Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
judgement_n error_n parliament_n writ_n 2,585 5 9.9558 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A59090 The priviledges of the baronage of England, when they sit in Parliament collected (and of late revised) by John Selden of the Inner Temple Esquire, out of Parliament rolles ... & and other good authorities ... : the recitalls of the French records in the 4th. chap., also newly translated into English ... Selden, John, 1584-1654. 1642 (1642) Wing S2434; ESTC R10915 70,579 178

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and ●riors who gave their letters usually to Parsons Prebendaries Canonists and such like In that Parliament of Carlile under Edward the first the Bishop of Exeter sent to the Parliament Henry de Pynkney parson of Houghton as his Proxie The Bishop of Bath and Wells sent William of Charleton a Canon of his Church and in like for t other of the spiritualty of that time In the beginning of the 17th yeare of Richard the second the Bishop of Norwich made Richard Corqueanx being then Deane of the Arches Thomas Hederset Archdeacon of Sudbury and Iohn Thorpe parson of Epingham his Proxies by the name of Procuratores sive nuntij And in the same time the Bishop of Durhams proxies were Iohn of Burton Canon of Bewdley and Master of the Rolls and Iohn of Wendlingborough Canon of London and other like are of the same time By which also that of the Preamble of the Statute of Praemunire is understood where it is said that the advice of the Lords spirituall being present and of the procuratores of them that were absent was demanded The like under Henry the fourth and Henry the fift are found in the Rolls And under Henry the fift the Arch-Bishop of Yorke gives the proxie to the Bishop of Durham and to two other Clerkes of his Province And it is observable that in the making of proxies by the whole number of Bishops in case of Attainders upon Appeale their course was sometime to make a Gentleman beneath the degree of a Baron their Proxie as under Richard the second first they made their proxie for assenting in the Parliament but afterwards the Earle of Wiltshire had that place in the same Parliament But this of making others then Barons of Parliament proxies is carefully found in the cases of the Lords spirituall One speciall case of it is under Henry the fift in that of Thomas de la Ware who being a Clergie man had his Barony descended unto him and is stiled in the summons alwayes Magister Thomas de la Ware and not Dominus hee gave his Letters to John Franke and Richard Hulme Clerkes but the proxie Rolls for the Temporall Lords are for the most part lost The following Times especially ever since the first memorie extant of the Iournalls of the upper House which began the first of Henry the eight have kept a constant course of making parliamentory Barons onely proxies And it appeareth in those Iournalls that one two or three are joyned conjunctim divisim and most commonly Temporall Lords have given their proxies to temporall and spirituall men yet not without a Temporall Lords giving his letters of proxie to a Spirituall and Temporall Lord together And under Queen Mary Francis Earle of Shrewsbury made Anthony Viscount Mountague and Thomas Bishop of Ely his proxies And in the beginning of Queene Mary Stephen Gardiner Bishop of Winchester was joyned in letters of proxie sometimes with a Temporall Lord But the Lords spirituall have so much mistataken of late the Lawes of this Kingdome the Kings prerogative given by the Law and what and whence was the Originall of the Honours they themselves had obtained and have beene ready to inlarge the Dominions of Antichrist and to induce an arbitrary government by their writings and other apparent practises in so much as now they have lost both Priviledge and Vote in Parliament CHAP. II. Priviledges in Suites as well for their followes as for themselves during the Parliament IN a Bill exhibited under Henry the fourth is shewed that the Lords Knights c. and their men and servants c. should not be arrested or otherwise imprisoned by the custome of the Realme and it is prayed that if any be the parties offending may make fine and ransome and give dammages c. Hereunto the Answer is there is sufficient remedy in the case In the beginning of Queene Elizabeths reign Iohn Broxham being Plaintiffe in an Assise in the County of Lincolne against the Lord Willoughby it was ordained that an Injunction should goe out of the Chancery Subpaena 500. l. That the Plaintiffe should not proceed to Tryall To this head may bee referred that case of the Lord Cromwell cited in the Title of processe against them in English Courts in the Iournalls of Queen Elizabeth King James and our present Soveraigne the Testimonies of these priviledges for the servants of every Baron of Parliament are most frequent Hereunto may be added that of the first citation out of an Ecclesiasticall Court against the Earle of Cornewall which was served upon him in Westminster Hall as he was going to the Parliament at the Suite of Bago d● Clare and the Prior of Saint Trinity in London for the Earle sued them for the contempt and recovered 1000. Markes dammages And in the same Parliament the Master of the Temple petitioneth that he might distraine for rent in a house in London which it seemes the Bishop of Saint Davids held of him In qua non potest distringere in tempore Parliamenti But answer is non videtur honestum quod Rex concedat quod ille de consilio suo distringatur per Ostia fenestras prout Moris est CHAP. III. No Peere of the upper House to be called to answer in the lower House only THomas Philips complained of the Bishop of London upon divers Articles in the lower House and at first by Order of the House whence it was referred by reason of the slight nature of the offence c. whereupon the Bishop remembring the upper House of their Priviledges Ejus verbis auditis pr●ceres omnes unâ voce dicebant quòd non consentantum fuit aliquem procerum praedictorum alicui in eo loco responsurum So where the Bishop of Bristoll had written the Booke of Vnion which was conceived to be derogatory to the honour of both Houses yet hee was complained of onely in the upper House and that so he might bee and not before the lower House alone it was acknowledged in the message delivered from the lower House touching him The like is the priviledge of the Bishops complained of in this present Parliament 1641. CHAP. IV. The Iurisdiction of the Lords of Parliament in matters of offences aswell capitall as not capitall and in errors out of the Kings bench THe power of Iudicature belonging to the Lords of Parliament is chiefly seene in their Iurisdiction upon Writs of error and their Iudgements of Offences as well capitall as not capitall which they give to any publicke mischiefe in State Of these Iudgements of such Offences many examples are of former times in the Records of Parliament and out of them are here selected some such as most of all conduce to the opening of the course of Accusation the forme of the Defendants answering the usuall wayes of Triall and other Incidents in their various kindes of Iudgements which are found arbitrary in cases not capitall so that they extend not to the life
expeditionem negotiorum Parliamenti praedicti cum omni diligentia proced●rent Iudgements upon Writs of error in PARLIAMENT IF erroneous Iudgements bee given in the Kings Bench or in the Exchequer Chamber upon the Statute of 27. Eliz. cap. 18. the party may have his Writ of ●r●o● retureable in Parliament but not upon judgement given in the Common Pleas untill the same bee ●ever●ed or affirmed in the Kings Bench as it was answered in Parliament under ●dward the third in the case of the Bishop of Norwich Vpon the Writ of Er●or the Lord chiefe Iustice of the Kings Bench is to bring in the Record and a ●ra●script of it into the Parliament and the●e leaveth the Transcript ●ut car●●e●h the Record b●ck and there●p●n the Er●ou●s bei●g assigned or as some Examples are befo●e the Assignamus of the Errors order is to bee given that a Scire facias be awarded against the Defendant upon whose appea●anc examination of the Errors by the Lords the Iudgement is either affirmed or reversed AFter the Record thus brought in Clericus Parlïamenti habet inde Custoaiam per duos tantum non per Communitatem assignabitur Senescallus qui cum Dominis spiritualibus ac temporalibus per con●ilium Justiciariorum procedat ad err●rem corrigendum In which words it is observed that the Lords have power to make a Delegation of their Iurisdiction to a person chosen out of themselves as a Steward to judge for them as also they did in their proceedings against Gomemz and Weston under Richard the second when they ap●ointed the Lord Scroope for Steward of the Parliament to arraig●e the Offenders but this rests at their pleas●re whether they will judge themselves together or so appoint a Steward MEmorandum quod Christopherus Wray miles capital Iusticiarius de Banco Regis se●u adduxi● in ●ar in camera parl inter duos bre de errore billa de regina indors ac rotulat In quibus continebantur placita processus in quibus suppon●bature●ror ib. reliquit transcript totius recordi ci● Cler. Parl. super hoc venit Richardus Herbert Ioh. Awbr●y Willielmus filiam ●imon Brow●e in propriis personis suis in Parliamento statim dixerunt quod in recordo processu praedict. in redditione Iudic●i praedict. manifestè est erratum in hoc quo● postquam Iudicium praedict. in loquela praedict versus praefat. Thom. Gomiel redit fuit antequam praedict. Iohannes Hunt prosecutus fuit impetravit praedict. primum breve descire facias versus praefat. Thom. Ric. Herbert caeteros praedicto manucaptores praedict. Thom. Gomiel nullum breve de capias ad satisfaciendum pro debito damnis praedict. per praefat. Iohannem Hunt in Parliamento praedict. prosequendo Et reternat fuit versus praefat. Thom Gomiel ubi per consuetudinem Curiae dictae Dominae Reginae coram ipsa Regina à tempore contrarii memoria hominum non existit in eadem usitat approbat brev. de Cap. ad satisfaciendum versus eundem Thom. Gomiel pro debito damnis praedict. Parl. praedict. prosequi retornari debet antequam aliquid brev. de sci fac versus manucaptores pr●d●ct in loquela illa impetr●nt seu prosequi debe et licet consue●udo forum captionum r●cognitionum in curia praedict. usi fuerunt in forma praedict. viz. si contigerit eundem Thomam Gomiel in Parliamento praedict. convinci tunc iisdem manucaptores concesserunt quilibet eorum per se concessit tam praedict debitum quam omnia damna castag c. praefat. Ioh. Hunt in ea parte adjudicentur de Terris catallis eorum cuislibet fieri ad opus praedict. Iohannis Hunt levari si contigerit praedict. Thom. Gomiel debitum damnae illa praefat. Iohannis Hunt minime solvere aut se prisonae Marescall Dominae Reginae coram ipsa Regina ea occasione non reddere c. Et petiere iidem Rich. Herbert alii praedict. quod Iudicium praedict. processus super bre de scire fac prosecut in curia Dominae Reginae coram ipsa Regina revocetur adnulletur peni●us pro nullo habeatur Et super hoc Domini per consensum Iustitiariorum post longam maturam deliberationem cum consensu adjudicaverunt quod judicium praedict. processus super bre de scire fac prosecut in Curia dict. domin Reginae coram ipsa Domina Regina revocetur adnulletur penitus pro nullo habeatur CHAP. V. Bills passed and Judgements given without assent of the Lords Spirituall VNder Edward the third a Petition of the Commons was thus ITem wee are not willing to suffer that payment be made to Cardinalls for their juornying into France for to treat out of the Realme of England THe answer is as to the dispences of Cardinalls it seemeth ●o all the Baronage and other sages of the Kings Councell that the Commons demanded reason and for that they are agreed that it shall be so The like is there in the two Petitions of the Commons against the Clergy carrying money to Rome and Cardinall having benifices here divers Ordinances against the Church of Rome are agreed by the K. the Lay Peers Commons but all the Prelates made Protestation of not assenting or doing what may be or turne in prejudice of their Estate or Dignity The power and direction for Iustices of the peace is ordained at the complaint of the Commons by the King by the assent of the Lords Temporall And so also divers times without mention of the Lords Spirituall who indeed under Edward the 3 protested that they had not to do with matters of keeping the peace THe Commons exhibite a Petition against Procurations from Rome benefices obtained by Letters thence c. It is ordained established by the K. by the advise and ass●nt of the Lords Temporall that no Benefice is to be had here but by guilt from the Kings Subjects c. and if that any do contrary to this Act he should incurre the danger of a praemunire given by the Statute of 27 E. 3. A Petition in these words Item that the Appeales pers●ites accusations Iudgements had and rendered c. should be good notwithstanding the Lords Spirituall and the procurato●s of the Lords Spirituall absente● themselvs out of Parliament in time of the said Iudgements rendered for salvation of their e●tate As it is contained in a Protestation by which the Lor●s Spirituall and Procurators were in this present Parliament c. The King granteth it And the Protestation of the Clergy is entered as followeth For as much as certaine matters were moved in this present Parliament touching openly the crime of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and the other Prelates of his Province who made Protestation in the forme and words which followes IN
tryall shall bee by his Peeres And this is cleere for all Temporall Barons and their Ladies but it hath beene doubted whether the same Law bee in case of tryall of spirituall Barons or no and without doubt one speciall Argument among others hath beene made from the name of Peeres some concluding thus Spirituall Barons are no Peeres therefore not to be tryed by their Peeres others for the other part thus Spirituall Barons are Peers therefore to be tryed by their Peeres but of these two Arguments the first is false in matter the second in forme For the first it is true and plaine that Spirituall Lords have beene Peeres and of the antecedent false the Testimonies justifying them to have beene so are very frequent in the Bish of Winchesters case who departed from the Parliament at Salisbury about the beginning of Edward the third and was questioned for it afterwards in the Kings Bench hee pleaded to the Declaration Quod ipse est unus ê paribus Regni Praelatus c. and in that short disputation of the case which is lest in the the yeare bookes hee is supposed cleerely both by the Court and Councell to bee a Peere So afterwards under the same King in a Writ of Wards brought against the Bishop of London he pleaded to issue and the Defendant could not have day of grace for he said as the words of the booke are that a Bishop is a Peere of the Land Et haec erat causa c. And in a like case upon an Action of trespasse against the Abbot of Abyndon who was one of the Lords Spirituall day of Grace was denyed against him because he was Peere de la terre So expressely upon the Question of having a Knight returned into a Jury where a Bishop was Defendant in a quare impedit the rule of the Court was that it ought to bee so because the Bishop was a Peere of the Realme So the Iudgement given against the Bishop of Norwich in the time of Richard the second hee is in the roll expressely allowed to bee a Peere for hee had tooke eeceptions that some things had passed against him without assent or knowledge of his Peeres of the Realme To which exception the answer was It behooves you not at all to touch your Prelate of onely certaine misprisisions which you as a Souldier of the King c. have done and committed c. Here is to be avoided that challenge of Stafford Arch-Bishop of Canterbury under Edward the third when upon his being excluded the Parliament he thus challenged his place Ego tanquam major par Regni post Regem vocem habeus Jure Ecclesiae mea tantum vendico ideo ingressum in Parliamento peto the same is justified by the Clergy touching their Ius paritatis before recited at large and entered in the Parliament roll And in the Assignement of the Errours under Henry the fifth for the reversall of the Attayndor of the Earle of Salisbury one errour is assigned that Iudgement was given without assents of the Prelates which were Peeres in Parliament and that although that were adjudged to bee no errour yet it hath been allowed cleerely in the roll and the Petition that they were Peeres So in an Act of Parliament under the same King the Bishops and Arch-Bishops and Arch-Bishops of Ireland are called Peers of that Kingdome and divers other passages occurre touching this name of Prelate neither could any scruple bee further made of it untill the passing of an Act of this Parliament 17. Car. 1641. But as this is cleere that they were Peeres so also it is cleere that they were not by the lay to bee tryed as Temporall Barons by their Peeres and the conclusion of the contrary drawn as before out of that that they have been Peers is wholy without consequence this having been a point of the common Law as it is distinguished from Acts of Parliament which falls out generally to bee onely the knowne and received custome within the Kingdome if the practise and custome within the Kingdome be therein observed the point of Law may bee soone resolved In the practises and customes divers Bishops are found to have beene arraigned and legally tryed upon Capitall offences yet all that have beene so have had their Triall onely by common Iuries and whether by Statute any alteration bee of this common Law shall presently be examined there being many Bishops now to be tryed THat practise and Custome appeareth in particular examples found from the time of Edward the second to the age next before us thus collected Adam Bishop of Hereford under Edward the second was indicted of divers Felonies and of joyning with Roger Mortimer hee is arraigned in the Kings Bench and upon question how hee will be tryed he saith Quòd ipse est Episcopus Heref. ad voluntatem Dei summi Pontificis quòd materia praedicta Articulorum sibi imposit adeò ardua est quod ipse non debet in Curia sic super praedictis sibi impositis respondere nec inde responders potest absque offensu divino sanctae Ecclesiae Hereupon day is given over and then the Inditement is brought into the Parliament whereupon his arraignment hee give● the like answer and Walter Arch-Bishop of Canterbury petit eum ei liberatur and this is commanded that hee have him ready at a certaine day in the Kings Bench Et praeceptum est vicecomiti Hereford quòd venire faciat coram Domino Rege tot tales c. ad inquirend. prout moris est c. And a common Iury is returned which finds the Bishop guilty whereupon hee is committed to the Arch-Bishop and convict and his Lands and goods are seised into the KINGS hands Here was the Bishop tryed by a common Iury although it appear●s both in the Record and in the History of that time that the whole Clergy earnestly indeavou●ed to have kept him from conviction but no pretence of any right of Tryall by Peeres is once mentioned in this behalfe though other complaints are full enough expressed against the whol● proceedings VNder Edward the third Iohn de Isle brother to Thomas Hen Bishop of Ely was indi●ed in Huntingtonshire that he with divers others per assensum procurationem Episcop 28. E. 3. die Lunae post festam Sancti Iacobi burnt the house of the Lady Wake at Colne by Sommersham quòd praedictus Thomas Episcopus sciens praedictam combustionem per praedict. servientes suos esse factam dictos servientes apud Somersham postea receptavit c. And also it was found before the Sheriffe and Coroner that 29 Edward the third the Bishop was guilty de assensu of the murther of one William Holme slaine by Ralph Carelesse and Walter Ripton called little Watt upon malice conceived against Holme because hee followed the suit of the Lady Wake the principalls were attainted by Outlary
The Priviledges OF THE BARONAGE OF ENGLAND When they sit in Parliament Collected and of late revised by John Selden of the Inner Temple Esquire out of the Parliament Rolles and Journalls Patent and close Rolls the Crowne Rolls the proceedings of the English Courts at Westminster the Register of the Arch-bishop of Canterbury and the Delegates yeare-Bookes of the Common Law Statutes other good Authorities and in such sort that frequently the words of the chiefest Testimonies are transcribed least the freedome of the Readers Iudgement might be other wayes prevented by short Collections The recitalls of the French Records in the 4th Chap. also newly translated into English for the benefit of others as well as the Students of the Lawes of England Quo communius eo magis bonum quod est justum LONDON Printed by T. Badger for Matthew Wallbanck and are to be sold at his shop at Grase-Inne Gate 1642. The Introduction by way of Table or Index to the Chapters following contained in this Treatise PRiviledges are speciall Rights belonging to the Baronage of England In which name are com●rehended all those who as Magnati proceres regni by common right are summoned to every Parliament wherein also they have place and voyce as incident to their Dignities and what things doe concerne them e●ther as they are one Estate together in the upper House or as every one of them is privately a single Baron As for the prelacy who had heretofore the first place in the summons viz. Praelati magnates c. they have now lost all their Priviledges o● sitting in Parliament and of bearing of any secular Offices in the Kingdome they are disabled by act of this present Parliament 17. Car. 1641. For Priviledges of the first kinde CHAP. TEstimonies are hereby collected touching CHAP. 1. Their proxies and making of proxies 1 CHAP. 2. Their proceedings in Suits as well for followers as for themselves during the Parliament 7. CHAP. 3. That none of them bee subject to bee questioned before the lower House onely 9. CHAP. 4. Their Jurisdi●●ion in matters of offences as well capital as not capitall Errors out of the Kings Bench 10 CHAP. 5. Their passing of Bills and giving of Iudgements heretofore without any assent of spirituall Lords 120 CHAP. 6. Their appointing of Iudges out of themselves for examination of delaies of Iudgements in other Courts 127 CHAP. 7. Their Tennants of ancient Tennancies bring discharged of paying the charges of Knights of the shiere 129 For Priviledges of the second kinde of which also some are communicated to Baronesses The heads of the Collections are CHAP. 1. FIrst touching Oathes and Protestationt upon Honour 131 CHAP. 2 Tryall by Peeres 142 CHAP. 3 Scandala magnatum 155 CHAP. 4. Processe against them in English Courts Proceedings by Bill and Answere id CHAP. 5. Their number of Chaplaines is qualified 158 CHAP. 6. Their retayning of strangers 159 CHAP. 7. Clergy without reading id CHAP. 8. Their libertie of hunting in the Kings Forrests 161 CHAP. 9. Amerciaments of them id CHAP. 10. No Processe in a civill account to bee awarded against the body of a Baron 163 CHAP. 11. A Knight to bee returned upon every pannell where a Baron is party 16 CHAP. 12. No day of grace against a Baro● of Parliament ib. CHAP. 13. Making Deputies of places of Trust committed to them without words of the special power 167 BEsides these they have some Rights which are so commonly knowne that there needs no particular mention of them as their interest in making or repealing of Lawes or the like and divers others may perhaps be found which have not been oblivious in the late search made for them but of these particulars before mentioned according to the order in which they are described such store as are here collected doe follow First of the speciall RIGHTS WHICH Concerne them as they are one estate in the upper House of Parliament CHAP. I. Of Proxies of the Lords of Parliament VPON the summons of the Parliament licence of absence being obtained and the same licence as usually it being provided that a proxie bee made the Baron so licensed may appeare onely by that proxie to whom his voyce is so committed although his Writ bee Quod personaliter inter●it and so also without licence upon sicknesse or such inevitable cause of absence The first mention of Proxies that occurres in the memories of our Parliaments is of Carlile under Edward the first where the words are Quia omnes Praelati Milites alij de communitate Regni tunc plenariè non venerunt receptis quibusdam procurationibus Praelatorum qui venire non poterant adjornantur omn●s qui summoniti sunt ad Parliamentum usqué ad diem Mercurij proximum sequentem ad horam primam And in a Parliament held at Westminster under Edwa●d the second the Bi●hops of of Durham and Carlile remaining upon the defence of the marches of Scotland were severally commanded to stay there And in the Writ this clause was ordered to both of them Sed procuratorem vestrum sufficientèr instructum ad dictos diem locum mittatis ad consentiendum quod tunc ibidem per dictos praelatos proceres contigerit ordinari And the like Testimonies are afterwards under the same King for allowance and making of proxies by the name of procuratores sufficientes And in succeeding times the Testimonies of them downe to this day are most frequent But two things are most especially observable touching them 1. THat although the generall proxies were admitted yet when the nature of the Parliamentory businesse required more speedie and full advice a clause was inserted into the summons to premonish the Baron summoned that his proxie should not bee admitted unlesse he were compelled to absent himselfe by most inevitable necessity So was it in the Writs of summons under Edward the third to the Parliament held for advice touching the voyage of the King of France into the holy Land every Baron having these words in his Writ Scientes pro certo quod nisi evidens manifestus id exposcat non intendimus procuratores seu excusatores pro vobis admittere ea vice propter arduitatem negotiorum praedictorum And likewise under Richard the second the summons to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and the rest had these words Et 〈◊〉 nullatonus amittatis ●ne quid absit per vestram absentiam quàm necessitate infirmitate tunc ●etenti fueritis quòd aliqualiter illuc laborare non poteritis nullo modo excusatum habere volumus ista vice expeditio ne potior nostr●rum praedictorum retardetur seu aliqual●ter deferatur And divers other Exam●l●s are for personall appearance and exc●uding Proxies 2. That the course of the elder time was not that Barons onely were made Proxies in the upper House as at this day but other men also of low condition and this hath beene very frequently in the case of Bishops and Parliamentory Abbots
Dei Nomine Amen Cum de Jure consuetudine regni Angl. ad Archiep. Canterbur qui pro tempore fuerit nec non caeteros suos suffragandes Confratres Coeptis Abbates Priores aliosque Prelatos quoscunque per Baroniam de domino Rege tenentes pertinet in Parlimentum Regis quibuscunque ut pares regni praedicti personaliter interesse ibidemque de regni negotiis aliis ibi tractare consuetis cum caeteris dicti regni paribus aliis consulere ordinare statuere definire ac caetera facere quae Parliamenti Tempore ibid. incendet faciend in quibus omnibus singulis nos Willielmus Cant. Archiepiscopus totius Angl. Primas Angl. Sedis Legatus pro nobis nostrisque Suffraganeis Coep confratribus nec non Abbatibus Prioribus Prelatis omnibus supradictis potestat eorum quilibet potestatur qui per se vel procuratorem si fuerit modo presens publicè expresse quod intendimus intendi volumus ac vult eorum quilibet in hoc presenti Parliamento aliis ut pares regni praedicti more solito interesse considerare tractare ordinare statuere definire ac caetera exercere cum caeteris jus interessendi habentibus eisdem statu ordine Juris eorum cuilibet in omnibus semper salvum verum quia in praesenti Parliamento agitur de nonnullis materiis in quibus non licet nobis alicui eorum juxta sacrorum Canonum instituta quomodo libet personaliter interesse eo propter pro nobis eorum quolibet protestamus eorum quilibet hic presens etiam protestatur quod non intendimus nec volumus sicuti de Jure non possumus nec debemus intendi nec vult aliquis eorundem in praesenti Parliamento dum de hujusmodi materiis agitur vel agetur quomodo libet interesse sed nos eorum quemlibet in ea parte penitus absentare in re paritatis nostrae cujuslibet eorum interessend in dicto Parliamento quoad omnia singula ibidem exercenda juris eorum quilibet Statu ordine in omnibus semper salvo Ad hoc insuper protestamur eorum quilibet protestatur quod propter hujusmodi absentiam non intendimus nec volumus nec eorum aliquis intendit nec vult quod habet processus habend in praesenti Parliamento super materiis antedictis In quibus nec possumus nec debemus permittitur interesse quantum ad nos queml●bet eorum attinet futuris temporibus quomodo libet impugnentur infirmentur seu etiam revocentur Which Protestation read in full Parliament by the commandement of the King and Assent of the Lords Temporall and Commons In like manner make Protestation the Bishop of Duresme and Carlisle mutatis mutandis This was upon the occ●sion of the appeale of Treason in the same Parliament commenced by Thomas Duke of Gl●ucester and others against Alexander Arch-Bishop of Yorke Robert de Vere Duke of Ireland and others But although they thus absented themselves they made no proxy at this time to assent in their room as afterwards they agreed to do in cases of Iudgement of death But the first use of such proxies is in the 21 o●Rich the 2. neither at all are such proxies or assent of the Bishops For under H. 5. the Earle of Salisbury by Petition in the nature of a Writ of Error shewed that the Attai●der of John the late Earle father to the P●titioner in the second of H. the 4 might now be reversed and amongst the errors assigned one was that he had been adjudged sans assent in Parliament but it was in Parliament now adjudged that it was no error The Arch-bishops of Cant. and Yorke for themselvs their Clergy make Protestation not to consent to any Statute made in this Parliament Quatenus ea in restrictione potestatis Apostolicae aut in eversione Ecclesiae dignitatis tendere dignoscuntur which at their request was inrolled in Parliament yet an Act passed at that Time and is publique against the Popes giving of Benefices by way of provision in England In the beginning of Queene Elizabeths raigne when divers Acts passed touching matters of the Church as Service and Sacraments and Church-possessions c. the Bils passed Dissentientibus All the Bishops as it is especially entered in the Iournals with particular enumeration of all their names Whereunto may be added that assertion of the Iudges in that deliberation had under Henry the eight touching the power Royall in the Church as the words were reported That our Lord the King may well enough hold the Parliament by himselfe and all his temporall Lords without the spirituall Lords c CHAP. VI Their appointing Judges out of themselves for examination of Judgements and delayes of other Courts THis is given them by a Statute of Edward the third in these words Likewise for that many mischiefes are come c. That divers places as well in the Chancery as the Kings Bench Common pleas the Exchequer the Iustices assigned and other Iustices to heare and determine the Iudgements wherein have been delayes sometimes by difficulty somtimes by divers opinions of the Iudges and sometimes by other occasions it is assented established and agreed that of the Commons before said in every Parliament there be one Prelate two Earles and two Barons that shall have Commission and power of the King Which priviledge is now taken away from the Prelacy by Act of Parliament Anno 17. Car. to heare by Petition to them delivered the plaints of all those which complaine of such delayes or grievances done to them and that they have power to cause to come before them at Westminster or in any other places where the parliament shall be holden and the Courts of records and processes of such Iudgements as are delayed and shall cause to come before them the same Iustices who shall be there present to heare the cause and their reason also heard by good advice of them the Chancellor three Iustices of one Bench and of the other and others of the Kings Councell And in the same Parliament accordingly the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury the Earles of Arundell and Huntington and the Lord Woake and the Lord Basset were assigned to the same purpose and although the Iustices Chancellor Treasurer Privy Seale and others had before taken Oath c. Yet it was ordained that those of the Baronage assigned shall give them a new Oath and increase and diminish the Ministers of Iustice as they shall see Cause CHAP. VII Their Tenants of ancient tenancies being discharged of paying the charges of Knights of the shire THe Commons exhibite a Petition that whereas the Tennants of the Lords that did hold by Barony and summons to the Parliament might not be discharged of paying towards the expences of Knights c.