limitation of any estate Resolved that when the Lord admits Cestuy que use for life the reversion is in him that surrendered not in the Lord for he is but an instrument Resolved that a man may surrender to the use of his Wife though that Cestuy que use is in by him that surrendered because the Husband did not doe this immediatly to the Wife but by a second meanes Viz. By surrender to the Lord and by admittance of the Lord. Resolved that when B. surrendered out of Court and before that 't was presented in Court he dyes yet after being presented according to the custome 't is good otherwise if it had not beene presented according to custome so if the Tenants in whose hands c. dyes yet if it be proved 't is good enough so Queintons Case before if Cestuy que use c. dyes before admittance his Heires shall be admitted Downe and Hopkins Case 36. of the Queene fo 29. REsolved that where the custome of a Mannor was to grant Coppies for one two or three lives that a grant to a Woman during her viduity is within the custome for 't is an estate for life but every grant for life is not Durante viduitate issue was whether the custome was that the Wife of a Copy-holder after the death of the Husband should have for life and 't was given in evidence that she should have during her viduity and adjudged that the evidence did not maintaine such custome for 't is a lesse estate then for life But in the principall Case 't is a greater estate which is warranted by the custome and therefore a lesse is within it according to Graveners Case before 'T was said that a Lord may retaine a Steward by word to hold Courts c. as a Bayliffe and this retainer shall serve till he be discharged Harris and Jayes Case 41. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that a Lord may retaine one to be Steward of his Mannor and to hold Courts by word as in the Case before Resolved that where a Copy-hold escheates by attainder of felony of a Copy-holder of the Queene that the Steward may grant it over Ex officio without speciall warrant for the custome warrants the Steward to grant it and this shall binde the Queene and her Heires c. But yet his duty is before to informe the Lord Treasurer Chancellor or Barons of the Exchequer or any of them for his better direction Resolved that the Auditor or Receiver of the Queene hath no power to retaine a Steward to hold courts c. But it behooves that the Steward who makes such voluntary grants upon escheats or forfeitures to be good to have Letters Pattents of the Stewardship of the same Mannor And 't was said that 't was adjudged in the Lady Holcrofts Case that where one was retained generally by word to be Steward of a Mannor and to hold Courts that he may take surrenders of customary tenants out of Court Shaw and Thompsons Case 33. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that a Woman shall not be indowed of Copy-hold without speciall custome and that when a Woman is to be indowed by custome she shall have all incidents to Dower and shall recover damages by the Statute of Merton because her Husband dyed seised and therefore the recovery of damage of 50. l. in the Court of the Mannor was allowed though this exceeded 40 s Resolved that no Action of Debt lyes for these damages at common Law for upon such judgement no error or false judgement lyes but the remedy is in the Court of the Mannor or Chancery Fenner Justice said That he had seene a Record 36. H. 8. where the Lord by Petition to him had for certaine errors in the proceeding reversed such a judgement and upon this the Defendant maintained an Audita quaerela to be restored to the damages recovered against him See 14. H. 4. cited before in Brownes Case And 7. E 4. 29. Hoe and Taylors Case 37. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that Underwood growing upon parcell of the Mannor may by custome be granted by Copy of Court roll and 't is a thing of perpetuity to which a custome may extend for after every cutting the underwood growes Ex stipitibus So 't was resolved that Herbage or any profit of any parcell of the Mannor may by custome be granted by Copy and 't was said that a faire appendant to the Mannor of C. in S. is granted by Copy and this explaines the reason of the first pillar in Murrels Case Frenches Case 18. 19. of the Queene fo 31. REsolved if the Lord Lease for yeares life or make any other estate by deed or without deed of Copy-hold Land forfeited escheated c. to him that this Land can never be granted againe by Copy for the custome is destroyed for during these estates the Land was not demised nor demisable by Coppy So if the Lord make a feoffement and enter for condition broken but if the Lord keepe it in his hands a long time or leases it at will he his heires or assignes may regrant it So if the interruption be tortious as by disseisin and discent false verdict or erroneous judgement for Non valet impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum quod contra legem fit pro infecto habetur But if it be extended upon a Statute or recognizance acknowledged by the Lord or if the Wife of the Lord hath this Land assigned to her in Dower though these impediments are by act in Law yet for that the interruptions are lawfull the Land cannot be after granted by Copy If a Copy-holder accept a Lease for yeares of the Lord of his Copy-hold 't is destroyed for ever If a Copy-holder take a Lease for yeares of the Mannor his Copy-hold hath not continuance Hides Case adjudged 17. of the Queene But there 't was resolved that such Lessee might regrant the Copy to whom he would for the Land was alwayes demised or demisable If a Coppy-hold be surrendered to the Lessee his Executors or assignes may regrant it If a Copy-hold escheate to the Lord his alienee by fine feoffement c. may regrant it Foiston and Crachroodes Case 29. and 30 of the Queene fo 31. ADjudged that where a Copy-holder in pleading alledges Quod infra Man praed talis habetur nec non a toto tempore cujus c. habebatur consuetudo Viz. quod quilibet tenentes praedictorum tenement vocat C. have used to have common in such a place parcell of the Mannor and that he is a Copy-holder of the said Tenement that this custome as well for the matter as the forme was good for the Copy-holder cannot prescribe in his owne name for the exility and basenes of his estate and if he had claimed common in the soile of another he ought to prescribe in the name of the Lord Viz. That the Lord and all his ancestors and all those whose estate c. have
of Action he shall not have judgement a Count may be made good by barre and a barre by replication in matters of circumstance but not of substance See there seaven things observed by Cooke for the better direction of the President and Comminalty of the said Colledge hereafter The Case of the City of London 7. Jac. fol. 121. IT is a good custome within a Citty that a Forreinor within the said Citty shall not sell things by retaile and it is good also upon paine of 5. l. but it is not good by Charter therefore Citties which are incorporate within time of memory cannot have such priviledges without Parliament so of a custome that goods forreigne bought and forreigne sould shall be forfeited So one may prescribe to have a Bake-house in a Towne and that no other shall have one there and the Statutes which provide that every one may sell in retaile or in grosse extend onely to Merchands aliens and demisens who export and import things vendible Three inconveniences by confluence of people to London c. The Case of Thetford Schoole fol. 130. 8. Jac. LAnds of the yearely value of 35. l. in ao 9. El. was devised by the will of Thomas Fulmerston to certeine persons and their Heires for maintainance of a Preacher four dayes in the yeare of the Master and Usher of a free Grammar-Schoole and foure poore People Viz. Two men and two women and the Defendant delayed to accept a Release to defraud the Plaintiffe adjudged for the Plaintiffe 1. Although that two recoveries are without covin yet the composition so operates that nothing shall be accounted administred but onely so much as he hath paid by composition and the converting of any part to his owne use and the deferring to accept a Release is against the office of an Executor and shall not aide him 2. The barre is insufficient because he hath not shewed that the Court of C. had power to hold plea of debt 2. Because he hath not shewed that the Testator was bound in an Obligation and if it were onely upon contract the administrators were not chargable in Debt 3. Be the replication evill yet because the Barre is insufficient the Plaintiffe shall have judgement because he had not shewed any thing against himselfe but if it appeare by the replication that he had no cause of Action he shall be barred Mary Shipleys Case 8. Jac. fol. 134. AN action of Debt against an Executor of 200. l. the Defendant pleaded Plene administravit the Plaintiffe replies that the Executor had assets the Jury found assets to the value of 172. l. judgement was given to recover the whole Debt of 200. l. and damages and costs of the goods of the Testator S. c. Et si non then the damages of the proper goods of the Defendant Sir John Nedhams Case 8. Jacobi Communi Banco fol. 135. IN debt as administratrix upon administration committed by the Bishop of R. the Defendant pleads administration committed unto him by the Deane and Chapter of C. sede vacante because the Intestate had bona notabilia c. the Plaintiffe replyes that that administration was repealed adi for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol Because it is not shewed that the Intestate had bona notabilia c. it shall be intended that he had not and yet the administration is not voyde but voydable 2. Before the repeale of administration committed by the Metropolitan the inferior Ordinary may commit administration because this is by the repeale declared voyd ab initio and an administration is but an authority which may well commence in futuro 3. The committing of administration to the obligor hath not extinguished the bebt because it is in anothers right otherwise it is if the obligee himself make the Obligor his executor because this is his owne act De bonis defuncti trina dispositio 1. Necessitatis ut funeralia 2 Vtilitatis that every one shall be payd in due order 3. Voluntatis as Legacies Sir Francis Barringtons Case 8. Jacobi Communi Banco fol. 136. THe Lord R. granted wood within a Forrest in which the Plaintiffe had common which grant is confirmed by Statute the grantee cuts wood and inclose it the commoner shall loose his common for seven yeares 1. Resol The grantee had an inheritance to take in another soyle and the soyle is to the Lord R. 2. Although the grantee had not the inheritance yet the Statute extends to him and he may inclose for the Statute is or any other person to whom wood is sould 3. 22. E. 4. cap. 7. extends to wood which one had in severalty and not where another had common there for at the common Law one who had wood in a Forrest cannot incloser against a commoner but if it be his severall wood he might inclose parvo fossato c. for three yeares 4. The sayd Statute is as a conveyance betweene the King and his Subjects which taketh not away the right of third persons as the commoner here is 5. In the sayd Statute there is a clause that hee may inclose without suing to the King or other owner so that power is given against them and not against a commoner Beasts of Forrest are Hart Hinde Hare wilde Boare and Wolfe of chase Buck Doe Fox Martin and Roe 6. By the Statute of 35. H. 8. cap. 17. he is barred of his common which provideth that no Beasts shall be suffered to come there for seven yeares 7. The Statutes which concerne Forrests are generall because they concerne the King and the Court shall take notice of them Doctor Druries Case 8. Jacob. fol. 141. DOctor Drury recovers against B. who is outlawed and taken by Capias ut-legatum and escapeth the Utlary is reversed Doctor Drury sueth execution B. brings an Audita quaerela adjudged that it lyeth not It was resolved that if A. be in execution at the suit of B. upon an erroneous judgement and after escape and after the judgement is reversed by a Writ of error the action against the Sheriffe is extinct for hee may plead Nul tiel record But untill it be reversed it remaines in force be it never so erroneous and if the partie have judgement and execution upon the escape against the Sheriffe or Goaler and after the first judgement is reversed yet for as much as judgement upon this collaterall thing is executed it shall remaine in force notwithstanding the reversall of the first 7. H. 6. 4. Yet it seemeth to me he may have remedy by Audita quaerela for that the ground and cause of the collaterall action is disproved by the reversall of the first judgement a difference betweene meane acts compulsatory and voluntary and betweene a recovery by eigne title and reversall of a recovery Davenports Case 8. Jacobi fol 144. TEnant for yeares of an advowson granteth proximam advocationem donationem si eadem Ecclesia contingerit vacua fore durante termino c. And afterward surrenders his terme yet if
a Stranger be not in another part of the House but this was before 39. Eliz. cap. 15. whereby clergy is taken away without putting any feare if he rob any man of above the value of five shillings Accessory before in robbing a House in the day is ousted of Clergy by 4. 5. Phiâ— Mary Accessory in robbing a Booth in the night or day or out House upon 39. Eliz. shall have his Clergy Nota Although a Statute takes away Clergy from the principall yet the accessory before or after shall have it and where by statute for any offence a man is ousted of his Clergy the indictment must containe the offence with the circumstances in the Statute Dyer 99. and 183. And A. P. was ordered to be hanged in Chaines c. Metcalfs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 38. In Accompt IUdgement is given against M. Quod computet ideo in misericordia quia prius non computavit and before finall Judgement Error is brought 1. Resol It lyeth not 1. Because the Writ of Error saith Si juditium inde redditum sit which shall be intended of the principall Judgement as the Feast of St. M. shall be intended the principall Feast and the Feme shall be received upon default of her Baron after judgement of admeasurement before the principall judgement 2. It shall be intended an intire judgement therfore in an action against two if one plead to the issue and the other confesseth and judgement given against him he shall not have error before the Plea determined against the other for otherwise there would be a failer of right for the Kings Bench cannot proceed upon the Record nor the Common place because it is removed 3. The first judgement is not ad grave damnum for by that he looseth nothing but judgement of the arrearages and damages is the end of the originall 4. This is not properly a Judgement but an Award of the Court as ouster of ayde in partitione facienda an awarde quod partitio fiat c. which are but interlocutory and not definitive 5. They have day by the Roll untill the last judgment but if a Felon dye after the exigent awarded and before attainder a Writ of Error lyeth for necessity for otherwise his goods are forfeited by awarding of the exigent without remedy if diverse are sued by severall Praecipes and Judgement given against one he shall have error before judgement given against the other and if error be in the originall the tenor onely shall be certified for otherwise the Court cannot proceede against the others 2. It was Resolved That the Record is not removed because untill finall Judgement be given the Chiefe Justice of the Common place hath no authority to send it and they may proceed notwithstanding the Roll be marked Mittitur Richard Godfreys Case 12. Jacobi fol. 42. TWelve chiefe pledges according to the custome of the Mannor to present at the Leet that every one of themselves ought to pay for themselves 10 s. pro certo letae the Stewart imposeth a Fine of 6 l. upon them the Lord distreineth for the Fine and certainty of Leet one of the pledges brings Replevin and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol The Fine is not well assessed for it ought to be severall and not joynt as it is because the offence is severall and although that the offence be joynt yet the Fine shall be severall as in disseisin and trespasse But for the incertainty of the persons and infinitenesse of the number many may be fined together as a Towne for the escape of a Felon and the reasonablenesse and excessivenesse of the Fine shall be determined by the Judges Excessus in re qualibet jure reprobatur communi as excessive distresse excessive ayde and excessive amerciament are against the Common Law 2. If the Fine be imposed erroneously it may be avoyded by Plea for he had no other remedy 3. The Lord cannot distraine pro certo Letae without prescription because it is against common right but he may for a Fine or amercement but for an amercement in a Court Baron the Lord must prescribe a Fine because it is assessed by the Court needs not to be affered but an amercement must be affered by the Countrey 4 Admitting that he may distraine pro certo Letae he shall have a returne although hee had not cause to distraine for the Fine for where one brings an Action for two things and it will not lie for one of them it shall abate onely for that if he cannot have a better action for it but if he may it shall abate for the whole as in a Formedon of Land and of an advowson the Writ shall stand for the Land so if a man avow for diverse Rents arreare and it appeareth that parcell is not yet due yet the avowry is good for the residue but if a man bring a Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize of two Acres where it appeareth that for one Acre he ought to have a Writ of Entry in the per there all shall abate for this extends not to the action but to the Writ onely Richard Lifords Case 12. Jacobi fol 46. IN trespasse the Defendant pleads that J. L. was seized in fee and demised to T. S. and M. P. excepting Trees above twenty one yeares growth if not decayed for their lives and covenanted to stand seized de tenementis predictis cum pertinentijs superius dimissis to the use of R. L. in taile c. and the Defendant as Servant to the sayd R. L. entered and sold Trees and Judgement was given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resol That the Trees notwithstanding the exception remaine parcell of the inheritance and are not Chattels but shall descend to the Heire for the Law doth not favour severance of the Trees from the Land therefore if one bargaine and sell Land upon which there are Trees they shall not passe without inrolement 2. If there had not been such an exception the generall interest of them is in the Lessor and the Lessee had but a particular interest in them and the Lessor may sell them without license of the Lessee to take effect after the Lease determined and tithes shall not be payd for them because they are parcell of the inheritance 2. By the exception of them the soile is not excepted but onely so much as sustaineth the Tree and if he by licence of the lessee root them up the lessee shall have the soile but by exception of Wood the Land it selfe is excepted if an Acre or an advowson be severed from the Mannor by exception upon a Lease for life it shall not be parcell of the Mannor againe otherwise of trees for they were not severed in facto because they grow out of the Land 3. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life but Trees which grow out of the Land and Fish or Deer in the Land may and shall passe with it
the Mannor ex speciali gratia c. and all her right estate title claime c. Resolved that the Record was well removed by the Writt of Error which was for to remove the recovery of the Mannor of M. in M. cum pertinentiis and the Recovery was of the Mannor of M. cum pertinentiis Resolved that this Writt of Error was not given to the King by any of the words of the Statute of 28. H. 8. because the terrtenant is in by title and the entry of the person attainted taken away and such a right for which the party hath no remedy but by action is a thing consists in privity which cannot Escheate nor be forfeited by the common law and this word right in the Act shall be satisfied with a right of entry and 't was observed by the Court that by no Act of attainder a right of action was ever given Note a diversitie betwixt inheritances and chattells for Obligations Statutes Recognisances c. are forfeited by attainder or Outlawry By the Court if L. had made a Feoffement without warranty this had been a discontinuance of the moity for the joynture was severed Resolved that H. N. had no right to a moity of the Mannor for though the recovery were erronious for 't was agreed 't was not void yet the recovery being in force the remainder hath no right for the intended recompence if tenant in taile suffers an erronious recovery and disseise the recoveror and dye his issue shall not be remitted for the taile is barred as long as the recovery stands in force and the Court agreed that neither an action without a right with a discent shall make a Remitter as in the principall case nor a right without an action for a man shall never be remitted but when an action lyes if the right and possession were in severall persons Resolved for the one moity the Recovery shall be a barre to the taile and remainder for though that as well L. as the vouchee might have abated the Writt because Anne was joyntly seised not named yet when the vouchee without demanding any Line enters generally into warranty and admits the Writt good and L. recovers in value which shall inure according to his estate with the remainder over 't is barred for by the recovery against L. the joynture was severed but for the other moity the recovery was not a barre to the taile or remainder because for that L. was not tenant to the Praecipe but the recovery is by Estoppell onely Agreed that H. N. at the time of the attainder was not intitled to have error yet 't was agreed that the remainder upon a taile shall have error upon a judgement given against tenant in taile for when W. 2. inables the donor for to limit a remainder over upon the taile all actions which the common Law gave to privies in estate are by the same Act as incident given also as a reversion or a remainder shall have Error upon a judgement given against tenant for life though not privie by aide voucher or receiver But agreed that by the common Law Error doth not lye by c during the life of tenant for life except he were privy to the first Record by aide voucher or receiver for remedy whereof 9. R. 2. ca ' 3. was made which gives an attaint or error during life upon which Statute the Court resolved 1. that though the Statute speakes onely of reversions yet remainders are within the purview 2. That a reversion expectant upon a taile is out for the Statute enumerates these foure estates Life Dowor Courtesie and Tenant in taile after possibility which declares their intentions to exclude reversions upon tailes and this upon great reason for the taile by possibility may continue for ever and here L. survived H. N. and so his possibility of error destroyed and no word of the Act extends to give a possibility Resolved admitting the Writ of Error had been given to the Queene that by this generall grant of the Queene it did not passe for a common person cannot grant it and therefore it ought to passe by Prerogative and ought to have precise words adjudged in Cromers case 8. of the Queene the Queene having a right of a disseisee attainted grants de speciali gratia c. all lands c. The right doth not passe without speciall recitall and words Owen and Morgans case Trin. 27. of the Queene Baron and Feme are seised and to the heires of the body of the husband a recovery is had against the Baron sole without naming of the wife and after the wife dyed Resolved that though the wife were not party to the Writ nor the Conisance for the estate of the husband and wife was by render upon a Fine levied by the husband and though it does appeare within the same Record that she was a stranger yet the render to her is voidable onely Resolved that this recovery against the husband onely shall not binde the remainder for betwixt husband and wife there are no moities and the husband hath no power to sever the joynture or dispose any part and he during the life of the wife is not seised by force of the taile and he can by no Act execute any part so the Praecipe being brought against him onely the recompence cannot enure to the taile or remainder for to all it cannot for the wife hath a joynt estate in possession and for a moity it cannot for there are no moities and the remainder depends upon the entire estate and recompence recovered by the husband onely cannot inure to him who hath a remainder depending upon the undevided estate of the husband and wife and the joyn-tenancy cannot be severed by the judgement against the husband onely and though the husband hath all the inheritance yet because by no possibility it can be executed 't is all one as if the husband had a remainder depending upon an estate for life and then a common recovery shall not binde because not tenant to the Praecipe nor seised by force of the taile but tooke effect by Estoppell onely The issue may say his auncestor was not tenant tempore brevis and though here the husband survived the wife this is not materiall for the Law adjudges as 't was then Copledikes Case 44. of the Queene fo 5. C. And his wife were seised and to the heires males of the body of the husband the husband levies a Fine to A. B. recovers in a Writ of entry against A. who vouches the husband onely the wife living who vouches the common vouchee Resolved that this recovery shall binde the remainder for here was a lawfull tenant to the Praecipe and though the husband were onely vouched and not his wife who had a joynt estate with him yet the husband coming in as vouchee he came in in privity of the estate taile and not of another estate and the recovery in value gives recompence to the taile which
judgement and this error assigned for that R. the plaintiffe was an Infant and was admitted by his Gardian and no Record made of it as 't is used in Banco but onely recited in the Count J. R. per A. B. gardianum suum ad hoc per curiam specialiter admissum queritur Which was disallowed by all the Justices upon search and view of many presidents which make a Law in this Court yet some presidents were as in Banco Note Reader according to the opinion of Wray 't was resolved in Londons case that if a man takes a lease by Indenture of his own land this is an Estoppell but during the terme and then both parts of the Indenture belong to the lessor Wardens and Commonalty of Sadlers case 30. of the Queene fo 54. BY Mandamus 't was found before B. Mâ—yor of London Escheator of the City and thâ— inquisition was returned in Chancery that T. C. held of the King c. and dyed seised without heire the Wardens c. shewed their right that R. M. was seised in fee and devised to them in fee and that they were seised till by C. disseised and shew the custome of London that a Citizen and Freeman may devise in Mortmaine and averred that R. M. was c. Tempore mortis and upon this great question was whither a Monstrans de droit lyes or it ought to be by Petition See the Case at large for this Learning Bereblock and Redes Case was cited to be adjudg'd if A. be bound in a recognizance Statute c. and after a recovery in Debt is had against him and he dyes his Executors ought first to pay the Debt upon the Recovery though it be puny to the Statute c. for though both be Records yet the judgement in the Court upon judiciall and ordinary proceeding is more notorious and conspicuous and of more high and eminent degree then a Statute c. taken in private by the consent of Parties Forse and Hemblings Case 37. Eliz. in com Banc fo 60. ALice Allen seised of certaine Messuages in Fee maketh her will in Writing and thereby demiseth that if James Amynd doth survive her that then she doth demise and bequeatheth the same messuage to him and his Heires And afterwards the said Alice did Intermarry with the said James and during her coverture she said often the said James should never have the said Messuage by her said Will Alice dyed without issue and James survived and the Question was whither the Will was countermanded by the said Marriage or not and if not whither by the words of revocation after the Marriage was a Countermand and it was adjudged upon great deliberation that the taking of a Husband and the coverture at the time of her death was a countermand of the Will For the making of a Will is but an inception thereof and it doth not take any effect untill the death of the Devisor For Omne testamentum morte consummatum est voluntas est ambulatoria usque extremum vitae exitum And it should be against the nature of a Will to be so absolute that he that made the same being of sane memory may not countermand the same And therefore the taking of her Husband being her owne proper act doth amount to a countermand in Law Also 't was said that after Marriage all the will of the Wife in judgement of Law is subject to the will of her Husband and a Feme Covert hath no Will and therefore the Countermand after Marriage was of no force Quod fuit concessum per tot Cur. Harlakendens Case 31. El. In banco regis fo 62. THe Earle of Oxford leased to A. B. and C. except the Trees for 21. yeares C. assigned to D. the Earle sells the Trees to A. B. and D. they leased to E. and after sell the Trees the Vendee cuts them the Lessee brings Trespasse When a man maketh a Lease for life or yeares the Lessee hath but onely a speciall interest or property in the Trees being Timber as things annexed to the Land but if the Lessee or another severs them the property and interest of the Lessee is determined and the Lessor may take them as things which were parcell of his Inheritance It was also resolved that this clause without impeachment of wast doth not give to the Tenant for life any greater interest in the Trees then he had by the demise of the Land but onely that it will serve that he shall not be impeached in any action of Wast or to recover damages or the place wasted * This is adjudged otherwise by all the Judges of England in Lewes Bowles Case in the 11. Report It was also resolved that if an House fall by tempest or other act of God the Lessee for life or yeares hath a speciall interest to take Timber to reedifie the same if he will But if the Lessee suffer the House to fall or take it downe the Lessor may take his Timber as parcell of his Inheritance and the interest of the Lessee is determined and he may have wast and treble damages Resolved that the Lessee by the grant had an absolute property in the Trees so that by the Lease of the Land they did not passe and he hath not equall ownership in both and it should be a prejudice to him if they should be joyned to the Land for then he could not cut during the terme without wast and after he shall not have them and the Lessor shall not have them against his owne act And here A. B. and D. were Tenants in common of the Land and joyntenants of the Trees and so their interest of severall qualities and therefore cannot be a union betwixt them but upon a feoffement if the Feoffor accept the Trees they are in property divided though In facto they remaine annexed to the Land for it is not felony to cut them c. and if the Feoffor grants them to the Feoffee they are reunited in property as well as De facto and the Heire shall have them not the Executors for the feoffee hath an absolute ownership in both and it is more benefit to him that they are reunited It was resolved That if Tymber Trees be blowne downe with the winde the Lessor shall have them for they are parcell of his inheritance and not the Tenants for life or yeares but if they be Dotards without any Timber in them the Tenant shall have them It was adjudged that wast may be committed in glasse in the Windowes for it is parcell of the house and discends as parcell of the inheritance to the Heire and the Executors shall not have them although the Lessee put the glasse in the Windowes at his owne cost and if he take them away he shall be punished in wast And 42. Eliz. in com Banco It was resolved that Wainscote whither it be annexed to the house by the Lessor or the Lessee is parcell of the House and there
his owne just Debt for every Creditor by such meanes when the goods be not sufficient would strive to make himselfe Executor De son tort to satisfie himselfe and barr others c. And it is not reasonable that one should take advantage of his owne wrong Non facies malum ut inde fiat bonum melius est omnia mala pati quod malo consentire It is also cleere that all lawfull acts that such an Executor doth or disseisor or an abator c. are good Hargraves Case 41. and 42. Eliz. banco regis fo 31. LEssor bringeth Debt against the Administrator of the Lessee for yeares for rent due after the Administration committed in the Debet and so it ought to be because he himselfe tooke the profits and nothing is assets in his hands but the profits besides the rent but in all Actions brought by Executors as Executors the Writ shall be alwaies in the Detinet tantum although the duty accrew in their owne time Pettifers Case 45. Eliz. banco regis fo 32. UPon a fieri facias de bonis testatoris the Sheriffe returneth Nulla bona a Writ issueth to the Sheriffe to inquire by inquest if the Executors have wasted and how much who returneth that they have and judgement given against them De bonis proprijs they bring error in redditione Executionis and the Execution was reversed for the course is upon Nulla bona to have a speciall Fieri Facias to make Execution De bonis proprijs if they have wasted and if the Sheriffe so doth where they have not wasted they have remedy against him but if he taketh an inquest and returneth it although it be false there is no remedy against the Sheriffe or any other Robinsons Case 1. Jac com banco fo 32. EXecutor brings Debt as Administrator and is barred by Plea that he is Executor he may bring Debt as Executor for he was barred as to the Action of the Writ to have Debt as Administrator but not to the Action Reades Case fo 33. 2. Jac. com banco WHen a man dyeth intestate and a strange person taketh the goods of the intestate and useth them or sells them this maketh him an Executor of his owne wrong for when none assumeth to be Executor nor takes Letters of administration there the using of the goods is sufficient to charge one as Executor De son torte for those to whom the Deceast was indebted unto have not any other in this case against whom they may bring their actions for recovery of their Debts When an Executor is made and he proveth the Testament or assumeth upon him the charge and doth administer in this case if a stranger take any of the goods and claime them for his owne this doth not make him an Executor of his owne wrong because there is another lawfull Executor A lawfull Executor shall not be charged but with the goods that come to his hands after that he assumes upon him the charge of the Will c. but if another man first take the goods c. before the lawfull Executor hath assumed the Execution or proved the Testament in this case he may be charged as an Executor of his owne wrong Constructeon of the Statutes of Jeofails c. Amendment of Records Fines Recoveries c. Playters Case 25. 26. Eliz. Banco regis fo 34. THe Defendant was found guilty in trespasse Quare clausum fregit pisces suos cepit and damages assessed intirely it was moved in arrest of judgement because in the Count neither the nature nor the number of Fishes was shewed It was answered by the Plaintiffe That the Defendant is found guilty to damages and so Non refert of what nature or number they are 2. That the Fishes themselves are not to be recovered but damages for them therefore no need to shew the certainty 3. All the damages shall be intended to be given for the close broken which is laid in the Declaration 4. It is matter of forme ayded by the Statute of 18. Eliz cap. 14. But judgement was stayd for the Office of the Declaration is to reduce the Writ to certainty for otherwise upon such a generall Issue if the Jury give a false Verdict they cannot be attainted and damages shall be intended to be given for all because they are intire but if they had beene severed the Plaintiffe shall recover for so much as is well pleaded and this is matter of substance and not of forme because it is no default of the Clerke but of the Plaintiffe and therefore not aided by the Statute Walcots Case 30. Eliz. banco regis fo 36. DEbt was brought against Baron and Feme in the Detinet tantum upon an Obligation by the Feme before Marriage it ought to be in the Debet and Detinet because the Baron had the goods of the wife in his owne right and for that reason debt is brought against the Heire in the Debet and this is matter of substance and point of the Action not remedied by the Statute of 18. Eliz. c. 14. Baynehams Case 30. Eliz. in Scaccar fo 36. AN Ejectione firmae of Lands in A. B. and C. tryed for the Plaintiffe by a Visne out of A. onely this is insufficient and not remedied by any Statute Gardiners Case 21. Eliz. Banco regis fo 37. 23. Jurors are returned 12. appeare and finde for the Plaintiffe this is remedied by 18. Elizabeth cap. 14. Bishops Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 37. VAriance is betweene the Writ and count in name the Plaintiffe recovers the Defendant bringeth Error the Writ was remov'd into the Kings Bench and the judgement was reversed because the Statute remedieth where there is no Originall but not where the Originall is vitious and although it were removed after pleading c. yet because the fault appeared to the Court the judgement was reversed Teys Case 34. Eliz. Banco regis fo 38. BAron and Feme levy a fine to one who grants and renders to them two and to the Heires of the Baron and after renders part to the Feme in taile the remainder over the Heire of the Husband brings a Writ of Error and assignes for error the said Variance 1. Resolved that there needeth not a precise forme in render upon a fine but it shall be in this case construed as a grant by Charter for it is but a grant of record 2. There are five parts of a fine 1. The Originall 2. The License to accord for which the Kings Silver is due and ought to be entered upon the Writ of Covenant and the summe and he who payeth it that is he in whom the fee reposeth the Plea and betwixt whom c. and the Land ought to be mentioned 3. The concord which is the substance of the fine for if upon that the Kings silver be paid although the party dye the fine is good 4. The Note which is many times taken for the Concord And lastly the Foote of the
in the remainder enters J. S. takes the Corne he in remainder brings Trespas The right of the Corne is not in the plaintiffe or defendant but in the lessee for yeares of lessee for life but the lessee of the disseisor had right against the plaintiffe by reason of the possession and for that if he had pleaded that he had entred to take the Corne this had been good but because he pleaded Non culp the plaintiffe had judgement for the Entry and was barred for the residue Penrins case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 85. W. P. Brings a Quod ei deforceat in nature of a Writt of Right in Wales and after the mise joyned is nonsute Judgement finall is given he brings the like Writt and the first Judgement is pleaded in barre the demandant demurres and adjudged against him and he brings Error 1. Although by the Statute of 12. E. 1. Triall of right in Wales shall be by Common Jury yet Judgement finall shall be given 2. Erroneous Judgement finall in right shall binde untill it be reversed 3. Judgement finall shall not be given upon default of the Tenant in a Writt of right but a Petit Cape shall issue for peradventure he may save his default Cases of Executions Blumfeilds Case in banco le roy 39. Eliz. fo 86. TWo men were bound joyntly and severally in an Obligation the one was sued condemned and taken in Execution and after the other was sued condemned and taken in Execution and after the first escaped and the other brought an Audita quaerela and although the Plaintiffe might have his Action against the Sheriffe upon the escape yet untill he be satisfied indeed the other cannot have his Audita quaerela for if the Defendant be sued by one Writ or severall Proces although the entry be Quod unica fiat executio This is to be understood of one Execution with satisfaction for he may have three bodies in Execution In communi banco inter Lynacre Rodes Case Hill 33. Eliz. It was adjudged that notwithstanding the Conusor in a Statute Staple was taken and escaped yet his goods and Lands upon the same Statute may be extended for the Escape and the Action which the Plaintiffe might have against the Sheriffe is not a satisfaction of the Debt And if so the Conusor be taken and dye in Execution the Conusee shall have Execution of his goods and Lands And it was adjudged 24. Eliz. in t Joanes Williams that where two men were condemned in a Debt and the one taken and dyed in Execution yet the taking of the other was lawfull and then it was resolved Per. tot Cur. that if a Defendant dye in Execution yet the Plaintiffe may have a new Execution by Elegit or Fieri facias c. The Execution of the body is an Execution but not a satisfaction as appeareth in 4. H. 7. 8. and 33. H. 6. 47. in Hillaryes Case adjudged but a gage for the Debt for the words of the Writ are Capias I. S. Ita quod habeas corpus ejus coram Justic nostris c. ad satisfaciendum G. L. de debito damnis c. and so his body is taken to the intent he should satisfie and when the Defendant hath paid the money he shall be discharged out of Prison Garnons Case 40. Eliz. fo 88. LAyton recovered against Wallwyn in an Action of Debt and Outlawed the Defendant after judgement and sued a Cap. Vtlag and delivered the same to Garnon the Sheriffe who did take the Party and before the returne of the Writ the Defendant escaped and thus it was resolved that if one at the common Law have judgement in an Action of Debt and after judgement Outlaw the Defendant then the Plaintiffe is at the end of the Suite for any processe to be sued in his name Yet if the Defendant be taken by Vtlary at the Suite of the King no Laches being in the Plaintiffe in continuance of his Processe he shall be in Execution for the Plaintiffe if he will for reason requireth that if the King shall have benefite by the Suite of the party So the Plaintiffe shall have benefite by the Suite of the King if judgement in error be affirmed within the yeare a Capias or Fieri facias lyeth without any Scire facias although in another Court Frosts Case In communi banco 41. Eliz. fo 89. FRost recovered Debt and damages against B. who was Outlawed after judgement and a Cap. Vtlagatum delivered to the Sheriffe of London Laborne a Serjeant arrested the said B. in Fleete-streete Ad respondendum A. Laborne kept B. in his House and then Frost came to Laborne with the Sheriffes Warrant to Arrest B. upon the said Cap. Vtlagat the which to doe Laborne refused and afterwards the Sheriffe suffered the said B. to goe at large and upon this matter Frost brought his Action upon the case against the Sheriffe and supposed that the Sheriffe did arrest the said B. by vertue of the said Cap. Vtlagat and that he suffered him to goe at large and the Defendant pleaded Non permisit eum ire ad largum The Jury found all the said speciall matter and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe For first it was resolved That when a man is in custody of the Sheriffe by Processe of the Law and after another Writ is delivered unto him to apprehend the body of him who is in his custody immediately he is in his custody by force of the second writ by judgement of Law although he make no actuall arrest of him for to what purpose should he arrest the party that is already in his custody Et lex non precipit inutilia quia inutilis labor stultus the words of the writ are not onely Capias c. but also Salvo custodias c. Ita quod habeas corpus coram c. and so he ought safely to keepe him Vide 7. H. 4. 30. And the Defendant ought not to be discharged untill he had found surety to satisfie the Plaintiffe by 5. E. 3. cap. 12. Hoes Case 42. Eliz. fo 89. In the Exchequer EXecution of a writ of Execution as well at the Suite of a common person as at the Kings suite is good without returne of the writ for if a man be arrested upon a Cap. ad satisfaciendum the Execution is good although the Sheriffe doe not returne the writ and so in all writs of Execution where the Sheriffe doth onely execute the same as Cap ad satisfaciendum habere fac seisinam vel possessionem Fieri Facias Liberat. If the Execution be duely made it is good but if Cap. in Processe be not returned the Arrest is not lawfull for there the intent of the writ is to bring the party to answer the Plaintiffe and in case of an Elegit for there the extent is to be made by Inquest and not by the Sheriffe onely and the writ ought to be returned otherwise it is of none effect In this case
make a Lease for yeares and after enter into the Land and make wast and the Lessor recover in an Action of wast against the Lessee for life he shall avoid the Lease for yeares made before the wast committed But if a Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares and after enter and make a feoffement in fee the Lessor shall not avoid the Lease for yeares and so if a Tenant make a Lease for yeares and after is attainted of felony or dyeth without heire the Lord by escheate shall not avoide the tearme But because the feoffement in the case at barre was executed by Letter of Attourney it was resolved to be void and the Land escheated to the Queene Jehu Webbes Case 6. Jacobi com banco fo 45. THe King grants the office of the Kings Tennis plaies at W. to one who being disseised brings an assize The Patent shall have a reasonable construction not onely when the King himselfe playes but when any of his Houshould As if a Commission be made to take Singing-Boys in a Cathedrall-Church for the Kings Chappell those that Sing there for their pleasure cannot be taken but such as get their living by it There were but two manner of assizes at the common Law assizes De libero tenemento and De communia pasturae but for no other common but for this onely there is a Writ in the Register But the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. giveth it De proficuo in certo loco capiendo in lieu of a Quod permittat and although that there offices amongst other things are named yet an assize lay of an office at the common Law and although that no Tenant for life may have a Quod permittat yet an assize did lye for him but that is to be understood of an office of profit for it lyeth not of an office of charge Originall Writs made by Statute cannot be altered without Statute In an assize of a new office it ought to be shewed what profit belongs to it but not for an ancient office because that is sufficiently knowne Syms Case 6. Jacobi fo 51. TEnant in taile levyeth a fine with warranty and dyeth the warranty discends upon the issue of him in the remainder inheritable to the taile and another the issue in taile brings a formedon and is barred for all for the warranty is intire and barreth every one upon whom it discends of all his right as if one seised of three acres maketh a feoffement of one with warranty and dyes having issue two Daughters who make partition the Mother purchaseth the part of one brings dower against the feoffee who Vouches the Daughters shee shall recover all the other acre of the other Daughter if Tenant by the curtesie make a feoffement with warranty and dyes and his Sonne heire of the Feme recovers and assets discends after the feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the Land first recovered by the Statute of Glouc. c. 3. but if assets descend to the Heire in taile bound with a lyneall warranty after recovery in formedon the Feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the assets for otherwise if the recoverer alien the assets the issue of him will recover the Land in taile againe but in these cases the discontinuee ought to confesse the title of the Demandant and pray that if assets descend after they may discend unto him for if he plead a warranty and assets this is peremptory unto him if it be found that assets did not discend for the Statute is that a Scire facias shall issue out of the rolls of the Justices and in this case there is no ground for the Scire facias in the Record but in this case if the issue in taile pleads no assets and assets are found but not to the value the tenant shall have a Scire facias to recover the assets discended after for that false plea of the Vouchee Warranty and estoppell discend upon the heire generall and warranty barreth although that he upon whom it discends claimeth not by him that made it but so doth not an estoppell but estoppells with recompence binde the right of one who claimeth not by him that made it Roger Earle of Rutlands Case 6. Jacobi fo 55. THe King grants the pannage and herbage of a Park to M. for life and reciting this grants it to the Earle of Rutland for his life 1. Resolved the King hath three manner of inheritances 1. Some which he cannot excercise himselfe and cannot grant them in reversion or remainder as Corodies and Churches of which he is Patron 2. Others which he cannot excercise himselfe but may grant them in reversion or remainder as offices 3. Others which he may excercise himselfe and may grant as Lands Houses c. 2. The King here is not deceived for when he reciteth here that M. had for life and grants for life this inureth as by Law it may that is as a grant in reversion 3. In this case the grant to the Earle shall commence after the determination of the estate of M. and if the King grants Land to one and his Heires Habendum to him and his Assignes it is good and the Habendum shall be rejected for the honour of the King See the Lord Chandos case in the sixth Booke and when a Charter of the King may be taken to two intents good in many cases it shall be taken to such intent as is most beneficiall for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another void then for the honour of the King and benefit of the Subject then it shall be taken so that it may take effect Beechers Case 6. Jacobi fo 58. B. Plaintiffe in Debt Se retraxit by attourney and by the judgement is not amerced he brings eror 1. Resolved a Retraxit ought to be in proper person for at the common Law every one who appeared ought to come in proper person and make his attorney after by license of the Court but if it be without writ he cannot without a writ of Attornato faciendo In cases where one may make an attourney but for contempt is bound to appeare in person if he appeare by attourney this is not error because the court may dispens with the contempt otherwise where he cannot appeare by Law by attorney as here for if he appeare by attourny this is error 2. B. ought to be amerced if upon a Nonsuite a Fortiori upon a Retraxit and although it is for his advantage yet he may assigne it for error because the judgement is not perfect and because it is for the advantage of the King and it shall not be amended because the act of the Court. 3. Where one disclaimes he shall not have a Writ of error because he hath confessed that he had no right otherwise it is upon a Retraxit for this is but a barre of the action à fortiori here where it wat void done by an attourney
Heires Males of his Body c. And if A. or his issue c. shall attempt c. to alien c. by which any estate shall be barred c. that after such attempt and before any act executed the use and Estate of him so attempting c. shall cease onely as to him so attempting in the same degree as if he were naturally dead and not otherwise and that then it shall be immediately to such persons to whom it should come by the intent of the Indenture c. C. dyes A. suffers a recovery B. enters c. adjudged he could not for this proviso is repugnant impossible and against Law for the death of Tenant in taile is not a cesser of the Estate taile but death without issue Males and by this reason the issue should have it in the life of the Father c. And for every discent c. Death naturall or civill is requisite and t is not materiall though Tenant in taile had no issue at the time of the breach for t was repugnant at the beginning and the estate taile doth not commence by the having of issue and a gift in taile upon condition that if the Donee dyes his estate shall cease is a void condition Also the proviso is void for the incertainty as a gift to two Et haeredibus is voide though a Warranty be made to them and their Heirs in Jermine Arscotts Case the like proviso was adjudg'd voide for be the proviso a condition or a limitation the intire estate ought to be defeated by it and an Estate in Land cannot cease for part and continue for the residue nor cease for one person and continue for another nor cease for a time and revive after The like judgement was betwixt Chomly and Humble but the Parliament or Law may make an estate voide as to one and good to another as Tenant in speciall taile levies a fine the issue is barred not the wife so a release by the demandant to the vouchee is good not by a stranger so if an Executor surrender a tearme to one respect t is extinct to another t is assetts c. And uses are within the Statute De donis though it speakes onely of Lands and Tenements and there shall be a Possessio fratris c. of them for they are guided by the Rules of the common Law Richill in the time of R. 2. and Thirning in the time of H. 4. Justices intended for to make a perpetuity but could not Shelleyes Case 23. Eliz Fol. 94. EDward Shelley leased for yeares and after Covenanted to suffer a recovery which should be to the use of himselfe and after to the use of A. for 24. yeares and after to the Heires Males of the body of the said E S. and the Heires Males of the said Heires Males c. E. S. dyes 9 of Octob. the first day of the Terme in the morning betwixt five and six a clock the recovery passes the same day and an Habere facias seisinam awarded the recovery was executed the 19 of Octob. 4 Decemb. the Wife of the Eldest Son before dead of E. S. was delivered of a Son named Henry Richard the second Son of E. S. entered and made a Lease c. Henry entred upon the Lessee who brought an Eject firmae and Judgement was given for the Defendant and t was resolved that if Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery and dye before execution that execution may be sued against the issue for the intended recompence in favour of the common assurance resolved that the revertion in judgement of Law is not in the recoveror before execution sued for the judgement is Quod recuperet seisinam which cannot be executed till entry or claime as 't is of a Common c. granted upon condition for when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime The third and great point resolved was that the Uncle is in as by discent though he shall not have his age nor be in ward 1. Because the recovery being the Originall act had its Essence in the life of E. S. to which the execution hath retrospect 2. Because the use might have vested in E. S. if he were in life 3. Neither the recoverors by their entry nor the Sheriffe by making execution may make an Inheritance to whom they please 4. Because the Uncle claimed the use by the recovery and Indenture and by words of limitation not purchase Albanies Case 28. Eliz Fo. 111. A By Indenture infeoffed B. of two Acres to the use of A. for life the remainder in taile to C. the remainder in fee to D. with a proviso if E. dye without issue that A. at any time by indenture sealed c. in the presence of foure c. may alter c. any use c. A. of the one acre infeoffes F. and for the other Acre A. by Indenture renounces surrenders releases c. to B. C. and D. the said power condition authority c. E. dyes without issue A. by Indenture in presence of foure revokes the first uses and limits new resolved that by the feoffement the power to revoke as to limit new uses was extinct and by Wray chiefe Justice the future power may be released as a condition subsequent though the performance or breach cannot be done without an act precedent but as to this poynt the Court did not give their resolution but the whole Court agreed that if the power had beene present as t is usuall this might be extinct to any one who hath a free hold in possession reversion or remainder 'T was moved if the future power could not be released whether it might be defeated by the words of defeasance both being executory and 't was said that in all cases when any thing executory is created by a deed that the same thing by consent of all parties to the creation by their deed may be nullified as a warranty recognizance rents charge annuities covenant c. And of the same opinion was Wray chiefe Justice and the whole Court and judgement given according Chudleighs Case Or the Case of perpetuities Fo. 120. SIr Richard Chudleigh was seised in fee of the Mannor of D. and had issue foure Sonnes A. B. C. D. and 26º Aprill the third and fourth of Phillip and Mary infeoffed E. F c. in fee to the use of himselfe and his Heires of the body of G. then Wife of H. and after to the use of the performance of his Will for ten yeares immediately after his death and after to the use of the feoffes and their Heires during the life of A. the Eldest Sonne the remainder to the use of the first issue Male of the body of A. and the Heires of the body of the first issue Male and so to the second issue Male the remainder to the use of B. the second Sonne and the Heires of his body the remainder to C.
the wrong but that the said Bill shall remaine alwayes of record to their infamy and here no murther or piracy can be punished upon any Bill exhibited in English but he ought to have beene indicted and therefore he hath not onely mistaken the Court but also the nature of exhibiting the Bill hath not appearance of any ordinary course of justice but no action lyes upon an appeale of murder returnable in the Common Bench for though the Writ is not returned before competent Judges who may doe justice yet 't is in nature of a lawfull Suite namely by Writ of appeale wherefore judgement was given for the Plaintiffe And in a Writ of error in the Chequer Chamber brought by Wood 't was resolved that Sir R. B. might have had a good action but here because the action was not upon the Bill exhibited at Westminster but because he said in the County of S. that his Bill was true In auditu quamplurimorum without expressing the said matters in particular so that it was not any Slaunder judgement was reversed Stanhopp and Bliths Case 27. of the Queene fo 15. MAster Stanhopp who was a surveyor of the Dutchy and had divers Offices and was a justice of peace Hath but one Mannor and that he hath gotten by swearing and forswearing Resolved that the action doth not lye for they are too generall and words which charge any one in an action in which damages shall be recovered ought to have convenient certainty and he doth not charge the Plaintiffe with swearing c. and he may recover a Mannor by swearing c. yet not procuring or assenting to it Resolved if one charge another that he hath forsworne himselfe no action lyes First because he may be forsworne in usuall communication Quia benignior sensus in verbis generalibus seu dubijs est praeferenda Secondly it is an usuall word of passion and choller as also to call another a Villaine a Rogue or Varlet these and such like will not mayntaine Action Boni judicis interest lites derimere But if one say to another that he is perjured or that he hath forsworne himselfe in such a Court c. For these words an Action will lye Hext Justice of Peace against Yeomans 27. of the Queene fo 15. FOr my ground in H. Hext seekes my life and if I could finde one J. H. I doe not doubt but within two dayes to arrest Hext for suspicion of felony Adjudged that no action lyes for the first words 1. Because he may seeke his life lawfully upon just cause and his land may be holden of him 2. 'T is too generall and the Law inflicts no punishment for seeking of his life but adjudged that the action lyes for the last words for for suspicion of felony he shall be imprisoned and his life in question Birchleys case 27. 28. of the Queene fo 16. THe Defendant said to B. Clerke of the Kings Bench and sworne to deale duely without corruption you are well knowne to be a corrupt man and to deale corruptly Adjudged that the action lyes 1. Because the words Ex causa dicendi imply that he hath dealt corruptly in his profession Et sermo relatus ad personam intelligi debet de conditione personae 1. This touches the Plaintiffe in his oath 2. The words Scandalize him in the duty of his profession by which he gets his living Skinner of London said that Manwood was a corrupt Judge adjudged actionable Resolved in this case that if the precedent parlance had beene that B. was a usurer or executor of another and would not performe the will and upon this the Defendant had spoken the words following no action would lye Weaver and Caridens case 37. of the Queene fo 16. AAjudged that no action lyes for saying that the Plaintiffe was detected for perjury in the Starre-chamber for an honest man may be detected but not convicted Stuckley and Bulheads case 44. and 45. of the Queene fo 16. ADjudged that an action lyes for saying Master St. he was a Justice of peace covereth and hideth felonies and is not worthy to be a Justice of peace for this is against his oath and his office and a good cause to put him out of Commission and for that he may be indicted and fined Snagg and Gees case 39. of the Queene fo 16. THou hast killed my wife and art a traytor Adjudged that the action will not lye for the wife was in life as appeared in the Declaration and so the words vaine and no scandall otherwise if shee had beene dead Eaton and Allens case 40. of the Queene fo 16. HE is a brabler and a quarreller for he gave his Champion counsell to make a Deed of gift of his goods to kill me and then to fly out of the Country but God preserved me Resolved that the action will not lye for the purpose without act is not punishable and though he may be punished for such conspiracy in the Star-chamber yet this is by the absolute power of the Court not by ordinary course of Law Observe well this case and the cause and reason of this Judgement Anne Davies case 35. of the Queene fo 16. THe Defendant said to B. a Suitor to the Plaintiffe and with whom there was neare an agreement of marriage I know Davies daughter well she did dwell in Cheapside and a Grocer did get her with childe and the Plaintiffe declared that by reason thereof the said B. refused to take her to wife Resolved the action lyes for a woman is punishable for a Bastard by 18. of the Queene ca. 3. And though that fornication c. is not examinable by our Law because done in secret and uncomely openly to be examined yet the having a Bastard is apparant and examinable by the said Act. Resolved if the Plaintiffe had been charged with nude incontinency onely the action lyes for the ground of the action is temporall viz. the defeating of her advancement in marriage By Popham an action lyes for saying that a woman Inholder had a great infectious disease by which shee loses her guests Banister and Banisters case 25. of the Queene Resolved that an action lyes for saying to the sonne and heire that he was a Bastard for this tends to his disinherison but resolved if the Defendant pretend that the Plaintiffe is a Bastard and he himselfe right heire no action lyes and this the Defendant may shew by way of barre Jeames case 41. 42. of the Queene fo 17. THe Defendant said to B. Hang him innuendo praedict J he is full of the pox innuendo the French pox c. Resolved two things are requisite to have an action for slander 1. That the person scandalized be certaine 2. That the scandall be apparent by the words themselves And therefore if a man says that one of the servants of B. is a notorious felon or traytor an action lyes not if he have more servants and innuendo cannot make it certain
had common in such a place for him and his Tenants at will but when he claimes this in the soile of the Lord he cannot prescribe in the name of the Lord for the Lord cannot prescribe to have common c. in his owne soile and therefore he ought to alledge that within the Mannor there is such a custome Note a good diversity betweene a prescription which is personall and alwayes made in the name of a certaine person or his auncestors or those whose estate c. and a custome which is locall and alleadged in no person but that within the Mannor there is such a custome this shall serve for those who cannot prescribe in their owne name nor in the name of any person certaine as the Inhabitants of a Towne Also the allegation of a custome shall serve when 't is referred to a thing insensible Viz. that all such Lands are devisable And for that in the principall case the custome may have a lawfull commencement that one copy-holder onely shall have common estovers or other profit in the land of the Lord and that in many Mannors some Copiholders have common in one wast of the Mannor and others in another severally so that the custome cannot be applied to all and because that all the other Copiholds may be determined and extinct 't was adjudged the custome was well alledged So to have common of estovers in the wood of his Lord parcell of the Mannor c. was adjudged good 10. of the Queene as 't was said Myttons case 26. Eliz. QUeene Elizabeth by Letters Patents did grant the office of the Clerkship of the County Court of Somerset to Mytton with all fees c. for life Arthur Hopton Esquire Sheriffe of the same Shire interrupted him because it was incident to his office Mytton complained to the Lords of the Councell and it was referred to the two chiefe Justices Wray and Anderson And after many arguments concerning the validity of the grant and conference had with all the other Justices It was resolved by all the Justices Nullo contradicente aut reluctante that the said Letters Patents were voyd And their reasons were that the office of the Sheriffe was an ancient office before the Conquest and of great trust and authoritie for the King committeth unto him Custodiam Comitatus And though the King may determine the office ad beneplacitum yet he cannot determine this in part as for one Towne or Hundred nor abridge him of any incident to his office for the office is entire and ought to continue so without any fraction or diminution without by Parliament and the County Court and the entring of all proceedings therein are incident to the Sheriffes office c. And though 't was granted when the office of the Sheriffe was voyd yet the new Sheriffe shall avoyde it as Scroges case in the time of vacation of the office of the Chiefe Justice of the Common Bench Queene Mary granted the office of the Exigenter of London resolved that the next Chiefe Justice shall avoyd it for 't was incident to his office Also in all Writs directed to the Sheriffe concerning the County Court the King says in comitatu tuo and in retourne of exigents made by him he says ad comitatum meum tent c. and the style of the Court proves it and by the Statute of 33. H. 8. the Sheriffe of Denbigh shall keepe his Shire Court at c. In a false judgement 't is said in pleno com' tuo recordari facias c. and in a precept of Tolt 't is said summoneas c. quod sit ad comitatum meum And it should be very inconvenient that another should have the custody of the entries and Rolls of Court which may be imbesilled and the Sheriffe responsable for them And it was resolved that the custody of all the Gaoles within every County belongs to the Sheriffe by right and are annexed and incident by the Law to the Sheriffes office vid. stat An. 14o. E. 3. ca. 10. Bozouns case 26. 27. of the Queene fo 34. A. Portion of tythes in L. appertained to the Rectory of G. which was presentable and the Queene was seised of the Rectory of L. jure coronae which was appropriated to the Monastery of W. and grants to B. ex gratia speciali c. totam illam portionem decimarum c. in L. c. Cum omnibus alijs decimis suis quibuscunque in L. tunc vel nuper in occupatione J. C. and that the pattents shall be of force non obstante aliquibus defectibus in non nominando male recitando c. alicujus occupatoris And J. C. never had any tythes in L. Resolved that in the occupation of J. C referres to all the sentence and not onely to cum omnibus alijs decimis c. 1 Because illam demonstrates fully that there ought to be words subsequent to explaine and reduce in certainty what portion by the intention of the Queene should passe viz. that which was in the occupation of J. C. and 't is not satisfied till it be come to the full end of the sentence 2. This conjunction cum omnibus alijs c. couples the last words to the former and makes the words subsequent to referre to all the sentence 3. If all the tythes in L. of the said Rectory should passe the addition of the occupation of J. C. should be vaine maledicta expositio c. Resolved that by grant of portionem decimarum c. the tythes parcell of the Rectory of L. doe not passe for portion properly signifies a part or portion in grosse divided and not parcell of the Rectory and the Queene had not any portion in grosse but all were parcell of the Rectory And ex gratia speciala c. shall not extend by any strained constructiō to make a thing passe against the intention of the Queene expressed in her grant and against the apt proper and usuall signification of the words of his grant Resolved that because J. C. had not any tythes there nothing passes for admit that a portion should be taken for a part then the effect of the grant is totam illam portionem decimarum in occupatione J. C. and in truth he never had any part nothing without question passes in case of a common person a fortiori not in the case of the Queene As to the point when a clause of Non obstante shall make the grant of the Queene good when not Resolved when the King by the common Law cannot in any manner make a grant there a Non obstante of the common Law will not make the grant good against the reason of the common Law as the King grants a protection in an Assise or Quare Impedit notwithstanding any Law to the contrary 't is voyd for protection lyes not in these cases for the losse which may come to the parties by such great delay But when the King may lawfully make
Parliament in the upper House that Leases made to the Queene by Colledges Deans and Chapters or any other having spirituall or Ecclesiasticall Livings against the provision of the Act 13. Eliz. ca ' 10. are restrained by the same Act as well as Leases made to common persons for they are disabled by Parliament to make estates the King being the head of the Common-wealth may not be an Instrument to defeate the provision of an Act of Parliament made Pro bono publico For though the Queene by the common Law had ability to take it yet insomuch the Parliament had dissabled them to make states estates made to the Queene against the Act are voyd Covenants c. Concerning Leases Assurances c. Spencers Case 25. Eliz. fo 16. Banco Regis A Lessee doth Covenant for himselfe his Executors and Administrators with the Lessor that he his Executors or Assignes shall build a Brick Wall upon parcell of the Land demised c. afterwards the Lessee assignes over his tearme to B. in this Case B. is not bound to build the Wall When the Covenant extends to a thing In esse parcell of the demise then the thing to be done by force of the Covenant is Quodammodo annexed and appurtenant to the thing demised and shall run with the Land and binde the Assignee although he be not bound by expresse Covenant But when the Covenant extends to a thing which had not essence at the time of the demise made that cannot be appurtenant or annexed to a thing which had not essence As if a Lessee Covenant to repaire the housses to him demised during the tearme this is parcel of the contract c. and shall bind the Assignee although he be not bound expresly by the Covenant But in this Case the Covenant concernes a thing which had not essence at the time of the demise but to be made after and therefore it shall binde the Covenantor his Executors and administrators and not the assignee for the Law will not annexe the Covenant to a thing which had not essence It was resolved in this Case if the Lessee had Covenanted for him and his assignes c. that in as much as it was to be builded upon the thing demised it should binde the assignee by expresse words Also if a warranty be to one his Heires and assignes by expresse words the assignee shall take benefite thereof and have a Warrantia cartae But although the Covenant be for him and his Assignes yet if the thing to be done be meerly collaterall to the Land demised and doe not concerne the same the Assignee shall not be charged as if the Lessee Covenant for him and his Assignes to build a house upon the Land of the Lessor which is not parcell of the demise or to pay any collaterall Summe of money to the Lessor or to a stranger this shall not binde the Assignee Also in a case of goods as Sheepe Chattell c. there is not any privity or reversion in the Assignee but meerely a thing in action in the personalty which cannot binde any but the Covenantor his Executors or administrators which doe represent him The same Law is if a man demise Lands for yeares with a stock of Cattle or Summe of money rendring rent and the Lessee Covenants for him his Executors Administrators and Assignes to deliver the Stock of Cattle or the Summe of money at the end of the Terme yet the Assignee shall not be charged with the Covenant This word Concessi or Demisi imports a Covenant and if an Assignee of a Lessee be evicted he may have a Writ of Covenant so shall Tenant by Statute or Elegit of a Terme or he to whom the Lease is sould by force of any Execution c. If a man grant to a Lessee for yeares that he shall have so many estovers as shall serve to repaire his House or that he shall burne within his House or such like during the Tearme that is appurtenant to the Land and shall run with the same as a thing appurtenant in whose hands soever the same commeth Assignee of an Assignee Executors of an Assignee ASSIGNES of Executors or Administrators of every Assignee may have Action of Covenant for all are comprised within this word Assignees for the same right that was in the Testator or intestate shall goe to the Executors or administrators It was resolved That the Act of 32. H. 8. c. 24. extendeth onely to Covenants which touch the thing demised and not to collaterall Covenants Slingsbyes Case 29. Eliz. fo 18. Vpon error in the Exchequer Chamber IF any party Covenantor in a Tripertite Indenture breake Covenant all the rest of the parties Covenantees are to maintaine the Action notwithstanding the words of the Covenant are Et ad cum quolibet eoâ—um But if a man demise to A black Acre to B. white acre to C. greene Acre and Covenant with them and every of them in this Case in respect of the severall interest by these words And every of them the Covenant is made severall but if the demise be made to them joyntly then these words in the Covenant And every of them are made voyd A man cannot binde himselfe to three and to every of them to make that joynt or severall at the Election of severall persons for one selfe same cause for the Court will be in doubt for which of them to give judgement It was resolved that an interest cannot be granted joyntly and severally as if a man grant Prox imam advocationem or make a Lease for Terme of yeares of Land to two joyntly and severally these words severally are voyd and they are joyntenants but a power and authority may be joyntly and severally as to make livery or to sell for they have no interest or Action but are as servants to others And judgement was reversed Rosewells Case 35. Eliz. fo 19. BArgainor of Land covenanteth to make to the Bargainee such assurance as his Councell shall advise the Bargainee himselfe cannot devise it although he be Learned in the Law for then it would be no good plea to say Quod consilium non dedit advisamentum Higginbottoms Case 35. Eliz. Banco regis fo 19. A Parson assumeth to I. S. to make him such an estate in a Rectory as the Counsell of the said I. S. shall devise the Counsell shall be given to I. S. and he shall notifie it to the Parson Stiles Case 38. Eliz. Banco regis fo 20. A Charter with the words Haec indentura without a manuall Act of indenting of the paper or parchment is not an Indenture Sir Anthony Maynes Case 38. Eliz. fo 20. Error in Banco regis SIr A. M. Leaseth to S. for twenty one yeares and bindeth himselfe to make a new Lease unto him upon surrender of the old and Leaseth to another for 80. yeares by fine Scott the first Lessee bringeth debt and had judgement If you be bound to enfeoffee one in the Mannor of D. before
In cur wardo fol. 68. IN a devise of Lands by writing an averment out of the will shall not be received for a Will concerning Lands c. ought to be in Writing and not by any averrment out of the same otherwise it were great inconvenience that not any might know by the written words of the will what construction to make if it might be controuled by collaterall averrment out of the will Cases of Vsury Burtons Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 69. A. Lends to T. W. 100. l. 7. July 21. Eliz. in consideration of which T. W. grants to him a rent charge of 20. l. per annum the first payment to be at the Nativity 1580. upon condition of payment of the said 100. l. this is out of the Statute of Usury for he had a 100. l. for a yeare and a quarter without consideration and if he pay it within this Time A. shall not have the rent so that he was not assured of any consideration But if it were agreed betweene them that the 100. l. shall not be payd this is within the meaning of the Statute A Demurrer is a confession of all such matters in fact onely as are well and sufficiently pleaded Claytons Case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 70. THirty pound was lent for halfe a yeare to have for it thirty-three pound if the sonne of the obligee be then in life if not 27. pound this is within the intent of the Statute of Usury Vsura dicitur ab usu aere quasi usuaera 1. usus aeris Et usura est commodum certum quod propter usum rei mutuatae recipitur Glanvile lib. 7. cap. 16. Hoes Case 34. Eliz. fo 70. A Duty certaine upon a condition subsequent may be released before the day of the performance of the condition but a dutie uncertaine at the first and upon condition precedent to be made certaine after this in the meane time is but onely a meere possibilitie and therefore cannot be released And it was adjudged 4. El. in communi Banco that by a release of all actions suites and quarrels a covenant before breach of it is not released thereby But by a release of covenants the covenantor is discharged before the breach vide Litt ' 170. A release in the time of vacation to the Patron dischargeth an annuitie wherewith the Parson is charged in respect of the parsonage and a warranty may be released before suite because he may have a warrantia chartae St. Johns case 34. El. Banco Regis fol. 71. DAggs Pistolls c. are within the Statute of 33. H. 8. ca ' 6. the same Statute doth prohibite Crosse-bowes and under the same name stone-bowes are forbidden for if a small alteration or addition should defeat the penaltie of the act the Statute should be of small effect And it was resolved that the Sheriffe or any of his Officers for the better execution of Justice may carry handguns or other weapons invasive or defensive and not restreined by the generall prohibition of the said act vide 3o. H. 7. fo 1. Williams case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 72. ONe man shall not have an action of the case for common Nusans made in the high way because it is a common Nusans and it is not reason that any particular person should have an action for then every particular person might have an action for the same and so thereby one might be punished an hundred times for one cause But if any particular person have more particular damage then another hee may have a particular action upon the case for this particular injury for common Nusances which are equall to all the Kings people the common Law hath appointed other Courts viz. Leets c. A prescription to doe divine service in a Chappell for the Lord and his tenants is remediable onely in the Court Christian but for the Lord and his private family an action of the case lyeth for the Lord onely Case of Orphanes of London 35. El. Banco Regis fol. 73. IF any Orphane of London sue for goods c. in the Court Christian or of Requests a prohibition lyeth because their government by their custome belongs to the Major of L. So if a Will be proved in the Court Christian the probate whereof belongeth to the Lord of a Mannor Wymarkes case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 74. PLaintiffe in an Ejectione firmae counts of a Lease of R. S. the defendant pleads in barre an Indenture of bargaine and sale and sheweth it by the said R. S. to E. W. who was seised untill disseised by R. S. who leased to the plaintiffe and he as servant to E. W. enters Three Termes after the plaintiffe replies that the bargaine and sale was upon condition which was broken and the bargainor entred and leased to him and did not shew forth the deed of bargaine and sale Judgement given for the defendant 1. Resol When a Deed is shewed to the Court it remaineth in the Court all the Terme in Judgement of Law because the Terme is but one day in Law and this as well to strangers as parties to take advantage thereof without shewing but at the end of the Terme it shall be delivered to the party if it be not denied for then it shall remaine in Court to be damned if it be found not his Deed. 2. The Course in the Kings Bench is that Imparlances to plead in barre are entred but not Imparlances to Reply or rejoyne so that the Replication here although it be three Termes after the Barre yet it shall be intended here the same Terme and so he shall not need to shew the Deed. Cliftons case 35. Eliz. fol. 75. IF a woman tenant for life take an husband which committeth wast and after the wife dyeth the husband is dispunishable of and for such wast for the Writ is Quare cum de communi consilio c. provisum sit quod non liceat alicui vastum venditionem seu destructionem facere de terris c. sibi demissis ad terminum vitae vel annorum c. And in this case the husband hath not any estate for life in this Land but the wife hath estate for life and the husband but onely an estate in her right and so he is not within the Act. Pilkintons case 43. Eliz. in banco le Roy. fo 76. IT was resolved Per tot ' Cur ' that when a distresse is taken for damage fesant that the party may tender amends untill the beasts be impounded but after they be in the pound they are in the custody of the Law and then the tender cometh too late It was also resolved that tender of amends to the Bayliffe or servant that taketh them will not serve for he cannot deliver the distresse once taken no more then change the avoury of his Master or demand rent upon a condition of reentry The Earle of Pembrookes case 36. El. Banco Regis fol. 76. WHere the defendant sheweth a
the King dyes the Father is King and the Son Duke by the said Statute against the rules of Law 2. The Lands cannot be so annexed to the Duchie that they cannot be severed without Statute 3. The estate is limitted to cease when the King hath no first begotten Son and to revive when he hath which cannot be without Statute 4. It should be absurd that six being then created Earles that their creation should be firme and the Creation of the Prince void 5. In the Charter there is De communi consilio Praelatorum c. and in the end Per ipsum Regem totum concilium in Parliamento such an Act as beginneth Rex Statuit and alwayes reputed for a Statute shall not be drawne in question but if it be Rex ex assensu the Commons or Lords omitting the other part it is voide 2. The said Charter having the force of a Statute is good without aid of any other Statute and although the King in his Scire facias recite another Act for thâ—s surplus the writ shall not abate 3. The Prince had the Dukedome in Fee for it is an inheritance because 21. E. 3. 41. the Princesse was indowed and it is no estate taile because it is not limitted of what body it shall come but onely that they shall be Heires to the black Prince 4. Against a generall Statute Nul tiel recorde shall not be pleaded for although it be lost yet the Judges ought to take notice of it and this is such an one which concernes the Prince and the Statute of confirmations doth not extend unto it 1. Because this hath a speciall relation to certeine defects as Misnosiner c. 2. Patents are made good onely against the King saving the right of others therefore the Princes right is saved In a Scire facias the King or Prince may reply but the most formall way is for the Attourney to replie as here he did No Sonne of the King but his first begotten shall be Duke of C. although he be Heire apparent to the Crowne Calyes Case 26. Eliz. Banco regis fo 32. 1. REsolved that to maintaine an action against an Inkeeper for goods lost c. it ought to be a common June 2. He ought to be a Passenger therefore a Neighbour shall not 3. An inholder shall not answer for any thing but that which is Infra hospitium therefore if a Passenger require that his Horse be put to grasse the inholder shall not answer if he be stollen otherwise if he require it not 4. There ought to be a default in the Inholder or his Servants therefore if a Guest bring one with him who stealeth the goods the Inholder shall not be charged otherwise if the Hostler appoint one with him in his Chamber who doth it But an inholder shall not be charged if he require the Guest to put his goods in a Chamber and he leaves them in the Court but it is no excuse to the Inholder that he delivered the Key of the Chamber to the Guest or that no goods were delivered to him 5. The Hostler shall answer for Charters if they be stollen but not if a Guest be beaten and all this appeares by the Writ and the words of it Paynes Case 29. Eliz. com banco fo 34. A Feme Tenant in taile taketh Baron and hath issue who is heard to cry and dyeth the Feme dyeth without issue the Husband shall be Tenant by the courtesie for although the state of the Feme be determined yet it is Tacite implied in the guift that every Husband of a Feme inheritable to the said estate shall have the Land for his life after the death of the Feme if he be intitled to be Tenant by the courtesie If a Feme be delivered of a Monster this doth not intitle the Husband to be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue had humane shape but is blemished if a Feme be ripped and the issue taken out of her Wombe the Baron shall not be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue which they had dyes and Lands discends after A man shall not be Tenant by the courtesie but where his issue may inherit as heire to the Feme therefore he shall not be of a possession in Law because there he makes title from the auncester of the Feme and not from the Feme Barretry 30. Eliz. fol. 36. A common Barretor is a common maintainer of Suites or quarrells in Courts or in the Countrey As first in disturbance of the peace Secondly in taking and keeping of possession with force or deceite Thirdly by false calumniation and sowing of Quarrells but to indite him of it it ought not to be that he hath done so twice or thrice but that he is a common doer of them Grieslies Case 30. Eliz. com banco fo 38. BY the custome one is chosen in a Leete to be Constable who refuseth and departeth out of the Court the Steward imposeth a Fine of 5. l. upon him for which the Bailiffes of the Lord distreine and he brings a replevin 1. Resolved every Judge of record may assesse a reasonable fine upon any man who makes contempt or disturbance to the Court but a Judge who is not of record cannot 2. This fine heeds not to be afferred because the Statute of Mag. Ch. speakes of Amerciaments and not of Fines for a fine is imposed by the Court and an Amerciament by the Jury therefore the Judgement in an Amerciament is generall Quod sit in misericordia and after upon estreits directed to the Coroners they are afferred and the Statute is that a Noble man shall be Amerced by his Peers which is not used at this day because it is reduced to a certeinty Viz. A Duke to 10. l. and others to 5. l. but an Amerciament of an Officer of the Court or he who hath execution of Writs shall be afferred by the Court so of any who is Judge as Suitors If a Juror appeare and is adjourned to a day of which he makes default this shall be inquired by his Companions for he shall be fined to the value of his Land per annum which the Court cannot know 3. A distresse may be taken for a fine without custome or for an Amerciament which is lesse Whittinghams Case 45. Eliz. fo 42. IT was resolved that if there be Lord and Tenant an Infant and the Infant make a feoffement in fee and execute the same by livery of seisin by his owne hands and after dye without heires in this case the Lord shall not have the benefit of the escheate and the Feoffement is unavoidable There be three manner of privities Viz. privity in blood 2. Privity in estate 3. Privity in Law Privities in blood as heires in blood privity in estate as joyntenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donee Lessor and Lessee c. privities in Law as Lord by escheate Lord of a Villaine c. If a Lessee for life
disseissed at the common ley and dyed and the Feme before entry dyed this is a discontinuance to the Sonne because he cannot enter as Heire to both but if the Feme enter the discontinuance is purged 2. The estate which the Feme had jointly with her Baron is within the purviewe of the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 28. That no fine levyed by the Baron sole of Lands of the Feme shall hurt her and within the Statute of West 2. c. 3. 3. The entry of the Sonne is lawfull although he claimes not as heire to the Feme as the Statute speakes but as heire to both because he is within these words or to such as have right by the death of such Wife and this is to be intended of discontinuances made by the Baron and not of a rightfull barre of the issue for they cannot avoide it and the Statute is that they may enter which they cannot doe where they are barred and if the Feme enter within 5. yeares as shee may after a Fine levyed by the Baron this doth not take away the future barre of the issue and if shee enter not within 5. yeares shee also is barred Baron tenant in taile the remainder to the Feme in taile makes a feoffement the Feme may enter after his death by this Statute but if the Baron suffer a recovery she shall not enter in the Case at barre the son may have a Formedon at the common Law and where before this Statute a Cuj in vita or Sur cuj in vita did lye entry is given by this Statute and not otherwise The Lord Staffords Case 7. Jacobi fo 73. THe Queene revertioner upon an estate taile grants the revertion to T. T. in taile upon condition is to have Praedictam reversionem in fee the condition is performed the Lord Stafford Tenant in taile levyeth a fine his issue is barred 1. Resolved that a condition of accruer may be annexed to a thing which lyeth in grant and to an estate taile as if Lessee for life be the remainder for life with condition of accruer to the first this is good and yet no Merger of estate 4. things are requisit to an accruer 1. A particular estate as the Foundation Ergo a Lease at will shall not be 2. The estate ought to continue in the Grantee untill accruer therefore if the Grantee alien and repurchase the condition is Tolled but Quaere if the Tenant alien upon condition which is broken if the fee shall accrew but grantee may grant part of his estate as if Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares he may performe the condition after so may Tenant in speciall taile after he is become tenant in taile after possibility c. so may the surviving jointenant and the heire of Tenant in taile An instant is sufficient to support an accruer as if the condition be if the Lessee be ousted Eo instante that the ouster is the fee accrueth but if Lessee for yeares accept a confirmation for life the condition is gone but it is not necessary that the estate of the grantor or Lessor continue because by his owne act he shall not defeate his grant 3. It ought to vest at the time of the condition performed or never and for that rather that it shall not vest at this time by performance of the condition the fee without office or other ceremony shall be devested out of the King 4. It is necessary that the particular estate and the condition be in one deede or two deeds delivered at the same time for in Law they are but one grant and by the condition performed he had fee from the delivery Resolved Praedict reversionem signifies the reversion which the Queene had Viz. That which depends upon both the estates taile and so was the intent also shee granted Omnia praemissa which maketh it cleere Resolved also that these words Will and Declare doe amount to a grant and are so used in Patents of Liberties and things to take effect in Futuro Tenant in taile the remainder in taile the remainder to the King Tenant in taile suffers a recovery this doth not barre the remainder in taile because the issue in raile is not barred and therefore the revertions and remainders in taile are preserved by the Statute of 34. H. 8. c. 20. Lastly Resolved if the reversion in fee had remained in the Crowne that the fine levyed by Ed Lord Stafford the Father had not barred the Lord that now is Notlyes Case 31. Eliz. com banco Wiat Wields Case 7. Jacobi 78. W. W. seised of Land to which he had common appurtenant aliens 5. acres to one who in replevin counts that he and those whose estate he had in the said 5. acres have had common there c. and good 1. Resolved although by purchase of part of the Land in which c. the common appurtenant is destroyed in all yet it is not so by alienation of part of the Land to which but all remaines without damage to the Tenant of the Land 2. That the pleading of it was sufficient Vinyors Case 7. Jacobi fo 80. ONe was bound to stand to the award of W. R. and revokes the submission the Obligee brings Debt 1. Resolved the Countermand is good for an authority Countermandable by the Law cannot by any way be made irrevocable 2. Although that the Plaintiffe doth not show that the Defendant had given notice to the arbitrator yet it is good because this is implied for without notice the revocation is void 3. The Obligation by the Countermand is forfeited because he doth not stand to c. when he Countermands it 2. By his owne act he had made the condition impossible Ergo the Obligation is single if one bindes himselfe to give License to carry Wood c. for a certaine time if he give it and disturbe him the Obligation is forfeited Sir Richard Pexhalls Case 7. Jacobi fo 83. SIr R. P. seised of Lands part whereof is houlden in Capite deviseth 100. Sheepe 10. Bullocks and 10. l. quarterly to one with clause of distresse and that the Grantee shall hold his Courts for his life for rent arreare for 2. yeares the grantee avoweth 1. Resolved a devise of rent out of all is good and taketh effect out of two parts and as to the third is void 2 The grantee shall have an estate for life in rent and so he shall if it be granted by Deede also by the Intent of the Devisor it appeares that the Grantee shall hold Courts and have 10. l. per annum for his wages and quarterly here had relation to rent onely because the word Et disjoyneth it from Sheep and Bullocks and judgement given for the Avowant Buckmers Case 7. Jac. fo 86. T. B. gave a House in Gavellkinde to M. his Eldest Daughter in taile the remainder of one Moity to J. a second Daughter in taile the remainder of the other Moity to K. a third Daughter in
taile with crosse remainders to J. and K. M. discontinueth and dyeth without issue J. dyeth without issue K. dyeth and her issue brings a Formedon in the remainder and good although severall remainders for they depend upon one estate and commence by gift at one time In actions reall in which title is expressed a man shall not have one Writ for Lands to which he had severall Titles as in escheate cessavit Writ of Mesne c. but he may have a Writ of ward of Land onely although it be by severall Tenures nor one formedon upon two distinct gifts where the foundation is severall but he shall have it if there be one gift although it take effect at severall times because the foundation was joynt and single as upon a gift in taile to Brother and Sister who dye without issue or if the Brother dye without issue and the Sister dye having issue who dyes without issue he to whom the remainder limitted shall have one formedon although it vest at severall times so in an estate taile to Father and Sonne and so here In actions reall founded upon Torte a man shall have one Writ to recover Lands to which he had severall Titles as in an assize a Writ of entry c. but in a Writ of entry upon disseisin made to my Mother and her Sister Coperceners because there title is in the Writ it appeareth he ought to have severall actions but in personall actions one may comprehend severall torts and causes of actions as trespasse for trespasse made at severall dayes and places wast upon severall Leases and so of Debt Nota if a remainder be executed issue in remainder shall not have a formedon in remainder but in the discender and Count of an immediate gift but if there be a Lease for life to one the remainder in taile to A. the remainder in taile to B. A. dyes without issue if B. be chased to his formedon he shall not count of an immediate remainder but shall shew the first remainder to A. and that he is dead without issue 2. In formedon in the remainder or reverter omission of issue inheritable in the pedigree of the demandant abates the Writ but not upon the part of the perticular Tenant 3. The Demandant must make mention of the Sonne who survived the Father to which Son the Land discended but was not seised by force of the taile but he shall name him Sonne but not heire 4. The Demandant in a formedon in the Discender must make himselfe heire to him that was last seised and he to the Donee Note here because K. was never seised the Writ shall say Remanere not descendere and the Writ was Remansit jus because a discontinuance otherwise it should be Tenementa remanserunt Fraunces Case 7. Jac. fo 89. THe Plaintiffe pleads in barre of avowry that R. F. devised to I. his Sonne who leased to him the avowant replyeth that after the devise R. F. made a Feoffement to the use of the said I. upon condition that he shall suffer his Executors to take away his goods and the estate limitted to him was for sixty yeares if he should so long live with diverse remainders over and that after the death of F. I. hindered the Executors to carry away the goods whereupon T. in remainder entered and judgement given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolv Although the condition be taken strictly the uses to I. onely and to his Heires are onely avoided by it 2. A disturbance by paroll is no Breach of the condition and because the avowant did not shew a speciall disturbance his replication was void 3. I. ought to have notice of the condition being a Stranger to it or otherwise he cannot breake it as a Copy-holder shall not forfeite for denyall of rent to him to whose use a Mannor is transferred before notice but he who bindes himselfe to doe any thing must take notice at his perill because he hath taken it upon him 4. Although that the Title which the Plaintiffe had made in barre to the avowry be destroyed yet he shall have judgement because his count is good and another Title that is to have the Land for sixty yeares by force of the uses declared upon the feoffement is given unto him by the Replication although that the title which he made for himselfe be destroyed yet the Court must adjudge upon all the record and judgement was entered for him accordingly Edward Foxes Case 7. Jacobi fo 93. A Revertioner upon a Lease for life the remainder for life in consideration of 50. l. demiseth granteth c. his reversion for 99. yeares rendering rent this is a bargaine and sale and there needs no attornement for the words of bargaine and sale are not necessary if there are words which tantamount as if at the common Law one had sould his Land an use had beene raised to the Vendee because their intent so appeared so here but if it appeare that their intent was to passe it at the common Law as if a Letter of Attorney be made to make livery the use had not risen and here appeareth their intent to passe it as a bargaine and sale because rent is reserved presently therefore it is reason that he shall have the rents of the particular Tenants presently which cannot be if it passe not by bargaine and sale and inrollment is not necessary because a tearme for yeares onely passeth in this case and â—o freehold See Sir Rowland Heywards Case 2. Report fo 35. Matthew Mannings Case 7. Jacobi fo 94. LEssee for yeares is bound in 200. Markes to W. C. and deviseth to his Wife for life and after her death to M. M and makes his Wife Executrix who agrees and dyeth intestate M. M. enters and takes administration of the goods not administred W. C. brings Debt against him Resolved that M. M. takes by Executory devise and not as a remainder and the estate limmitted to him in construction precedeth the limittation to the Wife as if he had devised that if the Wife die within the terme that then M. M. shall have the residue and also devised it to his Wife for life 2. This case is most strong because a Chattell which may vest and revest at pleasure of the Devisor without mischiefe to the Praecipe 2. A devise of the Terme and Occupation thereof all one Viz. So many yeares as the Feme shall live the remainder to M. M. 4. After the Executrix had agreed the first devisee cannot barre the Executory devise 5. A man may devise an estate which he cannot convey by act executed as to his Executors untill his Debts shall be paid the remainder over they have a Chattell determinable upon payment of the Debts which cannot be at the common Law If a Sheriffe sell a Terme upon a Fieri facias and judgement is reversed the sale shall stand otherwise none will buy any thing upon Execution and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe and affirmed in Error
the Lord distreine when no rent is arreare the Tenant or Lessee may make rescons and so releive himselfe The Abbot of Strata Mercella his Case 34. Eliz. fol. 23. IN a Quo warranto for claiming Waifes c. and Fellons goods c. the Defendant pleaded as to the Fellons goods that the Abbot of S. M. Licite habuit gavisus fuit them untill the Abbey was granted to the King by 27. H. 8. and pleads also 32. H. 8. c. 20. of reviving of priviledges of Abbies and that the K. granted a Mannor parcell of the Abbey tot talia tanta privilegia as the late A. had to one by whom he claimed by feoffement and pleaded not the feoffement by deede Judgement against the Defendant for the Queene it was said that the Charter of the Defendant was void 1. Because it appeares not what estate the Abbot had 2. Because the Defendant claimeth Catalla felonum appendant to a Mannor because he pleaded a feoffement of the Mannor and had not pleaded it by deed without which the priviledges doe not passe To the first the Court answered that it shall be intended a seisin in fee untill the contrary be shewed To the second no resolution but it was resolved that if the K. grant a Mannor bona catalla felonum dicto Manerio spectant these passe although they cannot be appendant But for the third exception judgement was given against the Defendant In this Case foure things worthy of consideration 1. What ancient franchises ought to have allowance as to that some may be claimed by prescription without record and some by record onely and a Charter of the latter shall not be allowed if it be before time of memory if it be not allowed within time of memory as allowance in Eyre or confirmation by the K. but usage will not serve and no more shall be allowed then are confirmed Obscure words in these ancient Charters shall be construed according to ancient usage and not according to usage at this day 2. A man may prescribe in Franchises lying in poynt of Charter with aide of allowance in Eyre without shewing the Originall Charter 3. If a Patent of priviledges whereby they are granted in fee referre to a grant made before to one for life onely this is good for the relation is to the quality and not to the quantity of the estate See there what trialls shall be allowed by Law such priviledges as are ancient flowers of the Crowne as Bona catalla felonum fugitivorum c. if these come againe to the K. they are merged in the Crowne but not those which were erected and created by the K. as Faires Markets Parkes Warren and the like Bucknalls Case 42. Eliz. Com. banco fol. 33. IF the Lord avow for other services then the Tenure is traversable if for more services of the same nature the seisin is traversable for he may incroach and it cannot be avoided in an avowry if it be not for an outragious distresse but seisin binds not in Ne injuste vexes Cessavit Assize Rescons or Trespasse but in them he shall traverse the Tenure but issue in taile successor of a Bishop c. shall avoide seisin in an avowry and every one may that can shew a deed of the tenure but none shall have a Contraformam feoffamenti but the feoffee or his Heires and incroachment hurteth not where there is no Tenure and if an incroachment be of payment at more dayes if they agree in the Sum it doth not prejudice Seisin in an avowry is not traversable generally as never seised of the services because by that meanes he leaveth no remedy to the Lord by avowry but in such a Case he shall disclaime or pleade out of his fee and so traverse the Tenure He who denyeth seisin after the limittation must first acknowledge a Tenure that the Lord may have his Writ of Customes and Services as if the Avowry be for rent fealty and suite Henslowes Case 42. Eliz fol. 36. AN Action of Debt was brought against Gage and others as Executors one of the Executors refused before the ordinary the probate and the rest of the Executors proved the Testament it was adjudged that notwithstanding that refusall he may administer the will afterwards at his pleasure for when many are named Executors and some of them refuse and other some prove the Testament those which refused may afterwards administer notwithstanding the refusall before the Ordinary but if all refuse before the Ordinary and the Ordinary commit the administration to another then they cannot prove at any time and the Executor that proveth the will ought to name every other of the Executors that refused in every action for recovery of Debts of the Testator and they may release the debts duties c. and they which refused may have an Action by survivor and after that Executors have administred and have once taken upon them the charge of the Executor-ship they cannot refuse at any time after It is holden in 2. R. 3. tit testament 4. that it is but of late times that the Church had the probate of Testaments in this Land for 't was given by an act c. and in all other Nations it is not so but in England and in many places of England the Stewards in their Courts Baron have probate of Testaments in their temporall Courts at this day Lynwood who was Deane of the Arches and writ in Anno. Dom. 1422. did confesse the probate of Testaments to belong to the Ordinaries De consuetudine Angliae non de communi jure and that in other Realms the Ordinaries have not so and in another place he affirmeth that the power of the Bishop in probate of Testaments is Per consensum regni suorum procerum ab antiquo And I have seene a Booke in Latine published 1573. by the Reverend Father Matthew Parker Arch Bishop of Canterbury who was very Learned in matters of Antiquity in these words Rex Angliae olim erat consiliorum Ecclesiasti orum praeses vindex temeritatis romanae propugnator Religi nis nec ullam habebant Episcopi authoritatem praetam eam quam à rege acceptam referebant jus testamenta probandi non habebant administrationis potestatem cuique delegare non poterant It was resolved by Littleton Newton and Danby in 7. E 4. 14. that if all the Executors refuse before the Ordinary they may prove the Testament afterwards but I think this is before the Ordinary hath committed the administration for afterwards they cannot The Executors have their Title by their Testament which is temporall But to the suing of Actions in the Kings Courts the Judges will not admit the Executors for to sue except that they shew the Testament proved under the seale of the Ordinary duely but alwayes the Kings Courts have used to allow the probate of any of the Executors to inable them all to sue actions but the probate of the Testament doth not
them and after Judgement was given for the Plaintiffs Whistlers Case 10. Jacobi fol. 62. Vpon a speciall Verdict BEfore the Statute of Praerogativa Regis cap. 15. by the grant of the King of a Mannor all appendants without naming them passe and the Statute excepteth Knights Fees Advowsons and Indowments but all other appendants now passe without naming them and so doe Advowsons passe in case of restitution for the Statute speaketh of Grants and in Grants also without expresse mention by the words Adeo plené integré c. See other good matter there touching this Subject The Church Wardens Case of Saint Saviours in Southwark fol. 66. QUeene Elizabeth leased the rectory to the Church-Wardens of St S. for 21. yeares and after leased to them for 50. yeares in consideration of the payment of 20. l. and surrender of the Letters Patents by the Church-Wardens Modo habentes ad presens possidentes and the speciall Verdict found that they paid the 20. l. and that they delivered the Charter in Court to be cancell'd and that they paid the Fees but that no Vacat was made yet the grant is good for it appeares that the intent was not to make a surrender in deed because he saith Modo possidentes but a surrender in Law by acceptance of the second Letters Patents and although a Corporation cannot make a surrender in deed yet they may make a surrender in Law 2. Although an actuall surrender is requisit they have done all which belongs to them by delivery of the Chartar and payment of the fees and the Cancelling belongs to the Court. 3. Although it was recited that 20. l. was paid yet it needs not to be found for it is but in the personalty and is affirmed by the King to be paid and is also executed See Barwicks Case 5. Report 93. The Case of the Marshalsea 10. Jacobi fol. 68. In false Imprisonment AN Action upon the Case upon an assumpsit is brought in the Marshalsea whereas no party was of the Kings House the Plaintiffe recovered the Defendants arrested the Plaintiffe by a precept in the nature of a Capias ad satisfaciendum and he brings false Imprisonment and judgement given against the Defendants 1. Resolved the Steward and Marshall at the Common Law hath two Authorities One generall as Vicegerents of the Chiefe Justice in his absence within the Verge Another as Judges of the Marshalsea This last was limitted to Debt and Covenant where both are of the House and to trespasse Vi armis where one is but not if it concerne Land and because they have the generall authority at will and the other for life they draw many cases to the Marshalsea which ought to be in other Courts Their Jurisdiction by Fleta Lib. 2. cap. 2. Infra metas hospitij continentes 12. Leucas in circuitu And the Statute of 13. R. 2. c. 3. limits the 12. miles to be accounted about the Kings Tonnell 2. The reasons wherefore this speciall authority was given them were 1. Because the Suite there is by Bill by reason of their Priviledge which cannot be elsewhere 2. In respect of the necessity of attendance of the Kings Servants 3. If Strangers shall be suffered to sue there one Carman would sue another Carman there In aula Regis which were undecent but the generall authority vanished by the Act of 28. E. 1. c. 5. which Ordained that the Chancellour and Justices of the King should follow him therefore in Praesentia Majoris cessat c. and about 4. E. 3. the Court of K. Bench became Resident 3. The Statute of Articuli super Chartas is as much as an explanation of the great Charter and the Charter of the Forrest and not introductory of a new Law and the third Chapter of that act explaines the Jurisdiction of the Marshalsea as before and if he hold plea otherwise a prohibition lyeth and the party shall have an Action upon the Case as a consequent upon the Statute 4. That part of the Statute which giveth them Jurisdiction in trespasse shall be intended trespasse Vi armis 5. This action lyeth against the Defendants because the Court had not Jurisdiction and so have not done it by command of the Judge otherwise if the Court had Jurisdiction but proceedeth Inverso ordine or erroneously as if a Capias be awarded against an Earle c. one who is Indicted before Justices of the Peace cannot approve 1. Because he cannot assigne a Coroner 2. Because it is out of their Commission if a Court Leete be holden at another day then it ought to be the proceeding is Coram non judice otherwise it is of a Court Baron 6. R. 2. Action upon the Statute Plac. ultimo in the point that judgement in the Marshalsea when none of the parties is of the K. house may be avoided by plea without any Writ of Error which proveth that it is void Leonard Loveis Case 11. Jacobi fol. 78. In ejectione firmae for 8. acres c. L. L. seised of diverse Mannors in socage and in chivalry In Capite maketh a feoffement to diverse uses in an Indenture precedent whereby he limits to himselfe for life without impeachment of wast and to the use of his Lessees and devisees the remainder to his second Sonne in taile c. the reversion to himselfe with power of revocation after he purchaseth 8. acres in socage and revoketh as to certaine Mannors holden in socage and deviseth them and the 8. acres to his Eldest Sonne and the heires Males of his body for 500. yeares provided that if he alien otherwise then for yeares determinable upon the deaths of three persons or lesse number rendring the old rent or die without issue Male then to his second Sonne in taile with proviso to make Leases according to 32. H. 8. onely L.L. dyeth the Eldest Sonne enters into the 8. acres and dyeth leaving one Daughter who Marrieth R.D. who enters into the 8. acres c. second Sonne dyeth having L. L. who enters upon R. D. and leaseth to the Plaintiffe who enters upon whom the Defendant enters and ejecteth c. and if the entry of L L. the Lessor was congeable or not was the Question and it was adjudged that his entry was not lawfull and judgement was given against the Plaintiffe in this Case diverse points resolved some at the common Law and some upon 32 and 34. H. 8. of Wills 1. Resolv if a man seised of three acres of equall value one holden in Capite and giveth that and one of the other to his younger Sonne in taile he cannot devise any part of the third Acre because he had executed his power and if he purchase other Land in socage he can devise but two parts of that by reason of his reversion in Capite expectant upon the estate taile Object that the K. was once satisfied of the wardship by the Statute in respect of the Acre holden and the reversion thereupon shall not hinder the
the Lord Dyer made a Quaere of that if one of the Jurors die before Verdict be given a Tales shall be granted he who is meerly a Defendant cannot pray a Tales untill default be made by the Plaintiffe the number ought to be under the number in the principall pannell except in an appeale because there the Defendant may challenge peremptorily the number shall be diminished in every new Tales and they ought to be of the same quality with the former as if the principall pannell were Per medietatem linguae so shall the Tales be Justices of Assize shall not award a Tales de circumstantibus in an Assize for the Statute of 35. H. 8. c. 6. speaketh where the Triall is Habeas corpora distringas or Nisi prius for an Assize cannot be taken by Nisi prius but must be taken in the proper County and after by advice of all the Justices of the common place and Barons of the Exchequer the judgement was affirmed Humphrey Lofields Case 10. Jacobi fol. 106. In debt upon Bond. D. Leased for a yeare to H. L. and if the parties shall please to renue the terme at the end of that yeare that he shall have for three yeares rendring 40 l. per annum H. L. bindeth himselfe to performe Covenants and faileth of payment of 20 l. at Christmas Quarter D. bringeth debt It was resolved for the Plaintiffe It was objected against the action 1. That the reservation was upon a contingency if the terme shall revive 2. Because the reservation is durante termino praedicto Viz. the last terme 3. The reservation shall be taken strictly because the words of the Lessor But it was resolved that the reservation extendeth to the first yeare for the proper place of a reservation is after the limitation of the estate as if a Lease be made with diverse remainders over reserving Rent this goeth to all and although the second terme be in contingency yet the first is certaine and Termino praedicto signifieth both the termes for it is Nomen collectivum and the reservation shall be taken reasonably according to the intent of the parties Tenant in taile of an Acre in borough English and of another by the Common Law by an Oxe dyeth having issue two Sons the service shall not be increased And Increase is onely betweene very Lord and very Tenant for there may be an increaser but not where there is a reservation or if the Seigniory be by Deed and services are reserved within time of memory for he shall have no more then he himselfe reserved In the Case at Barre in respect the obligation was forfeited the Court moved the Plaintiffe to take his arrerages costs and damages with which he was contented and so no judgement was given Arthur Legats Case in subversion of pestilent Patents of theevish Concealors 10. Jacobi fol. 109. in Communi Banco THe King ex certa scientia c. grants fifteene Acres as concealed which were parcell of a Mannor of the profits whereof the King was answered Nothing passeth 1. Resol If the King were answered of the old Rent of the Mannor and the Fermors c. suffer one to intrude in part this is not concealed 2. The grant is voyd for quae quidem c. is the suggestion of the party 2. This is a clause of restraint and nothing passeth which is not concealed 3. The King did not intend to diminish his Revenue which will be if the grant be good 4. The clause quae quidem hath a double conjunctive concelata detenta and Land cannot be detained from the King 3. Ex mero motu c. aydeth it not 4. If the Officers of the King may by matter of Record have notice of putting the Land in charge in Court of Record and doe it not yet this is not concealed and if the clause quae quidem be added for more certainty the grant shall not be vicious by it if it be false as if a Mannor be granted quod quidem was in the tenure of I. S. where it was not this is good If one substract or take the Kings Rents this is not concealed for the King may charge him as Baily and the Law will make a privity See the Statute of 4. H. 4 cap. 4. called in the Rolle Brangwyn in English White Crow And it was sayd that Perpetuities Monopolies and Patents of concealement were borne under one unfortunate constellation for as soone as they came in question judgement was ever given against them and none ever for them and they have all two inseperable qualities Viz. to be troublesome and fruitlesse Robert Pilfolds Case 10. Jacobi fol. 115. THe Plaintiffe in trespasse counts to damages of 40 l. and at the Nisi prius the Jury assessed for damages 49 l. and 20 s. costs at the day in banke hee released 9 l. parcell of the damages and had judgement of 40 l. and 10 l. for costs de incremento the defendant brings error because the damages and costs surmount the summ in the Count but judgement was affirmed for in reall actions before the Statute of Glocester 6. E. 1. cap. 1. no damages were recoverable but in personall actions and mixt they were and by that Statute a man shall have costs in all cases where he recovers damages Viz. before or by the same Statute therefore if after this damages are given where they were not at the Common Law costs shall not be recovered as in a Quare impedit but if a Statute after this give double or treble damages where damages and costs were by the common Law there the Plaintiffe shall recover the damages increased and costs also but in waste against tenant for life costs shall not be recovered for although that this Statute was at the same Parliament yet it was an act of Creation and therefore no costs And true it is that damages include costs in a generall sense but in the count it is taken for damages before the action brought in a relative signification therefore expensae litis may be added to it although he count not of them as a man shall doe in reall actions without counting of them because he shall recover them pending the Writ In entrie sur disseisin the Plaintiffe shall recover damages from the disseisin to the Writ of Inquiry c. and if the issue be tryable by verdict c. to the verdict but in a Praecipe of Rent of his owne possession hee shall recover all arreares to the judgement Judgement affirmed by all Cheyneyes Case 10. Jacobi fol. 118. IN a Valore maritagij issue is joyned upon the tenure and found for the Plaintiffe but the Jury did not inquire of the value Adjudged the verdict is insufficient and shall not be supplyed by a Writ of Inquiry 1. In this Writ three things are to be recovered the value damages and costs and although the issue be joyned upon the tenure yet as a consequent upon the issue and their charge they ought to
such a possibility as may be released ought to be Propinqua and not Remota and it is more then a common possibility that an Executor will dye before 5000. yeares and the person who releaseth it ought to have it in certeine therefore if a remainder be limitted to the right Heires of I. S. his Eldest Sonne cannot release it because he is not certeine whither he shall be Heire at the death of his Father so if a Lease be made to Baron and Feme the remainder to the survivor of them for 21. yeares the Baron cannot grant this Tearme 4. This by her death goeth to her Executors therefore it may be extinguished by her if the disseissee release all actions to the disseissor who dyes the disseissee shall have a Writ of entry against his Heire or if Bailor release all Actions to the Bailee he shall have adetinue against his Executors 5. It is a present Legacy although the interest be In futuro and therefore the Legacy may be discharged and consequently the interest it selfe For Qui destruit medium destruit finem and this may be before assent of the Executor 6. Otherwise there would be a perpetuity of Chattells 2. By this release the Executor had a perfect estate for 5000. yeares absolutely 3. The request and acceptance of the release by the Executor amounteth to an agreement The Case of the Chancellour Masters and Schollers of the Vniversity of Oxford 11. Jacobi fol. 53. THe Statute of 3. Jacobi giveth presentments of Churches which belong to Recusants convicted to the Chancellour and Schollers of O. and makes grants of such Recusants void One indicted of recusancy grants a prochein avoidance and is after convicted the Church becommeth voyd the Chancellour Masters and Schollers bring a Quare impedit and averr that he remained a Recusant 1. Resol The grant of the next avoydance betwixt the Indictment and conviction is void for the Statute is that a Recusant convicted shall be disabled c. from the time of the Session of the Parliament so a grant of the next avoidance by an Abbot before surrender and after the Statute of 31 H. 8. cap. 13. of Monasteries is void so if an Officer of the King purchase Land and alien it and become indebted to the King this Land is lyable to the debt 2. Covine shall not be presumed if it be not averred and if the Jury finde that Covine was to one intent that shall not be taken to another intent therefore because it is not sayd that this grant was by Covine it shall not be intended 3. Although the Statute giveth the avoydances to the Chancellour and Schollers of O. yet they may bring a Quare impedit in the name of their Corporation and the misnaming of the Corporation doth not avoyd the act when it appeareth what Corporation is intended 2. It was pleaded that the Statute giveth it to the Chancellour Master and Schollers and the Defendant had demurred upon it 3. This being a private act it shall be taken as it is pleaded 4. The University must shew that the Grantor was a Recusant convicted at the time of the avoydance but not that he continued so because it is a Chattell vested in them which shall not be devested by his conformity after Judgement for the Plaintiffs The Bishop of Salisburies Case 11. Jacobi fol. 58. THe Defendant in a second deliverance pleads a grant of the Bishop of S. to E. G. and himselfe of the office of Surveiorship of his Mannors with a rent charge of twenty Nobles per annum with confirmation of the Deane and Chapter and that it is Antiquum officium used to be granted in such manner to such person and persons as the Bishop and his Predecessors shall please The Plaintiffe pleads the Statute of 1. Eliz. and that the sayd Office hath not beene used to be granted but for the life of one whereby the grant is voyd Et hoc paratus est verificare It was excepted to the Barr that the avowant had pleaded that the Bishop and his Predecessors have used to grant the said Office to such person or persons c. And the Plaintiffe pleads in barr that it had not been used to be granted but for one life and concludeth hoc paratus est c. where it ought to have been quod inquiratur per c. yet it is good because the avowry is in the disjunctive 2. It is not averred that the Bishop is dead and if he be not the grant is good during his life it is good for it appeareth by the words nuper Episcopum that he was dead or removed exceptions to the avowry that to say this is an ancient Office is too generall because hee made title to the Office it selfe but it had been good if he had claimed another thing by reason of the Office and the exception holden good It was objected that this grant was out of the Statute of 1. Eliz. because no parcell of the possessions of the Bishoprick as the Statute speaketh 2. Such things are restrained by the Statute whereof a rent may be reserved 3. If it had been an Office parcell of the Bishoprick which the Bishop might exercise this had been within the Statute but this is not so 4. If it be restrained for two lives then also for one life But it was Resolved that the sayd grant for two lives was voyd against the successor by the Statute of 1. Eliz. 1. Resol This grant had been good at the Common Law by confirmation of the Deane and Chapter 2. The Act of 32. H. 8. cap. 28. inableth the Bishop to make a Lease for 21. yeares or three lives observing the limitations of the Statute without the Deane and Chapter 3. The Statute of 1. Eliz. restraineth the Bishop to grant any parcell of his possessions or any thing belonging to his Bishoprick but for 21. yeares or three lives c. but against the Bishop himselfe it is good and this Office may be sayd belonging to his Bishoprick because he had an inheritance in the disposition of it and the intent of the Statute was to avoyd diminutions and dilapidations therefore a grant of such an ancient Office of service and necessity for one life as was accustomed is out of the Statute but more then that he cannot doe because it is not of necessity and the death of one of them in the life of the Bishop is not to the purpose for the grant was voyd against the successor and it shall not be made good by accident after 4. Such a grant for one life without confirmation of the Deane and Chapter is voyd because it is out of the Statute of 1. Eliz. and resolved also that although the Bishoprick be new yet a grant of a necessary Office with a reasonable Fee of which the Court shall judge bindeth the successor Nota Where there was a clause in 1. Eliz. that Bishops may grant to the Queene c. 1. Jacobi by Parliament restraineth