Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	defendant_n	law_n	plaintiff_n	2,005	5	10.1186	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A28585	The continuation of An historicall discourse of the government of England, untill the end of the reigne of Queene Elizabeth with a preface, being a vindication of the ancient way of parliaments in England / by Nath. Bacon of Grais-Inne, Esquire.	Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660.; Bacon, Nathaniel, 1593-1660. Historicall and political discourse of the laws & government of England.	1651 (1651)	Wing B348; ESTC R10585	244,447	342

the State would trust it with and because it pretended Cognisance onely of matters of Record before them they found out a way of examining of witnesses by Commission and returning their Depositions in writing which being become a Record before them they gave their Sentence upon the whole matter without the ancient ordinary tryall Per pares It becomes a kinde of Peculiar exempting it selfe from the ordinary course in manner of triall and from the ordinary rules of Law in giving of Sentence and as a back doore for the Kings Arbitry in case of Judicature in matters of Common Pleas as the Councell Table was in Crowne Pleas they both are looked upon with a very pleasing eye of Majesty which loves not to be straite laced yet all is imbattelled under the colours of Equity Honor Conveniency and Conscience like a Monopoly that is bred under the wings of the Publique but feeds it selfe upon it That this had attained the Title of a Court so anciently as in K. Stevens time as the Honorable Reporter noteth I much question by the Title that Fleta gives it in later times nor under his favour will that Testimony cited out of the History of Ely warrant it but upon a mistaken ground of misplacing the note of distinction for I take the words to be thus translated King Etheldred determined and granted that the Church of Ely should for ever in the Kings Court hold the dignitie of the Chancery and not hold the dignitie of the Kings Court of Chancery Neverthelesse its clear that these times brought it to that condition that it might well carry that name if formerly it had not For it grew very fast both in honour and power and this not by usurpation though it did exceed but by expresse donation from the Parliament Yet is this power much darkned in the limits and extent thereof chiefly in regard that the Chancellor is betrusted with many things whereof there is no evidence for the Chancery to claim any Cognisance For he was in these times a person of many interests and relations being one of the Quorum in the Star-Chamber of the Kings Councell chief in the Chancery most commonly a Clergy man and therewith Legate è latere and in these severall Relations might act directly and yet in severall Courts And therefore though he had power with others to punish neglects of Execution of the Statutes of Wines by Act of Parliament and also of the Statute concerning Victuall and to determine matters of controversie between parties in Cases depending before the Parliament and in some matters that concern the Kings Revenue yet cannot these be said to be the proper worke belonging to the Cognisance of the Chancery but to the Chancellor by speciall Commission in another relation Allbeit I cannot deny but the Court it selfe had Cognisance in matters of as strange a nature Viz. To punish disturbances of Merchants in their trade to see to the executing of the Statutes of Purveiors and to remedy greivances contrary to other Statutes which generall words let in a wilde liberty to that Court to intermeddle in Lawes which were never intended for their touch to punish Nusances according to discretion to give remedy to Merchants upon the Statute of Staple so that its clear enough the Parliament intended it should be a Court and gave their Seale to their power of Judicature Nor as it seemeth was this any regret to the Courts of Common Law but as a thing taken for granted For the Reports tell us that if the King grants Tythes arising from without the bounds of any Parish the Patentee shall sue in the Chancery by Scire Facias and shall there proceed to issue or demurrer and then to the common Law where upon triall if the Defendant make default the Plaintiffe shall have Judgement and Execution And if the Heire be in Ward to the King the Mother shall sue and recover her Dower in the Chancery And they tell us that it had power to prohibite Spirituall Courts and Courts of common Law yea to over-rule or reverse judgements and yet the common Law held its ground when it was concerned for neither were all suites there by Bill as in cases of Equity nor determined according to such rules nor did the power of Judicature rest in the breast of one Chancellor but in him joyntly with other Councell of the King which were also learned Judges of the Law For the Report informeth that Edward the Second had granted a Rent in Taile to the Earle of Kent who dying his Sonne under age and Ward to the King Edward the Third seised amongst other Lands the rent and granted it to Sir John Molins Upon Petition the King refers the matter to the Arch Bishop and others of the Councell calling to them the Chancellor A Scire Facias goes forth to Sir John Molins he upon appearance pleaded to the jurisdiction as a case belonging to the common Law but it would not be allowed because it was to repeale the Kings Charter And whereas it was objected that the reference was to the Arch Bishop and others and therefore the cause ought not to be determined in the Chancery it was resolved that it did properly belong to the Chancery by the Law And in the Argument of the case it appeares clearely that the Kings Councell there were learned in the Law And the same is yet more evident by the Title of Bills in those dayes exhibited in the Chancery which was directed to the Chancellor and the Kings Councell and the rule given Per tout les Justices which I rather note for the shortnesse of the forme of Bills in those dayes farre different from these times wherein the substance of the complaint however small in it selfe is oftentimes blowne out into so great a bubble that it breakes to nothing And the Statutes formerly mentioned do assert the same thing as touching the Kings Councell For though they speake of the Councell or Chancery in the English Tongue yet in the Originall the words are Conceill en Chancery Having thus touched upon the matters under the Judicatory of the Chancery and Judges in the same in the next place the manner of proceedings comes to consideration For it seems they had been formerly very irregular and that contrary to the Grand Charter upon a bare suggestion in the Chancery the party complained of was imprisoned and no proceedings made thereupon for remedy whereof it was ordained that upon suggestions so made the complainant was to finde Sureties to pursue the suggestions and that the processe of Law should issue forth against the party without imprisoning him and that if the suggestions were not proved true the complainant should incur the like penalty that the Defendant should have done in case be had beene found guilty but afterwards this later clause was altered by another Statute because it was full of uncertainty and it was ordained that in such case the Complainant