solummodo publica so Glanvil but in Bracton Fama apud graves bonos and in Fleta apud bonos graves infamia yet must the Party be Attached vel per Carceris Inclusionem vel per Plegios idoneos so it was in Glanvils time for all but Homicide but in Fleta's Diffamatus vel Accusatus attachiabitur per Corpus Captus Remanebit donec se indè Legitimè acquietaverit That is in him till he have Legally cleared himself from all Seducement of the King Kingdom or Kingdoms Army Omnemque seductionem Regis Regni vel sui exercitus quicquid sit contra Pacem suam which Glanvil expresseth thus Machinatum fuisse vel aliquid fecisse in mortem Regis vel seditionem Regni vel Exercitus vel Consensisse vel Consilium dedisse vel Authoritatem praestitisse In such Cases also they debate who should be Iudge and for this they all agree in that fundamental Principle of right Reason and Nature that Parties may never be Iudges in their own Causes for which besides all others the Mirror is large and clear among all Exceptions to the Iudges Person if he have no Commission or refuse to shew it as he ought or be Party c. of which also Britton in Appeals cap. 22. fol. 41. And for this reason Bracton and Fleta with others agree that in such Causes neither the King who might so they say be Iudex Actor nor the Kings Commissioners should Judge or determine But Curia Pares except only when the Case is not of Life but finable for in such the Kings Commissioners may determine sine Paribus But who are these Peers and what is this Court One of Bractons first Maxims in his second Chap. is that all obscure difficult and new Judgments ought to be suspended Usque ad magnam Curiam ibi per Consilium Curiae terminentur Fleta is somewhat clearer in his second Book and second Chap. Habet enim Rex curiam suam in Concilio suo in Parliamentis suis presentibus Prelatis Com. Baron Proceribus aliis viris Peritis ubi terminatae sunt Dubitationes Iudiciorum Novis injuriis emersis Nova constituuntur Remedia unicuique Iustitia prout meruit Retribuetur Ibidem Unicuique What to every Man in all the Kingdom or how far and how high may this extend or reach Shall we propound this Doubt to the Antient Parliaments who were most like to know their Power and Priviledge The Law was clear enough before but some were pleased not to think it so and therefore in the Statutes of Marlbridge as old as Henry the third in the first place of all it was agreed and enacted That all men Living of this Kingdom as vvell high as lovv tam Majores quam Minores must and ought submit to Judgment Iustitiam habeant Recipiant in Curia Domini Regis That this Expression may go lovver than the Court of Parliament I can not deny nor vvill others I suppose deny but that it may and must be yielded to the highest Court of all One of the Clauses of the Kings duty expressed in the Saxon Lavvs is to do all things rightly by the Judgment of his great Court per Iudicium Procerum Regni and again by that great Council to maintain or do Justice and Judgment Iudicium Rectum Facere Iustitiam tenere per Concilium Procerum Regni All vvhich and much more in those Lavvs must be solemnly Svvorn by the King before the Kingdom and the Clergy in propria persona inspectis tactis Sacrosanctis Evangeliis c. coram Regno Sacerdote Clero This may be considered antequam ab Archiepiscopis Episcopis Regni Coronetur Even before he may he Crowned or should require his Subjects Homage Insomuch that vvhen the Subjects have tendered Homage as some Lords did to King Henry the fifth before the King had done his Homage and Sworn his Fealty to the State and Laws It hath been observed by Historians as some kind of Comet that I say not a Prodigy in State Politicks And besides all the forms of Coronation found in Hoveden Walsingham and other Historians secundum antiqua Statuta as Matthew Paris speaketh it is clear enough in the Records and Rolls of Richard the second before others how the King first did take that Solemn Oath and then the Archbishop went to every side of the Scaffold relating to the Kingdom how the King was Svvorn and then he asked them si ipsi consentire vellent if they would now give consent to take him for their King and Liege Lord and if so they came and did him Homage If they would consent What was it at their Choyce and were our English Kings Elective plain Elective sure it would be duely weighed and I confess some things have made me very much suspect they were Elective And the rather also by considering the great Care and Importunity of some Kings to procure the Crown to be setled by Parliament upon their Heirs Which might intimate that indeed it was not their Inheritance at Common Law for it was seldom seen I suppose that English Men have taken much Pains to obtain an Act of Parliament to settle their Inheritance on their own Heirs except they were Illegitimate or Aliens And upon search I cannot find the old Oaths of Allegiance did relate to the Kings Heirs or Successors either in the Saxon or first Norman times although we find the Oath in old Laws long before Edw. the second and in old Lawyers Bracton Britton Fleta with the Mirror punctual in the Oath of Allegiance but not a Syllable of Heirs or Successors that I can find Yet in the times of Henry the first and Henry the second there was some special Acts of Parliament for setling the Crown on Maud the Emperess or her Issue and King Henry's Son was Crowned in his Fathers Reign and of that time the Salvo in Glanvil Regi Haeredibus which I find not in any other old Lawyer and I believe it not usual till the great Quarrels of York and Lancaster it may be much Later But all such Acts for tying the Crown to such or such a Family do not evince a former Right of Succession any more than the House of Austria doth prove the Empire not to be Elective though it now seem as entailed on that Family I say not how often it hath been adjudged that Affirmative Statutes do not annul the Common Law and that one may Prescribe against a Statute Negative but in Affirmance of the Common Law for which the Comments on Littletons Burgage So that if an English King was Elective by the Common Law the Kingdom might prescribe against late Statutes which might erre much more than they could oblige all future Parliaments but they might still be free and most of all in what was due before by Common Law Let us discuss it then and see what Antient Lawyers and Historians do record about our Kings
at his Coronation which yet was by consent of Parliament Matris suffragio proceribus Congregatis as the Monk of Malmsbruy Where we have this Compendium of Ethelred Regnum adeptus obsedit potius quam Rexit Annis 37. Saevus in Principio miser in Medio Turpis in Exitu So that we need not wonder at the Parliament which in his Time provided that the greatest and the highest Offenders should have most punishment and heaviest Doom In the Danish Storm he fled to Normandy and the Parliament sent him this Message in VVigornensis Hoveden Huntingdon Florilegus and All That they would receive it again on Condition he would govern more Justly or more Mildly si ipse vel Rectius gubernare vel Mitius By his Son Edward he cajoled both the Lords and the Commons Majores Minoresque Gentis suae promising to be wholly guided by them and so return'd again But he gave so little satisfaction to his People that they rejected his Sons and Elected Canute Who did solemnly Swear to them quod secundum Deum secundum Seculum Fidelis esse vellet eis dominus as the Monk at VVorcester and those that follow him Yet it is also agreed that the Citizens of London pars Nobilium did Elect Edmund Ironside and that the Kingdom was also parted between these Two by consent of Parliament and beside the croud in the Road the Laws of the Confessor do assert that Agreement to the Parliament Universis Angliae Primatibus assensum Praebentibus Edmund lived but a few Months to interrupt Canute who was then received by Consent of All Iuraverunt illi quod eum Regem sibi eligere vellent Foedus etiam cum Principibus omni Populo ipse illi eum ipso percusserunt as Old Florence and Hoveden besides the Saxon Chronology and the Abbot of Croyland hath it thus Omnium Consensu Canutus super totam Angliam Coronatus Of his Parliaments and their good Laws I spake before and of their Oath to the Kingdom much might be added And besides all Historians Fleta speaketh of his Brief or Writ sent to the Pope and of his Church-seed payed as he saith Sanctae Ecclesiae die Sancti Martini Tempore tam Britonum quam Anglorum Lib. 1. Cap. 47. Harold came after Consentientibus quam plurimis Natu Majoribus Angliae As Wigornensis and Hoveden Electus est in Regem fuit N. Magnum placitum aput Oxenford Elegerunt Haroldum as we read in Huntingdon and Matthew of Westminster But Harold being dead Proceres ferme totius Angliae Legatos ad Hardicanutum Bricgae Mittentes Rogaverunt illum ut Angliam veniret Sceptra Regni susciperet And afterward Gaudentur ab omnibus suscipitur and Huntingdon addeth Electus est But he did nothing worthy of their Choice and so became odious E're long we find him swooning at Lambeth in the midst of a Wedding Jollity and soon after Expiring Edward the Confessor succeedeth by Election Paruit Edwardus Electus est in Regem ad omni Populo And Florilegus addeth to Huntingdon That Annuente Clero Populo Londinis in Regem Eligitur As before them both Ingulph Omnium Electione in Edwardum Concordatur His Elder Brother Elfred stepping in between the Death of Harold and Hardicanute Compatriotarum perfidia maxime Godwini Luminibus orbatus est and little less than Famished Godwin excuseth himself by the Kings Service or Command but it would not acquit him though he bestowed costly Bribes Edward can hardly dissemble it Godwine rageth flieth out into Rebellion and is Banished it seems by Parliament E're long he returns again presuming on his Great Friends and Alliance but in Parliament the King Appeals him of his Brothers Death which Godwine denies and puts himself upon the Parliament as did the King saying That they had heard his Appeal and the Earls Answer and it remained that they should do Justice and pronounce Judgment It was in Debate whether a Subject might Combat his Prince upon Appeal but at length the Quarrel was composed by the Parliament till Godwine curseth himself and is choaked as his Lands swallowed in Godwins Sands of which Old Wigornensis and Hoveden with Malmsbury Huntingdon Florilegus and divers others but especially Aornalensis and Mr. Seldens Titles of Honour That King Edward named the Duke of Normandy for his Successor is affirmed by some that follow the Abbot of Croyland and Malmsbury but the Monk of Worcester asserteth Harold to be chosen by the King and Parliament to be his Successor Quem Rex Successorem elegerat à totius Angliae Primatibus ad Regale Culmen electus as Roger Hoveden in the same words And the Monk of Malmsbury confesseth That Angli dicant a Rege Concessum c. Adding also That Harold excuseth his Breach of Oath to the Norman in which All agree by saying It was presumption so to swear or promise the Succession to the Crown without consent and act of Parliament Absque Generali Senatus Populi Conventu Edicto or Absque Generali consensu as Matthew Paris and Westminster express it but what in them is Tanto favore Principum as in Malmsbury and the continuer of Bede Tanto favore Civium regendum susceperit Of William the Norman much in the Militia much yet to be added for his Election and the Peoples free consent against his Conquest Londonias eum Episcopis plurimis Petit Laetanter receptus oranterque Rex conclamatus So the Abbot of Croyland living at the time which Malmsbury expresseth thus Londoniam petit moxque cum gratulatione Cives omnes effusi obviam vadunt prorupit omnibus portis unda Salutantium auctoribus Magnatibus Ita Angli qui in unam coeuntes sententiam potuissent Patriae reformare ruinam dum nullum ex suis vobebant induxere Alienum Huntingdon thus Susceptus est à Londiniensibus pacifice Coronatus Matthew Paris and Florilegus thus In Magna exultatione à Clero Populo susceptus ab Omnibus Rex acclamatus Gemitivensis addeth That ab omnibus Proceribus Rex est electus Sacro Oleo ab Episcopis Regni delibutus as Walsingham in his Neustria Wigornensis telleth us that before his Coronation he did solemnly Swear Coram Clero populo se velle Sanctas Dei Ecclesias Rectores illarum defendere nec non cunctum populum juste regere rectam Legem statuere Tenere c. So also doth Hoveden Matthew Paris in the Life of Frethrerick Abbot of St. Albans sheweth how free the Norman found our Ancestors Iugum servitutis à tempore Bruti nescientes more Normanorum Barbas radere which they note in Caesar also of the Britains and concludeth that pro bono pacis he did solemnly swear to observe their Old Laws Bonas Approbatas antiquas Leges quas Sancti Pii Angliae Reges ejus Antecessores Maxime Rex Edwardus statuit inviolabiliter observare the like Phrase we find in Ingulph of the same Laws
call it and the Barons of Wars Or the time of the great Charter For since that time the Rolls and Printed Acts are every where much larger and much better than my little reading or my leasure can present them Two words have sound of horror to the People who are taught to think them both oppressions and the sins of him they call the Conqueror Dane-geld and the Book of Dooms-day Some have added Curfeu with I know not what to make poor Children quake These have been proved to be long before the Normans coming in To that of Dane-geld I may add that good King Edward did also retain it to his Coffers when the Danish Storm was over till he saw the Devil dance upon it As the Crouland Abbot doth Record But it did rise from one to three to four to six shillings on the Hide but so by Parliament as may be much collected from the 11th Chap. of King Edwards Laws compared with Florence of Worcester Hoveden Huntingdon Math. Paris and Math. of Westminster besides some others which we must produce e're long And to say nothing of eleemosyne pro Aratris of which Canute and Ethelred it is clear in King Ethelstanes Laws that single Hides or Ploughlands in England were to maintain two Horsemen with Arms by Act of Parliament And this was more it seems than ever was King Williams Hydage or Dane-geld Which may be added to King Ethelstanes Militia as also his Doom book for all Judgments in one Form of which his Laws speak to what is said of Booca Doom But to King Williams Doomsday I shall now add to what before that besides the Mirror and Fitz-Herberts N. B. with the old Abbot of Crouland There is enough in every segment of that Roll to make one know it was a Review and little but a Review of what was done before They do abuse us else that bid us read the T. E. R. in all that Roll Tempore Edwardi Regis plain enough sometimes without all Divination That it was also confirmed by Parliament may be clear enough from the many exemptions a servitio Regis and a Vice-comit Nay to some inferiour places as Ely and Worcester Besides old Crowland which was not exempted from such service till the latter Saxon or first Normans time though Ingulph spake of divers Ethelreds But the same Abbot will tell us that this Doom Book was now also made juxta Taxatorum fidem qui Electi de qualibet Patria c. And that his Taxors were both kind and merciful non ad verum pretium nec ad verum spatium c. So preventing future Burthens and Exactions Talem Rotulum multum similem ediderat quondam Rex Alfredus c. But Alfreds own Will seemeth to carry it higher Nor was Ingulph's favour at the Court altogether useless for by that we come to know that our Norman King even in little things proceeded by a Great Councel So that our Abbots Charters must be viewed by Parliment Coram Domino meo Rege ac universo Concilio c. Thence he brought St. Edward's Laws as was observed before Huntingdon and Matthew Paris with Matthew of Westminster spake of his Hydage and Dooms-day as done with great Advice and Justice Misit Iusticiarios per unamquamque scyram inquirere fecit per jusjurandum quot Hydae i. e. jugera uni Aratro sufficientia per annum essent in unaquaque c. Nor are they wholy silent of his Parliaments Cum de more tenuisset curiam suam in Natali ad Gloucestriam and again at Winchester the like at London in another season Tilburiensis telleth us that Mony was paid to the Crown by Cities and Castles that used no Tillage But from the Land or Farms only Victuals till Henry the first And when the Kings foreign Wars did make him press for ready Mony the people murmured offering their Plowshares Horum igitur Querelis inclinatus Rex by advice of his Great council definito magnatum Concilio he sent out discreet prudent men that upon view of all the Lands should assesse the sums which the Sheriffs were to pay into the Exchequer This Gervase lived a while after King William Florence of Worcester near his Reign he telleth us of a Great Councel at Winchester And again of another at a place called Pedred not only by the King Arch-Bishops Bishops Earls but also primatibus totius Angliae a full Parliament for which Florilegius and Walsingham Newstria may be considered with Hoveden following Wigornens That in his Reign there was an High Constable of England ceasing in Henry the Eight appeareth by the Parliament Rolls of Edward the Fourth but Alfigar in the Book of Ely was such in St. Edwards time and to Him some ascribe the Constable of Dover with the Warden and Priviledge of the Cinque Ports with their Hamlets or Circuit including Rye and Winchelsey But all this speaketh Parliament as doth also his New Church Priviledge Communi Concilio Archiep. Episcop Abbat omnium Principum Regni mei Yet to be seen not only at Sir Robert Cottons Jewel House but among the Rolls with King Richards Charters for the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln This exemption of the Church from Seculars c. is the more considerable because it came up with the Norman King at the time of Hildebrand whose Letters missive came hither ad Willielmi Regis Concilium And that this Councel was a full Parliament appeareth by the Charters as I may call them of the Arch-Bishop of York ex praecepto Papae Gregorii 7. and Confirmatione Domini Willielmi Regis sub Testimonio Universalis Anglorum Concilii c. Of which Roger Hoveden is clear telling us also that this King summoned the Arch Bishops Bishops Abbots Counts Barons Vice Comit. cum suis Militibus were these Knights of Shires To this I may add from the Continuer of the Saxon Chronology that Lanfranc came hither from Caen on the Kings call and the Popes Command primatum Regni Anglorum in Ecclesia Cant. suscepit eligentibus eum Senioribus cum Episcopis principibus clero Populo Angliae in curia Regis a very clear and full Parliament Nor may I so wrong our Common Law as to detain that antient Record which the great Judg in his Reports citeth of a Writ of Right brought by this Lanfranc against Odo Bishop of Bajeux and removed by a Toll into the County Court where the King commanded all the good Lawyers to attend the County a toto Comitatu Recordatum atque judicatum est That as the King held his Lands in His Demesn in Dominio suo so was the Arch Bishop to hold his omnino liberas quietas in Dominiquo suo which Judgment was afterward confirmed by the King and Parliament cum consensu omnium principum suorum With which Record I may compare the old Manuscrips in Bennets Coll. Cambridge telling us of a great Moot magnum placitum in loco qui dicitur Pinenden in
the Militia For in such a Case the Sheriff or Bayliff shall not only force his Entry by the Posse-Comitatus into such a Castle on the suit of a Subject but it may also come so far that the said Fort or Castle may be beaten down without recovery And although it be said it shall be done by the Kings Command yet it is well known and seen by experience that it is and always was by Order of the Courts of Justice and for this Semain's Case in the fifth part of Reports may be very well added to the Comments on the First of Westminster By which we see how much the very Forts and Castles or Militia must be subject to the Courts of Iustice Not the King only but in and by his Courts especially the Parliament that may Command Controul and Over-rule all other Courts How tender the Law is in Case of Estate Forfeit by Alienation I have touched before much is to be added Nay in the worst and lowest Estates by Tenure of Will of which somewhat also before for a Fine Reasonable c. as by Copy where Alienation and Wast against the Custom with other Cases in the fourth part of Reports may Forfeit to the Lord but he cannot Out his Tenant at pleasure especially him that sweareth Fealty but the said Tenant may sue his Lord or bring his Action of Trespasse For Offices Forfeited by Bargain and Sale or Brocage the Statutes are clear and just To which may be added the Comments of Littletons Estates Conditional as also for Forfeitures of Conditions It is expresly provided by Act of Parliament that no Sheriff or any other Person do take or seize any mans Goods much less may he take his Lands for Treason or Felony until he be duly convicted or Attainted by Trial Confession or Outlawry upon pain to Forfeit double to the party grieved nor is this only in Richard the third but in the first great Charter and before it also as was touched before Among the Saxons none were Outlawed but for Capital crimes we find it often in the Mirror and in such the Out-law might be killed by any that met him as might any man Attainted of Premunire that vast Chaos of confusion till Queen Elizabeths Time I do not find any outlawry below Felony till about the Barons Wars and then it came not below an Action of Forceable Trespass Vi Armis But in the Common Pleas it came to lie upon Account Debt Detinue Covenant and other petty Actions which the Mirrour would pronounce a most great abuse But in Edw the third there was some amends in providing that none should kill an Out-law but a Sheriff only with lawful Authority Yet in inferiour Cases Land Issues might be sequestred in the Kings Hands till Appearance or Reversal Only in Treason and Felony it forfeiteth as much as Attainder by Judgment But it may be Pleades and Reversed divers ways And a Petty Misnomer or a misdate is ground enough to Reverse it by a Writ of Errour And of this the Books are full But Nimin's case is a criticism in Chronology One of the Sheriffs Returns was dated on the 8th of Iuly in the second and third of Phil. and Mary but it was declared there could be no such day but in the 2d and 4th year which was only between the 6th and 25th of Iuly yet this was enough to Reverse an Attainder of Treason by Writ of Errour And in Favour of Life our Law admitteth Pleas to Out-Lawries in Capitals there where in other Cases must be brought a formal Writ of Error I cannot deny but even by the common Law upon Indictment for Treasom or Felony the Goods and Chattels might be Inventored but not seized as Forfeit till Conviction Nor are Lands and Tenements Forfeit till Attainder by Judge And in case of Appeal which related no time that is only Forfeit which is possessed at the Iudgment But upon Indictment dating the crime the Forfeiture will reach to the crime committed although there be Alienation before Judgement But no Forfeiture before Conviction no seizure before Indictment And the Book of Assizes telleth us the Judges took away a Commission from one that under the great Seal had power to arrest and seize on Goods before Indictment And how tender our Law was in this for Estate it may be seen at large in Bracton and Fleta with the old Writ not only in them but in the Register also relating to the great Charter forbidding all Disseisin till Conviction Yet it requireth the Sheriff per visum suum legalium hominem to Apprise and Inventory all the Offenders Chattels but with a double Salvo both for safe keeping them and for this Security was to be given by the Bailiffs or the Township and for maintaining the person in Prison with all his necessary Family Salvo tamen eidem Capto familiae suae necessariae quamdiu fuerit in prisona Rationabili Esto verio suo Which was not only Meat but Cloathing c. as hath often been adjudged in Edward the third Henry the fourth and other Times See the third part of Institutes cap. 103. It will not be long I hope before God stirreth up our Governours to Reform the crying sins of this Kingdom and not only Gaolers in our oppressing grinding Prisons But the Heathen Moralist hath also told us that Divine wheels are also grinding and will grind to powder though they be slow in motion as unwilling to revenge It is true that Prisons should be by Law both safe and strait Custodies nor should they admit such wandring abroad as some mens Mony doth procure But although Recoveries on Record much lesse Discents do not bind men in Prison or conclude them for want of claim yet upon motion Prisoners may and ought to be brought to the Court in Suits or Actions against them in case of Judgement or where ever else they ought to be in person present And for this I may only referre to the Commentator on the continual claim and the Cases by him cited How unwilling our Law was to empair our Liberty was touched before in the Capias on Debt And although some latter Statutes do out-go our Common Law for Imprisonments yet it is still received for a general maxim in Law that Prisons should be Custodiae not Poenae And where ever any man is unjustly in Prison the Law affordeth him more ways of getting out than his Enemies had to get him in He may have an Habeas Corpus and he may have a Writ de Homine Replegiando He may have an Action of False Imprisonment And may found an Action on the Great Charter Or on it may cause his unjust friend to be Endicted And the Writ de Odio Atia was again revived though by Statute once it was forbidden And for these with Bayl by Judges or Justices Replevins by Sheriffs c. We have the Judgement of all the Judges on Articuli Cleri and the Comments on the great
In the Conquest about Investitures K. Henry the first wrote to the Pope that he could not diminish the usual Rights and Dignities of the Crown or Kingdom and that if he should be so Abject as to attempt it his Parliament would not permit it Optimates mei totius Angliae Populus id nullo modo pateretur In the great Moot of Scotlands dependance upon England Edward the First confessed as much to another Pope to whom also the Parliament both Lords and Commons wrote that they they were all obliged by Oath to maintain the Just Rights Liberties Laws and Customs of the Kingdom where we may see their Oath of Allegiance to the Kingdom that nothing should be acted against Them In exheraeditionem Iuris Coronae Regie Dignitatis ac subversionem status ejusdem Regni nec non praejudicium Libertatum Consuetudinum Legum Paternarum These are on the Rolls and printed on the Statute of Merton and in Walsinghams Edward 1. and the Surveigh of Normandy And from other Records of the same King we learn that when the Pope demanded the Grants of K. Iohn he answered That he could not do it without consent of his Parliament Sine Praelatis Proceribus Regni being tyed by his Coronation Oath to keep all the Laws and Rights of the Kingdom Illibati and to do nothing that might touch the Crown without their Consent Which may be added to that before in St. Edwards Laws of the Kings Oath to do all things Ritè per Concilium Procerum Regni When the King of France demanded Homage of K. Edw. the Third he desired Respite till he had the Advice of his Great Council as we may read in Froizard because he could not act without them in such great Affairs And when the Pope demanded Homage of the same King he referred it to Parliament who adjudged and declared that K. Iohns Grants to the Pope were unjust illegal and against his Coronation Oath being done without his Parliaments Assent or Counsel And yet K. Iohn's Charter to the Pope in Matth. Paris doth pretend it done Communi Concilio Baronum And about Stephen Langton the same K. Iohn did write to the Pope that he could not depart from the Liberties of his Crown but would or should defend them to his Death And hence began the Great Excommunication which begot a Confiscation of the Church Revenues hinc ille Lachrymae which could not be stopped till the Crown did stoop to Pandulph which might have excused the poor Hermit Peter from being so cruelly dragged from Corf◠Castle to Warham But when the same King felt his Arms loose he laid about him so that all believed he meant to strike In that Meen the Arch-bishop told him It was against his Oath to raise or make War without the Consent of his Great Court Si absque Iudicio Curiae suae Contra quempiam Bellum moveret to be added to the Militia But the fire was already kindled and the Smoak or Flame brake out at Nottingham I must not touch the Barons Wars except I had leisure to discourse and discuss them freely Only as we found our Great Charters made up of old Laws and Customs so I might now also clear it more that it was not a new Fetter on the King to have some Supervisors set about him for to order all his Actions who by his Coronation Oath was tied to do nothing touching the Kingdom but with Advice and Consent of the Great Council per Concilium per Iudicium Procerum Regni That it was so also among the Britains to all observed before I might add the Old Scottish Custom of choosing Twelve Peers in Parliament to be the Kings Tutors as we may call them for by them the King must be wholly governed Quorum Concilio Rex Regnum gubernare debebat as we may read it in Walsinghams Edward 1. besides their own Chronicles that I say nothing of the Twelve Brittish Peers of which Cambden in Siluribus We need not much wonder at the Writs in K. Iohn's Time requiring all Men of all Conditions to oblige themselves by Oath to maintain the Great Charter and to compel the King thereunto Et quod ipsum Regem pro posse suo per Captionem Castrorum suorum distringerent gravarent ad praefata Omnia Exequenda when as this very Clause was in his Charter Et illi Barones cum Communa totius Terrae distringent gravabat nos modis Omnibus quibus poterunt scilicet per Captionem Castrorum terrarum possessionum aliis modis quibus potuerint donec fuit emendatum secundum Arbitrium eorum Which may be added to that before of our Allegiance or Oath of Fealty to the King with the Kingdom and of the Kings Oath to be guided by the Judgment of his Great Court. Nay as if K. Iohn's Salva persona N. Reginae N. Liberorum N. had been too loose in K. Henry's Charter it was expressed thus Licet Omnibus de Regno N. contra Nos insurgere Nay and to do all things quae gravamen nostrum respiciant ac si nobis in Nullo tenerentur These times seem not to attend our Grand Maxim of State The King can do no wrong or at least they understood it not as some late Courtiers would perswade us Yet it is true he can do nothing but by Law and what he may by Law can do no wrong And if he do against the Law his Personal Acts Commands or Writing do oblige no more than if they were a Childs And the Books call him an Infant in Law though his Politick Capacity be not in Nonage as the Parliament declared in Edward the Sixth which is not to exempt him from Errors or to excuse his Crimes but to shew that he must be guided by his Council and that his own Personal Grants or Commands cannot hurt any more than an Infants which may be reclaimed and recalled by the Council of the Kingdom So the Mirror saith The King cannot grant a Franchise to prejudice his Crown or others because he holds his Right and Dignities but as an Infant Cap. 4. Sect. 22. If I should say The Commons in Parliament are and were the Kingdoms Peers as well as the Lords I might vouch an Old Authority as good as the Ancient Modus of Parliament which doth often call the Commons Peers of Parliament as well as the Lords So debent Auxilia Peti pleno Parliamento in scripto cuilibet graduum Parium Parliamenti oportet quod omnes Pares Parliamenti consentiant duo milites pro Comitatu majorem vocem habent in Concedendo contradicendo quam Major Comes Angliae c. So in doubtful Cases of Peace and War disputetur per Pares Parliamenti and if need be Twenty five shall be chosen de omnibus paribus Regni which are so specified Two Bishops Three Proctors Two Earls Three Barons Five Knights Five Citizens and Five Burgesses And again Omnes Pares
It cannot be expected that I should shew the Original of all Changes or Distempers in this Kingdom It is work enough to shew our first Mould or Constitution yet for this also it cannot be doubted but the Barons Wars and Power might gain upon the Commons more than on the King he had such Bounds before that he could hardly be obliged more or capable of granting much but what was due before to all his People But it might be easie for the Potent Lords to grow upon the Commons in the Name of Barons In that Name I say for I cannot determine but the old Barons being the great Freeholders and the Lords of all the Manors that have left their Names in our Courts Baron had by Law and Reason much more Power than had the Kings Patentees Created Barons by Patent or Writ But this new Creation did but multiply the Iudges or the Kings Councellors for by so taking their Commission from the King they were only as other Judges in Inferiour Courts and so did really lose their great Power of Iudging which was proper only to those who were the Kingdoms Peers and Iudges So that these Lords did justly admit the Commons or rather were admitted by the Commons into the grand Iudicature and it may be that as the Barons did communicate their Power Iudicial so the Commons might communicate their Legislative unto those who had the Name but little of the Nature of the old Barons by Tenure yet by so doing they might bring Confusion or an harsh Discord into Natures Harmony But the main occasion seemed thus the King was tyed by his Coronation Oath to hold keep and defend the just Laws and Customs chosen by the Commons Iustas Leges consuetudines quas vulgus elegerit and this Limitation of Iust seemed to admit of reason or debate so much as might convince the Laws required to be Just for else I know not that the King was ever tyed to them And because he was or might be an Infant he had still a great Council about him to discuss the Laws proposed by the Commons and for this Cause he did and by reason might Summon the Lords or any other Wise and good Man he knew to come and give him Counsel as the Writ speaketh to the Lords and Iudges c. De quibusdam arduis nobiscum tractaturi Concilium impensuri So we find the old Acts passed per Consilium Baronum as we might shew in all Ages And because he used to demurr at Bills till he had the Advice of his great Council hence it may be for more Compendium the Bill was sent up first to the Lords as the Kings Counsellors and if they Counselled him against it then he answered Le Roy s'avisera The King will yet be farther Advised for he did not and I think he could not give a denyal nor of old perhaps Demurred till the Lords advised him against it I dispute not how much the Commons might oblige the Commons without assent of Lords or King Nor have I yet said that in the Coronation Oath the Commons Just Acts are called Laws and to Mould them may be works distinct enough and the plain truth is his Oath is to hold and to keep and to defend the Commons Laws à Tenir Gardir Les Defenderer per se tenendas protegendas as well as to Grant or to Confirm However I do not see either by Reason or Law That the King was so obliged to the Judgment of his own created Lords and there be few or none others left in England that he might not be convinced by the Reason of the Commons either without or against the Lords And beside divers Ordinances without any of the Lords it cannot be denyed but in Divers ages there were Acts of Parliament made without or against all the Lords Spiritual which yet often were the Major part of the Lords House and had as good it may be better Votes as Barons by Tenure than had all the other Lords by Writ and Patent only which might make them Judges or Councellors much rather than Law-makers I should still be far from desiring to obtrude my own Fancies or Opinions upon any least of all to the wrong of others Therefore if any can produce a better Title my Petition is they may be heard and may receive their Just Rights and Priviledges But if this be true which I now only propose and submit to better Thoughts and Judgments then had the Lords of late but a Right Consultative of making Laws And besides all that was said before this seemeth one Reason why our Ancestors did so willingly follow the Vice of Nature in placing the Power Legislative Iudicial and Executive in three distinct Estates as in Animals Aerials Etherials or Celestials three Regions and three Principles in Naturals that so they might be forced to consult often and much in all they did And if this frequent Consultation were retained and observed still it might not only occasion good Reviews but also prevent That which to the Common-wealth I fear and not Alone to private Persons may be sometimes prejudicial in a sudden Vote or Act of one House or one Body and yet one may be better much than Many if they be not good It must be granted that in Bodies of the Best Complexion and Composure here below there may be such Distemper and such Gangrene in some Members that it may be more than fit to cut it off Nay what was best may come to be the worst in Putrefaction That it may be meer Necessity to bury it although it were as Dear as Sarah was to Abraham or set on high by him that raised up the Brazen Serpent which see e're long lye buryed with this Epitaph Nehushtan And to all that is truly Just the Commons of England will not need to plead a bare Necessity for by Law and Reason too it may be said and proved I believe That both the King himself who chooseth by his Writ and All the Lords by several Votes have left the Legislative power so to the House of Commons that they had a Legal Right to do what all the Kingdom and Common-wealth of England Justly could But They are Men and therefore may be much unjust Nay where the Thing they do is Iust They may be much or most unjust I have neither Calling nor Ability to Judge them Nor may I act with force against them for whate're I think Unjust No not if I should think they did Usurp the Crown For if the Law Reports and Books deceive me not it hath been Judged Treason and so is for Private Men to rise conspire or Levy War against one that Usurps the Crown and Rights thereof except it rightly were declared Usurpation or that others should or might oppose him that did so Usurp Of which the Reasons may be Great and obvious Let me then suppose any one Man of all the Commons in Parliament for I will not
Beasts which in Ezechiel's Mircavah the Jews will have to be the Emblems of the four great Monarchies in Daniel even these four Beasts and the Elders of Presbyters with all the Angels of Heaven and all the Creatures of Heaven and Earth and of the Sea and under the Earth how long or how far this may reach I know not all shall fall down about the Throne giving Honour and Blessing and Praise to him that sitteth on the Throne and to the Lamb for ever and ever And the four Beasts again in special say Amen There is much spoken of a Personal Reign of Christ upon Earth I do not affirm it yet I believe there is more much more for it then I have yet seen in any of the many Writers on Daniel or the Revelation And beside the Judgment of so many if not all the Orthodox in Iustin Martyr's time there be some very antient almost Apostles that relate how our Saviour himself discoursed of this Kingdom which the Acts do but Intimate But for my part I do acknowledg my self to be so ambitious as to expect somewhat much higher and better then his bodily Presence which yet I long for as the Captive hasteth to be loosed But this would please or profit little without Life and Power and Real Light above our Doubts Disputes or Demonstrations Nor would this much profit man or please God I think without true Love proportionate to such a Light The first Paradice had one River parted into four Streams and one Tree of Knowledg but of Evil rather than Good The new Paradice shall have many Rivers of Knowledg to cover the Earth and many Trees of Knowledg also whose very Leaves shall heal the Nations what then shall their Fruit be but Resurrection from the Dead I see so much of this vain World that I cannot but earnestly desire and long for a new Earth and for new Heavens but yet I should not value or desire them much were it not that in these I hope to see more Iustice and more Mercy Is not that the World to come of which the Hebrews and our Saviour speak as pardoning all but one Sin The Phrase is common with the Jews who do expect it on Earth and the Prophets make it a pardoning World to come so that the Inhabitants shall not say they are Sick for their Iniquities shall be forgiven I must confess my Hope is that he that bid us still forgive so much that we might be like our Father meaneth himself to forgive very much being himself the Founder and great Patron of that great Order of Christians whose Badg is this Conquer thy self and others Evil by doing Good Elijah must level his Way and many if not all the Antients thought Elijah yet to come which our Saviour also seemeth to intimate with that at his Transfiguration And the Jews repeat the Verse of the Prophet Malachi which seemeth also to speak of two Days and all Elijah's Work was hardly fulfilled at Christ's first Coming However when that Levelling is over and past the Lamb shall come of another Spirit For the Son of Man came not to destroy but save He is the Prince of Peace And when he shall come to Conquer He will come on a White Horse and shall ride on Prospering because of Meekness with Truth and Righteousness He will have Mercy and not Sacrifice and that will please him more than all burnt Offerings He will make our Officers Peace and our Exactors Righteousness For Violence shall be no more But a King shall Rule in Judgment and a Man shall be an hiding Place from Storm and Tempest I will hear what the Lord God will speak For he will speak Peace as well as Truth to his People and to his Saints that they may no more return to Folly or have Cause to Blush Mercy and Truth shall meet together Righteousness and Peace shall kiss each other Truth shall spring out of the Earth but Mercy this the Jews called Righteousness shall come down from Heaven for the Kingdom of God confisteth in Peace and Ioy as well as Righteousness For the Fruit of Righteousness is Peace and Assurance for ever being sown in Peace of them that make Peace Such is the Wisdom from above and such are the Fruits of the Holy Spirit What shall we say then to the Messenger of the Nation or to the Angel spoyling Edom and Babylon What That the Lord hath founded Sion and the Poor of his People shall trust in it He will leave an afflicted poor People and they shall trust in the Name of the Lord and then will he give them a pure Language that they may all call upon him with one Consent Thou hast indeed smitten Edom and Babylon Let not thine Heart lift thee up for why wilt thou meddle to thine own Ruine that thou shouldest also fall thou and all Juda with thee Shall the Sword devour for ever Knowest thou not that it will be Bitterness in the latter end How long shall it be then ere thou bid the People return from persuing their Brethren Again and yet again I bow my Soul and Pray and humbly Beg That all may be both Iust and Iustly done Not with Justice only but with Pitty and great Compassion and much Mercy for in many things we fail all I say that the Commons also failed to the Common-wealth But to speak freely altho I will not Judg the Commons yet I cannot Justifie that House but I must also Condemn what was lately done to them also even to the House of Commons by that Army which hath often been acknowledged to have both served and saved them from Ruine or Slavery I desire not to dispute matter of Fact nor can I Judg it It is true that by express Law besides all of Reason and Nature there should be no Force of Arms near or so much as in appearance of overawing the Parliament and I looked on it as an heavy Charge on some that perswaded the Scots or the Northern Army to look as if they would have moved towards the City and Parliament against its Will Nor can we forget it was so late that the House voted it Treason to act by Command of Parliament under a visible Force But how shall wee know or discern this visible Force They may be Free under that which I may think a Force and therefore I must believe them to be Free unless they declare themselves to be Forced For by Judging what is the Priviledg of Parliament I may certainly break their Priviledg while I inveigh against others for so doing and by this incur the Danger of those that Judg before the time or out of Place for I suppose I see 100 of the Commons seized and secured I cannot Judg it a Breach of Priviledg because I know not but it might be done by the Command Order or Consent of Parliament till it declare the contrary Or if not by Order of Parliament yet it may be by some
quo Lanfrancus diratiocinatur and the conclusion that he was to hold his Lands and Customs by Sea and Land as free as the King held his ezcept in three things si regalis via fuerit effossa arbor incisa juxta super eam ceciderit si homicidium factum sanguis in ea fusus fuerit Regi dabit alioquin liber a Regis exactoribus In the same Author were read of a Great Counsel at London in that Normans Reign and of another at Glocester where the Arch Bishop of York jubente Rege et Lanfranco consentiente did consecrate William Bishop of Durham having no help adjunctorium from the Scottish Bishops subject to him which may be added to that before of Scotland belonging to the Province or Diocesse of York Nor can I abstain from the next paragraph in the same Author how Lanfranc did consecrate Donate a Monk of Canterbury ad Regnum Dubliniae at the Request of the King Clergy and people of Ireland Petente Rege clero populo Hiberniae which with divers others might be one Argument for the Antiquity of Irish Parliments and their dependance on England long before King Henry the Second For which I might also cite King Edgars Charters Oswalds Law and divers Historians of his times But the Charters mention Dublin it self and yet our Lawyers are so Courteous as to free Ireland from our Laws and Customs till towards the end of King Iohn and some of them conjecture that the Brehon Law came in again and that our Parliament obliged them not till Poynings Law in Henry the seventh But to return to our Norman King I need not beg proofs of Parliaments in his time at least not to those who know the Priviledge of antient Demesne which therefore is free from sending to Parliaments and from Knights Charges and Taxes of Parliament because it was in the Crowns not only in King William but before him in King Edward and the Rolls of Winchester for which the old Books are very clear with divers Records of Edward the third and Henry the fourth besides natura brevium That I say nothing of the old Tractat. de antiquo Dominico which is stiled a Statute among our English Statutes And besides all the late Reports or Records I find it in the Year Books of Edward the Third that he sued a Writ of Contempt against the Bishop of Norwich for encroaching on Edmondsbury against express Act of Parliament By King William the Conqueror and by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and all the other Bishops Counts and Barons of England It is 21 of Ed. 3. Mich. fol. 60. Title 7. Contempt against an Act of Parliament This might well be one of the reasons why the great Judge giveth so much credit to the old Modus of Parliament as it was held in the time of King Edward the Confessor which as the antient copy saith was by the discreet men of the Kingdom recited before King William the Norman and by him approved and in his time used I have cited it before and compared it with Irish Modus which my much honoured friend Mr. Hackewil one of the Masters of Chancery hath under his hand attested from the Great Seal and Charter of Henry the fourth which himself hath seen reciting a former Charter of King Henry R. Angliae Hiberniae conquestor Dominus who sent the same Modus into Ireland Where himself or his Son Iohn sans terre had no great work to reduce them to the civility of Parliaments To which they had been long before accustomed and the Roll saith communi omnium de Hibernia consensu teneri statuit c. nor doth the division of the Irish-Shires seem so lately setled as some have thought although I may not dissent from the great Patron of Civill and Ecclesiastical Learning the late Primate of Ireland Touching that Irish Modus I have very little to add to the fourth part of the great Institutes in several places I shall now only observe that both these old Modi of Parliaments do agree in this Custom of the Kingdom that the King should require no Ayd but in full Parliament and in Writing to be delivered to each in degree Parliament And both they agree that every new difficult case of Peace and any war emergent within or without the Kingdom vel Guerre emergat in Regno vel extra ought to be written down in full Parliaments and therein to be debated which may be considered by all that will argue the Militia To which also we may add one clause of the Jewish Laws of their great Sanhedrim to whom they retain the power of Peace and War especially where it is Arbitrary and not meerly defensive in which the Law of nature maketh many Magistrates and this might with ease be confirmed from the Laws and Customs of all Civil Kingdoms in all ages But I must not wander from our English Laws I had almost forgotten that which should be well remembred Although many would perswade us to seek our Laws in the Custumier of Normandy it is not only affirmed in the Great Reports but also asserted by Guil de Rovell Alenconien and proved by divers Arguments in his Commentaries on that Grand Custumier that the Normans had their chief Laws from Hence As had also the Danes in the time of Canute for which we might have more proof and witness than the Abbot of Crowland So much even strangers did Love and Honour old English Laws Of King William the Second Sirnamed Rufus I shall speak but little for I must discuss his Election and Coronation Oath in a fitter place Some footsteps we find of his Parliaments in divers Wigornensis and Hoveden tell us that when he would have constrained the Scottish King ut secundum judicium Baronum suorum in curia sua Rectitudinem ei faceret Malcolm did refuse to do it but in the Confines or Marches Where he could not deny but the Kings of Scotland were accustomed rectitudinem facere regibus Angliae But he then said it ought to be by the Iudgement of the Parliaments of both Kingdoms secundum judicium utriusque Regni primatum And I find the like Record cited on Fortescue from Godfrey of Malmsbury But Huntingdon and Matthew Paris also relate that the same King Malcolm did submit both to do Homage and to swear Fealty to our English King and Paris addetth a pretty Story of King Malcolms overlooking Treason But again to King William Of his Errors in Government I shall only say that if Edom did really signified Red as hath been thought I could believe that all Historians speaking of Adamites then oppressing the People might allude to the near affinity between Edom and Rufus for Red. For this was his Sirname of King William the Second Henry the First is yet alive in his Laws and Charters Not only in Wendover with other Historians but among the Rolls and Records yet to be seen in the Exchequer They are now in Print
ab omnibus approbetur Which is one clause in the Writ of Summons to Parliament about a War with France in Edward the First Which seemeth to speak a necessity of Parliaments for matters of War Not only for Money as some have pleased to speak or at the Kings choice to call them if he please The Writ speaks an Act of Parliament Lex justissima provida circumspectione stabilita not let at loose to the Kings pleasure but as Fortescue or long before him the old Modus of Parliament maketh it necessary for the King and his Duty to Call a Parliament in all such Cases Nor shall I need to add what Paulus Iovius Froisard Comineus de Serres and the Duke of Rohan with many other strangers have observed of our Parliaments in this which is the Law of Nature rather than of England For as in the Heavens or great World we did before observe Mars or the Genius of War to be there placed immediately under Iupiter the great Councel and not under the Sun So in the Microcosm or little World of Man we find both Spleen and Gall within Hands and Feet without at a good distance from the Head and never joyned to it but in Monsters Yet it is true that some Creatures have Horns on their Heads but they are Beasts and not Men. Much less Kings I hope But did we Labour Toyl and Sweat so much to keep a little River in its bounds that so we might be drowned by the boundless Ocean Or be swept away at once by a destroying and devouring Deluge Did we scruple at a little Gravel or a Pebble that we might be crushed by a Mountain Would we strain at a Gnat that we might be choaked by a Camel or be swallowed whole by Behemoth It may not be at least it may not seem enough to quiet trembling minds to say or prove by arguments there shall be nothing done but what is just except we also see or know the way and means and usual course our Governours will please to take in doing that which may or is and ever shall I hope be just The way must be both Right and Clear as well as is the End And of the two Unjust and Arbitrary Power doth seem to be in Processe or in ways and means much rather than in Ends or Things that be effected by it Sure it was at least it might be good to build a gallant Fleet of Ships and so it might be just that each should contribute a part to such a publick work Nor was it only that which then was taken from us for a Ship that made us sigh and groan and cry or fear our Ruine or a universal deluge of Oppression But it much or mainly was we did not see the way or mean or Legal Process which the Court did take in Taxing or Assessing such a Place a County or a Person And it was but thus in Loans and so in divers if not all the things we so abhorred in the Crown the thing did not so much displease as did the way or means to such or such an End I need not say how curious or how scrupulous and tender still our Laws have been in pointing out the Way as well as End the Process in the Courts of Justice as the Final Iudgements So that indeed the very Form and Life and Power or Substance of the justest Laws doth much consist in Processe which by some may be thought a shadow or a Ceremony left at pleasure for a blustring Wind or any furious hand to shake as much as long as it shall please And then to salve it up by saying to the Root We mean you Good and do but lay you bare that so you may the more behold and more admire our Iustice in the End when all the Boughs and Branches shall be gone that do but hinder all your Prospect I must but Touch and glance There is a Trinity which all our Laws do seem to Worship here on Earth Estate Liberty and Life Of all Estate the Dower of Widows hath the greatest priviledge For which the Comments upon Littletons first and fifth with the Statutes of Merton and some clauses of the great Charter it self for Quarentine and Dower are good glosses on the Saxon Laws or those already touched and I shall not add one syllable All Estates have priviledge in Law and all Amercements must be such as may consist with mens Estate from Alfred Edgar Ethelred Canute or Edward it did come to Henry the first and thence to the Great Charter Where the Law is plain and clear No Free man shall be Amerced but according to his Default and Estate Salvo sibi Contenemento suo Which is so branched that it reacheth to Villains also though it speak at first but of Free-men Hence the Name of Amercement because it was and ought to be an Amerciament or a merciful Fine In which the Saxons went beyond us in their Weregylds and Divers Wytes for which Fleta may be a Comment to the Laws of Ethelstane and others of the Saxons All this for End but what must be the Way How shall it be imposed so that it may as it should be merciful 'T is miserecordiu Regis as the Laws and Books do speak but the King doth not may not Fine or Amerce any but in and by his Courts of Justice So that to render ones self to the Kings Judgment is to no effect and so adjudged For as the Father judgeth no man so the King who is or should be Father of the Country but he hath committed all judgment unto Men that are our Fellows Pares in the Courts of Justice VVhere indeed the King did sometime sit in Person yet the Court did Judge and not the King as Fortescue doth plainly tell us And the Judgment still is entred from and by the Court and not the King Ideo consideratum est per Curiam And so the great Charter saith we will not go upon him nec ibimus nec mittemus but by Legal Judgment of his Peers vel per Legem Terrae and of this last clause I never saw a fuller Comment in a few words than in Mr. Seldens Notes on Attaint in Fortescue But of all Iudgments to be made by Peers somewhat was said before in Henries Laws and more again ere long And for Fines by Courts of Justice not by the King and Amerciaments by Peers besides the Comments on Magna Charta there are divers Book Oases cited from Henry the fourth Henry the sixth Richard the third in the fourth part of Institutes Kings Bench To which may be added Greislies Case in the eighth part of Reports And the first of Westminster doth add to the great Charter or at least explain it in this But the Mirror will tell us it was an abuse not to expound it so largely before And although the VVrit de moderata misericordia in the Register and N. B. be founded on the Statute yet it seemeth clearly but
in affirmance of the Common Law As appeareth not only by Bracton and Fleta but by Glanvil who did write before the Charter and by all the Saxon Laws which were the samplers to King Henry the first But how tender our Law hath always been in matters that concern Estate or Liberty may well appear by all the Executions grantable for Debt or Dammages The Merchant and the Staple Statutes are and were by Statute not by Common Law They seem as sweeping Rain and Storms that drive away the Body Goods and Lands in Fee at time of Recognition or accrewing since but none in Tail but during life of him that was the Cognisor Nor Copyhold or Goods or Leases for a Term of years but only what was in possession at the Execution done They are fore-known and therefore may be well avoided by all such as do not choose their own destructions And there is a tender care in Law not only of exact and punctual Recognitions and recording of them but in case of forfeit upon a Certiorari sued forth from the Chancery and not before return thereof a Capias shall be granted on the Statute Merchant for the Body only if it be a Laic and if Laic be not found and so returned into the Kings Bench or Common Pleas then on pauze of divers months the exigent may be awarded But in Statute Staple on the first Return of Certiorari may the Execution issue forth returnable into the Petty Bag of all it seems the worst in this But the Merchants Court Aequitatem summam desiderat although a kind of Peepoudres as Bracton and the Notes on Fortescue Upon a Recognizance a Capias doth not go before a Scire Facias be Returned into the Chancery Then a Capias or a Fieri Facias or an Elegit at the choyce of Cognisee as in other Common Judgements And of these the fieri facias is the mildest and the oldest by the Common Law It toucheth Goods and Chattels only such as are the Parties Own not lent by or Leased to another For although the Sheriff find them in the Parties Use and full Possession as he thinks yet may he be a Trespasser in taking such and so may run the hazard of an Action ere he be aware Nor did the old Levari facias seize the Land but Corn or that which grew thereon An Elegit hath its Name from his Election or his Choice that sues it out Who so concludes himself from other Executions This did come by Statute not by Common Law and toucheth Half the Fee and all the Goods but yet with Salvo to Contenement he must not lose his Oxen or his Cattle for his Plough For then he cannot live and keep his Family So Tender is our Law for all Estates and Livelihood Nay this Extent must not be made by Sheriffs who may not divide a right but by a Iury of Inquest And so must be Returned and preserved on Record as the first Capias with all mean Processe must or else it shall be nothing worth as may appear at large in the fourth and fifth parts of the great Reports Hoes and Fulwood with divers other Cases And the second of Westminster that giveth this Elegit doth require both Extent of Lands and prize of Goods to be Reasonable that is by Inquest of Twelve and so returned of Record As is cleared in the Commentator See also Littletons Parceners A Capias ad Satisfaciendum taketh the Body but it is by Statute only for it did not lye by Common Law in Debt or Dammages but only where the Original Action was for Forceable Trespass Vi Armis Which is Now crept into every Trespass But of this Sir William Herberts Case in the third part of Reports It may be forbidden again by Statute as it was first granted and that justly too for ought I know if other course be taken for the payment of Just and Reasonable Debts For the Capias as now managed is a great mischief and divers times to the utter ruine of the Debttors whole Family And yet but very little advantage to the Creditor except the Debtor escape and so the Sheriff come to pay the Debt or except he dye in Prison and the Plaintiff get an Elegit for the Debtors Goods at his death or half his Fee-Simple which he had at the time of Judgement or after it For an Action for Debt or Dammages doth but respect the Person and the Law attendeth not what Lands were enjoyed at the Original or before the Judgment But an Action brought against an Heir may aim at Land and so may charge it although he Aliene while the suit dependeth Neither shall I need to add that all these Executions must be sued out For this is required by Law except in the Kings Case within one year and a day after Judgment Yet they may be continued after and by a scire facias be renewd or repealed till the Judgment have Full Execution But this was also given by Statute and to this may the Debter plead although he cannot plead against an Execution Yet it may be suspended by a Writ of Errour and Recognizance according to the Statute of Iames and 3 Caroli And without a Writ of Error after judgement if the Defendant have matter to discharge him of the Execution still the Law is open for him And he may relieve himself by a Writ of Audita Querela And in case of Elegit as soon as the Debt is satisfied the Debtor may enter on his Lands again and if he conceive the Creditor satisfied by casual profits he may bring a scire facias upon which the Creditor may clear how much he hath received of the Debtor's Estate Unto this occasional discourse I shall only add that grand maxime of our Law that Executions ought to be more favourable than any other Process of Law whatever Of which the great Judge upon Littletons Releases and the second of Westminster in Edward the First And for Executions for the Kings Debt's restrained by the great Charter I have little to add to the Comment on the eight chapter of that Charter But the twelfth of Articuli super Chartas hath afforded a Writ commanding the Sheriff to accept of Sureties else an Attachment lieth against him or the party may bring an Action against the Shetiff that refuseth Sureties It is a maxime in Law that a mans House is his Castle so that the Sheriff cannot break it open for an Execution But upon a Writ of Seisin or Possession the Sheriff and other Officers upon suspicion of Treason or Felony may break open an House and so also in common Executions where the King is a party But in all such Cases first the Sheriff must request the door to be opened And the First of Westminster doth also require solemn demand of Beasts driven away into a Castle or Fort which is a kind of vetitum nomium which may be regained By Withernam Which Case I cite the rather because of
men Trustees to the whole Kingdom and Neighbours to the Fact or Party or both To which also there must be a legal proof by lawful Witnesses or else the Charge will not suffice And in such Indictments from the Commons the Lords are the Tryers and the King may seem as the Iudg but in other Courts also the Judgment goeth of course upon the Verdict and must be entred per Curiam as adjudged by the Court although there be but one Judge or tho' his Mouth pronounce not the Sentence But we are not yet come to debate the King's Consent to the Lords Judgment an Indictment from the Commons It is also to me very considerable how the House of Commons could or ever did Indict I cannot deny them to have been a Court and a Court of Record although some have seemed to question it and their Records are not so ancient as some others But I have not fully understood how they ever did make or receive a Formal Legal Indictment when as they did not give a single Oath much less Empannel a Iury or Enquest Yet some there be that without a Writt or any written Commission did and might do this Virtute Officii But they be known chosen sworn Officers of the Kingdom for such Purposes as the Peeples Bayliffs Coroners Sheriffs Escheators and some Officers about the Forest who by the Common Law did Summon and Empannel Juries But so did not the House of Commons How then did they Indict Of all Crimes committed in the House they are and were so much the sole Iudges that they seldom use to complain much less to Indict any other And for any thing done abroad I hope they do not use to take Rumours and Reports though from their own Members to be sufficient for or equivalent to a legal Indictment on Oath Seeing their scarce is or can be any Case so notorious but it may be pleaded unto by somewhat of Law or Necessity And although I should yield the Commons to be the Masters of the Law in making it yet they pleased to allow others to be Iudges in their Laws And if they reassume this also yet it may be more easie to judge of some Law than of any Fact at least as it may be cloathed so as a curious search or Enquest may be requisite to lay it clear and naked Neither can I see how it may be necessary to proceed against any by force or illegal Process when it is easie as well as just to go rightly as to do right For who can imagine a Case so dark and intricate but it may be contrived so that particular men may be Accusers and others Witnesses with a clear and real distinction between Indictors Tryers and Iudges most of all in Cases notorious and evident For in such there may be less fear of the Iuries Verdict against Evidence or of the Iudges Sentence against the Verdict Or if this should happen in a Tryal is there not a most heavy doom appointed by Law for all Iurors that forswear themselves and goe against their Evidence Is there not a clear way of Relief by Writ of Attaint Is it not worse than Death to forfeit all Estate and be thrown into Prison while both Wife and Children must be turned out of Doors and All For his House must be pulled down his Ground be plowed up and his Trees rooted out with loss of Franchise and with a perpetual Brand of Villany This is the Common Law for a perjured Iuror and that also in Petty Cases how much more might it be just in Case of Life and Death And for Corrupt Iudges our Law is very severe altho' we have much lost the Custom of the Grand Eyres in this also King Alfred be long since dead who hanged 30 or 40 more unjust Judges than Cambyses flead And for that the Mirror may be a good Comment on some Passages in Alfred's Life by Asser And if it be true that Horn lived to the end of K. Edward it is much wonder that on such occasion he did not also mention some of those Judges by him so punished when there was scarce any left but good Iohn of Mettingham and Elias of Bechingham And of this the Dissertations of Fleta may be added to all before as that of Sir William Thorp and the Great Judg in the third Part of Institutes about corrupt Iudges and the Iudge's Oath It is very considerable how curious the Iews were in Creating or rather Ordaining of Judges For indeed the Phrase of Ordination seemed to be first raised from Them For which I have little to add to Mr. Selden on the Eutychian or Alexandrian Antiquities as old as St. Mark the Evangelist Nor can it be denied but the Jewish Judges and Magistrates had a very good Right and so used as we find in the Books of Moses and the Kings and Tirshatha's to Read and Expound the Law Moral as well as Iudicial Nay in this they seemed to have some advantage of the Priests or Levites that had work enough most times in that which was but Ceremonial This may Expound those Pieces of Scripture Old and New where we find some explaining Scripture being neither Priests nor of the Tribe of Levi. And the Iews Punishments of evil Judges are severe and most remarkable nay where all others were again restored to their Offices after Corporal Punishment their Lord Chief Iustice or President of their Sanhedrim or any Chief Iustice could never be restored again after such punishment no not to be as one of his inferour Colleagues So just he ought to be and circumspect by daily experience added to his own wisdom Our Laws are so just and so good in themselves that there could not be be so much cause of complaints in all our Gates for such were the Iews Courts of Iustice if our Judges were such as they should and might be And yet I cannot deny but that there be very great abuses among the Lawyers and Attorneys or Solicitors but if the Judges were as just and wise as they may be inferiour Officers would soon amend or comply for Love or Fear so much as would prevent Complaints and many of their Causes But it is the work of a God and not of a Man to reform abuses in all Courts of Justice Hercules did never cleanse so great so foul a Stable or a Stall yet in this also a wise and just Parliament will do much and will need none of my help or advice How tender all should Delegates be in making Delegates But in nothing should they be more tender or more circumspect then in this of making Judges For in these of all Delegates our law is most scrupulous Before the Statute of Merton those that held by suit Service were bound to appear in Person because the Suitors were Judges in causes not their own but by that Statute they had power given to make Attorneys but it was only ad Sectas faciendas to make or follow
in Parliament Which was the Receiving of Petitions As the Rolls of most times witness It being the old Mode and others accounted it somewhat against Reason that Petitions should be taken and brought into the House by those that were to debate and determine them and so might at pleasure keep them Out or too hastily might press them in Whereas they were to be filled up in course and so to be debated as they were received which was therefore entrusted to the care of known and sworn Officers of the Kingdom Although of late their work in Parliament be so strangely degenerate from that it was of old when also beside Receivers there were some appointed for Tryers of Petitions who as it seemeth were to enquire of matter of Fact expressed in the Petition that it might be cleared and rightly stated before it came to be debated in full Parliament I do not deny but these Triers of Petitions were most frequently some of the Bishops and other Barons But by this I am not convinced that the Lords had by Right and Legislative Power or were the sole Determinors of all Petitions as some would infer or that they were the sole Judges except also the Petty Jury that are Tryers of Fact shall be esteemed the sole Judges of Matters of Law And yet I shall not deny but Petitions concerning abuses or errors in Judicature were often deermined by the Lords as the great Judges but of error in the King's Bench as Judges above the King as was shewed before or from the Exchequer In Queen Ellzabeths Time for the seldom meeting or great Affairs of Parliament the Writs of Error from the King's Bench were by special Act of Parliament to be brought before the Judges of the Common Pleas and Barons of the Exchequer and by them to be determined But with these express Limitations as the Law shall require other than for Errors to be assigned or found for or concerning the Iurisdiction of the said Court of Kings Bench or for want of form in any Writ Process Verdict c. and that after all the Records and all concerning them be remanded to the King's Bench as well for execution as otherwise as shall appertain and with this express Proviso That any Party agrieved by such Iudgment in the Exchequer shall and may sue in Parliament for a further and due Examination By which I do not see such Parties agreed were absolutely tied to Petition the Lords onely although it were onely in a Case judicial Yet I deny not but in Edward the 3d. there was a Committee made of a Bishop two Earls and two Barons to hear and determine all Petitions complaining of Delays or Grievances in Courts of Justice But with great Limitations so that they must send for the Records and Judges which were to to be present and be heard and then by good advice of the Chancellor Treasurer Judges and other of the Council to make an Accord yet so that all be remanded to the Judges before whom the Cause did first depend who were then to proceed to Judgment according to the Accord of the said Committee And in Case it seemed to them to be such as might not well be determined but in full Parliament that then the said Records or Tenors should be brought by the said Commitee to the next Parliament it being the Common Law of the Kingdom and so expressed in all the old Books that all new unwonted difficult matters of consequence should still be brought and submitted to the Judgment of full Parliament so that all our Iudges did and ought to respit such Causes till the next Parliament of which there be almost innumerable Precedents in all the Rolls Nay in Richard the 2d there was a Committee of Lords and Commons appointed to hear and determine all Petitions present in that Parliament But afterwards it was adjudged and declared That such a Commission ought not to be given committing or betraying the High Power of Parliament into a few private hands as we may learn out of Henry the 4th beside other times Yet the Modi of Parliament admit that some extraordinary Cases where the Estates could not agree or the greater part of the Knights Proctors Citizens c. There by consent of the whole Parliament the Matter might be compromised to 25. chosen out of all Degrees and to fewer till at length it might come to 3. who might determine the Case except that being written it were corrected by Assent of Parliament and not otherwise And this seemeth to be the Law of Nature and right Reason That Delegates should not delegate others which was one reason why the Commons never made Pracies as the Lords did Nor might any Committee so determine but there might be Appeal from it to the Parliament Nor doth the Parliament it Self conclude so but that there may be Appeal from its self to its self even to its Iustice if it erre or at least to its mercy by some motion or Petition In one Parliament of Richard the 2d it was Enacted that no man condemned by Parliament should move for Pardon but another Parliament 10 years after did annul this Branch as unjust unreasonable and against the Law and Custom of Parliament For from this which is the highest here there still lieth Appeal from its Self to its Self For which also by the Laws and Customs of the Kingdom there were to be frequent Parliaments that so the errors or omissions of one being still human and therefore errable might be corrected and amended in another By express Statutes of Edw. the 3d. we are to have Parliaments once every year and oftner if need be They were of Old three or four times a year as may be found in all the Old Historians speaking of the great Feats in the Militia in King Alfred's Time they were to be twice a year and that at London as the Mirror affirmeth which we compared with the Laws of the Confessor And I speak also of King Edgars and Canutes Laws for the Celeberrimus Conventus ex qualibet Satrapta which the Great Iudg applieth to the Parliament Eternity it self would be a Burthen unto him that is not pleased with his Being so would Omnipotence to him that is unhappy in his acting It was therefore goodness in God to limit man as well in Doing as in Being It was also the Wisdom of our Ancestors to bound and limit out the Being Acting and continuing not onely of other Judges but also of Parliaments Yet the Old Modi of Parliament agree in this That a Parliament should not be Dissolved till all Petitions were discussed and answered and that after all there should be Proclamation made in some open place whether any had a Petition or just Address to the Parliament and if none replied then it was to be Dissolved I need not shew the Care of our Ancestors or former Parliaments for most strict observation of their own good Orders and Customs of Parliament which are such so just and reasonable that they well deserve a peculiar Discourse by themselves and suppose it not impossible to clear them more by the practice and consent of most Ages in this Kingdom which might also be useful for the Times to come And although it might be possible to find some of their old custome fit to be changed yet my hope is they will retain and observe such Rules of right Reason good Orders and Customs as may still make this an Happy Nation and that they will be mindful of their great Trust for which they are accountable And however it may be in this World yet they also must be judged at his coming who shall bring every Work into Iudgment with every secret Thing whether it be good or whether it be evil And I am not ashamed both to long and pray for his coming who is King of Kings and Lord of Lords The Prince of Salem that is Peace as well as King of Righteousness Melchizedek the Lamb upon the white Thone All the Creation groaneth and the Spirit and the Bride saith come Lord Iesus come quickly FINIS