by Mittimus for there never was any president thereof and the Book of the House of Commons which is with their Clerk ought not to be divulged And C. Littl. is that if a man be indicted in this Court for Piracy committed upon the Sea he may well plead to the jurisdiction of this Court because this Court cannot try it 2 ly It appears by the old Treatise de modo tenendi Parliamentum that the Iudges are but assistants in the Parliament and if any words or acts are made there they have no power to contradict or controul them Then it is incongruous that they after the Parliament dissolved shall have power to punish such words or acts which at the time of the speaking or doing they had not power to contradict There are superiour middle and more inferiour Magistrates and the superiour shall not be subject to the controle of the inferiour It is a Position that in pares est nullum imperium multò minus in eos qui majus imperium habent C. Littl. saies that the Parliament is the supream Tribunal of the Kingdom and they are Iudges of the supream Tribunal therefore they ought not to be questioned by their inferiours 3 The offences objected do concern the priviledges of Parliament which priviledges are determinable in Parliament and not else-where as appears by the presidents which have been cited before 4 The common-Law hath assigned proper Courts for matters in respect of the place and persons 1 st for the place It appears by 11 E. 4.3 old Entries 101. that in an Ejectione firme it is a good plea that the land is antient demeasne and this excludes all other Courts So it is for land in Durham old Entries 419. for it is questionable there not out of the County 2 ly For persons H. 15. H. 7. roll 93 old Entries 47. If a Clerk of the Chancery be impleaded in this Court he may plead his priviledge and shall not answer So it is of a Clerk of the Exchequer old Entries 473. then much more when offences are done in Parliament which is exempt from ordinary jurisdiction they shall not be drawn in question in this Court And if a man be Indicted in this Court he may plead Sanctuary 22 H. 7. Keilw 91. and 22. and shall be restored 21 E. 3.60 The Abbot of Bury's case is to the same purpose 5 For any thing that appears the House of Commons had approved of these matters therefore they ought not to be questioned in this Court. And if they be offences and the said House hath not punished them this will be a casting of imputation upon them 6 It appears by the Old Entries 446 447 that such an one ought to represent the Borough of St. Jermans from whence he was sent therefore he is in nature of an Ambassadour and he shall not be questioned for any thing in the Execution of his office if he do nothing against the Law of Nature or Nations as it is in the case of an Ambassadour In the time of Queen Elizabeth the Bishop of Rosse in Scotland being Ambassadour here attempted divers matters against the State and by the opinion of all the Civilians of the said time he may be questioned for those offences because they are against the Law of Nations and Nature and in such matters he shall not enjoy the priviledges of an Ambassador But if he commit a civill offence which is against the Municipall Law onely he cannot be questioned for it as Bodin de Republica agrees the case Upon the Statute of 28 H. 8. c. 15. for tryall of Pirats 13. Jac. the case fell out to be thus A Iew came Ambassador to the United Provinces and in his journey he took some Spanish ships and after was driven upon this coast And agreed upon the said Statute that he cannot be tryed as a Pyrat here by Commission but he may be questioned civiliter in the Admiralty For Legati suo Regi soli judicum faciunt So Embassadors of Parliament soli Parliamento to wit in such things which of themselves are justifiable 7 There was never any president that this Court had punished offences of this nature committed in Parliament where any plea was put in as here it is to the jurisdiction of the Court and where there is no president non-usage is a good Expositor of the Law Lord Littl. Section 180. Co. Littl. f. 81. saies As Usage is a good interpreter of the Lawes so Non-usage where there is no example is a great intendment that the Law will not bear it 6 Eliz. Dy. 229. upon the Statute of 27 H. 8. of Inrolments that bargain and sale of a House in London ought not to be enrolled the reason there given is because it is not used 23. Eliz. Dy. 376. No errour lies here of a Iudgment given in the five Ports because such Writ was never seen yet in the diversity of Courts it is said That errour lies of a Iudgment given in the five Ports 39 H. 6.39 by Ashton that a protection to go to Rome was never seen therefore he disallowed it 8 If this Court shall have Iurisdiction the Court may give judgment according to Law and yet contrary to Parliament Law for the Parliament in divers cases hath a peculiar Law Notwithstanding the Statute of 1 H. 5. c. 1. that every Burgesse ought to be resident within the Burrough of which he is Burgesse yet the constant usage of Parliament is contrary thereunto and if such matter shall be in question before ye ye ought to adiudge according to the Statute and not according to their usage So the House of Lords hath a speciall Law also as appears by 11 R. 2. the Roll of the Processe and Iudgmen which hath been cited before to another purpose where an appeal was not according to the one Law or th' other yet it was good according to the course of Parliament 9 Because this matter is brought in this Court by way of Information where it ought to be by way of Indictment And it appears by 41 ass p. 12. that if a Bill of Disceit be brought in this Court where it ought to be by Writ This matter may be pleaded to the Iurisdiction of the Court because it is vi armis and contra pacem It appears by all our Books that informations ought not to be grounded upon surmices but upon matter of Record 4 H. 7.5.6 E. 6. Dy. 74. Information in the Exchequer and 11 H. 8. Keilw 101. are this purpose And if the matter be vi armis then it ought to be found by Enquest 2 E. 3.1 2. Appeal shall not be grounded upon the Return of the Sheriff but the King ought to be certified of it by Indictment 1 H. 7.6 and Stamf. f. 95. a. Upon the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 4. that none shall be imprisoned but upon Indictment or Presentment and 28 E. 3. c. 3. 42 E. 3. c. 3. are to the same purpose
express command to Bristol to deliver his thanks to the King of Spain for the high entertainment personal kindness respect and favor received by his Son the Prince who was returned so well satisfied as that he was not able to magnifie it sufficiently And further to let him know That to make a firm and indissoluble union between their Families Nations and Crowns and withal not to abandon his own Honor nor at the same time to give joy to his only Son and to give his onely Daughter her Portion in Tears he had by the advice of that Kings Ambassadors entred into a Treaty for the Restitution of the Palatinate that he always understood and expected that upon the effecting of this Marriage he should obtain the restoring of his Son-in-law both to his Countrey and Dignity and that the Emperor either by sinding out some great Title or by increasing the number of the Electoral Stiles might satisfie the Duke of Bavaria And for these Reasons the King commanded Bristol instantly to procure from that King a punctual Answer touching the course he resolves to take for the restitution of the Palatinate and Electorate and what assurance shall be given for his contentment if the Emperor or Duke of Bavaria should oppose any part of the expected restitution Moreover he gave direction and signified his special desire that the Espousals should be made in one of the Christmas Holidays because that holy and joyful time would best become an action so notable and blessed The Earl of Bristol with the Concurrence of Sir Walter Aston took boldness to demur upon these new Instructions and yet again to represent to his Majesty the state of these affairs they inform him that by deferring the Epousals till Christmas the powers were made altogether useless and invalid there being a Clause in the body of them That they shall remain in force till Christmas and no longer And the suspending of the execution of the powers till the validity of them be expired is an effectual revoking of them Besides the pretexts of this delay are no new but old matters which were often under debate but never insisted on to retard the main business And it will be thought that they should rather have hindered the Grant of these powers then the execution of them being granted Surely a staggering in the former resolutions will be suspected and the clearing thereof between Spain and England will cost much time As concerning the Prince Palatine it was the care of the Spanish Ministers that that business might be well compounded before the Infanta's coming into England For they say that otherwise they might give a Daughter and a War presently follow Besides the Instructions given under his Majesties hand were indeed to insist upon the restoring of the Prince Palatine yet not so to annex it to the Treaty as thereby to hazard the Match For he seemed to be confident that the one would never grow to a conclusion without a setled resolution to effect the other And the Prince and Duke during their being in Spain observed the same course Moreover the Palatinate affairs have relation to many great Princes interessed therein and cannot be ended but by a formal Treaty which will require a great length of time and if the conclusion of the Match should depend thereon the Prince may be long enough unmarried for the advancement of their interest who desire he should so continue or not match with Spain The preparations for the Marriage go on chearfully the Popes Dispensation is hourly expected with an intention to demand the powers immediately and upon what pretext shall they be detained Shall we alledge his Majesties pleasure that the solemnity be performed in the Christmas Holidays But that is impossible for the powers are then expired Shall we urge the restoring of the Palatine This was not made a condition but was treated as a business a part The delay of the Desponsario's will put a scorn upon the Infanta and upon the King of Spain who hath called himself the Infanta's Desponsado And this cannot stand with that exact and honorable dealing which his Majesty hath hitherto used Now upon these Inducements in the result and close of all the Ambassador humbly advised the King to return to the former state of the Treaty and to nominate a day for the delivery of the Proxies and resolved somewhat to protract the time for the receiving of his Majesties further direction Thus did the Earl of Bristol endeavor to restore the business and the better to bring it on Sir Walter Aston labored to reconcile the Duke to Spain by this manner of Insinuation He believed that his Grace was infinitely provoked to be an enemy to this Match and might have many Reasons suggested how much it concerned him to break it with all the force he hath yet he could not believe that the Error of one Man can make him an enemy to that which carries in it so much content to the King and Prince nor that his judgment can be led by these Arguments which under colour of safety would bring him into a dangerous labyrinth For the most prosperous War hath misfortune enough to make the Author of it unhappy and how innocent soever his Grace might be yet the occasions which have been given him will make him liable to such an aspersion But if the Match proceed and take effect he will have the honor thereof and the Infanta being duly informed must needs acknowledge him to be the person unto whom in that behalf she is most obliged But these Motions incensed Buckingham And now having the Prince linked to him he could over-rule the King and bear down all his Adversaries The Prince and the Duke began to take a popular way and to close with those of the Privy Council and the Nobility that were opposite to Spain and best liked of by the Puritan party They projected also the calling of a Parliament to consult the Nation and to clear the Kings integrity and to gain to themselves a great esteem in the hearts of the people And some there were that suggested to the King that the Dukes design was to prevent the Princes Marriage not onely with Spain but any where else that his own greatness might still be absolute For say they were it love to his Countrey that led him to a breach and War with Spain there was as much reason for a breach of the Match and Peace when the Parliament urged it as now there is And they said That the approaching Parliament was to marry the Duke to the Commonwealth that he might stand not onely by the King but by the people and popular humor which of late he hath courted earnestly and so they warned the King to have more special care of his own preservation But the Earl of Bristol was straightly commanded to follow the new Instructions namely before he deliver the Powers or move to the Contract to procure from
unfortunate mistaking of the Speeches I used to Mr. Clark I shall conclude by entreating your Lordships favor That I may understand from you as I hope for my comfort that this Letter hath given his Majesty satisfaction or if there should yet remain any scruple That I may have a clear and plain signification of the Kings pleasure which I shall obey with all Humility Your Lordships humble Servant BRISTOL The Earl of Bristol petitions the House of Lords shewing That he being a Peer of this Realm had not received a Summons to Parliament and desires their Lordships to mediate with his Majesty that he may enjoy the Liberty of a Subject and the Priviledge of his Peerage after almost two years restraint without being brought to a Tryal And if any Charge be brought in against him he prayeth that he may be tryed by Parliament The business is referred to the Committee of Priviledges and the Earl of Hartford reported from that Committee That it is necessary that their Lordships humbly beseech his Majesty that a Writ of Summons may be sent to the Earl of Bristol as also to such other Lords whose Writs are stopped except such as are made uncapable to sit in Parliament by Judgment of Parliament or some other Legal Judgment Hereupon the Duke signified to the House That upon the Earl of Bristols Petition to the King His Majesty had sent him his Writ of Summons And withal he shewed to the Lords the Copy of a Letter written from the King unto the said Earl being as followeth WE have received your Letter addressed unto us by Buckingham and cannot but wonder that you should through forgetfulness make request to us of favour as if you stood evenly capable of it when you know what you behaviour in Spain deserved of us which you are to examine by the observations we made and know you well remember how at our first coming into Spain taking upon you to be so wise as to foresee our intention to change our Religion you were so far from disswading us that you offered your advice and secresie to cocurre in it and in many other Conferences pressing to shew how convenient it was to be a Roman Catholick it being impossible in your opinion to do any great action otherwise And how much wrong disadvantage and disservice you did to the Treaty and to the Right and Interest of our dear Brother and Sister and their Children what disadvantage inconvenience and hazard you intangled us in by your Artifices putting off and delaying our return home the great estimation you made of that State and the low price you set this Kingdom at still maintaining that we under colour of friendship to Spain did what was in our power against them which you said they very well knew And last of all your approving of those Conditions that our Nephew should be brought up in the Emperors Court to which Sir Walter Ashton then said that he durst not give his consent for fear of his head you replying unto him that without some such great Action neither Marriage nor Peace could â—e had Upon the receipt of the Writ Bristol again Petitions the House of Lords and annexes to his Petition the Lord Keepers Letter and his own Answer thereto and desires to be heard in accusation of the Duke The humble Petition of Iohn Earl of Bristol Humbly shewing unto your Lordships THat he hath lately received his Writ of Parliament for which he returneth unto your Lordships most humble thanks but ioyntly with it a Letter from my Lord Keeper commanding him in his Majesties name to forbear his personal attendance and although he shall ever obey the least intimation of his Majesties pleasure yet he most humbly offereth unto your Lordships wise considerations as too high a point for him how far this may trench upon the Liberty and Safety of the Peers and the Authority of their Letters Patents to be in this sort discharged by a Letter missive of any Subject without the Kings hand And for your Lordships due information he hath annexed a Copy of the said Lord Keepers Letter and his Answer thereunto He further humbly Petitioneth your Lordships That having been for the space of two years highly wronged inpoint of his Liberty and of his Honor by many sinister aspersions which have been cast upon him without being permitted to answer for himself which hath been done by the power and industry of the Duke of Buckingham to keep him from the presence of his Majesty and the Parliament lâ—st he should discover many crimes concerning the said Duke He therefore most humbly beseecheth That he may be heard both in the point of his Wrong and of his Accusation of the said Duke wherein he will make it appear how infinitely the said Duke hath both abused their Majesties the State and both the Houses of Parliament And this he is most confident will not be denied since the Court of Parliament never refuseth to hear the poorest Subject seeking for redress of Wrongs nor the Accusation against any be he never so powerfull And herein he beseecheth your Lordships to mediate to his Majesty for the Suppliants coming to the House in such sort as you shall think fitting assuring his Majesty That all he shall say shall not onely tend to the Service of his Majesty and the State but highly to the Honor of his Majesties Royal Person and of his Princely vertues And your Suppliant shall ever pray for your Lordships prosperity The Lord Keeper to the Earl of Bristol March 31. 1626. My very good Lord BY his Majesties commandment I herewith send unto your Lordship your Writ of summons for the Parliament but withal signifie his Majesties pleasure herein further that howsoever he gives way to the awarding of the Writ yet his meaning is thereby not to discharge any former directions for restraint of your Lordships coming hither but that you continue under the same restriction as you did before so as your Lordships personal attendance is to be forborn and therein I doubt not but your Lordship will readily give his Majesty satisfaction And so I commend my service very heartily unto your Lordship and remain Your Lordships assured Friend and Servant THO. COVENTRY C.S. Dorset-Court March 31. 1626. His Answer to the Lord Keeper May it please your Lordship I Have received your Lordships Letter of the 31 of March and with it his Majesties Writ of Summons for the Parliament In the one his Majesty commandeth me that all excuses set aside upon my Faith and Allegiance I fail not to come to attend his Majesty And this under the Great Seal of England In the other as in a Letter missive his Majesties pleasure is intimated by your Lordship that my personal attendance should be forborn I must crave leave ingenuously to confess unto your Lordship that I want judgement rightly to direct my self in this Case as likewise that I am ignorant how far this may trench
King so straitned in time as by the said Article is pretended will appear by the said Earls Dispatch of September 28. 1623. In which upon scruple that was then made of the Infanta's entring into Religion he wrote to the same effect Viz. That if the Dispensation should come he knew no means how to detain the Proxies above twenty or twenty four dayes So that although difficulty happened until the middest of November 1623. yet it was foreseen that it must of necessity happen whensoever the Dispensation should come and then was warning of two moneths given thereof viz. from September 24. until November 29. which was the time appointed for the Desponsories So as he most humbly submits himself unto your Lordships which of the two wayes was the safer or dutifuller for him to take whether upon inferences and conjectures to have overthrown so great a business or on the otherside first to have presented unto his Majesty the truth and sincerity as he did the true estate of his Affairs with his humble opinion therein with an intimation that if his Majesty should resolve to break the Match that for the said Earl his honest discharge of the publick Trust reposed in him when the Proxies were deposited in his hands and for his sufficient warrant in so great a cause his Majesty would be graciously pleased to give him clear and express order which he had not and in the interim whilest his Majesty might take into consideration the great inconveniences that might ensue the said inconveniences might be suspended and the business kept upon fair terms that his Majesty might have his way and choice clear and unsoiled before him And as to the evil Consequences which are pretended would have followed if the said Earl had proceeded to the consummation of the Match before he had express order and warrant to the contrary he supposeth his Majesty should speedily have seen the Marriage which he so long sought to have effected that the Prince should have had a worthy Lady whom he loved that the Portion was much greater then ever was given in money in Christendom that the King of Spain had engaged himself for restitution of the Palatinate for which the said Earl conceived a daughter of Spain and Two Millions had been no ill pawn besides many other additions of advantage to the Crown of England Whereas on the contrary side he foresaw that the Prince would be kept a year longer unmarried a thing that so highly concerneth these Kingdoms he doubteth that the recovery of the Palatinate from the Emperor and Duke of Bavaria by force would prove a great difficulty and that Christendom was like to fall into a general Combustion So that desiring that his Majesty should have obtained his ends and have had the honor and happiness not onely to have given peace plenty and increase unto his own Subjects and Crowns but to have compounded the greatest differences that had been these many years in Christendom And by his Piety and Wisdom to have prevented the shedding of so much Christian Blood as he feared would ensue if these businesses were disordered These Reasons he confesseth and the zeal unto his Majesties service made him so earnestly desire the effecting of this business and cannot but think himself an unfortunate man his Majesties affairs being so near setling to his Majesties content as he conceived they were and hoping to have been unto his Majesty not onely a faithful Servant but a successful Servant to see the whole estate of his affairs turned up-side down without any the least fault of his and yet he the onely Minister on the English and Spanish side that remained under disgrace XI To the Eleventh Article the said Earl saith That the Article is grounded upon a Petition by him preferred to this Honorable House supposed to be scandalous which your Lordships as he conceiveth according to the Customs and Priviledges of the House of Peers would have been pleased first to have adjudged so to have been either for matter appearing in it self or upon hearing the said Earl for if the matter appearing in the Petition it self be not to be excepted unto it cannot as he conceiveth by Collateral accidents be taken for a Scandal till it be examined and found false For a plain and direct Answer thereunto he saith That the said Petition is such as will not warrant any such inference as by the said Article is inforced And that he hopeth to justifie the Contents of the said Petition in such sort as shall not displease his Majesty nor deserve that expression which is used in the Charge but contrarily what he hath said or shall say therein in his defence shall in all things tend to the Honor and Service of his Majesty by reducing into his Memory divers Circumstances and laying before him the passages of divers particulars which by undue practices have been either concealed from his Majesty or mis-related to him Having thus offered to this High and Honorable Court such Proofs and Reasons as he hopeth shall in your Lordships Wâ—sdom and Justice clearly acquit him of any capital Crime or wilful Offence if it shall appear that out of Errors of Judgment too much ferventness of zeal to his Majesties service or the ignorance of the Laws of this Realm wherewith he hath not been able to be so well acquainted as he ought by reason of Foreign Employments by the space of many years or by any other ways or means he hath faln into the danger of the Laws for any thing pardoned in the General Pardon made in the Parliament holden at Westminster Anno Vicesimo primo Regni Imp. Iacobi Angliae c. of Blessed Memory he humbly prayeth allowance of the Pardons and the benefit thereof with this Clause That he doth and will aver that he is none of the persons excepted out of the same although he is very confident he shall not need the help of any pardon having received many significations as well from his Majesties own mouth that he had never offended his Majesty as lately by several Letters from the Lord Conway that he might rest in the security he was in and sit still and should be no further questioned But he hopes your Lordships will not onely finde him so far from blame but that he hath served his late Majesty of Blessed memory and his most gratious Son the Kings Majesty that now is with that fidelity care and industry that your Lordships will take such course as you in your wisdoms shall think fit not onely for the upholding the Honor and Reputation of a Peer of this Realm after so many employments but likewise become humble and earnest Suitors to his Majesty on his behalf which he humbly prayeth That he may be restored to his Majesties most gratious Favor which above all worldly things he most desireth The Eighth of May the Commons brought up their Charge against the Duke which was delivered at a Conference of both Houses
onely an Award and no Judgement and in the L. Chief Justice his Argument there was no word spoken that the King might commit or detain without cause For the King to commit a man is indignum Regi Mercy and Honor flow immediately from the King Judgement and Justice are his too but they flow from his Ministers the Sword is carried before him but the Scepter in his hands These are true Emblems of a good King The Law admits not the King power of detaining in Prison at pleasure In antient times Prisons were but pro custodia carceres non ad poenam sed ad custodiam Admit the King may commit a man yet to detain him as long as he pleaseth is dangerous and then a man shall be punished before his offence Imprisonment is a Maceration of the body and horror to the minde it is vita pejor morte Mr Selden last of all produced the Statutes Presidents and Book-Cases which were expresseâ— in point to the Question in hand and the House commanded that Case in the Lord Chief Justice Andersons Book all of his own hand-writing to be openly read And for the Presidentâ— cited by the Kings Council in 34 years of the Queen as the Opinion of all the Judges certainly there was a great mistake in it and the mistake was the greater when it passed as currant by the Judges of the Kings-Bench in the last Case of the Habeas Corpus And that the truth of the Opinion may clearly appear let us read the words out of the Lord Chief Justice Andersons Report out of the Book written with his own hand which will contradict all those Apocrypha Reports that go upon the Case The words of the Report were these Divers persons fueront committes a several temps a several prysons sur pleasure sans bon cause parte de queux estiant amesnes en banck le Roy. Et parte en le Commune banck fuerunt accordant a le ley de la terre mise a large discharge de le imprisonment pur que aucunt grands fueront offendus procure un commandment a les Iudges que ils ne fera ainsi apres Ceo nient meins les Iudges ne surcease mes per advise enter eux ils fesoint certain Articles le tenour de queux ensus deliver eux al seignieurs Chancelor Treasurer eux subscribe avec touts lour mainies les Articles sont come erisnoint We her Majesties Iustices of both Benches and Barons of the Exchequer desire your Lordships that by some good means some order may be taken that her Highness Subjects may not be committed or detained in prison by commandment of any Noble man or Councellor against the Laws of the Realm either else to help us to have access to her Majesty to the end to become Suitors to her for the same for divers have been imprisoned for suing ordinary Actions and Suits at the Common-Law until they have been constrained to leave the same against their wills and put the same to order albeit Iudgement and Execution have been had therein to their great losses and griefs for the aid of which persons her Majesties Writs have sundry times been directed to sundry persons having the Custody of such persons unlawfully imprisoned upon which Writs no good or lawfull cause of imprisonment hath been returned or certified Whereupon according to the Laws they have been discharged of their imprisonment some of which persons so delivered have been again committed to prison in secret places and not to any common or ordinary Prison or lawfull Officer or Sheriff or other lawfully authorized to have or keep a Goal So that upon complaint made for their delivery the Queens Courts cannot tell to whom to direct her Majesties Writs and by this means Iustice cannot be done And moreover divers Officers and Serjeants of London have been many times committed to Prison for lawfull executing of her Majesties Writs sued forth of her Majesties Court at Westminster and thereby her Majesties Subjects and Officers are so terrified that they dare not sue or execute her Majesties Laws her Writs and Commandments Divers others have been sent for by Pursevants and brought to London from their dwellings and by unlawfull imprisonment have been constrained not only to withdraw their lawfull suits but have been also compelled to pay the Pursevants so bringing such persons great sums of money All which upon complaint the Iudges are bound by Office and Oath to relieve and help by and according to her Majesties Laws And where it pleaseth your Lordships to will divers of us to set down in what Cases a Prisoner sent to custody by her Majesty or her Councel are to be detained in Prison and not to be delivered by her Majesties Court or Iudges We think that if any person be committed by her Majesties command from her person or by order from the Council board and if any one or two of her Council commit one for high Treason such persons so in the Cases before committed may not be delivered by any of her Courts without due Trial by the Law and Iudgement of acquittal had Nevertheless the Iudges may award the Queens Writ to bring the bodies of such Prisoners before them and if upon return thereof the causes of their commitment be certified to the Iudges as it ought to be then the Iudges in the Cases before ought not to deliver him but to remand the Prisoner to the place from whence he came which cannot conveniently be done unless notice of the cause in general or else in special be given to the Keeper or Goaler that shall have the Custody of such a Prisoner All the Iudges and Barons did subscribe their names to these Articles Ter. Paschae 34 Eliz. and delivered one to the L. Chancellor and another to the L. Treasurer after which time there did follow more quietness then before in the Cause before mentioned After the reading of this Report Sir Edw. Cook said That of my own knowledge this Book was written with my L. Andersons own hand it is no flying report of a young Student I was Solicitor then and Treasurer Burley was as much against Commitment as any of this Kingdom It was the White Staves that made this stir Let us draw towards a conclusion The Question is whether a Feeman can be imprisoned by the King without setting down the cause I leave it as bare as Aesops Crow they that argue against it Humores moti non remoti corpus destruunt It is a Maxime the Common-Law hath admeasured the Kings Prerogative that in no Case it can prejudice the Inheritance of the Subjects had the Law given the Prerogative to that which is taken it would have set some time to it else mark what would follow I shall have an Estate of Inheritance for life or for years in my Land or propriety in my Goods and I shall be a Tenant at will for my liberty I shall have
ends And he vindicated the Duke in point of Religion 'T is true said he his Mother is a Recusant but never any thing more grieved him and never did a Son use more means then he to convert her and he hath no power over her and for his own Lady whom he found not firm in his Religion he hath it used means to confirm her As for Arminians I have often heard him protest and vow against these Opinions It is true many that have skill therein may have some credit with him and make use of his noble nature for their own ends One particular I know well that some Gentlemen and Preachers of great esteem were questioned for a matter wherein there was some error in the manner of which they were presented I told him of them and that they were questioned and he answered me he would do the best he could for to countenance them Sir Benjamin Rudyard gave his judgement that if the matter be urged home it will proclaim the man lowder then we can in words If we name excess of Power and abuse of Power it will reach to the Duke and all others in future times and to a Gentleman of honour nothing is so dear as sense of Honour I am witness and do know that he did many great and good Offices to this House If the forfeiture of my life could breed an Opinion that ye should have no occasion to complain at your next meeting I would pawn it to you Nor let any man say it is fear makes us desist we have shewed already what we dare do And because the imployment of Dalbeer had given much offence Sir Thomas Jermin stood up in his defence and said he had given great evidence of his Trust and Fidelity When the Count Palatine retired himself and the Councel agreed to send a Party under Count Mansfield to make a head and the King sent word to the Palatine to be present in Person Dalbeer went along with him with one more and being in a Village in Germany a Troop of fifty Horse met them Dalbeer went to the Captain and said we are in a Service I will give you so many crowns to conduct us which was done and Dalbeer went along with him In conclusion Iune the 13. it was Ordered upon the Question that the excessive Power of the Duke of Buckingham is the cause of the Evils and Dangers to the King and Kingdom And that this be added to the Remonstrance At this very time being Iune 18. 1628. Doctor Lamb so called having been at a Play-house came through the City of London and being a person very notorious the Boys gathered thick about him which increased by the access of ordinary People and the Rabble they presently reviled him with words calling him a Witch a Devil the Duke's Conjurer c. he took Sanctuary in the Wind-mill Tavern at the lower end of the Old Jury where he remained a little space but there being two Doors opening to several Streets out of the said House the Rout discovering the same made sure both Doors lest he should escape and pressed so hard upon the Vintner to enter the House that he for fear the House should be pulled down and the Wines in his Cellar spoiled and destroyed thrust the imaginary Devil out of his House whereupon the tumult carried him in a croud among them howting and showting crying a witch a Devil and when they saw a Guard coming by order of the Lord Mayor for the rescue of him they fell upon the Doctor beat him and bruised him and left him for dead With much ado the Officers that rescued him got him alive to the Counter where he remained some few houres and died that night The City of London endeavoured to find out the most active persons in this Riot but could not finde any that either could or if they could were willing to witnesse against any person in that businesse This happened to be in Parliament time and at that instant of time when they were about the Remonstrance against the Duke And shortly after so high was the rage of people that they would ordinarily utter these words Let Charles and George do what they can The Duke shall die like Doctor Lamb. What fine the City underwent for this miscarriage we shall observe in order of time Two days after the Privy Councel writ this ensuing Letter to the Lord Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs of London WHereas we are given to understand that the fury and outrage of divers dissolute and disorderly person assembled together in great numbers without any resistance made or course taken to suppresse them by the Magistrates to whom it appertained one Lamb was in a barbarous manner slaine and murdered wherewith his Majesty having been likewise made acquainted as he is very sensible of the scandal that may hereby be cast upon the Peace and Government of the Realme in general when the chief City thereof and where his own Person is resident should by the remissnesse and neglect of Magistrates in the Execution of his Laws suffer a fact and misdemeanour of so high a nature to be committed and to passe unpunished So he is very highly displeased thereat and hath therefore commanded us in his name hereby streightly to charge and require your Lordship c. that with all care and diligence you do forthwith enquire out the principal Actors and Abettors therein and to cause them to be apprehended and committed to Prison and to be proceeded with and punished in the sevarest manner that by the Laws of the Realme is provided against offenders in so high a nature And so c. The Commons at this time voted that Doctor Neal Bishop of Winchester and Dr. Laud Bishop of Bath and Wells be named to be those near about the King who are suspected to be Arminians and that they are justly suspected to be unsound in their opinions that way The House was turned again into a Committee concerning the Remonstrance And Mr. Selden proposed that to the excessive power of the Duke should be added the abuse of that power since that abuse is the cause of these evils that it be presented to his Majesty to consider whether it be safe for the King and Common-wealth that a man of his power should be so near his Majesty and it was ordered accordingly All the parts of the Remonstrance being agreed unto it was perfected to be presented to the King being as followeth MOst Dread Sovereign as with humble thankfulnesse we your dutiful Commons now assembled in Parliament do acknowledge the great comfort which we have in your Majesties pious and gracious disposition so we think it a meet and most necessary Duty being called by your Majesty to consult and advise of the great and urgent affairs of this Church and Common-wealth finding them at this time in apparent danger of ruine and destruction faithfully and dutifully to informe your Majesty thereof
Laud look to thy self be assured thy life is sought as thou art the fountain of wickedness repent of thy monstrous sins before thou be taken out of the world and assure they self neither God nor the world can endure such a vile Counsellor or whisperer to live The other was as bad against the L. Treasurer Weston The King purposing to proceed against the Members of the House of Commons who were committed to Prison by him in the Star-Chamber caused certain Questions to be proposed to the Judges upon the 25 of April WHereupon all the Judges met at Sergeants-Inne by command from his Majesty where Mr. Atturney proposed certain Questions concerning the offences of some of the Parliament-men committed to the Tower and other prisons at which time one Question was proposed and resolved viz. That the Statute of 4 H. 8.8 intituled An Act concerning Richard Strode was a particular Act of a Parliament and extended onely to Richard Strode and to those persons that had joyned with him to prefer a Bill to the House of Commons concerning Tynners And although the Act be private and extendeth to them alone yet it was no more then all other Parliament-men by priviledge of house ought to have viz. Freedom of speech concerning those matters debated in Parliament by a Parliamentary course The rest of the Questions Mr. Atturney was wished to set down in writing against another day Upon Munday following all the Judges met again and then Mr. Atturney proposed these Questions 1. Whether if any Subject hath received probable Information of any Treason or treacherous attempt or intention against the King or State that Subject ought not to make known to the King or his Majesties Commissioners when thereunto he shall be required what Information he hath received and the grounds thereof to the end the King being truly informed may prevent the danger And if the said Subject in such Case shall refuse to be examined or to answer the Questions which shall be demanded of him for further inquiry and discovery of the truth whether it be not a high contempt in him punishable in the Star-Chamber as an offence against the general Iustice and Government of the Kingdom Sol. The resolution and answer of all the Justices That it is an offence punishable as aforesaid so that this do not concern himself but another nor draw him to danger of Treason or contempt by his answer 2. Whether it be a good answer or excuse being thus interrogated and refusing to answer to say That he was a Parliament-man when he received this Information and that he spake thereof in the Parliament-house and therefore the Parliament being now ended he refused to answer to any such Questions but in the Parliament-house and not in any other place Sol. To this the Judges by advise privately to Mr. Atturney gave this Answer That this excuse being in Nature of a Plea and an errour in judgement was not punishable until he were over-ruled in an orderly manner to make another answer and whether the party were brought in Ore tenus or by Information for this Plea he was not to be punished 3. Whether a Parliament-man committing an offence against the King or Council not in a Parliament way might after the Parliament ended he punished or not Sol. All the Judges una voce answered He might if he be not punished for it in Parliament for the Parliament shall not give priviledge to any contra morem Parliamentarium to exceed the bounds and limits of his place duty And all agreed That regularly he cannot be compelled out of Parliament to answer things done in Parliament in a Parliamentary course but it is otherwise where things are done exorbitantly for those are not the Acts of a Court. 4. Whether if one Parliament-man alone shall resolve or two or three shall covertly conspire to raise false slanders and rumours against the Lords of the Council and Iudges not with intent to question them in a Legal course or in a Parliamentary way but to blast them and to bring them to hatred of the people and the Government in contempt be punishable in the Star-Chamber after the Parliament is ended Sol. The Judges resolve that the same was punishable out of Parliament as an offence exorbitant committed in Parliament beyond the office and besides the duty of a Parliament-man There was another Question put by Mr. Atturney viz. Whether if a man in Parliament by way of digression and not upon any occasion arising concerning the same in Parliament shall say The Lords of the Council and the Judges had agreed to trample upon the Liberty of the Subject and the priviledges of Parliament he were punishable or not The Judges desired to be spared to make any answer thereunto because it concerned themselves in particular The next day Mr. Atturny put the Judges another Case It is demanded of a Parliament-man being called Ore tenus before the Court of Star-Chamber being charged that he did not submit himself to examination for such things as did concern the King and the Government of the State and were affirmed to be done by a third person and not by himself if he confess his hand to that refusal and make his excuse and plead because he had priviledg of Parliament Whether the Court will not over-rule this plea as erronious and that he ought to make a further answer It is the justest way for the King and the party not to proceed Ore tenus because it being a point in Law it is fit to hear Counsel before it be over-ruled and upon an Ore tenus by the Rules of Star-Chamber Counsel ought not to be admitted and that it would not be for the Honor of the King nor the safety of the subject to proceed in that manner Pasca 5 Car. upon a Habeas Corpus of this Court to bring the body of William Stroud Esq with the cause of his imprisonment to the Marshal of the Kings Bench It was returned in this manner That Mr. William Stroud was committed under my custody by vertue of a certain Warrant under the hands of twelve of the Lords of the Privy-Council of the King the tenor of which Warrant followeth in these words YOu are to take knowledge that it is his Majesties pleasure and commandment that you take into your custody the Body of William Stroud Esq and keep him close prisoner till you shall receive other order either from his Majesty or this Board for so doing this shall be your Warrant Dated this 2 of April 1629. And the direction of the Warrant was To the Marshal of the Kings Bench or his Deputy He is also detained in prison by vertue of a Warrant under his Majesties hand the tenor of which Warrant followeth in these words C.R. WHereas you have in your custody the Body of William Stroud Esq by Warrant of Our Lords of our Privy-Council by Our special Command you are to take notice that this
and Southcot Justices That offences committed in Parliament may be punished out of Parliament And 3 Ed. 3.19 it is good Law And it is usual neer the end of Parliaments to set some petty punishment upon offenders in Parliament to prevent other Courts And I have seen a Roll in this Court in 6 H. 6. where judgment was given in a writ of annuity in Ireland and afterwards the said judgment was reversed in Parliament in Ireland upon which judgment Writ of Error was brought in this Court and reversed Hide Chief Justice to the same intent No new matter hath been offered to us now by them that argue for the Defendants but the same Reasons and Authorities in substance which were objected before all the Justices of England and Barons of the Exchequer at Sergeants-Inn in Fleet-street upon an Information in the Star-Chamber for the same matter At which time after great deliberation it was resolved by all of them That an offence committed in Parliament that being ended may be punished out of Parliament And no Court more apt for that purpose then this Court in which we are and it cannot be punished in a future Parliament because it cannot take notice of matters done in a foregoing Parliament As to that that was said That an Inferiour Court cannot meddle with matters done in a Superior True it is That an Inferior Court cannot meddle with judgments of a Superior Court but if the particular members of a Superiour Court offend they are oft-times punishable in an Inferior Court As if a Judg shall commit a capital offence in this Court he may be arraigned thereof at Newgate 3 E. 3.19 and 1 Mar. which have been cited over-rule this case Therefore Whitlock accordingly 1. I say in this Case Nihil dictum quod non dictum prius 2. That all the Judges of England have resolved this very point 3. That now we are but upon the brink and skirts of the Cause for it is not now in Question if these be offences or no or if true or false but only if this Court have jurisdiction But it hath been objected That the offence is not capital therefore it is not examinable in this Court But though it be not capital yet it is criminal for it is sowing of sedition to the destruction of the Commonwealth The Question now is not between us that are Judges of this Court and the Parliament or between the King and the Parliament but between some private Members of the House of Commons and the King himself for here the King himself questions them for those offences as well he may In every Commonwealth there is one supereminent Power which is not subject to be questioned by any other and that is the King in this Commonwealth who as Bracton saith solum Deum habet ultorem But no other within the Realm hath this Priviledge It is true that that which is done in Parliament by consent of all the house shall not be questioned elsewhere but if any private Members exuunt personas judicum induunt malefacientium personas sunt seditiosi is there such Sanctimony in the place that they may not be questioned for it elsewhere The Bishop of Ross as the Case hath been put being Embassadour here practised matters against the State And it was resolved That although Legatus sit Rex in alieno solo yet when he goes out of the bounds of his Office and complots with Traytors in this Kingdom that he shall be punished as an offender here A Minister hath a great Priviledge when he is in the Pulpit but yet if in the Pulpit he utter speeches which are scandalous to the State he is punishable so in this Case when a Burgess of Parliament becomes mutinous he shall not have the Priviledge of Parliament In my opinion the Realm cannot consist without Parliaments but the behaviour of Parliament-men ought to be Parliamentary No outragious speeches were ever used against a great Minister of State in Parliament which have not been punished If a Judge of this Court utter scandalous speeches to the State he may be questioned for them before Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer because this is no judicial act of the Court. But it hath been objected That we cannot examine Acts done by a higher Power To this I put this Case When a Peer of the Realm is arraigned of Treason we are not his Judges but the high Steward and he shall be tryed by his Peers But if errour be committed in this proceeding that shall be reversed by errour in this Court for that which we do is Coram ipso Rege It hath been objected That the Parliament-Law differs from the Law by which we judge in this Court in sundry Cases And for the instance which hath been made That by the Statute none ought to be chosen Burgesse of a Town in which he doth not inhabit but that the usage of Parliament is contrary But if Information be brought upon the said Statute against such a Burgess I think that the Statute is a good warrant for us to give judgement against him And it hath been objected That there is no President in this matter But there are sundry Presidents by which it appears that the Parliament hath transmitted matters to this Court as 2 R. 2. there being a question between a great Peer and a Bishop it was transmitted to this Court being for matter of behaviour and although the Judges of this Court are but inferiour men yet the Court is higher for it appears by the 11 Eliz. Dy. That the Earl Marshal of England is an Officer of this Court and it is always admitted in Parliament That the priviledges of Parliament hold not in three Cases to wit in case of Treason secondly in case of Felony and in suit for the peace and the last is our very case Therefore c. Crook argued to the same intent but I did not well hear him he said That these offences ought to be punished in the Court or no where and all manner off offences which are against the Crown are examinable in this Court It hath been objected That by this means none will adventure to make his complaints in Parliament That is not so for he may complain in a Parliamentary course but not falsely and unlawfully as here is pretended for that which is unlawfully cannot be in a Parliamentary course It hath been objected That the Parliament is a higher Court then this is And it is true But every Member of Parliament is not a Court and if he commit offence he is punishable here Our Court is a Court of high jurisdiction it cannot take cognizance of real Pleas but if a real Plea comes by Error in this Court it shall never be transmitted But this Court may award a grand Cape and other Process usual in real Actions But of all capital and criminal causes we are originally competent Judges and by consequence of this matter But I am not
upon the Priviledges of the Peers of this Land and upon mine and their safety hereafter For if the Writ be not obeyed the Law calleth it a Misprission and highly fineable whereof we have had late examples and a missive Letter being avowed or not is to be doubted would not be adjudged a sufficient discharge against the Great-Seal of England On the other side if the Letter be not obeyed a Peer may De facto be committed upon a Contempt in the interim and the Question cleared afterwards so that in this case it is above mine abilities I can onely answer your Lordship that I will most exactly obey and to the end I may understand which obedience will be in all kindes most suitable to my duty I will presently repair to my private Lodging at London and there remain until in this and other Causes I shall have petitioned his Majesty and understand his further pleasure For the second part of your Lordships Letter where your Lordship saith That his Majesties meaning is not thereby to discharge any former directions for restraint of your Lordships coming hither but that you continue under the same restriction as before so that your Lordships personal attendance here is to be forborne I conceive your Lordship intendeth this touching my coming to Parliament onely for as touching my comning to London I never had at any time one word of prohibition or colourable pretence of restraint but on the contrary having his late Majesties express leave to come to London to follow my affairs out of my respect to his Majesty then Prince and to the Duke of Buckingham I forbore to come until I might know whether my coming would not be disagreeable unto them whereunto his Majesty was pleased to answer both under the hand of the Duke and of Mr Secretary Conway That he took my respect unto him herein in very good part and would wish me to make use of the leave the King had given me since which time I never received any Letter or Message of restraint onely his Majesty by his Letter bearing date June the last commandeth me to remain as I was in the time of the King his Father which was with liberty to come to London to follow mine own affairs as I pleased as will appear unto your Lordship if you will afford me so much favor as to peruse them I have writ this much unto your Lordship because I would not through misunderstanding fall into displeasure by my coming up and to intreat your Lordship to inform his Majesty thereof And that my Lord Conway by whose Warrant I was onely restrained in the late Kings time of famous memory may produce any one word that may have so much as any colourable pretence of debarring my coming up to London I beseech your Lordship to pardon my desire to have things clearly understood for the want of that formerly hath caused all my troubles and when any thing is misinformed concerning me I have little or no means to clear it so that my chief labor is to avoid misunderstanding I shall conclude with beseeching your Lordship to do me this favor to let his Majesty understand that my coming up is onely rightly to understand his pleasure whereunto I shall in all things most dutifully and humbly conform my self And so with my humble service to your Lordship I recommend you to Gods holy protection and remain Your Lordships most humble Servant BRISTOL Sherborn April 12. 1626. Hereupon the Lord Keeper delivered this Message from the King to the House of Lords THat his Majesty hath heard of a Petition preferred unto this House by the Earl of Bristol so void of duty and respects to his Majesty that he hath great cause to punish him That he hath also heard with what duty and respectfulness to his Majesty their Lordships have proceeded therein which his Majesty conceiveth to have been upon the knowledge they have that he hath been restrained for matters of State and his Majesty doth therefore give their Lordships thanks for the same and is resolved to put the Cause upon the honor and justice of their Lordships and this House And therefore his Majesty commanded him the Lord Keeper to signifie to their Lordships his Royal pleasure That the Earl of Bristol be sent for as a Delinquent to answer in this House his Offences committed in his Negotiations before his Majesties being in Spain and his Offences since his Majesties coming from Spain and his scandalizing the Duke of Buckingham immediately and his Majesty by reflection with whose privity and by whose directions the Duke did guide his Actions and without which he did nothing All which his Majesty will cause to be charged against him before their Lordships in this House The Lords appointed a Committee to attend the King and to present their humble thanks to his Majesty for the trust and confidence he had placed in the honor and justice of their House About this time the Marshal of Middlesex petitioned to the Committee of the House of Commons touching his resistance in seising of Priests goods A Warrant was made by Mr Attorney General to Iohn Tendring Marshal of Middlesex and other therein named to search the Prison of the Clink and to seise all Popish and Superstitious matters there found A Letter also was directed to Sir George Paul a Justice of Peace in Surrey to pray him to take some care and pains to expedite that service On Good Friday April 7. Sir George Paul was ready by six a clock in the morning five or six Constables being charged and about an hundred persons to aid and assist them The Marshall being attended with the persons named in the Warrant and divers others of his own servants and the Aid being provided by Sir George Paul came to the Clink and finding a door open without any Porter or Door-keeper at all entred without resistance at the first appearing But immediately upon discovery of his purpose the Concourse of people without and his unexpected entrance giving occasion thereto the Porter steps up shuts the door and keeps the Marshal and some few that entred together with him within and his Aid without resisting them that would enter their Warrant being shewed notwithstanding until by force another door was broken open by which the other persons named in the Warrant the Marshals men with the Constables and others appointed for their assistance with Halberts did enter also leaving sufficient company without to guard the three several doors belonging to the House Being within the Marshall gave direction to his followers to disperse themselves into several parts of the House to the end that whilest he did search in one part the other parts and places might be safely guarded and so he proceeded in his search in the prosecution whereof he found four several Priests in the house viz. Preston Cannon Warrington Prator Preston was committed to the Clink about 16 years since and discharged of his imprisonment about