Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	common_a	error_n	plea_n	2,544	5	10.2333	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A56211	The soveraigne povver of parliaments and kingdomes divided into foure parts· Together with an appendix: wherein the superiority of our owne, and most other foraine parliaments, states, kingdomes, magistrates, (collectively considered,) over and above their lawfull emperours, kings, princes, is abundantly evidenced, confirmed by pregnant reasons, resolutions, precedents, histories, authorities of all sorts; the contrary objections re-felled: the treachery and disloyalty of papists to their soveraignes, with their present plots to extirpate the Protestant religion demonstrated; and all materiall objections, calumnies, of the King, his counsell, royallists, malignants, delinquents, papists, against the present Parliaments proceedings, (pretended to be exceeding derogatory to the Kings supremacy, and subjects liberty) satisfactorily answered, refuted, dissipated in all particulars. By William Prynne, utter-barrester, of Lincolnes Inne. It is on this second day of August, 1643. ordered ... that this booke ... be printed by Michael Sparke ...; Soveraigne power of parliaments and kingdomes	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1643 (1643)	Wing P4087A; ESTC R203193	824,021	610

irregularities I make no question that they would have joyntly answered as I doubt not but our Parliaments Kingdomes and all other Nations were they at this day to institute their preerected Principalities and Kings would answer to that they had never any imagination to erect such an absolute eternall unlimited uncontrollable irresistable Monarchy and plaine tyranny over them and that they ever intended to reserve the absolute originall Soveraigne Jurisdiction in themselves as their native hereditary priviledge which they never meant to divest themselves of that so by means thereof if their Princes should degenerate into Tyrants they might have a just authority power and remedy residing in them whereby to preserve themselves the Nation Kingdome from utter desolation ruine and vassalage An impregnable evidence that the whole Kingdom and Parliament representing it are the most Soveraign power and above the King himselfe because having the supream Jurisdiction in them at first they never totally transferred it to our Kings but reserved it in themselves which is likewise further confirmed by that notable passage of Philocheus Archilacus in his Somnium Viridarii c. 171. Royall power is instituted three manner of wayes First by the will and pleasure of the people because every people wanting a King of their own not being subject to the Emperour or some other King MAY BY THE LAW OF NATIONS MAKE THEMSELUES A KING 94. Dist. c. Legitima If a Royall Principality be thus instituted as it is in the proper pleasure and power of the people to ordaine that the King shall be either Successive of Elective so it is in their pleasure to ordaine That Kings succeeding hereditarily shall enjoy their power due nnto them either immediately before any Coronation or any other solemnity or that they shall receive this power onely by their Coronation or any other solemnity about him Thereason whereof is Because as every one in the delivery of the gift of his owne goods may impose what covenant or condition he pleaseth and every man is moderator and disposer of his owne estate so in the voluntary institution of a King and Royall Power IT IS LAWFULL FOR THE PEOPLE SUBMITTING THEMSELUES TO PRESCRIBE THE KING AND HIS SUCCESSORS WHAT LAW THEY PLEASE so as it be not unreasonable and unjust and directly against the rights of a Superiour Therefore lawfull to reserve ●he Soveraigne Power in and to themselves and not to transfer it wholly to their Kings 14 There is one cleare Demonstration yet remaining to prove the supreme power of Parliaments above Kings themselves which is this That the Parliament is the highest Court and power to which all Appeal●s are finally to be made from all other Courts and Iudges whatsoever yea from the Kings own personall resolution in or out of any other his Courts and such a transcendent ● ribunall from whence there is no appeale to any other Court or person no not to the King himselfe but onely to another Parliament If any erroneous Judgement be given in the Kings Bench Exchequer-Chamber Chancery Court of Wards or any other Court within the Realm or in the Parliament in Ireland it is finally to be reversed or determined in Parliament by a Writ of Error or upon a Petition or Bill If any sentence be unjustly given in any Ecclesiasticall Courts or before the D●legates the finall Appeale for redresse must be to the Parliament Illegall sentences in the now exploded extravagant Courts of Star-Chamber or High Commission Injuries done by the King and his privy Councell at the Councell Table are examinable and remediable in this high Court Nay if the King himselfe should sit in person in the Kings Bench or any other Court as sometimes our Kings have done and there give any Judgement it is not so obligatory or finall but that the party against whom Judgement is pronounced may appeale to the Parliament for reliefe as Seneca epist. 100. out of Tully de Repub. Fenestella Hugo Grotius de jure Belli l. 1. c. 4. s. 20. p. 65. record that among the Romanes in certain causes they might appeale from the King to the people But if the Parliament give any Judgement There can be no appeale to any higher Tribunall Court or person no not to the King but onely to the next or some other Parliament as is evident by experience by all Attainders of Trea●on by or in Parliament by all inconvenient and unjust Acts passed in Parliament which concerne either King or Subject which cannot be reversed nor repealed though erroneous nor the right heire restored in blood by any Charter from the King but onely by an act of repeale or restitution in another Parliament Now this is an infallible Maxime both in the Common Civill and Canon Law that The Court or person to whom the last appeale is to be made is the Supream●st power as the Kings Bench is above the Common Pleas the Eschequer Chamber above the Kings Bench and the Parliament above them all because a Writ of Error to reverse erroneous judgements given in the Common Pleas lyeth in the Kings Bench Errors in the Kings Bench may be reversed in the Eschequer Chamber and errors in all or either of them may be redressed finally in Parliament from whence there is no further appeale Hence the Canonists conclude a Generall Councell above the Pope the Pope above the Archbishop the Archbishop above the Ordinary because men may Appeale from the Ordinary to the Archbishop from him to the Pope but now with us to the Kings Delegates If there be any difference betweene King or Subject touching any inheritances Priviledges or Prerogatives belonging to the Crowne it selfe or any points of misgovernment yea which is more if there be any suite quarrell or difference betweene our Kings in Act and any other their Competitors for the Crowne it selfe which of them hath best title to it who of them shall enjoy it and how or in what manner it shall be setled the Lords and Commons in Parliament are and ought to be the sole and final● Judges of it Not to give you any instances of this kinde betweene King and Subjects which I have formerly touched nor to relate how our King Iohn condemned to death by a Parliament in France by French Peers for slaying his Nephew Arthur treacherously with his own hands and likewise to lose the crown of England or bow Henry the third K. Edward the first and other our Kings have Appealed to the Parliaments of France and England upon differences betweene the Peeres and Kings of France and them concerning their Lands and Honours in France Or how King Edward the third and Philip of France submitted both their Titles to the Kingdome of France to the determination in a French Parliament where they were both personally present which adjudged the Crowne to Philip. Nor yet to mention how the Parliaments and generall assembly of the estates of France have

wils pleasures profit or benefit of Kings who by birth and nature differ not at all from the meanest of their Subjects but Kings were at first constituted and still continued for the protection welfare benefit service of their kingdomes Parliaments People whose publicke Servants Ministers Shepherds Fathers Stewards and Officers they are Now Nature Reason and Scriptures resolve that he who is instituted meerely for the benefit and service of another as all the Creatures were created for mans use and therefore are inferiour unto man in dignity and power is of lesse dignity power and jurisdiction than the intire body of those for whose good he was instituted as the servant is inferiour to his Master the Wife to her Husband for whom they were created the Mayor to the whole Corporation and the King to his whole Kingdome and Parliament which consideration hath caused sundry Kings and Emperours not onely to adventure their lives in bloody battles but to lay downe their Crownes for the peace and safety of their Subjects witnesse Otho the first and others with the Examples of Moses Exod. 32. 9. to 15 32. Numb 14. 11 to 15. of David 2 Sam. 29. 17. 1 Chron. 21. 17. and Iohn 10. 11. 15. with other precedents which I pretermit And the reason is apparent for if the King be slaine in defence of the kingdome or People yet the kingdome and people may remaine secure and another succeed him in that office of trust In which respect a Politique body differs from a Naturall that it hath life continuance and meanes to guide defend and Order it selfe though the King and head be cut off by death But if the Realme and People be destroyed though the King survive them as a Man yet he must necessarily perish in and with them as a King since he cannot possibly be a King without a kingdome and people for whose good and safety alone he was made a King Hence Aristotle Polit. l. 3. c. 4. and Marius Salamonius de Principatu l. 2. p. 50. define a Principality to be A just Government for the benefit of the people respecting onely the publique good and welfare not its owne private advantage Hence Plato de Repub. l. 1. thus describes the Office of a Prince towards the Common-wealth That as he is a Prince he neither mindes nor commands what is advantagious to himselfe but what is beneficiall to his Subjects and whatever he saith or doth he saith and doth it for the profit and honour of the Republicke which Cicero in his Offices hath more elegantly thus translated As the defence so the procuration of the Common-weale is to be managed to be benefit of those who are committed not of those to whom it is committed And de Finibus l. 3. A good and wise man not ignorant of his civill Office is more carefull of the utility of all than of any one or of his owne Neither is a Traytor to his Country to be more dispraised than a deserter of the common profit and safety for his owne profit and safety And the Emperour Iustinian used this golden sentence Quod communiter omnibus prodest hoc privatae nostrae utilitati praeferendum esse censemus nostrum esse proprium subjectorum commodum Imperialiter existimantes Imperialis benevolentiae hoc esse judicantes in omni tempore Subjectorum commodatam investigare quam eis mederi procuremus I shall conclude this with Salamonius his words Let the Prince be either from God or from men yet think not that the world was created by God and in it men that they should serve for the benefit of Princes for it is an absurdity above what can be spoken to opine that men were made for Princes since God hath made us free and equall But Princes were ordained ONELY FOR THEIR PEOPLES BENEFIT that so they might innocently preserve humane and civill societie with greater facility helping one the other with mutuall benefits Which he there largely proves by sundry Histories and Authorities That of Peter Matthew being a certaine verity All the Actions of a Prince must tend to the good and health of his people for whom he lives and more than for himselfe as the Sun doth not shine and give heat but for men and the elements The King then being made King onely for the Kingdomes Parliaments Peoples service must needs in this regard be inferiour to not Paramount them in absolute Soveraigne power though greater better than any particular Subjects Seventhly The Parliament as our Law-bookes and Writers resolve is the most high and absolute power the supreamest and most ancient Court of the Realme of England and hath the power of the whole Realme both Head and Body and among other Priviledges this is the highest that it is above the Law it selfe having power upon just grounds to alter the very common Law of England to abrogate and repeale old Lawes to enact new Lawes of all sorts to impose taxes upon the people Yea it hath power to declare the meaning of any doubtfull Lawes and to repeale all Patents Charters Grants and Iudgements whatsoever of the King or any other Courts of Iustice if they be erroneous or illegall not onely without but against the Kings personall consent so farre as finally to obliege both King and Subjects Now it is cleare on the contrary side that the King hath not the power of the whole Realme vested in his person that he and his Prerogative are not above but subordinate to the Lawes of the Realme that he cannot by his absolute regall power alter the Common Law of the Realme in any particular point whatsoever that he cannot repeale any old nor enact any new Law whatsoever nor impose the least taxe or common charge upon his people nor imprison their persons distraine their goods declare any Law or reverse any judgement in the meanest of his Courts without or against his peoples joynt consents in Parliament For Potest as sua Iuris est non injuriae Nihil aliud potest Rex in terris nisi ID SOLUM QUOD DE JURE POTEST Bracton l. 3. c. 9. f. 107. Therefore without any peradventure the Parliament in this regard is the most Soveraigne Authority and greater in jurisdiction than the King Iohn Bodin that great Lawyer and Politician resolves That the chiefe marke of an absolute and Soveraigne Prince is to give Lawes to all his Subjects in generall and to every of them in particular without consent of any other greater equall or lesse than himselfe For if a Prince he bound not to make any Lawes without the consent of a greater than himselfe he is then a very Subject if not without his equall he then hath a Companion as Bracton and others forecited say our English King hath namely his Earles and Lords thence stiled Comites if not without the consent of his inferiours whether it be of his Subjects or of the Senate or

inferior Court of Iustice whatsoever hath such a Priviledge by the Common law and statutes of the Realm that the King himself hath uo negative voice at all somuch as to stay or delay for the smalest moment by his great or privy seale any legall proceedings in it much lesse to countermand controle or reverse by word of mouth or proclamation any resolution or judgement of the Iudges given in it If then the King hath no absolute Negative overruling voice in any of his inferiour Courts doubtlesse he hath none in the supre●mest greatest Court of all the Parliament which otherwise should be of lesse authority and in farre worse condition then every petty sessions or Court Baron in the Kingdome The sole question then in debate must be Whether the King hath any absolute Negative over-ruling voice in the passing of publike or private Bills For resolving which doubt we must thus distinguish That publike or private Bills are of two sorts First Bills only of meere grace and favour not of common right such are all generall pardons Bills of naturalization indenization confirmation or concession of new Franchises and Priviledges to Corporations or private persons and the like in all which the King no doubt hath an absolute negative voice to passe or not to passe them because they are acts of meere grace which delights to be ever free and arbitrary because the king by his oath and duty is no way obliged to assent thereto neither can any subjects of justice or right require them at his hands it being in the Kingsfree power to dispence his favours freely when and where he pleaseth and cōtrary to the very nature of free grace to be either merited or cōstrained Secōdly Bills of common right and justice which the King by duty and oath is bound to administer to his whole kingdome in generall and every subiect whatsoever in particular without denyall or delay Such are all Bills for the preservation of the publike peace and safety of the kingdome the Liberties Properties and Priviledges of the Subiect the prevention removall or punishment of all publike or private grievances mischiefes wrongs offences frauds in persons or callings the redresse of the defects or inconveniences of the Common Law the advancing or regulating of all sorts of Trades the speedy or better execution of Justice the Reformation of Religion and Ecclesiasticall abuses with sundry other Lawes enacted in every Parliament as occasion and necessity require In all such Bills as these which the whole state in parliament shall hold expedient or necessary to be passed I conceive it very cleare that the king hath no absolute negative voyce at all but is bound in point of office duty Oath Law Iustice conscience to give his royall assent unto them when they have passed both houses unlesse he can render such substantiall reasons against the passing of them as shall satisfie both Hou●e● This being the onely point in controversie my reasons against the Kings absolute over-swaying negative Voyce to such kinde of Bills as these are First because being Bills of common right and Iustice to the Subiects the denyall of the Royall assent unto them is directly contrary to the Law of God which commandeth kings to be just to doe judgement and justice to all their Subjects especially to the oppressed and not to deny them any just request for their reliefe protection or wellfare Secondly because it is point-blanke against the very letter of Magna Charta the ancient fundamentall Law of the Realme confirmed in at least 60. Parliaments ch 29. WE SHALL DENY WE SHALL DEFERRE both in the future tense TO NO MAN much lesse to the whole Parliament and Kingdome in denying or def●rring to passe such necessary publike Bills IVSTICE OR RIGHT A Law which in terminis takes cleane away the Kings p●etended absolute negative Voyce to these Bills we now dispute of Thirdly Because such a disasse●t●ng Voyce to Bills of this nature is inconsisent with the very office duty of the king and the end for which he was instituted to wit equall and speedy administration of common right justice and assent to all good Lawes for protection safety ease and benefit of his Subjects Fourthly Because it is repugnant to the very Letter and meaning of the kings Coronation Oath solemnly made to all his Subiects TO GRANT FVLFILL and Defend ALL RIGHTFVLL LAWES which THE COMMONS OF THE REALME SHALL CHVSE AND TO STRENGTHEN AND MAINTAINE THEM after his power Which Clause of the Oath as I formerly manifested at large and the Lords and Commons in their Remonstrance of May 26. and Nov. 2. prove most fully extends onely or most principally to the kings Royall assent to such new rightfull and necessary Lawes as the Lords and Commons in Parliament not the king himselfe shall make choise of This is infallibly evident not onely by the practise of most of our kings in all former Parliaments especially in king Edward the 1 2 3 4. Rich. 2. Hen. 4 5 and 6. reignes whereof the first Act commonly in every Parliament was the confirmation of Magna Charta the Charter of the Forest and all other former unrepealed Lawes and then follow sundry new Act● which the Lords and Commons made choise of as there was occasion and our Kings assented to confessing they were bound to doe it by their Coronation oath and duty as I shall manifest presently but likewise by the words of the Coronation oaths of our ancienter Kings already cited in the first part of this Discourse and of our Kings oaths of latter times the Coronation Oaths of King Edward the 2. and 3. remaining of Record in French are in the future tense Sire grantes vous a tenir et garder LES LEYS et les Coustumes DROITVRELES les quiels LA COMMVNANTE de vostre Royaume AVRESLV les defenderer et assorcer●r al honeur de Di●u a vostre poare Respons Ie le FERAI in the future too The close Roll of An. 1. R. 2. M 44. recites this clause of the Oath which King Rich took in these words Et etiam de tuendo custodiendo IVST AS LEGES consuetudines ecclesiae ac de faciendo per ipsum Dominum Regem eas esse protegendas ad honorem Dei CORROBOR AND AS quas VVLGVS IVSTE ET RATIONABILITER ELEGERIT juxta vires ejusdem Domini Regis in the future tense And Rot. Parliament 1. H. 4. p. 17. expresseth the clause in King Henry his Oath thus Concedis IVSTAS LEGES consuetudines esse tenendas promittis per te eas esse protegendas ad honorem Dei CORROBORANDAS QV AS VVL GVS ELEGERIT secundum vires tuas Respondebit Concedo Promitto In the Booke of Clarencieux Hanley who lived in King Henry the 8. his reig●e this clause of the Oath which this king is said to take at his Coronation is thus ●endred in English Will you GRANT FVLFILL defend ALL

Armes against his loyall Subjects and assault their persons to murther them and spoyle their goods if they by common consent in Parliament especially shall forcibly resist disarme or restraine his person till his fury be appeased and his judgement rectified by better councells shall this be Treason Rebellion or Disloyaltie God forbid I thinke none but mad men can or will averre it It was a great doubt in Law till the statute of 33. H. 8. c. 20. setled it If a party that had committed any high Treasons when he was of perfect memory after accusation examination and confession thereof be●came madde or lunaticke where he should b● tried and condemned for it during this distemper And some from that very act and 21. H. 7. 31. 36. Ass 27. 12. H. 3. For faiture 33 and Dower 183. Fitz. Nat. Br. 202. D. Stamford Pleas 16. b. and Cooke l. 4. f. 124. Beverlyes case which resolve that a Lunaticke or Non Compos cannot be guilty of murther feloney or petite Treason because having no understanding and knowing not what he doth he can have no fellonius intention conceive that a reall mad-man cannot be guilty of high Treason though Sir Edward Cooke in Bev●rlies case be of a contrary opinion if he should assault or kill his king And I suppose few will deeme Walter Terrils casuall killing of King William Rufus with the glance of his arrow from a tree shot at a Deere high Treason neither was it then reputed so or he prosecuted as a Traytor for it because he had no malicious intention as most thinke against the King or any thought to hurt him But I conceive it out of question if a king in a distracted furious passion without just cause shall invade his subjects persons in an open hostile manner to destroy them it neither is nor can be Treason nor Rebellion in them if in their owne necessary defence alone they shall either casually wound or slay him contrary to their loyall intentions and those Statutes and Law-bookes which judge it high Treason for any one maliciously and trayterously to imagine compasse or conspire the death of the King will not at all extend to such a case of meere just defence since a conspiracie or imagination to compasse or procure the Kings death can neither be justly imagined nor presumed in those who are but meerely defensive no more then in other common cases of one mans killing another in his owne inevitable defence without any precedent malice in which a Pardon by Law is granted of course however questionlesse it is no Treason nor murther at all to slay any of the kings souldiers and 〈◊〉 who are no kings in such a defensive warre Sixthly suppose the King should be captivated or violently led away by any forraign or domesticke enemies to him and the kingdome and carried along with them in the field to countenance their warres and invasions upon his loyallest Subjects by illegall warrants or Commissions fraudulently procured or extorted from him If the Parliament and Kingdome in such a case should raise an Army to rescue the King out of their hands and to that end encountring the enemies should casually wound the King whiles they out of loyalty sought onely to rescue him I would demaund of any Lawyer or Divine whether this Act should be deemed Treason Rebellion or Disloyalty in the Parliament or army Or which of the two Armies should in point of Law or Conscience be reputed Rebells or Traytors in this case those that come onely to rescue the King and so fight really for him indeed though against him in shew and wound him in the rescue Or those who in shew onely fought for him that they might still detaine him captive to their wills Doubtlesse there is no Lawyer nor Theologue but would presently resolve in such a case that the Parliaments Army which fought onely to rescue the King were the loyall Subjects and the Malignants army who held him captive with them the onely Rebels and traytors and that the casuall wounding of him proceeding not out of any malicious intention but love and loyalty to redeeme him from captivity were no trespasse nor offence at all being quite besides their thoughts and for a direct president It was the very case of King Henry the third who together with his sonne Prince Edward being taken Prisoner by the Earle of Leycester in the battle of Lewis and the Earle afterwards carrying him about in his Company in nature of a Prisoner to countenance his actions to the great discontent of the Prince the Earle of Glocester and other Nobles hereupon the Prince and they raising an Army encountred the Earle and his Forces in a battle at Evesham where the King was personally present slew the Earle Routed his Army and rescued the king in this cruell battell the king himselfe being wouded unawares with a Iavelin by those who rescued him was almost slaine and lost much of his blood yet in a Parliament soone after sommoned at Winchester Anno 1266. the Earle and his Army were dis-inherited as Traytors and Rebels but those who rescued them though with danger to his person rewarded as his loyall subjects And is not this the present case A company of malignant ill Councellors Delinquents Prelates Papists have withdrawne his Majestie from his Parliament raised an Army of Papists Forraigners Delinquents and Male-contents to ruin the Parliament Kingdome Religion Lawes Liberties to countenance this their designe they detaine his Majestie with them and engage him all they can on their side the Parliament out of no disloyall intention but onely to rescue his Majesties person out of their hands to apprehend delinquents preserve the Kingdome from spoyle and defend their Priviledges Persons Liberties estates religion from unjust invasion have raised a defensive Army which encountred these Forces at Edgehill where they say the King was present slew the Lord Generall Earle of Lindsey with many others and as they never intended so they offered no kind of hurt or violence at all to his Majesties person then or since and now full sore against their wils Petitions endeavours for peace they are necessitated to continue this offensive warre for their owne and the Kingdomes necessary preservation The sole question is Whether this Act this Defensive Warre of the Parliament and their Forces be high Treason or Rebellion and who are the Traytors and Rebells in this case Certainly if I understand any Law or Reason the Parliament and their Forces are and must be innocent from these crimes and their opposite Popish Malignant Cavaleers the onely Rebels and Traytors as this Parliament the onely proper Judge of Treasons hath already voted and declared them in point of Law Seventhly it is Littleto●s and other Law-bookes expresse resolutions That if a man grant to another the Office of a Parkership of a Parke for life the estate which he hath is upon condition in Law though not expressed that he shall well

or of any other beasts taking or carriage of goods harnesse armour cattle and other movable goods breaking of houses or of other possessions or goods assault battery robberies thefts comming or tarrying with force and armes or armed in the Kings presence at the Parliament or Councell or else where Raysing of people or exciting the people to rise forcibly against the peace by letters commissions or any other deeds or of any other thing that may be surmised by them or any of them or ought or purposed to have beene done from the beginning of the world touching any of the said matters before the end of this present Parliament by any imagination interpretation or other colour but shall bee quit and discharged for ever except that the King be answered of all the goods and cattels that were to them which be attainted in this present Parliament or to any of them and which goods and things were taken by any person the first day of Ianuary last past or after hitherto We considering the matter of the said Petition to be true and the request of the said Commons in this party to be to the honour of God and the profit of us and our Realme of the assent of the Prelates Dukes Earles Barrors and all others of this present Parliament doe garnt the requests of the said Commons in all points after the forme of the said Petition And moreover of the assent aforesayd we will and grant for the greater quietnesse of our said Realme though that the said Duke or Earles appellants or any other of their company retinue force ayde councell or adherents or any of them have taken led away or withholden any of our Iusticers or any other of our ministers in disturbance of execution of the Law of our Realme of England or in other manner or that they have taken any manner of person as Traitors to Us or to our Realme or other person and the same have voluntarily suffered to goe at large or escape beyond the sea from the 14 th day of Novemb. last past till the end of this present Parliament that they nor any of them be for this cause impeached molested nor grieved any manner of way at the suite of us our heires nor none other party but thereof they shall be quit and discharged for ever nor that they nor any of them be in any wise molested grieved nor impeached at the suite of us our heires or other party for any thing done at any time for to a taine to their purpose against the said appealers or any of them or against any other person for this cause nor for any other thing or deed to affirme the same purposes till the end of this present Parliament but thereof shall be acquitted This Act with others made the same Parliament continued inviolable without dispute for 10. yeers space during w ch there were 8. more Parliaments held w ch approved in but it 21 R. 2. the King having violently seised upon the Duke of Glocester the Earles of Warwicke and Arundell and packed a Parliament to his minde by not summoning any Lords thereto but those of his party by causing divers Knights and Burgesses of his own nomination never chosen by the people to be returned in divers places and overawing the rest with a guard or 4000. Cheshire Archers caused these Lords to be illegally attainted of Treason upon fained pretences out of this old grudge and the Acts of this Parliament to be reversed yet not this Act as I conceive which is part of it being specially saved by 21. R. 2. c. 13. But however by the statute of 1 H. 4. c. 3. 4. the Parliament of 21. was wholly repealed reversed revoked voyded undone and anulled for ever with all the Acts circumstances and dependants thereof and this Parliament of 11. R. 2. Enacted to be firmely holden and kept after the purport and effect of the same as a thing made for the great Honour and common profit of the Realme and ch 5. It is ordained and assented that the Lords and other which were forejudged in the Parliament holden the said 21. yeare or by Authority of the same which now be in life and the heires of the Lords and others that be dead shall be wholly restitute and restored to their names all manner of inheritaments and possessions reversions fees reversions offices liberties and franchises as intirely as the said Lords and others which be in life or the Lords and other which be dead ancestors of the heires or the feoff●es of the said Lords or other aforesaid or other feoffees to their use were at the time of the judgement given against them the said 21 yeare by entrie without other suite thereof to be made or livery to be had of the same And all the goods and chattels which were the said Lords or the other persons aforesaid so forejudged whereof the king is not answered and be in the hands of the Sheriffes Escheators or other Officers Ministers or any other and concealed by them the king wills and granteth that the same Lords and other which now be in life and the Executors and administrators of them that be dead shall have thereof delivery and restitution and that the Sheriffes Escheators Officers and Ministers so occupying the said goods and chattels by such concealment bee punished for the same concealement So that by the expresse resolution of these two severall Parliaments these Lords and Commons taking up defensive Armes and making war against those wicked Councellours of this King which sought their ruine and endeavoured the destruction of the Realme though they had the kings presence and commissions to countenance all their actions and proceedings of this nature and the Lords wanted the Ordinances of both houses to authorize this their arming and war was solemnely declared and adjudged to be no Treason nor Rebellion at all nor levying of warre against the king within the statute of 25. E. 3. but contrarywise a thing done to the honour of God the Salvation of the King for if the Kingdome perish or miscarry the king as king must needs perish with it the maintenance of his Crowne supported onely by the maintenance of the kingdomes welfare and the Salvation and common profit of all the Realm and this being one of the first solemne judgements if not the very first given in Parliament after the making of the statute of 25 E. 3. which hath relation to its clause of levying war must certainely be the best exposition of that Law which the Pa●liament onely ought to interpret as is evident by the statute of 21. R. 2 c. 3. It is ordained and stablished that every man which c. or he th● raiseth the people and riseth against the King to make warre within his Realme and of h●t be duly attainted and judged in the Parliament shall be judged as a Traytor of High Treason against the Crowne and other forecited Acts and if this were no Treason nor

Rebellion nor Trespasse in the Barons against the king or kingdome but a warre for the honour of God the salvation of the king the maintenance of his Crowne the safety and common profit of ●ll the Realme much more must our Parliaments present defensive warre against his Majesties 〈◊〉 Councellors Papists Malignants Delinquents and men of desperate fortunes risen up in Armes against the Parliament Lawes Religion Liberties the whole Kingdomes peace and welfare be so too being backed with the very same and farre better greater authority and more publike reasons then their warre was in which the safety of Religion was no great ingredient nor the preservation of a Parliament from a forced dissolution though established and perpetuated by a publike Law King Henry the 4 th taking up Armes against King Richard and causing him to be Articled against and judicially deposed in and by Parliament for his Male-administration It was Enacted by the Statute of 1. Hen. 4. cap. 2. That no Lord Spirituall nor Temporall nor other of what estate or condition that he be which came with King Henry into the Realme of England nor none other persons whatsoever they be then dwelling within the same Realme and which came to this King in aide of him to pursue them which were against the Kings good intent and the COMMON PROFIT OF THE REALME in which pursuite Richard late King of England the second after the Conquest was pursued taken and put in Ward and yet remaineth in Ward be impeached grieved nor vexed in person nor in goods in the Kings Court nor in none other Court for the pursuites of the said King taking and with-holding of his body nor for the pursuits of any other taking of persons and cattells or of the death of a man or any other thing done in the said pursuite from the day of the said King that now is arived till the day of the Coronarion of Our said Soveraigne Lord Henry And the intent of the King is not that offendors which committed Trespasses or other offences out of the said pursuits without speciall warrant should be ayded nor have any advantage of this Statute but that they be thereof answerable at the Law If those then who in this offensive Warre assisted Henry the 4 th to apprehend and depose this perfidious oppressing tyrannicall king seduced by evill Counsellors and his owne innate dis-affection to his naturall people deserved such an immunity of persons and goods from all kinds of penalties because though it tended to this ill kings deposition yet in their intentions it was really for the common profit of the Realme as this Act defines it No doubt this present defensive Warre alone against Papists Delinquents and evill Counsellors who have miserably wasted spoiled sacked many places of the Realme and fired others in a most barbarous maner contrary to the Law of Armes and Nations and labour to subvert Religion Laws Liberties Parliaments and make the Realm a common Prey without any ill intention against his Majesties Person or lawfull Royall Authority deserves a greater immunity and can in no reasonable mans judgement be interpreted any Treason or Rebellion against the king or his Crowne in Law or Conscience In the 33. yeare of king Henry the 6 th a weake Prince wholly gui●ed by the Queene and Duke of Somerset who ruled all things at their wills under whose Government the greatest part of France was lost all things went to ruine both abroad and at home and the Queene much against the Lords and Peoples mindes preferring the Duke of Sommerset to the Captain ship of Calice the Commons and Nobility were greatly offended thereat saying That he had lost Normandy and so would he doe Calice Hereupon the Duke of Yorke the Earles of Warwicke and Salisbury with other their adherents raised an Army in the Marches of Wales and Marched with it towards London to suppresse the Duke of Sommerset with his Faction and reforme the Governement The king being credibly informed hereof assembled his Host and marching towards the Duke of Yorke and his Forces was encountred by them at Saint Albanes notwithstanding the kings Proclamation to keepe the Peace where in a set Battell the Duke of Somerset with divers Earles and 8000. others were slaine on the kings part by the Duke of Yorke and his companions and the king in a manner defeated The Duke after this Victory obtained remembring that he had oftentimes declared and published abroad The onely cause of this War to be THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE PVBLIKE WEALE and TO SET THE REALME IN A MORE COMMODIOVS STATE and BETTER CONDITION Vsing all lenity mercy and bounteousnesse would not once touch or apprehend the body of King Henry whom he might have slaine and utterly destroyed considering that hee had him in his Ward and Governance but with great honour and due reverence conveyed him to London and so to Westminster where a Parliament being summoned and assembled soone after It was therein Enacted That no person should either judge or report any point of untruth of the Duke of Yorke the Earles of Salisbury and Warwicke For comming in Warlike manner against the King at Saint Albanes Considering that their attempt and enterprise Was onely to see the Kings Person in Safeguard and Sure-keeping and to put and Alien from Him the publike Oppressors of the Common wealth by whose misgovernance his life might be in hazard and his Authority hang on a very small Thred After this the Duke an● these Earles raised another Army for like purpose and their owne defence in the 37 and 38 yeares of H. 6. for which they were afterwards by a packed Parliament at Coventree by their Enemies procurement Attainted of high Treason and their Lands and Goods confiscated But in the Parliament of 39. H. 6. cap. 1. The said attainder Parliament with all Acts and Statutes therein made were wholly Reversed Repealed annulled as being made by the excitation and procurement of seditious ill disposed Persons for the accomplishment of their owne Rancor and Covetousnesse that they might injoy the Lands Offices Possessions and Goods of the lawfull Lords and liege People of the King and that they might finally destroy the said lawfull Lords and Liege People and their Issues and Heires forever as now the Kings ill ●ounseilors and hungry Cavalleers seek to destroy the Kings faithfull Liege Lords and People that they may gaine their Lands and Estates witnesse the late intercepted Letter of Sir Iohn B●ooks giving advise to this purpose to his Majestie and this Assembly was declared to be no lawful Parliament but a devillish Counsell which desired more the destruction then advancement of the Publike weale and the Duke Earles with their assistants were restored and declared to be Faithful and Lawful Lords and Faithful liege People of the Realme of England who alwaies had great and Fathfull Love to the Preferrement and Surety of the Kings Person according to their Duty If then these two Parliaments acquitted

between the English and the Hollander the ancient friendship with the Dukes of Burgondy the familiarity of these people and the old Consanguinity all the rest which are noted at the end of the former Chapter And therefore with Cicero They thinke not that the nocent are not to be defended if they be the friends of a good man Adde one thing of great moment that the Hollanders overcome in Warre should altogether change their condition and we see it in the conquered part being for the most part cast downe from their ancient Liberty and for the most part oppressed with Garrisons are governed now onely at the pleasure of the Prince But this our Neighbours cannot endure Neither is any other forbidden to favour Libertie But it much behoveth Neighbours to have a Neighbour For if one man hath neede of another man what shall we say that one Neighbour is to another saith Pindarus and Callimac●us Ill Neighbours are odious to mee and some wise Hebrew The worst of all diseases is an ill Neighbour And another of the same Nation Woe to the wicked and woe to his Neighbour And where may Morall Fables be silent An evill neighbourhood is like a mis-fortune The vicinity of great Men is alwaies to bee shunned of the weaker Good men receive good things from good Neighbours and evill Men evill things c. So * Plato and so Th●mistocl●s When hee ●old a pi●ce of ground ●ee commanded the Crier to Proclaime that it had a good Neighbour Which Interpreters note to the Law And there bee many things of the same kinde Wherefore neither if these neighbouring Subjects would change their condition neither if by reason of a fault committed against their owne King they be compelled to alter it is another Neighbouring Prince compelled to suffer it to whom neither another mans will nor offence ought to bring damage The Venetian Embassadors when they interceded for Sigismund of Maltesta to Pope Pius the second they spake even this that Neighbouring Princes would not have another Neighbour whom furthermore they knew not what he might hereafter be And you may note that Sigismond held Townes from the Church and for his committed offences he ought worthily to lose them Perhaps some will doubt whether these things be true in private mens causes For a private man seemes to have power to doe with his owne what he list if it bee profitable to himselfe and hurt not another Yet these things bee true thus in the causes of Empires For Princes ought to take heed for the future that another if he will may not yet be able to hurt another which is expounded in the Treatise of Profitable defence But even that rule that it is lawfull for any to doe what he list with his owne holds not otherwise then if the condition of a Neighbour bee made neither worse nor more grievous thereby although it be true that no man may take care of the gaine which his Neighbour made and which was owing to him by no obligation But even security and a certaine singular conjunction of love from a Neighbour is due to Empires Now this we know what things are taken away when Neighbours are changed And the same people is not the same that they were if the Common-wealth be not the same that it was For it is not lawfull I say againe to doe all things with the Subjects for that is not lawfull with the Subjects which would be a hurt and a danger to those that are no Subjects It is not lawfull to make Fortes in his owne Land which may be terrible to those that are not his as you shall heare in the third Booke Therefore neither is it lawfull to doe with his owne that which may be a terrour to others How ever these are called equivalent to doe in his own place and towards his own Subjects Whether if my Neighbour should place in his House Gunnes and other things against my House may I neither be carefull for my selfe nor stirre against my Neighbour Thus thus were Preparations made in Holland and that great Noble man Leicester very wisely foresaw that the defence of the Hollanders was very wholesome and necessary for the Common-wealth and he perswaded it to be undertaken least if the Spaniards should break through that Pale of Europe as then very wisely Iustus Lipsius called it there should remaine no obstacle at all to their cruelty And thus farre of Warre Defensive Thus and much more this our learned Professor of the Civill Law Albericus Gentilis whose words I have thus largely transcribed because they not onely abundantly justifie the lawfulnesse of the Parliaments present Defensive Warre in point of Law and their Ordinances of Association and mutuall Defence but likewise fully answer all the cavils and pretences of Royalists and Malignants against the progresse and managing of this warre from principles of Nature Law Humane Reason Equi●y and humane Authorities THE LAWFVLNES OF THE PARLIAMENTS present Defensive Warre in Point of Divinity and Conscience THe lawfulnesse and justnesse of the Parliaments present necessary Defensive Warre in point of Common Civill Canon Law and Policy having been largely debated in the premises because not hitherto discussed in that kinde by any to my knowledge I shall in the next place proceed to justifie it in point of Divinity and Conscience Wherein though I shall be more concise then I intended because sundry Learned * Divines in many late Printed Bookes common in all mens hands have professedly handled it at large and given good satisfaction unto many unresolved scrupulous Consciences yet because this Treatise may come into diverse hands which have not perused their discourses and those whose judgements may be convinced by the Legall may still have some scruples of Conscience resting in them in reguard of the Theologicall Part and because some things perchance in Point of Theology which others have wholly omitted may seasonably be here supplyed to satisfie Consciences yet unresolved of the justnesse of the present and all other necessary Defensive Warres I shall not over-sparingly or cursorily passe through it without a competent debate Now lest the Consciences of any should bee seduced ensnared with generalities or cleere mistakes through the mis-stating of the points in question with which devise many have beene hitherto deluded by the Opposites who cumbate onely with their owne mishapen fancies discharging all their Gu●shot against such Tenets as are not in question a●d no waies comming neere the White in Controversie I shall for my own orderly proceeding and the better satisfaction of ignorant scrupulous seduced consciences more punctually state the Question then formerly in the Legall Part first Negatively next Positively and then proceede to its debate Take notice therefore First that this is no part of the question in dispute Whether the Parliament or any Subjects wha●soever may actually disobey or violently with