Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	error_n	judge_n	writ_n	1,482	5	9.3217	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A46779	Severall papers lately vvritten and published by Iudge Ienkins, prisoner in the Tower viz. 1. His vindication. 2. The armies indempnity [sic]: with a declaration, shewing, how every subject ought to be tryed for treasons, felonies, and all other capitall crimes. 3. Lex terræ. 4. A cordiall for the good people of London. 5. A discourse touching the incoveniences of a long continued Parliament. 6. An apologie for the army.; Severall papers lately written and published by Judge Jenkins, prisoner in the Tower.	Jenkins, David, 1582-1663.	1647 (1647)	Wing J608; ESTC R217036	64,480	98

Declarations otherwise truth must be said and will be said that there is brought in a new arbitrary and tyrannicall government If the Lords have taken one mans life by an Ordinance they are not bound to take any more and the case differs in case any appeale be made from a tryall by Ordinance to a tryall at common law which was not done by that man whose life was taken away by an Ordinance The Lords ought to remember that his Majesty and his Progenitors have made them a house of Peeres they are trusted to counsell him in peace f Nevels case 8. part Cooks reports and defend him in war his Majesty in Parliament is to consult and treat with the Peers and with his Counsell at Law Judges his Sergeants Atturney and Solicitor and Masters of the Chancery the Lords and that counsell by the respective Writs of Summons to Parliament are to give Counsell g 4 Pars instit fol. 4.9 the House of Commons by their Writ to performe and consent In the House of Lords the Court of Parliament only is for they only examine upon oath h 1 H. 7. fol. 20. with them the King in person sits and by them there erroneous judgements * 14. Ed. 3. c. 5. upon a Petition to his Majesty for obtaining of a Writ of Errour by the advice of the Judges are reversed or affirmed c. the Lords are to remember that their eminency and grandeur is preserved by the Laws if they leave all to will and dishonour their King and make nothing of the Lawes they will make nothing of themselves in the end And therefore it is well worth your observation what was said by Mr Iohn Pym a Member of the House of Commons in his speech against the Earle of Strafford in the beginning of the Parliament which speech is published by the expresse order of the House of Commons the words are these The Law is that which puts a difference betwixt good and evill betwixt just and unjust if you take away the Law all things will fall into a confusion every man will become a Law unto himselfe which in the depraved condition of humane nature must needs produce many great enormities Lust will become a Law and Envy will become a Law Covetousnesse and Ambition will become Lawes and what di●tates what decisions such Lawes will produce may easily be discerned i See part book deel pag. 140.163 c. They that love this Common-wealth as things now stand will use all meanes to procure an Act of Oblivion a generall pardon from his Majesty the Souldiers their Arrears and tender consciences a just and reasonable satisfaction else we all must perish first or last God preserve His Majesty and the Lawes wherein their Lordships and the whole Kingdome are concerned Mai. 17. 1647. David Ienkins Prisoner in the Tower of London FINIS TO THE HONORABLE Societies of Grayes-Jnne and of the rest of the Innes of Court and to all the Professors of the LAW I Have now spent Forty five yeares in the Study of the Lawes of this Land being my profession under and by the conduct of which Lawes this common-wealth hath flourished for some ages past in great splendor and happinesse jam seges est ubi Troja fuit The great full body of this Kingdome hath of late yeares fallen into an extreame sicknesse it is truly said that the cause of the disease being knowne the disease is easily cured There is none of you I hope but doth heartily wish the recovery of our common parent our native country Moribus antiquis stat res Britannica I call God to witnes that this discourse of mine hath no other end then my wishes of the common●g●od how farr I have been from Ambition my life past and your owne knowledge of me can abundantly informe you and many of you well know that I ever d●tested the ship 〈◊〉 and monopolies that in the beginning of this Parliament for opposing the excesses of one of the Bishopes I lay under three Excommunications and the Examination of seeventy seven Articles in the high Commission Court His sacred Majesty God is my witnes made mee a judge in the parts of Wales against my will and all the meanes I was able to make and a patent for my place was sent mee for the which I have not paid one farthing and the place is of so inconsiderable a benefit that it is worth but 80. l. per Annum when paid and it cost me every yeare I served twice as much out of mine owne estate in the way of an ordinary and frugall expence That which gave me comfort was that I knew well that his Majestie was a just and a prudent Prince In the time of the Attournyships of Master Noy and the Lord Banks they Were pleased to make often use of me and many referrences concerning suits at Court upon that occasion came to my knowledge and as I shall answer to God upon my last account this is truth that all or most of the referrences which I have seen in that Kind and I have seen many were to this effect That his Majesty would be informed by his Counsell if the suits preferred were agreeable to the Lawes and not inconvenient to his people before he would pass them What could a just and pious Prince do more Gentlemen you shall find the Cause and the Curse of the present great distemper in this discourse and God Prosper it in your hands thoughts and words as the Case deserves Hold to the Lawes this great body recovers for sake them it will certainly perish I have resolved to tender my selfe a Sacrifice for them as cheerefully and I hope by Gods assistance as constantly as old Eleazer did for the holy Lawes of his Nation Your well-wisher DAVID JENKINS Now Prisoner in the Tower LEX TERRAE THE Law of this Land hath three grounds First Custom Secondly Iudiciall Records Thirdly Acts of Parliament The two latter are but declarations of the Common-Law and Custome of the Realme touching Royall Government And this Law of Royall-Government is a Law-Fundamentall The Government of this Kingdome by a Royall Soveraign hath beene as ancient as history is or the memoriall of any time The kings prerogative is a principall part of the common Law Com Litt● 344 what power this Soveraignty alwayes had and used in warre and peace in this land is the scope of this discourse That Vsage so practised makes therein a Fundamentall Law and the Common Law of the Land is common Vsage Pl●wdens Commentaries 195. For the first of our Kings ●ithence the Norman conquest the first William second William Henry the first Stephen Henry the second and Richard the first the Customs of the Realme touching Royall Government were never questioned The said Kings injoyed them in a full measunt In King Iohns time the Nobles and Commons of the Realme conceiving that the arcient customes and Rights were violated and thereupon pressing the

facto but not de jure Ed. 4. c. ● but not de jure as appeares by the Acts of Parliament declaring them so And by all our Law-Bookes and the fundamentall constitution of the Land Regall power is hereditarie and not elective For the words vulgus-elegerit if vulgus be applyed to the House of Commons 1 H. 7. they of themselves can make no Lawes The Peeres were never yet tearmed vulgus but allowing they be so called the Lawes to be made must be just and who is fit to judge thereof is before made evident Customes cannot referre to future time ●5 Ob. and both are conpled Lawes and Customes Princes have beene deposed and may be by the two Houfes go. The deposers were Traytors Sol. as appeares by the resolution of all the Judges of England Coke Chap. Treason in the second part of the Institutes And never was King deposed but in tumultuous and mad times and by the power of Armies and they who were to be the succeeding Kings in the head of them as Edward the third and Henry the fourth The appeale to the Parliament for errors in judgements in all Courts 16 Ob. is frequent go. This is onely to the House of Lords Sol. and that is not the Parliament the House of Commons have nothing to doe therewith and in the House of Peeres if a Writ of Error be brought to reverse any judgement there is first a petition to the King for the allowance thereof and the reason of the Law in this case is for that the Judges of the Land all of them the Kings Councell and twelve Masters of the Chancerie assist there by whose advice erroneous judgements are redressed The Parliaments have determined of the rights of Kings 17 Ob. as in Henry the sixts time and others and Parliaments have bound the succession of Kings as appeares by the Statute of the thirteenth of Q. Elizab. Chapter the first and the discent of the Crowne is guided rather by a Parliamentarie Title then by Common Law go. If this Objection be true Sol. that the Title to the Crowne is by Parliament then we had no Usurpers for they all had Parliaments to back them yea Richard the third that Monster All cur Bookes of Law say they have the Crowne by discent and the Statutes of the Land declare that they have the same by inherent birth-right And the Statute of the thirteenth of Elizabeth the first Chapter was made to secure Q Elizabeth against the Qu. of Sca●● then in the kingdome clayming the Grown of England and having many adherent● 〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 And that Statute to that end a firmes no such power in the two Homfor which is the Question but in Q Elizabeth and the two Houses which makes against the pretence of this time Master Prynne fol. 104. of his booke intituled The Parliaments supreme power c. Objecting the Statute of the first of Queen Elizabeth and his own Oath that the king is the onely supreme Governour of this Realme Answers The Parliament is the supreme power and the king supreme Governour And yet there he allowes him a Negative Voyce and fol. 107. confesseth that Acts of Parliament translated the Crowne from the right Heires at Common-law to others who had no good Title then the Parliamentary Title makes not the king so powerfull in truth that it escapes from a man unawares To make a distinction betweene Supreme Governour and Supreme power is very strange for who can Governe without power The king assembles the Parliament by His Writ adjourns Vide Speed 645.4 par Instit 27. 1. prorogues and dissolves the Parliament by the law at his pleasure as is evident by constant practise the House of Commons never sate after an adjournment of the Parliament by the kings command Where is the supreme Power The king by his Oath 1●● Ob. is bound to deny no man right much lesse the Parliament to agree to all just and necessary lawes proposed by them to the king This is the substance of the discourse against the kings Negative Voyce The king is so bound as is set downe in the Objection but who shall judge whether the Bill proposed be just and necessary Sol. For all that they doe propose are so pretended and carried in either House sometimes by one or two Voyces or some few as aforesaid and certainly as hath been shewn the king his Councell of State his Judges Sargeants Attorney Sollicitor and twelve Masters of the Chatcery can better judge of them then two or three or few more Mr. Pryn fol. 45. In his book of the Parliaments interest to nominate Privie-Councellors calleth the opinion of the Spencers to divide the Person of the King from his Crowne a strange opinion Calvins case 7. pars fol. 11. and cites Calvins Case but leaves out the conclusions there in mentioned fol. 15. Master Prynne saith there But let this opinion bee what it will without the Kings Grace and Pardon it will goe very far and two Acts of Parliament there mentioned are beyond an opinion And in his Book of the opening of the Great Scale fol. 17. The Parliament hath no jurisdiction to use the Great Seale for Pardons Generall or Particular Where is the Supreme power Mr. ●9 Ob. Prynnes opening of the Seale pag. 19. saith The Noblemen and State the day after the Funerall of King Henry the third King Edward the first his sonne being in the Holy Land made a new Great Seale and Keepers of the same And in Henry the sixts time in the first yeere of his Reigne the like was done in Parliament A facto Sol. ad jus is no good Argument for that in Edward the firsts time it was no Parliament for King Henry the 3. was dead which dissolved the Parliament if called in his time and it could be no Parliament of Edward the firsts time for no Writ issued to summon a Parliament in his Name nor could issue but under that New Seale it was so sodainly done after Henry the thirds death King Edward the first being then in the Holy Land it was the first yeere of his Reign and no Parliament was held that yeere nor the second yeere of his Reigne The first Parliament that was in his Reigne was in the third yeere of his Reigne as appeares by the Printed Acts. Also the making of that Seale was by some Lords then present What hand had the Commons in it Concerning the Seale made in Henry the sixths time the Protector was Vice-Roy according to the course of Law and so the making of that Seal was by the Protector in the Kings name and that Protector Humphrey Duke of Gloucester as Protector in the kings Name summoned that Parliament and was Protector made by the Lords and not in Parliament as appeareth plainely for that Parliament was in the first of Henry the sixth and the first holden in his time and power given by Commission to the

Land or without any thing should lose or forfeit for doing their duty or service of Allegiance It be therefore ordained enacted and established by the King our Soveraigne Lord by the advice and assent of the Lords spiritual and temporall and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by authority of the same that from henceforth no manner of person or persons whatsoever he or they be that attend upo● the King and Soveraigne Lord of this Land for the time being in his person and doe him true and faithfull service of allegiance in the same or be in other places by his commandement in his wars within this Land or without that for the said deed and true duty of allegiance he or they be in no wise convict or attaint of high treason nor of other offences for that cause by act of Parliament or otherwise by any processe of Law whereby hee or any of them shall lose or forfeit life lands tenements rents possessions hereditaments goods chattels or any other things but to be for that deed and service utterly discharged of any vexation trouble or losse And if any act or acts or other processe of the Law hereafter thereupon for the same happen to be made contrary to this Ordinance that then that act or acts or other processe of the Law whatsoever they shall be stand and be utterly void Provided alwaies that no person or persons shall take any benefit or advantage by this Act which shall hereafter decline from his or their said allegiance Cap. 24. In the Statute of 27. H. 8. It is enacted that no person or persons of what estate or degree soever they be of shall have any power or authority to pardon or remit any treason murders man-slaughters or any kinde of Fellonies c. but that the King shall have the sole and whole power and authority thereof united and knit to the Imperiall Crowne as of right it appertaineth c. And in the same it is enacted further that none shall have power of what estate degree or condition soever they be to make Justices of Eyre Justices of Assize Justices of the Peace c. but all such officers and Ministers shall be made by Letters Patents under the Kings great Seale in the name and by the authority of the King and his Heires and Successors Kings of this Realme In the first yeare of Queen Mary and the first Chapter It is enacted by the Queen with the consent of the Lords and Commons That no deed or offence by Act of Parliament made treason shall be taken deemed or adjudged to be high treason but only such as be declared and expressed to be treason by the Act of Parliament made 25. Ed. 3. cap. 2. before mentioned A Declaration of M. David Ienkins now Prisoner in the Tower of London one of His Majesties Iudges in Wales for tryalls of Treasons Murthers Felonies and all other capitall crimes that they ought only to be by Iuries and not otherwise unlesse it be by Act of Parliament THe common Law of this Land is That every freeman is subject to a tryall by bill of Attainder in Parliament wherein His Majesty and both Houses must necessarily concurre for that tryall and attainder is an Act of Parliament to which all men are subject to a Mag. Chart. cap. 29. 2 part instit fol. 28 29.46.48 49 50. composed by Sir Ed. Cooke and published by the Order of the House of Commons in May 1641. No man shall otherwise be destroyed c but by the lawfull judgement of his Peers or by the common Law of the Land Peers to Noblemen are Noblemen Peers to the Commons are Knights Gentlemen c. Judgement of Peers refers to Peers those words The Law of the Land refers to the Commons the Law of the Land is for the tryall of the life of a free Commoner by Indictment Presentment of good and lawfull men where the deed is done or by Writ originall of the common Law all this is declared in Magna Charta c. 29. and by 25. Ed. 3. c. 4. 28. Ed. 3. c. 3. 37. Ed. 3. c. 8. 42. Ed. 3. c. 3. If the Lords will try any man by an Ordinance they destroy that excellent Act of Magna Charta and all those other good Lawes Sir Simon de Bereford a free Commoner of England was condemned by the Lords to death by an Ordinance which after the Lords better considering the matter that they might be acquitted of that sentence became suters to the King that what they had so done in future time might not be drawn into president because that which they had so done was against the Law b Rot. Par. 1. roule 4. E. 3. Num. 2. part inst page 50. with this 〈◊〉 grees Sir Jo●n Lees case Rot. Par. 42. E. 3. Num. 22.23 2. inst fol. 50. with this agrees the practice and usage of all times in this Land all the free Commoners of this Kingdome have alwayes been tryed and acquitted or condemned in capitall causes by Jurers of their equalls An Ordinance bindeth not in Law at all c See 4. part inst fol. 23.48.292 2. part inst f. 47 48. and but pro tempore as the two Houses now affirme a mans life cannot be tryed by that which is not binding and to continue for all times for a life lost cannot be restored By an Act of Parliament of the 1. and 2. of Philip and Mary chap. 10. It is enacted that a●● tryalls for Treason hereafter to be had shall be according to the course of the common-law If the crime charged upon any be treason against the two Houses against the Parliament it cannot be for there is no Parliament without the King that is no Treason in Law as appeares by 25. Ed. 3. chap. 2. 11. R. 2. chap. 3. 1 Hen. 4. cha 10. 1. and 2. Philip and Mary chap. 10. 3 part of the institutes Page 23. An Act of Parliament to make any a Judge where he is party is a void act d Dr ●o●ams case 8. part of Cooks reports for none can be a Judge and party in the same cause and therefore the House of Peers being a party touching the crime charged upon any man whom they would try by an Ordinance for Treason against both Houses cannot be a Judge By the Petition of Right e Petition of Right 3. Car. Regis if any man deserve death he ought to suffer the same according to the Lawes of the Land established and not otherwise but an Ordinance of the Lords is no established law The Protestation the Vow and Covenant the solemne League and Covenant the Declarations of both Houses had made and published sithence this unnaturall Warre are amongst other things sworne and set downe to be for the maintenance of the Lawes the people of this land ought to enjoy the benefit of their Birth-right the Law of the Land and the making good of the said Protestation Vow and Covenant League and Covenant and

Spencers did either that the King may be removed for misdemeanours or reformed per aspertè or that the Subject is bound to govern in ayde of him we only say that his power is distinguishable from his person and when he himself makes a distinction betwixt them commanding one thing by his Legall Writs Courts and Officers and commanding another thing extrajudically by word of mouth Letters or Ministers we are to obey his power rather then his person 5. We take not from the King all power of pardoning Delinquents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo For if the King pardon him which hath murthered my sonne his pardon shall not cut me off from my appeale and 't is more unreasonable that the Kings pardon should make a whole State which hath suffered remedilesse then any private man So if the King should deny indemnity to these which in the furie of Warre have done thing● unjustifiable by the Lawes of Peace and thereby keep the wounds of the State from being bound up 't is equitable that an Act of Indemnity should be made forcible another may And if this will not hold yet this is no good consequence the King is absolute in point of pardons therefore he is absol●●e in all things else and the Parliament hath no power to discharge Delinquencies therefore it hath no power in other matters 6. The Parliament hath declared the King to be in no condition to govern but this must not be interpreted rigidly and without distinction for if the King with his sword drawn in his hand and pursuing the Parliament and their adherents as Rebels be not fit for all Acts of Government yet 't is not hereby insinuated that he is divested of the habit or right of governing If he be unqualified now he is not unqualified for the future if he may not doe things destructive to the Parliament he is not barred from returning to the Parliament or doing justice to the Parliament This is a frivolous cavil and subturfuge 7. We sweare that the King is our supreme Governour over all persons and in all Causes but we doe not sweare that he is above all Law nor above the safety of his people which is the end of the Law and indeed Paramount to the Law it selfe If he be above all Law or liable to no restraint of our Law then we are no freer then the French or the Turks and if he be above the prime and of Law common fafety then we are not so free as the French or Turks For if the totall subversion of the French or the Turk were attempted they might by Gods Law imprinted in the Book of Nature justifie a self-defence but we must remedilesty perish when the King pleases to command our threats Besides how atchieved the King of England such a Supremacie above all Law and the community it selfe for whose behoofe Law was made If Gods donation be pleaded which is not speciall to him or different from what other Kings may pretend to● then to what purpose serve our Laws nay to what purpose serve the Laws of other Countries for by this generall donation all Nations are condemned to all servitude as well as we If the Law of this Land be appealed to what Books hath Mr Ienkins read where hath he found on t that Lex Regia whereby the people of England have given away from themselves all right in themselves Some of our Books tell us that we are more free then the French that the King cannot oppresse us in our our persons or estates by imprisonment denying justice or laying Taxes without our consents other Books tell us that the safety of the people is the supreme Law and that the King hath both God and the Law for his Superiour But all this is nothing to learned Mr Ienkins 8. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are compleat or formally binding without the Kings assent yet this is still to be denyed that therefore without this assent particularly exprest the two Houses can doe nothing nor have any virtuall power at all no not to examine Mr Ienkins nor to doe any other thing of like nature though in order to publick justice and safety I have done and wish Mr Ienkins would call in and lick up againe his black infamous execrable reproaches so filthily vomited out against the Parliament To the first I Was examined by a Committee appointed by the House of Commons I say and said that the House of Commons have no power to examine me for that it is no Court every Court hath power to examine upon Oath this power the House of Commons never claimed The Court of Pie-powders Court-Baron Hundred Court 5 H. 4. c. 3. 3 H. 6.46 1 H 6.43 35 H. 6.5 County Court and every other Court of Record or not of Record hath power to examine upon oath and an examination without Oath is a communication only examination in Law is upon Oath There is no Court without a power of tryall the House of Commons have no power to try any offence Sir Anthony Maynes case Cook 5. pars Reports Lit. 2. lib. Sect. 194.6 H. 4.1 nor ever practised it by Bill Inditement Information Plaint or Originall to deduce it to tryal nor to try it by Verdict Demurrer or Examination of Witnesses upon Oath without which there can be no condemnation or judgement and that which can attaine to no reasonable end the Law rejects as a thing inutile and uselesse Sapiens incipit a fine The Writ Whereby they are called gives them power A● faciendum consentiendum to what to such things Que ibidem de communi Consilie ordinari contigerint 4 pars instit fol. 4. 9. viz. in the Parliament This makes nothing at all for a Court for the House of Commons that consilium which that Writ intends is cleared partly by the Writ for chusing Knights c. For the King by that Writ is said to resolve to consult and treat with the Prelates and Peeres of the Kingdome for and touching the great concernments of the Common-wealth for the King never sits in the House of Commons and this also is made evident by the Writs to the Prelates Peeres Iudges and to his Councell at Law the words in their Writ are To appear and attend the Parliament consilium impensuri the one doth consulere the other facere consentire The House of Lords where the King sits in person 7. H. 6.28 1 H. 7.20 13. E. 3. ca. 5. 4 pars instit pag. 21. assisted by his Lords Judges Serjeants Atturney Sollicitor Masters of the Cnancery is a Court of Record to many purposes set down in the Books of Law and the Statutes of the Land and that Court is only in the House of Lords where the Kings sits A Court must either be by the Kings Patent Statute Law or by the Common Law which is common and constant usage the House of Commons hath no Patent to be a