Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
judgement_n common_a error_n writ_n 3,288 5 9.7175 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A36228 The antiquity and power of parliaments in England written by Mr. Justice Doddridge and several other learned antiquaries. Doddridge, John, Sir, 1555-1628. 1679 (1679) Wing D1791; ESTC R13105 30,734 146

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

therefore they shall by their Proxie make their Procurator and depart the House the party indited shall be put to plead to the inditement whereunto if he plead Not guilty he shall be thereof tried by his Peers and first the most puisne Baron shall be examined of his verdict by the Lord Steward and so in order until all they man by man have delivered their Opinion of the matter either in convicting the person standing accused before them or by clearing and acquitting him of the crime if by their verdicts he be thought guilty of the offence thereof is made an Act which when it hath the consent of the King it is then esteemed a Judgement and the Offender thereby is attainted Herein is to be noted that this verdict of the Lords is not upon their Oaths but upon their Honour for persons of so high degree should have so great care for the preservation of their Honour as themselves or any other have for the safe-Guard of their Souls which is admitted in that and in all other Attaynders per Pares by the Peers as well for that they are in that place not onely as Triers of the Fact but also Judges appointed over the fault and never was it used that Judges should verifie their sentence upon attestation thereof upon their Oaths Secondly in this manner of trial they must think that the bread which is broken unto others by them may by the just Judgement of God in like measure be broken unto themselves in that he whom they censure was in equal degree unto themselves Thirdly also for that where the Law requireth at the hands of other persons an Oath it ordaineth that Barons should regard their Honors Secondly it is to be noted that the party so arraigned in Parliament ought to be called to answer for himself for the Law of England is not so unreasonable to condemn any that will defend himself and it hath heretofore been noted as an error in the judgement of the Parliament 21 E. 3.46 b. when they have given a judgment in the cause of any private person he being not called thereunto and that in a civil matter of much less moment then is the cause of life and death wherefore if the party may be had and do not willingly and wilfully absent himself he is thereunto called to answer and therefore the Parliament in 37 and 38 H. 8. was freed of fault herein upon the Attainder of the Duke of Norfolk he then being in the Tower for that it was signified by the Lord Burghley Lord Treasurer in the Star-chamber when as Philip the last Earle of Arundel was called to answer in the Star-chamber to an undutiful Letter written by him to her Majesty that the said Duke was sent unto and would not come to the Parliament and the said Lord Treasurer affirmed that he then being of the lower House was sent thither with others see for this 1 Mar. Dyer 93. p. 24. The Lord high Steward giveth the Judgement upon Attaynder of treason 1 H. 4.1 a. 13 H. 8.12 a. as appeareth by the Judgment given in Parliament 21 R. 2. n. 15 16. The Bills of Attaynder in Parliament are intituled Placita Coronae coram Domino Rege in Parliamento suo Errours in Parliament reversed Now touching the manner how errors in the Kings Courts committed are reversed in Parliament I shall be very brief First the parties that are grieved through any erronious judgment given against them 22 E. 3.3 a. 12 Ass p. 22. 2 H. 7.19 ought to make their petition un-the King or Monarch that it would please him to permit that erronious judgement as is given against them in such Courts from whence they cannot further appeal may be in Parliament reviewed and reversed This their Petition ought to contain the effect of their grief and ought to be endorsed Let right be done unto the parties In this manner Soit Droit fait as Parties Hereupon the Lord Chancellor of England shall make a Writ of error 1 H. 7.19 n. directed unto the Judges of such Courts where the error was committed and now to be reversed by the Parliament by vertue of which writ the Lord chief Justice of England shall in person bring before the Lords in the higher House the said Petition the said Writ of error and the Rolls wherein is contained the judgment and proces wherein error is supposed H. 7.19 2 E. 3.3 and shall there leave the same petition writ and the transcript of the said Record but not the Record it self with the Clerk of the Parliament for that the Record it self shall be brought back again into the said Court for these Reasons 8 H. 5. f. Errour 88. 23 Eliz Dy. 375. First because these Rolls do concern other matter Secondly because if judgment should be there affirmed then the inferiour Court may have Record whereupon to a ward Execution And lastly for that it is a Rule that when a Record is sent from an inferior Court to a higher Court it is never remanded so that if the former judgement should be affirmed in the Parliament and the Parliament after dissolved the party plaintiff should be without remedy wherefore the record is brought back again as aforesaid 1 H. 7.20 And thus the said Petition indorsed the Writ of Errour and the Transcript remaining in the hands of the Clerk of the Parliament the matter shall be signified unto the Lord Steward by whom together with the other Lords Spiritual and Temporal 22 E. 3.3 a. and with the Iudges the same shall be determined or otherwise the King may appoint out a Commission and thereby assigne certain Earles and Barons who together with the Iudges shall determine the same but the Commons shall not intermeddle therewith moreover after that the Transcript is examined with the Record and that the Record is sent back to the former Court the party plaintiff ought to assigne his Error in writing and thereupon shall have a Scire facias against the defendant ad audiendum errores which writ shall be returned the next Parliament ensuing for that the common day of a Scire facias is forty days but because it is uncertain whether the Parliament shall be dissolved or no before that time therefore the said writ shall be returned the next Parliament 8 H 5. f. tit Error 88. but if the writ be sued forth at a Session of Parliament the same shall be returned the next Session after the said errors assigned and the Scire facias pursued the plaintiff shall not enter into Recognisance to satisfie the judgment 1 H. 7.20 if it shall happen to be given against him or to render his body to prison in such manner as is done in a writ of error in the upper Bench sued upon an erronious judgment given in the Common place but he shall still remain in prison for if the party plaintiff should be at large upon such recognisance acknowledged in