Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	king_n	parliament_n	writ_n	1,771	5	9.5540	5	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A66022	The lawes subversion: or, Sir John Maynards case truly stated Being a perfect relation of the manner of his imprisonment upon pleasure, for the space of five moneths by the House of Commons, and of the impeachment of high treason exhibited against him before the Lords, together with all the passages between him and the Lords, in messages to them, and speeches at their barre, as they were taken from his own mouth. VVherein also is contained a cleare discovery of the dangerous and destructive infringement of our native liberties, and of the arbitrary government now introduced by an aspiring faction over-awing the Parliament. Also that groundlesse false report concerning Sir Iohn Maynards submitting to the Lords jurisdiction refuted, to the shame of the reporters. By J. Howldin, Gent.	Wildman, John, Sir, 1621?-1693.	1648 (1648)	Wing W2169A; ESTC R204812	33,799	42

have a writ of errouâ— directed to the chiefe Iustices of the Kings-bâ—nch for removing the errour iâ—to the present Parliament and he prâ—duceth ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ president in these words The Bishop of Nâ—rwich â—â—â—weth that an errâ—neous judgement was given against him â—o the common placâ— fâ—r the Arcâ—dâ—coâ—ry of Norwich belonging to his presentation anâ— prayed that â—hose errours might be heard and redresâ—ed â—n answer was maâ—e that by he law errours in the common place are â—o be corrâ—câ—ed in â—â—e Kings bench and of the Kings bench in the Parliament and â—o otherwise now I desire any Lawyer to informe me wheâ—â—er accâ—rdâ—ng to the custom of England the houâ—e oâ— Lords be caâ—â—ed the Parâ— of Eâ—gl or what is done by them can be â—aâ—d to be â—one by Parâ—â—am â—ut you may observe how learned Sir Edward Cooâ—e contraâ—â—â—tâ— himâ—elfe when once he forsakes the rule of the Law and now I suppose I may coâ—clude there is no wriâ—ten Law authâ—rizing the Lords to take câ—gnizance of any case of Commoners whatsoever and if Sâ—r Eâ— â—ooke say true 1. part lust see 19â— p. 125 that in case a â—â—ry commeth out of a wrâ—ng place or reâ—urned by a wrong offâ—cer and give a verdict Iudgement â—ught not to be given upon â—uch a verdict then much better I might conclude â—hat all the judgment of the Lords passed upon Commoners are â—uâ—l in themselves Objection But it will be yet objected that by Custome the Lords have a juriâ—diction over Commoners and that both in cases of erroâ—â—ous judgements and also in criminal cases Answ. 1. There is no legall custome for their exercâ—se of that juriâ—dictâ—on there are two things essential to a valid custome 1. ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ 2 Time yet that time must be such whereof there is no râ—â—mâ—â—y of man â—as Câ—ok saith 1. part dâ—â—stit p. 144. and the usage must be peaceable end without interruption but both these are wanting for iâ—s within the memory of man that the Houses were divided and â—heâ— the Lords had no such juriâ—diction The Lords being a House by themselves was but since King Richard the first but more prâ—oâ— of this in some other treaâ—ise and iâ—s evident by the Precedent of Sir ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ de Berâ—sfords Case That the Lords have beene interrupted in their pracâ—â—â—e of judging Commoners Answ. 2. Suppose there were custome yet there is not the same reason that ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ should invesâ— any with a power of judâ—cature as that it should be a Title to any liberty pertaining to a Town or an inheritance c. if long usurpations of power should make the exercise thereof legalâ—â— the very â—oundaâ—iâ—n of just Government were subveâ—â—ed Answ. 3. But â—urâ—her no custome that is against an act of Parliament is valid in Law and it s proved that the Lords exercise of jurisdiction over Commoners is against many Acts of Parliament there may be fifty found conâ—â—â—ming each other Answ. 4. Customes are only valid when reaâ—onable Coâ—k 1. part â—nstit p. 62 that any customes how long soever it â—ath continued if it be against reasoâ— it s of no â—orcâ— in saw and pag 56. â—e saith nothing that is contrary to reason is consonant to law that oâ—Vlpiaâ—â— l. 29. ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ unquestionabâ—â— quod ab ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ est c. Course of time amends not that which was corrupt in â—â—s originall Now that the Lords jurisdiction oâ—er Commoners â—s diâ—conâ—â—nant to equity and reason I suppoâ—e Sir Iohn Maynards Protest that followes will evince to minde â—ree from prejudice yet this I â—hall here add That the â—aw of nature abhors the I ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ claime to a juriâ—dâ—ction over all the people of the Land as unreasonable 1. â—â—s repugnant to the law of nature that the judgment of the law and of the guilt and innocency of persons should be commâ—tted to any number of men withouâ— a diâ—cretion oâ— ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ or any judgment passed upon them whether they bâ— capaâ—â—e or ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ of the place of judgment and this is the case oâ— the ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ most of them at least â—it in that House becauâ—e ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ were ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—f Patents whâ—câ—â—ad Pâ—ttents for Bâ—â—onies Eaâ—ldomâ— c. from the ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ and no prâ—â—â—tion ever made of their sutablenesse or unsutâ—blenâ—sse and the laws of the land seeme also to ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ this Sir Edward ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ 1 part Iâ—st â— pag. â— saith If an Office either of the grant of the King or Subject which concerns the administâ—â—tion proceeding or execution oâ— ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ and bâ— granâ—ed unto a man that is unexpâ—â—â— and haâ—h ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ of science to execuâ—e the same the grant is mâ—erly void in law Is it not indeed irrationall that any person should be constiâ—utâ—d a Juâ—ge over the people blind sole before ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ possâ—â—le to know whether theâ—e will be honesty ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ wisdome in him ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ for judgment â— Iâ—s repugnant to the law of nature that any number of men and theiâ— Poâ—â—erities should be constant Judges of the guilt or innocency of whâ—m they please or of aâ—l the people â—n a ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ if this werâ— grâ—nted can it be avoyded but they muâ—t be frequently â—uâ—geâ— and Parties and this is directly included in the Lords claime to a juriâ—dictiâ—â— over Commoners and expetience gives cleere testâ—mony to this in Sir â—ohn Maâ—â—ardâ— present case for the major part atâ—east of the present Houâ—e of Lords subscriâ—ed an Engagement at ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ heath to joyne with the Army against the City in that unhappy diffâ—â—â—nce and yet they would be the Judges of Sir â—ohn who they â—ay iâ— guilty of treason ringaging against them and the Army at that time 3. I câ—uâ—d say the written Lawes of God abâ—â—rs the manner of the Lords claime to a â—uriâ—dâ—ction over Commonâ—â—â— they will not submit the ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ to be â—â—â—yed â—y Commoners and â—o do not to others aâ— they would theâ—â—hould do to them Therefore I may conclude that the common law of â—â—gland the â—nwritten and written law of God declares this custome â—â—ll in Law Answ. But â—â—rchâ—r Custome in this case consâ—sts onely of many Acts of Judicature which the Lords have exercised over Commoâ—ers and Ã facto ad jus non valet argumentum because they have usurpod a power therefore they may continue their usurpation is on good Argument Yet it may be further said that all their judgements passed upon Commoâ—ors before this present Parliament were â—ulled by the Acts of Parliment made in 17. Car. for the abolishing the Staâ—â—e-Chamber and Counsell Table wherein Magna Charta and the Stat. of 42. Ed. 3. and the Petition of Right 3. Câ—r and other Statutes were confirmed which declare all judgements that are passed coâ—taâ—y to the Teâ—â—re of Magna Charta to be holden for â—ought and by consequence the â—ords are deâ—oyd of all presâ—deâ—ts also for exercising a â—urisdâ—ction over Commoâ—ers unlesse they produce those made siâ—ce the War wherein the voice of the Law could not be heard for the noise of the Drum and souâ—d of the Tâ—â—mpet Now from all these consideratâ—ons I shall presume to collect this

The Lawes Subversion OR Sir John Maynards Case truly stated BEING A perfect Relation of the man ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ s imprisonment upon pleasure for the space of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ moneths by the House of Commons and of the Impeachment of high Treason exhibited against him before the Lords together with all the passages between him and the Lords in Messages to them and Speeches at their Barre as they were taken from his own mouth VVherein also is contained a cleare discovery of the dangerous and destructive infringement of our native Liberties and of the arbitrary Government now introduced by an aspiring Faction over-awing the Parliament Also that groundlesse false report concerning Sir Iohn Maynards submitting to the Lords Jurisdiction refuted to the shame of the Reporters By J. Howldin Gent. Printed for Ja. Hornish 1648. Sir John Maynards Case truly stated MUch admired Aristotle Tutor to the greatest Emperour Alexander the great was of opinion that the Lawes a not Kings Princes or Magistrates be they one or more or never so good ought to be sole â—ords or Rulurs of the Common-wealth and that Princes and Governours ought to governe by the Lawes and canâ—ot coâ—mand what the Lawes do not command and â—n his judgement those who command that the Law should rule command thâ—t God should rule but he that commands a man to be a Prince i. e. to be an absolute Ruler commands that â—â—th a man and beast should be Princeâ— for ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ and the lust of the mind are brâ—tish affectâ—ons ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ bâ—th Magâ—strates and the very best of meâ— out the Lawâ—â— a constant aâ—d quiet mind and reason â—oâ—d of all ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ and desire answerable to this opinion have ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ proceeded in their first Constitution of their Governmâ—â—â—â— Pelitius saith that Kingdomes b were first erected and ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ on the worthiest men by the free voluntary joynt â—â—â—sent of the people and founded aâ—d coâ—fiâ—med be Customes and Lawes of each Country aâ—d thâ—â—efoâ—e they oâ—lâ—ged their King to conforme their Government unto the Lawâ—s established so Dioderus Siâ—ulus testifies of the Egyptians that their Kings c were bound to conforme the Regiment of their Kingdomes and their lives and families to the Lawes establâ—shed and were obnoxious to sensures in case of defaults and Zenephâ—â— testifies the same of the Lacedemontans and d Licurguâ— being little lesse then an Oracle in his time took an Oath every moneth to govern the Kingdome according to the Lawes â—nacted and M. T. Cicero informes us of the famous Romane State that the people gave Lawes to all their Magistrates by which they should order their Government thus much may be deduced from these words Imperium in Magistratibus Authoritatem in Sâ—â—atâ— e potestatent in plebe Majestatem in populo command was in the Magistrates Authority in the Senate power in the menâ—all people and majesty in the people in generall so Livy hath these words frequently ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ decreâ—â—â— populus jussit the Senate hath decreed the people commanded and whoever hath leisure to read Purcâ—â— pilgrimage and voyages Peter Martyrs Jud. Hist. Boemus de mâ—ribus Gentium Strabo and such other Histories shall find that the Athenians Persians Corinthians Medes and Germanes Sweâ—es Dâ—nes c. prescribed to all their Governours Lawes and Rules wherebâ— to govern and reserved to themselves Soveraigne power to prescribe farther Lawes and limits to their Kings and Mâ—gistrates and to call them to a publike accompt for their offâ—â—ces and misgovernment and thus Aâ—drew Horne f an ancient Lawyer informes us that when the forty Saxon Princes which for some time râ—led this Nation chose to themselves a King they made him sweare at his â—nâ—â—garation that he should govern the people by rules of Law without regard to the person of any and that he should be obedient to suffer right as well as any of the people and at the Coronation of Kings unto this day there is an Oath appointed wherein they sâ—eare g to keep the Lawes and Customes then established and to grant and defend all such rightfull Lawes as the Commons of the Realme shall choose And without controversie this concurrent practise of the Nations in obliging all Magistrates to govern by Lawes only was founded upon impregâ—â—ble reason and equity Every Nation is but a rude indâ—gested Chaos a deformed lump untill Lawes or rules of Government be established Lawes are the viâ— plistica or formatrix that formes the principall vitalls the heart the braâ—ne the liver of the Common-wealth as it is such the Lawâ—s of every people puts the difference as to them between things judicialâ— just and unjuâ—â— good and evill the Lawes are the only measure and boundary of every mans right interest and property without such rules of Government every mans right to any thing is equall and every mans tâ—tle to Magistracy or rule râ—ns parallel with other therefore when the Lawes of a people are destroyed and Magistrates exercise dominion over them as being loose and absolved from all Lawes or Rules of Government and obnoxious to no censures then all things returne to confusion and every mans depraved will becomeâ— a law to himselfe and as many as he can subdue by his sword then iust envy malice covetousnesse and ambition supply the place of Law and most men must be subject to their Dictates and decisions thâ—â— faction and private interest exalt and abase destroy and save alive at their pleasures then distractions commotions and bloody massacres overspead the face of a people and no security remaines to the estates liberties or lives of the people more then to the wild beasts of the Forrest Now what puâ—blind eye cannot discerne Englands faâ—e in this Glasse are not our Lawes subverted and turned into arbitrary Decrees and resolutions every day rising and every day withering like Mâ—shromes and are we not governed by those who conceive themselves absolved from all Lawes or Rules of Government â—â—a are we not governed Jure vago incâ—â—â—â— by a leaden ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Rule to which we cannot square our obedience but inâ—st writ untill the Grandees that guide the Legislative power measure our actions for us or apply the Rule mâ—â— we not complaine with the French-men in Lewis the eleventh timâ—s that will is law and law is will what is now more common then a transgression without a Law an accusation without an Accuser and imprisonment without a cause rendered a sentence without a legall Judge and â— condemnation without a legall hearing or triall who can promise himseâ—fe the least safety either in his life oâ—â— liberty unlesâ—e hâ—s mind and conscience be taâ—quam ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ as a pure table wherein the prevailing faction may freely engrave the determinations of their wills I shall not for present endanger the Readers eyâ—s with an uncessant eâ—â—iux of brinish teaâ—â—s by relating many of the doâ—efull tragedies really acted upon our Libertâ—s I shall ooeâ—â— give you an impartiall narrative of Sir Iohn Maynards Caâ—e and of the wounds which our liberties

â—â—sseised of his Free hold ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Liâ—erâ—ies or Customes or ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ or exiâ—ed or any wayes destroyed nor we will not passeâ— on him nor câ—ndemn him but by the lawâ—ull juâ—gment of hiâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ the law of tâ—e Land Bâ— the judâ—ment of â—is peers is hâ—re meaâ—â—â—â—e verdict of 12. of his Equals and observe the latitude oâ— this â— exâ—ends to aâ—l cases whatsoever not only to crâ—minall caâ—es but â—o aâ—â— caâ—eâ— oâ— conâ—roverâ—e about meâ—m â—â— tuuâ— all is coâ—tâ—â—nâ—d uâ—der be â—â— words Free-Folds Lâ—berties â—r Free-cuâ—tomes whatever any man pâ—ssesse its to be comprehended under the nâ—â—â—â—n â—f Free â—oâ—d or a Liberty or Free-hold and yet iâ— this shouâ—d seem deâ—câ—tive â—â—e nâ—xt wordâ— would supply if we will not passe upon any man neque bimuâ— nâ—que mâ—ttemâ—â— c. â—aith the Latine that is neiâ—her the King nor any justice or Câ—uâ—â— shall try any â—ree men but by his Equals â—o that by law the Lords are totally excluded â—rom intermedling with the tryalâ— of any Commoner in any case wâ—atâ—oever And to his agrees the Statuâ—e of 25. Ed. 3. c. 4 42. Ed. â— c 3. and there are ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ Sâ—aâ—utes in force â—ew in print enacted since Magra Charta which ordains the tryall of all Commoners to bee by theâ—â— Equals on ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ and tâ—e same Charter and many of those Statutes particularly are confirmed by the Peâ—â—tion of Right 3 Car. and by the Acts in dâ— this â—reâ—ent Parlâ—ament for the aâ—olâ—shâ—ng the Star chamber and ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—aâ—le nâ— the â—anâ—n Lawes so that whilest those Laws re in force the Lord House is incapable to be made Iudges of any Commâ—â—er But it seâ—mâ—s this liberty of the Commons of England was sometimes invaded â—y the Lords and Sir E. Cook 2. part of Inst. â— p. 50 â—aiâ—h that iâ— wâ—s enacted at the ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ of the Lords that hereaâ—ter no Peeres should be droven to give judgment on any otherâ— then on their Peers according to the Law and he cites Rot. Parl. 4. E. 3 â—â— 6. 10 maâ—ntaine his asserâ—ion and it s recorded in 4. E. 3. Rot. 2 in Sir Sâ—mon de Bereâ—â—ords case who was adjudged as an accessary to Roger Morâ—imer in the murder of King Ed. 2 in these words THE PRECEDENT ANd it is assâ—nted anâ— aâ—râ—ed by our Lord the King and all the Graâ—â—ees in ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Paâ—â—â—ment that albeit the â—aid Pâ—â—râ— as â—udges of Parliamenâ— took upâ—n ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ in the presence of â—ur Lord the King â—â— make and given ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ by the aâ—â—enâ— of the King upon â—â—me of â—â—em which were not their pâ—â—rs and by â—eason of the murther oâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ â—ord aâ—d â—â—struction oâ— him which was so â—eere of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ râ—yall and â—on of a Kinâ— that therefore the ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Peeres which ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ be not bound orcharged to give judgemâ—nâ— upon oâ—â—ers ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ their Peers nor shall do it but let the Peers of the Land ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ power but of that for ever they be discharged and ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ judgment â—ow given be not drawne ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ for the time to câ—me by which â—e said ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—ay â—e charge ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ to judge others then their Peeres agaâ—nst ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ of the Land â—f any suchcase happen Now ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ hence â—â— may â—e collected that it was against the law of the land for the Lords to juâ—ge a Commâ—ner in any case whatsoever and ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ they were again bâ—â—rd by their own ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ neâ—er to judg any ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ for Sir ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ a that was â—nâ—â—ted But ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ the law were ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ as to the Lâ—â—ds ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ can ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ any jurisâ—â—â—â— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ not receive it as a trust ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ which ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ a juriâ—d ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ them â—nd aâ— yet â—â— never ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ law that gaâ—e thâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ to theâ—r practiâ—e But ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ at the Lordsâ—re the supream Câ—urâ— of â—ustice in caâ—es ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ juâ—gmenâ— or caâ—es of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ and ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ by Act of Parâ— by ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ thâ—â— the Author of ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ upon ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ Sir ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ Lords I ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ c. and it may ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ thâ—t the lawes whereupon ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ of their ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ever him in criminall causes â—ever made such a distinction between causes criminall and civil â—nd that in case ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Lâ—wes were invalid to exclude them from exercising any ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ of â—rrour and which conceâ—â—es the â—reeâ—olds and liberties â—â— Commoners then they are also invalide to restrain their exercising jurisdiction oâ—er him in cases criminall But because the statâ— of Ed. 3. câ—5 conceived to be â—hâ— bâ—sis of the Lords jurisdiction in cases of erronious judgements â—delâ—yes c. I shall unâ—â—ld the meaning of that statute That statâ— ordaâ—ned that a ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ 2 Earâ—â—sâ—â— Bâ—rons should bee châ—sâ—n to receive Commissions from ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ King to â—e are the Petiâ—â—ons of those where caâ—â—â—s wâ—râ— dâ—â—larâ—d in any ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—o that no judgement could â—e obtained and to inâ—uire ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ jusâ—â—ces of any court the reasons of such deâ—aiâ—s and by the advice oâ— tâ—e â—ustices of â—oth Benâ—â—es tâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ and give judgement and remand the cause â—o the â—ustices to execuâ—e the â—aiâ— judgement ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ if the case be ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ it is to be transfâ—rred to Parliament That those ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ were thus chosen by Parliament to prevent deâ—ayes of judgement should ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ onely ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ one Parliament until ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ therâ—fore P. A. B B of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ the Earle of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—â— ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ the Lord ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ were then ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ ordâ—â—ned to contâ—â—ue â—ntiâ—l the nâ—â—r Parliament Hereby it appeares this statute gives the house of Lords no power to ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ in cases upon â—â—its of ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—â—ither dâ—â—h it appeare that this staâ—uâ—â— ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ been observed ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ Parliaments have ever ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—â—at time chosen 2 ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ 2 Baâ—ors â—â— hear petitions in cases of ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ judgement â—ut the law hath provided that all the Iustices Baâ—â—â—ns of the ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ being of the â—rdâ—r of the â—uoiâ—â— or else the Lorâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ and Lord ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ either by a speciall wrâ—â— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ determine ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ to be passed this is the ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ 8. 31 Elâ—â— 1 A ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ would ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—ow that ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ of the Lords jurisdiction ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ upon this statute 1. ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ judgment ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ Lords â—â—use are so much as ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ statute 2. Tâ—e ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ ordâ—â—ned to be câ—oâ—en to heâ—re Petitioners in cases oâ— ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ judgment were to be câ—osen by the Parliament 3. ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ if the case wherein judgment was ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ were ã€ˆâ€¦ã€‰ Lords should ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ it unto the next Parliament And as for the statute of 2â— of Eâ—iz c. 8. which thâ—y say confirmed â—â—e stat of â—4 Ea. â—5 the very first clause says thus forasmuch as erroneous Judgâ—mâ—nts given in the Court called the Kings â—ench are onely to be reâ—â—rmed by that high Câ—uâ—t of Paâ—iâ—menâ— c. And then it makes that provisâ—ion which I mentioned beâ—â—re by a wriâ— of errour from the Chancery and yet it leaves â—haâ— planâ—â—â—e at libeâ—â—y to â—ueâ—n the high Court of Parliament to reverâ—e the ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ Iudgement and so â—e stat of 31 â— d. c. 1. alâ—o concâ—udâ—s and Sir Ed. ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ in the same place 4 part Iâ—st p 20 21 where he aâ—â—owes the ã€ˆâ—Šã€‰ â—o have â—urisdâ—ction over â—ommoners in cases of erâ—oneous Iudgâ—mâ—nâ—s and saith thus a party grieved upon a Petition to the King may

Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Text snippets containing the quad