Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	king_n	parliament_n	writ_n	1,771	5	9.5540	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A63255	The triumphs of justice over unjust judges exhibiting, I. the names and crimes of four and forty judges hang'd in one year in England, as murderers for their corrupt judgments, II. the case of the Lord Chief Justice Trefilian, hang'd at Tyburn, and all the rest of the judges of England (save one) banisht in K. Rich. the 2ds time, III. the crimes of Empson and Dudley, executed in K. Henry the 8th's days, IV. the proceedings of the ship-money-judges in the reign of K. Charles the first, V. diverse other presidents both antient and modern : to which is added VI. the judges oath, and some observations thereupon, humbly dedicated to the Lord Chief Justice Scroggs.	Philo-Dicaios.	1681 (1681)	Wing T2297; ESTC R3571	28,282	42

Justice was in those days Administred in the Countrey in Neighbouring Courts which yet as appears by the nature of the offences alledged against them had jus vitae necis power of life and death and so may properly be called Judges whose Names and particular Crimes here follow in the words of that worthy Author p. 296. of the French and p. 239 of the English Edition It is an abuse that Justices and their Officers who kill People by false judgment be not destroyed which King Alfred caused to be done who caused Forty four Iustices in one year to be hanged as Murderers fer their false judgments 1. He hanged Darling because he judged Sidulf to death for the retreat of Edulf his Son who afterward acquitted him of the Fact 2. He hanged Segnar who judged Ulf to death after sufficient acquittal 3. He hanged Cadwine because that he judged Hachwy to death without the Consent of all the Jurors for whereas he had put himself upon a jury of Twelve-men because that three would havesaved him against the Nine Cadwine removed the three and put others upon the jury upon whom Hachwy put not himself 4. He hanged Cole because he judged Ive to death when he was a Mad-man 5. He hanged Malme because he Judged Prat to death upon a false suggestion that he committed the felony 6. He hanged Athulf because he caused Copping to be hang'd before the Age of one and twenty years It was against Law then but now nequitia supplet Aetatem 7. He hanged Markes because he judged During to death by twelve men that were not sworn 8. He hanged Ostline because he judged Seaman to death by a false Warrant grounded upon false suggestion which supposed Seaman to be a Person in the warrant which he was not 9. He hanged Billing because he judged Leston to death by fraud In this manner he said to the People sit all ye here but he who killed the man and because that Leston did not sit with the other he commanded him to be hanged and said that he did assist where he knew he did not assist to kill the Party 10. He hanged Seafoul because he judged Ording to death as not answering 11. He hanged Thurston because he judged Thurgner to death by a Verdict of Inquest taken ex officio without Issue joyned 12. He hanged Athelston because he judged Herbert to death for an offence not mortal 13. He hanged Rambold because he judged Leschild in a Case not notorious without Appeal and without Indictment 14. He hanged Rolf because he judged Dunston to dye for an escape out of prison 15. He hanged Frebern because he judged Harpin to dye whereas the July were in doubt of their verdict for in doubtful cases one ough rather to save than condemn 16. He hanged Seabright who judged Athebrus to death because he had discharg'd one that had given a false judgment in a Case Capital 17. He hanged Hale because he saved Tristrain the Sherif from death who took to the Kings use from another goods against his will for as much as any such taking from another against his will and Robbery hath no difference 18. He hanged Arnold because he saved Bailifs who robbed the people by colour of Distresses some by selling Distresses such and others by extortion of Fines because between such tortious Acts and Robbery there was no difference 19. He hanged Erkinwald because he hanged Frankling for nought else but because he taught to him who vanquished him by Battle-mortal to say the word Cravant 20. He hanged Bermond because he caused Garbot to be beheaded by his judgment in England for that for which he was outlaw'd in Ireland 21. He hanged Alkman because he saved Cateman by colour of Disseisin who was Attaited of Burglary 22. He hanged Saxmond because he hanged Barold in England where the Kings Writ runneth for a fact which he did in the same Land where the Kings Writ did not run 23. He hanged Alflet because he judged a Clerk to death over whom he had no Cognizance 24. He hanged Piron because he judged Huntiny to death because he gave judgment in Appeal before the forty days pendant the Appeal by a Writ of false judgment before the King 25. He hanged Delani because he caused Eldons to be hanged who kill'd a man by misfortune 26. He hanged Oswin because he judged Fulcher to death out of Court 27. He hanged Mucdin because he hanged Helgrave by warrant of Indictment not special He hanged Horn because he hanged Simin at days forbidden 29. He hanged Wolmer because he judged Grant to death by colour of a Larceny of a thing which he had received by Title of Bailment 30. He hanged Therberne because he Judged Osgot to death for a Fact whereof he was Acquitted before against the same Plaintiffe which Acquittance he tendred to averre by Oath and because he would not averre it by Record Therbern would not allow of the Acquittal which he tendred him 31. He hanged Wolston because he adjudged Howbert to death at the suit of the King for a fact which Howbert confest and of which the King gave him his Pardon but he had no Charter thereof nevertheless he vouched the King to Warrant it and further tendred to averre it by Enrollment of the Chancery 32. He hanged Oskitell because he Judged Cutlinge to death by the Record of the Coroner where by Replication allowable the Plea did not hold And the Case was such Cutling was taken and Tortured so much as he confessed he had Mortally offended only to be quitted of the pain and Oskitell adjudged him to death upon such his Confession which he had made to the Coroner without trial of the truth of the Torture or the Fact And further the said King caused the Coroners and Officers Accessories to be apprehended who hanged the people and all those that might have hindred the false Judgment and did not hinder the same in all cases For he hanged all the Judges who had falsely saved any man guilty of Death or hath falsely hanged any man against Law or any reasonable Exception He hanged the Suitors of Calevot because they had adjudged a man to death in a case not notorious although he were guilty thereof for no man can Judge within the Realm but the King or his Commissaries except those Lords in whose Lordships the Kings Writ doth not run He hanged the Suitors of Dorcester because they Judged a man to death by Jurors in their Liberty for a Felony done out of it and whereof they had not the Conusance by reason of forraignty He hanged the Suitors of Cirencester because they kept a man so long in Prison that he dyed in prison who would have acquitted himself by Forraigners that he offended not Feloniously 'T is supposed these Suitors of each place were Four in Number which compleats the number of 44. Hanged in all In his time also the Suitors of Doncaster lost their Jurisdiction besides other Punishments because

Administration of Iustice to the Subject according to the Laws which are every Free-mans Birth-Right so also as they be of the Kings Council they are by such their Oaths oblig'd lawfully to counsel him that is whenever their opinions are demanded they are sworn and bound to deliver them according to the Law Let us see how our Ancestors resented these matters In a Parliament held in the 11th year of Richard the 2. there was Iudgment of High-Treason given against 18 several Persons and all save one of them of Eminent Rank Three Privy Counselors viz. The Archbishop of York The Duke of Ireland and Earl of Suffolk the Bishop of Exeter the Kings Confessour Five Knights of whom some had been Servants to Edw. the 3. and all but one Servants to the then King and some of them of Noble Descent but that which I more particularly observe there were amongst them Six Judges and Locton the Kings Serjeant at Law Blake of the Kings Council at Law and Usk the under Sheriff of Middlesex Of these 18 8 were Executed that is Sir Robert Tresilian the Lord Chief Iustice was drawn from the Tower through the midst of London to Tyburn and there Hanged so likewise were Usk and Blake and Sir Iohn Salisbury but the other 4 Knights had the Favour to be Beheaded Three that is the Archbishop of York the Duke of Ireland and the Earl of Suffolk died miserable Fugitives in forreign Parts The other seven whereof five were Judges with much ado got a Pardon as to Life but were banished and their Lands and Goods all forfeited and it was made Felony for any to procure their Recalling home and themselves forthwith to be executed as Traytors if at any time they should presume to return And of these eighteen Persons all save three were impeached by the Commons The Offences which procured these Exemplary Punishments were briefly these King Richard the II. being an unthinking dissolute Prince by the ill counsel of some near his Person there had during his minority happened divers miscarriages in the Government To redress which in a Parliament holden in the tenth year of his Reign and the twentieth of his Age a Commission was awarded to Twelve Peers and others of greatest Wisdom and Ability impowering them to inspect the past management of the Houshold the Revenue the Courts of Justice and in a word all things that did concern the Good of the Realm with full power finally to determine and put all things in excution so as might most tend to the Honour of the King Relief of the People and Safety of the Land which Commission was to endure onely one year Now come five of the Persons above-named viz. the Archbishop the Duke the Earl of Suffolk the Chief Justice and Brembre who seeing themselves like to be called to Account for their pernitious Counsels and Irregularities and to be brought to deserved shame and punishment to avoid the same and continue their Villanies for the future they insinuated to the King That this Commission intrenched upon the Royal Power and was derogatory to the Crown that the procurers thereof had extorted His Royal Assent thereunto in Parliament and that this was Treason for so the Chief Justice and Blake the Kings Council who was advised withal in the Writ declared it to be whereupon Blake was commanded to prepare an Indictment of Treason against all the said Commissioners and against such others as had been most active in procuring that Authority Accordingly he draws the Indictment which stands entred in the Roll and is to this effect That they the said Commissioners c. had Traiterously conspired among themselves to make this Commission by Authority of Parliament against the Royalty of the King to his disherison and in derogation of the Crown and that they forced the Kings Consent and confederated themselves to maintain one another in so doing It was designed that they should be tryed upon this Indictment in Middlesex or London and therefore some of the parties to be prosecuted not being Peers Usk the Under-Sheriff of Middlesex was acquainted with the business who was to return a Pack'd-Iury you see that 's a very old Game that might be sure to do the business which he performing accordingly was therefore hang'd But further the five grand Favourites that the King might the more confide in their Counsels for so are the words of the Record and that under colour of Law they might cover their malice from the King and the Kingdom before the Trials were to be brought on advise the King to demand the Opinion of some of the Judges that is of the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron and the Judges of the Common-Pleas six in all in number and of Locton the Kings Serjeant Blake of the Kings Council at Law was commanded to draw up those Questions who did it accordingly and for drawing the same and the before-mentioned Indictment he was himself Drawn and Hanged The Questions being prepared in Writing the Iudges were sent for to Nottingham Castle where in the Kings own Presence they were commanded upon their Allegiance to deliver their Opinions 1. Whether the Commission was derogatory to the Rights of the Crown They answered It was 2. Whether the persuading and urging the King to consent thereunto in Parliament was Treason They answered That it was Here were other Questions ask'd but these were the Main and those for which they were condemned as appears by the Replication of the Commons to the Iudges Answer and by the Words of the Iudgment That they the said Iudges knew that this Commission was awarded in Parliament c. that it was for the Publick Good That they knew of the Traiterous Intent to destroy the Procurers of this Commission That they knew the Law and that it was not Treason and had delivered such Opinions thereby under colour of Law to cover their Treasonable Intent and therefore Iudgment of High-Treason was given against them and against Locton the Kings Serjeant who had Subscribed these False Opinions with the Iudges And though there be other Articles against the Rest yet this alone is adjudged Treason in the several Iudgments against every one of the Eighteen And 't is observable That in all these Iudgments they are adjudged Traitors as well against the Person of the King as against the Common-wealth And it is there declared upon great Advice taken That in Treasons which concern the King and Kingdom they are not bound to proceed according to the Rules of the Common-Law but according to the Course of Parliaments so as may be for the Common-Good Nor were these Iudgments huddled up in haste but given upon long and mature Deliberation the Work of a Whole Parliament And it is declared in the Roll That they spent long time and took great pains in examining the Evidence the better thereby to satisfie their own Consciences and the World Their Proceedings against the five Plotters were begun the 14 of Novemb. and the

England was to be done whereupon a Scire Facias issued out of the Exchequer reciting the said Writs to warn Mr. Hampden amongst others to shew Cause why he should not be Charged with this Money Upon this he being Summoned Appeared and demanded Oyer of those Writs and Schedule which being Entred he Demurr'd in Law that is demanded the Opinion and Judgment of the Court of Exchequer Whether this Writ were sufficient in Law to Force him to pay the said Twenty Shillings This being a Great and General Case the Barons of the Exchequer desired the Assistance of the rest of the Judges who did Joyn accordingly The Case was argued first by Councel on both Sides and next by the Judges severally of whom Sir Richard Hutton Knight one of the Judges of the Common-Pleas and Sir Richard Crook Knight one of the Judges of the King 's Bench in large and learned Arguments since Printed did shew the Illegality of such Writs and gave their Opinion That the Defendant Hampden ought not to be Charged But the rest of the Judges were resolved to carry the Point for the King and accordingly gave their Opinions That the Defendant ought to be Charged And then it was the Part of the Barons of the Exchequer to give Judgment which was Entred in these Words Quod seperalia Brevia predicta Retorn ' eorundem ac Schedul ' praedict ' eisdem Annex ' ac materia in eisdem content ' sufficient ' in Lege Exist ' ad praefat Johannem Hampdem de predictis viginti solidis super ipsum informa ex causa praedictae Assessae onerand Ideo consideratum est per eosdem Barones quod pr●●…ctus Johannes Hampden de eisdem viginti solidis oneretur inde satisfaciat That the said several Writs and Returns thereof and the Schedules thereunto annex't and the Matter in the same contained are sufficient in Law to Charge the said John Hampden with the Twenty Shillings upon him in the Form and by Vertue of the Assessment afore-said imposed Therefore it is considered by the said Barons That the said John Hampden shall be Charged and shall satisfy the same This Judgment was imposed as such an Infallible Determination of the Law in this Case that no further Dispute would be allow'd thereof to any others insomuch that a Person of Honour having a Case depending in the King 's Bench was denyed any Argument or Debate concerning the Right of Ship-Money for no other Reason but that it had been by the former Judgment decided already in the Exchequer It may perhaps be said This Imposition of Ship-Money was small and inconsiderable Mr. Hampden a Gentleman of a fair Fstare was Assessed but Twenty Shillings And Why should any Body-scruple such a petty Business when the King Commanded it Was not the Remedy far worse than the Disease Why should any Subject exspend a great deal of Money in Law to avoid Payment of so Trivial a Sum Or What Harm could accrue to the Publick by the Judges allowing the King Power to Impose such an Assessment when it was for the Defence of the Realm from Eminent and Imminent Danger and he exerted that Power so favourably c. In Answer to such Objections it must be said That true it is it was then only Mr. Hampden's Case but the whole Nation every individual Subject of England was concern'd in it nay so far concern'd that all his Estate and Liberty was therein given up The Question was not Quantum but Quo Jure If Publick Danger might give the King Title to lay Impositions without a Parliament and He alone were Judge of such Danger When might it not be alledged If Twenty Shillings were Assessed on Mr. Hampden that Year How did it appear but Twenty Pounds might be required the next and Two Thousand Pounds the Year following And What Use what Occasion would the Court have had for ever afterwards of a Parliament But as to the Illegality of these Ship-Writs I refer the Reader to Judge Crook's Argument where the same is Demonstrated to be against the Common-Law against divers Statutes not to be maintain'd by any Prerogative or Power Royal unwarrantable by any former Precedents c. Let us see then what were the Consequences of these Extrajudicial Opinions and this Illegal Judgment of the Judges First As to the King They thereby mis-led him as much as in them lay to Discompose the Harmony of Government to Entrench upon the Property of His Subjects and contrary to his Intentions by Colour of Right to violate the Laws which no doubt that Good Prince meant to have preserv'd Inviolable Secondly As to the Subjects They were not only hereby Injured but their Affections Alienated from their Sovereign which to occasion is no doubt a very High because almost Irreparable Treason The Genuine Sense of these Resolutions being no less than this That the King of England as often as Himself pleaseth may declare the Kingdom to be in Danger and that so often His Majesty for Prevention of such Dangers may by His Writ under the Great Seal of England alter the Property of the Subject's Goods without their Consent in Parliamen and that in such Proportions as His Majesty shall think fit And besides may deprive them of the Liberty of their Persons and that in such Manner as Himself shall please Thirdly As to the Judges themselves It prov'd deservedly Fatal For no sooner was a Parliament Call'd but they were call'd to Account for these their Illegal Opinions and Judgment And after a long Debate on Monday the Seventh of December 1640. these Four several Votes Passed upon them without so much as One Negative Voice to any of them viz. First THat the Charge imposed upon the Subjects for the Providing and Furnishing of Ships and the Assessments for Raising of Money for that purpose commonly called Ship-Money are against the Laws of the Realm the Subjects Right of Property and contrary to former Resolutions in Parliament and to the Petition of Right Secondly That the Extrajudicial Opinions of the Iudges Published in the Star-Chamber and Inrolled in the Courts at Westminster before Recited in the whole and in every part of them are against the Laws of the Realm the Right of Property and the Liberty of the Subjects and contrary to former Resolutions in Parliament and to the Petition of Right Thirdly That the Writ to the Sheriff of Bucks particularly Recited and the other Writs commonly called Ship-Writs are against the Laws of the Realm the Right of Property and the Liberty of the Subjects and contrary to former Resolutions in Parliament and to the Petition of Right Fourthly That the Iudgment in Mr. Hampden's Case as before Recited in the matter and substance thereof and in that it was conceived that Mr. Hampden was any way Chargeable is against the Laws of the Realm the Right of Property the Liberty of the Subjects and contrary to former Resolutions in Parliament and to the Petition of Right These

they held Pleas forbidden by the Customs of the Realm to Ordinary Judges and Suitors to hold In this time Colgrin lost his Franchise of Enfangthief because he would not send a Thief to the common Gaole of the County who was taken within his Liberty and not Bailable In this time Buttolph lost his view of Frank-pledges because he charged the Jurours with other Articles than those which belonged to the View and Amerced people in personal Actions where one was not to be amerced by a pecuniary Punishment And accordingly he caused punishments of Death to Criminal Judges for wrongful mortal Judgements and so he did proportionably for wrongful Judgements of a lesser nature As Imprisonment for wrongful Imprisonments and and like for like with the other Punishments for he delivered Thelweld to Prison because he Judged men to Prison for Offences where they ought not to be Imprisoned He Judged Lithing to Prison because he imprisoned Herbote for the Offence of his Wife He Judged Rutwood to Prison because he Imprisoned Old for the Kings Debt Note In those days people were not to be Imprisoned for Debt but only their Goods distrain'd On the other side he Cut off the Hand of Haulf because he saved Armorks Hand who was Attainted before him that he had Feloniously wounded Richbold He Judged Edulfe to be wounded because he Judged not Arnold to be wounded who had Feloniously wounded Aldens In lesser Judgments he did not meddle with the Judgments but Disinherited the Justices and Removed them according to the Points of those Statutes where he could understand that they had Transgressed their Jurisdiction or the Bounds of their Delegacy or Commission or had concealed Fines or Amerciaments or ought that belonged to the King or had Released or Increased any Punishment contrary to Law or procured Pleadings without Warrant c. Thus far Horns Mirrour Now that this Alfred was one of the Wisest and most Renowned Kings that ever this Land was happily Governed by appears as well by the Eulogies given him by the Ancients as those Encomiastick Verses Dedicated to his Memory by a present Ingenious Courtier Sir Winston Churchill Kt. in his Diri Britannici Fol. 140. Who would not follow him into the Field Who cannot choose but Conquer tho' he yield Whose Sword cut deep yet was his Wit more keen Some Fence ' gainst that But this did wound unseen To thee is due Great Elfrid double praise To thee we bring the Laurel and the Bayes Master of Arts and Arms Apollo so Sometimes did use his Harp sometimes his Bow And from the other Gods got this Renown To Reconcile the Gauntlet to the Gown But who did e're with the same Sword like Thee Execute Justice and the Enemy Keep up at once the Law of Arms and Peace And from the Camp Issue out Writs of Ease The next English Prince of Renown before the Norman Conquest was King Edgar about the year 960. Amongst whose Noble Acts 't is recorded as none of the least memorable that in his Circuits and Progresses through the Countrey he would take Account of the Demeanour of his Lords and especially of his Judges whom he severely Punished if he found them Delinquents Bakers Chron. Fol. 11. Nor have the best and wisest of our Princes since the Conquest been less ready to give up Ill Judges to just Punishment nor our English Parliaments wanting to bring them to it In the pear 1290. being saith Walsingham p. 54. the 17th year of Edw. 1. Justitiarios ferè omnes de falsitate deprehensos a suo Officio deposuit ipsos juxta merita puniens gravi Mulctâ He finding almost all his Judges guilty of Corruption put them out of their places and Punisht them according to their Demerits with heavy Fines Which the Lord Cook in the Second part of his Institutes Fol. 508. likewise takes notice of and tells us That this was done by a Parliament held after the Feast of St. Hillary and only two Judges scap'd scot-free But how severe the Fines of the other Delinquents were appears in Bakers Chronicle fol. 100. Sir Ralph de Hengham says he Chief Justice of the Kings-Bench for Corruption was Fined 7000 Marks Sir John Lovetot one of the Justices of the Common Pleas 3000 Marks Sir William Brompton 6000 Marks Sir Solomon Rochester 4000 Marks Sir Richard Boyland 4000 Marks Sir Walter Hopton 2000 Marks Sir William Saham in 3000 Marks Robert Lithbury Master of the Rolls in 1000 Marks Roger Leicester in 1000 Marks Hugh Bray Escheator and Judge for the Jews 1000 Marks But Sir Adam Stratton Chief Baron of the Exchequer who it seems had been a notable Bribe-fingerer four and thirty Thousand Marks A prodigious Summe allmost 400 years ago And Sir Thomas Wayland Chiefe Justice of the Common-Pleas being found the greatest Offender of all was Attainted of Felony for taking of Bribes and his Lands and Goods Forfeited as appears in the Pleas of Parliament 18 Edw. 1. And he was also Banisht the Kingdom as unworthy to live in that State against which he had so much Offended Sir William Thorp Chief Justice of the Kings-Bench in K. Edw. the Thirds time having of five several persons received five several Bribes which in all amounted to 100 l. was for this alone adjudged to be Hang'd and all his Goods and Lands Forfeited The reason of the Judgment is entred in the Roll in these words Quia praedictus Willielmus Thorpe qui Sacramentum Domini Regis erga populum suum habuit ad Custodiendum fregit malitiosè falsè Rebelliter quantum in ipso fuit Because that as much as in him lay he had broken the Kings Oath made to the People which the King had Intrusted him withall And so much did the then Collective Wisdom of the Nation respect Judges herein that 't is expresly entred that this Judgment should not be drawn into example against any other Officers who should break their Oaths but only against those Qui predictum Sacramentum fecerunt et fregerunt et habent Leges Angliae ad Custodiendum That is only to the Judges that violate their Oaths having the Laws of England Entrusted unto them This Iudgment was given 24 Edw. 3 d. The next year in the Parliament 25 Edw. 3. Numero 10. it was debated in Parliament Whether this Iudgment was Legal and Nullo Contradicente unanimously it was declared to be just and according to the Law and that the same Iudgment may be given in time to come upon the like occasion Which Case I humbly conceive resolves the Case in Law Point Blank thus That it is death for any Judge wittingly to break his Oath in any part of it This Oath of Thorp is entred in the Roll and is the same verbatim with the Iudges Oath in 18 Edw. 3 The same too as I humbly conceive which our Iudges now a days take and is herein afterwards punctually recited The Oaths of our Iudges of England as they bind them to the due