Duke of Somerset in the Time of Ed. 6. was tried for Felony and Treason by his Peers upon an Indictment Id. 71. for it is the Suit of the King When a Lord of Parliament is tried by his Peers 1 Hen. 4.1 Id. 72. they shall not be Sworn to say their Verdict but they shall give their Verdict upon their Honour and are not charged but upon their Honours And 6 Maij 1628. Sir Wm. Jones's Rep. 154 155. It was ordered on the Question Nem. Dissen That the Nobility of this Kingdom and Lords of the upper House of Parliament are of antient Right to Answer in all Courts as Defendants upon Protestation of Honour only and not upon the common Oath An order of the House of Lords was in 1640. Cursus Cancel 112. That the Nobility of this Kingdom and Lords of the upper House of Parliament and the Widows and Dowagers of the Temporal Lords shall Answer in Chancery c. upon Protestation of Honour only but altho their Honour may bind their Conscience in Equity yet Evidence upon their Honour ought not to be admitted in any Court of Law And we must here Note That even Lords of Parliament or Peers of the Realm in giving Evidence to a Jury or in their Depositions in Chancery c. are to be Examined on Oath A Lord of Parliament shall have Knights upon his Trial in every Action 27 Hen. 8. f. 27. A Lord of Parliament may be Outlawed for Murder 27 Hen. 8. f. 17. If a Lord of Parliament makes a Rescous 27 H. 8.27 a Capias shall be taken out against him if the Sheriff return the Rescous otherwise it is in Case of Debt A Capias ad Satisfaciendum does not lyc against a Lord of Parliament 11 H. 4.15 27 Hen. 8.27 for the Law presumes that he has Assets An Attachment is not grantable by the Common Law Dyer 316. Statue Law Custom or Precedent against a Lord of Parliament and the Lord Cromwel by Order in the Parliament-Chamber was discharged of such Process In a Praemunire against a Lord of Parliament Arc. Parl. he ought to appear in his proper Person and not by Attorney unless he has a special Writ of Chancery De attornato faciendo CHAP. V. The Power of the House of Lords A Peer of the Realm being Indicted of Treason or Felony 4 Inst 23. or Misprision of Treason may be Arraigned thereof in Parliament a Lord Steward being appointed and then the Lords Spiritual shall make a Procurator for them and the Lords as Peers of the Realm during the Parliament are Judges whether the Offence be Treason c. that is supposed to be committed by any Peer of the Realm and not the Justices Vide a Letter sent by nine Lords Rush Col. 3. Stat. vol. 1. f. 737. Ant. 42. to the Parliament June 4 1642 who had gone from their House and repaired to the King at York wherein they say We do conceive that it is the apparent usual and inherent Right belonging to the Peerage of England that in the highest Misdemeanour whatsoever no Peer is to Answer to the first Charge but in his Place in his own Person and not upon the first Charge to come to the Barr. In 1553. primo Mariae Burn. His Ref. vol. 2. p. 253. The Bill of Tonnage and Poundage was sent up to the Lords who sent it down to the Commons to be reformed in two Provisoes that were not according to former Precedents How far this was contrary to the Rights of the Commons who now say that the Lords cannot alter a Bill of Money I am not able to determine Die Mercurij 25 Novembris 1692. It is Resolved upon the Question by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal that for the future when there shall be a Devision in the House upon any Question the Contents shall goe below the Barr and the Not Contents stay within the Barr And it is Ordered that this Resolution be added to the Roll of standing Orders of this House Die Lune 7. Decembris 1691. It is Ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament Assembled that for the future upon giving Judgment in any Cases of Appeals or Writs of Error in this House the Question shall be put for Reversing and not for Affirming And that this be added to the Roll of standing Orders 30. Jan. 1640. Rush Col. 3. part vol. 1 p. 165. Upon a Debate in the Lord's House touching the Power of conveying away of Honour it was Nemine contradicente Resolved upon the Question that no Person that hath any Honour in him as a Peer of this Realm may alien and transfer the same to any other Person See Sir B. Shower's Cases in Parliament 1.2 c. See many notable Judgments by the Lords at the Prosecution of the Commons Rush Col. passim Nalson and in later Times Error serra sue in Parliament Vid. Crom. 18. Error Vid. infra Parliament poet prendre Recognizance Brook 137. Error Error shall be sued in Parliament and the Parliament may take a Recognizance If a Judgment be given in the King's Bench 4. Inst 21. either upon a Writ of Error or otherwise the Party grieved may upon a Petition of Right made to the King in English or in French and his Answer thereto Fiat Jusstitia let Justice be done have a Writ of Error directed to the Chief Justice of the King's Bench for removing of the Record in praesens Parliamentum c. And hence it may be presum'd that Writs of Error in Parliament were originally Returnable before the Commons as well as the Lords See Yelverton's Rights of the Commons and Hales of Parliaments p. 18. to 23. When one sueth in Parliament to Reverse a Judgment in the King's Bench he sheweth in his Bill which he exhibiteth to the Parliament some Error or Errors whereupon he prayeth a Scire Facias Id. 22. The Proceeding upon the Writ of Error is only before the Lords in the Upper House Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti The Case between Smith and Busby in a Writ or Error Resolved 2 Nalson 716. 'twas decidable in no other Court but in Parliament If any Question be moved in Parliament for Priviledge 4 Inst 363 or Precedency of any Lord of Parliament it is to be decided by the Lords of Parliament in the House of Lords as all Priviledges and other Matters concerning the Lords House of Parliament are November 1641. 2 Nalson 625. Resolved by the House Nemine contradicente that it belongs to the House of Peers by the antient Laws and Constitutions of this Kingdom to interpret Acts of Parliament in Time of Parliament in any Cause that shall be brought before them Julij 12. 1641. 2. Nalson 381. An order of the Lords for Relief of a Feme-Covert and her Children against a Husband refusing to Cohabit The Sentence pronounced by the Lords upon Sir Giles Mompesson Rushw Col. 27.28 and Sir Fracis Michel for Projectors Upon Complaints and Accusations of the Commons Selden's Judicature
against his Body and the like And by this it appeareth what Persons are de Jure triable by the Lords in Parliament viz. their Peers only which Bishops are not Judgments in Parliaments for Death have generally been strictly guided per Legem Terrae i.e. Lex Parliamenti d. 168. The Parliament hath three Powers Sir Rob. Atkyns Argument c. 36. a Legislative in Respect of which they are call'd the three Estates of the Realm a Judicial in respect of this it is call'd Magna Curia or the High Court of Parliament a Counselling Power hence it is call'd Commune Concilium Regni The Parliament gives Law to the Court of King's-Bench Id. 49. and to all other Courts of the Kingdom and therefore it is absurd and preposterous that it shou'd receive Law from it and be subject to it The greater is not judged of the less All the Courts of Common Law are guided by the Rule of the Common Law Id. 50 but the Proceedings of Parliament are by quite another Rule The Matters in Parliament are to be discussed and determined by the Custom and Usage of Parliament and the Course of Parliament and neither by the Civil nor the Common Law used in other Courts Ibid. The Judges of all the Courts of Common Law in Westminster are but Assistants and Attendants to the High Court of Parliament And shall the Assistants judge of their Superiors The High Court of Parliament is the dernier Refort Ibid. and this is generally affirm'd and held but it is not the last if what they do may yet again be examin'd and controlled Because the High Court of Parliament proceeds by a Law peculiar to that High Court Id 52. which is call'd Lex Consuetudo Parliamenti and not by the Rules of the Common Law and consists in the Customs Usages and Course of Parliament no Inferior Court can for this very Reason judge or determine of what is done in Parliament or by the Parliament A Statute Arc. Parl. 85. or Act of Parliament need not be proclaim'd for the Parliament represents the Body of the whole Realm for there are Knights and Burgesses of every County and Town But otherwise where it is ordained by the Act that it shall be proclaimed A Man Attainted of Felony Id. 100. or Treason shall not be restored in Blood without Parliament 28 Ed. 1. Petyt's Appendix to Miscel Parliam n. 38. A Truce being concluded between the English and French by King Edward's Ambassadors who therein had dishonourably agreed to include the Scots the Ambassadors at the ensuing Parliament were sharply rebuked and corrected not only by the King himself the Prelates and Nobles but by the Commons The Court of Parliament was the Sanctuary Turner's Case of Bankers 36. whether the distressed Subject in his Exigence fled for Shelter and Refuge and alway found it Into the Sacred Bosom of Parliaments it was Ibid Vide Several Precedent and Records that they poured out their Sighs and Groans with constant Success and when in Cases of high Nature the Common Law was arrested and stopt in her proceedings Parliaments evermore ran into ther Rescue and in dutiful ways discharged those Locks and Bars which had been unjustly fastned on the Exchequer The Right of the Crown of England Stat. Prov. 25 Ed. 3. Rast Stat. 99. and the Law of the said Realm is such that upon the Mischiefs and Damages which happen to the Realm the King ought and is bound by his Oath of the Accord of his People in Parliament thereof to make Remedy c. To conclude this Chapter Le Parliament ad Absolute poiar en touts Cases come a faire Leys d'adjuger Matters en Ley a trier vie del home a reverser Errors en Bank le Roy especialment lou est ascun Commune Mischief que l'ordinary Course del Ley n'ad ascun means a remedier en tiel Case ceo est le proper Court Et tonts choses que ils font sont come Judgments Et si le Parliament mesme erre Finche's Nomotecnia l. 2. c. 1. f. 21. 22. come il poet ceo ne poet estre reverse en ascun Lieu forsque en le Parliament Which because it is omitted as several other things are in the Book translated into English I will thus give it the Reader that does not understand French The Parliament hath Absolute Power in all Cases as to make Laws to adjudge Matters in Law to try Men upon their Lives to reverse Errors in the King's Bench especially where there is any Common Mischief which the ordinary Course of the Law hath not any means to remedy in such Case this is the proper Court And all things which they do are as Judgments And if the Parliament it self errs as it may that cannot be reversed in any place but in Parliament Sir Robert Cotton See Sir Robert Cot. Treatise of Parliaments p. 44 45 c in his Discourse of the Privilege and Practice of Parliaments says thus by Parliaments all the wholesom Fundamental Laws of this Land were and are Establish'd and Confirmed By Act of Parliament the Pope's Power and Supremacy in this Kingdom and the Romish Superstition and Idolatry were abrogated and abolished By Act of Parliament God's true Religion Worship and Service are or may be establish'd and maintain'd By Act of Parliament the two Universities of Oxford and Cambridge with other Cities and Towns have had many Privileges and Immunities granted em By Parliament one Pierce Gaveston a great Favourite and Misleader of King Ed. 2. was remov'd and Banished and afterwards by the Lords Executed Also by Parliament the Spencer's Favourites and Misguiders of the same King were Condemned c. and so was Delapool in H. 6. Time and others since By Parliament Empson and Dudley two notable Polers of the Common-wealth by exacting Penal Laws on the Subjects were Discover'd and afterwards Executed By Parliament the Damnable Gunpowder Treason hatch'd in Hell is recorded to be had in Eternal Infamy By Parliament one Sir Giles Mompesson a Caterpiller and Poler of the Common-wealth by exacting upon In-holders c. was discover'd degraded and Banished by Proclamation By Parliament Sir Francis Bacon Note the Censure on the late E. of Macclesfield Quere made by K. James 1. Baron of Verulam Viscount of St. Albans and Lord Chancellor of England was for Bribery c. discover'd and displac'd By Parliament Sir John Bennet one of the Judges of the Prerogative Court being Pernitious to the Common-wealth in his Place was discover'd and displac'd By Parliament Lyonel Cranfield sometime a Merchant of London and made by K. James 1. Earl of Middlesex and Lord Treasurer of England being hurfull in his Place to the Common-wealth was discover'd and displaced By Parliament Note Sir Francis Mitchell a jolly Middlesex Justice of Peace in the Suburbs of London another Canker-worm of the Common-wealth by Corruption in exacting an Execution of the Laws upon poor Alchouse-keepers Victuallers c. was discover'd and degraded from his Knighthood and
was disabled for ever to serve in Parliament Quere post 141.146 17 Dec. 1584. 27 Eliz. Id. 76. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 340.341 342. A Bill against Jesuits and Seminary Priests pass'd upon the Question Dr. Parry only gave a Negative and after inveighed in violent Speeches against the whole Bill affirming it to savour of Treason to be full of Blood Danger Despair and Terror or Dread to the English Subjects of this Realm our Brethren Uncles and Kinsfolks Upon which he was sequestred from the House into the outer Room into the Hands of the Serjeant and not to confer with any while the House was in Debate of that Business Afterward he was brought to the Bar and there kneeling he was told by the Speaker If he thought fit the House was content to hear his Reasons but he refusing was committed to the Serjeant's Ward The next Day he was brought to the Bar and kneeling confessed he had unduly behaved himself and had rashly and unadvisedly uttered those Speeches he had used and was with all his Heart very sorry for it alledging withal he had never been of the House till that Session and so could not so well know the Orders of the House as he shou'd do and that he would not henceforth willingly offend the House nor any one Man in it and so humbly prayed their good Favour toward him Whereupon being again sequestred out of the House after some Arguments and Debates it was resolved upon this Acknowledgement of his Fault and his humble Submission he shou'd be received into this House again as a Member thereof and take his Place as before so that he would still afterward behave himself in good sort as he ought to do and thereupon being call'd again to the Bar and there Kneeling and directly reiterating his former Confession of his Fault and humble Submission with promise of better Demeanor he was admitted 18 Febr. 1584. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 352. Col. 2 27 Eliz. Upon a Motion by Mr. Diggs That the same Dr. Parry a late unworthy Member of this House and now Prisoner in the Tower hath since his Submission and Reconcilement so mis-behaved himself as deserveeth the said Imprisonment Resolved by the House That he be disabled to be any longer a Member of this House and that a Warrant be directed for choosing another Burgess in his stead 18 Jac. 1. Sir Giles Mompesson for being a Vid. Post Conysby's Case Monopolist and for other great and insufferable Crimes by him Committed to the Abuse of his Majesty and grievous Oppression of the Subjects was turn'd out of the House committed to the Tower and after Impeached before the Lords who gave Judgment upon him 1. Petyt's Miscel Par. 91 92 To be degraded of the Order of Knighthood 2. To stand perpetually in the degree of a Person Out-lawed for Misdemeanors and Trespasses 3. His Testimony never to be received in any Court nor to be of any Inquisition or Jury 4. To be excepted out of all General Pardons 5. That he should be Imprisoned during his Life 6. Not to approach within twelve Miles of the Courts of the King or Prince nor at the King's High Court usually held at Westminster 7. That the King should have the profits of his Land for Life and all his Goods and Chattels 8. That he should be fined at 10,000 l. 9. He was also disabled to hold or receive any Office under the King or for the Common-wealth 10. And lastly Ever to be held an infamous Person 19 Jac. 1. Sir John Bennet Id. 92. for receiving Bribes c. Ordered by the Commons House to be safely kept by the Sheriffs of London to be put out and no longer continue a Member of the House and a Warrant for a Writ for a new choice In the same Parliament Id. 93. Sir Robert Floyd for being a Projector of a Patent for a Monopoly resolved una voce That he was a Person unworthy to continue a Member of this House and adjudged presently to be put out 3 Car. 1. Id. 94 95. Mr. John Barbour Recorder of Wells for subscribing a Warrant for the Quartering of Soldiers suspended the House and sequestred till the Pleasure of the House be known 13 Febr. 1606. Id. 77 78.79 Upon a Report made in the House of the Remembrances formerly set down of the Particulars of a Conserence the Speaker offering to read the Paper and being interrupted by some Motions and Disputes Whether they shou'd be read one by one and so debated or all at once In that Difference one of the Knights for Bucking hamshire with a loud Voice not standing up Bare-Headed as the Order is pressed to have them Read The House observing his earnestness and manner of Sitting and Calling for Order's sake urged him to stand up and speak He stood up and pretending to offer some Reasons fell into an Invictive against the Scots much distasting the House yet out of a common Care to expedite the weighty Business then in Hand his Speech was neglected without Tax or Censure But on Monday following it was remembred and his Words of Offence recited in particular The Gentleman being absent was sent for by the Serjeant The Serjeant having brought the Offender it was moved he might be heard at the Bar which was assented to and after he had spoken he was commanded to retire and not long after was call'd in again to the Bar where Kneeling Mr. Speaker acquainted him Since the Offence was so apparently heinous the House did not hold it fit that any Particulars shou'd be named or to give any Reason of their Judgment but the Order was That he shou'd be carry'd to the Prison of the Tower and there remain during the Pleasure of the House and that he shou'd be dimiss'd from his Place of Knight of the Shire for Bucks and a new Writ to issue for a new Choice 15 Febr. 18 Jac. 1. Id. 79. A Bill being read the second Time for the better Observation of the Sabbath one of the Members made an Invective against it and something which seem'd to reflect on a Member of the House who presented it as favouring a Puritan and factious Spirit Exceptions were taken at the Words After he had explained himself he was ordered o withdraw out of the House and Debate being had he was call'd to the Bar and upon his Knees he received the Judgment of the House pronounced by the Speaker That he should be discharged from the Service of the House with an Intimation that his Judgment was very merciful for that the House might for so exorbitant an Offence have Imprison'd and further punish'd him 3 Apr. 1604. Id. 80. In a Debate upon a Bill a Member of the House utter'd some Speeches highly distasting the House but no Notice was taken of it till the Bill was Committed and then the Words being repeated he was call'd to the Bar where he made his Excuse and was Pardon'd 26 Apr. 1641. Ibid. Great Offence was taken by
Body as the Upper House was for their Privileges Customs and Orders which continual and common Usage hath approved of As to their Charge of having used Precipitancy and Rashness they answered That they used it in such a Manner as in all other Cases they were wont to do scilicet To have first a Motion of the Matter in Controversy and then they caused the Clerk of the Crown to bring the second Day the Writs and Returns and they being thrice read they proceed to the Examination of them and upon Examination gave Judgment which was the true proper Course of the Place As to the House's not having used the King well the Thing being done by his Command they say That they had no Notice before their Sentence that the King himself took any special Regard of that Case but only that his Officer the Chancellor had directed his second Writ as formerly had been done As to the Matter of the Outlawry they said That they understand by his Royal Person more Strength and Light of Reason from it than ever before and yet it was without Example That any Member of the House was put out of the House for any such Cause but to prevent that they had prepared a Law That no outlawed Person for the Time to come should be of the Parliament nor any Person in Execution should have the Privilege of Parliament But they said further That Sir Francis Goodwyn was not outlawed at the Day of his Election for he was not Quinto Exactus the five Proclamations never had been made which Proclamations they in London always spare except the Party or any for him require it and that Exigent was never returned nor any Writ of Certiorari directed to the Coroners to certify it but after his Election which was a Thing unusual the Money being paid and the Sheriffs being long since dead to disenable the said Goodwyn to serve in Parliament that the Exigent was returned and the Names of the deceased Sheriffs put thereto Et ex hoc fuit without doubt that Goodwyn could not have a Scire Facias for there was no Outlawry against him and by Consequence the Pardons had discharged him And they farther shewed to the King That if the Chancellor only could examine Returns then upon every Surmise whether it were true or false the Chancellor might send a second Writ and cause a new Election to be made and thus the free Election of the County should be abrogated which would be too dangerous to the Commonwealth For by such Means the King and his Council might make any Man whom they would to be of the Parliament-House against the Great Charter and the Liberties of England It is found among the Precedents of Queen Elizabeth's Reign Rush 3 vol. pag. 591. on whose Times all good Men look with Reverence that She committed one Wentworth a Member of the House of Commons to the Tower sitting the House only for proposing That they might advise the Queen in a Matter which she thought they had nothing to do to meddle in Quere If not in advising her to marry This notorious Infringement of their Liberties and Privileges See Sir Matthew Hâ—â—'s of Parliament pag. 206 216 217.218 c. in the latter End of Queen Elizabeth seems to be what the Commons complained of and mention in that famed Remonstrance or Declaration of their Privileges printed and directed to King James the First in the Beginning of his Reign viz. Anno Dom. 1604. Wherein they tell that King That they bore with some Things in the latter Times of Queen Elizabeth in regard of her Sex and her Age and not to impeach his Majesty's Succession under whom they then hoped to have them redressed and rectified Whereas on the contrary in that very first Parliament of his Majesty they found That the whole Freedom of the Parliament and Realm had been on all Occasions mainly hewed at As That the Freedom of their Persons in Election had been impeached The Freedom of their Speech prejudiced by often open Reproofs That particular Persons Members who had spoken their Consciences in Matters proposed to the House noted with Disgrace c. That a Goaler had contemned the Decrees and Orders of the House Some of the higher Clergy to write Books against them even fitting in Parliament The inferior Clergy to inveigh against them in their Pulpits c. After which they roundly assert That the Prerogative of Princes may easily See the Force of a Precedent once fixed in the Crown 2 Inst 61. Houâ—â—shead 1 Tom. pag 135. and do daily grow and increase But the Privileges of Subjects are for the most Part at an everlasting Stand They may by good Providence and Care be preserved but being once lost are not to be recovered but with much Disquiet and Disorder Vide ibid. plura To conclude this Treatise as I begun it give me leave to add There is nothing ought to be so dear to the Commons of Great Britain as a Free Parliament that is a House of Commons every Way free and independent either of the Lords or Ministry or c. Free in their Persons Free in their Estates Free in their Elections Free in their Returns Free in their assembling Free in their Speechs Debates and Determinations Free to complain of Offenders Free in their Prosecutions for Offences and therein Free from the Fear or Influence of others how great soever Free to guard against the Incroachments of arbitrary Power Free to preserve the Liberties and Properties of the Subject and yet Free to part with a Share of those Properties when necessary for the Service of the Publick Nor can he be justly esteem'd a Representative of the People of Britain who does not sincerely endeavour to defend their just Rights and Liberties against all Invasions whatsoever See further touching the Rights and Duties of Parliaments in Rapin's History Vol. II. Book XXII especially Page 583 and 595. Sed quae sunt Jura si non Libere Fruantur FINIS Books lately Printed MODERN Entries in English Being a select Collection of Pleadings in the Courts of King's-Bench Common-Pleas and Exchequer viz. Declarations Pleas in Abatement and in Bar Replications Rejoinders c. Demurrers Issues Verdicts Judgments Forms of Continuances Discontinuances and other Entries and of entering Judgments c. in all personal Actions and also all Kinds of Writs Original and Judicial Translated from the most authentick Books but cheifly from Lutwich's Saunders's Ventris's Salkeld's and the Modern Reports and from other Cases lately try'd and adjudg'd and wherein Writs of Error have been brought and Judgments affirm'd Together with Readings and Observations on the several Cases in the Reports as well relating to the Precedents herein as to all other Cases incident to each particular Title and the same abridg'd in a methodical Order To which are added References to all the other Entries in the Books with three distinct Tables one of the Precedents the second of the Cases abridg'd and the third of the Names of the Cases By a Gentlman of the Inner-Temple The Law of Uses and Trusts collected and digested in a proper Order from the Reports of adjudged Cases in the Courts of Law and Equity and other Books of Authority Together with a Treatise of Dower To which is added A compleat Table of all the Matters therein contained And The Law and Practice of Ejectments Being a compendious Treatise of the Common and Statute Law relating thereto To which is added Select Precedents of Pleas special Verdicts Judgments Executions and Proceedings in Error with two distinct Tables to the Whole The Second Edition carefully corrected and revised by the Author The Attorney's Pocket Companion Or A Guide to the Practisers of the Law In two Parts Being a Translation of Law Proceedings in the Courts of King's-Bench and Common-Pleas Containing a Collection of the common Forms beginning with the Original and ending with the Judicial Process Together with an historical as well as practical Treatise on Ejectment To which is also added The Law and Practise of Fines and Recoveies and several other Precedents with some Remarks on the Forms of the Habeas Corpora and Jurata now in Use In two Vols
c. 6 7. the Lords may proceed in Judgment against the Delinquents of what Degree soever and of what Nature soever the Offence be For where the Commons complain the Lords do not assume to themselves Trial at Common Law Q. Neither do the Lords at the Trial of a Common Impeachment by the Commons decedere de Jure suo for the Commons are then instead of a Jury and the Parties Answer and Examination of Witnesses are to be in their Presence Post 120. or they to have Copies thereof and the Judgment is not to be given but upon their Demand which is instead of a Verdict so the Lords do only judge not try the Delinquent 28 Hen. 6. Id. 98. Tho' the Lords refused to commit the Duke of Suffolk upon the Commons complaint of him of a common Fame of Treason yet when they accused him of a particular Treason he was Committed and brought Prisoner to his Answer But in Cases of Misdemeanors it is otherwise Then the Party accused whether Lord or Commoner answers as a Freeman viz. The Lord within his Place Ibid. the Commoner at the Bar and they are not committed till Judgment unless upon the Answer of a Commoner the Lords find Cause to commit him till he find Sureties to attend c. lest he should fly Prout Jo. Cavendish upon the Lord Chancellor's demand of Justice against him for his false Accusation was Committed after his Answer until he put in Bail Anno 7 Rich. 2. and before Judgment In Cases of Misdemeanors only Id. 105. the Party accused was never deny'd Counsel If the Commons do only complain Id. 163. and do neither impeach the Party in Writing nor by Word of Mouth in open House nor demand Trial to be in their Presence Post 120. in these Cases it is in the Election of the Lords whether the Commons shall be present or not In Complaints of Extortion Id. 173. and Oppression the Lords awarded Satisfaction to the Parties wronged which sometime was certain sometime general but alway secundum non ultra Legem It appeareth plainly by many Precedents Id. 176 177. that all Judgments for Life and Death are to be render'd by the Steward of England or by the Steward of the King's House and this is the Reason why at every Parliament the King makes a Lord Steward of his House tho' he hath none out of Parliament And at such Arraignment the Steward is to sit in the Chancellor's Place and all Judgments for Misdemeanors are by the Chancellor or by him who supplies the Chancellor's Place In Case of Recovery of Damages Id. 187. or Restitution the Parties are to have their Remedy the Parliament being ended in the Chancery and not in any other inferior Court at the Common Law But the Lords in Parliament may direct how it shall be levied The Judges who are but Assistants to the Upper House have leave from the Lord Chancellor or Keeper Sir Simon d'Ewes Journal 527. Col. 2. to sit cover'd in the House but are alway uncover'd at a Committee 3. Car. 1. Petyt's Msscel Parliam 212 213. The Sentence of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal pronounced by the Lord Keeper against Ensign Henry Reynde for ignominious Speeches uttered by him against the Lord Say and Seal and for his Contempt of the High Court of Parliament was thus 1. That he never bear Arms hereafter but be accounted unworthy to be a Soldier 2. To be imprisoned during Pleasure 3. To stand under the Pillory with Papers on his Head shewing his Offence at Cheapside London or at Banbury 4. To be fined at 200 l. to the King 5. To ask Forgiveness here of all the Lords of Parliament in general and of the Lord Say and his Son in Particular both here and at Banbury And the Court of Star-Chamber ordered by the Lords to put the said Sentence in Execution out of Time of Parliament Id. 213. Vide a Sentence pronounced by the Lords Die Martis 26. Julij 1642. against one John Escot of Launceston in the County of Cornwall for speaking Scandalously of the Parliament in Rush Col. Vol. 1. f. 759 760. And likewise against John Marston Clerk Rector of St. Mary Magdalen in the City of Canterbury ibid. See divers particulars touching the Power and Jurisdiction of the House of Lords in Prynn's Plea for the House of Lords c. as also a Book printed Anno 1669. Entitled The Grand Question concerning the Judicature of the House of Peers Stated c. See also Sir M. Hales of Parliaments Pa. 138 139. and ibid 140 c. where Attendants on the upper House may be Members of the House of Commons Q. CHAP. VI. House of Commons THE House of Commons was originally Sir R. Atkyns Argument c. p. 13. and from the first Constitution of the Nation the Representative of one of the three Estates of the Realm and a part of the Parliament It is assirmed by Mr. Lambard Lambard's Archeion 257 258. that Burgesses were chosen to the Parliament before the Conquest The antient Towns call'd Boroughs Littleton Sect. 164. are the most antient Towns that are in England for the Towns that now are Cities or Counties in old Time were Boroughs and call'd Boroughs for that of such old Towns came the Burgesses to the Parliaments Knights of the Shire to serve in Parliament Sir Rob. Atkyn's 18. and the paying Wages to them for their Service has been Time out of Mind and did not begin 49 Hen. 3. for that is within Time of Memory in a Legal Sense The House of Commons Id. 34. as a Member of the High Court of Parliament have been as antient as the Nation itself and may in the Sense of Julius Caesar be accounted among the Aborigines and that they have had a perpetual Being to speak in the Language of the Law a Tempore cujus Contraria memoria Hominum non existit and that they are therefore capable by Law together with the rest of the three Estates in Parliament to prescribe and claim a share in all Parliamentary Powers and Priviledges I do not mean seperately but in conjunction with those other Estates which they could not otherwise legally have done if their Original and Commencement could have been shewn During the British Saxon Petyt's Preface to the antient Rights of the Commons c. p. 3. and Norman Governments the Freemen or Commons of England as now call'd and distinguish'd from the great Lords were pars essentialis constituens an essential and constitutent part of the Wittena Gemot Commune Concilium Baronagium Angliae or Parliament in those Ages It is apparent Id. 12. and past all Contradiction that the Commons in the Times of the Britons Vid. Ch. 1 ante Saxons and Picts were an essential Part of the Legislative Power in making and ordaining Laws by which themselves and their Posterity were to be Govern'd and that the Law was then the golden Metwand and Rule which Measured out and allowed the Prerogative of the Prince and
Liberty of the Subject and when obstructed or denyed to either made the Kingdom deformed and leprous I may with good Reason and Warranty conclude Id. 125. that our Ancestors the Commons of England the Knights Gentlemen Freeholders Citizens and Burgesses of a great and mighty Nation were very far from being in former Times such Vassals and Slaves or so abject poor and inconsiderable as the absurd and malicious Ignorance and Falsities of late Writers have been pleased to make and represent them especially the Author of the Grand Freeholders Inquest and Mr. James Howel c. as if they were only Beasts of Carriage and Burthen ordain'd to be tax'd and talliated and have their Lives Estates and Liberties given away and disposed of without their own Assents If the Commons do only Accuse by any way of Complaint whatsoever Selden's Judicature c. 14. and do not declare in Special against the Party accused then the Suit is the King's and the Party is to be Arraigned or otherwise proceeded against by Commandment Ex parte Domini Regis In the Lower House sit the Speaker Crompton 2.4 Inst 1. and the Knights Citizens Burgesses and Barons of the Cinque-Ports who represent the Body of the whole Commonalty of England All Persons St. 5 Rich. 2 c. 4. Rast 140. and Commonalties which shall be summon'd to Parliament shall come as they have been used and accustom'd of antient Time and he that shall not come having no reasonable Excuse shall be amerced and otherwise punish'd as of antient Time hath been used Vide ante p. 17. Algernon Sidney c. 3. Sect. 38 An Eminent and Noble Author has in his Discourses on Government asserted that the Power of calling and dissolving Parliaments is not simply in our Kings alone And in support of this Assertion gives us the following Reasons viz. First says he the King can have no such Power unless it be given him by Law for every Man is naturally Free and the same Power that makes him King gives him all that belongs to his being King and no more 'Tis not therefore an Inherent but only a Delegated Power and whoever Receives it is accountable to those who gave it for they who give Authority by Commission do always retain more than they Grant Secondly The Law for Annual Parliaments expresly Declares it not to be in the King's Power as to their Meeting nor consequently as to their Continuance for they meet to no Purpose if they may not continue to do the Work for which they meet and it were absur'd to give them a Power of Meeting if they might not continue till the End for which they met were attained Qui Dat Finem Dat Media ad Finem Necessaria the only Reason End why Parliaments do Meet is to provide for the publick Good and they ought to Meet and continue for that End they ought not therefore to be Dissolved till it be accomplished and 'twas for this Reason that the Opinion given by Tresilian that Kings might Dissolve Parliaments at their Pleasure Note was adjudg'd to be a principal part of his Treason See other Reasons there Assign'd and on the whole he concludes that Parliaments have in themselves a Power of Meeting Sitting and Acting for the Publick Good After which Ibid p. 432. he further Prosecutes the same Point and then proceeds to shew That as the Peoples Delegatees or Representatives in Parliament do not meet there by a Power derived from Kings but from those that chuse them so they who Delegate Powers do always retein to themselves more than they give and therefore the People do not give their Delegates an absolute Power of doing what they please but do always retein to themselves more than they confer on their Deputies who must therefore be accountable to their Principalls Vide plura ibid. CHAP. VII The Power of the House of Commons in particular Cases THE House of Commons is a House of Information and Presentment Rush Coll. 217. vol 1. but not a House of Definitive Judgment The House of Commons is a considerable Grand Jury Trials of the Regicides p. 53. 'tis a good Billa vera they return their Orders are Records and that appears also by 6. H. 8. c. 16. where the Words are viz. And the same Licence shall be entred on Record in the Book of the Clerk of the Parliament appointed or to be appointed for the Common's House c. Sir Audley Mervyn's Speech to the Duke of Ormond 13. Heb. 1662. containing their Sum of Affairs in Ireland p. 17. And more directly in their point upon the Trial of Harrison the Regicide Mr. Jessop was produc'd to attest several Orders of the Common's House Mr. Jessop being Clerk of the House Note the said Stat. 6. H. 8. c. 16. says Rast Stat. p. 429. 4. Inst 23. Hales of Parl. 213. 215. That no Member should depart from the Parliament nor absent themselves from the same without the Licence of the Speaker and Commons in Parliament Assembled to be entred upon Record in the Book of the Clerk of the Parliament And yet some Judges have been of Opinion Hob. Rep. 110.111 that the Journals of the House of Commons are no Records but only Remembrances Before the Year 1550. 3. E. 6. Bur. Hist Ref. vol. 2. p. 143. it seems that no Eldest Sons of Peers were Members of the House of Commons and Sir Francis Russel becoming by the Death of his Elder Brother Heir Apparent to the Lord Russel it was on the 21st of January carried upon a Debate that he should abide in the House as he was before But this was by a special Order so it is entered in the Original Journal of the House of Commons and is the first Journal that ever was taken in that House 1. Car. 1. 1625. Resolved Rush ib. that common Fame is a good Ground of Proceeding for this House either by Enquiry or Presenting the Complaint if the House find Cause to the King or Lords 26 Jan. 28 Hen. 6. Selden's Judicat p. 29. Vid. id 38 The Commons required the Duke of Suffolk might be committed to Ward for that the General Fame went of him c. The Lords on Consultation with the Justices thought the same to be no good Cause of Commitment unless some special Matters were objected against him It is certain Pettyt's Miscell Pref. c. p. 5. and not to be deny'd That in elder Time the People or Free-men had a great Share in the Publick Council or Government For Dion Cassius or Xiphiline out of him in the Life of Severus assures us Apud hos i. e. Britannos Populus magna ex Parte Principatum tenet It was not in the Power of all the Tenants in Capite in England Id. 47 48. tho' with the King's Consent to bind and oblige others or to make or alter a Law sine Assensu Communitatis Regni who had Votum consultivum decisivum an Act of Authority and Jurisdiction as well in assenting to Spiritual Laws as Temporal
a Speech spoken by him in the House he shou'd be sent to the Tower during the Parliament or presently after Darryel was sent for by the Serjeant to answer it to the House and upon Testimony of it he was committed to the Serjeant till Thursday following and then to acknowledge his Fault or to be committed to the Tower 16 Junij 1604 Ibid. Complaint being made of one Thomas Rogers a Currier dwelling in Colemanstreet for abusing Sir John Savil in slanderous and unseemly Terms upon his Proceedings at a Committee in the Bill touching Tanners c. he was sent for by the Serjeant at Arms to the Bar to answer his Offence Sir William Aston Rush Col. 656. Vid. Petyt 's Miscell Parl. 108. Acon 's Case Sheriff of London being examined before the Committee concerning some Matters about the Customs and not giving that clear Answer which he ought and as the House conceived he might have done was therefore committed to the Tower of London And a Question was made in the House at that Time Whether the House had at any Time before committed a Sheriff of London to Prison To which Mr. Selden made Answer That he could not call to mind a Precedent of sending one Sheriff of London to Prison but he well remembred a Precedent of sending both the Sheriffs of London to the Tower and instanced the Case One Trussel Towns Col. 20. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 438. Col. 1. being in Execution in one of the Compter's in London was order'd to be brought before the Committee with his Keeper without Danger of an Escape in the Execution Note the Case of Mr. W. Montague who being a Prisoner in Execution was notwithstanding elected a Burgess for Stockbridge and discharged of his Imprisonment by the House See the Case in Bohun's Collection of Debates pa. 275. to 281 where all the Precedents of this Kind are cited at large 4 Novemb. 1640 Scobel 16. upon a Report from the Committee for Priviledges That several Indentures were returned for Burgesses for the Borough of Bossinny in the County of Cornwal the one by the Mayor of the Town the other promiscuously the Committee were of Opinion upon view of the bare Indenture That Sir Charles Harbord who was return'd by the Mayor was well return'd See hereafter Ch. 12. and 13 but the House declar'd he shou'd not sit till the Election were decided 44 Eliz. 1601 the Course hath been Towns Col 297. if the House hath been desirous to see any Record the Speaker shou'd send a Warrant to the Lord Keeper to grant a Certiorari to have the Record brought into the House Decemb. 1641 Nalson 753. ordered That Mr. Speaker do write his Letters to the Mayor of Berwick enjoyning him to require such Papists and suspected Persons as reside there or make their constant Repair thither forthwith to depart the Town and to tender the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance to such as shall refuse and to proceed against them according to Law and to require him that a Guard be kept at the several Gates and that the Arms of that Place be in Readiness The like to the Mayor of Newcastle and of Hull The Commons Rush Col. 358. upon Imprisonment of their Members and the Offence taken by the King resolved to proceed in no other Business till they were righted in their Liberties See Nalson's Col. p. 3. to 21. Dec. 1641 Nalson 732. Mr. Long a Justice of the Peace sent to the Tower for setting a Guard without Consent of the Parliament A Knight 4 Inst 12. Citizen or Burgess of the House of Commons cannot by any Means make a Proxy because he is elected and trusted by Multitudes of People If the Commons accuse a Commoner of Misdemeanors Selden 's Jud. 101. in such a State of Liberty or Restraint as he is in when the Commons complain of him in such he is to answer Sir Francis Michel Seld. Jud. Ibid. and Sir John Bennet were both committed by the Commons before their Complaint to the Lords and so they answered as Prisoners but that in a Sort may be call'd Judicium parium suorum If the Commons impeach any Man Ib. 124. Ante they are in loco proprio and there no Jury ought to be only Witnesses are to be examined in their Presence or they to have Copies thereof and the Judgment not to be given until the Commons demand it The Presence of the Commons is necessary at the Parties Answer Ib. 158. Ante 56. and Judgment in Cases Capital Now one Reason for the King's Assent and the Commons Presence in such Judgments may be this Both King and People are to be satisfied for the Death of the Subject therefore all Trials for Life and Death are publick in the full Assembly of the Court and how can it be said in full Parliament when the Commons one of the States are absent Tho the Commons are not present when the Lords do consider of the Delinquents Answer and the Proofs Ib. 159. and do determine of their Judgment yet at their Return to their own Assembly they consider among themselves if the Proceedings were legal and may come again and shew it and require a Rehearing of the Cause as they did at the Judgment of the Duke of Clarence in 18 Ed. 3. In Judgments on Misdemeanors Ib. 162. Ante 58. the Presence of the Commons is not necessary unless they impeach a Delinquent prout 50 E. 3. and then they are present at all the Answers of those whom they impeach and are to demand Judgment When the Lords had determin'd one Part of the Complaint of the Commons against William Ellis touching the Wrong done to certain Scottish Merchants the Commons pray'd a general Inquiry might be made of the Residue whereof they complained Ibid. which the Lords granted When the Lord Nevil answered Id. 163. the Commons required that one Richard Love might be examined to prove that which the said Lord deny'd and so departed but two of the Commons remained and heard the Examinations and told the Lords That the said Richard had related otherwise to the Commons the Day before which the said Richard deny'd Then all the Commons came and justify'd it again and thereupon the said Richard Love confessed it and on their Demands was committed In the 10 Rich. 2. Ibid. when the Commons had Impeached the Lord Chancellor they were present at his Answer and so often reply'd and enforced his Oath against him Vid. Post 80. and required him to be committed and so he was before Judgment If the Commons do only complain Ibid. and do neither impeach the Party in Writing nor by Word of Mouth in open House nor demand Trial to be in their Presence in these Cases it is in the Election of the Lords Whether the Commons shall be present or not Issuing of Quo Warranto's out of the Court of King's-Bench Nalson 588. Court of Exchequer or any Court against Boroughs that anciently or recently sent Burgesses to Parliament to shew
cause why they sent Burgesses of Parliament and all the Proceedings thereupon are Coram non Judice illegal and void And the Right of sending Burgesses to the Parliament is questionable in Parliament only and the Occasioners Procurers Note and Judges in such Quo Warranto's and Proceedings are punishable as in Parliament shall be thought consonant to Law and Justice And note See Bohun's Inst Legalis 186.190 c. The Practice and Proceedings on Quo Warranto's Mandamus's and some other Prerogative Writs seem to have been an Invention of the Judges in order to draw the Rights and Privileges of Burroughs and Corporations as well as of the People under the Cognizance of B. R. c. Where the Articles against the Delinquents are ex Parte Domini Regis Selden 's Judicature 118. there the Commons cannot reply nor demand Judgment for the Suit is the King's and not theirs In Trewinnard's Case Id. 39. Dyer 60 61. The Priviledge of the Commons is termed the Priviledge of Parliament and the Judgment given in that Case by the House of Commons is there said to be The Judgment of the most High Court of Parliament Sir Robert Atkyn's Argument 35. which proves they are not without a Judicial Power The King cannot take notice of what is done in the Commons House Id. 53. or deliver'd to them but by the House itself and that is one of the Laws and Customs of Parliament In 31 Hen. 6. Id. 55. When the Commons requested the King and Lords to restore their Speaker to them c. The Judges being demanded of their Counsel therein See this Case reported at large in Bohun's Debates in Parliament p. 276. c. Ibid. after mature deliberation they answer'd It was not their part to judge of the Parliament which may judge of the Law The Reason to judge of the Law signifies that they the Parliament can judge whether a Law be good or not in order to approve it and to re-enact it or to repeal a Law c. In 1621. Ibid. The House of Commons made a Protestation against all Impeachments other than in their House for any thing there said or done It was said by Mr. Justice Crook Id. 58. Rush Col. Vol. 1. f. 663. That regularly a Parliament-Man cannot be compelled out of Parliament to answer Things done in Parliament in a Parliamentary Course See Sir R. Atkins's Argument per Totum If it be done in a Parliamentary Course what Occasion can there be to answer for it But who shall judge what is a Parliamentary Course but a Parliament Not Judges of the Common Law for the Parliamentary Course differs from the Rules of the Common Law 27 Eliz. 1584 ordered Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 347 Col. 2. That the Serjeant of this House do forthwith go to the Common Pleas Bar and charge the Recorder then pleading there to make his present Repair unto this House for his Attendance See and Note the Case of Judge Thorp Cottons Rec. 74 and 316. who 25 E. 3. was condemn'd to Death and to forfeit all his Lands and Goods for Bribery i. e. receiving 20 l. from a Person who had a Cause depending before him Note in the Parliament 11 R. 2. commonly called The Wonder working Parliament all the Judges as they were sitting in Westminster-Hall were arrested c. by Order of Parliament And the like happen'd to several Judges in the Convention Parliament upon the Revolution but Quere if their Commitment was by the Lords and Commons or by the Commons only See also the Journal of the House of Commons Journal of the Commons An. 1680. Anno 1680 several Orders and Resolutions of the Commons against divers of the Judges and others for encouraging Addresses c. in Order to obstruct the Meeting and Sitting of that Parliament And see there December the 30th the following Resolutions of that House viz. 1. That the several Writings Papers and Proceedings relating to such Members of the late Long Parliament of Pensioners who receiv'd Allowances out of the Monies appointed for secret Services be produced to this House 2. Nem. Contr. That no Member of this House shall accept of any Office or Place of Profit from the Crown without the Leave of this House nor any Promise of any such Office or Place during his being or continuing a Member of this House 3. That all Offenders herein be expell'd this House See there also the Report and Censure of the the Proceedings of divers of the Judges of Westminster-Hall viz. Sir Francis North Sir W. Scroggs Justice Jones and Baron Weston whereupon the House came to the following Resolutions viz. 1. That the Discharge of the Grand Jury of the Hundred of Osulston in Com. Middx by the Court of B. R. in Trin. Term last before the last Day of the Term and before they had finished their Presentments was arbitrary and illegal destructive to publick Justice a manifest Violation of the Oaths of the Judges of that Court and a Means to subvert the fundamental Laws of the Kingdom and to introduce Popery 2. That the Rule made by the Court of B. R. in Trinity Term last against Printing of a Book called The Weekly Pacquet of Advice from Rome is illegal and arbitrary the Judges thereby usurping to themselves Legislative Power to the great Discouragement of the Protestants and countenancing of Popery 3. That the Court of King's Bench in the Imposition of Fines on Offenders have of late Years acted arbitrarily illegally and partially favouring Papists and Persons popishly affected and excessively oppressing his Majesty's Protestant Subjects 4. That the refusing sufficient Bail in those Cases wherein the Persons committed were Bailable by Law was illegal and a high Breach of the Liberties of the Subject 5. That the Expressions in the Charge given to the Grand Jury by Baron Weston were a Scandal to the Reformation and tending to raise discord between His Majesty and his Subjects and to the Subversion of the antient Constitution of Parliaments and of the Government of this Kingdom 6. That the Warrant mentioned in the Report i. e. for Harry Carrs Commitment c. was arbitrary and illegal And then follow the several Resolutions for Impeaching the Judges above-named See also Ibid. Jan. 3. and the Articles against Scroggs c. And Jan. 4. 1680 resolved Nem. Cont. That such Members of this House who in this Time of imminent Danger do absent themselves without Leave of the House are to be reputed Deserters of their Trust and Neglecters of that Duty they owe to this House and their Country 27 Eliz. 1584 John Bland a Currier for making dishonourable Reflections on the House of Commons brought to the Bar and pardoned upon his Submission paying twenty Shillings Fee to the Serjeant and taking the Oath of Supremacy Eodem An. Id. 368. Col. 1. A Warrant for a Writ of Priviledge awarded for setting at Liberty John Pepler Servant to Sir Philip Sidney a Member of this House now Prisoner for Debt in the Compter in
Question is to be put first in the Affirmative and then the Negative Id. 24. to which Question every Member ought to give his Vote one way or other and the Speaker is to declare his Opinion whether the Yea's or the No's have it which is to stand as the Judgment of the House But if any Member before any new Motion made shall stand up and declare that he doth believe that the Yea's or the No's as the Case shall be have it contrary to the Speaker's Opinion then the Speaker is to give Direction for the House to divide declaring whether the Yea's or the No's are to go forth Upon the dividing of the House Id. 25. those are to go forth who are for varying from or against the constant Orders of the House as that a Question shall not be put or not be now put it being the Course of the House that after a Debate the same shou'd be determin'd by a Question or the like or against any positive Order made by the House or for the passing any new Thing and for reading a Petition or Bill and committing ingrossing or passing such Bills or the like Those that are for the new Bill if there be a Question of Voices shall go out of the House Id. 52. and those who are against the Bill Co. 12.116 Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 505. Col. 1. Vid. contra Scobel 43. and for the common Law or any former Law shall sit still in the House for they are in Possession of the old Law Yet in 1604. those for the Bill sate and those against it went out So 7 Aug. 1641. 10 Dec. 1640. Memorials in Hakewel 25. Vide Sir S. d'Ewes Jour 505. It was declared for a constant Rule That those that give their Votes for Preservation of the Orders of the House shall stay in and those who give their Votes otherwise to the introducing any new Matter or for any Alteration shall go forth 24 Mart. Memorials ut supra 21 Jac. 25. The House being divided upon a Question about Election of Members it was over-ruled by the House that the No's should go forth This is also the Course upon any Question to agree with a Report in Favour of the Opinion of a Committee Ibid. Upon dividing the House Id. 26. the Speaker is to nominate two of those that are in the Affirmative and two of the Negatives to count the House which four each of them having a Staff in his Hand are to count the number of the Persons who remain sitting in the House and then to stand within the Door two on the one Side and two on the other and to count the Number of them who went forth as they come in While the House is thus divided Ibid. or dividing no Member may speak nor unless it be to go forth upon the Division remove out of his Place When the House is thus told Id 27. those two of the Tellers who are of the Number of those who have the major Votes standing on the right Hand and the two other on the left Hand at the Bar the rest being all set in their Places are to come from thence up to the Table together making the usual Obeysance to the House three Times once at the Bar again in the middle of the House and again when they are come to the Table and that Person who stands on the right Hand is to declare to the Speaker the Number of the Yea's who sat or went out as the Case is and of the No's and then with like Reverence to depart into their Places after which Mr. Speaker is to report the same to the House If the Affirmative have the major Votes by the Judgment of the Speaker Ibid. or in case of Division upon the Division the Clerk is to enter the Vote Resolved If the Negatives then he is to enter it thus The Question being put setting down the Words of the Question it pass'd in the Negative Upon the Division Ibid. if the Members appear to be equal then the Speaker is to declare his Vote whether he be a Yea or a No which in this Case is the casting Voice but in other Cases the Speaker gives no Vote 1 Maij 1606. Ibid. Upon a Question whether a Man saying Yea may afterward sit and change his Opinion a Precedent was remembered by the Speaker of Mr. Morris Attorncy of the Wards in 39 Eliz. that in like case changed his Opinion If upon a Debate it be much controverted Id. 28. and much be said against the Question any Member may move that the Question may be first made whether that Question shall be put or whether it shall be now put which usually is admitted at the Instance of any Member especially if it be seconded and insisted on and if that Question being put it pass in the Affirmative then the main Question is to be put immediately and no Man may speak any thing further to it either to add or alter But before the Question whether the Question shall be put any Person who hath not formerly spoken to the main Question hath liberty to speak for it or against it because else he shall be precluded from speaking at all to it If in a Debate there arise more Questions than one and it be controverted Ibid. which Question should be first put the Question first moved and seconded is regularly to be first put unless it be laid aside by general Consent If the first Question be insisted on to be put and the major Part seem to be against it the Question is to be whether that Question shall be now put if that pass in the Negative then the other Question may be put if desired nevertheless any Person may speak to it again before it be put If in the Affirmative then it is to be put without any Addition or Alteration as before and after the Question is put if any Member move to have the other Question put every one hath leave to speak to it again as if it were a new Question If a Matter be received into Debate Id. 29 and a Question grow whether the House shall proceed in that Debate at this time and it fall out that the House be divided in such Case the No's are to go forth it being contrary to the Course of the House that any Business shou'd be laid aside 'till it be determined by a Question if the Question be for an Adjournment of a Debate the Yea's are to go forth upon the same Reason After a Question is propounded Ibid. no Man may speak more than once to the Matter but having spoken to the Matter when the Question comes to be put he may speak to the Manner or Words of the Question keeping himself to that only and not ravelling into the Merits of it If a Question upon a Debate contain more Parts than one Ibid and the Members seem to be for one Part and not for the other it may be moved that the same may be
divided into two or more Questions as Dec. 2. 1640 the Debate about the Election of two Knights was divided into two Questions No Member in his Discourse in the House may mention the Name of any other Member then present Id. 30. Vide Smyth's Common-wealth 85. but to describe him by his Title or Addition as that Noble Lord that worthy Knight or by his Office as Judge Serjeant Gentleman of the long or short Robe or by his Place as the Gentleman near the Chair near the Bar or on the other side or that Gentleman that spake last or last save one or the like During any Debate any Member Memorials ut supr 30. tho' he have spoken to the Matter may rise up and speak to the Orders of the House if they be transgressed in Case the Speaker do not but if the Speaker stand up he is first to be heard and when he stands up the other must sit down 'till the Speaker sit down But if any Person rise up to speak to the Orders of the House in the midst of a Debate Ibid. 31. he must keep within that Line and not fall into the Matter itself if he do he may be taken down by the Speaker or any other Member calling to the Orders of the House While a Member is speaking to a Debate or Question he is to be heard out Id. 31. Vid. Town Coll. 205. and not taken down unless by Mr. Speaker as in some Cases he may or that he speak of such Matter as the House doth not think fit to admit A Matter upon Debate having been once finally determined by a Question Memorials in Hakeavel 33. ought not to be again brought into Dispute 27 Martij 1604. Ibid. Sir Edward Coke Attorney-General and Dr. Hone bring a Message from the Lords desiring a Conference about the Case of Sir Francis Godwyn Vide this Argument at large in the Appendix Upon this Message it was argued That now the Judgment having pass'd the House it could not nor ought to be reversed by them and upon the Question it was resolv'd There shou'd be no Conference 2 Apr. 1604. Ibid A Vote having passed some Days past That no Conference shou'd be admitted with the Lords the same Question was again moved but was carried in the Negative And it was then urged for a Rule That a Question having been once made and carried in the Affirmative or Negative cannot be questioned again but must stand as the Judgment of the House 4 Junij 1604. Id. 45 Agreed for a Rule If two stand up to speak to a Bill He who first stood up if it be known by Demand or otherwise is to be first heard 11 Nov. 1640. Id. 69. It is declared as a constant Order of the House That if a Witness be brought to the House the House sitting the Bar is to be down otherwise if the House be in a Committee In a Debate about an Election Id. 70. it was Resolved That the Party concern'd shall be heard to inform the House and then he is to go forth When any Complaint is made against a Member Id. 71. or Exceptions taken to any Thing spoken by him after he hath been heard to explain himself if he desire or the House command it which is usually done by him standing in his Place if the House be not satisfied but sall into Debate thereof such Member is to withdraw The Members of the lower House came to the Lords upon a Conference Town Coll. 311. as they were sitting at the Table and going to the upper End thereof spake When any Bills or Messages are brought from the lower House to be presented to the upper House the Lord Keeper Towns 95. Vide Sir S. d'Ewes Jour 585. and the rest of the Lords are to rise from their Places and to go down to the Bar and there meet such as come from the lower House and from them to receive in that Place their Messages or Bills But when any answer is to be deliver'd by the Lord Keeper in the Name and behalf of the upper House Ibid. to such Knights and Burgesses as come from the lower House the said Knights and Burgesses are to receive the same standing toward the lower End of the House and the Lord Keeper is to deliver the same with his Head covered and all the Lords are to keep their Places In the Answer of the Commons House of Parliament to King James his Objection in Sir Francis Goodwyn's Case 3 Apr. 1604. Memorials ut supra 33 34. the Objection being That they refuse Conference with the Lords The Answer is in these Words Concerning our refusing Conference with the Lords there was none desired 'till after our Sentence passed and then we thought that in a Matter private to our own House which by Rules of Order might be by us revoked we might without any Imputation refuse to confer Orders and Resolves of the House taken out of the third Volume of Mr. Rush worth's Collections Part 1. 2 Apr. 1604. Id. 71. A Rule that a Question being once made and carried in the Affirmative or Negative cannot be questioned again but must stand as a Judgment of the House the Case of Sir Francis Goodwyn and Sir John Fortescue See at the End of the House of Commons Proceedings about the Aylesbur-men 9 Nov. 1640. Id. 38. Ordered that the general Order for those that are double returned shall not bind Mr. now extra Regnum 10 Nov. 1640. Id. 41. Declared in the House that at the naming a Committee if any Man rise to speak about the same the Clerk ought not to write down any more Names whilst the Member standing up is speaking Ibid. Id. 42. Declared that when a Business was begun and in Debate if any Man rise to speak to a new Business any Member may but Mr. Speaker ought to interrupt him 11 Nov. 1640. Id. 44. That whosoever shall go forth of the House to a Conference in a confused manner before Mr. Speaker shall forfeit 10 s. and that the Reporters ought to go first to take their Places at Conferences 25 Nov. 1640. Id. 60. Ordered that when any Message is to go up to the Lords none shall go out of the House before the Messenger 26 Nov. 1640. Id. 61. That neither Book nor Glove may give any Man Title or Interest to any Place if they themselves be not here at Prayers 28 Nov. 1640. Id. 66. Ordered that if any one be chosen a Member of this House and his Writ not yet returned he may notwithstanding be admitted to the Sacrament to Morrow delivering a Ticket of his Name and the place for which he serves 4 Dec. 1640. Id. 83. Ordered that whosoever does not take his Place when he comes into the House or removes out of his Place to the Disturbance of the House shall pay 12 d. to be divided between the Serjeant and the Poor and whosoever speaks so loud in the House when any Bill or other Matter is reading as to
Sir Francis Popham being returned a Burgess for Chippenham by one Indenture Id. 14. and another Person returned for the same Place by another Indenture it was moved he might be admitted into the House till the Matter were determined But he was not so admitted and it was referred to the Committee for Privileges 21 Jac. 1. Id. 15. Two Indentures were return'd for Southwark the one returned Yarrow and Mingy the other Yarrow and Bromfeild Upon a Report from the Committee of Elections it was resolved That the Election and Return for Yarrow should stand good and that he should sit in the House 22 Martii Ibid. 21 Jac. 1. Sir John Jackson and Sir Thomas Beaumont were both returned for one Burgess's Place for Pontefract Ordered That the Committee take the Election into Consideration to Morrow and that in the mean Time the Parties forbear to come into the House CHAP. XXI A Session of Parliament and of Prorogations and Adjournments WHAT shall make a Session of Parliament See 1 Rol. R. 29. Hutton 61. 4 Inst 27. 1 Siderf 457. 1 Mod. Rep. 151 155. If several Bills are passed at one and the same Parliament none of them shall have Priority of the other for they are made all in one Day and Instant and each of them have relation to the first Day of the Parliament though in several Chapters and shall so be construed as if they had been all comprehended in one and the same Act of Parliament Sir W. Jones Rep. 22. Hob. 111. Bro. tit Parl. 86. and Relat. 35. Plowd 79.6 Levintz 9. Crooke says That though in Fiction of Law a Statute shall have relation to the first Day of the Parlaiment yet revera nothing is settled nor is it a perfect Statute till the Parliament is ended Jones ut sup 370. Vide cont ibid. 371. Hales Justice said That if the Parliament has several Prorogations and in the second or third Session an Act is made this shall not have relation to the Day of the Beginning of the Parliament that is to say to to the first Day of the first Session but only to the first Day of the same Session in which it is made Plowd 79.6 In a Session of Parliament though it continue never so many Weeks yet there is nothing prius aut posterius but all Things are held and taken as done at one and the same Time Rush Vol. I. Page 581. Jones in the Case of Sir John Elliot Ibid. p. 687. says We are Judges what shall be said a Session of Parliament Sed Quere de hoc The Passing of any Bill or Bills 4 Inst 27. by giving the Royal Assent thereto or the giving any Judgment in Parliament doth not make a Session but the Session doth continue till that Session be prorogued or dissolved And this is evident by many Presidents in Parliament ancient and modern 14 Ed. 3. Ibid. On the first Monday a Grant of c. being given to the King was made a Statute and pass'd both Houses and had the Royal Assent thereunto yet after this the Parliament continued and divers Acts made and Petitions granted 3 Rich. 2 Declared by Act of Parliament Ibid. That the killing of John Imperial Ambassador of Genoa was High Treason yet the Parliament continued long after and divers Acts made c. 7 Hen. 4. Ibid. An Act made for certain Strangers departing the Realm c. yet the Parliament continued till Dec. 8. Hen. 4. 1 Hen. 7. Ibid. The Attainders of such as were returned Knights Citizens and Burgesses were revers'd by Act Parliament before they could sit in the House of Commons and the Parliament continued and divers Acts made 33 Hen. 8. Ibid. At the Beginning of the Parliament the Bill of Attainder against Queen Catherine Howard passed both Houses yet the Parliament continued and divers Acts passed Though Bills passed both Houses Ibid. and the Royal Assent be given thereto there is no Session until a Prorogation or a Dissolution The Diversity between a Prorogation and an Adjournment Ibid. or Continuance of the Parliament is That by the Prorogation in open Court there is a Session and then such Bills as passed either or both Houses and had no Royal Assent to to them must at the next Assembly begin again Every several Session of Parliament is in Law a several Parliament Ibid. Hutton 61. Brook tit Parl. 86. But if it be but adjourned or continued then there is no Session and consequently all Things continue in the same State they were in before the Adjournment or Continuance The Titles of divers Acts of Parliament be 4 Inst 27. At the Session holden by Prorogation or by Adjournment and Prorogation but never by Continuance or Adjournment tantùm And the usual Form of Pleading is ad Sessionem tentam c. per Prorogationem The Adjournment or Continuance is much more beneficial for the Common-wealth 4 Inst 28. for expediting of Causes than a Prorogation The King desired the House of Commons not to make a Recess in the Easter Holidays Rush Col. 537 This Message for Non-recess was not well pleasing to the House Sir Robert Philips first resented it and took Notice That in 12 18 Jac. 1. upon the like Intimation the House resolved It was in their Power to adjourn or sit Hereafter said he this may be put upon us by Princes of less Piety Let a Committee consider hereof and of our Right herein and to make a Declaration Sir Edward Coke said The King makes a Prorogation but this House Adjourns itself The Commission of Adjournment we never read but say This House adjourns it self If the King writes to an Abbot for a Corody for a Vallet if it be ex rogatu though the Abbot yeilds to it it binds not Therefore I desire that it be entered That this be done ex Rogatu Regis And this Matter touching his Majesty's Pleasure about the Recess Rush Col. 537. was referred to a Committee and to consider the Power of the House to adjourn itself The Sovereign may adjourn the Parliament Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 318. Col. 2. as well as the Parliament adjourns itself When a Parliament is called 4 Inst 28. Hutton 61. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 407. Col. 1. and doth sit and is dissolved without any Act of Parliament passed or Judgment given it is no Session of Parliament but a Convention 18 Rich. 2. The Petitions of the Commons were answered 4 Inst 28. and a Judgment given in the King's Bench reversed but no Act passed Yet without Question it was a Session else the Judgment should not be of Force Many Times Judgments given in Parliament have been executed Ibid. the Parliament continuing before any Bill passed If divers Statutes be continued till the next Parliament Hutton 61. or next Session and there is a Parliament or Session and nothing done therein as to Continuance all the said Statutes are discontinued and gone 8 April Hakewel 180. 1604. In the last Session of the first Parliment of K.
an Information exhibited against him in the Star-Chamber by the Earl of Huntington And Order was entered as the Act of that House 43 Eliz. 601. That he ought not to be molested in that Manner 10 Feb. 4 Car. 1. Rush Col. 653. Vid. Petyt 's Miscel Parl. p. 107. Whilst the House was in Debate the Warehouse of Mr. Rolls Merchant and Member of the House then sitting in Parliament was locked up by a Pursuivant and himself called from the Committee and served with a Subpoena This gave Occasion of smart Debates in the House Id. 654. After which the Attorney General writ a Letter That the serving a Subpoena was a Mistake and prayed a favourable Interpretation Resolved That Mr. Rolls Rosh Col. 659. a Member of the House ought to have Privilege of Person and Goods 16 Feb. 5. Memorials of the Method of Proceedings in Parliament 97. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 85. Col. 1. Eliz. Robert Parker Servant to Sir William Woodhouse Knight for Norfolk being attached in London at the Suit of one Baker in Trespass had a Warrant of Privilege notwithstanding Judgment given against him for four hundred Marks 20 Febr. 18 Eliz. 1575. Ibid. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 251. Col. 1. Upon the Question and also upon Division of the House Edward Smaley Servant to Arthur Hall Esq one of the Burgesses for Grantham being arrested upon an Execution had Privilege 16 Dec. 44 Eliz. Anthony Curwen Ibid. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 680. Col. 1. Servant to William Huddleston Esq one of the Knights of Cumberland being arrested upon a Capias ad Satisfaciendum out of the Common Pleas for six Pounds Debt and forty Shillings Damages and detained in Execution a Supersedeas was awarded and he was delivered And the House awarded the Officer that arrested him should be discharged Towns Col. 326. Vid. Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 680. Col. 1 686. Col. 1. paying his Fees and that Matthews should pay them and also his own Fees and remain three Days in the Serjeant's Custody for procuring the Arrest 11 Maii 19 Jac. 1. Memorials c. p. 98. The Under-Sheriff of Middlesex was called to the Bar for causing Alexander Melling Servant to the Chancellor of the Dutchy to be arrested He denied he knew him to be his Servant Mr. Speaker let him know the House had ordered him to have Privilege and therefore ordereth the Under-Sheriff to discharge him 1 Jac. 1. Sess 2. Ibid. Sir Edward Sandys moveth a Breach of Privilege by Sir Robert Leigh a Justice of the Peace for committing his Coach-Man to Newgate Sir Robert Leigh was sent for by the Serjeant and an Habeas Corpus for the Prisoner Sir Robert Leigh being brought to the Bar acknowledged his Fault and was discharged and so was the Prisoner 3 Martii Ibid. 1606. Valentine Syre Servant and Bag-Bearer to the Clerk of the Commons House being arrested upon an Execution was by Order and Judgment of the House enlarged 7 Sept. 1601. Id. 99. Vid. Towns Col. 196 206 210 Vide Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 629. Col. 1. Woodal Servant of William Cook Esq a Member of the House being arrested and in Prison in Newgate the Serjeant at Arms was presently sent to Newgate to bring him to the House sedente Curiâ And being brought to the Bar with his Keeper was discharged from his said Keeper and from his Imprisonment 1 Julii Memorials 99. 1607. John Pasmore the Marshal's Man being sent for and brought to the Bar for arresting John Jessop Waterman Servant to Sir Henry Nevil a Member of the House He denied that he knew he was Sir Henry's Servant until afterward notwithstanding he took an Assumpsit from him to answer the Action The House thought fit to commit him to the Serjeant till the House's Pleasure were further known and till he had discharged the Assumpsit and paid the Fees 17 Junii 1609. Ibid. Upon a Report from the Committee for Privileges That a menial Servant of Sir Robert Wroth was arrested eight Days before this Session the Serjeant was sent for the Prisoner and the Serjeant that made the Arrest one King who followed it and Fisher at whose Suit he was arrested 4 Junii 19 Jac. 1. Johnson Id. 100. a Servant to Sir James Whitlock a Member of the Commons House was arrested upon an Execution by Moor and Lock who being told That Sir James Whitlock was a Parliament Man Fulk one of the Prosecutors said He had known greater Men's Men than Sir James Whitlock 's taken from their Masters Heels in Parliament Time This appearing Lock and Moor were called in to the Bar and by the Judgment of the House were sentenced First That at the Bar they should ask Forgiveness the of House and of Sir James Whitlock on their Knees Petyt 's Miscel Parl. 118. Secondly That they should both ride upon one Horse bare-back'd Back to Back from Westminster to the Exchange with Papers on their Breasts and this Inscription For arresting a Servant of a Member of the Commons House of Parliament And this to be presently done sedente Curiâ Which Judgment was pronounced by Mr. Speaker against them at the Bar upon their Knees 28 Apr. 22 Jac. 1. Memorials 100. A Warrant was ordered to be issued by the Speaker for a Writ of Privilege to bring up Andrew Bates Servant to Mr. Richard Godfrey of the House in Execution with the Sheriff of Kent at the Suit of one Hunt This Privilege doth take Place by Force of the Election and that before the Return be made as appears in the Case following 19 Nov. 1601. Id. 107 108. Vide Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 642. Col. 2. 643. Col. 1. Vid. Petyt Miscel Parl. 119. Upon Information to the House that one Roger Boston Servant to Lanckton Baron of Walton who upon credible Report of divers Members of the House was affirm'd to be chosen a Burgess for the Borrough of Newton in Lancashire but not yet return'd by the Clerk of the Crown had been during that Session of Parliament arrested in London at the Suit of one Muscle the said Muscle together with the Officer that made the Arrest were sent for by the Serjeant and brought to the Bar and there charged by Mr. Speaker in the Name of the whole House with their Offence herein And having been heard Boston was ordered to have Privilege and to be discharged of his Arrest and Imprisonment and the Offenders for three Days committed to the Serjeant and ordered to pay such Charges to Boston as the Speaker shall set down and their Fees 6 Martii 1586. Memorials p. 108 109. Sir Simon d'Ewe's Jour 410. Col. 1.414 Col. 2. This Day William White brought to the Bar for arresting Mr. Martin a Member of the House made Answer That the Arrest was made above fourteen Days before the Beginning of the Parliament The House thereupon appointed a Committee to search the Precedents And March 11. the Committee made their Report of Mr Martin a Member of this House arrested upon mean
of 7 H. 4. which prescribes the Manner of the Election of Knights and Burgesses it is Enacted That the Election shall be by Indenture between the Sheriff and the Freeholders and that the Indenture shall be the Return of the Sheriff It was also said That the Precedents do warrant this Judgment viz. 1. One Precedent of 39 H. 6. where a Person outlawed was adjudged a sufficient Member of Parliament Another 1 Eliz. and at that Time one Gargrave who was a Man learned in the Law was Speaker and of the Queen's Council 2. Another was the Case of one Fludd in the 23d of the Queen who being outlawed was adjudged That he should be privileged by Parliament and at that Time the Lord Chief Justice Popham was Speaker And 3. In the 35th of Elizabeth there were three Precedents scil one of Fitz-Herbert another of one Killegrew being outlawed in fifty two Outlawries and the third of Sir Walter Harecourt being outlawed in eighteen Outlawries But after this Sentence and Judgment of the Parliament the King's Highness was displeased with it because the second Writ emanavit by his Assent and by the Advice of his Council And therefore it was moved to the Judges in the Upper-House Note Whether a Person outlawed could be a Member of Parliament who gave their Opinions that he could not And they all except Williams agreed That the Pardon without a Scire facias did not help him but that he was outlawed to that Purpose as if no Pardon had been granted And upon this the Lords sent to the Lower-House desiring a Conference with them concerning this Matter which Conference the Lower-House after some Deliberation denied for these Reasons 1. Because they had given their Judgment before and therefore they could not have Conference de re Judicata as in like Manner they did 27 Queen Eliz. upon a Bill that came from the Lords and was rejected by Sentence upon the first Reading Sir Walter Mildmay being then of the Privy Council and of the House 2. Because they ought not to give any Accompt of their Actions to any other Person but to the King himself This Answer the Lords did ill resent and therefore refused Conference in other Matters concerning Wards and Respite of Homages and Purveyors and also they sent to the King to inform him of it But before their Messengers came to the King two of the Privy Council scilicet Sir John Stanhope and Sir John Herbert were sent to the King by the Lower-House to inform him that they had heard that his Grace was displeased with the House for their Sentence given for Sir Francis Goodwyn as well as in the Matter of the Sentence which was as they heard said to be against Law as also for the Manner of their Proceedings being done hastily without Calling to it either Sir John Fortescue or his Council or without making his Grace acquainted with it And therefore they desired his Grace to understand the Truth of this Matter and also told him That they were ready with his good Leave with their Speaker to attend his Majesty to give him Satisfaction about their Proceedings But the King told them they came too late and that it ought to have been done sooner calling the House Rash and Inconsiderate But yet notwithstanding he was content to hear their Speaker in the Morning at Eight of the Clock Upon this Message Committees were chosen to consider of the Things and Matters aforesaid which should be delivered to the King in Satisfaction of the Sentence given by the House which afterwards were considered of and digested by the Speaker and Committees in three Points viz. 1. In the Reasons and Motives of their Resolutions 2. In the Precedents which were those I before have reported 3. And in Matters of Law Which were those Matters of Law also before reported by me with another Addition That in the Time of Henry the Sixth the Speaker of the Parliament was arrested in Execution at the Suit of the Duke of York and the Question being put to the Judges at that Time See Bohun's Col. p. 277. Whether the Speaker ought to have his Privilege it was said by them That they were Judges of the Law and not Judges of Parliament The Reasons and Motives were the free Election of the County the Request of one of the House the double Return of the Sheriff with a Commemoration of the Length of the Time since the Outlawries and with that the Payment of the Debts To this Report the King answered That he now ought to change his Tune which he used in his first Oration scilicet Thanksgiving to Grief and Reproof But he said That it was as necessary they should be reproved as congratulated and therefore he cited a parcel of Scriptures wherein God had so done with his People Israel nay with King David the People whom he tendered as the Apple of his Eye and David who was a Man after his own Heart He said It seems antiently to be a Privy Counsellor was incompatible with being a Member of Parliament or Publick Counsellor That since Sir Francis Goodwyn was received by the House upon Reasons and Motives inducing the House thereunto so the King upon Reason too took Consideration of Sir John Fortescue being one of the Council an ancient Counsellor a Counsellor not chosen by the King but by his Predecessors and so he found him and therefore he endeavoured to grace him being the only Man of them that had been disgraced the King protesting that he would not for any Thing in the World offer unjustly any Disgrace to any Man in the Nation Besides he did not proceed rashly as they had proceeded but upon Deliberation with double Advice as well with that of his Council as with that of his Judges And in his answering the Precedents Quere If the King himself was not here too over weening he said That those were his own proper Records and to use them against himself was over-great Weenings But in Precedents he said that they ought to respect Times and Persons and therefore said That Henry the Sixth's Time was troublesome he himself Weak and Impotent And as for the other Precedents they were in the Time of a Woman which Sex was not capable of Mature Deliberation and so he said where Infants are Kings whom he called Minors For the Law Part he referred to the Answer of his Judges who by the Lord Chief Justice gave these Resolutions They all unanimously agreeing in them 1. That the King alone and not the Parliament House had to do with the Returns of the Members of Parliament for from him the Writs issued and to him the Sheriff is commanded to make his Returns but when a Man is returned and sworn the Parliament-House hath to do with him and the Sheriff ought to Return the Outlawry if he knew it before his Return 2. They resolved clearly Thatan outlawed Person cannot by the Law be a Member of the Parliament-House but for that Cause