of false imprisonment because that he is Iudge of the Cause 14 H. 8. 16. Factum a Judice quod ad ejus officium non pertinet ratum non est Reg. I. C. Coke l. 10. f. 76. b. Judicium a non suo Judice datum nullius est momenti An act done by a Iudge which doth not appertain to his Office is not allowed and a Judgment given by him is not his proper Iudge is of no weight nor moment As if the Sheriff who is prescribed by the Law to hold his Turn within a month after Michaelmas holdeth his Turn after the moneth and taketh an Indictment of robbery at the same Turn and the Indictment is by a Certiorari removed into the Kings Bench by advice of all the Iustices the party so indicted was discharged because the Indictment was utterly void coram non judice because at that time the Sheriff had no authority to hold it And if a man have a Leet which is holden at a day certain if he hold it another day such Court so holden is void and without Warrant but it is otherwise of a Court Baron Coke ibidem but if the Court of Common Bench holdeth plea without an Originall it is not void for they are Iudges of those pleas and it cannot be said that the proceeding is coram non judice 19 E. 4. 8. Iudgment in the Marshalsey when none of the parties be of the houshold of the King may be avoided by plea without any Writ of Error which proveth that it is void 6 N. 2. So in Trespass before the Marshall if none of the parties be of the houshold of the King it is coram non judice because they passe their power 29 E. 4. 16. If one of the Queens houshold sue another of the same houshold and the Plaintiff is put out of service the plea depending the other may shew this and abate the Writ but otherwise it is if the Defendant be put out of service Lib. de divers des Courts f. 102. b. And if a man be impleaded in the common place for lands within the Cinque-ports the Tenant may shew to the Court that the land is within the Cinque-ports and by this plea the Court shall be outed of iurisdiction but if the Tenant doth plead in bar which is found against him and the Demandant haue judgment to recover the land tâ— is judgment shall bind the Tenant for ever Ib. 107. b And so it is of land in ancient Demesne if a Writ be brought for them in the common place if the Tenant appear and plead the bar and taketh no exception to the jurisdiction and the plea is found against him so that the Demandant recovereth he shall not reverse this by a Writ of Error because he might have taken exception to the jurisdiction of the Court and that should have been allowed ibidem But the Lord may reverse this judgment by a Writ of Deceit and make the land ancient Demesne as it was before If a man devise to one lands devisable the Devisee cannot sue for these lands in the Ecclesiasticall Court but if he make a devise of goods and chattles reall as a terme of years or of a ward he may for such sue in that Court F. N. B. f. 43. b. Jurisdictio est potestas de publico introducta cum necessitate juris dicendi Coke l. 10 f. 73. Iurisdiction is a power introduced by the publick for the necessity of decreeing and doing right The Iurisdiction of the Court of the Marshally was first instituted for the necessity of the rule and governance of the Servants of the Kings house-hold and therefore was it anciently stiled placita corona aulae hospitiâ— domini regis the Pleas of the Court of the house-hold of the Lord the King by which words it is proved that the one or the other party ought at the least to be of the house-hold of the King for how can these words stand when neither of the parties be of the house-hold of the King and that is the reason that it is not necessary in suites before the Steward and Marshall to alledge that the Plaintiff or Defendant were of the house-hold of of the King for the stile of the Court doth the same imply ibidem So the jurisdiction of the Court of Py-powders was introduced for the necessity of doing right in suits and matters concerning Markets and as that Court hath not jurisdiction but for things concerning the Market so hath it not Iurisdiction for matters concerning the Market unlesse they be done in the same Market M. 42. 42. Eliz in B. R. Hall brought a Writ of Error against Jones of a judgement given in the Court of Py-powders of the Market c. for Jones one of the Registers of the Bishop of Gloucester because Hall had published slanderous words of him c. and the judgement was reversed for two errors because those words did not concerne any matter concerning the Market and therefore the Court had no jurisdiction of it but if one slander any that shall come into the Market in any thing which concerneth his trade an Action well lyeth against hims and 2. it appeareth in the count that the words were spoken before the Market and not in it for the Court hath onely jurisdiction of those things which are done and said in the Market ibidem a. b. Where there is no colour to hold Plea as in a Court Baron of Land not holden of a mannor all is void but where there is colour to hold Plea though it be by plaint where it should be by originall yet the Iudgement rendred is onely voidable by a Writ of Error ibidem Non pertinet ad judicem secularem cognoscere de ijs quae sunt spiritualibus annexa Bract. l. 5. c. 2. It doth not appertaine to the secular Iudge to take cognizance of those things which are annexed to spirituall things And therefore the branches of Trees which are priviledged from Tithes shall be also priviledged but the suite for the Tithe branches of Trees which are not priviledged shall be in the spirituall Court as well as the suite for the Tithe of Trees themselves Res judicata pro veritate accipitur Coke com 103. a. The thing adjudged is taken for truth As in an Action of debt upon an Obligation against an Abbot the Abbot acknowledgeth the Action and dyeth the successor shall not avoid execution though the Obligation was made without the assent of the Covent for he cannot falsify the recovery in an higher Action and the thing judged is taken for truth and this is but a Chattle and so is it of a Statute or Recognizance acknowledged by an Abbot and Prior ibidem And therefore doth the Law so much respect the certainty of Iudgement and the credit and authority of Iudges as it will not permit any error to be assigned that impeacheth them in their trust and office and in wilfull abuse of the same but onely
specie virtatis umbra Vice fairely enbellished with virtues shape And shadow doth often men delude H. 7. f. 2. As Richard the third did many whose virtues as Sir Francis Bacon histerizeth it were feined and affected things to seek his ambition and not true qualities engendred in his judgement and nature But though as Matchevill saith such vertuous shews and shadowes are sufficient to please and delude the people yet the Law Divine and the Law Humane which dimaneth from the Divine is able and doth distinguish between good and evill and as the great Legist of Rome imperat honesta prohibet contraria commandeth that which is good and honest and inhibiteth that which is evill and impious and so doe the Justices and Judges of the Law for as Bodin saith Eodin M. hist f. 50. Qui in litibus versantur Judiciorum communione omnia mala norunt nec mala duntaxat siditiam bona sinc quibus illa constare percipi nullo modo possunt bonorum autem malornm finibus omnis humana prudentia continetur Those who are versed in suits of Law by the participation of Judgements know all evill things and not onely evill but also good things without which they can no way consist or be perceived but in the limits and bounds of good and evill all humane prudence doth consist and therefore by the Law as the same Legist saith are proposed and appointed praemia virtutibus supplicia vitiis rewards to virtues and punishments to vices and is so severe in the censure of vice and evill that it will not permit any one to doe evill that good may come thereof As the Law will not permit a Creditor who is not Executor to take and retaine the goods of the Testator to pay and satisfy himselfe though the payment of his debt be a good and honest thing for by that meanes if the goods of the Testator be not sufficient to satisfy all the Creditors the rest shall be barred and if the Law should give him that power it should be the cause and occasion of wrong and the Law of God saith you shall not do evill that good may come thereof Coke l. 5. f. 30 b. And therefore doth our Law terme such an one an Executor of his own wrong and so in 17. E. 3. 59. The Friers Carmelites who had then no habitation obtained of one I. M. who was seised of ten Acres of Land of the Bishop of Winchester to have those acres of Land for their habitation and because the said I. M. could not grant to them those ten acres by reason of the Statute of Mortmaine the said I. M. and the Carmelites by covin between them to make an evasion out of the Statute of Mortmaine granted the said ten Acres to the King his Heirs and Successoers by which the Signiory of the Bishop should be extinct to the intent that the King shal grant it over to the Friers Carmlites which was done accordingly and for that it was by covin contrived before to take the Bishop from his Signiory which was an evill act it was adjudged that the Charter shall be repealed and the Friers Carmelites should be constrained to render their Charter to be cancelled for though the Friers Carmelites were of the profession of religion and had no habitation before so as it seemed a work of piety and charity to provide an habitation for them yet you shall not doe evill that good may come thereof Coke l. 11. f. 74. a. Contra jus na urale est malum pro bono reddere Ployd f. 405. b. It is against the Law of nature to render evill for good As it was a Law in a City that strangers who did goe or clime up to the Walls of the City should be punished with death but it happened that strangers innocently passing by the City heard a noise that the Enemy would suddenly assault and sack the City whereupon the strangers more reddily then the Citizens got upon the Walls and defending the City now the debate whether they should dye as the Law commanded and it was answered not because it is against the Law of nature to render evill for good vide ibidem plura Beneficium nulâ—i obtrudiâ—ur Pap. f. 212. The Law doth not obtrude or doe good turnes to one whether he will or no and therefore an alien borne shal not have medietatem linguae unlesse he request it So Damages ex incremento are allwayes to be assessed ex petitio ne quaerentis and so are costs ex incremento and upon a Writ of Error because in the beginning of the judgement it was said ideo ad petitionem quaerentis consideratum est and not ideo consideratum est ad petitionem quaerentis and the words were displaced the Judgement was reversed for the words misplaced will not supply this defect for if the usuall forme should not be observed all would fall into a confusion and in as much as the words are misplaced it is as if they had not been put in at all and therefore void like unto the case put in Walsinghams case in Ploydon where an averrment misplaced is as if it were none vide ibidem plura in Goods case Malum quo communius eo pejus an evill thing the more common it is the worser it is Coke l. 4. 109. b. For as the more common a good thing is the better it is so the more common an evill thing is the worser it is for contrariorum contraâ—ia est ratio for as the true service of God which is in publick Churches is better then that which is in private Churches for the generall good that by it may accrew so all superstitious uses which are in publick Churches are worse then those which are in secret Chambers for the generall prejudice which may accrew by them vâ—de ibidem plura Theft in the beginning in most Nations was not punished with death but with satisfaction or some lessor punishment the Pretors of Rome did punish a theef paena quadâ—upli with a foure fold satisfaction and the Jewes with seven fold or if his goods would not amount to so much with all the goods in his house Pro 6. 31. The Misians did punish petit Larceners with whips but if a thing of good value be taken away they must render the nine fold or else be put to death Fulb. Pard f. 80. But when the malice of men did increase an iniquity did abound that as the Poet in facinus jurasse putes and that many turned the crime of stealing into a trade of living and did not gaine their lively-hood with their hands by working but with their fists by fighting and stealing as the Comedian facitely ventri pugnae dant ventri suo the detriment to the republick and community of the offence made it capitall so as though the offence and the punishment being compared that Law may seeme unjust yet as Metsner faith Cum nullam aliud supersurit remedium
hidden to us if the reading of the ancients were more familiar to us As though one peradventure may know the Law upon the ancient statutes yet will he never know the true reason of the interpretation of them if he know not what was the law before the making of them Majorum precepta justa vel injusta non sunt contemnenda Reg. I. C. And Coke l. 7. f. 3. Calvins case Interroga pristinam generationem The precepts of the elders be they just or unjust are not to be contemned and enquire of the former age for out of the old fields must come the new Corne for we are but as yesterday and therefore had need of the wisdome of those which were before us and we had beene ignorant if we had not received light and knowledge from our forefathers and our daies upon the earth are but a shadow in respect of the ancient daies and times past wherein the lawes have beene by the wisdome of the most excellent men in many succession of ages by long and continuall experience fined and refined which by no man being of so short a time although he had in his head the wisdome of all the men in the world in any one age could ever be effected and attained unto and therefore it is the best rule then which there is not one more true and firme Neminem oportet esse sapientiorem legibus no man ought to take upon him to be wiser then the lawes vide ibidem â—lura Monumenta quae nos Recorda vocamus sunt veritatis vetâ—statis vestigia Cok. com f. 117. A record and inrolement are the footsteps of antiquity and truth and is a memoriall and monument of so high a nature as it importeth in it selfe such absolute verity that if it be pleaded There be no such record it shall not receive any triall by witnesse by Jury or otherwise but onely by it selfe And every Court of record is the Kings Court though another may have the profit in which if the judges doe erre a Writ of error lyeth but the county Court the Hundred Court and the Court Baron and the like are no Courts of record and therefore the proceedings there may be denied and râ—ied by Jury and upon a judgement a writ of error lyeth not but a writ of false judgement becauâ—e they are no Court of record for that they can hold no plea of debt or trespass if the dâ—bt or damage amounteth to 40. s or of any trespasse vi armis Coke l. 4. f. 71. in Hindes case Records containe in themselves truth and do conclude all men to deny any apparent thing in the record as antedate c. 37. H. 6. f. 21. but to take averrment of that which standeth with the record and that doth not impugne any thing apparent in the record the law well admitteth and alloweth As against a fine upon release to say that the Connusee had nothing at the time of the fine levyed 16 H. 7. So against letters Patents of the King under the great Seale shewed in Court none can them deny but non concessit per predictas literas patentes he hath not granted by the said Letters Patents is a good Plea for though there be such Letters Patents yet peradventure nothing may passe by them and so by consequence hee hath not granted and though an inrolement or matter of record shall not be tried by the country yet the time when the inrolement was made shall be tried by the country but the inrolement it selfe shall not be drawne in question but onely the time of it as when one pleadeth a grant of the King by his Letters Patents under the great Seal and the other pleadeth non concessit by the same his Letters Patents the Letters Parents are confessed but the effect and operation of them is denied and therefore the triall shall not be where the Letters Patents beare date but where the land lyeth as it was adjudged Coke l. 6. 15. b. So if profession be denied it shall be tried by Court Christian but if the time of his profession be in issue it shall be tried by the Country 9. H. 7. f. 2. ibidem Multitudo errantium non paâ—it errori patrocinium Coke l. f. 94. a. The multitude of them who erre doth not produce a Patronage to the error As returnes and presidents which peradventure passe without challenge of the parties or debate of the Judges thouâ—h they be many if the Court adjudge them contrary to reason they shall be amended and in this case according to 5. E. 4. f. 112. presidents and course doe not rule the law but the law shall rule them and therfore it was there said That an Outlawry was reversed because that it was ad com Lancast ibid. tent and doth not say at Lancaster or such place certain to which ibid. might be referred and though there were 100. presidents of such returnes yet notwithstanding it was reversed A fortiori if there be but one or two presidents for una hiâ—undo non facit ver Dier 105. a. but otherwise it is when presidents are judiciall and Justices by diverse successions of ages have given judgements in Actions brought there for it shall bee intended that some of the counsell with the Defendant or some of the Justices before whom the action was tried and the record read would have excepted against it but returnes of Sheriffs in case of Outlawries or entries of Clarkes the records passe in silence without exception of parties and therefore are not so authenticall as judgements upon demurrers or verdicts Coke l. 4. f. 94. a. And whereas the latter judgements doe many times crosse and contradict the former there are very few presidents of such contrary judgements scarce two in an age But yet if the reasons of the latter judgement did appeare upon record we should find them grounded upon mischiefs and inconveniences arising since the former judgements or other waighty considerations respecting the good of the Common-weale in generall Sir John Davis in his Preface From Propositions A Proposition is an oration affirming or denying aliquid de aliquo something of something and is called of the Philosopher 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a pronouncing speech shewing the thing either to be true or false Negativum nihil implicat 11. H. 7. 23. Dod. E. L f. 111. There are propositions negative which imply an affirmation and those we call negative pregnants which we doe refuse in all issues of trialls by Jurors except in some cases where the necessity of the cause doth require the same and there are also propositions meerely negative which are meere negations of which we commonly say negativum nihil implicat a negative implieth nothing As the Tenant wageth law of non Summons this doth not imply that he was tenant neither shall conclude him 22. H. 6. 41. One pleadeth ne Chasa pas he did not hunt in the free Chase of the Plaintiff this is no granting that the
sub eo ipse sub nullo nisi tantum sub Deo Bract. l. 1. c. 8. The King is the Vicar and Minister of God upon earth every one is under him and he under none but onely under God and therefore the Lands which are in the Kings possession are free from tenure for a tenant is he which holdeth of some superior Lord by some service so as the King cannot be a tenant because he hath no superior but God for as Coke l. 8 f. 118. It would be against common right and reason that the King should hold of any or doe service to any of his Subjects and therefore all Lands holden of him mediately or immediately Co. com f. 1. and for which reason Cowell thought it not so proper in the Kings case to say that he is seised in dominico suo ut de feodo as if feodum in our Law was taken as it is in the fendall Law onely for the Lands held in Services whereas feodum as Bracton Britton Fleta and Littleton tels us idem est quod haereditas Davis case of Tenures f. 30. Neither can the King be a Joynt-tenant with any though it be of land or other things that he had in his body naturall for none can be equall with him And therefore if two purchase lands to them and their heirs and one be made King they are no more Joynt-tenants but Tenants in Common 3 Eliz 339. Nay Acts of Parliament do not bind him unless they concern the Common-wealth or he be specially named 4. E. 4 21. 1 Eliz. 223. And no man can declare against the King but he must sue by way of Petition Ployd f. 241. b. 18 Eliz 498. He hath the property of all Goods that are nullius in bonis and shall have all Tythes out of Forrests and places out of any Parish for rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote In a Writ of Error upon false Judgment given for the King no Scire facias shall go forth ad audiendum errores for the King is alwaies in Court and that is the cause that the form of Entry is in all Suits for the King in the name of his Attorney generall F.N.B. 21. b. Rex semper praesumitur attendere ardua negotia regni pro publico bono omnium Coke l. 5. f. 56. a. It is alwaies presumed that the King doth attend the weighty and hard things of the Kingdome for the publick good of all And therefore have the Grants of the King a more beneficiall interpretation then the Grants of the Subject that may attend their private Affaires which are alwaies taken more strongly against them As if the King do grant lands to I.S. and his Heirs and in truth I. S. is the Kings Villain that shall not enfranchise the Villain by Implication The same Law is of an Alien born 17. E. 3. 39. The Advowson of Pravondry holden of the King was aliened to an Abbot and his Successors and that the Successors shall hold the Provandry to their own use The King shall seise the Advowson for Alienation in Mortmain and destroy the Appropriation for he shall not be ousted of his right of Advowson by Implication So 2 R. 2. 4. If two be indebted to the King and the King release to one it shall not discharge the other for no prejudice shall accrue to the King by construction or implication upon his Grant more then he truly intended by it ibidem So if a release be made by him of all demands the right of Inheritance shall not be released 6 H. 7. 15. If the King granteth lands in fee upon condition that they do not alien it is good but in all these cases it is otherwise in the case of a common person And in many cases the King who claimeth by a Subject shall be in a better case in respect of the Prerogative incident to his Royall person then the Subject himself by whom he claimeth As if the King have a Rent-seck by Attainder of Treason or by Grant he shall distrain for it not onely in the land charged but also in all his other lands and yet the Subject by whom he claimeth shall not distrain If a Subject have Recognizance or an Obligation and after is outlawed or attainted the King shall seise all the land of the Conusor or Obligor where he himself can have but the Moyety the King shall take advantage of a Condition broken without demand whereas a common person who claimeth under the King cannot re-enter for non payment of Rent without demand made And if the King purchaseth a Lordship of which land is holden by posteriority the King shall have the priority vide ibidem plura in Knights case Davis f. 45. If a common person grant rent or any other thing which lieth in grant onely without limitation of any estate by the delivery of the deed only a Frank-tenement shall passe 17 E. 3. 43. a. If the King grant rent or land without the limitation of any estate the Grant is meerly void for the incertainty 7 Ass pl. 1. and the Grantee shall not be Tenant at Will as it is ruled in the case of Alton Wood. Ployd f. 243. The Grant of the King is taken more strongly against a stranger and more favourable to the King although the thing granted come to the King by purchase or descent Whereas it is otherwise of a common person As a grant of a Mannor by the King the Advowson shall not passe without speciall words So the King may grant a thing in action which another cannot So if the part of an entire thing commeth to the King the Common Law hath given him all As if an Obligation be made to two and one is outlawed the King shall have all the duty So he shall have an entire Horse or Oxe which one who is outlawed holdeth in Common ibidem So Coke l. 9. f. 129. b. Quando jus domini regis subditi in simul concurrunt jus regis preferri debet when the right of the King and the Subject concur and meet together the right of the King ought to be preferred as in Dame Hales case Baron and Feme Joynt tenants of a term for years the Baron is felo de se the Baron shall forfeit all Ployd Com. 262. vide ibidem plura in Quicks case The King may mend his Declaration that term that it is put in p. 13 E. 48. So the King may wave his Demurrer and traverse the plea of another M. 28 H. 6. f. 2. So if the King grant lands in fee with Warranty against all the Patentee shall not have value in recovery without express words to have value So the King may make a Lease to a stranger this reservation is good and the stranger shall distrain for it or have an action of debt after the Lease determined M. 35. H. 6. f. 36. Ployd f. 243. a. So for arrearages of Rent-charge granted to the King he may distrain in all other
in ignorance or mistaking either of the Law or of the Case and matter of fact according to the rule de fide officio judicis non recipitur quaestio Bac. Max. f. 62. sed de scientia sive error sit juris sive facti there is no question to be made of the office and faith of a Iudge but of his knowledge whether it be error in Law or fact as if I will assigne for error that whereas the verdict passed for me the Court received it contrary and so gave Iudgement against me this shall not be received F. N. B. f. 21. So if I will alledge that whereas I. S. offered to pleade a sufficient bar the Court refused it and drave me from it this error shall not be allowed 3. H. 6. 3. If an appeale of maihme be brought and the Court by the assistance of the Chyrurgions adjudge it to be a maihme the party cannot bring a Writ of Error 1. Mar. 5. If a woman bring a Writ of Dower and the tenant pleadeth her husband was alive this shall be tryed by proofes and not by Iury and upon Iudgement given on either side no Error lyeth 8. H. 6. 23. If nul til Record be pleaded which is to be tryed by inspection of the Record upon Iudgement no Error lyeth 5 E. 4. 3. So if upon Iudgement given upon confession for default and the Court doe assesse damages the Defendant shall never bring a Writ though the damages be outragious F. N. B. 23. And the reasons of these cales are that the Law will not have the Iudges called in quostion in the point of their office when they undertake to discusse the issue and to examine againe what the Court had tryed were to attaint the Court yet there may be question of the Error in Law or the Error in Fact and Errors in Law and Errors in Fact or ever of such matters as were not crossed by the Record as to alledge the death of the tenant at the time of the Iudgement given and nothing appeareth on Record to the contrary so when an infant levieth a fine and it appeareth not upon Record that he is an infant then it is error in fact and shall be tryed by inspection during nonage F. N. B. 21. And you shall never alledge an error in fact contrary to the Record as if a man will assigne for error that whereas the Iudges gave judgement for him the Clerks entred it in the Roll against him this error shall not be allowed and yet it doth not touch the Iudges but the Clerks but the reason is if it be an error it is an error in fact vide Ba. Max. f. 65. Novum judicium non dat jus novum sed declarat antiqum quia judicium est quasi jurisdictum per judicium jus est noviter revelatum quod diu fuit velatum Coke l. 10. f. 42. a. A new judgement doth not give or make a new Law for judgement is the voice of the Law and by judgement the Law is newly revealed that hath long been covered as that though it seemed to be a new opinion that tenant in taile cannot be restrained from suffering a common recovery yet it appeareth by the ancient Books and Litt. also that it is not of late invention and it is true the Law sometime sleepeth but judgement it awaketh and certainely these perpetuities were born under an unfortunate constellation for in so greate a number of suits concerning them in all the Courts of Westminster they never had any one Iudgement given for them but many judgements given against them by which those fettered inheritances of the Frank-tenements of the Subjects be set at liberty according to their originall freedome vide ibidem plura Mandatum ita regulatur in superioribus sicut in privatis a voluntate mandantis Reg. I. C. a commandement is regulated from the will of the Commander as well in higher as in private things so as in every command the will of the Commander is to be considered and observed and therefore Coke com 258. a. Regularly it is true that where a man doth lesse then the commandement and authority committed to him there the commandement and authority being not pursued the act is void The King licenseth an Abbot and Covent to alien and the Abbot sole alieneth it is void 11. H. 7. 8. And the rule is given by Frowick when the King maketh any grant or licence it ought to be executed accordingly and strictly as if the King granteth to me a licence to make a Feoffment by Deed I cannot make a Feoffment without Deed nor e contra so that the licence must ever be pursued or otherwise the act done is not warranted by the licence 18. Ass Pl. ult The licence was to levy a fine of the Mannor of Dale to finde two Chaplaines and he would have levied the fine leaving out the Chaplaines and could not be suffered 3. E. 3. 5. Davis in his case of tenures f. 19. The Statute of Merton c. 3. ordaineth that in a re-disseisin the Sheriff assumptis secum custodibus placitorum coronae doe go to that tenement of which the complaint is made if the Sheriff take but one Coroner it is not good for the Act appointeth a number two at the least which number ought to be satisfied or else the authority given by them is not pursued 23 Ass 7 Ployd f. 393. So as it is manifest a nude authority must be pursued strictly both for matter or manner or the act down by colour of the authority iâ— void Dyer ibidem f. 20. Coke com f 52. a. b. If a man be disseised of black acres and white acres and a VVarrant of Attorney is made to enter into both and to make livery here if the Attorney enter into black acre onely and maketh a livery and seisin secundum formam chartae there the livery of seisin is void for the estate of the disseisor cannot be devested in white acre without an entry In a praecipe quod reddat there must be two Summoners there for Summons by one summoner is not good because he doth not pursue the authority of the Writ and if there be but one and the tenant make default and loose by default he shall have a Writ of deceite Ployd 393. 50. E. 3. 16. When a man assigneth Auditors to Accomptants and they be found in arrearages by the Statute of W. 2. c. 12. they may be arrested and by the warrant of the Auditors sent to Goale there if there be but one Auditor assigned he cannot commit the Accomptant to the Goale for the Statute limiteth such power to two at the least vide ibidem plura in the Earle of Leicesters case quod vide A Letter of Attorney to foure or three joyntly to make seisin two of them cannot make livery ibidem f. 181. b. But there is a diversity between an authority coupled with an interest and a bare authority as for example a custome
seised by word assigned Dower to the Feme which she accepteth yet was it adjudged that that refusall of the estate of inheritance and acceptance of her Dower in pais shall not devest the Frank-tenement out of her So 13 Ric. 2. Joynt-tenancy a Charter of Feoffment was made to foure and seisin delivered to three in the name of all and after the Seisin delivered the fourth commeth and vieweth the Deed and saith by word that he will have nothing in the Land and it was adjudged that that agreement by word in pais shall not devest the Frank-tenement out of him and Thorp 35 Ed. 3. Disclaimor said that in such a case the Tenement remained in all untill a disagreement in Court of Record So if there be Lord and Tenant by Deed enfeoffeth the Lord and a stranger and maketh Livery to the stranger in the name of both if the Lord by word disagreeth to the estate it is nothing worth but if he enter into the Land generally and take the profits that amounteth to an agreement to the Feoffment but if he enter into the Land and distrain for his Seignory that act amounteth to a disagreement of the Feoffment and shall devest the Frank tenement out of him 10 E. 4. 12. by all the Justices But if Lands be given to Baron and Feme and after by the Statute of 32 H 8. the Baron alieneth the Land to the use of him and his heires and after deviseth it to his wife for life the wife enters claiming by word the estate for life this is a good agreement to the estate for life and a good disagreement to the estate of inheritance Dyer 351. b. And if A. maketh an Obligation to B. and deliver it to C. to the use of B. this is presently the Deed of A. But if he offereth it to B and he refuseth it in pais by it the Obligation shall lose his force Dyer 167. The same Law is of the gift of goods and chattels and if the goods be delivered to the use of the Donee the goods were in him presently but he may refuse them in pais and by it the property shall be determined ibidem SECT III INclusio unius est exclusio alterius Coke l. 11. f. 50. a. b The inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of another As when an act of Parliament giveth a power and interest to one certain person by that expresse designation of one all others are excluded although such a statute be in the affirmative As where the statute of 31 E. 3. c. 12. it was provided that error in the Exchequer shall be corrected and amended before the Chancellor and Treasurer and therefore it could not be corrected before any other and the generall Rule is put that when any thing is to be done before any person certain by any statute it cannot be done before any other and yet the statute of 31 E. 3. is in the affirmative Ployd 106. b. in Stradlings case So whereas by the statute of 8 H. 6. c. 9. forcible Entry is designed to the Justice of Peace to make restitution by it others be excluded though the statute be in the affirmative and therefore neither Justices of Oyer or Terminor or of Goal-delivery c. shall do it Dallisan 3 Eliz vide ibid. plura And this is true in all acts which are the introduction of a novel Law as the above said acts are but where acts of Parliaments are no introductions of a new Law it is otherwise So the act of 35 Eliz. doth not exclude those to whom the Forfeitures are limited by the act of 23 Eliz because by it they are not given to a new person but to the same person to wit the Queen and is but an act of addition to give more speedy remedy As the statute of W. 2. c. 9. in a VVrit of Mesne giveth more speedy proces and in the end fore-judger whereas the proces at the Common Law was but Distresse infinite yet the Plaintiff may take which proces he will either at the Common Law or upon the statute because they are both in the affirmative Coke l. 11. f. 64. a. And also in many cases the designation of a novell person in a latter act of Parliament shall not exclude another person that was authorized to do the same thing by an act precedent As by the statute of 8 H. 6. c. 16. after Office found he who found himself grieved might within a moneth after traverse take the Tenements to farm that then the Chancellor Treasurer or other Officer shall demise to him to farm untill c. 13 E. 4. f. 8. and yet by the statute of 1 H. 8. c. 16. he hath liberty by the space of three monthes and after by the statute of 32 H. 8. c. 40. the Master of the Court of Wards by advice of own of his Councell is authorized to make a Lease of Land in VVard or an Ideot And though the latter act design another person yet it is not the first altogether taken away for before any Lease made by the Master of the VVards the Chancellor and Treasurer may do it and so e contrario as Stanf. holdeth Prerog f. 69. a. b. VVhere he maketh mention of this Rule â—eges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant vide ibidem plura Coke com f. 210. a. If the Condition upon a Mortgage be to pay to the Mortgagee or his heires the money and before the day of payment the Mortgagee dyeth the Lessor is not to pay the money to the Executors but to the Heire for in this case designatio unius personae est exclusio alterius Consensus tolliâ— errorem Coke com f. 37. a. Consent taketh away error As Dowment ad ostium Eclesiae ex assensu patris seem to be good albeit the wife be within the age of nine years But without question for the same reason a Joynture made to her under or above the age of nine years is good ibidem Coke com f. 125. b. a. If a Venire facias be awarded to the Coroners where it ought to be to the Sheriff or the Visne cometh out of the wrong place yet by assent of the parties and so entred of Record it shall stand for all consent taketh away error ibidem Coke l. 5. f. 36. b. Dyer 367. in Bainhams case Coke l. 5. f. 40. a. b. in Dormers case A common Recovery is not to be resembled to a judgement or proceeding at the common Law for by usage and custome it is become a common assurance and conveyance of Lands and because it is done by mutuall consent errors are not to be allowed for consensus tollit errorem If the Demandant and Tenant consent that two of the foure in a Writ of Right shall be Esquires where by the Law they ought to be Knights and well because by consent Tryall of Villenage was altered from the naturall tryall by consent Pleader of a Feoffment upon condition without deed and