knowing the aforesaid T. to be a fugitive and deceiptfull person and plotting and intending him the said H.C. to hinder from the recoverie of his debt aforesaid and to cause him the said H.C. what in him lay wholly to lose his debt aforesaid the aforesaid T. before the aforesaid Justices of our Lady the Queen here at or ever after the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. according to the purport of the aforesaid Writ he had not but the same T. he the said H. C. of his said debt aforesaid being in no wise satisfied or in any manner contented before the retorn of the same Writ to wit such a day and year at London c. in the Parish c. he suffered to go at large whithersoever he would in the danger of the losse of the debt of the aforesaid H. C. For that if the aforesaid H. A. had had the aforesaid T. before the Justices of our Lady the Queen here at the aforesaid day of Wednesday c. according to the purport of the Writ aforesaid and the aforesaid Arrest then the same T. ought to have found in the Court here to him the said H. C. sufficient Manucaptors who must have undertaken for the aforesaid T. that if the same T. should be Convict in the Debt aforesaid that then he the said T. should pay the debt aforesaid to him the said H.C. or should render himself to the Prison of our Lady the Queen of the Fleet by occasion of the Judgement of and upon the Premisses to be rendred or that they the said Manucaptors the debt aforesaid for the aforesaid T should pay to him the said H. C. And if the same T. did not find such Manucaptors that then he should be committed to the Prison of our Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to stay untill he should do it To the damage of him the said H. C. a hundred pounds And thereupon he brings his Sure c. And the aforesaid H. A. by Thomas Foster his Attorney comes and defends the force and injurie when c. Not guilty pleaded And sayes that he is in nothing guilty of the Premisses above imposed upon him And of this he puts himself upon the Countrey And the aforesaid I. C. in like manner Therefore Command is given to the Sheriff that he cause to come here in eight dayes of the Purification of the blessed Virgin Mary and c. By whom c. And who neither c. To Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid here c. This was tried in London and a Verdict and Judgement for the Plaintif And a Writ of Error was brought and assigned for Error For that it appears not in what place the Bailiff of the Libertie delivered the Prisoner to the aforesaid F. the under-Sheriff nor whether he was delivered in the County of Essex or no. Error also for that he said not in his Declaration that the Defendant took no securitie for the appearance aforesaid for it might be that the Sheriff delivered him up upon Bayl according to the form of of the Statute Error also for that the Plaintif said not that the aforesaid T. appeared not in the Bench. Afterwards the Defendant after he had pleaded in nullo est Erratum died And then was made this Entrie following as yet c. Afterwards to wit the fifth day of May in the Four and thirtieth year of the reign of our Lady the Queen that now is before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney aforesaid And sayes that the aforesaid H. C. is dead and prayes licence to purchase a new Writ of Error c. And it is granted unto him c. And afterwards to wit the sixt day of May then next following before our Lady the Queen at Wistminster came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney aforesaid And brought before our Lady the Queen a certain new Writ of Error of our Lady the Queens directed to the Justices of our Lady the Queen of the Pleas before her the said Queen assigned to be held which said Writ follows in these words Elizabeth c. And so recite the Writ of Error And upon this the same H.A. says that in the Record and Processe aforesaid as also in the rendring of the Judgement aforesaid it is manifestly Erronious alleging for Errors the severall matters above assigned And the same H.A. sayes further that the aforesaid H.C. before his death to wit at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid made his last VVill and Testament in writing And thereby Constituted and ordeined Elizabeth his then wife Executrix of his Testament aforesaid and there afterwards died And the same H. A. prayes a VVrit of our Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid Executrix of being here c. retornable on the morrow of the holy Trinitie c. wheresoever c. At which day came the aforesaid H. A. by his Attorney And the aforesaid Defendant by John Williams her Attorney came And upon this the aforesaid H. A. as formerly sayes That in the Record and Premisses aforesaid c. it is manifestly Erronious And the Executrix pleads that it is in nothing Erronious and so they continue it for argument And afterwards upon full debate judgement was affirmed ACTIONS OF DEBT AND DIVERS OTHER Actions and Pleas. DEBT ss W C. Complaineth of I.H. in the Custody of the Marshall c. of a plea A Declaration in Debt upon a Bill to be paid at the day of Marriage of the Defendant that he render unto him 20 l. of good and lawfull c. which c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid I. in such a day and year at c. by his certain Bill Obligatory sealed with the Seal of him the said I and unto the Court c. whose date c. acknowledged himself to owe unto the said W. the aforesaid 20. l. to be paid unto the said W. at the day of the Marriage of him the said I and the said W. in fact saith that the said I. afterwards that is to say in such a day and year c. married to wife one M.A. by which an Action did accrue unto the said W to require c. ss W. B. next of Kin of R.B. deceased Declaration in Debt for an Administrator against an Administrator Administrator of all and singular the Goods Chattels rights and Credits which where of R.B. late of H. in the County of Middlesex Yeoman otherwise called c. deceased which dyed intestate complaineth of A.N. Widow Administrator of all and singular the goods and chattels rights and credits which were of R.N. late of F. in the County of Middlesex Yeoman deceased in the custody of the Marshall c. of a Plea that he render unto him 60. l. of lawfull c. which c. for that to wit that whereas the aforesaid R.N. in his life that is
I. N. by pretence of the said Demise unto him made put the said Cattell there to feed Upon which the said R. S. of L. and T. then upon and in those Closes being the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others those Cattell then that is to say at the said time in which c. they took and deteyned and the Ewe-sheep as yet they unjustly detein of which said taking and deteyning the said I. N. hath now brought his said Action thereupon against them And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintains his Plea without this they disseized the other Plaintif And they the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others say that the said Closes at the said time in which c. was the ground and Freehold of the said R. S. of L. and T. and that the said Cattel at the same time were in those Closes c. feeding and there doing Damage by which they the said R. S. the now Defendant and the others as Bayliffs of the said R. S. of L. and T. those Cattell at the said time in which c. they took and deteyned as unto them it was lawfull as they before have alleged Without this that the said R. S. of L. and T. have disseised the said W. H. of the said Close Without this with th' appurtenances as the said I. N. before hath alleged And this they are ready to prove whereupon as before they pray Judgement c. and for the said R. S. of L. and T. the retorn of the said Oxen Steers Calf Heifer and living goods to be adjudged unto him to be adjudged unto her c. And the said I. N. saith that the said R. S. of L. and T. have Disseised the said W. T. of the said Closes with th' appurtenances in manner and form as he before hath alleged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of by the Countrey c. ss AND they the said R. A. and W. D. by A. B. their Attorney commeth and defendeth the force and wrong when One of the Defendants avoweth and the other Justifies as Servant for rent-charge behind c. all taking and whatsoever c. And the same R. doth well arow and the said W. D. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. And justly c. because he saith that the said R. G. Gent. long before the said time in which c. was seized of one Tenement and C. acres of land in C. whereof the place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee and he so thereof seized long before the said time in which c. by his certain Deed which the said R. here in Court profereth whose Date is the fourth day of the month of July in the nineteenth year of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the Fourth To have hold and receive that annuall Rent unto the said R. and his Assigns at the Term of his life of and in the said Lands and Tenements with th' appurtenances every year at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell the Birth of our Lord Easter and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist equally to be paid And the said R. A. further saith that the said R. G. by his said writing further granted that if it should happen the said yearly Rent to be behind in part or in all by one moneth next after any Feast of the said Feasts in which it ought to be paid unto the said R. A. or his Assigns unpaid that then it should be lawfull unto the said R. A. and his Assigns into all the said Lands and Tenements and the rest of the Premisses with th' appurtenances to enter and distrein and the Distresse so there taken to lead carry away impound and in Pound to keep untill to him of that annuall Rent so being behind together with the Costs and Charges if any should be were fully satisfied and paid And for twenty six shillings eight pence being behind at the end of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist next before the said time in which c. the said R. A. doth well avow and the said W. D. as Servant of the said R. A. and by his Command at the said time in which c. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. by the name of Distresse for 26. shillings and 8. pence so being behind as in the Lands and Tenements unto the Distresse of him the said R. A. with the said yearly Rent in form aforesaid charged as to them were lawfull And this c. whereupon c. And the said I. not acknowledging any the matrers by the said R. A. and W. D. before alleged to be true saith that the said R. G. long before the said time in which c. was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and he so thereof seized long before the said time that is to say the first day of October in the fourteenth year of the Reign of the said now king at A. in C. aforesaid demised those Tenements with th' appurtenances unto the said I. H. to have and occupy to him and his Assignes from the feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell then last past untill the end and Term of seven years then next following and fully to be compleated by virtue of which Demise the said I. H. long before the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with th' appurtenances entred and was thereof possessed and so the same I. saith that she hath nothing in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances unles at the Term of the said seven years in forme aforesaid thereupon after that term compleated belonging unto the said R.G. his heirs and Assignes without which said R. G. the same I. H. saith that she cannot answear to the said Plea of the said R. A. and W. D. And prayeth Aid of him the said R. G. and she hath Aid prayed c. Therefore the said R. H. is summoned that he before the Lord the King from the day of Easter in Eight weeks wheresoever c. to answer to the said Plea of the said R. A. and W. D. together with the said R. H. if c. the same day is given to the said parties c. At which day before the said King at Westminster cometh aswell the said I. H. as the said R. A. and W. D. by their said Attorney being summoned c. by A. B. his Attorney likewise cometh and joyneth himself with the aforesaid I. H. to avow and acknowledge the said c. and aswell the same I. as the said R. G. who joyneth himself c. Say that the said R. A. the taking of the said
a Bayliff of a liberty in the nature of Escape title Trespas upon the Case 80 Case against one for disturbance of a Steward in keeping of a Court title Trespas upon the Case 82 Case for Cancelling of a Bond title Trespas upon the Case 82 Case against an Inne-keeper for a Horse lost title Trespas upon the Case 83 Case against an Executrix upon the promise of the testator title Trespasse upon the Case 84 Case by way of deceipt in a Bargain title Trespasse upon the Case 85 Case against one for scandalous words of an Alderman of London title Trespasse upon the Case 86 Case against one for frequenting Company in a dishonest manner with another mans Wife title Trespasse upon the Case 87 Case against one for negligent keeping of his fire whereby another mans house was burnt title Trespasse upon the Case 88 Continuance of a Decem tales title of Continuance ibid. Continuance upon a Summons ad auxiliandum title Continuance ibid. Continuance of a Demurrer in Law and an issue title Continuance Conspiracy Declaration in it upon the Statute of 8. Hen. the 6. title Conspiracie 25 Conspiracie for indicting of one as a common Baretter title Conspiracy 31 In Conspiracie the Defendant justifies what he did as a Juror with others c. title Conspiracie 29 Conspiracie Action upon it brought by the Man and the Wife for Felony supposed to be done by the Wife title Conspiracie 27 Continuance of a Scire facias in a Writ of Error title Continuance 34 Continuance of a Judgement after a verdict title Continuance 34 Continuance of an Exigent title Continuance 35 Continuance of a Distringas title Continuance 35 Continuance of a Jurata for want of Jurors and a Decem tales awarded title Continuance 35 Continuance of a matter in Law title Continuance 35 Continuance of a Writ of adjournment title Continuance 36 Continuance of a Jurata where the Plaintife acknowledges one of the Defendants to be dead title Continuance 36 Continuance of a Jurata by consent of the parties title Continuance 36 Committitur of a Prisoner to the Marshall being in the custody of a Sherife by vertue of a Case 38 Committitur of a Prisoner upon a Capias ad satisfaciend title Commititur 38 Committitur after judgement title Committitur 38 Certiorare to the chiefe Justice title Error 40 Certificate of the chiefe Justice title Error 40 Custom of the Common Bench alleadged for the Mannor of entring of judgement title Error 41 D. DEclaration in Debt upon a Bill to be paid at the day of Marriage title Debt 1 Debt for an Administrator against an Administrator title Debt 1 Debt upon the Statute of Mayntenance title Debt 1 Debt upon the Statute of Perjury title Debt 3 Debt upon a Judgment title Debt 5 Debt upon the Statute for Costs for not prosecuting title Debt 6 Debt upon an escape made by a Sherife title Debt 8 Debt in Accompt after Auditors assigned title Debt 10 Demurrer adjudged good and a Writ of Enquire of Damages in Trespasse and Batterie title Trespasse 111 Demurrer in Law to matter of Error title Error ibid. E. ENtrie of a Recognizance after issue joyned Title Debt 5 Essoyne cast Title Replevin 39 Entrie of an Essoyne and joyning in ayde Title Trespas 99 Escape pleaded in Audita querela and issue thereupon Title Audita querela 18 Error in assault and Batterie the especiall matter of Error alleadged and pleaded to Title Error 39 Error for want of admission by prochainamie the party Plaintiff being within age Title Error 40 Escape against a Sheriff Title Error 40 Escape upon a Bill of Middlesex against the Sheriffs Title Escape 47 Escape against a Sheriff for not having the body of one arrested at the returne of the Writ Title Escape 50 F. FIne pleaded Title Replevyn 42 Forme of pleading of an Outlawrie after Judgment Title Trespasse upon the Case 79 Forme of pleading where Land is granted by Copy of Court Roll. Title Trespas 110 Forme of pleading where the Lands accrued to the Husband under the Wifes title Title Trespas 40 Feoffement pleaded Title Trespas 41 Feoffement pleaded Title Assize 12 I. JVdgement by nihil dicit in Debt Title Debt 9 Judgement and verdict in Appeale Title Appeale 8 Incursion and issue upon it Title Replevyn 27 Issue in ayde Prayer Title Replevyn 34 Joynder in Ayde Title Replevyn 37 Issue upon a Traverse of Disseisin Title Replevyn 37 Issue upon a Traverse of Prescription Title Replevyn 39 Issue upon the Tenure Title Replevyn 41 Issue upon the seisin of Rent Title Replevyn 44 Judgement of a Playnt returned by the Sheriff upon Recordare Title Replevyn 44 Issue upon the taking of the Cattell out of his fee c. Title Replevyn 45 Justification of taking Cattell as servant to another the Cattell doing damage to the Master Title Replevyn 46 Justification of the taking of Cattell as Bayliff to another in the name of Distresse for parcell of a Rent Charge Title Replevyn 52 Issue taken upon a Prescription title Replevin 55 Justification ibid. Inrollment that the Defendant secure Delivery of the Cattell Title Replevyn 69 Imparlance in Replevyn Title Replevyn â—â— Justification of taking of Cattell as Bayliff to another for arreares of a Rent charge title Replevyn 71 Justification Especiall in an Action of the Case for standing of a Title with a Replication thereto Title Trespas upon the Case 74 Justification in trespas as servant to one that had the freehold title Trespas 83 Issue upon a Custome in Gavel-kinde and a Venire facias awarded out of the bodie of the County title Trespas 98 Justification in trespas by vertue of a Demise title Trespas 101 Judgment after a verdict in Assize title Assize 13 Jurie put in respite in Audita querela title Audita querela 18 Jurata either in Debt Trespas or Ejectione firmae title Continuance ibid. L. LEtters Patents pleaded title Trespas 71 Licence pleaded by the Defendant in Trespas title Trespas 48 N. NOnage pleaded in Barre to an Avowry title Replevyn 50 Not guilty pleaded to an Action of the Case title Trespas upon the Case 82 P. PRohibition where the Plaintiffe suggests the Lands out of which Tithes are required to be Priorie Lands title Prohibition 11 Prohibition a Declaration for prosecuting in the Court Christian after the Prohibition delivered 14 In Prohibition the Defendant pleads he did not prosecute after the Prohibition to him delivered title Prohibition 21 Prohibition to the Court of Admiralty upon the Statute of 13 of Richard the second title Prohibition 22 Prescription to Destrain for Rent title Replevyn 27 Prayer in Ayde by the Plaintiffe in title Replevyn 28 Prayer in Ayde and joynder in Ayde upon Summons title Replevin 33 Prayer in ayde and Summons upon it title Replevin 36 Prescription for common of Pasture title replevyn 39 Playntiff in mercy and the Defendant without day c. title Replevyn 44 Plea as to taking part of the cattell and Chattells that he did not
peace as also assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other Misdemeanours in the same County of S. on Monday next after such a Feast such a year at Winchester in the aforesaid County of S. to be Indicted and her upon that occasion such a day year and place to be taken and in the Prison of our Lord the King of his Gaol of Winchester Untill the same T. in the Court of our Lord the King before the beloved and faithfull of our said Lord the King T.VV. and R. R. Justices of the Assizes of our said Lord the King assigned to be taken in the County of S. by the form of the Statute thereupon published and provided by vertue of the Writ of our Lord the King of Nisi prius on Monday next after such a Feast such a year at Winchester taken according to the Law and custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England thereupon he was there acquitted to be deteined falsly and maliciously they procured to the great damage of them the said T. M. and T. and against the form of the Ordinance in that case provided c. Whereupon they say that they are worsted and have damage to the value of 100. l. And thereupon they bring their sute c. One of the Defendants pleads not guilty and the other that at the time of the originall issuings c. he was inhabiting at Thrukleston and not at Truckleston and so not the same person And the aforesaid N. L. I. H. and I.VV. lately of I. c. by A.G. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And the aforesaid I. VV. and I. H. lately of I. say that they are in nothing guilty c. And upon this they puts themselves upon the Country c. And the aforesaid T. M. and D. in like manner c. And the aforesaid N. L. sayes that he the day of the issuing forth of the originall Writ of the aforesaid T. M. and T. was dwelling and conversant at Thruckleston in the County of S. without that that the same N. ever was dwelling oâ— conversant at Traxston as by the aforesaid Writ it is supposed and this he is ready to aver whereupon he prayes judgement of the Writ c. And the aforesaid T. M. and T. say that they by any thing by the aforesaid N. L. prealleged their Writ aforesaid ought not to be quashed because as to the Plea of the aforesaid N. L. in quashing of the Writ aforesaid above pleaded The same T.M. and T. say that the aforesaid Village of T. the said day of the obteining the originall Writ of them the said T. M. and T. to Wit the 6. day of January in the 9. year of the Reign of the King that now iâ— was known and called aswell by the name of the Viâ—lage of Truxston as by the Writ aforesaid is supposed as by the name of the Village of Truckleston and this they pray may be enquired of by the Country and the aforesaid N. in like manner Therefore the Jury thereupon is to come before our Lord the King from the day of St. Michael in fifteen dayes wheresoever of the Visonage of T. by whom c. And who neither c. to Recognize c. Because aswell c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid now appearing c. ANd the aforesaid I. P. and W. by R. R. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when Justification in Conspiracy for that the Defendant was one of the Jury with other Jurors before the Justices of the Peace at the Sessions c. And all Conspiracie and whatsoever c. And the aforesaid I. sayes that he is not guilty c. And of this he puts himself upon the Country and the aforesaid W. by Protestation acknowledging not any such Conspiracie as is above supposed But that the aforesaid R. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he sayes that at the time wherein the aforesaid R. supposeth himself in form aforesaid to be Indicted he then together with other Iurors by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid was impanelled and summoned to appear before the aforesaid late Iustices of the Peace at Norwich to doe there before the same Iustices of the Peace that which by the same Iustices on the behalf of our Lord the King should be enjoyned them by reason whereof he with other Iurors then and there before the same Iustices of the peace appeared and by the same Iustices of the Peace upon the book were sworn and changed by their oath to enquire for the King of all Felonies Trespasses and other articles in the Commission of our said late Lord the King Father of our Lord the King that now is to the aforesaid Iustices of the Peace directed conteined within the County aforesaid done or committed and he together with other Iurors before the aforesaid late Iustices of the Peace upon the book then sworn and charged him the said R. according to their conscience by form of Law of the Felonie in the Writ and Declaration above specified did Indict Which all and singular he is ready to aver Whereupon he expects not that the aforesaid R. ought not his action aforesaid for any Conspiracie in that Case to maintain against him c. And prayed judgement c. And the aforesaid R. sayes that he from his action of Conspiracie aforesaid against the aforesaid W. by any thing by him the said W. prealleged ought not to be debarred Because he saith that he the day and year c. in the Declaration above specified together with the aforesaid I. Conspired to Indict him the said R. of the Felony aforesaid Traverse in the form wherein he above by his Writ and Declaration supposeth Without that that there is had any such Record in which it is contained that he before the aforesaid Justices of the Peace together with other Jurors was sworn on him the said R. of the Felony aforesaid in form aforesaid as he above by pleading hath alleged and this he is ready to aver and for that he gain saith it not c. he prays judgment c. And the aforesaid W. by Rejoinder saith that there is had such a Record in which is contained that he before such and such late Justices of the Peace together with other Jurors was sworn and that they the aforesaid R. of the Felonies aforesaid in form aforesaid Indicted as he above by pleading hath alleged and this he avows in the Records in the Rolls of them the said late Iustices of the Peace under the custodie of the Iustices of the Peace of our Lord the King that now is in the County aforesaid reserved c. And the aforesaid R. in like manner c. Therefore as to that above of the issue pleaded above to be tryed Command is given to the Sheriff that he cause to come before our Lord the King in eight
that he had him now here ready upon which the same Defendant is Committed to the Prison c. by occasion of the Premisses to stay untill c. Commitment after Iudgement AFterwards to wit such a day then next following before c. Came the aforesaid I. in his proper person and rendred himself to the person of the Marshall of the Marshallsee of our Lord the King for the debt and damages aforesaid Upon which the same I. is committed to the Marshall of the Marshalsee c. in Execution for the debt and damages aforesaid There to remain untill c. ACTIONS OF ERROR ERROR AFterwards to wit such a day c. Error alleged in assault and batterie in the judgement that the Entrie was that the partie be taken when the cause of action was before a general Pardon in this self-same Term before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid Nicholas Stoddard by William Man his Attorney And sayes that in the Record and Processe aforesaid as also in the rendring of the judgement aforesaid it is manifestly Erroneous in this That whereas in every judgement Entred or to be Entred in Trespass and Assault after the generall pardon of our Lady the Queen that now is by Act of Parliament of Trespass and assault made before the same act of Parliament the judgements so Entred and to be Entred ought to be Entred And nothing of fine of the aforesaid Defendant because he is pardoned and not that he should be taken yet after the generall Pardon of our Lady the Queen that now is had and Enacted in the Parliament of our Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster in the County of Middlesex the twenty fifth day of October in the thirty ninth year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is the Judgement aforesaid was Entred against the aforesaid Nicholas in the Plea aforesaid that he the said Nicholas should be taken for the Trespass and Assault aforesaid made the aforesaid tenth day of September in the thirty seventh year aforesaid in the Record aforesaid specified which was long before the aforesaid act of Parliament of the generall Pardon aforesaid And so that Judgement is void in Law Also it is Erronious in this for that whereas the aforesaid John S. the aforesaid Term of Easter Error also for want of admission by Procâ—â—in amy the partie being within age in the aforesaid forty first year of the Reign of the Queen had prosecuted by John Mallows and William Evoring as the next kinsmen of him the said John yet there is not had any Record of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. being an Infant in form aforesaid to prosecute the Plea aforesaid by his next kinsmen aforesaid under the names of any of the Prothonotaries of the Common Bench Entred as by the Law and Custom of the Court of our Lady the Queen of Common Bench aforesaid it ought to be Entred And prayes a Writ of our Lady the Queen to the aforesaid Edmond Anderson Knight Chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of the Common to whom it belongs to make Certificates in that behalf to certifie our Lady the Queen thereupon more fully the truth And it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded the aforesaid E. Anderson Chief Justice of the Bench aforesaid That having searched the Rolls Certiorare to the Chief Justice awarded to certifie c. under the names in the Offices of the Prothonotaries aforesaid of the admission of Infants to prosecute by their next kinsmen of the Term and year aforesaid And what of the admission aforesaid in the same he shall find he should certifie forthwith to our Lady the Queen wheresoever c. together with the Writ to him directed The Certificate of the Chief Justice c. Which said Chief Iustice of our Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon directed certified to her the said Lady the Queen that having searched the Rolls of the Entries of every of the Prothonotaries aforesaid in the aforesaid County of Suffolk of the Term and year aforesaid in his Custody of Record remaining he found not in the same any Entrie of the admission of the aforesaid I. S. to prosecute by I. M. and W. E. the next kinsmen of him the said I. being within age against the aforesaid N. S. of the aforesaid Plea as by the aforesaid Writ it was Commanded unto him which said Writ is Filed amongst the Records without day of this Term Upon which the aforesaid N. S. prayes a Writ of our Lady the Queen to warn the aforesaid I. S. of being before our Lady the Queen to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid And it is granted unto him c. By which it is Commanded to the Sheriff that by honest men c. he make known to the aforesaid I. S. that he be before our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. to hear the Record and Processe aforesaid if c. And further c. The same day is given to the aforesaid N. S. c. Denâ—rrer in Law to the first matter of the Errors And the aforesaid I. S. by T. Bland his Attorney comes and as to the aforesaid first matter by the aforesaid Nicholas above for Error in form aforesaid assigned For that that after the Generall Pardon of our said Lady the Queen that now is had and enacted in the aforesaid Parliament of our Lady the Queen that now is at Westminster aforesaid the aforesaid twenty fifth day of October in the thirty ninth year of her Reign aforesaid the judgement aforesaid was entred against the aforesaid N. in the Plea aforesaid that he the same N. should be taken for the Trespass and Assault aforesaid made the aforesaid tenth day of September in the thirty seventh year aforesaid which was long before the aforesaid Act of Parliament of Generall pardon aforesaid The same I. by Protestation that that matter for that Error in form aforesaid assigned is insufficient in the Law to maintain the aforesaid Writ of Error of him the said N. in that behalfe To the which he the said I. hath no necessitie nor by the Law of the Land is bound in any manner to rejoyn for Plea yet he saith that in the aforesaid Court of Bench aforesaid there is had The Custom of the Common Bench alleged for the manner of Entring judgment in the Case and time out of mind there hath been had such a Custom used and approved That is to say that the Clerks of the same Court who for the time being are assigned and allowed to enter and Record any Iudgements in the same Court from time to time rendred and to be rendred were used and accustomed in the Entries of the Rolls and Records of the same Court of the Judgements rendred in the same Court upon any action of Trespass against the Defendant
the judgement in the same Record was rendred that he should be taken as if it were entred in the same Record within And nothing of Fine of that party because he is pardoned as the aforesaid I.S. by his Plea aforesaid above hath alleged And further the aforesaid chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of her Bench aforesaid by vertue of the aforesaid Writ of our Lady the Queen further certifies that having serched the Rolls of Robert Berners Phillizer of the County of S. of the Term of Easter in the 41. year of the Reign of our Lady the Queen that now is he finds as within in these words appears That is say Pleas at Westminster before Edmund Anderson Knight and his fellows Justices of our Lady the Queen of her Bench here of the Term of Easter in the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth by the grace of God c. the 41. Roll 386. The Entry of the Warrant of admission with the Phillizer ss IOhn Mallows and W. E. are admitted by the Court of our Lady the Queen here to prosecute for I. S. who is within age as the next of Kindred of him the said I. S. against N. S. lately of c. Gentleman of a Plea of Trespass and assault Which said Writ so as aforesaid returned amongst the Records of this Court is filed Upon which the aforesaid I. S. sayes that in the Record and Process aforesaid nor in the rendring of the judgement aforesaid there is nothing erroniouâ— and prayes that the Court of our Lady the Queen here may proceed unto examination aswell of the Record and Process aforesaid as of the matters aforesaid above for errors assigned and that the judgement aforesaid may be affirmed And because the Court of our the Lady the Queen here of their judgement of and in the premises to be rendred are not as yet advised day thereupon is given to the parties aforesaid before our Lady the Queen untill eight dayes of St. Michael wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement for that the Court of our Lady the Queen here thereupon are not as yet At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid and upon this all and singular the premises being by the Court of our Lady the Queen here seen and fully understood and mature deliberation thereupon had for that that it seems to the Court of the Lady the Queen here that aswell the aforesaid Writ of Certiorare to the aforesaid chief Justice of the Common Bench in form aforesaid issued and directed as the aforesaid answer of the same chief Justice of the Bench unto that Writ as now it remains filed upon Record before our Lady the Queen does not sufficiently and fully agree and answer the aforesaid allegation of the aforesaid I. S. as to the aforesaid custom oâ— the said Court of Bench for the entring of an admission of an Inâ—ant to prosecute by his next of Kindred in any his Pleas in the Rolls of the same Court where the Declaration of such infant is entred and enrolled by the aforesaid I. S. above a leged so that the same Court of our Lady the Queen before her the said Queen here for the incertaintie of the truth of such custom of the said Court of Bench in that behalf in form aforesaid alleged to their judgement of and upon the premises aswel on the part of the aforesaid N. S. in deniall as on the part of the aforesaid I. S. in affirmation to the judgement aforesaid above alleged cannot proceed Without more full information of the consciences of the Justices And that the Court of our Lady the Queen here before her the said Queen of the truth of the custom of the said Court of Bench in that behalf above alleged An Alias Cerâ—orare warded Therefore it is commanded the aforesaid chief Justice of the Bench aforesaid that he the full and whole certaintie and truth of the aforesaid custom of the said Court or Bench of the entrie of the admission of Infants to prosecute by their next of Kindred in personall Pleas in the same Court by the aforesaid I. S. above alleged to our Lady the Queen aforesaid from the day of St. Hilary in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. doe certifie together with the Writ thereupon to him directed c. The same day is given to the parties aforesaid c. At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid And the aforesaid Chief Justice of our Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him thereupon in form aforesaid directed to her the said Lady the Queen at Westminster aforesaid at the same day certified The Return of the Cerâ—â—rare that in the said Court of our Lady the Queen of the Bench is had and from the time out of mind there hath been had such a custom used and approved in the same Court of Bench that every admission of any Infant to prosecute in the same Court of Bench aforesaid by his next of Kindred in any Plea entred and inrolled and to be entred and inrolled have been used and accustomed in the Roll where the Declaration in that Plea is entred and inrolled Which said Writ so as aforesaid returned together with the return thereupon amongst the Records of this Court is filed And upon this the aforesaid I. S. further prayes that the Court of our said Lady the Queen here may proceed to the Examination aswell or the Record and Process aforesaid as of the aforesaid matters above for errors assigned and that the judgement aforesaid may be affirmed and because the Court of our said Lady the Queen here are not as yet advised of and upon the rendring their judgement of and upon the premises day is thereupon further given to the parties aforesaid before our Lady the Queen Mich. Term 41. 42. Judgement was affirmed in this cause Roll. 417. untill from the day of Easter in fiftteen dayes wheresoever c. of hearing thereupon their judgement For that the Court of our said Lady the Queen here thereupon as yet have not c. ss AFterwards to wit on Saturday the 9. The affirmation of a judgment upon a Wâ—t of Error out of the Kings Bâ—â—ch into the Exchequer Chamber day of February in the 2. year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is The transcript of the Record and Process aforesaid between the parties aforesaid with all things touching them by reason of a certain Writ of our Lord the King of correcting error by them the said Thomas Scot Elizabeth and Thomas Forn of and upon the premises prosecuted before the Iustices of our said Lord the King of his Common Bench and the Barons of the Exchequer of our said Lord the King in the Exchequer Chamber aforesaid according to the form of the Statute in the Parliament of the
any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments or in any Courts of Record or in any Leet or View of Frank-pledge in a Court day called Law-day or in any Court in antient Demesn Hundred Court Court Barron or in the Court or Courts of the Stannery in the County of Devon and Cornwall or being examined to the perpetuall memory of a thing that then whatsoever person and persons so offending and being duly convicted or attainted by the Laws of this Kingdome of England for his or their said offences shall lose and forfeit unto the said Lady the Queen 20. pounds and should have Imprisonment by the space of six moneths without Bail or Mainprise and that the Oath of such person or persons so offending from thenceforth afterwards in any Court of Record should not be taken within this Kingdom of England or Wales or Marches of the same till what time the Judgement given against the said person or persons should be made void or revoked by Attainder or otherwise that upon every such kind of Revocation the parties grieved shall recover his or their Dammage against all and singular such person and persons as should procure the said Judgement so revoked to be rendered against him or them or any of them by Action or Actions to be prosecuted upon his or their Case or cases according to the course of the Common Lawes of this Kingdome of England and if it should happen the said offendor or offendors not to have any goods or chattells to the value of 20. pounds that then he or they should be put upon the Pillory in any Market place within the County City or Burrough where the said offence should be committed by the Sheriff or his Officers if they should happen to be without any City or Town Corporate then by the chief Officer or Officers of such City or Town Corporate or by his or their Officers And there should have both his ears nayled and from thenceforth should be discredited and disabled for ever to be sworn in any the Kings Courts of Record aforesaid untill the Judgement should be reversed and thereupon to recover his Damages in manner and form before mentioned one Moity of which said sum of Money to be forfeited in manner and form aforesaid should be to the said Lady the now Queen her Heirs and Successors and the other Moity thereof unto such person or persons as should be grieved hindred or molested by reason of the offence or offences before mentioned who therefore would prosecute by action of Debt Bill Plaint Information or otherwise in any the Kings Courts of Record in which no Wager of Law Essoin Protection or Injunction should be allowed as in the said Statute amongst other things more fully it is manifested and it appeareth And where also c. ss A. B. Late of London Taylor Declaration in Debt after Verdict and Judgement in Trespas in the Kings Bench upon Recognizance there against one of the Bayl. Easter 6. H. 8. Roll. 432. was Summoned to answer R.H. of a Plea that he render unto him 100. pounds of lawfull money of England which c. And thereupon the said R. by R. I. his Attorney saith that whereas he the Monday next after fifteen dayes of the holy Trinity in the fourth year of the Reign of the now King before him the said Lord the King at Westminster in his proper Person came and appeared and then and there in the Court of the said King brought his Bill against one W.G. Mercer in the Custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsea of the Lord the King before him the King then and there being of a Plea of Trespass and the Pledges to prosecute are Philip Mason and John Wicham by which said Bill the said R. Complained of the said W. of that that he the second day of July in the third year of the said now King with force and arms that is to say with Swords c. the house of him the said R. at London in the Parish c. had broke and other wrongs to him had done against the Peace c. to the damage c. and the aforesaid W. by T.C. his Attorney appearing commeth and defendeth the force and Injury when c. and saith that he in no wise was thereof guilty concerning the Trespass aforesaid as the said R. above against him Complained And of this he put himself upon the Countrey And the aforesaid R. likewise c. therefore thereupon commeth the Jury before the Lord the King at Westminster the Monday next after eight c. of St. Michael And who neither c. to Recognize Entrie of Recognizance after Issue ioyned c. because aswell c. the same day was given to the parties aforesaid there c. And upon this before the said Lord the King at Westminster in the said County of Middlesex personally then and there commeth I.G. of London Gent. and L.G. of London Gent. and the aforesaid A. the Manucaptors for the said W.G. that is to say under the pain of 100. pounds which they acknowledged and every of them for himself acknowledged of his Lands and Chattels and of every of them to be done And to the use of the said R. to be levyed and likewise the said W.G. assumed for himself under the pain of 100. pounds which he acknowledged of his Lands and Chattels to be executed and to the use of the said R. to be levyed if the said W. all such Damages Costs and charges in which it should happen him the said W. in the Plea aforesaid in any manner lawfully to be overthrown doth neither pay or himself to the Prison of the Marshall of the Lord the King before him the King in that occasion not to render c. At which said day of Monday next after eight c. of St. Michael before him the Lord the King at Westminster commeth aswell the aforesaid R. in his own person as the said W.G. by his foresaid Attorney And the Sheriff then sendeth a Writ of Venir ' fac ' 24. c. in all Services and Executions together with the Pannell of the names of the Jurors thereupon impannelled upon which the Jurors of that Jury being called likewise come who being chosen tryed and sworn to speak to the truth of the Premisses Say upon their Oath that the said W. was guilty of the Trespass aforesaid even as the said R. had above Complained And they Assessed the Damage of him the said R. by reason of the Trespass as in the Verdict for which it was considered at that time in the same Court before him the Lord the King that the said R. should recover against the said W c. as in the Record even as in that Record it more fully appeareth And the said R. saith that afterwards the said W.G. in Damage Costs and charges aforesaid was convicted and after Judgement was thereupon given hitherto the said W.G. the Damage Cost and Charges unto the said R. hath not paid
the said Homage fealty and sute of Court as of fee and right and of the said Rent and residue of the said Services in his Demesn as of Fee And because the sute of him the said T. H. at the Court of the said R. A. held at his said Mannor on fryday next after the Epiphany of our Lord in the fourteenth year of the reign of the now King unto the said R. A. remaining undone the said R. A. doth well avow the taking of the said Cattel in the said place in which c. as in parcell of the said tenement of him the said R. A. in form aforesaid held and upon the said T. H. as upon his true Tenant thereof c. And within his fee c. And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth judgment and the return of the said Cattel to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant protesting that he did not hold the premisses by the services in the avowment of the Plantif specifyed and that the Defendant was not of the same seized c. for Plea saith that he holdeth by fealty 3. shillings tent onely without this that he holdeth as above And the said T. H. saith that the said R. A. by any thing before alleged the taking of the said Cattel ought not to avow just because protesting that the said T. doth not the said Messuage and Virge of land with th' appurtenances of the foresaid R. A. by the said services in the avowment of him the said R. before specified c. And protesting also that the said R. A. was not seized of the said services by the hands of him the said T. in manner and form as the said R. A. before hath alleged for Plea saith that the said T. doth hold the said Messuage and Virge of land of the aforesaid R. A. as of his Mannor of B. by fealty and the Rent of three shillings onely for all services and ancient demands without this that the said R. A. was seized of the said services to doe sute at the Court of him the said R. A. of his said Mannor from three weeks to three weeks there to be held and of the residue of the said services in manner and form as the said R. A. in his said avowment before hath alleged and this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and his Damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. And the said R. A. saith Issue upon the Tenure that the said R. was seized of the said Services to do Sute to the Court of him the said R. of his said Mannor from three weeks to three weeks there to be held and of the residue of the said Services in manner and form as the said R. before hath alleged And of this he putteth himself upon the Country and the said T. likewise c. ss AND the said I.T. and H. by R. M. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and injury when The form of a Plea where the Defendant took more Beasts and Chattels than the Plaintif by his Declaration supposeth himself to have taken the Defendants say as to one Horse they did not take as to the residue say that he the said J.D. one of the Defendants in right of his Wife was seized of the Mannor of D. of which Mannor the Plaintif holdeth ten acres of land wherof c. of the Defendant by Fealty and four shillings Rent and to do Sute of Court and a Fine was leavyed of the same Mannor between W.F. Plaintif and the said I. E. and his Wife and that afterwards the said W. F. granted the said Mannor unto the said I.E. and his Wife and to the Heirs of their bodies c. in Fee-tayl and that after the Plaintif attorned unto them the said I. P. and his Wife and because the said Rent was behind the Defendants took the Beasts c. c. and as to the taking of one Horse of the said Horses they the said J. and H. say that they did not take that Horse in manner and form as the said Prioress before against them complaineth And of this they put themselves upon the Country And the said Prioress likewise c. And the said I. and H. further say that they at the time in which the taking of the said Cattell is supposed to be done they took four Horses of the said five Horses in the said Declaration specified and also one Cart with six Stacks of Barley in the same Cart being with the whole Tacklyn to the sayd Cart belonging that is to say Cartharness for the said four Horses in the same Cart to be drawn of the said Oxen and Cattell of the said Piroress in the said place in which c. which said four Horses and the said Cart with the said six Stacks of Barley in the same Cart being and the said Cattell that is to say the tackling of the said Cart called Horse Harness for the said four Horses drawing that Cart of I.N. Knight Sheriff of the said County at the Complaint of the said Prioress unto the said Prioress caused to be replevyed and of the said four Horses and Chattells the said I. in his own right and of Anne his Wife doth well avow And the said Hen. as Bailiff of the same I. doth well acknowledge the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. and justly c. because he saith that the said place in which c. doth contein in it self ten acres of land with th' appurtenances in C. aforesaid whereof the said Prioress at the said time in which c. long before c. was seised in her Demesn as of Fee in the right of her said Monastery and so thereof being seized held the same of the said I. and A. his Wife in the right of her the said A. as of her Mannor of D. in the said C. of K. by Fealty and the Rent of 4. shillings every year at the Feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell to be paid and by Service to do Sute at the Court of them the said I. and A. of their said Mannor from three weeks to three weeks there to be held of which Services the said I. and A. in the right of her the said A. were seized by the hands of the said Prioress as by the hands of their then true Tenant that is to say of Fealty and Sute of the said Court as of Fee and in right and of the said Rent in their Demesn as of Fee And them the said I. and A. in the right of her the said A. so of the said Mannor Rent and Services being seized long before the said time A Fine levied where the wise is Cognisee seized of the lands acknowledged in which c. that is to say in Eight dayes of St. Michael in the 21. year of Henry late King of England and France the seventh from the Conquest in the Court of him the said late King
Cattel in the said place in which c. For the reason before alleged Plaintif and Lessor say that the same Lessor at the time of the making of the writing by which the said annuall Rent was granted was within age c. to avow just nor the said W. D. the taking of those Cattel in the same place in which c. to acknowledg just ought not because they say that well and true it is that the said R. G. long before the said time in which c. was seized in the said Tenements with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee and that he so thereof seized long before the same time gave and granted the said annuall Rent unto the said R. A. to have and to hold the said annuall Rent unto the said R. and his Assignes to the Term of his life in manner and form as the same R. A. and the said W. before in pleading have alleged And further the said I. H. and R. G. say that the said R. G. long before the said time in which c. that is to say the first day of October in the fourteenth year of the Reign of the said Lord the now King aforesaid at A. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with th' appurtenances whereof the said place in which c. is and then was parcell unto the said I. H. to have and occupy to him and his Assignes from the said feast of St. Michael th'Arch-Angell then last past untill the end and Term of seven years then next following and fully to be compleated by vertue of which demise the said I. long before the said time in which c. was thereof possessed And moreover they the said R. G. and I. H. say that the said I. G. at the said time of the making of the said writing was within the age of twenty one years And this they are ready to prove as c. Within age Whereupon from which the said R. A. and W. the taking of the said Cattel before acknowledging pray judgement and his damages by that occasion to be adjudged unto them c. And they the said R. A. and W. D. as formerly saith Defendant maintaines the Plea without this that the Lessor was within age c. that the said R. G. was seized of the said Tenements with th' appurtenances in his Demesn as of Fee and that he so thereof seized by his said Deed at C. aforesaid gave and granted unto the aforesaid R. A. the said annuall Rent of twenty six shillings and eight pence to have and receive that yearly Rent unto the said R. and his Assignes to the Term of his life of and in the said Lands and Tenements with th' appurtenances every year at the feasts of St. Michael th'Arch-Angel the birth of our Lord Baster and the Nativity of St. John the Baptist equally to be paid and that the said R. G. by his said writing further granted that if it should happen the said yearly Rent to be behind in part or in all by one Month after any feast of the said feasts in which it ought to be paid unto the said R. A. or his Assignes unpaid that then it should be lawfull unto the said R. A. and his Assignes into all the said lands and Tenements and the rest of the premisses with th' appurtenances to enter and the distresses so there taken to lead carry away impound and in pound to keep untill unto him of that annuall Rent so being behind together with the Costs and Charges if any should be should be fully satisfyed and paid And for twenty six shillings and eight pence being behind at the feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist next before the said time in which c. the said R. A. doth wel avow and the said W. D. as Servant of him the said R. A. and by his Command at the said time in which c. doth well acknowledg the taking of the said Cattel in the said place in which c. By the name of distress for the same twenty six shillings eight pence so being behind Without this that the Grantor was within age c. as unto them it was lawfull in manner and form as they before have alleged without this that the said R. G. at the said time of the making of the said writting he granted the said annuall Rent he was within the age of twenty one years in manner and form as they the said I. H. and R. G. before in pleading have alleged And this c. whereupon as formerly they pray judgement and the return of the Cattel to be adjudged unto them And that the said I. from her said action against them had may be precluded c. And the said I. and R. G. as formerly say at the said time of the making of the said writing of the Grant of the Annuall Rent was within the Age of twenty one years in manner and form as they the said I. and R. G. before in Pleading have alleged and this they pray that it may be enquired of by the Country c. Defendant justifies the taking of the Cattel for parcell of a yearly Rent Charge behind by the name of distresse ss AND the said V. E. by R. M. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as Bailiff of the said T. C. widdow doth well acknowledg the taking of the said Cattel in the said place in which c. And justly c. Because he saith that long before the said taking supposed to be done one J. M. late of the parish of St. Lawrence in the I le of Tenet in the said County was seized of one Tenement called the H. in the said Parish of S. and of twenty four acres of Meadow thirty acres of pasture and twenty acres of Wood with th' appurtenances unto the same Tenement appertaining in S. aforesaid called the H. whereof the said place in which c. is and at the said time of the said taking supposed to be done was parcell in his Demesn as of Fee and so being seized the said I. M. the Eighth day of July in the seventeenth year of the Reign of the Lord Henry late King of England the seventh at S. aforesaid by his certain Writing sealed with the Seal of him the said I. which the said V. herein Court prosereth whose date is the same day and year gave and granted and by the said writing confirmed unto one T. W. Esquire father of the said T. a certain yearly Rent of fifty three shillings and four pence going out of the said Tenements called the H. in the Parish of S. in the said County and of all Meadowes feedings pastures and woods unto the said Tenement in what soever manner belonging To have levy and receive the said annuall Rent of fifty three shillings and four
the Sea in his Voyage towards London aforesaid with the said Wine And further the said I. N. in fact saith that after the said lading of the said thirty two Pipes of Canary Wines of the said I. N. in the said Ship in form aforesaid done to be transported from the said Isle of Teneriff up to London aforesaid and after the said departing of the said Ship from the said Port of the Isle of Teneriff aforesaid in his said Voyage towards London aforesaid the same Ship bâ—ing laden with the said thirty two Pipe of Canary Wines of him the said I. N. in saying upon the main Sea from the Isle of Teneriff aforesaid towards London aforesaid that is to say the twenty eighth day of I in the fortieth year of the Reign of the said now Queen aforesaid by the boisterousness of Winds and great Tempests in the main 〈◊〉 was overwhelmed and there was cast away and the said thirty two Pipes of the Canary Wines of him the said I. there then and in the main Sea were altogether lost that the said I. N. afterwards that is to say the Tenth day of A. in the fortieth year aforesaid at London aforesaid in the Parish and c. gave Notice to the said 8. of the said losse Notwithstanding which the said E. his promise and Assumption aforesaid nothing regarding but imagining and fraudulently intending the said I. N. of the said twenty five pounds or any parcell thereof unto the said I. N. hath not as yet paid or in any manner for the same hath satisfied although afterwards that is to say such a day and year at L. aforesaid in the Parish and c. was required by the said I. to doe this whereupon the said I. faith that he is the worse and hath Damage to the value of ten pounds And thereupon he bringeth his Sute c. ss EDward Ayscoughe Esquire complaineth of Thomas Pelhum Esquire late Sheriff of the said County Surrey Declaration against a Sheriff for that he did not arrest one in exccution upon a Cap. utl after Judgement being in his presence Enquire if the Plaintif ought not declare who aswell for the Queen as for himself A Cap ' to satisfie to the Sheriff of London and that he was not to be found ret ' thereupon for that that the Originall Writ there had issued in the Custody of the Marshall c. for that that whereas the said E. formerly that is to say in the Term of St. Michael in the 28. and 29th years of the Reign of the now Queen before Edmond Anderson Knight and his fellows then Justices of the Queens Bench at Westminster in the County of Middlesex by Consideration of the same Court had recovered against one W. Howard late of c. sixty five pounds three shillings four pence which was adjudged unto the said E. in the Court of the said Queens Bench for his Damages which he had by occasion of a certain Trespas upon the Case unto him by the aforesaid W. done as it had been said whereupon he was convicted upon which said Judgement the said E. for the more speedy obtaining of the said Damages afterwards that is to say the nineteenth day of J. in the thirtieth year of the said now Queen shed forth out of the Court of the said Queens Bench a certain Writ of the same Queen to satisfie against the said W. directed to the then Sheriffs of London where his Originall Writ in the said Plea had formerly issued by which said Writ the said Queen had commanded them the said then Sheriffs of London that they should take the said W. if he should be found in their Bayliwick and him safely to keep so that they should have his body before the Justices of the said Queen at Westminster from the day of the holy Trinitie in fifteen dayes then next following to satisfie unto the said E. of the said 65. pound 3. shillings four pence which unto the said E. in the same Queens Court were adjudged for his said Damage whereof he was Convicted At which day before the said E. Anderson and his fellows then Justices of the said Queens Bench at Westminster aforesaid came the same Edward by his Attorney and T. Skinner and I. Catcher then Sheriffs of London sent to the then Justices of the said Queen at Westminster that the said W. was not found in their Bayliwick by which then and there a Command was to the same then Sheriffs of London Exigent to the Sheriffs of London that they should cause to be called the said W. from Husting to Husting until according to the Law and Custom of the Kingdom of the said Q. of England he should be Outlawed if he should not appear and if he should appear then they should take him and cause safely to be kept so that they should have his Body before the Justices of the said Queen at Westminst aforesaid on the Morrow of all Souls then next following to satisfie unto the said Edward of the said Damages At which day before the aforesaid Justices of the said Queen at Westminster came the said E. by his said Attorney Exigent retorned by the new Sheriffs which was executed by the Sheriffs of London their Predecessors and H. Offeley and R. Saltenstall then Sheriffs of London then and there retorned the said Writ unto them by the said T. Skinner and I. C. late Sheriffs of London their Predecessors in going out from their Office delivered unto them and in form following retorned and executed that is to say at the Husting of a Plea of the Land held in Guild-hall of the City of London on Monday next after the Feast of the Apostles of Peter and Paul in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. the first time was called and did not appear At the Husting of a Plea of the Land held in the Guild-hall of the said City on Monday next after the end of St. Mildred the Virgin in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. was the second time called and did not appear At the Husting of a Plea of the Land held in Guild-hall of the said City on Monday next after the end of St. James the Apostle in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. was the third time called and did not appear At the Husting c. held c. on Monday next afor the end of St. Faiths the Virgin in the year c. the said W. was the fourth time called and did not appear At the Husting c. held c. on Monday next after the end of St. Luke the Evangelist in the thirtieth year abovesaid the said W. was the fift time called and did not appear therefore he was Outlawed Outlawed Upon which the said E. afterwards that is to say in the Term of St. Hilary in the thirty second year of the Reign of the said now Queen he Sued forth out of the said Court of the Queens Bench aforesaid at Westminster aforesaid a certain Writ
before himself now complaineth was done are and at the said time of that Trespass done were aswell the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid as the said other place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliff in G. aforesaid whereupon from which they the said R. and W. to the said Trespass in the said place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliff before of new Assigned to be done doe not answer prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudgâ—d unto him c. And as to the said Plea of the said R. B. before pleaded the same E. saith that he by any matter in the said Plea before alleged from his said Action against the said R. had ought not to be precluded because he saith that he himself at the time of the said Trespass done was seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the Mannor of G. in C. aforesaid whereof the said place called the Dens to the said time in which c. was parcell untill the said R. together c. the day and year aforesaid in the said Declaration before specified the Close of him the said E. aforesaid at G. aforesaid in the said place called the Dens within the said bounds and limits did break and his Grass to the value c. there late growing with his said Cattle by the time aforesaid was eaten up trodden down and consumed in what manner and form the same E. before against him complaineth Without this Without this that the said W. C. and all those whose Estate he hath in the said three Messuages and 16. Acres of Land in the Bar of the said R. before specified from the time of the contrary of which the memory of Man doth not remain had and accustomed to have common of pasture of and in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the bounds and limits aforesaid with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever in all time of the year as the said R. before in the said Bar hath alleged And this he is ready c. whereupon from what the said R. the said Trespass in the said place called the Dens done in G. aforesaid afore hath acknowledged prayeth Judgement and his Damages by occasion of that Trespass to be adjudged unto him c. And as to the said Plea of the said W. C. before pleaded the said E. saith that he by any matter in the same Plea before alleged The Plaintiff to the Plea of the other Defendant pleadeth as to the Plea of the first from his said Action against the said W. had ought not to be precluded because he saith that he himself at the said time of the said Trespass done was seised in his Demesn as of Fee of and in the said Mannor of G. whereof the said place called the D. is and at the said time in which c. was parcell untill the said W. C. together with c. the day and year aforesaid in the said Declaration before specified the Close of him the said E. aforesaid Without this at G. aforesaid c. as before Without this that the said W. C. and all those whose Estate he hath in the said two Messuages and two Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time c. as before And this he is ready to prove whereupon from what c. as before One of the Defendants to the trespass of the new Assignment pleadeth not guilty to the other Plea maintaineth as before and Issue upon that And the said R. B. as to any Trespass in the said place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliffin G. aforesaid of new Assignment made supposed to be done saith that he in nothing is thereof guilty And of this he puts himself c. And the said E. likewise c. And as to the said Plea of the said E. before in replying pleaded the said R. as before saith that he and all those whose estate he hath in the said 3. Messuages and 16. Acres of Land with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had and accustomed to have Common of Pasture of and in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the said bounds and limits with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever in all time of the year as the said R. before in his said Bar hath alleged And of this he putteth himself upon the Country And the said E. likewise c. And the said W.C. as to any Trespass in the said place called the East Heath with the descending of the Cliff in G. aforesaid of new Assignment supposed to be done saith that he in nothing is thereof guilty And of this putteth himself upon the Country and the said E. likewise c. And as to the said Plea of the said W. C. afore to the replying pleaded as before saith that he and all those whose Estate he hath in the said two Messuages and two Acres of Pasture with the appurtenances from the time of which c. had and accustomed to have Common of Pasture of and in the said place called the Dens in G. aforesaid within the bounds and limits aforesaid with all and all manner of his Cattle and living Creatures whatsoever in all time of the year as the said W. before in his said Bar hath alleged And of this putteth himself upon the Country and the said E. likewise therefore as well as to the trying of that Issue as the said c. Middles Declaration in trespass for taking and leading away of a horse Hill 22. H. 8. Roll 26. ss I. W. complaineth of R. W. in the custody of the Marshall c. of that that he in the Feast of St. Margaret the Virgin in the 21. year of the Reign of King Henry the 8. with force and Arms that is to say with Staves c. one Gelding of Colour black Gray of him the said I. of the price of 5. marks at W. in the County aforesaid found took and lead away And other Wrongs Defendant pleads that before the time of the trespas c. he was possessed of the horse c as of his proper horse and that certain Malefactors took the said horse out of his possession and it came to the hands of the Plaintif out of whose possession the Defendant took the horse as his own horse and so justifies c. to the Damage c. 10. marks And thereupon he bringeth his Suit c. And the said R. by W.T. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the comming with force c. or whatsoever thing c. Not guilty And as to the residue of the Trespass no Action c. because he saith that before the said time of the said Trespass supposed to be done the same R. was of the said Horse as of his
M. of those Tenements with the appurtenances so being seized the same M. before the said time of the said Trespas done at C. aforesaid took to her husband the said J.B. by vertue of which they the said J. and M. were seized of those Tenements with the appurtenances in their demesne as of fee in the right of her the said M. and them the said J. and M. of those tenements with the appurtenances so being seized they the said J. and M. afterwards and before the said time of the said trespas done that is to say at the Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angell in the thirty seventh year of the Raign of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England at C. aforesaid demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto one S.S. and unto the aforesaid A. now one of the Plaintiffs the then wife of the same S. to have and to hold the same Tenements with the appurtenances unto the same S. and A. their Executors and Assigns from the same Feast of Saint Michael the Arch-Angel untill the End and Tearm of seven years from thence next insuing and sully to be compleat by vertue of which said demise they the said S. and A. so thereof being possessed the same S. before the said time in which c. at C. aforesaid dyed and the said Allice him survived and held her self in in the said Tenements with the appurtenances and was thereof possessed by the Right of increase and she the said A. so thereof being possessed the same A. before the said time in which c. at C. aforesaid took to her Husband the said E. H. by virtue of which they the said E. and A. were possessed of the said Tenemenrs with the Appurtenances By the Right of increase untill the said G. W. the now Defendant at the said time of the said Trespasse done the said Close with Force and Armes aforesaid did breake and enter and the said Grasse to the value c. with his feet walking did tread down and consume and the said Cattell in the said Declaration before specified then and there found he did take and chase in manner and form as they the said E. and A. before against him themselves now complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said G. W. the now Defendant the said Trespasse before acknowledging prayeth Judgment and his Damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintains the plea without this that G.W. Grand-Father infeoffed the said A.W. his Sonne c. AND the said G. W. the now Defendant as before saith that the said G. VV. the now Defendant was of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances seized in his Demesne as of Fee and he the said G. W. the Elder of those Tenements with the Appurtenances so being seized the same G. W. the Elder of those Tenements with the Appurtenances died thereof by protestation seized after the death of which said G. W. the Elder the said Tenements with the Appurtenances for that that the same Tenements are of the Tenure and Nature of Gavel-kinde in the said County and that all Lands and Tenements of the same Tenure and Nature in the same County from the time the contrary of which c. were parted and partable between the Heires Males did discend unto the said G. W. as Son and Heire of the said G. W. the Grand-father of the said G. W. the now Defendant and unto the same G. the now Defendant and to the said R. W. Brother of the same G. the now Defendant and unto the aforesaid Margery as Kinne and Co-heire of the said G. their Grand-father that is to say unto the aforesaid G. the now Defendant and Richard his Brother as Sons and Heires of the said R W. one of the Sons and Co-heires of the said G. W. the Elder and unto the aforesaid T. as another Son and Co-heire of the said G. W. the Grand-father of the said G. the now Defendant and unto the aforesaid Margery as Daughter of the said Alexander another of the Sons and Co-heires of the said G. W. the Grand-father by virtue of which the said G. W. the now Defendant and the said R. W. his Brother into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and were and as yet are thereof seized in their Demesne as of Fee and the same Tenements with the Appurtenances do hold and at the time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done and at the day of fyling the said Bill did hold and as yet doth hold in common and undivided with the said Edward and Alice who the Pur-party of the said Margery Bedell of and in the said Tenements with the Appurtenances do hold and at the said day of fyling of the said Bill did hold for tearm of yeares Without this from the demise of the said I. B. and Margery in manner and form as the said G. the now Defendant before in pleading hath alledged without this that the said G. W. the Grand-father infeoffed the said A. W. his Son of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in Manner and Form as the said E. and Alice before in replying have alledged And this c. whereupon as before prayeth Judgment and that the said E. and A. from their said Action against him had may be precluded c. And they the said E. and A. as before saith that the said G. W. the Grand-father infeoffed the aforesaid A. W. his Son of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in Manner and Form as they the said E. and A. before in replying have alledged and this they pray that it may be inquired of c. AND the said W. W. by R. C. his Attorney Devon Defendant Justifies that the Tenements in which c. was the ground of another man and iustifies the Trespasse as his Servant doing damage cometh and defendeth the Force and Wrong when c. And as to the coming with Force and Armes c. not guilty and as to the residue c. the same W. W. saith that the said W. S. no Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which c. the said Trespasse is supposed to be done are and at the time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done were thirty six Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in V. aforesaid in a certain place there called W. which are and at the said time of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done were the Ground and Free-hold of one R. M. by which the same W. W. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances as Servant of the said R. and by his Command entred and the said Close as the proper Close of him the said R. did breake And the same W. W. found the said Colt there the Grasse of him the said R. upon the Ground of him the said
R. that is to say upon the said thirty six Acres of Land growing eating up and Damage there unto the said R. doing the same W. W. that Colt for that Damage then and there as afore it is said done took and lead away as unto them it was lawfull And this c. whereupon c. Not to bee precluded because he saith that long before the said time in which c. the said R. M. in the said Bar before named was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and so thereof being seized before the said time in which c. that is to say the twelfth day of August in the first yeare of the Reigne of the said now King Edward the sixth at A. in the said County of D. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the aforesaid W. S. to have to him and his Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-angell from thence next ensuing untill the end and tearm of three yeares from thence forth next following and fully to be compleat by virtue of which said Demise the same W. S. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before the said time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and he the said W. S. of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances so being possessed the same W. S. before the said time in which c. the said Colt into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances to the Grasse there growing as the proper Grasse of him the said W. S. put to feed which said Colt was there the Grasse there growing feeding upon untill the said W. W. at the said time in which c. upon the Possession of him the said W. S. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and the said Close in the said place in which c. did breake and the said Colt then and there did take and lead away in manner and form as the same W. S. before against him complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said W. W. the said Trespasse in form aforesaid done before acknowledging prayeth Judgment and his Damages by occasion of the said Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. Defendant maintaineth Plea without this that the said stranger demised the said Tenements AND the said W. W. as before saith that the said Tenements with the Appurtenances are and at the said time in which c. were the Ground and Free-hold of the said R. M. by which the same W. W. at the said time in which c. into the said Tenements with the appurtenances as Servant of the said R. and by their Command entred and the said Close as the proper Close of him the said R. did breake and for that he the same W. W. found the said Colt the said Grasse of the said R. upon the Ground of him the said R. that is to say upon the said thirty six Acres of Land growing eating up Damage thereunto the same R. doing the same W. that Colt for that Damage Without this then and there as before is said done did take and lead away as to him it was lawfull without this that the said R. M. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the aforesaid W. S. in manner and form as the said W. S. before in replying hath alleadged And this c. whereupon as before prayeth Judgment and that the said W. S. from his said Action against him the said W. W. had may be precluded c. And the said W. S. as before saith that the said R. M. demised the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said W. S. in manner and form as the said W. S. before in replying hath alleadged and this he prayeth that it may be inquired of c. AND the said S. S. by W. D. his Attorney Suff. ss Defendant iustifies Trespasse by virtue of a Demise made by a Master of a Colledge cometh and defendeth the force and wrong when c. And as to the coming with force c. not guilty and as to the residue of the said Trespasse before supposed to be done the same S. saith that the said R. no Action because he saith that the said Close and also the place in which it is supposed the said Trespas before to be done are and at the said time of the said trespas before supposed to be done were a hundred Acres of Lands and Pasture with the Appurtenances in E. aforesaid parcell of the Mannor of E. with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said mannor with the appurtenances long before the said time in which c. one G. W. Clark late Master of the late Colledge of R. in the County of Norffolke and the Fellowes of the same late Colledge were seized in their demesne as of fee in the right of their said Colledge and them the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c so thereof being seized they the said late Master and fellowes of the said late Colledge before the said time in which c. that is to say the twentieth day of December in the year of the Raign of the Lord Henry the eighth late King of England 30. at R. in the said County of Norffolke by their certain writing indented with the common seal of them the late Master and fellowes sealed and unto the Court of the Lord the now King here shewed whose date is the same day and year by their unanimous assent and consent did demise and to farm let unto the aforesaid S. his heirs Executors and Assignes the said mannor of E. with the appurtenances in the laid county of Suffolke with all arrable Lands and pasture of Sheep with all their appurtenances and other commodities unto the said Mannor and preimses belonging as well within the town E. aforesaid as within other towns unto the same adjacent with the Lands and Pastures lying at Dead-mans Grave to have and to hold the same Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c and other the premises unto the aforesaid S. his Executors and Assigns from the Feast of the invention of the holy Crosse last past before the date of the said writing indented untill the end and tearm of fifty years from thence forth next insuing and fully to be compleat by virtue of which said demise the said S. into the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. before the said time in which c. entred and was thereof possessed and the said R. claiming the said mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. by colour of a certain deed of demise unto him thereof made for the tearm of his life by the said late Master and fellowes of the said late colledge long before the said demise unto the aforesaid S of that mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. as afore is said made where nothing of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof
his Continuance and being at the aforesayd time of the aforesayd Demise of the same Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd S. by the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood in forme above in the Barr aforesayd specified was supposed to be done By which the same Demise in the Barr aforesayd pleaded in the same manner and forme made is voyd and of none effect And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesayd S. the Trespasse aforesayd in the aforesayd hundred Acres of Land with the appurtenances above acknowledgeth the same R. prayes Judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. AND the aforesaid S. as formerly saith The Defendant maintaines his Plea and traverseth the demise of the Master and Brother-hood to T. Bostnay and S. That the aforesaid late Master and Brotherhood aforesayd of the late Colledge long before the aforesayd time of the Trespasse aforesayd above supposed to be done were seized of the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. in their Demesne as of Fee in right of their Colledge aforesayd And the said late Master and Brotherhood of the same late Colledge of that Mannor with the appurtenances whereof c. being seized the same late Master and Brotherhood of the aforesayd late Colledge before the aforesayd time wherein c. to wit the aforesaid twentieth day of December in the thirtieth yeare of the Raign of the aforesayd late King at R. aforesayd by their aforesayd Writing indented with the Seale of them the sayd Master and Brotherhood sealed and to the Court of our aforesayd late Queen shewen as aforesayd whose date is the same day and yeare by their unanimous assent and consent did demise and to Farme let unto the aforesayd S. his Heires Executors and Assignes the aforesaid Mannor of E. with the appurtenances to have and to hold the aforesaid mannor with the apuptenances whereof c. to the aforesayd S. his Executors and Assignes from the aforesayd Feast of the Intention of the holy Crosse last past before the date of the said indented Writing unto the end and terme of fifty yeares from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended By vertue of which sayd Demise the aforesayd S. into the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed in manner and forme as the aforesayd S. above by pleading hath alledged Without that that the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood aforesayd of the late Colledge demised the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd E. Bestnay and S. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above by Replication hath alleadged And this c. Whereupon he prayes Judgment and that the aforesayd R. may be debarred from having his Action aforesayd against him c. AND the aforesayd R. F. as formerly saith That the aforesayd late Master and Brotherhood of the aforesayd late Colledge did demise the Mannor aforesayd with the appurtenances whereof c. to the aforesayd E. B. and S. in manner and forme as the aforesayd R. above by Replication hath alledged and this hee prayes may be inquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid S. in like manner c. Therefore command is to the Sheriff of Norfolke A Justification in Trespasse by a Prescription for a Procession way in another place then in the declaration with a traverse that he is guilty in the place in the declaration that he cause to come here twelve c. AND the aforesayd T. A. R. T. M. and others by W.H. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And the aforesayd T. M. sayes That he is in nothing thereof guilty And of this c. and the aforesaid Prior in like manner c. And the aforesaid T. A. R. and others as to the coming by Force and Armes say that they are in nothing thereof guilty And of this c. and the aforesaid Prior in like mannor c. And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made they the said T A.R. and others say that the aforesaid Prior ought not to have his action aforesaid against them Because they say that long before the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be done one E. M. was seized of one Marsh called forty acres containing forty acres of Marsh land with the appurtenances lying in the Parish of H. in the County aforesaid in his demesne as of fee and being so thereof seized before the said time wherein c. at H. aforesaid demised the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh Land to the aforesaid Prior to hold to him at the will of him the said E. By vertue of which demise hee the said Prior the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made was thereof possessed further say that the same T. A. is and the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done was Vicar of the Parish Church of H. aforesaid and that they the said R. and others at the same time of that Trespasse supposed to be made were Parishioners of the same Parish of H. and dwelling within the same Parish and further say that the aforesaid T.A. and all his predecessors Vicars of the Parish Church of H. aforesaid and whomsoever Parishioners of the same Parish from the time being from time out of minde were used and accustomed yearly at their pleasure on the Eve of Ascention day within the Rogation dayes to go and walk about through the Marsh aforesaid with solemne procession of the aforesaid Parish of H. By which the aforesaid T. A. the aforesaid time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be made then being Vicar of the same Church And the aforesaid R. and others then Parishioners of the same Parish of H. and dwelling within the same Parish on the Eve of Ascention day within the Rogation daies in the aforesaid first year of the Reign of our Lord the King that now is with other Parishioners of the same Parish with the solemne procession of the same Parish did goe and walke about the aforesaid forty acres of Marsh The aforesaid Prior then of the Marsh aforesaid being possessed by vertue of the demise aforesaid to him made and in that walking about the grasse aforesaid in the same Marsh then growing by walking with their feet they did tread down and consume as it was lawfull for them to doe Without that that the aforesaid T. A. R. and others are guilty of the Trespasse aforesaid in S. aforesaid supposed to be done in the forme which the aforesaid Prior above against them complaineth and this c. Whereupon they pray judgement whether the aforesaid Prior ought to have his action aforesaid against them ANd the aforesaid Prior sayes Issue upon the Traverse that he ought not be debarred from having his Action aforesaid against c. Because he saith by Protestation that the aforesaid
say such a day and year aforesaid one E G. to whom the Sacraments and holy things then were to be administred and administrable was possessed of the aforesaid horse as of his proper horse And he being so thereof possessed long before the said time wherein c. delivered that horse to the aforesaid R.G. safely to be kept And that horse to him the said E. to be redelivered when he should be thereunto required And that also long before the said time wherein c. that is to lay the eleventh day of March such a yeer One R.R. to whom the Sacraments and holy things then were to be administred and administrable was possessed of the aforesaid Oxe as of his proper Oxe And so being thereof possessed long before the same time wherein c. delivered that Oxe to the aforesaid R.G. to be safely kept And that Oxe to him the said R.R. when he should be thereunto required to bee re-delivered By means whereof the aforesaid R. E. long before the aforesaid time wherein c. was of the said Oxe possessed And he being so of the same Horse and Oxe possessed the aforesaid E. G. and R. R. afterwards and long before the same time at Ewell aforesaid within the Parish aforesaid dyed By means whereof the Horse and Oxe aforesaid came and belonged to the aforesaid R.P. in the name of a Mortuary of them the said E. G. and R.R. By which the same R.P. as in his owne Right And the aforesaid A. and W. as servants of him the said R.P. and by his command the aforesaid time wherein c. the Horse and Oxe aforesaid at Ewell aforesaid found in the name of Mortuaries of them the said E.G. and R.R. they tooke and led away as it was lawfull for them to doe And this c. whereupon they pray judgement whether the action c. AND the Plaintiffe sayes that he ought not to be debarred from his action aforesaid c. because he saith That the Prior Parson of the Church aforesaid imparsonate in the same remaines and all his Predecessors aforesaid Parsons of that Church from time out of minde were used and accustomed to have of each person within the Precinct of the Parish of Ewell dying to whom the Sacraments and holy things at the time of his death are to be administred and administrable one living beast of the same so dying person if the same dying person have living beasts at the time of his death or one other better thing of his the said person so dying if at the same time he had no living beasts in the name of a Mortuary for Sacramentals to him so dying to be administred And that also within the same Parish of Ewell from the whole time aforesaid there is had such a custome that wheresoever any of the Parish aforesaid to whom Sacraments and holy things are to be administred and administrable at the time of his death within the Parish aforesaid doe dye having livings beasts or other things at the time of his death that then after his death his Executor or Executors of his last will or Administrator or Administrators of the goods and Chattels of him so dying were used and accustomed to have the first election of all and singular the beasts or of any other better things which were of him so dying at the time of his death And the same living beasts or other better things first chosen to bee taken and seized to the fulfilling of the Will of the Testator so deceasing And after such election of the living beasts or of other better things of such person dying by the Executor or Administrator of the goods of such so dying in forme aforesaid made That then the aforesaid Prior Parson imparsonate of the Church aforesaid or his Deputy by the whole time aforesaid were used and accustomed to have to himselfe of the beasts or of other things residue which were of the aforesaid so dying person at the time of his death the best beast or other better thing of his so dying by his Executors or Administrators formerly in no wise taken or seized for his Mortuary And the aforesaid R. and M. say that the aforesaid E.G. and I.R. long before the said time wherein c. And at the time of the death of them were possessed of the aforesaid Horse and Oxe as of their proper Horse and Oxe And so being thereof possessed at Ewell aforesaid constituted the aforesaid R.G. Executor of their last Wills And long before the aforesaid time wherein c. By means whereof the said R.G. after the death of the aforesaid E.G. and R.R. as Executor of the Testament and last Will of them the said E.G. and R.R. long before the said time wherein c. the aforesaid Horse and Oxe as the best living beasts of the aforesaid Testator took and seized to the fulfilling of the execution of the Testament of the aforesaid Testators By which he the said E.G. long before the said time wherein c. was of the same Horse and Oxe possessed untill the said R.P.A. and W. in the said time wherein c. the same Horse and Oxe out of the possession of him the said E. G. they took and led away in manner and forme as the same E.G. above against them complaineth And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid R.P.A. and W. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayeth judgement and his damages upon that occasion to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendant maintaines his plea in bar and traverses the custome pleaded by the Plaintiffe Traverse AND the aforesaid R.P.A. and W. as to the aforesaid residue of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to be done sayes as formerly that the aforesaid Prior is and at the said time wherein c. was Parson of the Church aforesaid imparsonate in the same and that he and all his predecessors and so recite as in the first plea in bar of the Defendant Without that that within the aforesaid Parish of Ewell from time out of minde c. there was had such a custome that whensoever any of the Parish aforesaid to whom Sacraments and holy things at the time of his death are to bee administred or administrable do dye within that Parish having livings beasts or other things at the time of his death that then after his death his Executor or Executors of his will aforesaid or the Administrator or Administrators of the goods and Chattels of him so dying were used and accustomed to have the first election of all and singular the livings beasts or of any other better things which were of his so dying at the time of his death And the same living beasts or other bette things first chosen to take and seize to the fulfilling of the Execution of the Testament of such Testator so deceasing as the aforesaid R.G. above by pleading hath alleadged And this c. Whereupon they pray judgement And that he the said E.G. may bee
acre of Land with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid And being so thereof seized before the same time of the Trespasse aforesaid made to wit the first day of June in the 33 yeare of the Reigne of our Lord the King that now is at E. aforesaid in the County aforesaid demised the same Tenements with the appurtenances to him the said Plaintiffe To have and to occupy to him the said Plaintiffe and his assignes from the feast of the Nativity of St. John Baptist then next following untill the feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel in the 35 yeare of the Reigne of our Lord the King that now is By vertue of which demise hee the said Plaintiffe of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances was possessed untill the aforesaid Defendants the day and yeare aforesaid in the Declaration aforesaid above specified by force and armes c. the close and house of him the said Plaintiffe at E. aforesaid they did break against the peace of our Lord the King that now is as he above against them complaineth And this c. Wherefore for that the aforesaid Defendants the breaking of the close and house aforesaid above acknowledgeth he prayes judgement and his damages by occasion of that Trespasse to be adjudged unto him c. The Defendants maintain their plea and traverse their Dâ—mise AND the aforesaid Defendants as formerly say that the aforesaid I.R. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee in right of his Vicaridge aforesaid as they above have alleadged Without that that the aforesaid I.R. demised the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the aforesaid Plaintiffes as the same Plaintiffe above alleadgeth And this c. Whereupon as formerly he prayes judgement and that the aforesaid Plaintiffe may be debarred from having his action aforesaid of the breach of the close and house aforesaid against them c. Issue upon the Traverse AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe as formerly sayes that the aforesaid I. R. demised to him the said Plaintiffe the same Tenements with the appurtenances as he above hath alleadged And this bee prayes may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Defendants in like manner c. Iustification in Trespasse by vertue of a demise made to the Testator who bequeathed the same to his wife AND the aforesaid R.F. by R. M. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And as to the coming by force and armes and whatsoever c. not guilty c. And as to the residue of the Trespasse aforesaid above supposed to be done the aforesaid R.F. sayes that the aforesaid R.R. and I. ought not to have their action aforesaid against him c. because hee sayes that the close and house aforesaid as also the place in which the trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be done was and the aforesaid time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made were one Messuage and one close of Land containing in it fifteen acres of Land with the appurtenances in S. aforesaid whereof before the said time wherein c. one I. A. Esq was seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place did demise the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to one R.W. of c. To have and to hold to him and his Assignes from the feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following unto the end and terme of forty years from thence next following and fully to be compleat and ended By vertue of which Demise the same R. W. was thereof possessed And so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place made his last Will and Testament And by the same willed and declared that Elizabeth his wife immediately after the decease of him the said R. W. should have and enjoy his state terme and interest which he then had to come in the Tenements aforesaid The forme of pleading where the Lease accrued to the husband under the wifes title with the appurtenances And afterwards and before the said time wherein c. the same R.VV. dyed After whose death the aforesaid E. was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. to wit such a day year and place took to husband him the said R. F. By which he the said R. F. was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and the aforesaid Plaintiffes claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certaine Deed of Demise to them thereupon made for terme of their life by the aforesaid I.A. long before the aforesaid Demise by the same I. A. to the aforesaid R. W. thereupon in forme aforesaid made where nothing of these Tenements with the appurtenances into the possession of them the said Plaintiffes by that Deed ever passed into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances before the said time wherein c. did enter Upon whose the said Plaintiffes possession thereupon the same Defendant afterwards to wit the same time wherein c. into the same Tenements with the appurtenances did re-enter and the grasse aforesaid then there growing which the aforesaid Cattell did eat up tread down and consume and the ground aforesaid in the aforesaid fifteen acres of Land with his ploughes aforesaid he did break up as it was lawfull for him to do And this c. Wherefore he prayes judgement whether the action c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe sayes The Plaintiffe pleads that before the domâ—se c. the aforesaid Feoffee enfeoffed the Plaintiffe and others to the use of a stranger that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against the aforesaid Defendants because he sayes that before the aforesaid time of the Trespass aforesaid made the aforesaid I.A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee and so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. and before the aforesaid foure and twentieth day of September in the year c. of the same Tenements with the appurtenances enfeoffed them the said Plaintiffes and one R. E. Knight and W. L. to hold to them and their heires for ever to the use of one T. A. son and heir apparent of the aforesaid I. A. and Mary the wife of him the said T.A. and the heires of their bodies of them lawfully begotten By vertue of which said Feoffement they the said Plaintiffes and R. and W. were thereof seized in their demesne as of Fee to the same use And the said Plaintiffes and R. and W. to that use being so thereof seized the aforesaid J.A. the aforesaid foure and twentieth of September in the eighteenth year aforesaid with the appurtenances
to the aforesaid R.W. To have and to hold to him and his assignes from the aforesaid feast of St. Michael the Arch-angel from thence next following unto the end and terme aforesaid By vertue of which demise hee the said R. W. was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the aforesaid such a day and year and place made his last Will and Testament in writing and by the same willed and declared that the aforesaid Elizabeth his wife immediatly after his decease should have and enjoy his state terme and interest which he then had to come in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and after the same R.VV. dyed after whose death the aforesaid E. into the Tenements aforesaid entred and was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed afterwards to wit the aforesaid tenth day of M. in such a yeare aforesaid the same E. tooke to husband the aforesaid Defendant By which the same Defendant was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed as he above hath alleadged and hee being so thereof possessed the aforesaid R.E. and VV.L. before the time wherein c. at London in the Parish c. dyed after whose death the same Plaintiffes before the said time wherein c. into the Tenements aforesaid with their appurtenances did re-enter and were thereof seized in their demesne as of fee to the use aforesaid by right accruing c. And further the same Plaintiffes say that the Trespasse aforesaid whereof they now complaine was made in the Mid-time between the aforesaid Feoffement by the aforesaid I. A. to them the said Plaintiffes and the aforesaid R.E. and VV.L. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in forme aforesaid made and the said Re-entry of them the said Defendants in the same and this c. VVhereupon for that the aforesaid Defendants the Trespasse aforesaid in the Tenements aforesaid above acknowledged they the said Plaintiffes pray judgement and their damages by occasion of that Trespasse to bee adjudged unto them c. The Defendant maintaines his Plea and tracurses the Feoffeoment AND the aforesaid Defendant sayes that before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to be made the aforesaid I. A. was seized of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. to wit the aforesaid three and twentieth day of S. in the aforesaid such a year at S. aforesaid demised the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the aforesaid R.VV. to have and to hold to him the said R.W. and his assignes from the aforesaid feast of St. Michael the Archangel then next following unto the end and terme aforesaid By vertue of which demise he the said R.W. was thereof possessed and so being thereof possessed the aforesaid such a day year and place made his last Will and Testament and by the same willed and declared that the aforesaid Elizabeth his wife immediately after the decease of him the said R.W. should have his whole state terme and interest which he then had to come of and in the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and afterwards the same R.W. at S. aforesaid dyed after whose death the aforesaid Elizabeth was of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances possessed and so being thereof possessed before the said time wherein c. at S. aforesaid took to husband the same Defendant By which the same Defendant before the said time wherein c. into the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances did enter and was thereof possessed as hee above hath alleadged Without that that the aforesaid I. A. before the aforesaid such a day and year enfeoffed the aforesaid Plaintiffes and others of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances The traverse of the Feoffement To hold to them and their heires for ever to the use of the aforesaid T.A. and M. and the heires of their bodies lawfully begotten as the aforesaid Plaintiffes above have alleadged And this c. VVhereupon he prayes judgement And that the aforesaid Plaintiffes may be debarred from having their action aforesaid against him c. AND the aforesaid Plaintiffes as formerly Issue upon the Traverse say that the aforesaid I.A. before the aforesaid foure and twentieth day of S. in the aforesaid such a yeare enfeoffed them the said Plaintiffes and the aforesaid R.E. and W. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them and their heires to the use of the aforesaid T.A. and M. and the heires of their bodies lawfully begotten as they above have alleadged And this they pray may be enquired of by the Country And the aforesaid Defendants in like manner c. Therefore it is commanded the Sheriffe that he cause to come c. AND the aforesaid T.P. by R. F. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when Iustification in Trespasse for the taking of goods by pretext of gift from the Plaintiffe to the Defendants wife while she was sole c. And as to the coming by force and arms c. not guilty And as to the residue c. the same T. not acknowledging himselfe to have taken and carried away so many goods or chattels nor that the goods or chattels were of so much value as by the Writ and Declaration aforesaid is supposed saith that the aforesaid I. E. ought not to have his action aforesaid against him because he saith that the aforesaid I. before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made to wit such a yeare and place gave to one A. the wife of the aforesaid T. the goods and chattels aforesaid to hold to him and his assignes for ever By vertue of which said gift the same A. was thereof possessed and afterwards tooke to husband the same Defendant And that the aforesaid A. was possessed of the goods and chattels aforesaid at the time wherein the aforesaid Defendant took her to wife By which the same Defendant the goods and chattels aforesaid as his own proper goods and chattels at the time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to bee done at R. there found tooke and carried away as it was lawfull for him to doe And this hee is ready to averre Whereupon hee intendeth not any injury in that behalfe should be assigned to his person c. The Plaintiffe said that the wife of the Defendant while she was sole give backe to him the goods AND the aforesaid Plaintiffe not acknowledging any thing by the aforesaid Defendant before alleadged to be true sayes that he by any thing pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his action aforesaid against him c. because he saith that before the aforesaid time wherein c. there was certaine communication had between him the said Plaintiffe and the aforesaid A. of Matrimony between them to be contracted And thereupon the aforesaid A. him the said Plaintiffe treated with such flattering and dissembling
aforesaid saies that he is nothing thereof guilty c. and as to the breaking of the Closes and Houses and the assault aforesaid the same S. sayes that the Plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him Because he saith that the Closes and Houses as also the places in which the Trespasse aforesaid was supposed to bee made are and the aforesaid time wherein c. were seven Messuages and four Gardens with the appurtenances in the parishes of St. Sepulchers and St. Martins and St. Brigets aforesaid in the Ward aforesaid of which said seven Messuages and foure Gardens before the said time wherein c. one I.S. was seized of his demesne as of fee and so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid S.P. to hold for him and his Heires for ever By vertue of which Feoffement the same S. was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee and the aforesaid E. claiming the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances by colour of a certaine Deed or Demise to him thereupon made for terme of his life by the aforesaid J.S. long before the said Feoffement of the same Tenements with the appurtenances to the aforesaid S. in forme aforesaid made were nothing of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the possession of her the said E. ever passed into the same Tenements with the appurtenances before the said time wherein c. and enter upon whose said E. her possession thereupon the aforesaid time wherein c. peaceably re-entred and the Houses and Closes brok and upon the same E. then being there softly laid his hands and commanded her the said E. then and there to goe out of the Messuages and Gardens aforesaid under the danger which by the Law otherwise might come to her the said E. as it was lawfull for him to doe Which said soft laying on of hands and entry and breach of Closes and houses aforesaid out of the house aforesaid is the same assault whereof the aforesaid E. above now complaineth and this hee is ready to aver whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid E. ought to have her action aforesaid against him c. And the aforesaid E. sayes that she by any thing before pre-alledged ought not to be debarred from having her action aforesaid against him because she saith that as to the aforesaid Plea of him the said D. of the assault c. aforesaid above pleaded the same E. saith that the aforesaid S. the day and year in the said Declaration of her the said E. above specified at London aforesaid in the Parish and Ward aforesaid of his proper injury and without any such cause by him the said S. in his barre aforesaid above alleadged on her the said E. made an assault and her then and there beat c. in manner and forme as the same E. above by her Writ and Declaration above against him hath declared And this she prayes may be enquired of by the country And the aforesaid S. in like manner c. And as to the aforesaid Plea of the aforesaid S. to the breaking of the Closes and houses aforesaid above pleaded the same E. sayes that long before the said I. S. had any thing in the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances the same E. was of the same Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances seised in her demesne as of Fee Until the aforesaid S. her the said E. long before the trespasse aforesaid made unjustly and without judgement disseised by which the same S. was of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee by disseisin and he by that disseisin being so c. The same S. before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid I. S. to hold to him and his heires prove By vertue of which said Feoffement the said I.S. was thereof seized in his demesne as of Fee And so being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof enfeoffed the aforesaid S. to hold to him and his heires for ever By vertue of which said Feoffmenent the same S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the same S. above by pleading hath alleadged Upon which the said S.P. his possession thereupon the aforesaid E. before the said time wherein c. did enter and was thereof seised in his demesne as of Fee Untill the aforesaid S. the aforesaid time of the trespasse aforesaid made by Force and Armes c. the Closes and houses of her the said E. with the appurtenances hee did break in manner and forme as the same E. by her Writ and Declaration aforesaid above against him hath complained And this c. Whereupon for that the aforesaid S. the Trespasse aforesaid above acknowledgeth she prayeth judgement and her damages by reason of that Trespasse c. to be adjudged unto her c. The Defendant maintaines his plea and traverses the disseizin AND the aforesaid S. as formerly saith that long before the said time wherein the Trespasse aforesaid is supposed to be made the aforesaid I.S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of fee and he being thereof seized before the said time wherein c. thereof Enfeoffed him the said S. to hold to him and his Heires for ever by vertue of which Feoffement the same S. was of the same Tenements with the appurtenances seized in his demesne as of Fee in manner and form as the same S. in his aforesaid above hath alledged Tranverse Without that that the same S. dis-seized the aforesaid E. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the aforesaid E. in her replication aforesaid above hath alledged And this c. whereupon hee prayes judgement and that the aforesaid E. may be debarred from having her action aforesaid against him c. ANd the aforesaid E. as formerly saith Issue upon the Traverse that the aforesaid S. dis-seized her the said E. of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances as the same E. in her replication aforesaid above hath alledged and this she prayes may be inquired of by the Country and the aforesaid S. in like manner c. ANd the aforesaid W.S. in his proper person comes and defends the force and injury when c. and as to the coming by force and armes c. as also the whole Trespasse aforesaid Iustification by vertue of a Justices of peaces warrant besides the assault aforesaid sayes that he is in nothing thereof guilty c. and as to the assault aforesaid the same W. sayes that the aforesaid plaintiffe ought not to have his action aforesaid against him Because he saith that before the time of the Trespasse aforesaid supposed to bee made to wit such a day and yeare at C. in the County of N. before T. C. Earle of Devonshire then one of the Justices
And sayes that he at and by the request of the aforesaid I. B. and W. T. in the Bill aforesaid named before the maintenance aforesaid supposed was reteyned at F. in the County of B. to be of Counsell with them the said I and W. in the Bill aforesaid named Taking therein for his Counsell as then and there between them was agreed By virtue of which Reteynder the same B was of Counsell of the aforesaid I and W. as well in the matter in the plaint aforesaid contained as in all other their Law matters and them counselled according to the best of his understanding knowledge and conception of the Law at the time of the maintenance aforesayd supposed and had Communication with other persons of their Counsell and them he requested and laboured to be of their Counsell as it was lawfull for him to do which is the same maintenance whereof the aforesaid Plaintiffe in his Bâ—ll aforesaid complaines Which all and singular the same Defendant is ready to averre Whereupon he prayes judgement whether the aforesaid Plaintiffe ought to have his Action aforesaid against him c. The Plaintife sayes that the Defendant was a Lay man and not a Counsellor AND the aforesaid A. sayes that he by any thing before pre-alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that at the time of the maintenance aforesaid the aforesaid Defendant was a Lay man and not a Counsellor learned of and in the Law aforesaid as the aforesaid Defendant hath above alleadged And this he prayes may be enquired of by the Countrey And the aforesaid Defendant in like manner c. Iustification in mayntenance as an Attorney by warrant of Attorney AND the aforesaid I. B. in his proper Person comes and having heard the Bill aforesaid defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever c. by Protestation that the Bill aforesaid containeth not in it sufficient matter to enforce him the sayd I. to answer the same matter for Plea he saith that he presumeth not that our Lord the King will impeach or molest him the said I. of the maintenance aforesaid by occasion of the Bill aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid R.P. before the time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made that is to say such a day and year in the Court of our Lord the King before him the said King at Westminster the aforesaid plaint then depending in the same Court by Writ of Attaint by a certaine Warrant of Attorney residing here in Court constituted and ordained and put in his place him the said I.B. to prosecute for him the said R.P. the aforesaid Writ of Attaint or to gaine or loose in that plaint and the same I. B. was to this admitted by the same Court as it appears here in the same Court amongst the Warrants of Attorney of the Term of the Holy Trinity in the 34th yeare aforesayd By which the same I.B. the said Writ of Attaint for the aforesaid R. P. prosecuted and for him the said R. P. apeared in the same plaint as Attorney of him the said R. P. by vertue of the Waâ—â—ant aforesaid the said time wherein c. as it was lawfull for him to do which said prosecution and appearance are the same maintenance whereupon the said Lord the King prosecutes his Action And this he is ready to averre as the Court c. whereupon he presumeth not that the said Lord the King him the said I. B. of the maintenance aforesaid by occasion of the Bill aforesaid in this case will impeach or molest and prayes that he may be quietly therefrom dismissed c. And the aforesaid R. F. by G.L. his Attorny comes and defends the force and injury when c. and all contempt and whatsoever Iustification in Maintenance by cause of Consanguinitie c. And sayes that the aforesayd W. C. ought not to have his action aforesayd against him because he saith that he the same R. F. is and the sayd time wherein the Maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made was Cosen of the aforesaid R. M. that is to say Son of Margaret Sister of Alice mother of the aforesaid R.M. for whose part the aforesaid W.C. supposeth him the said R.F. to have maintained the plaint aforesaid And the same R. F. sayes further that the aforesaid R. M. for whose part c. before the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at S. aforesaid came unto him the sayd R. F. and requested him the said R. F. that he the said R. F. would procure a certaine man learned in the Law of the Land to be of Counsell of him the said R. M. in the playnt aforesaid And that the same R. M. would well and sufficiently reward him for his Counsell By virtue of which request he the said R.F. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was supposed to be made at S. aforesaid came unto one E. L. learned in the Law of the Land and requested him the said E. that he would be of Counsell with him the said R. M. in the playnt aforesaid and told him the said E. that the aforesaid R.M. would well and sufficiently reward him the said E. for his Counsell Which said coming to the aforesaid E. requesting and speaking to him the said E. out of the cause aforesaid are the aforesaid maintenance whereof the aforesaid W. C. brings his action aforesaid And this c. as the Court c. Whereupon he prayes judgment whether the aforesaid W.C. ought to have his Action aforesaid against him c. And the aforesaid W. C. not acknowledging that the aforesaid R.F. is a Cosen of the aforesaid R. M. in the form wherein the same R. F. above supposeth The Plaintife replies that the Defendant gave money to the Iurors of his own to give a Verdict for Plea he saith that he by any thing before alleadged ought not to be debarred from having his Action aforesaid because he saith that the aforesaid R. F. the said time wherein the maintenance aforesaid was made at S. aforesaid gave oâ— his own proper Money to one I. P. 6 s. 8 d. being one of the Jurors who were impannelled on the aforesaid Writ of Novell desseisin to be arraigned and before the aforesaid I. P. and R. L. Justices of Assizes of our Lord the King in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken returned between the aforesaid R. M. and the aforesaid W.C. the now Plaintiff And unto T. R. 3 s. and 4 d. another of the Jurors on the aforesaid Writ of Assize of Novel desseisin in like manner impannelled and before the aforesaid Justices between the same parties in the playnt aforesaid named to speak their verdict with the aforesaid R.M. in the same plaint Which said gifts are the same mayntenance upon which the same W. C. conceiveth his action aforesaid And this c. as the Court
E. who prosecutes for our Lord the King in that behalfe for the same Lord the King sayes that Whereas in the Statute in the Parliament of our Lord King Henry the 6th late King of England held at Westminster in the 23th yeare of his Raign amongst other things it is ordained and established that no Sherife undersherife Baylife of any Liberty or franchise or any other Baylife by occasion or colour of his Office should take any other thing by them c. and so recite the Statute And that all Sherifes under-Sherifes Bayliffs of liberties or other Bayliffes or any other Officers or Ministers who should do contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid or any the Articles in the same should loose to the party grieved in that behalfe his damages to the trouble and should forfeit the summe of fortie pound each Sherife wherein he or any of them should do contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid Whereof the Lord the King was to have one Moyetie to the use of his houshold and no other wayes and to him who in that behalfe will prosecute another moyetie thereof as in the same Statute more fully is contained yet the aforesaid Defendant little weighing the aforesaid Statute such a day and yeare then being under-Sherife of the County aforesaid at such a place by colour of his Office aforesaid took Extortiously of one I. D. by the hands of one R. W. for the making and returning of a certaine pannell upon a Writ of Venire facias at the Suit of the aforesaid I. D. against R. H. and others in the same Writ contained in a Plea of trespasse prosecuted thirteen shillings and foure pence against the forme and effect of the Statute aforesaid by which the Action accrued to the said Lord the King to require and have of the aforesaid Defendant the aforesaid forty pound yet the aforesaid Defendant allthough often required c. the aforesaid forty pounds to the said Lord the King he hath not as yet rendered it but the same to him hitherto to render he hath denyed and as yet doth denie Whereupon c. The Defendant pleads that he took not against the form of the Statute AND the aforesaid Defendant by W.C. his Attorney comes c. and sayes our aforesaid Lord the King him the said Defendant by occasion of the premises in an thing to impeach or trouble ought not because he saith that he took not of the aforesaid I. D. the aforesaid thirteen shillings and foure pence against the forme of the Statute aforesaid as the aforesaid I. C. for our Lord the King aforesaid above hath alleaged And of this he puts himselfe upon the Countrey And the aforesaid I. which c. for our Lord the King in like manner c. Therefore c. VVITHERNAM WIlts ss Command was to the Sheriffe as it was often commanded him Entries of a Plure Replegiare that instantly and without delay he should cause to be replevyed to R. D. his cattell which E.P. I. D.W.S. and W. W. took and unjustly detained or that he should be before our Lady the Queen in eight dayes of Saint Hillary last past wheresoever The Sherife returnes the cattell were so farre off remved c. c. to shew wherefore the command of our Lady the Queen so oftentimes thereupon to him directed he had contemned and the same Sherife to her the said Lady the Queen at that day returned that the Cattell aforesaid were removed afarr off to a place unknown unto him by the aforesaid E.P. others so that he could not have the view of them Therefore command was to the same Sherife The entrie of a Withernam and Pone that of the cattell of the aforesaid E P. and others in his Bailywick he should take in Withernam and the same to the aforesaid R.D. he should cause to be delivered to be held to him untill the aforesaid E. and others would deliver the cattell aforesaid and in what manner he should have executed the same precept he should make known to our Lady the Queen from the day of Easter in fifteen dayes wheresoever c. The returne of the Writ Command was also to the same Sherife that if the aforesaid R.D. should make him secure of prosecuting his Complaint as also of returning the cattell aforesaid if the returne thereupon should be adjudged then he should put by sure and safe pledges the aforesaid E.P. and others that they should be before our Lady the Queen at the aforesaid Term to answer the aforesaid R. D. of the taking and detaining of the cattell aforesaid At which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the aforesaid R. D. by M. Moseley his Attorney And the Sherife returned that the aforesaid R. D. had made him the said Sherife secure of prosecuting his Complaint aforesaid and of the returne of the cattell aforesaid if the returne hereupon should be adjudged and that the aforesaid E.P. is attached by Pledges of W.P. and G.G. as also that the aforesaid I.T. W.S. and W.W. hath nothing within his Baily-wick whereby they can be attached The same Sherife also returnes that he the 24th of March in the one and twentieth year of the Raign of our Lady E. now Quen of England took in Withernam two horses whereof one is of Colour white and the oâ—her very gray and three Maâ—â—s whereof one is of a bay Colour another of a Gray colour and another of a daple Gray and eighteen Sheep of the Cattell of the aforesaid E.F. and others and the same to the aforesaid R. D. he hath caused to be delivered to be held unto him untill the said E. and others the cattell aforesaid formerly taken they will deliver as it was commanded unto him and the aforesaid E. P. and others the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called by R. Best their Attorney in like manner came upon which the aforesaid D. declaring aganst the aforesaid E. P. and others complaines that they such a day and yeare at Lockeridge in the Parish of Fifeeld in the County aforesaid in a certaine place there called the Common Field took the cattell of him the said Robert that is to say six Geldings of the price of 24. l. and them unjustly detained against Sureties and Pledges c. Whereupon he saith he is worsted and hath damage to the value of forty pounds And thereupon he brings his Suit c. Judgement for the Plaintiff in a Replevin upon a Demurrer in Law Easter 30. Eliz Rot. 196. THE Plaintiff declares and the Defendant pleads in acknowledgment c. and the Plaintiff pleads in Bar and the Defendants rejoines to the Bar and thereupon the Plaintiff demurs in Law and they join in Demurrer and Judgment was had for the Plaintiff as followes Because as yet c. at which day before our Lady the Queen at Westminster came the parties aforesaid by their Attorneys aforesaid Vpon which all and singular the premises being seen