a Bayliff of a liberty in the nature of Escape title Trespas upon the Case 80 Case against one for disturbance of a Steward in keeping of a Court title Trespas upon the Case 82 Case for Cancelling of a Bond title Trespas upon the Case 82 Case against an Inne-keeper for a Horse lost title Trespas upon the Case 83 Case against an Executrix upon the promise of the testator title Trespasse upon the Case 84 Case by way of deceipt in a Bargain title Trespasse upon the Case 85 Case against one for scandalous words of an Alderman of London title Trespasse upon the Case 86 Case against one for frequenting Company in a dishonest manner with another mans Wife title Trespasse upon the Case 87 Case against one for negligent keeping of his fire whereby another mans house was burnt title Trespasse upon the Case 88 Continuance of a Decem tales title of Continuance ibid. Continuance upon a Summons ad auxiliandum title Continuance ibid. Continuance of a Demurrer in Law and an issue title Continuance Conspiracy Declaration in it upon the Statute of 8. Hen. the 6. title Conspiracie 25 Conspiracie for indicting of one as a common Baretter title Conspiracy 31 In Conspiracie the Defendant justifies what he did as a Juror with others c. title Conspiracie 29 Conspiracie Action upon it brought by the Man and the Wife for Felony supposed to be done by the Wife title Conspiracie 27 Continuance of a Scire facias in a Writ of Error title Continuance 34 Continuance of a Judgement after a verdict title Continuance 34 Continuance of an Exigent title Continuance 35 Continuance of a Distringas title Continuance 35 Continuance of a Jurata for want of Jurors and a Decem tales awarded title Continuance 35 Continuance of a matter in Law title Continuance 35 Continuance of a Writ of adjournment title Continuance 36 Continuance of a Jurata where the Plaintife acknowledges one of the Defendants to be dead title Continuance 36 Continuance of a Jurata by consent of the parties title Continuance 36 Committitur of a Prisoner to the Marshall being in the custody of a Sherife by vertue of a Case 38 Committitur of a Prisoner upon a Capias ad satisfaciend title Commititur 38 Committitur after judgement title Committitur 38 Certiorare to the chiefe Justice title Error 40 Certificate of the chiefe Justice title Error 40 Custom of the Common Bench alleadged for the Mannor of entring of judgement title Error 41 D. DEclaration in Debt upon a Bill to be paid at the day of Marriage title Debt 1 Debt for an Administrator against an Administrator title Debt 1 Debt upon the Statute of Mayntenance title Debt 1 Debt upon the Statute of Perjury title Debt 3 Debt upon a Judgment title Debt 5 Debt upon the Statute for Costs for not prosecuting title Debt 6 Debt upon an escape made by a Sherife title Debt 8 Debt in Accompt after Auditors assigned title Debt 10 Demurrer adjudged good and a Writ of Enquire of Damages in Trespasse and Batterie title Trespasse 111 Demurrer in Law to matter of Error title Error ibid. E. ENtrie of a Recognizance after issue joyned Title Debt 5 Essoyne cast Title Replevin 39 Entrie of an Essoyne and joyning in ayde Title Trespas 99 Escape pleaded in Audita querela and issue thereupon Title Audita querela 18 Error in assault and Batterie the especiall matter of Error alleadged and pleaded to Title Error 39 Error for want of admission by prochainamie the party Plaintiff being within age Title Error 40 Escape against a Sheriff Title Error 40 Escape upon a Bill of Middlesex against the Sheriffs Title Escape 47 Escape against a Sheriff for not having the body of one arrested at the returne of the Writ Title Escape 50 F. FIne pleaded Title Replevyn 42 Forme of pleading of an Outlawrie after Judgment Title Trespasse upon the Case 79 Forme of pleading where Land is granted by Copy of Court Roll. Title Trespas 110 Forme of pleading where the Lands accrued to the Husband under the Wifes title Title Trespas 40 Feoffement pleaded Title Trespas 41 Feoffement pleaded Title Assize 12 I. JVdgement by nihil dicit in Debt Title Debt 9 Judgement and verdict in Appeale Title Appeale 8 Incursion and issue upon it Title Replevyn 27 Issue in ayde Prayer Title Replevyn 34 Joynder in Ayde Title Replevyn 37 Issue upon a Traverse of Disseisin Title Replevyn 37 Issue upon a Traverse of Prescription Title Replevyn 39 Issue upon the Tenure Title Replevyn 41 Issue upon the seisin of Rent Title Replevyn 44 Judgement of a Playnt returned by the Sheriff upon Recordare Title Replevyn 44 Issue upon the taking of the Cattell out of his fee c. Title Replevyn 45 Justification of taking Cattell as servant to another the Cattell doing damage to the Master Title Replevyn 46 Justification of the taking of Cattell as Bayliff to another in the name of Distresse for parcell of a Rent Charge Title Replevyn 52 Issue taken upon a Prescription title Replevin 55 Justification ibid. Inrollment that the Defendant secure Delivery of the Cattell Title Replevyn 69 Imparlance in Replevyn Title Replevyn â—â— Justification of taking of Cattell as Bayliff to another for arreares of a Rent charge title Replevyn 71 Justification Especiall in an Action of the Case for standing of a Title with a Replication thereto Title Trespas upon the Case 74 Justification in trespas as servant to one that had the freehold title Trespas 83 Issue upon a Custome in Gavel-kinde and a Venire facias awarded out of the bodie of the County title Trespas 98 Justification in trespas by vertue of a Demise title Trespas 101 Judgment after a verdict in Assize title Assize 13 Jurie put in respite in Audita querela title Audita querela 18 Jurata either in Debt Trespas or Ejectione firmae title Continuance ibid. L. LEtters Patents pleaded title Trespas 71 Licence pleaded by the Defendant in Trespas title Trespas 48 N. NOnage pleaded in Barre to an Avowry title Replevyn 50 Not guilty pleaded to an Action of the Case title Trespas upon the Case 82 P. PRohibition where the Plaintiffe suggests the Lands out of which Tithes are required to be Priorie Lands title Prohibition 11 Prohibition a Declaration for prosecuting in the Court Christian after the Prohibition delivered 14 In Prohibition the Defendant pleads he did not prosecute after the Prohibition to him delivered title Prohibition 21 Prohibition to the Court of Admiralty upon the Statute of 13 of Richard the second title Prohibition 22 Prescription to Destrain for Rent title Replevyn 27 Prayer in Ayde by the Plaintiffe in title Replevyn 28 Prayer in Ayde and joynder in Ayde upon Summons title Replevin 33 Prayer in ayde and Summons upon it title Replevin 36 Prescription for common of Pasture title replevyn 39 Playntiff in mercy and the Defendant without day c. title Replevyn 44 Plea as to taking part of the cattell and Chattells that he did not
knowing the aforesaid T. to be a fugitive and deceiptfull person and plotting and intending him the said H.C. to hinder from the recoverie of his debt aforesaid and to cause him the said H.C. what in him lay wholly to lose his debt aforesaid the aforesaid T. before the aforesaid Justices of our Lady the Queen here at or ever after the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. according to the purport of the aforesaid Writ he had not but the same T. he the said H. C. of his said debt aforesaid being in no wise satisfied or in any manner contented before the retorn of the same Writ to wit such a day and year at London c. in the Parish c. he suffered to go at large whithersoever he would in the danger of the losse of the debt of the aforesaid H. C. For that if the aforesaid H. A. had had the aforesaid T. before the Justices of our Lady the Queen here at the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. according to the purport of the Writ aforesaid and the aforesaid Arrest then the same T. ought to have found in the Court here to him the said H. C. sufficient Manucaptors who must have undertaken for the aforesaid T. that if the same T. should be Convict in the Debt aforesaid that then he the said T. should pay the debt aforesaid to him the said H.C. or should render himself to the Prison of our Lady the Queen of the Fleet by occasion of the Judgement of and upon the Premisses to be rendred or that they the said Manucaptors the debt aforesaid for the aforesaid T should pay to him the said H. C. And if the same T. did not find such Manucaptors that then he should be committed to the Prison of our Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to stay untill he should do it To the damage of him the said H. C. a hundred pounds And thereupon he brings his Sure c. And the aforesaid H. A. by Thomas Foster his Attorney comes and defends the force and injurie when c. Not guilty pleaded And sayes that he is in nothing guilty of the Premisses above imposed upon him And of this he puts himself upon the Countrey And the aforesaid I. C. in like manner Therefore Command is given to the Sheriff that he cause to come here in eight dayes of the Purification of the blessed Virgin Mary and c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. This was tried in London and a Verdict and Judgement for the Plaintif And a Writ of Error was brought and assigned for Error For that it appears not in what place the Bailiff of the Libertie delivered the Prisoner to the aforesaid F. the under-Sheriff nor whether he was delivered in the County of Essex or no. Error also for that he said not in his Declaration that the Defendant took no securitie for the appearance aforesaid for it might be that the Sheriff delivered him up upon Bayl according to the form of of the Statute Error also for that the Plaintif said not that the aforesaid T. appeared not in the Bench. Afterwards the Defendant after he had pleaded in nullo est Erratum died And then was made this Entrie following as yet c. Afterwards to wit the fifth day of May in the Four and thirtieth year of the reign of our Lady the Queen that now is before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney aforesaid And sayes that the aforesaid H. C. is dead and prayes licence to purchase a new Writ of Error c. And it is granted unto him c. And afterwards to wit the sixt day of May then next following before our Lady the Queen at Wistminster came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney aforesaid And brought before our Lady the Queen a certain new Writ of Error of our Lady the Queens directed to the Justices of our Lady the Queen of the Pleas before her the said Queen assigned to be held which said Writ follows in these words Elizabeth c. And so recite the Writ of Error And upon this the same H.A. says that in the Record and Processe aforesaid as also in the rendring of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly Erronious alleging for Errors the severall matters above assigned And the same H.A. sayes further that the aforesaid H.C. before his death to wit at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid made his last VVill and Testament in writing And thereby Constituted and ordeined Elizabeth his then wife Executrix of his Testament aforesaid and there afterwards died And the same H. A. prayes a VVrit of our Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid Executrix of being here c. retornable on the morrow of the holy Trinitie c. wheresoever c. At which day came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney And the aforesaid Defendant by John Williams her Attorney came And upon this the aforesaid H. A. as formerly sayes That in the Record and Premisses aforesaid c. it is manifestly Erronious And the Executrix pleads that it is in nothing Erronious and so they continue it for argument And afterwards upon full debate judgement was affirmed ACTIONS OF DEBT AND DIVERS OTHER Actions and Pleas. DEBT ss W C. Complaineth of I.H. in the Custody of the Marshall c. of a plea A Declaration in Debt upon a Bill to be paid at the day of Marriage of the Defendant that he render unto him 20 l. of good and lawfull c. which c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid I. in such a day and year at c. by his certain Bill Obligatory sealed with the Seal of him the said I and unto the Court c. whose date c. acknowledged himself to owe unto the said W. the aforesaid 20. l. to be paid unto the said W. at the day of the Marriage of him the said I and the said W. in fact saith that the said I. afterwards that is to say in such a day and year c. married to wife one M.A. by which an Action did accrue unto the said W to require c. ss W. B. next of Kin of R.B. deceased Declaration in Debt for an Administrator against an Administrator Administrator of all and singular the Goods Chattels rights and Credits which where of R.B. late of H. in the County of Middlesex Yeoman otherwise called c. deceased which dyed intestate complaineth of A.N. Widow Administrator of all and singular the goods and chattels rights and credits which were of R.N. late of F. in the County of Middlesex Yeoman deceased in the custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea that he render unto him 60. l. of lawfull c. which c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid R.N. in his life that is
that he had him now here ready upon which the same Defendant is Committed to the Prison c. by occasion of the Premisses to stay untill c. Commitment after Iudgement AFterwards to wit such a day then next following before c. Came the aforesaid I. in his proper person and rendred himself to the person of the Marshall of the Marshallsee of our Lord the King for the debt and damages aforesaid Upon which the same I. is committed to the Marshall of the Marshalsee c. in Execution for the debt and damages aforesaid There to remain untill c. ACTIONS OF ERROR ERROR AFterwards to wit such a day c. Error alleged in assault and batterie in the judgement that the Entrie was that the partie be taken when the cause of action was before a general Pardon in this self-same Term before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Nicholas Stoddard by William Man his Attorney And sayes that in the Record and Processe aforesaid as also in the rendring of the judgement aforesaid it is manifestly Erroneous in this That whereas in every judgement Entred or to be Entred in Trespass and Assault after the generall pardon of our Lady the Queen that now is by Act of Parliament of Trespass and assault made before the same act of Parliament the judgements so Entred and to be Entred ought to be Entred And nothing of fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned and not that he should be taken yet after the generall Pardon of our Lady the Queen that now is had and Enacted in the Parliament of our Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the twenty fifth day of October in the thirty ninth year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is the Judgement aforesaid was Entred against the aforesaid Nicholas in the Plea aforesaid that he the said Nicholas should be taken for the Trespass and Assault aforesaid made the aforesaid tenth day of September in the thirty seventh year aforesaid in the Record aforesaid specified which was long before the aforesaid act of Parliament of the generall Pardon aforesaid And so that Judgement is void in Law Also it is Erronious in this for that whereas the aforesaid John S. the aforesaid Term of Easter Error also for want of admission by Procâ—â—in amy the partie being within age in the aforesaid forty first year of the Reign of the Queen had prosecuted by John Mallows and William Evoring as the next kinsmen of him the said John yet there is not had any Record of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. being an Infant in form aforesaid to prosecute the Plea aforesaid by his next kinsmen aforesaid under the names of any of the Prothonotaries of the Common Bench Entred as by the Law and Custom of the Court of our Lady the Queen of Common Bench aforesaid it ought to be Entred And prayes a Writ of our Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of the Common to whom it belongs to make Certificates in that behalf to certifie our Lady the Queen thereupon more fully the truth And it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded the aforesaid E. Anderson Chief Justice of the Bench aforesaid That having searched the Rolls Certiorare to the Chief Justice awarded to certifie c. under the names in the Offices of the Prothonotaries aforesaid of the admission of Infants to prosecute by their next kinsmen of the Term and year aforesaid And what of the admission aforesaid in the same he shall find he should certifie forthwith to our Lady the Queen wheresoever c. together with the Writ to him directed The Certificate of the Chief Justice c. Which said Chief Iustice of our Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon directed certified to her the said Lady the Queen that having searched the Rolls of the Entries of every of the Prothonotaries aforesaid in the aforesaid County of Suffolk of the Term and year aforesaid in his Custody of Record remaining he found not in the same any Entrie of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. to prosecute by I. M. and W. E. the next kinsmen of him the said I. being within age against the aforesaid N. S. of the aforesaid Plea as by the aforesaid Writ it was Commanded unto him which said Writ is Filed amongst the Records without day of this Term Upon which the aforesaid N. S. prayes a Writ of our Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid I. S. of being before our Lady the Queen to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid And it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded to the Sheriff that by honest men c. he make known to the aforesaid I. S. that he be before our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid if c. And further c. The same day is given to the aforesaid N. S. c. Denâ—rrer in Law to the first matter of the Errors And the aforesaid I. S. by T. Bland his Attorney comes and as to the aforesaid first matter by the aforesaid Nicholas above for Error in form aforesaid assigned For that that after the Generall Pardon of our said Lady the Queen that now is had and enacted in the aforesaid Parliament of our Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid the aforesaid twenty fifth day of October in the thirty ninth year of her Reign aforesaid the judgement aforesaid was entred against the aforesaid N. in the Plea aforesaid that he the same N. should be taken for the Trespass and Assault aforesaid made the aforesaid tenth day of September in the thirty seventh year aforesaid which was long before the aforesaid Act of Parliament of Generall pardon aforesaid The same I. by Protestation that that matter for that Error in form aforesaid assigned is insufficient in the Law to maintain the aforesaid Writ of Error of him the said N. in that behalfe To the which he the said I. hath no necessitie nor by the Law of the Land is bound in any manner to rejoyn for Plea yet he saith that in the aforesaid Court of Bench aforesaid there is had The Custom of the Common Bench alleged for the manner of Entring judgment in the Case and time out of mind there hath been had such a Custom used and approved That is to say that the Clerks of the same Court who for the time being are assigned and allowed to enter and Record any Iudgements in the same Court from time to time rendred and to be rendred were used and accustomed in the Entries of the Rolls and Records of the same Court of the Judgements rendred in the same Court upon any action of Trespass against the Defendant
in the same action named for any Trespass committed before any Generall Pardon to Enter aswell in the end of such Judgement And nothing of Fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned As in the End of such Judgement And the aforesaid Defendant is to be taken and to note in the Margent of the same Rolls directly opposite to the word Capiatur in the 〈◊〉 Judgement this word Pardoned by that means giving direction 〈◊〉 the Clerk of the Estreats of the same Court where he may find them amongst the Rolls of the same Court against whom he the said Clerk doth send out and direct Writs of our Lord the King of Capias pro fine to compell them to render themselves and come under their Fines in the same Court for their Trespasses and other causes fineable according to the Custom and Law of the Land of this Kingdom of England And against whom he should omit and forbear to send forth the like Writs And that the same Entrie of Pardon in the Margent of the Record aforesaid is and for the whole time aforesaid was as sufficient a discharge of the aforesaid partie against whom the Judgement in the same Record is rendred that he should be taken as if within the same Record it had been Entred nothing of the Fine of that partie because he is pardoned And the aforesaid I. S. in fact saith that in the Record aforesaid sent before our Lady the Queen the aforesaid word Pardon'd in the Margent of the same Record is entred and noted according to the Custom aforesaid as by that Record above appeareth And as for the other matter by the aforesaid N. for his last Error in form aforesaid assigned the same I. S. sayes that in the aforesaid Court of the Bench aforesaid there is had and time out of mind there hath been had such a Custome used and approved The Plaintif sets form the Custom to Enter the admâ—ssion upon the Roll wherein the Declaration is Entred that is to say that every admission of any Infant to prosecute in the same Court of Bench aforesaid by his next kindred in any Plea to be entred and inrolled were used to be Entred and inrolled in the Roll wherein the Declaration in that Plea was Entred and inrolled And the same I. further faith that the Declaration aforesaid of him the said I. in the Plea aforesaid against him the said N. was Entred amongst the Rolls of Robert Bernors Gent. Phillizer of the County of Suffolk to wit in the Roll 386. as in the Record aforesaid sent here to the Court of our Lady the Queen more fully appears And the same I. S. further saith that although the aforesaid Chief Justice of the Common Bench hath certified to the Lady the Queen that having searched the Rolls of the Entries of every the Prothonotaries of the aforesaid County of S. of the Term and year aforesaid in his Custodie remaining of Record he had not found in the same any Entrie of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. to prosecute by the aforesaid I. M. and W. E. next of kindred to him the said I. S. being within age against the aforesaid N. S. of the aforesaid Plea yet there is had such a Record of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. so being within age to prosecute in the aforesaid Court of Bench by the aforesaid I. M. and W. E. his next kindred against the aforesaid N.S. of the aforesaid Plea Entred in the same Bench in the aforesaid Roll 386. on which the Declaration aforesaid as is aforesaid remains Entred â—â—â—ording to the Law and Custom of the said Court of Bench aâ—â—â—â—said Which said Record as yet remains before the aforesaid Justices of the Common Bench under the Custodie of the aforesaid Chief Justice omitted as yet to be certified to our Lady the Queen Certiâ—rare awarded to Certifie the full truth And the same I. S. prayes a Writ of Certiorare of our Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Chief Justice of the Common Bench to be directed to whom the certifying aswell of the omission aforesaid as of the Customs aforesaid rests to be made to Certifie our Lady the Queen more fully of the truth thereof and it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded to the aforesaid Chief Justice of the Common Bench that searching the Rolls of the Entries of the aforesaid Phillâ—zor of the aforesaid County of Suffolk of the aforesaid Term of Easter in the sixteenth year aforesaid And what in the same Rolls of the omission aforesaid he shall find as also the whole and full certaintie and truth of the aforesaid severall Customs of the said Court of our Lady the Queen of the Bench from the day of the holy Trinity in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. he do certifie together with the Writ of our Lady the Queen to him thereupon directed The same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of her Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon in form aforesaid directed certified to her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster at the same day That in the Court of the Lady the Queen of Common Bench There is had such a custom used and approved that the Clarks of the same Court who for the time being are assigned and allowed to enter and Record in the Rols and Records of the same Court any judgements in the same Court from time to time rendred and to be rendred were used and accustomed in the entry in the Rolls and Records of the same Court the judgements rendred in the same Court in and upon any action of Trespass against the Defendant in the same action named for any Trespass committed before any generall pardon to enter aswell in the end of such judgement And nothing of Fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned as in the end of such judgement And the aforesaid Defendant is to be taken And to note in the Margent of the same Roll direct opposite to those words in the judgement this word pardon for that reason to give direction to the Clark of the Extreats of the same Court where he shall find amongst the same Rolls of the same Court against whom he the said Clark doth send or direct Writs of our Lord the King of Capias pro fine to compell them to render themselves and to undergoe their fines in the same Court for their Trespasses and other causes fineable according to the custom and Laws of this Kingdom of England And against whom he is to omit and forbear to send forth and direct such Writs And that such entry of pardon in the Margent of the Record aforesaid is and by the whole time aforesaid was as sufficient a discharge of the party aforesaid against whom
any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or in any Courts of Record or in any Leet or View of Frank-pledge in a Court day called Law-day or in any Court in antient Demesn Hundred Court Court Barron or in the Court or Courts of the Stannery in the County of Devon and Cornwall or being examined to the perpetuall memory of a thing that then whatsoever person and persons so offending and being duly convicted or attainted by the Laws of this Kingdome of England for his or their said offences shall lose and forfeit unto the said Lady the Queen 20. pounds and should have Imprisonment by the space of six moneths without Bail or Mainprise and that the Oath of such person or persons so offending from thenceforth afterwards in any Court of Record should not be taken within this Kingdom of England or Wales or Marches of the same till what time the Judgement given against the said person or persons should be made void or revoked by Attainder or otherwise that upon every such kind of Revocation the parties grieved shall recover his or their Dammage against all and singular such person and persons as should procure the said Judgement so revoked to be rendered against him or them or any of them by Action or Actions to be prosecuted upon his or their Case or cases according to the course of the Common Lawes of this Kingdome of England and if it should happen the said offendor or offendors not to have any goods or chattells to the value of 20. pounds that then he or they should be put upon the Pillory in any Market place within the County City or Burrough where the said offence should be committed by the Sheriff or his Officers if they should happen to be without any City or Town Corporate then by the chief Officer or Officers of such City or Town Corporate or by his or their Officers And there should have both his ears nayled and from thenceforth should be discredited and disabled for ever to be sworn in any the Kings Courts of Record aforesaid untill the Judgement should be reversed and thereupon to recover his Damages in manner and form before mentioned one Moity of which said sum of Money to be forfeited in manner and form aforesaid should be to the said Lady the now Queen her Heirs and Successors and the other Moity thereof unto such person or persons as should be grieved hindred or molested by reason of the offence or offences before mentioned who therefore would prosecute by action of Debt Bill Plaint Information or otherwise in any the Kings Courts of Record in which no Wager of Law Essoin Protection or Injunction should be allowed as in the said Statute amongst other things more fully it is manifested and it appeareth And where also c. ss A. B. Late of London Taylor Declaration in Debt after Verdict and Judgement in Trespas in the Kings Bench upon Recognizance there against one of the Bayl. Easter 6. H. 8. Roll. 432. was Summoned to answer R.H. of a Plea that he render unto him 100. pounds of lawfull money of England which c. And thereupon the said R. by R. I. his Attorney saith that whereas he the Monday next after fifteen dayes of the holy Trinity in the fourth year of the Reign of the now King before him the said Lord the King at Westminster in his proper Person came and appeared and then and there in the Court of the said King brought his Bill against one W.G. Mercer in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsea of the Lord the King before him the King then and there being of a Plea of Trespass and the Pledges to prosecute are Philip Mason and John Wicham by which said Bill the said R. Complained of the said W. of that that he the second day of July in the third year of the said now King with force and arms that is to say with Swords c. the house of him the said R. at London in the Parish c. had broke and other wrongs to him had done against the Peace c. to the damage c. and the aforesaid W. by T.C. his Attorney appearing commeth and defendeth the force and Injury when c. and saith that he in no wise was thereof guilty concerning the Trespass aforesaid as the said R. above against him Complained And of this he put himself upon the Countrey And the aforesaid R. likewise c. therefore thereupon commeth the Jury before the Lord the King at Westminster the Monday next after eight c. of St. Michael And who neither c. to Recognize Entrie of Recognizance after Issue ioyned c. because aswell c. the same day was given to the parties aforesaid there c. And upon this before the said Lord the King at Westminster in the said County of Middlesex personally then and there commeth I.G. of London Gent. and L.G. of London Gent. and the aforesaid A. the Manucaptors for the said W.G. that is to say under the pain of 100. pounds which they acknowledged and every of them for himself acknowledged of his Lands and Chattels and of every of them to be done And to the use of the said R. to be levyed and likewise the said W.G. assumed for himself under the pain of 100. pounds which he acknowledged of his Lands and Chattels to be executed and to the use of the said R. to be levyed if the said W. all such Damages Costs and charges in which it should happen him the said W. in the Plea aforesaid in any manner lawfully to be overthrown doth neither pay or himself to the Prison of the Marshall of the Lord the King before him the King in that occasion not to render c. At which said day of Monday next after eight c. of St. Michael before him the Lord the King at Westminster commeth aswell the aforesaid R. in his own person as the said W.G. by his foresaid Attorney And the Sheriff then sendeth a Writ of Venir ' fac ' 24. c. in all Services and Executions together with the Pannell of the names of the Jurors thereupon impannelled upon which the Jurors of that Jury being called likewise come who being chosen tryed and sworn to speak to the truth of the Premisses Say upon their Oath that the said W. was guilty of the Trespass aforesaid even as the said R. had above Complained And they Assessed the Damage of him the said R. by reason of the Trespass as in the Verdict for which it was considered at that time in the same Court before him the Lord the King that the said R. should recover against the said W c. as in the Record even as in that Record it more fully appeareth And the said R. saith that afterwards the said W.G. in Damage Costs and charges aforesaid was convicted and after Judgement was thereupon given hitherto the said W.G. the Damage Cost and Charges unto the said R. hath not paid
I. N. by pretence of the said Demise unto him made put the said Cattell there to feed Upon which the said R. S. of L. and T. then upon and in those Closes being the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others those Cattell then that is to say at the said time in which c. they took and deteyned and the Ewe-sheep as yet they unjustly detein of which said taking and deteyning the said I. N. hath now brought his said Action thereupon against them And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintains his Plea without this they disseized the other Plaintif And they the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others say that the said Closes at the said time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of the said R. S. of L. and T. and that the said Cattel at the same time were in those Closes c. feeding and there doing Damage by which they the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others as Bayliffs of the said R. S. of L. and T. those Cattell at the said time in which c. they took and deteyned as unto them it was lawfull as they before have alleged Without this that the said R. S. of L. and T. have disseised the said W. H. of the said Close Without this with th' appurtenances as the said I. N. before hath alleged And this they are ready to prove whereupon as before they pray Judgement c. and for the said R. S. of L. and T. the retorn of the said Oxen Steers Calf Heifer and living goods to be adjudged unto him to be adjudged unto her c. And the said I. N. saith that the said R. S. of L. and T. have Disseised the said W. T. of the said Closes with th' appurtenances in manner and form as he before hath alleged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of by the Countrey c. ss AND they the said R. A. and W. D. by A. B. their Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when One of the Defendants avoweth and the other Justifies as Servant for rent-charge behind c. all taking and whatsoever c. And the same R. doth well arow and the said W. D. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. And justly c. because he saith that the said R. G. Gent. long before the said time in which c. was seized of one Tenement and C. acres of land in C. whereof the place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee and he so thereof seized long before the said time in which c. by his certain Deed which the said R. here in Court profereth whose Date is the fourth day of the month of July in the nineteenth year of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the Fourth To have hold and receive that annuall Rent unto the said R. and his Assigns at the Term of his life of and in the said Lands and Tenements with th' appurtenances every year at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell the Birth of our Lord Easter and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist equally to be paid And the said R. A. further saith that the said R. G. by his said writing further granted that if it should happen the said yearly Rent to be behind in part or in all by one moneth next after any Feast of the said Feasts in which it ought to be paid unto the said R. A. or his Assigns unpaid that then it should be lawfull unto the said R. A. and his Assigns into all the said Lands and Tenements and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances to enter and distrein and the Distresse so there taken to lead carry away impound and in Pound to keep untill to him of that annuall Rent so being behind together with the Costs and Charges if any should be were fully satisfied and paid And for twenty six shillings eight pence being behind at the end of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist next before the said time in which c. the said R. A. doth well avow and the said W. D. as Servant of the said R. A. and by his Command at the said time in which c. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. by the name of Distresse for 26. shillings and 8. pence so being behind as in the Lands and Tenements unto the Distresse of him the said R. A. with the said yearly Rent in form aforesaid charged as to them were lawfull And this c. whereupon c. And the said I. not acknowledging any the matrers by the said R. A. and W. D. before alleged to be true saith that the said R. G. long before the said time in which c. was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and he so thereof seized long before the said time that is to say the first day of October in the fourteenth year of the Reign of the said now king at A. in C. aforesaid demised those Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said I. H. to have and occupy to him and his Assignes from the feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell then last past untill the end and Term of seven years then next following and fully to be compleated by virtue of which Demise the said I. H. long before the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so the same I. saith that she hath nothing in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances unles at the Term of the said seven years in forme aforesaid thereupon after that term compleated belonging unto the said R.G. his heirs and Assignes without which said R. G. the same I. H. saith that she cannot answear to the said Plea of the said R. A. and W. D. And prayeth Aid of him the said R. G. and she hath Aid prayed c. Therefore the said R. H. is summoned that he before the Lord the King from the day of Easter in Eight weeks wheresoever c. to answer to the said Plea of the said R. A. and W. D. together with the said R. H. if c. the same day is given to the said parties c. At which day before the said King at Westminster cometh aswell the said I. H. as the said R. A. and W. D. by their said Attorney being summoned c. by A. B. his Attorney likewise cometh and joyneth himself with the aforesaid I. H. to avow and acknowledge the said c. and aswell the same I. as the said R. G. who joyneth himself c. Say that the said R. A. the taking of the said
the said T. late Prior and all his Predecessors heretofore Priors of the said Church from the time of which c. in the Right of that Church distreined and used to distrein for the said Rent and the Arrerages of the same in the said twenty acres of Land with th' appurtenances and in every parcell thereof when that Rent or any parcell thereof unto the Prior of the said Church for the time being by any Feast in which as is premised ought to be paid should happen to be behind unpaid and the Distresses so taken to lead chase carry away and wholly to retein them untill that Rent and the Arrerages of the same unto the Prior of the said Church for the time being should be fully satisfied and paid which said T. the late Prior afterward dyed The death of one of the Priors the Choosing of another after whose death the said now Prior was elected and made Prior of the said Church And because the said Rent at the time of the said taking supposed to be done was behind for two years next before the day of the said taking done unto the said now Prior unpaid the said R.B. as Bailiff of the said now Prior for thirteen shillings four pence of that Rent of those two years so being behind doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell and Chattels in the said place in which c. And justly c. as in parcell of the said twenty acres with th' appurtenances unto the Distresse of him the said Prior of that Rent in form aforesaid charged And justly c. And this he is ready to prove c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement and the Retorn of the said Cattell and Chattells to be adjudged unto him c. ACTIONS OF TRESPASS upon the CASE TRESPAS UPON THE CASE Declaration for scandall of a Tytle ss R Stevens otherwise Walker complaineth of Thomas Gittens in the Custody of the Marshall c. for that namely that whereas the eighth day of October in the eleventh year of the Reign of the said Lady the now Queen one I. E. was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in one Messuage a hundred acres of Land fourty acres of Meadow two hundred acres of Pasture and twenty acres of Wood with th' appurtenances in H. in the said County and so being thereof seized the same I. afterwards that is to say the 22. day of October in the sayd eleventh year infeoffed the said R. of the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances to have to the said R. to him and his Assigns for ever by virtue of which the said R. into the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances entred and was and yet is thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee which said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances being desirous to sell to pay divers sums of money unto divers persons unto whom he was indebted the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances unto one G. P. and divers other subjects of the Lady the now Queen after the said 22. day of October in the eleventh sent aforesaid and before the 20. day of March in the twenty third year of the Reign of the said Lady the now Queen for one hundred pounds of lawfull money of England could have bargained and aliened the said Thomas well knowing of the Premisses craftily and deceiptfully imagining and intending the said R. of the Sale of the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances for a good value of the same maliciously to hinder and the right and Title of the said R. of in the said R. and the rest of the Premisses unjustly and untruly to extenuate scandalize and to bring into obloquy Afterwards that is to say the 22. day of March in the twenty third year abovesaid at H. aforesaid in the said County by colour of a certein Deed indented by one W.E. unto the said T. of and in the Premisses made in the presence and hearing of divers Venerable and of other worthy people of Credit subjects of the now Lady the Queen then and there being and hearing did speak these false feigned and scandalous English words and plainly with a loud voice pronounced and published that is to say I himself the said T. B. meaning have better right to half the Lands meaning the half of the said Messuages and Tenements above specified than he the meaning the same R. now Plaintif hath Which said W. E. had no right to sell the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses where in truth the said R. S. purchased the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances of the said I. E. who at the time of that purchase had right to sell the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances and where in truth the said T. E. nothing of right or lawfull claim of to or in the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances then had or as yet hath or in any manner whatsoever was able or is able lawfully to sell or demand by pretence of which said speech publication and claim aforesaid the said R. at any time after the 20. day of March in the twenty third year above said the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses Enquire whether these words are sufficient to maintain the said Action because the Defendant spoke the words in his proper right and tytle with th' appurtenances unto any person in no wise could bargain or sell by reason of which the said R. was not onely constreined to his great charges and costs to borrow of divers persons divers sums of money to be paid at the debt of him the said R. and also true it is the same R. for clearing of the said Title and Claym by the said T.G. in form aforesaid made and for the manifestation and proof of the right and title of him the said R. aforesaid of and in the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances he took upon him and underwent divers grievous Labours of his body and hath divers wayes spent vast sums of money and also certain other great dutifull Affairs of him the said R. doe remain undone and neglected Whereupon the said I. saith that he is the worse and hath Damage to the value c. Justification of the speaking of the scandalous words by reason of a Feoffment ss AND the said T. E. by E. B. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and Injury when c. And saith that he ought not to maintain an Action because he saith that the said W. E. tenth day of August in the eleventh year of the Reign of the now Lady the Queen was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the Moitie of the said Messuage and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances in H. aforesaid
the Sea in his Voyage towards London aforesaid with the said Wine And further the said I. N. in fact saith that after the said lading of the said thirty two Pipes of Canary Wines of the said I. N. in the said Ship in form aforesaid done to be transported from the said Isle of Teneriff up to London aforesaid and after the said departing of the said Ship from the said Port of the Isle of Teneriff aforesaid in his said Voyage towards London aforesaid the same Ship bâ—ing laden with the said thirty two Pipe of Canary Wines of him the said I. N. in saying upon the main Sea from the Isle of Teneriff aforesaid towards London aforesaid that is to say the twenty eighth day of I in the fortieth year of the Reign of the said now Queen aforesaid by the boisterousness of Winds and great Tempests in the main 〈◊〉 was overwhelmed and there was cast away and the said thirty two Pipes of the Canary Wines of him the said I. there then and in the main Sea were altogether lost that the said I. N. afterwards that is to say the Tenth day of A. in the fortieth year aforesaid at London aforesaid in the Parish and c. gave Notice to the said 8. of the said losse Notwithstanding which the said E. his promise and Assumption aforesaid nothing regarding but imagining and fraudulently intending the said I. N. of the said twenty five pounds or any parcell thereof unto the said I. N. hath not as yet paid or in any manner for the same hath satisfied although afterwards that is to say such a day and year at L. aforesaid in the Parish and c. was required by the said I. to doe this whereupon the said I. faith that he is the worse and hath Damage to the value of ten pounds And thereupon he bringeth his Sute c. ss EDward Ayscoughe Esquire complaineth of Thomas Pelhum Esquire late Sheriff of the said County Surrey Declaration against a Sheriff for that he did not arrest one in exccution upon a Cap. utl after Judgement being in his presence Enquire if the Plaintif ought not declare who aswell for the Queen as for himself A Cap ' to satisfie to the Sheriff of London and that he was not to be found ret ' thereupon for that that the Originall Writ there had issued in the Custody of the Marshall c. for that that whereas the said E. formerly that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the 28. and 29th years of the Reign of the now Queen before Edmond Anderson Knight and his fellows then Justices of the Queens Bench at Westminster in the County of Middlesex by Consideration of the same Court had recovered against one W. Howard late of c. sixty five pounds three shillings four pence which was adjudged unto the said E. in the Court of the said Queens Bench for his Damages which he had by occasion of a certain Trespas upon the Case unto him by the aforesaid W. done as it had been said whereupon he was convicted upon which said Judgement the said E. for the more speedy obtaining of the said Damages afterwards that is to say the nineteenth day of J. in the thirtieth year of the said now Queen shed forth out of the Court of the said Queens Bench a certain Writ of the same Queen to satisfie against the said W. directed to the then Sheriffs of London where his Originall Writ in the said Plea had formerly issued by which said Writ the said Queen had commanded them the said then Sheriffs of London that they should take the said W. if he should be found in their Bayliwick and him safely to keep so that they should have his body before the Justices of the said Queen at Westminster from the day of the holy Trinitie in fifteen dayes then next following to satisfie unto the said E. of the said 65. pound 3. shillings four pence which unto the said E. in the same Queens Court were adjudged for his said Damage whereof he was Convicted At which day before the said E. Anderson and his fellows then Justices of the said Queens Bench at Westminster aforesaid came the same Edward by his Attorney and T. Skinner and I. Catcher then Sheriffs of London sent to the then Justices of the said Queen at Westminster that the said W. was not found in their Bayliwick by which then and there a Command was to the same then Sheriffs of London Exigent to the Sheriffs of London that they should cause to be called the said W. from Husting to Husting until according to the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of the said Q. of England he should be Outlawed if he should not appear and if he should appear then they should take him and cause safely to be kept so that they should have his Body before the Justices of the said Queen at Westminst aforesaid on the Morrow of all Souls then next following to satisfie unto the said Edward of the said Damages At which day before the aforesaid Justices of the said Queen at Westminster came the said E. by his said Attorney Exigent retorned by the new Sheriffs which was executed by the Sheriffs of London their Predecessors and H. Offeley and R. Saltenstall then Sheriffs of London then and there retorned the said Writ unto them by the said T. Skinner and I. C. late Sheriffs of London their Predecessors in going out from their Office delivered unto them and in form following retorned and executed that is to say at the Husting of a Plea of the Land held in Guild-hall of the City of London on Monday next after the Feast of the Apostles of Peter and Paul in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. the first time was called and did not appear At the Husting of a Plea of the Land held in the Guild-hall of the said City on Monday next after the end of St. Mildred the Virgin in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. was the second time called and did not appear At the Husting of a Plea of the Land held in Guild-hall of the said City on Monday next after the end of St. James the Apostle in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. was the third time called and did not appear At the Husting c. held c. on Monday next afor the end of St. Faiths the Virgin in the year c. the said W. was the fourth time called and did not appear At the Husting c. held c. on Monday next after the end of St. Luke the Evangelist in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. was the fift time called and did not appear therefore he was Outlawed Outlawed Upon which the said E. afterwards that is to say in the Term of St. Hilary in the thirty second year of the Reign of the said now Queen he Sued forth out of the said Court of the Queens Bench aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid a certain Writ
were the customary Lands and parcell of the Mannor aforesaid and Demised and Demiseable by the Lord of that Mannor and by the Steward of the Court of the same Mannor for the time being to whatsoever person or persons were willing to take the same in Fee-simple Fee-tayl for term of life or years or otherwise at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor aforesaid and that he the said Plaintif of the Mannor aforesaid with th' appurtenances whereof c. so being seized before the said time of the foresaid Trespass done at his the said Court of the Plaintif of his said Mannor holden the said twelfth day of October in the thirty fift year abovesaid by the aforesaid I. W. at that time his Steward of his Mannor aforesaid granted the aforesaid Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the foresaid Defendant to have and to hold to the said Defendant and his Heirs by a Rod at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor by vertue of which said Grant the said Defendant into the aforesaid Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor in manner and form as the said Defendant above in pleading hath alleged And that the said Defendant being so thereof seized before the time of the said Trespass done that is to say the tenth day of November in the first and second year of the Reign of the now Lord the King and the now Lady the Queen made waste in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in felling and cutting down one Oak of the age of Ten years and more and by Destroying the branches of the stem of the same Oak thereout growing with his Cattell under pretence of which the said Plaintif before the said time in which the said Trespass was done into the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. entred as into the Tenements unto him the Plaintif by the said Defendant forfeited and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said Defendant the said first day of October in the second and third year abovesaid with force and arms c. the Close and House aforesaid at F. aforesaid brake and the aforesaid Oak to the value c. there lately growing cut down and carried away against the peace of the said now King and Queen as he above against him complaineth and this he is ready to prove whereof from which the said Defendant the said Trespass aforesaid above acknowledging the said Plaintif prayeth Judgement and his Damages by reason of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant pleads the Custome of the Mannor to give the customary Tenants liberty to cut down Trees growing upon their Tenements ss AND the said Defendant by Protestation not acknowledging any matters in the said Replication above to be true for Plea saith that within the Mannor aforesaid it hath from the time of which the memory of men is not to the contrary it had such a Custom that is to say that every Costomary Tenant of the Mannor aforesaid who held any Customary Tenements within that Mannor unto him and his heirs at the Will of the Lord of the Mannor by Copy of Court-Roll of that Mannor according to the Custome of the same Mannor could and might cut down whatsoever Trees and Wood growing in or upon the Customary Tenements without forfeiture of such Customary Tenements unto the Lord of that Mannor for the time being for such waste by which the said Defendant being seized of the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. in his Demesn as of Fee at the will of the Lord of the said Mannor that Oak the said first day of October in the years of the Reign of the now King and Queen the second and third abovesaid then and there growing did cut down as to him it was lawfull and this he is ready to prove whereof as before he prayeth Judgement and that the said Plaintif from his action aforesaid against him the Defendant had may be precluded c. ss AND the said Plaintif as formerly he saith Plaintif maintains the Replication without this that there is such a Custom as the Defendant in his Rejoynder allegeth c. that he the said Plaintif is and at the time of the said Trespass done and long before was seized of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesn as of Fee and that the said Messuage and two acres of Land with th' appurtenances are and at the time in which c. and also from the time c. were Customary Lands and parcell of the said Mannor and Demiseable and demised by the Lord of that Mannor and by the Steward of the Court of the same Mannor for the time being unto whatsoever person or persons is or are willing to take them in Fee-simple Fee-tayl for term of life or years or otherwise at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor And that the Plaintif of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. before the said time of the said Trespass done that is to say at the said Court of him the Plaintif of his said Mannor holden the twelfth day of October in the thirty fift year abovesaid by the aforesaid I. W. then his Steward of his said Mannor granted the said Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the foresaid Defendant to have and to hold unto the said Defendant and his Heirs by a rod at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor by vertue of which said grant the said Defendant into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seised in his demesn as of Fee at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor in manner and form as the said Defendant above in pleading hath alleleged and that the said Defendant so being thereof seized before the said time of the said Trespass done that is to say the tenth day of November in the years 1. 2. abovesaid he made waste in the same Tenements with th' appurtenances that is to say in cutting and felling down one Oak of the age of ten years and more by destroying the branches of the stem of the same Oak thenceforth growing with his Cattell under pretence of which before the said time in which the said Trespass was done into the Tenements aforesaid with th' appurtenances in which c. he entred as into the Tenements unto him the Plaintif by the said Defendant forfeited and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said Defendant the said first day of October in the years second and third abovesaid with force and arms c. the said Close and House at Foxley aforesaid did break and the Oak aforesaid to the value c. there lately growing
did cut down and carry away against the Peace of the said now King and Queen as he above against him complaineth in manner and form as he the said Plaintif in replying hath alleged without this that within the said Mannor it hath and from the time of which the Memory of men is not to the contrary it had such Custome that is to say that every customary Tenant of the said Mannor who held any customary Tenements within that Mannor to him and his heirs at the Will of the Lord of that Mannor by Copy of Court-Rolls of that Mannor according to the Custome of the same Mannor was able to and might cut down whatsoever Trees and Woods growing in or upon those Customary Tenements without any forfeiture of any such Customary Tenement unto the Loâ—d of that Mannor for the time being for such like waste in manner and form as the said Defendant above in rejoyning hath pleaded and this c. wherefore as formerly he prayeth Judgement and his Damages aforesaid by reason of the said Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. ss AND the said Defendant as before saith that within the said Mannor it hath and from the time of which c. it had such Custome that is to say that every Customary Tenant of the said Mannor which held any Customary Tenements within that Mannor to him and his heirs at the Will of the Lord of that Mannor by Copy of Court-Roll of that Mannor according to the Custome of the same Mannor is able to and might cut down whatsoever Trees and Wood growing in or upon those Customary Tenements without forfeiture of any such like Customary Tenements unto the Lord of that Mannor for the time being for such like waste And of this he putteth himself upon the Countrey and the said Defendant likewise c. ss AND the said Johane by W.B. her Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and injury when Defendant justifies Trespas as Servant by vertue of a certain Demise by the Rector of the Parish Church of St. Swithins in London according to the Custom of the City of London by the assent of the Warden of the same Parish the Deed being openly known Custome of London that the Rector of any Church might let the land of his Church with the assent of the Wardens of that Church and of honest persons of the Vestrey c. and as to the comming with force and arms not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespass above supposed to be done the said I. saith that the foresaid R. ought not to maintain his Action because he saith that the said House in which the said Trespass is supposed to be done is and at the time of that Trespass above supposed to be done was one Messuage with th' appurtenances in the Parish and Ward aforesaid whereof long before the said time in which c. one R. Chatterton Clerk late Rector of the Parish Church of St. Swithin in Candle-wick-street in the City of London was seized in his Demesn as of Fee in the right of his said Church and that the said City of London is an antient City within which said Ciity it hath and from the time c. it had such Custom that if and whensoever any person being Rector of any Parish Church within the said City being seized in his demesn as of Fee in the right of his Church aforesaid of any Messuage or Tenement within the same City to the use of the Parishioners of the Parish of which any such person should be Rector or to the use intention or Trust to any charitable works to be done or done or to the use of finding any Chaplain at Divine Services in such Church where such person so should be Rector to doe and celebrate and if such Rector so seized at such use should make any Demise of any such Messuage or Tenement unto any person or persons for term of years by his Deed indented sealed with his Seal by the Assent of the Wardens of good Works Rents and Ornaments of such Church or of one of the Wardens of such Church for the time being and of any other honest persons of that Church in a certain place called the Vestrey of the Church of such Parish being come together to the handling of the businesses of that Church or the greater Number of those persons so being there assembled that from thenceforth such Demise for Term of years so made should be and from the whole time abovesaid it was used to be good valid and of force in Law against such Rector and his Successors of others whosoever claiming under the title and titles of the Rector during such Term in such Deed of Demise specified although such Demisor shall die or his Rectory or Benefice thereupon resign or her with any other person should grant within such Term in such Deed of Demise contained and that long before the said time in which c. and long before which the said R. H. had any thing in the aforesaid Messuage with th' appurtenances the said R. C. Clerk then being Rector of the Parish Church of St. Swithin aforesaid was seized of that Messuage with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and in right of the said Church to the use to find a Chaplain to celebrate Divine Services in the aforesaid Church of St. Swithins for ever and so thereof to that use being seized the said R. C. being Rector of that Church long before the said time in which c. that is to say in such a day in the thirty second year of the Reign of H. 8. at London in the Parish of St. Swithins in the Ward of Walbrook aforesaid by his certain Deed indented one part of which is sealed with the Seal of the said R. C. the same I. R. here in Court doth profer whose Date is the same twenty first day of October in the said twenty second year of H. 8. abovesaid with the Assent of William Spâ—nk and Richard Bownington then Wardens of the good Works Rents and Ornaments of the said Church of St. Swithins being and of the greater number of honest persons of that Parish in a place called the Vestrey of the Church of the said Parish being assembled to treat of the businesses of that Parish Namely T. P. A. R. R. C. I. P. R. D. W. D. W. S. W. G. T. W. H. B. A. B. W. H. R. C. I. H. R. B. and I. S. Demised Granted and to farm let unto one John Rogers the aforesaid Messuage with th' appurtenances To have and to hold unto the said R. his Executors and Assigns from the Feast of the Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ from thenceforth next ensuing untill the end and term of ten years from thenceforth next ensuing and fully to be compleat and ended yielding and paying therefore yearly during the said Term unto the said Rector and Wardens or to their Successors Rectors and Wardens of the said Church
late King Father of the Lord the now King neither in the actuall or reall possession of the Lord the now King neither excepted in the foresaid Act of the said late King or by any Commission of the Lord the now King altered otherwise disposed neither changed by pretence of which said Act of the said Lord the now King the same Lord the now King from the said Feast of Easter in the said Act specified was of the Messuage aforesaid with th' appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee and so being thereof seized the said Lord the now King afterwards and before the said time of the aforesaid Trespass done by his Letters Patents the Date whereof is at Westminster the twentie first day of May in the third year of his Reign gave and granred and by his the said Letters Patents confirmed unto one I.H. B.B. the foresaid Messuage with th'arpurtenances among other Lands and Tenements to have hold and enjoy unto them the said I. and B. their Heirs and Assigns for ever by vertue of which said Grant they the said I. and B. were of the said Messuage with th' appurtenances seized in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized they the said I. and B. afterward and before the said time of the foresaid Trespass done that is to say sixth day of May in the year of the Reign of the Lord now King third at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid they gave and granted the said Messuage with th' appurtenances unto the same R. H. To have hold and enjoy the aforesaid Messuage with th' appurtenances unto the said R. H. his Heirs Trespas granted by Letters Patents of the King and Assigns for ever by pretence of which said Gift and Grant the said R. H. long before the said time in which c. into the said Messuage with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said I. the day and year abovesaid in the said Declaration above specified with force and arms c. into the said Messuage with th' appurtenances broke in manner and form as he above c. against him complaineth Without this Without that that the said R. C. Demised Granted and to Farm let unto the foresaid I. R. the said Messuage with th' appurtenances in manner and form as the said I. above in pleading hath alleged and this c. VVhereupon from which the said I. the said Trespass above done acknowledged prayeth Judgement and his Damage by that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. And the said as I. before saith that the said Richard C. Demised Granted and to farm let unto the aforesaid I. R. the said Messuage with th' appurtenances in manner and form as she hath alleged and of this putteth her self upon the Countrey c. ss AND the said G. B. by W. W. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and Injury when Defendant justifies that the place is parcel of the M. of R. and that he as Servant of the Lord of the Mannor broke the Close and so justifies c. and as to the coming with force and arms c. and also the whole Trespass aforesaid above supposed to be done besides the breaking of the said Close saith that he is not guilty and as to the breaking of that Close the said G. saith that no Action c. because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which the said Trespass is supposed to be done are and at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done were two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances in W. aforesaid called Waldringfield Heath which said two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes lye between a certain way called the Procession way of Mertlesham dividing the said Furzes of W. Heath and certain Furzes called Marlad Heath in part and Land called Ringland late J. Kingbils in part of the Furzes called Brightwill Heath Abâ—ttals and Dapdalewey in part upon the South and Land called Colecroft in part and Land lying in the Town of Martlesham and the Heath in Martlesham and the Dâ—tch called Fexall Ditch of the North part and one head of the said Heath called Waldringfield Heath abutting upon the terre Tenements appertaining to the Mannor of Rivershall and Waldringfield against the east and other two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes are and at the said time in which c. were parcell of the Mannor of Rivershall in W. aforesaid Which said Mannor is and at the aforesaid time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of one I. and M. by which the Defendant as the Servant of them said I. and M. and by their Command the Close aforesaid as the proper Close and ground and freehold of them the said I. and M. did break as to him it was lawfull and this c. whereof c. Plaintif saith that the place c. is not parcell of the M. of R. but that one I. P. was seized and so seized Demised two hundred acres of oâ— Land parcell of the hundred and fifty acâ—es in bar specifies the Plaintif to hold unto the Plaintiff at the Will of the Lessor ss NOT to he precluded because he saith that the said Close and also the places in which the said Trespass whereupon the said R. himself above in manner Complaineth was done are and at the time of that Trespass were two hundred acres parcell of the said two hundred and fifty acres of Heath and Furzes in barre aforesaid before specified whereupon long before the said time of the foresaid time done one I. P. was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and the said I. so being thereof seized the said I. before the said time of the said Trespass done that is to say such a day and year at N. in the County aforesaid Demised the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances unto the said R.W. To have and to hold the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances unto the said R. at the will of her the said Jane by vertue of the same Demise the said R. into the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes with th' appurtenances before the foresaid time of the said Trespass done entred and was thereof possessed untill the said G. B. at the time of the said Trespass done the foresaid Close did break in manner and form as the said R. himself above Without this and in manner complaineth Without this that the said two hundred acres of Heath and Furzes are and at the time of the said Trespass done were parcell of the Mannor of Rivershall in manner and form as the said G. B. before in pleading hath alleged and this c. Whereupon from that the said G. the Trespass aforesaid before acknowledging the said R. prayeth Judgement and his Damages by reason of that
B. the Brother the said Moity of the said Tenements which was of his the said G. B. according to the said Custom of Gavelkind descended unto the said I. B. and unto one R. B. as Kin and Heirs of the whole bloud of the said G. B. c. namely as Sons of H. B. Brother of T. B. Father of the said T. Father of the said T. B. the Son and G. B. by which they the said I. B. and R. B. before the said time in which c. into the said Moity of the said Tenements entred and thereof were seized in their Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the said time in which c. thereof Infeoffed the said I. M. To have to him and his Heirs for ever by vertue of which said Feoffement the said I. M before the said time in which c. demised the said Moity unto the said I. B. for the said Term of two years yet in being as the same I. B. before hath alleged by vertue of which said demise the said I. B. of that Moity was possessed untill the said I.C. at the said time in which c. chased the said Horse out of the 20. Acres of Land as the said I. B. before complaineth Without this that it hath or from the time of which memory is not it had any such Custom in the said County of Kent that whensoever two Heirs Males Coparceners of the half bloud of whatsoever Parent begotten should be inheritable of any Lands or Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the said County and either of those Heirs should dye without Heir of his body seized of his purpart of such like Inheritance that then the other Heir Coparcener of the same Heir surviving might inherit and by all the said time was inheritable and hath inherited and ought to inherit according to that Custom that purpart of all the Lands and Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind aforesaid of the other Heir so without Heir of his body dying before any other Kin of the same Heir of the whole bloud so dying without Heir of his body as the said H.C. before in pleading hath alleged And this c. whereupon from which the said H. C. the said Trespass being acknowledged prayeth judgement and his damages by reason of the said Trespass before acknowledged prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. Issue upon Custom And the said H. C. as before saith that it hath and from the time which memory doth not remain it had such Custom in the said County of Kent that whensoever two Heirs Males Coparceners of the half bloud of whomsoever begotten were inheritable of any Lands or Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the same County and either of those Heirs should dye without Heir of his body seized of his put part of such like inheritance that then the other Heir Coparcener of the same Heir superviving might inherit and by all the time aforesaid was inheritable and hath inherited and ought to inherit according to that Custom the purpartie of all the Lands and Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind of the said other Heir so without Heir of his body dying before any other Kin of the same Heir of the whole bloud so without Heir of his body dying as the said H. before in pleading hath alleged Enter the Court will advise before the Ven ' fac ' adjudged and a speciall rendting of his Judgement thereupon in which they were before to confer with the Justices of the Bench and a Writ of Ven ' fac ' of the body of the County of Kent should be awarded And of this he putteth himself upon the Country and the said I. B. likewise And because the Court of the Lady the Queen hereof c. issues aforesaid between the said parties before joyned will advise before any Writ of Venir fac ' to the Jury to try the issue should be adjudged day is given to the said parties before the Lady the Queen in what State now untill in 8. days of St. Hillary whensoever c. then to attend and hear the Order or Judgement of the said Court of and upon the premises for that that the Court of the Lady the Queen thereof c. At which day before the Lady the Queen at Westminster commeth the said parties by their said Attorneys And c. And so it was continued by 10. Terms then next following c. And in this thing the inspection and view diligently aswell the said issues as in all and singular the premises by the Court of the Lady the Queen of the Bench is to be had and consulted with for that the Tryall of the said Issue doth touch and concern the Comunalty of the said County and it is the Custom that a Writ to call a Jury to try that Issue of the body of the said County of Kent should Issue forth and should be directed to the Sheriff of the same County by which the command is to the Sheriff of the same County that he should cause to come before the Lord the King in 8. dayes of St. Hillary wheresoever Ven ' fac ' of the body of the County of Kent awarded c. 24. aswell Knights c. of the body of the said County by whom c. And who neither c. to recognize c. because aswell c. the same day is given to the said parties there c. AND the said W. saith Plaintif saith that he held the said twenty acres of Land of the said Prior by Fealty Sure of Court and the rent of four shillings and for that rent behind the said Priaccustomed to distrain Without this that the Prior was seized of the Rent-charge as c. that the said R. B. the taking of the said Cattell and Chattells in the said place in which c. ought not to acknowledge just c. because he saith that he himself was seized of the said Ten acres of Land with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized the same twenty acres of Land with th'appurtenance held of the aforesaid T. late Prior of the said Church by Fealty and Sute to the Court of him the said late Prior of his Mannor of I. in C. aforesaid to be held from three weeks to three weeks and by the Rent of four shillings unto the said late Prior at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell yearly to be paid And the said W. M. and all those whose estate he hath in those twenty acres of Land held those twenty acres of Land with th' appurtenances of the said late Prior and his Predecessors heretofore Priors of the said Church by that Service and Rent in the right of the said Church from time out of mind held and by all the said time the said late Prior and all
his Predecessors formerly Priors of the said Church accustomed to distrein in the said twenty acres of Land for that the same Rent of four shillings and every parcell thereof whensoever that Rent should happen to be behind in part or in all Without this that the said T. the late Prior Issue upon Seifin of Rent and his Predecessors heretofore Priors of the said Church from the time wherein the Memory of man is not extant in the right of that Church were seized of the said Rent of six shillings eight pence issuing out of the said twenty acres of Land as of Rent-Charge in the form which the said R. B. by the said Acknowledgement before hath supposed And this c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of the taking and deteining of the said Cattell and Chattells to be adjudged unto him c. And the said R. saith that the said W. the now Prior and his Predecessors heretofore Priors of the said Church from the time whereof the Memory of man is not extant in the right of that Church were seized of the said Rent of six shillings eight pence of the said twenty acres of Land as of a Rent-Charge in what form the said R. by his said acknowledgement before supposeth And of this he putteth himself upon the Countrey c. AT which eight dayes of St. Hillary before the Lord the King Entry of an Essoin and joyning in Aid and imparlance in Replevin Mich. 15. H. 7. rot 78. the like Mich. 23. H. 7. rot 103. at Westminster cometh the said parties by their said Attorneys and the said I. T. being summoned at the aforesaid Eight dayes of Saint Hillary caused himself to be Essoyned of the said Plea and had thereupon day by his Essoyn untill at this day that is to say from the day of Easter in three weeks then next following before the said King wheresoever c. And now at this day before the said King at Westminster commeth aswell the said R.M. as the said P.S. and I. and R. W. by his said Attorney and the said I. T. in the fourth day being solemnly called by W. F. his Attorney likewise commeth and joyneth himself in Ayd of the said R. M. to answer unto the said P. S. I. and R. together with the said R. M. to the said Avowment and Acknowledgement is granted c. And upon this day thereof is given to the said parties before the said King untill in eight dayes of the holy Trinity Imparlance by default Plaintif joyneth himself in Ayd The Writ of Ven ' Fac ' is not put into the Crown wheresoever c. that is to say to the aforesaid R. M. and I. T. to imparl and then to answer c. And as to the trying of the said Issue before joyned he hath not put the Writ thereof in the Crown Therefore as often commeth the Jury thereupon before the said King at the same Term by whom c. And who neither c. to Recognise c. Because aswell c. the same day is given to the said parties c. Defendant pleads that the Wife of the Plaintif whilest she was sole released him Hill 13. H. 8. 10 32. ss AND the said I. F. by R. T. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when c. and saith that the said W. and A. ought not to have an Action c. because he saith that the said Anne before the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done and before the Marriage between her the said A. and the said W. solemnized that is to say the eighteenth day of October in the Ninth year of the Reign of the now King the said A. delivered unto the aforesaid I. F. the said goods and Chattells as the said W. and A. before have declared And afterwards that is to say the twenty fifth day of November in the Ninth year of the Reign of the Lord the now King aforesaid the said A. whilest she was sole by the name of Anne Redhelke of L. Widow at L. that is to say in the Parish and Ward aforesaid by her certain Writing which the said I. sealed with the Seal of her the said A. here in Court profered whose Date is the said twenty fifth day of November in the ninth year of the Reign of the said now King aforesaid remised and released unto the said I. F. by the name of I. F. Citizen and Merchant Taylor of London all and all manner of personall Actions and Demands which she might have against him the said I. by whatsoever reason from the beginning of the World untill the day of making of the said Writing as in that Writing more fully is contained Without this that the said A. delivered the said goods and Chattels unto the said I. F. the said twentieth day of December in the said Ninth year of the Reign of the said now King or at any time after the making of the said VVriting of the Release And this c. whereupon c. Protestation And they the said W. and A. say that they by any matter c. ought to be precluded because protesting that the said A. delivered unto the said I. F. the said goods and Chattells as they the said W. and A. before against him Complaineth for Plea saith that the said Writing of Release Not her Deâ—d is not the Deed of the said A. in manner and form as the said I. F. before have alleged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of c. ss AND the said I. O. in his own person commeth and defendeth the force and Wrong when c. Kent Defendant justifies the Trespass by vertue of a Demise Judgement for the Plaintif Trin. 13. H. 7. â—ot ' 87. And as to the coming with force and arms or whatsoever which is against the Peace of the Lord the now King and also all the said Trespass besides the breaking of the said Close and eating up treading and consuming of the said Grass in N. aforesaid saith that he in no manner is guilty thereof And of this he putteth himself upon the Country And the said Plaintif likewise c. And as to the breaking of the said Close and eating up treading and consuming of the said grass in N. the said Defendant saith that he ought not to have his Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which the said Trespass is supposed to be done in N. aforesaid was and at the said time in which c. were thirty acres of Land with th' appurtenances in N. aforesaid called H. whereof before the said time in which c. one T. Chelyn was seized in her Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized before the said time in which c. that is to say in the Feast of St. Michael th'Archangell in the twelfth year of the Reign of the now King at Feversham in the said County Demised
the same Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said Defendant to have unto the said Defendant from the same Feast of Saint Michael to the end of the Term of four years from thence next following and fully to be Compleated By vertue of which said Demise the said John was of the said Tenements possessed And the said Plaintif claimed the said Tenements with th' appurtenances by Colour of a certain Deed of Demise unto him thereof made for Term of his life by the said Thomasine Colour before the said Demise unto the said Defendant in form aforesaid made where nothing of those Tenements with th' appurtenances in the possession of them the Plaintifs by that Deed ever passed into the said Tenements before the said time in which c. they entred upon which said possession of the Plaintifs thereupon the said Defendant into the said Tenements in which c. at the same time in which c. claiming his said Term re-entred and the said Close in the same Tenements in N. did break and the grass upon the same Tenements then growing with the said Cattell did eat up and tread down as to him it was lawfull And this c. Whereupon c. And they the said Plaintifs say Plaintif allegeth a certain Conveyance unto him by the said T. Chelyn made for and in consideration of a certain Marriage that they by any matter before alleged from his said Action against him the said Defendant had ought not to be precluded because they say because that long before the said Trespass done the said T. Chelyn was seized of the said thirty acres of Land in N. aforesaid and of the hundred and thirty acres of wood with th' appurtenances in D. and N. aforesaid called the Mannor of Sholand in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized long before the said Trespass done that is to say the sixt day of July in the Third year of the Reign of the said now King at Lynsted in the said County between the said T. C. and one William Morgan the then Son and Heir apparent of the said Thomasine and A. Hett it was agreed and covenanted that the said W. Morgan should take to VVife and marry the said A. and the said A. should take to Husband the said W. Morgan and the same Thomasine for Matrimony between them to be solemnized then and there covenanted and granted unto the said W. M. and Alice that they from the day of Matrimony between them to be solemnized should have and hold unto them and their Assigns for Term of their and either of their life as long as they live the said Tenements in D. and N. aforesaid and that the same Thomasine and all and singular other persons which then were or then afterward should be seized of and in those Tenements should stand and be thereof seized immediatly after the Matrimony between the said W. M. and Alice solemnized to the use of them the said W. M. and Alice to the Term of their or either of their life so long as they live and after the death of them the said W. and A. to the use of the said T. C. and her heirs and that the same Thomasine should make or procure to be made all and singular the said Tenements to be secured unto the said W. M. and Alice according to the form of the said Concord and Agreement when she should be thereunto requested And the said Plaintifs say that after the said Concord and Agreement in form aforesaid made that is to say the twenty sixth day of the said Moneth of July in the third year aforesaid the said Alice at Hern in the said County of Kent took to Husband the said W.M. and he took to wife the said Alice that the Matrimony solemnized and celebrated between them was according to the form and effect of the said Concord and agreement by and after which said Matrimony solemnized and consummated the said Thomasine was of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in her Demesn as of Fee seized to the use of the said W.M. and Alice for the Term of their and either of their life so long as they live and she so therof being seized the said VV. M. and A. according to the form of the said Concord and Agreement the issues and profits of the said Tenements by the Sufferance of the said Thomasine from the said 26. day of July in the third year abovesaid until the 15. day of July the said W. M. at Feversham in the said County of Kent dyed and the said Alice him survived by which the said Thomasine was of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances seized in her Demesn as of Fee to the use of the said Alice for the term of her life and she the said Thomasine so thereof to that use being seized the said Alice after the death of the said VV. M. and long before the said Trespass done into the said Tenements entred and those Tenements with th' appurtenances afterwards that is to say in the day of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist in the twelfth year aforesaid an Hern aforesaid the said Plaintifs demised To have to them and their Assigns from the same day untill the end and Term of three years from thence next following and fully to be compleat by vertue of which Demise the said Plaintifs were of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances possessed untill the said Defendant at the time of the said Trespass done the said Close did break and the said grass in that Close then growing with the said Cattell did eat up tread down and consume in manner and form as they the said Plaintifs by their said Bill before against him doe Complain All and singular which matters they the said Plaintifs are ready to prove whereupon from what the said Defendant the said Trespass in N. aforesaid before hath acknowledged pray Judgement and their said Damages by occasion of the said Trespass to be adjudged unto them c. And the said Defendant protesting that it was not consented Protestation agreedâ— and covenanted between the said Thomsine and the said W.M. and Alice that the said VV. M. should take to VVise the said A. H. protesting also that the said Thomasine for the Matrimony between the said W. M. and A. to be solemnized did not Covenant nor grant to and with the said W. M. and Alice that they from the day of Marriage to be solemnized between them they should have and hold to them and their Assigns for the Term of their and either of their life so long as they live the said Tenements nor that the same Thomasine and all and singular other persons which were or then afterwards should be seized of and in those Tenements should stand and be thereof seized after the Matrimony between them the said W. M. and A. solemnized to the use of them the said W.M. and A. for the Term of their and either of their life
so long as they live Protesting also that the said Alice did not Demise unto the said Plaintifs the said Tenements in manner and form as the said Plaintifs in their said Replication before have alleged for Plea as before saith that the said Thomasine was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in N. in her Demesn as of Fee And so seized demised the same Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said Defendant To have to him from the Feast of St. Michael th'Archangell untill the end of the Term of four years from thence next following and fully to be Compleat By vertue of which Demise the said Defendant was of those Tenements possessed in manner and form as the said Defendant in barre before hath alleged Without this Without this that the said Thomasine at the time of the said Demise by the said Alice unto the said Plaintiffs of the said Tenements supposed to be done was seised of the said Tenements with the appurtenances to the use of the said Alice in manner and form as the said Plaintiffs before in pleading have alleged And this c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement and that the said Plaintiff from his said Action against him the said Defendant had may be precluded c. And the said Defendants say that the said Thomasine at the time of the said Demise by the said Alice unto the said Plaintiffs in form aforesaid made was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances to the use of the said Alice in manner and form as they the said Plaintiffs before in pleading have alleged And this they pray that it may be enquired of by the Country c. â—uff Declaration in Trespass wherfore they broke the Close against two Defendants who plead severally Parl. 32. H. 8. Rot. 111. One of the Defendants pleads that he is seised of certain Lands c. in Fee by reason of which hee ought to have Common in the place in which c. and that he put the Cattle c. for using the CoÌ„mon c. which is the same Common and so justifies ss R. B. late of Levistost in the said County Yeoman and W. H. late of L. c. were attached to answer unto Edward B. together with R. H. late of c. of a Plea wherefore with force and Arms the Close of him the said E. at G. they did break and his Grass to the value of 10. l. there late growing with certain Cattle they did eat up tread and consume And other Wrongs c. To the great Damage c. and against the Peace c. And the said R. B. and W.C. by R. B. their Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the comming with force and Arms c. Not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespass before supposed to be done the said R. B. saith that the said E. no Action because he saith that the place in which the said Trespass is supposed to be done is and at the said time of that Trespass supposed to be done was a certain place called the Dens conteining in it self D. Acres of Land in G. aforesaid extending it self from the South from a certain place called G. in L. aforesaid unto a certain place called H. in G. aforesaid against the North-West and so extending from the foot of the Rock of the Cliff untill the Sea against the East and that he at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done and long before of 3. Messuâ—ges and 16. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in L. aforesaid was seised in his Demesn as of Fee And that he and all those whose estate he hath in the said 3. Messuages and 16. Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had were accustomed to have common of Pasture of and in the said places caâ—led the Dens within the said Bounds and Limits with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever at all time of the year by which the said R. B. at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done his said Cattle into the said Close in the said place called the D. in G. aforesaid within the said Bounds and Limits to the said Grass there then growing to feed in using his said Common by the time aforesaid did put as to him it was lawfull which things are the same breaking of the Close treading consuming and eating up of the said Grass whereof the said G. before himself doth now complain And this c. Whereupon he prayeth Judgement if an Action c. And the said W.C. saith that the said E. No Action The other Defendant saith that he likewise is seized of certain other Lands c. in Fee by reason of which he hath Common of pasture in the place in which c. and that he put in Cattle c. in using the Common c. which is the same Trespass c. and so justifies because he saith that the place in which the said Trespass supposed to be done is and at the said time of that Trespass before supposed to be done was the said place called the Dens and that he at the time of that Trespass before supposed to be done and long before was likewise seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in two Messuages and 2. Acres of Land with the appurtenances in L. aforesaid and that he and all those whose estate he hath in the said two Messuages and two Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had and were accustomed to have Common of Pasture in the said place called the Dens within the said bounds and limits with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever at all time of the year by which the said W.G. at the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done his said Cattle into the said Close in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the said bounds and limits to the said Grass there then growing to feed in using his said Common by the said time put as to him it was lawfull which matters are the same breaking of the Close treading consuming and eating up of the said Grass whereof the said E. before himself how complaineth And this c. whereupon c. And the said E. B. saith To the Plea of one of the Defendants the Plantiff saith that the Trespass done was aswell in the said place called the Dens as in another place called the East Heath and because the Defendants to the Trespass in the same place called East Heath of new assigned doe not answer prayeth Judgment c. New Assignment that he by any matter before alleged from his said Action against the said R. B. and W.C. had ought not to be precluded because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which the said Trespass whereof the said E.
before himself now complaineth was done are and at the said time of that Trespass done were aswell the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid as the said other place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliff in G. aforesaid whereupon from which they the said R. and W. to the said Trespass in the said place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliff before of new Assigned to be done doe not answer prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudgâ—d unto him c. And as to the said Plea of the said R. B. before pleaded the same E. saith that he by any matter in the said Plea before alleged from his said Action against the said R. had ought not to be precluded because he saith that he himself at the time of the said Trespass done was seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the Mannor of G. in C. aforesaid whereof the said place called the Dens to the said time in which c. was parcell untill the said R. together c. the day and year aforesaid in the said Declaration before specified the Close of him the said E. aforesaid at G. aforesaid in the said place called the Dens within the said bounds and limits did break and his Grass to the value c. there late growing with his said Cattle by the time aforesaid was eaten up trodden down and consumed in what manner and form the same E. before against him complaineth Without this Without this that the said W. C. and all those whose Estate he hath in the said three Messuages and 16. Acres of Land in the Bar of the said R. before specified from the time of the contrary of which the memory of Man doth not remain had and accustomed to have common of pasture of and in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the bounds and limits aforesaid with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever in all time of the year as the said R. before in the said Bar hath alleged And this he is ready c. whereupon from what the said R. the said Trespass in the said place called the Dens done in G. aforesaid afore hath acknowledged prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. And as to the said Plea of the said W. C. before pleaded the said E. saith that he by any matter in the same Plea before alleged The Plaintiff to the Plea of the other Defendant pleadeth as to the Plea of the first from his said Action against the said W. had ought not to be precluded because he saith that he himself at the said time of the said Trespass done was seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the said Mannor of G. whereof the said place called the D. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell untill the said W. C. together with c. the day and year aforesaid in the said Declaration before specified the Close of him the said E. aforesaid Without this at G. aforesaid c. as before Without this that the said W. C. and all those whose Estate he hath in the said two Messuages and two Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time c. as before And this he is ready to prove whereupon from what c. as before One of the Defendants to the trespass of the new Assignment pleadeth not guilty to the other Plea maintaineth as before and Issue upon that And the said R. B. as to any Trespass in the said place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliffin G. aforesaid of new Assignment made supposed to be done saith that he in nothing is thereof guilty And of this he puts himself c. And the said E. likewise c. And as to the said Plea of the said E. before in replying pleaded the said R. as before saith that he and all those whose estate he hath in the said 3. Messuages and 16. Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had and accustomed to have Common of Pasture of and in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the said bounds and limits with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever in all time of the year as the said R. before in his said Bar hath alleged And of this he putteth himself upon the Country And the said E. likewise c. And the said W.C. as to any Trespass in the said place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliff in G. aforesaid of new Assignment supposed to be done saith that he in nothing is thereof guilty And of this putteth himself upon the Country and the said E. likewise c. And as to the said Plea of the said W. C. afore to the replying pleaded as before saith that he and all those whose Estate he hath in the said two Messuages and two Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had and accustomed to have Common of Pasture of and in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the bounds and limits aforesaid with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever in all time of the year as the said W. before in his said Bar hath alleged And of this putteth himself upon the Country and the said E. likewise therefore as well as to the trying of that Issue as the said c. Middles Declaration in trespass for taking and leading away of a horse Hill 22. H. 8. Roll 26. ss I. W. complaineth of R. W. in the custody of the Marshall c. of that that he in the Feast of St. Margaret the Virgin in the 21. year of the Reign of King Henry the 8. with force and Arms that is to say with Staves c. one Gelding of Colour black Gray of him the said I. of the price of 5. marks at W. in the County aforesaid found took and lead away And other Wrongs Defendant pleads that before the time of the trespas c. he was possessed of the horse c as of his proper horse and that certain Malefactors took the said horse out of his possession and it came to the hands of the Plaintif out of whose possession the Defendant took the horse as his own horse and so justifies c. to the Damage c. 10. marks And thereupon he bringeth his Suit c. And the said R. by W.T. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the comming with force c. or whatsoever thing c. Not guilty And as to the residue of the Trespass no Action c. because he saith that before the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done the same R. was of the said Horse as of his
own Horse possessed And afterwards and before the said time in which c. that is to say the 24. day of July in the 20. year of the Reign of the said now King the said Horse by certain Malefactors unto the said R. unknown out of the possession of him the sayd R. feloniously was taken and led away and afterward the said Horse came to the possession of him the said I. And because the said R. at the same time in which c. found the same Horse in the possession of him the said I. the same R. the said Horse of him the said R's own out of the possession of him the said I. did take and lead away as to him it was lawfull And this c. Whereupon c. The Plaintif saith that one I. R. being of the said Horse possessed at B. in the Fair there sold that Horse that he paid unto the Bailiff of the Fair toll c. Protestation And the said I. saith that he by any matter before alleged c. ought not to be precluded c. because protesting that the said Horse was never the Horse of the said R. as the said R. in his said barre before hath alleged for a Plea notwithstanding the said I. saith that before the said time of the said Trespass done the said I. R. was possessed of the said Horse and so possessed in the Feast day of the Body of Christ in the 21. year of the Reign of the said now King abovesaid at Canbury in the County of Oxon ' in a certain Fair or Market there then held did bargain and sell unto the said I. W. the said Horse for the sum of 31. shillings six pence of lawfull c. which the said I. W. then and there unto the said I. R. paid And further the said I. W. saith that he then and there paid unto one R. C. the then Bailiff of the said Fair one penny by the name of Toll for the said Horse by which the said W. was of the same Horse possessed untill the said R. W. the day and year in the Declaration of him the said I. W. before specified at W. aforesaid in the County aforesaid the same Horse with force and arms aforesaid did take and lead away in manner and form as the said I. W. in his said Declaration before against the said R. W. doth Complain And this c. Whereupon from what the said R. the said Trespass before hath acknowledged to have done he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendant saith that I. R. did not sell unto the Plaintif in the Fair nor the Plaintif paid the Tol. Without this And the said R. W. as before saith that before the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done the same R. W. of the said Horse as of his own Horse was possessed untill the same Horse by the said Malefactors unto the said R. unknown out of the possession of him the said R. feloniously was taken and led away as the said R. in his Bar before hath alleged Without this that the said I. R. did bargain and sell unto the said I. W. the said Horse in the Market or Fair aforesaid Nor the same I. W. unto the aforesaid R. C. the then Bailiff of the said Fair one penny in the name of Toll for the said Horse did pay as the said I. in his Replication before hath alleged And this c. whereupon he prayeth Judgement and that the said I. W. from his said Action against him the said R. had may be precluded c. And the said I. W. saith that the said I. R. did bargain and sell unto the said I. W. the said Horse in the said Market and unto the said R. C. the then Bailiff of the said Fair one penny by the name of Toll for the said Horse did pay as the same I. in his Replication before hath alleged Ven ' fac ' to the Sheriff of Oxoâ— And this he prayeth that it may be enquired of the Countrey And the said R. likewise c. Therefore Command is to the Sheriff of Oxon. that he cause to come before the Lord the King at Westminster the day c. twelve c. of the Visn of B. in the said County of Oxon. by whom c. and who neither c. To Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the said parties there c. ss AND the said I. M. by R. M. his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when Staff Justific ' in Trespass for that that the Tenements in which c. were Customar ' c. and as to the Comming with force and arms c. Not guilty And as to the residue of the said Trespass before supposed to be done the same I. M. saith that the said I. S. No action because he saith that the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in the said Declaration before specified are and from the time whose contrary c. were Customary Tenements and Lands and parcell of the Mannor of Harnedesworth with th' appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. long before the said time in which the said Trespass is supposed to done one T. late Earl of Ormond was seized in his Demesn as of Fee and that the same Tenements with th' appurtenances are and from all the time aforesaid were Demised and demiseable by Copy of Court-Roll of the said Mannor by the Steward of the said Court of that Mannor for the time being unto any person or persons willing to take the same in Fee-simple Fee-tail to Term of life or years or otherwise at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the said Mannor and him the said Earl of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. so as before is said being seized the same Earl afterwards and before the said time in which c. that is to say at the Court of him the said Earl of his said Mannor held at that Mannor the tenth day of October in the twentieth year of the Reign of the said now King of England the seventh after the Conquest by one W. H. the then Steward of him the said Earl of the said Mannor according to the Custom of the said Mannor Demised by Copy of Court-Roll the said Tenements with th' appurtenances amongst other things by the names of one Messuage By names and a certain parcell of Land unto the aforesaid Tenement with th' appurtenances belonging unto one R. M. To have and to hold unto him and his heirs for ever according to the Custom of the said Mannor by vertue of which said Demise the same R. was of those Tenements with th' appurtenances seized in his Demesn as of Fee according to the Custom of the said Mannor And he the said R. of those Tenements with th' appurtenances
so being seized the same R. of such his Estate before the said time in which c. dyed thereof seized after the death of which said R. the said Tenements with th' appurtenances descended unto one Matild as Daughter and Heir of the said R. by which the same Matild into the same Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in her Demesn as of Fee according to the Custom of the said Mannor and so thereof seized the same Matild before the said time in which c. took to Husband the said I. M. by which they the said I. and Matilda were of the same Tenements with th' appurtenances seized in their Demesn as of Fee according to the Custom of the said Mannor Colour by demise by Copy of Court-Roll in the right of the said M. And the said I. S. claiming the said Tenements with th' appurtenances by Colour of a certain Deed of Demise to him thereof made by the said late Earl in his life long before the said Demise of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the aforesaid R. M. in form aforesaid made where nothing of the said Tenements into the possession of him the said I. S. by that Deed ever passed into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred Upon the possession of which said I. S. the same I. M. in the right of the said M. his Wife afterwards that is to say at the same time in which c. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances re-entred and the said Close and House as the proper Close and House of them the said I. M. and M. did break and the said Grass as the proper Grass of the said I.M. and M. with the said Cattell did eat up tread and consume as to him it was lawfull The form of Pleading where Land is granted by Copy of Court-Roll to him and his And further the same I. M. saith in fact that within the said Mannor it hath and from the time the Contrary of which the memory c. it had such Custom that is to say that all Tenants of any Lands and Tenements within the said Mannor having and holding the same Lands or Tenements as of the said Mannor by Copy of Court-Roll by these words in the same Copies that is to say To have to him and his according to the Custom of the said Mannor they shall have an estate in the same Lands and Tenements with th' appurtenances in Fee-Simple according to the Custom of the said Mannor And this c. And whereupon c. And the said I. S. saith that he by any matter c. not to be precluded because he saith that well and true it is that the said late Earl of Ormond was seized of the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof dyed seized after the death of which said Earl the said Tenements with th' appurtenances Discent descended unto the aforesaid I. S. as to the Cosin and Heir of the said late Earl that is to say as Son and Heir of George as Son and Heir of Anne Daughter and Heir of the said Earl by which the said I. S. before the said time of the said Trespass done into the said Mannor with th' appurtenances whereof c. entred and was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee untill the said I. M. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and the said Close and House then and there did break and the said grass then and there growing with the said Cattell did eat up tread and consume in manner and form as the said I. S. before Without this himself now Complaineth Without this that the said Tenement with th' appurtenances are and from the time the contrary of which the memory of man doth not remain were Customary Lands and Tenements and Demised and demiseable by Copy of Court-Roll of the said Mannor in manner and form as the said I. M. before in pleading hath alleged And this c. Whereupon from what the said I. M. of the said Trespass before acknowledgeth prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of the said Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. And the said I. M. as before saith that the said Tenements with th' appurtenances are and from the time the Contrary of which the memory of men doth not remain were Customary Tenements and Lands and Demised and demiseable by Copy of Court-Roll of the said Mannor in manner and form as the said I. M. before in Pleading hath alleged And of this he putteth himself upon the Countrey And the said I. S. likewise c. Therefore c. I. I. lately of c. and B. P. lately of Declaration in Trespass and false imprisonment c. were attached to answer W. N. of a Plea wherefore by force and arms him the said W. at London they took imprisoned and evill handled and him there so in prison against the Law and Custome of the Realm of our Lady the Queen that now is they long deteyned and other harms to him they did to the great Damage of him the said W. and against the Peace of our Lady the Queen c. And whereupon the same W. by I. W. his Attorney complaines that the aforesaid I. and B. such a day and year by force and arms that is to say with Clubs and Knives him the said W. at London c. they took imprisoned and evill handled And him there in Prison against the Law and Custom of the Realm of our Lady the Queen that now is they long that is to say for the space of thirty dayes they deteined And other harms c. To the great Damage c. And against the Peace c. Whereupon he saith he is worsted and hath Damage to the value of 300. pounds And thereupon he brings his Sute c. To this Declaration above the Defendants plead specially the Charter of the Universitie and that they were Proctors And that the Plaintif was fined for ingrossing and forestalling c. And this in the Chancellours Court in Cambridge and so justifie the taking of him for the Fine and to this the Plaintif Demurs and the Defendants joyn in Demurrer At which day here came aswell the aforesaid W. as the aforesaid I and B. by their Attorneys aforesaid The Demurrer adjudged good and a Writ of Enquirie of Damage awarded And upon this the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid I. and B. above in Bar pleaded being seen and by the Justices here fully understood it seems to the same Justices here that that Plea in the manner and form aforesaid pleaded and the matter conteined in the same is insufficient in the Law to debar him the said W. from having his Action aforesaid against the aforesaid I. and B. For which the aforesaid Plaintif ought to recover his Damages by occasion of the Trespass aforesaid against the aforesaid
Trespasse done into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in which c. entred And the said T. and J. of those Tenements with the Appurtenances in which c. wholly expelled and amoved by which the said C. was thereof possessed untill the said T. and J. at the said time in which c. with Force and Armes aforesaid the Close of him the said C. in the said place in which c. did breake and his said Grasse there then growing with the said Cattell did eat up tread and consume and the said Ground there with a Plow did rip up and also his said Wood there then growing they did cut down and carry away against the Peace c. in manner and form as the same C. before against them himselfe now complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said T. and J. the said Trespasse before acknowledging the same C. prayeth Judgment and his said Damages by occasion of that Trespasse unto him to be adjudged c. AND they the said T. and J. say that they the said T. and J. by the said space of one yeare that is to say from the said two and twentieth day of Aprill in the fourth yeare of the said Reigne of the said now King above said untill the said foure and twentieth day of Aprill in the fifth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King aforesaid did inhabit within the said Mannor of B. and not without in manner and form as the said C. before in replying hath alledged and this c. Whereupon as before he praieth Judgment and that the said C. from his said Action thereupon against them had may be procluded c. AND the said C. as before saith that the said T. and J. by the space of one yeare and a day that is to say from the said two and twentieth day of Aprill in the fourth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King untill the foure and twentieth day of Aprill in the fifth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King did inhabit without the said Mannor of B. that is to say at C. aforesaid and within the Mannor of the said C. in manner and form as the same C. before in replying hath alledged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of by the Country c. WILLIAM Attersale Kent Declaration upon the Statute of the eighth year of H. 6. of forcible entryes by Deeds complaineth of John Fuller and M. his wife and VV. Parker in the custody of the Marshall c. Of a Plea wherefore whereas in a Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the sixth after the Conquest at VVestminster in the eight yeare of his Reigne held established amongst other things it should be continued that if any person of any Lands or Tenements with main strength be expulsed and disseised or peaceably is put out and afterward is held out with force or any Feoflment or discontinuance thereof after such entry for the Right of the Possessor to defraud and take away in any manner is made the party in this behalfe grieved may have against such disseisor an Assise of new disseisin or a writ of Trespasse and if the party grieved by Assise or by Action of Trespasse shall recover and by Verdict or in other manner by due form of Law it shall be found that the party Defendant in the Lands and Tenements was by force of entry or after his entry should hold by force the Plaintiff shall recover his treble Damages against the Defendant And further shall make Fine and Redemption as in the same Statute more fully is contained Notwithstanding they the said J. M. and W. P. the said Statute little weighing and the Penalty in the same little fearing the first day of October in the sixth yeare of the now King Edward the sixth into two parts of one Messuage and twelve Acres of Land with the Appurtenances of him the said VV. A. in J. in the County aforesaid with main force that is to say with Swords Staves Clubs Bowes and Arrowes they entred and the said VV. A. with main force expulsed and disseised and him so expulsed and disseised of the same two parts of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances with the said main force withheld and as yet doth withhold from the same to the contempt of the said now King and to the Damage of him the said W. A. 20 l. and against the form of the said Statute and against the Peace of the Lord the now King And thereupon he bringeth his Suit c. Defendant iustifies by vertue of a certain demise unto them at will by one made his own Right the rest as his Servants peaceably and quietly entry into the Tenements c. AND they the said J. F. M. and W. P. by I.C. their Attorney come and defend the force and wrong when c. all Contempts and whatsoever c. And say that long before the said Entry into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before supposed to be done one I. G. was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and him the said I. G. so being thereof seized the same I. G. afterward and before the said time in which c. that is to say the eighth and twentieth day of October in the yeare of the Lord 1541. at I. aforesaid made his last Will and by the same Will that I. then his Wife should have the said Tenements with the Appurtenances to the Tearm of the life of her the said J. so that after the Discease of her the said J. have those Tenements with the Appurtenances should remain unto one J. K. and his Heires for ever And afterwards and before the said time in which c. the said J. at I. aforesaid died after the death of which said J. G. by vertue of the said last Will the same J. into the Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesne as of Free-hold and she the said J. so thereof being seized the same J. long before the said time in which c. that is to say the twentieth day of September in the sixth yeare of the Reigne of the now Lord King Edward the sixth at J. aforesaid demized the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said J. F. one of the aforesaid Defendants to have and to hold those Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said J. F. his Executors and Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-angell Lease at will from thence next following and fully to be compleat and so from yeare to yeare as long as both parties should please By vertue of which said Demise the same J. F. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred Colour by demise and was thereof possessed and the said W. A. claiming the said Tenements with the Appurtenances by colour of which Deed of Demise unto him thereof made by the said
J. G. in his life for tearm of his life where nothing of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances into the Possession of him the said W. A. by that Deed ever passed into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred Upon the Possession of which said W. A. thereupon the said J. F. in his proper Right claiming his said Tearme and the said M. and W. P. as Servants of him the said J. F. and by his command at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances peaceably and quietly now have entred Verification of a Lease for anothers life as unto them it was lawfull without this that they the said J. F. M. and W.P. will prove that the said J. have in her full life remaineth that is to say at T. in the County aforesaid without this that they the said I. F.M. and W. P Traverse to the Delaration upon the Statute of forcible entry that it was not with force against the form of the Statute c. Plaintiff faith that certaine strangers were seized c. and so seived by fine acknowledged before the Justices of the said Lord the Kings Bench acknowledged the Tenements to be of his the plaintifs by pretence of which the Plaintiff entred and was thereof seized c. untill c. Fine acknowledged of the moiety of a messuage c. Conveyance of a Title by fine at the said time in which c. into the said tenements with the appurtenances with Force and armes aforesaid entred against the form of the said statute in manner and form as the said W. A. before against them complaineth and this c whereupon they pray Judgement if an Action c ANd the said W. A. saith that he by any matter by the said I. F. M. and W.P. c. not to he precluded c. because he saith that long before the said time of the said entry made one I.H. and I. his wife and T. C. and B. his wife were of the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances seized in their Demesne as of Fee and them the said I.H. and I.T.B. and B. of that moiety of the said tenements with the appurtenances so being seized they the said I. H. and the rest afterwards that is to say from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes in the sixth yeare of the Raign of the now King Edward the sixth before E. Mountaine C.I. H. and E.M. Justices of the said Lord the King personally came and acknowledged the moiety of the said Lands with the appurtenances by the name of the moiety of one messuage of one Garden and fourteen acres of Land with the appurtenances in I. aforesaid to be the right of him the said W. A. as those which the said W. A. had of the gift of the said I.H. and I T B. and B. and they remised and quite claimed from them the said J. J. T. and B. and the heirs of them the said I. and B. unto the said W. A. and his heirs for ever by pretence whereof the said W. A. of the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee untill the said I. E. into the said tenements with the appurtenances entred and him the said W. A. of the moiety of the same Tenements with the appurtenances unjustly and without judgement unjustly disseised by which the same I. was of the moiety of those Tenement aforesaid with the appurtenances seized by disseisin and shee the said I by that disseisin so thereof being seized the same I. before the said time of the said entry made that is to say the said twentieth day of September in the sixth year of the Raign of the said now King Edward the sixth at J. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said I. F. now one of the Defendants to have and to hold unto the same I F. his Executors and assignes from the said Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-Angell from thence next following untill the end and tearm of one year from thence forth next following and so from year to year as long as the said both Parties should please by virtue of which said Demise the said I. F. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof Possessed in manner and form as the said I. F.M. and W P above in Pleading have alleadged upon the Possession of which said I. F. thereupon the said W. A. before the said time of the said Entry made into the Moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesne as of Fee untill by the said I. F.M. and W.P. of the said moiety of the said Tenements Avermenn that 2 parties and one moiety of those said lands are one and not diverse with Force and Armes and with the said main strength in form aforesaid was disseized in manner and form as the same W. A by his said declaration before against them have declared and this he is ready to prove together with this that the said moiety of the said Tenements in the said Fine contained and the said two Parts in the said Declaration specified in which the said Entry is supposed are one and the same and not others nor divers whereupon from which the said I. M. and W.P. the said Entry and disseisin before done acknowledging the same W.A. as well for the King as for himself prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that Entry and disseisin to be adjudged unto him c. ANd they the said I. F.M. and W.P. as formerly say that long before the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done the said J. G. in the said Barr before named was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and he the said I. G. so of those Tenements with the appurtenances being seized the same I G. before the same time in which c that is to say the said twenty eighth day of October in the year of our Lord one thousand five hundred forty and one at I. aforesaid made his last will and by the same willed that the said I. his Wife should have the said Tenements with the appurtenances to the tearm of the life of her the said Iohanne so that after the decease of her the said Johane those Tenements with the appurtenances should remain unto the aforesaid I. R. and his heirs for ever and afterwards and before the said time in which c. the same I G. at I. aforesaid dyed after the death of which said I. G. the said I. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances by virtue of the said last wil entred and was thereof seized in his demesne as of free-hold And she the said I. so thereof being seized the same I. before the said time in which c. that is to say the said 20 day of September in the
to say the first day of August in the first year of the Reign of the said now King Edward the sixth at Alhallowes aforesaid demised the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said John Wood to have and to hold the same moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances unto the said J.W. and his Executors from the said first day of August untill the end and tearm and for the Tearm of twelve yeares from thence forth next ensuing and fully to be compleated by vertue of which said demise the said J.W. into the moiety of the said Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed untill the said S. him the said J. W of the moiety of those Tenements with the appurtenances thrust out and the said A. B. of the same unjustly and without judgement disseised upon the possession of which said S. thereupon the said J. Wood before the said time of the said Trespasse done claiming his said tearm of and in the same into those Tenements with the appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed by virtue of the said Demise untill the said S. afterwards that is to say at the said time of the said Trespasse done the said Close did break Without this and the said Cattell then and there did take and the same in form aforesaid impounded in manner and form as the same J. Wood before against him himselfe complaineth without this that the said R S. was seized of the said whole tenements with the appurtenances in manner and form as the said S. above in his said Barr hath alleadged and this c. whereupon from which the same S. the said trespasse before acknowledging prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the said S. as before saith that the said R.W. was seized of the said whole tenements with the appurtenances in manner and form as the same S. before in pleading hath alledged and of this he putteth himself upon the Country c. Justification of Trespasse for Lands in Gavel-kinde AND the said G. W. by R.H. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when Kent Justification in Trespasse for that that the Tenements were of nature of Gavel-kind in the County of Kent c. and as to the coming with force and armes c. not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespass before supposed to be done the same G. saith that the said E. and A. no action because he saith that the said Close called R. otherwise B. doth contain and at the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done did contain eighteen acres of land and wood with the appurtenances of which said Tenements with the appurtenances long before the said time in which c. one E.W. the Elder Grand-Father of the said G.W. the now defendant was seized in his demesne as of fee and him the said G.W. the grand-father of those Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same G.W. the Grand-Father before the said time in which c. died thereof by protestation seized after th death of whichsaid G.W. the G-F those Tenements w th the appurtenances for that they are of the tenure and nature of gavelkind in the said county and that all Lands and tenements of the same Tenure and nature in the same county from the time the contrary of which memory c. were parted and partable between the heirs males did discend to T W. as Son and Co-heir of the said G. the Grand Father and unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendant and R.W. his Brother and Margery Bedell as Kinne and Co-heir aforesaid of the said G. W. their Grand-Father that is to say unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendants and to the said R. his Brother as Sonnes and heirs of one R.W. one of the Sons and Co-heirs of the said G. W. the elder and unto the aforesaid T.W. as another of the sons and Co-heirs of the said G. the said G.W. the now Defendants Grand-Father and unto the said Margery as the Son of A. another of the Sons and Co-heirs of the same G.VV. the Grand-Father Discent By vertue of which the said G.VV. the now Defendant and the said R. VV. his Brother into the said Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and were and as yet do thereof remain thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee and the same Tenements with the appurtenances do hold In common and undivided and at the time of the said Trespasse supposed to be done and at the day of the filing of the said Bill that is to say the tenth day of October in the sixth year of the Reign of the said now King held in common and undivided with the said Edward and Alice who the pur-party of the said Margery of and in the said Tenements do hold from the said Day of filing of the said Bill they have holden for tearm of years then during from the demise of the said Margery and one John Bedell her husband And this c. Whereupon he prayeth Judgment if an Action c. NOt to be precluded because he saith Plaintiff saith that the said G.W. the Grand-Father infeossed one A.W. his Sonne which said A. had issuee Margery W. and dyed unto which said Margery the Tenements discended in the right of an heir and the same Margery tooke to husband one J.B. and the said J.B. and M. demised the Tesements unto S.S. and A. his wife now one of the Defendants and afterwards the same S.S. dyed and the same A took to husbanb the said E. now one of the plaintiffs by vertue of which said demise they the said E. entred that well and true it is that the said G.VV. the Grand-Father in the said Barr before named was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the said G. the now Df. before in pleading hath alleadged and that the same G.VV. the Grand-Father so thereof being seized before the said time of the said trespas done of the said tenements with the appurtenances infeoffed the said A.VV. his Son to have the same Tenements with the appurtenances unto the same A. and his heirs for ever by vertue of which said Feoffment the same A.VV. was seized of the said Tenements with the appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and him the said A. of the said Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same A. of those Tenements with the appurtenances died seized after the death of which said A. the said Tenements with the appurtenances discended unto Margery VVallis Daughter and heir of the same A. by vertue of which the same M. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances long before the said time of the said trespas done entred and was thereof seized in her demesne as of fee and she the said
M. of those Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same M. before the said time of the said Trespas done at C. aforesaid took to her husband the said J.B. by vertue of which they the said J. and M. were seized of those Tenements with the appurtenances in their demesne as of fee in the right of her the said M. and them the said J. and M. of those tenements with the appurtenances so being seized they the said J. and M. afterwards and before the said time of the said trespas done that is to say at the Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angell in the thirty seventh year of the Raign of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England at C. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto one S.S. and unto the aforesaid A. now one of the Plaintiffs the then wife of the same S. to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances unto the same S. and A. their Executors and Assigns from the same Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angel untill the End and Tearm of seven years from thence next insuing and sully to be compleat by vertue of which said demise they the said S. and A. so thereof being possessed the same S. before the said time in which c. at C. aforesaid dyed and the said Allice him survived and held her self in in the said Tenements with the appurtenances and was thereof possessed by the Right of increase and she the said A. so thereof being possessed the same A. before the said time in which c. at C. aforesaid took to her Husband the said E. H. by virtue of which they the said E. and A. were possessed of the said Tenemenrs with the Appurtenances By the Right of increase untill the said G. W. the now Defendant at the said time of the said Trespasse done the said Close with Force and Armes aforesaid did breake and enter and the said Grasse to the value c. with his feet walking did tread down and consume and the said Cattell in the said Declaration before specified then and there found he did take and chase in manner and form as they the said E. and A. before against him themselves now complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said G. W. the now Defendant the said Trespasse before acknowledging prayeth Judgment and his Damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintains the plea without this that G.W. Grand-Father infeoffed the said A.W. his Sonne c. AND the said G. W. the now Defendant as before saith that the said G. VV. the now Defendant was of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesne as of Fee and he the said G. W. the Elder of those Tenements with the Appurtenances so being seized the same G. W. the Elder of those Tenements with the Appurtenances died thereof by protestation seized after the death of which said G. W. the Elder the said Tenements with the Appurtenances for that that the same Tenements are of the Tenure and Nature of Gavel-kinde in the said County and that all Lands and Tenements of the same Tenure and Nature in the same County from the time the contrary of which c. were parted and partable between the Heires Males did discend unto the said G. W. as Son and Heire of the said G. W. the Grand-father of the said G. W. the now Defendant and unto the same G. the now Defendant and to the said R. W. Brother of the same G. the now Defendant and unto the aforesaid Margery as Kinne and Co-heire of the said G. their Grand-father that is to say unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendant and Richard his Brother as Sons and Heires of the said R W. one of the Sons and Co-heires of the said G. W. the Elder and unto the aforesaid T. as another Son and Co-heire of the said G. W. the Grand-father of the said G. the now Defendant and unto the aforesaid Margery as Daughter of the said Alexander another of the Sons and Co-heires of the said G. W. the Grand-father by virtue of which the said G. W. the now Defendant and the said R. W. his Brother into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and were and as yet are thereof seized in their Demesne as of Fee and the same Tenements with the Appurtenances do hold and at the time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done and at the day of fyling the said Bill did hold and as yet doth hold in common and undivided with the said Edward and Alice who the Pur-party of the said Margery Bedell of and in the said Tenements with the Appurtenances do hold and at the said day of fyling of the said Bill did hold for tearm of yeares Without this from the demise of the said I. B. and Margery in manner and form as the said G. the now Defendant before in pleading hath alledged without this that the said G. W. the Grand-father infeoffed the said A. W. his Son of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in Manner and Form as the said E. and Alice before in replying have alledged And this c. whereupon as before prayeth Judgment and that the said E. and A. from their said Action against him had may be precluded c. And they the said E. and A. as before saith that the said G. W. the Grand-father infeoffed the aforesaid A. W. his Son of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in Manner and Form as they the said E. and A. before in replying have alledged and this they pray that it may be inquired of c. AND the said W. W. by R. C. his Attorney Devon Defendant Justifies that the Tenements in which c. was the ground of another man and iustifies the Trespasse as his Servant doing damage cometh and defendeth the Force and Wrong when c. And as to the coming with Force and Armes c. not guilty and as to the residue c. the same W. W. saith that the said W. S. no Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which c. the said Trespasse is supposed to be done are and at the time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done were thirty six Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in V. aforesaid in a certain place there called W. which are and at the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done were the Ground and Free-hold of one R. M. by which the same W. W. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances as Servant of the said R. and by his Command entred and the said Close as the proper Close of him the said R. did breake And the same W. W. found the said Colt there the Grasse of him the said R. upon the Ground of him the said
R. that is to say upon the said thirty six Acres of Land growing eating up and Damage there unto the said R. doing the same W. W. that Colt for that Damage then and there as afore it is said done took and lead away as unto them it was lawfull And this c. whereupon c. Not to bee precluded because he saith that long before the said time in which c. the said R. M. in the said Bar before named was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the said time in which c. that is to say the twelfth day of August in the first yeare of the Reigne of the said now King Edward the sixth at A. in the said County of D. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the aforesaid W. S. to have to him and his Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-angell from thence next ensuing untill the end and tearm of three yeares from thence forth next following and fully to be compleat by virtue of which said Demise the same W. S. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and he the said W. S. of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances so being possessed the same W. S. before the said time in which c. the said Colt into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances to the Grasse there growing as the proper Grasse of him the said W. S. put to feed which said Colt was there the Grasse there growing feeding upon untill the said W. W. at the said time in which c. upon the Possession of him the said W. S. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and the said Close in the said place in which c. did breake and the said Colt then and there did take and lead away in manner and form as the same W. S. before against him complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said W. W. the said Trespasse in form aforesaid done before acknowledging prayeth Judgment and his Damages by occasion of the said Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintaineth Plea without this that the said stranger demised the said Tenements AND the said W. W. as before saith that the said Tenements with the Appurtenances are and at the said time in which c. were the Ground and Free-hold of the said R. M. by which the same W. W. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances as Servant of the said R. and by their Command entred and the said Close as the proper Close of him the said R. did breake and for that he the same W. W. found the said Colt the said Grasse of the said R. upon the Ground of him the said R. that is to say upon the said thirty six Acres of Land growing eating up Damage thereunto the same R. doing the same W. that Colt for that Damage Without this then and there as before is said done did take and lead away as to him it was lawfull without this that the said R. M. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the aforesaid W. S. in manner and form as the said W. S. before in replying hath alleadged And this c. whereupon as before prayeth Judgment and that the said W. S. from his said Action against him the said W. W. had may be precluded c. And the said W. S. as before saith that the said R. M. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said W. S. in manner and form as the said W. S. before in replying hath alleadged and this he prayeth that it may be inquired of c. AND the said S. S. by W. D. his Attorney Suff. ss Defendant iustifies Trespasse by virtue of a Demise made by a Master of a Colledge cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the coming with force c. not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done the same S. saith that the said R. no Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which it is supposed the said Trespas before to be done are and at the said time of the said trespas before supposed to be done were a hundred Acres of Lands and Pasture with the Appurtenances in E. aforesaid parcell of the Mannor of E. with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said mannor with the appurtenances long before the said time in which c. one G. W. Clark late Master of the late Colledge of R. in the County of Norffolke and the Fellowes of the same late Colledge were seized in their demesne as of fee in the right of their said Colledge and them the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c so thereof being seized they the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge before the said time in which c. that is to say the twentieth day of December in the year of the Raign of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England 30. at R. in the said County of Norffolke by their certain writing indented with the common seal of them the late Master and fellowes sealed and unto the Court of the Lord the now King here shewed whose date is the same day and year by their unanimous assent and consent did demise and to farm let unto the aforesaid S. his heirs Executors and Assignes the said mannor of E. with the appurtenances in the laid county of Suffolke with all arrable Lands and pasture of Sheep with all their appurtenances and other commodities unto the said Mannor and preimses belonging as well within the town E. aforesaid as within other towns unto the same adjacent with the Lands and Pastures lying at Dead-mans Grave to have and to hold the same Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c and other the premises unto the aforesaid S. his Executors and Assigns from the Feast of the invention of the holy Crosse last past before the date of the said writing indented untill the end and tearm of fifty years from thence forth next insuing and fully to be compleat by virtue of which said demise the said S. into the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. before the said time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and the said R. claiming the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. by colour of a certain deed of demise unto him thereof made for the tearm of his life by the said late Master and fellowes of the said late colledge long before the said demise unto the aforesaid S of that mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. as afore is said made where nothing of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof
c. into the possession of him the said R. by that deed ever passed into the said Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. before the said time in which c. entred upon the possession of which said R. thereupon the said S afterwards that is to say at the said time in which c. into the said Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. claiming the said Tearm then to come of and in the same re-entred and the said Close as the proper close of him the said S. then and there did break and the said grass as the proper grasse of him the said S. then and there growing with his cattell did eat up tread and consume as unto him it was lawfull and this c. whereupon c. Judgement if action c. NOt to be precluded because he saith that well and true it is that before the said time of the said Trespas done the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge were seized of the said Mannor with the appurtenances whereof the said hundred acres of pasture with the appurtenances in which the said Trespas was done are and at the said time of the said trespas done and also from the time the contrary of which memory c. were parcell in his Demesne as of fee and so thereof seized they the said Master and fellows before the said time of the said trespas done and before the said demise of the said Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. unto the aforesaid S. in form aforesaid made that is to say the last day of January in the twentieth year of the Raign of the said late King at E. in the said county of N. by their certain Deed with the common Seal of the same late Master and fellowes Sealed whose date is the same day and year did demise and to farm let unto one E.B. and the said S. the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. to have and to hold to the same E. and S. from the feast of the invention of the holy Crosse from thence forth next insuing untill to the end and Tearm of â—fty years from thence next following and fully to be compleat in manner and form as the said S. in his bar before in pleading hath alleadged And further the same R. saith that by a certain Act in Parliament of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England Father of the said now King at Westminster in the county of Middlesex the twenty eighth of Aprill in the thirty first year of the Raign of him the late King began and there then held and continued untill the twenty eighth day of June then next following amongst other things it was enacted ordained and established by him the late King and the Lords spirituall and temporall and also the commonalty in the same Parliament then assembled and by the authority of the same that not only all late Monasteries Abbyes Priories Monks Houses Colledges Hospitalls Fryers Houses and other Religious and Ecclesiasticall Houses and Places Scites Circuits Precincts Mannors Demesnes Granges Messuages Lands Tenemenss Meadowes Pastures Reversions Services Woods Tythes Pensions Portions Rectoryes Appropriations Vicaridges Chappell 's Advowsons Patronages Annuities Interests Entries Conditions Commons Courts Leets Liberties Priviledges Franchises and all the rest of the Hereditaments whatsoever henceforth immediatly and then presently but also all other Monasteries Abbyes Priories Monks Houses Colledges Houses of Monks Colledges Hospitalls Fryers houses and other religious and Ecclesiasticall houses and Places which from thenceforth afterwards should happen to be dissolved suppressed renounced forsaken forfeited surrendred or in any other manner come to the Kings most excellent Majesty and also all Scites Circuits Precincts Mannors Demesnes Granges Messuages Lands Tenements Mannors Pastures Rents Reversions Services Woods Tythes Pensions Portions Rectories Appropriations Vicaridges Churches Chappell 's Advowsons Nominations Patronages Annuityes Rights Interests Conditions Commons Court Leets Liberties Priviledges Franchises and other Hereditaments whatsoever belonging or appertaining unto them or any of them whensoever as often as they should be dissolved suppressed renounced forsaken forfeited surrendred or by any other means should come unto the Kings Excellency they should be vested deemed and adjudged by the authoriry of the same Parliament in the true actuall and reall seizin and possession of the said late King his heirs and Successors for ever in the State and condition as at the making of the same act then were and even as all the said late Monasteries Abbyes Priories Monks Houses Colledges Hospitalls Fryers Houses and all religious and Ecclesiasticall houses and places so dissolved suppressed renounced forsaken forfeited surrendred or come to the Kings Excellency as it is before said as also the said Monasteries Abbies Priories Friers Houses and all Religious and Ecclesiasticall Houses and Places which then afterwards should happen to be dissolved suppressed renounced forfeited surrendred or become to the Kings Excellency the Scites Circuites Precincts Mannors Demesnes Granges Lands Tenements and the rest of the Premises whatsoever should be in the same Act specially and particularly recited nominated and expressed by expresse Words Names Titles and Faculties in their kindes natures and qualities And further it was enacted by the said Authority that if any Abbot Prior Prioresse or other Ecclesiasticall Governor or Governesse of any Monastery Abbey Prior Monks House Colledge Hospitall Friers House or other Religious Houses or Places which then afterwards should happen to be dissolved suppressed renounced forsaken forfeited surrendred or come to the Kings Highnesse within one yeare next before the first day of the same Parliament had made or from thence afterwards should make any Demise or Grant under their Conventuall or common Seale or otherwise for tearm of yeares or life or lives of the Scite Circuit and Precinct of their aforesaid Monastery Abbey Priory House of Monks Colledge Hospitall House of Friers or other Religious or Ecclesiasticall House or Place or of any part of them or of any Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Rectories appropriate Tithes Pentions Portions or other Hereditaments belonging or pertaining to their aforesaid late Monastery Abbey Priory House of Monks Colledge Hospitall House of Friers or Religious or Ecclesiasticall House or Place Which Mannors Messuages Granges Lands Tenements Rectories appropriate Tithes Pentions Portions and other Hereditaments whatsoever had not been before the same Demise commonly used to be let nor set to Farm but kept and reserved in the manurate Tillage or Occupation of the aforesaid Governor or Governesse for Maintenance of Hospitality and good House keeping or within one yeare next before the first day of the same Parliament had made or afterwards should make any Demise or Grant for tearm of life or for tearm of yeares of any Mannors Messuages Lands Tenements Meadowes Pastures Woods Rectories appropriate Tithes Pentions Portions Churches Chappels or other Hereditaments whatsoever whereof and in which the State or Interest for tearm of life yeare or yeares at the time of the making any
his Continuance and being at the aforesayd time of the aforesayd Demise of the same Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd S. by the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood in forme above in the Barr aforesayd specified was supposed to be done By which the same Demise in the Barr aforesayd pleaded in the same manner and forme made is voyd and of none effect And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesayd S. the Trespasse aforesayd in the aforesayd hundred Acres of Land with the appurtenances above acknowledgeth the same R. prayes Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid S. as formerly saith The Defendant maintaines his Plea and traverseth the demise of the Master and Brother-hood to T. Bostnay and S. That the aforesaid late Master and Brotherhood aforesayd of the late Colledge long before the aforesayd time of the Trespasse aforesayd above supposed to be done were seized of the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. in their Demesne as of Fee in right of their Colledge aforesayd And the said late Master and Brotherhood of the same late Colledge of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. being seized the same late Master and Brotherhood of the aforesayd late Colledge before the aforesayd time wherein c. to wit the aforesaid twentieth day of December in the thirtieth yeare of the Raign of the aforesayd late King at R. aforesayd by their aforesayd Writing indented with the Seale of them the sayd Master and Brotherhood sealed and to the Court of our aforesayd late Queen shewen as aforesayd whose date is the same day and yeare by their unanimous assent and consent did demise and to Farme let unto the aforesayd S. his Heires Executors and Assignes the aforesaid Mannor of E. with the appurtenances to have and to hold the aforesaid mannor with the apuptenances whereof c. to the aforesayd S. his Executors and Assignes from the aforesayd Feast of the Intention of the holy Crosse last past before the date of the said indented Writing unto the end and terme of fifty yeares from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended By vertue of which sayd Demise the aforesayd S. into the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed in manner and forme as the aforesayd S. above by pleading hath alledged Without that that the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood aforesayd of the late Colledge demised the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd E. Bestnay and S. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above by Replication hath alleadged And this c. Whereupon he prayes Judgment and that the aforesayd R. may be debarred from having his Action aforesayd against him c. AND the aforesayd R. F. as formerly saith That the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood of the aforesayd late Colledge did demise the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd E. B. and S. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above by Replication hath alledged and this hee prayes may be inquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid S. in like manner c. Therefore command is to the Sheriff of Norfolke A Justification in Trespasse by a Prescription for a Procession way in another place then in the declaration with a traverse that he is guilty in the place in the declaration that he cause to come here twelve c. AND the aforesayd T. A. R. T. M. and others by W.H. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And the aforesayd T. M. sayes That he is in nothing thereof guilty And of this c. and the aforesaid Prior in like manner c. And the aforesaid T. A. R. and others as to the coming by Force and Armes say that they are in nothing thereof guilty And of this c. and the aforesaid Prior in like mannor c. And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made they the said T A.R. and others say that the aforesaid Prior ought not to have his action aforesaid against them Because they say that long before the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be done one E. M. was seized of one Marsh called forty acres containing forty acres of Marsh land with the appurtenances lying in the Parish of H. in the County aforesaid in his demesne as of fee and being so thereof seized before the said time wherein c. at H. aforesaid demised the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh Land to the aforesaid Prior to hold to him at the will of him the said E. By vertue of which demise hee the said Prior the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made was thereof possessed further say that the same T. A. is and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done was Vicar of the Parish Church of H. aforesaid and that they the said R. and others at the same time of that Trespasse supposed to be made were Parishioners of the same Parish of H. and dwelling within the same Parish and further say that the aforesaid T.A. and all his predecessors Vicars of the Parish Church of H. aforesaid and whomsoever Parishioners of the same Parish from the time being from time out of minde were used and accustomed yearly at their pleasure on the Eve of Ascention day within the Rogation dayes to go and walk about through the Marsh aforesaid with solemne procession of the aforesaid Parish of H. By which the aforesaid T. A. the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made then being Vicar of the same Church And the aforesaid R. and others then Parishioners of the same Parish of H. and dwelling within the same Parish on the Eve of Ascention day within the Rogation daies in the aforesaid first year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is with other Parishioners of the same Parish with the solemne procession of the same Parish did goe and walke about the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh The aforesaid Prior then of the Marsh aforesaid being possessed by vertue of the demise aforesaid to him made and in that walking about the grasse aforesaid in the same Marsh then growing by walking with their feet they did tread down and consume as it was lawfull for them to doe Without that that the aforesaid T. A. R. and others are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid in S. aforesaid supposed to be done in the forme which the aforesaid Prior above against them complaineth and this c. Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid Prior ought to have his action aforesaid against them ANd the aforesaid Prior sayes Issue upon the Traverse that he ought not be debarred from having his Action aforesaid against c. Because he saith by Protestation that the aforesaid
Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done entred upon which said T.B. possession thereupon the aforesaid T. A. and W. as the servants of them the said F. and I. and by their commandement the aforesaid time wherein c. into the same Tenements with the appurtenances re-entred and the close aforesaid then there broke and the corne and grasse then there growing did tread downe and consume continuing that treading downe and consumption in forme aforesaid as it was lawfull for them to do And this c. Whereupon c. Whether action c. The Plaintiffe Assigns Trespasse anew AND the aforesaid T.R. sayes that he by any thing by the aforesaid T.A. and VV. pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them of the Trespasse aforesaid made because he saith that the place in which the Trespasse aforesaid whereof he above now complaineth is and the said time wherein c. was two hundred acres of Lands in R aforesaid called Fatherfeild Thistlecrosse and Churchfield other then the Tenements aforesaid in the aforesaid barre of them the said T.A. and VV. specified VVhereupon for that the aforesaid T.A. and VV. to the Trespasse aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land answer not he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the aforesaid T.A. and W. as to the trespasse aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of land anew assigned supposed to be done The Defendants justifie the Trespasse in the lands anew assigned for certain way from their houses to the Church say that the aforesaid T.R. ought not to have or maintain his action aforesaid against them c. because they say that the aforesaid T.A. and W. are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were seized of one Messuage with the appurtenances in R. aforesaid in their demesne as of Fee and that they and all those whose estate the same T.A. and W. have in the same Messuage with the appurtenances were accustomed to have a certaine way from the said Messuage unto the Parish Church of R. over and upon the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land from the time out of mind c. By which the same T.A. and W. the aforesaid time wherin c. into the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land entred using their way aforesaid in the same as it was lawfull for them to doe which is the same trespasse of breaking the Close aforesaid and treading downe and consuming the grasse aforesaid in the same two hundred acres of Land whereof the aforesaid A. B. above against them complaineth And this c. whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid T.B. ought to have and maintaine his action aforesaid against them c. ANd the aforesaid T.B. saies that he by any thing before alledged ought not to be debaâ—red from having his action aforesaid against them The Plaintiff by protestation saies the Defendant had no way for plea that they trod down the grasse out of the way because by protestation that the aforesaid T. A. and W. and all they whose state the same A.T. and W. have in the Messuage aforesaid have not had nor were accustomed to have the way aforesaid from the Messuage aforesaid to the Church aforesaid over and upon the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land in the aforesaid last bar specified from the time out of mind c. as they above by pleadings have alledged for plea he sayes that he the same T.B. was of the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land with the appurtenances long before the said time wherein c. seized in his demesne as of Fee untill the aforesaid T. A. and W. by force and armes aforesaid the Close aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of Land did breake and the come and grasse aforesaid out of that way growing did tread downe and consume in manner and forme as the same T. B. above by pleading hath alledged and this c. whereupon he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the aforesaid T.A. and W. as to the trespasse aforesaid out of the way aforesaid in the aforesaid two hundred acres of Lands supposed to be made say that they are nothing thereof guilty And of this they put themselves upon the Country and the aforesaid T.B. in like manner c. The Defendants justifie the taking of a Mortuary by vertue of a Demise to them of the Rectory c. Trin. 21. Hen. 7. Rol 62 ANd the aforesaid R. P. and W. P. by A. B. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes or whatsoever c. not guilty c. and as to the residue c. the same R. and W. say that the aforesaid plaintiffe ought not to have his action c. because they say that one L. Prior of the house and Church of the blessed Mary and St. Thomas the Martyr of the now place near Guilford is and the said time wherein c. was Parson imparsonate of the Church of Ewel aforesaid and that he and all his Predecessors Priors of the house aforesaid from the time out of minde c. were Parsons of the same Church imparsonate in the same And that he and all his Predecessors aforesaid Parsons of the Church aforesaid by the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to have of every person within the Precinct of the Parish of Ewel aforesaid dying to whom the Sacraments and holy things at the time of his death are administred or administrable one living Beast of the same so dying person if the same dying man have beasts at the time of his death or before or the best thing of him the said so dying man if he have no living beasts at the same time in the name of a Mortuary for the holy things to him so dying to be celebrated And that the aforesaid Prior and all his Predecessours aforesaid Parsons of the Church aforesaid from the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to take and seize such Mortuary so happening to whose hands soever they should come And the same R.P. and VV. say that the aforesaid now Prior long before the said time wherein c. that is to say such a day and yeer at Ripley in the County aforesaid demised to the aforesaid R.P. the Rectory of Ewel aforesaid with all fruits oblations offerings glebes lands and other their appurtenances whatsoever To have and to hold to him the said R.P. and his Assigns untill the end and terme of one and twenty years from thence next following and fully to be compleat By vertue of which Demise the aforesaid R.P. long before the said time wherein c. was of the Rectory aforesaid and other the premises with their appurtenances possessed And hee being so thereof possessed after and before the said time that is to
say such a day and year aforesaid one E G. to whom the Sacraments and holy things then were to be administred and administrable was possessed of the aforesaid horse as of his proper horse And he being so thereof possessed long before the said time wherein c. delivered that horse to the aforesaid R.G. safely to be kept And that horse to him the said E. to be redelivered when he should be thereunto required And that also long before the said time wherein c. that is to lay the eleventh day of March such a yeer One R.R. to whom the Sacraments and holy things then were to be administred and administrable was possessed of the aforesaid Oxe as of his proper Oxe And so being thereof possessed long before the same time wherein c. delivered that Oxe to the aforesaid R.G. to be safely kept And that Oxe to him the said R.R. when he should be thereunto required to bee re-delivered By means whereof the aforesaid R. E. long before the aforesaid time wherein c. was of the said Oxe possessed And he being so of the same Horse and Oxe possessed the aforesaid E. G. and R. R. afterwards and long before the same time at Ewell aforesaid within the Parish aforesaid dyed By means whereof the Horse and Oxe aforesaid came and belonged to the aforesaid R.P. in the name of a Mortuary of them the said E. G. and R.R. By which the same R.P. as in his owne Right And the aforesaid A. and W. as servants of him the said R.P. and by his command the aforesaid time wherein c. the Horse and Oxe aforesaid at Ewell aforesaid found in the name of Mortuaries of them the said E.G. and R.R. they tooke and led away as it was lawfull for them to doe And this c. whereupon they pray judgement whether the action c. AND the Plaintiffe sayes that he ought not to be debarred from his action aforesaid c. because he saith That the Prior Parson of the Church aforesaid imparsonate in the same remaines and all his Predecessors aforesaid Parsons of that Church from time out of minde were used and accustomed to have of each person within the Precinct of the Parish of Ewell dying to whom the Sacraments and holy things at the time of his death are to be administred and administrable one living beast of the same so dying person if the same dying person have living beasts at the time of his death or one other better thing of his the said person so dying if at the same time he had no living beasts in the name of a Mortuary for Sacramentals to him so dying to be administred And that also within the same Parish of Ewell from the whole time aforesaid there is had such a custome that wheresoever any of the Parish aforesaid to whom Sacraments and holy things are to be administred and administrable at the time of his death within the Parish aforesaid doe dye having livings beasts or other things at the time of his death that then after his death his Executor or Executors of his last will or Administrator or Administrators of the goods and Chattels of him so dying were used and accustomed to have the first election of all and singular the beasts or of any other better things which were of him so dying at the time of his death And the same living beasts or other better things first chosen to bee taken and seized to the fulfilling of the Will of the Testator so deceasing And after such election of the living beasts or of other better things of such person dying by the Executor or Administrator of the goods of such so dying in forme aforesaid made That then the aforesaid Prior Parson imparsonate of the Church aforesaid or his Deputy by the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to have to himselfe of the beasts or of other things residue which were of the aforesaid so dying person at the time of his death the best beast or other better thing of his so dying by his Executors or Administrators formerly in no wise taken or seized for his Mortuary And the aforesaid R. and M. say that the aforesaid E.G. and I.R. long before the said time wherein c. And at the time of the death of them were possessed of the aforesaid Horse and Oxe as of their proper Horse and Oxe And so being thereof possessed at Ewell aforesaid constituted the aforesaid R.G. Executor of their last Wills And long before the aforesaid time wherein c. By means whereof the said R.G. after the death of the aforesaid E.G. and R.R. as Executor of the Testament and last Will of them the said E.G. and R.R. long before the said time wherein c. the aforesaid Horse and Oxe as the best living beasts of the aforesaid Testator took and seized to the fulfilling of the execution of the Testament of the aforesaid Testators By which he the said E.G. long before the said time wherein c. was of the same Horse and Oxe possessed untill the said R.P.A. and W. in the said time wherein c. the same Horse and Oxe out of the possession of him the said E. G. they took and led away in manner and forme as the same E.G. above against them complaineth And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid R.P.A. and W. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayeth judgement and his damages upon that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendant maintaines his plea in bar and traverses the custome pleaded by the Plaintiffe Traverse AND the aforesaid R.P.A. and W. as to the aforesaid residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done sayes as formerly that the aforesaid Prior is and at the said time wherein c. was Parson of the Church aforesaid imparsonate in the same and that he and all his predecessors and so recite as in the first plea in bar of the Defendant Without that that within the aforesaid Parish of Ewell from time out of minde c. there was had such a custome that whensoever any of the Parish aforesaid to whom Sacraments and holy things at the time of his death are to bee administred or administrable do dye within that Parish having livings beasts or other things at the time of his death that then after his death his Executor or Executors of his will aforesaid or the Administrator or Administrators of the goods and Chattels of him so dying were used and accustomed to have the first election of all and singular the livings beasts or of any other better things which were of his so dying at the time of his death And the same living beasts or other bette things first chosen to take and seize to the fulfilling of the Execution of the Testament of such Testator so deceasing as the aforesaid R.G. above by pleading hath alleadged And this c. Whereupon they pray judgement And that he the said E.G. may bee
paid that horse to him the said A. hee sold And the same horse to him the said A. then and there delivered By vertue of which said sale and delivery of that horse as of his proper horse was possessed and as yet is And the aforesaid C. the horse aforesaid out of the possession of him the said B. took and was thereof possessed untill the same A. the same horse as his proper horse at S. aforesaid at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made out of the possession of the aforesaid B. by means of the sale and delivery aforesaid he againe took and led away as it was lawfull for him to do And this c. Whereupon hee demands judgement c. AND the aforesaid C. sayes that he by any thing before alleadged The Plaintiffe pleads the property in another stranger who sold to him and traverses the sale made to the Defendant ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against him c. because by protestation that the aforesaid propriety of the horse aforesaid was never the aforesaid B. for Plea he saith that long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made the propriety of the horse aforesaid was one T.H. which said T. of that horse as of his proper horse then being possessed that horse to him the said C. long before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was made to wit such a day and yeare and place and County for a 100 s. to him the said T. in hand paid sold to him the said C. the horse aforesaid And that horse to him the said C. then and there delivered By vertue of which said sale and delivery the same C. of that horse as of his proper horse was possessed untill the aforesaid A. the horse aforesaid at S. aforesaid at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made by force and arms out of the possession of him the said C. he took and led away as he by his aforesaid Writ and declaration above against him complaineth Without that A Traverse of the sale to the Defendant that the aforesaid B. the horse aforesaid to the aforesaid A. at D. aforesaid the aforesaid such a day and yeare sold in manner and forme as the aforesaid A. above alleadgeth And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid A. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth hee prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of the Trespasse aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid A. sayes that the aforesaid B. the horse aforesaid to the aforesaid A. at D. aforesaid the day and year aforesaid sold in manner and form as he above hath alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid C. in like manner c. Therefore the Jury is to come c. Institutions in trespasse for want of reparation of the hedges by the Plaintiffs Trin. 22. Hen. 6. Rol. 89. AND the aforesaid T. and I. by I.H. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury where c. And as to the coming by force and armes c. not guilty And as to the breaking of the close aforesaid and the eating up treading downe and consuming of the grasse aforesaid the same T. and I. say that the aforesaid N. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that they at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made were and are seized of a certain close of pasture near adjoyning to the said close of the aforesaid N. in which the grasse aforesaid grew in K. aforesaid in their demesne as of Fee Between which said closes there is a certaine hedge separating each from other the aforesaid closes Which said hedge the aforesaid N. and all they whose estate the same N. hath in the close aforesaid from time out of minde were accustomed to make repaire and sustaine and say that that hedge for want of reparation and sustaining of the same was at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made broken downe and laid prostrate to the ground and that the Cattell of them the said T. and I. in their close aforesaid put to depasture into the said close of the aforesaid N. by the breach and decay of the said hedge did enter against the will of them the said T. and I. and the grasse aforesaid did eat up tread downe and consume the same T. and I. their Cattell aforesaid freshly pursuing into the said close of the said N. by the breach and decay aforesaid did enter to drive backe their cattell into the said close of them the said T. and I. and into that close speedily drove them as it was lawfull for them to doe which is the same Trespasse and breach of close and feeding treading downe and consuming the grasse aforesaid whereof the aforesaid N. above against them complaineth And this they are ready to aver c. whereupon c. The Defendants plead that the Vicar was seized in right of his Vicaridge and justifie as his servants Essex AND the aforesaid H.T.R. and VV. by T. G. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the breaking of the close and how aforesaid say that they are not guilty c. And as to the breaking of the close and house aforesaid they the same H.R. and VV. say that the aforesaid C. ought not to have thereof his action aforesaid against them because they say that the close and house aforesaid and also the place in which it was supposed the same Trespasse to be made The form of pleading where the quantity of the close is not ascertained in the Declaration was one house acre of Land with the appurtenances in Eastham aforesaid which are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were parcel of the Mannor of Eastham in the County aforesaid whereof before the said time wherein c. one I.R. Vicar of the Church of Eastham aforesaid was seized in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid by which the same H. R. and W. as the servants of him the said I. R. and by his command the aforesaid time wherein c. the close and house aforesaid did break as it was lawfull for them to doe And this c. Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid C. ought to have or maintaine his action aforesaid against them c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes The plaintiffe replies that the Vicar demised to him c. that he by any thing before pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them of the breach of the close and house aforesaid because he saith that it is well and true that before the said time of the Trespasse aforesaid made the aforesaid I.R. was seized of the aforesaid house and one
acre of Land with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid And being so thereof seized before the same time of the Trespasse aforesaid made to wit the first day of June in the 33 yeare of the Reigne of our Lord the King that now is at E. aforesaid in the County aforesaid demised the same Tenements with the appurtenances to him the said Plaintiffe To have and to occupy to him the said Plaintiffe and his assignes from the feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist then next following untill the feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel in the 35 yeare of the Reigne of our Lord the King that now is By vertue of which demise hee the said Plaintiffe of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances was possessed untill the aforesaid Defendants the day and yeare aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid above specified by force and armes c. the close and house of him the said Plaintiffe at E. aforesaid they did break against the peace of our Lord the King that now is as he above against them complaineth And this c. Wherefore for that the aforesaid Defendants the breaking of the close and house aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendants maintain their plea and traverse their Dâ—mise AND the aforesaid Defendants as formerly say that the aforesaid I.R. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid as they above have alleadged Without that that the aforesaid I.R. demised the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Plaintiffes as the same Plaintiffe above alleadgeth And this c. Whereupon as formerly he prayes judgement and that the aforesaid Plaintiffe may be debarred from having his action aforesaid of the breach of the close and house aforesaid against them c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe as formerly sayes that the aforesaid I. R. demised to him the said Plaintiffe the same Tenements with the appurtenances as he above hath alleadged And this bee prayes may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Defendants in like manner c. Iustification in Trespasse by vertue of a demise made to the Testator who bequeathed the same to his wife AND the aforesaid R.F. by R. M. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever c. not guilty c. And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the aforesaid R.F. sayes that the aforesaid R.R. and I. ought not to have their action aforesaid against him c. because hee sayes that the close and house aforesaid as also the place in which the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done was and the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made were one Messuage and one close of Land containing in it fifteen acres of Land with the appurtenances in S. aforesaid whereof before the said time wherein c. one I. A. Esq was seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place did demise the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one R.W. of c. To have and to hold to him and his Assignes from the feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following unto the end and terme of forty years from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended By vertue of which Demise the same R. W. was thereof possessed And so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place made his last Will and Testament And by the same willed and declared that Elizabeth his wife immediately after the decease of him the said R. W. should have and enjoy his state terme and interest which he then had to come in the Tenements aforesaid The forme of pleading where the Lease accrued to the husband under the wifes title with the appurtenances And afterwards and before the said time wherein c. the same R.VV. dyed After whose death the aforesaid E. was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place took to husband him the said R. F. By which he the said R. F. was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and the aforesaid Plaintiffes claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certaine Deed of Demise to them thereupon made for terme of their life by the aforesaid I.A. long before the aforesaid Demise by the same I. A. to the aforesaid R. W. thereupon in forme aforesaid made where nothing of these Tenements with the appurtenances into the possession of them the said Plaintiffes by that Deed ever passed into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances before the said time wherein c. did enter Upon whose the said Plaintiffes possession thereupon the same Defendant afterwards to wit the same time wherein c. into the same Tenements with the appurtenances did re-enter and the grasse aforesaid then there growing which the aforesaid Cattell did eat up tread down and consume and the ground aforesaid in the aforesaid fifteen acres of Land with his ploughes aforesaid he did break up as it was lawfull for him to do And this c. Wherefore he prayes judgement whether the action c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes The Plaintiffe pleads that before the domâ—se c. the aforesaid Feoffee enfeoffed the Plaintiffe and others to the use of a stranger that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendants because he sayes that before the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid made the aforesaid I.A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee and so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. and before the aforesaid foure and twentieth day of September in the year c. of the same Tenements with the appurtenances enfeoffed them the said Plaintiffes and one R. E. Knight and W. L. to hold to them and their heires for ever to the use of one T. A. son and heir apparent of the aforesaid I. A. and Mary the wife of him the said T.A. and the heires of their bodies of them lawfully begotten By vertue of which said Feoffement they the said Plaintiffes and R. and W. were thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee to the same use And the said Plaintiffes and R. and W. to that use being so thereof seized the aforesaid J.A. the aforesaid foure and twentieth of September in the eighteenth year aforesaid with the appurtenances
to the aforesaid R.W. To have and to hold to him and his assignes from the aforesaid feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel from thence next following unto the end and terme aforesaid By vertue of which demise hee the said R. W. was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the aforesaid such a day and year and place made his last Will and Testament in writing and by the same willed and declared that the aforesaid Elizabeth his wife immediatly after his decease should have and enjoy his state terme and interest which he then had to come in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and after the same R.VV. dyed after whose death the aforesaid E. into the Tenements aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed afterwards to wit the aforesaid tenth day of M. in such a yeare aforesaid the same E. tooke to husband the aforesaid Defendant By which the same Defendant was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed as he above hath alleadged and hee being so thereof possessed the aforesaid R.E. and VV.L. before the time wherein c. at London in the Parish c. dyed after whose death the same Plaintiffes before the said time wherein c. into the Tenements aforesaid with their appurtenances did re-enter and were thereof seized in their demesne as of fee to the use aforesaid by right accruing c. And further the same Plaintiffes say that the Trespasse aforesaid whereof they now complaine was made in the Mid-time between the aforesaid Feoffement by the aforesaid I. A. to them the said Plaintiffes and the aforesaid R.E. and VV.L. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in forme aforesaid made and the said Re-entry of them the said Defendants in the same and this c. VVhereupon for that the aforesaid Defendants the Trespasse aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid above acknowledged they the said Plaintiffes pray judgement and their damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto them c. The Defendant maintaines his Plea and tracurses the Feoffeoment AND the aforesaid Defendant sayes that before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made the aforesaid I. A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. to wit the aforesaid three and twentieth day of S. in the aforesaid such a year at S. aforesaid demised the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the aforesaid R.VV. to have and to hold to him the said R.W. and his assignes from the aforesaid feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following unto the end and terme aforesaid By vertue of which demise he the said R.W. was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the aforesaid such a day year and place made his last Will and Testament and by the same willed and declared that the aforesaid Elizabeth his wife immediately after the decease of him the said R.W. should have his whole state terme and interest which he then had to come of and in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and afterwards the same R.W. at S. aforesaid dyed after whose death the aforesaid Elizabeth was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. at S. aforesaid took to husband the same Defendant By which the same Defendant before the said time wherein c. into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed as hee above hath alleadged Without that that the aforesaid I. A. before the aforesaid such a day and year enfeoffed the aforesaid Plaintiffes and others of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances The traverse of the Feoffement To hold to them and their heires for ever to the use of the aforesaid T.A. and M. and the heires of their bodies lawfully begotten as the aforesaid Plaintiffes above have alleadged And this c. VVhereupon he prayes judgement And that the aforesaid Plaintiffes may be debarred from having their action aforesaid against him c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffes as formerly Issue upon the Traverse say that the aforesaid I.A. before the aforesaid foure and twentieth day of S. in the aforesaid such a yeare enfeoffed them the said Plaintiffes and the aforesaid R.E. and W. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them and their heires to the use of the aforesaid T.A. and M. and the heires of their bodies lawfully begotten as they above have alleadged And this they pray may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Defendants in like manner c. Therefore it is commanded the Sheriffe that he cause to come c. AND the aforesaid T.P. by R. F. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when Iustification in Trespasse for the taking of goods by pretext of gift from the Plaintiffe to the Defendants wife while she was sole c. And as to the coming by force and arms c. not guilty And as to the residue c. the same T. not acknowledging himselfe to have taken and carried away so many goods or chattels nor that the goods or chattels were of so much value as by the Writ and Declaration aforesaid is supposed saith that the aforesaid I. E. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that the aforesaid I. before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made to wit such a yeare and place gave to one A. the wife of the aforesaid T. the goods and chattels aforesaid to hold to him and his assignes for ever By vertue of which said gift the same A. was thereof possessed and afterwards tooke to husband the same Defendant And that the aforesaid A. was possessed of the goods and chattels aforesaid at the time wherein the aforesaid Defendant took her to wife By which the same Defendant the goods and chattels aforesaid as his own proper goods and chattels at the time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to bee done at R. there found tooke and carried away as it was lawfull for him to doe And this hee is ready to averre Whereupon hee intendeth not any injury in that behalfe should be assigned to his person c. The Plaintiffe said that the wife of the Defendant while she was sole give backe to him the goods AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Defendant before alleadged to be true sayes that he by any thing pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against him c. because he saith that before the aforesaid time wherein c. there was certaine communication had between him the said Plaintiffe and the aforesaid A. of Matrimony between them to be contracted And thereupon the aforesaid A. him the said Plaintiffe treated with such flattering and dissembling
speeches that the same Plaintiffe beleeving that she would give her consent to such Matrimony The goods and chattels aforesaid to her the said A. the aforesaid day year and place did give And afterwards the aforesaid A. turning her heart from the aforesaid Plaintiffe on the aforesaid Defendant to have him for her husband after the gift aforesaid the aforesaid A. coming to the Village of R. aforesaid such a day and yeare the goods and chattels aforesaid to him the said Plaintiffe then and there gave backe againe what time the aforesaid A. was sole By pretext whereof the same Plaintiffe was thereof possessed until the aforesaid Defendant by force and armes the goods and chattels aforesaid at R. found took and carried away against the peace of our Lord the King that now is and the same Plaintiffe above against him complaineth And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth the Trespasse aforesaid he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto him c. Issue upon the giving back of the goods AND the aforesaid Defendant not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Plaintiffe before alleadged to be true sayes that the aforesaid A. after the Gift aforesaid to her by the aforesaid Plaintiffe of the goods and chattels made did not give backe againe the aforesaid goods and chattels to him the aforesaid Plaintiffe as the same Plaintiffe above hath alleadged And of this hee puts himselfe upon the Country c. And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. The Defendant justifies for that the goods were pawned to the Plaintiffe and be pawned them to another who delivered them to the Defendant to be safely kept and to whom the Defendant afterwards the same re-delivered AND the aforesaid W.B. by I.C. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the taking and carrying away of one bolle of Gold and one bolle of Silver and gilt and one cup of Gold sayes that in nothing thereof guilty c. And as to the taking and carrying away of the aforesaid one bolle of Gold one bolle of Silver and gilt and one cup of Gold the same Defendant not acknowledging these goods and chattels to have been of such value as by the Declaration aforesaid is supposed sayes that the aforesaid W.C. ought not to have his action c. because he saith that one R.C. was Proprietor of these goods and in the possession of them long before the aforesaid Plaintiffes had any thing in them And so being Proprietor and possessed such a day yeare and place pawned to the aforesaid Plaintiffe those goods and chattels for forty Marks of him the said Plaintiffe by him the said R.C. of loan received under such a condition that if the aforesaid R. C. should pay to the said plaintiffe the aforesaid forty Marks before the feast of the Birth of our Lord then next following Then he the said Plaintiffe should re-deliver to the aforesaid W. those goods and chattels otherwise he should keep them safe until he should be fully satisfied and paid the aforesaid forty Marks By vertue of which said pawnings the said Plaintiffe was possessed of these goods and chattels under the condition aforesaid And so being thereof possessed the same goods and chattels further pawned to one W. G. for other forty Marks of him the said W. by him the said Plaintiffe of loan received under such condition that the aforesaid W.G. those goods and chattels to them the aforesaid R.C.W.C. who should pay and deliver those forty Marks to him the said W.G. should re-deliver and sayes that these forty Marks to the aforesaid W.G. at the time when the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made were not paid and fearing and supposing the same goods and chattels could not be kept secure in the house of him the said VV. G the same goods and chattels before the aforesaid feast of the Birth of our Lord at C. aforesaid delivered to him the said Defendant to be safely kept And to him the said VV. G when he should bee thereunto required to bee re-delivered and sayes that he contemned the keeping of those goods knowing them to be his by wicked profit and being unwilling for that cause to keep them any longer the same goods and chattels at the time when the Trespasse aforesaid was above supposed to bee made from a certaine chest where in his house at C. aforesaid they lay hee took and to the house of the aforesaid VV. G. in the same Village he carried and the same to him the said VV. G then and there delivered which said taking and carrying of the goods and chattels aforesaid by the cause aforesaid are the same taking and carrying away of the aforesaid goods and chattels of which the aforesaid Plaintiffe above now complaineth And this c. VVhereupon he prayes judgement whether the Plaintiffe ought to have or maintaine his action aforesaid against him c. The Plaintiffe pleads that I.C. pawned the goods unto him and payed not the summe for which they were pawned and traverses that she pawned them in mannor and forme c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Defendant before alleadged to be true sayes that hee by any thing afore alleadged ought not to bee debarred from having his action aforesaid against him for the aforesaid taking and carrying away the aforesaid goods and chattels which the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth because he saith that the aforesaid R.G. the aforesaid such a day and yeare at C. aforesaid pawned to him the said Plaintiffe these goods and chattels for forty Marks of him the said Plaintiffe by him the said R. of loan received under such condition that if the same R. should pay to him the said Plaintiffe these forty Markes before the feast of the birth of our Lord then next following then the same goods and chattels to him the said R. should be delivered otherwise to the same Plaintiffe they should remaine as his proper goods and chattels to him by the aforesaid R. sold for the aforesaid forty Marks and sayes that the aforesaid R. paid not to him the said Plaintiffe the aforesaid forty Marks before the aforesaid feast of the birth of our Lord By which the same goods and chattels the taking and carrying away whereof the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth to him the said Plaintiffe as his proper goods and chattels did remaine And the aforesaid Defendant the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done by force and armes of his proper injury the same goods and chattels at C. found took and carried away as the same Plaintiffe above against him complaineth Traverse Without that that the same Plaintiffe pawned to the aforesaid W.G. these goods and chattels for forty Marks as the aforesaid Defendant above alleadgeth And
this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth the taking and carrying away of the goods and chattels aforesaid he prayes judgement and damages by occasion of the Trespasse aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid Defendant sayes that the aforesaid Plaintiffe pawned to the aforesaid W. G. the aforesaid goods and chattels the taking and carrying away whereof the same Defendant above acknowledgeth for forty Marks as the same Defendant hath above alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. Justification in Trespasse for killing Hogs and Sheep as the servant of the Plaintiffe being a Butcher AND the aforesaid T. by W.T. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever is against the peace c. besides the killing of the Hogs and Sheep aforesaid sayes that he is not guilty And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to bee done the same Defendant sayes that the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that hee all the time of that Trespasse supposed to be made and long before was servant of the aforesaid Plaintiffe to serve him in the service of a Butcher And that the same Plaintiffe before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made at B. aforesaid commanded him the said Defendant then his servant in form aforesaid the Hogs and Sheep aforesaid the said time wherin c. as best conduced with his and of a Butcher to kill and the flesh thereof to put to sale By which the same Defendant the Hogs and Sheep aforesaid the aforesaid time wherein c. as best conduced to his art of a Butcher he did kill as it was lawfull for him to doe And this c. Whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought to have his action aforesaid against him c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes that he by any thing by the aforesaid Defendant before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against him because hee saith the aforesaid Defendant maliciously of his proper injury the Hogs and Sheep aforesaid the said time wherein c. he killed Without that Traverse that the same Plaintiffe commanded him the said Defendant to kill the Hogs and Sheep aforesaid in the forme wherein the same Defendant above by pleadings hath alleadged And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid Defendant above acknowledgeth the Trespasse aforesaid he prayeth judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid Defendant sayes Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid Plaintiffe commanded him the said Defendant to kill the Hogs and Sheep aforesaid in the form wherein he the said Defendant above by pleading hath alleadged And of this hee puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. Therefore as well c. AND the aforesaid W. by I. R. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. Iustification in a Trespasse for a horse or foot way leading from one Village to another And as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever c. and the whole Trespasse aforesaid besides the breaking of the Parke aforesaid â— yes that he is in nothing thereof guilty c. And as to the breaking of the Parke aforesaid the same Defendant sayes that the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that within the Parke aforesaid there hath been had and time out of minde there was had a certain common high-way leading from the Village of A. unto the said Village of B. in the same County by the middle of the Park aforesaid for all men from the same Village of A. unto the same Village of B. by the same way for the same whole time willing to ride or walke by pretext whereof the same Defendant the said time wherein c. by the same common way within the Parke aforesaid did ride from the same Village of A. unto the aforesaid Village of B. which said riding within the Parke aforesaid is the same breaking of the Park aforesaid whereof the aforesaid Plaintiffe above now complaineth And this c. VVhereupon c. The Plaintiffe replyes that hee did it of his proper injury AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes that he by any thing before prealledged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendant for the breach of the Park aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid Defendant the aforesaid time wherein c. by force and arms of his own proper injury broke the Park aforesaid Traverse the prescription VVithout that that there is had or time out of minde there was had such a common high-way leading by the middle of the Parke aforesaid as the aforesaid Defendant above by pleading hath alleadged And this c. VVhereupon for this c. he prayes judgement and his damages c. to be adjudged unto him c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid Defendant sayes that there is had and from the time out of minde there hath been had such a common high-way leading by the middle of the Parke aforesaid as hee the same Defendant above by pleading hath alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country and the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner Therefore the Jury thereupon is to come c. Iustification in Trespasse by license AND the aforesaid I. by I.R. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes or any thing c. as also the whole Trespasse besides the breaking of the house aforesaid sayes that he is not guilty c. And as to the Trespasse aforesaid of breaking the house aforesaid above supposed to be done the same Defendant sayes that the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid thereupon against him because he saith that the same Plaintiffe long before the same time wherein c. at Westminster in the County of Middlesex licensed him the said I. to enter into the house aforesaid By which the same Plaintiffe long before the said time wherein c. at Westminster in the County aforesaid finding the doors of the house open he peaceably entred that house as it was lawfull for him to doe which is the same breaking of the same house whereof the aforesaid Plaintiffe above against him complaineth And this he is ready to aver VVhereupon hee demands judgement whether the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought to have his action against him c. The Plaintiffe replies that hee did it of his proper injury â—â—ll traverses the License AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes that he by any
thing pre-alledged ought not to bee debarred from having his action aforesaid of the breach of the house aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendant because he saith that the same Defendant of his owne proper injury the said time wherein c. by force and armes aforesaid the house aforesaid he did in manner and form as the same Plaintiffe above against him complaineth Without that that the same Plaintiffe licensed the aforesaid Defendant to enter the house aforesaid Traverse as the same Defendant above by pleading hath alledged And this c. Whereupon for that the same Defendant the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayeth judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid Defendant as formerly saith Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid Plaintiffe licensed him the said Defendant to enter into the house aforesaid in the forme wherein he the Defendant above by pleading hath alleadged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid Plaintiffe in like manner c. Therefore the Jury is to come between them c. AND the aforesaid R.P. and I.R. by L.S. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. Iustification for that the Plaintiffe was suspected for a Felâ—â— And as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever which is against the peace of our Lord the King that now is as also the Trespasse aforesaid of woundings supposed to be made sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the same R. and I. say that the aforesaid W. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that long before the said time wherein the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made to wit the tenth day of January in the eighth yeare of the reigne of our Lord the King that now is one I.S. at Norwich aforesaid in his house there was feloniously spoiled and robbed of two silver Spoons to the value of 10 s. And that the aforesaid W. divers daies and times before the felony aforesaid made frequented the house of him the said I.S. aforesaid suspiciously without any reasonable cause there to be had And that the aforesaid W. R. the said time of the felony aforesaid done was in the house of the aforesaid I.S. by which the same R. and I.R. had suspicion the aforesaid W.R. to have committed the felony aforesaid And that the aforesaid R. and I.R. the same time wherein c. being then Sheriffes of the City aforesaid softly laid their hands upon him the said W.R. the same time wherein c. And the same W. R. for suspicion of the Felony aforesaid the same time wherein c. they tooke and him the said W. to the Goale of our Lord the King within the City aforesaid there to be safely kept for the same Felony the said time wherein c. they lead and imprisoned as it was lawfull for them to doe which said softly laying on of their hands of them the said R. and I.R. upon the aforesaid W.R. and the taking of him the said W. R. and the leading and imprisoning of him out of the cause aforesaid are the same assault beating and imprisonment whereof the aforesaid W.R. above complaineth And this they are ready to aver whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid W.R. ought to have his action aforesaid against them c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes that he by any thing before alledged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them because he saith that the aforesaid R. and I. R the day and yeare aforesaid of his own proper injury by force and armes without any such cause by them the said R. and I.R. above by pleading alleadged on him the said W.R. at Norwich aforesaid they made an assault and him did beate wound imprison and evill intreate in the manner and forme as the aforesaid W.R. above against them complaineth And this he prayeth may be enquired of by the Country c. Iustification upon imprisonment and assault by vertue of a Warrant of the Peace Mich. 8. Hen. 8. Rolle 77. Staff ss AND the aforesaid H.W. by W.F. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes or whatsoever is against the peace c. not guilty and as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the same H. sayes that the aforesaid R. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that long before the said time wherein the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done on I.W. at Stafford in the County aforesaid came before R W. then one of the Justices of the Peace of our Lord the King assigned in the County aforesaid to be kept and there tooke his corporall oath that he grievously and manifestly went in danger of his life and maiming of his members by the aforesaid R.C. By which he the same I.W. long before the said time wherein c. at Stafford aforesaid at the Petition of the aforesaid I.W. directed a certaine precept of our Lord the King to the aforesaid H. W. then being Bailiffe of R. and to the Constable of R. aforesaid and to either of them joyntly and divided commanding them by that precept that they cause to come the aforesaid R. C. before the aforesaid R. W. or one of his Companions Justices of the peace of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid to find sufficient security of the peace of our Lord the King towards the Lord the King and all his people and cheifly against the aforesaid H.W. to be given And if the same R.C. should refuse to doe this then the same H. and the aforesaid Constable the same R.C. unto the next Goale of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid should cause to bee led or one of them should cause to be led there to stay untill he would freely doe this By reason of which precept the aforesaid H.W. before the said time wherein c. did repair to the aforesaid R.C. at R. aforesaid and shewed to the aforesaid R.C. there the precept aforesaid then and there further requiring the same R. to find before the said R. W. or one of his companions Justices of the peace of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid then being to find security for bearing the peace of our Lord the King in form aforesaid and the same R. this to do then at R. aforesaid upon which the same A.W. him the said R. then and there the said time wherein c. arrested and him in bringing towards the prison of our Lord the King at the Castle of Stafford in the County aforesaid imprisoned by the time aforesaid and his hands upon him the said R. in that arresting and leading did softly lay as it was lawful for him
aforesaid saies that he is nothing thereof guilty c. and as to the breaking of the Closes and Houses and the assault aforesaid the same S. sayes that the Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him Because he saith that the Closes and Houses as also the places in which the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to bee made are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were seven Messuages and four Gardens with the appurtenances in the parishes of St. Sepulchers and St. Martins and St. Brigets aforesaid in the Ward aforesaid of which said seven Messuages and foure Gardens before the said time wherein c. one I.S. was seized of his demesne as of fee and so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid S.P. to hold for him and his Heires for ever By vertue of which Feoffement the same S. was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee and the aforesaid E. claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certaine Deed or Demise to him thereupon made for terme of his life by the aforesaid J.S. long before the said Feoffement of the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the aforesaid S. in forme aforesaid made were nothing of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the possession of her the said E. ever passed into the same Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time wherein c. and enter upon whose said E. her possession thereupon the aforesaid time wherein c. peaceably re-entred and the Houses and Closes brok and upon the same E. then being there softly laid his hands and commanded her the said E. then and there to goe out of the Messuages and Gardens aforesaid under the danger which by the Law otherwise might come to her the said E. as it was lawfull for him to doe Which said soft laying on of hands and entry and breach of Closes and houses aforesaid out of the house aforesaid is the same assault whereof the aforesaid E. above now complaineth and this hee is ready to aver whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid E. ought to have her action aforesaid against him c. And the aforesaid E. sayes that she by any thing before pre-alledged ought not to be debarred from having her action aforesaid against him because she saith that as to the aforesaid Plea of him the said D. of the assault c. aforesaid above pleaded the same E. saith that the aforesaid S. the day and year in the said Declaration of her the said E. above specified at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid of his proper injury and without any such cause by him the said S. in his barre aforesaid above alleadged on her the said E. made an assault and her then and there beat c. in manner and forme as the same E. above by her Writ and Declaration above against him hath declared And this she prayes may be enquired of by the country And the aforesaid S. in like manner c. And as to the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid S. to the breaking of the Closes and houses aforesaid above pleaded the same E. sayes that long before the said I. S. had any thing in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances the same E. was of the same Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances seised in her demesne as of Fee Until the aforesaid S. her the said E. long before the trespasse aforesaid made unjustly and without judgement disseised by which the same S. was of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee by disseisin and he by that disseisin being so c. The same S. before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid I. S. to hold to him and his heires prove By vertue of which said Feoffement the said I.S. was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid S. to hold to him and his heires for ever By vertue of which said Feoffmenent the same S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the same S. above by pleading hath alleadged Upon which the said S.P. his possession thereupon the aforesaid E. before the said time wherein c. did enter and was thereof seised in his demesne as of Fee Untill the aforesaid S. the aforesaid time of the trespasse aforesaid made by Force and Armes c. the Closes and houses of her the said E. with the appurtenances hee did break in manner and forme as the same E. by her Writ and Declaration aforesaid above against him hath complained And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid S. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth she prayeth judgement and her damages by reason of that Trespasse c. to be adjudged unto her c. The Defendant maintaines his plea and traverses the disseizin AND the aforesaid S. as formerly saith that long before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made the aforesaid I.S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of fee and he being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof Enfeoffed him the said S. to hold to him and his Heires for ever by vertue of which Feoffement the same S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the same S. in his aforesaid above hath alledged Tranverse Without that that the same S. dis-seized the aforesaid E. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid E. in her replication aforesaid above hath alledged And this c. whereupon hee prayes judgement and that the aforesaid E. may be debarred from having her action aforesaid against him c. ANd the aforesaid E. as formerly saith Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid S. dis-seized her the said E. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the same E. in her replication aforesaid above hath alledged and this she prayes may be inquired of by the Country and the aforesaid S. in like manner c. ANd the aforesaid W.S. in his proper person comes and defends the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes c. as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid Iustification by vertue of a Justices of peaces warrant besides the assault aforesaid sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty c. and as to the assault aforesaid the same W. sayes that the aforesaid plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him Because he saith that before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to bee made to wit such a day and yeare at C. in the County of N. before T. C. Earle of Devonshire then one of the Justices
of the peace of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be kept came the same W. S. then and there before the same Earle having taken his corporall oath upon the holy Evangelist that he the same W. S. damage and corporall hurt to him the said W.S. by him the said W. C. and his companions upon him the said W. S. to be brought he did grievously dread and feare the same W.S. then and there supplicating that the same Earle him the said W. C. might be bound to put in sufficient security of the peace keeping towards him the said W.S. and all and every the leige people of the Kings one in form of law by pretext whereof the same Earl a certain warrant under his scale to the Constable and Bailiffes of the Hundred of M. as also to R.N.H.H. and T.F. directed he made and delivered commanding them the said Constable and Bayliffes and the aforesaid R.H. and T. joyntly and severally by the same warrant on the behalfe of our Lord the King commanding them that the same Constables Bayliffes R.I. c. and every one of them that they should cause to come the aforesaid W.C. before the aforesaid Earle or any other Justice of the peace of our Lord the King in the aforesaid County of S. assigned to be kept immediately for the finding sufficient security of the peace in forme aforesaid And if the same W.C. so to doe should refuse then the same Constables Bayliffes and the aforesaid R.I. c. or either of them the same R. C. should cause to be brought to the Goale of our Lord the King of Y. in the same County of D. by force of that warrant there to stay until the aforesaid WC should find the security aforesaid according to what law requires in that behalfe By which meanes the same R. carrying with him the warrant aforesaid to him the said W. C. at H. aforesaid the same day the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made And to him the said W. of the same warrant and of the matter and effect of the same warrant then and there before the same assault made gave notice by vertue of the same warrant then and there requiring the same W.C. that he the said W.C. before the said Earle or other Justice of peace of our said Lord the King assigned to be kept in the same County to find sufficient security of the peace in forme aforesaid together with him the said R. he would goe which said W. C. to doe this then and there refused for which cause the same R. him the said W.C. then would have taken and arrested but the same W.C. would not stay nor obey that arrest but at the same arrest then and there drew his sword and also what in him lay offered to rescue himselfe from that arrest By which the aforesaid R. and N. and the aforesaid VV.S. as the servant of him the said R. and by his command at the time of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be made by laying their hands upon him the said VV. C. and compelling him the said VV. C. to stand to that arrest him the said VV. C. then and there they took and arrested as it was lawfull for them to doe which said laying on of hands out of the cause aforesaid is the same assault whereof the same VV.C. above against him complaineth And this he is ready to averre whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid VV. C. ought in this behalfe to have his action aforesaid against him c. AND the aforesaid W.C. not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid W.S. before alleadged to be true sayes that he by any thing therein before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid because hee saith that the aforesaid W.S. by force and armes of his owne proper injury on him the said W.C. did make an assault and him did beate wound and evill handle in manner and form as he the said W.C. above by his bill hath declared Traverses the notice of the Warrant Without that that the same R. to him the said W.C. of the warrant aforesaid or of the matter and effect of the same warrant before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid made did give notice as the aforesaid W.S. above by pleading hath alledged And this he is ready to averre whereupon for that the aforesaid W.S. the Trespasse and Battery aforesaid above acknowledgeth he the said W.C. prayeth judgment and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid W.S. sayes Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid R. to him the said W.C. of the Warrant aforesaid and of the matter and effect of the same Warrant long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made did give notice in manner and forme as he the said W. S. above by his pleading hath alleadged And of this hee puts himselfe upon the Country And the aforesaid W. C. in like manner c. Middlesex R.M. complaines of I. H. in the custody of the Marshall Declaration in assault and battery c. for that he such a day and year by force and armes on him the said R. at Westminster in the County aforesaid hee made an assault and him the said R. then there beat wounded evil handled so that of his life he did despair and also so grievous a wound upon the upper part of the left shoulder of him the said R. then and there put on him so that the same R. by reason of the extraordinary effusion of blood out of the same wound flowing and arising fell into great sicknesses and weaknesses of his body then and there and stood in great danger of losing of his life by reason thereof for a great time that is to say for the space of one month then next following As also divers great summes of mony for his healing and curing there in that behalfe to lay out and spend then and there was forced and compelled And divers difficult businesse of him the said R. then to be done and finished by the aforesaid space of one month remained undone And other harmes c. Against the peace c. to the damage c. AND the aforesaid I. H. by W. Astrie his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. Concord pleaded And as to the coming by force and armes c. sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty c. And as to the residue c. sayes that the aforesaid R. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that after the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made to wit such a day and year I.E. in the County of Norfolk there was such an agreement had between the aforesaid R. and him the said J. to wit that he the said I. should give to the aforesaid R. one Gallon of Sack in recompence and
ought to have her action aforesaid against them c. AND the aforesaid E. sayes that shee by any thing before alleadged by them the said W. and R. ought not to be debarred from having her action aforesaid against them because by Protestation that the aforesaid sixty acres of wood with the appurtenances are and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid made were the sole and freehold of the aforesaid E. Traverse of the Prescription Without that that the aforesaid W. and all they whose estate the same W. now hath and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid made had of and in the aforesaid Messuage and twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances have had and time out of minde were accustomed to have for themselves their Farmers and Tenants of the same Messuage and twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances reasonable Estators in the aforesaid sixty acres of wood with the appurtenances for their proper and necessary fireboot in the said Messuage of him the aforesaid W. to be spent and burnt as unto the same Messuage and twenty acres of Land with the appurtenances belonging in manner and forme as the said VV. and R. above by pleading have alleadged And this he is ready to aver VVhereupon for that that the aforesaid VV. and R. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledge he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto him c. Issue taken upon the Traverse of the Prescription AND the aforesaid Prior I.L. and I.F. by VV.C. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. The Defendants all plead not guilty as to the force and armes and one as to the rest And the other justifie by vertue of a Warrant And as to the coming by force and armes not guilty c. And the aforesaid Prior as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty And of this he puts himselfe upon the Country c. And the aforesaid J.L. and J.R. say that the aforesaid J. B. ought not to have his action aforesaid against them because they say that long before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made our Lord the King that now is was seized of the Mannor and Lordship of Leeds in his demesne as of Fee within which said Mannor our Lord the King that now is held his Court called a Court-Baron as in right of his Mannor aforesaid from three weeks to three weeks before his Steward for the time being there to be held And sayes that our Lord the King so being seized by his Letters Patents whose date is the tenth day of October in the seventeenth yeare of his Reigne granted unto the aforesaid Prior and Covent the custody of the Mannor and Lordship of Leeds aforesaid with the appurtenances and the joysting of the Parke there To hold to him and his successours from such a day next to come unto the end of twenty years from thence next following fully to be compleat and ended rendring therefore yearly to our said Lord the King in his Exchequer at the feasts of Easter and St. Michael the Arch-angel by equall portions for the custody and joysting aforesaid 24 l. of lawfull money of England as they before had paid and also sustaining the Closes and Edifices and also supporting all other charges to the same Mannor belonging appertaining so long as they should have the custody and joysting aforesaid By vertue of which said Grant the same Prior and Covent were thereof possessed long before the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made and at the day of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to bee made And they say also further that long before the trespass aforesaid was supposed to be made that is to say such a day and year one J.S. Knight before R.C. then Steward of the same Prior of his Court aforesaid in the same Court brought a certaine plaint against the aforesaid I.B. of a plea of Trespasse by force of which said plaint the same Steward then and there commanded a certaine precept to one VV.R. then Bayliffe of the Mannor aforesaid directed to attach the aforesaid I.B. by his goods and chattels within the Precinct of the same Mannor to appeare before the aforesaid Steward at the next Court there to be held that is to say the second day of September then next following to answer the aforesaid I. S. in his plaint aforesaid by force whereof the same Bayliffe the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made And the aforesaid I.L. and I.F. as the servants of the same Bayliff and by his command the aforesaid I B. by two Horses and six Oxen aforesaid then in the place in which c. which is within the Precinct of the Mannor aforesaid found they did attach And the same Oxen and Horses then there they impounded and held impounded as it was lawfull for them to do which said taking impounding and detaining of the Cattel aforesaid out of the cause aforesaid are the same Trespasse taking c. of which the same I.B. conceives his action aforesaid c. Which all and singular they are ready to aver Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid I. B. ought to have his action aforesaid against them c. The Plaintiffe replies that they did it of their proper injury without such a cause AND the aforesaid J.B. sayes that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against them because he saith that the aforesaid I. L. and I.F. of their owne proper injury and without such cause by them the aforesaid I.L. and I F. above alleadged with force and armes aforesaid have made in manner and forme as he the said I. B. above against them complaineth And this he prayes may be inquired of by the Country And the aforesaid I. L. and I.F. in like manner c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the said I. M. as before saith That the said Tenements with the appurtenances are and from the time of the memory of man were customary Tenements and Lands and demised and demisable by Copy of Court Roll of the said Mannor in manner and forme as the said I.M. before in pleading hath alleadged And of this hee putteth himselfe upon the Country And the said I. S. in like manner Therefore c. Trespasse upon the Case Midd. ss BOnaventure Ashby Gentleman Declaration in Trover of a reclaymed Falcon Pasch 19. Eliz. Rol. 499. complaines of John Gifford Gentleman in the custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say whereas the aforesaid B. such a day year and place in the County aforesaid was possessed of a Falcon reclaimed and tamed of the price of 40 l. with two Belles to the value of 12 d. and two Varvils in which the name of the aforesaid B. was inscribed to the value of 5 s. as of his proper goods and chattels
And sayes that he at and by the request of the aforesaid I. B. and W. T. in the Bill aforesaid named before the maintenance aforesaid supposed was reteyned at F. in the County of B. to be of Counsell with them the said I and W. in the Bill aforesaid named Taking therein for his Counsell as then and there between them was agreed By virtue of which Reteynder the same B was of Counsell of the aforesaid I and W. as well in the matter in the plaint aforesaid contained as in all other their Law matters and them counselled according to the best of his understanding knowledge and conception of the Law at the time of the maintenance aforesayd supposed and had Communication with other persons of their Counsell and them he requested and laboured to be of their Counsell as it was lawfull for him to do which is the same maintenance whereof the aforesaid Plaintiffe in his Bâ—ll aforesaid complaines Which all and singular the same Defendant is ready to averre Whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought to have his Action aforesaid against him c. The Plaintife sayes that the Defendant was a Lay man and not a Counsellor AND the aforesaid A. sayes that he by any thing before pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that at the time of the maintenance aforesaid the aforesaid Defendant was a Lay man and not a Counsellor learned of and in the Law aforesaid as the aforesaid Defendant hath above alleadged And this he prayes may be enquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid Defendant in like manner c. Iustification in mayntenance as an Attorney by warrant of Attorney AND the aforesaid I. B. in his proper Person comes and having heard the Bill aforesaid defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever c. by Protestation that the Bill aforesaid containeth not in it sufficient matter to enforce him the sayd I. to answer the same matter for Plea he saith that he presumeth not that our Lord the King will impeach or molest him the said I. of the maintenance aforesaid by occasion of the Bill aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid R.P. before the time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made that is to say such a day and year in the Court of our Lord the King before him the said King at Westminster the aforesaid plaint then depending in the same Court by Writ of Attaint by a certaine Warrant of Attorney residing here in Court constituted and ordained and put in his place him the said I.B. to prosecute for him the said R.P. the aforesaid Writ of Attaint or to gaine or loose in that plaint and the same I. B. was to this admitted by the same Court as it appears here in the same Court amongst the Warrants of Attorney of the Term of the Holy Trinity in the 34th yeare aforesayd By which the same I.B. the said Writ of Attaint for the aforesaid R. P. prosecuted and for him the said R. P. apeared in the same plaint as Attorney of him the said R. P. by vertue of the Waâ—â—ant aforesaid the said time wherein c. as it was lawfull for him to do which said prosecution and appearance are the same maintenance whereupon the said Lord the King prosecutes his Action And this he is ready to averre as the Court c. whereupon he presumeth not that the said Lord the King him the said I. B. of the maintenance aforesaid by occasion of the Bill aforesaid in this case will impeach or molest and prayes that he may be quietly therefrom dismissed c. And the aforesaid R. F. by G.L. his Attorny comes and defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever Iustification in Maintenance by cause of Consanguinitie c. And sayes that the aforesayd W. C. ought not to have his action aforesayd against him because he saith that he the same R. F. is and the sayd time wherein the Maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made was Cosen of the aforesaid R. M. that is to say Son of Margaret Sister of Alice mother of the aforesaid R.M. for whose part the aforesaid W.C. supposeth him the said R.F. to have maintained the plaint aforesaid And the same R. F. sayes further that the aforesaid R. M. for whose part c. before the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at S. aforesaid came unto him the sayd R. F. and requested him the said R. F. that he the said R. F. would procure a certaine man learned in the Law of the Land to be of Counsell of him the said R. M. in the playnt aforesaid And that the same R. M. would well and sufficiently reward him for his Counsell By virtue of which request he the said R.F. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at S. aforesaid came unto one E. L. learned in the Law of the Land and requested him the said E. that he would be of Counsell with him the said R. M. in the playnt aforesaid and told him the said E. that the aforesaid R.M. would well and sufficiently reward him the said E. for his Counsell Which said coming to the aforesaid E. requesting and speaking to him the said E. out of the cause aforesaid are the aforesaid maintenance whereof the aforesaid W. C. brings his action aforesaid And this c. as the Court c. Whereupon he prayes judgment whether the aforesaid W.C. ought to have his Action aforesaid against him c. And the aforesaid W. C. not acknowledging that the aforesaid R.F. is a Cosen of the aforesaid R. M. in the form wherein the same R. F. above supposeth The Plaintife replies that the Defendant gave money to the Iurors of his own to give a Verdict for Plea he saith that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid R. F. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was made at S. aforesaid gave oâ— his own proper Money to one I. P. 6 s. 8 d. being one of the Jurors who were impannelled on the aforesaid Writ of Novell desseisin to be arraigned and before the aforesaid I. P. and R. L. Justices of Assizes of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken returned between the aforesaid R. M. and the aforesaid W.C. the now Plaintiff And unto T. R. 3 s. and 4 d. another of the Jurors on the aforesaid Writ of Assize of Novel desseisin in like manner impannelled and before the aforesaid Justices between the same parties in the playnt aforesaid named to speak their verdict with the aforesaid R.M. in the same plaint Which said gifts are the same mayntenance upon which the same W. C. conceiveth his action aforesaid And this c. as the Court
E. who prosecutes for our Lord the King in that behalfe for the same Lord the King sayes that Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of our Lord King Henry the 6th late King of England held at Westminster in the 23th yeare of his Raign amongst other things it is ordained and established that no Sherife undersherife Baylife of any Liberty or franchise or any other Baylife by occasion or colour of his Office should take any other thing by them c. and so recite the Statute And that all Sherifes under-Sherifes Bayliffs of liberties or other Bayliffes or any other Officers or Ministers who should do contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid or any the Articles in the same should loose to the party grieved in that behalfe his damages to the trouble and should forfeit the summe of fortie pound each Sherife wherein he or any of them should do contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid Whereof the Lord the King was to have one Moyetie to the use of his houshold and no other wayes and to him who in that behalfe will prosecute another moyetie thereof as in the same Statute more fully is contained yet the aforesaid Defendant little weighing the aforesaid Statute such a day and yeare then being under-Sherife of the County aforesaid at such a place by colour of his Office aforesaid took Extortiously of one I. D. by the hands of one R. W. for the making and returning of a certaine pannell upon a Writ of Venire facias at the Suit of the aforesaid I. D. against R. H. and others in the same Writ contained in a Plea of trespasse prosecuted thirteen shillings and foure pence against the forme and effect of the Statute aforesaid by which the Action accrued to the said Lord the King to require and have of the aforesaid Defendant the aforesaid forty pound yet the aforesaid Defendant allthough often required c. the aforesaid forty pounds to the said Lord the King he hath not as yet rendered it but the same to him hitherto to render he hath denyed and as yet doth denie Whereupon c. The Defendant pleads that he took not against the form of the Statute AND the aforesaid Defendant by W.C. his Attorney comes c. and sayes our aforesaid Lord the King him the said Defendant by occasion of the premises in an thing to impeach or trouble ought not because he saith that he took not of the aforesaid I. D. the aforesaid thirteen shillings and foure pence against the forme of the Statute aforesaid as the aforesaid I. C. for our Lord the King aforesaid above hath alleaged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Countrey And the aforesaid I. which c. for our Lord the King in like manner c. Therefore c. VVITHERNAM WIlts ss Command was to the Sheriffe as it was often commanded him Entries of a Plure Replegiare that instantly and without delay he should cause to be replevyed to R. D. his cattell which E.P. I. D.W.S. and W. W. took and unjustly detained or that he should be before our Lady the Queen in eight dayes of Saint Hillary last past wheresoever The Sherife returnes the cattell were so farre off remved c. c. to shew wherefore the command of our Lady the Queen so oftentimes thereupon to him directed he had contemned and the same Sherife to her the said Lady the Queen at that day returned that the Cattell aforesaid were removed afarr off to a place unknown unto him by the aforesaid E.P. others so that he could not have the view of them Therefore command was to the same Sherife The entrie of a Withernam and Pone that of the cattell of the aforesaid E P. and others in his Bailywick he should take in Withernam and the same to the aforesaid R.D. he should cause to be delivered to be held to him untill the aforesaid E. and others would deliver the cattell aforesaid and in what manner he should have executed the same precept he should make known to our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. The returne of the Writ Command was also to the same Sherife that if the aforesaid R.D. should make him secure of prosecuting his Complaint as also of returning the cattell aforesaid if the returne thereupon should be adjudged then he should put by sure and safe pledges the aforesaid E.P. and others that they should be before our Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Term to answer the aforesaid R. D. of the taking and detaining of the cattell aforesaid At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid R. D. by M. Moseley his Attorney And the Sherife returned that the aforesaid R. D. had made him the said Sherife secure of prosecuting his Complaint aforesaid and of the returne of the cattell aforesaid if the returne hereupon should be adjudged and that the aforesaid E.P. is attached by Pledges of W.P. and G.G. as also that the aforesaid I.T. W.S. and W.W. hath nothing within his Baily-wick whereby they can be attached The same Sherife also returnes that he the 24th of March in the one and twentieth year of the Raign of our Lady E. now Quen of England took in Withernam two horses whereof one is of Colour white and the oâ—her very gray and three Maâ—â—s whereof one is of a bay Colour another of a Gray colour and another of a daple Gray and eighteen Sheep of the Cattell of the aforesaid E.F. and others and the same to the aforesaid R. D. he hath caused to be delivered to be held unto him untill the said E. and others the cattell aforesaid formerly taken they will deliver as it was commanded unto him and the aforesaid E. P. and others the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called by R. Best their Attorney in like manner came upon which the aforesaid D. declaring aganst the aforesaid E. P. and others complaines that they such a day and yeare at Lockeridge in the Parish of Fifeeld in the County aforesaid in a certaine place there called the Common Field took the cattell of him the said Robert that is to say six Geldings of the price of 24. l. and them unjustly detained against Sureties and Pledges c. Whereupon he saith he is worsted and hath damage to the value of forty pounds And thereupon he brings his Suit c. Judgement for the Plaintiff in a Replevin upon a Demurrer in Law Easter 30. Eliz Rot. 196. THE Plaintiff declares and the Defendant pleads in acknowledgment c. and the Plaintiff pleads in Bar and the Defendants rejoines to the Bar and thereupon the Plaintiff demurs in Law and they join in Demurrer and Judgment was had for the Plaintiff as followes Because as yet c. at which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Vpon which all and singular the premises being seen
Trespass to be adjudged unto him ss AND the said G. B. as before saith that the said CC. Acres of Heath and Furzes are and at the said time of the said Trepass done were parcell of the said Mannor of R. in manner and form as the said G. above in pleading hath alleged And of this he putteth himself c. ss AND the said Henry Crowch by J. Percivall his Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and injury when Defendant justifies as Lossee the Coheirs in Gavelkind with the Plantiff had one Father per divers venters Mi. 11. H. 8. Roll. 88. c. And saith that the said T.B. ought not to have c. any Action because he saith that long before that the said T. B. had any thing in the foresaid Tenements with the appurtenances on T. B. Father of the said T. B. the now Plaintiff was seized of all the whole Tenements aforesaid as in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof being seized took to Wise one A. S. and they the said T. B. the Father and A. had issue between them the said T. B. and afterward the aforesaid A. dyed after whose death the said T. B. the Father took to Wife one M. C. which said T. and M. had issue between them one G. B. and afterward the said T. B. the Father dyed by Protestation seized of all the whole Lands aforesaid after whose death the said Tenements for that that the same Tenements are and were then of the tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the County of Kent and that the same Tenements Custom of Land of the tenure of Gavelkind and all other the Lands and Tenements of the same tenure and nature are and from what time memory doth not remain were parted and partable between the Heirs Males and that from the whole time of which memory doth not remain in the County of Kent by the Custom of the said County it was used that whensoever two Heirs Males were Copartners of the half bloud of whatsoever Parent begotten were inheritable of any the Lands or Tenements of the said tenure or nature of Gavelkind in the same County and if either of the same Heirs without Heir of his body should dye of his purpartie of such like Hereditaments seized That when the other Heir Copartner of the same Heirs surviving inherited and by the whole time aforesaid was Hereditable and did inherit and ought to inherit according to the Custom of the said County all the purpart of the Lands and Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind aforesaid of the other Heir so without Heir of his body dying or any of the other bloud of the same Heir of the whole bloud so without Heir of his body dying descended to the said Thomas B. Son and to the said G. Bedell as Sons and Heirs of the said T. B. the Father according to the aforesaid Custom By which the said T. B. the Son and G. B. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and thereof were seized in their Demesn as of Fee And afterwards and before the same time in which c. the said G. B. at Southwark in the County of Surry dyed and his said Moity or purpart seized without Heir of his body lawfully begotten after whose death the Moity or purpart of the said G. descended unto the said T. B. the Son and Brother and Heir of the haâ—f bloud of the said T. B. according to the said Custom by which the said T. B. the Son into the said other Moity or purpart of the said G. his Tenements aforesaid before the said time in which c. entred and was of the whole tenements seized in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized before the time aforesaid in which c. demised the said whole Tenements unto the said H. C. to have to him for the rest of the years by which the said H. C. of the same Tenements was possessed And because the said H. at the said time in which c. found the aforesaid Horse eating the Grass of him the said H. in the said Tenements then growing and there then doing dammage the said H. chased that Horse out of the said Tenements into the common Straw House as it was lawfull to him to do And this c. Whereupon c. Acknowledgeth part of the Plea of the Defendant by the Plantiff ss NOT to be precluded because he saith that true it is that the said T. B. the Father was seized of the said whole Tenements in his Demesn as of Fee and so thereof seized took to Wise the aforesaid A. S. and they the said T. and A. had issue between them the said T. B. the Son and afterward the said A. dyed after whose death the said T. B. the Father took to Wife the said M.C. and they the said T. and M. had issue between the said G.B. and that afterwards the said T. B. the Father dyed seized of the whole Tenements after whose death the said Tenements for that that the said Tenements are of the tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the County of Kent and that the same Tenements and all other the Lands and Tenements of the same tenure and nature are and from the whole time of memory doth not remain were parted and partable between the Heirs Males and that from all the said time of which memory doth not remain in the said County of Kent by Custom of the said County it was used that whensoever two Heirs Males Copartners of the half bloud of whatsoever Parent begotten were of any Lands or Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind in the same County hereditable and either of those Heirs without Heir of his body should dye seized of his purparty of such Inheritance that then the other Heir Copartner of those surviving shall inherit and by all the time aforesaid was hereditable and did inherit and ought to inherit according to the use and Custom of the said County the purparty of all the Lands and Tenements of the said tenure and nature of Gavelkind aforesaid of the other Heir so without Heir of his body dying before any other bloud of the same Heir of the whole bloud and without Heir of his body dying descended unto the foresaid T. B. the Son and G. B. Sons and Heir of the said T. B. the Father according to the aforesaid Custom by which the said T. B. the Son and G. B. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and thereof were seized in their Demesn as of Fee and that that the said G. B. at Southwark aforesaid dyed and of his said Moity or purpart seized without Heir of his body lawfully begotten in manner and form as the said H. C. in his said Bar before hath alleged And the said I. B. the now Plantiff saith that after the death of the said G.