queen of the same Bench And that the said Sheriff by the Court here may be discharged from further Custody of the body of the said T. T. by vertue of the said writ whereupon it was given to the Court here to understand by the same T. T. that that writ by the said now Sheriff brought and shewed in the Court here is of no force in Law And by the same Court there ought not to be received for a writ of the said Lady the Queen to be Filed amongst other writs for that that the said writ in Easter tearm last past issued forth of the Court here retornable before the Justices here tres Trinitat last past And then the said writ had the test of Easter term before which said tres Septim S. Trinitatis was not found within the Balywick of the said late Sheriff of the said county of Mid. And that long after the said tres Sept. S. Trinit elapsed that writ was found rased in the test in the return of the same and then by couler of the said writ so opened and rased and not sealed and whereof then there was not any Record in the Court here remayning whereupon the said writ so rased had not any day of continuance after the said tres Septim S. Trinitatis the said T. T. after the said tres Sept. by the said late Sheriff was taken arrested and prayeth that he may be dismissed out of the Custody of the said now Sheriff of the said County of Midd. whereupon the truth of the premisses being by the Justices here in Court inquired into whereupon one I. S. Citizen and Gold-Smith of London and Sebastian T. late one of the Clerks of R. L. one of the Prothonotaries of the Court of the Lady the Queen here by command of the Justices here present here in court Justices inquire of the premisses And the same I. F his corporall oath being by him taken was conferred with by the Court hereof and upon the premisses who being examined said That the said executors in Easter Term last prosecuted out of the Court of the Bench here the said Writ against the said T. T. directed to the then Sheriff of the said County of Midd. and returnable here at the said tres Septim S. Trinitatis then next following which said writ with the seale of the said Lady the Queen deputed to seale the writ of the same Lady the Queen in the Bench here was sealed And that the said executors delivered that writ so sealed to the said I. F. desiring the same I. F. to act and prosecute in that behalf for them and in the names of them the said executors in that behalf to do what could be don by Law Examinations of 3. or 4. in court their depositions and confessions in fact recorded And the same I. F. that writ so sealed and returnable at the said tres Trin. c. in the term of the holy Trinity last past in the names of the said Executors at London delivered to one W. Y. one of the Clerks of Humphry M Gent then deputy and under Sheriff of the said late Sheriff of the said county of Midd. to be executed in form of Law And afterwards to wit one Moneth being elapsed after the said tres Sept. S. Trinitatis last past the same I. F See M. 8. Eliz Dier fol. 242. pl. 50. and fol. 244. Pl. 61. came to the said W. Y being then in one of the counters in London and requested him the said W. Y. in the names of the said execuors to make a certayne warrant upon that writ to take and arrest the same T T. for the debt and damages aforesaid to whom the said W. Y. then said that the day of returne of that writ was past And that the same I. F. ought to have that writ amended in the test and in the retorne of the same by some of the Clerks of the said R. L whereupon the same I F came to the said Sebastian T. then one of the Clerks of the said R. L. being then in London and requested
upon statute Merchant and upon return nulla bona mobilia And that he is beneficed at D. and awarding of an Extent c. See the Register of Writs fol. 148. An action 147. C. B. F. N B. fol. 131. A. M. 39. H. 6. rot 134. fi fa. de bonis eccliastices H 45. Eliz. Rot. Rot. 1211. Brownlow C. Ebor. ss The Sheriffs were commanded that 400 l. of the movable goods and Chattles of Richard Baitson of B. in the county of York Clerk in the Bailywick without delay they levy and cause to be had to Eliz. M. of the City of York merchant which the same Richard the 9th July Ao. R. nunc 44. before T. M. Mayor of the City of York and Thomas Royston then clerk deputed to take Recognizance of debts according to the form of the statute merchant within the same city acknowledged himselfe to owe to the same E. which he ought to have paid to him at the Feast of St. Michael then next coming and the same to him hath not yet paid c. And in as much c. They should make known here at this day to wit in October Pur. S. Mariae c. And now here at the day came the same Eliz. by James Bryâ— his attorny here into the court the Recognizance aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in Form aforesaid testifieth And the Sheriff now retorneth that the same Richard hath no movable goods or chattles in their Bailywick wherof they could levy the debt aforesaid or any parcel thereof And that the same Rich. is a clerk and benificed within the Dioces of York to wit at B. aforesaid And that he hath no lay Fee within their Bailywick and hereupon the same Eliz. praveth a writ of the Lady the Queen by the statute c. to the Reverent Father in Christ to Mathew Arch-Bishop of York Primate and Metropolitan of England to be directed and it is granted to him c. And in asmuch c. the same Archb. should make knowne here 15. Trin. the same day is given to the same Eliz. here c. Distringas Distress against the Lord of a mannor in aneient demesnes to hold his court c. Mich. 1. Mariae Rot. 123. entry of a writ of distresse against the Lord of a Mannor of ancient demesnes to hold his court so that the Sheriff recordari fac Loq in a writ of false iudgment upon a writ de recto clause T 3. Ca. Rot. 1887. Pytt Philizer London ss Entrey of a distringas against the Sheriff for returning of Pettit issues the plaintiff prayeth a Test Distringas to a forreigne county that the defendant may be distrained by greater issues omnia issues 10 l. It was commanded the Sheriffs as more times the King had commanded the same Sheriffs that they should destrain the Mayor Cominalty citizens of the city of London otherwise called M C. and C. of the city of London by all their lands c. and that of the issues c. And that they should have their bodys here at this day to witt in Cr. Trin. to answer D. B. widow R. B. Esquire and T. B. gent. executors of the testament of Tho. Bennet otherwise called T. B. the younger citizen and Alderman of London of a plea that they render unto to them 1500 l. which from them they uniustly detaine c. And now here at this day come the same D.R. and T. Bennet by Richard Williams their attorney and offered themselves the 4. day against the said Mayor and Cominalty citizens of the city of London in the plea aforesaid and they came not the sheriffs to wit R. F. and E. Brumfeyld now retorn that the same M. and C. and citizens of London are distrained by their chattles to the value of 40 l. and bayled by I. G. and R. R. Therefore they in mercy and because it is testified in the same court of the Lord the King here on the behalfe of the same executors that the said Mayor and C. and. citizens of London have divers lands and chattles in the county of Surrey Testat distringas awarded to the Sheriff of Surry whereof they may be distrained for better issues of their lands and chattles so that the Lord the King now may be answered of better issues of the lands chattles of the same Mayor Cominalty and citizens of the city of London if the same Mayor and C. C. of the city of London in the same court here will not soone appeare to answer the same D. R. and T. Bennet in the plea aforesaid Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of Surrey that he destrain the same Mayor and Cominality citizens of the city of London by all their lands c. And that for the issues See the old Book of entries fol. 226. title distresses pl. 4. accord Surry c. so that he may have their bodies here tres Mich. to answer the said Dorothey Rich. and Tho. Bennet in the plea aforesaid c. And it is to be knowne that a writ thereof the Justices here have delivered to Theophi Tipton undersheriff of Surrey present in Court here that same Tearm to execute in Forme of Law c. Elegit M 19. Ja Rot. 1949. Entrey of a writ of Elegit in the same term wherein it was returned not upon the indictment Roll nor upon the Roll of the writ of Scire facias the custom it But note that the writ of Elegit is demanded and adjudged to the enter upon Roll of the entrey of the Scire fac The like form of entrey of Elegit P 10. H. 4. Rot. 140. It was commanded to the sheriff of Derb. whereas lately in the court of the Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster it had been considered that P. Moyl should have execution against Robert Turner Gent. one of the attornies of the Court of the common Bench of the Lord the King here aswell of a certaine debt of 40 l. which the same Prudence in the court of the Lord the King here had recovered against him as of c. which to the same P. in the same court of the King here were adjudged for her damages which she had by occasion of the detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted The same Prudence afterwards came into the same court of the Lord the King here and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to her all the goods and Chattles of the same Rob. besids his Oxen and necessaries of his Plough H. 12 Eliz. rot 1470. s. Fylmer T. against L. entry of a Writ of Partition by prec fuit vic P. 12 Eliz Rot 1016. the like upon an extent T. 20. Jac. Rot 2080. B. against M. H. 19 Jac. Rot 3192. S. g. J.T. 1. Caâ— Regis rot 569. M. against C. and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick to hold to her the goods and chattles aforesaid as her
entred as followeth Afterwards to wit ter die came here into the Court the said W. by the Keeper of the Prison aforesaid to the Bar here brought and saith that he ought not longer to be kept in the prison aforesaid for that the same W. at his owne request and not at the request of the said Plaintiff was committed to the Prison aforesaid and for that cause prayeth that he may be dismissed at large from the prison aforsaid by the Court here The Defendant is discharged out of Prison for that the Plainâ—iff prayed him not in execution And because the Justices here by due examination in this behalfe made and that it sufficiently appeareth by the Record that the allegation of the said W. is true therefore the said W. by the Court here is dismissed from the prison aforesaid And the said Keeper of the Prison aforesaid by the said court here is discharged from the custody of the said W. c. M 15. Jac. Rot. 2167. e Walter between Willby and Davenant in a Scire Facias against C. and B. Manucaptors in a Recognizance of 740 l. that the said Davenant should appeare to an account of 330 l. at the Suit of the Plaintiff Nota bien and alleageth that the Defendant appeared to an Originall of 330 l. and that afterwards in Mich. 4. Jac. R. nunc the said Davenant was condemned in the said 330 l. and in 80 s. for damages and afterwards that the Plaintiff remitted 25 l. 6 s. 4 d pro ut c. the said Davenant hath not rendred his body in execution for the judgment aforesaid for 208 l 13 s. 9 d. residue of the debt and Damages aforesaid in the same Court neither hath satisfied to the plaintiff for the residue of the debt and Damages aforesaid the Defendant Pleads that the Plaintiff ought not to have execution c. because he saith that after the Judgment aforesaid given to wit the 23 day of January An. 14. abovesaid came here into the Court the same Davenant in his proper person and then and there rendred his body to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet in execution for the said 208 l 13 s. 4 d residue of the debt and damages aforesaid against the said Davenant in Form aforesaid Recorded and in discharge of the said severall Recognizances by the severall Manucaptors acknowledged And that the said Plaintiffe then and there altogether refused to receive or Charge the said Davenant in Execution for the said 208 l. 13 s. 4 d. And this they are ready to verify c. the Plaintiffe protesting saith that he never refused c. And for that he did not render his body pro ut c. issue per Pais And it was moved by Serjeant A. that the same ought to be tried by the record and not by the county See Easter 6. H. 8. Rot. 432. And in this case divers presedents were shewed as well of Ancient as of moderne times M. Easter 12 H. 8 Rot. 324. and Easter 29. Eliz. Rot. 651. T. 12 H. 8. Rot 331. Easter 6. Ja. Rot. 105. such rendring their bodis in execution in discharge of their Manucaptors but note that there is no tender but to discharg the bail See M. 27. ort 37. Eli. Rot. c. Trin. 16. Ia. Rot. 786. tender of the body in execution to discharge the baile P 14. Ia. Rot 2175. W. against B. who tendred himselfe in execution in discharge of his sureties the Plaintiff praies him in execution and the Court will advise themselves of such commitment for that a writ of Error was brought and the Record with the Recognizance certifyed away but at length he was committed in execution notwithstanding the writ of Error in discharge of his Sureties H 9. H. 5. Rot. 461. Henster Bristoll ss Extent upon a Statute-merchant by an Executor It was commanded the sheriff that he should take the body of W. C. late Burgesse and merchant of the Town of Bristoll if c. And in the prison of the Lord the King safe c. untill he shall have fully satisfied unto R. Scot and William Scot executors of the testament of Iohn B. late Burgesse of the Town of Bristoll of 120 l. which the said W. Coombe the third day of Aprill An. R. Rich post conques se 5. before W. C. then Mayor of the City of B. and I W. then Clerke deputed to take Recognizances of debts at B. acknowledged himself to owe to the said I. B. And which they ought to have paid him at the Feast of the apostles Philip and Jacob then next and the same to him as yet c. and in asmuch c. he should make knowne to the Justices here at this day to wit in Oct. Pur beat Mariae c. And now came the said Thomas Stanford on the behalfe of the said executors And the said W. Combe came not and the sheriff retorneth that he is dead and hereupon the said Thomas Stanford prayeth a Writ thereof by the statute c. and because the Justices here are not yet advised whether they ought to grant that Writ at the petition of the said Thomas in this case or not 2 R. 3 f 8 Pl. 16. P. 2 Eliz. Dyer f. 180. Pl. 49 H. 18 E. f. 10. Pl. 35. against this Sci faâ— day therein is given to the said Executors by the said Thomas here untill 15. Pas At which day here the said Thomas Stanford and T. B and I B. who answer for the said Executors as their attornies by writ of the Lord the closed directed to the Justices here to them delivered and pray a writ by the statute And because the Justices here are not yet advised whether that writ ought to be granted at the petition of the said attornies Dyer f. 180. 49. e conâ—r quaere in this case or not day is given therein to the said Executors by their attornies here untill in Octo. S. Trin. At which day here came the same Executors by the said Thomas Stanford their attorney and they bring here into Court the statute aforesaid and also the letters Testamentary of the said Io. Barstable by which it sufficiently appeareth to the Court here the said Robert and William to be the Executors of the Testament of the said I. B. and thereof to have the administrations c. and pray thereof a writ by the statute c. and to them it is granted retorneable here A die S. Mich. in un Mensem c. and in asmuch c. the sheriff should make known here at the same Term c. before which day the Plaintiffe aforesaid remaineth without day for that the Lord Hen. late King of England the 5 after the conquest dyed afterwards to wit in the Term of S. Hil. An. 1. Hen. 6. now King of England after the conquest namely the same W. Scot executor by the same Thomas Sanford his attorny and for that the same W. S.
aforesaid or any parcell thereof he could cause to be made Therefore it is commanded to the Reverend Father in Christ John by Divine Providence Bishop of Norwich and Ordinary of that place that of the goods Ecclesiasticall of the sayd Edward within his Diocesse he cause to be made the Debt and Damages aforesayd and that he have those monyes here in Octob. S. Mich. to render to the sayd T. for his debt and damages aforesaid c. Entry of a Writ of fieri facias de bonis testatoris the Sheriff returned that the parcell of the debt is leviâ—d De bonis testat and as to the residue that the Executor had wasted c. and that he had made the damages De bonis propriis and execution awarded De bonis propriis for the goods wasted PAsch 12. Jac. rot 2167 Norff ss It was commanded the Sheriff that of the goods and chattells which were of I. B. late called I. B. of W. in the County of N. Yeoman in the hands of Joan B. of F. in the County aforesaid Widow Executrix of the Testament of the same John in your Bailiwick he should cause to be made as well a certain debt of an hundred pounds which F D. in the Court of the King here to wit at Westminster recovered against him as two pound six shillings eight pence which to the same F. in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of detaining of that Debt if the same Joan had so much Goods and Chattells which were of the sayd John at the time of his Death in her hands to be administred and if she had not then the damages aforesaid of the proper goods and chattells of the same Ioan to be levied and that he should have those monyes here at this day to wit 15 Pasch to render to the same F. for his debt and Damages aforesaid whereof he is convicted And now here at this day came the same Francis B. by S. L. his Attorney and the Sheriff to wit Iames Calthrop Knight now returneth that after the death of the same I. B. and before the coming of the said Writ the goods and chattells which were of the said J at the time of his death to the value of fifty eight pounds four shillings and two pence came to the hands of the same Joan after the death of the same I. B. to be administred of wh ch sayd goods and chattells twenty seven pounds eight shillings and two pence of the debt aforesaid he caused to be made according to the Exigency of the same Writ Devasta vit and that the same Joane before the coming of the sayd Writ wasted the residue of the goods and chattells aforesaid and converted to her own use so that the residue of the sayd Debt or Damages aforesaid of the same goods or chattells he could not cause to be made but that of the proper goods and chattells of the same Joane by vertue of the Writ aforesaid he cause to be made the Damages aforesaid and those monies together with the twenty seven pounds eight shillings and two pence of the goods and chattells of the sayd John as aforesaid levied before the Justices here at this day to render to the same Francis according to the Exigency of that Writ he had ready T. 14. H. 6. rot 318. A Devastavit returned and thereupon an Elegit is awarded as by the same Writ to him it was commanded c. Therefore it is considered that the same Francis have Execution against the same Joan for the residue of the said fifty eight pounds four shillings two pence by the same Joan as aforesaid wasted of the proper goods and chattells of the same Joan c. H 19 H 6 rot 134 Brownlow London ss An entry of a speciall fi fac de bonis testatoris H. 9. H. 6. fol. 87. pl. 2. Fitz. Executors pl. 7. this Writ awarded and by the Court The judgment in this case was entred T. 8 H 6 rot 102 See the old book of entries fol 326 title Execution against Executoâ—s pl. 8 scire facias brought against two Administrators after a Devastavit to have Execution De terris catallis propriâ—s P 9 H 6 fol 9 Fitz Executors 9 M 11 H 6 fol 8 pl. 12. An Action of Debt brought against the administrators and suggests that hee had wasted the goods c. 3 H 6 fol 148 P 11 H 6 fol 351. 12 E 3 Fitz Executors pl 73 and pl 85. Old Book of Entries fol 326 title Execution against Executors pl. 8. See Fitz return De viscount pl. 9 H. 6 H 9 fol 57 that such a return is not good M 5 Car rot 874 the like for Rivers against the Sheriff of Castle maine It was commanded the Sheriffs that of the goods and chattells which were of R. S. late Citizen and Cloth worker of London being in your Bailiwick in the hands of John Leweter of London Gent. R. B. of London Draper B. H. of London Draper and Allice who was the wife of R S. late Citizen and Clothier of London Administrators of the goods and chattells which were of R. S. late Citizen and Clothier of London who dyed Intestate c. yet should cause to be made forty pounds which William Andrewes Citizen and Poulterer of London in the Court of the King here recovered against the said Administrators of the goods of the said Richard being in the hands of the said Administrators to be levied and of the proper Lands and Chattells of the said Administrators nine markes which to the said William in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of that Debt and that they should have them here at this day to wit in 8. S. Hil. to answer to the said William of his Debt and Damages aforesaid whereof they are convicted And now cometh the said William by W. B. his attorney and the sheriffs now returne that from the coming of the writ aforesaid untill the day of the retorn of the same no goods or chattles which were of the said R. S. at the time of his death in their Bayliwick in the hands of the said Administrators were or are whereof the said 40 l. or any monies thereof they could cause to be made as by lawfull waies and meanes which they knew or better thereof could know to them at the present can appeare to be made Notwithstanding they have made of the proper Lands and Chattles of the said Administrators the 9. Marks aforesaid which they have ready here at this day which said nine Marks are delivered to the said W. Therefore aswell the said sheriffs as the said administrators are thereof quiet And because the retorne aforesaid as to the said 40 l. is reputed insufficient and conceived to be made in delay of the execution of the recovery aforesaid And in the Kings Court here on
the behalfe of the said W. it is testified that the same administrators have sold divers goods and chattles which were of the said Richard at the time of his death And the monies for those goods and Chattles have converted to their own uses And that the residue of the goods and chattles of the said Richard by the administrators aforesaid are eloyned with the in intention that the said execution should not be made thereof Therefore the same sheriffs to wit W. C. and R. L. in mercy And are Fined by the Justices here at 20 s. And the Lord the King not willing that those things which in the Court here are rightly Acted and adjudged should by subtil Art and unfaithfull ingeny be infringed Commandeth the same shriffs that the said 40 l. of the goods and Chattles which were of the said Rich. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said Administraâ— if they can thereof levy them otherwise so much thereof as is deficient as the goods and Chattles aforesaid by the same Administrators sold or cloyned do amount unto as by the Inquisition in this behalfe to be taken or any other way wherein you can be better certified you cause to be made of the proper lands and Chattles of the said administrators and that you have those moneies thereof made here in Octob. Pur. beat Mariae to render to the said William for his debt aforesaid c. Entry of a Fâ—â— facâ— for damages in replevin the Sheriff returneth fieri fecit and bringeth not the monie into Coâ—uâ— nor paid it to the party A Sci fac is awarded to the Coroners against the Sheriff because the Plaintiff cannot have an execution against him for the moniâ—â— by him levied in forme aforesaid T 19. Jac Rot. 3313. Brownlow Buck. ss It was commanded the sheriff that of the Lands and Chattles of Anthony Chester Baron in his Bayliwick he should cause to be made 16 l. pounde which to Wil. Carpenter Gent. in the Court of the Lord the King here were adjudged for his damages which he sustained by occasion of the taking and unjustly detayning of the goods and chattles of the said W. by the same Anthony and T in a certaine place called Ozier Cob otherwise the Ozier Holm in the County aforesaid and that he should have those monies here to wit in Cro S. Trin. to render to the said William for his debt and damages whereof he is convicted And now here at this day came the said William by T. S. his attorny and the sheriff to wit H. Lee Knight and Barronet now here retorneth that by vertue of the said writ to him directed of the goods and Chattles of the said Anthony in his Bayliwick he causeth to be made those monyes which said moneys he hath here ready at the same day As by the said writ it was commanded him c. And because the same sheriff the monies aforesaid here at this day hath not ready to render to the said William for his damagas aforesaid in Form as aforesaid according to the command of that Writ Scâ— fac awarded â—oron against the Sheriff to him in Forme aforesaid directed nor hath hitherto payed the damages aforesaid to the said William nor otherwise contented Therefore the same sheriff to wit the same Henry Lee in mercy and is Fined by the Justices here at 40 s. And it is commanded to the Coroners of the county aforesaid that by honest c. they make known to the said Henry Lee sherâ—ff of the County aforesaid that he be here in Cro. Anim. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same William execution against them fâ—r the said 16 l. by the said Henry in Form aforesaid levyed ought not to have of the proper goodslands and Chattles of the same Henry if c. IN this Case I conceive a doubt Nota quere for the Presidents are dubious in what County this Scire fac ought to issue whether out of the County where the return of the Fi. fac was made to wit in the county of Buch. or in the County where the record of the returne of the Fi. Fac. remaineth to wit in the County of M And Justice J then Serjeant and counsel with the pla and Brownlow Prothonotary agree that it ought to be awarded in the county where the action lyeth and so it was made H 16. Jac rot 2255. the like Sci fac and afterwards the matter was agreed 9. E. 4. fo 50. Br. Sci Fac. 134. A Sci. Fac. issued to the new sheriff by which it appeared that the Sci. Fac. issued in the county where the return was made And Br. retorne de Briefe 55. See H. 9. E. 4. Rot. 349. A. distringas nuper vic to render the monies by him levied awarded But by the said book of 9. E. 4. fo 50. it appeareth by Littleton that the Justices are advised upon the returne of the Fi. feci to award a Sci. fac and not a Distringas because upon the Distringas petit issues are retorned whereby the Plaintiffe is a long time delayed M 13. H 7. Rot. 307. Foringer of an attorney Midd. ss Be it remembred that the 8 day of November that same Term one Rowland Brigg one of the attornies of the Bench here present here in Court was solemnly called by the Court here to appeare and answer unto certaine matters Offences objections and impositions by him done as it is said and against him in the Court here imposed and objected Therefore the said R for his contumacy is forejudged from exercising his office of an attorney of this Court untill c. An attorney for iudged the Court for forgery of a writ committed sent to the courâ—s of the Queen the Exchequer and her Court to be loked upon For iudged of the Clerk of the Jurat for non attendance in his Office H 31. Eliz. Rot. 1720. A speciall entry of the imprisonment and Forejudging of an attorney of the Common Bench for Forging of a Supers de non molestando And note that he was committed to the Fleet and sworn that he would not afterwards prosecute as an attorney of the same court and was put out of the Barr of the same Court and sent by the Warden of the Fleet and sent up to the Queens Court to be looked upon there and afterwards in the Court of the Exchequer to be looked upon there M 9. Edw. 4. Rot. 328. Copleg Be it Remembred that Iohn Cheker who was admitted to the Office of Clerk of the Jurat and writs of Dedimus potestatem of this Court and was sworne well and faithfully to exercise and occupy the same to which said Office aforesaid of the said Iohn doth belong to receive Writs of Dedimus Potestatem of acknowledgment of Fines levyed to make writs of Nisi Prius and other Jurats out of the Court issuing from the exercise and attendance of the same Office for a long
also the same Richard had promised and by his said writ covenanted to and with the said Hugh to redeliver the same goods and chattels to the same Hugh Beeston or his assignes within the space of one Moneth after warning thereof to the said Richard given as by the writing aforesaid fully appeareth And the same Hugh in Fact saith that he after the making of the writing aforesaid and before the day of exhibiting of the same bill to wit the 9 day of Feb. An. 16. c. at London in the parish and ward aforesaid requested the said Richard to deliver to the said Hugh the same goods and chattels within the space of one moneth then next following after the warning aforesaid in Form aforesaid given according to the Forme and effect of the writing aforesaid And so the same Richard although often requested the covenant aforesaid In that the same Richard should redeliver to the said Hugh the same goods and chattels within the space of one moneth after warning to him thereof given hath not held but broken and the same to him yet to hold gainesayd and yet gainsayeth wherupon he sayth that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 30 l. In such sort it is proceeded in our said Court and that the said Hugh his damages by occasion of the breaking of the Covenants aforesaid in not delivery of the goods and chattles aforesaid to wit one Fether bed one long Table c. of the goods and chattells aforesaid against the same Richard ought to recover But because it is unknowne what damages the said Hugh hath sustained by occasion of the breaking of the covenant aforesaid in not delivering the goods and chattles aforesaid we command you that by the oath of honest c. you diligently inquire what damages the said Hugh sustayned aswell by occasion of the breaking of the covenant aforesaid in not delivering of those goods and chattells as for his costs and charges by him about his Suit in this behalfe laid out And the Inquisition c retornable upon Thursday next after the morrow of S. Martin under your Seales c. And the seales c. damages 8 l. charges 26 s. 8 d. increase 4 l. 7 s. 4 d. in whole 14 l No judgment was entered because the Parties agreed H 18. I. Rot. 568. Devon ss Entry of a Writ of Inquiry in case for sees for suing forth of a Writ of covenant Whereas Iohn Blachford was attached to be in our court before our Just ces at Westminster c. to answer Iohn Hore Gent. one of the attornies of the court of common Bench for that that whereas the said Io. here the 28. day of Sep. An. c. 12. was and alwaies hitherto is one of the attornies of the bench aforesaid and so being one of the attornies of the same Court the same Io. Blachford the said 28. day of Sept. An. 12 above said at Chagford in consideration that the same I. Hore at the speciall instance and request of the same I. Blachford would be the attorney of one Tho. Wise Knight and to prosecute for the same Tho. out of our court of Chancery a certaine writ of ours of covenant of and for levying of a Fine in our said Court of the common Bench between the said Tho. and certaine O. W. Esquire and Margaret his wife of certain lands with the appurtenances in W. and D. in the county aforesaid and a certaine other Writ of ours of Dedimus Potestatem to certaine F. F. Knight H. C. Gent. and I the same I. Hore to be directed to acknowledg the Caption which the same Oliver and Margaret before them or two of them should make of the same lands that a Fine thereupon might be had according to the course of Fines at the common Law of our Realm of England assumed upon himselfe and to the said Iohn Hore then and there faithfully promised that he the said Iohn Blachford all expences which the same Iohn Ho. in and about the prosecution of the Writs aforesaid the levying and ingrossing of the Fine aforesaid and other things which in that behalfe should be requisite and necessary to be don should expend and deposit And also 3 s. 4 d. for his attornies Fee For every Terme wherein the same John Hore should be the Attorney of the same Thomas Wise in and about the prosecution of the businesses aforesaid when thereof he should be required well and faithfully would pay and content And although the said John Hore giving credit to the promise and assumption of the said John Blachford afterwards to wit the 6. day of October An. 12. abovesaid the said Writ of Covenants of the lands aforesaid to wit of 1. messuage 1. Garden one orchard 200. acres of land c. with the appurtenances in W. and T. under the name of the said T. W. against the said F. Whi. and Margaret his wife before the Justices of the Bench in Oct. S. Hillar then next following retornable and retorned And the 7. day of the said month of Octo. the aforesaid other writs of Dedi Potestat of our said Court of Chancery to the same Fr. F. Kt. H. C. and to the same I. H. directed was likewise prosecuted and a Fine thereupon before our said Justices was in due manner had levied ingrossed And a Fine therupon according to the common Law of our Realm of Eng. was levied And all and singular other things which in that behalf were necessary and expedient to be don did and performed And was attorney for the said Thomas in that cause in the Term of S. Michael An. 12. abovesaid and in the Term of S. Hillary then next following and 6 s. 8 d. for his Attorneys Fee in the same Terms were due to the same I. Hore and the same John 78 s. 2 d. in and about the bringing and prosecution of the same Writs and levying and ingrossing of the said Fine and in doing all and singular other things which in that behalf were necessary and expedient to be done in and about the premisses laid out and deposited which said severall summes in the whole doe amount unto 84 s. and 10 d. neverthelesse the said I. B. his promises and assumption aforesaid not regarding but indeavouring and fradulently intending him the said J. Hore of the said 84 s. 10 d. craftily and subtilly to defraud the same 84 s. 10 d to the same I. H. according to his promise and assumption aforesaid hath not paid although to this by the same I. H. afterwards to wit the 20. day of March An. c. 14 s. at Chagford aforesaid was requested but the same to him heitherto to pay hath denyed yet denyeth c. In such sort it is proceeded c. damages 6 l. mi. 20 s increase 6 s. in whole 8 l. Liberari Facias P 4 Eliz. rot 1919. H 32 Eliz. rot 1606 Heref. ss Entry of a wâ—it of Liberari fac to the
Cognizee of lands extended by extent upon statute merchant but not delivered to him for that the Conusor dyed and the hâ—ir at the time of the inquisition taken was within age but now at full age if it do appeare to the Sheriff that the heire is of â—u â— age See the Statute for Merchants 13 E. 1. accord It was commanded the Sheriff whereas the Lady the Queen by her certain Writ out of the Court of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster in the Terme of the Holy Trinity Anno Reg. c. 38. issuing and directed to the Sheriff of the County of Hereford reciting by the said Writ That whereas the sayd Lady the Queene had commanded the Sheriff of Middlesex by her said writ that the bodyes of E. W. of D. in the County c. and I.T. of W. in the same County c. if they were lay men found in his Bailâ—wick he should take should safely keep in the prison of the said Lord the King untill they had fully satisfied S. B. of W c. of fifty pounds which the same E. and I. the second day of Iuly Anno 23. Eliz. before R. N. and R. C. then Bayliffs of the City of W. and keepers of the greater peice of the seale of the statute Merchant there and W. I. Gent. then Clarke of the City aforesaid and keeper of the lesser part of the seale of Statute Merchant aforesaid Deputed to take acknowledgment of such Statutes for Debt for Merchants at the City aforesayd acknowledged themselves to owe to the said S. which they ought to have paid unto him at the Feast of Saint Michael the Arch Angell then next following and they have not payd the same unto him as it is said and in as much as the said Sheriff of Middlesex shall have executed the precept of the said Lady the Queen he should make appear to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here in 8 Hillarii Anno 37 Reginae Nunc and the said sheriff of Middlesex to the Justices of the sayd Lady the Queene here at Westminster at that day returned that the same W and I. were Lay men and were not found in his Bailiwick and to the Sheriff of Hereford commanded that all the goods and chattells of the same E and I. and all the Lands and Tenements whereof the same E and I. at the day of the acknowledgement of the Debt aforesaid Recitall of the Writ of extent or at any time afterwards were seised to whose hands soever they should come unlesse to any heire within age by hereditary Descent they should descend he should deliver to the said S by reasonable price and extent To hold the goods and chattells aforesaid as his proper goods and chattells and the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his free Tenement to him and his Assignes according to the form of the Statute therein made and provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with his reasonable and necessary Damages and costs as in Labours Suits Delayes and Expences he should levy thereof And neverthelesse That hee should take the bodyes of the sayd E. and I. and should safely keepe them in the prison of the sayd Lady the Queen untill they should satisfie the sayd S. of the Debt aforesayd in forme as aforesaid and in as much as that precept of the Lady the Queen should be executed he should make appear to the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster in Octob Sancti Michaelis Anno 38. abovesaid and that he should have then there the Writ aforesaid the same Sheriff of Hereford to the Iustices of the sayd Lady the Queen here at VVestminster The Sheriff returneth that the Conusors are dead Inquisition taken and the Lands extended but the Lands descended to an infant and the Sheriff by reason of his nonage could not deliver them to the Conusees at the said 8 S. Mich. returned that the same E. and I. were dead and also to the same Iustices of the sayd Lady the Queen here at that day returned a certain Inquisition before him the sayd sheriff of Hereford by vertue of a certain Writ to him therein directed at K. in the County of Hereford the thirteenth day of S. Anno 38. abovesaid by the oath of twelve honest and lawfull men of the County of Hereford was taken by which it was found that the same E. I. were dead after the acknowledgment of the Debt aforesaid and long before the taking of the said inquisition and that the same I the day whereon he dyed was seised in his Demesne as of Fee of and in four Closes or parcells of pasture lying and being in H within the parish of L. in the same County of Hereford containing by estimation fifteen acres c. as in the Inquisition And the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances were worth by the year in all issues besides Reprizes sixty shillings and that the same I.T. of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in forme aforesaid being seized after the acknowledgement of the Debt aforesaid and before the coming of the sayd Writ dyed thereof seised after whose Death The lands discend to the heir within age the Tenements aforesayd with the Appurtenances descended to one I.T. son and heir of the said I. T the son at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid was within the age of one and twenty yeares to wit of twenty yeares and no more so that the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said S. by reason of the minority of the said I.T. the son he could not deliver according to the Tenor of the said writ to him therein directed and that the said E. at the time of the acknowledgement aforesaid made or at any time afterwards had no Lands or Tenements in the County of Hereford as by the Record and proceedings therein in the Court of the said Lady the Queen here plainly appeareth Suggestion that the heir is of full age And now in the Court of the said Lady the Queen before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster it is alledged that the said I.T. the son is come to his full age of one and twenty yeares and hath of a long time been of full age therefore the said Lady the Queene doth command the said Sheriff of Hereford that if it can appeare to the said Sheriff that the same I.T. came to his full age of one and twenty yeares before the issuing forth of this Writ and now to be then the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances by the Extent aforesaid in forme aforesaid made he should deliver to the said S. to hold as his free Tenement to him and his Assignes according to the forme of the Statute aforesaid thereof made and provided untill the Debt aforesaid Liberate conditionall that if it could appear to the sheriff that the heir is at full age together with reasonable and necessary Damages and Costs as
in Labours Suits Delayes and Expences be thereof levied c. and in as much c. hee make appear here 15. Trinitat c. Mittimus T 3. Jac. rot 24 10. Entry of a Mittimus of the Record and proceedings Which was removed out of another Court by a certiorare out of the Chancery and sent to the Justices of the Bench. The Lord the King sent to his Iustices of the Bench here his Writ closed in these words James by the Grace of God c. To his Justices of the Bench greeting The Record and proceedings in a certain plaint which was in the Court of our Honor and Castle of Windsor before our deare Cosen and Counsellour Charles Earle of Nottingham of the noble Order of the Garter Knight Admirall of England Constable of our honorable Castle aforesaid and keeper of the whole Forrest of the same or to his Deputy of Keeper of his place there without any writ between William R. Esquire and J. M. Gent of cattell of the same W. taken and unjustly detained as is said by Jo. Trevor Knight Deputy of the same County by vertue of our writ of Certiorare to you into our Chancery certified we send you in these presents inclosed commanding you that the Records and proceedings of the plaint aforesaid being inspected you further do therein at the prosecution of the same James what of right and according to the Law and custome of our Realme of England is to be done Teste c. James by the grace of God c. To our dear Cosen c. greeting we willâ—ng for certain causes to be certified by the Record and proceedings in a certain plaint which is before you in our Court of the Honour and Castle aforesaid without out writ between W.R. Esquire and I Moor of cattell of the same W. c. we command you that the Record and proceedings in the plaint aforesaid with all things touching the same by whatsoever names the parties aforesaid in the said plaint are distinguished to us into our Chancery wheresoever it shall then be under your seale without delay you distinctly and plainely send and this VVrit c. Note Nota. That if the Record had been sent to the Justices of the common Bench they could not have proceeded upon the Tenor of the Record but upon the Return sent c. H 17 Eliz rot 939. Nota. Cause certified into the Bench was removed by a procedendo because the monies in the plaint amounted not to 40 s. T 20 Jac rot 3371. Brownlow The Lord the King c. The Tenor of the Record and proceedings c. We send to you inclosed in these presents and so recite the Certiorare which is we willing for certaine causes to be satisfied upon the Tenor of the Record c and the plaint c And now here to wit at Westminster in Cr. Trin. that same Term came as well the said Plaintiff by T. R. his Attorney as the said Defendant by F. M. his Attorney and the Writs and Return aforesaid being seen and by the Justices here fully understood and examined to the said Iustices here it sufficiently appeareth that the Court here upon the Tenor of the Record aforesaid cannot proceed Therefore it is considered that the said Mayor and Burgesses of the Burrough of N aforesaid in the plaint aforesaid according to the Law and custome of the Burrough aforesaid at the prosecution of the said William may proceed with effect and to the parties aforesaid full and speedy Iustice therein according to the custome of the Court aforesaid may exhibit c. betweene C. and A. Ne Exeat Regnum Ne exeat Regnum M 7. H. 6. rot 600. or 606. Security found that he depart not the Kingdome Nvsance Selde M. 8. Car. Regis rot _____ To the Sheriff of Middlesex greeting whereas of late we have made publick Proclamation amongst other things that none should erect any Walls whereupon _____ might be super added within our City of London or the Subburbs of the same or within the distance of three thousand paces of any of the Gates of the same City or from the Palace of Westminster license from our Commissioners assigned to oversee the buildings in those parts not before had Notwithstanding Thomas Ford late of the parish of Saint Andrew Holborne in your County Yeoman contemning our commands promulgated license of our Commissioners not before had in a certaine Feild in the Parish of Saint Clements Danes without Temple Bar London Selde on the south part of the ancient Inne called Clemants Inne of a long time appointed for the Residence of men incumbent in the study of our Lawes a certain wall to which _____ may be superadded of Brick Lime and Sand to erect and part of the same Feild intendeth to inclose as an ally or common place to bowle in And the foundation of the same Wall hath now laid and more Brick Lime and Sand for further progresse in the same Wall hath here also put and hath ready as it is said and if that place should be also inclosed It would happen that the Students of that Inn incumbent in the same in the study of our Lawes with the Clamors and noise of men resortng to that place would be so much disturbed that they could not Follow their Studies We to observe our commands and willing to regard the quiet and tranquility of the students aforesaid that they should not be diverted from their Studyes Command you that you omit not for any liberty of your county but that you command the said Thomas on our behalfe that from further building of the wall aforesaid he be altogether superseded and the wall begun and the Foundation of that wall by him in the place aforesaid put he cause to be demolished upon the danger to follow Test 19. Nov. Car. T. C. C. S. Cartwright Originall M 18. H 8. Rot. 2. ss An originall Writ out of the Chancery at the Suit of the party directed to the Justices of the Common Bench to stifying that he is a Lord of the Parliament that they should make no other proces against him onely such as are made against the Peeâ—s of the Land The Lord the King sent to his Justices of the bench here his writ closed in these words Henry the 8. by the grace of God c. To his Justices of the Common Bench Greeting we command you that if Edward Sutton of Dudly in the County of Staff Knight be impleaded before you at the suit of any one in a personall action you cause so to be made against him such Proces and no other in the action aforesaid as ought against Lords Peeres Earls and Barons of this our Kingdom of England which ought to come to our Parliaments upon our summons or any of them as according to our Lawes and Customes of the Realm of England ought to be made Because we record the same Edward one of the
Barones of our Realm aforesaid coming to our Parliament and this to you and every of you who are interested therein we notifie witnesse our selves at Westminster c. And it ought to be written upon the back of the said writ as followeth It is inroled in the Bench in the Terme of S. Michael An. Regni R. H. 8. 18. Rot. 2. and ought to be Filed amongst the Records sine die c. See the old Book of entries fo 313. Title Errour in utlawry 20. Ms 31. H. 6. Rot. 309. H. 1. H 7. Rot. 305. A servant of a Knight in the Parliament impleaded in the Bench brought his writ here out of the Chancery testifying it and there upon the Justices Surcease and the servant goeth thereof without day c. Pardon Entry of the allowance of a uenerall pardon gpon an Utlary after judgment wherein it appeareth by the Record that the Pl. is satisfied of his debt and damages P. 3. â— Eliz rot 1131. tiel upon satisfaction given to the Executor after the death of the testator M 22 Jac rot 2781. e. Brownlow for Andrewes against Mason the like but note that the judgment was entred with Waller and the pardon was pleaded with Mr. Brownlow chief Prothonat ry H 44 Eliz. rot 2550. the like but more generall T 19. I. Rot. 1887. Midd. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but that he should take F. T. late of c. Esq utlawed in London die lun prox pro fest c. Ano. Regni c. 3. at the Suit of F. W. in a Plea of debt wherof he is convicted and him safely c. so that he might have his body here at this day to wit tres Trinitatis c. to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in this behalfe and now here at this day came the same F. T. By F. B. his attorney And saith that after the utlawry aforesaid against him the said Francis in Form aforesaid published and had by a certaine act in Parliament of the said Lord the King now held at Westminster in the county of Midd. 9. of February An. 7. amongst other things it was inacted and established by the authority of the same Parliament that all and singular the subjects of the said Lord the King aswell Spirituall as temporall of this Kingdom of England Walls Jsls of Jernesey and Garnsey and of the towne of Barwick their heires Successors executors administrators of them and every of them And all and singular Corporations or Towns incorporate Cities Burroughs Counties Ridings Hundreds Lath Rape Wapentacks Townes Uillages Hamlets and Tithings and every of them and the Successors of them and every of them by authority of the same Parliament should be acquitted pardoned released and discharged against the same Lord the King his heires and Successors and every of them from all Treasons and Felonies Offences contempts Trespasses entries injuries deceipts c. As in the Act and the same Francis Tunstall saith that the utlawry aforesaid against the same F. in Forme aforesaid published and had is not excepted and foreprised in the Act aforesaid and that he is and at the time of the making of the Act aforesaid long before was a subject and Leige man of the same Lord the King now borne under his obedience to wit at Westminster aforesaid in the said County of Midd. And that he satisfied to the said Francis Waswell for the said debt of 401 l. which the same Francis White in the court of the said Lord the King here recovered against him as of the said 36 s. which to the same Francis White in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by the occasion of the detayning of the said debt as it appeareth in the Term of S. Hillary An. Rs. nunc 2. Rot 1846. For which said debt and damages the same Francis Tunstal was at the suit of the said Francis White in Form aforesad utlawed and this he is ready to verifie where When and as the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider c. Therefore it is not intended that the Lord the King now will impeach or charge the same Francis Tunstall by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid whereupon he Prayeth judgment and that he may be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid And because by upon inspection of the record of the same Terme of S. Hillary An. 2. abovesaid It sufficiently appeareth to the said justices upon Record that the same Francis White is satisfied of the debt and damages aforesaid Therefore the same generall pardon is allowed to the same Francis Tunstall And the same Francis may goe thereof without day c. P 32. Eliz. Rot. 1131. Scot. Essex Entrey of speciall pardon of an utlawry after satisfaction of the judgment Note Note that the defendant came there by a Cepi Corpus and is committed to the Fleet And then he pleads the pardon and the satisfact on and prayeth that the pardon may be allowed and he set at larg and it was don P 44. Eliz Rot. 1539. H. 19. Eliz. Rot. 424. Tiel H 8. Iac. Rot. Brownlow London ss R. T. utlawed An. 34 Eliz. Whereof he is convicted at the suit of G. At 8. Pardon and release of demands pleaded in the discharge of an Expostat Pur. commeth and pleadeth the pardon de 39. Eliz. and sets forth that the utlawry is not excepted c. And that he is a Subiect c. And that the same Edw. after the utlawry aforesaid against the said R. in Form aforesaid published and had to wit 30. Jan. An. 37. Eliz. released all demands to the Defendant as by the said writing more fully appeareth and th s he is ready to verifie c. vnde non intendit Dom. Rex c. But because it is not knowne whether the writing of the release aforesaid by the same R. above pretended be the deed of the said Edward or not And because it is expedient and necessary that the said Ed. for his interest in this behalfe be premonished before it be further proceeded in to discharg the same R. from the utlawry aforesaid according to the Form of the Act aforesaid the sheriff is commanded that by the honest Sci. fac awarded c. they make known to the said Ed. c. 15 Pas to acknowledg or gainesay the writing of release aforesaid and also to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said Rob. ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid if c. M 18. Jac. Rot. Brownlow Sussex ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas Walter Covert Knight was summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King now here to answer Ed Culpeper Knight of a plea wherefore Entry of a writ to make partition and partition made therupon and judgment therein whereas the same Ed. and Walter
together and undâ—videdly doe hold 20. Mes 6. mills 20. Gardens 2000. acres of land 500. acres of Meadow 1000. acres of Pasture 2000. acres of wood 2000 acres of Furs and heath and 500. acres of land covered with water with the appurtenances in Balcombe Tuck-feild Slewham Crawley and Porth the same Walter to make partition thereof between them according to the Forme of the statute in such case provided gainsayeth and unjustly permited not the same to be don and against the Form of the statute aforesaid And the same Walter in the Court of the King here well granteth that partition thereof be made by which it was considered in the same Court of the Lord the King here that partition should be made between the parties aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances That taking with him 12. Free and lawfull men of the neighborhoods of B. C. S. C. and W. by whom c. he should come in his proper person unto the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and in the presence of the parties aforesaid by the same Sheriffe to be premonished if they will be present the same Tenements with the appurtenance by the oath of honest and lawfull men of his county respect being had to the true value of the same Tenements with the appurtenances he should cause to be parted into two equall parts and one part of the sâ—me Tenements with the appurtenances to the same Edward and the other part of the same Tenements with the appurtenances residue to the same Walter to hold to them in severalty he should cause to be delivered and assigned so that neither the said Edward nor the same Walter may have more of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances then belongeth to them to have and that the said Edward of his purpart to the same Edward out of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapning And the same Walter of his purpart to the same Walter out of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapning may severally apportion themselves and that partition by the same sheriff distinctly and openly made he should make appeare here in Oct. S. Mich. under his seale and the seales of them upon whose oath that partition shall be made and that he should have here the names of them upon whose oath he should make that Inquisition and that writ And now here at this day came the same Edward by Robert Moyle his attorney and the sheriff to wit Nicholas Eversfeild Esq now retorneth here a Certaine partition between the parties aforesaid of the tenements aforesaid by the same sheriff before him by vertue of the writ aforesaid and according to the Form of the said writ by the oath of 12 c. made which followeth Sussex ss I. N. E. sheriff of the county aforesaid to the Justices of the Lord the King do certifie by vertue of a writ therein to me directed and to this schedule annexed the seventh day of August An. c. 18. See the new book of Entries title Partition fo 411. such a form took with mee I. F the elder I. F. the younger and ten others twelve Free and lawfull men of the Neighbourhoods of B. C. S. C. and W. in the same writ specified I came in my proper person to the tenements in the same writ specified to wit to 20 Mess 20. Gardens 2000. acres of Land 500 acres of Meadow 1000. acres of pasture 2000. acres of Wood 2000. acres of Furze and heath and 500. acres of Land covered with water in B. C. S. C. and W. in the same writ mentioned And there by their oath respect being had to the true value of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in the presence of the parties in the same writ named by me the same sheriff premonished the same Tenements into two equall parts with the appurtenances I have made to be parted and one part of the Tenements aforsaid with the appurtenaces to wit one Capitall Messuage or mansion house called T. with the appurtenances c. and so receite the parcells c. I have caused to be delivered and assigned to Edward Culpeper Knight in the same writ named for his purpart of the Tenements aforesaid to hold to the same Edward in severalty by himself as by meets and bounds they are now divided And an other part of the same Tenements with the appurtenances that is to say one Messuage called the glovers house otherwise Gardners farm c. And so receit the other particulars c. 2. Part. I have câ—used to be delivered and assigned to Walter Covert Knight in the same writ likewise named for his purpart of the Tenements aforesaid to hold to the same Walter in severalty by himself as by meets and bounds they are now divided so that the same Edward of his purpart of the same Edward out of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapâ—ing And the same Walter of his purpart to the same Walter out of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in Form aforesaid hapning may severally apportion themselves as by the same writ it was commanded to me in Testimony whereof aswell I the same sheriff as the Jurors aforsaid to this partition have severally put our seales the day and yeare abovesaid Judgment that the paâ—tion be held fâ—â—m amd stable Therefore it is considered that the partition aforesaid be held Firm and Staple for ever Note that at the retorn of this writ of particion Hickham the Kings Serjeant at Law and of councell with the defen Sr. Walter Covert Knight came to the bar and moved that the partition might be quashed and that a new Writ to make partition might issue For that the partition was not Legally made by the sheriff And upon much debate in Court the 4 Judges Hobort Warborton Winch and Hutton ordered Sr. Walter Covert to pay to Sr. Edw. Colpeper 3500 l. for his part wherewith the parties are agreed and Sr. Walter Covert in joyed the lands aforesaid and the writ was not Filed nor the judgment entred but I added it to the partition because of the presedent Plur. Replegiare M 6. 7. Eliz. Rot. 423. Entry of a wrâ— of Plur. replegiare Otherwise as it appeareth in the time of the holy Trinity An. 6. Regin nunc Rot. 621 It is thus contayned Derb ss It was commanded the sheriff that whereas of late the Qu. had more times commanded the said sheriff that instantly and without delay he should make replevy to M. S. widow a certaine oxe which E. T. and W. T. took and unjustly detayned c. Or the sheriff of the County aforesaid should be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at VVestminster in Oct. S. Mich. An. 4 Reg. nunc to shew wherefore he contemned to execute the command of the Lady the Queen so often to him therein directed And the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at the day of the retorne that
the whole time aforesaid to be replevied by the sheriffs Ministers of the City aforesaid for the time being by vertue of a plaint in the Court of the sayd Lady the Queen and her progenitors Kings of England held before the Sheriffs of the City aforesaid for the time being levied and not by writ of the said Lady the Qu. or her progenitors Kings of E. issuing out of the Chancery and also that all the customes of the City aforesaid by Authority of Parliament of the Lord E late King of England after the Conquest at Westminster The Sheriffs are free men of London and held by their oath to observe the customes of the City the fifteenth year of his Reign held were ratified and confirmed to the then Mayor and Comminalty of the same City and their successors which said Liberties and free Customes of the same City they the same sheriffs and freemen of the City aforesaid before the purchasing of the said Originall Writ and alwaies afterwards hitherto being bound by oath have observed and are bound to hold without any violation for which causes the sheriffs aforesaid could not replevy the goods and chattells in the sayd Writ specified or do Execution upon the sayd writ nor can at the present but because it seemeth to the Court here that the Return aforesaid The Returne of the Sheriff vicious in form aforesaid made is as well in contempt and prejudice of the said Lady the Queen now and of her Court and also in Derrogation of her Crown and Dignity and manifest Danger of her Dis-inheriting and also that it giveth way and redoundeth to the immoderat damage and greivance of the same W and Delay of his suit therefore as before the sheriffs are commanded without Delay to replevy to the same W. the goods and Chattells aforesaid according to the Tenor of the commands of the said Lady the Queen now aforesaid therein to them directed Plur. repleg awarded and in as much c. They make appear here in 8 Sancti Hillarii c. It is also commanded the Coroners of the said Lady the Queen that they cause to come here the same sheriffs at the same Term to answer as well to the said Lady the Queen as to the same W of and upon the premisses further to do and receive what the Court of the said Lady the Queen here shall consider of them in this behalfe and in as much c. The same Coroner cause to appear at the same Term c. Pone Sheriffs returne upon a Pone adjudged void for that he shew edssino the cattell in specie named in the Returne See p. 3 El. Dyer fol. 199. pl. 54. Report of the case 21 E 4 fol. 23. M. 18. H. 6. rot 428. H 2. Eliz. rot 191. It is recorded by the Court here the third day of May in the year of the Raign of the Lady Elizabeth now 3. That the Returne aforesaid is vitious invalid and insufficient in Law for that there are no cattell named in Specie in the Return aforesaid contained for which the same Sheriff by vertue of a Writ of _____ was attached to be here at the said Octab. Pur. c. whereupon no judgement by the Justices then here for any forfeiture to be made to the Lady the Queen upon the Attachment by the Law of the Land ought to be given nor is given as it appeareth above and so the processe and extracts for the price or value of the Cattell aforesaid to be forfeited without Judgement and consent of the Court here by the Officers of the same Court without Warrant was made c. Quaere if not between Netherfall and Lawrence Priviledge H 45. Eliz. rot 818. Brownlow Lanc. ss At the return of a Capias against a servant of the câ—cife Cleâ—k of the Kings Bench the servant came in person into the Court of Common Beuch delivered to the Justices a writ of supersedias prayed the allowance thereof that they would not hold plea c A writ of priviledge for a servant of the cheif clark of the Kings bench It was commanded the Sherif that he should take John Wood late of Brenset in the county aforesaid Yeoman of c. and safely c. so that hee might have his body here at this day to wit in Octab. Sancti Hillarii to answer to T. L in a plea wherefore with force and arms one Messuage ten acres of Land with the Appurtenances in B. which Margeret Erlington widdow to the same T. devised for a Terme which is not past entred and him from his Farme aforesaid ejected and other Enormities c. To the great Damage c. and against the peace c. And now here at this day came as well the same T. by I. P. his Attorney as the same John Wood in his proper person and hereupon the same J W. brought here into the Court a certain Writ of the sayd Lady the Queen of Supersedeas in the cause aforesaid closed to them directed The Tenor whereof followeth in these words Elizabeth c. To our Beloved and faithfull Edmund Anderson Knight and his Associates Justices of the same Bench greeting As well of our Dignity as according to the ancient Custome used and approved of in times past hitherto obtained That our cheif Clark of the pleas in our Court before us ought not to be drawn or compelled to answer before any secular Judges upon any pleas or complaints pleas of Free Tenement only excepted nor by the whole time aforesaid were accustomed And now in our Court here before us on the behalf of John Wood one of the servants of John Rooper Knight our cheif Clarke assigned to Roll pleas in our said Court before us It is given us to understand That one Thomas Lacke little regarding the custome aforesaid the same I W by the name of I. W. late of B. in the County of Kent Yeoman hath drawn into plea of a plea wherefore with force and armes one Messuage c. as above untill against our peace c. to the very great disprofit and greivance of the said I. W and manifest infringement of the Liberties and priviledges aforesaid in our Court before us by the whole time aforesaid hitherto used and approved whereupon we are willing to provide him a fit speedy remedy to observe the Liberties priviledges aforesaid for so long time used infringed We command you that from further holding of the plea aforesaid before you or compelling him the said I. W. further to answer before you in the plea aforesaid ye be altogether superseded saying on our behalf to the same T L. That he at our said Court before us may come and have Justice there if he will Teste Iohn Popham at Westminster the twenty fourth day of January Anno Regni nostri 45. Rooper Which said Writ being read and heard the same Iohn Wood saith That he is and at the day of purchasing of the Writ
of the said T. Lacke was servant of the said Iohn Rooper Knight Cheif Clarke of the said Lady the Queen now assigned to enroll the pleas of the said Lady the Queen before the same Queen and prayeth that the said Writ of Supersedeas according to the Forme of the same Writ to be granted and allowed to him and that the Justices here will not take Cognizance of the plea aforesaid against him c. Counter plea to the writ of priviledge that the Defendant is farmer of the said cheif clark of dives lands c. and traverseth that he is a fervant to him and abiding with him attending in the office Traverse And the said Thomas saith That the Court here for any thing before alledged ought not to be repelled from the having and taking Cognizance of the plea aforesaid because he saith That the said Iohn Wood at the day of the purchasing of the Originall Writ of the same Thomas to wit the same seventeenth day of September Anno c. 44. was Farmer of the same I Rooper Knight of certain Lands of the said I. at B. aforesaid in the said County of Kent without this that the same I W the same day of purchasing of the Originall Writ of the same T. or at any time afterwards was servant of the said I.R. Kinght abiding with the said I. or attending the said I R in his affaires in the Office aforesaid and this he is ready to verifie as the Court shall consider and prayeth the Supersedeas not to be allowed him and that the Court would take further Cogn zance against him c. Demurrer to the counter plea ANd the same Iohn Wood saith That the said Plea of the said T. above pleaded to adnull the said Writ of Supersedeas and also the matter in the same plea contained are insufficient in Law to deprive the same I W. from having the said Writ of supersedeas allowed or that the Court here should take further Cognizance against him in the plea aforesaid and that he to the plea aforesaid in forme aforesaid pleaded hath no need nor by the Law of the Land is held to answer and this hee is ready to verifie Joinder in Demurrer whereupon he prayeth Judgement that the said Writ of supersedeas according to the form of the said Writ may be granted and allowed unto him and that the Justices here would not take further cognizance against him in the plea aforesaid c. And the same T. from whence he sufficient matter in Law to deprive the same I W from having the said Writ of super and that the Court here should take further Cognizance against him of the plea aforesaid hath above alledged which he is ready to verifie which sayd matter the same I. W. doth not gainsay nor any wise answer to the same but doth altogether refuse to admit of the verification thereof prayeth judgement if the said Writ of Supersedeas ought to be granted or allowed unto him and that the Court would take Cognizance against him the said I. W. in the plea aforesaid and because the Iustices c. M. 9 Jac. rot 705. ss A Writ of priviledge allowed for one of the six Clarks of the Chancery The Lord the King sent to his Justices of the Common Bench here his Writ closed in these words James by the Grace of God c. To his Justices of the Bench greeting Whereas the Masters Clarks and Officers of our Court of Chancery and of our progenitors late Kings of Eng and also their servants and familiars whosoever to answer in our Court before you or before any of our Justices or Ministers or other secular Judges whatsoever besides before us in our Chancery aforesaid upon any Writs Causes or Complaints Trespasses Actions or Demands which concern not our person pleas of Freehold Felonyes and Appeales only excepted according to the Jurisdiction Liberties priviledges and Customes of our Chancery aforesaid from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary hitherto obtained ought not to be drawn compelled or imprisoned nor hitherto were wont And now we understand that W. S. Knight doth implead in our Court before you Valentine Saunders Esquire one of the six Clarkes of our Court of Chancery aforesaid for 400 pounds which the same W. doth demand of the said Valentine as it is sayd in Derogation of our Court of Chancery and against the custome aforesaid and because we will inviolably observe the Jurisdiction Liberties priviledges and customes aforesaid We command you that from further holding before you of the plea aforesaid by whatsoever name the same V. be reputed you be altogether superseded declaring to the sayd W. on our behalfe that he follow against the same V. before us in our Chancery aforesaid and no where else If it seeme expedient for him Teste c. 9 November Anno 16. and 45. By pretext of which sayd Writ the Rolls and other Memorables of the Court of the Lord the King here remaining being searched it sufficiently appeareth upon Record that before the same writ of supersedeas was delivered to the said Justices here the same V was put in Exigent in the Hustings of London to be outlawed at the suit of the said VV. in the plea aforesaid which said writ of Exigent before the Justices here is returnable in Octab. S. Hillarii whereupon the same Valentine for his indempnity prayeth a writ of the Lord the King to be directed to the Sheriffs of London to supersede the Execution of the said writ of Exigent so that the same VV. at that day may shew if he can wherefore the same Va the priviledge of the Court Chancery of the said Lord the King according to the forme and effect of the writ aforesaid ought not to have if c. and it is granted to him returnable here at the same Terme c. The same day is given to the said V. here c. H Il. 1. and 2. Eliz. rot 630. The like writ is allowed for a Chancery Clarke H 18 El. rot 602 the like writ is allowed T. 19. El. rot 1213. H. 25. Eliz. rot 2019 A writ of priviledge for a Prothonotaries clarke of the Kings Bench allowed in the Common Bench. P 44 Eliz. rot 1841. The Lord the King c. reciting the writ of priviledge for Richard Swaine Doctor of Lawes one of the Masters of the Chancery Teste Anno 44. and for that the plaintiff alledged nothing in court here wherefore the said writ ought not to be allowed him therefore the plea aforesaid against the same R in the court of the King here shall be no more attempted c. M. 11 H 7 rot 133. T 5 Jac. rot 750 P 18 Jac. rot 1795. for M. P 13. Jac. rot 2192. P 11 Iac. rot 1368. P 36 Eliz. rot 320 P 8 H 7 rot 130. Allowance of a writ of priviledge for T.S. his Clerke one of the servants of our beloved clarke I.B. keeper
of the Rolls of our chancery allowed c. Entry of a writ of attachment of priviledge in the Common Bench for an attorney of the same Bench in debt against 2 severall persons severally M 19 Iac. rot 2948 Brownlow Lincolne ss The Sheriff was commanded that he should attach T B. clerk and L E clerke so that hee should have them here upon Satturday next after the morrow of all Soules to answer R Clarke Gent. one of the Attornyes of the court of the Lord the King of Common Bench here according to the liberties and priviledges c. in a plea of Debt severally And now here at this day came the said Robert in his proper person and offered himselfe against the said T and L in the plea aforesaid and they came not and the sheriff to wit T T Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed tooke the bodies of the same T and L. whose bodyes the same sheriff hath now here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him Cedi corpus returned and because the same sheriff the bodies of the same T and L now here at this day hath not ready therefore the same sheriff to wit the same Tho. T Esquire in mercy c. and he is fined by the Justices here at forty shillings and it is commanded to the same sheriff that he have here upon Wednesday next after 15 san Martini the bodies of the same T and L whom c. to answer to the same Robert in the plea aforesaid and the same sheriff to wit T.T. Esquire now returneth that the said T. and L. are in prison of the Lord the King at his Castle of Lincolne so languishing that he could not have their bodies here at this day without perill of death as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon in the same Court of the King here on the behalfe of the said Robert it is testified that the same T and L are sound and whole and able to travell therefore it is commanded the same sheriff that he or his under sheriff be here upon Wednesday next after eight dayes of Saint Hillary bringing with him the same T and L whether they be found or infirme to answer to the same Robert in the plea aforesaid and that he omit nothing herein under the penalty of 20 l. which if he shall not do the sheriff shall know he is to loose c. Duces recum awarded under the penalty of 20 l. Procedendo H 35. H. 8. Rot. 318. ss A Procedend awarded in a plea of lands to be removed out of an inferiour Court by Recordare Whereupon the cause aforesaid being seen alleaged by the same B. to remove the Plaintiff aforesaid in the writ aforesaid above specified It seemeth to the justices here that cause to be in sufficient in law to remove the plaint aforesaid out of the Court of the said Elizabeth B. nor but that the Bayliff of the said E. B of her mannor of B. with the Soke aforesaid in the court of the same E. B. and upon the plaint aforesaid ought to proceed c. Therefore it is considered that the said Brian notwithstanding the said Writ to the said sheriff to Record and remove the plaint aforesaid before directed he may proceed in the plaint aforesaid with effect And to the parties aforesaid exhibit full and speedy justice therein according to the Law and Custome of the Lord the King of England and the Court aforesaid c. M 8. H. 4. Rot. 114. Procedendo Rege inconsulto In a Sci. Fac. the Tenant pleads an attaint of the predecessor of the demandant by act of Parliament that the Tenements of the demandant came to the Kings hands and prayeth judgment si Rege in consulto c. And the King sent his writ de procedendo therein directed to the Justices that the Tenant plead de novo with the demandant c. H 13. Jac. Rot. Brownlow London ss A Procedendo after much debate granted upon a speciall return made upon a Hab. cor upon the custom of London concerning Prentices their ages and their Indentures between them and their Masters Indenture void if the Prentice be not of the age of fourteen years when he was bound An Habeas Corpus upon the privileges in the Bench for Martin Slater was directed to the Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs of London retornable immediatly before Henry Hobert Knight and Baron Cheife Justice c. Test 28. Nov. 13. Iac. by H. Hobert Execution c. ss London ss we I. Kt. Mayor of the said City of London and of the same City Aldermen and W. I. and I. G sheriffs of London to H. H. Knight and Baronet Chief Justice of the Lord the King now of the common Bench at this time in the precincts of great S. Bartholomew London do certifie that c. Prohibition BE it remembred that the 20. day of November the same Terme came here into the Court I. L. in his owne person and gave the Court here to understand Prohibition to the Court of Stanneries in the County of Cornw for holding plea of maters which contcern the Stanneries Suggestion That whereas by the lawes statutes of the Realme of the Lord the King of England it is provided that Keeper of the stanuaries of the Lord the King and of the court of the Stannaries within the counties of Devon and Cornewall or Keeper or Keepers of his place for the time being may not nor shall not hold pleas before him in the Court of Stannaries aforesaid unlesse arising between the Stannators whilst they work in the stannaries and between them and other Forreigners of any trespasses plaints or contracts made within the places wherein they work within the Stannaries neverthelesse certaine I. C. Gent. Administrator of the Goods and Chattles which were of I. C. his Father not being a Tinner in any of the stannaries aforesaid not ignorant of the premisses but indeavouring and intending very much to vex and disturb the same I against the lawes of the Realm of the Lord the King of England In the stannary court of the Lord the King of F in the said county of C before the Substeward of the Stannary Court aforesaid or deputy or Keeper of his place in the Court aforesaid or any of them in a certaine plea of Account by plaint by the said I. C. the same against the said L. in the same Court levyed upon supposall that the said L. was receivour of the monies of the said I. C. the Father and to have received of the monies of the said I.C. the Father in his life time 20 l. of one I. M to render an account thereof to the said I. C. drew into plea And the same L. to appeare in the said Stannery Court of F. aforesaid by occasion of the premisses and to answer the said C. of and upon the premisses
Plaintiff and Defendant come by attorny And there upon the same David prayeth execution against the same John for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowedged to be levyed of his lands and Chattles and against the same Bartholomew for the said 20 l. c. and so against the rest severally And the same I. B. W. and H. pray liberty to imparle untill Cr. Tri. and have it c. The same day is given to the same David here c. Execution prayed severally PAsch 9. Jac. Roll 349. Walter Devon ss It was commanded the sheriff because in the record and proceedings Scire facias after a judgment reversed in a writ of false judgment upon a Record in Detinue and also in commencing of a certain plaint which was in the hundred of N. C. Esquire of N. without writ of the Lord the King between I. C. W. H. in a plea of detinue of corne which the same I. C. demanded of the same W. a writ of false judgment was given against him in the said plaint as the King is informed by the grievious complaint of the said William and as by the inspection of the Record proceedings in the cause aforesaid which the said Lord the King now caused to be brought before his Justices at Westminster sufficiently appeareth that false judgment was given against the same William in the plaint aforesaid For which in the Court of the Lord the King now here before his said Justices it was considered that the judgment aforesaid should be revoked nulled and altogether taken for nothing Judgment reversed And that the same William should be restored to all things which he had lost by occasion of the judgment aforesaid Notwithstanding because the said Io. Clerk after the judgment aforesaid in the hundred aforesaid given and by force thereof and pretence of a certaine judiciall precept issuing out of the hundred caused to be don and levyed upon one Cow of the same Willam 39 s. 11 d. for the value of the said Corne to wit for eight bushels of Rye and 12 d to the same Iohn for his costs and charges which he had and sustained by the occasion of the detention of the corne aforesaid in the hundred aforesaid adjudged And thereupon the said Cow was sold by which occasion the said Iohn Clark of the said 39 s. 11 d. for the value of the said corne and of the said 12 d. for his costs and charges aforesaid in the hundred aforesaid by vertue of the judgment aforesaid recovered was and is satisfied as by the relation and information of the said William the Lord the King is informed and understands And because c. that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said I. C. that he should be here at this day to wit Men. Pas to shew if any thing c. Wherefore the Cow aforesaid or the value of the same or the said 10 s and 11 d. in Form aforesaid recovered Scire facias to have restitution ought not to be restored and repayd unto the said William according to the Form and effect of the said judgment in the said Court of the said Lord the King now in Form aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same W. H. by R. S. his attorney and offered himselfe the 4 th day against the said I. C. in the plea aforsaid and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath nothing Alias Sci. fac awarded c. nor is to be found c. Therefore as before it was commanded the sheriff that by honest men c. he shall make known to the said I. C. that he be here in Cr. Trin. to shew in Form aforesaid c. PAas 13. Jac Rot. 774. Brownlow Civit. Covent ss It was commanded the Coroners of the City aforesaid whereas the King had commanded the late sheriff of the City aforesaid that of the lands and chattls of H. L. late of D. in the county of Cest Gent. in their bayliwick they would cause to be made aswell a certaine debt of 150. Scire facias directed to the Coroners and Sheriffs both to levy a certaine debt upon a fi fac and not payed to the party at the returne of the fi fac l. which H S. in the Court of the King here to wit at Westminster recovered against him as 30 s. which to the same H. in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt and that they should have those monies before the Justices here to wit at Westminster 15. Marti last past to render to the said Humphery for his debt and damages aforesaid whereof he is convicted at which day here to wit at Westminster aforesaid came the same H. by G. B. his attorney and the sheriffes to wit T. L. and I. B. then retorned that they by vertue of the said writ to them directed of the Chattles of the said H. have caused to be made 125 l. parcell of the debt and damages aforesaid which said 125 l. here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at that day they have ready notwithstanding the same sheriffs the said 125 l. had not here in Court of the Lord the King at that day nor have satisfied the same Humphry for the said 125 l. as by the information of the said H. to the King was made known and because c. that by honest and c. they should make knowne to the same T. and I that they should be here at this day to wit 15. Pas to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same H execution against them for the said 125 l. by them in Form aforesaid levyed ought not to have c. if c. And now here at this day commeth the said H. by his attorney aforesaid and offered himself the 4 th day against the said T. and I. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the Coroner to wit W. F. now retorneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed by F. N. and T. W. honest c. made known to the same T. and I. to be here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid c therefore it is considered that the said H. have execution against the same T. and I. for the same 125l by them in Form aforesaid levyed by default c. LOndon ss Pasch 11. Jac. Rot. 620. The entry of a Sci. fac upon a generall pardon Capias ut lagat Brownlow ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should not omit for any liberty within their Bayliwick but that they should take H. H late c. otherwise called c. utlawed in London next before the Feast of St. Dunston the Bpp. An. primo c at the suit of G. E. in a plea of debt if c. and him in safty c. so
came to the hands and possession of the said P. after the death of the said W. and this c. Judgement if Execution c. AND the said R. saith Peplication that he had more assets at tue Teste of the Writ c. to the value of the debt c. and issue thereupon That hee by any thing before alledged from having his Execution aforesaid of the Debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith that the said P. the day of the obtaining of the writ of Scire facias aforesaid to wit such a day and year had diverse goods and chattells which were of the same W at the time of his death to be administred to the value of the Debt and Damages aforesaid above recovered besides the goods and chattells to the value of forty shillings which came to the hands of the said P. after the death of the said W. whereof the same P. might have satisfied the said R. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid to wit at S. in the County aforesaid and this he prayeth may be enquired of by the Country and the same Defendant c. Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he cause to come c. THe Jury say upon their oath Verdict that he had assets to 30 l. at the Teste c. overâ— c. and no more c. as to thirty pounds of the within written two hundred and six pounds parcell that the said P. the day of purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias to wit such a day and year had diverse goods and chattells which were of the within named W at the time of his death and in his hands to be administred to the value of the said thirty pounds besides the goods and chattells to the value of the said Forty shillings which came to the hands of the same P. after the death of the same W to be administred whereof the same P might have satisfied the said R. of the said thirty pounds Verdect for the Defendant to wit at S aforesaid as the same R hath thereof within alledged and as to the seventy foure pounds of the within named two hundred and six pounds residue the same Iury say upon their oath That the same P. the day of purchasing of the Writ of Scire facias to wit such a day and year had no Lands or Chattells which were of the within named W. at the time of his death in his hands to be administred to the value of the said one hundred seventy four pounds beside the goods and chattells to the value of the said forty shillings Judgement which came to the hands of the said P. after the death of the same W. whereof the same P. could satisfie the same R. of the said one hundred seventy four pounds to wit at S. in the County aforesaid as the same P. thereof within alledged therefore c. search the Judgment with Mr. Brownlow Entry of a Sci fac against an executor of one Manucaptor of three Manucaptors upon a Recognizance of baile upon an arrest in debt c. P 1. Jac. rot 817. Middlesex ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas by I R of B c. H D of C. c. and T. M. of C. c. of late to wit the twentieth day of Aprill Anno 41 Eliz. before E. A. Knight cheife Justice of the Court of Common Bench of the said Lady the Queen here at his dwelling house in the Charterhouse neer London undertook and every of them did undertake for M. T. late of London c. otherwise called c. in the County of Somerset Gent. in one hundred and fifty pounds And the same Morgan then and there assumed for himselfe in three hundred pounds and if it should happen the same M in a certain plea of Debt upon Demand of one hundred and fifty pounds against the same M by one Elias I in the said Court of the Lady the Queene of the Common Bench Recitall of the recognizance here prosecuted in any lawfull manner to be convinced and Judgement for the same E in the plea aforesaid against the said W. in the said Court to be given that then the same M. the said Debt of one hundred and fifty pounds and also all Damages to the said E by occasion of the detaining of the said Debt in the same Court of the late King against the same M in any manner to be assessed or adjudged would satisfie and render which said one hundred and fifty pounds the same I H and T M severally acknowledge to be made upon their Lands and Chattells And which sayd three hundred pounds the said M acknowledgeth to be likewise made of his Lands and Chattells and to Be levied for the use of the said E if it should happen the same M contrary to the Manucaption aforesaid in any manner to make Default And although the same E afterwards Judgement against the principall Hil. 42 Eliz to wit in the Terme of Saint Hillary Anno 42 Eliz. before E. Anderson Knight and his Associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by consideration of the same had recovered against the same M. as well the same one hundred and fifty pounds at the same forty shillings which to the same E in the same Court of the Queen here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of that Debt whereof hee is convicted as by the record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the said late Queen here remaining manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the same M. hitherto hath not satisfied the same E. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid Breach of the Recognizance nor in the same Court here hath rendred his body in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesayd according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid and the said T M is dead as by the information of the same E the King is given to understand And because c. that by honest c. he make known to A M Widdow An Alias Sci. fac was awared and continuances divers imparlances ought to be here The Defendant pleads assets to the value of 36 l. 5 s. came to her hands after the death c. and pleads a judgment against the Testator in his life time in London upon concessit solvere and that she had imployeâ— part of the assets about the funerall part about the the probaâ—e of the will part to compound the judgment and the residue brings here into Court ready to pay c. with plea that she hath no more c. The plaint leviviâ—d The plaintiffs finde pledges to prosecute and make their Attorney Executrix of the testament of the same T. M. of being here at this day to wit in Cro Asc Dom to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T in forme aforesaid acknowledged of
of March An. Regis nunc 21. held made to be assessed to be paid Notwithstanding the said Thomas the statute aforesaid not regarding more money of the towne of C aforesaid then unto which it was assessed against the manner and form of assessement made upon it caused to be leived in contempt of the Lord the King now and against the forme of the statute aforesaid that he should make known to the said T. that be should be here at this day to wit in 15 Hillarii to answer as well for the said Lord the King as for himselfe followeth in this behalfe wherefore twenty pounds to the said Lord the King and ten pounds to the said John he ought not to be satisfied according to the forme of the statute aforesaid And now here at this day came as well the said John by R. H. his Attorney as the said T. by T.G. his Attorney and the sheriff now returneth That hee made knowne to the said Thomas of being here at this day c. to answer in Forme aforesaid c. by W. R. I. R. and I D. honest c. And hereupon day is given to the said I. B. as to the said T.S. here untill 15 Pasch in State as now reserving to the said parties their pleas exceptions and advantages to the Writ aforesaid c. Abridge in Poulton title de Parliament 12. H 27. H. 6. rot 240. In Trespasse the Defendant justifies for Knights expences Et tre de summ and another summons directed to the Sheriff to assesse the Knights expences the plaintiff saith that the Vill is parcell of the Barony c. and discharged from payment and issue thereupon T 21. H. 6. rot 117. A Writ of Attachment to the sheriff of S out of the Parliament to hear their Bill in the same Parliament M 9 H. 5. rot 579. Speciall bastardâ— pleaded in bar to a Sci fac to have execution upon a fiâ—e ss And the said Richard Holt as to the Mannor of D with the Appurtenances and the said Advowson of the same Church of S saith that the said Hugh ought not to have Execution against him thereof because he saith that the said Joan which the sayd Hugh supposeth to be his Mother whilst shee was sole was not married to any man long before the same Joan was married was notably great with child at D in the County aforesaid by one W.L. of the said Hugh by the said W of the said John begotten he the same W then also being sole and not married to any woman and long afterwards that the sayd I was so notoriously great with childe and continually sole and not being married to any man Elopement and with the same W.L. there continually abiding took to husband one T. M. at D. aforesaid from which Thomas the said Hugh took to him his kindred and afterwards Matrimony and Espousalls between the same T. M. and Ioan at D aforesaid were celebrated the same Ioan incontinently departed thence from the said Thomas her husband and enlarged her self from the said Thomas unto the house of the said William in the said Town of D. and with the said W L. there continually the whole life time of the said Ioan was commorant and continued in adultery with the said William After which Matrimony and Espousalls so celebrated the sayd H at D aforesaid was borne without this that the said I was ever married to any other man but only to the said T. M. and all and every of these things the said R. H. is ready to verifie whereupon it shall not be intended that the sayd Hugh as son and heir of the said Ioan ought to have Execution against him of the Mannor aforesaid with the Appurteuances and of the Advowson of the Church of S. in this behalfe c. And as to the residue of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances and the sayd Advowson of the said church of F. in the Fine aforesaid contained the said R. Holt prayeth licence thereof to imparle here untill in 8. Hill and hath it c. by the consent of the said Hugh the same day is given to the said Hugh here c. ANd the same Hugh not knowing any thing by the same R Holte above alledged Demurrer in Law besides the said Matrimony and Espousalls between the said T. M. and Ioane celebrated whereby the Remainder of the said Mannor of D with the Appurtenances and the Advowson of the Church of S to the said Ioan and the heires males of her body coming by the fine aforesayd was intailed and the same H as Son and heir of the said I sufficiently demandeth Execution thereof by vertue of a fine aforesaid and the said R Holte doth not contradict it but the sayd Hugh is son and heir of the said I and as to the matter by the said R. H. above alleadged the same Hugh hath no need nor by the Law of the Land is held to answer prayeth judgement and Execution thereof for Defect of sufficient answer to him to be adjudged c. Joynder ANd the said R Holte as to the said Mannor of D with the Appurtenances and the Advowson of the Church of S. wherein the said H. doth not gainsay the sayd matter by the said Richard above aleadged which sayd matter is sufficient in Law to exclude the sayd H from having his Execution thereof by vertue of the Fine aforesaid which sayd matter the sayd Richard is ready to verifie prayeth judgement and that the said H may be barred from having his Execution therein and because the Justices c. untill 8 Hillary c. And to another parcell thereof the Defendant saith Non Tenure And to the whole residue pleads in Barr as before and a Demurrer in Law thereupon and continued untill 15 Pasch At which day here came as well the said Hugh by his Attorney aforesaid as the said Richard Holt in his proper person and hereupon the plea aforesaid being heard and understood it seemeth to the court here that the said Hugh Marchon ought to have Execution of the said Mannor of D. and Tenements with the Appurtenances and of the Advowson of the Church of S whereof the parties aforesaid have pleaded to judgement by vertue of the Fine aforesaid notwithstanding any matter for the said Richard Holt before alleadged Therefore it is considered that the same Hugh have Execution against the said Richard Holte of the said Mannor of D and Tenements with the Appurtenances Judgment for the demandant and of the same Advowson of S. c. T 31. H. 6. Execution awarded at the Assizes upon issue in a Sci. fa. upon a fine before the day in the Bench. Ayde of the King rot 315 ss An Entry of a scire facias upon a Fine for W. L. Knight against I H. of the Mannor of H. with the Appurtenances neer R at the Nisi prius at Bitingford verdict for the plaintiff before Io. Prisot Knight then Justice of the
Tenant had not duly made his execution Suff. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas William Ayleff Esquire Barbara his wife lately in the court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered their seisin against I. A. of the third part of the Mannor of Abbotts with the appurtenances in D. c. and whereas also at the prosecution of the same W. and B out of the said Court of the Lady the Queen here of and upon the judgment aforesaid to wit the 6. day of November An. 42. Eliz. issued forth a certaine writ of the Lady the Queen de Sesina directed to the sheriff of the county aforesaid By which said Writ the said Lady the Queen commanded the said sheriff that he should know that the same W and B. in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the common Bench here to wit at VVestminster aforesaid had recovered their seisin against the said I. of the said third part of the Mannor of Abbotts in the appurtenances and 8 messuages c. with the appurtenances as the Dower of the said Barbara of the indowment of Martin A. her late husband c. whereupon the said Lady the Queen now to the said sheriff commandeth that the said W. and B. full seisin of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them in severalty by meats and bounds he should cause to be had and in as much as he should that precept of the Lady the Queen he should make appeare to the Justices of the Lady the Qu. here to wit at VVestminster in 8. Hill then next following which said Writ of seisin afterwards to wit the 16. day of Ianuary then next following at Y. aforesaid in the county aforsaid to E. B. Esquire then sheriff of the County aforesaid being was delivered to be executed in Form of Law And also by the information of the said W. and B. the same Lady the Queen hath understood that the said Edward favouring the same I. A. and indeavouring wholely to defraud the same W. and B of the recovery of the third part aforesaid afterwards to wit the 17. day of Jan. An. 43. abovesaid caused to be had to the same W. and B. full seisin of 1 Messuage in E aforesaid late in the tenure c. to hold to the same W. and B as the Dower of the same B. of the Indowment of the said Martin her late husband in the same mannor of A. and to the Tenements and Rents aforesaid in Y. c. contingent as by the Record and proceedings here in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen remayning manifestly appeareth whereas notwithstanding all and singular the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B. by the said Ed. Bacon for the third part of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in Forme aforesaid delivered and assigned are not parcell of the mannor lands and Tenements aforesaid wherof the same W. and B. have recovered their third part in forme as aforesaid to the immoderate damage and grievances of the said W. and B. whereupon they have supplycated the said Lady the Queen to adhibet to them a fit remedy in this behalfe the same Lady the Queen not being willing in any wise to injure the same W. and B. But being willing that compleat justice be don and used to them in this behalfe that by honest c he should make known to the same I. that he should be here at this day to wit in 8. Mi. to shew if any thing c. Wherefore omitting the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned the same W. B seisin and execution of the said third part of the mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the said W. and B. have recovered their third part in Form as aforesaid according to the Form of the recogniz aforesaid against the same I. ought not to have if c. THe Defendant appeareth and saith that the said W. and A. any further execution of the third part aforesaid of the mannor and Tenements c. aforesaid with the appurtenances by them above recovered against him ought not to have because he sayeth that well true it is c. And confesseth the Recovery the writ of seisin and the return thereupon and that the Defendant entred into the land and further saith That the said messuage 3. acres of Land c. in D. aforesaid to the same W. B by the same E. B. for the third part of the mannor c. in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned are parcell of the mannor and Tenements whereof the same W. B. have recovered their seisin of the third part abovesaid in Form as aforesaid and this c. Judgment for the Tenant upon the demurrer And demurrer for that the writ lyeth not but afterwards an other Writ generall was brought And it was adjudged to be well brought See Hill 25. Rot. 650. P. 9. Jac. rot 656. Entry of a Sci. fac in a Quare Impedit T 30. Eliz. rot 1308. Lincoln ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas Thomas Beverly Gent. in the Court of the Lady the Queen now here to wit in the Term of of S. M. An. Eliz. 28. and 29. before Ed. Anderson Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench here by the consideration of the same Court had recovered his presentation against Iohn Arch. Bpp. of Canterbury and G. Cornwall his Clerk of the Church of Somerby in the County aforsaid being void and belonging to his gift by writ of the said Lady the Queen de Quare impedit as by the record and proceeding therein in the same Court here remayning it manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet resteth to be don as by the information of the said Thomas the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the said Arch Bpp. and Gabriel that they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. S Tri to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Thomas execution against them ought not to have according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said Thomas by VVilliam Be. his attorny as the same Arch Bpp. and Gabrill by R. P. their attorney And here upon the said Thomas prayeth Execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch. Bpp. and G. to him to be adjudged Saith nothing but the ordinary c. and the same Arch Bishop defenderth the force and wrong when c. and nothing in Bar of the execution of the said Thomas saith whereby the said Thomas remayneth against the said Arch. Bpp. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the same Thomas have execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch-Bishop according to
the Form of the recovery aforesaid by default c. But let execution therein cease The Incumbent pleads in Bar that the writ of Quare impedit depending the plaintiff was utlawed and that he resigned by which it appertained to the Queen to present and the Queen presented him and that he was indicted such a day and after that the plaintiff sued a writ of Error forth to reverse the utlâ—ry and afterwards it was reversed as to have a writ to the Bishop untill the plea between the said Thomas and the said Gabriel be determined c. and the said Gabriel saith that the said Thomas execution upon the judgment aforesaid against him ought not to have because he saith that the said writ of quare impedit depending to wit such a day and yeare certain C. B. Esquire out of the Court of Chancery of the Lady the Queen at VVestminster in the County of Midd. then being prosecuted a certaine Originall writ of the said Lady the Queen against the same Thomas Beverly c. And recite the outlawry Therefore he by the judgment of W. D. and T. G. then Coroners of the said Lady the Queen of the County aforesaid was utlawed after wich said utlawry against the same Thomas B. in Form aforesaid published remayneth reversed or adnulled and after the said recovery of the presentations aforesaid in the said writ of Scire facias specified to wit the first day of December An. Rn. c. 23. the same Gabriel being then Parson of the Church of Somerby aforesaid at Somerby aforesaid on his owne accord resigned the same Church into the hands of William then Bpp. of Lincoln ordinary of that place whereof the Church aforsaid was then void By pretext whereof the right of the presentation to the same Church being so void by force of the utlawry aforesaid as is before said then being in his strength to the said Lady the Queen belonged the same Lady the Queen to the said Church being so void afterwards to wit the third day of December An. Regni sui 9. by her letters Patents which the said Gabriel with the Great Seale of England Sealed bringeth here into the Court whose date is at Westminster in the County of Midd. the same day and year Presented the same Gabriel her Clerk and the same Gab. by vertue of the presentation afterwards to wit the 5 day of December An. 29. abovesaid was admitted and instituted in the same and afterwards and before the day of the purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias to wit the 16. day of December An. 29. abovesaid the same Gabriel into the Church aforesaid was inducted by pretext whereof the said Church was full and yet is of the same Gab. by the presentation of the said Lady the Queen after which said admission institution induction of the said Gabriel into the Church aforesaid to wit the 13. day of February An. Rn. 29. abovesaid the same Thomas Beverly prosecuted out of the same Court of Chancery aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid then being a certain writ of the said Lady the Qu. De Errore corrigendo to her beloved and faithfull Edm. Anderson Knight directed By which said writ the said Lady the Queen now reciteth by the said Writ that because in the Record and Procedings and also in publishing the said utlawry against the said Thomas in the County of Lincoln aforesaid published and before the same E. A. and his associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench as is said retorned manifest error hath intervened to the great Damage of the said Thomas as by his complaint the Queen understood the same Lady the Queen willing the error if any be in due manner to be corrected and to the same Thomas full and speedy Justice may be don in this behalf commanded the said Edmond Anderson that if the utlawry aforesaid before the said Edmond and his associats aforesaid in the bench aforesaid be returned so it was said then the record and processe of the utlawry aforesaid with all things touching them to the said Lady the Queen under your Seale you distinctly and plainly send and that Writ so that we may have them a die Pas in tres Sept. then next following wheresoever we shall be in England that viewing the Record and proceedings aforesaid we have cause further to be don thereupon for correcting the said Error that of right and according to the Law and custom of the Lady the Queen of E. ought to be done by vertue of which writ de err corig the same E. A. the record and proceedings aforesaid whereof mention is made in the said writ of Error Certificat of the utlawry upon the writ of Error to the said Lady the Qu at W. aforesaid at the said tr Sep. Pas under his seal sent according to the form and effect of the said writ the Tenor of which Record and proceedings follow in these words Pleas at W. before E. A. Kr. and his associats Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench of E Term An. of the reign of El. by the grace of God c. 28. rot 1209. Lincoln ss Charles Bawdes Esquire by his attorney offered himself the 4. day against Thomas Baverley c of A plea wherefore with force and armes c. And he came not c. therefore the sheriff was commanded that he attach him c. and the sheriff now returneth that he hath nothing c. therefore let him be taken that he may be here Tli die At which day there came the said Charles by his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the said Thomas in the plea aforesaid and he cannot And the sheriff was commanded that he should take him c. and the sheriff now returneth that he is not found c. Therefore as before let him be taken that he be here Tli die ss Pleas at Westminster before c. and recite the entry of the Plu. Capias and the pleas at Westminster c. And recite the entry of the Exigi Fac. At which day the sheriff returned that his county held at Lowth in the county aforesaid the 24. day of Oct. An Regni Eliz. now c. 28. The same Thomas Beverly was the 5. time called and appeared not And that so at the 4. Countys next preceding the same Thomas was likewise called and appeared not and because he appeared not at any of the aforesaid Countyes therefore he is utlawed afterwards to wit on Thursday next after tres Sept. S. Mich. then next following before the said Lady the Queen at Westminster came the same Thomas B in his proper person and rendred himself prisoner to the Marshall of the Marshallsey of the said Lady the Queen before the same Queen by occasion of the utlawly aforesaid who was committed to the Marshall c. Error assigned And presently said that in the record and proceedings aforesaid and also in publishing of the
Jac. Rot. 1510. It is thus contayned Mid. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas G. B. of Cobham in the County of Surry gent. had prosecuted a certaine Writ of the Lord the King of Audita querela to the Justices of the Lord the King here directed against one I. D. Doctor of the Lawes upon a certain judgment in the Court of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench here given for the same Iohn against the said O. given aswell of a certaine debt of 200 l. as of 33 s. and 4. d. for his damages which the same I. had by occasion of detayning of that debt by the same Iohn against the said O. in the same court of the said Lord the King here rccovered and the same O thereupon afterwards to wit the 29. day of May An. Rs. c. 7. out of the same Court had obtayned a certaine writ of the said Lord the King directed to the sheriff of Suss against the same Iohn to premonish the said Iohn of being before the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster such a retorn the next following to answer to the said writ of Audita querele And further to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King shall consider of him in that behalf and whereas also afterwards to wit the said 29. day of May An 7. abovesaid in the same Court before the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster came E. M. of c. G. M. of c. T. W. of c. and R. E. and undertook and every of them did undertake for the same O. in the summe of 200 l. and the same O then present in the same Court undertook for himselfe in the summe of 500 l. to prosecute the said writ of Audita querela with effect and if it shall happen judgment against the said O. in this behalfe to be given that then the same O. should satisfie to the same I. of the debt and damages aforesaid in the same Court recorded which said summe of 500 l. the said Owen acknowledgeth of his Lands and Chattles to be made and to be levied to the use and behoofe of the said Iohn And which said severall sumes of 200 l. every of the Mnucaptors aforesaid acknowledge of their Lands and Chattles and every of them to be made if it should happen the said Owing to make default in any of the premisses and thereof to be lawfully convicted and although afterwards to wit in the morrow of the holy Trinity An. Rs. c. 8. after the appearance of the said Iohn to the writ aforesaid made in the Court of the said Lord the King before his Justices here to wit at Westminster by the judgment of the same Court it was considered that the said Owing shall take nothing by the said writ aforesaid but should be in mercy for his false clamor therein And that the said Iohn should goe therein without day c. and prosecute for his execution if to him it should seem expedient Neverthelesse the said Owing of the said 200 l. of the debt aforesaid the said 33 s. and 4 d. for the damages aforesaid hath not satisfied to the said Iohn neither the said Owing the said 500 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to the said Iohn hitherto hath not paid nor the same Edmond George Thomas Robert or any of them the said 200 l. by them severaly in Form aforesaid acknowledged of their lands and chattles to the same I. D hitherto hath paid as by the information of the said Iohn the King understandeth And because c that by honest c. he make knowne to the said O. E. G. T. and Rob that they should be here at this day to wit 15 Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the same O wherefore the same 500 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his lands and chattles and the same E G. T. and R. wherefore the same 200 l. by them severally in Form aforesaid acknowledged of their Lands and Chattles ought not to be made and rendred to the said Iohn according to the Forme of the acknowledgment aforesaid if c. At which day here came the said John by I N his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the same O. E. G. T. and R. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c. Therefore as before it was commanded the sheriff that by honest c he should make knowne to the said O. E. G. T. and R. that they should be here 15 Pas to shew in Form aforesaid c. At which day here came aswell the same Iohn by his Attorney aforesaid as the said O. E. G. T. and R. by Oth. Gager their Attorney and the sheriff as before retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are to be found c. And hereupon the same Iohn prayeth execution against the said Owin of the said 500 l. by the same O. in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the same Edmond for the same 200 l. by the same E. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and against the said George for the said 200 l. by the same George in Form aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Thomas of the said 200 l. by the same Thomas in Form aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Robert of the said 200 l. by the same Robert in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. and the same O E. G T. and R. praylicence to imparle and have it c. At which day came here aswell the said Iohn as the said O. E. G. T. and R. by their attornies aforesaid and hereupon the same Iohn as before prayeth judgment and execution against the said O. E. G. T. and R. of the said severall summes by them in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. And the same attorney of the said O. E G T. and R. saith that he is not informed c. therefore it is considered that the same I. D. have execution against the same O for the said 500 l. by the same O. in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the said Ed. for the said 200 l. by the same E in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and against the said George for the said 200 l. by him in Forme acknowledged And against the said Thomas for the said 200 l. by the same Thomas in Forme aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Robert for the said 200 l. by the same Robert in Form aforesaid acknowledged c. T 10. Jac. Rot. 338 Walter Staff ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of a speciall writ of Scire facias where the lands are extended for the Pâ— but the sheriff saith that he extended the same Lands upon an other Elegit and delivered them to the party and that he cannot deliver them to the pâ— now
same sheriff of N. that by honest and lawfull men of his Bayliwick he make knowne to the said George that he should be here at this day to wit tres Trin. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same George whereas to him of his debt Damages costs and reasonable and necassary charges it hath been satisfied possession of the Mannor and the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he ought or can hold At which day here came the same T. by Iohn Maior his attorney and offered himself the 4th day against the said George in the plea aforesaid and he being solemnly called by Thomas Bennet appeared and the sheriff to wit Thomas Huchison Knight now retorneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed by George West and G. Mercer honest c. of his bayliwick make known to the said George that he should be before the Justices of the Lord the King at the same Term. And hereupon the same George by his attorney aforesaid prayeth licence therein to imparle here untill in 8. S. Mich. And hath it c. The same day is given to the said Thomas here c. Entry of a Sci fac after a devastavit returned brought by the Administrator of the plaintiff who is dead after judgment upon the devastavit that he should have execution de bonis propr executoris M 9 Jac Rot 703. the like H 19. Jac. Rot. 2098. B. Cornub ss It was commanded whereas the King had lately commanded W. C. late sheriff of the County aforesaid that of the goods and Chattells which were of Io. P. late called Io. of M. within the parish of P. in the County aforesaid Gent. at the time of his death in the hands of W.P. late of P. c. Gent. and Joane P. late of P. in the County aforesaid widow executors of the Testament of the same Iohn in your bayliwick he should make aswell a certaine Debt of 40 l. which Gar. B. widow in the Court of the King now here to wit at Westminster had recovered against them as 40 s. which to the same G. in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for her Damages which she had by occasion of the detayning of the said Debt if the same W. and I. so much goods and Chattells which were of the same I. at the time of his death in their hands to be administred had and if they had not Then the Damages aforesaid of the proper goods and Chattells of the said William and Joane to be levied and that he should have those monyes here in Cr. S. Martini last past to render to the same Gar. for her Debt and Damages aforesaid whereof they are convicted And now here at this day came the said Gar. by Nich. Cory her attorney And the same now Sheriff at that day retorned that before the comming of the Writ aforesaid to him directed the same William and Joane the goods and Chattles which were of the same Iohn at the time of his death in the hands of the said William and Ioane to the value of the debt and Damages aforesaid had wasted by which the Debt and Damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof he could cause to be made and the same sheriff further returneth that he caused to be made of the proper goods and Chattels of the said William 40 s. for the Damages aforesaid which said 40 s. at the day and place abovesaid he had ready as by the said writ it was commanded him And the same Gar. is dead as by the information of E L. and Margaret his wife Administratrix of the goods and Chattels which were of the said Gar at the time of her death and Ric. Penhallow and Mary his wif co-administratrix with the said Margaret of the goods and chattells aforesaid the King understandeth and because c. That by honest c. he should make known to the same William and J that they should be here at this day to wit Tres Tr. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said Ed. and Margaret R. and Mary Offer execution against them for the Debt aforesaid of the proper goods and Chattells of the same W. and I they ought not to have c. And now here at this day came the same Ed. and Margaret Richard and Mary by the same N. C. their Attorney Averment that the plaintiff died intestate and the Letters of administration shewed c. and offered themselves the fourth day against the same William and Ioane in the same plea c. and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now returneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c. And hereupon the same Edward and Margaret Richard and Mary say that the said Gartrude dyed intestate and that the Administration of all the goods and chattells which were of the said Gartrude at the time of her death by George by Divine providence c. the twenty sixt day of May Anno Domini 1621. at London in the Parish of Saint Mary Bow in the Ward of Cheap to the same Margaret and Mary after the death of the said Gartrude was committed and they bring here into the Court the Letters administratory of the said Arch-Bishop which the Commission of the Administration aforesaid in forme aforesaid testifie c. and pray Execution against the same William and Ioan of the Debt aforesaid to them to be adjudged c. Therefore it is considered that the same Edward and Margaret Richard and Mary Execution by Default have Execution against the said W. and Io. of the debt aforesaid of the proper goods and Chattells of the same W. and Ioane to be levied by default c. TRin. 2. H. 6. rot 131. Essex ss It was commanded the Sheriff Entry of a Scire fac against the Sheriff for taking insufficient pledges in a Replegiare in Com. 2 H. 6. fol. 15. pl. 15. This case reported agreeing with this Record Fitzherbert processe 72. 9 H. 6. 42. Booke of entries 564. 570 571. 15 E. 4. fol. 19. by Callow Detinue â—yeth H 11. Jac. 10â— 3563. Bi Leicester ss Sommerfield and Buney against Beamount the like Scire facias F.N.B. 69. cap. 74.21 H. 6. 40. Hill 44. Eliz. rot 2555. whereas of late the King had commanded the same sheriff that by honest and lawfull men of his County he should make known to Jo. Wallis and William Bennet who for John Compeer late of O. c. became pledges for the Return of the cattell to be made which Jo. Armour Citizen and Mercer of London took and unjustly detained as is said if it should be adjudged that they should be before the Justices of the Lord the King here in Octob. saucti Hillarii last past to shew if any thing c. wherefore the cattell aforesaid for that return of them to the said I Armour for default of the same I. C. in the same Court afterwards made was adjudged and that the cattell
aforesaid were sold and eloyned to the same I. Armour ought not to be returned or for defect of Return of the same Cattell the Price of them of the lands and chattells of the same I W. and W. B. in your Bailiwick to be made and rendred to the same I A according to the forme of the statute therein made and of the pledges abovesaid the same sheriff to the same Justices of the Lord the King at that day returned that the same I W and W B have nothing in his Bailiwick by which he could make known to them nor were found in the same whereby the said I. A. from having return aforesaid hath received a very long delay whereupon he hath besought the Lord the King to exhibit justice to him and that the statutes of the Kingdome of the Lord the King made for the bettering of the same may remaine stable the King will for the benefit of his Leige people by speediest remedyes consonant to the same statutes that by honest c. hee should make known to W. L. late sheriff of the County aforesaid predecessor of the now sheriff who took the pledges aforesaid in Forme aforesaid that he should be here at this day to wit in 8 sancti Trinitatis to shew if any thing c. wherefore he so many cattell to wit two horses and eighty sheep as the same I. A. took from the same I. C. as in the same Court he hath avowed Sci. fac returned or the price of them for the insufficiency of the pledges aforesaid to the same I. A. in the name of the Returne of the Cattell aforesaid ought not to render according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid Judgement ' by default and the awarding of a writ to take of the said sheriff totanimali vel prec and to deliver them to the plaintiff Nomine returni if c. And now here at this day cometh the same I. A. in his proper person and the said W.L. late sheriff 4 Die pl. being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now returneth that hee made known to the said late sheriff of being here at this day to shew in Forme aforesaid by I.S. and W.C. Therefore it is considered that the same I. A. have of the late sheriff two horses and eighty sheep to the value of the other goods aforesaid which the said I. A. late took or the price of them and a writ to the sheriff to take of the late sheriff the Cattell aforesaid or the price of them and them or that to the same I. A. in the name of the Returne of the other cattell aforesaid to deliver c. Count in Sci. fa. upon a Recognizance acknowledged in the Country before a Justice of the common Bench and afterwards delivered to be inrolled and is enrolled in the same Terme in which it was delivered to be inrolled H. 8. Eliz. rot 104 3. H. 15. Jac. rot 21. in t Pl. ter and there rot 80. a recognizance is entred with a condition T. 21. Jac. rot 73. or 78. the like Inrollment of a recognizonce with the Terme number of the roll extressed Mich 28. and 29. Eliz. rot â—046 Generall entry of a recognizance taken before a Justice of the Common Bench and a Scire facias thereupon M 20 Jac. rot 843. Brownlow otherwise as it appeareth in Michaelmas Terme 19. Jac. rot 1906. It is thus contained Oxon ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas R. H. of S in the County of Oxon Esquire the twentieth day of Iuly Anno c. 18. and Scotland 53. before Peter Warburton Knight then one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench of the City of Oxford in the County aforesaid acknowledged himself to owe to Richard Farmer of S. in the County aforesaid Knight one thousand Markes of lawfull mony of England which he ought to have paid him at the Feast of the birth of our Lord then next following which same Recognizance the same Peter Warburton afterwards to wit the twelfth day of February in the Terme of Saint Hillary Anno 18 abovesaid delivered here in Court with his own proper hands to be there inrolled upon Record and there before Henry Hobart Knight Cheife Justice of the Lord the King of Common Bench and his Associates Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench in the same Terme of Saint Hillary it is enrolled upon Record which said one thousand Markes the same R to the said R. hath not yet paid as by the information of the said R. the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. hee should make known to the said Ralph that hee should be here at this day to wit A die sancti Michaelis in unam mensem to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said one thousand Markes ought not to be made of his Lands and chattells in your Bailiwick and rendred to the same R. according to the Forme of the Recovery aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same Richard by Thomas G. his Attorney as the sayd Ralph forenamed c. by Io. Wells his Attorney and hereupon the same Richard prayeth Execution against the same Ralph of the said one thousand Markes of the Lands and chattells of the same Ralph to be made by pretext of the Recog aforesaid to him to be adjudged and the same Ralph prayeth the hearing of the Recognizance aforesaid and it is read unto him c. And also prayeth the hearing of the Condition of the same Recognizance and it is read unto him in these words The condition of this Recognizance is such That if the said Ralph Holte his Heâ—â—â— or Assignes shall and will for his and their parts well and truly observe fullfill and keep the Award Doome and Order of Sir Thomas Spencer Knight and Baronet and Edw. Sheldon Esquire for and concerning Suits matters and controversies moved depending or being between the said Ralph Holte on the one part and the above named Sir Richard Farmer on the other part for and concerning the Common for foure hundred sheep and right for keeping conyes in and upon the grounds called Bayards green in the County of Oxford and all Commons and other profits claimed therein by the said Ralph Holte and the Right Title and possession of the same Common and keeping of Conyes so as the said Sir Thomas Spencer and Edward Sheldon do make their sayd Award touching the premisses or any part thereof on this side the Feast day of the Nativity of our Lord next coming after the Date hereof and do cause the same to be put in writing under their hands and seales ready to be delivered unto the said Ralph Holt then this present Recognizance to be void or else to stand in force and vertue which being read and heard the Defendant prayeth imparlance and hath it c. And it is continued by imparlance untill Cr. Tri. 20. Jac. at
Henr 6. Fitzh processe 72. The great question was whether the plaintiff should have such a Scire facias against the sheriff or a writ of Detinue but it was not adjudged but by the consent of the parties the demâ—urrer was waived and issue taken Note that in the very case there was a non suit at Surrey Assizes upon issue taken upon the avowry for damage feasant and such issue is not expressed in the writ for which the writ is not good Quaere tamen Note where the pledges were sufficient at the time of the taking c. and afterwards in the Terme it was tried at the bar and found for the Defendant notwithstanding that the plaintiff gave in evidence that one of the pledges was insufficient because he should have replyed that I.S. one of the pledges was not sufficient at the time of the taking c. Iac. rot 2752. It is thus contained Surr. ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas Edmund Travers was summoned to be in the Court of the Lord the King now before his Iustices here to wit at Westminster to answer Rich. Ray of a plea wherefore he the thirtieth day of August Anno of the Lord the King now of England the nineteenth at Deptford in a certain place there called H. took the cattell to wit three Geldings four Oxen five Cowes seventy sheepe and one Calfe of the same R. and them unjustly detained against sureties and pledges c. of which said taking and unjust detaining of the cattel aforesaid the same Richard Raye another time to wit the one and thirtieth day of August Anno 19. abovesaid without our writ levied a certain plaint against the same Edmond Travers before R. M. Knight late Sheriff of the county of Surrey in his County Court then held at Guildford in the same County of Surrey and then and there in the same County Court aforesaid found to the then sheriff of the sayd County of Surrey Pledges as well to prosecute his plaint as for the Return of the cattell aforesaid to the same Edmund or the price of them if returne of them should be adjudged to the said Edmund to wit certain R.R. and R.K. upon which said pledges the same then sheriff of Surry afterwards to wit then at the petition of the said R.R. the cattell aforesaid according to the Law and Custome of the Realm of the Lord the King of England to the same Richard Raye caused to be replevied the Record of which said plaint afterwards by Writ of the said Lord the King to the sheriff of the sayd County of Surrey in due manner sent here to wit at Westminster aforesaid was had and the same R. Ray afterwards in the same Court of the Lord the King here being solemnly called came not but made Default by which afterwards to wit in Michaelmas Terme Anno 19. abovesaid in the same Court of the Lord the King here it was considered that the same Richard Ray and his pledges to prosecute should be thereof in mercy let the names of the pledges be enquired of and that the same Ed. Travers should go thereof without day c. And that he should have Return of the Cattell aforesaid whereupon by writ of the said Lord the King it was commanded to the late sheriff of Surrey that he should without delay make returne of the cattell aforesaid to the said Edmond Travers and should not deliver them at the complaint of the sayd Richard Ray without the writ of the said Lord the King which should make expresse mention of the said judgment and in as much as that precept of the Lord the King should be executed he should make to appear to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster in Cro. sancti Trinitatis Anno Regis nunc 20 And the same late sheriff of Surrey to the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid at that day returned that before the coming of the said writ to him therein directed the cattell aforesaid were eloyned by the same R. Raye to places to him unknown so that hee could not make returne of the cattell aforesaid to the said Edmund Travers as by the said writ to him it was commanded c. whereupon it was commanded to the same Sheriff of Surrey that of other cattell of the said R. Ray to the value of the cattell aforesaid first taken hee should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said Edmund Travers to keep to him untill he could cause to be returned to the said Edmund Travers the cattell before taken and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges the same R. Ray that he should be before the Iustices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster Tres Trin. then next following to answer as well the said Lord the King for the contempt as to the said Edmund Travers for the damages and injuries to him in this behalfe done and the said sheriff of Surrey to the same Iustices of the Lord the King at Westminster at that day returned that the same R. Ray had no goods nor chattells in his Bayliwick which he could take in Withernam nor had any thing in his bayliwick by which he m ght be attached according to the Exigency of that writ as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth whereupon the sayd Lord the King to the same then sheriff by another writ of his had commanded that by honest c. he should make known to the same R. R. and R. K. his pledges that they should be here at this day to wit in Cro. Animarum then next following to shew if any thing c. wherefore the cattell aforesaid ought not to be delivered to the same Edmund Travers for the same cattell of the same Richard Raye by the same Edmund Travers so before taken and now by him eloyned as they as aforesaid became pledges And now here at this day came the said Edmund Travers by Henry Millet his Attorney and offered himselfe the fourth day against the same R.R. and R. K. pledges in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now returneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c. And whereupon the same Edmund Travers of having the Return of the cattell aforesaid hath been a long time delayed wherefore he supplicateth to the said Lord the King to exhibit Iustice to him and that the statutes of the Lord the King of his Kingdom made for the bettering of the same may remain stable the Kâ—ng will for the benefit of his Leige people by speediest remedies consonant to the same Statutes be assistant The sheriff is commanded that by honest c. he make known to the said R. M. late sheriff of the same County of Surrey who took the pledges aforesaid in form aforesaid that he should be here at this day A
Deputy sheriff of the County aforesaid in Forme of Law to be Executed c. by proclamation thereof made according to the forme of the statute c. Entry of a summons in a Qâ—ar imp with the essâ—ine and an attachment awarded for default H 2. Jac. rot 192. North. G C. Esquire by his Attorney offered himselfe the fourth day against Thomas Bishop of the Burrough of Saint Peter otherwise Peterburrough and William B. his Clarke that they permit him to present a fit person to the Church of W. which is void and belongeth to his gift c. and they came not and they had therein day to wit the same Bishop by essoine here untill in Octab. Sancti Hillarii last past and the said W. hath day therein by his Essoine here untill this day to wit in Octob. Pur B. Mariae after they were summoned c. judgement that they be here 15. Pasch c. H 10. Jac. rot 20. Wollaston Eber. ss Speciall entry of a summons in quare Imp. and the she iff returns tarde and an al sum awaâ—ded It was commanded the sheriff that he summon by good summoners George bishop of C. E. C. Gent. I.T. Clark that they should be here at this day in Oct. Pur. B. Mariae to answer M W. Knight and F. S. Esquire of a plea that they suffer them to present a fit person to the Church of S which is void and belongeth to their gift and now here at this day came the same M. and F. by their Attorney and the sheriff to wit C.H. Knight now returneth that that writ was delivered to him so late that for the brevity of time hee could not execute it as by the said Writ it was commanded him therefore as before it is commanded to the said sheriff that he summon by good summe oners thsame Bishop E. and I. that they be here 15. Pas to answer to the same M. and F. in the plea aforesaid c. P 11. Iac. rot 20. Wellaston ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of an al sum â—n a quar imp â—n feverance and an attachment awâ—rded against the defendant as otherwise the King had commanded the said sheriff that he should summon by good summoners G. Bishop of E. E. E. Gent. and I. T. Clerke that they should be here at this day to wit 15. Pasch to answer as above And now here at this day came the same Marmaduke by A. B. his Attorney and the said F likewise plaintiff c. the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called came not and hereupon the same M offereth himselfe the fourth day against the said Bishop E and I in the plea aforesaid and they came not and the sheriff now returneth that he had summoned c judgement they be attached that they be herein Cro. Trin. and it is commanded to the same sheriff that hee summon by good summoners the same F. that he be here at the said Terme to follow against the said Bishop E and I his plea aforesaid together with the said Marmaduke if c. Surrender H 1 Iac. rot 1699. Brownlow ss Surrender of a Philizers office see the old book of entries f 442 title de office and officers Be it remembred that the thirteenth day of February that same Terme came here into Court Edward Pytt Knight Philizer in the same Court as well of London as of the County of Middlesex Huntington and Cambridge in his proper person and of his own accord surrendred into the hands of Edmund Anderson Cheif Iustice of the Lord the King of the Bench here his office of philizer aforesaid to the use of Iames Pyt Knight whom the said Cheife Iustice as the Custome is freely admitted to the same Office to hold occupy and have to him as his free Tenement according to the custome of the Court aforesaid in the whole time aforesaid used and approved The oath and presently the same Iames Pytt upon the taking of his corporall Oath as the custome is well and faithfully to behave and carry himselfe in the office aforesaid Put into possession put and constituted him into the corporall possession of the same Office to hold occupy and have the same in forme aforesaid with the Fees and profits incumbent to the said office and anciently due and accustomed c. SEE Hill 13. Iac. rot 732. the like in Ady and Maydwell H 10. Iac. rot 3279. in Gulston and Mill. T 28. H. 8. rot 511. Surrender by Pateshal Philizer of Essex and Hertford T 22. Iac. rot 2085. Surrender by the Philizer of Norfolke Lambe to Thelwall M. 28. H. 8. rot 108. T. 33. H. 8. rot 1. T. 3. and 4. Philip and Mary rot 904. T. 1. C. Reg. rot 958. Grant of the office of the Philizer of W. made by H. P. after the death of Plumstead by the Lord Hobart Supersedeas Supersedeas to a Cap. iâ— Withernam quia inconsult emanavit and aver elongat returned thereupon and a cap Withernam awarded for the Defendant against the plaintiff upon a writ of Plur. repleg Aver elongat returned upon the plur replevin Câ—pias in With rnam of the Ca tell of Defendant awarded for the plaintiff 3. El. Dyer fol. 189. pl. 12. P 8. Edwardi 4. rot 106. Surrey ss Be it remembred that the Iustistices here in Court the fourteenth day of May that same Terme delivered here to W.F. Deputy sheriff of the County aforesaid a certain writ of the Lord the King now closed directed to the said sheriff under forme of Law to be executed which said Writ the same W. opened here in Court the Tenor whereof followeth in these words Edward by the grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland to the sheriff of Surrey greeting Whereas lately by our Writ as more times we have commanded you that justly and without delay you should replevy to W.W. and T. M. his cattell which I. L. took and unjustly detained as he saith or that you your selfe should be before our Iustices at Westminster 15 Trin. last past to shew wherefore you have contemned to execute our commands so often to you therein directed and then to our said Iustices at Westminster at the same 15 Tr. hast returned that those cattell aforesaid were enlarged to unknowne places by the same I. so that you could not have sight of them and that you could not replevy the said Cattell to the said W. and T. wherefore we have commanded you that you should take of the cattell of the said I in your Bailiwick to the value o the saâ—d cattell of the said W and T in Withernam and shouldest deliver them to the said W and T to be kept untill the said Cattell of the said W and T you could redeliver to the same W and T and in as much as you shall execute this our precept Pone Def. ad respondend of the taking of the cattell with a repleg fac of
the County of Lincoln and by the opinion of Court it was adjudged Male for that the proclamation ought to have been at least a Mo. before the 5. Eactus and the reason in the court was for that the retorne of the proclamation was that the defendant should yeeld himselfe to the sheriff of Lincoln which he could not do before the utlawry for that the utlawry was pronounced the same day with the proclamation ss Mich. 36. and 37. Eliz. rot 2894. London ss Entry of a travers de Comorance in an other county reversall of an utlawry pur non Comorans and possession of the attorney generall It was commanded the sheriffs that they should not omit for any liberty of their County but they should take P. L. of c. utlawed in London upon Munday next after the Feast of the Ascention of our Lord An 36. Eli. at the suite of W. G. in a plea of debt if c. and safely c. so that they might have his body here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Mich. c. to do and receive what the Court of the Lady the Queen here shall consider of him in that behalfe And now here at this day came the same P. in his proper person the sheriffs of L. novv retorne that they by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to them directed took the body of the same P. whose body they have now here present as by the said writ it was commanded them and hereupon the same P. so taken here had prayeth the hearing of the Record Alit sur Comorans in aut Uill in codem Com. Pas 2. Iac. rot 1012. of the Writ of the said Lady the Queen of Exigent whreupon the same P. at the suite of the said W. was in Form aforesaid utlawed issued And it is read unto him in these words London ss W. E. Gent by E. Y. his attorney offered himselfe the 4. day against P. L. late of c. otherwise called P. L. c. of a plea that he render unto him 200 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. Recital of the record of the exigent Pas 37. Iac. rot 1612. T. 3. Ia rot 651. issue fuit Comorans And he came not and as more times the sheriffs are commanded that they should take him c. and safely c so that they might have his body here at this day to wit tali die to answer the said W. in the plea aforesaid And the sheriffs now retorne that he is not found c. Therefore the sheriffs are commanded that they put him in Exigent from Hust to Hust untill c. he be utlawed if not c. and if c. then they take him and safely c. so that they may have his body here in Cr. Trin. to answer the said W. in the plea aforesaid and whereupon c. And it is to be knowne that a writ thereof the Justices here in Court that same Terme delivered to Z. deputy of the sheriffs of London in Form of Law to be executed Proclamation awarded upon the exigent c. and the sheriffs of Midd. is commanded that in his full county he proclame the same P. three severall daies according to the Forme of the statute An. 31. Eliz. thereof made and provided that the same P. render himselfe to the sheriffs of London so that the same sheriffs may have his body here at the same Terme to answer the said W. in the plea aforesaid 31. Eliz. Cap. 3. Poulton novell statuts 186. or 77 86. And it is to be knowne that a Writ thereof the Justices here in Court that same Term delivered to Z. S. Deputy of the sheriff of Midd. to be executed in Forme of the Law c. which being read and heard the same P. saith that he is injured in this behalf and that he by the Law of the Land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that he at the aforesaid Oct. Pur. which day the said Writ of exigent whereupon the said P. was utlawed at the suite of the said W. issued out of the court here Plea that at the awarding the Exigent he was comorant in an other County Traverse was Comorant and conversant at N. within the Isle of Weight in the county of Southampton without this that he the same day or at any time afterwards was comorant or conversant at Graies Inn in the county of Midd. as by the same Record issuing forth of the said writ of Exigent is suposed and this he is redy to veryfie whereupon for that the said Writ of proclamation was not directed to the sheriff of the said County of Southampton wherein the same P. at the day of issuing forth of the said Writ of Exigent was Comorant and Conversant as of right it ought to have beene directed according to the Form of the statute aforesaid the same P. prayeth judgment and that he from the Court here of the utlawry aforesaid may be acquitted discharged and set at large And because it is expedient and necessary Scire Fac. awarded to premonish the Pla. that the said W. for his interest in this behalfe be premonished before it be further proceeded to discharge the same P. from the utlawry aforesaid It is commanded the sheriff of London that by honest c. they make knowne to the same W. that he be here in Cr. Anim. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same P. ought not to be discharged from the said utlawry c. and hereupon the same M. W. of c. and R. C. The defen is bayled the entry of the Recog Note the form of the recog of c. undertook and each of them did undertake for the same P. to have his body here at the said Term and so from day to day at every day of the plea untill the plea aforesaid be determined And judgment thereupon given to wit each of them body for body and the said P. in his proper person assumed upon himself to be then here at every day of the plea under the penalty of 10 l. which said 10 l. the said P. acknowledged to be made and levied to the use of the said Lady the Queen of his goods Return of a Scire Fac and the Pl. appears by Attorney and Chattells to whose hands soever they shall come and if it happen the same P at any day of the plea by the Court here to be prefixed to make default or not to prosecute his suite with effect c. At which said Cr. Anim came here aswell the said P in his proper person as the same W. premonished c. by E. Y. his attorney and hereupon the same P. as before saith that he at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said Writ of Exigent whereupon the same P. was utlawed at the suite of the said W issuâ—ng out of the Court here Count against
the said writ of Exigent and the said Record from whence the said Writ issued and which ought to warrant that writ in this That in the said Record the said Francis is named F. C. of Lynfield And in the said Writ of Exigi fac he is named F. C. of Lymfeild and so there is variance betweene the Record and Writ aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment and that he may be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid Whereupon the writ and record aforesaid being seene and by the Justices here fully understood it sufficiently appeareth to the justices here That the allegation of the said F. in discharge of the utlawry aforesaid is true Therefore it is considered that the said F. be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid And for that occasion shall not de molested or in any thing grieved but goe thereof without day c. M 6. Jac. rot 924. And now here at this day came the said A. by W. K. his Attorney and prayeth the hearing of the writ of Exigi Fac. whereupon the said A. at the suite of the said G. is utlawed Utlary reversed for that the Capias whereupon the Exigent issued was awarded after a yeare and a day without a Sci fac to revive the judgment And it is read unto him in these words James c. which being read and heard the same attorney on the behalfe of the said A. saith That the same A ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that the judgment whereupon the same A. was convicted was given in Mich. Term An. Rs. 3. that is say by one yeare three Moneths and more before the proclamation of the said Writ of Capias ad satisf whereof mention is made in the said Writ of Exigent whereupon the said writ of Exigent issued In which case the same G. Execution upon that judgement ought not then to prosecute unlesse he had prosecuted before out of this Court a writ of the Lord the King of Scire Facias to premonish the said A. of being here in Court to shew wherefore the said E. ought not to have execution against him according to the Form of the Recovery if to him it had seemed Expedient And so the said Writ of Capias for execution of the judgment aforesaid in Forme aforesaid prosecuted And the said writ of Exigent thereupon issuing was erroniously prosecuted and for that cause prayeth that the utlawry aforesaid may be adnulled c. whereupon aswell the Record of the judgment aforesaid as the record of the adjudging of the said Writ of Exigi Fac. whereupon the said writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum in the same record recited by the Court here being seen and fully understood It is found that the allegation of the said A. is true Utlary reversed for omission of the word Quinte in the 5. Exact and for that the last County was held upon Sunday Therefore it is considered c. and that the utlawry be reversed M 4. Jac. Rot. 306. Which being read and heard the said A. saith that he ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that by the returne aforesaid it doth not appeare That the same A. at the said County of South held at the Castle of Winch. the same eight day of September An. 8. abovesaid was called and so the same A. was not the fift time called as by the law of the Land he ought to have been And also for that the 6. day of October whereupon the last County was held was Sonday in which case according to the Law of this Realme of England the County ought to be held And so the utlavvry aforesaid against the same A. in Forme aforesaid published and had is altogether void And judgement that it be reversed The like reversall in Mich. 44 45. Eliz. rot 1909. Utlary reversed for that the day of the 5 Exact was before the Test of the Exigent T 13. Iac. Rot. 3617. Brownlow Which being read and heard the same Robert saith that he is injured c because he saith that it is vicious to vvit in that that it appeareth That the said first day of March An. Sup. upon vvhich day the said Robert vvas quinto Exactus vvas longe before the issuing forth of the said Writ of Exigent And for that cause and others in the returne aforesaid being prayeth judgment that the utlavvry aforesaid may be reversed c. vvhereupon c. And it vvas reversed c. Int. Smith and Wingham M. 10. Iac Rot. 3398. the like Cook against Tompson Primo Exact held after the return of the Exigent M 10. Iac. Rot. 1708. Brownlow Bradbury adv Allen Exigi Fac. retornable Tres Trin. T. 24. Ia. 8. I. The first County vvas held 7. Feb. 9. Ia And because it appeareth by the returne aforesaid That the first county vvhereat the said E. vvas first called vvas held after the retorne of the said Writ of Exigent and for that cause c. Vtlary reversed for omission of the word Scotie out of the stile of the Writ T 13. Iac Rot. 3527. Brownlow Hearing of the Writ of Exigi fac is prayed vhich being read c. the said Writ is vicious to vvit in this that this vvord Scotiae is omitted in the beginning of the said vvrit And for that cause and others being in the said Writ he prayeth judgment c And the utlavvry is reversed betvveen Walker and Vaughan H 12. Iac. Rot. 2265. Brownlow Utlavvry reversed for not naming the names of the Coroners particularly at the end of the retorne of the Exigent Vtlary reversed for default of the Coroners names and hereupon the same I. prayeth hearing of the return of the vvrit de Exigi Fac And it is read to him in these vvords At my County held c. untill Therefore by the judgment of the Coroners of the county aforesaid he is utlavved vvhich being read and heard onerari non because he saith that in the record aforesaid no mention is made of the name of any Coroner vvho gave judgment upon that Writ or should vvarrant the judgment And for that cause the returne aforesaid is insufficient in lavv in t Lavel and others at the suit of Godolph see Harper fo 19 a by Justice Browne If the sheriff retorne upon the Exigent the quinto Exact et non Compe Ideo ut lagat est It is a good return Although he retorne not the judgment of the Coroners for it is comprised in these words Ideo ipse utlagat est H 12 Jac. rot 1949. Brownlow Utlar Waviar reversed for the same defect Reversall for omitting the Coroners Names which being read c. the same Martha and Anthony say that they are wronged in this behalfe and that the same M of the Waiver aforesaid or the said Anthony with the Outlawry aforesayd ought not by the Law of the Land to be charged because they say that the return aforesaid is vicious and
occasion shall not be molested or in any manner greived but be thereof in quiet and dismissed at large c. T 10. Jac. rot Brownlow London Reversall for that the Defendant was the 1 and 2 time called before the Tâ—ste of the Exigent R. adds of Evans Utlawry reversed for variance between the Originall Writ and the Exigent in this that in the Writ of Exigi fac this word Gent. which is the name of the degree of the said Henry is omitted which is inserted in the Originall writ Et pro ea causa c. T 11. Jac. rot 1521. Brownlow Int. G. and P. Outlawry reversed for that the Defendant was the first and second time called before the Teste of the Exigent T 18. Eliz. rot 1529. Civit. Bristoll ss Afterwards to wit Vtlawry reversed for that the 5 County was held as appears by the returne of the writ before the Teste of the Allocat the fourteenth day of May then next following came here into the court one T. D. on the behalf of the sayd Ellen and prayeth heareing of the Writ of Allocat whereupon the Waviary aforesaid is published against the same E. and it is read unto him in these words Elizabeth by the Grace of God c. reciting the whole Writ Test 16. die Novemb. anno c. 18. And also prayeth hearing of the Returne of the said Writ and it is read to him in these words Alloc to her four Countyes c. Att our County held at the City of Bristoll in the Guildhall there 13. Ian. Anno infra script c. which being read and heard the same T. D. faith for the said Ellen That the Return of the said Writ of Allocat is insufficient in Law for that by the Return it evidently appeareth to the Justices here that the said fifth County held the same thirteenth day of Ian. Anno 18. abovesaid at which County the said E. was the fifth time called and appeared not was held Before the issuing forth of the sayd Writ of Allocat whereupon the said Writ Mich 6 7 Eliz oâ— 1971. the like siâ—e and returne upon the said Writ made by the Iustices here being fully understood it doth seem to the said Justices here that the said Returne is insufficient in Law whereby the Waviary aforesaid against the same E. in forme aforesayd published and had is altogether void and of no force nor effect in Law Therefore let no processe nor any other thing against the said E. upon the Waviary aforesaid The Sheriff amerced for ill returning of the Writ of Allocat be further made c. and the sheriffs of the sayd City of Bristoll to wit A. and B. in mercy for the insufficiency of the Return aforesaid made and they are fined by the Justices here at twenty shillings c. T 7. Iac. rot 3648. Brownlow ss Prayeth hearing of the Return of the Writ of Exigent and it is read unto him in these words A County holden at the Castle of Salop Utlary reversed for this word Meâ—m T. 13 Jac â—ot 633. c. which being read c. Onerari non because he saith that by the Returne aforesaid it appeareth not that the Countyes aforesaid in that Returne specified whereunto the said Iames was in forme aforesaid called were the Counties of the said sherif of Salop as by the Return aforesaid it ought to appear whereupon c. the Outlawry was reversed Int. Burmom and Ap-Thomas Salop T 7. Jac. rot 3647. Brownlow hereof Oyre of the retorne of the Exigent prayed at the hustings of the common Pleas in Guild-hall of the City aforesaid upon Munday next after the Feast Utlary reversed for omission of this word Tent. and for Sâ—do for being without a tittle â—r dash c. the same Henry was the second time called and appeared not which being read c. Onerare non Because he saith that by the retorne aforesaid it doth not appeare that any hustings of Common pleas were held at the Guild-Hall in the City of Herford the said Monday next after the Feast c. in the same retorne mentioned for that this materiall word Tent. in the same retorn was there omitted And also for that this word Scdo in the same retorne specified was written without any dash having no signification And for those causes and others c. pet judicium c. may be discharged from the utlawry c. And it is reversed Int. Vaughan and Masters Vtlary reversed for that the Capias was not returned M 32. and 33. Eliz. rot 131. Brownlow Midd. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit c. and here upon the said I prayeth hearing of the said writ of exigent whereupon he at the suit of the said W. is utlawed And it is read unto him in these words Elizabeth c. which being read and heard the said I. saith c. because he saith that the originall writ in the Court here in Oct. S. Mich. An. Reg. c. 30. retornable and was retorned and that upon the same writ three Writs de Capiendeum by the Court here in Mich. Terme An. Regin 30. and 31. were considered and adjudged As it appeareth in the Roll of the same Term To wit one of the said Writs de Capiend retornable in the court here in Cr. Ani. An. 30. abovesaid one other writ de capiend by the Court here in Form aforesaid considered and adjudged retornable at the said Cr. Ani. in the same Court here amongst the writs of Cr. Anim. An. 30. abovesaid in the said County of Ebor. is filed which said writ is not retorned whereupon the Justices here can in no wise certifie in Execution of the said Writ that it is indorsed As by the said Writ of Capias amongst the said Writs de Cr. Anim. in the Court here filed fully appeareth And so the said writs of alias and plures Capiend and the said Writ of Exi against the same I. afterwards considered and adjudged erroniosly and without sufficient warrant issued And for that cause he prayeth to be discharged by the Court here from the utlawry aforesaid c. whereupon the said Writ de Capiend filed in the Bench here at the said Cr. Ani. being seene it sufficiently appeareth to the Justices here upon Record that the allegation of the said I. is true therefore it is considered that the said I. by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid be not molested nor greived but goe thereof quiet c. T 16. Iac rot 3109. Brownlow between Ioanes and Griffin Vtlary reversed for infram for infranominat dua for duo utlawry reversed infrom for infra nominat and dua for duo T 16 Iac. Rot. 3114. Brownlow in t Washer and Dignbey In this that it appeareth to the Court here Vtlary reversed for the misplacing of the Sheriffs names that that writ was retorned by certaine Peter Proby and Martine Lumnly sheriffs of the City of London
whereas in truth Martine Lumnly was not then sheriff of the said City but certaine Martain Lumnley and the said Peter Probey were then sheriffs of the said City c. M 23. and 24. Eliz. rot 339. Midd. ss For that the same R. by vertue of the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid Utlary reversed for that the Supersedeas upon the Exigent was entred upon Record before the Defendant was 5 exactus to wit the 27. day of Ap. An. c. came here into the court and then proved a writ of the said Lady the Queen of Super quia improvide For that the said Writ of Exigi fac whereupon the said R. is utlawed out of the Court here erroniously issued For that the said Rob. by the said I. C. his attorney at the day of the returne of the plu Cap. thereupon and alwaies afterwards before the issuing forth of the said writ of Exigi facias often times offered himselfe to answer to the said M. in the plea aforesaid By pretext whereof it is commanded to the said sheriff of Midd. that of putting in Exigent utlawing taking or in any thing molesting of the said same R by occasion of the premises he be altogether Superseded as by the said Writ of Supers entred upon Roll in the Court of the Queen in the county held 15. Pas Rot. 1020. it sufficiently appeareth And this the same I. C. for the said R. is ready to veryfie by the Record And so the utlawry aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid published is void Whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said R. may be quiet of the utlawry aforesaid and discharged from the court here and set at large whereupon the Record being seene and upon the oath of R. U. servant of the said I. C. of his delivery of the writ of Sup. before the publishing of the utlawry aforesaid To one T. L. then being under sheriff of the county of Mi. before I. Dyer Knight Cheife Justice here examined and also the said T. L. then present not contradicting the reception of the said writ It sufficiently appeareth to the Justices here that the allegation of the said I. C. in discharge of the said R. from the utlawry aforesaid is true therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said R. upon that occasion be in nothing molested or grieved but goe thereof without day c. M 19. Iac. rot 2047. Brownlow London in t B. and E. Oyer of the return of the Ex. fac prayed which being read c. onerari non because he saith that in many places of the said return is used a certaine word to wit Civit. written for this word Civit. which word Civit. so written is no word of sense nor Latine having in it any signification Eaq causa Utlaâ— reversed for this Word Civit. for Civitat H 12 Jac rot 2265 quto for quinto the utlawry reversed by Justice Hutton Hill 8. Iac. Rot. 3526. Coronator for Coronatorum H. 12. Iac. Rot. 1949 Brownl inter S. and S. exact and not written exact with a dash T. 13 Iac. Rot. 3538. ura for vra T 19. Jac. rot 635. Anino for Anno. H. 11. Ja rot 3524 praedictus for praedictis same roll mercii for marcii rot 3522 mertris for martins ad Com. Exon for ad commit Civitatis Exoniae T 13 Jac Rot. 3527 Brownlow quinto Exactus for quarto Exact 13 Jacobus Rot 2538 utlawry that it appeared not where the Castle of Leic. is Hill 12. Iac. rot 2265. T. 13. Iac. rot 3538 that there is no such Feast as Kenelim Rs. and Martiris T. 13. Iac. Rot. 635. for no returne in the Writ of Exigi fac-to warrant the writ H. 37 Eliz. rot 132. non comperuit omitted in the retorne of the Exigi fac P. 24 H. 6. rot 24. reversall for that 2. Cap. were filed and not the plures T. 9. Iac. rot 129. Crompton for that the Feast at which the first hustings were held was before the Test of the Exigi fac M 10. Iac. rot 1709. Brownlow reversal for false Lattine Vtlary of the intestate reversed by the Administrator by speciall entry in the same term in which the Utlary was reversed to wit comperuit for comperuere H. 11. Iac. rot 3522. reversall for that it appeareth not in the returne that the old sheriffs had delivered the Writ to the new M 21. Iac. rot 3059. Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of the County aforesaid but that he should take I. B. late of F. in the County aforesaid Gent. Executor of the Testament of I. B. late called I. B of F in the County of Norff Yeoman utlawed in the County aforesaid 6 Ap. An. 22. Eliz. at the suite of W. Gray Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of R. G. who dyed intestate c. T 3. or 5 Car rot 531. the like for B. in a plea of debt whereof he is convicted if c. And safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit in Oct. Martini to doe and receive what the Court of the Lord the King shall consider of him in that behalf Return mortues And now here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Martini the sheriff of the said County of Norff. to wit R. B. Baronet retorneth that the said I. H 12 Jac rot 829. tiel H 45 Eliz rot 2834. generall pardon pleaded by the Executor for him that died utlawed is dead And hereupon came in to the Court one R. S. of F. in the county aforesaid Gent. Administrator of the goods and Chattles which were of the said James in his proper person and saith that the said Iames after the publishing of the said utlawry to wit The 8. day of Ianuary An. 20 Rs. nunc at F. aforesaid dyed intestate c. And that the administration of the goods and chattles which were of the said I. at the time of his death by Robert Redmaine Doctor of laws c. The tenth day of Ianuary An. Dom. 1622. at F. aforesaid to the said administrator after the death of the said Iames was committed and he bringeth here into the Court the letters administratory of the said Officiall which the commission of the administration aforesaid in Forme aforesaid testifie c. whose date is the same 10. day of Ianuary An. Dom. 1622. abovesaid and for the securing of the goods and chattles which were of the said I. at the time of his death from the utlawry aforesaid he prayeth the hearing of the return of the said writ de Exigi Faciend whereupon the said Ia. at the suit of the said VVilliam was utlawed And it is read unto him in these words Norff. At my county held at the castle of Nor. within the shiere-house in the county aforesaid the 25. day of December An. Reg. 24 within written The within
named I. B. was the first time called appeared not c. Return of the Exigent which being read and heard the same administrator saith that the utlawry aforesaid against the said I. in Forme aforesaid published and had is altogether void and of no Force nor effect in law because he saith that in the retorne aforesaid whereas it is expressed the said Iames to have been called at the said first county a certaine principall word to wit Norff. betweene these words meum Tent. which should denote and declare the name of the County aforesaid is omitted out of the said return whereby no first county by the law of the land was held To which the said Iames in his life time could render himselfe to the said sheriff of No. to save himselfe from the utlawry aforesaid And for that cause and others being in the retorne aforesaid That retorne is insufficient in law And this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment that the utlawry aforesaid may be reversed avoided and taken altogether for nothing and that the goods and chattles which were of the said Iames at the time of his death in the hands of the said administrator to be administred may be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid and hereupon the said retorne being seen And by the Justices here fully examined and understood It seemeth to the Justices here that the utlawry aforesaid shall be reversed vacated and taken altogether for nothing and that the goods and chattels which were of the said Iames at the time of his death being in the hands of the said administrator to be administred be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid c. Another forme of reversall of an Vtlary against the Intestate by the Administrator upon the Exigent roll and not in the same teâ—me in which it was reversed T 4 Jac. rot 2990. Page London ss Hugh ap David against Williams in debt the Exigent awarded retorned 8. Mich. 4. Jan. the utlawry is entred upon the Role and afterwards the 25. day of Aprill 10. Iacobi Henry Williams administrator of the said W. Williams comes shewes his letters of administration and prayeth hearing of the writ of Exigent with the returne thereof And prayeth that the goods in his hands may be discharged from the said utlawry because the Exigent and the returne thereof are erronious And the utlawry for error was reversed And that the goods and chattles which were of the said intestate at the time of his death being in the hands of the said Henry should be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid c. Utlary reversed for that there is no such name in Baptisme M 21 Iac. rot Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the sheriff c. utlawry reversed by the administrator which being read c. and the administrator prayeth hearing of the Roll of the Exigent And it is read unto him c. which being read c. the said administrator saith that the record is vitious and defective in law in this to wit That in divers places of the record aforesaid is written Edmindo for this word Edmundo which said word Edmundus is a name of Baptisme and that there is not any such word Edmindus as it is written in the Record aforesaid And that in the Record aforesaid is written recuperuit whereas it ought to be written or thographically Recuperavit and not Recuperuit And in the Record aforesaid there are materiall Words omitted To wit quodam Debito in these words de quadraginta so that by the omission of those materiall words aforesaid The Record aforesaid is altogether imperfect And this the said administrator is ready to verifie by the same Record of the Term of the holy Trinity An. 16. Reg. Rot. 1297. in the Court of the Lord the King now here remayning whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the utlawry aforesaid may be reversed c. Reversall of an Vtlary for that in the body of the Record the Proclamution is directâ—d to the Sheriff of Kent but in the Margent it is written Sussex for Kent M 21. Jac. rot Brownlow Sussex ss inter Smith and T. utlawed in Com. Sussex And prayeth hearering of the Exigent Role and it is read unto him untill and it commanded to the sheriff of K. that in his full county he make proclamation to the said David c. And the proclamation in the Margent is awarded in Sussex which being read he saith that the record is vitious in it selfe to wit in this that in the body of the record aforesaid it is commanded to the sheriff of Kent that he should make proclam the said David according to the Form of the statute in this case made and provided And in the margent of the said record it appeareth that the said writ of proclamation to be adjudged to the sheriff of Sussex and so it appeareth that the record aforesaid is varying uncertaine and contrary in it selfe And that searching the writ retornable in Cro. Trin. of the sheriff of the county of Kent noe Writ of proclamation against the said David was retorned by the said sheriff of Kent whereby the utlawry aforesaid against the said D in Form aforesaid published and had is void and of no force nor effect in Law Whereupon the record being seene and the Writs of the said county of Kent of the said Cr. Trin. filed in court here being searched fully examined and understood it seemeth to the said justices here that the alilegation of the said David is discharged of the utlawry aforesaid is true c. H 22. Jac. rot 2426. Brownlow Lond. ss B. and P. at the suit of C. the utlawry reversed for that the first county was held 14. Iu. 22. and the 2. Counties was held 9. August 22. Jac. which being read and heard c. Onerari non Utlary reversed for that one month was united between the first and the second Counties because he saith that the returne aforesaid is vitious and defective in Law to wit in this that it appeareth by the said retorne that the said county at which the said John and Eliz. were first called was held the said 14. day of June an 22. abovesaid and the said county at which the said John and Eliz. were the second time called was held the said 9. day of August An. 22. abovesaid whereas in truth the said second county the 9. day of July An. 22. abovesaid being the Moneth next following the moneth of June in which the said first County was as is aforesaid held by the sheriff of the county aforesaid ought to have beene held so by the retorn aforesaid it suficiently appeareth that the said 5. counties by the sheriff said for the county aforesaid in form aforesaid held at which the said Iohn and Eliz. in forme aforesaid were called Were not held from moneth to moneth successively one after an other as by the law of the land by the said sheriff they ought to have
London It was commanded the sheriffs whereas I. N. late of c. lately in the Court of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6 Venire fac to account against Tenant in Elegit and judgment against the Tenant and reliberate awarded before the Justices of the same late King of the Common bench here by the consideration of the same Court recovered against T. D. c. aswell a certaine debt of 400 l. as 6 l. which to the same I. in the same Court of the said late King were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted And the same I. afterwards to wit the 28. day of N. An. Reg. nunc primo comming into the Court of the said Lady the Qu. now before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the bench here to wit P 2 3 P. M â—ry rot 926. or 126. Dyer fol 1. Pl 6. 4 H 8. at Westminster close to be delivered to him c. to hold c. and prayeth a writ thereof to the then sheriff of the said County of War to be directed which was granted to him whereupon the Lady the Queen now by her writ commanded the then sheriff of War that all good c. to hold c. and how far he shall execute that precept he should make appeare to her Justices at Westminster 15. Hillarii and that then he should have there that writ at which said 15. Hillarii R. T. Knight then sheriff of the said County of Warr. to the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Common Bench here to wit at Westminster retorned that he had done execution upon the lands and Tenements which were of the the same T. the same day of the judgment aforesaid thereon given And that a moyety thereof to wit one Parke c. which amounted by the yeare in all issues besides reprizes to 62 l. the 13. day of I. An. abovesaid and delivered them to the said I. N. according to the value and extent aforesaid to hold as his Tenement to him and his assignes untill the 300 l. See the old Tenures fol 123 E according to thi writ of Ven fac for the debt and damages aforesaid be thereof levied and further the said sheriff to the said justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster aforesaid retorned that 105 l. in ready moneys which were of the said T. the same day of the judgment aforesaid therein given he likewise delivered to the same I. to hold to him the goods and Cattle aforesaid as his owne goods and Chattles for the residue of the said 105 l for the Debt and Damages aforesaid And because the King and Queene now by the information of the said T. B. know Suggestion that the Pla. had levied a 100 l. above the debt and damages in cutting downe woods See Fâ— tit Scire Fac. Pl. 101. P. 32. E. 3. that although the said moyety of the said Lands and Tenements of the same T. B. so delivered to the said I. M. did only extend unto 62 l. notwithstanding the said I. N. aswell of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid whose true value doth extend it selfe to a greater value then the extent aforesaid as also of the woods and under-woods growing upon the same moyety by the same I. N. lately cut downe and solde 150 l. above the said 406 l. for the Debt and Damages aforesaid hath now levied whereupon he supplicates the King to be by the King and Queen provided of a fit remedy A Venire fac awarded ad Computandum de Exit deterie bosci And the said King and Queen willing to do what should be just to the said T. in that behalfe commanded the sheriffs of London to cause to come here 15. Pas the said I. N. to account with the same B. of the moneys received aswell out of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid according to the true value of the same from the time of the delivery aforesaid as of the woods and under-woods of late growing upon the said Moyety by the same I. N. cut downe and sold And further to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said moyety delivered before to the said I. N ought not to be delivered to the same T.B. if c. Non inventu returned Testat cap. awarded to the sheriff of Mid. ad compuandum quaere de hoc The parties come by attornies Vic. retorneth a Sup. At which said 15. Pas came the said T. B. by F. M. his attorney And the sheriffs to wit T. and I. now retorned that the said I. is not found c. And hereupon it is testified in the Court of the King and Qu. here that the said I.N. doth hide and run from place to place in the county of Midd. Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of the said County of Midd. that he take the same I. N. if c. and safely c. so that he may have his body here tres Trin. to accout and shew in Form aforesaid c. And now here at the said tres Trin. came aswel the said T. B. by his attorney aforesaid as the said I. N. by F. M. his attorney and the sheriff of Midd. to wit T. and F. now retorned that after the receipt of the said writ of Capias I. N. delivered to the said sheriff a Writ of the Lord the King and the Lady the Queen of Sup. by which Writ the same sheriff as to the taking of the same I. N. could not proceed And hereupon the same T. B. saith that after 15. Hillarii An. Regin 1. Count upon the venire facias aswell of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid whereof the true value did amount to a great summe of money to wit 62 l. by the yeare above the extent aforesaid as also for the wood to wit Registred judiciale fo 14. such a writ against tenant by Elegie of 1200 Oakes and 340. Beech Trees and under-woods to wit C. cart loade of underwood to the value of 200 l. late growing in the said Moyety late cut down and sold by the same I. N. Cl. above the said 206 l. levied thereof for Debt and Damnges aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said I. N. may account with the said T. B. c. and also prayeth delivery of the Tenements aforesaid to the said T. B. to be done c. Nil dic ANd the said I. N. defends the force and wrong when c. And nothing in bar of the action of the said T. B. aforesaid wherefore the said I. of the moneys received of the premisses aforesaid to account with the same T. nor wherefore the said moyety to the same I. N. before delivered ought not to be redelivered to the same T. saith neither sheweth whereby the same B. Iudgment that he should account and
here at that day retorned a certaine extent taken before R. T. Bayliffe of the liberty of the honorable Epi. Wigor of O. at N. on Saturday such and year c. by vertue of the retorne of a certain writ of the Lord the Kingâ— to him by him thereof directed by which it was found that the same Bayliff by vertue of the retorne of the writ of the Lord the King aforesaid delivered to the same R. and I. the moyety of all the Lands and Tenements which the same I. had in his Bayliwick to wit the third part of one Messuage and 40. acres of Land with the appurtenances in N. which said third part is worth by the yeare 4 d. and the said 40. acres of land are worth by the yeare 5 s. to hold to them and their assignes as their Free Tenement untill the said 68 s. should be thereof levied and although the same R. and I. 10 s. 8 d Tender of the residue of monies by the defendant Refusall by the Plaintiffs to accept it out of the tenements aforesaid have now leyyed as by that extent it manifestly appeareth and the same I. H. the whole residue of the said 68 s. to wit 49 s. 4 d. is ready to pay notwithstanding the same R. and. I. have hitherto refused to receive that money as by the information of the same I. H. there the King is given to know Therefore the Bayliff is commanded that by honest c. he make known to the said R. and I. that they should be here at this day to wit in Octo. Mich. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same R. and I. ought not to be satisfied with the same 49 s. 8 d. and the Tenements aforesaid to them before delivered they ought not to be redelivered to the said I H. if to them it seemed expedient and now here came aswell the same I. H. in his proper person as the same R. and I. by R. W. their attorney Monie brought into Court and the sheriff retorneth that he made known to the same R. and I. of being here at this day in Forme aforesaid by R. B. c. honest c and hereupon I. H. bringeth here into court 8 s. 8 d. ready to render the same R. and I. if c. and prayeth delivery of the Tenements aforesaid Satisfaction c. whereupon it is requested of the same R and I. if they have or know any thing to say for themselves The monies are paid in Court to the Plaintiff and the Court awarded a redeliverance to be awarded to the Plaintiff wherefore they ought not to be satisfied with the money and to redeliver the Tenements aforesaid to the said I. H. who say that not and hereupon the said 53 s 8 d. is delivered to the said R. I. And it is considered by the Court that the said I. and H. shall have delivery of the Tenements aforesaid first delivered to the same R. and I. out of the hands of the same R. and I and that they goe thereof without day c. SEe 21. E. 3. f. 1 Plaintiffe 1. A Scire Facias awarded in Aide 21. E. fo 20. Pl. 21. ss IT was commanded the sheriff whereas I. C. Gent. lately it the Court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England here to wit in Easter in the 36. Entry of a Sci fac by an administrator against an executor H. 2 Jac. rot 1613. yeare of her Reigne before E. A. Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the common Bench here by the consideration of the same Court recovered against R. W. late of c. aswell a certaine debt of 200 l. as 6 l. which to the said I in the same Court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the said debt whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings thereof in the court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth execution notwithstanding of the said judgment yet resteth undon And aswell the said I as the said R. W. are dead as by the information of R. C. Gent. administrator of the goods Chattles which were of the said I. C. at the time of his death the King understandeth And because c. that by honest c. It be made knowne to P. R. executor of the Testament of the said W. that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Ascen Dom. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the debt and damages aforesaid of the goods and chattles which were of the said W. at the time of his death in the hands of the said P. R. to be administred ought not to be made to the same I. according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if The Plaintiff shewes the Letters of administration and prayes execution c And now here at this day came aswell the said R. by H. H. his attorney by the said P. premonished by A. B his attorney and the Sheriff now retorneth that he made knowne to the said P. of being here at this day by G. D. and D. E. honest c. to shew in Form aforesaid c. And hereupon the same R. saith that the said I. C. died intestat and that the administrators of all the goods and Chattles which were of the said at the time of his death by I by Divine providence c. was committed And he bringeth here into the Court the Letters Administratory of the said Arch-Bishop which the Commission of the Administration aforesaid in forme aforesaid testifie c. and prayeth Execution against the said P. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said I. C. being in the hands of the said P at the time of his death to be administred to him to be adjudged c. AND the said P. saith Defendant confesseth assets to 40 s. and traâ—erseth that any other goods of the Intestate besides c. came into his hands c. T 19 Jac rot 2892. That the said R Execution against him of the Dâ—bt and Damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death in the hands of the said P to be administred ought not to have because he protesting saith that the said W after the judgment aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid had at L aforesaid dyed intestate and that diverse goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death to the value af Forty shillings after the death of the said W. into the hands and possession of the said P. came and that the same P. the said forty shillings about the Funerall of the said W. after the death of the said W. expended without this that any other goods or chattells which were of the said W. at the time of h s death besides the goods and chattells to the value of forty shillings ever