Lists which I would avoid as a Purgatory being otherwise I say not better imployed than in such unprofitable Wranglings I should believe it not very difficult much less impossible to maintain That both the Moulding and Manage the Make and the Use of the Kingdoms Militia was ever immediately subject to the Command of the Courts of Iustice especially the Parliaments which may in a large Sense of Law be called the Crown or King's Politick Capacity but never I think to the King's Person alone which in Law is still an Infant as the Mirrour expresly calls him though his common Capacity be ever of age Be the Person a Child an Infant Lunatick Incompos Mentis or a Woman which sure our Ancestors could not but deem a most unlikely Person for a wise and valiant General If I were compelled to argue this it should not be only from right Reason or the Law of Nature which yet to me seemeth much to encline this way The Feet are to bear and the Hands to help to hold to bind and rub the Head in any Distemper or Weakness but if I should hear of any Man born with his Heels in his Neck or his Hands tyed to his Head or immediately under his Chin I should think it a Monster And wherever both Hands and Feet are at their due Distance from the Head with divers Nerves and other Vessels Bones and other parts between them yet I never heard or knew that they did obey the Head till it did command itself and them also by Reason or till it also doth Obey not only its own Eyes and Ears but the Common Sense and Reason of the Soul I must confess I have heard that Ticho-Brah did sometimes imagine that he found Mars below or under the Sun But if it were really so it seems as great a Prodigy in Nature as the new Star and that of Mars rather than a new Star in Cassiopeia might presage those sad Commotions which have since followed in many Places of Europe while Mars hath been so much below or under the Sun For by Nature Mars was said and ever thought to be placed immediately under Iupiter the great Judg or Court of Iustice which should command the Sword And so it doth by Law For in England the Iudgments given in any Court of Record do so command the Militia for Execution for a Writ runs of Course which was made by Common Consent and cannot be denyed Release to all Actions will not hold against Execution except all Suits were also released But this is such a Suit as the Law calls a Demand which may not be denyed And for other Cases of Routs Riots unlawful Assemblies Invasions c. The Posse Comitatus and by Consequence the Posse Regni was Disposed and Commanded by known sworn Officers that acted Virtute Officii by the Law and Custom of the Kingdom For it may be known that the old Iustices or Conservators of the Peace were chosen by the Counties as appeareth by Writs yet to be read from the Rolls of Edward the First And now their Commission and their Power dependeth on Parliament Nor could the Chancery have given such a Power had it not been so Established by Parliament which hath also strictly provided for their Legal Nomination and Election For which the Statutes of Richard the Second Henry the Fifth Henry the Sixth and before them all Edward the third thought it were not printed And it is very well known how by the Common-Law and Custom of the Kingdom all the Sheriffs do command the Posse Regni in their several Counties and that not onely Execution of Writs which may be thought to be Matters of Peace But the Lawyers know that Sheriff is Custos Legis and Reipublicae as well as of Peace of which he is the Principal Conservator in his Shire and County Nor may it be Presumption to say That all these Sheriffs also ought to be and so were chosen by the People as is sufficiently found in Hoveden and in the Laws of the Confessor And in full Parliament of Edward the first it was declared to be the Law and Custom of the Kingdom and therefore so setled in the Choice of the People There was in latter times some Alteration made in Choice of Sheriffs but it was by Parliament However we all know that Headboroughs Constables greater men than themselves know Coroners and divers others are yet still chosen in the Counties and do act by Custom and Common-Law And the Sheriff also however he be chosen yet he stands not by Commission nor ought to fall with Kings death But is a standing Officer by Common-Law Who may command all Lords Knights Gentlemen and others in his County by his Writ of Assistance Which issueth of course to every Sheriff I need not say how little the Kings Personal Command or Warrant can by Law interrupt or hinder the Process of Sheriffs Iustices Constables or others in their legal course for the Publick Peace Yea insomuch that if I should have beaten a Drum or raised Forces to rescue King Henry the Eighth from the Compter for abusing a Petty Watch in a Night-walk I might have been arraigned for it And so I might have been for refusing to fire the Beacons or to have raised the Counties if I had seen a Navie of French or Turks landing in King Iohn's time Although the King had come to me and bid me quiet because they were Friends or such as he invited in for the good of his Kingdom Which from his own Mouth or under his hand would have been no legal Supersedeas to a private man in case of such Danger much less to a Sheriff or other sworn Officer For in such cases of Apparent Danger any man that is next may esteem himself an Officer as in quenching great Fires or damming out the Sea And in such though the King himself should forbid me or get me indicted I may demur and put my self on the Judges of Law especially Parliament the most proper Judges in such Causes And to Lawyers I need not cite Records or Precedents Nor shall I need to adde That in case of Foreign Invasion or Intestine Motions and Breaches of Publick Peace the Common known Laws of the Land will warrant a Sheriff Officer or private man to go over a Pale an Hedge a Ditch or other Bound of a Shire or County In which our Ancestors were not so ceremonious or superstitious in case of hot Pursuit or the like Although they were punctual enough in keeping of Land-marks And in Peace in cases of real Actions and personal Trials They were very tender of those Marks in special that bounded out Shires or Counties The Original of Shires and Sheriffs is generally fixed upon King Alfred But the old Abbot of Crowland whence this arose seemeth to speak of new Names rather than Things for himself hath Provincias Comites Vice Domini though not Vice Comites of Ages before King Alfred And the Monk of
in Parliament Which was the Receiving of Petitions As the Rolls of most times witness It being the old Mode and others accounted it somewhat against Reason that Petitions should be taken and brought into the House by those that were to debate and determine them and so might at pleasure keep them Out or too hastily might press them in Whereas they were to be filled up in course and so to be debated as they were received which was therefore entrusted to the care of known and sworn Officers of the Kingdom Although of late their work in Parliament be so strangely degenerate from that it was of old when also beside Receivers there were some appointed for Tryers of Petitions who as it seemeth were to enquire of matter of Fact expressed in the Petition that it might be cleared and rightly stated before it came to be debated in full Parliament I do not deny but these Triers of Petitions were most frequently some of the Bishops and other Barons But by this I am not convinced that the Lords had by Right and Legislative Power or were the sole Determinors of all Petitions as some would infer or that they were the sole Judges except also the Petty Jury that are Tryers of Fact shall be esteemed the sole Judges of Matters of Law And yet I shall not deny but Petitions concerning abuses or errors in Judicature were often deermined by the Lords as the great Judges but of error in the King's Bench as Judges above the King as was shewed before or from the Exchequer In Queen Ellzabeths Time for the seldom meeting or great Affairs of Parliament the Writs of Error from the King's Bench were by special Act of Parliament to be brought before the Judges of the Common Pleas and Barons of the Exchequer and by them to be determined But with these express Limitations as the Law shall require other than for Errors to be assigned or found for or concerning the Iurisdiction of the said Court of Kings Bench or for want of form in any Writ Process Verdict c. and that after all the Records and all concerning them be remanded to the King's Bench as well for execution as otherwise as shall appertain and with this express Proviso That any Party agrieved by such Iudgment in the Exchequer shall and may sue in Parliament for a further and due Examination By which I do not see such Parties agreed were absolutely tied to Petition the Lords onely although it were onely in a Case judicial Yet I deny not but in Edward the 3d. there was a Committee made of a Bishop two Earls and two Barons to hear and determine all Petitions complaining of Delays or Grievances in Courts of Justice But with great Limitations so that they must send for the Records and Judges which were to to be present and be heard and then by good advice of the Chancellor Treasurer Judges and other of the Council to make an Accord yet so that all be remanded to the Judges before whom the Cause did first depend who were then to proceed to Judgment according to the Accord of the said Committee And in Case it seemed to them to be such as might not well be determined but in full Parliament that then the said Records or Tenors should be brought by the said Commitee to the next Parliament it being the Common Law of the Kingdom and so expressed in all the old Books that all new unwonted difficult matters of consequence should still be brought and submitted to the Judgment of full Parliament so that all our Iudges did and ought to respit such Causes till the next Parliament of which there be almost innumerable Precedents in all the Rolls Nay in Richard the 2d there was a Committee of Lords and Commons appointed to hear and determine all Petitions present in that Parliament But afterwards it was adjudged and declared That such a Commission ought not to be given committing or betraying the High Power of Parliament into a few private hands as we may learn out of Henry the 4th beside other times Yet the Modi of Parliament admit that some extraordinary Cases where the Estates could not agree or the greater part of the Knights Proctors Citizens c. There by consent of the whole Parliament the Matter might be compromised to 25. chosen out of all Degrees and to fewer till at length it might come to 3. who might determine the Case except that being written it were corrected by Assent of Parliament and not otherwise And this seemeth to be the Law of Nature and right Reason That Delegates should not delegate others which was one reason why the Commons never made Pracies as the Lords did Nor might any Committee so determine but there might be Appeal from it to the Parliament Nor doth the Parliament it Self conclude so but that there may be Appeal from its self to its self even to its Iustice if it erre or at least to its mercy by some motion or Petition In one Parliament of Richard the 2d it was Enacted that no man condemned by Parliament should move for Pardon but another Parliament 10 years after did annul this Branch as unjust unreasonable and against the Law and Custom of Parliament For from this which is the highest here there still lieth Appeal from its Self to its Self For which also by the Laws and Customs of the Kingdom there were to be frequent Parliaments that so the errors or omissions of one being still human and therefore errable might be corrected and amended in another By express Statutes of Edw. the 3d. we are to have Parliaments once every year and oftner if need be They were of Old three or four times a year as may be found in all the Old Historians speaking of the great Feats in the Militia in King Alfred's Time they were to be twice a year and that at London as the Mirror affirmeth which we compared with the Laws of the Confessor And I speak also of King Edgars and Canutes Laws for the Celeberrimus Conventus ex qualibet Satrapta which the Great Iudg applieth to the Parliament Eternity it self would be a Burthen unto him that is not pleased with his Being so would Omnipotence to him that is unhappy in his acting It was therefore goodness in God to limit man as well in Doing as in Being It was also the Wisdom of our Ancestors to bound and limit out the Being Acting and continuing not onely of other Judges but also of Parliaments Yet the Old Modi of Parliament agree in this That a Parliament should not be Dissolved till all Petitions were discussed and answered and that after all there should be Proclamation made in some open place whether any had a Petition or just Address to the Parliament and if none replied then it was to be Dissolved I need not shew the Care of our Ancestors or former Parliaments for most strict observation of their own good Orders and Customs of Parliament which are such so just and reasonable that they well deserve a peculiar Discourse by themselves and suppose it not impossible to clear them more by the practice and consent of most Ages in this Kingdom which might also be useful for the Times to come And although it might be possible to find some of their old custome fit to be changed yet my hope is they will retain and observe such Rules of right Reason good Orders and Customs as may still make this an Happy Nation and that they will be mindful of their great Trust for which they are accountable And however it may be in this World yet they also must be judged at his coming who shall bring every Work into Iudgment with every secret Thing whether it be good or whether it be evil And I am not ashamed both to long and pray for his coming who is King of Kings and Lord of Lords The Prince of Salem that is Peace as well as King of Righteousness Melchizedek the Lamb upon the white Thone All the Creation groaneth and the Spirit and the Bride saith come Lord Iesus come quickly FINIS
in affirmance of the Common Law As appeareth not only by Bracton and Fleta but by Glanvil who did write before the Charter and by all the Saxon Laws which were the samplers to King Henry the first But how tender our Law hath always been in matters that concern Estate or Liberty may well appear by all the Executions grantable for Debt or Dammages The Merchant and the Staple Statutes are and were by Statute not by Common Law They seem as sweeping Rain and Storms that drive away the Body Goods and Lands in Fee at time of Recognition or accrewing since but none in Tail but during life of him that was the Cognisor Nor Copyhold or Goods or Leases for a Term of years but only what was in possession at the Execution done They are fore-known and therefore may be well avoided by all such as do not choose their own destructions And there is a tender care in Law not only of exact and punctual Recognitions and recording of them but in case of forfeit upon a Certiorari sued forth from the Chancery and not before return thereof a Capias shall be granted on the Statute Merchant for the Body only if it be a Laic and if Laic be not found and so returned into the Kings Bench or Common Pleas then on pauze of divers months the exigent may be awarded But in Statute Staple on the first Return of Certiorari may the Execution issue forth returnable into the Petty Bag of all it seems the worst in this But the Merchants Court Aequitatem summam desiderat although a kind of Peepoudres as Bracton and the Notes on Fortescue Upon a Recognizance a Capias doth not go before a Scire Facias be Returned into the Chancery Then a Capias or a Fieri Facias or an Elegit at the choyce of Cognisee as in other Common Judgements And of these the fieri facias is the mildest and the oldest by the Common Law It toucheth Goods and Chattels only such as are the Parties Own not lent by or Leased to another For although the Sheriff find them in the Parties Use and full Possession as he thinks yet may he be a Trespasser in taking such and so may run the hazard of an Action ere he be aware Nor did the old Levari facias seize the Land but Corn or that which grew thereon An Elegit hath its Name from his Election or his Choice that sues it out Who so concludes himself from other Executions This did come by Statute not by Common Law and toucheth Half the Fee and all the Goods but yet with Salvo to Contenement he must not lose his Oxen or his Cattle for his Plough For then he cannot live and keep his Family So Tender is our Law for all Estates and Livelihood Nay this Extent must not be made by Sheriffs who may not divide a right but by a Iury of Inquest And so must be Returned and preserved on Record as the first Capias with all mean Processe must or else it shall be nothing worth as may appear at large in the fourth and fifth parts of the great Reports Hoes and Fulwood with divers other Cases And the second of Westminster that giveth this Elegit doth require both Extent of Lands and prize of Goods to be Reasonable that is by Inquest of Twelve and so returned of Record As is cleared in the Commentator See also Littletons Parceners A Capias ad Satisfaciendum taketh the Body but it is by Statute only for it did not lye by Common Law in Debt or Dammages but only where the Original Action was for Forceable Trespass Vi Armis Which is Now crept into every Trespass But of this Sir William Herberts Case in the third part of Reports It may be forbidden again by Statute as it was first granted and that justly too for ought I know if other course be taken for the payment of Just and Reasonable Debts For the Capias as now managed is a great mischief and divers times to the utter ruine of the Debttors whole Family And yet but very little advantage to the Creditor except the Debtor escape and so the Sheriff come to pay the Debt or except he dye in Prison and the Plaintiff get an Elegit for the Debtors Goods at his death or half his Fee-Simple which he had at the time of Judgement or after it For an Action for Debt or Dammages doth but respect the Person and the Law attendeth not what Lands were enjoyed at the Original or before the Judgment But an Action brought against an Heir may aim at Land and so may charge it although he Aliene while the suit dependeth Neither shall I need to add that all these Executions must be sued out For this is required by Law except in the Kings Case within one year and a day after Judgment Yet they may be continued after and by a scire facias be renewd or repealed till the Judgment have Full Execution But this was also given by Statute and to this may the Debter plead although he cannot plead against an Execution Yet it may be suspended by a Writ of Errour and Recognizance according to the Statute of Iames and 3 Caroli And without a Writ of Error after judgement if the Defendant have matter to discharge him of the Execution still the Law is open for him And he may relieve himself by a Writ of Audita Querela And in case of Elegit as soon as the Debt is satisfied the Debtor may enter on his Lands again and if he conceive the Creditor satisfied by casual profits he may bring a scire facias upon which the Creditor may clear how much he hath received of the Debtor's Estate Unto this occasional discourse I shall only add that grand maxime of our Law that Executions ought to be more favourable than any other Process of Law whatever Of which the great Judge upon Littletons Releases and the second of Westminster in Edward the First And for Executions for the Kings Debt's restrained by the great Charter I have little to add to the Comment on the eight chapter of that Charter But the twelfth of Articuli super Chartas hath afforded a Writ commanding the Sheriff to accept of Sureties else an Attachment lieth against him or the party may bring an Action against the Shetiff that refuseth Sureties It is a maxime in Law that a mans House is his Castle so that the Sheriff cannot break it open for an Execution But upon a Writ of Seisin or Possession the Sheriff and other Officers upon suspicion of Treason or Felony may break open an House and so also in common Executions where the King is a party But in all such Cases first the Sheriff must request the door to be opened And the First of Westminster doth also require solemn demand of Beasts driven away into a Castle or Fort which is a kind of vetitum nomium which may be regained By Withernam Which Case I cite the rather because of
the Militia For in such a Case the Sheriff or Bayliff shall not only force his Entry by the Posse-Comitatus into such a Castle on the suit of a Subject but it may also come so far that the said Fort or Castle may be beaten down without recovery And although it be said it shall be done by the Kings Command yet it is well known and seen by experience that it is and always was by Order of the Courts of Justice and for this Semain's Case in the fifth part of Reports may be very well added to the Comments on the First of Westminster By which we see how much the very Forts and Castles or Militia must be subject to the Courts of Iustice Not the King only but in and by his Courts especially the Parliament that may Command Controul and Over-rule all other Courts How tender the Law is in Case of Estate Forfeit by Alienation I have touched before much is to be added Nay in the worst and lowest Estates by Tenure of Will of which somewhat also before for a Fine Reasonable c. as by Copy where Alienation and Wast against the Custom with other Cases in the fourth part of Reports may Forfeit to the Lord but he cannot Out his Tenant at pleasure especially him that sweareth Fealty but the said Tenant may sue his Lord or bring his Action of Trespasse For Offices Forfeited by Bargain and Sale or Brocage the Statutes are clear and just To which may be added the Comments of Littletons Estates Conditional as also for Forfeitures of Conditions It is expresly provided by Act of Parliament that no Sheriff or any other Person do take or seize any mans Goods much less may he take his Lands for Treason or Felony until he be duly convicted or Attainted by Trial Confession or Outlawry upon pain to Forfeit double to the party grieved nor is this only in Richard the third but in the first great Charter and before it also as was touched before Among the Saxons none were Outlawed but for Capital crimes we find it often in the Mirror and in such the Out-law might be killed by any that met him as might any man Attainted of Premunire that vast Chaos of confusion till Queen Elizabeths Time I do not find any outlawry below Felony till about the Barons Wars and then it came not below an Action of Forceable Trespass Vi Armis But in the Common Pleas it came to lie upon Account Debt Detinue Covenant and other petty Actions which the Mirrour would pronounce a most great abuse But in Edw the third there was some amends in providing that none should kill an Out-law but a Sheriff only with lawful Authority Yet in inferiour Cases Land Issues might be sequestred in the Kings Hands till Appearance or Reversal Only in Treason and Felony it forfeiteth as much as Attainder by Judgment But it may be Pleades and Reversed divers ways And a Petty Misnomer or a misdate is ground enough to Reverse it by a Writ of Errour And of this the Books are full But Nimin's case is a criticism in Chronology One of the Sheriffs Returns was dated on the 8th of Iuly in the second and third of Phil. and Mary but it was declared there could be no such day but in the 2d and 4th year which was only between the 6th and 25th of Iuly yet this was enough to Reverse an Attainder of Treason by Writ of Errour And in Favour of Life our Law admitteth Pleas to Out-Lawries in Capitals there where in other Cases must be brought a formal Writ of Error I cannot deny but even by the common Law upon Indictment for Treasom or Felony the Goods and Chattels might be Inventored but not seized as Forfeit till Conviction Nor are Lands and Tenements Forfeit till Attainder by Judge And in case of Appeal which related no time that is only Forfeit which is possessed at the Iudgment But upon Indictment dating the crime the Forfeiture will reach to the crime committed although there be Alienation before Judgement But no Forfeiture before Conviction no seizure before Indictment And the Book of Assizes telleth us the Judges took away a Commission from one that under the great Seal had power to arrest and seize on Goods before Indictment And how tender our Law was in this for Estate it may be seen at large in Bracton and Fleta with the old Writ not only in them but in the Register also relating to the great Charter forbidding all Disseisin till Conviction Yet it requireth the Sheriff per visum suum legalium hominem to Apprise and Inventory all the Offenders Chattels but with a double Salvo both for safe keeping them and for this Security was to be given by the Bailiffs or the Township and for maintaining the person in Prison with all his necessary Family Salvo tamen eidem Capto familiae suae necessariae quamdiu fuerit in prisona Rationabili Esto verio suo Which was not only Meat but Cloathing c. as hath often been adjudged in Edward the third Henry the fourth and other Times See the third part of Institutes cap. 103. It will not be long I hope before God stirreth up our Governours to Reform the crying sins of this Kingdom and not only Gaolers in our oppressing grinding Prisons But the Heathen Moralist hath also told us that Divine wheels are also grinding and will grind to powder though they be slow in motion as unwilling to revenge It is true that Prisons should be by Law both safe and strait Custodies nor should they admit such wandring abroad as some mens Mony doth procure But although Recoveries on Record much lesse Discents do not bind men in Prison or conclude them for want of claim yet upon motion Prisoners may and ought to be brought to the Court in Suits or Actions against them in case of Judgement or where ever else they ought to be in person present And for this I may only referre to the Commentator on the continual claim and the Cases by him cited How unwilling our Law was to empair our Liberty was touched before in the Capias on Debt And although some latter Statutes do out-go our Common Law for Imprisonments yet it is still received for a general maxim in Law that Prisons should be Custodiae not Poenae And where ever any man is unjustly in Prison the Law affordeth him more ways of getting out than his Enemies had to get him in He may have an Habeas Corpus and he may have a Writ de Homine Replegiando He may have an Action of False Imprisonment And may found an Action on the Great Charter Or on it may cause his unjust friend to be Endicted And the Writ de Odio Atia was again revived though by Statute once it was forbidden And for these with Bayl by Judges or Justices Replevins by Sheriffs c. We have the Judgement of all the Judges on Articuli Cleri and the Comments on the great
appear on Record the Party must produce the Iudge's Seal which may be required by Writ and cannot be denied no not in such Exceptions as the present Court do over-rule And for Enrolling Records the same Statute provideth That the King should not Erect Offices or Elect Officers for Enrollment Fot that by the Common Law this did belong to the Courts themselves and Judges therein As to the Sheriff also to Elect the County Clerk for Enrollments so that the King himself could not Elect him as we find in Mitton's Case So punctual is our Law in all concerning Rolls Enrollments and Records Which is also the Law of Nature and for many Reasons As for that of Appeal to which all Courts on Earth must willingly submit Nay Heaven it self admits Appeal from its justice to its mercy so it would to Justice also by some Writ of Error if it could commit an error But however that its Judgments may be cleared to be just it also proceedeth by Record For God hearkeneth as the Prophet saith when ought is good when they meet and speak well together a Record is made and bound up as a Jewel and when evil also some are Watchers to Record it For the Books shall be opened and we shall all be judged by the Record of Heaven and our own Consciences which are now foul Draughts but shall then be as fair and clear as those of Heaven it self But in Courts on Earth if there be no Records there is scarce devisable a legal Traverse or Tryal whether all be right or appeal if any thing be wrong For what Appeal can any man make from that which doth not appear but it is only a Transient Air or Breath which may as soon be denied as it was spoken How can Errors not appearing be corrected or amended by the Parliament it self or any other Court but onely that keepeth Records of all our thoughts as much as of our words or actions I may be tedious in shewing how our Law hath ever allowed Appeals in Ecclesiasticals They were agreed in the Assizes of Clarendon in opposition to Appeals Foreign which were first attempted by Anselm as some affirm but the Date is later And the Lord Dier of Appeals is now printed in the 4th part of Institutes The Judgment of Delegates on such Appeals is called definitive And yet not so but that it may be all redressed by a Court below the Parliament for which we have the Commission of Review granted upon the Delegates nay and upon High Commission it Self as by a Clause in that Commission appeareth To which may be added Killingworth's Case and divers others Of the Court Admiral much I might add from the Laws of Olerom in Richard the 1st and the Rolls of Henry the 3d. and Edward the 1st of which also the Commentator on Littleton's continual Claim and the 22 Chapter of the last part of Institutes How it lieth open to the common Law and to daily Prohibitions may be fully seen in its Complaints to King Iames which were as fully answered by all the Judges It is no Court of Record and so did all the Judges declare in 8 Iacobi yet it must keep Records enough to ground an Appeal which lieth from thence as from Courts Ecclesiastical to Iudges delegate of which the 8th of Elizabeth and other Statutes County Hundred Baron Courts and those of Antient Demesne with all Close Writs are not of Record The Sutors are the Iudges as was said before in Cases not their own And some have thought they did proceed much by fancie without legal Proof and Witnesses till the great Charter commanding all Bayliffs to put no man upon Oath without faithful Witnesses But we have found the Charter long before King Henry the 3d. And in that Phrase of Bayliffs which in France are Governours and Magistrates as in eldest Towns or Cities with us some great Lawyers include all Iudges as Fleta with the Mirror which also calleth Coroners the Peoples Bayliffs and the Sheriffs Returns are de Baliva These inferiour Courts being not of Record held petty Pleas of Debt or Damages under 40 s Antient Demesn had other prviledges but not of forceable Trespass Vi Armis finable to the Crown Yet these also must keep Copies or some such Records as may suffice for Appeals For they may be questioned and their Proceedings being denied shall be Tryed by Iury and upon their judgments lyeth a Writ of false judgment not a Writ of Error But in the Case of Redisseison the Sheriff is Iudg by the Statute of Merton and a Writ of Error lieth on his judgment But in Case of Debt Detinue Trespass or other action above 40 s. where in the County the Sheriff holdeth Plea by force of a Writ or Commission of Iustices the Sutors are still the Iudges and no Writ of Error but false judgment lieth on them Nor doth the Coroner's judgment of Out-Lawry in the County Court forfeit Goods till it be returned and appear on Record Nay the Coroners Certificate on a Certiorari did not disable the Out-Law although the King might seize his Goods till the Return of the Exigent Quinquies Exact But a Writ of Error is proper to Record and from Record and a Plea of Nul tiel Record is not tryable by Witness or Iury but onely by it self in a Court Record Such are the Sheriffs Turns and from them as from Counties Hundreds came the Court Leets which may be held by prescription against the Great Charter In which Leets the Steward is Iudg as in the Turns the Sheriff and Bishop was till the first Norman who by Parliament exempted the Clergy as was touched before But the Laws of Henry I. bring them again into the Seculars So also the 10th of Marlbridg and before it the Laws of Clarenden for all Barons or Tenant in Capite to attend the Great Court till Sentence of Life or Member which continued long in the Parliament also The Turn enquireth of Common Nusance and of Felonies de Furtis medletis whence our Chance or Chaud Medly hot Debate or sudden Fray see the Notes on Hengham but not of Murder or Death of Man which alone of all Felony belongeth to the Coroner He was a very antient Officer and ought to be made a Knight for which the Register and Rolls of Edward the 3d. where a Merchant chosen Coroner was removed quia communis Mercator He must have a good Estate and might receive nothing of Subjects fot doing his Office But by late Statute he hath a Mark on Indictment of Murder yet upon Death by misadventure he must take nothing See the Comments on the 1st of Westminster The Coroner's Court is of Record and he may take Appeals as well as Indictments upon view of the Body and must enter them but cannot proceed but deliver them up to the Iustices which is as antient as the Great Charter for the next Gaol-delivery or the King's Bench sometimes also he is locum
tenens to the Sheriff and he standeth when the King dieth When also so many think there is no Sheriff but it may be more considered I must not stay in the Court of Peepoudres incident to every Fair or Market as a Court Baron to a Mannor although it be a Court of Record and a Writ of Error lyeth on its judgment for which Iones and Hall's Case in the 10th Part of Reports and in the 4th Institutes I need not speak of Writs of Error from the Common Pleas to the Kings Bench from the King's Bench to the Exchequer-Chamber and from thence as from the King's Bench also to the Parliament or of the known Statute of Henry the 6th making it Felony to steal withdraw or avoid Records or any parcel of Record But of no Records is the Law more punctual than in of extraordinary Cases of Oyer and Terminer which were more private oft and less fixed being transient on emergent Cases which yet being heinous seemed to require most exact Records especially because there might be Appeal so just and needful if the Judges exceeded but one tittle of their Commission If it were discontinued or expired then the Indictment and all Records were to meet in their proper Center at the King's Bench but in other Cases Records of Oyer and Terminer were sent into the Exchequer So in Edw. the 3d. As in Elizabeth Results on charitable uses and the like were to the Chancery by Act of Parliament The great Seal was the Soul to inform and actuate the Body of Records in all exemplifications from the Rolls in all Writs Pattents or Commissions and the rather also that by this nothing of moment might be hudled up but duly weighed and considered while it passed so many hands and judgments as it should before the Sealing Nor shall I add that an Act of Parliament it Self is not pleadable in a Court of Record but from Record or under the Seal whence the old custom was to remove the Records of Parliament by a Writ of Certiorari into the Chancery thence by the Lord Chancellor into the Kings Bench and thence by a Mittimus into the Common Plea and Exchequer with an usual Writ commanding all the Courts to keep and observe such Acts of Parliament which of Old were Proclaimed by the Sheriffs and were put under the Seal as we may see by the Proclamation now printed among the Statutes of Edw. the 3d. and they were not hudled into Print in those Days not of such vertue in Print as on Record and under the Seal For there were not then such Printers or Copiers that without much caution our fore-Fathers durst trust with all their Lives and Estates which by one dash of a Pen the change of a not a with a to a for or a from might be soon destroyed or enslaved Much less then should a Court of Record be Created but by Record yea and that be shewed under the Seal also For when the Seal was moulded our Ancestors ordained that no Jurisdiction should be grantable but under the Seal which should be known and obeyed by all the People as the Mirror discourseth at large In Edw. the 4th it was resolved by all the Judges in the Exchequer-Chamber that no man could be a Iudg or Iustice by Writ which was also Sealed but by open Pattent or a publick Commission But the Lord Chief Iustice of England hath of late no such Commission or Pattent yea a Sealed Writ and of Old he was also Created by Pattent till about the end of King Henry the 3d. if good Authors deceive me not It seemeth also somewhat disputable whether he were not included in the Statute of Henry the 8th for Commissions to the Judges by Letters Pattent under the Seal However the words are plain enough for Iustices of Eyre which of Old were also by Writ as those of Oyer and Terminer but now not to be but by Comission or Pattent under the Great Seal Which Commission should also be read and shewed in Court lest there be some kind of Demurrer or exception unto jurisdiction which hath been in some Cases at the Kings Bench and may be by Law to all now Judges by special Commission except it be produced under the Seal if the old Books deceive us not who do do not onely ascribe all jurisdiction to the Seal but in all legal exceptions ever admit of that to the Iudg if he be a Party or have not jurisdiction or be otherwise incompetent That the Parliament also will never Erect or Create any Court of Record but by Record and open Commission under the Great Seal I do the rather believe because the Seal is so proper and peculiar to the Parliament being made by common consent of which the Mirror and others at large and by such common consent used and committed to the special care of the Chancellor or Lord Keeper of England as he was called for keeping that which our Fathers esteemed as the Kingdoms Key or Clavis It is well known how King Henry the 3d. was brought to acknowledg That among all great Officers the Lord Keeper or Chancellor did especially belong to the Choice of the Parliament and Ralph Nevil among others refused to yield up the Seal to the King when it was demanded saying that he had received it by the Common Councel of the Kingdom and without their Warrant he would not deliver it of which both Matthew Paris and Matthew of Westminster From the continual use of this Seal in Parliament it is the Law and Custom of the Kingdom that the Lord Keeper shall have place in Parliament still to be there with the Sael although he be often no Peer and have no Vote but for making and Sealing of Charters Pattents Commissions and Writs framed by Parliament For although the Register made or continued by Parliament be now so full that there be little need yet the framing of New Writs was a great work of Old Parliaments as appeareth in the Books and Statutes as in that of Westminster the 2d de Casu consimili And as if the Parliament had made no Laws at all but onely New Writs the Old Modus brancheth out all the Laws of Parliament into Originals Iudicials and Executives which all know to he the Division of Writs Those especially de Cursu drawn by the Cursitors for Brevia Magistralia were let to be framed by the Masters of Chancery as appeareth at large in Bracton and Fleta and in the Oath of the Six Clerks or other Clerks of Chancery in Ed. 3 with that of Ed. 1. de casu continili in which Statute it is asol provided that if the Masters could not agree in framing such a new Writ they might if they saw cause respit the Parties till the next Parliament that so it might be formed by Advice of all the great Lawyers of the Kingdom Yet besides this of making and sealing of Writs there was another work and great use of the Masters of Chancery
solummodo publica so Glanvil but in Bracton Fama apud graves bonos and in Fleta apud bonos graves infamia yet must the Party be Attached vel per Carceris Inclusionem vel per Plegios idoneos so it was in Glanvils time for all but Homicide but in Fleta's Diffamatus vel Accusatus attachiabitur per Corpus Captus Remanebit donec se indè Legitimè acquietaverit That is in him till he have Legally cleared himself from all Seducement of the King Kingdom or Kingdoms Army Omnemque seductionem Regis Regni vel sui exercitus quicquid sit contra Pacem suam which Glanvil expresseth thus Machinatum fuisse vel aliquid fecisse in mortem Regis vel seditionem Regni vel Exercitus vel Consensisse vel Consilium dedisse vel Authoritatem praestitisse In such Cases also they debate who should be Iudge and for this they all agree in that fundamental Principle of right Reason and Nature that Parties may never be Iudges in their own Causes for which besides all others the Mirror is large and clear among all Exceptions to the Iudges Person if he have no Commission or refuse to shew it as he ought or be Party c. of which also Britton in Appeals cap. 22. fol. 41. And for this reason Bracton and Fleta with others agree that in such Causes neither the King who might so they say be Iudex Actor nor the Kings Commissioners should Judge or determine But Curia Pares except only when the Case is not of Life but finable for in such the Kings Commissioners may determine sine Paribus But who are these Peers and what is this Court One of Bractons first Maxims in his second Chap. is that all obscure difficult and new Judgments ought to be suspended Usque ad magnam Curiam ibi per Consilium Curiae terminentur Fleta is somewhat clearer in his second Book and second Chap. Habet enim Rex curiam suam in Concilio suo in Parliamentis suis presentibus Prelatis Com. Baron Proceribus aliis viris Peritis ubi terminatae sunt Dubitationes Iudiciorum Novis injuriis emersis Nova constituuntur Remedia unicuique Iustitia prout meruit Retribuetur Ibidem Unicuique What to every Man in all the Kingdom or how far and how high may this extend or reach Shall we propound this Doubt to the Antient Parliaments who were most like to know their Power and Priviledge The Law was clear enough before but some were pleased not to think it so and therefore in the Statutes of Marlbridge as old as Henry the third in the first place of all it was agreed and enacted That all men Living of this Kingdom as vvell high as lovv tam Majores quam Minores must and ought submit to Judgment Iustitiam habeant Recipiant in Curia Domini Regis That this Expression may go lovver than the Court of Parliament I can not deny nor vvill others I suppose deny but that it may and must be yielded to the highest Court of all One of the Clauses of the Kings duty expressed in the Saxon Lavvs is to do all things rightly by the Judgment of his great Court per Iudicium Procerum Regni and again by that great Council to maintain or do Justice and Judgment Iudicium Rectum Facere Iustitiam tenere per Concilium Procerum Regni All vvhich and much more in those Lavvs must be solemnly Svvorn by the King before the Kingdom and the Clergy in propria persona inspectis tactis Sacrosanctis Evangeliis c. coram Regno Sacerdote Clero This may be considered antequam ab Archiepiscopis Episcopis Regni Coronetur Even before he may he Crowned or should require his Subjects Homage Insomuch that vvhen the Subjects have tendered Homage as some Lords did to King Henry the fifth before the King had done his Homage and Sworn his Fealty to the State and Laws It hath been observed by Historians as some kind of Comet that I say not a Prodigy in State Politicks And besides all the forms of Coronation found in Hoveden Walsingham and other Historians secundum antiqua Statuta as Matthew Paris speaketh it is clear enough in the Records and Rolls of Richard the second before others how the King first did take that Solemn Oath and then the Archbishop went to every side of the Scaffold relating to the Kingdom how the King was Svvorn and then he asked them si ipsi consentire vellent if they would now give consent to take him for their King and Liege Lord and if so they came and did him Homage If they would consent What was it at their Choyce and were our English Kings Elective plain Elective sure it would be duely weighed and I confess some things have made me very much suspect they were Elective And the rather also by considering the great Care and Importunity of some Kings to procure the Crown to be setled by Parliament upon their Heirs Which might intimate that indeed it was not their Inheritance at Common Law for it was seldom seen I suppose that English Men have taken much Pains to obtain an Act of Parliament to settle their Inheritance on their own Heirs except they were Illegitimate or Aliens And upon search I cannot find the old Oaths of Allegiance did relate to the Kings Heirs or Successors either in the Saxon or first Norman times although we find the Oath in old Laws long before Edw. the second and in old Lawyers Bracton Britton Fleta with the Mirror punctual in the Oath of Allegiance but not a Syllable of Heirs or Successors that I can find Yet in the times of Henry the first and Henry the second there was some special Acts of Parliament for setling the Crown on Maud the Emperess or her Issue and King Henry's Son was Crowned in his Fathers Reign and of that time the Salvo in Glanvil Regi Haeredibus which I find not in any other old Lawyer and I believe it not usual till the great Quarrels of York and Lancaster it may be much Later But all such Acts for tying the Crown to such or such a Family do not evince a former Right of Succession any more than the House of Austria doth prove the Empire not to be Elective though it now seem as entailed on that Family I say not how often it hath been adjudged that Affirmative Statutes do not annul the Common Law and that one may Prescribe against a Statute Negative but in Affirmance of the Common Law for which the Comments on Littletons Burgage So that if an English King was Elective by the Common Law the Kingdom might prescribe against late Statutes which might erre much more than they could oblige all future Parliaments but they might still be free and most of all in what was due before by Common Law Let us discuss it then and see what Antient Lawyers and Historians do record about our Kings
Parliamenti sedebunt nullus stabit sed quando loquitur ut omnes audiantur à Paribus And again Nullus solus potest nec debet recedere à Parliamento sine Licentia Regis omnium Parium Parliamenti hoc in pleno Parliamento Ità quod inde fiat mentio in Rotulis Parliamenti It may be possible That Bracton and Fleta with others may use the Phrase Pares in such a sence when they say That the King or his Commissioners should not judge and determine of Treason but Pares Which may be added to the 25 th of Edw. 3. reserving Treason to Parliament where of Old it seemeth only determinable so that The Mirror would not have it Endicted but by Accusation and in full Parliament as in King Edmund's Time c. Cap. 2. Sect. 11. and in Edw. the 3 d it was enacted That Offences of Peers and great Officers and those who sued against the Laws should be tryed in Parliament And although now the Phrase be given to all the Lords of Parliament yet it was most or only proper to the Earls whom by Law and custom the King styleth Consanguineos and he might style them his Peers or Companions as in Latine Comites So Bracton Comites dicuntur quasi Socii Regis qui habet Socium habet Magistrum and in another place A Societate Reges enim tales sibi Associant ad consulendum regendum Populum Dei and the like is in Fleta Comites à Comitiva dicuntur qui cum viderint Regem sine Freno Frenum sibi apponere tenentur c. which is also in Bracton The Mirror is yet clearer although the King had no Equals yet because himself or his Commissars might not be Judge it was provided by Law that he should have Companions to hear and determine all his Torts c Aux Parliaments and those Companions were called Countees Earls from the Latine Comites So also Sarisberiensis cited before in Hen. 2. Comites à Societatis participatione dici quisquis ignorat ignarus est literarum c. some will have them Comites Socii in Fisca because of old some Earls had a third part of profits accrewing by Pleas and Forfeitures in their Counties as the Laws of the Confessor and Mr. Selden in his Comes but he will also grant their name à Comitiva potestate rather than from such Communion of profits That the old Sheriffs also who were Vice-Comites did come to Parliament appeareth in the Ancient Writs and Histories and yet the Barons seem to be the Kingdoms Iudges and the present Earls may seem to sit in Parliament but onely as Barons who are now all Peers and Lords and Parliament But although the Lords were the great Iudges of the Kingdom and of all Members thereof yet it is well known that in full Parliament as old as Edw. 3. they did not only acknowledge but protest that they were not to Iudge the Commons in Cases of Treason and Felony being not their Peers How it was in Rich. the Second may be seen at large in the Rolls and Records now printed in Edward the Second the Commons proceeded by the Judgment of the Lords for which also the Fructus temporum cited before may be added to all in the Road. Appeals and Writs of Error were from the King to the Lords in Ecclesiasticals that touched the King they were to the Spiritual Prelates Abbots and Priors of the Upper House by Act of Parliament in 24 Hen. 8. till which it may be Temporal Lords had also Cognizance of such as well as Temporals And Writs of Error in the Parliament were Judged by the Lords for they came from the Kings Court his Bench or his Exchequer and if Errors had been in the Common Pleas or below it they should not be brought into Parliament but to the Kings-Bench and from the Kings-Bench as from the King not otherwise they came to the Lords and although there was a formal Petition for removing the Record from the King it was but of Course and the King could not deny it Which we found granted by all the old Lawyers and Historians as I shewed before and by the grand Master and Patron of Law King Edw. 1. in Britton because none may Judge in his own Cause Therefore in Causes where our self shall be Party we do consent que N. Court soit judg Sicome Counts Barons in Temps de Parliament In the Laws of Hen. 1. one of the Chapters beginneth thus Iudices sunt Barones Comitatus qui liberas in eis terras habent for in those times Barons were by Tenure only not by Patent that I know till Beauchamp of Holt in Rich. 2. nor by Writ that I can find till the Barons Wars but K. Johns Charter is to Summon Comites Barones Regni majores sigillatim per literas N. But all that hold in Capitae by general Summons forty days before the Parliament and that Negotium procedat ad diem assignatum secundum consilium eorum qui presentes fuerint quamvis non omnes submoniti venerint and the Summons of Delinquents or Suitors in Parliament was to appear and abide the Judgment of the Court not of the King but of his Court for the King is Father and not Judge of his People in his proper Person as was shewed before and all the Books agree that he must Commit his Jurisdiction unto Judges in the Courts of Justice and when he might assume great Offices into his own Hands by Parliament in Edw. the third all Judges were expresly excepted and the Judges Oaths and several Acts of Parliament require them to proceed according to the Law notwithstanding the Kings Command or Seal against it and the Register affordeth a Writ to Supersede or Revoke any such Seal from the King himself to any of the Judges And the Lord Chief Justices as the Lord Chancellor and Treasurer were Chosen by the Kingdom as we found before in the time of Hen. 3. how much more then should the Lords of Parliament be made by Parliament for else they be the Kings Commissioners So the Roman saith our German Fathers chose their Lords in Common Council to be Judges in iisdem Conciliis Eliguntur Principes qui Jura reddunt De Minoribus consultant Principes de Majoribus Omnes And Caesar also observeth that their Princes or Lords were their great Judges sed Principes Regionem atque Pagorum inter suos jus dicunt Controversiasque minuunt Yet Tacitus will also tell us that with those Princes they did joyn Commons Centeni ex Plebe Comites which were perhaps the Fathers of our County Hundreds And in K. Williams Edition of the Confessor's Laws when he inclined so much to them of Norwey Universi Compatriotae Regni qui Leges Edixerant came and besought him not to change their Old Laws and Customs of their Ancestors because they could not judge from Laws they understood not quia durum valde foret sibi suscipere
Leges ignotas Judicare de eis quas Nesciebant How it was in Parliament while there were only Barons by Tenure would be more enquired But of later times Commons have adjudged Commons and have joyned with the Lords in adjudging Lords of which there are divers Cases cited in the Fourth Part of Institutes Cap. 1. pag. 23. It may be considered that many Kingdoms and Common-wealths that were not Kingdoms in all Ages did consist of Three Estates as of Three Principles in Nature or Bodies Natural which might occasion the Phrase of Tribe in many other besides the Romans who in Three Estates were not so Ancient as the Grecians or Aegyptians that I speak not of the Gauls Britans or the Eastern Nations And if any would observe it might be possible to find the Prophets hinting a Trinity in divers Kingdoms or Estates and that not only for moulding but for overthrowing them Besides the Three Captivities or Three overturnings of the Iewish State and the Three blows of the Goat on the Ram in Daniel as alluding to the Three great Battles which did break the Persian Empire And why may not the Sacred Trinity be shadowed out in Bodies Politick as well as in Natural And if so our Three Estates may be branched as our Writs into Original Iudicial and Executive as shadows of the Being Wisdom and Activity Divine If I may not grant yet I cannot deny Original Power to the Commons Iudicial to the Lords Executive to the King as the Spirit to the Body or if you will the Head or Fountain of Sense and Motion But he must see by two Eyes and hear by two Ears as I touched before yet his very pardoning although it be by Law much limited doth seem to speak his Power Executive And so his Writs do speak aright Because my Courts have so and so judged Therefore I do so and so command the Judgment shall be executed And if any will assert the Militia to this Power Executive I shall also grant it to the King So that it may be alwayes under the Power Original and Judicial This might belong to the Lords and that to the Commons And the plain truth is I do not find more Arguments to prove the Judicial Power to belong to the Lords than I do for rhe Legislative in the Commons And as it seemeth to be above so below also it may be much disputed That the Legislative Judicial and Executive power should be in distinct Subjects by the Law of Nature For if Law-makers be Judges of those that break their Laws they seem to Judge in their own Causes which our Law and Nature it self so much avoideth and abhorreth So it seemeth also to forbid both the Law-maker and Iudge to execute And by express Act of Parliament it is provided That Sheriffs be not Justices where they be Sheriffs But if Execution be alwayes consonant to Judgment and This to the Law there is still most sweet Harmony and as I may say a Sacred Unity in Trinity represented That the Commons should have most Right to the Power Original or Legislative in Nature I shall leave to be disputed by others I shall only touch some few Particulars which have made me sometimes to suspect that by our Laws and Model of this Kingdom it both was and should be so How the Roman Historian found the Judicial power given to the Lords by our Old Ancestors I did observe before he is as plain for the Legislative in the Commons Nay to the Lords themselves he saith in Judging was adjoyned a Committee of Commons both for Counsel and Authority Ex plebe Comites consilium simul Authoritas And again he sheweth how the Lords did sit in Council about the less Affairs but of greater all both Lords and Commons So also that those things which the Commons did determine Quorum Arbitrium penes Plebem apud Principes pertractentur they should be debated with the Lords for their Advice but not their Legislative Votes And the Mirror a good Comment on Tacitus in this sheweth how our Lords were raised out of the Commons and giveth them a power Judicial but where is their Ligislative Nay the Modus of Parliament will not only tell us that the Commons have better and stronger Votes than the Lords but that there may be a Parliament without the Lords as well as Prelates For there was a time in which there was neither Bishop nor Earl nec Baro so the Irish Modus and yet there were Parliaments without them but never without the Commons So that if the Commons be not summoned or for Cause Reasonable cannot or will not come for Specialties in which they blame the King Parliamentum tenebitur pro Nullo quamvis omnes Alii status plenarie ibidem interfuerint And the Kings Oath is to confirm the Just Laws which the Commons not the Lords but Commons shall Elect or Choose quas Vulgus Elegerit So in Latine and in French of Edw. 2. and Edw. 3. Les quiels la Communante aur ' eslu And in English of Hen. 8. and other Times which the Commons of the Realm shall choose And if we look into the Old Writs of Summons we shall find the Commons called ad consentiendum faciendum and the Old Writ addeth quod quilibet omnes de Comitatu facerent vel faceret Ii personaliter interessent As it is in the Modus of Parliament with sufficient intimation that without the Commons nothing could be done which the late Writs express thus Ita quod dicta Negotia Infecta non remaneant pro defectu potestatis c. But the Lords are called de quibusdam arduis tractaturi consilium Impensuri only as Counsellors not as Law-makers For the very same words are in the Writs for the Judges and others coming to Parliament although they do not Vote in making Laws This may also shew us how the Lords themselves did Elect the Knights of Shires and by Statute of Rich. 2. are to contribute to the charges of the County Knights who were to sit and Vote in Parliament as Law-makers for the whole County whereas the Lords were there but as Judges and the Kings Counsellors And is it probable they should retain to their own Persons that for which they delegated others who were there to do quod quilibet omnes facerent personaliter even all that all the Lords themselves should do as Freeholders not as Lords or the Kings Patentees who might so be his Councellors or Iudges rather than Law-makers this was more left it seems to the Commons who for this and other Reasons should not be Common Iudges as I think in private Causes or of private Persons but of Iudges or of such as the Mirror speaketh of whom elsewhere there was no Common Justice to be had But if the Lords had not a Legislative Right why did the Commons send up the Bills to them how came the Lords to joyn with the Commons in Passing of Acts
suppose it possible for All the House to Usurp the Royal Crown with all its Dues what should I what may I doe but mind my Calling and attend the Judgment of the Highest Court I know That may command my Body and my Judgment much for ought I see in things I know so little as I do or can the Due disposal of the Crown or that Mighty Burthen or that Royal Venom as the Roman Emperor did call it I did and still do believe there may and shall be such a Monarchy ere long tâ—â—â—ugh all the World that I shall gladly bow and stoop and bear the Yoke For it is easy and the Burthen light I hope and believe or know that God will come and appear ere long to dwell in the World For the Earth shall be full of his Glory and his Kingdom shall come and his Will be done on Earth as now in Heaven So we were taught to ask and it therefore shall be fully answered I could desire him rather if he pleased in the still quiet Voice then in the rushing Wind or Fire or Thunder-claps Yet so he came before and shook the Earth And so it seems again yet once again to shake both Heaven and Earth Overturning overturning overturning for there also were three till he comes whose Right it is To whom both Kings and Lords and all must bow or be bowed to submit and cast down their Crowns their Coronets and all their Glory The Earth shall reel and fall and rise no more For he will visit the Host of high ones that are on high and the Kings of the Earth upon the Earth they shall be taken and cast into Prison shut up in the Pit and shall be visited or wanting Nay he will darken the Sun and confound the Moon and make the Stars to Blush before he reigneth in Glory among his Antients in Jerusalem His Tabernacle then shall appear again and rest among them But BABYLON must first be pulled down We may deceive our selves in chayning Babylon to any Town or City whatsoever although one it may be more especially But Babel was the head of Nimrod 's Kingdom whence Tyranny did stream through all the World For although the out-lets of Euphrates be long since stopped in the Fenns of Caldea Yet there is another rapid Torrent Tygris which from Babylon disperseth much Confusion troubled Waters into all the Seas about Nor may it wholly be unworthy of our Thoughts how Babylon was alwaies the beginning or the Head of Tyranny through all this World But fatal still to most that did but touch it So to Nimrod the great Bell of Babylon and the Assyrians Sardanapalus might effect an end so like to Belus who was burnt some think with Fire from Heaven So that a Statue was made of him who left no Relique And from hence began Idolatry So to Nebuchadnezer and the Babylonian Monarhcy when the Watchers saw him strut and say Is not this my Babylon The Story of this and of its loss to Persians is so clear in Sacred Writ That I need not enlarge it from Iosephus the true Berosus Megasthenes Herodotus Xenophon or any later Though it be also very considerable among those Heathens And so is that famous Ruine of Senacherib whom Esay maketh a Type of all the Churches Carnal and Spiritual Foes Insomuch that from him rather than Egypt St. Iohn's binding of Satan the old Dragon the crossing Serpent seemeth borrowed The Persian Empire did begin from Cyrus taking Babylon It 's Pride and Tyranny did much encrease then when Darius won this Babylon again But neither Cyrus nor Cambyses Darius nor Xerxes or any other Persian Monarch could much prosper in ought of Consequence in Scythia Greece or other Places after they were stained or cursed with Babylon The Macedonian was succesful very much but not accounted any of those Monarchies till Alexander lost himself by gaining Babylon 'T is strange how great a Change it made in him that then became a Cruel Lustful and Licentious Tyrant stay but a while and you shall see him lose both Life and Monarchy at once in fatal Babylon Philip was very young but old enough to be the Father to a famous Grecian Epocha which used in the Machabees and many others first began in Babylon as Nabonassors's also long before The Character was Red and dyed with the Blood of all that Family Seleucus durst not call himself a King till well possessed of Babylon From whence began the Kingdom of the North which was in Daniel to wrestle with the South or Aegypt till the Ships of Chittim made him afraid and proud Antiochus was glad to bow and speak the Romans fair before he could be freed from his Circle though it were but made in Sand by a riding Rod. Babylon was fatal to the Romans also for so far they prospered still but never over or beyond the Streams of Babylon Charan was Tomb to Crassus's Army as before to Terah nearer much to Ura found in divers then to Urchoa with Ptolomy Much I might speak of Parthians Persians Saracens Turks These seem as Angels bound beyond Euphrates but being loosed and possess'd of Babylon their Tyranny was divilish Now it is or rather is not but poor Bagdad in Turkish Hands most times except an Army of Locusts 't is remarkable appear as Harbengers before the Persian But his Sun must be eclipsed with the Turkish Moon before the Glory of Ierusalem But to return to Babylon while Romans kept the Scene they acted well but 't was a Tragedy for some have thought they brought more Shame and Sin and Tyranny from all the Coasts of Babylon then Brass from Corinth or Antiquities from Greece Thus Babylon was buried in Rome but Rome is ruined by Babylon Edom and Babylon run Parallel in Judgment through the Prophets and the Iews were plain enough in saying or in proving who is Edom in this western World This Edom did give name all say since learned Fuller wrote his Miscellanies to the Red or rather the Reed Sea but this may be doubted and the rather with other great Objections for it is scarce a drop to that the Antients call the Erythrean Sea or Mare Rubrum never belonging unto Esau in that Edom will hardly be found to denote Red. A great Master of the Arabick and other kinds of Learning in Cambridge Mr. Wheelock did almost perswade me once that Edom's Name is better sought and found in Arabick where it may sound as much as Eator or a Glutton who did sell his Birthright for a mess of Broth as Adam the first Glutton sold his Paradice and all for a little Apple or the like This Etymology of Edom I could the rather believe because in Tuscan Latin and so many other Tongues Edo Eso Esor and the like Words do all signifie Eating and in other Nations the D is only changed into T its Cousen Germane How Edom came to be a Type of Rome as the Iews so constantly affirm may appear
Officer Virtute Officii or if by private Man yet upon some emergent Necessity or such Reason that I or others may not Judg much less Condemn but in Parliament For it may be possible perhaps but I hope not probable that some Parliament-men may design or consent to such a dangerous Treason or Felony that it may be the Duty of Officers or others to detain or secure them till the Cause be heard in Parliament and Resistance of any that detain upon suspicion of Treason hath been adjudged Ground enough to Justifie Detention and Securing till there be a legal acquitting And that species of Treason which is against the Kingdom or the Kingdoms Army may so much concern a General that it cannot be wondered if he should be the Accuser or Attacher who is the Kingdoms Sheriff and intrusted with the Posse Regni which he ought to manage for the best Advantage of the Kingdom prout melius visum est in Honorem Coronae Utilitatem Regni as the Confessor's Laws de Heretochiis and yet he is no Judg of this but must submit it to the Courts of Justice and in special to the Parliament when ever it concerneth any of that Body Representative I say not that the House should not or need not demand their Members and the Cause of any such Detention which still ought to be submitted to the Judgment of Parliament but I think it may be possible to suppose such a Case as cannot soon be heard and adjudged and in such Case I do not know it is absolutely Necessary for the House to sit still and to refuse to act at all till all their Members be restored For by this it might be possible for a few mischievous Persons still to keep the Parliament in such a perpetual Imployment or rather Idleness that they should do nothing but Dispute their own Priviledg and breach thereof Whereas it may be such a Case that should make them that be Free to be more active in the publick Service Ne quid Detrimenti capiat Resp. while some cannot and others will not come to do their Duties Yet if any be Zealous to spend their Time or rather the Kingdoms in Disputing an airie empty Species of Priviledg which themselves may reflect or refract at Pleasure every Moment I may not Condemn or Judg them But when the Sea breaks in I should fear it a Madness in my self to sit and frown with a Spanish Gravity chafing at those that broke down the Banks till the Waves come in and drown me with my Friends and Country I do not deny but that by the Law and Custom of Parliament 40 may be an House of Commons as well as 400. Yet to speak freely I could believe it to be the Duty of such 40 to call in their fellow Members especially when the Work is great and weighty And I must confess I should somewhat wonder to see 40 sit alone about the greatest Matters possible without so much as calling the rest or sending Writs for new Elections The Modus of Parliament telleth us that as the King might not absent himself but in the Case of Sickness and then he must lie in the same City or Mannor without Consent of Parliament so also there was great Caution against the Members absenting themselves so that it was expressed in the old Writ of Election that they should not depart from Parliament without Consent of Parliament But I know not whether the Crime may be so great in those that desert their Trust as it may be in those who permit them so to do But I will suppose the House of Commons is both Full and Free which we may and should for ought I know till they declare it otherwise Yet when they are freest they have Limits for they be not Infinite Nay when they are most Free they are most bound to good Orders and to right Reason They which bring them to this at any time though by any Army of Arguments or any thing else that is Reasonable are so far from enslaving them that indeed they make them Free compleatly Free and when they are set Free they are the more Inexcusable if they be not Rational for when Men are Slaves they may be the more excused for acting without or against Right Reason which to Man is the Natural Law of Liberty Which is not a Power to act quicquid Libet what we list for this may be Licentious and a Lust or Passion may enslave a Man as much as any Chain or Fetter but quod Licet what is Iust and Rational or as some of the Schools express it by the Wills following the Dictates of the Understanding or Right Reason rather than by a blind irrational Indifference or Power to Contradict its own Acts or to suspend its own Acting which is not found in all no not in the best Agents in their best Acts about the chiefest Good most Free and yet most Necessary and wherever such Indifference or such Suspension is it is a Stain or Spot and may be Slavery rather than an Ornament or Badg of Liberty For it ariseth from some Darkness in not discerning what is best or from some Inconstancy or Inability to follow it which without Suspence should be always Embraced and followed by Right Reason But what is this Reason is it only Discourse as the Schools use to express it who yet find somewhat higher in Man even a kind of Intuition which the old Philosopher did make the highest Sphear of all in Man's Soul Concentrical to Good when both Reason and Fancy were Excentrical But to me the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate Reason seemeth to be the first used of Proportion in the Mathematicks Mother of all Analogy and of most Learning to the Ancients so that those were called Rational Agents which acted in Proportion So the same old Philosopher that saith God ever acteth in Geometrical Proportion placeth Reason in a Mean between two Ends or Objects and the Master maketh Reason to be Mistress both to Art and Prudence this is Proportion in the Moral that in the Natural Part of Actions and describeth Virtue by a mean Proportion which he calleth Reason as a Wise Man would define it As the Sacred Writer of the Number of a Man that is perhaps Rational a Logarithm or a piece of true Algebra which we may Translate Mans Numbring For of all Visible Creatures Man only was found to use Numbers and Proportion But what is this Proportion which Denominates an Agent to be Rational Is it between the Actor and the Object and do Rationals only observe a Difference of Objects whereas Natural Agents go on alike to all Eodem modo ad Extremum posse But Rationals still do or still should act in Proportion suitable to themselves and to their Objects also which is two or three times observed by the Prophet Esay in describing Reason in that of Ploughing and Threshing and of Punishing with that of the
K. William as I should before upon the Oaths of chosen men from every County sworn as strictly as I remember any to have ever been with additions also of some emendations added by King William ad Utilitatem Anglorum These Laws he saith were compiled or conditae by the said great Glanvil who in Henry the 2d he stileth summum Iusticiarium totius Angliae And for this Kings confirmation of the good Laws of H. the first we need no more than what we find in him and all other Historians of the grand contest upon that occasion between the King Becket Son to a Saracen or Syrian Woman yet a Citizen of London and his Fathers Name was Gilbert Favourite at first he was to Theobald of whom before by him commended so that he became Lord Chancellor But at his Patrons Death being chosen to succeed in Canterbury he resignneth up the Seal at taking orders and in this both Wendover and Matthew Paris add to Hoveden who in Becket is the largest Polydore agreeth that his former perferment was to be Arch-Deacon to that Sea to which he makes the Office of a Legate to be then entailed ever since Lord Theobald did fetch his Pall from Rome But the great quarrel was about the confirmation of K. Hen. Laws of which before They touched all the Clergy So that once reading of them was enough to make the Pope condemn and Ban them all In a great Councel or Parliament the King did ask they say petitioned the Church that all would agree to keep the Laws of his Grandfather Henry the first Becket with some reluctance did consent without his Salvo But again repents in Parliament at Clarendon 't is clear as well for Commons as for others Congregato Clero Populo Regni apud Clarendun And again the Lords beseech the Prelate that he would vouchsafe to come and say before the King and Commons coram populo diceret that he would receive and admit those Laws He doth consent and comes into the House and frames his lips into a Content the King is glad and bids the Lords retire and bring those Laws from the Records that all might be perused and agreed Somewhat more he meant for when the Lords returned with those Rolls the motion was that all should set their hands or Seals in witness of agreement But at this The Prelate startles and recoyles again and riseth high or foul in Language So withdraws in greatest discontent Ere long we find him out again at least he would be out For now he sueth for a Pass to France he meant the Pope I must not here omit the course the King did take to stop him One there was that did complain he had been long in suit in some inferior Court of Becket yet he could not get his right and therefore was at length enforced to some other course and Court. For which his way was first to falsifie the Prelates Court by Oath according to the Custom of the Kingdom and of that we spake before in Writs of Right and Tolts or Pone's to remove them to some higher Court. This seemed but a petty Case that happen'd every day so that the usual Writ hath such a clause that if the Baron did not then the Sheriff should And if the Sheriff failed in the County Court then Bench must help But this was now enough to give a pause and check to that great Prelate He must stay and plead it out at length he finds the formal Oath to falsifie his Court was made upon Paper or a Service Book whereas the Law required that the Oath should be upon the Holy Gospels This would not suffice but Parliament at least the Barons and the Tenants en Chief were such did put the Prelate into Misericordia He doth struggle and attempt a Writ of Errour or the like Iudicium illud falsificare but he must submit and is amerced at 500 l. he cannot bear it fulleth 〈◊〉 but soon receives another summons For he shall have load enough and now must give account of all his former Bailywick He seeks delay and would be Essoyned de Malo lecti and instead of Knights two Earles are sent to view him whom they find in Bed but give him respite only till the morrow This bringeth a Case of Law to mind Essoyned of sickness cannot Rise without a License If the Knights that come to view him find him not or out of Bed it is default Of which in Bracton Fleta Hengham And his Learned Commentator addeth a pretty Case in Rich. the First The Abbot of Crowland sueth the Prior of Spalding for entring upon his Marsh. The Prior Pleads he entred as upon his own Ese-simple and doth offer 40 Marks for grand Assise and so the Mise is joyned and the Right doth lie at stake The Abbot is Essoyn'd de malolecti and the Writ goes but to the Knights But while one was coming to view him he doth rise and cometh towards the Court so the Knights Certificate is The Abbot was not in Bed On long debate the judgement was that upon default the Abbot yet in Possession must submit to yeild the seisin to the Prior whom he sued See the Statute of Marlbridge and the 2d of Westminster cap. 17. But Becket had Law enough to make him Rise and come to the Court in fear and discontent but his Right hand is so fastned to his Cross that it could hardly be forced from him who did struggle for it But his sorest pressure is an heavy Action of Account for all he had received as Lord Chancellor He pleads Discharge And that at his Election Henry Son to him that had such interest in the Kingdom cui Regnum adjuratum fuit and all the Barons of the Exchequer and Richard de Lucy Iusticiarius Angliae did declare him free quietum Deo Ecclesiae ab omni exactione seculari c. But his conclusion Ideo amplius Nolo inde placitare cost him dear For when the King had this he knew his way and said to the Parliament or Baronibus suit do me speedy Justice on this man Cito facite mihi Iudicium de illo qui Homo meus ligeus est stare Iuri in Curia mea recusat So they did retire and being alone without the King exeuntes Iudicaverunt And they did adjudge him to Prison But he escaped before his Commitment although some that saw him going cryed Traytor stay and take thy Doom By stealth he got to Sandwich thence to France by Flanders where he found the Pope I do not know that he talked much of refusing to make his account But his grand complaint was that he was pressed to consent to such injurious Laws as those which he brought to the Pope of King Henry the First Which were soon damned notwithstanding our Kings Embassadors But Writs were sent abroad to the Sheriffs and Iustices for seizing all belonging to the Arch-Bishop for attaching Arms that did appeal to Rome or
ab omnibus approbetur Which is one clause in the Writ of Summons to Parliament about a War with France in Edward the First Which seemeth to speak a necessity of Parliaments for matters of War Not only for Money as some have pleased to speak or at the Kings choice to call them if he please The Writ speaks an Act of Parliament Lex justissima provida circumspectione stabilita not let at loose to the Kings pleasure but as Fortescue or long before him the old Modus of Parliament maketh it necessary for the King and his Duty to Call a Parliament in all such Cases Nor shall I need to add what Paulus Iovius Froisard Comineus de Serres and the Duke of Rohan with many other strangers have observed of our Parliaments in this which is the Law of Nature rather than of England For as in the Heavens or great World we did before observe Mars or the Genius of War to be there placed immediately under Iupiter the great Councel and not under the Sun So in the Microcosm or little World of Man we find both Spleen and Gall within Hands and Feet without at a good distance from the Head and never joyned to it but in Monsters Yet it is true that some Creatures have Horns on their Heads but they are Beasts and not Men. Much less Kings I hope But did we Labour Toyl and Sweat so much to keep a little River in its bounds that so we might be drowned by the boundless Ocean Or be swept away at once by a destroying and devouring Deluge Did we scruple at a little Gravel or a Pebble that we might be crushed by a Mountain Would we strain at a Gnat that we might be choaked by a Camel or be swallowed whole by Behemoth It may not be at least it may not seem enough to quiet trembling minds to say or prove by arguments there shall be nothing done but what is just except we also see or know the way and means and usual course our Governours will please to take in doing that which may or is and ever shall I hope be just The way must be both Right and Clear as well as is the End And of the two Unjust and Arbitrary Power doth seem to be in Processe or in ways and means much rather than in Ends or Things that be effected by it Sure it was at least it might be good to build a gallant Fleet of Ships and so it might be just that each should contribute a part to such a publick work Nor was it only that which then was taken from us for a Ship that made us sigh and groan and cry or fear our Ruine or a universal deluge of Oppression But it much or mainly was we did not see the way or mean or Legal Process which the Court did take in Taxing or Assessing such a Place a County or a Person And it was but thus in Loans and so in divers if not all the things we so abhorred in the Crown the thing did not so much displease as did the way or means to such or such an End I need not say how curious or how scrupulous and tender still our Laws have been in pointing out the Way as well as End the Process in the Courts of Justice as the Final Iudgements So that indeed the very Form and Life and Power or Substance of the justest Laws doth much consist in Processe which by some may be thought a shadow or a Ceremony left at pleasure for a blustring Wind or any furious hand to shake as much as long as it shall please And then to salve it up by saying to the Root We mean you Good and do but lay you bare that so you may the more behold and more admire our Iustice in the End when all the Boughs and Branches shall be gone that do but hinder all your Prospect I must but Touch and glance There is a Trinity which all our Laws do seem to Worship here on Earth Estate Liberty and Life Of all Estate the Dower of Widows hath the greatest priviledge For which the Comments upon Littletons first and fifth with the Statutes of Merton and some clauses of the great Charter it self for Quarentine and Dower are good glosses on the Saxon Laws or those already touched and I shall not add one syllable All Estates have priviledge in Law and all Amercements must be such as may consist with mens Estate from Alfred Edgar Ethelred Canute or Edward it did come to Henry the first and thence to the Great Charter Where the Law is plain and clear No Free man shall be Amerced but according to his Default and Estate Salvo sibi Contenemento suo Which is so branched that it reacheth to Villains also though it speak at first but of Free-men Hence the Name of Amercement because it was and ought to be an Amerciament or a merciful Fine In which the Saxons went beyond us in their Weregylds and Divers Wytes for which Fleta may be a Comment to the Laws of Ethelstane and others of the Saxons All this for End but what must be the Way How shall it be imposed so that it may as it should be merciful 'T is miserecordiu Regis as the Laws and Books do speak but the King doth not may not Fine or Amerce any but in and by his Courts of Justice So that to render ones self to the Kings Judgment is to no effect and so adjudged For as the Father judgeth no man so the King who is or should be Father of the Country but he hath committed all judgment unto Men that are our Fellows Pares in the Courts of Justice VVhere indeed the King did sometime sit in Person yet the Court did Judge and not the King as Fortescue doth plainly tell us And the Judgment still is entred from and by the Court and not the King Ideo consideratum est per Curiam And so the great Charter saith we will not go upon him nec ibimus nec mittemus but by Legal Judgment of his Peers vel per Legem Terrae and of this last clause I never saw a fuller Comment in a few words than in Mr. Seldens Notes on Attaint in Fortescue But of all Iudgments to be made by Peers somewhat was said before in Henries Laws and more again ere long And for Fines by Courts of Justice not by the King and Amerciaments by Peers besides the Comments on Magna Charta there are divers Book Oases cited from Henry the fourth Henry the sixth Richard the third in the fourth part of Institutes Kings Bench To which may be added Greislies Case in the eighth part of Reports And the first of Westminster doth add to the great Charter or at least explain it in this But the Mirror will tell us it was an abuse not to expound it so largely before And although the VVrit de moderata misericordia in the Register and N. B. be founded on the Statute yet it seemeth clearly but
see and proceed in a judicial way Nor would he condemn or execute before he had not onely cleared his justice in himself or to his Angels but also to Abraham Lot and other Lookers on that he still might be justified both when he judgeth and is judged For he still did and will put his Actions on Man's Judgment This Process also towards Sodom is by many of our old Lawyers brought for the Pattern of our Laws in that especially that none may be condemned without a Legal Hearing And in this and divers other things do Bracton and Fleta borrow much from the Laws of Henry the First And be the Matter of Fact never so notorious yet may there be some Plea that no man can foresee or ought to forejudge before he heareth for all men may plead necessity or force upon themselves as well as Right and Law for any thing they do amiss And for this and other Reasons the Law doth suppose all men to be just or excusable till they be Legally heard and adjudged This Difference there is between the Judges and the Law-makers For these they say do suppose all men to be evil but the Judges should suppose all men to be good till they be proved to be evil The Charge and Accusation by the Law of Nature ought to be clear distinct and particular with time and place or other Circumstances else the Party accused cannot discharge himself Universalia non premunt omnino vel opprimunt Generals do not press at all or else they are apt to oppress The Witness and the Evidence must also be so clear that these must condemn rather than the Judge who sitteth as Counsel for the Party accused that so he be not oppressed by or against Law And besides the Judges in most Cases and in those also of Life in Scotland there is Counsel allowed by Law which may and ought to be heard in Particulars of Law or whatever may be justly disputable as Treason is by Statute So that of all Crimes by express Acts of Parliament it ought to have no Tryal but clear and plain according to the course and custom of the Common Law In such Cases therefore should the Iudges both in Law and Conscience sit and be instead of Counsel to the Party This they owe to every Subject though they had a special Obligation to the King Who to his own Rights and therefore to his Wrongs was an Infant in Law and so expresly declared in the Old Mirror besides other Books His Politick Capacity never but his Person ever in Nonage or supposed so in Law for it may be a Child or a Woman not able to know the Laws and therefore always had by Law a Legal Mouth assigned in Counsel of Law And so might any man else of old it seems for matter of Demurrers before Judgment or for framing of Legal Appeal by Writ of Error or some other way from any Judgment whatsoever It is also the Law of this Kingdom and of Nature that though there be no Councel assigned yet may any in a good manner move the Court to keep the Party from Injustice or the Court from Error as Stanford and the 3d. part of Institutes Cap. 2.63 and 101. And in such Cases it may be excused and not censured for rash zeal if some do or shall appear where or when it may be thought they be not called Neither can the whole Parliament of England I suppose make any Court to condemn without lawful Accusers or lawful Witnesses which by express Acts of Parliament is most especially provided in Case of Treason in King Edward the Sixth and Queen Maries Reign and Tryal of Treason was most expresly tyed to the course and custom of the Common Law Nay in full Parliament of Hen. the VIII it was declared that Attaint of Treason in or by Parliament was of no more force or strength than it was or ought to be by the Common Law or this as good and strong as that by Parliament Nor can the whole Parliament I think by the Law of Nature and right Reason make any Children Ideots or all others whatsoever to be so much as Accusers or Witnesses that I say not Indictors Tryers or Judges By express Acts of Parliament in Philip and Mary Edw. VI. Hen. VIII Hen. IV. Hen. I. for to him doth the Mirror and his Laws lead us as to a clear Crystal Fountain of our Law Process none should suffer for Treason or other Crime but by lawful Accusers lawful Witnesses before those that by Law might receive Indictments which with all Enquest are to be made by honest lawful able men Neighbours to the Fact And the Law of Nature with the Law of the Kingdom giveth any man leave to except against some for Accusers others for Witnesses and many for Tryers It being the known Law of the Land that one may challenge the Array either the principal Pannel or the Tales as well as the Polls and that the lowest Subject must be admitted if he require it to a perremtory challenge of divers it is now in most Capitals limited to 20. but in Treason it is as at Common Law it was to 3 Juries or 35 which may be challenged without any particular reason And the Law of Nature also seemeth to hear all Reasons and just exceptions against any whatsoever Nor shall I need to shew how sutable our Law is to the Law of Nature in providing that no Infant Ideot Alien Abjured Perjured or Attaint Outlaw'd or in Premunire be of any Enquest or Iury especially in Case of Life and Death And for Tryers besides all other exceptions This was thought enough that any of them had been Indictors which maketh Fortescu so much to Glory in our Law that putteth no man to Death but by the Oath of four and twenty men I should mispend my time to shew it to be the great Law of the Kingdom as well as of Nature that none may be Iudg and Parties in their own Cause which may ere-long be found perhaps to be the reason of the Three Estates and very much of our Common Law which is punctual in nothing more than in providing for a clear distinction of Accusers Witnesses Endictors Tryers and Iudges especially in Cases of Treason which upon divers motions of the Commons in Parliament have been so often Enacted and declared to be onely Tryable by the course and custom of the Common Law and no otherwise Nay in Parliament it self and Parliament Men there was and for ought I find always the like course observed For in Case of a Peer the Custom of the Kingdom is to proceed by a special Commission to one as Lord Steward and 12 others at least for a Iury of Tryors besides Accusers and Witnesses and a formal Indictment And all from Record to Record or all this is Illegal if it be onely by the House of Peers If Charge come from the House of Commons they are as Indictors being more than twelve sworn
men Trustees to the whole Kingdom and Neighbours to the Fact or Party or both To which also there must be a legal proof by lawful Witnesses or else the Charge will not suffice And in such Indictments from the Commons the Lords are the Tryers and the King may seem as the Iudg but in other Courts also the Judgment goeth of course upon the Verdict and must be entred per Curiam as adjudged by the Court although there be but one Judge or tho' his Mouth pronounce not the Sentence But we are not yet come to debate the King's Consent to the Lords Judgment an Indictment from the Commons It is also to me very considerable how the House of Commons could or ever did Indict I cannot deny them to have been a Court and a Court of Record although some have seemed to question it and their Records are not so ancient as some others But I have not fully understood how they ever did make or receive a Formal Legal Indictment when as they did not give a single Oath much less Empannel a Iury or Enquest Yet some there be that without a Writt or any written Commission did and might do this Virtute Officii But they be known chosen sworn Officers of the Kingdom for such Purposes as the Peeples Bayliffs Coroners Sheriffs Escheators and some Officers about the Forest who by the Common Law did Summon and Empannel Juries But so did not the House of Commons How then did they Indict Of all Crimes committed in the House they are and were so much the sole Iudges that they seldom use to complain much less to Indict any other And for any thing done abroad I hope they do not use to take Rumours and Reports though from their own Members to be sufficient for or equivalent to a legal Indictment on Oath Seeing their scarce is or can be any Case so notorious but it may be pleaded unto by somewhat of Law or Necessity And although I should yield the Commons to be the Masters of the Law in making it yet they pleased to allow others to be Iudges in their Laws And if they reassume this also yet it may be more easie to judge of some Law than of any Fact at least as it may be cloathed so as a curious search or Enquest may be requisite to lay it clear and naked Neither can I see how it may be necessary to proceed against any by force or illegal Process when it is easie as well as just to go rightly as to do right For who can imagine a Case so dark and intricate but it may be contrived so that particular men may be Accusers and others Witnesses with a clear and real distinction between Indictors Tryers and Iudges most of all in Cases notorious and evident For in such there may be less fear of the Iuries Verdict against Evidence or of the Iudges Sentence against the Verdict Or if this should happen in a Tryal is there not a most heavy doom appointed by Law for all Iurors that forswear themselves and goe against their Evidence Is there not a clear way of Relief by Writ of Attaint Is it not worse than Death to forfeit all Estate and be thrown into Prison while both Wife and Children must be turned out of Doors and All For his House must be pulled down his Ground be plowed up and his Trees rooted out with loss of Franchise and with a perpetual Brand of Villany This is the Common Law for a perjured Iuror and that also in Petty Cases how much more might it be just in Case of Life and Death And for Corrupt Iudges our Law is very severe altho' we have much lost the Custom of the Grand Eyres in this also King Alfred be long since dead who hanged 30 or 40 more unjust Judges than Cambyses flead And for that the Mirror may be a good Comment on some Passages in Alfred's Life by Asser And if it be true that Horn lived to the end of K. Edward it is much wonder that on such occasion he did not also mention some of those Judges by him so punished when there was scarce any left but good Iohn of Mettingham and Elias of Bechingham And of this the Dissertations of Fleta may be added to all before as that of Sir William Thorp and the Great Judg in the third Part of Institutes about corrupt Iudges and the Iudge's Oath It is very considerable how curious the Iews were in Creating or rather Ordaining of Judges For indeed the Phrase of Ordination seemed to be first raised from Them For which I have little to add to Mr. Selden on the Eutychian or Alexandrian Antiquities as old as St. Mark the Evangelist Nor can it be denied but the Jewish Judges and Magistrates had a very good Right and so used as we find in the Books of Moses and the Kings and Tirshatha's to Read and Expound the Law Moral as well as Iudicial Nay in this they seemed to have some advantage of the Priests or Levites that had work enough most times in that which was but Ceremonial This may Expound those Pieces of Scripture Old and New where we find some explaining Scripture being neither Priests nor of the Tribe of Levi. And the Iews Punishments of evil Judges are severe and most remarkable nay where all others were again restored to their Offices after Corporal Punishment their Lord Chief Iustice or President of their Sanhedrim or any Chief Iustice could never be restored again after such punishment no not to be as one of his inferour Colleagues So just he ought to be and circumspect by daily experience added to his own wisdom Our Laws are so just and so good in themselves that there could not be be so much cause of complaints in all our Gates for such were the Iews Courts of Iustice if our Judges were such as they should and might be And yet I cannot deny but that there be very great abuses among the Lawyers and Attorneys or Solicitors but if the Judges were as just and wise as they may be inferiour Officers would soon amend or comply for Love or Fear so much as would prevent Complaints and many of their Causes But it is the work of a God and not of a Man to reform abuses in all Courts of Justice Hercules did never cleanse so great so foul a Stable or a Stall yet in this also a wise and just Parliament will do much and will need none of my help or advice How tender all should Delegates be in making Delegates But in nothing should they be more tender or more circumspect then in this of making Judges For in these of all Delegates our law is most scrupulous Before the Statute of Merton those that held by suit Service were bound to appear in Person because the Suitors were Judges in causes not their own but by that Statute they had power given to make Attorneys but it was only ad Sectas faciendas to make or follow
suites for them but not to sit as Judges For as the Commentator addeth they could not depute or make Attornies in a place and act judicial I will not I cannot say the Commons of England cannot choose or constitute their Judges but this I say or believe their delegates ought to be exceeding Curious I had almost said exceeding Scrupulous in making Judges and in bounding them to law and Justice both in way as well as End I must again repeat it That it may not seem enough to settle Judges just and wise and good Nor only to provide that they may do what is just I speak of end but men are men and ought in cases of such consequence to have their Way their Rule and Square by which they must proceed to be prescribed in their Patents or Commissions that they may do justly too as well as what is just To me it seemeth to be reason or the law of nature unto men that the Supreme Court should so limit all inferiours that it may not be left at large to their list or pleasure to condemn or sentence without Hearing Accusation Witness or without such Process and Tryal as shall be clear and plain and so prescribed in the Patent or Commission If it be not so done and expressed I know not what appeal can be but from the Court before Judgment For what appeal what writ of Error or what Plea can a man frame upon their Judgment who have no Rule no way of process prescribed and so cannot Err Transgress or Exceed their commission no not if they should without all accusation proof or witnesses condemn one to be sliced and fryed with exquisite tortures They are Judges but unlimited in way of Process infinite and purely Arbitrary No they are Men and so they must be Rational and Iust which was presupposed by them that gave so vast power They may be Iust indeed and so they should but yet no thanks for this to their Commission if it do not bound and limit out their way and manner of Process as it doth their work and Object or their End which was the wont of English Parliaments who were Just and wise themselves that they did see or fear it might be possible for their Committees to be most Unjust and Arbitrary if they were not most exactly limited Of all Commissions none were more curiously drawn and Pointed out by our Ancestors than those of especial Oyer and Terminer because the cases were not only heinous so they ought to be but such as for some extr ordinary cause emergent seemed to be as it were Extra Iudicial and such as could not stay and abide the usual process of the settled Courts of Justice Yet of these also did our Fathers take most especial care that they might be Iust in Way as well as End and that they might not be too High in Iustice for it seems that they had also learned an usual saying of the Antients Summum jus est injuria So that in divers of the Saxons Laws we find High Iustice Summum Ius to be as much forbidden as Injustice And I should tremble at it as an ill Omen to hear Authority commanded the the Kings Bench or any other Court should be now Stiled the Bench of High-Iustice For in Iustice the higher men goe up the worse or so at least it was esteemed by our Ancestors Their constant limitation was in every such Commission Thus and thus you shall proceed but still according to the Laws and Customs of England Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Angliae and no otherwise that is as Fortescu will say you shall be pittiful in Iustice and more merciful then all the world besides this Kingdom And if such a limitation were not expressed this was enough to prove the Commission Unjust and Illegal which is so well known to all Lawyers that I need not cite N. B. or the Register Commissions or Scrogs's case in Dyer or so many elder cases in Edward the 3 d. Henry the 4 th and almost all Kings Reigns Nay in King Iames among the great debates of Uniting Scotland to England when it was driven up so close that instead of Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Angliae it might be Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Brittanniae It was resolved by all Judges that there could not be that little change but of one word that doth so limit such Commissions but by consent of Parliament of both Kingdoms And in divers Parliaments of Ed. 1. Ed. 3. Hen. 4 th there were many Statutes made to limit all Commissions of Oyer and Terminer as that they must never be granted but before and to some of the Iudges of the Benches or of the Grand Eyre Nor those to be named by Parties but by the Court And with this usual Restriction according to the known clause of the Statute of Westminster the 2 d. in the Reign of Edward the 1 st But the Printed Statute must be compared with the Roll and with the 2 d of Ed. the 3 d. for else there may be in this as in other Printed Acts a great mistake by leaving out or changing one particle for that Clause except it be for heinous offence hath such influence into all the words before that by the known Common Law a Supersedeas doth lye to such Commissions quia non enormis Transgressio as the Register may teach us And although by Law there may be granted a Commission of Association with a Writ of Admittance of others to the Iudges assigned for Oyer and Terminer yet in all those Commissions and Writs the Rule must be prescribed quod ad Iustitiam pertinet and that also according to the Law and Custom of the Kingdom which is so much the Law of Nature that I need not wonder at the great Judg who in all his Institutes and so many Reports maketh those words absolutely necessary to the work of a Lawful Commission And for more prevention or Redress of injustice and Arbitrary Process were our Ancestors so punctual in requiring Records of all Proceedings in the Courts of Justice which is so agreable to Reason and the Law of Nature That the whole Parliament of England as I humbly conceive cannot it self proceed in matters of highest concernment but by Record Much less can it Licence other Courts to be without or above Record in such Affairs It is so well known to be the custom of the Kingdom that I shall not need to shew it in the Statute of York in Edw. 2d and many others in affirmance of the great Charter nisi per Legem Terrae But by the Law of the Land And in Edw. 3d. it was in full Parliament declared to be the Law of the Land that none should be put to answer but upon presentment before Iustices or matter of Record And the 2d of Westminster is very punctual in requiring Records for all legal exceptions as well as other matters and provideth that in case an Exception should not