Selected quad for the lemma: judgement_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
judgement_n	case_n	court_n	reverse_v	2,041	5	12.2818	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34802	Lex custumaria, or, A treatise of copy-hold estates in respect of the lord, copy-holder wherein the nature of customs in general, and of particular customs, grants and surrenders, and their constructions and expositions in reference to the thing granted or surrendred, and the uses or limitations of estates are clearly illustrated : admittances, presentments, fines and forfeitures are fully handled, and many quaeries and difficulties by late resolution setled : leases, licences, extinquishments of copy-hold estates, and what statutes extend to copy-hold estates are explained : and also of actions by lord or tenant, and the manner of declaring and pleading, either generally or as to particular customs, with tryal and evidence holder may recieve relief in the Court of Chancery : to which are annexed presidents of conveyances respecting copy-holds, releases, surrenders, grants presentmets, and the like : as also presidents of court rolls, surrenders, admittances, presentments, &c. / by S.C., Barister at Law.	Carter, Samuel, barrister at law.	1696 (1696)	Wing C665; ESTC R4622	239,406	434

per quod quer ' communiam suam predict pro averiis suis c. in tam amplo beneficiali modo prout antea habuit c. habere non potuit This is a good Declaration though the Commoner cannot have any Damage for the taking and carrying away the Turffs yet the coming on the Land with Horse and Carts is a prejudice to the Common and the per quod the Common is impaired is the cause of Action and the carrying away a means to impair it 1 Rolls Abr. 89. Terry and Goodier and good tho' Damages were entire Action shall be brought in a Copy-holder Lunaticks name for though the custody of the Land was granted to one by the Lord yet no Interest was gained by this commitment and the Lord hath not power over the Lunaticks Lands without a Custom Hobart p. 215 216. Cox and Darson Trespass Quare clausum fregit Copy-holder of Under-Wood without the Soil shall have Trespass Quare clausum fregit Moor n. 480. Account for Profits Account lies not for an Heir Copy-holder for the Profits of his Copy-hold Lands taken during his non-Age where the Defendant hath not entred and taken the Profits as Prochein Amy but claims by Custom and Grant of the Lord to the Use of the Assignee which Custom is good 1 Leon. p. 226. n. 356. Anonymus Faux Judgment Writ of faux Judgment lies not for a Copy-holder Vide supra Writ of Right Close Writ of Right Close lies not for a Copy-holder 4 Rep. 21. Avowry for Rent by Lessee of a Copy-holder Lessee for years of a Manor distrains a Copy-holder for Rent he Replevins Lessee Avows Per Curiam Avowry may be made for the Rent of a Copy-holder in the Kings-Bench and there is difference between an Ejectione Firmae and this Case For the Ejectione Firmae is brought for the Copy-hold it self But this Avowry is for Rent due to the Lord which is a duty at the Common Law and therefore an Avowry may well be for it Cro. El. p. 524. Laughter and Humphry A Copy-holder in Fee by Licence made a Lease for 21 years by Indenture rendring Rent Covenant by Assignee of a Reversion wherein the Lessee Covenants for himself his Executors and Assigns That he will erect a c. The Lessor surrendred to the Use of the Plaintiff and his Heirs who was admitted accordingly and the Plaintiff as Assignee brings his Action of Covenant Whether the Assignee may maintain this Action by the Common Law or by the Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 34. was the Question for the Defendant demurred upon the Declaration it was adjourned in Cro. Car. 24. Plat and Plummer But it seems by 1 Keb. 356. Baker and Berisford's Case That the Assignee is not within this Statute to have a Covenant Action of Debt doth not lye for Arrearages of Copy Rents for the Stat. of 32 H. 8. Action of Debt for Rent does not extend to them but to Rents out of Free Land Yelv. p. 135. Appleton and Doily And so Executors shall not have Debt for Arreages of such Rents due in the Life-time of the Testator The Lord of a Manor is and Fines No Remedy for Fines Rents c. after vendition for Admittances and Copy-hold Rents are Arrear and then he sells the Manor he is without Remedy both in Law and Equity He hath deprived himself of the Remedy by his own act viz. the vendition 1 Rolls Abr. 374. Serjeant Hitcham and Finch Copy-holder for Life becomes Lunatick A. Action of Trover to be brought in the Lunaticks name he being a Copy-holder sows the Land The Lord grants the custody of the Lunatick to B. A. takes the Corn to the Use of the Lunatick B. Brought Trover in his own name it s ill brought It ought to be brought in the Lunaticks name and not in the name of the Committee Noy p. 27. Cox and Dawson Covenant by Rent Custom is when a Copy-holder dies seized of Copy-hold Lands or Rent That his Wife shall have the one moiety and his Issues the other moiety A. B. so seized takes Mary to Wife and they have Issue John A. B. dies so that Mary is seized of the moiety for her Life and John of the other moiety in Fee and of the first moiety as his Reversion Mary and John her Son make a Lease to J. B. for twenty one years rendring fifty pounds Rent to Mary and fifty pounds to John and after the death of Mary one hundred pounds to John John marries Margaret they have Issue three Sons John dies so that a fourth part comes to his Wife and the other fourth part to his three Sons Rent is behind Margaret brought Debt on Covenant for the Rent Per Curiam it was well brought by her sole Joynder in Action without joyning Mary with her Tenant in Commonn shall joyn in Action so long as the privity of Contract remains but when the privity is determined as it is here they may sever and such Contract shall ensue the nature of the Land and also there is a vesting by Custom and express several Reservations 2 Siderfin p. 9. Baker and Berisford CAP. XXX Of Copy-holders being Impleaded and Impleadable in the Lords Court Vide supra Tit. Customs COpy-hold Lands are as the Demesns of the Manor and are the Lords Freehold and therefore are not impleadable but in the Lords Court Croke Jac. 559. Pymmock and Hilder One recovered certain Copyhold Lands in the Court of the Lord of the Manor by Plaint in the nature of a Writ of Right A Precept cannot be made and awarded out of the Court to execute the said Recovery Posse Manerij and to put him who recovered into possession with the Posse Manerij for force in such cases is not justifiable but by command out of the Kings Courts 3 Leon. 99. A Woman recovered Dower of a Copy-hold within the Manor and 40 l. Damages 40 l. Damages recovered yet no Execution or remedy but by Petition and she brought Debt for the Damages in B.R. Per Cur. it lyes not because the Court Baron cannot hold Plea nor award Execution of 40 l. Damages though the Damages were there well assessed and because no Writ of Error or Faux Judgment lyes upon such a Recovery of a Copy-hold but only a Petition to the Lord of a Manor so that Copy-hold Plaints are not within the Jurisdiction of this Court of Kings-Bench Moor n. 559. Shaw and Tompson If an erroneous Judgment be given in a Copy-hold Court of a common Lord in an Action in nature of a Formedon a Bill may be exhibited in Chancery Faux Judgment how relieved in nature of a Faux Judgment to reverse this Pateshall's Case in Scaccario 1 Rolls Abr. 373. and Co. on Lit. p. 60. a. He cannot have the Kings Writ of false Judgment in respect of the baseness of the Estate and Tenure being in the Eye of the Law but a

Tnant at Will and the Freehold being in another But he may have a Petition to the Lord in the nature of a Faux Judgment and therein assign Errors and have Remedy according to Law 4 Rep. 21. Brown's Case Fenner said he had seen a Record 36 H. 8. where the Lord by Petition to him had for certain Errors in the Proceedings reversed such Judgment given in his own Court Now real Pleints are in the Lords Court are in this Form A. de B. queritur versus C. de D. de placito terrae videlicet de uno Messuagio quadraginta Acris terrae c. cum pertin fecit protestationem sequi querelam istam in natura Brevis Domini Regis Assisae mortis Antecessoris ad communem Legem vel Brevis Domini Regis Assisae novae disseisinae ad communem Legem aut in natura Brevis de forma donationis in discendere ad communem Legem and so in the nature of any other Writ c. plegii de prosequendo F. G. c. CAP. XXXI Declaration of for and concerning Copy-hold Lands and Presidents IN Ejectione Firmae it was doubted by the Court whether the Plaintiff in his Declaration ought to set forth the Custom of the Manor That the Copy-holder may Lease c. and then to shew that the Lease is warranted by the Custom Whether in Ejectment the Plaintiff need to shew that the Lease was warranted by the Custom in 1 Anderson Rep. Ewer and Astwick But it is fully resolved and agreed in Rumney and Eves's Case 1 Leon p. 100. That the Plaintiff ought not to shew that the Lease is warranted by the Custom but that shall come of the other side This was Pasch 30 El. B. R. But in Hill 38 El. Cro. p. 469. Wells and Partridge it was doubted because otherwise being a general Court it shall be intended of a Lease at Common Law which a Copy-holder cannot make as if the Heir in Burrough English brings a Mordancestor he ought to shew the Custom in his Count and declare according thereunto This was the Opinion of Anderson in the Case and in Moor n. 927. Gregory and Harrison It is said to be resolved an Ejectione Firmae doth not lye of a Copy-hold if the Plaintiff doth not declare the Custom Lease and Ejectment but the Practice now is otherwise Upon Agreement Whereas W. was seized of Copy-hold Lands That he should surrender the same to the Use of Elkin and that he was to give him for the same 560 l. and if he sold the same over the Plaintiff to have the moiety of what he sold over and above It is said in the Declaration Declaration must be That he is seized in Dom. suam ut de feodo secundum c. and also may shew that they are customary Lands he was seized in Dominico ut de feodo secundum consuetudinem manerij and he doth not shew the same was customary Land Per Cur. he ought to shew it but he need not shew that he was admitted 3 Bulstr 230. Elkins and Wastel Declaration sur Assumpsit to make a Surrender of Copy-hold Land Placita gen spec p. 16. Declaration in Case for a Copy-holder for cutting down Trees upon his customary Tenements Brownl 252. Def. seisitus de terris custumar vendidit querentur statum suum inde ac omnia bona as●umpsit causare statum fieri quer in terris deliberare bona Rast Ent. 7. Nar pro tenen customar versus Dom Maner qui succidit arbores suꝑ Tenementa custumar per quod quer non habet suffeciens forale sepimentur maremium ꝑro reparatione secundum consuetud Manerij Hern 216 or 226. 1 Brown 252. Pro ten custumar versus un Tanner de Tanpi●s erect propre rivulum decurren ad Messuagium querentis per quod aqua corrumpitur Hern 254. Ad exheredand quer de Tenementis custumar impediend ipsum de Administratione bonor ei committend Co. Entr. 29. Pro ten custumar molendini versus occupationem tenementorum qu● per consuetur debe● molare grana ad dict' molend Hern 83. Narrat in Action sur Case per Copyhold que fuit le Tenant pur 3 vies successive des terres d'un Manor deins quel fuit un Custome habere successive c. un auter Custome que prima persona in copiis rotulorum ejusdem Manerij nominata poet surrender in manus Dom al son proper use al use des deux auters nominand Le Def. in consideratione quod le Plaintiff pro 12 d. in manibus 50 quarter de brasis illi deliberand assumpsit sursum reddere ad usu ipsius duor alior ex nominatione Def. procurare cur assumpsit promisit apparere apud Curiam accipere statum ad usum ipsius 2 aliorum deliberare les 50 quartur brasii pred Winch. Ent. 65. Narratur per Copyhold qui fuit Tenant pur 3 vies successive des terres tenus d'un Manor deins quel fuit un Custome habere successive c. un auter Custome que prima persona in Copiis rotulorum ejudem manerij nominat poec surrender in manus Dom al son proper use al use deux auters per ipsum nominand Le Def. in consideratione que pro 12 d. in manibus 50 quarters de Malt a luy deliberand ad assume a Surrender al use de luy mesme 2 auters nominatione Def. procurare curiam assumpsit promisit d'appearer al Court d'accepter del Estate a luy les deux auters pur deliver les 50 quarters de Melt venditur Winch Entr. p. 65. Chambers and Turner Cond del obliḡ a Surrender un Copyhold Estate al use del●quer al proche in Court Bar quod Def. al Court tenus tiel jour surrendroit accordant al effect del condicon Winch. Entr. 241 222. demur general al bar Eldre Ll'uelling CAP. XXXII Of Pleadings The general Rules of Pleading as to Copy-hold Estates Of Pleading Customs and Prescriptions and the different Forms Pleading in reference to Common and when to be pleaded by way of Custom or by way of Prescription The manner of Pleading when a Lease is to be answered which is set forth in the Avowry Where in Pleading the Commencement of the Estate must be shewn and by whom granted or not How a Licence must be pleaded by the Lessee Prescription for Copy-holders to be discharged of Tythes How to be pleaded Of Traverses when and where to be taken Forms of Pleading of Surrenders Admittances Forms of Pleading Estates in Fee Tayl for Lives or Years Pleading of Presentments Grants Pleadings in respect of Commons Trees Ways Inclosures Forfeiture and all other Pleadings necessary for the Copy-holder to set forth his Title or to defend it Pleadings General Rules of Pleading as to Copy-hold Estates EVery Admittance of an Heir upon a Descent amounts in Law to a Grant and after Admittance the Heir may in Pleading

surrendred all the three Lives and though it was not a Copy-hold in Fee yet it was decreed That the Agreement should be performed and that the Defendant do Surrender to the Plaintiffs Use and an Injunction for quiet enjoyment A Woman Copy-holder for Life took an Husband and the Reversion of the said Copy-hold was granted to three viz. A. B. C. cum acciderit by Surrender or Forfeiture for their Lives successive according to the Custom The Husband doth Surrender to the Use of A. for Life to whom the Lord doth grant a Copy accordingly A. and B. dye and the Opinion of the Court was That C. hath no right to be admitted by the Law nor in Conscience for that after the death of the Husband the Wife may enter and have a Plaint in nature of a Cui in vita contradicere non potest and during the Husbands Life the Lord may have it in the nature of an Occupancy But the Case did proceed farther viz. That the Husband and Wife were willing to release all the Right of the Wife to the surviving Reversioner The Lord Decreed to hold a Court. and the Lord would not receive it nor hold a Court But it was decreed That the Lord should hold his Court and accept their Conveyance or else avoid the Possession thereof Dyer 246. a. Copy-hold Estate in some cases not to be passed but by Decree Where the Lord grants the Reversion of the Copy-holds the Tenant cannot Surrender there being no Dominus servitiorum as the Custom will warrant and he cannot pass his Estate any way but by a Decree in Chancery and this will bind the person only 4 Rep. p. 25. in Murrel's Case vide supra Fines and Rents arrear not relieved after Sale of the Manor Copy-hold Tenant in Fee surrenders to the Use of one for Life Remainder to B. in Fee Tenant for Life dies and B. pays no Fine for his Admittance but after dies and this descends to his Son and after his Son surrenders to the Use of J. S. in Fee and no Fine paid for it and also the Rents for divers years are behind and after the Lord grants the Manor in Fee to J. B. and after sues in a Court of Equity for the Fines and Rents due before the Sale of the Manor and alledgeth in his Bill That the Copy-holder had Free Land intermixed with the Copy-hold Land so that he could not know where to Distrain for it yet he shall not be relieved in Equity for this for it is against a Maxim in Law for as much as by his own Act he had destroyed his Remedy P. 10 Car. B. R. Serjeant Hicham Plaintiff and Finch and Block Defendants and a Prohibition was granted to the Court of Requests where the Suit was Gold versus Dore Martis 23. Oct. 2 Jac. The Plaintiff delivered to the Defendant an 100 l. to buy a Copy-hold in the Defendants Name but to the Plaintiffs Use because there were differences between the Lord of the Manor and the Plaintiff so as the Plaintiff had no hopes to prevail for himself and when the Copy-hold should be obtained then the Trust was That the Defendant should Surrender the same to the Use of the Plaintiff The Defendant accordingly bought the Copy-hold Trustee refusing to surrender according to his Trust not relieved and took it in his own name and his Childrens but afterwards would not surrender it to the Use of the Plaintiff notwithstanding the same was bought with the Plaintiffs mony for this the Plaintiff Exhibited his Bill in Chancery and this appearing to be the true state of the Case my Lord would not relieve the Plaintiff because he said he would never ground a Decree upon a Lye a Falsity it appearing to him that this packing was used to thrust a Tenant upon the Lord whom he liked not and so dismist the Cause Tracy versus Noel M. 2 Jac. Copy-holder in Fee takes a Lease the Manor is sold Copy-holder not relieved though the Purchaser had notice A Copy-holder of Inheritance took a Lease for years of his Copy-hold from the Lord of the Manor the Lord sold his Manor to J. S. who had notice of this Copy-hold of Inheritance yet would not this Court relieve the Copy-holder his Lease being ended for by Law his Copy-hold Estate is determined Robes Purchased the Inheritance of a Copy-hold in the Name of B. and another in Trust B. surrendred his moiety to the Use of his own Son and the other died seized The Son of B. and the Heir of the other for mony sold the Copy-hold to C. for 50 l. being of the value of 80 l. Robes sued the Son of B. and the Heir of the other and C. in Chancery for the 80 l. It was decreed That A. should recover this 50 l. only from B. and the Heir of the other No Recompence for the over-value of an Estate because no Fraud and C. should be discharged of it and hold it in peace But if notice had been proved in C. Robes shall have the Land and no recompence for the over-value was given against the Vendors because no Fraud Moor Rep. n. 745. Kobes Bent and Cock's Case Copy-hold devised without Surrender executed by Decree in Chancery A Copy-hold devised without Surrender it cannot be executed in point of Interest but only by Decree in Chancery by a Concessum in 2 Keb. 837. Harrison's Case A Copy-hold granted out of a Manor confirmed Court Rolls produced A Copy-hold granted at a Court kept out of the Manor confirmed against the Lord who made it Tothil 107. Mark contra Suliard In Corbet and Peshal's Case 12 Jac. it was Ordered That Court Rolls should be brought and shewed to Councel to shew which is Copy-hold and which is Free-hold Composition Decreed Sterling's Case a Composition formerly made between Lords and Tenants Decreed to bind a Purchasor or an Heir 9 Car. Bill in Chancery to reverse a Faux Judgment in the Lords Court If an erroneous Judgment be given in a Copy-hold Court of a common Lord in a Formedon a Bill may be exhibited in Chancery in nature of a Faux Judgment to reverse it Pateshull's Case in Scaccario 1 Rolls Abridgment 373. Admission by Letter of Attorny Copy-holder ought not to be admitted to a Copy-hold Estate by Letter of Attorny for he ought to do Fealty at the time of his Admittance which must be done in person 21 Car. 2. Flyer and Hedgingham Fines certain or not having been tryed at Law no farther Relief here Smith contra Sallet 24 Car. 2. Fines of Copy-holders whether certain or arbitrary it having been tryed at Law and in two Tryals Verdict for Fines certain This Court would not relieve the Plaintiff other than for the preservation of Witnesses and so dismist the Plaintiffs Bill it being to have an Issue directed to try whether certain or not Morgan versus Scudamore 29 Car. 2. The Lord limitted to a

of Fines the Plaintiff shewed divers Court Rolls of Admittances upon Surrenders and that the Fines taken by the Lord were not certain but sometimes one sometimes another Per Curiam To prove a Custom for uncertainty of Fines and not to be certain two years Rent there ought to be shewed Court Rolls Fines upon Discent and Purchase and that in Cases of Descents and that upon such Admittances they used to pay two years Rent the proof ought to be in case of Descents for in case of a Surrender or Purchase the Lord may take what Fine he will But such Fines are no proof to prove the taking uncertain Fines by the Custom but the same ought to be in cases of Descents Of Fines reasonable Excessive Fines how to be determined But where the Fines are uncertain yet the Lord cannot exact excessive Fines and if the Copy-holder deny to pay it it shall be determined by the Opinion of the Judges before whom the matter depends Hubbard and Hamon's Case cited 1 Brownl 186.4 Rep. 27. mesme Case Co. Lit. 59 60. To this purpose is Denny and Lemon's Case Hobart p. 135. Copy-holder brought Trespass against his Lord. Defendant pleads he had admitted the Copy-holder and had assessed a Fine of twenty Nobles and had appointed him to pay it to his Bayliff at his House within the Manor three Months after and alledged he had not paid it The Plaintiff demurs Whether in pleading the reasonableness of the Fine must be averred for that the Lord had not averred the Fine was reasonable But Per Cur. the Lord is not bound to aver it but it must come on the Copy-holders side to shew the circumstances of the Case to make it appear to the Court to be unreasonable and so to put it upon the Judgment of the Court for the Fine in Law is arbitrary and is due to the Lord of common Right and it is only in point of excuse to the Tenant if it be unreasonable and the Court shall judge the unreasonableness of it The Copy-holder if he be Defendant may plead not Guilty and then it shall come in Evidence whether the Fine were reasonable or not and so is the Opinion of my Lord Coke Comment upon Lit. Sect. 74. The reasonableness saith he shall be discussed by the Justices upon the true circumstances of the case appearing unto them and if the Court where the Cause dependeth adjudgeth the Fine exacted unreasonable then is not the Copy-holder compellable to pay it for all excessiveness is abhorred in the Law It was argued in Wheeler and Honor's Case That all Fines are reasonable unless the contrary appear 1 Keb. 154. What Customs are good as to payment of Fines Of Fines due by the Copy-holder to the Lord some be by change or alteration of the Lord and some by change or alteration of the Tenant If the Fine be due by the alteration of the Lord such alteration must be by act of God Fines due by the alteration of the Lord. for if the Lord do alledge a Custom within his Manor to have a Fine of every one of his Copy-holders at the alteration or change of the Lord of the Manor be it by alienation demise death or otherwise this Custom is against the Law as to the change of the Lord by the act of the Party for by that means the Copy-holders should be oppressed by the multitudes of Fines by the Lords own act but when the change groweth by the act of God there the Custom is good By the act of God as by the death of the Lord Co. Lit. 59. b. Due by the alteration of the Tenant But it is a good Custom that the Copy-holder had used to pay a Fine upon every alteration of the Tenant either by the act of God or by the act of the Party Co. Lit. 59. b. Armstrong's Case The Fine is to be assessed by the Lord. The Fine by whom to be assessed But in some places the Custom is That the succeeding Copy-holder shall compound with the Lord for his Fine and if he cannot compound then the Homage of the Manor shall assess the Fine as was the Case of Ford and Hoskins Cro. Jac. 368. Custom not to pay a Fine till full Age. The Custom is not to pay a Fine till one come to Age it s a good Custom 3 Keb. 90. agreed to in Champian and Atkinson's Case Fines as to Admittances to Reversions or Remainders Copy-holder in Fee surrenders to the Use of another for Life when Lessee dyes he shall not pay a Fine for his Admittance to the Reversion for this continues always in him 2 Rep. 107. Margaret Podger's Case If Copy-holder in Fee surrender to the Use of one for Life the Remainder to another for Life the Remainder to another in Fee there is but one Fine due for the particular Estate and the Remainders are but one Estate 1 Rolls Abr. 505. What refusal to pay a Fine shall be a Forfeiture or not If the Fine be uncertain Notice to be given if the Fines be uncertain notice must be given before there be a Forfeiture aliter if the Fine be certain but yet Denny and Lemon's Case is good Law Time and place must be ascertained and refusal must be proved 1 Keb. 154. 4 Rep. 27 28. The Lord assesseth a Fine of 12 l. to be paid by a Copy-holder Tendring the Fine certain though not the Fine assess'd is no forfeiture and appoints it to be paid at his Capital Messuage of the Manor three Months after and the Copy-holder pretending the Fine to be certain viz. two years Quit-Rent offered at the day of assessing the Fine according to the Rent for two years but at the day appointed for the payment thereof cometh not thither to excuse his non-payment nor makes any other refusal Per Cur. this is in Law a forfeiture of his Copy-hold but if he had come at the day assigned him for the payment and had then tendred the two years Quit-Rent being the Fine certain though not the Fine assessed it had been no forfeiture Cro. Jac. p. 617. Gardner and Norman It is adjudged in the Case of Dalton and Hammond More n. 851. If the Fine be certain the Tenant is to bring it with him to the Court and pay it before Admittance and if he be not ready to pay it it s a Forfeiture aliter of the refusal to pay an excessive Fine Where a Copy-holder hath divers several Lands For every several Tenure several Fines severally holden by several Services by Copy there the Lord may assess and demand Fines severally for every parcel which is so severally held for the Tenant may refuse to pay a Fine for the one and so forfeit this and yet pay the Fines for the others and for every several Tenure the Lord ought to demand and assess a several Fine as in Tavernor and Cromwel's Case 4 Rep. 28. Hobart and Hamond's Case How the

Lord shall have one Action and the Copy-holder another and each one shall recover Damages according to his Interest Vide Leon. 1. 272. Copy-holder dyes Lord admits a Stranger the Heir may enter and upon a re-entry maintain Trespass without Admittance Noy p. 172. Simpson and Gillion Vide Admittance For non-Admittance no Action by Surrendree Action on the Case against the Lord lyes not for non-Admittance A Copy-holder in the Eye of the Law is but Tenant at the Lords Will and if the Lord will not hold Court he hath no remedy to compel him but by order in Chancery Cro. Jac. p. 368. Ford and Hoskins No Action on the Case by a named Successor By Surrendror Surrendror may have an Action on the Case for not admitting but not the Surrendree 2 Keb. 357. Quaere Remedy in faux Judgment The Demandant in a Pleint in nature of a real Action recovereth the Land erroneously with remedy for the party grieved for he cannot have the Kings Writ of faux Judgment in respect of the baseness of the Estate and Tenure being in the Eye of the Law but a Tenant at Will and the Freehold being in another yet he shall have Petition to the Lord in nature of a Writ of faux Judgment and therein assign Errors and have remedy according to Law Co. Lit. 60. And if there be cause the Judgment may be reversed Assise Tenant by Copy shall not have Assise against his Lord as Tenant in ancient Demesn shall have because he hath no Frank-Tenement 4 Rep. 21. but he shall be relieved in Equity Tothil p. 108. The Copy-holders Actions and Remedies against Strangers and where A man grants all the Coals and Coal-Mines within a Manor and parcel was Copy-hold for Life to J. S. Where Copy-holder shall have Trover for Coals digged out of his Copy-hold Land Lessee enters into the Copy-hold and digs a new Pit in the Copy-hold Land during the Life of the Copy-holder and takes the Coals and converts them c. And Lessee of the Coal-Mine brought Trover against the Lessor Per Curiam he may do it for when the Lessor or Lessee of the Coals or a Stranger enters and digs the Coals out of the Pits these belong to the Lessee and if any one else take the Coals he shall have Trover Jones Rep. 243. Player and Roberts Lessee of a Copy-holder for a year Ejectment shall maintain an Ejectione Firmae for in as much as his Term is warranted by Law by force of the general Custom of the Realm it is but reason if he be ejected that he shall have Ejectione Firmae and it is a speedy course for a Copy-holder to have the possession of the Land against a Stranger 4 Rep. 26. As to the Declaration in Ejectment Vide Tit. Declaration In Cro. El. p. 224. It is said to be adjudged Ejectment Per tot Cur. That an Ejectione Firmae doth not lye of a Copy-hold Estate But it was agreed That an Ejectione Firmae doth lye of a Lease made by a Copy-holder but not of a Demise made by the Lord of a Copy-hold by Copy of Court Roll Cole and Wall 's Case A Copy-holder had Licence from his Lord to let his Land for 21 years he lets it to the Plaintiff for three years who entred and being Ejected brought Ejectione Firmae Ejectment by Lessee upon a Lease not warranted good against a Stranger Per Cur. he may maintain this Action at Common Law for it is a good Lease between the Pa●●●s and against all others but the Lord and as this Case is it is good against him because it is done by his Licence and it is a good Lease and well warranted by the Licence Cro. El. 535. Goodwin and Longhurst A Copy-holder made a Lease for one year excepting one day which was warranted by the Custom Lessee being ousted by a Stranger brings Ejectione Firmae it well lyes and if there were not any Custom yet it shall be good against all but him who had the Inheritance and Freehold So if a Lessee for Will at the Common Law had made a Lease for years for the Tenant at Will is only a Disseisor and the Lease is good against him Cro. Trin. 41 El. p. 676. Spark's Case So 717. Erish's Case Moor n. 709. Stoner and Gibson Ejectment by the Heir without Admittance to presentment If customary Lands do descend to the younger Son by Custom and he enters and leaseth to another who takes the Profits and after is Ejected he shall have an Ejectione Firmae without any Admittance of his Lessor or Presentment that he is Heir 1 Leon. p. 100. Rumny and Eves n. 128. If a Copy-holder had Common by Prescription in the Waste of the Lord and the Lord stores the Waste with Conies every Copy-holder may have Action on the Case against the Lord averring That by this the Common is impaired 1 Rolls Abr. 106. Clayton and Sir Jerom Horsey Trespass for Beasts depasturing his Common by every Commoner Copy-holder prescribes to have Common in the Waste of the Lord and brings Trespass on the Case against a Stranger for his Beasts depasturing on the Common there The Question was whether this Action lyes for 15 H. 7.12 it s agreed a Commoner cannot maintain an Action of Trespass nor no other but the Owner of the Soyl 12 H. 8.2 And the Commoner hath no right till he hath taken it by the mouth of his Beasts and the Damage is to the Tenant of the Land and then every other Commoner may have Action of Trespass and so the Stranger shall be infinitely punishable Per Coke If a Commoner may distrain Damage feasant doing Damage which proves lie hath wrong then by the same reason if the Beasts are gone before his coming he may have Action on the Case otherwise one that hath many Beasts may destroy the Common in a night And it s not like a Nusance for that is Publick and may be punished in a Leet But the other is private to the Commoners and cannot be punished in another course he cited one Whitehand's Case Many Copy-holders prescribe to have the Loppings and Toppings of Pollards the Lord cuts them every Copy-holder may have his Action and also Hill 5. Jac. Rot. 1427. Geo. England's Case and Warburton of the same Opinion 2 Brownl p. 146. Crogate and Morris If a Copy-holder by the Custom of a Manor had used to have Common for all his Beasts Action on the Case for digging Turffs on the Common Levant and Couchant upon his customary Tenements in a certain parcel of the Manor and a Stranger digs Turffs there and takes them away by which his Common is impaired Action on the Case lyes declaring That the Defendant digged so many Turffs there and then with his Horses and Carts Herbam tunc ibid crescen ' predict ambulando conculcando Declaration from the place aforesaid minus rite ceperit abcarriavit

be in the Tenant before Admittance and to what purposes not 155 Where there need no Admittance 154 In what cases the Lord shall be compelled to make Admittances 157 Actions Suits What Actions may be brought by the Lord 256 What Actions may be brought by the Copy-holder 256 257 258 What Actions the Copy-holder shall have against Strangers 258 Action on the Case by a Copy-holder for digging Turfs on the Common and Narr ' 261 No Actions or Remedies for Fines Rents Amerciament after Sale of the Manor 263 Of Copy-holders being impleaded and impleadable in the Lords Courts and the remedy there and how to be relieved against faux Judgment there 265 Copy-holder shall not have Assise against his Lord ibid. Copy-hold Inheritance shall not be Assets in the Heirs hands 267 Where Attornment is necessary to the passing of a Manor and where not 9 Attornment not necessary in the Grant of a Reversion of a Copy-hold Authority must be strictly persued Avowry for Rent by Lessee of a Copy-holder 262 Action must be brought in the name of a Copy-holder Lunatick and not in the name of the Committees 263 Acceptance of a Lease by the Tenant destroys the Copy-hold 225 Action on the Case lyes against the Lord for non-Admittance by the Surrendror but not by Cesty que use Chancery will compel the Lord to admit a Tenant 321 Admittance where it shall be pleaded as a Grant 271 B. Baron and Feme Custom That the Wife Feme Covert may devise good 55 Where the severance of the customary Tenants from the Manor shall not prejudice the Wife in her customary Estate 5 If the Lord enfeoff the Copy-holder this destroys the Widows Free-Bench 56 Of the transferring and assigning the Copy-hold Estate of a Bankrupts by Commissioners 251 Where and what acts of the Husband shall forfeit the Wives Estate or not 211 Copy-holds within the Statutes of Bankrupts 201 Of customary By-Laws 48 C. Original and nature of Copy-holds 1 Copy-hold created and guided by Custom 28 How a Copy Copy-holder and bare Tenant at Will differ 14 Three sorts of Copy-holders 70 Who may be said to be customary Tenants and in what respects What Evidence Copy-holders have for their Estates Copy-holders may have Sola separalis pastura in the Lords Soyl and exclude the Lord 66 Where a Copy-holder shall hold his Land charged by the Lord or the Copy-holder as to Dower Rents Charge and Statutes and how and where they shall be avoided 233 Custom The Nature of it 25 To be taken strictly and in many cases Cases Secundum vulgarem conceptum cannot extend out of the Manor 29 What is a good Custom or not and what things are required to the making a good Custom 30 How Customs ought to be certain 32 Of the reasonableness of Customs and when they are said to be unreasonable or not 33 Several Customs in several places 35 Three supporters of Copy-hold Custom 36 Of Customs enabling or disabling 36 37 Where a Custom shall be said to be pursued or not 43 Where one shall be Tenant by the Curtesie of a Copy-hold without Admittance of the Wife 86 Where Copy-hold is extinct Common is lost 62 Severance by the Lord shall not prejudice the Commoner 41 62 The nature of a Court Baron 73 Courts may be held out of the Manor by Custom and where 75 Of warning of Courts being holden at what place Relief for a Copy-holder in Chancery in many Cases where none is at Law 319 Chancery will design the bounds of Fines and of a Copy-hold but not whether parcel or not parcel 321 The Lord Decreed to hold a Court 324 Fines and Rents arrear not relieved after the Sale of the Manor 324 Composition decreed Statute 32 H. 8. cap. 7. against Champertry extends to Copy-hold 251 Copy-hold is not within Statute 31 Eliz. of Cottages 254 Copy-hold is not within the Stat. 32 H. 8. Of Entrys for Conditions broken 150 D. Demesns what 3 Dimis dimissib how to be understood Custom extends not to collateral Discents Discent of a Copy-hold Tolls not an Entry 68 Where the Heir shall be in by Discent or Purchase Copy-hold Estates how discontinued or not Surrender makes not a Discontinuance 175 176 What shall amount to a Discontinuance 69 Distress Avowry for Rent of a Copy-hold 236 Copy-holders Beasts distrainable or not for a Rent Charge 236 What shall be said a Disseisin as to Copy-hold Estates or not 255 Whether in Declaration in Ejectment the Plaintiff need to shew that the Lease was warranted by the Custom 257 Declaration by a Copy-holder That he is seised in Dominico suo ut de feodo secundum consuetud Manerii and also must shew that they are customary Lands 268 Presidents of Declarations ibid. E. Exposition of words Dimiss Dimissibile 16 Solum modo 44 Cum pertin 92 94 Ejectment brought by Copy-holder and how to declare 257 259 Emblements who shall have them upon a Ferfeiture 219 220 254 Evidence What shall be good Evidence to prove a Custom 305 Special Customs within several Limits ought to be shewed 306 Custom found 306 307 Evidence of Prescription 307 308 Where proof by Court Rolls are good Evidence 309 Copy of a Lease where good Evidence ibid. Who and what may be admitted to give Evidence Steward Court Books c. ibid. Extingushment A Copy-hold may be extinct as to the Services and remain as to the Customary Estate Copy-hold though severed from the Manor by the Lords act is not destroyed 222 Acceptance of a Lease by the Tenant destroys the Copy-hold 225 Copy-hold extinct by the Copy-holders Release to the Lord and where or how a Right to a Copy-hold shall shall be exinct by a Release 226 228 Copy-hold suspended and revived 230 231 After Escheat of a Copy-hold the Wife shall not be endowed 233 The Statute of VV. 2. that gives Elegits extends not to Copy-hold 253 F. Copy-hold Estates are within the words and intention of the Statute of Fines and non-claim 247 248 Of Copy-holder compounding for a Fine Fine on Admittance when to be paid 159 Of Fines certain 159 What Evidence shall prove the uncertainty of Fines 160 Excessive Fines how to be determined 160 What Customs are good as to payment of Fines and what not 161 Fine by whom to be Assessed 162 For every several Tenure several Fines 163 How the Lord shall recover his Fine 164 Difference as to what may pass by a Fine or be barred by a Fine at Common Law 176 Outragious Fines relieved in Chancery Forfeiture 319 Notice must be given if the Fines be uncertain before there can be a Forfeiture 198 Refusal to pay an excessive Fine no Forfeiture 198 What shall amount to a Forfeiture of a Copy-hold Estate 69 194 195 Refusal to pay Rent perform Services or Suit of Court when they shall be cause of Forfeitures 195 What words of denyal amount to a Forfeiture 197 Demand must be made of the person of a Tenant for a Fine or

by the Copy of Court Roll not Tenant by the Court Roll but Tenant by the Copy of Court Roll and he is the only Tenant in Law which holds by the Copy of any Record Deed or Charter or any other thing forasmuch as the Title or Estate of the Copy-holder is entred into the Roll whereof the Steward delivereth him a Copy thereof he is called a Copy-holder But by the Custom of Godmanchester in Huntingtonshire they pass their Estates by writing on wooden Indented Tallies 2. Originem or Commencement ad voluntatem Domini for originally he was not but a bare Tenant at Will to the Lord. Quod quis tempestive intempestive resumere possit pro voluntate sua revocare Bract. 3. Titulum his Title or Assurance secundum consuetud Manerij for the Custom of the Manor had fixed his Estate and assured the Land to him so long as he did the Services and Duties and performed the Customs of the Manor 9 Rep. Comb's Case Although a Copy-holder had not in Judgment of Law but an Estate at Will yet Custom had so establish'd and fixt his Estate that this by the Custom of the Manor is descendible and his Heirs shall Inherit it and therefore his Estate is not meerly ad voluntatem Dom. but ad voluntatem Dom. secundum consuetudinem Manerij so that the Custom of the Manor is the life and soul of Copy-hold Estates for without a Custom or if they break their Custom they are subject to the Will of the Lord. And by Custom a Copy-holder is to have his Land according to the Custom as he which had Freehold at Common Law as you may see by many Cases in 4 Rep. 21. Brown's Case Copy-hold at Common Law is but an Estate at Will but the Common Law so takes notice as to establish it by Custom that there may be a possessio fratris of it and he may have Trespass against his Lord. And as Copy-hold is created by Custom it is guided by Custom A Copy-holder doth not derive his Estate out of the Estate or Interest of the Lord only for then the Copy-hold Estate should cease When the Estate of the Lord determined but the Copy-holder is in by the Custom 4 Rep. 23. a. Yet it is but a base Estate and not look'd upon so worthy as Freehold And therefore in Indictment sur Stat. 8. H. 6. of forcible Entry for expelling one Syms from his Copy-hold The Exception to it was because disseisivit was not in the Indictment and yet it is good for though the Statute 21 Jac. 15. gives restitution of Possession to Tenants for years and Copy-holders in which there shall be an Entry or Deteiner by force yet the Statute doth not give an Indictment of forcible Entry of a Copy-hold but by Noy a Copyholder now shall have an Indictment of forcible Entry but disseisivit shall not be in it for no Jury can find that for it is impossible because a Copy-holder hath no Freehold but he shall have a Pleint in nature of an Assise against a Stranger Syms's Case Mich. 2 Car. B. R. Note This Custom goes not to Collateral things as Entries upon Condition vid. the Chapter of Collateral Incidents infra A Copy-hold as to passing Estates is in many Cases like a Will and therefore a party shall take by the Habendums in the Admittance which was no party to the Premisses Vide infra Tit. Surrender How a Copy-holder and a bare Tenant at Will differ Tenant at Will according to the Custom of the Manor may have an Estate of Inheritance but a Tenant by the course of the Common Law not so Therefore if a man seized of Lands which are not customary and lets them to another to have and to hold to him and to his Heirs at the will of the Lessor these words to the Heirs of the Lessee are void for if Lessee dyeth his Estate is absolutely determined and if his Heir enter Lessor shall have a good Action of Trespass vi armis before any Entry made by him otherwise of a Tenant according to the Custom of the Manor Fealty Tenant at Will who may be put out at the pleasure of the Lord shall not do Fealty for to what purpose were it to swear to do his Customs and Services when he hath no certain Estate but a Copy-hold Tenant shall do Fealty which proves he hath a fixed Estate so long as he observes the Customs of the Manor Coke Lit. 1.62 63. And the Copy-holder may justifie against his Lord and so cannot a Tenant at Will and he shall have the Aid of his Lord in an Action of Trespass 1 Leon. p. 4. If a Tenant at Will be Outlawed his Estate is determined but a Copy-hold is not forfeited or determined by Outlawry Littleton's Rep 234. As for Tenants by the Verge Tenants by the Verge they are but Copy-holders and have no other Evidence but by Copy of Court Roll but they are so called because when they Surrender they deliver a little Rod into the Stewards Hand the which they deliver to the Steward and he shall deliver the Rod to him that takes the Land in the name of Seisin It may be any other thing as well as a Rod according to the Custom as a single Penny a Glove c. Maxims of Copy-hold Estates 1. When there is no Custom to guide Copy-hold Estates they shall be directed by the Rules of the Common Law Vide this more Explained Maxim 3 4. 2. Copy-holders have no other Evidence concerning their Tenements but only the Copies of Court Rolls This is to be understood of Evidences of Alienation for a Copy-holder that comes in by way of Admittance may have a Release of a right by Deed and that is sufficient to extinguish the right of the Copy-hold which he that maketh the Release had Lit. Sect. 75. Coke Lit. 60. 3. When the Custom hath created Estates of Inheritance and that the Land shall be descendible then the Law shall direct the descent according to the Maxims and Rules of the Common Law as incidents to every Estate descendible therefore there shall be a possessio fratris to make the whole Blood to Inherit before a Son by the second Venter and this shall be tho' the elder dyes before Admittance but such customary Inheritances shall not have by the Law any other collateral Qualities which concern not Descents of Inheritance as other Inheritances at Common Law shall have Therefore such Copy-hold Inheritance shall not be Assets to charge the Heir nor shall the Wife be endowed nor the Husband Tenant by the Courtesie without special Custom 4 Rep. 22. b. Brown's Case 4. As well Estates as Descents shall be directed by the Rules of Law as necessary Consequents upon the Custom unless there be a special Custom in the Manor as sibi suis sibi assignatis may make an Estate of Inheritance Therefore a Surrender to the use of A. without any Limitation is but an Estate for Life

to him might have been barr'd and interrupted by non-claim so in case of forfeiture the reason of the Rule is because the Law conceives he will have that knowledge to preserve his right when he is of full Age Carter's Rep. 86. in Smith and Painton's Case It was holden in Rumny and Eve's Case Not bound during his Minority to pray Admittance 1 Leon. p. 100 Pl. 128. If a Copy-holder dyeth his Heir within Age he is not bound to come into any Court during his non-age to pray admittance or to tender his Fine An Infant who surrenders his Copy-hold Land within Age may enter at his full Age Infant Surrenders he may enter at full Age. without being put to any Suit for it A Case cited in Popham 39. in Bullock and Dibler's Case Infant Copy-holder in Fee makes a Lease for years without Licence Infant shall not forfeit by making a Lease without Licence Acceptance at full Age makes it good to Lessee rendring Rent at full Age he accepts the Rent and after outs the Lessee Lessee brings Ejectment and Judgment for Lessee Per Cur. this Lease may be affirmed by acceptance and such a Forfeiture shall not bind an Infant 8 Rep. 44. Noy 92. Of Copy-holds and Copy-holders in respect of the King and his Prerogative Per Stat. 2 Ed. 6. Cap. 8. Copy-holders shall enjoy their Estates where the King is intituled by Office though they be not found by Inquisition The Statute of Chantries gives no Copy-hold Land to the King 1 Ed. 6.14 The Estates of the Kings Copy-holders confirmed by Decree in the Exchequer or Dutchy-Chamber shall be good according to the same Decree Stat. 7 Jac. Cap. 21. A Popish Recusant shall forfeit all his Copy-hold Land 35 Eliz. Cap. 2. Whether the King shall have the Copy-hold granted in Trust for an Alien It was a Question in Car. 1. between the King and Holland whether the King shall have a Copy-hold which is granted to one in Trust for an Alien The better Opinion seems to be that he shall Styles Rep. p. 20.37 75. Vide this Case Reported in Rolls 1. Abr. 194. Tit. Alien If an Alien Amy Purchase Copy-hold in Fee in the Name of J. S. in Trust for himself and his Heirs It was a great Question and much Argued whether the King shall have the Trust of this Copy-hold but no Opinion given as to this Point But the Trust being traversed and found for the King yet Judgment was given against the King because by the Inquisition by which this Trust and matter was found J. S. who was the person trusted and who had the Estate in Fee in the Law in him Where the King hath no possion by force of the Inquisition was put out of possession of it by the Inquisition where the Alien had but the Trust and no possession and therefore admitting that the Trust should have been given to the King yet the King may not have the possession by force of this but ought to have sued to have the Trust executed in a Court of Equity The King is seized of a Manor in Fee in which is a Copy-hold demisable at Will according to the Custom of the Manor The King demised this Copy-hold to J. G. for Life King need not recite in his Grant that it is Copy-hold by Letters Patents J. G. dyes The great Question was if it be destroyed or the King may grant it again by Copy Per Cur. 1. The King need not recite in the Grant that it is Copy-hold 24 H. 8.21 2. Copy-holder for Life dyes the King may regrant That after the Estate for Life determined the King may grant this House and Land again by Copy of Court Roll It is otherwise in the Case of a common person The Rule That a Custom is an entire thing and cannot be apportioned shall not bind the King although it do bind a Common person The Kings Gifts shall be taken favourably and not extended to two intents where there is no necessity for it Kings Grants favourably construed as there is not here and we are not here to intend a collateral intent and so the Copy-hold is not destroyed for the Law takes care to preserve the Inheritance of the King for his Successors and it may be a benefit to the King to have it continue Copy-hold viz. to have Common Stiles p. 266. Cremer and Burnet If a Bishop Tenant in Tayl for Life or Years le ts a Copy-hold yet this shall not bind the Successor Issue in Tayl or him in Reversion to grant this by Copy again neither shall it bind an Infant Lord of Manor and the Estates and Possessions of the King are in like manner under the protection of the Law And if this Copy-hold should be extinguished Extinguishment perhaps a common Appendant or Appurtenant would be lost 2 Rolls Abr. p. 197. mesme Case If the King grants a Manor in which are Copy-holders in Fee-farm the Lands or Goods of the Copy-holder are not lyable to the Fee-farm Rent although the Freehold is Fee-Farm Rent because the Copy-holders are elder than the Rent being by Prescription 2 Rolls Abridgment p. 157. Loss of Issues If the Lord of a Manor lose Issues being summoned upon a Jury Process shall issue out of the Exchequer to levy them upon the Lands of the Copy-holders Lessees for Life or Years for the loss of Issues lyes upon the Land as an inherent Servitude by the Law in whose Hands soever it comes 1 Rolls Abr. 157. Surrender to the King without other matter of Record A Surrender of a Copy-hold to the King Lord of a Manor was in Lee and Boothby's Case 1 Keb. 720. adjudged good without other matter of Record All the Demesn Lands The King grants all his Demesn Lands in W. his Copy-hold Lands shall not pass Aliter in a common person 1 Rep. 46. Alton Wood's Case CAP. IV. The Nature of Custom in general Maxims of Customs What things are requisite to make a good Custom Time out of Memory Explained What shall be said to be an Interruption of Custom or not The reasonableness of Customs how to be judged of Several particular Customs Ratione Loci Of Customs enabling and disabling Of Customs and Prescriptions their difference and the different manner of Pleading them The several sorts of Prescription and how Prescription to be made and when and when not and by whom And when a Custom shall be said to be pursued or not Custom The Nature of Custom in general A Custom which hath obtained the force of a Law is always said to be Jus non scriptum for it cannot be made or created either by Charter or by Parliament which are Acts reduced to Writing and are always matter of Record But being only matter of Fact and consisting in Use and Practice it can be recorded and registred no where but in the Memory of the People For a Custom taketh beginning and

mortem sursum redditionem vel forisfacturam of the Feme and after the Husband Surrenders to the Use of B. for Life and so he is Admitted Tenant and after dyes In this Case C. shall not have this because his Estate is not to commence till after the Death Surrender or Forfeiture of the Feme and the Feme here is in Life and had not made any Surrender or Forfeiture and the Wife had right in this in the nature of a plaint de cui in vita But the Lord in this Case may retain it in his own proper hands or disposition Occupant during the Life of the Husband quasi an Occupant Dyer 9 El. 264. Sect. 38. Surrender to whom To the Wife By the Husband to the Use of the Wife is good vide supra and 4 Rep. 29. Bunting's Case for it is done by Surrender to the Lord and Admittance To the Steward A Surrender made to the Steward to the Use of the Steward is good for the Entry is quod sursum reddidit in manus Domini and the Steward is but the Lords Servant and the surrender is to the Lord and not to him Cro. El. p. 717. Erish and Rives So Infant Vide supra Of Countermand of a Surrender Where the Surrender of a Copy-hold may be Countermanded by the Party himself and what collateral Act without the assent and privity of the Party shall be a countermand and where and what not Grant by Baron and Feme shall bind the Feme notwithstanding the Coverture so Grant by non compos mentis Infant Vide supra Vide supra Where and what Grants by Lords of Manors shall be good or defeasible in respect of the Estate they had therein Surrender is not Countermanded by the death of Surrenderor before Presentment 4 Rep. 29 Bunting's Case VVhere the Customs are not pursued the surrenders are void Vide sparsim and 5 Rep. 84. Peryman's Case Surrender by Steward or Deputy Steward and of persuing their Warrants vide Steward supra What remedy to force a Trustee to Surrender A Copy-holder doth surrender to the Use of one A. in Trust In the Lord's Court. that he shall hold the Land until he hath levied certain Monies and that afterwards he shall surrender to the Use of B. The Monies are levied A. is required to make surrender to the Use of B. he refuseth B. exhibits a Bill to the Lord of the Manor against A. who upon hearing of the Cause Decrees against A. That he shall Surrender he refuseth Now the Lord may seize and admit B. to the Copy-hold for he in such case is Chancellor in his own Court Per totam Curiam 1 Leon. 2. Or relief may be had in Chancery CAP. XVI Of Presentment How and when to be made How to be pursuant to the Surrender What the Law is if Surrenderor or Cesty que use or the customary Tenants into whose Hands the Surrender was made dye before Presentment or Admittance VVhere two Surrenders are and the second Surrender is presented first Presentment No good Surrender till presented IF the Surrender be made out of Court into the Hands of the Lord himself which the general Custom will warrant or into the Hands of the Bayliff or of two Tenants of the Manor which is warrantable only by special Custom there must be a true Presentment of the Surrender in Court by the same Persons into whose Hands the Surrender was made and the Admittance of the Lord must be according to the effect and tenor of both the Surrender and Presentment It is not an effectual Surrender till it be presented in Court And therefore in an Action on the Case on Assumpsit in Consideration that the Plaintiff would surrender to the Defendant and his Heirs a Copyhold according to the Custom of the Manor Defendant assumed to pay 500 l. and for breach of this promise the Plaintiff brings the Action and had a Verdict but Judgment was arrested because the Consideration on the Plaintiffs part was not performed for the Consideration was That he should surrender the Copy-hold to the Defendant and his Heirs and he hath alledged the surrender to be into the Hands of a Copy-hold Tenant of the Manor to Use of the Defendant which is no surrender untill it be presented at the next Court and so it is uncertain whether it shall take effect or not Stiles p. 256. Shaan and Shaan The Presentment by the general Custom of Manors is to be made at the next Court day When to be be made immediately after the surrender but by special Custom at the second or third day afterwards and by Rolls in Jay's Case Stiles 275. there is no certain time but as the Custom is so that it be within the Life of the Tenant it is to be made by the same persons that took the Surrender and in points material according to the true tenor of the Surrender But if the Surrender be conditional Presentment must pursue the Surrender and the Presentment absolute the Surrender Presentment and Admittance are void except the Steward in the entry of it omits the Condition and upon sufficient proof made in Court of that the Surrender shall not be avoided but the Roll amended and this shall be no conclusion to the Party to plead or give in Evidence the truth of the matter 4 Rep. 25. Kite and Quinton But in May's Case Norf. Summer Assises 1663. The Custom of a Manor was for a Copy-holder in extremis to surrender into one Tenants Hands in the presence of credible Witnesses and a Surrender was made accordingly but presented to be done to another Tenant yet being proved to be done to a Tenant of the Manor It was holden by Wadham Windham Justice to be good Of Presentment where the Surrenderor or Surrendree Cesty que use or customary Tenants dye before Presentment or Admittance Surrenderor dyes If one Surrender out of Court and dye before Presentment if Presentment be made after his death this is good 4 Rep. 29. Bunting's Case Cesty que use dyes If Cesty que use he to whose Use the Surrender is made dyeth before Presentment yet upon Presentment made after his death his Heir shall be admitted Stiles p. 145. Barker and Denhan Surrenderor and Cesty que use both dye If one Surrender out of Court to the Use of one for Life the Surrenderor and the Lessee for Life both dye before the Presentment yet upon Presentment made he in Remainder shall be Admitted Surrendree dyes Surrendree dyes before Admittance his Heir may be Admitted and if it be Burrough-English the youngest Son 2 Siderfin 38 61. The Tenants into whose hands the Surrender was made dye If the Tenant into whose Hands the Surrender was made dye before Presentment yet upon sufficient proof made in Court That such a Surrender was made the Lord shall be compelled to admit Co. Lit. 62. Nothing passeth till presentment But nothing passeth till Presentment

Copy-holder It hath been a Question when a Copy-holder bargains and sells his Copy-hold to the Lord of a Manor in Lease for years whether the Copyhold Estate was extinguished But in Hutton p. 81. it is agreed that this Copy-hold is not extinguished but that the Lord who is Lessee for years is Dominus pro tempore and may grant it by Copy de novo The Lord of a Manor demised Copy-hold Lands to three Sisters Habend to them for their Lives successive the eldest Sister married one C. after which the Lord by Indenture leased the same Land to the eldest Sister the Remainder to the Husband Remainder to the second Sister and no Agreement was made thereunto by the second Sister by Deed before or after making the said Indenture but four days after the Lease made she agreed to it in pais and then married a Husband Agreement to an Indenture by one in Remainder for Life and they claim the Land The point is if by Agreement of the second Sister her Right to the Copy-hold were extinct The Interest of the eldest Sister is gone by her acceptance of the Estate by Indenture now if the second Sister may come and claim her customary Interest Per Cur. it s no extinguishment in the second Sister and yet Judgment was against her for Per Gaudy none can take advantage of the eldest Sister's Estate being determined the Lord against his Lease cannot enter or claim and the second Sister cannot enter during the Life of the eldest Sister for her Remainder takes effect in possession after the death of her said Sister 1 Leon. p. 73. Curtis and Cottell's Case 28 Eliz. Trin. B. R. By acceptance of a new Estate of Free-hold Baron and Feme Copy-holders to them and their Heirs the Baron in consideration of mony paid by him to the Lord obtaineth an Estate of the Freehold to him and his Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies Baron dieth having Issue the Feme enters and suffers a Recovery and his Heir enters Per Statute 11 H. 7. Per Cur. the Entry is lawful for the Copy-hold by the Acceptance of the new Estate was extinguished Cro. El. 24. Stockbridge's Case Where and how Right to a Copy-hold shall be Extinguished by Release A man makes a Surrender of his Copy-hold Land to J. S. which is not good and after J. S. is admitted he which made the Surrender releaseth to him being in possession and after enters upon him The Question was if his Entry be congeable and if by the Release by Deed the customary Right of the Copy-holder was extinct And Per Cur. it is extinct by the Release for he to whom the Release was made was Copy-holder in possession and admitted to the Tenements and therefore the Release of a customary right may enure to him and the Lord hath no prejudice for he hath received his Fine for Admittance and he to whom the Release is made is in by Title viz. by Admittance of the Lord and so this Release enures by way of extinguishment And there is great difference between transferring of an Estate and an extinguishment of a Right Diversity between the transferring of an Estate and the extinguishment of a Right But if a Copy-holder be ousted per Tort there his Release to the disseisor or other wrong doer does not transfer his Right or Bar him 1. Because there is no customary Estate upon which a Release of any customary Right may enure and then 2. It would be a prejudice to the Lord who would lose his Fines and Services Co. 4 Rep. 25. b. Kite and Queinton In Replevin bar to the Conisance That K.D. was seized of the Manor of R. in Fee and that the Tenements in which c. were customary held of the said Manor and that at such a Court a Copy was granted to the Plaintiff whereby he entred and put in his Beasts The Defendant protesting the Premisses were not customary for Plea saith That before the Plaintiffs Title J. Abbot of the Monastery of B. was seized of the Manor of R. c. and one R. T. being seized of the customary Lands in which c. in Fee at the will of the Lord the said R. surrendred to the Abbot who was possessed and occupied the said Premisses for divers years and afterwards demised the said Manor for 40 years to W. M. and then surrendred the entire Manor and Abbathy to H. 8. who granted the entire Manor to the Duke of Norfolk in Fee and he with the assent of the Termor made a Feoffment to Drury of the Manor to whom the Termor surrendred his Lease Drury dyes and it descends to his Heir who granted the Land in which c. again by Copy to Tillot for his Life who entred and put in his Beasts Demurrer The Question was if the Custom is destroyed or if Drury the Defendant may avoid his Grant by Copy Note The custumary Land was never severed from the Manor but granted with the Manor as part of it and was demisable by Copy by all the Lords of the Manor and so it remained till the 15th of Eliz. when the Defendant granted the Copy to the Plaintiff Winch Ent. 991 992. Where a Copy-hold shall be perpetually extinct or where it shall after become a Copy-hold by regrant Forfeit Escheat If a Copy-hold Estate be forfeit or escheat to the Lord or otherwise come into the Hands of the Lord if the Lord make a Lease for years or for Life or other Estate by Deed or without Deed this Land shall never after be granted again by Copy for the Custom is destroyed for that during such Estates the Land was not demised nor demisable by Copy of Court Roll So if the Lord make a Feoffment and enter for the Condition broken it shall never be granted again by Copy But if the Lord keep it in his Hands a long time or let this at will then he may re-grant it Lach p. 213. 1 Rolls Abr. 498. Downcliff and Minors So if the interruption be tortious as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor dye seized or the Land be recovered against the Lord by false Verdict or erroneous Judgment yet after the Land recovered or the judgment reversed this is grantable again by Copy Legal Interruptions But if the Land so Forfeited or Escheated before any new Grant be extended upon a Statute or Recognizance acknowledged by the Lord or the Lords Wife hath this assigned to her in a Writ of Dower though these are impediments by acts in Law yet the interruptions are lawful and the Lands may never again be granted by Copy 4 Rep. 31. Frenches Case If Copy-holder takes a Lease for years of the Manor by this his Copy-hold is destroyed but such Lessee may re-grant the Copy-hold again to whom he will for the Land was always demised or demisable If a Copy-hold be surrendred to the Lessor of a Manor or be Forfeited to him he his Executors or Assigns may well

Custom may be alledged within the Manor and applied but to a single Copy-hold Per Cur. such Custom as well for the form as the matter is good for a Copy-holder cannot prescribe in his own name for the exility of his Estate Precribe for Common in one Copy-holder but he ought to prescribe in the Lords name when he claims Common c. out of the Land of a Stranger but if he claim such profit in the Manor he must lay it by way of Custom for then he cannot prescribe in the Lords Name for the Lord cannot prescribe to have Common in his own Soil and one Copy-holder may have such Common c. It may have a lawful commencement and all the other Copyholds may be extinct 4 Rep. 31 32. Foyston's Case vide for Prescription devant In Trespass the Defendant justifies as Copy-holder for Common he saith these are customary Lands but doth not say ad voluntatem Dom. which is uncertain whether Tenant-right Lands or Burrough-English or Free-hold Judgment Pro Quer. 3 Keb. 368. Walker and Wilson Customs must be pursued in Pleadings A man cannot plead a Prescription against a Prescription A Prescription not to be pleaded against Prescription but he ought to answer the Prescription alledged in the Count when two Customs repugne Cro. Car. 432. Spooner and Day 's Case Carter's Rep. 88. Custom alledged to be That if any Copy-holder seised of customary Lands of the said Copy-hold die seized thereof having many Sons that the youngest shall Inherit and the Defendant in Replevin makes his Title That a customary Estate was granted to the Father and Mother and the Heirs of the Father and the Mother survived This Estate is not within the Letter of the Custom Per Walmsly and cited Sir John Savage's Case Quod vide supra sub Tit. Custom 2 Leon. 208. Beal and Langly A particular Tenant at Will may not prescribe in his sole Tenancy Prescription by a particular Tenant at Will but when the Prescription and the Custom runs half through the Manor he may well lay it by Custom Kelloway 76 77. Tropnel's Case Tenant may plead a Custom to enjoy without interruption of the Lord. Copy-holder may plead a Custom That every Tenant after he hath paid the Lord his Fine may enjoy his Lands and Tenements granted by Copy during their Estates Terms or Interests without interruption or expulsion of the Lord for the time being they performing their Services and doing nothing that may Forfeit Kelloway 76 77. Ann Tropnel's Case Vide supra When the Copy-holder claims any thing by Prescription in the Soil of another in Pleading he ought to prescribe in the name of the Lord but if he claim any thing in the Soil of the Lord When it must be pleaded by way of Custom and when by way of Prescription within the Manor then he shall plead the Custom of the Manor for there he cannot plead in the name of the Lord in as much as the Lord cannot prescribe in his own Soil Foyston's Case and 4 Rep. 31. Cooper's Case 6 Rep. 60. Gateward's Case Rule There is nothing more common than for the Lord to prescribe for his Tenants by Copy in another mans Land whereas if it be in his own it shall ever be laid per Custom Hob. p. 28 61. Of Pleading a Custom for Common by Prescription Defendant pleads in Trespass That there are divers Freehold Tenements time out of mind in the said Manor c. and that there were and are infra eand villan divers customary Tenements parcel of the said Manor grantable ad voluntatem Dom. by Copy That all the Tenants of the Free Tenements time out of mind Habuerunt usi fuerunt and all the Tenants of the customary Tenements per consuetudinem ejusdem manerij in eodem manerio a toto tempore supra dict usitat approbat habuerunt habere consueverunt solam separalem pasturam c. for all their Cattel Hogs Sheep and Steers excepted Levant and Couchant upon their respective Messuages and Tenements every year for all times of the year except c. as belonging and appertaining to their several Tenements and that at the time of the Trespass the Defendant put in his own Cattel Levant and Couchant upon this said Messuage prout ei bene licuit c. Exceptions to this Pleading were 1. That he was seised de Antiquo Messuagio and of no Land is not proper for in common intention Cattel cannot be said to be Levant upon a Messuage only 2. He saith he put in his own Levant and Couchant but avers not as he ought That none of them were Porci Oves or Steers 3. The Plea doth not set forth the Custom of the Manor but implicitely That the Freehold and customary Tenants have had and enjoyed Per Consuetudinem Manerij solam separalem Pasturam for all their Cattel which is a double Plea both of the Custom of the Manor and of the claim by reason of the Custom which ought to be several and the Court shall judge and not the Jury whether the claim be according to the Custom alledged the Custom may be different from the Claim Per Consuetudinem Manerij if particularly alledged Vaughan's Rep. 253. North and Cole In Replevin Defendant makes Conuzance as Bayliff to c. Damage Fesant In bar of this Cognizance the Plaintiff pleads That H. Earl of H. was seized of the Manor of A. whereof one Messuage c. is parcel and demisable by Copy and that within the said Manor there is this Custom That every customary Tenant of the said Messuage c. have used to have Pasture c. in the said place called Land-Mead The Form how to apply the Custom of a Manor to a particular Messuage in pleading and so derives his Title by Grant by Copy the Issue was upon the Traverse Absque hoc quod infra manerium praed talis habetur consuetudo quod quilibet tenens custumarius c. have used to have Common c. prout c. Here is no Custom alledged because it did not appear in Pleading That the place where the taking was supposed to be was within the said Manor and no Custom of the Manor can extend out of the Manor but he ought to prescribe in the Manor Note he ought to have pleaded That the place in which c. was parcel of the Manor and then the Plea had been good Hob. p. 286. 1 Brownl 172. Roberts and Young Plaintiff in Replevin rejoyns by Custom of all the Copyholders of Blackacre in the Manor of D. used to have Common in A. to which the Avowant demurred because he should have prescribed in the Lords name A. being out of the Manor but the truth being that A. was anciently parcel and lately severed by the Lord this destroys not the Common Per Cur. But the Copy-holder ought to prescribe specially That Talis consuetudo suit till such a day Special Prescription